The Complete Guide to Hazing Lawsuits and Campus Accountability for Lytle, Texas Families

A Nightmare No Lytle Parent Should Face

Imagine a crisp fall evening in South Texas. A young man from Lytle High School, now a freshman at a major Texas university, nervously approaches an off-campus fraternity house. He’s excited about the promise of brotherhood and lifelong friendships. What unfolds over the next few hours, however, is a ritual of humiliation and violence: forced to drink excessive amounts of alcohol, subjected to brutal calisthenics, sprayed in the face with a hose “like waterboarding,” and threatened with expulsion if he refuses. By morning, he’s vomiting, disoriented, and his urine is turning brown. His fraternity brothers tell him to “sleep it off.” His parents in Lytle receive a panicked call from a hospital in Houston four days later—their son has acute kidney failure and a life-threatening muscle condition called rhabdomyolysis.

This is not hypothetical. This is exactly what happened to Leonel Bermudez, a University of Houston student from Harris County, during his fall 2025 pledge period with the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu chapter. The Click2Houston, ABC13, and Hoodline reports detailing his ordeal reveal a systematic pattern of abuse that put him in the hospital for days and left him with potentially permanent kidney damage. Right now, Attorney911—The Manginello Law Firm—represents Bermudez in his $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston, Pi Kappa Phi’s national headquarters, the UH System Board of Regents, the chapter’s housing corporation, and 13 individual fraternity leaders.

If you’re a parent in Lytle, Atascosa County, or anywhere in Texas, this case demonstrates what can and does happen to Texas students in Greek organizations, athletic programs, Corps of Cadets units, and other campus groups. Your child does not have to be at UH for similar patterns to occur at Texas A&M, UT Austin, Baylor, SMU, or any of the dozens of Texas campuses where Lytle students pursue their education.

What This Guide Offers Lytle Families

This comprehensive resource exists for one purpose: to give parents and families in Lytle and throughout Atascosa County the information they need to protect their children and understand their legal rights when hazing occurs. We’ll cover:

What hazing really looks like in 2025—beyond the stereotypes, including digital coercion and psychological abuse
Texas hazing laws and how they protect your child, even if they “agreed” to participate
National hazing case patterns that repeat at Texas schools, including the current UH/Pi Kappa Phi case Attorney911 is litigating
Campus-specific realities at universities where Lytle students commonly attend
The full network of organizations behind Greek life at Texas schools—and how we track them
Practical steps for evidence preservation, reporting, and seeking accountability
Why Attorney911’s Texas-based expertise matters for Lytle families facing these institutional battles

Whether your child attends a local college, commutes to San Antonio, or lives on campus at a major university hours from home, Texas law and experienced Texas counsel can help. This is general information, not specific legal advice. Our firm serves families throughout Texas, including right here in Lytle and Atascosa County. If you need immediate help, call 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911).

Immediate Help for Hazing Emergencies

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

Call 911 for medical emergencies
Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
We provide immediate help—that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

In the first 48 hours:

Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
- Photograph injuries from multiple angles
- Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity/sorority
- Sign anything from the university or insurance company
- Post details on public social media
- Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
Universities move quickly to control the narrative
We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like Beyond the Stereotypes

For families in Lytle who may be unfamiliar with modern campus Greek life or athletic team dynamics, understanding what constitutes hazing requires moving beyond old stereotypes of “harmless pranks” or “team bonding.” Hazing today is systematic, often digitally coordinated, and psychologically sophisticated.

A Modern, Texas-Ready Definition

Hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. Under Texas Education Code Chapter 37, this includes any intentional, knowing, or reckless act—whether on or off campus—that endangers a student’s mental or physical health for purposes of initiation, affiliation, or maintaining membership in an organization.

Critically, Texas law states that “consent is not a defense.” Even if your child “agreed” to participate, the power imbalance, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion mean such consent isn’t legally valid when the activity meets the definition of hazing.

The Five Main Categories of Modern Hazing

1. Alcohol and Substance Hazing
This remains the most common and deadly form. It includes forced chugging challenges, “lineups” where pledges drink rapidly in succession, drinking games with penalties for wrong answers (like the “Bible study” that killed Max Gruver at LSU), and pressure to consume unknown or mixed substances. In the UH Pi Kappa Phi case, Leonel Bermudez was forced to consume milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting, then immediately forced to sprint.

2. Physical Hazing
Beyond traditional paddling, this now includes extreme calisthenics framed as “workouts” or “conditioning.” Bermudez was forced through 100+ push-ups and 500 squats in a single session. It also includes sleep deprivation, food/water restriction, exposure to extreme temperatures, and dangerous physical tests. Another UH pledge was hog-tied face-down on a table with an object in his mouth for over an hour.

3. Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing
This involves forced nudity, simulated sexual acts (the “roasted pig” position reported in Texas A&M Corps cases), degrading costumes, and acts with racial or sexist overtones. The “pledge fanny pack” in the UH case contained condoms and sex toys as tools of humiliation.

4. Psychological Hazing
Verbal abuse, threats, isolation from non-members, manipulation, forced confessions, and public shaming during meetings or on social media. This creates trauma that can last long after physical injuries heal.

5. Digital/Online Hazing
This is the newest frontier: group chat dares, TikTok “challenges,” pressure to create compromising content, 24/7 availability demands via GroupMe or Discord, and location tracking via apps. Organizations use digital tools to maintain constant control while creating less physical evidence.

Where Hazing Happens—It’s Not Just “Fraternities”

While Greek organizations receive the most attention, hazing occurs in:

Fraternities and sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural)
Corps of Cadets / ROTC / military-style groups (significant issues at Texas A&M)
Athletic teams (from football to cheerleading)
Spirit and tradition groups (Texas Cowboys, Song Leaders, etc.)
Marching bands and performance groups
Some academic, service, and cultural organizations

Social status, tradition, and secrecy keep these practices alive even when everyone “knows” hazing is illegal. For Lytle families, this means being vigilant regardless of what type of organization your child joins.

Texas Hazing Law & Liability: What Lytle Families Need to Know

Texas has some of the nation’s most clearly defined hazing statutes, but understanding how they work in practice is crucial for Atascosa County families seeking accountability.

Texas Education Code Chapter 37: The Core Framework

§ 37.151 Definition
Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

Plain English translation: If someone makes your child do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a group, and they meant to do it or were reckless about the risk, that’s hazing under Texas law. Location doesn’t matter—it can happen at an off-campus house, an Airbnb, or a remote retreat.

§ 37.152 Criminal Penalties

Class B Misdemeanor: Hazing that doesn’t cause serious injury (up to 180 days jail, fine up to $2,000)
Class A Misdemeanor: If hazing causes injury requiring medical treatment
State Jail Felony: If hazing causes serious bodily injury or death
Also criminal: Failing to report hazing if you knew about it, and retaliating against someone who reports

§ 37.153 Organizational Liability
Organizations themselves can be prosecuted and fined up to $10,000 per violation if they authorized or encouraged hazing, or if an officer knew about it and failed to report. Universities can revoke recognition and ban organizations from campus.

§ 37.155 Consent Not a Defense
This is critical for Lytle parents to understand: It is not a defense that the person being hazed consented to the activity. Courts recognize that “consent” under peer pressure and power imbalance isn’t true voluntary consent.

§ 37.156 Reporting by Educational Institutions
Texas colleges must provide hazing prevention education, publish policies, and maintain annual reports of hazing violations. Some schools, like UT Austin, make these publicly available; others are less transparent.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Two Paths to Accountability

Criminal Cases

Brought by the state (district attorney)
Aim: Punishment (jail, fines, probation)
Typical charges: Hazing, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, manslaughter in fatal cases
Example: Multiple Pi Kappa Phi members could face criminal charges in the UH case

Civil Cases

Brought by victims or surviving families
Aim: Monetary compensation and institutional accountability
Focus: Negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, premises liability, emotional distress
A criminal conviction is NOT required to pursue a civil case
Example: Leonel Bermudez’s $10 million lawsuit against UH and Pi Kappa Phi

These cases can run side-by-side. Many families pursue civil actions even when criminal charges are pending or resolved, because civil cases can uncover institutional failures that criminal cases might not address.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024)
This federal law requires colleges receiving federal aid to:

Report hazing incidents more transparently
Strengthen hazing education and prevention
Maintain public hazing data (phased in by 2026)
This will eventually make it easier for Lytle parents to research which organizations have violations.

Title IX & Clery Act
When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based hostility, Title IX obligations trigger additional reporting requirements and investigation protocols. The Clery Act requires reporting certain crimes and maintaining safety statistics that may include hazing-related assaults.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit?

1. Individual Students
Those who planned, supplied alcohol, carried out acts, or helped cover them up. In the UH case, 13 individual members were named.

2. Local Chapter/Organization
The fraternity/sorority or club itself if it’s a legal entity. The Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu housing corporation is a defendant.

3. National Fraternity/Sorority Headquarters
National organizations that set policies, receive dues, and supervise chapters can be liable based on what they knew or should have known from prior incidents. Pi Kappa Phi’s national headquarters is a defendant.

4. University or Governing Board
Schools may be sued for negligence, premises liability, or civil rights violations. The University of Houston and UH System Board of Regents are defendants.

5. Third Parties
Landlords of event spaces, bars that overserved alcohol (under Texas dram shop laws), security companies, or event organizers.

Every case is fact-specific. An experienced hazing attorney evaluates all potential defendants during investigation.

National Hazing Case Patterns: What History Tells Us About Texas Risks

Major hazing cases across the country establish patterns that repeat at Texas schools. Understanding these patterns helps Lytle families recognize warning signs and strengthens legal arguments about foreseeability.

The Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017)
During a bid-acceptance event with heavy drinking, Piazza suffered severe falls captured on chapter cameras. Fraternity members delayed calling for help for hours. The case resulted in dozens of criminal charges, civil litigation, and Pennsylvania’s Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law.

Andrew Coffey – Florida State, Pi Kappa Phi (2017)
During a “Big Brother Night,” Coffey was given a handle of liquor and drank to dangerous levels. His death led to criminal hazing charges and FSU temporarily suspending all Greek life.

Max Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017)
A “Bible study” drinking game required drinking when answering questions incorrectly. Gruver’s death led to Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act making hazing a felony.

Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)
Forced to drink nearly a bottle of whiskey during a pledge event, Foltz died from alcohol poisoning. The family reached a $10 million settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national, ~$3M from BGSU).

What This Means for Lytle Families: Forced drinking rituals follow similar scripts nationwide. When Texas chapters repeat these patterns, it shows national organizations failed to prevent foreseeable harm.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013)
During a fraternity retreat, Deng was subjected to a violent blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual involving repeated tackling. He suffered fatal head injuries while help was delayed. The national fraternity was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter—a rare case of organizational criminal liability.

What This Means for Lytle Families: Off-campus “retreats” can be particularly dangerous, as organizations believe they’re beyond university oversight. Liability still applies.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025)
Former players alleged sexualized, racist hazing within the football program over multiple years. Multiple lawsuits led to the head coach’s firing and confidential settlements. The case demonstrated hazing extends far beyond Greek life into major athletic programs.

What These National Cases Mean for Texas Families

Common threads emerge:

Forced drinking rituals with established scripts
Physical violence disguised as “tradition” or “conditioning”
Delayed medical care due to fear of consequences
Systematic cover-ups and evidence destruction
Institutional knowledge of patterns but inadequate intervention

Texas families facing hazing at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor, or other Texas schools are not alone—they’re navigating a landscape shaped by these national lessons. More importantly, these cases establish legal precedents about foreseeability, duty of care, and institutional liability that apply directly to Texas situations.

Texas University Focus: Where Lytle Students Attend and What Happens There

Lytle families send students to colleges across Texas, from local community colleges to major universities hours from home. Understanding the specific landscapes of these campuses—including the University of Houston case Attorney911 is actively litigating—is crucial for prevention and response.

Understanding Lytle’s Educational Landscape

While Lytle students attend schools statewide, several patterns emerge:

Local options: Texas A&M University-San Antonio, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio College
Regional draws: Texas State University (San Marcos), University of Texas at Austin
Major Texas hubs: Texas A&M University (College Station), University of Houston, Baylor University, Southern Methodist University
Specialized programs: Students may travel farther for specific majors or athletic opportunities

Each campus has its own Greek life ecosystem, athletic culture, and history with hazing incidents. What happens at one school often mirrors patterns at others because the same national organizations operate across campuses.

Public Records: The Greek Organization Ecosystem Serving Lytle Families

Attorney911 maintains a Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine tracking over 1,423 Greek-related organizations across 25 Texas metros. For Lytle families in the San Antonio-New Braunfels metro area, here’s what that ecosystem looks like based on public IRS and organizational records:

San Antonio Metro Greek Organizations (Sample from 86 Total):

Xi Omicron Iota House Association (Trinity University)
Alpha Lambda Chapter of Sigma Chi (Trinity University)
Delta Sigma Theta Sorority – San Antonio Alumnae Chapter
Kappa Alpha Psi – San Antonio Alumni Chapter

Statewide Major University Greek Entities (Relevant to Lytle Students):

Kappa Sigma – Mu Camma Chapter Inc (EIN: 133048786) – College Station, TX 77845
Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity – EIN listed in national databases with Texas chapters
Sigma Alpha Epsilon – Texas Rho Corp. (Austin, TX – UT chapter house corporation)
Beta Theta Pi – Eta Chapter House Corp. (College Station, TX 77840)
Alpha Sigma Phi Fraternity Inc – Multiple Texas chapters including at UH, Texas A&M, UT
);

Honor Societies & Academic Groups (Also Governed by Hazing Laws):

Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi – Texas A&M University Chapter (EIN: 900293166) – College Station, TX 77843
Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi – University of Texas at Tyler Chapter (EIN: 352335400) – Tyler, TX 75799
Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi – Texas Woman’s University Chapter (EIN: 263170920) – Denton, TX 76204

Why This Directory Matters for Lytle Families:
When hazing occurs, identifying every potentially liable organization is crucial. National fraternities often have separate legal entities for housing corporations, alumni associations, and educational foundations—all of which may carry insurance or assets. We track these entities so families don’t start from zero during the worst moments of their lives.

University of Houston (UH): Attorney911’s Current Litigation Battleground

Campus & Culture Snapshot
UH is Texas’s third-largest university with over 46,000 students and significant Greek life. As an urban, diverse campus, it hosts traditional fraternities/sororities alongside multicultural and NPHC (Divine Nine) organizations. The Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu chapter operated near campus until its November 2025 closure following the Bermudez hazing allegations.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
UH prohibits hazing on and off campus, defining it consistently with Texas law. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students Office, Campus Safety, and online reporting forms. The university’s response in the Pi Kappa Phi case—labeling conduct “deeply disturbing” and promising cooperation with law enforcement—demonstrates how institutions react when public scrutiny intensifies.

The Leonel Bermudez / Pi Kappa Phi Case (Active Attorney911 Litigation)
This ongoing case exemplifies severe modern hazing:

Locations: Pi Kappa Phi house, Culmore Drive residence, Yellowstone Boulevard Park
Methods: “Pledge fanny pack” humiliation, forced dress codes, overnight chauffeuring, extreme workouts, cold-weather exposure, lying in vomit-soaked grass, hose spraying “similar to waterboarding,” forced consumption until vomiting
Medical Consequences: Rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney failure, brown urine, 4-day hospitalization, critically high creatine kinase levels, ongoing risk of permanent kidney damage
Defendants: UH, UH System Board of Regents, Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters, Beta Nu housing corporation, 13 individual chapter leaders
Institutional Response: Chapter suspended November 6, 2025; charter surrendered November 14, 2025; UH promises disciplinary action up to expulsion

How a UH Hazing Case Proceeds
For Lytle families with students at UH, jurisdiction typically involves Harris County courts. Investigations may involve UH Police Department and/or Houston Police Department depending on location. Civil suits can target the multi-layered defendant network Attorney911 has identified in the Bermudez case.

What UH Students & Lytle Parents Should Do

Report immediately to UH Dean of Students and campus police
Preserve digital evidence (GroupMe, texts, social media) before deletion
Seek medical attention and request complete records mentioning hazing
Document everything with dates, times, names, locations
Consult an attorney with UH-specific experience before talking to university investigators or insurance adjusters

Attorney911’s active litigation against UH and Pi Kappa Phi means we have current, firsthand knowledge of how these institutions respond to serious allegations—knowledge that benefits all Texas families, including those in Lytle.

Texas A&M University: Corps Culture and Greek Life Intersection

Campus & Culture Snapshot
Texas A&M’s distinctive Corps of Cadets tradition, massive Greek life system, and fierce school pride create unique hazing risks. With over 2,500 students in the Corps and approximately 60 Greek chapters, the campus has multiple subcultures where hazing can occur.

Documented Incidents & Responses

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Chemical Burns Case (2021): Pledges allegedly covered in substances including industrial-strength cleaner, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The chapter was suspended; plaintiffs sought $1 million.
Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): A cadet alleged degrading hazing including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The case sought over $1 million; A&M stated it handled the matter internally.
Ongoing Monitoring: Texas A&M appears in Attorney911’s Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine with multiple Greek organizations registered in Brazos County, including the Beta Theta Pi Eta Chapter House Corp. (College Station, TX 77840).

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Proceeds
Jurisdiction typically involves Brazos County courts. The university’s status as a state agency triggers sovereign immunity considerations, but exceptions exist for gross negligence or willful misconduct. Both the university system and individual employees may be liable.

What Texas A&M Students & Lytle Parents Should Do

Understand both university student conduct processes AND Corps-specific discipline systems if applicable
Report to appropriate authorities: Student Conduct Office for Greek life, Commandant’s Office for Corps issues
Recognize that “tradition” arguments are legally irrelevant when conduct meets hazing definitions
Seek medical documentation immediately—Corps or athletic “toughness” culture may discourage reporting injuries

University of Texas at Austin: Transparency and Patterns

Campus & Culture Snapshot
UT Austin hosts approximately 60 Greek chapters among its 51,000 students. The university maintains a public hazing violations log—one of Texas’s more transparent systems—which reveals recurring patterns despite sanctions.

Public Hazing Violations Log Insights
UT’s publicly available log shows:

Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): New members directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics; chapter placed on probation with required hazing-prevention education
Multiple organizations sanctioned for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, or punishment-based practices
Pattern evidence: Similar violations recur across years despite disciplinary actions

How a UT Austin Hazing Case Proceeds
Travis County courts typically have jurisdiction. UT’s public violation log becomes powerful evidence in civil cases, demonstrating institutional knowledge of patterns. The university’s status as a state agency affects liability arguments but doesn’t prevent suits against individuals or national organizations.

What UT Austin Students & Lytle Parents Should Do

Check UT’s public hazing log (hazing.utexas.edu) for organization histories
Report through Dean of Students Office and UTPD
Document how current incidents mirror prior violations on the public log
Recognize that probation or sanctions don’t necessarily prevent recurrence

Baylor University & Southern Methodist University: Private School Dynamics

Baylor University Considerations

Religious identity interacts with hazing accountability narratives
Baseball Hazing (2020): 14 players suspended following hazing investigation
Legacy of institutional scrutiny following football sexual assault scandal affects how hazing claims are handled
Key for Lytle families: Private university status means fewer sovereign immunity protections but potentially more aggressive defense of institutional reputation

Southern Methodist University Considerations

Affluent student body and strong Greek presence
Kappa Alpha Order Incident (2017): New members reportedly paddled, forced to drink, deprived of sleep; chapter suspended until approximately 2021
Key for Lytle families: SMU’s private status affects transparency; internal reports aren’t publicly posted like UT’s log, making discovery in litigation crucial

What Private University Students & Lytle Parents Should Do

Understand that “zero tolerance” policies may conflict with institutional reputation protection
Request internal investigation reports through attorneys if necessary
Recognize that private schools have different liability exposures than public institutions
Document all communications with administrators

Fraternities & Sororities: National Histories That Repeat in Texas

The same national organizations operate across Texas campuses, bringing with them histories of hazing incidents elsewhere. This pattern evidence is crucial for establishing foreseeability—the legal concept that organizations should have anticipated and prevented harm based on prior knowledge.

Why National Histories Matter for Lytle Families

When a Pi Kappa Phi chapter at UH engages in forced drinking and extreme workouts, and Pi Kappa Phi had a nearly identical incident kill Andrew Coffey at Florida State in 2017, that history becomes evidence that the national organization knew the risks but failed to prevent recurrence. This pattern applies across organizations:

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) National Pattern:

Stone Foltz (Bowling Green, 2021) – alcohol poisoning death
David Bogenberger (Northern Illinois, 2012) – alcohol poisoning death, $14M settlement
Multiple Texas chapter violations including at UT Austin
Legal significance: National had constructive notice of “Big/Little” drinking risks

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) National Pattern:

Carson Starkey (Cal Poly, 2008) – alcohol poisoning death
University of Alabama traumatic brain injury case (2023)
Texas A&M chemical burns case (2021)
UT Austin assault case (2024)
Legal significance: National eliminated pledge program in 2014 due to pattern but violations continue

Phi Delta Theta National Pattern:

Max Gruver (LSU, 2017) – “Bible study” drinking game death
Legal significance: Louisiana passed Max Gruver Act creating felony hazing statute

Pi Kappa Phi National Pattern:

Andrew Coffey (Florida State, 2017) – “Big Brother Night” alcohol death
Leonel Bermudez (UH, 2025) – rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure (Attorney911 case)
Legal significance: Current active litigation demonstrates ongoing pattern

How National Headquarters Structure Affects Liability

National fraternities/sororities often create complex legal structures:

National headquarters – sets policies, collects dues, oversees chapters
Educational foundations – tax-exempt entities for scholarships/training
Housing corporations – own/manage chapter houses (like Beta Nu Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity Housing Corporation Inc, EIN: 462267515, Frisco, TX 75035)
Alumni associations – maintain relationships post-graduation

Each entity may carry insurance or assets. Identifying all related organizations is crucial for recovery. Our Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine tracks these connections so Lytle families don’t face this investigative burden during crisis.

The Legal Concept of “Foreseeability”

Texas courts consider whether harm was foreseeable based on:

Prior incidents at the same chapter
Prior incidents at other chapters of the same national
Industry knowledge (what reasonable fraternity/sorority should know)
Specific warnings or complaints

When national organizations have thick anti-hazing manuals, it’s because they know the risks. When they fail to enforce those policies, foreseeability strengthens negligence claims.

Building a Hazing Case: Evidence, Damages, and Strategy for Lytle Families

Pursuing accountability requires understanding what evidence matters, what damages are recoverable, and how institutional defendants fight back. Here’s what Lytle families should know.

Critical Evidence Categories

1. Digital Communications

GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, fraternity-specific apps
Instagram DMs, Snapchat, TikTok messages (even disappearing ones)
Emails between members, officers, nationals
Action for Lytle parents: Help your child screenshot everything immediately. Don’t delete anything, even if embarrassing.

2. Photos & Videos

Content filmed during events (often shared in group chats)
Social media posts/stories showing activities
Security camera or doorbell footage at houses/venues
Action: Preserve originals with metadata intact

3. Internal Organization Documents

Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, tradition lists
Emails/texts planning events or discussing “what we’ll do”
National policies and training materials (obtained through discovery)

4. University Records

Prior conduct files on the same organization
Incident reports to campus police or conduct offices
Clery Act reports and annual security disclosures
Note: These often require subpoenas or public records requests

5. Medical & Psychological Records

ER/hospitalization records (must mention hazing for context)
Surgery/rehab notes
Toxicology reports (blood alcohol, drug screens)
Psychological evaluations (PTSD, depression, anxiety diagnoses)

6. Witness Testimony

Other pledges, members, roommates
RAs, coaches, trainers, bystanders
Former members who quit or were expelled

Recoverable Damages in Hazing Cases

Economic Damages (Quantifiable)

Medical expenses (past and future)
Lost income/earning capacity
Educational costs (missed semesters, transfer expenses)
Property damage

Non-Economic Damages

Physical pain and suffering
Emotional distress, trauma, humiliation
Loss of enjoyment of life
Reputational harm

Wrongful Death Damages (for families)

Funeral/burial costs
Loss of companionship and support
tf- Emotional harm to parents/siblings
Lost financial contributions

Punitive Damages (when applicable)

Punish especially reckless or malicious conduct
Deter future misconduct
Available under Texas law in certain circumstances

Important: We describe damage categories, not guarantee specific amounts. Every case depends on facts, jurisdiction, evidence, and many other factors.

How Insurance Coverage Fights Work

Fraternities, sororities, and universities typically have insurance policies that may cover hazing claims—or that insurers may try to exclude. Common insurance arguments:

“Hazing is an intentional act, not covered”
“The policy doesn’t cover this defendant”
“Notice wasn’t timely”
“Policy limits are exhausted”

Attorney911’s unique advantage: Mr. Lupe Peña spent years as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. He knows exactly how insurers value claims, set reserves, use Independent Medical Exams to reduce settlements, and deploy delay tactics. We don’t just fight insurers; we fight them with insider knowledge of their playbook.

The Role of Different Defendants

National Organizations
Often argue: “We didn’t know” or “This was rogue individuals.” We counter with pattern evidence from other chapters and proof that nationals received dues/supervised training.

Universities
Public schools (UH, Texas A&M, UT) claim sovereign immunity. We navigate exceptions for gross negligence, Title IX violations, or individual employee liability. Private schools (Baylor, SMU) have different defenses but fewer immunity protections.

Individual Members
May claim: “Everyone agreed” or “It was tradition.” Texas law explicitly rejects consent defenses. Individual assets and homeowner insurance policies may provide recovery sources.

Third Parties
Landlords, alcohol providers, security companies—each with potential negligence theories.

Practical Guides & FAQs for Lytle Families

For Parents: Warning Signs and Action Steps

Warning Signs Your Child May Be Hazed:

Unexplained injuries, bruises, burns
Extreme exhaustion beyond normal college stress
Drastic mood changes: anxiety, depression, withdrawal
Constant secret phone use for group chats
Fear of missing “mandatory” events at odd hours
Sudden financial requests without clear explanation
Defensiveness when asked about organization activities

How to Talk to Your Child:

Choose a private, calm setting
Use open questions: “How are things with [organization]?” not “Are they hazing you?”
Emphasize safety over status: “I care more about your health than any group”
Listen without judgment; your child may feel shame or loyalty conflict
If they open up, document what they say with dates/times

If Your Child Is Hurt:

Medical attention FIRST—even if they resist
Preserve evidence: photos of injuries, screenshot messages
Write down everything they tell you while fresh
Save names, dates, locations
Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 within 24-48 hours

Dealing with the University:

Document every communication (emails, calls, meetings)
Ask specifically about prior incidents involving the organization
Don’t sign anything without attorney review
Remember: university process ≠ legal accountability

When to Contact a Lawyer:

Significant physical or psychological harm
University/organization minimizing or hiding what happened
Need to preserve disappearing evidence
Questions about criminal vs. civil options
Insurance companies contacting you
Sooner is better—evidence disappears fast

For Students/Pledges: Recognizing and Responding

Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?
Ask yourself:

Do I feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced?
Would I do this if there were no social consequences?
Is the activity hidden from public view or administrators?
Are older members making me do things they don’t do themselves?
If yes to any, it’s likely hazing.

Exit Strategies:

Immediate danger: Call 911, then get to safe location
Wanting to quit: Send written resignation to chapter president; don’t attend “one last meeting”
Fear retaliation: Report that fear to Dean of Students and campus police
Document threats: Screenshots, recordings (Texas is one-party consent state)

Your Legal Rights in Texas:

You cannot be punished for calling 911 in medical emergencies (good-faith reporter immunity)
Hazing is a crime; you’re the victim even if you “agreed”
You can request no-contact orders through university or courts
Civil lawsuits can proceed even without criminal charges

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

1. Letting Evidence Be Destroyed

What happens: Messages deleted, photos erased, witnesses coached
Why it’s wrong: Makes case nearly impossible; looks like cover-up
Better approach: Preserve everything immediately; use cloud backups

2. Confronting the Organization Directly

What happens: They lawyer up, destroy evidence, prepare defenses
Why it’s wrong: Eliminates surprise element; allows evidence destruction
Better approach: Document first, then let your attorney handle communication

3. Signing University “Resolution” Forms

What happens: You may waive legal rights; settlements are often low
Why it’s wrong: Universities protect themselves, not you
Better approach: “I need to have my attorney review this first”

4. Posting on Social Media

What happens: Defense attorneys screenshot everything; inconsistencies hurt credibility
Why it’s wrong: Can waive privileges; creates contradictory evidence
Better approach: Document privately; let attorney control messaging

5. Waiting “To See How University Handles It”

What happens: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, statute runs
Why it’s wrong: University controls narrative; internal process ≠ accountability
Better approach: Preserve evidence NOW; consult attorney immediately

6. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without Lawyer

What happens: Recorded statements used against you; early lowball settlements
Why it’s wrong: Adjusters work for insurance company, not you
Better approach: “My attorney will contact you”

Frequently Asked Questions for Lytle Families

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities have sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals personally. Private universities have fewer immunity protections. Every case is fact-specific—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case-specific analysis.

“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default, but it becomes a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individual officers can also face charges for failing to report hazing.

“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” under peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.

“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally 2 years from the date of injury or death in Texas, but the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses forget, and organizations destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately.

“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
Location doesn’t eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be liable based on sponsorship, control, knowledge, and foreseeability. Many major hazing cases (Pi Delta Psi retreat, Sigma Pi unofficial house) occurred off-campus and still resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments.

“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. You can request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. We prioritize your family’s privacy while pursuing accountability.

Why Attorney911 for Lytle Hazing Cases

When your family faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. From our Texas offices, we serve families throughout the state, including right here in Lytle and Atascosa County.

Our Unique Qualifications for Hazing Litigation

Insurance Insider Advantage (Mr. Lupe Peña)

Former insurance defense attorney at a national firm
Knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims
Understands their delay tactics, coverage exclusion arguments, and settlement strategies
“We know their playbook because we used to run it.”

Complex Institutional Litigation Experience (Ralph Manginello)

One of few Texas firms involved in BP Texas City explosion litigation
Federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas)
Not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their defense teams
“We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won.”

Current, Active Hazing Litigation
06

Right now, we’re litigating the Leonel Bermudez $10 million case against UH and Pi Kappa Phi
This isn’t historical experience—it’s current, real-world knowledge of how these institutions respond
We understand 2025 hazing dynamics because we’re in the courtroom fighting them today

Multi-Million Dollar Catastrophic Injury Experience

Proven track record in complex wrongful death and severe injury cases
Experience working with economists on lifetime care needs and lost earning capacity
“We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force accountability.”

Dual Criminal + Civil Capability

Ralph’s membership in Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA)
Understands how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation
Can advise witnesses and former members with dual exposure

Investigative Depth & Resources

Network of experts: medical, digital forensics, economists, psychologists, Greek life culture experts
Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine tracking 1,423 Greek organizations across 25 metros
Experience obtaining hidden evidence (deleted group chats, chapter records, university files)
“We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.”

Spanish-Language Services

Mr. Lupe Peña habla Español
Full legal services available in Spanish
Cultural understanding of Texas Hispanic families’ needs

We Understand What Lytle Families Need

We know hazing cases are about more than money. They’re about:

Getting answers when institutions want to hide the truth
Preventing this from happening to another family
Honoring courage when victims come forward despite fear
Balancing privacy with the need for accountability
Navigating the collision of campus life, legal process, and family trauma

Our approach combines aggressive investigation with genuine empathy. We’ve seen how hazing destroys lives and how institutions protect themselves. We’re here to level that playing field for Texas families.

Your Next Step: Free, Confidential Consultation

If hazing has impacted your family—whether your child is at UH, Texas A&M, UT, Baylor, SMU, or any Texas campus—we want to hear from you. Families in Lytle, Atascosa County, and throughout South Texas have the right to answers and accountability.

What to Expect in Your Free Consultation

We listen without judgment – Tell us what happened in complete confidence
Evidence review – We’ll look at any photos, messages, medical records you have
Legal options explained – Criminal reporting, civil lawsuit, both, or neither
Realistic expectations – Timelines, challenges, potential outcomes
Cost transparency – Contingency fee basis: we don’t get paid unless we win
No pressure – Take time to decide; we’re here when you’re ready
Everything confidential – Attorney-client privilege protects our conversation

Contact Attorney911 Today

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com (Ralph Manginello)
Spanish Services: lupe@atty911.com (Mr. Lupe Peña)

Serving Texas from offices in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont

Whether you’re in Lytle or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. The same institutions that failed to protect your child will have teams of lawyers protecting themselves. You deserve someone fighting just as hard for you.

Call 1-888-ATTY-911 today. Let’s get you answers, accountability, and justice.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com