24/7 LIVE STAFF — Compassionate help, any time day or night
CALL NOW 1-888-ATTY-911
Blog | City of Natalia

Natalia & South Texas Hazing Lawyers | UTSA, Texas A&M-San Antonio, UT Austin & Texas State University Fraternity Wrongful Death Cases | Attorney911 — Legal Emergency Lawyers™ | Former Insurance Defense Attorney Knows National Fraternity Insurance Tactics | Federal Court Experience for Title IX & Institutional Accountability | Multi-Million Dollar Results | Evidence Preservation Specialists | 24/7 Help: 1-888-ATTY-911

February 15, 2026 43 min read
city-of-natalia-featured-image.png

The Complete Guide to Hazing Lawsuits & Campus Accountability for Families in Natalia, Texas

At The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC (Attorney911), we understand the nightmare facing parents in Natalia and across Medina County. Your child leaves for college full of promise, only to be subjected to dangerous, degrading hazing rituals that can cause permanent injury or death. We are Texas-based hazing specialists, and we are currently fighting one of the most serious hazing cases in the country right here in our state. This guide is written specifically for you—the parents, students, and concerned community members in Natalia and surrounding areas—to understand your rights, the reality of modern hazing, and the path to accountability.

Immediate Help for Hazing Emergencies

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help—that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if your child insists they are “fine”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
    • Post details on public social media
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours. Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses). Universities move quickly to control the narrative. We can help preserve evidence and protect your family’s rights. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

The Nightmare Scenario Happening Right Now in Texas

Picture this: A college freshman from a good Medina County family accepts a bid to join a fraternity at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, or another Texas campus. What begins as exciting “traditions” quickly turns dark. He’s required to carry a “pledge fanny pack” 24/7 containing condoms, sex toys, and humiliating items. He’s forced to chauffer older members at all hours, endure weekly “interviews” about his dedication, and participate in late-night “workouts” at parks miles from campus.

The physical abuse escalates: forced sprints, bear crawls, wheelbarrow races until vomiting. Cold-weather exposure in just his underwear. Being sprayed in the face with a hose “similar to waterboarding.” Being forced to consume milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until he vomits, then immediately forced to sprint more. During one “Nov 3 workout,” he’s threatened with expulsion unless he completes 100+ push-ups and 500 squats while reciting the fraternity creed.

Days later, he can’t stand without help. His urine turns brown. His mother rushes him to the hospital, where doctors diagnose rhabdomyolysis (severe skeletal muscle breakdown) and acute kidney failure. His creatine kinase levels are critically high. He spends four days hospitalized, facing ongoing risk of permanent kidney damage and long-term physical and psychological harm.

This is not a hypothetical scenario. This is exactly what happened to Leonel Bermudez at the University of Houston in fall 2025.

We know these details because our firm—Attorney911, with attorneys Ralph Manginello and Mr. Lupe Peña (he/him)—represents Leonel Bermudez in his $10 million hazing and abuse lawsuit against the University of Houston, the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu chapter, its housing corporation, Pi Kappa Phi’s national headquarters, the UH System Board of Regents, and 13 individual fraternity leaders. The case has been covered extensively by Houston media (Click2Houston, ABC13, Hoodline), and it reveals exactly how modern hazing operates, how institutions respond, and what families in Natalia need to know if their child faces similar abuse.

For families in Natalia and throughout Medina County, this case is particularly relevant. While the incident occurred in Houston, the patterns, organizational structures, and legal principles apply equally whether your child attends the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, or any other Texas campus. The same national fraternities, the same insurance companies, the same institutional cover-up tactics exist everywhere in Texas.

What Hazing Really Looks Like in 2025: Beyond the Stereotypes

Hazing in 2025 is not just “boys being boys” or “harmless pranks.” It’s a sophisticated, evolving form of abuse that adapts to avoid detection while maintaining power over new members. For parents in Natalia who may not be familiar with modern Greek life or campus organization dynamics, understanding these realities is the first step toward protecting your child.

Three Tiers of Modern Hazing

Tier 1: Subtle Hazing (Psychological Control)
These behaviors emphasize power imbalance and often get dismissed as “tradition” but create the foundation for worse abuse:

  • Digital control: 24/7 group chat monitoring, required instant responses, location sharing via apps like Find My Friends
  • Servitude: Mandatory overnight chauffeuring, cleaning older members’ rooms, running errands at all hours
  • Social isolation: Cutting off contact with non-members, requiring permission to socialize
  • Deception: Being told to lie to parents, RAs, or university officials about activities

Tier 2: Harassment Hazing (Emotional & Physical Discomfort)
Behaviors that cause measurable harm but organizations claim are “voluntary”:

  • Sleep deprivation: Late-night “meetings” or tasks, 3 AM wake-up calls, multi-day events with minimal sleep
  • Forced consumption: Spoiled food, excessive milk/bread/hot dogs, hot sauce, unpleasant substances
  • Extreme exercise: “Smokings” or calisthenics beyond safe limits (hundreds of push-ups, wall sits until collapse)
  • Public humiliation: “Roasts,” degrading costumes, performing embarrassing acts in public
  • Digital shame: Forced embarrassing social media posts, TikTok “challenges,” meme creation mocking pledges

Tier 3: Violent Hazing (High Injury/Death Risk)
Activities that regularly cause catastrophic injuries and fatalities:

  • Forced alcohol consumption: “Big/Little” nights with handles of liquor, “Bible study” drinking games, lineups, funneling
  • Physical beatings: Paddling, punching, kicking, “branding” with burns or cuts
  • Dangerous tests: Blindfolded tackles (“glass ceiling” rituals), forced fights, swimming while intoxicated
  • Sexualized abuse: Forced nudity, simulated sexual acts, sexual assault or coercion
  • Chemical exposure: Industrial cleaners poured on skin (causing chemical burns), unknown substance ingestion

The Evolution of Hazing Tactics

Organizations have become sophisticated at hiding abuse:

  • “It’s Optional” Framing: Activities are announced as “voluntary” to create legal cover, but not participating means social exclusion
  • Off-Campus Shifting: Moving hazing to Airbnbs, private rentals, or family properties to avoid campus jurisdiction
  • Digital Evidence Destruction: Using disappearing messages (Snapchat, Instagram vanish mode), encrypted apps, coaching members on what to say
  • Euphemistic Language: Calling hazing “bonding,” “new member education,” “challenges,” or “team building”
  • The “Anti-Hazing Policy” Shield: Maintaining thick policy manuals as window dressing while ignoring actual enforcement

For Natalia families, the key realization is this: If your child feels unsafe, humiliated, or coerced; if they’re forced to drink or endure pain; if activities are hidden from university officials—it’s hazing, regardless of what the organization calls it.

Texas Hazing Law: What Natalia Families Need to Know

Texas has specific anti-hazing laws that govern cases involving students from Natalia attending any Texas university. Understanding this framework is crucial for knowing your rights and the potential consequences for those who harm your child.

Texas Education Code Chapter 37, Subchapter F

Definition (§37.151): Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, directed against a student that:

  1. Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of that student, AND
  2. Occurs for purposes of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

Key Points for Natalia Families:

  • Location doesn’t matter: Hazing occurring at an off-campus house, Airbnb, or retreat is still illegal
  • Mental harm counts: Psychological abuse, humiliation, and emotional distress qualify
  • “Reckless” is enough: The person doesn’t need to intend harm—just be reckless about the risk
  • “Consent is not a defense” (§37.155): Even if your child “agreed,” it’s still hazing under Texas law

Criminal Penalties (§37.152):

  • Class B Misdemeanor: Hazing that doesn’t cause serious injury (up to 180 days jail, $2,000 fine)
  • Class A Misdemeanor: Hazing causing injury requiring medical treatment
  • State Jail Felony: Hazing causing serious bodily injury or death
  • Additional crimes: Failing to report hazing, retaliating against reporters

Organizational Liability (§37.153):
Fraternities, sororities, clubs, and teams can be criminally prosecuted and face:

  • Fines up to $10,000 per violation
  • University recognition revocation and campus bans

Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting (§37.154):
A person who in good faith reports hazing to university or law enforcement is immune from civil or criminal liability. This is critical—many students fear reporting because they were drinking underage or involved; Texas law protects those who call for help.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Understanding the Difference

Criminal Cases (The State vs. Individuals/Organizations)

  • Brought by: District Attorneys (Harris County, Travis County, Brazos County, etc.)
  • Goal: Punishment (jail, fines, probation)
  • Common charges: Hazing, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, manslaughter in fatal cases
  • Burden of proof: Beyond a reasonable doubt

Civil Cases (Your Family vs. Responsible Parties)

  • Brought by: Victims and families (like the Bermudez case we’re handling)
  • Goal: Compensation for damages and institutional accountability
  • Legal theories: Negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, premises liability, emotional distress
  • Burden of proof: Preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not)

Crucial Insight: A criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case. The civil system operates independently and can provide compensation even when criminal charges aren’t filed or don’t result in conviction.

Federal Law Overlay

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024)

  • Requires colleges receiving federal aid to report hazing incidents more transparently
  • Mandates strengthened hazing education and prevention programs
  • Requires public hazing data reporting (phasing in by 2026)

Title IX & Clery Act

  • When hazing involves sexual harassment, assault, or gender-based hostility, Title IX obligations trigger
  • Clery Act requires reporting certain crimes and maintaining safety statistics
  • Both create additional avenues for accountability beyond state law

National Hazing Cases: Patterns That Repeat at Texas Schools

The tragedies at other universities are not abstract news stories—they are blueprints for what can and does happen at Texas campuses where Natalia students attend. Understanding these patterns helps prove foreseeability in court: the organizations knew these activities were dangerous because people kept getting hurt or dying elsewhere.

Alcohol Poisoning Death Pattern

Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)

  • What happened: 20-year-old pledge forced to consume entire bottle of alcohol during “Big/Little” night; died from alcohol poisoning
  • Legal outcome: Multiple members convicted; $10 million settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national, ~$3M from BGSU)
  • Texas relevance: Pi Kappa Alpha has chapters at UT Austin, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, and other Texas schools

Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017)

  • What happened: Pledge forced into “Bible study” drinking game; wrong answers = forced drinking; died from alcohol toxicity (BAC 0.495%)
  • Legal outcome: Multiple prosecutions; Louisiana enacted Max Gruver Act (felony hazing statute)
  • Texas relevance: Phi Delta Theta has chapters at UT Austin, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, UH, and SMU

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017)

  • What happened: Bid-acceptance night with extreme drinking; severe falls caught on chapter cameras; delayed medical help
  • Legal outcome: 18 members charged with 1,000+ counts; Pennsylvania enacted Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law
  • Texas relevance: Beta Theta Pi has chapters at UT Austin, Texas A&M, Texas Tech

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013)

  • What happened: Pledge blindfolded, weighted with backpack, repeatedly tackled during “glass ceiling” ritual; died from traumatic brain injury; delayed 911 call
  • Legal outcome: National fraternity convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter; banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years
  • Texas relevance: Shows national organizations can face criminal conviction, not just civil liability

Non-Fatal Catastrophic Injuries

Danny Santulli – University of Missouri, Phi Gamma Delta (2021)

  • What happened: 18-year-old pledge forced to drink excessive alcohol during “pledge dad reveal”; suffered permanent brain damage (cannot walk, talk, or see; requires 24/7 care)
  • Legal outcome: Multiple criminal charges; settlements with 22 defendants (reported multi-million-dollar)
  • Texas relevance: Phi Gamma Delta has chapters at UT Austin, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, SMU

Texas A&M University, Sigma Alpha Epsilon (~2021)

  • What happened: Two pledges alleged forced strenuous activity with substances including industrial-strength cleaner poured on them, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries
  • Legal outcome: Pledges sued for $1 million; fraternity suspended for two years
  • Texas relevance: This happened right here in Texas at a school many Natalia students attend

What These Cases Mean for Natalia Families

  1. Patterns repeat: The same dangerous “traditions” (Big/Little nights, drinking games, physical endurance tests) recur across campuses
  2. Delayed medical care kills: Organizations consistently prioritize protecting themselves over getting help for injured members
  3. Cover-ups are standard: Evidence destruction, witness coaching, and intimidation are routine responses
  4. Only litigation drives change: Significant reforms typically follow only after tragedy and lawsuits
  5. National organizations know the risks: Their anti-hazing policies exist because they’ve seen deaths and injuries repeatedly

The Texas University Landscape: Where Natalia Families Send Their Kids

Medina County families have strong connections to Texas’s major university systems. Whether your child attends a local community college, commutes to San Antonio schools, or lives at a major residential campus, understanding each university’s hazing landscape is critical.

University of Houston: The Active Litigation Case

For Natalia Families: While UH is approximately 200 miles from Natalia, many Medina County students transfer to or graduate from UH programs. The ongoing Bermudez case provides a real-time case study in hazing litigation.

Campus Snapshot:

  • Large urban commuter/residential mix
  • Active Greek life with 50+ fraternity/sorority chapters
  • Includes NPHC “Divine Nine” historically Black organizations

The Bermudez Case Details:

  • Plaintiff: Leonel Bermudez, represented by Attorney911 (Ralph Manginello & Mr. Lupe Peña)
  • Defendants: University of Houston, UH System Board of Regents, Pi Kappa Phi national HQ, Beta Nu housing corporation, 13 individual fraternity leaders
  • Hazing methods: “Pledge fanny pack” humiliation, forced dress codes, overnight chauffeuring, extreme physical workouts, forced consumption leading to vomiting, hose spraying “like waterboarding,” cold-weather exposure
  • Medical harm: Rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney failure, 4-day hospitalization, ongoing kidney damage risk
  • Organizational response: Pi Kappa Phi HQ suspended chapter Nov 6, 2025; chapter voted to surrender charter Nov 14, 2025; UH called conduct “deeply disturbing”
  • Media coverage: Click2Houston, ABC13, Hoodline (late November 2025)

UH Hazing Policy & Reporting:

  • Prohibits hazing on and off campus
  • Reporting through Dean of Students, Student Conduct, UHPD
  • Critical insight: Despite policies, the Bermudez case shows systemic failure

How a UH Hazing Case Proceeds:

  • Jurisdiction: Harris County courts (Houston)
  • Police involvement: UHPD and/or Houston Police Department
  • Civil venue: Harris County district courts
  • Potential defendants: Individuals, local chapter, national organization, university, property owners

Texas A&M University: Corps Culture & Greek Life

For Natalia Families: Located approximately 150 miles from Natalia, Texas A&M is a common destination for Medina County students, particularly those interested in engineering, agriculture, and the Corps of Cadets.

Campus Snapshot:

  • Large residential campus in College Station
  • Prominent Corps of Cadets military tradition
  • Extensive Greek system with 60+ chapters

Documented Hazing Incidents:

  1. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Chemical Burns Case (~2021)

    • Pledges allegedly covered in substances including industrial-strength cleaner
    • Severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries
    • $1 million lawsuit; chapter suspended for two years
  2. Corps of Cadets “Roasted Pig” Case (2023)

    • Cadet alleged degrading hazing including simulated sexual acts
    • Bound between beds in “roasted pig” pose with apple in mouth
    • Sought over $1 million; A&M stated it handled matter internally
  3. Multiple Greek Life Suspensions

    • Regular disciplinary actions for alcohol hazing, physical abuse, policy violations
    • Publicly available through student conduct records

Unique A&M Factors:

  • Corps of Cadets culture: Military-style discipline traditions that can cross into hazing
  • “University-approved” vs. underground activities: Much hazing occurs outside official channels
  • Strong institutional loyalty: Can create pressure against reporting

How an A&M Case Proceeds:

  • Jurisdiction: Brazos County courts
  • Police involvement: Texas A&M University Police Department, College Station PD
  • Special considerations: Corps administrative processes run parallel to university conduct system

University of Texas at Austin: Transparency & Repeated Violations

For Natalia Families: UT Austin is approximately 75 miles from Natalia, making it accessible for Medina County students. Its public hazing violation database provides unique transparency.

Campus Snapshot:

  • Flagship UT system campus in Austin
  • 60+ fraternity/sorority chapters
  • Publicly available hazing violation database

Documented Violations (Public Database Examples):

  1. Pi Kappa Alpha (2023)

    • New members directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics
    • Found to be hazing; chapter probation and required prevention education
  2. Texas Wranglers (Spirit Organization)

    • Forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, punishment-based practices
    • Multiple sanctions over years
  3. Multiple Greek Chapters

    • Regular entries for alcohol hazing, physical endurance tests, mental abuse
    • Pattern of probation, education requirements, temporary suspensions

UT’s Hazing Transparency:

  • Public database at hazing.utexas.edu
  • Lists organizations, dates, conduct, sanctions
  • Strategic value: Provides pattern evidence for civil cases showing institutional knowledge

How a UT Case Proceeds:

  • Jurisdiction: Travis County courts
  • Police involvement: UT Police Department, Austin Police Department
  • Evidence advantage: Public violation database helps establish foreseeability

Southern Methodist University: Private Campus Dynamics

For Natalia Families: SMU in Dallas is approximately 300 miles from Natalia but attracts Medina County students seeking private university education.

Campus Snapshot:

  • Private university in Dallas
  • Affluent student body with strong Greek presence
  • Less public transparency than state schools

Documented Incidents:

  1. Kappa Alpha Order (2017)

    • New members reportedly paddled, forced to drink, sleep-deprived
    • Chapter suspended; recruiting restrictions until ~2021
  2. Multiple Anonymous Reports

    • SMU uses Real Response anonymous reporting system
    • Regular disciplinary actions not always publicly disclosed

Private University Considerations:

  • Less public record availability: Requires litigation discovery to obtain internal documents
  • Different liability standards: Sovereign immunity doesn’t apply (unlike public universities)
  • Reputation protection: Strong institutional incentives to resolve matters quietly

Baylor University: Religious Identity & Scandal History

For Natalia Families: Baylor in Waco is approximately 175 miles from Natalia, with particular appeal to religious families in Medina County.

Campus Snapshot:

  • Private Baptist university in Waco
  • History of athletic and Title IX scandals
  • Religious branding that can complicate abuse reporting

Documented Incidents:

  1. Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020)

    • 14 players suspended following hazing investigation
    • Staggered suspensions over early season
  2. Broader Cultural Context

    • Previous sexual assault scandal revealed institutional cover-up patterns
    • Raises questions about handling of hazing complaints

Unique Baylor Factors:

  • Religious environment: Can create additional pressure against reporting
  • Athletic program prominence: Similar to Northwestern football scandal dynamics
  • Post-scandal reforms: May affect how current cases are handled

The Texas Greek Ecosystem: Organizations Behind the Letters

When your child joins “Pi Kappa Phi” or “Sigma Alpha Epsilon,” they’re not just joining a local club. They’re connecting to a national network with documented hazing histories, insurance policies, and legal liabilities. Understanding this ecosystem is crucial for holding the right parties accountable.

The Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine: What We Know About Texas Organizations

Our firm maintains a comprehensive database of Texas Greek organizations compiled from public records. For Natalia families, this means we don’t start from scratch when investigating hazing—we already know the organizational landscape.

IRS B83 Texas-Registered Greek Organizations: 125 Entities
These are tax-exempt organizations the IRS classifies as fraternities, sororities, and related groups with Texas mailing addresses:

  • KAPPA SIGMA – MU CAMMA CHAPTER INC (EIN: 133048786) | 3007 EARL RUDDER FWY S, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845
  • BETA NU PI KAPPA PHI FRATERNITY HOUSING CORPORATION INC (EIN: 462267515) | 10601 BIG HORN TRL, FRISCO, TX 75035
  • PI KAPPA PHI DELTA OMEGA CHAPTER BUILDING CORPORATION (EIN: 371768785) | 4102 EASTSHORE ST, MISSOURI CITY, TX 77459
  • TEXAS KAPPA SIGMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC (EIN: 741380362) | PO BOX 470061, FORT WORTH, TX 76147
  • CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY (EIN: 740555581) | 2711 RIO GRANDE ST, AUSTIN, TX 78705
  • SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY EPSILON XI CHAPTER (EIN: 746084905) | 4300 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD, HOUSTON, TX 77204
  • ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC (EIN: 475370943) | 5019 CALHOUN RD, HOUSTON, TX 77204
  • HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI (Multiple EINs) | Campuses statewide including UT Tyler, Texas Tech Health Sciences, Texas A&M, UH-Victoria

Total Texas Fraternities & Sororities: 1,423 organizations across 25 Texas metros tracked through public records.

San Antonio Metro Area Organizations (Relevant to Natalia)

Natalia sits in Medina County, part of the broader San Antonio-New Braunfels metropolitan area. Greek organizations in this region include:

San Antonio Metro Area (86 total organizations per Cause IQ data):

  • Xi Omicron Iota House Association (ΩΧΟ) – San Antonio (Trinity University)
  • Alpha Lambda Chapter of Sigma Chi – San Antonio (Trinity University)
  • Delta Sigma Theta Sorority – San Antonio Alumnae – San Antonio
  • Kappa Alpha Psi – San Antonio Alumni – San Antonio

Nearby Campuses Medina County Families Attend:

  • University of Texas at San Antonio (San Antonio, Bexar County) – 50 miles from Natalia
  • Texas A&M University-San Antonio (San Antonio, Bexar County) – 45 miles from Natalia
  • Our Lady of the Lake University (San Antonio, Bexar County) – 50 miles from Natalia
  • St. Mary’s University (San Antonio, Bexar County) – 50 miles from Natalia

National Organizations with Documented Hazing Histories Present at Texas Schools

These are the same organizations involved in fatal and injurious hazing incidents nationwide:

Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / “Pike”)

  • National incidents: Stone Foltz death (BGSU, 2021), David Bogenberger death (NIU, 2012)
  • Texas chapters: UT Austin, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, UH, others
  • Pattern: Big/Little alcohol hazing, forced consumption rituals

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / “SAE”)

  • National incidents: Multiple alcohol deaths, traumatic brain injury case (Alabama, 2023), chemical burns (Texas A&M, ~2021)
  • Texas chapters: UT Austin, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, UH, SMU
  • Pattern: Physical abuse, alcohol hazing, chemical exposure

Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ)

  • National incidents: Max Gruver death (LSU, 2017)
  • Texas chapters: UT Austin, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, UH, SMU
  • Pattern: Drinking games, “Bible study” rituals

Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ)

  • National incidents: Andrew Coffey death (FSU, 2017)
  • Texas chapters: UH (Beta Nu chapter in Bermudez case), Texas A&M, others
  • Pattern: Big Brother nights, forced alcohol consumption

Kappa Alpha Order (ΚΑ)

  • National incidents: Multiple hazing suspensions including SMU chapter (2017)
  • Texas chapters: SMU, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, others
  • Pattern: Paddling, physical endurance tests

Why National Histories Matter in Your Case

When we represent Natalia families in hazing cases, we use national pattern evidence to prove:

  1. Foreseeability: The national organization knew or should have known these activities were dangerous
  2. Inadequate supervision: Despite prior incidents, national failed to implement effective prevention
  3. Punitive damages potential: Repeated ignoring of known dangers can justify punishment beyond compensation
  4. Insurance coverage arguments: Showing pattern helps overcome “intentional act” exclusions

Building a Hazing Case: Evidence, Strategy & Damages

When your child has been hazed, the path to accountability requires systematic investigation, strategic legal positioning, and comprehensive damage assessment. This is where our experience handling complex institutional cases—from the BP Texas City explosion to multi-million dollar wrongful death claims—becomes critical for Natalia families.

Critical Evidence Collection Timeline

HOURS 0-48 (PRESERVATION PHASE):

  1. Digital communications: Screenshot ALL group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Snapchat, Instagram DMs, fraternity apps). Capture full threads with timestamps and participant names visible.
  2. Photos/videos: Document injuries from multiple angles with scale reference (coin, ruler). Photograph locations, alcohol bottles, paddles, props.
  3. Medical documentation: Go to ER immediately. Tell medical providers “I was hazed” so it’s in the record. Request copies of all records (ER reports, lab results, imaging).
  4. Witness list: Write names/contact info for other pledges, members, roommates, RAs who saw something.
  5. Physical evidence: Save clothing (don’t wash), receipts, pledge manuals, any objects used in hazing.

DAYS 3-30 (INVESTIGATION PHASE):

  1. Digital forensics: Our experts can often recover deleted messages from phones, cloud backups, or carrier records.
  2. University records: We subpoena prior conduct files, incident reports, Clery reports, internal emails about the organization.
  3. National organization records: We obtain prior incident reports, risk management files, communications between chapter and nationals.
  4. Third-party evidence: Surveillance footage from venues, bar tabs, Airbnb records, landlord communications.
  5. Expert consultations: Medical experts, toxicologists, psychologists, economists, Greek life culture experts.

The Defendants: Who Can Be Held Accountable

In the Bermudez case we’re litigating, we sued 17 different defendants across multiple categories. This comprehensive approach ensures maximum accountability and access to insurance coverage.

Individual Students (13 in Bermudez case):

  • Chapter president, pledgemaster, sorority relations chair, risk manager, other officers
  • Members who planned, participated in, or covered up hazing
  • Personal liability: They can be sued individually, and their parents’ homeowner insurance may provide coverage

Local Chapter/Organization:

  • The fraternity/sorority as an entity (if incorporated)
  • Housing corporations that own chapter houses
  • Example: Beta Nu Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity Housing Corporation Inc (EIN: 462267515)

National Headquarters:

  • Pi Kappa Phi national (in Bermudez case)
  • Other nationals like Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, etc.
  • Liability basis: Negligent supervision, failure to enforce policies, pattern of ignoring known dangers

University & Governing Board:

  • University of Houston, UH System Board of Regents (in Bermudez case)
  • Texas A&M University System, UT System Board of Regents, etc.
  • Legal theories: Negligence, Title IX violations, Clery Act violations, premises liability
  • Sovereign immunity challenges: Public universities have some protection, but exceptions exist for gross negligence

Third Parties:

  • Property owners (landlords of off-campus houses)
  • Alcohol providers (bars, liquor stores under dram shop laws)
  • Security companies, event venues
  • Alumni advisors who failed to supervise

Damages: What Your Family Can Recover

Hazing causes catastrophic losses that extend far beyond medical bills. We work with economists, life care planners, and medical experts to quantify the full impact.

Economic Damages (Quantifiable Financial Losses):

  • Medical expenses: ER care, hospitalization, surgery, medications, future treatment, lifelong care for permanent injuries
  • Lost income/earning capacity: Missed semesters, delayed career entry, reduced earning potential for permanent disabilities
  • Educational losses: Tuition for withdrawn semesters, lost scholarships, transfer costs
  • Property damage: Destroyed clothing, phones, other personal items

Non-Economic Damages (Subjective but Compensable):

  • Physical pain & suffering: From injuries, medical procedures, ongoing pain
  • Emotional distress: PTSD, depression, anxiety, humiliation, loss of dignity
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: Can’t participate in activities they loved, damaged relationships
  • Reputational harm: Social stigma, difficulty transferring schools or finding jobs

Wrongful Death Damages (For Families):

  • Economic losses: Funeral/burial costs, lost financial support, loss of inheritance
  • Non-economic losses: Loss of companionship, love, guidance; grief and mental anguish
  • Punitive damages: In cases of particularly reckless or malicious conduct

Recent Hazing Case Settlements/Verdicts:

  • Stone Foltz (Pi Kappa Alpha): $10 million total settlement
  • David Bogenberger (Pi Kappa Alpha): $14 million settlement
  • Max Gruver (Phi Delta Theta): $6.1 million verdict (plus prior settlements)
  • Chad Meredith (Kappa Sigma): $12.6 million jury verdict
  • Sigma Chi (College of Charleston): $10+ million settlement
  • Joseph Snell (Omega Psi Phi): $375,000 verdict (early precedent)

Overcoming Common Defense Tactics

Universities and fraternities use predictable defenses. We anticipate and counter them:

Defense: “The Pledge Consented”

  • Our response: Texas Education Code §37.155 states consent is not a defense. Power imbalance, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion create coercion, not true consent.

Defense: “National Didn’t Know / Rogue Chapter”

  • Our response: We subpoena national records showing prior incident reports, pattern evidence from other chapters, and inadequate supervision.

Defense: “It Happened Off-Campus / Not Our Property”

  • Our response: Location doesn’t eliminate duty. Nationals and universities benefit from and control chapter activities regardless of venue.

Defense: “We Have Anti-Hazing Policies”

  • Our response: Paper policies are meaningless without enforcement. We show prior incidents were ignored or minimally punished.

Defense: “University Sovereign Immunity”

  • Our response: We argue exceptions for gross negligence, ministerial vs. discretionary acts, Title IX violations, and sue individuals in personal capacity.

Defense: “Insurance Doesn’t Cover Intentional Acts”

  • Our response: We argue negligent supervision (covered) vs. intentional hazing (potentially excluded), pursue multiple policies, and bring bad faith claims if insurers wrongly deny coverage.

Practical Guide for Natalia Families: What to Do Right Now

For Parents: Warning Signs & Action Steps

Red Flags Your Child Is Being Hazed:

  • Unexplained bruises, burns, or injuries with inconsistent explanations
  • Extreme exhaustion beyond normal college stress
  • Weight changes from food/water restriction or stress
  • Constant secret phone use, anxiety about missing group messages
  • Withdrawal from family, old friends, non-Greek activities
  • Personality changes: anxiety, depression, irritability, defensiveness
  • Financial requests for unexplained “dues,” “fines,” or alcohol purchases
  • Academic decline: missed classes, dropping grades, lost scholarships

How to Talk to Your Child About Hazing:

  1. Choose the right time: Private, calm, no distractions
  2. Use open questions: “How are things with your fraternity/sorority?” not “Are they hazing you?”
  3. Listen without judgment: If they open up, don’t interrupt with anger at the organization
  4. Emphasize safety: “Your health is more important than any membership”
  5. Offer unconditional support: “We’ll figure this out together, no matter what”

If Your Child Is Injured:

  1. Medical care first: Go to ER immediately, even if they resist
  2. Document everything: Photos, screenshots, notes with dates/times/details
  3. Contact Attorney911: Call 1-888-ATTY-911 within 24-48 hours
  4. Preserve evidence: Don’t let them delete messages or “clean up”
  5. Do NOT confront the organization: This triggers evidence destruction and witness coaching

Dealing with the University:

  • Document all communications: Emails, calls, meetings
  • Ask specific questions: “What prior incidents involve this organization?” “What disciplinary action was taken?”
  • Request records: Under FERPA, your child can request their own disciplinary records
  • Do NOT sign settlement offers: Universities often push quick, low-dollar resolutions that waive legal rights
  • Involve your attorney early: Universities have legal teams; you need your own

For Students: Safety, Evidence, & Reporting

Is This Hazing? Self-Assessment:

  • Do you feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced?
  • Would you do this if you had a real choice (no social consequences)?
  • Is the activity dangerous, degrading, or illegal?
  • Are you being told to keep secrets or lie about it?
  • If yes to any, it’s hazing.

How to Exit Safely:

  1. Immediate danger: Call 911, get to safe location
  2. De-pledging: Send email/text to chapter president: “I resign my pledge/membership effective immediately”
  3. Tell someone first: Parent, RA, trusted friend so there’s a record
  4. Do NOT go to “one last meeting”: This is when pressure/retaliation happens
  5. If threatened: Report to campus police, seek protective order

Evidence Collection Guide:

  • Screenshots: Full chat threads with timestamps, participant names
  • Recordings: Texas is one-party consent—you can record conversations you’re part of
  • Photos: Injuries (multiple angles with scale), locations, objects
  • Medical: Go to student health or ER, say “I was hazed” for the record
  • Witnesses: Names/contacts of others who saw what happened

Reporting Channels:

  • Campus: Dean of Students, Office of Student Conduct, Title IX office, campus police
  • Local police: If crimes occurred (assault, furnishing alcohol to minor)
  • National Anti-Hazing Hotline: 1-888-NOT-HAZE (anonymous, 24/7)
  • Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (confidential legal consultation)

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

Mistake #1: Deleting Evidence

  • Why wrong: Looks like cover-up, can be obstruction of justice, makes case impossible
  • Right move: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content

Mistake #2: Confronting the Organization

  • Why wrong: Triggers evidence destruction, witness coaching, prepared defenses
  • Right move: Document everything, call attorney before any confrontation

Mistake #3: Signing University “Resolutions”

  • Why wrong: Often waive right to sue, settlements are typically lowball
  • Right move: Do NOT sign anything without attorney review

Mistake #4: Social Media Posts

  • Why wrong: Defense attorneys screenshot everything, inconsistencies hurt credibility
  • Right move: Document privately, let your lawyer control public messaging

Mistake #5: Waiting for University “Investigation”

  • Why wrong: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, statute of limitations runs
  • Right move: Preserve evidence NOW, consult lawyer immediately

Mistake #6: Talking to Insurance Adjusters

  • Why wrong: Recorded statements are used against you, early settlements are lowball
  • Right move: “My attorney will contact you”

Frequently Asked Questions for Natalia Families

Q: Can we sue a university for hazing in Texas?
A: Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities (UH, Texas A&M, UT) have sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in personal capacity. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on specific facts—contact us at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case-specific analysis.

Q: Is hazing a felony in Texas?
A: It can be. Texas Education Code §37.152 classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default, but it becomes a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individual officers can also face charges for failing to report hazing.

Q: What if my child “agreed” to the activities?
A: Texas Education Code §37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” under peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent. This is a critical protection for victims.

Q: How long do we have to file a lawsuit?
A: Generally 2 years from the date of injury or death in Texas, but the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—call us immediately at 1-888-ATTY-911.

Q: What if the hazing happened off-campus?
A: Location doesn’t eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be liable based on sponsorship, control, knowledge, and foreseeability. Many major hazing cases (Pi Delta Psi retreat, Sigma Pi unofficial house) occurred off-campus and still resulted in judgments.

Q: Will our names be public?
A: Most hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. We can request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. We prioritize your family’s privacy while pursuing accountability.

Q: How much does it cost to hire Attorney911?
A: We work on a contingency fee basis for personal injury cases—you pay no upfront fees, and we only get paid if we win your case. This makes quality legal representation accessible to all families.

Q: Do you handle cases outside Texas?
A: While we are Texas-based, we serve hazing victims nationwide through co-counsel arrangements with local attorneys in other states and consultation for families anywhere in the U.S. If your case has Texas connections (national org HQ, Texas-based insurance, etc.), we may serve as lead counsel.

Why Attorney911 for Natalia Hazing Cases

When your family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how universities and national fraternities fight back—and how to win anyway. For families in Natalia and throughout Medina County, here’s why our firm is uniquely qualified to handle your hazing case:

Our Active Texas Hazing Litigation: The Bermudez Case

Right now, we’re fighting one of the most serious hazing cases in Texas history. The Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston & Pi Kappa Phi case isn’t a past victory we talk about—it’s current, active litigation we’re handling day-in, day-out. This means:

  • We know the latest defense tactics universities and fraternities are using in 2025
  • We have live experience with the Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine data in court
  • We understand current insurance company strategies for denying hazing claims
  • We’re already navigating the exact legal issues your family may face

Mr. Lupe Peña’s Insurance Insider Advantage

Mr. Lupe Peña (he/him) spent years as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. He knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies:

  • Value (and undervalue) hazing claims
  • Use delay tactics to pressure families
  • Argue “intentional act” exclusions to deny coverage
  • Set reserves and negotiate settlements

“We know their playbook because we used to run it.” This insider knowledge is invaluable when fighting well-funded institutional defendants.

Ralph Manginello’s Complex Litigation Experience

Ralph Manginello’s background includes:

  • BP Texas City explosion litigation (one of few Texas firms involved)
  • Federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas)
  • HCCLA membership (Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association—elite criminal defense credential)
  • 25+ years of practice handling high-stakes cases

“We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. National fraternities and universities don’t intimidate us.”

Our Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine

While other firms start from scratch, we begin with comprehensive data:

  • 1,423 Greek organizations tracked across 25 Texas metros
  • IRS B83 records on 125+ Texas-registered entities
  • Campus-specific rosters for UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor
  • National hazing incident database with patterns and precedents

For Natalia families, this means we already understand the organizational landscape affecting your child’s campus.

Comprehensive Damage Recovery Approach

We don’t just settle for medical bills. We work with:

  • Economists to calculate lifetime earning loss
  • Life care planners for catastrophic injury cases
  • Medical experts to document ongoing treatment needs
  • Psychologists to quantify emotional trauma

We build cases that force full accountability, not quick, low-dollar settlements.

Spanish-Language Services

Mr. Peña speaks fluent Spanish. For Hispanic families in Natalia and across Texas, we provide:

  • Consultations in Spanish
  • Spanish-language case materials
  • Cultural understanding of family dynamics

Contact Attorney911 for a Free, Confidential Consultation

If your child has been hazed at any Texas campus—whether here in Natalia, at a nearby San Antonio school, or at a major university across the state—we want to hear from you. Families in Natalia, Devine, Lytle, Castroville, and throughout Medina County have the right to answers and accountability.

What to expect in your free consultation:

  1. We listen without judgment: Tell us what happened in complete confidence
  2. Evidence review: We’ll look at any photos, messages, medical records you have
  3. Legal options explained: We’ll outline criminal reporting, civil lawsuits, or other paths
  4. Realistic assessment: We’ll discuss strengths, challenges, and potential outcomes
  5. No pressure: Take time to decide what’s right for your family
  6. Cost transparency: We explain our contingency fee structure clearly

Contact us today:

Serving families throughout Texas from our offices in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont.

Plain Text Links to Key Resources

News Coverage of Leonel Bermudez / UH Pi Kappa Phi Case:

  • Click2Houston coverage: https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/
  • ABC13 coverage: https://abc13.com/post/waterboarding-forced-eating-physical-punishment-lawsuit-alleges-abuse-faced-injured-pledge-uhs-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity/18186418/
  • Hoodline summary: https://hoodline.com/2025/11/university-of-houston-and-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity-face-10m-lawsuit-over-alleged-hazing-and-abuse/

Attorney911 Educational Videos:

  • Evidence preservation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs
  • Statute of limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c
  • Client mistakes to avoid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY
  • Contingency fees explained: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc

Attorney911 Main Website: https://attorney911.com

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Share this article:

Need Legal Help?

Free consultation. No fee unless we win your case.

Call 1-888-ATTY-911

Ready to Fight for Your Rights?

Free consultation. No upfront costs. We don't get paid unless we win your case.

Call 1-888-ATTY-911