Hazing at Texas Universities: A Comprehensive Legal Guide for Uncertain Families

A Parent’s Worst Nightmare: When Tradition Turns to Trauma

It starts with a phone call no parent in Harrison County ever wants to receive. Your child—the one you sent off to Texas A&M or the University of Houston with so much hope—is in the emergency room. They’re talking about “brown urine,” muscle breakdown, kidney failure. The details come out slowly, painfully: forced drinking, all-night workouts, humiliation rituals, threats. They were trying to join a fraternity. They were being “initiated.” They were being hazed.

Right now, just hours from Uncertain in Houston, we’re fighting exactly this kind of case. We represent Leonel Bermudez, a University of Houston student who suffered rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure after alleged hazing by the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu chapter. His story—documented in a $10 million lawsuit—involves enforced “pledge fanny packs” with degrading items, forced consumption of milk and hot dogs until vomiting, extreme physical workouts including 100+ push-ups and 500 squats, and being sprayed in the face with a hose “similar to waterboarding.” After passing brown urine, he was hospitalized for four days with critically elevated creatine kinase levels confirming severe muscle breakdown and kidney injury.

If you’re a parent in Uncertain, Marshall, or anywhere in Harrison County, this guide is for you. We’ll explain what hazing really looks like in 2025, how Texas law protects your child, what’s happening at universities where East Texas families send their children, and what legal options exist when tradition turns dangerous. Harrison County families deserve to know the truth about campus safety, institutional accountability, and their legal rights when hazing injuries occur.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

• Call 911 for medical emergencies
• Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

In the first 48 hours:

• Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
• Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
  • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
  • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
• Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
• Do NOT:
  • Confront the fraternity/sorority
  • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
  • Post details on public social media
  • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

• Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
• Universities move quickly to control the narrative
• We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
• Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like Beyond the Stereotypes

The Modern Reality of Campus Hazing

For families in Uncertain and throughout East Texas, understanding contemporary hazing requires moving beyond outdated stereotypes of harmless pranks. Today’s hazing blends digital surveillance, psychological manipulation, and sophisticated cover-up tactics that make detection difficult and evidence preservation critical.

Hazing in 2025 is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. Crucially, “I agreed to it” does not automatically make it safe or legal when there exists the power imbalance, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion that characterize initiation environments.

Five Categories of Modern Hazing

1. Alcohol and Substance Hazing
The most common—and most deadly—form involves forced or coerced consumption. This includes “lineup” drinking games where pledges must finish drinks in sequence, “Big/Little” nights where new members are given handles of liquor, and games like “Bible study” where incorrect answers mandate drinking. The Pi Kappa Phi case at UH involved forced consumption of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting. These rituals aren’t social drinking; they’re calculated, tradition-bound coercion.

2. Physical Hazing and Endurance Rituals
Beyond the stereotypical paddling, modern physical hazing includes extreme calisthenics termed “smokings” or “workouts” that far exceed normal conditioning. At UH, Leonel Bermudez was allegedly forced through 100+ push-ups and 500 squats under threat of expulsion. Other forms include sleep deprivation during “hell weeks,” food/water restriction, exposure to extreme temperatures, and dangerous “trust” exercises. The hog-tying of another Pi Kappa Phi pledge face-down on a table for over an hour represents particularly egregious physical restraint hazing.

3. Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing
This category includes forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts, degrading costumes, and acts with racial, sexist, or homophobic overtones. The “pledge fanny pack” requirement in the UH case—forcing pledges to carry condoms, sex toys, and humiliating items 24/7—represents psychological and sexualized hazing designed to degrade and control.

4. Psychological Hazing and Digital Control
Modern hazing increasingly occurs in digital spaces through 24/7 group chat monitoring, geo-tracking demands, social media policing, and public shaming via platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Discord. Pledges may be required to respond instantly to messages at all hours, share live locations, and post compromising content. This creates constant psychological pressure that extends far beyond physical events.

5. Service and Labor Exploitation
Often disguised as “tradition” or “building brotherhood/sisterhood,” this includes mandatory chauffeuring at all hours (as alleged in the UH case), cleaning members’ rooms, running personal errands, and being “on call” 24/7 for member demands. These activities interfere with academics, sleep, and normal college life while establishing power dynamics.

Where Hazing Occurs in Texas Universities

Hazing extends far beyond fraternity houses:

• Fraternities and Sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural Greek councils)
• Corps of Cadets and ROTC Programs at schools like Texas A&M
• Spirit Squads and Tradition Organizations (Texas Cowboys, cheer teams, dance teams)
• Athletic Teams from football to baseball to cheerleading
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups
• Academic and Service Organizations

The common thread across all contexts is social status, tradition, and secrecy that keep dangerous practices alive even when participants “know” hazing is illegal. For Harrison County families, this means vigilance must extend beyond Greek life to all organizations where your child might seek belonging.

Texas Hazing Law: What Uncertain Families Need to Know

Texas Education Code Chapter 37: Your Legal Foundation

Texas has specific anti-hazing provisions in the Education Code that protect students at both public and private institutions. Understanding these laws is crucial for Harrison County families navigating hazing situations.

§ 37.151 Definition: Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
• Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

For Uncertain parents, key points include:

• Location doesn’t matter—hazing can occur on or off campus
• Harm can be mental or physical
• “Reckless” conduct is enough—they don’t need malicious intent
• Most importantly: “Consent” is not a defense under Texas law

§ 37.155 Consent Not a Defense: This critical provision explicitly states that it is not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the hazing activity. This directly counteracts the common defense claim that “they wanted to do it” or “everyone agreed.”

Criminal Penalties Under Texas Law

§ 37.152 establishes escalating penalties:

• Class B Misdemeanor: Hazing that doesn’t cause serious injury (up to 180 days jail, fine up to $2,000)
• Class A Misdemeanor: If hazing causes injury requiring medical treatment
• State Jail Felony: If hazing causes serious bodily injury or death

Additional criminal provisions:

• Failing to report hazing (if you’re a member/officer and knew about it): misdemeanor
• Retaliating against someone who reports hazing: misdemeanor

For organizations (fraternities, sororities, clubs):

• Fines up to $10,000 per violation under § 37.153
• Universities can revoke recognition and ban organizations from campus

Protection for Good-Faith Reporting

§ 37.154 Immunity: A person who in good faith reports a hazing incident to university or law enforcement is immune from civil or criminal liability that might otherwise result from the report. Many Texas universities extend this through medical amnesty policies that protect students who call 911 during alcohol emergencies, even if underage drinking was involved.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Understanding the Difference

Criminal Cases:

• Brought by the state (prosecutor)
• Aim: punishment (jail, fines, probation)
• Typical hazing-related charges: hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, manslaughter in fatal cases
• Burden of proof: “beyond a reasonable doubt”

Civil Cases:

• Brought by victims or surviving families
• Aim: monetary compensation and accountability
• Legal theories: negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring/supervision, premises liability, emotional distress
• Burden of proof: “preponderance of the evidence” (more likely than not)

These cases can run simultaneously, and a criminal conviction is not required to pursue civil justice. In fact, many families find civil litigation provides more comprehensive accountability and compensation than criminal proceedings alone.

Federal Overlay: Additional Protections

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): Requires colleges receiving federal aid to:

• Report hazing incidents more transparently
• Strengthen hazing education and prevention
• Maintain public hazing data (phased in by around 2026)

Title IX: When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based hostility, Title IX obligations can be triggered, creating additional reporting requirements and potential liability.

Clery Act: Requires reporting certain crimes and maintaining safety statistics; hazing incidents often overlap with assault or alcohol/drug crimes that trigger Clery reporting.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit?

For Harrison County families considering legal action, multiple parties may share liability:

1. Individual Students:

• Those who planned, supplied alcohol, carried out acts, or helped cover them up
• Chapter officers (president, pledgemaster, risk manager) often face heightened liability

2. Local Chapter/Organization:

• The fraternity/sorority or club itself (if incorporated)
• Housing corporations that own chapter properties

3. National Fraternity/Sorority Headquarters:

• Entities that set policies, receive dues, and supervise chapters
• Liability often hinges on what they knew or should have known from prior incidents

4. University or Governing Board:

• Schools may be liable under negligence, premises liability, or civil-rights theories
• Key questions involve prior warnings, policy enforcement, and deliberate indifference

5. Third Parties:

• Landlords/owners of houses or event spaces
• Bars or alcohol providers (under dram shop theories)
• Security companies or event organizers

The Pi Kappa Phi case against UH demonstrates this comprehensive approach, naming 17 defendants including individual members, chapter officers, the Beta Nu housing corporation, Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters, the University of Houston, and the UH System Board of Regents.

National Hazing Case Patterns: What Texas Precedents Mean for Uncertain Families

Alcohol Poisoning and Death: The Most Common Tragedy

Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017): During a bid-acceptance event, Piazza consumed dangerous amounts of alcohol, suffered multiple falls captured on chapter cameras, and received delayed medical help. The case resulted in dozens of criminal charges, substantial civil litigation, and Pennsylvania’s Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. For Texas families: it demonstrates how delayed 911 calls and cover-up culture exponentially increase liability.

Max Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017): During a “Bible study” drinking game where incorrect answers mandated drinking, Gruver died from alcohol toxicity (BAC 0.495%). The case led to Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act creating felony hazing statutes. Key takeaway for Harrison County: legislative reform often follows public outrage and clear proof of hazing patterns.

Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): During a “Big/Little” event, Foltz was forced to consume nearly a bottle of whiskey and died from alcohol poisoning. The case resulted in multiple criminal convictions and a $10 million total settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national, ~$3M from BGSU). For Texas families: it shows universities and nationals both face significant financial consequences.

Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): During a “Big Brother Night,” Coffey was given a handle of liquor and died from acute alcohol poisoning. The case prompted FSU to temporarily suspend all Greek life and overhaul policies. Relevance for Texas: even “social” fraternities like Pi Kappa Phi have fatal hazing histories that create foreseeability arguments.

Physical and Ritualized Hazing Patterns

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): During a fraternity retreat, Deng was blindfolded, weighted with a backpack, and repeatedly tackled during a “glass ceiling” ritual, suffering fatal head injuries while help was delayed. The case resulted in Pi Delta Psi being banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years and multiple criminal convictions. For Texas families: it demonstrates that off-campus retreats can be particularly dangerous venues for hazing.

Danny Santulli – University of Missouri, Phi Gamma Delta (2021): During a “pledge dad reveal” night, Santulli was forced to consume excessive alcohol, suffered severe permanent brain damage, and now requires 24/7 care. The case resulted in settlements with 22 defendants and highlights catastrophic non-fatal injuries. For East Texas families: it shows lifelong care costs that civil litigation must address.

Athletic Program Hazing and Abuse

Northwestern University Football (2023-2025): Former players alleged sexualized, racist hazing within the football program over multiple years, resulting in multiple lawsuits, the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald, and confidential settlements. The case demonstrates that hazing extends far beyond Greek life into major athletic programs with substantial institutional oversight.

What These National Cases Mean for Harrison County Families

Several critical patterns emerge relevant to Texas cases:

1. Forced Drinking Scripts Are Predictable: “Big/Little” nights, bid acceptance parties, and drinking games follow remarkably similar patterns across organizations and campuses.

2. Delayed Medical Care Compounds Liability: Cases where members hesitate to call 911 for fear of “getting the chapter in trouble” consistently result in enhanced charges and larger settlements.

3. Digital Evidence Is Decisive: Group chats, security footage, and social media posts increasingly make or break both criminal prosecutions and civil cases.

4. National Histories Create Foreseeability: When a Texas chapter repeats conduct that caused injuries or deaths at other chapters, that pattern evidence strongly supports negligence claims against national headquarters.

5. Institutional Accountability Extends Upward: Successful cases increasingly hold not just individual members but chapter officers, housing corporations, national organizations, and universities accountable.

For families in Uncertain dealing with hazing at Texas schools, these national precedents provide both cautionary tales and legal roadmaps for pursuing accountability.

Texas Universities: What Harrison County Families Need to Know

Understanding Your Child’s Campus Environment

Harrison County families often send students to universities throughout Texas, each with distinct Greek life cultures, hazing histories, and accountability systems. Understanding these differences is crucial when evaluating hazing risks and institutional responses.

University of Houston: Urban Campus with Complex Greek Ecosystem

For Uncertain Families: UH represents both geographic proximity and a common destination for East Texas students seeking an urban university experience. The recent Pi Kappa Phi case demonstrates serious hazing risks that can affect Harrison County students.

UH Greek Life Snapshot:

• 50+ fraternity and sorority chapters across four governing councils
• Active National Pan-Hellenic Council (Divine Nine) presence
• Significant multicultural Greek organization community
• Mix of residential and commuter student involvement

Documented Hazing Incidents:

• 2025 Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu Case: As detailed in our ongoing litigation, allegations include forced drinking, extreme physical workouts, humiliation rituals, and medical consequences including rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure.
• 2016 Pi Kappa Alpha Incident: Pledges allegedly deprived of food, water, and sleep during multi-day events; one student suffered a lacerated spleen.
• Regular disciplinary actions for alcohol violations, unauthorized social events, and policy non-compliance.

UH Hazing Policy and Reporting:

• Prohibits hazing on and off campus
• Defines hazing broadly including forced consumption, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment
• Reporting channels: Dean of Students Office, Campus Safety, online reporting forms
• Published hazing education and prevention resources

How a UH Hazing Case Might Involve Harrison County Families:

• Initial investigation may involve UH Police Department or Houston Police Department
• Civil litigation typically filed in Harris County courts
• Potential defendants include individuals, local chapter, housing corporation, national headquarters, and university
• Harrison County families would likely travel to Houston for legal proceedings or arrange remote participation

What UH Students from Uncertain Should Know:

• UH’s urban setting means hazing often occurs in off-campus houses and rented venues
• The university’s commuter population can create social pressures to prove commitment through extreme measures
• Document everything immediately—Houston jurisdictional complexity makes evidence preservation critical
• Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 if you suspect hazing, as we have specific experience with UH cases and local courts

Texas A&M University: Corps Culture and Greek Life Intersection

For Harrison County Families: Texas A&M’s proximity to East Texas and its Corps of Cadets tradition make it a common choice for Uncertain students. The unique blend of military-style discipline and Greek life creates distinct hazing risks.

A&M Greek Life and Corps Snapshot:

• 60+ fraternity and sorority chapters
• Prominent Corps of Cadets with traditional military-style discipline
• Strong agricultural and legacy family involvement
• Tradition-heavy culture that can normalize hazing as “character building”

Documented Hazing Incidents:

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon Chemical Burns Case (2021): Pledges allegedly covered in substances including industrial-strength cleaner, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The fraternity was suspended for two years.
• Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): Cadet alleged degrading hazing including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth, seeking over $1 million in damages.
• Regular disciplinary actions for alcohol violations, physical hazing, and unauthorized activities.

A&M Hazing Policy and Corps Regulations:

• University prohibitions against hazing in both Greek life and Corps
• Corps-specific regulations with traditional discipline measures
• Reporting through Student Conduct Office, Corps leadership, or anonymous systems
• Public transparency limited compared to UT Austin

How an A&M Hazing Case Might Involve East Texas Families:

• Brazos County jurisdiction for local legal matters
• Corps cases may involve military-style discipline proceedings alongside civil litigation
• Transportation from Uncertain to College Station for proceedings (approximately 3 hours)
• Potential for media attention given A&M’s high profile

What A&M Students from Harrison County Should Know:

• Corps traditions and Greek life rituals often intersect, creating compounded risks
• Physical endurance hazing may be rationalized as “training” or “tradition”
• Document injuries immediately and seek medical attention regardless of Corps or chapter pressure
• Contact Attorney911 if hazing involves physical injury, as we understand both Greek life and institutional dynamics at A&M

University of Texas at Austin: Transparency and Tradition

For Uncertain Families: UT Austin represents a premier academic destination with robust Greek life and relatively transparent hazing reporting. East Texas students attending UT should understand both the opportunities and risks.

UT Austin Greek Life Snapshot:

• 60+ fraternity and sorority chapters across multiple councils
• Significant athletic and spirit organization involvement
• Public hazing violations database providing unusual transparency
• Tradition-rich environment with historical hazing patterns

Documented Hazing Incidents:

• Public Hazing Violations Database: UT maintains one of Texas’s most transparent systems, listing organizations, dates, conduct, and sanctions.
• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): New members directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics; chapter placed on probation with required hazing-prevention education.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon Assault Case (2024): Australian exchange student alleged assault resulting in dislocated leg, broken ligaments, fractured tibia, and broken nose.
• Multiple spirit organization sanctions for forced workouts, alcohol hazing, and punishment-based practices.

UT Hazing Policy and Reporting:

• Comprehensive prohibition including physical, psychological, and substance hazing
• Public hazing violations website with detailed incident reports
• Multiple reporting channels including anonymous options
• Strong emphasis on bystander intervention training

How a UT Hazing Case Might Involve Harrison County Families:

• Travis County jurisdiction for local legal matters
• UT’s transparency can provide valuable pattern evidence for civil cases
• Transportation from Uncertain to Austin for proceedings (approximately 4 hours)
• Potential for using UT’s public violations database to establish institutional knowledge

What UT Students from East Texas Should Know:

• UT’s transparency means hazing incidents are more likely to become public
• The public violations database can help identify organizations with prior incidents
• Document everything and report through official channels to create institutional record
• Contact Attorney911 if hazing causes injury, as we can navigate UT’s systems while protecting your rights

Southern Methodist University: Private Campus with Greek Prominence

For Harrison County Families: SMU’s private university status, affluent student body, and strong Greek presence create distinct dynamics for East Texas students attending on scholarship or through family connections.

SMU Greek Life Snapshot:

• Smaller Greek community than public universities but high participation rates
• Significant financial and social prestige associated with membership
• Private university with less public transparency than state schools
• History of hazing incidents despite anti-hazing policies

Documented Hazing Incidents:

• Kappa Alpha Order Incident (2017): New members reportedly paddled, forced to drink alcohol, and deprived of sleep; chapter suspended with multi-year recruiting restrictions.
• Regular disciplinary actions for alcohol violations, unauthorized parties, and hazing allegations.
• Limited public disclosure due to private university status.

SMU Hazing Policy and Reporting:

• Prohibitions similar to Texas Education Code definitions
• Anonymous reporting systems including Real Response platform
• Private disciplinary proceedings with limited public transparency
• Emphasis on education and prevention programs

How an SMU Hazing Case Might Involve Uncertain Families:

• Dallas County jurisdiction for legal matters
• Private university status may affect public records availability
• Potentially higher insurance coverage from affluent defendants
• Transportation from Uncertain to Dallas for proceedings (approximately 2.5 hours)

What SMU Students from Harrison County Should Know:

• Social and financial pressures at SMU can intensify hazing dynamics
• Private university status doesn’t eliminate legal liability for hazing injuries
• Document everything despite potential institutional resistance
• Contact Attorney911 if hazing occurs, as we have experience with private university cases and their defense strategies

Baylor University: Religious Identity and Accountability Challenges

For East Texas Families: Baylor’s religious affiliation, Waco location, and history of institutional challenges create unique considerations for Harrison County students.

Baylor Greek Life Snapshot:

• Growing Greek community within religious university context
• History of institutional scrutiny following football and Title IX scandals
• Mix of religious values and traditional Greek dynamics
• Ongoing efforts to improve accountability and transparency

Documented Hazing Incidents:

• Baseball Team Hazing (2020): 14 players suspended following hazing investigation; staggered suspensions affected team performance.
• Regular disciplinary actions for alcohol violations and hazing allegations.
• Institutional focus on reforming culture following broader accountability challenges.

Baylor Hazing Policy and Reporting:

• Prohibitions consistent with Texas law
• Reporting through Student Conduct, Title IX Office, or anonymous systems
• Ongoing reforms to improve transparency and accountability
• Religious context influencing disciplinary approaches

How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Involve Harrison County Families:

• McLennan County jurisdiction for local matters
• Baylor’s religious affiliation may influence jury dynamics in Waco
• Transportation from Uncertain to Waco for proceedings (approximately 3 hours)
• Potential for institutional resistance given past accountability challenges

What Baylor Students from Uncertain Should Know:

• Religious affiliation doesn’t prevent hazing or eliminate liability
• Document all incidents despite potential institutional pressure
• Baylor’s reformed systems may provide more support for reporting
• Contact Attorney911 if hazing causes harm, as we understand both legal and institutional dynamics at Baylor

Fraternities and Sororities: National Histories and Texas Connections

Why National Histories Matter for Harrison County Families

When your child is hazed at a Texas university, the local chapter doesn’t operate in isolation. National fraternities and sororities maintain extensive records of hazing incidents across their networks, creating crucial “pattern evidence” that can establish foreseeability and support negligence claims.

National headquarters typically:

• Maintain thick anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies because they’ve seen deaths and injuries
• Track incident reports from chapters nationwide
• Know the recurring scripts: forced drinking nights, paddling traditions, humiliating rituals
• Have legal departments that develop defense strategies for hazing claims

When a Texas chapter repeats conduct that caused injuries or deaths at other chapters, that history can establish that the national organization knew or should have known the risks but failed to take adequate preventive measures.

Major National Organizations with Texas Presence

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike):

• National Hazing History: Stone Foltz death at Bowling Green State University ($10M settlement), David Bogenberger death at Northern Illinois University ($14M settlement)
• Texas Chapters: Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor
• Pattern Evidence: “Big/Little” alcohol hazing events repeatedly cause alcohol poisoning deaths

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE):

• National Hazing History: Multiple alcohol-related deaths, traumatic brain injury case at University of Alabama, chemical burns case at Texas A&M
• Texas Chapters: Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor
• Pattern Evidence: Physical hazing including forced consumption of harmful substances

Pi Kappa Phi:

• National Hazing History: Andrew Coffey death at Florida State University, current UH case involving rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure
• Texas Chapters: Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin
• Pattern Evidence: Extreme physical workouts causing medical emergencies

Phi Delta Theta:

• National Hazing History: Max Gruver death at LSU leading to Louisiana felony hazing law
• Texas Chapters: Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor
• Pattern Evidence: “Bible study” drinking games with forced consumption

Beta Theta Pi:

• National Hazing History: Timothy Piazza death at Penn State leading to Pennsylvania anti-hazing law
• Texas Chapters: Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor
• Pattern Evidence: Delayed medical care following alcohol hazing

How Pattern Evidence Strengthens Texas Cases

For Harrison County families pursuing hazing claims, establishing these national patterns serves several crucial purposes:

1. Foreseeability: Shows national organizations knew certain activities (forced drinking, extreme workouts) repeatedly cause harm
2. Negligence: Demonstrates failure to implement adequate safeguards despite known risks
3. Punitive Damages: Supports claims that conduct was willful, reckless, or malicious
4. Insurance Coverage: May defeat insurance exclusions for “expected or intended” injuries

In the UH Pi Kappa Phi case, national history of alcohol-related hazing deaths establishes that the organization knew the risks of forced drinking rituals but allegedly failed to prevent similar conduct at the Beta Nu chapter.

Texas-Specific Organizational Data: The Hazing Intelligence Engine

Beyond national patterns, Texas-specific organizational data reveals the complex ecosystem behind Greek life:

IRS B83 Texas-Registered Greek Organizations: 125+ entities including:

• Beta Nu Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity Housing Corporation Inc (EIN 462267515, Frisco, TX 75035)
• Texas Kappa Sigma Educational Foundation Inc (EIN 741380362, Fort Worth, TX 76147)
• Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity (EIN 746064445, Nederland, TX 77627)
• Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity (multiple EINs across Texas)

Metro Organization Concentrations:

• Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington: 510 Greek-related organizations
• Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land: 188 organizations
• Austin-Round Rock: 154 organizations
• College Station-Bryan: 42 organizations

This data matters for Harrison County families because:

• It identifies potential defendants beyond individual members
• It reveals insurance coverage sources through housing corporations and alumni associations
• It demonstrates the scale of Greek life infrastructure in Texas
• It provides investigation starting points for identifying responsible entities

Building a Hazing Case: Evidence, Damages, and Strategy for Uncertain Families

Evidence Collection: The Foundation of Every Successful Case

For Harrison County families facing hazing situations, immediate and thorough evidence preservation is critical. Evidence disappears rapidly—group chats are deleted, witnesses are coached, physical items are destroyed.

Digital Communications (Most Critical Evidence):

• Group Messaging: GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, fraternity-specific apps
• Social Media: Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok comments, Facebook Messenger
• Recovery Potential: Digital forensics can often recover deleted messages, but immediate screenshots are best
• Preservation Steps: Screenshot entire conversations with timestamps visible, back up to cloud storage, email copies to yourself

Photos and Videos:

• Injury Documentation: Photograph injuries immediately from multiple angles, include scale references, document progression over days
• Event Evidence: Capture videos or photos of hazing activities if safe to do so
• Location Evidence: Photograph houses, rooms, venues where hazing occurred
• Object Evidence: Document paddles, alcohol bottles, props, costumes used in hazing

Internal Organization Documents:

• Pledge Manuals: Initiation scripts, tradition lists, member expectations
• Communications: Emails, texts from officers about activities
• National Policies: Risk management manuals, anti-hazing training materials
• Financial Records: Dues payments, event budgets, alcohol purchases

University Records:

• Prior Conduct Files: Previous hazing violations, probation/suspension records
• Incident Reports: Campus police reports, student conduct complaints
• Clery Reports: Annual security reports documenting crime statistics
• Internal Communications: Emails among administrators about organizational risks

Medical and Psychological Records:

• Emergency Care: ER reports, ambulance records, hospitalization documentation
• Specialist Care: Surgery notes, rehabilitation records, ongoing treatment plans
• Psychological Evaluation: PTSD diagnoses, depression/anxiety treatment, therapy notes
• Lab Results: Toxicology reports, kidney/liver function tests, imaging studies

Witness Information:

• Other Pledges: Names, contact information, descriptions of shared experiences
• Members: Those who participated, witnessed, or expressed concerns
• Bystanders: Roommates, friends, significant others who noticed changes
• Experts: Medical professionals, Greek life culture experts, digital forensics specialists

Damages: What Harrison County Families Can Recover

In civil hazing litigation, damages aim to compensate victims and families for their losses while holding responsible parties accountable.

Economic Damages (Quantifiable Financial Losses):

• Medical Expenses: Past and future medical care, including emergency treatment, hospitalization, surgery, rehabilitation, medications, medical equipment
• Lost Earnings: Income lost due to injury recovery, reduced earning capacity from permanent disability
• Educational Costs: Tuition/fees for missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed graduation expenses
• Other Expenses: Property damage, relocation costs, therapy expenses

Non-Economic Damages (Compensating Subjective Harm):

• Physical Pain and Suffering: Compensation for pain from injuries, ongoing discomfort, loss of physical abilities
• Emotional Distress: PTSD, depression, anxiety, humiliation, loss of enjoyment of life
• Reputational Harm: Social stigma, difficulty transferring schools or obtaining employment
• Loss of Consortium: Impact on family relationships and support

Wrongful Death Damages (When Hazing Causes Fatalities):

• Economic Losses: Funeral/burial costs, loss of financial support, loss of inheritance
• Non-Economic Losses: Loss of companionship, love, guidance; grief and emotional suffering

Punitive Damages (When Conduct is Especially Egregious):

• Purpose: Punish defendants for reckless, willful, or malicious conduct; deter future hazing
• Availability: Subject to Texas caps but may be pursued in cases involving extreme conduct, cover-ups, or prior warnings

Case Strategy: Navigating Complex Hazing Litigation

Successful hazing litigation requires strategic navigation of multiple legal and practical challenges:

Defeating Common Defense Strategies:

• “Consent” Defense: Texas law explicitly states consent is not a defense to hazing
• “Rogue Chapter” Defense: Pattern evidence from national histories establishes foreseeability
• “Off-Campus” Defense: Location doesn’t eliminate liability when organizations sponsor or control activities
• “Policy Existence” Defense: Having anti-hazing policies doesn’t suffice if they’re not enforced
• “Sovereign Immunity” (Public Universities): Exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, individual capacity suits

Insurance Coverage Navigation:

• Multiple Policies: Identify all potential coverage through nationals, housing corporations, universities, individual members’ homeowner policies
• Coverage Disputes: Anticipate arguments that hazing constitutes “intentional conduct” excluded from coverage
• Bad Faith Claims: Pursue insurers who wrongfully deny coverage or fail to defend

Settlement vs. Trial Considerations:

• Most Cases Settle: Confidential settlements often provide compensation while protecting privacy
• Trial Readiness: Preparation for trial improves settlement leverage and ensures readiness if negotiations fail
• Public Accountability: Some families pursue trial to create public record and institutional reform

Multi-Defendant Coordination:

• Identifying All Responsible Parties: Individuals, local chapters, housing corporations, nationals, universities, third parties
• Allocation of Responsibility: Determining comparative fault among multiple defendants
• Joint Settlement Negotiations: Coordinating with multiple defense counsel and insurance carriers

For Harrison County families, working with attorneys experienced in multi-defendant hazing litigation is crucial, as these cases involve complex coordination among numerous parties with competing interests.

Practical Guides and FAQs for Uncertain Families

For Parents: Recognizing and Responding to Hazing

Warning Signs Your Child May Be Being Hazed:

• Physical Signs: Unexplained bruises, burns, cuts; extreme fatigue; weight changes; sleep deprivation; injuries to hands/back/legs; signs of alcohol poisoning
• Behavioral Changes: Sudden secrecy about activities; withdrawal from family/friends; personality changes (anxiety, depression, irritability); defensive reactions to questions; obsession with pleasing older members
• Academic Red Flags: Grades dropping; missing classes; skipping assignments for “mandatory” events; losing scholarships
• Financial Red Flags: Unexpected large expenses; buying excessive alcohol/items for members; overdrafts/credit card debt; unexplained money requests
• Digital Behavior: Constant group chat monitoring; anxiety about phone notifications; deleting messages obsessively; all-hours communication demands; social media posts showing concerning activities

How to Talk to Your Child About Hazing:

1. Ask Open Questions: “How are things going with [organization]?” “What do new members typically do?”
2. Listen Without Judgment: Create safe space for disclosure without immediate reaction
3. Express Concern, Not Accusation: “I’m worried about your safety” rather than “You’re being hazed”
4. Emphasize Support: Reiterate that their safety matters more than membership status
5. Document Disclosures: Write down what they share while details are fresh

Immediate Steps If You Suspect Hazing:

• Prioritize Safety: Remove from dangerous situations, seek medical attention if injured
• Preserve Evidence: Screenshot messages, photograph injuries, save physical items
• Document Everything: Write detailed notes including dates, times, locations, participants
• Seek Legal Guidance: Contact experienced hazing attorney before confronting organization or university
• Avoid Common Mistakes: Don’t delete evidence, don’t confront organization directly, don’t sign university agreements without review

For Students: Safety Planning and Rights Protection

Is This Hazing? Self-Assessment Questions:

• Am I being forced or pressured to do something unsafe or humiliating?
• Would I do this if there were no social consequences for refusing?
• Is this activity hidden from university officials or the public?
• Are older members making new members do things they don’t do themselves?
• Am I being told to keep secrets or lie about activities?
• Does this feel like initiation/affiliation rather than voluntary fun?

If you answer “yes” to any question, you’re likely experiencing hazing.

How to Exit Safely:

• Immediate Danger: Call 911, get to safe location, seek medical help
• Planning to Quit: Tell someone outside organization first, send written resignation, avoid “one last meeting”
• Safety Concerns: Document threats/harassment, report to university/police, seek protective orders if needed
• Legal Protection: Texas law protects good-faith reporters from liability

Your Legal Rights in Texas:

• Immunity for Reporting: You cannot be punished for calling 911 or seeking medical help in emergencies
• Crime Victim Status: You are the victim, not perpetrator, even if you “agreed”
• Civil Lawsuit Option: You can pursue damages even without criminal charges
• No-Contact Orders: Available through university or courts if harassed after reporting

Evidence Collection for Students:

• Digital Preservation: Screenshot all messages with timestamps, back up to cloud, don’t delete anything
• Photo/Video Documentation: Capture injuries, locations, objects; use scale references
• Medical Documentation: Seek care immediately, tell providers you were hazed, request records
• Witness Information: Document names/contacts of others who experienced or witnessed hazing

For Former Members/Witnesses: Navigating Moral and Legal Complexity

If you participated in hazing and now regret it, or witnessed hazing and fear consequences:

• Legal Exposure: Understand potential criminal and civil liability based on your role
• Cooperation Benefits: Testifying truthfully may provide legal protections and moral resolution
• Attorney Guidance: Seek independent legal advice before making statements
• Moral Responsibility: Your testimony could prevent future harm to others

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Hazing Case

MISTAKE #1: Deleting Evidence

• Why It’s Wrong: Looks like cover-up, may be obstruction of justice, eliminates crucial proof
• Right Approach: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content

MISTAKE #2: Confronting the Organization Directly

• Why It’s Wrong: Triggers evidence destruction, witness coaching, defense preparation
• Right Approach: Document thoroughly, consult attorney before any confrontation

MISTAKE #3: Signing University Agreements Without Review

• Why It’s Wrong: May waive legal rights, accept inadequate settlements, limit options
• Right Approach: Have attorney review all documents before signing

MISTAKE #4: Posting on Social Media

• Why It’s Wrong: Defense attorneys screenshot everything, inconsistencies hurt credibility
• Right Approach: Document privately, let attorney control public messaging

MISTAKE #5: Waiting for University Resolution

• Why It’s Wrong: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, statutes run, university controls narrative
• Right Approach: Preserve evidence now, consult attorney immediately

MISTAKE #6: Talking to Insurance Adjusters Unrepresented

• Why It’s Wrong: Recorded statements are used against you, early settlements are lowball offers
• Right Approach: “My attorney will contact you”

MISTAKE #7: Letting Your Child Return for “One Last Meeting”

• Why It’s Wrong: Opportunity for pressure, intimidation, statement extraction
• Right Approach: Once considering legal action, all communication through attorney

Frequently Asked Questions for Harrison County Families

“Can we sue a Texas university for hazing?”
Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities (UH, Texas A&M, UT) have sovereign immunity limitations but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and individual capacity suits. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Each case requires fact-specific analysis—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case evaluation.

“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. Texas Education Code §37.152 makes hazing a Class B misdemeanor by default but elevates it to a state jail felony if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individual officers can also face misdemeanor charges for failing to report hazing.

“What if my child ‘agreed’ to the activities?”
Texas Education Code §37.155 explicitly states consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” under peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion isn’t voluntary. Your child’s participation doesn’t eliminate liability for those who organized, supervised, or coerced the hazing.

“How long do we have to file a lawsuit?”
Generally 2 years from date of injury or death in Texas, but exceptions exist. The “discovery rule” may extend time if harm or cause wasn’t immediately known. In cover-up situations, statutes may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears quickly. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately for timeline assessment.

“What if hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
Location doesn’t eliminate liability. Universities and nationals can still be liable based on sponsorship, control, knowledge, and foreseeability. Many major hazing cases (Pi Delta Psi retreat, Sigma Pi unofficial house) occurred off-campus and resulted in substantial judgments.

“Will this be confidential or public?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. You can request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. We prioritize family privacy while pursuing accountability, though some families choose public litigation to prevent future harm.

“How much will this cost us?”
We work on contingency fee basis—you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation. We advance case expenses and are reimbursed only if successful. This makes quality legal representation accessible regardless of financial circumstances.

“What if the fraternity/sorority has already been suspended?”
Suspension doesn’t eliminate liability and may actually strengthen your case by demonstrating institutional knowledge of problems. Even “underground” organizations continuing after suspension may create liability for nationals who maintain contact or collect dues.

“Can international students pursue hazing cases?”
Yes, international students have the same legal rights and protections. We provide Spanish-language services and understand unique concerns for international students and families.

“What if criminal charges are also involved?”
We can coordinate with criminal defense counsel if needed. Ralph Manginello’s HCCLA membership and criminal defense experience ensure proper handling of intersecting civil and criminal matters.

Why Attorney911 for Hazing Cases: Texas-Based Experience for Harrison County Families

Our Unique Qualifications for Texas Hazing Litigation

When your family faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. For families in Uncertain and throughout Harrison County, Attorney911 brings specific qualifications that matter in hazing cases.

Insurance Insider Advantage (Lupe Peña’s Defense Background):
Mr. Lupe Peña spent years as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm, learning exactly how insurance companies value claims, deploy delay tactics, and fight coverage. This insider knowledge is crucial when facing fraternity and university insurers who routinely deny hazing claims as “intentional acts” excluded from coverage. We know their playbook because we used to run it.

Complex Institutional Litigation Experience (Ralph Manginello’s BP Credential):
Our involvement in the BP Texas City explosion litigation—one of the few Texas firms selected—demonstrates our capability against billion-dollar defendants with unlimited legal resources. Universities and national fraternities deploy similar defense strategies: delay, deny, defend. We’re not intimidated because we’ve faced deeper pockets before—and won.

Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Results:
We have recovered millions for families in wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases, working with economists to value lifetime care needs and loss of earning capacity. Hazing cases involving permanent injuries (brain damage, organ failure) or fatalities require this sophisticated damages analysis to ensure fair compensation.

Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise (HCCLA Membership):
Ralph Manginello’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association provides critical understanding of how criminal hazing charges intersect with civil litigation. We can advise families on both tracks, coordinate with criminal defense counsel when needed, and understand the defense strategies used in both arenas.

Investigative Depth and Expert Network:
We maintain relationships with medical experts, digital forensics specialists, Greek life culture experts, economists, and psychologists who help build compelling hazing cases. In the UH Pi Kappa Phi case, we utilized medical experts to establish rhabdomyolysis and kidney injury causation—critical for proving damages.

Texas-Specific Geographic and Legal Knowledge:
Based in Houston with offices in Austin and Beaumont, we understand Texas courts, judges, and procedures. For Harrison County families, this means efficient navigation of potentially complex multi-jurisdictional cases involving students at various Texas universities.

Our Approach to Hazing Cases

Immediate Response and Evidence Preservation:
We act within hours, not days, because hazing evidence disappears rapidly. Our evidence preservation protocols include digital forensics consultation, witness interviewing, and immediate legal demands to prevent evidence destruction.

Comprehensive Defendant Identification:
We look beyond obvious parties to identify all potentially liable entities: individual members, chapter officers, housing corporations, alumni associations, national headquarters, universities, third-party vendors, and property owners. The more defendants, the greater the insurance coverage and accountability.

Pattern Evidence Development:
We research national hazing histories to establish foreseeability—showing that similar conduct caused injuries at other chapters, putting nationals on notice of risks they failed to address.

Damage Maximization Through Expert Collaboration:
We work with medical experts, life care planners, economists, and mental health professionals to fully document both economic and non-economic damages, ensuring compensation reflects true harm.

Trial Readiness for Settlement Leverage:
We prepare every case as if it’s going to trial, because that mindset produces better investigations, stronger evidence, and maximum settlement leverage. Institutions settle more fairly when they know we’re trial-ready.

Privacy Protection and Strategic Communication:
We help families navigate media attention, social media risks, and institutional pressure while protecting privacy and case integrity.

For Harrison County Families Specifically

We understand that hazing cases affecting Uncertain students involve unique considerations:

• Geographic Logistics: We manage cases efficiently whether your student attends UH, Texas A&M, UT, or other Texas schools
• Local Court Familiarity: We know Texas courts and procedures where your case may be heard
• East Texas Community Understanding: We respect family privacy concerns in close-knit communities
• Practical Case Management: We minimize travel burdens through technology and strategic planning
• Comprehensive Service: From initial consultation through resolution, we handle all aspects so families can focus on healing

Contact Attorney911: Your Harrison County Hazing Legal Resource

Confidential Consultation: Your First Step Toward Accountability

If hazing has affected your family, we offer confidential, no-obligation consultations to help you understand your options. During your consultation, we’ll:

• Listen to your story without judgment
• Review any evidence you’ve preserved
• Explain legal rights and options under Texas law
• Discuss practical considerations for your specific situation
• Answer questions about process, timeline, and what to expect
• Provide honest assessment of case strengths and challenges

There’s no pressure to hire us— we believe informed families make the best decisions for their circumstances.

What Makes Our Hazing Practice Different

We’re Currently Litigating Major Texas Hazing Cases:
Right now, we’re representing Leonel Bermudez in the $10 million Pi Kappa Phi case against the University of Houston. We’re not theorizing about hazing litigation—we’re actively doing it, navigating the exact challenges your family may face.

We Understand Both Sides of Insurance Fights:
Mr. Peña’s defense background means we anticipate insurer tactics and counter them effectively. We know how to overcome coverage denials and bad faith arguments.

We’re Not Intimidated by Institutional Defendants:
Our BP litigation experience means we’re comfortable against well-funded defendants with aggressive defense counsel. We match their resources with preparation and strategy.

We Prioritize Prevention Through Accountability:
While securing compensation for families, we also pursue institutional reforms that prevent future hazing. Many settlements include safety improvements and policy changes.

Contact Information for Harrison County Families

24/7 Emergency Line: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct Office: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com (Ralph Manginello), lupe@atty911.com (Lupe Peña)

Spanish Language Services:
Hablamos Español – Contact Mr. Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Service Areas:
While based in Houston, we serve families throughout Texas including Uncertain, Marshall, and all of Harrison County. We handle cases involving Texas universities regardless of where families reside.

Take the First Step Today

Hazing cases involve strict deadlines, disappearing evidence, and institutional pressure to remain silent. The sooner you contact us, the better we can protect evidence, document injuries, and begin building your case.

Call 1-888-ATTY-911 now for immediate consultation. If your child has been hazed at any Texas campus—whether nearby or hours from home—you don’t have to face this alone. We’ll help you navigate this difficult situation with expertise, empathy, and commitment to accountability.

Plain Text Links to Key Resources

News Coverage of Leonel Bermudez / UH Pi Kappa Phi Case:

• Click2Houston Report: https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/
• ABC13 Coverage: https://abc13.com/post/waterboarding-forced-eating-physical-punishment-lawsuit-alleges-abuse-faced-injured-pledge-uhs-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity/18186418/
• Hoodline Summary: https://hoodline.com/2025/11/university-of-houston-and-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity-face-10m-lawsuit-over-alleged-hazing-and-abuse/

Attorney911 Educational Videos:

• Evidence Preservation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs
• Statute of Limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c
• Client Mistakes to Avoid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY
• Contingency Fee Explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc

Attorney911 Main Website: https://attorney911.com

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com