Hazing Incidents, Lawsuits & Campus Accountability: The Complete Guide for Irving, Texas Families

If Your Child Was Hazed at a Texas University, You’re Not Alone—And You Have Legal Rights

This guide is for you if: You’re a parent in Irving, Las Colinas, Valley Ranch, or anywhere in Dallas County whose child has been hazed, injured, or abused in connection with fraternities, sororities, Corps of Cadets programs, athletic teams, spirit groups, or other campus organizations at any Texas university.

Right now, just a few hours south of Irving in Houston, we’re fighting one of the most serious hazing cases in Texas history. Leonel Bermudez, a University of Houston student, suffered rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure after alleged hazing by the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu chapter. His urine turned brown, he was hospitalized for four days, and he faces ongoing risk of permanent kidney damage. The $10 million lawsuit we filed in late 2025 details forced consumption of milk and hot dogs until vomiting, “waterboarding” with a hose, 100+ push-ups, 500 squats, humiliating “pledge fanny packs,” and systematic abuse at multiple Houston locations.

If you’re reading this because something similar happened to your child at UT Austin, Texas A&M, SMU, Baylor, or any Texas campus—whether they’re attending school in Irving at the University of Dallas or hours away at a major university—we want you to know three things immediately:

Hazing is a crime in Texas, and consent is NOT a defense
Universities and national fraternities can be held accountable through civil lawsuits
Evidence disappears quickly—you need to act within days, not weeks

We’re The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC (Attorney911), and we represent hazing victims and their families throughout Texas. We’re based in Houston but serve families across the state, including here in the DFW metro area where Irving is located. This comprehensive guide will explain exactly what hazing looks like in 2025, how Texas law works, what’s happening on Texas campuses, and what legal options your family may have.

⚠️ IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

Call 911 for medical emergencies
Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
We provide immediate help—that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

In the first 48 hours:

Get medical attention immediately, even if your child insists they’re “fine”
Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
- Photograph injuries from multiple angles
- Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects used in hazing)
Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity/sorority directly
- Sign anything from the university or insurance company
- Post details on public social media
- Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
Universities move quickly to control the narrative
We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like Beyond the Stereotypes

For Irving families navigating college experiences with their children, understanding modern hazing is critical. What was once stereotyped as simple “pranks” or “initiation rituals” has evolved into sophisticated, often dangerous systems of coercion and abuse that extend far beyond traditional fraternity parties.

The Three Tiers of Modern Hazing

Tier 1: Subtle Hazing (Often Dismissed as “Harmless”)
These behaviors emphasize power imbalances and create psychological harm:

Digital control: 24/7 group chat monitoring, mandatory instant responses, location tracking via Find My Friends or Snapchat Maps
Servitude requirements: Acting as designated drivers at all hours, cleaning members’ rooms, running personal errands
Social isolation: Cutting off contact with non-members, requiring permission to socialize outside the organization
“Optional” mandates: Events framed as voluntary but carrying implicit social consequences for non-participation

Tier 2: Harassment Hazing (Creates Hostile Environments)
These behaviors cause emotional or physical discomfort:

Sleep deprivation: Late-night “meetings,” 3 AM wake-up calls, multi-day events with minimal rest
Forced consumption: Spoiled food, excessive amounts of bland items (milk, bread, hot dogs), hot sauce, or other unpleasant substances
Public humiliation: Embarrassing costumes, forced performances, “roasting” sessions
Extreme physical activity: “Smokings” with hundreds of push-ups, wall sits until collapse, punitive “workouts”

Tier 3: Violent Hazing (High Risk of Injury or Death)
These activities have catastrophic potential:

Forced alcohol consumption: “Lineup” drinking games, Big/Little nights with handles of liquor, “Bible study” drinking quizzes
Physical beatings: Paddling, punching, kicking, “branding” with burns or cuts
Dangerous “tests”: Blindfolded tackle rituals (“glass ceiling”), forced fights, swimming while intoxicated
Sexualized hazing: Forced nudity, simulated sexual acts, sexual assault or coercion
Chemical exposure: Texas A&M Sigma Alpha Epsilon case where pledges were covered in industrial-strength cleaner, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin grafts

Where Hazing Happens in Texas

While fraternities receive most attention, hazing occurs across campus organizations:

Fraternities and sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural chapters)
Corps of Cadets / ROTC programs (military-style traditions with documented abuse cases)
Athletic teams (football, basketball, baseball, cheer—as seen in Northwestern University scandal)
Spirit and tradition groups (Texas Cowboys, cheer teams, drum lines)
Marching bands and performance groups (Florida A&M fatal hazing case)
Academic and service organizations

The common thread isn’t the type of organization—it’s power imbalance, tradition justification, and enforced secrecy.

Texas Hazing Law: What Irving Families Need to Know

Texas has specific anti-hazing statutes that apply whether your child attends school in Irving at the University of Dallas or at a campus hours away. Understanding this legal framework is the first step toward accountability.

Texas Education Code Chapter 37: The Hazing Statute

§ 37.151 Definition:
Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

Key implications for Irving families:

Location doesn’t matter: On-campus, off-campus, at retreats, at private homes—all covered
Mental OR physical harm: Psychological trauma qualifies, not just physical injuries
“Reckless” is enough: Doesn’t require malicious intent, just disregard for known risks

§ 37.152 Criminal Penalties:

Class B Misdemeanor: Hazing without serious injury (up to 180 days jail, $2,000 fine)
Class A Misdemeanor: Hazing causing injury requiring medical treatment
State Jail Felony: Hazing causing serious bodily injury or death

§ 37.155 Critical Protection: Consent is NOT a Defense
Texas law explicitly states that the victim’s “consent” does not excuse hazing. Courts recognize that power imbalances, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion create coercive environments where true voluntary consent doesn’t exist.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Understanding the Difference

Criminal Hazing Cases:

Brought by: The State of Texas (prosecutor’s office)
Purpose: Punishment (jail, fines, probation)
Common charges: Hazing, assault, furnishing alcohol to minors, manslaughter in fatal cases
Burden of proof: Beyond a reasonable doubt

Civil Hazing Lawsuits:

Brought by: Victims or surviving families
Purpose: Compensation and accountability
Common claims: Negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, emotional distress, negligent supervision
Burden of proof: Preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not)

Critical insight: These cases often proceed simultaneously. A criminal conviction isn’t required for a civil lawsuit, and a criminal acquittal doesn’t prevent civil recovery.

Federal Laws Overlaying Texas Cases

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024):

Requires colleges receiving federal aid to report hazing transparently
Mandates public hazing data by approximately 2026
Strengthens prevention education requirements

Title IX Applicability:
When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based hostility, Title IX obligations trigger additional university responsibilities and potential federal claims.

Clery Act Reporting:
Hazing incidents involving assaults, alcohol crimes, or other reportable offenses must appear in campus crime statistics, creating public records that can support civil cases.

National Hazing Cases That Shape Texas Litigation

The cases below aren’t just news stories—they establish legal precedents, legislative reforms, and settlement patterns that directly affect what Irving families can expect when pursuing hazing claims.

Alcohol Poisoning Deaths: The Most Common Fatal Pattern

Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)

What happened: 20-year-old pledge forced to drink entire bottle of alcohol during “Big/Little” night
Medical cause: Fatal alcohol poisoning
Legal outcomes: Multiple criminal convictions; $10 million settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national, ~$3M from BGSU)
Texas relevance: Same national fraternity operates chapters at UT Austin, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, and other Texas campuses

Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017)

What happened: Pledge forced to participate in “Bible study” drinking game; incorrect answers = forced drinking
Medical cause: Fatal alcohol toxicity (BAC 0.495%)
Legal outcomes: Criminal convictions; Louisiana enacted Max Gruver Act making hazing a felony
Texas relevance: Demonstrates how one case can drive statewide legislative reform

Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017)

What happened: Pledge died from acute alcohol poisoning during “Big Brother Night”
Legal outcomes: Multiple criminal prosecutions; FSU temporarily suspended all Greek life
Texas relevance: Same national fraternity involved in our active University of Houston lawsuit

Physical & Ritualized Hazing: Beyond Alcohol

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013)

What happened: Pledge blindfolded, weighted with backpack, repeatedly tackled during “glass ceiling” ritual
Medical cause: Fatal traumatic brain injury; delayed 911 call
Legal outcomes: National fraternity criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter; banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years
Texas relevance: Shows national organizations face direct criminal liability, not just civil

Northwestern University Football Program (2023-2025)

What happened: Former players alleged sexualized, racist hazing within football program
Legal outcomes: Multiple lawsuits; head coach fired; confidential settlements
Texas relevance: Proves hazing extends beyond Greek life to major athletic programs with similar institutional cover-up patterns

What These Cases Mean for Irving Families

Patterns repeat: The same hazing methods (forced drinking, physical abuse, delayed medical care) recur across campuses and organizations
National histories matter: When a Texas chapter repeats conduct that caused deaths elsewhere, that shows foreseeability—a key legal element
Settlement ranges established: Death cases typically settle between $1-14 million; severe injury cases $375,000 to multi-millions
Individual accountability: Chapter presidents and officers can face personal liability (Pi Kappa Alpha president ordered to pay $6.5 million personally in Foltz case)

Texas University Focus: Where Irving Families Send Their Kids

Irving sits in the heart of the DFW metroplex, with educational opportunities ranging from local campuses to major universities across Texas. Understanding the hazing landscape at these institutions is crucial for prevention and response.

University of Dallas (Local Irving Campus)

Campus Context for Irving Families:
Located right here in Irving at 1845 E Northgate Drive, the University of Dallas serves many local students and draws others from across the region. As a Catholic liberal arts university with approximately 2,800 students, its smaller size doesn’t eliminate hazing risks.

Greek Life Presence:
While smaller than major state universities, UD has fraternity and sorority life that requires vigilance. The university’s policies prohibit hazing, but as with all campuses, enforcement and prevention vary based on resources and institutional commitment.

For Irving Parents:

Your child can experience hazing right here in our community, not just at distant campuses
University of Dallas falls under the same Texas hazing laws as larger institutions
Local jurisdiction means Irving Police Department and Dallas County courts may be involved in cases

Southern Methodist University (Nearby Dallas Campus)

Proximity to Irving:
Just 15 minutes from central Irving, SMU represents a common choice for high-achieving Irving students. Its reputation as a private, affluent campus with strong Greek life creates particular hazing dynamics.

Documented Hazing Incidents:

Kappa Alpha Order (2017): Chapter suspended after reports of paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation
Multiple Greek organizations appear on SMU conduct reports for alcohol violations and “endangerment” that often correlate with hazing behaviors

SMU’s Institutional Response:

Private university status means less public transparency than public institutions
Hazing prevention programs exist but face the same implementation challenges as other campuses
Civil lawsuits can compel discovery of internal reports that aren’t publicly posted

For Irving SMU Families:

Jurisdiction typically involves Dallas Police and Dallas County courts
SMU’s substantial endowment means they have resources for aggressive legal defense
Your child’s proximity to home doesn’t reduce hazing risks—in some cases, it increases pressure to conceal incidents from family

University of Texas at Austin (Major State Destination)

Irving Student Pipeline:
UT Austin draws numerous Irving graduates annually. Its massive Greek system (approximately 60 fraternities and sororities) and intense campus traditions create elevated hazing risks.

UT’s Public Hazing Transparency:
UT maintains a public Hazing Violations page showing organizations, dates, conduct, and sanctions:

Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): New members directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics; chapter placed on probation
Texas Wranglers (multiple years): Sanctioned for forced workouts and alcohol-related hazing
Various fraternities and sororities: Repeated violations showing patterns despite sanctions

Recent High-Profile Cases:

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (2024): Australian exchange student allegedly assaulted at party, suffering dislocated leg, broken ligaments, fractured tibia, and broken nose; sued for over $1 million
Multiple organizations appear annually on UT’s violation logs for alcohol hazing, physical abuse, and endangerment

For Irving UT Families:

Travis County courts typically handle litigation
UT’s public violation logs provide valuable evidence for civil cases showing pattern and knowledge
The university’s size means hazing often goes unreported or unaddressed until tragedy strikes

Texas A&M University (Another Major Destination)

Corps of Cadets Culture:
Texas A&M’s unique Corps tradition creates particular hazing risks beyond Greek life. The university’s military-style environment has documented abuse cases requiring specialized legal understanding.

Documented Hazing Lawsuits:

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (~2021): Pledges allegedly covered in substances including industrial-strength cleaner, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin grafts; fraternity suspended; $1 million lawsuit filed
Corps of Cadets (2023): Cadet alleged degrading hazing including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in “roasted pig” position with apple in mouth; sought over $1 million
Kappa Sigma (2023): Reports of hazing resulting in rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown)—the same medical condition as our UH client

For Irving A&M Families:

Brazos County courts typically handle litigation
Cases may involve both Greek life AND Corps traditions, requiring attorneys familiar with both cultures
A&M’s institutional pride sometimes creates resistance to transparency about hazing problems

University of Houston (Active Litigation Campus)

Current High-Stakes Case:
We are actively litigating Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston & Pi Kappa Phi, a $10 million hazing lawsuit that demonstrates exactly what Texas families face:

The Hazing Conduct:

“Pledge fanny pack” rule: Pledges carried condoms, sex toys, nicotine devices, humiliating items 24/7
Forced consumption: Milk, hot dogs, peppercorns until vomiting, followed immediately by sprints
Physical abuse: 100+ push-ups, 500 squats, “save-your-brother” drills, cold-weather exposure in underwear
“Waterboarding” simulation: Sprayed in face with hose, threatened with actual waterboarding
Location network: Pi Kappa Phi house, Culmore Drive residence, Yellowstone Boulevard Park

Medical Catastrophe:

Bermudez developed rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown) and acute kidney failure
Passed brown urine, hospitalized four days with critically high creatine kinase levels
Faces ongoing risk of permanent kidney damage

Institutional Response:

November 6, 2025: Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters suspends Beta Nu chapter
November 14, 2025: Chapter members vote to surrender charter; chapter shut down
UH statement: Conduct “deeply disturbing,” promises disciplinary measures “up to expulsion” and cooperation with law enforcement

Defendants in Our Lawsuit:

University of Houston
UH System Board of Regents
Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters
Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu housing corporation
13 individual fraternity leaders (president, pledgemaster, risk manager, etc.)

For Irving UH Families:

Harris County courts handle litigation
This active case proves hazing causes catastrophic, life-altering injuries, not just “bad experiences”
The lawsuit shows how we identify every potentially liable entity, from national headquarters to housing corporations to individual members

Baylor University (Private Institution Considerations)

Institutional History Context:
Baylor’s recent history with athletic scandals and Title IX issues creates particular dynamics for hazing cases. The university’s religious identity sometimes affects transparency and response patterns.

Documented Incidents:

Baylor Baseball (2020): 14 players suspended following hazing investigation
Various Greek organizations periodically suspended for conduct violations

For Irving Baylor Families:

McLennan County courts typically handle litigation
Baylor’s private status affects legal strategies differently than public universities
The university’s past scandals mean they may approach hazing cases with particular sensitivity to public relations

Texas Fraternities & Sororities: The Organizations Behind the Letters

Understanding the national organizations operating on Texas campuses is crucial because their histories create legal patterns that affect Irving families’ cases.

Why National Histories Matter Legally

When a Texas chapter repeats hazing methods that caused deaths or injuries at other chapters, that establishes foreseeability—the legal concept that the harm was predictable and preventable. National headquarters that receive dues, provide materials, and exercise oversight can face liability for failing to prevent predictable harm.

Public Records Directory: Greek Organizations Serving Irving Families

If you’re a parent in Irving, you deserve to know who really stands behind the Greek organizations connected to your child. Below are examples from the Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine we maintain—a database of 1,423 Greek-related organizations across 25 Texas metros, built from IRS records, university data, and public filings.

DFW Metro Area Organizations (510 Total Greek Entities):

Beta Upsilon Chi Fraternity – Fort Worth, TX 76244 (Cause IQ metro listing)
Texas Kappa Sigma Educational Foundation Inc – EIN 741380362, Fort Worth, TX 76147-0061 (IRS B83 filing)
Delta Delta Delta – Arlington Alumnae Chapter – Dallas, TX (Cause IQ metro listing)
Kappa Delta Sorority – Gamma Beta Chapter – Denton, TX (Cause IQ metro listing)
Zeta Sigma House Corporation of Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity Inc – EIN 752620706, Dallas, TX 75223-1349 (IRS B83 filing)

Statewide Educational Foundations & Housing Corporations:

Texas Kappa Sigma Educational Foundation Inc – EIN 741380362, Fort Worth, TX 76147-0061
Beta Nu Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity Housing Corporation Inc – EIN 462267515, Frisco, TX 75035-6629
Pi Kappa Phi Delta Omega Chapter Building Corporation – EIN 371768785, Missouri City, TX 77459-1820
Alpha Sigma Phi Fraternity Inc – Theta Delta – EIN 475370943, Houston, TX 77204-7005

Honor Societies with Texas Chapters:

Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi – EIN 263170920, Denton, TX 76204-0000 (Texas Woman’s University chapter)
Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi – EIN 352335400, Tyler, TX 75799-6600 (UT Tyler chapter)
Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi – EIN 383742830, El Paso, TX 79968-8900 (UT El Paso chapter)
Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi – EIN 900293166, College Station, TX 77843-0001 (Texas A&M chapter)

National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC/D9) Organizations:

Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity – Lambda Lambda Chapter – EIN 521278573, Dallas, TX 75241-4331
Zeta Phi Beta Sorority Incorporated – Sigma Gamma Chapter – EIN 392352450, Houston, TX 77254-0026
Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority – EIN 364091267, Waco, TX 76710-4154
Arlington-Grand Prairie Alumni Chapter of Kappa Alpha Psi Frat Inc – EIN 232452759, Grand Prairie, TX 75054-2901

Why This Directory Matters for Your Case:

Insurance identification: These entities often carry liability insurance
Legal liability tracing: House corporations and alumni chapters can share responsibility
Pattern evidence: National brands appearing across multiple metros show systematic operations
Asset discovery: Educational foundations and housing corporations may hold significant assets

National Organizations with Documented Hazing Histories at Texas Campuses

Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ) – “Pike”

National history: Stone Foltz death (BGSU, $10M settlement), multiple other fatalities
Texas presence: UT Austin, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Texas State, multiple campuses
Recent Texas sanctions: UT Austin chapter probation (2023) for forced milk consumption and calisthenics

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ) – “SAE”

National history: Multiple hazing deaths nationally; eliminated traditional pledge process in 2014
Texas incidents: Texas A&M chemical burns lawsuit (~2021), UT Austin assault lawsuit (2024)
Pattern: Repeated physical abuse and alcohol hazing across chapters

Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ)

National history: Andrew Coffey death (FSU)
Texas current case: Our active University of Houston lawsuit alleging rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure
Demonstrates: Same national organization, same dangerous patterns

Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ)

National history: Max Gruver death (LSU) leading to felony hazing law
Texas presence: Multiple campuses including UT Austin
Legal significance: Shows how one case drives legislative reform

Kappa Alpha Order (ΚΑ)

National pattern: Physical hazing and paddling traditions
Texas incidents: SMU suspension (2017), other campus sanctions
Consideration: Traditions explicitly violating national policies create liability

How National Histories Strengthen Texas Cases

When we represent Irving families, we use these national patterns to:

Establish foreseeability: Prove the national organization knew or should have known specific hazing methods were dangerous
Negate “rogue chapter” defenses: Show the conduct follows established patterns across chapters
Support punitive damages: Demonstrate reckless disregard for known risks
Identify all insurance sources: Trace liability through national organizations, housing corporations, and related entities

Building a Hazing Case: Evidence, Strategy & Damages

When Irving families come to us after a hazing incident, we follow a systematic approach to investigation, evidence preservation, and legal strategy development.

Critical Evidence Categories in Modern Hazing Cases

Digital Communications (Most Important Evidence Source):

Group messaging apps: GroupMe, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, Discord, Slack
Text messages/SMS: Screenshot entire conversations with timestamps
Social media DMs: Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook Messenger
Chapter-specific apps: Fraternity/sorority communication platforms
Preservation protocol: Screenshot immediately, back up to cloud storage, do NOT delete anything

Photos & Videos:

Event documentation: Content filmed by participants during hazing
Injury documentation: Multiple angles, include ruler/coin for scale, progression over days
Location evidence: Houses, rooms, venues where hazing occurred
Social media posts: Even “joking” content can establish facts and timeline

Internal Organization Documents:

Pledge manuals/education materials: Often contain implicit or explicit hazing instructions
Chapter communications: Emails, texts about “traditions” or pledge activities
National policies: Risk management manuals showing what should have been prevented
Financial records: Dues payments, alcohol purchases, event expenditures

University Records:

Prior conduct files: Previous hazing violations by same organization
Campus police reports: Incident documentation
Clery Act reports: Public crime statistics showing patterns
Title IX records: If sexualized hazing involved

Medical Documentation:

Emergency records: ER reports, ambulance documentation
Hospital records: Admission notes, progress notes, discharge summaries
Lab results: Blood alcohol, toxicology, kidney function tests (critical for rhabdomyolysis cases)
Specialist evaluations: Psychiatry/psychology for PTSD, depression, anxiety

Witness Testimony:

Other pledges: Often afraid initially but may cooperate as case develops
Former members: Those who quit or were expelled often provide crucial testimony
Roommates/friends: Observed behavioral changes or physical symptoms
Medical providers: Documented observations of injuries and patient statements

Damages: What Families Can Recover in Texas Hazing Cases

Economic Damages (Quantifiable Losses):

Medical expenses: Past and future care, including lifelong treatment for permanent injuries
Lost income/earning capacity: Interrupted education, delayed career entry, reduced lifetime earnings
Educational costs: Lost tuition, forfeited scholarships, transfer expenses
Therapy/treatment: Physical rehabilitation, psychological counseling, medication

Non-Economic Damages (Subjective but Real Harm):

Physical pain/suffering: From injuries during hazing and recovery
Emotional distress: PTSD, depression, anxiety, humiliation, loss of dignity
Loss of enjoyment: Can’t participate in activities, social withdrawal, educational disruption
Reputational harm: Social stigma, digital footprint, future impact

Wrongful Death Damages (When Hazing Proves Fatal):

Funeral/burial expenses: Immediate costs
Loss of financial support: Deceased’s potential lifetime contributions
Loss of companionship/guidance: For parents, siblings, spouses
Emotional suffering: Family’s grief, trauma, psychological treatment

Punitive Damages (When Conduct is Especially Reckless):

Available when defendants show gross negligence, malice, or conscious disregard for safety
Often supported by evidence of prior incidents, cover-ups, or violation of known policies
Texas has statutory caps but exceptions exist for particularly egregious conduct

Legal Strategy: Overcoming Common Defense Tactics

Based on our experience with the UH Pi Kappa Phi case and other Texas hazing litigation, we anticipate and counter these common defenses:

Defense: “The Victim Consented”

Our counter: Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states consent is NOT a defense to hazing
Evidence: Power imbalance documentation, peer pressure evidence, fear of exclusion proof

Defense: “This Was a Rogue Chapter”

Our counter: National pattern evidence showing same methods caused injuries/deaths elsewhere
Evidence: Prior incident reports, national training materials acknowledging risks

Defense: “It Happened Off-Campus”

Our counter: Texas law applies regardless of location; universities/nationals maintain control and benefit
Evidence: Organization sponsorship, advisor involvement, tradition continuity

Defense: “We Have Anti-Hazing Policies”

Our counter: Policy without enforcement is negligence; prior violations show ineffective implementation
Evidence: Repeated sanctions without meaningful reform, superficial “training”

Defense: “Insurance Doesn’t Cover Intentional Acts”

Our counter: Negligent supervision claims may be covered even if hazing was intentional
Strategy: Identify all potential policies, pursue bad faith claims if coverage wrongfully denied

Defense: “University Sovereign Immunity”

Our counter: Exceptions for gross negligence, ministerial acts, Title IX violations
Strategy: Sue individuals in personal capacity, leverage settlement pressure despite immunity arguments

Practical Guides for Irving Families, Students & Witnesses

For Parents: Recognizing & Responding to Hazing

Warning Signs Your Child May Be Being Hazed:

Physical indicators: Unexplained bruises/burns/cuts, extreme fatigue, weight changes, sleep deprivation
Behavioral changes: Sudden secrecy, withdrawal from family/friends, personality shifts, defensiveness
Academic red flags: Grades dropping, missing classes, losing scholarships
Digital patterns: Constant phone monitoring, anxiety about messages, deleted conversations
Financial concerns: Unexpected large expenses, maxed credit cards, vague explanations for spending

Questions to Ask (Non-Confrontationally):

“How are things going with [organization]? Are you enjoying it?”
“Have they been respectful of your time for classes and sleep?”
“What do they ask you to do as a new member?”
“Is there anything that makes you uncomfortable or that you wish you didn’t have to do?”
“Do you feel like you can leave if you want to, or would there be consequences?”

48-Hour Action Checklist for Parents:

Hours 1-6: Ensure medical safety, preserve initial evidence, document everything, call us at 1-888-ATTY-911
Hours 6-24: Secure digital evidence, obtain medical records, identify witnesses, avoid university pressure
Hours 24-48: Consult experienced hazing attorney, make strategic reporting decisions, establish evidence backup systems
Week 1: Continue medical documentation, begin formal investigation, develop comprehensive strategy

For Students: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning

Is This Hazing? Decision Framework:

Are you being forced or pressured to do something unsafe, illegal, or degrading?
Would you participate if there were no social consequences for refusing?
Are older members making new members do things they don’t have to do themselves?
Are you being told to keep secrets, lie, or hide activities from outsiders?
Does the activity endanger physical or mental health?

If you answer YES to any question, it’s likely hazing.

Safe Exit Strategies:

Immediate danger: Call 911, get to safe location, you won’t get in trouble for emergency help
Planning to quit: Tell someone outside the organization first, send written resignation, avoid “one last meeting”
Evidence preservation: Screenshot everything, photograph injuries, save physical items, document threats
Reporting options: Dean of Students, campus police, Title IX office, National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE)

Your Texas Legal Rights:

You cannot be punished for calling 911 in an emergency (good-faith reporter immunity)
Hazing is a crime—you’re the victim, not perpetrator
Civil lawsuits can proceed even without criminal charges
No-contact orders are available if you face retaliation

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Hazing Case

Based on our experience with the UH case and other Texas litigation, these errors compromise cases:

MISTAKE #1: Letting Evidence Get Deleted

What happens: Group chats disappear, photos get erased, witnesses get coached
Our solution: Immediate preservation protocol, digital forensics when needed, adverse inference arguments when evidence is destroyed

MISTAKE #2: Confronting the Organization Directly

What happens: They lawyer up, destroy evidence, prepare defenses
Our solution: Strategic investigation first, all communication through counsel, element of surprise preserved

MISTAKE #3: Signing University “Resolution” Forms

What happens: Families waive rights for minimal settlements, universities control narrative
Our solution: “Do not sign anything” rule, thorough review of all documents, negotiation from strength

MISTAKE #4: Social Media Posting Before Counsel

What happens: Defense attorneys screenshot everything, inconsistencies hurt credibility
Our solution: Complete social media blackout, controlled messaging through legal team

MISTAKE #5: Waiting for University “Internal Process”

What happens: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, statutes of limitations run
Our solution: Parallel investigation, preservation demands, litigation readiness while university process continues

Frequently Asked Questions for Irving Families

“Can we sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities (UT, Texas A&M, UH) have sovereign immunity limitations, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and individual employee actions. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Every case requires individual analysis—call us at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case-specific evaluation.

“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. Texas Education Code § 37.152 makes hazing a state jail felony when it causes serious bodily injury or death. Individual officers can also face misdemeanor charges for failing to report hazing.

“What if my child ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states: “It is not a defense to prosecution that the person against whom the hazing was directed consented to the hazing activity.” Courts recognize that power imbalances and peer pressure negate true consent.

“How long do we have to file a lawsuit?”
Generally two years from the date of injury or death in Texas, but the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm wasn’t immediately apparent. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—call us immediately at 1-888-ATTY-911.

“Will my child’s name be public?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. We can request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. While some aspects may become public, we prioritize your family’s privacy throughout the process.

“What if the hazing happened at an off-campus house?”
Location doesn’t eliminate liability. Universities and national organizations can still be liable based on sponsorship, control, and foreseeability. Many major cases (Pi Delta Psi retreat, Sigma Pi unofficial house) occurred off-campus with substantial recoveries.

Why Attorney911 for Texas Hazing Cases: Our Unique Qualifications

When your Irving family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how universities and national fraternities fight back—and how to win anyway.

Our Active Texas Hazing Litigation: The UH Pi Kappa Phi Case

Right now, we’re leading one of Texas’s most significant hazing lawsuits: Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston & Pi Kappa Phi. This isn’t theoretical expertise—it’s active, high-stakes litigation involving:

Catastrophic injury: Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure requiring hospitalization
Multiple defendants: University, national fraternity, housing corporation, 13 individual members
Complex evidence: Digital communications, medical records, institutional documents
Substantial damages: $10 million lawsuit for life-altering injuries

This case demonstrates exactly what we bring to Irving families’ cases: investigative depth, institutional litigation experience, and relentless advocacy.

Unique Advantages for Texas Hazing Cases

Insurance Insider Knowledge (Mr. Lupe Peña’s Defense Background):

Former insurance defense attorney at a national firm
Knows exactly how fraternity and university insurers value claims, deploy delay tactics, and fight coverage
Understands reserve-setting formulas, IME (Independent Medical Exam) strategies, and settlement playbooks
“We know their tactics because we used to implement them”

Complex Institutional Litigation Experience (Mr. Ralph Manginello’s BP Credential):

One of few Texas firms involved in BP Texas City explosion litigation
Federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas)
Not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their deep-pocket defense teams
“We’ve faced billion-dollar defendants before. We know how they operate.”

Multi-Million Dollar Catastrophic Injury Results:

Proven wrongful death and severe injury settlements
Economist collaboration for lifetime care valuation
Experience with brain injury, permanent disability, and life care planning
“We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force real accountability.”

Dual Criminal/Civil Hazing Capability:

Mr. Ralph Manginello’s HCCLA (Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association) membership
Understands how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation
Can advise witnesses and former members with potential criminal exposure
Navigates parallel proceedings effectively

Comprehensive Investigative Resources:

Digital forensics for deleted messages and social media evidence
Medical experts for rhabdomyolysis, TBI, PTSD, and other hazing injuries
Greek life culture experts to explain traditions, power dynamics, and coercion
Economists for lifetime earning loss and care cost calculations
Institutional policy experts to prove negligent supervision

Spanish-Language Services:

Mr. Lupe Peña speaks fluent Spanish
Full service available for Hispanic families throughout Texas
Cultural understanding of family dynamics and communication preferences

How We Investigate Hazing Cases Differently

Immediate Evidence Preservation:
Within hours of your call, we implement protocols to:

Secure digital evidence before deletion
Document injuries and locations
Identify and interview witnesses
Send preservation letters to prevent evidence destruction

Comprehensive Defendant Identification:
We trace liability through all potentially responsible parties:

Individual members and officers
Local chapters and housing corporations
National headquarters and educational foundations
Universities and their governing boards
Third-party property owners and alcohol providers

Pattern Evidence Development:
We establish foreseeability by demonstrating:

Prior incidents at same chapter
Similar incidents at other chapters of same national
National organization knowledge of dangerous traditions
University awareness of recurring problems

Strategic Insurance Navigation:
We identify all potential coverage sources and:

Navigate “intentional act” exclusions
Pursue bad faith claims when coverage wrongfully denied
Maximize available policy limits
Structure settlements to ensure actual recovery

Our Commitment to Irving Families

We understand that hazing cases involve more than legal claims—they’re about:

Getting answers when institutions stonewall
Achieving accountability for life-altering harm
Securing resources for recovery and future needs
Preventing this from happening to another family

While we aggressively pursue compensation, we never lose sight of what matters most: your child’s wellbeing and your family’s healing.

Your Next Steps: Contact Attorney911 for a Confidential Consultation

If you’re an Irving parent whose child has experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether they attend University of Dallas here locally, commute to SMU, or study at UT Austin, Texas A&M, UH, Baylor, or any other Texas university—we want to hear from you.

What to Expect in Your Free Consultation

When you call us at 1-888-ATTY-911, you’ll receive:

Compassionate Listening: We’ll hear your story without judgment or interruption
Preliminary Case Analysis: Initial assessment of legal options and potential claims
Evidence Preservation Guidance: Immediate steps to protect crucial evidence
Strategic Overview: Explanation of how hazing cases proceed in Texas
Realistic Expectations: Honest discussion of timelines, challenges, and potential outcomes
Fee Explanation: Clear outline of our contingency fee structure (no fee unless we recover)
No Pressure: Time to consider options without immediate commitment

Our Contact Information

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Legal Emergency Lawyers™

Phone: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
24/7 Cell: (713) 443-4781

Email: ralph@atty911.com (Mr. Ralph Manginello)
Email: lupe@atty911.com (Mr. Lupe Peña)

Website: https://attorney911.com

Hablamos Español: Full Spanish-language services available

Service Areas: While based in Houston, we serve families throughout Texas, including Irving, Dallas County, and the entire DFW metro area.

Why Choose Attorney911 for Your Irving Hazing Case

Proven Texas Hazing Litigation: We’re actively litigating the UH Pi Kappa Phi case right now
Insider Insurance Knowledge: Former defense attorney experience against fraternity/university insurers
Complex Case Experience: BP Texas City explosion litigation against massive institutional defendants
Comprehensive Investigation: Digital forensics, medical experts, economist collaboration
Dual Criminal/Civil Capability: Understand both sides of hazing cases
Spanish Language Services: Full representation for Hispanic families
Contingency Fees: No cost unless we recover for you
Statewide Service: We represent Texas families regardless of campus location

Final Message to Irving Families

Hazing transforms what should be an exciting college experience into a traumatic, life-altering event. The isolation you feel—watching your child suffer while institutions minimize and deny—is real. But you’re not alone, and you’re not powerless.

Texas law provides avenues for accountability. National precedents establish recovery ranges. And experienced hazing attorneys like our team at Attorney911 know how to navigate these complex cases against powerful defendants.

Whether your child attends school here in Irving or anywhere in Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you deserve answers, accountability, and resources for recovery. The call is free. The consultation is confidential. And the time to act is now, before evidence disappears and memories fade.

Call us today at 1-888-ATTY-911. Let us help you take the first step toward justice and healing.

Plain Text Links to Key Resources

Attorney911 Main Website & Contact: https://attorney911.com

News Coverage of Active UH Pi Kappa Phi Case:

Attorney911 Educational Videos:

Evidence preservation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs
Statute of limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c
Client mistakes to avoid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY
Contingency fees explained: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc

National Anti-Hazing Hotline (Not affiliated with Attorney911): 1-888-NOT-HAZE (1-888-668-4293)

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com