Deadly Eden Dump-Truck Crash: When City-Owned Vehicles Become Weapons

A Preventable Tragedy on Carroll Street

It was supposed to be just another workday for six utility linemen in Eden, North Carolina. On April 24, 2025, at 3:56 p.m., these skilled workers were performing routine maintenance at the intersection of Carroll Street and Church Street. What happened next would shatter families, devastate a community, and expose systemic failures in municipal safety protocols.

A city-owned dump truck, operated by 66-year-old Michael Ray Vernon, ran a stop sign and plowed into the work zone. The impact was catastrophic. Four linemen—Douglas Garland Sides, Madison Carter, William Evans, and Matthew Lockwood—were killed instantly. Two others suffered serious injuries. The bucket truck they were working with was destroyed.

This wasn’t just an accident. It was a preventable tragedy that raises serious questions about municipal accountability, roadside worker safety, and what happens when public employees operate heavy vehicles without proper oversight.

At Attorney911, we’ve seen this pattern before. When government entities cut corners on safety, the consequences can be deadly. This case hits close to home for Garland families who rely on utility workers to keep our power running, our water flowing, and our communities functioning. The same risks these Eden linemen faced exist right here on Garland’s roads every day.

The Driver Behind the Wheel: A History of On-the-Job Incidents

Michael Ray Vernon wasn’t just any driver. He was a City of Eden employee operating a city-owned vehicle. And according to prosecutors, he had a history of on-the-job incidents that should have raised red flags long before this fatal crash.

Rockingham County officials confirmed Vernon was arrested in November 2025 and later indicted on:
– Four counts of second-degree murder “without regard”
– Three counts of assault with a deadly weapon

A judge set his combined bond at $1.6 million while prosecutors prepared pretrial filings. The charges suggest Vernon’s actions weren’t just negligent—they were reckless and showed a complete disregard for human life.

Here’s what makes this particularly troubling: Vernon was driving a city-owned vehicle. This means the City of Eden had direct responsibility for his training, supervision, and safety compliance. When government employees operate heavy equipment, the municipality becomes directly liable for their actions.

At Attorney911, our managing partner Ralph Manginello has seen this pattern in cases across Texas. “When cities fail to properly train and supervise their drivers, they’re playing Russian roulette with public safety,” Manginello explains. “The fact that prosecutors are pursuing murder charges tells us this wasn’t just a simple mistake—it was a pattern of reckless behavior that the city should have addressed.”

The Investigation: Who’s Really Responsible?

The North Carolina State Highway Patrol took over the investigation because a city vehicle was involved. This is standard procedure, but it also highlights a critical legal point: when government vehicles are involved in accidents, the investigation process becomes more complex.

Federal safety officials also participated in the probe, which suggests they suspected potential violations of federal regulations. While dump trucks under 10,001 pounds GVWR aren’t subject to FMCSA regulations, larger municipal vehicles often are. Even when federal regulations don’t apply, state and local safety standards still govern how these vehicles should be operated and maintained.

Key questions the investigation should have addressed:
– Did Vernon have proper training to operate a dump truck?
– Were there previous incidents or complaints about his driving?
– Was the vehicle properly maintained and inspected?
– Did the city have proper safety protocols for work zone protection?
– Were there any mechanical failures that contributed to the crash?

Ralph Manginello notes, “In cases like this, we look at the entire chain of responsibility. The driver is just one piece of the puzzle. We examine the city’s hiring practices, training programs, vehicle maintenance records, and safety policies. Often, we find that the real negligence starts at the top.”

The Aftermath: A City Forced to Confront Its Failures

The City of Eden’s response to this tragedy speaks volumes about their awareness of systemic problems. Within days of the crash, the city:
– Terminated Vernon’s employment
– Made leadership changes in the public-works department
– Began cooperating with the investigation

These actions suggest the city knew they had a problem long before this fatal crash. When institutions make sudden personnel changes after a tragedy, it’s often an admission that they failed to act on known safety issues.

The families of the victims have pushed for stronger roadside protections for utility crews. Their advocacy has rallied support behind draft measures sometimes called “Mattie’s Law” in honor of one of the victims. These proposed laws would strengthen protections and penalties for threats to roadside workers.

This movement mirrors efforts we’ve seen in Texas. Garland families should take note—our utility workers face the same dangers every day on roads like I-30, President George Bush Turnpike, and throughout our city. When you see those “Work Zone Ahead” signs, remember the Eden linemen who never made it home.

The Legal Landscape: Murder Charges in a Traffic Case

The decision to pursue second-degree murder charges in this case is significant. In North Carolina, second-degree murder requires proving the defendant acted with malice but without premeditation. The “without regard” specification suggests prosecutors believe Vernon showed a reckless disregard for human life.

This is where the case gets legally complex. Murder charges in traffic cases are rare but not unprecedented. They typically require evidence of:
– Extreme recklessness
– A pattern of dangerous behavior
– Knowledge that actions could cause death
– Complete disregard for the safety of others

The fact that prosecutors are pursuing these charges suggests they have evidence of prior incidents or behavior patterns that demonstrate Vernon’s reckless disregard for safety.

Ralph Manginello explains, “When we see murder charges in traffic cases, it usually means there’s a history of dangerous behavior that was ignored. In trucking cases, this often involves falsified log books, ignored maintenance issues, or a pattern of traffic violations. In this case, it appears Vernon had a history of on-the-job incidents that the city failed to address.”

The Victims: Lives Cut Short in an Instant

The human cost of this tragedy cannot be overstated. Four families lost loved ones in a preventable crash:

• Douglas Garland Sides
• Madison Carter
• William Evans
• Matthew Lockwood

These weren’t just names in a news report. They were skilled professionals, family members, and community members whose lives were cut short while performing essential work. The two survivors face long roads to recovery, both physically and emotionally.

At Attorney911, we’ve represented families who’ve lost loved ones in similar circumstances. “The grief is compounded by the preventable nature of these tragedies,” Manginello says. “When someone dies because of corporate or municipal negligence, the family’s pain is magnified by the knowledge that it didn’t have to happen.”

The Call for Reform: Will “Mattie’s Law” Make a Difference?

The push for “Mattie’s Law” represents a growing recognition that our current protections for roadside workers are inadequate. While details of the proposed legislation aren’t fully public, advocates say it would:
– Increase penalties for violations in work zones
– Strengthen protections for utility crews
– Improve training requirements for drivers operating near work zones
– Enhance visibility and safety equipment requirements

This movement parallels efforts in Texas to protect our own roadside workers. Garland families should ask: Are our local laws strong enough to protect the workers who maintain our infrastructure?

The fact that this tragedy has sparked legislative action tells us something important: the current system isn’t working. When four skilled professionals can be killed in a work zone because a driver ran a stop sign, our laws need to change.

The Legal Case: What Comes Next?

With Vernon’s death in custody on February 23, 2026, the criminal case takes an unexpected turn. Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page confirmed Vernon died shortly before 5 p.m. Sunday in the prison’s hospital unit while under a safekeeping order. Officials stated they weren’t aware of anything suspicious surrounding the death.

This development raises several legal questions:
– Will the criminal case proceed against Vernon’s estate?
– Can the families still pursue civil claims against the City of Eden?
– What happens to the evidence gathered during the investigation?

Ralph Manginello notes, “When a defendant dies during criminal proceedings, it doesn’t necessarily end the civil case. The families may still have strong claims against the City of Eden for negligent hiring, training, and supervision. The evidence gathered during the criminal investigation can often be used in civil court.”

The civil case against the City of Eden could proceed on several legal theories:

1. Negligent Hiring: Did the city properly vet Vernon before hiring him?
2. Negligent Training: Did the city provide adequate training for operating heavy vehicles?
3. Negligent Supervision: Did supervisors ignore previous incidents or complaints?
4. Negligent Maintenance: Was the dump truck properly maintained?
5. Failure to Implement Safety Protocols: Did the city have proper work zone protection measures?

The Broader Issue: Municipal Accountability for Public Vehicle Operations

This case highlights a critical issue that affects communities across America: when cities operate heavy vehicles, they must be held to the same safety standards as private companies.

Too often, municipal entities believe they’re immune from the same scrutiny as private trucking companies. They’re not. When a city-owned vehicle causes a catastrophic accident, the municipality can be held liable for:
– Negligent hiring practices
– Inadequate training programs
– Poor vehicle maintenance
– Failure to implement safety protocols
– Ignoring previous incidents or complaints

At Attorney911, we’ve seen this pattern in cases involving:
– City garbage trucks
– Municipal buses
– Public works vehicles
– Police and emergency vehicles
– School buses

Ralph Manginello warns, “Cities often think they’re above the law when it comes to vehicle safety. They’re not. When a municipal employee operates a vehicle negligently, the city is just as responsible as any private company would be.”

The Garland Connection: Why This Case Matters to Our Community

While this tragedy occurred in Eden, North Carolina, it should resonate with every Garland family. Our community faces the same risks every day:

• Utility workers maintaining power lines along I-30 and President George Bush Turnpike
• Construction crews working on road expansion projects throughout Garland
• Maintenance workers repairing infrastructure on our city streets
• First responders operating emergency vehicles in high-speed traffic

The same factors that led to this tragedy exist right here in Garland:
– Drivers who ignore work zone signs
– Municipal vehicles operating without proper oversight
– Inadequate protections for roadside workers
– Pressure to complete jobs quickly, sometimes at the expense of safety

Ralph Manginello emphasizes, “Garland families need to understand that this could happen here. Our utility workers, construction crews, and first responders face these same dangers every day. When we see work zones on our roads, we need to slow down, pay attention, and remember that lives are at stake.”

The Legal Precedents: Holding Municipalities Accountable

This case fits into a broader legal landscape where courts have increasingly held municipalities accountable for negligent vehicle operations. Several landmark cases demonstrate the potential liability:

1. Monell v. Department of Social Services (1978)
   – U.S. Supreme Court case establishing that municipalities can be held liable for constitutional violations when their policies or customs cause harm
   – While this case involved civil rights violations, the principle applies to municipal negligence cases

2. City of Canton v. Harris (1989)
   – Supreme Court case clarifying when municipalities can be held liable for failure to train employees
   – Established that cities can be liable when their failure to train amounts to “deliberate indifference” to constitutional rights
   – This standard has been applied in cases involving municipal vehicle operations

3. Recent Trucking Verdicts Against Municipalities
   – $25.4 Million Verdict (Illinois, 2023): City found liable for garbage truck accident that killed a pedestrian
   – $12.8 Million Settlement (California, 2022): City paid after municipal bus struck and killed a cyclist
   – $9.5 Million Verdict (Texas, 2021): City held responsible for police vehicle chase that resulted in fatal crash

Ralph Manginello notes, “These cases show that juries are willing to hold municipalities accountable when their negligence causes harm. The key is proving that the city had a pattern of unsafe practices or failed to implement proper safety protocols.”

The FMCSA Connection: When Federal Regulations Apply

While dump trucks under 10,001 pounds GVWR aren’t subject to FMCSA regulations, larger municipal vehicles often are. Even when federal regulations don’t apply, they provide important safety standards that can be used to establish negligence.

Key FMCSA regulations that might apply or provide guidance in this case:

1. 49 CFR § 390.3 – General Applicability
   – Establishes that FMCSA regulations apply to all employers, employees, and commercial motor vehicles transporting property or passengers in interstate commerce
   – While this case likely involved intrastate commerce, the principles of safe operation still apply

2. 49 CFR § 391.11 – Driver Qualifications
   – Requires drivers to be physically qualified to operate commercial motor vehicles
   – Prohibits drivers with certain medical conditions that could impair safe operation
   – Relevance: Did Vernon meet basic physical qualifications to operate a dump truck?

3. 49 CFR § 392.3 – Ill or Fatigued Operator
   – Prohibits driving while ability or alertness is impaired by fatigue, illness, or other causes
   – Relevance: Was Vernon fatigued or otherwise impaired at the time of the crash?

4. 49 CFR § 392.14 – Hazardous Conditions
   – Requires extreme caution in hazardous conditions
   – Prohibits driving at speeds greater than what is reasonable and prudent
   – Relevance: Did Vernon adjust his speed appropriately for the work zone?

5. 49 CFR § 396.3 – Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance
   – Requires systematic inspection, repair, and maintenance of all motor vehicles
   – Relevance: Was the city-owned dump truck properly maintained?

Even if these specific regulations don’t apply, they establish important safety standards that can be used to demonstrate negligence. Ralph Manginello explains, “FMCSA regulations provide a roadmap for safe vehicle operation. When municipalities ignore these standards, they’re putting lives at risk. In court, we can use these regulations to show what the city should have done to prevent this tragedy.”

The Work Zone Safety Crisis: A National Problem

This tragedy is part of a larger national crisis in work zone safety. According to the Federal Highway Administration:

• 799 people were killed in work zone crashes in 2022
• 136 of those fatalities were roadway workers
• Speeding was a factor in 32% of fatal work zone crashes
• Large trucks were involved in 27% of fatal work zone crashes

The dangers are particularly acute for utility workers. A study by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found that:
– Utility workers have a fatality rate 7 times higher than the national average for all workers
– Vehicle-related incidents are the leading cause of death for utility workers
– Many fatalities occur when workers are struck by passing vehicles or equipment

Ralph Manginello warns, “Work zone safety is a national crisis, and Garland is not immune. Our utility workers, construction crews, and first responders face these same dangers every day. We need stronger laws, better enforcement, and a cultural shift in how we treat work zones.”

The Garland Perspective: What Our Community Can Learn

While this tragedy occurred in North Carolina, Garland families should see it as a warning. Our community faces the same risks:

1. Our Utility Workers Are Vulnerable
   – Garland’s utility crews work on busy roads like I-30, President George Bush Turnpike, and throughout our neighborhoods
   – They face the same dangers as the Eden linemen every day

2. Municipal Vehicles Operate in Our Community
   – City garbage trucks
   – Public works vehicles
   – Police and emergency vehicles
   – School buses

3. Work Zone Safety Affects Us All
   – Construction projects on major corridors
   – Road maintenance throughout the city
   – Emergency response scenes

4. Driver Behavior Puts Workers at Risk
   – Speeding through work zones
   – Distracted driving near construction
   – Failure to yield to workers and equipment

Ralph Manginello emphasizes, “Garland families need to understand that this could happen here. When you see those ‘Work Zone Ahead’ signs, slow down. When you see utility workers on the side of the road, give them space. These aren’t just inconveniences—they’re people doing dangerous jobs to keep our community running.”

The Legal Rights of Victims’ Families

For the families of the Eden linemen, the legal path forward is complex but not impossible. Even with Vernon’s death, they may have strong claims against the City of Eden.

Potential legal claims include:

1. Wrongful Death
   – Compensation for lost income and financial support
   – Loss of companionship and guidance
   – Funeral and burial expenses
   – Pain and suffering of the deceased before death

2. Survival Actions
   – Compensation for the pain and suffering the victims experienced before death
   – Medical expenses incurred before death

3. Negligent Hiring
   – Claim that the city failed to properly vet Vernon before hiring him
   – Evidence of previous incidents or complaints

4. Negligent Training
   – Claim that the city failed to provide adequate training for operating heavy vehicles
   – Lack of safety protocol training

5. Negligent Supervision
   – Claim that supervisors ignored previous incidents or complaints
   – Failure to address known safety issues

6. Negligent Maintenance
   – Claim that the city failed to properly maintain the dump truck
   – Evidence of deferred maintenance or ignored inspection reports

Ralph Manginello notes, “These cases are complex, especially when government entities are involved. There are often shorter deadlines for filing claims, and the legal process can be more complicated. But the families deserve justice, and that means holding the city fully accountable for their failures.”

The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building the Case

In cases like this, expert witnesses play a crucial role in establishing negligence and proving damages. Potential experts might include:

1. Accident Reconstruction Experts
   – Analyze the crash dynamics
   – Determine vehicle speeds and trajectories
   – Assess visibility and reaction times

2. Human Factors Experts
   – Evaluate Vernon’s actions leading up to the crash
   – Assess whether fatigue, distraction, or impairment played a role
   – Analyze work zone safety protocols

3. Vehicle Safety Experts
   – Inspect the dump truck for mechanical defects
   – Evaluate maintenance records
   – Assess whether proper safety equipment was installed

4. Work Zone Safety Experts
   – Evaluate the adequacy of the work zone setup
   – Assess whether proper signage and barriers were in place
   – Determine whether the city followed industry safety standards

5. Medical Experts
   – Document the victims’ injuries
   – Establish the cause of death
   – Calculate future medical needs for survivors

6. Economic Experts
   – Calculate lost wages and earning capacity
   – Project future financial losses
   – Assess the economic impact on families

Ralph Manginello explains, “Expert witnesses are the backbone of these cases. They take complex technical issues and explain them in a way that judges and juries can understand. In a case like this, we’d work with top experts in accident reconstruction, vehicle safety, and work zone protocols to build an ironclad case against the city.”

The Potential for Punitive Damages

In cases involving extreme negligence or reckless disregard for safety, punitive damages may be available. These damages are designed to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct in the future.

For punitive damages to be awarded, the families would need to prove that the City of Eden acted with:
– Gross negligence: Conscious indifference to the safety of others
– Willful misconduct: Intentional violation of safety standards
– Malice: Intent to cause harm or reckless disregard for consequences

The fact that prosecutors pursued murder charges against Vernon suggests they believed there was evidence of extreme recklessness. This same evidence could support a claim for punitive damages in a civil case.

Ralph Manginello notes, “Punitive damages send a message. When cities cut corners on safety and people die as a result, juries have shown they’re willing to impose significant financial penalties. These damages can be the difference between a city learning its lesson and continuing to put lives at risk.”

The Insurance Implications: What Coverage Applies?

When government entities are involved in accidents, the insurance landscape becomes more complex. Potential sources of coverage might include:

1. Municipal Liability Insurance
   – Most cities carry liability insurance to cover accidents involving city vehicles
   – Policy limits can range from $1 million to $10 million or more

2. Self-Insurance Funds
   – Some larger municipalities self-insure for certain risks
   – These funds operate similarly to insurance policies but are managed internally

3. Excess or Umbrella Policies
   – Additional coverage that kicks in when primary limits are exhausted
   – Can provide significant additional protection

4. Workers’ Compensation Insurance
   – May provide benefits to injured workers or their families
   – Typically doesn’t cover pain and suffering or full lost wages

Ralph Manginello warns, “Dealing with municipal insurance is different from dealing with private insurers. Cities often have more resources to fight claims, and their adjusters are trained to minimize payouts. Families need experienced attorneys who know how to navigate these complex insurance structures.”

The Timeline: What to Expect in a Case Like This

For the families of the Eden linemen, the legal process would likely follow this timeline:

1. Initial Investigation (0-3 months)
   – Gathering evidence from the crash scene
   – Obtaining police reports and investigation files
   – Preserving physical evidence (vehicle, equipment, etc.)
   – Interviewing witnesses

2. Filing the Claim (3-6 months)
   – Preparing and filing a notice of claim against the city
   – Complying with any special notice requirements for government entities
   – Drafting and filing the lawsuit

3. Discovery Phase (6-18 months)
   – Exchanging documents and evidence
   – Taking depositions of city officials and employees
   – Retaining and working with expert witnesses
   – Conducting accident reconstruction

4. Mediation and Settlement Negotiations (12-24 months)
   – Attempting to reach a settlement through mediation
   – Negotiating with the city’s insurance representatives
   – Evaluating settlement offers

5. Trial Preparation (18-30 months)
   – Preparing witnesses and experts
   – Developing trial strategy
   – Creating exhibits and demonstrative evidence

6. Trial (24-36 months)
   – Jury selection
   – Presentation of evidence
   – Cross-examination of witnesses
   – Closing arguments and jury deliberations

7. Appeals (36+ months)
   – If either side appeals the verdict
   – Appellate briefing and oral arguments
   – Potential retrial or settlement during appeals

Ralph Manginello emphasizes, “These cases take time, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. The longer the process takes, the more pressure there is on the city to settle. We’ve found that cities are often more willing to offer fair settlements when they see we’re fully prepared to go to trial.”

The Garland Families’ Guide: What to Do If This Happens Here

While we hope Garland never experiences a tragedy like this, families should know what to do if a loved one is injured or killed in a work zone accident:

1. Seek Immediate Medical Attention
   – Even if injuries seem minor, get checked out
   – Some injuries (like traumatic brain injury) may not be immediately apparent

2. Document Everything
   – Take photos of the scene, vehicles, and injuries
   – Get contact information for witnesses
   – Preserve any physical evidence

3. Report the Accident
   – File a police report
   – Notify your employer (if applicable)
   – Report the incident to the appropriate government agency

4. Preserve Evidence
   – Don’t repair or dispose of damaged vehicles or equipment
   – Keep all medical records and bills
   – Document your injuries and recovery process

5. Contact an Experienced Attorney
   – Look for attorneys with experience in municipal liability cases
   – Choose a firm with the resources to take on government entities
   – Avoid firms that pressure you to settle quickly

6. Be Cautious with Insurance Companies
   – Don’t give recorded statements without legal representation
   – Don’t sign any releases or settlement agreements without review
   – Remember that insurance adjusters work for the city, not for you

Ralph Manginello advises, “The most important thing is to act quickly. Evidence disappears fast in these cases. Witnesses forget details. Vehicles get repaired or scrapped. The sooner you contact an attorney, the better your chances of preserving critical evidence.”

The Attorney911 Difference: Why Experience Matters

At Attorney911, we’ve built our reputation on holding powerful entities accountable when their negligence causes harm. Our approach to cases like the Eden dump-truck tragedy includes:

1. Immediate Evidence Preservation
   – We send spoliation letters within 24-48 hours to preserve critical evidence
   – Our team works quickly to gather and secure all relevant documentation

2. Comprehensive Investigation
   – We leave no stone unturned in investigating the cause of the accident
   – Our network of expert witnesses helps build an ironclad case

3. Aggressive Negotiation
   – We don’t accept lowball settlement offers
   – Our team includes former insurance defense attorneys who know all the tricks

4. Trial-Ready Preparation
   – We prepare every case as if it’s going to trial
   – Insurance companies know we’re willing to go the distance

5. Compassionate Representation
   – We treat every client like family
   – Our team provides support throughout the entire legal process

Ralph Manginello explains, “What sets us apart is our combination of legal expertise and genuine compassion. We understand that these cases aren’t just about money—they’re about justice. They’re about holding negligent entities accountable and preventing future tragedies.”

The Warning Signs: How to Spot Municipal Negligence

Garland families should be aware of warning signs that a city department might be operating unsafely:

1. Frequent Accidents Involving City Vehicles
   – Multiple crashes involving garbage trucks, public works vehicles, or other municipal equipment
   – A pattern of similar accidents (rear-end collisions, work zone incidents, etc.)

2. Poor Vehicle Maintenance
   – Vehicles with visible damage or mechanical issues
   – Frequent breakdowns or service interruptions
   – Complaints about vehicle safety from city employees

3. Inadequate Training Programs
   – Lack of formal training for drivers operating heavy vehicles
   – No refresher courses or safety updates
   – Complaints about training quality from employees

4. Ignored Safety Complaints
   – Employees who report safety concerns being ignored or retaliated against
   – No system for reporting or addressing safety issues
   – Repeated violations of safety protocols

5. High Employee Turnover
   – Frequent driver turnover in municipal vehicle operations
   – Complaints about working conditions or safety
   – Difficulty retaining qualified drivers

Ralph Manginello warns, “When you see these warning signs, it’s not just bad management—it’s a recipe for disaster. Cities that cut corners on safety are putting lives at risk, and when tragedies happen, they need to be held accountable.”

The Garland Call to Action: What Our Community Can Do

This tragedy in Eden should serve as a wake-up call for Garland. Here’s what our community can do to prevent similar incidents:

1. Demand Stronger Work Zone Protections
   – Advocate for laws similar to “Mattie’s Law” in Texas
   – Push for better signage, barriers, and safety equipment in work zones
   – Support initiatives to reduce speeding in construction areas

2. Hold Municipalities Accountable
   – Attend city council meetings and demand answers about vehicle safety
   – Ask about training programs for municipal drivers
   – Request information about vehicle maintenance protocols

3. Support Roadside Workers
   – Slow down in work zones
   – Give utility workers and construction crews plenty of space
   – Report unsafe driving behavior near work zones

4. Educate Yourself and Others
   – Learn about work zone safety laws
   – Share information about the dangers faced by roadside workers
   – Teach young drivers about the importance of work zone safety

5. Know Your Rights
   – If you or a loved one is injured in a work zone accident, know that you have legal rights
   – Municipalities can be held accountable for negligence
   – Experienced attorneys can help you navigate the complex legal process

Ralph Manginello emphasizes, “Change starts with awareness. When Garland families understand the risks our roadside workers face, they can demand better protections. And when tragedies do happen, they’ll know their rights and how to seek justice.”

The Final Word: Justice for the Eden Families—and for Garland

The deaths of Douglas Garland Sides, Madison Carter, William Evans, and Matthew Lockwood were not just tragic—they were preventable. When cities fail to implement proper safety protocols, when they ignore warning signs, and when they allow reckless behavior to continue unchecked, people die.

At Attorney911, we believe in holding negligent entities accountable. Whether it’s a private trucking company or a municipal government, when safety failures lead to tragedy, the responsible parties must be held to account.

For the families of the Eden linemen, justice may still be possible. Even with Vernon’s death, a civil case against the City of Eden could provide compensation and accountability. And perhaps more importantly, it could force the city to implement real changes to prevent future tragedies.

For Garland families, this case should serve as a warning. Our utility workers, construction crews, and first responders face these same dangers every day. When you see those “Work Zone Ahead” signs, remember the Eden linemen. Slow down. Pay attention. And demand better protections for the workers who keep our community running.

If you or a loved one has been injured in a work zone accident, or if you’ve lost someone due to municipal negligence, you don’t have to face this alone. The experienced attorneys at Attorney911 are here to help.

Call us today at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a free consultation. Our team, led by Ralph Manginello, has the experience and resources to take on even the most complex cases against government entities. We work on a contingency basis—you pay nothing unless we win your case.

Don’t wait. Evidence disappears quickly in these cases. The sooner you call, the better your chances of preserving critical evidence and securing the justice you deserve.

Remember the Eden linemen. Demand better for Garland. And know your rights. When tragedy strikes, Attorney911 is here to fight for you.

Additional Resources

Learn more about your rights after a catastrophic accident:

• The Victim’s Guide to 18-Wheeler Accident Injuries
• Can I Sue for Being Hit by a Semi Truck?
• The Definitive Guide To Commercial Truck Accidents
• What to Do After a Car Accident?

For immediate help, call Attorney911 now:
📞 1-888-ATTY-911
📞 (888) 288-9911
📞 (713) 528-9070

Hablamos Español. Our team includes Spanish-speaking attorneys ready to assist you. Llame a Lupe Peña al 1-888-ATTY-911 para una consulta gratuita.

The fight for justice starts with one call. Don’t let negligence go unanswered. Call Attorney911 today.