Hazing in Texas: A Comprehensive Legal Guide for Burleson Parents and Families

The Nightmare That Hits Close to Home

It’s 2 AM, and your phone rings. Your son, a freshman at a Texas university, sounds different—slurred, confused, scared. Between fragmented sentences, you piece together that he’s at a fraternity house after being forced through hours of “pledge activities.” He mentions being made to drink something, perform humiliating acts, and now he can’t stand up straight. You hear laughter in the background. The call drops. You’re three hours away in Burleson, feeling utterly helpless.

This scenario isn’t just parental anxiety—it’s the reality facing Texas families right now. In November 2025, just hours from Burleson in Harris County, Attorney911 filed one of the most serious hazing lawsuits in recent Texas history on behalf of Leonel Bermudez against the University of Houston and the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu chapter. The details are horrifyingly specific: forced consumption of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting; a “pledge fanny pack” containing condoms and sex toys; being sprayed in the face with a hose “similar to waterboarding”; and extreme workouts that led to rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney failure, and four days of hospitalization. The chapter was suspended on November 6, 2025, and voted to surrender its charter on November 14, 2025.

If you’re a parent in Burleson, Johnson County, or anywhere in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, this case matters to you. Not just because it shows hazing’s brutal reality, but because the same national organizations operating at UH also have chapters at every major Texas university—including those where Burleson families send their children. This comprehensive guide explains what hazing really looks like in 2025, Texas and federal law, institutional accountability, and what legal options exist for families throughout Texas, including right here in Burleson.

Immediate Help for Hazing Emergencies

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

• Call 911 for medical emergencies
• Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

In the first 48 hours:

• Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
• Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
  • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
  • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
• Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
• Do NOT:
  • Confront the fraternity/sorority
  • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
  • Post details on public social media
  • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

• Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
• Universities move quickly to control the narrative
• We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
• Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

Hazing has evolved far beyond the stereotypes of “harmless pranks” or “boys will be boys.” For Burleson families with children at Texas universities, understanding modern hazing is critical to recognizing danger signs and taking appropriate action.

A Modern Definition of Hazing

Hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. Key elements Burleson parents should understand:

• Location doesn’t matter: Hazing occurs on-campus, off-campus at houses like the Pi Kappa Phi chapter house at UH, at private residences like the Culmore Drive property mentioned in the Bermudez lawsuit, and even at public parks like Yellowstone Boulevard Park where UH pledges were hazed.
• “Consent” is irrelevant: Texas law explicitly states that a victim’s “agreement” to participate is not a defense. The power imbalance between pledges and members, combined with fear of exclusion, renders true consent impossible.
• Digital transformation: Today’s hazing lives in GroupMe chats, Instagram DMs, Snapchat stories, and Discord servers—platforms that Burleson parents might not monitor but where evidence of coercion is documented.

Five Categories of Modern Hazing

1. Alcohol and Substance Hazing

• Forced consumption games like those in the UH Pi Kappa Phi case where pledges drank until vomiting
• “Big/Little” nights with handles of liquor
• Coerced use of drugs, sometimes disguised as “team building”

2. Physical Hazing

• Extreme workouts causing rhabdomyolysis (the muscle breakdown disease Bermudez suffered)
• Paddling, beating, or “smokings” (excessive calisthenics)
• Exposure to extreme temperatures or dangerous environments
• Sleep and food deprivation

3. Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing

• Forced nudity or partial nudity
• Simulated sexual acts, degrading costumes
• Acts with racial, sexist, or homophobic overtones
• The “pledge fanny pack” humiliation documented in the UH case

4. Psychological Hazing

• Verbal abuse, threats, isolation from non-members
• Manipulation through fear of expulsion from the group
• Public shaming in meetings or on social media

5. Digital/Online Hazing

• Group chat dares and challenges
• Pressure to create compromising content
• 24/7 availability demands via messaging apps
• Location tracking through apps like Find My Friends

Who’s at Risk? It’s Not Just Fraternities

While the UH Pi Kappa Phi case involves a fraternity, Burleson parents should know hazing occurs across campus organizations:

• Fraternities and Sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural)
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC (especially relevant for Texas A&M families)
• Athletic Teams (from football to cheerleading)
• Spirit and Tradition Groups (like Texas Cowboys at UT)
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups
• Some Academic and Service Organizations

The common thread: any organization that uses power imbalance, tradition, and secrecy to initiate or maintain membership can harbor hazing.

Law & Liability Framework: Texas and Federal Law

Texas Hazing Law: Education Code Chapter 37

For Burleson families, understanding Texas law is the foundation for any legal action. Texas Education Code Chapter 37, Subchapter F provides the statutory framework:

§ 37.151 Definition: Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, directed against a student that endangers mental or physical health AND occurs for purposes of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office, or maintaining membership.

Key Points for Johnson County Families:

• “Reckless” suffices: The person need not intend harm—reckless disregard for safety qualifies
• Mental OR physical harm: Emotional trauma alone can constitute hazing
• No location limitation: Off-campus houses, Airbnb rentals, parks—all covered
• Broad application: Applies to any organization with student members

§ 37.152 Criminal Penalties:

• Class B Misdemeanor: Basic hazing (up to 180 days jail, $2,000 fine)
• Class A Misdemeanor: Hazing causing injury requiring medical treatment
• State Jail Felony: Hazing causing serious bodily injury or death (like the UH case)

§ 37.155 Critical Provision – Consent Not a Defense:
Texas law explicitly states: “It is not a defense to prosecution that the person against whom the hazing was directed consented to the hazing activity.” This directly addresses the “they agreed to it” argument often used by defense attorneys.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Understanding the Difference

Burleson families often ask: “Will there be criminal charges, or do we need to file a lawsuit?” The answer is often both, but they’re fundamentally different:

Criminal Cases (State brings charges):

• Purpose: Punishment (jail, fines, probation)
• Burden of proof: “Beyond reasonable doubt”
• Possible charges: Hazing, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, manslaughter in deaths
• Example: Individual Pi Kappa Phi members in the UH case could face criminal charges

Civil Cases (Family files lawsuit):

• Purpose: Compensation and accountability
• Burden of proof: “Preponderance of evidence” (more likely than not)
• Possible claims: Negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision
• Example: The $10 million Bermudez lawsuit against UH, Pi Kappa Phi nationals, and individual members

Critical Point: A criminal conviction is NOT required to pursue civil action. Many hazing cases settle civilly even when criminal charges aren’t filed.

Federal Law Overlay: Title IX, Clery, and New Legislation

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024):

• Requires colleges receiving federal aid to publicly report hazing incidents
• Mandates enhanced prevention education
• Phased implementation through 2026
• Creates national database of hazing incidents

Title IX Implications:

• When hazing involves sexual harassment or gender-based hostility
• Triggers specific investigation and response obligations
• Can waive certain immunity defenses for universities

Clery Act Requirements:

• Mandates reporting of certain crimes, including some hazing-related offenses
• Requires annual security reports documenting incidents
• Can provide data showing institutional patterns

Who Can Be Liable? The Complete Defendant Universe

The Bermudez case against UH and Pi Kappa Phi names 17 defendants across multiple categories—a model for understanding full accountability:

1. Individual Students:

• Those who planned, executed, or covered up hazing
• Chapter officers (president, pledgemaster, risk manager named in UH case)
• Members who participated or failed to intervene

2. Local Chapter/Organization:

• The campus chapter as an entity
• Chapter housing corporations (like the Beta Nu housing corporation sued at UH)

3. National Fraternity/Sorority Headquarters:

• Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters (named in UH lawsuit)
• Organizations that set policies, collect dues, and supervise chapters
• Can be liable for “prior notice” based on incidents at other chapters

4. University and Governing Boards:

• University of Houston and UH System Board of Regents (both sued)
• Can be liable for negligent supervision, premises liability, Title IX violations
• Sovereign immunity issues for public universities (UH, Texas A&M, UT)

5. Third Parties:

• Property owners (like the Culmore Drive residence owner in UH case)
• Bars or alcohol providers under dram shop laws
• Security companies or event organizers

For Burleson families, this multi-defendant approach is crucial—it ensures all potentially liable parties are identified and prevents finger-pointing between entities.

National Hazing Case Patterns: What They Mean for Texas Families

Alcohol Poisoning and Death Pattern

Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017)

• 19-year-old died after bid acceptance night with extreme drinking
• Security cameras captured hours of delayed medical response
• 18 members charged with over 1,000 criminal counts
• Takeaway for Burleson families: Delayed medical care dramatically increases liability and reflects institutional culture problems.

Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)

• Pledge died after being forced to drink nearly a full bottle of whiskey
• $10 million settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national, $3M from university)
• Chapter president ordered to personally pay $6.5 million
• Takeaway: Both nationals AND universities face massive financial exposure.

Max Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017)

• Died during “Bible study” drinking game
• Louisiana passed “Max Gruver Act” making hazing a felony
• Takeaway: Legislative reform often follows high-profile deaths.

Physical and Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013)

• Pledge died during violent “glass ceiling” ritual at retreat
• National fraternity convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter
• Banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years
• Takeaway: Off-campus retreats don’t eliminate liability—they can increase it.

Athletic Program Hazing and Abuse

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025)

• Allegations of sexualized, racist hazing within football program
• Multiple lawsuits against university and staff
• Head coach fired, then settled wrongful-termination suit
• Takeaway: Hazing extends far beyond Greek life into athletic departments.

What These Cases Mean for Burleson Families

These national patterns create legal precedents that strengthen Texas cases:

• Foreseeability: When a Texas chapter repeats conduct that caused death elsewhere, nationals can’t claim “we didn’t know it was dangerous”
• Settlement benchmarks: Multi-million dollar settlements set valuation expectations
• Institutional accountability: Courts increasingly hold universities responsible for patterns they ignored
• Individual liability: Officers and participants face personal financial ruin

Texas Focus: Universities Relevant to Burleson Families

Burleson sits in Johnson County within the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington metro—a region with extensive higher education options. Many Burleson students attend nearby universities, while others venture to major hubs across Texas. Understanding each campus’s hazing landscape is crucial for local families.

University of Houston: The Active Litigation Case Study

For Burleson Families: While UH is approximately 4 hours from Burleson, the ongoing Pi Kappa Phi case establishes critical legal precedents that affect hazing litigation statewide, including for DFW-area universities.

Campus & Culture Snapshot:

• Large urban research university with 46,000+ students
• Active Greek life with 50+ fraternities and sororities
• Mix of commuter and residential students
• Recent focus on improving campus safety and accountability

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting:

• Prohibits hazing on and off campus
• Requires reporting to Dean of Students Office
  or UH Police Department
• Offers anonymous reporting options
• Current transparency: UH has publicly called the Pi Kappa Phi conduct “deeply disturbing” and promised cooperation with law enforcement

Documented Incident & Response (The Flagship Case):
The Leonel Bermudez Pi Kappa Phi case demonstrates UH’s current hazing reality:

• Timeline: September 2025 bid acceptance → November 3 extreme workout → November 6 chapter suspension → November 9 hospitalization → November 14 charter surrender
• Hazing Acts: Fanny pack humiliation, forced overeating, hose spraying “like waterboarding,” 100+ push-ups/500 squats, cold exposure, overnight driving duties
• Medical Consequences: Rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney failure, brown urine, 4-day hospitalization, risk of permanent kidney damage
• Institutional Response: Chapter suspended then closed, UH cooperation with investigation, disciplinary and criminal referrals promised

How a UH Hazing Case Proceeds:

• Jurisdiction: Harris County courts (Houston) for civil cases; Harris County District Attorney for criminal
• Investigative agencies: UHPD and Houston Police Department
• Defendant universe: As demonstrated in Bermudez case—individuals, chapter, housing corporation, national HQ, university, board of regents
• Evidence sources: Group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp), medical records, chapter documents, university disciplinary files

What UH Students & Burleson Parents Should Do:

• Immediate reporting: UH Dean of Students (713-743-5470) or UHPD (713-743-3333)
• Evidence preservation: Screenshot all digital communications immediately
• Medical documentation: Obtain full records from Memorial Hermann or other treating hospitals
• Legal consultation: Contact Attorney911 to understand rights before speaking with university investigators or insurance representatives

Texas A&M University: Corps Culture and Greek Life Intersection

For Burleson Families: Located approximately 3 hours from Burleson, Texas A&M represents a common destination for Johnson County students, particularly those interested in Corps of Cadets or traditional campus life.

Campus & Culture Snapshot:

• 74,000+ students with strong tradition culture
• Active Corps of Cadets (2,400+ members)
• 60+ fraternities and sororities
• Historic emphasis on loyalty and tradition

Documented Incidents & Responses:

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon Chemical Burns Case (2021): Pledges allegedly covered in industrial-strength cleaner causing severe burns requiring skin grafts; chapter suspended; $1 million lawsuit filed
• Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): Cadet alleged being bound in “roasted pig” position with apple in mouth during hazing; sought over $1 million; A&M stated matter handled internally
• Kappa Sigma Rhabdomyolysis Case (2023): Ongoing litigation involving extreme physical hazing leading to muscle breakdown

Hazing Policy & Reporting:

• Student Conduct Office handles investigations
• Corps has separate disciplinary system
• Anonymous reporting through Ethics Point system
• Transparency challenge: Less public reporting than UT Austin

How a Texas A&M Case Proceeds:

• Jurisdiction: Brazos County courts (College Station)
• Investigative complexity: May involve both university conduct process and Corps discipline
• Unique factors: Corps traditions sometimes defended as “military training”
• Common evidence: Corps training records, medical documentation from CHI St. Joseph, group communications

What A&M Students & Burleson Parents Should Do:

• Dual reporting: Student Conduct Office AND Corps leadership if applicable
• Medical attention: CHI St. Joseph Health emergency department for documentation
• Tradition documentation: Save any materials referencing “old Army” or historical practices
• Legal timing: Act before end of semester when evidence disappears and witnesses graduate

University of Texas at Austin: Transparency and Pattern Evidence

For Burleson Families: Approximately 3 hours from Burleson, UT Austin represents another major destination for local students, particularly those seeking prestigious academic programs alongside active Greek life.

Campus & Culture Snapshot:

• 52,000+ students with highly competitive Greek system
• Public hazing violations database (hazing.utexas.edu)
• 60+ fraternities and sororities
• History of spirit organization hazing issues

Documented Incidents & Public Records:
UT’s transparency provides unique evidence sources:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): New members directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics; chapter probation and education requirement
• Texas Wranglers (multiple years): Spirit group violations for forced workouts, alcohol hazing
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon Assault Case (2024): Australian exchange student allegedly assaulted at party; pre-existing chapter suspension for prior violations

Hazing Policy & Reporting:

• Dean of Students Office investigates
• Public violations database maintained since 2018
• Required reporting for all university-recognized organizations
• Transparency strength: Public database provides pattern evidence for civil cases

How a UT Austin Case Proceeds:

• Jurisdiction: Travis County courts (Austin)
• Evidence advantage: Public database shows prior violations and institutional knowledge
• Common defendants: Individual members, chapter, national, university (with sovereign immunity considerations)
• Medical documentation: Dell Seton Medical Center or UT University Health Services records

What UT Austin Students & Burleson Parents Should Do:

• Check public database: hazing.utexas.edu for organization’s violation history
• Report strategically: Dean of Students with awareness that reports become public record
• Medical documentation: Insist on detailed records from university health services
• Legal advantage: Prior violation patterns strengthen negligence arguments against university

Southern Methodist University: Private University Dynamics

For Burleson Families: Located just 45 minutes from Burleson in University Park, SMU represents the closest major private university to Johnson County and a common choice for local students.

Campus & Culture Snapshot:

• 12,000+ students with affluent demographic profile
• Strong Greek life as social center
• Private university status affects transparency
• History of hazing incidents despite anti-hazing policies

Documented Incidents:

• Kappa Alpha Order (2017): New members paddled, forced to drink, sleep deprived; chapter suspended until 2021
• Multiple anonymous reports: Social media allegations of ongoing hazing in various organizations
• Discipline patterns: Suspensions typically 2-4 years followed by reinstatement

Hazing Policy & Reporting:

• Office of Student Affairs handles investigations
• Real Response anonymous reporting system
• Limited public disclosure due to private status
• Transparency challenge: Less public information than state schools

How an SMU Case Proceeds:

• Jurisdiction: Dallas County courts
• Discovery advantage: Private universities have fewer public record exemptions
• Common defendants: Individuals, chapter, national, university (no sovereign immunity)
• Evidence sources: University internal investigation files obtainable through discovery

What SMU Students & Burleson Parents Should Do:

• Immediate documentation: Private universities may move quickly to contain situations
• Legal preservation letter: Attorney can send notice to preserve all evidence including internal emails
• Medical attention: Texas Health Presbyterian or SMU Health Center for documentation
• Strategic timing: Act before university completes internal investigation and decides on narrative

Baylor University: Religious Identity and Accountability History

For Burleson Families: Approximately 1.5 hours from Burleson in Waco, Baylor represents a common choice for Johnson County families seeking faith-based education, though its history with institutional accountability complicates hazing response.

Campus & Culture Snapshot:

• 20,000+ students with Baptist affiliation
• Greek life integrated with faith activities
• History of Title IX and sexual assault scandal affects current oversight
• Baseball hazing incident demonstrates athletic program risks

Documented Incidents:

• Baseball Hazing (2020): 14 players suspended following investigation; staggered suspensions during season
• Multiple Greek investigations: Periodic suspensions for alcohol and hazing violations
• Pattern: Violations often handled internally with limited public disclosure

Hazing Policy & Reporting:

• Student Conduct Administration investigates
• Required reporting for all organizations
• Title IX Office involvement if sexual harassment elements
• Transparency mixed: Some public discipline, much handled internally

How a Baylor Case Proceeds:

• Jurisdiction: McLennan County courts (Waco)
• Institutional history: Prior sexual assault scandal affects current liability standards
• Common defendants: Individuals, chapter, national, university (private, no sovereign immunity)
• Evidence considerations: Religious context sometimes used in defense arguments

What Baylor Students & Burleson Parents Should Do:

• Parallel reporting: Student Conduct AND Title IX Office if sexual elements present
• Medical documentation: Baylor Scott & White Medical Center for thorough records
• Institutional pattern evidence: Research prior violations through public records requests
• Legal strategy: Leverage university’s prior accountability failures in negligence arguments

The Dallas-Fort Worth Greek Ecosystem: What Burleson Families Are Up Against

The Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington metro area, which includes Burleson and Johnson County, contains one of the nation’s densest concentrations of Greek organizations. According to the Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine data from Cause IQ summaries, the DFW metro hosts approximately 510 Greek-related organizations. These range from undergraduate chapters to alumni associations, house corporations, and educational foundations.

Public Records Directory: Fraternities, Sororities & Greek Organizations Serving Burleson Families

The following organizations are recorded in IRS B83 filings and other public records as operating within or connected to the DFW metro area that serves Burleson families:

DFW Metro Area Organizations (Partial Listing):

• Beta Upsilon Chi Fraternity, EIN: 742911848, 12650 N Beach St Suite 114, Fort Worth, TX 76244 (IRS B83 filing, Cause IQ metro listing)
• Texas Kappa Sigma Educational Foundation Inc, EIN: 741380362, PO Box 470061, Fort Worth, TX 76147-0061 (IRS B83 filing, Cause IQ metro listing)
• Zeta Phi Beta Sorority Inc – Sigma Gamma Chapter, EIN: 392352450, PO Box 540026, Houston, TX 77254-0026 (IRS B83 filing)
• Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity – Lambda Lambda Chapter, EIN: 521278573, 3837 Simpson Stuart Rd, Dallas, TX 75241-4331 (IRS B83 filing)
• Delta Delta Delta – Arlington Alumnae Chapter, Dallas, TX (Cause IQ metro listing)
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity – Texas Rho Corp., Austin, TX (Cause IQ metro listing connected to DFW alumni)
• Chi Omega Educational Corporation, Fort Worth, TX (Cause IQ metro listing, TCU connection)

Johnson County and Burleson Area Connections:
While Burleson itself doesn’t host university chapters, Johnson County contains Southwestern Adventist University in Keene, and Burleson families commonly send students to:

• Tarleton State University (Stephenville, approximately 1.5 hours)
• Texas Christian University (Fort Worth, approximately 45 minutes)
• University of Texas at Arlington (approximately 45 minutes)
• All major DFW universities within commuting distance

Cross-Validated Brands (IRS + Cause IQ Overlap):
These organizations appear in both IRS filings and metro intelligence data, confirming their operational presence:

1. Beta Upsilon Chi (Fort Worth based, multiple DFW chapters)
2. Texas Kappa Sigma Educational Foundation (Fort Worth based, statewide reach)
3. Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority (multiple Texas chapter listings)

This directory represents just a fraction of the 510+ Greek entities in the DFW metro. For Burleson families, this density means:

• Your child likely knows multiple students in Greek organizations
• Hazing incidents at one DFW school quickly become known at others
• Alumni networks throughout Johnson County can influence institutional responses
• Legal strategies must account for multi-metro organizational structures

Where Burleson Families Send Their Kids: Campus Realities

Primary University Destinations from Burleson:

1. Commuter Schools (<1 hour):

   • Texas Christian University (Fort Worth)
   • University of Texas at Arlington
   • Tarleton State University (Stephenville)
   • Dallas College campuses

2. Regional Universities (1-3 hours):

   • Baylor University (Waco)
   • University of North Texas (Denton)
   • Texas A&M University (College Station)
   • University of Texas at Austin

3. Distant Major Universities (>3 hours):

   • University of Houston
   • Texas Tech University (Lubbock)
   • Out-of-state schools

Greek Life Penetration Rates:
separate research shows approximately 20-25% of undergraduates at Texas public universities participate in Greek life, with higher rates at private institutions like TCU (40%+) and SMU (35%+). For Burleson families, this means roughly 1 in 4 students will encounter Greek organizations directly, with many more affected through social networks.

Fraternities & Sororities: National Histories and Local Realities

Why National Histories Matter for Burleson Cases

When a Pi Kappa Phi chapter at UH hazes pledges in 2025, that incident doesn’t exist in isolation. National headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina had prior notice from:

• Andrew Coffey’s death at Florida State (2017)
• Multiple other alcohol hazing incidents nationwide
• Their own risk management policies acknowledging these dangers

This pattern evidence creates “foreseeability”—the legal concept that an organization should have anticipated and prevented harm based on prior similar incidents. For Burleson families, this means:

1. Stronger negligence claims: Nationals can’t claim “we didn’t know this could happen”
2. Punitive damage potential: Repeated ignoring of known dangers can justify punishment beyond compensation
3. Insurance coverage arguments: Pattern of violations may affect policy applicability

Major National Organizations with Texas Presence and Hazing Histories

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) – Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT, Baylor:

• Stone Foltz: Bowling Green State 2021, $10 million settlement
• David Bogenberger: Northern Illinois 2012, $14 million settlement
• Texas pattern: Multiple chapter suspensions across Texas campuses

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) – Active at All 5 Major Texas Schools:

• Traumatic Brain Injury Case: University of Alabama 2023 lawsuit
• Chemical Burns Case: Texas A&M 2021, $1 million lawsuit
• Assault Case: UT Austin 2024, pre-existing suspension for violations
• National pattern: Eliminated pledge program in 2014 due to deaths

Pi Kappa Phi – Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT:

• Andrew Coffey: Florida State 2017 death
• Leonel Bermudez: University of Houston 2025, $10 million lawsuit (current Attorney911 case)
• Chapter closure pattern: Multiple chapter suspensions following incidents

Phi Delta Theta – Active at All Major Texas Schools:

• Max Gruver: LSU 2017 death, Louisiana passed “Max Gruver Act”
• National response: Enhanced alcohol-free housing policies

Sigma Chi – Active Throughout Texas:

• College of Charleston: 2024, >$10 million settlement for physical/psychological hazing
• UT Arlington: 2020 alcohol poisoning hospitalization, settled 2021

The “Playbook” Defense Strategies and How We Counter Them

Through our work on the UH Pi Kappa Phi case and other hazing litigation, Attorney911 has identified common defense strategies and developed countermeasures:

Defense: “The Pledge Consented”

• Their playbook: Argue victim willingly participated
• Our counter: Texas law §37.155 explicitly states consent is not a defense; document peer pressure and power imbalance

Defense: “Rogue Chapter, National Didn’t Know”

• Their playbook: Blame local members, claim headquarters unaware
• Our counter: Subpoena national records showing prior incidents, training materials acknowledging risks, communication patterns

Defense: “Off-Campus, Not Our Responsibility”

• Their playbook: Distance from university control
• Our counter: Document university recognition, advisor involvement, institutional benefit from organization

Defense: “We Have Anti-Hazing Policies”

• Their playbook: Point to policy manuals as sufficient
• Our counter: Show policy-performance gap, inadequate enforcement, prior violations without meaningful consequence

Defense: “Insurance Doesn’t Cover Intentional Acts”

• Their playbook: Claim hazing exclusion applies
• Our counter: Argue negligent supervision is covered, pursue multiple policy layers, bad faith claims if denial improper

For Burleson families, understanding these dynamics helps explain why experienced hazing counsel matters—we’ve seen these defenses before and know how to dismantle them.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, and Strategy

Evidence Collection: The Digital Crime Scene

In 2025, hazing evidence lives predominantly in digital spaces. The UH Pi Kappa Phi case demonstrates what matters:

Group Communications (Priority Evidence):

• GroupMe: The most common fraternity/sorority communication platform
• WhatsApp/Signal/Telegram: Encrypted apps requiring quick preservation
• iMessage/SMS: Phone-based group texts
• Discord/Slack: Organizational communication servers
• Fraternity-specific apps: Chapter websites and member portals

Preservation Protocol for Burleson Families:

1. IMMEDIATE screenshots: Capture full threads with timestamps visible
2. Cloud backup: Save to Google Drive, iCloud, or email to yourself
3. Do NOT delete: Even embarrassing content is evidence
4. Device preservation: Don’t upgrade phones or reset devices
5. Forensic consideration: Deleted messages may be recoverable by experts

Social Media Evidence:

• Instagram Stories/Snapchat: 24-hour disappearing content requires immediate capture
• TikTok/YouTube: Video evidence of hazing “traditions”
• Facebook/Private Groups: Organization pages and alumni interactions
• Hashtags and location tags: Documenting event planning

Physical Evidence Often Overlooked:

• Medical records: Complete files from ALL treating facilities
• Receipts: Alcohol purchases, costume rentals, equipment
• Photographs: Injuries at multiple stages (bruises evolve over days)
• Objects: Paddles, props, clothing worn during incidents
• Location documentation: Photos of houses, rooms, parks

Damages: Understanding What’s Recoverable

Through our wrongful death and catastrophic injury practice, Attorney911 has developed comprehensive damages models for hazing cases:

Economic Damages (Quantifiable Losses):

• Medical expenses: Past and future (ER, hospitalization, surgery, therapy)
• Lost earnings: Current and future diminished earning capacity
• Educational costs: Tuition for disrupted semesters, lost scholarships
• Life care expenses: For permanent injuries like traumatic brain injury or kidney damage

Non-Economic Damages (Subjective but Real Harm):

• Physical pain and suffering: From injuries and treatment
• Emotional distress: PTSD, anxiety, depression, humiliation
• Loss of enjoyment: Inability to participate in college life, activities
• Reputational harm: Social stigma and future impact

Wrongful Death Damages (For Families):

• Funeral and burial expenses
• Loss of companionship and support
• Parents’ and siblings’ emotional suffering
• Loss of guidance for younger siblings

Punitive Damages (When Appropriate):

• For especially reckless or intentional conduct
• To punish and deter future behavior
• Subject to Texas statutory caps with exceptions

The Bermudez case illustrates comprehensive damages: past medical bills (4-day hospitalization), future kidney monitoring/treatment, pain from rhabdomyolysis, emotional trauma from humiliation and fear, and potential punitive claims given the extreme conduct.

Strategic Considerations for Burleson Families

Timeline Awareness:

• Statute of limitations: Generally 2 years from injury in Texas
• Evidence deterioration: Digital evidence disappears quickly
• Witness availability: Students graduate, move, memories fade
• University response timing: Internal investigations have deadlines

Defendant Identification:

• Individual actors: Those who planned, participated, covered up
• Chapter officers: Presidents, risk managers, pledgemasters
• National organizations: HQs with deep pockets and insurance
• Universities: Particularly if prior notice existed
• Third parties: Property owners, alcohol providers

Insurance Coverage Mapping:

• Chapter policies: Often minimum coverage
• National policies: Larger limits but exclusions arguments
• University policies: Sovereign immunity complications for public schools
• Individual homeowner policies: May provide additional coverage
• Bad faith potential: If insurers unreasonably deny claims

Settlement vs. Trial Considerations:

• Confidentiality needs: Many families prefer private resolution
• Public accountability: Some want institutional change beyond compensation
• Time factors: Trials take years; settlements can provide quicker resources for recovery
• Precedent value: Public verdicts help future victims

Practical Guides & FAQs for Burleson Families

For Parents: Warning Signs and Action Steps

Physical Warning Signs:

• Unexplained bruises, burns, or injuries with inconsistent explanations
• Extreme fatigue beyond normal college stress
• Significant weight changes (from food restriction or stress eating)
• Sleep deprivation patterns (late calls, early demands)
• Injuries to specific body areas (hands from paddling, back from carrying)

Behavioral and Emotional Red Flags:

• Sudden secrecy about organization activities
• Withdrawal from family and non-Greek friends
• Personality changes: anxiety, depression, irritability
• Defensiveness when asked about the group
• Constant phone checking/response demands
• Financial surprises (unexplained charges, requests for money)

Academic Indicators:

• Grades dropping suddenly
• Missing classes or assignments
• Losing scholarships or academic standing
• Choosing organization events over academic responsibilities

How to Talk to Your Child About Concerns:

1. Choose neutral timing: Not during arguments or stress
2. Use open questions: “How are things with your organization?” not “Are they hazing you?”
3. Express care, not accusation: “I’m worried about your safety” not “You’re being stupid”
4. Listen without interruption: Let them share at their pace
5. Offer unconditional support: Make clear your priority is their wellbeing

If You Discover Hazing is Occurring:

1. Prioritize safety: Medical attention if needed
2. Preserve evidence: Follow digital preservation protocol
3. Document conversations: Write down what your child says with dates/times
4. Contact an attorney: Before speaking with university or organization
5. Avoid confrontation: Don’t contact the organization directly
6. Protect privacy: Limit social media discussion

For Students: Rights, Risks, and Resources

Identifying Hazing vs. Tradition:

• Ask: Would I do this if I could truly say no without consequences?
• Question: Is this activity secret from university officials or parents?
• Consider: Are only new members subjected to this while older members watch?
• Reflect: Does this activity serve any legitimate purpose beyond humiliation or endurance?

Your Legal Rights in Texas:

• Consent is not a defense: You can’t “agree” to illegal hazing
• Good faith reporting protection: Legal protections for those who report or seek help
• Right to leave: You can quit any organization at any time
• Protection from retaliation: Universities must protect reporting students

Safe Exit Strategies:

1. Tell someone first: Parent, trusted advisor, or attorney
2. Written notification: Email chapter president and advisor of resignation
3. Avoid “one last meeting”: Don’t attend meetings where pressure may occur
4. Document any retaliation: Screenshot threats or harassment
5. University reporting: Inform Dean of Students if safety concerns exist

Evidence Collection for Students:

• Screen recording: For disappearing content like Snapchat
• Voice memos: Texas is one-party consent for recordings you’re part of
• Medical documentation: Tell healthcare providers exactly what happened
• Witness information: Note names and contact info for others present
• Location data: Photos of houses, addresses, license plates

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

MISTAKE #1: Deleting Digital Evidence

• Why it’s wrong: Looks like cover-up, destroys critical evidence, may be obstruction
• Correct approach: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content

MISTAKE #2: Confronting the Organization Directly

• Why it’s wrong: Triggers evidence destruction, witness coaching, defense preparation
• Correct approach: Document quietly, consult attorney before any contact

MISTAKE #3: Signing University “Resolution” Agreements

• Why it’s wrong: May waive legal rights, accept inadequate compensation, bind to confidentiality
• Correct approach: “I need to consult with an attorney before signing anything”

MISTAKE #4: Social Media Discussion

• Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys monitor everything, inconsistencies hurt credibility, may waive privileges
• Correct approach: Private documentation only, public silence until case resolution

MISTAKE #5: Delaying Legal Consultation

• Why it’s wrong: Evidence disappears, statutes run, universities control narrative
• Correct approach: Contact Attorney911 within 24-48 hours of discovery

Frequently Asked Questions from Burleson Families

“Can we sue a Texas university for hazing?”
Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities (UH, Texas A&M, UT) have sovereign immunity limits but can be sued for gross negligence, Title IX violations, or when individual employees are sued in personal capacity. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. The key is establishing the university knew or should have known about the danger and failed to take reasonable preventive action.

“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. Under Texas Education Code §37.152, hazing is a Class B misdemeanor by default, but becomes a state jail felony if serious bodily injury or death occurs. Individual officers can also face charges for failing to report hazing.

“What if my child ‘agreed’ to participate?”
Irrelevant for liability. Texas law §37.155 explicitly states: “It is not a defense to prosecution that the person against whom the hazing was directed consented to the hazing activity.” Courts recognize that power imbalance and fear of exclusion negate true consent.

“How long do we have to file a lawsuit?”
Generally 2 years from the date of injury in Texas, but exceptions exist:

• Discovery rule if harm wasn’t immediately known
• Tolling for minors
• Fraudulent concealment if cover-up occurred
  Time is critical—contact Attorney911 immediately at 1-888-ATTY-911.

“What if the hazing happened off-campus?”
Location doesn’t eliminate liability. Universities and nationals can still be responsible based on sponsorship, control, and foreseeability. The Pi Delta Psi retreat death and Sigma Pi unofficial house case both resulted in judgments despite off-campus locations.

“Will my child’s name be public?”
Most cases settle confidentially before trial. We can request sealed records and confidential settlement terms. While high-profile cases like the UH Pi Kappa Phi lawsuit involve public filings, we prioritize client privacy throughout the process.

“How much does a hazing lawsuit cost?”
Attorney911 works on contingency for personal injury cases—no upfront costs, no fee unless we recover compensation. We advance investigation expenses and only recover them if we win your case.

“What’s the typical timeline for a case?”

• Investigation phase: 3-6 months
• Pre-suit negotiation: 3-12 months
• Litigation if needed: 1-3 years
• Trial if necessary: Additional 1-2 years
  Many cases settle during investigation or pre-suit phases when evidence is strong.

About Attorney911: Why Texas Hazing Families Choose Us

When your family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. From our Houston office, Attorney911 serves families throughout Texas, including Burleson, Johnson County, and the entire Dallas-Fort Worth region.

Our Unique Qualifications for Hazing Cases

Insurance Insider Advantage (Lupe Peña’s Defense Background):
Mr. Lupe Peña spent years as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. He knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies:

• Value and undervalue hazing claims
• Use delay tactics to pressure families
• Argue coverage exclusions for “intentional acts”
• Set reserves and negotiate settlements
  His insider knowledge means we know their playbook because we used to run it.

Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions (Ralph Manginello’s Experience):
Ralph Manginello is one of the few Texas attorneys involved in BP Texas City explosion litigation—taking on billion-dollar corporations with unlimited legal budgets. That same capability applies directly to hazing cases against:

• National fraternities with deep pockets
• University systems with institutional protection
• Insurance companies with endless resources
  We’re not intimidated by powerful defendants because we’ve beaten them before.

Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience:
Through our wrongful death practice, we’ve recovered millions for families in cases involving:

• Lifetime care valuation for brain injuries
• Economic loss calculations for young victims
• Comprehensive damages modeling
• Punitive damage arguments for reckless conduct
  We don’t settle cheap—we build cases that force real accountability.

Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise:
Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides unique dual capability:

• Understanding criminal hazing charges and defenses
• Navigating interaction between criminal and civil cases
• Advising witnesses and former members with potential exposure
• Developing strategies that work in both courtrooms

Investigative Depth and Expert Network:
We investigate hazing cases with resources typically reserved for much larger firms:

• Digital forensics experts: Recovering deleted messages and social media evidence
• Medical specialists: Documenting rhabdomyolysis, traumatic brain injury, PTSD
• Greek life culture experts: Explaining power dynamics and coercion
• Economists: Valuing lifetime impacts of permanent injuries
• Institutional policy experts: Analyzing university response adequacy

The Attorney911 Difference: Data-Driven Investigation

While many firms approach hazing cases anecdotally, Attorney911 employs a data-driven strategy informed by our Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine. This proprietary system tracks:

Organizational Mapping:

• 1,423 Greek organizations across 25 Texas metros
• 125+ IRS-registered Texas Greek entities with EINs and addresses
• Campus-specific chapter rosters at all major universities
• National brand overlaps showing organizational reach

Pattern Evidence Development:

• Prior incidents at same chapter
• Similar conduct at other chapters of same national
• University disciplinary history through public records
• Insurance coverage mapping across defendant entities

Strategic Advantage:
We don’t start from zero. When a Burleson family comes to us with a hazing case, we already understand:

• The national organization’s history and litigation pattern
• The university’s prior handling of similar incidents
• The insurance landscape for that fraternity/sorority
• The local legal jurisdiction’s tendencies

This intelligence informs every decision—from evidence preservation priorities to settlement valuation to defendant targeting.

Our Commitment to Burleson Families

Geographic Accessibility:
While based in Houston, we serve families throughout Texas including:

• In-person meetings: Houston, Austin, Beaumont offices
• Virtual consultations: Zoom/phone for Burleson families
• Local counsel collaboration: Working with attorneys in DFW when helpful
• Travel to clients: We come to you when needed

Spanish Language Services:
Mr. Lupe Peña provides full legal services in Spanish—critical for Johnson County’s growing Hispanic community.

Contingency Fee Structure:
No upfront costs. We advance investigation expenses. We only get paid if we recover compensation for you.

Immediate Response Commitment:
As the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we provide 24/7 availability for true emergencies through our 1-888-ATTY-911 line.

Call to Action: Your Next Steps as a Burleson Family

If you’re reading this guide because hazing has touched your family, you’re not alone. The path forward may seem overwhelming, but taking deliberate, informed steps can protect your child’s rights and future.

What to Expect in Your Free Consultation

When you contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911, here’s what happens:

1. Compassionate Listening:
We listen to your story without judgment. We understand this is emotionally difficult and legally complex.

2. Initial Evidence Review:
We’ll review whatever documentation you have—texts, photos, medical records, notes.

3. Legal Options Explanation:
We explain your choices: criminal reporting, civil lawsuit, both, internal university process, or doing nothing.

4. Realistic Timeline Discussion:
We outline what to expect week by week, month by month.

5. Cost Transparency:
We explain our contingency fee structure clearly—no surprises.

6. No Pressure Decision Making:
Take time to decide. We provide information, not pressure.

Contact Information

Attorney911 / The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC
Houston | Austin | Beaumont, Texas

24/7 Emergency Line: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct Office: (713) 528-9070
Cell/Text: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com | lupe@atty911.com

Spanish Services Available:
Hablamos Español – Contacte a Lupe Peña en lupe@atty911.com

Final Message to Burleson Families

Whether your child attends university minutes from home in Fort Worth or hours away in Houston, College Station, or Austin, hazing’s impact reaches back to Johnson County. The trauma affects not just the student but parents, siblings, and the entire family system.

The Leonel Bermudez case at UH shows that even in 2025, with all our awareness and policies, devastating hazing continues. But it also shows that accountability is possible—that universities, national organizations, and individuals can be held responsible when they prioritize tradition over safety.

You have rights. Your child has rights. And you have options for seeking justice, compensation, and institutional change.

Don’t let confusion, fear, or institutional pressure prevent you from taking action. Evidence disappears. Witnesses scatter. Statutes of limitations run.

Call us today at 1-888-ATTY-911. Let’s discuss what happened, what it means legally, and how we can help your family move forward.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Plain Text Links to Key Resources:

Media Coverage of Leonel Bermudez / UH Pi Kappa Phi Case:

1. Click2Houston Report: https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/
2. ABC13 Coverage: https://abc13.com/post/waterboarding-forced-eating-physical-punishment-lawsuit-alleges-abuse-faced-injured-pledge-uhs-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity/18186418/
3. Hoodline Summary: https://hoodline.com/2025/11/university-of-houston-and-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity-face-10m-lawsuit-over-alleged-hazing-and-abuse/

Attorney911 Educational Videos:
4. Evidence Preservation Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs
5. Statute of Limitations Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c
6. Client Mistakes Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY
7. Contingency Fees Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc

Attorney911 Main Website:
8. https://attorney911.com