It’s nearly 3 AM, and your child, a freshman from Bastrop County attending a Texas university, calls in a panicked whisper. They’re locked in a cold, dark room with other new members, having been roused from sleep for the fifth time this week. They’re tired, hungry, constantly on edge, and just witnessed an older member scream obscenities at a friend for not finishing a bottle of liquor fast enough. They’re telling you they feel humiliated and trapped, but also scared to quit because they’ve been told countless times that “everyone did this, it’s tradition, and if you leave now, you’ll be marked for life.” They ask, “Mom/Dad, is this hazing? What do I do?”
This isn’t just a scenario played out in movies. It’s a stark reality for many Texas families, from Bastrop County to the Rio Grande Valley. The pressure your child describes, the fear, the secrecy—these are hallmarks of hazing in 2025. It’s no longer just a “prank” or innocent “tradition.” Hazing often involves serious physical and psychological abuse, sometimes leading to catastrophic injury or even death.
This guide is designed to be a comprehensive resource for families in Bastrop County and across Texas who are grappling with the complex and often devastating issue of hazing. We will cover:
- What hazing truly looks like in today’s collegiate environment, going beyond outdated stereotypes.
- The Texas and federal laws that govern hazing and hold individuals and institutions accountable.
- The critical lessons learned from major national hazing cases and how they impact victims in Texas.
- Documented incidents and insights from major Texas universities, including the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University.
- How the national histories of fraternities and sororities contribute to liability and risk right here in Texas.
- What legal avenues are available for victims and families in Bastrop County and throughout Texas seeking justice and accountability.
While this article provides general information to empower and educate, it is not a substitute for specific legal advice. Every hazing incident is unique, and we, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, encourage you to contact us for a confidential evaluation of your individual case. We serve families throughout Texas, including Bastrop County, offering dedicated legal support when you need it most.
IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:
-
If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™
-
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.”
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
- Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
- Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
- Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
- Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity/sorority.
- Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
- Post details on public social media.
- Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.
-
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
- Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
- We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.
Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like
For many Bastrop County families, the word “hazing” might still conjure images from movies: a few embarrassing dares, some push-ups, or minor pranks. However, the reality of hazing in today’s college environment, especially across Texas campuses, is far more sinister and dangerous. It has evolved from mere “tradition” into a complex system of abuse, coercion, and control that often puts students’ physical and mental health at severe risk.
Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing
At its core, hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status in a group. This behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. A crucial point to understand is that “I agreed to it” does not automatically make it safe or legal. When there’s immense peer pressure, a power imbalance, and a fear of social exclusion, consent is often rendered meaningless in the eyes of the law.
Main Categories of Hazing
Hazing behaviors can manifest in various forms, often escalating in severity. It’s vital to recognize these different categories:
-
Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is tragically one of the most common and deadly forms of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking, such as chugging challenges, “lineups” where pledges are forced to rapidly consume alcohol, or “games” specifically designed to induce extreme intoxication. It can also extend to being pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, leading to alcohol poisoning, blackouts, and even death.
-
Physical Hazing: This category includes direct physical abuse like paddling and beatings. It also encompasses extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” that push individuals far beyond safe limits, often resulting in injuries like rhabdomyolysis – severe muscle breakdown. Other forms include sleep deprivation, food or water deprivation, and exposure to extreme temperatures or dangerous environments.
-
Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts are designed to degrade and strip individuals of their dignity. Examples include forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (sometimes referred to as “roasted pig” positions), wearing degrading costumes, or participating in acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones. This behavior is not only psychologically damaging but can also constitute sexual assault.
-
Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but profoundly damaging, psychological hazing involves verbal abuse, threats, and deliberate isolation. It can include manipulation, forced confessions, public shaming on social media or in meetings, and intense psychological pressure designed to break down an individual’s self-esteem and foster dependence on the group.
-
Digital/Online Hazing: With advances in technology, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation orchestrated via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Discord. There is also immense pressure to create or share compromising images or videos and to respond instantly to group messages at all hours, contributing to sleep deprivation and anxiety.
Where Hazing Actually Happens
A common misconception in Bastrop County and beyond is that hazing is limited to “frat boys” at large universities. The truth is hazing permeates various student organizations across all types of campuses:
- Fraternities and Sororities: This includes those under Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek councils.
- Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: Organizations with hierarchical structures often present opportunities for hazing to be masked as “discipline” or “tradition.”
- Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Student Groups: Organizations like college cheerleading squads, dance teams, and university spirit organizations can also engage in hazing practices.
- Athletic Teams: Hazing can occur within football, basketball, baseball, swimming, soccer, and other university athletic programs, often under the guise of “team building” or “initiation.”
- Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly benign groups like marching bands or theater ensembles can sometimes engage in hazing practices.
- Some Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Any group with an “initiation” or “new member” component can be vulnerable to hazing.
These practices persist because of a complex interplay of social status, ingrained traditions, and an enforced code of silence. Even when everyone “knows” hazing is illegal or harmful, the desire to belong, the fear of exclusion, and the loyalty to the group often keep these behaviors alive, creating a dangerous trap for students.
Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)
Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is crucial for families in Bastrop County. Both Texas state law and evolving federal regulations provide avenues for accountability and justice when hazing occurs.
Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)
Texas has specific anti-hazing provisions outlined in its Education Code, designed to protect students. In plain terms, Texas hazing law broadly defines hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act directed against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. This act must:
- Endanger the physical health or safety of a student (e.g., forced consumption of alcohol/drugs, physical beatings, extreme exercise, sleep deprivation).
- OR substantially affect the mental health or safety of a student (e.g., extreme humiliation, intimidation, verbal abuse, psychological manipulation leading to distress).
Under Texas law – which governs cases in Bastrop County – a key principle is that the victim’s consent is not a defense. Even if a student technically “agreed” to participate, the law recognizes the inherent power imbalance and peer pressure that often negate true voluntary consent in hazing scenarios.
-
Criminal Penalties:
- Hazing that does not cause serious injury is generally a Class B Misdemeanor (punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine up to $2,000).
- If hazing results in an injury requiring medical treatment, it can be elevated to a Class A Misdemeanor.
- Crucially, if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it becomes a State Jail Felony in Texas, carrying more severe penalties.
- Additionally, individuals in positions of leadership or knowledge who fail to report hazing can face misdemeanor charges, as can those who retaliate against someone who reports hazing.
-
Reporter Protections: Texas law provides some immunity for individuals who report hazing incidents in good faith to university authorities or law enforcement. This aims to encourage reporting without fear of personal legal repercussions for the act of reporting itself, although students may still face university disciplinary action for their involvement in hazing.
Criminal vs. Civil Cases
It’s important for Bastrop County families to understand that hazing incidents can lead to two distinct types of legal action:
-
Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations accused of violating hazing laws or other criminal statutes. The primary aim of criminal cases is punishment – fines, probation, or incarceration. Hazing-related criminal charges often include direct hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, and in the most tragic cases, involuntary manslaughter or negligent homicide.
-
Civil Cases: These are initiated by victims or their surviving family members. The goal of a civil lawsuit is to obtain monetary compensation for the harm suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil claims in hazing cases often center on legal theories such as:
- Negligence and gross negligence (failure to act responsibly).
- Wrongful death (when hazing leads to a fatality).
- Negligent hiring, supervision, or retention (regarding university staff or fraternity advisors).
- Premises liability (if hazing occurs on properties that are poorly managed or unsafe).
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress or assault/battery.
A critical point for Texas families is that a criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case. The standards of proof differ, and a civil action can proceed independently, focusing on proving harm and liability to secure compensation.
Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery
Beyond Texas state law, federal regulations play an increasing role in addressing hazing, particularly at institutions receiving federal funding.
-
Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal financial aid must enhance their hazing prevention efforts and transparency. By around 2026, these institutions will be required to publicly report hazing incidents and aggregate data, providing a clearer picture of hazing activity on campuses across the country, including those attended by students from Bastrop County.
-
Title IX and Clery Act:
- Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in education. When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based hostility, it can trigger Title IX obligations for universities, requiring them to investigate and respond appropriately.
- The Clery Act mandates that colleges and universities disclose campus crime statistics and security policies. Hazing incidents often intersect with Clery reporting requirements, especially when they involve assaults, alcohol or drug-related offenses, or other reportable crimes.
Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit
Determining who is legally responsible in a hazing incident can be complex, but several parties can potentially be named as defendants in a civil lawsuit:
- Individual Students: Those who actively planned, executed, procured substances, or directly participated in the hazing, or even those who stood by and enabled it, can be held individually liable.
- Local Chapters/Organizations: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or student organization itself may be sued, especially if it operates as a legal entity and its leadership authorized or encouraged the hazing. Officers or “pledge educators” can be key targets.
- National Fraternities/Sororities: The national headquarters, which sets policies, collects dues, and is often responsible for the oversight of its local chapters, can be held liable. This liability often hinges on whether the national organization knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing within its chapters or at the specific chapter in question and failed to act.
- Universities or Governing Boards: The educational institution itself, or its governing regents, may be sued under various theories, including negligence, negligent supervision, or for violating their own policies. Key factors include the university’s prior knowledge of hazing, its enforcement of anti-hazing policies, and whether it acted with “deliberate indifference” to known risks. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) often claim sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence or when suing employees in their individual capacities. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections.
- Third Parties: This can include property owners or landlords of off-campus houses where hazing occurred, bars or liquor stores that illegally supplied alcohol to minors (under Texas Dram Shop laws), or even security companies and event organizers who failed in their duty of care.
Every case is fact-specific, and not every party will be liable in every situation. Properly identifying all potential defendants and building a robust case requires deep experience in hazing litigation, a specialization we offer to families from Bastrop County and across Texas.
National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)
When Bastrop County families face hazing, understanding national patterns offers critical context. These cases, though geographically distant, illuminate the recurring dangers, legal liabilities, and avenues for justice that apply to hazing in Texas. They serve as anchor stories, demonstrating the severe consequences and the legal precedents that shape our approach to cases at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor.
Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern
Forced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing fatalities across the nation. Many of these tragic incidents share common threads: extreme intoxication, delays in seeking medical help, and a pervasive code of silence.
-
Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017): A new member, Timothy Piazza, died after consuming dangerous amounts of alcohol during a Beta Theta Pi bid-acceptance event. Critically, fraternity brothers delayed calling for medical help for nearly 12 hours after he suffered severe falls, all captured on internal security cameras. This case led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the creation of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania. For Texas families, this underscores how the combination of extreme intoxication, delayed medical care, and a culture of silence is legally devastating, often leading to severe criminal and civil repercussions.
-
Andrew Coffey – Florida State, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges, including Coffey, were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to consume them rapidly. This tragedy resulted in criminal hazing charges against multiple members and prompted Florida State University to temporarily suspend all Greek life, leading to significant policy overhauls. This case tragically demonstrates how organized, formulaic “tradition” drinking nights within fraternities are a recurring script for disaster, a pattern we see echoed in hazing incidents at Texas universities.
-
Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver died with a blood alcohol content of 0.495% after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where wrong answers meant forced drinking. His death catalyzed the creation of the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing law in Louisiana. This shows that public outcry and undeniable proof of hazing often lead to legislative change, an important consideration for advocating for improved hazing laws in Texas.
-
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): During a fraternity pledge night, Stone Foltz was forced to consume nearly a full bottle of whiskey and died from alcohol poisoning. In the aftermath, multiple fraternity members faced criminal convictions. The Foltz family secured a $10 million settlement, with nearly $3 million coming from Bowling Green State University itself, and the remainder from the national Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity and individuals. This case is crucial for Bastrop County families to understand, as it highlights that universities can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities, especially when there’s evidence of institutional negligence. In 2024, a court ordered the chapter president to personally pay $6.5 million to the Foltz family, a powerful example of individual officer liability.
Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern
Beyond alcohol, ritualized physical abuse and dangerous “initiation” activities constitute a significant portion of severe hazing incidents.
- Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng died after being subjected to a violent, blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. Members repeatedly tackled him while he was weighted down with a backpack, leading to a fatal head injury. Crucially, fraternity members delayed calling 911 for hours. Multiple members were convicted, and the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity was itself found criminally liable for aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter and effectively banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. This case demonstrates that off-campus “retreats” can be as dangerous or even more dangerous than parties on campus, and national organizations bear significant legal and criminal sanctions.
Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse
Hazing is unfortunately not exclusive to Greek life. Major athletic programs, driven by intense competition and team loyalty, can also be breeding grounds for abuse.
- Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): This scandal involved former football players alleging widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program over multiple years. The allegations included forced sexual acts, derogatory language, and other degrading behaviors. Multiple players sued Northwestern University and the coaching staff, leading to the high-profile firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who later settled a wrongful-termination suit confidentially. For Bastrop County families, this case is a stark reminder that hazing extends beyond Greek life into major athletic programs, raising critical questions about institutional oversight and accountability.
What These Cases Mean for Texas Families
These national tragedies share common threads: forced consumption of dangerous substances, humiliating and violent acts, delayed medical care, and concerted cover-up efforts. These patterns, repeated across different organizations and states, tragically prove that such incidents are often far from “unforeseeable accidents.”
What these cases also show is that reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements or verdicts usually follow only after tragedy strikes and determined families pursue litigation. For families in Bastrop County facing hazing at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, understanding these national lessons is paramount. It informs the legal strategies used to hold institutions accountable and to ensure that historical patterns of negligence and indifference are exposed.
TEXAS FOCUS: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor
For families in Bastrop County, understanding the hazing landscape at major Texas universities is paramount. Many students from our community attend these institutions, and the issues faced on their campuses directly impact our local residents. Even if your child attends a school farther from Bastrop County, the patterns, policies, and legal precedents discussed here apply statewide.
In this section, we will delve into the specific hazing environments at the University of Houston, Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University. We’ll examine their policies, documented incidents, and how a legal case might unfold at each.
5.1 University of Houston (UH)
The University of Houston, a vibrant and diverse urban campus in the heart of the state, attracts many students from across Texas, including Bastrop County. Over the years, UH has seen its share of hazing allegations within its active Greek life and other student organizations.
5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
UH is a large public research university with a dynamic mix of commuter and residential students. Its Greek life is robust, featuring fraternities and sororities from various councils (IFC, Panhellenic, MGC, NPHC). Beyond Greek life, UH boasts numerous student organizations, cultural groups, and athletic clubs, all of which carry the potential risk of hazing.
5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
The University of Houston maintains a clear anti-hazing policy that prohibits hazing both on-campus and off-campus. Its policy specifically bans a wide range of activities, including forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and any acts causing mental distress for initiation or membership purposes. UH provides dedicated reporting channels through its Dean of Students Office, Office of Student Conduct, and the UH Police Department. The university often posts a hazing statement and some limited disciplinary information on its website.
5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses
One notable incident involved the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity in 2016. Pledges alleged they were deprived of adequate food, water, and sleep during “new member activities.” One student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being violently slammed onto a table or similar surface, highlighting the extreme physical dangers. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and a significant university suspension. Subsequent disciplinary references at UH have also pointed to fraternities engaged in behaviors “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including alcohol misuse and policy violations, leading to further suspensions or probationary periods for various organizations. This indicates UH’s willingness to suspend chapters, though public details often remain limited.
5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed
In the event of a hazing incident at UH, investigations may involve the UH Police Department and/or the Houston Police Department, depending on the exact location of the incident (on-campus vs. off-campus Houston property). Any civil lawsuits arising from hazing at UH would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County. Potential defendants could include individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the University of Houston itself, as well as property owners if the hazing occurred off-campus.
5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do
For Bastrop County students attending UH, and their parents, here are some concrete steps:
- Familiarize yourself with UH’s official hazing reporting channels, including the Dean of Students Office, UHPD, and any anonymous online reporting forms.
- If you have witnessed or experienced hazing, meticulously document all details—dates, times, locations, names, and specific actions.
- If similar incidents have occurred in the past, noting those prior complaints and responses can be crucial evidence.
- If hazing becomes a legal matter, talking to a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can significantly aid in uncovering prior disciplinary actions and internal university files through legal discovery. Our firm has deep roots in Houston and expertise navigating its legal systems.
5.2 Texas A&M University
Texas A&M University, a sprawling campus with deeply entrenched traditions, is famous for its unique culture, including its robust Greek life and the revered Corps of Cadets. Students from Bastrop County often gravitate towards A&M, drawn by its academic programs and strong traditions, making it a focal point for hazing discussions.
5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
Texas A&M’s identity is heavily influenced by its military roots, exemplified by the Corps of Cadets. This tradition-heavy, military-style environment, alongside a very active Greek life, can sometimes blur the lines between “discipline” and dangerous hazing practices. The university’s emphasis on tradition and unity, while positive in many ways, can also contribute to a culture of secrecy around potentially harmful rituals.
5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
Texas A&M University strictly prohibits hazing, articulating its policies through student conduct codes and specific regulations for the Corps of Cadets and Greek organizations. The university defines hazing in line with Texas state law, banning any act that endangers physical or mental health for initiation or affiliation. Reporting is available through the Dean of Student Life, the Texas A&M Police Department, and an anonymous “Stop Hazing” hotline.
5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses
Texas A&M has faced significant hazing allegations:
- Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Lawsuit (2021): Two pledges from SAE alleged severe hazing that included forced strenuous activity, followed by the pouring of substances like industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit on them. This resulted in severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries, leading to a $1 million lawsuit against the fraternity. The chapter was suspended for two years by the university. This incident underscores the extreme physical dangers hidden within hazing rituals and the potential for long-term injury.
- Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): A former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading and sexualized hazing, including being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth, simulating sexual acts. The lawsuit sought over $1 million, drawing national attention to hazing within military-style organizations. A&M stated it addressed the matter under its own rules.
- The notorious Aggie Bonfire collapse in 1999, while not traditional hazing, raised critical questions about the dangers of unsupervised, tradition-based student activities and institutional liability, leading to over $6 million in settlements. This historical context influences how A&M approaches high-risk student organizations.
5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed
Hazing cases at Texas A&M would likely involve investigations by the Texas A&M Police Department and could lead to civil lawsuits filed in courts with jurisdiction over Bryan/College Station and Brazos County. Because of A&M’s status as a public university, sovereign immunity (refer to Section 3.4) would be a key early defense, but as seen in other public university settlements (like BGSU with Stone Foltz), it is not an absolute bar to legal action, especially when gross negligence or pattern evidence can be shown.
5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do
For Bastrop County families with connections to Texas A&M:
- Be aware of the university’s strict stance against hazing and its specific reporting mechanisms for both Greek life and the Corps.
- Do not let the mystique of “tradition” or “the Aggie Spirit” deter you from reporting any behavior that endangers mental or physical health.
- Thoroughly document any incidents, including group chat messages, photos of injuries, and accounts of what happened.
- If hazing occurs, contacting a hazing attorney promptly is vital. Our firm is well-versed in the specifics of A&M’s culture and can help navigate its unique internal processes and legal challenges.
5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)
The University of Texas at Austin is the flagship public university in Texas, drawing thousands of students from Bastrop County and beyond. UT, like other large universities, has had its share of challenges with hazing, but has also become notable for its increased transparency regarding incidents.
5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
UT Austin is a sprawling, highly competitive campus with a vibrant and diverse student body. Its Greek life is extensive and influential, complemented by a myriad of student organizations, including spirited traditions and athletic clubs. The university’s sheer size and large student population mean that oversight can be challenging, despite clear policies.
5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
The University of Texas at Austin has a comprehensive anti-hazing policy that aligns with Texas state law. It unequivocally prohibits any act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. One of UT’s distinctive features is its commitment to transparency: the university maintains and publicizes an online Hazing Violations webpage (http://hazing.utexas.edu) that lists organizations, dates of incidents, a description of the conduct, and the disciplinary actions taken. Reporting channels include the Office of the Dean of Students, the UT Police Department (UTPD), and an online reporting form.
5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses
UT’s public Hazing Violations page often provides real-time insights into incidents:
- Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): The UT chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha faced disciplinary action when new members were directed to consume excessive amounts of milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. This was deemed hazing, resulting in disciplinary probation and a requirement for enhanced hazing-prevention education.
- Other groups, including various spirit organizations like the Texas Wranglers, have faced sanctions for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, sleep deprivation scenarios, or punishment-based initiation practices, all detailed on UT’s public log.
- In January 2024, Sigma Alpha Epsilon was sued for over $1 million following an alleged assault on an exchange student, further highlighting ongoing concerns with certain chapters.
This level of transparency is rare among universities and is a powerful tool for families from Bastrop County and elsewhere to understand patterns of behavior and accountability at UT. However, the presence of repeated violations on this list also underscores that hazing remains an ongoing challenge despite these efforts.
5.3.4 How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed
Hazing investigations at UT Austin often involve UT Police Department (UTPD) and, if off-campus, the Austin Police Department. Civil lawsuits would typically fall under the jurisdiction of courts in Travis County. As a public university, the University of Texas at Austin can invoke sovereign immunity, but exceptions can be argued, particularly in cases of gross negligence or Title IX violations. Critically, the public record of prior violations on UT’s website can serve as powerful evidence in civil suits, demonstrating a pattern of behavior and the university’s prior knowledge of hazing issues within specific organizations. This is crucial for establishing foreseeability and supporting claims against the university.
5.3.5 What UT Students & Parents Should Do
For Bastrop County residents with students at UT Austin:
- Regularly check UT’s Hazing Violations webpage (http://hazing.utexas.edu) to see if an organization your child is considering joining has a history of misconduct.
- Be acutely aware of UT’s policies and reporting channels, including the Dean of Students and UTPD.
- Immediate documentation and evidence preservation—especially screenshots of digital communications—are critical, as these are often used in university investigations and civil litigation.
- If hazing occurs, seeking legal counsel promptly is essential. Our firm understands how to leverage UT’s public records and navigate the complexities of civil litigation against a public university, both in Austin and for families from Bastrop County.
5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)
Southern Methodist University, a distinguished private university in Dallas, has a strong and often influential Greek life. Many students from Bastrop County choose SMU for its academics and social environment, making its approach to hazing highly relevant.
5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
SMU is known for its beautiful campus, affluent student body, and deeply ingrained Greek culture. Fraternities and sororities play a prominent role in campus social life, and like many institutions where Greek life is a central feature, SMU has had to confront hazing issues within its organizations.
5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
SMU strictly prohibits hazing, defining it broadly to include any action that places a student in mental or physical jeopardy for initiation or affiliation into a group. The university outlines its policies in its Student Code of Conduct. SMU emphasizes prevention efforts, including anonymous reporting systems like “Real Response” and direct channels through the Dean of Students office and the SMU Police Department.
5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses
SMU has experienced notable hazing incidents:
- Kappa Alpha Order (2017): This fraternity chapter faced allegations of severe hazing, including reports of new members being paddled, forced to consume excessive amounts of alcohol, and deprived of sleep. The chapter was swiftly suspended by the university, with restrictions on its ability to recruit new members for several years. This incident underscored the persistence of physical and alcohol-related hazing even at institutions with clear anti-hazing policies.
- Other SMU organizations have faced disciplinary action for various policy violations related to new member activities, though the details of private universities are often less publicly transparent than public institutions like UT.
5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed
Hazing investigations at SMU typically involve the SMU Police Department and the Dean of Students Office. Civil lawsuits would fall under the jurisdiction of courts in Dallas County. As a private university, SMU does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more directly liable in a civil lawsuit than a public institution for its own negligence or role in hazing incidents. This can significantly impact the legal strategy for families from Bastrop County and elsewhere. Civil suits can compel discovery of internal reports and communications, even if not publicly posted.
5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do
For Bastrop County families connected to SMU:
- Pay close attention to SMU’s Student Code of Conduct and its clear hazing definition and reporting procedures.
- Utilize SMU’s anonymous reporting systems if you or your child witnesses or experiences hazing.
- Document any evidence meticulously, including digital communications, photos, and personal accounts.
- If hazing leads to injury or significant distress, contacting an experienced hazing attorney is crucial. Their expertise in navigating cases against private institutions and compelling full disclosure can be invaluable for families seeking accountability and compensation.
5.5 Baylor University
Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, holds a unique position among Texas institutions. While deeply rooted in its religious identity, Baylor has faced significant scrutiny over student safety, making its approach to hazing a critical concern for parents, including those in Bastrop County.
5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
Baylor’s campus culture is strongly influenced by its Christian mission, which often underscores values of community and ethical conduct. However, like other universities, it still features active Greek life and a wide array of athletic and student organizations. Baylor’s recent history, particularly its highly publicized sexual assault scandal involving its football program and Title IX issues, has placed a spotlight on institutional oversight, student welfare, and “zero tolerance” policies. This context shapes how hazing incidents are perceived and handled.
5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
Baylor University has a firm anti-hazing policy, rigorously defining prohibited acts in its Student Code of Conduct. The policy emphasizes the protection of students’ physical and mental well-being and clearly states that consent is not a defense. Baylor provides reporting channels through the Dean of Students’ office, the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD), and an online reporting form. The university often publicizes its “zero tolerance” stance on hazing.
5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses
Baylor’s commitment to student safety has been continuously tested:
- Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): This incident led to the suspension of 14 players from the Baylor baseball team following an internal hazing investigation. While specific details were not fully disclosed, the staggered suspensions over the early season indicated a significant, widespread issue within the prominent athletic program.
- Beyond specific incidents, Baylor’s broader challenges with student misconduct and institutional oversight, previously seen in the sexual assault scandal, color how hazing allegations are handled. This prior scrutiny suggests a higher expectation for rigorous enforcement of misconduct policies.
5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed
Hazing investigations at Baylor typically involve the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) and the Dean of Students office. Civil lawsuits would fall under the jurisdiction of courts in McLennan County. As a private university, Baylor does not have the protection of sovereign immunity, making it directly subject to civil litigation for its actions or inactions related to hazing. The legal strategy in cases against Baylor may often touch upon the university’s “zero tolerance” messaging versus the reality of recurring misconduct, sometimes drawing parallels to its prior history of institutional failures.
5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do
For Bastrop County families connected to Baylor University:
- Thoroughly understand Baylor’s Student Code of Conduct, particularly its anti-hazing provisions and its “zero tolerance” stance.
- Be proactive in documenting any suspected hazing, including digital evidence and firsthand accounts.
- If hazing occurs, report it through Baylor’s official channels (Dean of Students, BUPD, online forms) and seek immediate legal counsel. Our firm has experience with cases involving institutions that face heightened scrutiny and can help families navigate the complex interplay of university policies, legal liability, and prior institutional history effectively.
Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories
The Greek system at universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, as well as those attended by many Bastrop County students, often prides itself on tradition, brotherhood, and sisterhood. Yet, underneath this veneer, hazing remains a persistent and dangerous problem. Critically, to understand hazing at a local chapter in Texas, we must also look at the national organizations they belong to.
Why National Histories Matter
Most fraternities and sororities on Texas campuses are chapters of much larger national organizations. These national headquarters often wield significant power, setting policies, collecting dues, and providing oversight (or in some cases, a lack thereof) to their local chapters.
Why is this important for a Bastrop County family? Because these national organizations all have extensive anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies PRECISELY because they have seen repeated deaths and catastrophic injuries in the past. They know the patterns: the forced drinking nights, the “Bible study” games, the physical beatings, the humiliating rituals, and the code of silence. They have been sued countless times.
When a Texas chapter—whether at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor—repeats the same dangerous script that has caused injury, death, or severe disciplinary action at other chapters nationwide, it can be a powerful indicator of foreseeability. This pattern evidence is crucial in a legal case, bolstering arguments for negligence or even punitive damages against the national entities. It demonstrates that the national organization had prior knowledge of specific hazing risks within its system but allegedly failed to intervene effectively.
Organization Mapping (Synthesized)
Here, we highlight some key fraternities and sororities with a significant presence at Texas universities and a documented national history of severe hazing incidents. This is not an exhaustive list, but rather illustrative of the patterns.
- Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor. Nationally, Pi Kappa Alpha has a tragic history of hazing deaths, notably the Stone Foltz case at Bowling Green State University (2021), where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink nearly a bottle of liquor, resulting in a $10 million settlement. Another significant case involved David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University (2012), where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning, leading to a $14 million settlement. These incidents consistently involve forced, dangerous alcohol consumption during pledge activities. The UT Austin chapter was also disciplined in 2023 for hazing involving milk consumption and calisthenics, showing a local pattern.
- Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE chapters are found at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. The national organization famously announced the elimination of its pledge process in 2014 due to a pattern of hazing-related deaths, yet incidents persist. Recent high-profile cases include:
- A University of Alabama (2023) traumatic brain injury (TBI) case involving a pledge.
- A Texas A&M University (2021) case where pledges allegedly suffered severe chemical burns from industrial-strength cleaner poured on them, leading to a $1 million lawsuit and chapter suspension.
- A University of Texas at Austin (January 2024) lawsuit where an exchange student alleged assault by fraternity members, leading to severe injuries and a claim for over $1 million. These cases highlight ongoing issues despite national policy changes.
- Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, Phi Delta Theta is another prominent fraternity. It was tragically involved in the Max Gruver death at Louisiana State University (2017), where a pledge died from massive alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game, leading to a felony hazing law in Louisiana.
- Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Chapters are active at UH and Texas A&M. This fraternity was involved in the Andrew Coffey death at Florida State University (2017), where a pledge died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” involving excessive liquor consumption. This led to criminal prosecutions and a statewide anti-hazing movement in Florida.
- Kappa Alpha Order (ΚΑ): Present at Texas A&M and SMU. The SMU chapter itself was notoriously suspended in 2017 following allegations of new members being paddled, forced to drink alcohol, and deprived of sleep. This demonstrates that national organizations’ patterns directly manifest at our local Texas campuses.
- Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor. Recent incidents include a College of Charleston (2024) case where a family received over $10 million in damages for alleged physical beatings, forced consumption, and psychological torment of a pledge. Another case at the University of Texas at Arlington (2020) involved a pledge hospitalized with alcohol poisoning, leading to a settlement.
- Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor. This fraternity was liable in the Chad Meredith death at the University of Miami (2001), where a pledge drowned after being pressured into a dangerous swim while intoxicated, resulting in a $12.6 million verdict. More recently, the Texas A&M chapter (2023) has faced allegations of hazing causing severe injuries (rhabdomyolysis or severe muscle breakdown from extreme physical activity), leading to ongoing litigation.
- Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): Found at Texas A&M. This fraternity was involved in the Danny Santulli case at the University of Missouri (2021), where a pledge suffered severe, permanent brain damage after being forced to consume excessive alcohol, leading to multi-million-dollar confidential settlements with 22 defendants.
These examples are not exhaustive but illustrate a grim reality: many of these national organizations have a documented history of severe hazing, leading to injuries, deaths, and significant legal penalties.
Tie Back to Legal Strategy
For families in Bastrop County, these national patterns are not just historical footnotes; they are crucial components of a legal strategy:
- Foreseeability and Prior Knowledge: When a local chapter in Texas engages in hazing that mirrors incidents at other chapters of the same national organization, it demonstrates that the national entity had repeated warnings about specific dangers. This can prove that the organization knew, or should have known, what was likely to happen, bolstering arguments for negligence.
- Policy vs. Practice: National organizations often point to their anti-hazing policies and training as a defense. However, if previous incidents show these policies were not meaningfully enforced, or if internal documents reveal a disconnect between stated policy and actual practice, it can undermine their defense and strengthen a plaintiff’s case.
- Insurance Coverage: Evidence of a national pattern of hazing can influence how insurance companies for the fraternity or university respond to claims. While they may initially deny coverage citing “intentional acts,” a strong argument about negligent supervision and a pattern of organizational failure can compel them to defend and settle.
- Punitive Damages: In egregious cases, especially where an organization showed a callous indifference to known risks or repeatedly ignored warnings, a jury might consider awarding punitive damages (designed to punish and deter). The comprehensive history of national hazing incidents significantly supports such claims.
Understanding these national histories and how they connect to local chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor is essential for building a robust legal case and seeking true accountability when hazing devastates a family.
Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy
For families in Bastrop County encountering the aftermath of hazing, the path to justice can seem daunting. However, building a strong legal case relies on clear strategies for gathering evidence, understanding the full scope of damages, and navigating the complex legal landscape. Here at The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, we specialize in these complex cases.
Evidence
In today’s digital age, evidence in hazing cases is more abundant than ever, yet also more ephemeral. Prompt and thorough collection and preservation are critical. Our video, “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs), provides invaluable initial steps for families and victims.
-
Digital Communications: These are often the most crucial pieces of evidence. This includes messages from:
- Group Messaging Apps: GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, or fraternity/sorority-specific apps. We look for messages planning hazing activities, giving instructions, making threats, or discussing efforts to conceal the hazing.
- Social Media: Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok comments, or posts. Even seemingly casual posts can reveal context, intentions, or evidence of events.
- Crucially, evidence includes both live messages and those that have been “deleted.” Digital forensics can often recover deleted messages, but original screenshots are always best.
-
Photos & Videos:
- Content filmed by members during hazing events, either for their own amusement or to document compliance.
- Photos or videos shared in group chats, on social media, or even those on personal devices.
- Security camera footage from houses or venues where hazing occurred, including doorbell cameras like Ring.
- Photos of injuries: taken immediately after the incident and again over several days to document progression (e.g., bruising).
-
Internal Organization Documents: These can reveal institutional knowledge and intent.
- Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, or “ritual books.”
- Emails or texts from officers or advisors about “new member education” that clearly outline illicit activities or expectations.
- National organization policies and risk management training materials, which can be compared against actual conduct.
-
University Records: We seek records from the university itself.
- Prior conduct files, records of probation, suspensions, or warning letters issued to the specific organization.
- Incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices.
- Clery Act reports and other public safety disclosures.
- Internal emails between administrators regarding the organization, often obtained through legal discovery.
-
Medical and Psychological Records: These documents are essential for proving the extent of harm.
- Emergency room and hospitalization records, particularly if there were life-threatening injuries.
- Surgery and rehabilitation notes.
- Toxicology reports (e.g., blood alcohol content, drug screenings).
- Psychological evaluations that diagnose conditions like PTSD, depression, anxiety, or document suicidality.
-
Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts are powerful.
- Other pledges or new members, even if initially reluctant to speak.
- Current or former fraternity/sorority members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, or other bystanders.
- Former members who quit or were expelled, as they often have firsthand knowledge and less incentive to protect the organization.
Damages
When building a hazing case for Bastrop County families, it’s vital to fully quantify all the harm suffered. We articulate these as “damages,” which fall into several categories:
-
Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs associated with physical and mental health treatment.
- Immediate emergency care (ambulance, ER, ICU).
- Hospitalization, surgeries, ongoing treatments, and physical therapy.
- Medications.
- Crucially, it includes long-term care plans for catastrophic injuries such as brain damage, organ damage, or spinal cord injuries, potentially lasting a lifetime.
-
Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: Hazing can derail a student’s academic and professional future.
- Lost wages if the student was working and missed time due to injury.
- Costs for missed semesters, lost scholarships, or the need to transfer universities.
- Reduced earning capacity if injuries lead to permanent disability or significantly delay entry into a professional field.
-
Non-Economic Damages: These address the intangible, yet profound, suffering.
- Physical pain and suffering: From the injuries themselves and any ongoing chronic pain.
- Emotional distress and trauma: Including diagnosed conditions like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, or anxiety, stemming from humiliation, fear, and psychological abuse.
- Loss of enjoyment of life: The inability to participate in activities, hobbies, or social life that once brought joy, or the general diminished quality of life.
- Reputational harm: If the incident is publicly known, it can lead to social stigma or difficulty in future academic or career endeavors.
-
Wrongful Death Damages (for families): In the most tragic cases where hazing results in death, surviving family members can pursue a wrongful death claim. This includes:
- Funeral and burial costs.
- Loss of financial support the deceased would have provided.
- Loss of companionship, love, and society experienced by parents, siblings, or spouses.
- Grief and emotional suffering of the family.
- Loss of guidance and counsel.
It is important to note that we describe types of damages, and are not promising or predicting specific dollar amounts. The precise value of a case depends on many unique factors.
Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage
Hazing litigation often involves powerful defendants like national fraternities and major universities, who typically have extensive insurance policies. However, obtaining compensation from these policies is rarely straightforward.
- Insurance Company Tactics: Insurers frequently argue that hazing constitutes “intentional acts” (assault, battery) or “criminal acts,” which are often excluded from coverage under their policies. They may also claim the policy doesn’t cover certain individuals or events.
- Our Strategy: Our firm’s unique advantage, stemming from Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), is our deep understanding of these tactics. We know how to:
- Identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, including individual homeowner’s policies, chapter policies, national policies, and university umbrella policies.
- Navigate policy exclusions by framing the injury as a result of negligent supervision, training, or institutional indifference (which can be covered) rather than purely an intentional act.
- Force insurers to defend and ultimately settle claims justly, or pursue bad faith claims if coverage is wrongfully denied.
Building a successful hazing case for families in Bastrop County and across Texas requires not just legal knowledge, but also relentless investigation, a deep understanding of institutional defenses, and the resources to stand up to powerful defendants. Our firm is equipped with all these capabilities.
Practical Guides & FAQs
When hazing strikes, families in Bastrop County are often left feeling helpless and unsure of where to turn. This section provides immediate, actionable guidance for parents, students, and witnesses, empowering them with the information they need to protect themselves and seek justice.
8.1 For Parents
For Bastrop County parents, recognizing the signs of hazing and knowing how to respond effectively can make all the difference.
-
Warning Signs of Hazing: Be vigilant for:
- Unexplained injuries (bruises, burns, cuts) or repeated “accidents” with inconsistent stories.
- Sudden, extreme exhaustion or significant sleep deprivation.
- Drastic changes in mood, increased anxiety, depression, or withdrawal from friends and family.
- Constant, secretive phone use for group chats; an overwhelming fear of missing “mandatory” events or displeasing older members.
- Sudden secrecy about activities, often accompanied by phrases like “I can’t talk about it” or “it’s just tradition.”
- Changes in grades, missing classes, or neglecting academics due to non-academic obligations.
-
How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy and without judgment. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with [organization name]?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priorities, far above any group affiliation. Reassure them that you will support them regardless of their decision.
-
If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize their health. Get them immediate medical care, even if they insist they’re “fine.” Document everything: take clear photos of any injuries, save all texts and digital communications they show you, and write down every detail they share—who, what, when, where.
-
Dealing with the University: If you engage with university officials, document every communication. Ask specific questions about any prior incidents involving the same organization and what the school did (or didn’t do) in response. Do not sign any “releases” or “resolutions” without legal review.
-
When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or hiding what happened, it’s time to speak with an attorney. Early legal consultation is critical.
8.2 For Students / Pledges
If you are a student from Bastrop County involved in a new member process, understanding your rights and discerning hazing from legitimate activities is crucial.
- Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself: Do you feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced? Are you forced to drink or endure pain? Is the activity hidden from administrators or the public? If you wouldn’t do it if you had a real choice, or if it endangers your physical or mental health, it likely is hazing. Your gut feeling is often right.
- Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Despite what older members might say, your “consent” under duress, peer pressure, or fear of exclusion is often not considered true voluntary consent under the law. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing.
- Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, remove yourself from the situation immediately and, if necessary, call 911. Document any threats or intimidation you receive. You can report hazing privately or anonymously through campus channels (Dean of Students, Title IX Coordinator, Campus Police) or national hotlines like 1-888-NOT-HAZE.
- Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and state laws (including Texas) provide protections for students who call for help in an emergency, even if they were underage drinking or involved in the hazing. Your safety, and the safety of others, comes first.
8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses
If you were once a part of a hazing incident, perhaps even participating, and now experience guilt or fear, know that your choice to come forward can save lives and prevent future harm.
- Your Role in Accountability: Your testimony and evidence can be pivotal in shutting down dangerous practices and holding responsible parties accountable. While there may be personal repercussions, cooperating can be a crucial step towards preventing another tragedy.
- Seeking Legal Advice: If you have concerns about your own legal exposure, it is wise to seek confidential legal advice. An attorney can help you understand your rights, potential liabilities, and how to navigate cooperating with authorities or civil litigation effectively. Sometimes, your cooperation is considered when assessing your role.
8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case
For Bastrop County families, navigating a hazing case is fraught with potential pitfalls. Avoid these common mistakes that can severely damage your ability to seek justice: Our video, “Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY), further details these.
-
Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence:
- Why It’s Wrong: This looks like a cover-up, can be obstruction of justice, and makes proving your case nearly impossible. Digital forensics can sometimes recover deleted data, but original evidence is paramount.
- What to Do Instead: Preserve everything immediately – even embarrassing content – by screenshotting photos, videos, and entire message threads.
-
Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly:
- Why It’s Wrong: This alerts them to potential legal action, giving them time to destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defense.
- What to Do Instead: Document every detail in private, then consult with a lawyer before any direct confrontation.
-
Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms:
- Why It’s Wrong: Universities may pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements that often waive your right to sue or result in settlements far below the true value of the case.
- What to Do Instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or insurance company without an attorney reviewing it first.
-
Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer:
- Why It’s Wrong: Defense attorneys will screenshot everything. Inconsistencies between public posts and later testimony can severely hurt credibility. Public posts can also inadvertently waive legal privileges.
- What to Do Instead: Document privately and let your legal team control public messaging strategically.
-
Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting”:
- Why It’s Wrong: Organizations may pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can later be used against your child in an investigation or lawsuit.
- What to Do Instead: If you are considering legal action, all future communication with the organization should typically go through your lawyer.
-
Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”:
- Why It’s Wrong: Evidence vanishes quickly, witnesses graduate or leave, the statute of limitations continues to run, and the university’s priority is often protecting its own reputation, not necessarily ensuring full accountability for your child’s harm.
- What to Do Instead: Preserve evidence now and consult a lawyer immediately. University disciplinary processes often differ significantly from real legal accountability.
-
Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer:
- Why It’s Wrong: Adjusters are trained to minimize payouts. Your recorded statements can be used against you, and early settlement offers are typically lowball.
- What to Do Instead: Politely decline to speak with them and state, “My attorney will contact you.”
8.5 Short FAQ
-
“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT, while often protected by sovereign immunity, can be sued for gross negligence, when Title IX obligations are triggered, or by suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case is unique and hinges on specific facts—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case-specific analysis. -
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. While basic hazing is a Class B misdemeanor, it becomes a state jail felony under Texas law if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges. -
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and juries understand that “consent” given under duress, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent. -
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally, there is a 2-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this period if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations destroy records. Our video, “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c), provides more detail. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately. -
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities and sororities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and the foreseeability of hazing. Many major hazing settlements and verdicts, such as the Pi Delta Psi retreat case or the Sigma Pi unofficial house case, involved incidents that occurred off-campus. -
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. While public lawsuits are sometimes necessary for accountability, we can often work to protect your family’s privacy through sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. We prioritize your family’s well-being and privacy while pursuing accountability.
About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action
When your family in Bastrop County faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need tenacious attorneys who understand how powerful institutions — like national fraternities, universities, and their insurers — fight back, and how to win anyway. At The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we bring a unique blend of insights and experience to the fight for justice in hazing cases.
From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Bastrop County. We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects families across the region, from those with students at UT Austin a short drive away, to those attending Texas A&M, UH, SMU, or Baylor.
Our unique qualifications for hazing litigation stand out:
-
Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, leverages her background as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/). She knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and often undervalue) hazing claims. She understands their delay tactics, coverage exclusion arguments, and settlement strategies, allowing us to anticipate and counter their moves. We know their playbook because we used to run it.
-
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, is not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their formidable defense teams (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/). His experience includes being one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation — taking on billion-dollar corporations and winning. We know how to fight powerful defendants and secure significant results.
-
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases, including collaborating with economists to fully value the devastating loss of a life. We also have extensive experience valuing lifetime care needs for catastrophic brain injury or permanent disability cases resulting from hazing. We don’t settle cheap; we meticulously build cases that force genuine accountability.
-
Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a critical edge. We understand how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, allowing us to advise witnesses and former members who may face dual exposure, ensuring a comprehensive legal strategy.
-
Investigative Depth: We have a robust network of experts, including medical professionals, digital forensics specialists, economists, and psychologists. We are adept at obtaining hidden evidence—from deleted group chats and social media data to subpoenaing national fraternity records revealing prior incidents, and uncovering university files through discovery and public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.
We know that confronting hazing, especially when it involves powerful organizations, is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We focus on thorough investigation and real accountability, not just quick settlements.
Call to Action
If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether attending UT Austin, Texas A&M, UH, SMU, Baylor, or another university—we want to hear from you. Families in Bastrop County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.
Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened without judgment, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.
In your free consultation, you can expect:
- An empathetic ear from attorneys who understand the trauma of hazing.
- A review of any evidence you have (photos, texts, medical records).
- A clear explanation of your legal options: criminal report, civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
- A discussion of realistic timelines and what to expect during the legal process.
- Answers to your questions about costs. We operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case (refer to our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).
- No pressure to hire us on the spot—we want you to make the best decision for your family.
- Everything you tell us is confidential.
Call today:
- 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- Direct: (713) 528-9070
- Cell: (713) 443-4781
- Our website: https://attorney911.com
- Email Ralph Manginello directly: ralph@atty911.com
Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for a consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.
Whether you’re in Bastrop County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.
Legal Disclaimer
This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.
Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.
If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.
The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com