The Complete Guide to Fraternity & Sorority Hazing Lawsuits for Star Harbor, Texas Families
A Parent’s Worst Nightmare: When “Tradition” Turns to Trauma
Imagine your child, a bright student from Star Harbor, excitedly begins their fall semester at a Texas university. The promise of friendship, belonging, and tradition leads them to accept a bid from a fraternity or sorority. What starts as team-building exercises and social events slowly escalates. Late-night “study sessions” become mandatory workouts at 3 AM. Encouragement to participate becomes coercion. Humiliating costumes, forced alcohol consumption, and exhausting physical trials are disguised as “character building.” Then comes the call—or worse, the silence—that tells you something has gone terribly wrong. Your child is in the hospital with a condition you’ve never heard of: rhabdomyolysis. Their kidneys are failing. Their urine is brown. The organization they trusted has nearly destroyed them.
Right now, in Houston, we are fighting exactly this scenario. We represent Leonel Bermudez in a $10 million hazing and abuse lawsuit against the University of Houston, the Pi Kappa Phi national fraternity, its Beta Nu chapter at UH, and 13 individual fraternity leaders. According to detailed media reports from Click2Houston and ABC13, Bermudez was subjected to a “pledge fanny pack” rule filled with humiliating items, forced through extreme physical hazing including being sprayed in the face with a hose “like waterboarding,” made to consume milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting, and required to perform hundreds of push-ups and squats under threat of expulsion. The result was catastrophic: severe muscle breakdown leading to rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney failure, and a four-day hospitalization with ongoing risk of permanent damage.
If your family in Star Harbor, Athens, Mabank, or anywhere across Henderson County is facing a hazing crisis—whether at a local community college or a major university hours away—you are not alone, and you have rights. This comprehensive guide explains what hazing really looks like in 2025, how Texas law protects your child, and what legal options exist to hold organizations accountable.
IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:
If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
- Photograph injuries from multiple angles
- Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
- Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
- Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity/sorority
- Sign anything from the university or insurance company
- Post details on public social media
- Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
- Universities move quickly to control the narrative
- We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation
Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like—Beyond the Stereotypes
A Modern Definition: Coercion Disguised as Community
Hazing in 2025 is not just “boys being boys” or harmless pranks. It is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. The critical element is the power imbalance between new members and established members, and the implicit or explicit threat that refusal means exclusion.
A common misconception we hear from Star Harbor families is, “But my child agreed to it.” Texas law recognizes what psychology confirms: “consent” under peer pressure, fear of exclusion, and desire for belonging is not true voluntary consent. The Texas Education Code explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing—a legal principle that protects your child even if they went along with dangerous activities.
The Five Modern Hazing Categories
1. Alcohol and Substance Hazing
This remains the most common—and most deadly—form of hazing. It includes forced or coerced drinking games like “lineups,” “century clubs,” or “big/little” nights where new members must consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. The Pi Kappa Phi case at UH involved forced consumption of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting, followed immediately by sprints. What looks like “party culture” is often calculated coercion with life-threatening consequences.
2. Physical Hazing
Beyond traditional paddling, modern physical hazing includes extreme calisthenics disguised as “workouts” or “conditioning.” In the UH case, Bermudez was forced through 100+ push-ups and 500 squats in a single session. Other methods include sleep deprivation, food/water restriction, exposure to extreme temperatures, and dangerous “trust exercises” that risk serious injury.
3. Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing
This category includes forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts, degrading costumes, and acts with racial or sexist overtones. The “pledge fanny pack” in the UH case—containing condoms, sex toys, and other humiliating items—represents this psychological degradation designed to break down personal boundaries.
4. Psychological Hazing
Verbal abuse, threats, isolation, manipulation, and public shaming—both in person and online—create psychological trauma that can last long after physical injuries heal. The constant fear of expulsion for not complying, as reported in the UH case, creates a coercive environment where students feel they have no real choice.
5. Digital/Online Hazing
The smartphone era has created new hazing frontiers: group chat dares, social media challenges, forced sharing of compromising content, and 24/7 accessibility expectations. Students in Star Harbor might be pressured to create TikTok videos, participate in Instagram story dares, or maintain constant communication under threat of punishment—all documented digitally, which can become crucial evidence.
Where Hazing Happens: It’s Not Just “Fraternities”
While Greek organizations receive significant attention, hazing occurs across campus organizations:
- Fraternities and Sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural)
- Corps of Cadets, ROTC, and military-style groups
- Athletic teams (from football to cheerleading)
- Marching bands and performance groups
- Spirit and tradition organizations
- Some academic, service, and cultural clubs
The common thread is tradition, secrecy, and power imbalance. Organizations often defend harmful practices as “how we’ve always done it,” creating cultures where each new class endures what previous classes suffered, perpetuating the cycle.
The Texas Legal Framework: Your Child’s Rights and Protections
Texas Education Code Chapter 37: The Hazing Statute
Texas has specific anti-hazing laws that apply whether incidents occur on-campus or off-campus. For families in Star Harbor and Henderson County, understanding these provisions is crucial:
§ 37.151 Definition: Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety and occurs for purposes of initiation, affiliation, or membership in any organization.
Key Points for Star Harbor Families:
- Location doesn’t matter—off-campus houses, retreats, or remote locations are covered
- Mental health harm counts as seriously as physical harm
- “Reckless” conduct qualifies—they don’t need to have intended harm
- The law applies to all student organizations, not just Greek life
§ 37.152 Criminal Penalties:
- Class B Misdemeanor: Basic hazing (up to 180 days jail, $2,000 fine)
- Class A Misdemeanor: Hazing causing injury requiring medical treatment
- State Jail Felony: Hazing causing serious bodily injury or death
§ 37.155 Critical Protection: Consent is NOT a defense. Even if your child “agreed” to participate, the organization and individuals can still face criminal charges and civil liability.
Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Understanding the Difference
Criminal Cases:
- Brought by the state (prosecutor)
- Purpose: Punishment (jail, fines, probation)
- Typical charges: hazing, assault, furnishing alcohol to minors, manslaughter in fatal cases
- Requires proof “beyond a reasonable doubt”
Civil Cases:
- Brought by victims or surviving families
- Purpose: Compensation and accountability
- Legal theories: negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, emotional distress
- Requires proof “by a preponderance of the evidence” (more likely than not)
Crucial Insight: These cases can proceed simultaneously. A criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case. In fact, many hazing cases see civil lawsuits filed while criminal investigations are ongoing, as evidence preservation is time-sensitive.
Federal Laws Overlaying Texas Protections
Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024):
This federal law requires colleges receiving federal aid to:
- Report hazing incidents more transparently
- Strengthen hazing education and prevention programs
- Maintain public hazing data (phased in by 2026)
For Star Harbor students at Texas public universities, this means increased transparency and reporting requirements.
Title IX & Clery Act:
When hazing involves sexual harassment, assault, or gender-based hostility, Title IX obligations trigger additional protections and reporting requirements. The Clery Act requires reporting certain crimes—many hazing incidents involve assault or alcohol crimes that must be included in campus crime statistics.
National Case Patterns: What History Teaches Us About Accountability
The Alcohol Poisoning Pattern: Repeated Tragedies
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)
The 20-year-old pledge was forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “big/little” event. He died from alcohol poisoning. The case resulted in multiple criminal convictions and a $10 million settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national, ~$3M from BGSU). Takeaway for Star Harbor families: The “big/little” dynamic is a recurring deadly script in fraternity culture.
Max Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017)
Pledge forced to participate in a “Bible study” drinking game where incorrect answers required drinking. He died with a 0.495% BAC. The case led to Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act making hazing a felony. Takeaway: Drinking games disguised as “education” are particularly dangerous and legally indefensible.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017)
Pledge died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” where pledges were given handles of hard liquor. The case caused FSU to temporarily suspend all Greek life. Takeaway: National patterns repeat—the same organization (Pi Kappa Phi) now faces serious allegations at University of Houston.
Physical and Ritualized Hazing: Violence Disguised as Tradition
Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013)
Pledge was blindfolded, weighted with a backpack, and repeatedly tackled during a “glass ceiling” ritual at a remote retreat. He died from traumatic brain injuries. Result: The national fraternity was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. Takeaway for Henderson County families: “Retreats” and off-campus locations don’t provide immunity—they often enable more dangerous conduct.
Athletic Program Hazing: Beyond Greek Life
Northwestern University Football (2023–2025)
Former players alleged sexualized, racist hazing within the football program over multiple years. Multiple lawsuits followed, the head coach was fired, and the university faced massive reputational damage. Takeaway: Hazing exists in multi-million dollar athletic programs with the same patterns of abuse and cover-up.
What These Cases Mean for Star Harbor Families
These national precedents create legal pathways for Texas families:
- Pattern Evidence: When a Texas chapter repeats conduct that caused deaths elsewhere, that shows foreseeability—the national organization should have known this could happen.
- Settlement Frameworks: The $10M Foltz settlement and $6.1M Gruver verdict establish value ranges for serious injury and death cases.
- Institutional Accountability: Courts increasingly hold universities responsible for what they knew or should have known about dangerous traditions.
Texas University Focus: Where Star Harbor Students Attend
Star Harbor families typically send students to a mix of local institutions, regional universities, and major Texas hubs. Understanding the hazing landscape at these schools is crucial.
Local and Regional Institutions Accessible to Star Harbor Families
Trinity Valley Community College (Athens, TX)
Just 15 miles from Star Harbor, TVCC serves many Henderson County students. While community colleges typically have less Greek life, hazing can occur in athletic teams, cheer squads, and student organizations. The college has anti-hazing policies aligned with Texas law, and incidents would fall under Henderson County jurisdiction.
University of Texas at Tyler (UT Tyler)
Approximately 60 miles from Star Harbor, UT Tyler has growing Greek life and student organizations. The university publishes hazing policies and reporting procedures through its Dean of Students office. East Texas families should know that hazing incidents here would involve Smith County courts and Tyler police jurisdictions.
Texas A&M University-Commerce
About 70 miles away in Hunt County, A&M-Commerce hosts multiple fraternities and sororities. The university has dealt with hazing incidents historically and maintains conduct records. Commerce police and Hunt County courts would handle local incidents.
Major Texas Universities: Where Henderson County Students Often Transfer
University of Houston (UH) – Current Ground Zero for Texas Hazing Litigation
Campus Culture: As Texas’s third-largest university, UH hosts extensive Greek life with over 40 fraternities and sororities across multiple councils. The urban commuter-campus mix creates unique dynamics where off-campus housing and events are common.
The Current Case – Leonel Bermudez v. UH & Pi Kappa Phi:
We are actively litigating this $10 million lawsuit that alleges:
- Systematic hazing throughout Fall 2025 pledge period
- “Pledge fanny pack” humiliation rules
- Extreme physical abuse including hose spraying “like waterboarding”
- Forced consumption leading to vomiting followed by immediate exercise
- 100+ push-ups and 500 squats leading to rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure
- Chapter suspension (Nov 6, 2025) and charter surrender (Nov 14, 2025)
UH’s Response:
The university called the conduct “deeply disturbing,” promised disciplinary measures up to expulsion, and stated cooperation with law enforcement. This case demonstrates UH’s willingness to take action when presented with concrete evidence.
How UH Hazing Cases Proceed:
- Jurisdiction: Harris County courts, Houston police or UHPD
- Potential defendants: Individuals, local chapter, Pi Kappa Phi national, UH system
- Evidence sources: GroupMe chats, medical records, chapter documents
What UH Students & Star Harbor Parents Should Know:
- Report to: UH Dean of Students, Office of Student Conduct, UHPD
- Evidence preservation is critical—messages disappear quickly
- Prior incidents can be discovered through public records requests
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately if facing UH hazing issues
Texas A&M University – Corps Culture and Greek Life
Campus Culture: The Corps of Cadets creates a unique environment where military tradition intersects with Greek life. This combination can sometimes escalate hazing under the guise of “discipline” and “tradition.”
Documented Incidents:
- Sigma Alpha Epsilon Chemical Burns Case (2021): Pledges allegedly had industrial-strength cleaner poured on them, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The fraternity was suspended for two years.
- Corps of Cadets “Roasted Pig” Case (2023): Cadet alleged being bound between beds in a degrading position with an apple in his mouth during hazing. Sought over $1 million in damages.
- Texas A&M Hazing Transparency: The university maintains conduct records but is less transparent than UT Austin about public listings.
Unique Aspects for Star Harbor Families:
- Corps hazing follows different traditions but similar patterns of abuse
- Brazos County jurisdiction (College Station police, county courts)
- Both criminal (misdemeanor/felony hazing) and civil options exist
- Evidence tip: Corps and Greek life often use different communication channels—preserve all of them
University of Texas at Austin – Transparency and Patterns
Campus Culture: UT Austin’s public hazing violations log (hazing.utexas.edu) makes it one of Texas’s most transparent universities. This transparency helps families see patterns but also shows how often violations recur.
Documented Incidents from Public Log:
- Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): New members directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. Outcome: Chapter probation and mandatory hazing prevention education.
- Texas Wranglers (Multiple Years): Spirit organization cited for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, punishment-based practices.
- Sigma Alpha Epsilon Assault Case (2024): Australian exchange student alleged assault resulting in dislocated leg, broken ligaments, fractured tibia, broken nose. Chapter already under suspension for prior violations.
Why UT’s Transparency Matters for Star Harbor Families:
- Pattern Evidence: Repeated violations by the same organization strengthen negligence claims
- Prior Notice: University knowledge of previous incidents creates stronger duty arguments
- Settlement Leverage: Public records become negotiation assets
Jurisdiction for UT Cases: Travis County courts, UTPD or Austin police. Many national fraternities have Texas headquarters in Austin, creating additional jurisdictional hooks.
Southern Methodist University (SMU) – Private University Dynamics
Campus Culture: As a private university with affluent student population, SMU’s Greek life is prominent but operates with less public transparency than state schools.
Documented Incidents:
- Kappa Alpha Order (2017): New members reportedly paddled, forced to drink, deprived of sleep. Chapter suspended until approximately 2021.
- SMU’s Reporting Systems: Anonymous reporting via Real Response app, but outcomes often remain private.
Special Considerations for Star Harbor Families:
- Private university = different legal standards than public institutions
- Dallas County jurisdiction (University Park police, Dallas courts)
- Often higher insurance limits due to affluent student demographics
- Strategic insight: Private settlements are common but require experienced negotiation
Baylor University – Religious Identity and Accountability History
Campus Culture: Baylor’s religious identity and recent history with athletic scandals create complex dynamics around accountability and transparency.
Documented Incidents:
- Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): 14 players suspended following hazing investigation; staggered suspensions affected team season.
- Greek Life Context: Baylor has fewer Greek organizations than larger schools but similar risk patterns.
Considerations for Henderson County Families:
- McLennan County jurisdiction (Waco police, county courts)
- Religious framing sometimes used to defend or excuse behavior
- Important: Prior scandals have made Baylor sensitive to bad publicity—this can affect settlement dynamics
The Greek Organization Landscape: National Patterns Meet Local Chapters
Why National Histories Matter for Star Harbor Cases
When a Pi Kappa Phi chapter at UH engages in dangerous hazing, the national organization’s history with Andrew Coffey’s death at Florida State becomes critically relevant. This pattern evidence shows:
- The national knew or should have known these practices were occurring
- Their anti-hazing policies were inadequate or unenforced
- They failed to take sufficient action to prevent repeat incidents
Major Organizations Present at Texas Universities with National Hazing Histories
Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ) – “Pike”
- National History: Stone Foltz death (BGSU, $10M settlement), multiple other alcohol-related deaths
- Texas Presence: Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor
- Pattern: “Big/Little” alcohol hazing, forced consumption traditions
- Legal Significance: National already paid $7M in Foltz settlement—shows recognition of severe risk
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ) – “SAE”
- National History: Multiple deaths nationwide, traumatic brain injury lawsuit (Alabama), chemical burns case (Texas A&M)
- Texas Presence: All five major Texas universities
- Pattern: Physical abuse, dangerous substances, repeated violations
- Legal Significance: Known as “hazing repeat offenders” in court documents
Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ)
- National History: Andrew Coffey death (FSU), now current UH case
- Texas Presence: UH (currently suspended), other campuses
- Pattern: Alcohol hazing, physical endurance tests
- Legal Significance: Active litigation shows ongoing risk management failures
Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ)
- National History: Max Gruver death (LSU, felony hazing law resulted)
- Texas Presence: Multiple Texas campuses
- Pattern: Drinking games disguised as education
- Legal Significance: $6.1M verdict establishes case value for serious injury
How We Use National Patterns in Star Harbor Cases
- Establishing Foreseeability: Show courts that the national organization had prior notice of exact same dangerous practices
- Negligence Arguments: Demonstrate that policies were inadequate given known risks
- Punitive Damages: Show willful disregard for student safety
- Insurance Coverage: Pattern evidence can defeat “unforeseeable accident” defenses
Building a Hazing Case: Evidence, Strategy, and What to Expect
The Evidence Matrix: What Wins Cases in 2025
Digital Communications (Most Critical Evidence):
- GroupMe/WhatsApp/iMessage Threads: Screenshot EVERYTHING before deletion
- Social Media: Instagram stories, TikTok videos, Snapchat memories
- Chapter Apps: Many fraternities use custom apps for communication
- Email Chains: Official chapter communications about events
- Digital Forensics: Even deleted messages can often be recovered—don’t reset phones!
Physical Evidence:
- Medical Records: ER reports, hospitalization records, lab results (like the critical CK levels showing rhabdomyolysis in the UH case)
- Injury Documentation: Photograph bruises, burns, injuries from multiple angles daily
- Objects: Paddles, costumes, alcohol bottles, “pledge manuals”
- Clothing: Don’t wash items that have blood, vomit, or substance stains
Institutional Records:
- University Conduct Files: Prior violations, probation records, warning letters
- National Fraternity Files: Risk management reports, incident histories
- Insurance Policies: Coverage documents for chapters and nationals
- Property Records: Who owns the house where hazing occurred
Witness Testimony:
- Other pledges (often afraid but may cooperate with protection)
- Former members who quit over hazing concerns
- Roommates, significant others, friends who observed changes
- Medical providers who treated injuries
The Damages Framework: What Families Can Recover
Economic Damages (Quantifiable Losses):
- Medical Expenses: Past and future care—in the UH case, this included hospitalization, ongoing kidney monitoring, potential future dialysis
- Lost Income/Earning Capacity: Missed semesters, delayed career entry, reduced earning potential if permanent injury
- Educational Costs: Tuition for interrupted education, lost scholarships
- Therapy/Treatment: PTSD treatment, psychological counseling, rehabilitation
Non-Economic Damages (Substantial but Subjective):
- Physical Pain & Suffering: From injuries and recovery
- Emotional Distress: PTSD, depression, anxiety, humiliation
- Loss of Enjoyment: Can’t participate in college life, sports, activities
- Reputational Harm: Social stigma, difficulty transferring schools
Wrongful Death Damages (For Fatal Cases):
- Funeral/burial costs
- Loss of financial support
- Loss of companionship, love, guidance
- Parental grief and suffering
Punitive Damages (When Conduct is Egregious):
- To punish particularly reckless or malicious behavior
- To deter future hazing
- Available under Texas law when defendants show “conscious indifference”
Case Strategy: How We Approach Hazing Litigation
Phase 1: Immediate Response (First 48 Hours)
- Evidence preservation before deletion
- Medical documentation and specialist referrals
- Witness interviews while memories are fresh
- Initial legal demands to preserve evidence
Phase 2: Investigation (Weeks 1-12)
- Subpoena university and national fraternity records
- Digital forensics on phones and computers
- Identify all potential defendants: individuals, chapter, national, university, property owners
- Consult medical experts to document full extent of harm
Phase 3: Negotiation & Litigation (Months 3-24+)
- Demand packages to insurance companies
- Settlement negotiations
- If necessary, file lawsuit and begin discovery
- Prepare for trial while seeking fair settlement
Why Insurance Knowledge Matters:
Mr. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney gives us critical insight. We know how fraternity and university insurers:
- Value and undervalue claims
- Use delay tactics to pressure families
- Argue coverage exclusions for “intentional acts”
- We counter with time-bound strategies and trial readiness
Practical Guide for Star Harbor Parents, Students, and Witnesses
For Parents: Recognizing and Responding to Hazing
Warning Signs Your Child May Be Being Hazed:
- Unexplained injuries or frequent “accidents”
- Extreme exhaustion beyond normal college stress
- Sudden secrecy about organization activities
- Personality changes: anxiety, depression, withdrawal
- Constant phone use for group chat monitoring
- Financial requests without clear explanation
- Academic performance dropping suddenly
What to Do If You Suspect Hazing:
- Prioritize Safety: If immediate danger, call 911
- Document Everything: Write down what your child tells you with dates/times
- Preserve Evidence: Help them screenshot messages, photograph injuries
- Medical Attention: Insist on medical evaluation—documentation is critical
- Consult Attorney: Call 1-888-ATTY-911 before confronting organization or university
- Report Strategically: With legal guidance, report to appropriate authorities
Critical Questions to Ask (Non-Confrontationally):
- “How are things going with [organization]? Are you enjoying it?”
- “What do they ask new members to do?”
- “Is there anything that makes you uncomfortable?”
- “Do you feel like you can leave if you want to?”
- “Are they asking you to keep secrets?”
For Students: Self-Protection and Safe Exit Strategies
Is This Hazing? Ask Yourself:
- Would I do this if there were no social consequences?
- Is this dangerous, degrading, or illegal?
- Would my parents/university approve if they knew exactly what’s happening?
- Am I being told to keep secrets or lie?
If You Need to Exit Safely:
- Immediate Danger: Call 911 first
- Tell Someone Outside: Contact parent, RA, trusted friend first
- Formal Resignation: Email/text chapter leadership: “I resign effective immediately”
- Do NOT Attend “One Last Meeting”: This is often a pressure/intimidation tactic
- Document Retaliation: If harassed after leaving, document everything
Evidence Collection for Students:
- Screenshots: Capture full conversations with timestamps
- Voice Memos: Texas is one-party consent—you can record conversations you’re part of
- Photos: Injuries, locations, objects used in hazing
- Medical Records: Tell providers you were hazed so it’s documented
- Save Everything: Don’t delete anything, even if embarrassed
For Witnesses/Former Members: Doing the Right Thing Safely
We understand the complex position of witnesses and former members. You may feel guilt, fear of consequences, or loyalty conflicts. Consider:
Your Legal Position:
- You may need your own attorney (we can refer you)
- Cooperation can sometimes lead to limited immunity or favorable treatment
- Your testimony may prevent future injuries or deaths
How to Come Forward:
- Consult with an attorney about your exposure
- Document what you know while memory is fresh
- Consider anonymous reporting if fearful
- Know that many witnesses find relief in helping achieve accountability
Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case
1. Letting Your Child Delete Evidence
What seems like protecting privacy actually destroys your case. Preserve everything immediately.
2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly
This triggers evidence destruction, witness coaching, and legal preparation against you.
3. Signing University “Resolution” Forms
Universities often pressure quick settlements far below case value. Never sign without attorney review.
4. Posting on Social Media
Defense attorneys monitor everything. Inconsistencies hurt credibility and can waive privileges.
5. Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”
Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, statute of limitations runs while you wait.
6. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without Counsel
Recorded statements are used against you. Early settlements are always lowball offers.
We cover these critical mistakes in detail in our educational video: Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case.
Frequently Asked Questions for Star Harbor Families
“Can we sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities (UH, Texas A&M, UT) have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) have fewer protections. Every case is fact-specific—call 1-888-ATTY-911 for case analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. Texas law makes hazing a state jail felony if it causes serious bodily injury or death. The UH case involving rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure would likely qualify for felony charges if prosecutors pursue them.
“What if my child ‘agreed’ to the activities?”
Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states: consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” under peer pressure and power imbalance isn’t valid consent.
“How long do we have to file a lawsuit?”
Generally 2 years from date of injury or death in Texas, but the “discovery rule” may extend this if harm wasn’t immediately known. In hazing cases with cover-ups, statutes may be tolled. Time is critical—call immediately.
“What if it happened off-campus at a private house?”
Location doesn’t eliminate liability. Universities and nationals can still be liable based on sponsorship, control, and knowledge. Many major cases (Pi Delta Psi retreat) occurred off-campus.
“Will this be confidential?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. We prioritize your family’s privacy while pursuing accountability. Public trials are rare but sometimes necessary for justice.
“How much does it cost to hire Attorney911?”
We work on contingency—no fee unless we win. Learn more in our video: How Do Contingency Fees Work?
“What if we’re not in Houston?”
We serve families throughout Texas, including Star Harbor and Henderson County. Initial consultations can be by phone/video, and we travel as needed for case work.
Why Attorney911 for Star Harbor Hazing Cases
Our Texas Hazing Intelligence Advantage
Unlike general personal injury firms, we maintain a proprietary Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine built from public records, including:
IRS B83 Data – 125+ Texas-Registered Greek Organizations:
We track the legal entities behind Greek life across Texas. For example:
- Pi Kappa Phi Delta Omega Chapter Building Corporation (EIN 371768785) – Missouri City, TX
- Beta Nu Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity Housing Corporation Inc (EIN 462267515) – Frisco, TX
- Sigma Phi Epsilon Texas Eta (EIN 824398421) – Richmond, TX
- Alpha Sigma Phi Fraternity Inc – multiple Texas chapters with separate corporate entities
Texas University Network – 96 Campuses:
We understand the specific policies, jurisdictions, and patterns at Texas schools where Star Harbor students attend.
Metro-Level Organization Tracking:
- 510 Greek organizations in Dallas-Fort Worth metro
- 188 in Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land metro
- 154 in Austin-Round Rock metro
- 86 in San Antonio metro
This data-driven approach means we don’t start from zero when investigating your case. We already know the corporate structures, insurance carriers, and prior patterns.
Unique Qualifications for Hazing Litigation
Insurance Insider Knowledge (Mr. Lupe Peña):
As a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm, Mr. Peña knows exactly how fraternity and university insurers:
- Value and undervalue hazing claims
- Use Independent Medical Exams (IMEs) to reduce settlements
- Deploy delay tactics to pressure families
- Argue coverage exclusions
His insider perspective is invaluable for countering their strategies.
Complex Institutional Litigation (Ralph Manginello):
Our involvement in BP Texas City explosion litigation proves our capability against billion-dollar defendants with unlimited legal budgets. Universities and national fraternities use similar tactics—we know how to fight them.
Dual Civil/Criminal Expertise:
Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) means we understand both sides of hazing cases. We can advise on:
- Criminal exposure for witnesses/participants
- How criminal cases interact with civil litigation
- Constitutional protections during investigations
Multi-Million Dollar Results:
From logging accident brain injuries to wrongful death cases, we have recovered millions for Texas families. We apply the same rigorous economic analysis to hazing cases, working with life care planners, economists, and vocational experts to establish true case value.
Spanish Language Services:
Mr. Peña speaks fluent Spanish—critical for serving Texas’s Hispanic community. Se habla Español.
How We Investigate Star Harbor Hazing Cases
Phase 1: Evidence Preservation
- Immediate digital forensics before deletion
- Witness interviews while memories are fresh
- Medical expert consultation to document injuries
- Preservation letters to all potential defendants
Phase 2: Institutional Discovery
- Subpoena university conduct records
- Obtain national fraternity risk management files
- Research prior incidents through our Texas Haze Intelligence Engine
- Identify all insurance coverage sources
Phase 3: Strategic Litigation
- Demand packages backed by thorough investigation
- Negotiation from strength, not desperation
- Trial preparation that signals serious intent
- Settlement only when full accountability achieved
Call to Action for Star Harbor Families
You Don’t Have to Face This Alone
If hazing has impacted your family—whether your child attends school in Henderson County, at a regional university, or at a major Texas campus—we are here to help. The path from trauma to accountability is difficult, but you don’t have to walk it alone.
What to Expect in Your Free Consultation
When you call 1-888-ATTY-911:
- We listen to your story without judgment
- Review any evidence you’ve preserved
- Explain your legal options clearly
- Discuss realistic timelines and outcomes
- Answer all your questions about process and costs
- No pressure to hire us—take time to decide
- Everything is confidential
We Serve All of Texas from Our Houston, Austin, and Beaumont Offices:
- Main Line: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- Direct: (713) 528-9070
- Cell: (713) 443-4781
- Website: https://attorney911.com
- Email: ralph@atty911.com or lupe@atty911.com
For Spanish-Speaking Families:
Hablamos Español. Contact Mr. Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish.
Take the First Step Toward Accountability
The organizations that harmed your child are counting on your silence. They’re hoping evidence will disappear, witnesses will scatter, and the statute of limitations will run. They’re banking on your family being too overwhelmed to fight back.
Prove them wrong.
Call us today. Let us help you preserve evidence, understand your rights, and pursue the accountability your child deserves. Whether you’re in Star Harbor proper, in neighboring communities like Athens or Mabank, or anywhere across Henderson County—if hazing has touched your family, we can help.
Call Attorney911 now: 1-888-ATTY-911
Because waiting could cost you everything. Acting now could save another family from the same pain.
Plain Text Links to Key Resources
News Coverage of the Leonel Bermudez / UH Pi Kappa Phi Hazing Lawsuit
Click2Houston (KPRC 2) – “‘Urine was brown’: Pledge sues over severe hazing at University of Houston’s shut down Pi Kappa Phi fraternity”
- Published: November 21, 2025 | Authors: Bryce Newberry & Holly Galvan Posey
- URL:
https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/
ABC13 Eyewitness News (KTRK) – “Waterboarding, forced eating, physical punishment: Lawsuit alleges abuse faced by injured pledge at UH’s Pi Kappa Phi fraternity”
- Published: November 22, 2025 | Author: Nick Natario
- URL:
https://abc13.com/post/waterboarding-forced-eating-physical-punishment-lawsuit-alleges-abuse-faced-injured-pledge-uhs-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity/18186418/
Hoodline – “University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity Face $10M Lawsuit Over Alleged Hazing and Abuse”
- Published: November 22, 2025 | Author: Alyssa Ford
- URL:
https://hoodline.com/2025/11/university-of-houston-and-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity-face-10m-lawsuit-over-alleged-hazing-and-abuse/
Attorney911 Educational YouTube Videos
“Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case | Attorney911 with Ralph Manginello”
- Content: Common mistakes that damage personal injury claims
- URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY
“Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case? | Attorney911 with Injury Lawyer Ralph Manginello”
- Content: Texas statutes of limitations explained
- URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c
“How Do Contingency Fees Work? Injury Lawyer Explains!”
- Content: Contingency fee model explained
- URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc
“Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case | Attorney911 Explains”
- Content: How to properly document evidence with your smartphone
- URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs
Attorney911 Main Website
Attorney911 – Main Website & Contact
- Full-service Texas personal injury and criminal defense law firm
- 24/7 free consultations | Offices in Houston, Austin, Beaumont
- URL:
https://attorney911.com
Legal Disclaimer
This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.
Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.
If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.
The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com | lupe@atty911.com (Spanish services available)