Holding Accountable: A Comprehensive Guide to Hazing in Lavaca County and Across Texas Campuses

A quiet Saturday night in Lavaca County. You might be settling in, confident your child is safe at their Texas university, perhaps at Texas A&M in College Station, or the vibrant campus of the University of Texas in Austin, or closer to home at the University of Houston. But imagine your phone rings. It’s a terrified voice on the other end, your child, whispering about a “mandatory event.” They sound different—strained, scared. They mention being blindfolded with other new members, forced to drink unknown liquids, pushed to their physical limits, all while older members record the humiliating moments on their phones. Someone just passed out. No one wants to call for help, because “the chapter will get shut down.” Your child feels trapped, choosing between calling for help and facing the wrath of their group, or staying silent and risking their own life.

This isn’t a scene from a movie; it’s the harsh reality of modern hazing, a dangerous undercurrent in universities across our state, affecting families right here in Lavaca County and communities throughout the region. The desire to belong, to be part of a tradition, can tragically blind students to the dangers until it’s too late.

This comprehensive guide is written specifically for families in Lavaca County and across Texas who are grappling with the dark reality of hazing. We at The Manginello Law Firm aim to empower you by explaining:

• What hazing truly looks like in 2025, far beyond mere pranks or harmless traditions.
• The specifics of Texas and federal anti-hazing laws and how they apply to the incidents affecting our students.
• Crucial lessons from major national hazing cases and how these precedents influence accountability for Texas students.
• The current landscape of hazing incidents and institutional responses at significant Texas universities, including the University of Houston, Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University.
• Your legal avenues and options when hazing exacts its toll on your child or family.

This article provides general information. It is not specific legal advice. We at The Manginello Law Firm serve families throughout Texas, including those in Lavaca County, and are available to evaluate your individual case based on its unique facts.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

• Call 911 for medical emergencies.
• Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

In the first 48 hours:

• Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Their life could depend on it.
• Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
  • Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
  • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
• Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
• Do NOT:
  • Confront the fraternity/sorority directly.
  • Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
  • Post details on public social media.
  • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

• Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
• Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
• We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
• Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Lavaca County families, the image of hazing might be something out of a 1980s movie—a harmless prank, some light-hearted mischief. But the reality of hazing in 2025 is far more sinister, manifesting as dangerous, degrading, and often life-threatening activities. It’s a complex web of social pressure, secrecy, and power imbalances, disguised as “tradition” or “bonding.” Make no mistake: if someone is pressured, forced, or coerced to do something that endangers their physical or mental health, or causes humiliation, in order to join or maintain membership in a group, that is hazing. The excuse “I agreed to it” does not make it safe, legal, or acceptable when the power dynamics make true consent impossible.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

At its core, hazing is any activity expected of new members, or any others, joining a group that humiliates, degrades, abuses, or endangers, regardless of the person’s willingness to participate. It’s about control, coercion, and enforcing group hierarchy under the guise of building camaraderie. This definition extends far beyond physical acts, encompassing emotional, psychological, and even digital forms of abuse.

Main Categories of Hazing

Understanding the various forms hazing can take is crucial for parents and students in Lavaca County and across Texas. Hazing isn’t a single act; it’s a spectrum of abuse:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is tragically one of the most common and deadliest forms. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often excessive amounts of hard liquor, during “lineups,” drinking games, “big/little” reveals, or seemingly innocent trivia where wrong answers lead to forced consumption. Students are pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, leading to alcohol poisoning, blackouts, and other life-threatening conditions.
• Physical Hazing: This category includes direct physical violence such as paddling, beatings, punches, or slaps. It also involves extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings”—punitive exercises far beyond normal athletic conditioning. Victims often suffer from sleep deprivation, food or water deprivation, and exposure to extreme temperatures or dangerous environments, leading to exhaustion, injury, and severe illness. In cases like the Texas A&M Sigma Alpha Epsilon chemical burns incident, physical hazing can involve dangerous substances, not just blunt force.
• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This deeply traumatic form of hazing involves forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (like “roasted pig” positions or “elephant walks”), or being forced to wear degrading costumes. It often includes acts with racial, sexist, or homophobic overtones, such as the use of slurs or forced role-playing of stereotypes, leaving lasting psychological scars.
• Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but just as damaging, psychological hazing includes verbal abuse, threats, and enforced social isolation, cutting off new members from friends and family. This can involve manipulation, forced confessions, or public shaming through social media or group meetings, leading to severe anxiety, depression, and long-term psychological trauma.
• Digital/Online Hazing: With the ubiquity of smartphones and social media, hazing has evolved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Discord, or GroupMe. Students are pressured to create or share compromising images or videos, or are subject to constant digital surveillance and demands, creating a 24/7 environment of control and fear.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is not confined to one type of organization or campus. While often associated with Greek life, it pervades many corners of university culture, including:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes social fraternities and sororities under various councils (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural Greek councils) that operate at almost every major Texas university where Lavaca County students attend.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: Organizations like the Texas A&M Corps of Cadets, with their emphasis on tradition, discipline, and hierarchy, have historically faced hazing allegations.
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs: Groups like spirit organizations, dance teams, and university tradition clubs (such as those that perform at sporting events or participate in campus-wide traditions) can also be venues for hazing.
• Athletic Teams: From football to basketball, baseball, cheerleading, and smaller sports like swimming, hazing can occur within team initiation rituals, as evidenced by incidents at Northwestern University and Baylor.
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups like marching bands can become environments for hazing, as tragically demonstrated by the Robert Champion case at FAMU.
• Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Any group with new member “initiation” or hierarchy can potentially foster hazing, driven by the desire for belonging and acceptance.

The uncomfortable truth is that social status, the allure of “tradition,” and a deeply ingrained culture of secrecy allow these practices to continue, often off-campus and out of sight, even when everyone “knows” hazing is illegal and dangerous. For Lavaca County families, understanding these myriad forms and venues is the first step toward prevention and protection.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For families in Lavaca County, understanding the legal landscape of hazing in Texas is essential. Our state has specific laws designed to combat hazing, and these are often reinforced by federal regulations, providing multiple avenues for accountability.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

The State of Texas defines hazing broadly within its Education Code, providing a framework for both criminal and civil liability.

Texas law defines hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that occurs for the purpose of pledging membership in, being initiated into, affiliating with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in an organization whose members are students. Crucially, this act must endanger the mental or physical health or safety of a student.

This means:

• Location is irrelevant: Hazing can happen on or off university campuses, whether in a dorm, an off-campus house, a retreat, or online.
• Mental or Physical Harm: The law recognizes that hazing can cause both physical injuries and significant psychological distress, including humiliation, intimidation, and isolation.
• Reckless is Enough: The individuals or organizations perpetrating hazing don’t need malicious intent. If they acted recklessly—meaning they knew or should have known their actions created a substantial risk of harm—they can still be held liable.
• “Consent” is Not a Defense: One of the most critical aspects of Texas hazing law is that the victim’s “consent” to the hazing activity is explicitly not a defense to prosecution or liability. The law recognizes that true consent is impossible in situations of extreme peer pressure and power imbalance.

Criminal Penalties

Under Texas law (Education Code § 37.152):

• Hazing is generally classified as a Class B Misdemeanor. This can carry penalties of up to 180 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $2,000.
• If the hazing causes bodily injury and requires medical attention, it can be elevated to a Class A Misdemeanor, with potential penalties of up to one year in jail and/or a fine of up to $4,000.
• Most severely, if hazing results in serious bodily injury or death, it becomes a State Jail Felony, which can carry a penalty of 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, in addition to fines.
• Furthermore, individuals who are aware of hazing and fail to report it, or those who retaliate against someone for reporting hazing, can also face misdemeanor charges.

These criminal provisions send a clear message: hazing is a serious crime in Texas, and individuals can face significant consequences.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s important for Lavaca County families to understand the distinction between criminal and civil legal actions related to hazing:

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (the District Attorney’s office) through law enforcement investigations. The goal is to punish the accused individuals or organizations with jail time, fines, or probation. Criminal charges focus on proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for violating state laws.
• Civil Cases: These are brought by the victims or their surviving family members. The primary goal is to seek monetary compensation for the harms suffered, such as medical expenses, lost income, and emotional distress, and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil cases focus on proving liability by a “preponderance of the evidence”—meaning it’s more likely than not that the defendant caused the injury.

A crucial point for Lavaca County families is that these two types of cases can proceed independently. A criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil lawsuit, and victims can seek justice and compensation even if criminal charges are never filed or if the accused is acquitted.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations also play a role in addressing hazing, particularly for institutions receiving federal funding:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This important federal law, which will be fully implemented by around 2026, mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal aid must:
  • Report all hazing incidents much more transparently, detailing the nature of the offense and the sanctions imposed.
  • Strengthen hazing education and prevention efforts across campus.
  • Maintain public data on hazing incidents, making it easier for families to research an organization’s history. This enhances accountability and transparency significantly.
• Title IX: This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education. If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based bullying, or other hostile acts based on gender, it can trigger Title IX obligations for the university. This can lead to internal investigations and disciplinary actions by the university, separate from criminal or civil lawsuits.
• Clery Act: This federal law requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents, particularly those involving assaults, alcohol or drug offenses, or other violent crimes, may fall under Clery Act reporting requirements, contributing to the public record of campus safety.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

When hazing occurs, multiple parties may bear legal responsibility. Identifying all potential defendants is a key part of building a strong civil case for families in Lavaca County:

• Individual Students: Those who actively planned, orchestrated, participated in, or even stood by and failed to intervene during hazing acts can be held personally liable. This includes “pledge educators,” chapter officers, or any member directly involved.
• Local Chapter / Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or athletic team, if it is a legally recognized entity, can be sued for the actions of its members and for failing to prevent hazing within its ranks.
• National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters often holds significant responsibility. Their liability can stem from:
  • Failing to adequately supervise local chapters.
  • Having previous knowledge of hazing within the chapter or similar patterns across other chapters of the same organization.
  • Inadequately enforcing their own anti-hazing policies.
  • Profiting from the chapter through dues and branding, thereby having a duty to ensure safety.
• University or Governing Board: Universities can be held liable under various legal theories, including:
  • Negligence/Gross Negligence: If the university knew or should have known about hazing and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it or respond to it.
  • Failure to Supervise: Negligently overseeing student organizations or failing to enforce their own hazing policies.
  • Title IX Violations: If hazing involved sex-based discrimination and the university was deliberately indifferent.
  • Premises Liability: If hazing occurred on university property and the university failed to maintain a safe environment. Public universities in Texas, such as UH, Texas A&M, and UT, typically have some sovereign immunity protection, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, specific types of injuries, or when suing individual administrators. Private universities like SMU and Baylor generally have less immunity.
• Third Parties: Depending on the specifics of the incident, other entities may also be liable, such as:
  • Landlords or Property Owners: If hazing occurred at a rental property they owned, and they had knowledge of the activities or failed to provide a safe premises.
  • Alcohol Providers: If alcohol was illegally furnished to minors, a bar or store could be liable under Texas’s dram shop laws.
  • Event Organizers or Security Companies: If they were contracted to manage an event where hazing occurred and failed in their duty of care.

Each hazing case is fact-specific, and not every party will be liable in every situation. A thorough investigation is crucial to identify all potentially responsible parties and ensure comprehensive accountability.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

When a hazing tragedy makes national headlines, it often represents a culmination of systemic failures, ignored warnings, and dangerous organizational cultures. These “anchor stories” are not isolated incidents; they reveal patterns of behavior that recur, sadly, in various forms and at different institutions. For families in Lavaca County with children attending schools like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, understanding these national precedents is vital. They demonstrate the foreseeability of hazing dangers and establish the legal and moral duty of universities and national organizations to protect students.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The most common and deadly form of hazing involves forced or excessive alcohol consumption. The following cases illustrate the devastating consequences and the recurring failures that lead to such tragedies:

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (February 2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a “bid acceptance” event where he was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. Fraternity members videotaped his agonizing falls down stairs and subsequent injuries, then delayed calling for help for nearly 12 hours. The criminal case saw 18 fraternity members charged with various offenses, including involuntary manslaughter and hazing, making it one of the largest hazing prosecutions in U.S. history. Civil litigation resulted in confidential settlements. Piazza’s tragic death led to the landmark Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, dramatically strengthening anti-hazing statutes. This case highlighted the lethal combination of extreme intoxication, delayed medical attention, and a pervasive culture of silence and cover-up within Greek organizations.
• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (November 2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning after a “Big Brother Night” where pledges were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to drink them. Multiple fraternity members were prosecuted, mostly pleading guilty to misdemeanor hazing. Coffey’s death prompted Florida State to temporarily suspend all Greek life and led to widespread anti-hazing reforms across Florida campuses. This incident underscores how common, formulaic “tradition” events, centered around excessive drinking, are repeating scripts for disaster.
• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (September 2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, died with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.495% after a “Bible study” drinking game where he was forced to consume alcohol whenever he answered a question incorrectly. While the family settled with LSU for a confidential amount, they secured a $6.1 million verdict against the fraternity and its insurer. Gruver’s death spurred the passage of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, making felony hazing easier to prosecute and carrying significant prison time. Max Gruver’s story powerfully illustrates how legislative change often follows public outrage and clear, undeniable proof of hazing’s dangers.
• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (March 2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” pledge night. Multiple fraternity members were convicted of hazing-related criminal charges. In 2023, Foltz’s family reached a $10 million settlement: $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and approximately $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This case not only demonstrated criminal accountability but also showed that universities can face significant financial and reputational consequences, alongside national fraternities, when they fail to prevent hazing incidents. This tragedy also led to the enactment of Collin’s Law: The Anti-Hazing Act in Ohio, making hazing a second-degree misdemeanor and a third-degree felony when alcohol or drugs cause physical harm.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and psychologically brutal rituals are hallmarks of hazing, leading to severe injuries and deaths:

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (December 2013): Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died from a traumatic brain injury suffered at a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. During a blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual, he was repeatedly tackled while wearing a heavy backpack. Fraternity members delayed calling 911 for hours, trying to cover up the incident. Multiple members were criminally convicted, and the national fraternity itself was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter—a landmark case of organizational criminal liability. Pi Delta Psi was banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years and fined over $110,000. This case unequivocally proved that off-campus “retreats,” held away from university oversight, can be as dangerous or even more so than on-campus events, and that liability extends to the national organization.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is endemic not only to Greek life but also to high-profile athletic programs, where the allure of scholarships and professional careers can create an intense pressure cooker for abuse:

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): In a scandal that rocked collegiate athletics, former football players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the Northwestern football program over several years. Players described forced sexual acts, racial discrimination, and other degrading rituals. Multiple lawsuits were filed against Northwestern University and its coaching staff, leading to the firing of highly successful head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who later settled a wrongful-termination suit confidentially. This case profoundly illustrated that hazing is not confined to Greek life; it can deeply infect even major, well-funded athletic programs and raise serious questions about institutional oversight at the highest levels.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national hazing tragedies, while occurring outside of Texas, establish critical precedents and illuminate dangerous patterns that deeply inform hazing claims within our state. For families in Lavaca County, whose children attend major Texas universities, these lessons are vital:

• Common Threads of Danger: The cases consistently feature forced drinking, extreme humiliation, physical violence, deliberate delays in seeking medical attention, and widespread cover-up attempts. These are the same tactics deployed in hazing incidents at Texas schools.
• Precedent for Accountability: These cases set legal precedents for holding individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and universities accountable. They show that multi-million-dollar settlements and significant jury verdicts are possible, particularly in wrongful death and severe injury cases.
• Legislative and Policy Impact: The public outrage generated by these tragedies has led to stronger anti-hazing laws and improved university policies in other states. While Texas has its own anti-hazing laws, these national reform efforts reflect a growing societal intolerance for hazing and can influence how Texas courts and juries view such conduct.
• Foreseeability: Perhaps most importantly, the repeated nature of these incidents across the country makes it increasingly difficult for national fraternities and universities to claim that hazing, and its potential for harm, is “unforeseeable.” When the same dangerous “traditions” unfold repeatedly within chapters of the same national organization, it establishes a pattern of knowledge and a clear duty to act.

Texas families facing hazing allegations at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor are not alone. They operate within a legal and cultural landscape profoundly shaped by these national lessons, underscoring the critical need for experienced legal counsel to navigate complex claims.

TEXAS FOCUS: UH, TEXAS A&M, UT, SMU, BAYLOR

Lavaca County families send their children to universities across Texas for higher education, opportunity, and growth. While Lavaca County itself is a rural county well-known for its rich agricultural heritage, its residents are deeply connected to the major university towns throughout the state. From the bustling metropolis of Houston where the University of Houston resides, to the vibrant state capital city of Austin and the University of Texas, to College Station with Texas A&M, the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex home to Southern Methodist University, and Waco with Baylor, Lavaca County families are impacted by and focused on the safety of these major institutions.

Understanding how each university approaches hazing—its policies, past incidents, and reporting mechanisms—is crucial. This section provides a detailed look at hazing at five of Texas’s largest universities, with specific insights relevant to Lavaca County families who may have children attending, or considering attending, these schools.

University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus located in the heart of our state’s largest city, is a popular choice for students from Lavaca County and across Texas seeking diverse programs and career opportunities. Its proximity to Lavaca County makes it a significant draw for many local families, and as such, understanding its stance and history with hazing is paramount.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH is a Tier One research institution with a dynamic and diverse student body. It offers a mix of commuter and residential experiences and boasts a highly active Greek life, encompassing Interfraternity Council (IFC), Houston Panhellenic Council (HPC), Multicultural Greek Council (MGC), and National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) organizations. Beyond Greek life, UH features numerous student clubs, athletic teams, and spirit organizations, all of which represent potential environments where hazing can occur. For Lavaca County students at UH, managing campus life while navigating social pressures is a key concern.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Houston maintains clear, stringent anti-hazing policies, rooted in Texas law and its own institutional values. UH’s Hazing Policy, outlined in its Student Code of Conduct, explicitly prohibits hazing whether it occurs on-campus, off-campus, on university-owned or controlled property, or at any university-sponsored event. Prohibited acts include, but are not limited to, forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and any acts that cause mental distress, all for the purpose of initiation or affiliation.

UH provides multiple channels for reporting hazing incidents:

• Dean of Students Office: Serves as a primary point of contact for student conduct issues, including hazing.
• Office of Student Conduct: Investigates alleged violations of the Student Code of Conduct.
• UH Police Department (UHPD): For incidents involving potential criminal activity or immediate safety concerns.
• Anonymous Online Reporting: UH typically offers anonymous reporting forms through its website to encourage individuals to come forward without fear of retaliation.

UH also publicly affirms its commitment to hazing prevention and posts information regarding its hazing statement and, to a limited degree, disciplinary actions.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

While UH may not maintain as detailed a public hazing violations log as some other institutions, incidents and institutional responses have been documented:

• 2016 Pi Kappa Alpha Incident: This highly publicized incident involved members of the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) fraternity. Pledges were allegedly subjected to physical and psychological abuse, including being deprived of sufficient food, water, and sleep during a multi-day “pledge activity.” One student suffered a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges in Harris County and was subsequently suspended by the university. This case highlighted the severe physical risks associated with such “traditions” and the criminal consequences for involved individuals.
• Ongoing Disciplinary Actions: UH’s public records and news reports frequently reference other disciplinary actions involving fraternities and sororities where conduct was deemed “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” often involving alcohol misuse, physical exercises, or policy violations. These lead to various sanctions, including probation, suspension, and loss of organizational privileges.

These incidents underscore UH’s willingness to enforce its anti-hazing policies and suspend chapters when violations occur, but also demonstrate the persistent challenge of hazing within the Greek system. For families from Lavaca County, these cases serve as stark reminders that hazing can have devastating physical consequences.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case originating at the University of Houston could involve several legal and institutional pathways:

• Law Enforcement: Depending on the location of the incident, investigations might be conducted by the UH Police Department (UHPD) for on-campus incidents or the Houston Police Department (HPD) for off-campus occurrences within the city. These investigations could lead to criminal charges under the Texas hazing statute.
• University Conduct Process: Regardless of criminal charges, the university’s Office of Student Conduct would typically initiate its own internal investigation, which could result in sanctions against individual students (e.g., suspension, expulsion) and/or the organization (e.g., suspension, loss of recognition).
• Civil Lawsuit: Families seeking justice and compensation would likely file a civil lawsuit in state courts within Harris County (where Houston is located) or potentially federal court if federal claims (like Title IX violations) are involved. Potential defendants could include the individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the University of Houston (though as a public university, UH benefits from some sovereign immunity protections, which an experienced attorney can help navigate).
• Interstate Connections: As a major national university, incidents at UH may connect to national fraternity histories or multi-state patterns of hazing. For Lavaca County families, selecting an attorney with a proven track record in complex litigation against large institutions, regardless of their location within Texas, is critical.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For Lavaca County students attending UH and their parents, taking proactive steps is vital:

• Be Aware of UH Policies: Familiarize yourselves with the University of Houston’s Student Code of Conduct and specific anti-hazing policies. Understand what hazing is and how to report it.
• Utilize University Reporting Channels: If you suspect hazing, report it to the Dean of Students Office, Office of Student Conduct, or UHPD. Explore anonymous reporting options if fear of retaliation is a concern.
• Document Everything Thoroughly: As detailed in our evidence section, screenshot group chats, take photos of injuries, and write down dates, times, and specific events. This is especially important given the swift pace of evidence disappearance.
• Seek Legal Counsel Immediately: If your child has been physically or psychologically harmed, or if you believe the university’s response is inadequate, contact a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases right away. An attorney can help preserve evidence, navigate complex university investigations, and protect your child’s rights.
• Educate About National Patterns: Understanding the national histories of certain fraternities and sororities can provide critical context to what might be happening at UH. For instance, if a UH chapter of a specific organization has a national pattern of alcohol hazing, this knowledge is valuable.

Texas A&M University

A beacon of tradition and an academic powerhouse, Texas A&M University in College Station holds a special place in the hearts of many Lavaca County families, who are often deeply connected to its Aggie spirit and values. With its renowned Corps of Cadets and robust Greek life, Texas A&M also presents unique challenges concerning hazing.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M is one of the largest public universities in the U.S., famous for its deep traditions, strong alumni network, and the highly visible Corps of Cadets. Alongside the Corps, A&M hosts a vibrant Greek system with numerous fraternities and sororities, and a multitude of student organizations. The culture at A&M often emphasizes loyalty and intense group bonding, which, in unfortunate instances, can be exploited under the guise of tradition, leading to hazing. Lavaca County students at A&M are often immersed in a strong sense of community that can sometimes complicate reporting of misconduct.

5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M unequivocally prohibits hazing, adhering to both state law and its own aggressive institutional policies. The university’s policies are detailed in its Student Rules and specifically address prohibited conduct that endangers mental or physical health for purposes of initiation or affiliation. Hazing is strictly forbidden in any recognized student organization, including ROTC, the Corps of Cadets, athletic teams, and fraternities/sororities.

Texas A&M encourages prompt reporting through several channels:

• Student Conduct Office: Primary unit for investigating alleged hazing incidents.
• Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD): For situations involving potential criminal acts or immediate danger.
• Risk Intervention & Safety Education (RISE): Provides resources and confidential reporting options.
• Aggie Honor System Office: Addresses academic integrity, though hazing can impact academic performance.
• Campus-wide Hazing Hotline or Anonymous Reporting System: Allows students to report concerns confidentially.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced its share of significant hazing incidents, both within its Greek system and its storied Corps of Cadets:

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Chemical Burns Lawsuit (around 2021): This alarming incident involved members of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity. Two pledges alleged they were subjected to a brutal hazing ritual involving forced strenuous activity, followed by having substances such as industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit poured on them. The pledges suffered severe chemical burns requiring emergency skin graft surgeries. The university suspended the SAE chapter for two years, and the pledges subsequently filed a $1 million lawsuit against the fraternity and its members. This case is a chilling example of physical hazing escalating to extreme, life-altering injuries.
• Corps of Cadets Hazing Allegations (2023 Lawsuit): A male cadet filed a federal lawsuit against Texas A&M and several individuals, alleging that he was subjected to degrading and sexualized hazing. The complaint described rituals including simulated anal sex, being forced to strip naked, and being tied between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The lawsuit, seeking over $1 million, highlighted the persistent challenges of hazing even within revered military-style organizations. Texas A&M stated it had handled these matters under its university rules.
• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ) Rhabdomyolysis Case (2023, ongoing): Allegations surfaced involving the Kappa Sigma fraternity at Texas A&M, where hazing led to severe injuries including rhabdomyolysis – a serious and potentially fatal condition involving muscle breakdown from extreme physical activity – requiring extensive medical intervention. This ongoing litigation highlights specialized legal representation needed for specific and severe hazing injuries.

These incidents demonstrate that even at an institution with strong traditions like Texas A&M, hazing continues to pose a serious threat, necessitating constant vigilance and accountability.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a hazing incident at Texas A&M, the legal and institutional procedures can be quite involved:

• Law Enforcement: The Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) would be the primary law enforcement agency for incidents on campus. Off-campus incidents in College Station would typically fall under the jurisdiction of the College Station Police Department or, wider still, the Brazos County Sheriff’s Office. Criminal charges, if warranted, would be pursued by the Brazos County District Attorney.
• University Conduct Process: The university’s Student Conduct Office would conduct an internal review, which can result in sanctions ranging from probation to expulsion for individuals and loss of recognition for organizations.
• Civil Lawsuit: Legal action by families in Lavaca County would typically be filed in Brazos County state courts or federal court. Potential defendants would often include the individual students, the local chapter, the national organization (especially for Greek life cases), and the university itself (subject to sovereign immunity considerations for public institutions like A&M).
• Corps-Specific Context: Hazing allegations within the Corps of Cadets can involve unique command structures, traditions, and an emphasis on group loyalty that impact evidence collection and witness cooperation.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For Lavaca County residents whose children are at Texas A&M, swift and informed action is crucial:

• Understand A&M’s Specific Policies: Familiarize yourselves with the detailed anti-hazing policies within the Student Rules, paying particular attention to sections covering the Corps of Cadets and Greek life.
• Utilize Reporting Systems: Take advantage of Texas A&M’s reporting channels, including the Student Conduct Office and the anonymous reporting hotline. Contact UPD for any immediate safety concerns or criminal acts.
• Document Everything Thoroughly: Given the strong sense of tradition and loyalty at A&M, evidence like screenshots of GroupMe chats, photos of injuries, and detailed notes of incidents are paramount. This is especially true for incidents involving the Corps or secret societies.
• Seek Experienced Legal Counsel: If hazing has occurred, contacting a lawyer experienced in Texas A&M hazing cases can provide invaluable guidance. An attorney can help navigate both university and criminal investigations, ensuring evidence is preserved and all responsible parties are held accountable.
• Connect National & Local Patterns: Recognize that a pattern of hazing within a specific national fraternity can inform a case against its Texas A&M chapter. This helps establish foreseeability and the national organization’s duty to act.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The flagship institution of the University of Texas System, UT Austin is a prime destination for many Lavaca County students, known for its academic prowess, vibrant campus life, and deep-rooted traditions. However, like many large universities, UT Austin has its own challenges with hazing, particularly within its expansive Greek system and various student organizations.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin is a sprawling urban campus renowned for its academic excellence, diverse student body, and deeply ingrained traditions. Its Greek system is one of the largest in the nation, comprising numerous fraternities and sororities under various councils. Beyond Greek life, UT has a vast array of student organizations, spirit groups (like the Texas Cowboys, which has faced hazing allegations), and athletic teams. The combination of intense competition for entry into popular groups, a lively social scene, and a strong sense of tradition can, unfortunately, create fertile ground for hazing incidents. For Lavaca County students at UT, the pressure to conform and “fit in” can be immense.

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Texas at Austin has a clear, comprehensive anti-hazing policy that aligns with Texas state law, emphasizing that hazing is strictly prohibited for any student organization, independent member, or group. Its policies specifically prohibit acts that cause physical harm, mental distress, or humiliation, or the forced consumption of any substance for initiation or affiliation.

Crucially, UT Austin stands out for its transparency regarding hazing incidents. It maintains a public online database of hazing violations, accessible through its Dean of Students office, providing specifics on:

• The organization involved.
• The nature of the violation.
• The specific conduct that constituted hazing.
• The sanctions imposed by the university.

UT offers multiple avenues for reporting hazing:

• Dean of Students Hazing Prevention: Provides resources and direct reporting options.
• Office of Student Conduct: Investigates alleged violations of the university’s code.
• UT Police Department (UTPD): For emergencies or suspected criminal activity.
• Anonymous Online Reporting System: Encourages students to report without fear of identification.

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s public Hazing Violations page is a valuable resource, detailing consistent issues across various organizations:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) (2023): The UT Austin chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) was disciplined for “new members being directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics.” This was determined to be classic physical hazing and forced consumption. The chapter was placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education. This parallels national patterns of Pike hazing.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Assault Case (January 2024): The UT Austin chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) faced a lawsuit from an Australian exchange student who alleged he was assaulted by fraternity members at a party. The student sustained severe injuries, including a dislocated leg, broken ligaments, a fractured tibia, and a broken nose. This particular chapter was already under suspension for prior hazing and safety violations, demonstrating a pattern of disregard for student safety.
• Texas Wranglers and Other Spirit/Tradition Groups: UT also has a history of hazing allegations against prominent spirit and tradition organizations. These have sometimes involved forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, or demeaning practices disguised as character-building. Violations have historically led to suspensions and programmatic overhauls.

UT’s commitment to publicly documenting hazing violations, though not always perfect, provides critical insight for families. It shows that despite robust policies, hazing persists, and the university actively attempts to address it through disciplinary measures.

5.3.4 How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed

Navigating a hazing case originating at the University of Texas at Austin involves several key agencies and legal pathways:

• Law Enforcement: The UT Police Department (UTPD) handles incidents on campus and university property. For off-campus hazing within the city, the Austin Police Department (APD) would typically investigate. Criminal charges would be pursued by the Travis County District Attorney.
• University Conduct Process: The Dean of Students and Office of Student Conduct would initiate an internal investigation, which can lead to sanctions for both students and organizations, publicly noted on UT’s hazing transparency webpage.
• Civil Lawsuit: Civil actions for compensation and accountability would generally be filed in state courts within Travis County (where Austin is located) or federal court. Potential defendants include individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and the University of Texas at Austin (a public university with some sovereign immunity, which can be challenged under specific negligence theories or by suing individuals).
• Impact of Public Log: UT’s detailed public hazing log is a powerful tool for plaintiffs’ attorneys. It provides crucial evidence of prior violations, establishing a pattern and demonstrating the university’s (and the organization’s) knowledge of ongoing hazing risks.
• Proximity to State Government: Being in the state capital, UT hazing incidents can often attract legislative attention, potentially impacting future state laws.

5.3.5 What UT Students & Parents Should Do

For Lavaca County students and parents connected to UT Austin, informed action is key:

• Utilize UT’s Public Hazing Log: Review the hazing.utexas.edu website to see the history of violations for specific organizations. This is an invaluable tool for making informed decisions and for building a legal case.
• Know UT’s Reporting Procedures: Understand how to report incidents to the Dean of Students, Office of Student Conduct, and UTPD. Use anonymous options if necessary.
• Document Everything Diligently: Given UT’s public transparency, it’s imperative to capture all physical and digital evidence—screenshots of group chats, photos of injuries, and detailed records of who said what, when, and where. This evidence reinforces existing university records.
• Contact an Experienced Hazing Attorney: If hazing has occurred, especially if it caused injury, consulting a lawyer experienced in UT Austin hazing cases is vital. Such an attorney can leverage UT’s public records, navigate the university’s internal processes, and build a strong civil case.
• Understand Greek and Spirit Group Dynamics: Be aware that the pressure to join highly selective Greek or spirit groups at UT can contribute to a climate where hazing is tolerated, despite policies.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, nestled in Dallas, is a leading private university known for its prestigious academic programs and vibrant Greek life. While generally insulated from some aspects of public university transparency laws, SMU also faces the challenge of preventing hazing, an issue relevant to the many Lavaca County families who choose private education for their children in Texas.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU is a private, religiously affiliated institution with a strong emphasis on tradition, academic rigor, and a highly active Greek scene. Greek life is a central component of social life for many students, often attracting individuals from affluent backgrounds. This combination can create a culture where social pressures, perceived exclusivity, and a desire to maintain a certain image can lead to hazing, sometimes conducted with extreme secrecy due to the private nature of the institution. For Lavaca County students at SMU, the social landscape and Greek culture are impactful elements of campus life.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU strictly prohibits hazing, in accordance with both Texas law and its own robust student conduct policies. Its policy unequivocally bans any act, on or off campus, connected to initiation or affiliation that causes mental or physical harm, directly or indirectly. As a private university, SMU has the authority to impose severe internal sanctions, including suspension or expulsion for individuals, and permanent removal of organizational recognition.

SMU provides various avenues for reporting hazing:

• Office of Student Conduct: Manages student disciplinary processes, including hazing investigations.
• SMU Police Department (SMU PD): For immediate safety concerns or criminal acts.
• Dean of Students Office: Offers support and facilitates reporting.
• Anonymous Reporting Systems: SMU, like other institutions, often employs anonymous reporting tools like “Real Response” or similar platforms to encourage candid disclosures.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

While private universities often have less publicly available detailed incident logs compared to public institutions, SMU has had its share of documented hazing issues:

• Kappa Alpha Order Incident (2017): The SMU chapter of Kappa Alpha Order faced significant disciplinary action following allegations that new members were subjected to paddling, forced excessive alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. The university suspended the chapter and imposed strict restrictions on its activities and recruiting efforts for several years. This incident highlighted the persistent use of physical and alcohol-related hazing even at private institutions.
• Ongoing Investigations: SMU frequently conducts internal investigations into various fraternities and sororities concerning allegations of hazing, alcohol violations, and other misconduct. While specific details may be less accessible to the general public than at open-records institutions, these illustrate a continuous effort to monitor and address potential violations within its Greek system.

These incidents demonstrate SMU’s commitment to addressing hazing through internal disciplinary processes, albeit often outside the public eye.

5.4.4 How a SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case at Southern Methodist University involves a slightly different jurisdictional landscape due to its private status:

• Law Enforcement: The SMU Police Department (SMU PD) would lead on-campus investigations. Off-campus incidents in Dallas would involve the Dallas Police Department (DPD), with criminal charges handled by the Dallas County District Attorney.
• University Conduct Process: SMU’s Office of Student Conduct would conduct an internal review, leading to sanctions against individuals and organizations. The details of these proceedings are often less publicly accessible than at state universities.
• Civil Lawsuit: Civil actions would generally be filed in state courts within Dallas County or in federal court. As a private university, SMU generally has fewer immunity protections than public institutions, potentially making it a more direct defendant in civil lawsuits. Defendants would include individuals, the local chapter, the national organization, and SMU itself.
• Discovery Process: In civil lawsuits, discovery mechanisms (subpoenas, depositions) are crucial to uncover internal university and organizational documents, even if they are not publicly posted.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For Lavaca County families with connections to SMU, proactive engagement and informed legal action are vital:

• Understand Private University Dynamics: Be aware that information on hazing incidents at SMU may not be as readily available in public databases as it is for state universities. This means victims and families may need to be more diligent in self-documenting.
• Utilize SMU’s Reporting Channels: Report any suspected hazing to the Office of Student Conduct or SMU PD. Leverage anonymous reporting systems offered by the university.
• Diligent Documentation is Key: Because public records might be scarcer, preserving all digital (group chats, photos) and physical evidence becomes even more critical. This evidence directly supports internal university investigations and potential civil claims.
• Seek Experienced Legal Counsel: If hazing has occurred, especially if injury resulted, contacting a lawyer experienced in SMU hazing cases is essential. An attorney can help navigate the nuances of a private university’s internal processes and effectively use civil discovery to build a case.
• Focus on National Patterns: Connect any local SMU chapter’s alleged hazing to the national organization’s history of incidents to demonstrate foreseeability and build a stronger claim of negligence against the national entity.

Baylor University

Baylor University, located in Waco, is a private Christian university deeply rooted in its faith mission. For many Lavaca County families, Baylor represents an attractive option for its academic rigor and distinct values. However, even with its unique institutional identity, Baylor has not been immune to hazing challenges, particularly within its athletic programs and Greek life.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University presents a unique campus culture with a strong Christian mission, which fundamentally shapes its policies and atmosphere. It boasts active Greek life, numerous student organizations, and competitive athletic programs that are a source of considerable pride. The university experienced significant scrutiny and criticism following a sexual assault scandal involving its football program and institutional leadership. This period led to a heightened awareness of institutional oversight and accountability failures, which implicitly impacts how hazing allegations are viewed and addressed. For Lavaca County students at Baylor, faith-based values and strong community ties are significant aspects of their university experience.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor University has a foundational commitment to its values, which unequivocally prohibits hazing. Its policies, contained within the Student Handbook, define hazing broadly and ban any act that causes physical, mental, or emotional harm, or that is demeaning or abusive, for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or membership. Baylor’s policies emphasize a “zero tolerance” approach to hazing, reflecting its broader commitment to student well-being and institutional integrity after its prior challenges.

Baylor encourages reporting through:

• Office of Student Conduct: Primary office for investigating and adjudicating hazing violations.
• Baylor Police Department (BUPD): For immediate threats or criminal behavior.
• Title IX Office: If hazing involves sexual harassment or discrimination under Title IX.
• Care Team/Reporting Hotline: Anonymous reporting mechanisms designed to promote transparency and ease of reporting without fear.

5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor’s history, particularly its recent scrutiny over sexual assault and Title IX compliance, means that allegations of misconduct, including hazing, are often met with intense internal and external review:

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): A significant incident involved the Baylor baseball team. Following an internal investigation into hazing allegations, 14 players were suspended prior to the 2020 season. The suspensions were staggered to minimize the impact on the team, but the sheer number of disciplinary actions underscored the severity and pervasiveness of the hazing within a prominent athletic program. This incident received media attention and demonstrated Baylor’s willingness to act on hazing, especially in the wake of its prior institutional challenges.
• Greek Life Investigations: While specific public records may not be as detailed as for some public universities, Baylor frequently conducts investigations within its various Greek life organizations. These investigations continually address issues such as unauthorized group activities, alcohol violations, and demeaning new member “traditions.”

These incidents show that despite a strong institutional stance and a history of critical review, hazing persists at Baylor, necessitating ongoing vigilance.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case at Baylor University involves distinct procedural characteristics due to its private and geographically specific nature:

• Law Enforcement: The Baylor Police Department (BUPD) would lead investigations on campus. Off-campus incidents in Waco would be handled by the Waco Police Department (WPD), with criminal charges pursued by the McLennan County District Attorney.
• University Conduct Process: Baylor’s Office of Student Conduct would conduct thorough internal investigations and impose sanctions on students and organizations accused of hazing. Due to Baylor’s private status, the outcomes of these internal processes may not be as publicly available as they are for public universities.
• Civil Lawsuit: Civil actions would typically be filed in state courts within McLennan County (where Waco is located) or in federal court. As a private university, Baylor does not enjoy sovereign immunity and therefore can be a direct defendant in lawsuits, alongside individuals, local chapters, and national organizations.
• Impact of Prior Scandals: Baylor’s recent history of institutional scrutiny over sexual misconduct means that any hazing allegations would be viewed through a lens of heightened expectation for thorough investigation and accountability, potentially making the university more sensitive to allegations.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For Lavaca County families with children attending Baylor, informed vigilance and swift action are crucial:

• Familiarize with Baylor’s Policies: Understand Baylor’s strong anti-hazing stance and detailed policies outlined in the Student Handbook. Know what constitutes hazing and what the university’s expectations are.
• Utilize Baylor’s Reporting Options: Report any suspected hazing to the Office of Student Conduct or BUPD. Use the anonymous reporting systems available to ensure concerns are heard without fear.
• Meticulous Documentation: Given that detailed public logs might be less common at private institutions, diligent preservation of all digital and physical evidence (screenshots, photos, personal notes) is especially important for any potential internal university investigation or civil lawsuit.
• Seek Experienced Legal Counsel: If hazing has occurred, contacting a lawyer experienced in Baylor hazing cases is highly advisable. Such an attorney understands the nuances of private university proceedings, the specific legal challenges in Texas, and how to effectively navigate civil litigation against an institution like Baylor.
• Consider Broader Accountability: For Lavaca County residents, understanding Baylor’s prior institutional challenges can inform their expectations regarding the university’s commitment to student safety and accountability in cases of hazing.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

The Greek system at universities throughout Texas – including UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor – provides a vibrant social experience for countless students, including many from Lavaca County. However, beneath the surface of philanthropy and camaraderie, many fraternities and sororities grapple with deeply entrenched hazing cultures. It’s crucial for families to understand that hazing isn’t just a local chapter problem; it’s often linked to broader, national patterns that can have severe consequences for local students.

Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities and sororities operating at Texas universities are part of large, national organizations. These national entities establish charters, collect dues, provide training and resources, and theoretically oversee their local chapters. Consequently, their historical patterns of misconduct are highly relevant:

• Foreseeability: National organizations develop comprehensive anti-hazing policies and risk management manuals precisely because they have a history of hazing incidents, injuries, and tragic deaths across their chapters nationwide. When a chapter at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor repeats the same type of hazing that has caused harm elsewhere, it becomes incredibly difficult for the national organization to claim it was “unforeseeable.” They had prior knowledge and a duty to prevent it.
• Notice: Repeated incidents at various chapters serve as constructive notice to the national headquarters about the persistent dangers of certain “traditions” or initiation customs within their organization.
• Institutional Failure: A pattern of hazing across multiple chapters of a single national organization can indicate a failure at the national level to adequately enforce policies, provide effective oversight, or respond aggressively enough to prior warnings and incidents. This can strengthen claims of negligence against the national entity in a civil lawsuit.

When a student from Lavaca County is harmed by hazing, our legal strategy often involves investigating the national organization’s history to establish this pattern of knowledge and institutional failure, driving accountability far beyond just the local chapter.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

While listing every single chapter at every Texas campus is beyond the scope of this guide, we can highlight some of the major national fraternities and sororities that are widely present at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, and which have extensive, publicly documented national hazing histories:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike)
  • Description: A large, established national fraternity often found at major universities. Known for its strong alumni network.
  • National Hazing History: Pike has a particularly disturbing national pattern of severe alcohol-related hazing. The tragic death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University (2021) from alcohol poisoning during a “Big/Little” event led to a $10 million settlement and multiple criminal convictions. Another devastating case involved David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University (2012), who also died from alcohol poisoning, resulting in a $14 million settlement. These cases, among others, demonstrate a recurring, identifiable pattern of high-risk alcohol initiation practices within Pi Kappa Alpha, making it harder for the national organization to deny knowledge of such dangers. Chapters of Pike at Texas universities, including UT Austin and UH, have also faced hazing allegations.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE)
  • Description: Another very large national fraternity with a significant presence on many campuses, including the flagship Texas universities.
  • National Hazing History: SAE has faced multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide over the years. This pattern of incidents led the national organization to controversially eliminate its traditional pledging process in 2014 in an attempt to curb hazing. Yet, incidents persist. Examples include a lawsuit filed in 2023 alleging a student suffered a traumatic brain injury during hazing at the University of Alabama chapter. Closer to home, a lawsuit at Texas A&M (2021) involved pledges allegedly suffering severe chemical burns after industrial-strength cleaner was poured on them. The University of Texas at Austin chapter (2024) also faced a lawsuit alleging the assault of an exchange student, with the chapter already under suspension for prior violations. This demonstrates a documented history of severe physical and chemical hazing within SAE chapters.
• Phi Delta Theta (Phi Delt)
  • Description: A major national fraternity with chapters at many Texas universities.
  • National Hazing History: Phi Delta Theta is tragically linked to the death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University (2017) from alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game, which led to the Max Gruver Act (felony hazing law in Louisiana) and a $6.1 million verdict against the fraternity and its insurer. This case provided undeniable proof of the dangers of forced drinking games disguised as initiation rituals, suggesting a national pattern that should have prompted more effective preventative actions from the national organization.
• Pi Kappa Phi (Pi Kapp)
  • Description: A large national fraternity with chapters in Texas, including at Texas A&M and UH.
  • National Hazing History: Pi Kappa Phi tragically witnessed the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University (2017) from alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event where pledges were given handles of hard liquor. This incident mirrored other alcohol-related hazing deaths and contributed to a statewide anti-hazing movement in Florida. The consistent nature of such events within the organization’s history underscores the foreseeability of the dangers involved.
• Phi Gamma Delta (FIJI)
  • Description: Often referred to as FIJI, this national fraternity has chapters at Texas A&M and maintains a presence at other universities.
  • National Hazing History: Phi Gamma Delta is notoriously associated with the catastrophic injury of Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri (2021). Santulli was forced to consume excessive alcohol during a “pledge dad reveal” night, leading to severe, permanent brain damage that leaves him unable to walk, talk, or see, requiring 24/7 care. While settlements were largely confidential, they were reportedly multi-million-dollar. This case illustrates the extreme and life-altering non-fatal consequences of alcohol hazing, and the massive financial liability for the organization and individuals.
• Kappa Sigma (Kappa Sig)
  • Description: One of the nation’s largest fraternities, with a significant presence across Texas campuses, including Texas A&M and UT.
  • National Hazing History: Kappa Sigma has a long and troubled hazing history. A landmark case from 2001 involved the death of Chad Meredith at the University of Miami, who drowned after being persuaded by fraternity members to swim across a lake while intoxicated. A jury awarded Meredith’s parents a $12.6 million verdict based on hazing and gross negligence. More recently, allegations at Texas A&M (2023) involved severe physical hazing causing rhabdomyolysis. These incidents demonstrate Kappa Sigma’s repeated involvement in dangerous activities that lead to severe injury or death.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

For families in Lavaca County seeking justice, connecting local hazing incidents to these national histories is a crucial legal strategy. It helps argue that:

• Foreseeability Was Established: National organizations cannot credibly claim ignorance to specific types of hazing (e.g., forced alcohol consumption at “Big/Little” events, violent physical rituals) when similar incidents have occurred repeatedly across their chapters for decades, often leading to severe injury or death.
• Institutional Negligence: This pattern evidence can demonstrate that the national organization has been negligent in enforcing its own anti-hazing policies, providing inadequate oversight, or failing to respond aggressively to prior warnings.
• Punitive Damages: In some cases, showing a pattern of deliberate indifference to known risks can support claims for punitive damages, which are intended not just to compensate the victim but to punish the defendant for egregious conduct and deter future harm.
• Insurance Coverage: Understanding national patterns of hazing also helps navigate complex insurance coverage disputes. Insurers often try to deny coverage for “intentional acts,” but a history of knowing negligence by the national organization can compel them to cover claims.

By meticulously researching the national and chapter-specific histories of organizations present at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, we can build a stronger case for accountability, ensuring that your child’s trauma is not dismissed as an isolated event. This depth of investigation is what sets experienced hazing attorneys apart.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

For families in Lavaca County who have experienced the trauma of hazing, the path to justice can seem daunting. However, a well-built legal case can achieve accountability, secure compensation for damages, and prevent future harm. At The Manginello Law Firm, our approach to hazing litigation is thorough, strategic, and deeply informed by our experience in complex cases against powerful defendants.

Evidence

In hazing cases, evidence is paramount. It disappears quickly (deleted messages, coached witnesses, destroyed materials), making immediate preservation critical. Modern hazing leaves a digital footprint, which is often the most damning evidence. We utilize techniques and experts to uncover and preserve these crucial details, much like Ralph Manginello drew on his experience in complex litigation during the BP Texas City explosion litigation and Lupe Peña leverages her insider knowledge of insurance defense to effectively gather and interpret facts.

• Digital Communications: This is often the most critical category of evidence in today’s hazing cases. GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, fraternity/sorority apps, Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, and TikTok comments provide a real-time window into the planning, execution, and cover-up of hazing. This evidence can show who was involved, what was said, directives given, signs of coercion, and even the immediate aftermath (e.g., discussions about deleting messages). The Attorney911 team understands how to work with digital forensic experts to recover deleted messages and authenticate digital evidence. Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.
• Photos & Videos: Beyond screenshots, actual photos and videos taken by members during hazing events (often for “entertainment” or “proof”) are invaluable. This includes media shared in group chats, on private social media accounts, or even security camera footage from houses or venues. Injury photos, especially if taken immediately and over time to show progression, also provide powerful visual evidence.
• Internal Organization Documents: These can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts (even if disguised), ritual “traditions” lists, and emails or texts from officers giving instructions or making threats. Additionally, national fraternity/sorority policies and risk management training materials, when compared against actual conduct, can highlight institutional failures.
• University Records: We meticulously seek university records, which can reveal crucial patterns. This includes prior conduct files, records of probation or suspension for the organization, letters of warning, incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, and Clery Act reports. For public universities like UT Austin, the public hazing log is a vital starting point.
• Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical documentation is essential to prove physical injuries. This includes emergency room reports, hospitalization records, surgical notes, physical therapy records, and toxicology reports (for alcohol/drug-related hazing). Equally important are psychological evaluations that document emotional distress, PTSD, anxiety, depression, or suicidal ideation resulting from hazing. These records not only confirm the harm but also help establish long-term care needs.
• Witness Testimony: The accounts of other pledges, active members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, trainers, or even bystanders can be critical. Former members who quit or were expelled due to hazing are often powerful, credible witnesses due to their insider perspective. Gathering and preserving their testimony before memories fade or fear of retaliation sets in is paramount.

Damages

The goal of a civil hazing lawsuit is to recover compensation for the full scope of damages suffered by the victim and their family. While no amount of money can truly replace what’s lost, it can provide necessary resources for healing and long-term care, and hold responsible parties accountable. We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force accountability. Attorney911’s video on “How Much is My Personal Injury Case Worth?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onBzdkIWadY) offers a general overview relevant to catastrophic injuries.

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs incurred for treatment, from emergency room visits and ambulance transport to surgeries, extended hospital stays, medications, and ongoing physical or occupational therapy. For severe injuries like brain damage or organ failure, this can include a “life care plan” that projects lifetime medical and care needs, a crucial component for cases like the Danny Santulli tragedy.
• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes lost wages if the student’s injuries prevented them from working. Critically, it also covers the financial impact of educational setbacks—tuition for missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed graduation, and reduced future earning capacity if the injuries (physical or psychological) result in permanent disability that impacts their career path.
• Non-Economic Damages: These are non-monetary losses that profoundly impact a person’s quality of life. They include physical pain and suffering, extreme emotional distress, humiliation, and psychological trauma (e.g., PTSD, anxiety, depression). They also account for the loss of enjoyment of life, as the hazing may have destroyed their ability to participate in hobbies, social activities, or even experience college life fully.
• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): If hazing results in a fatality, surviving family members can recover for funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and compensation for their own grief, mental anguish, and loss of companionship, love, and advice. Attorney911 has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic cases.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

The complexity of hazing cases often involves multiple defendants and intricate insurance coverage disputes. National fraternities, universities, and sometimes even individual officers or advisors, typically carry various forms of insurance (liability, directors & officers policies).

• Insurance Denials: Insurers often attempt to deny coverage for hazing claims, arguing that “intentional acts” or “criminal activity” are excluded under their policies. They may also attempt to argue a late notice of the claim or other technicalities.
• Experienced Legal Strategy: This is where the expertise of The Manginello Law Firm becomes critical. Lupe Peña, with her background as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), possesses insider knowledge of how these companies operate. We know their playbook because we used to run it. Our team meticulously researches all potential insurance policies, navigates challenging disputes about coverage exclusions, and has the experience to compel insurers to defend and ultimately pay on valid claims. We uncover every available avenue for recovery, whether it’s through the national organization’s liability policy, the university’s general liability or umbrella policy, or even individual homeowner’s policies of the students involved. Our goal is to ensure comprehensive financial accountability for the harms suffered.

Practical Guides & FAQs

For Lavaca County families, navigating the aftermath of a hazing incident can feel overwhelming. Here, we offer practical guides for parents, students, and witnesses, along with answers to common questions, to help you take immediate, informed action.

For Parents

No parent in Lavaca County wants to imagine their child in danger at college. Knowing the warning signs and how to respond is essential.

Warning Signs of Hazing

• Unexplained Injuries: Bruises, burns, cuts, or sprains that don’t have a credible explanation, or stories that change.
• Extreme Fatigue: Your child is constantly exhausted, showing signs of severe sleep deprivation, even nodding off in class or at inappropriate times.
• Sudden Mood Changes: Noticeable anxiety, depression, irritability, panic attacks, or extreme secrecy about group activities. A child who was once open now clams up.
• Obsessive Phone Use: Constant checking of phone for group chat demands, fear of missing “mandatory” communications, or being called/texted at odd hours.
• Academic Decline: Sudden drop in grades, missed classes, or neglecting academic responsibilities due to time demands from the group.
• Physical Changes: Weight loss or gain (due to food/water deprivation or stress), signs of alcohol abuse even if they’re not typically a heavy drinker.
• New Loyalty/Fear: An intense, almost cult-like loyalty to the group, coupled with a palpable fear of “getting in trouble” or “letting the chapter down.”
• Strange Demands: Unexplained financial requests for strange items, or stories about humiliating tasks they “had” to do.

How to Talk to Your Child

Approach interactions with empathy, not accusation:

• Ask Open-Ended Questions: Instead of “Are you being hazed?”, try “How are things really going with [group name]?” or “Is there anything about [group name] that makes you uncomfortable or feel unsafe?”
• Emphasize Safety Over Status: Reassure them that their well-being is your top priority, far above any perceived social standing or group loyalty.
• Listen Without Judgment: If they open up, let them talk. Don’t interrupt or immediately jump to solutions. Your role is to hear them and validate their feelings.
• Offer Unconditional Support: Make it clear you will support them, no matter what, and that you will help them navigate any consequences of reporting.

If Your Child is Hurt

• Seek Medical Attention Immediately: This is the absolute priority. Get them to an emergency room, urgent care, or a doctor. Their health comes first, and medical documentation is critical evidence.
• Document Everything: While fresh, write down dates, times, specific events, and what your child told you. Screenshot all relevant text messages, group chats, and social media posts, and photograph any injuries from multiple angles and over several days.
• Secure Witness Information: If your child knows other members who witnessed or participated, discreetly gather their names and contact information.

Dealing with the University

• Document All Communications: Keep a meticulous record of every email, phone call, and meeting with university administrators, including who you spoke to, when, and what was discussed.
• Inquire About Prior Incidents: Ask directly about any previous hazing violations involving the same organization. This information can be pivotal for establishing a pattern of conduct.
• Consult Legal Counsel Early: If your child has suffered significant harm, or if you feel the university is minimizing the incident or is more concerned with protecting its reputation than your child, consult with an attorney experienced in hazing cases immediately.

For Students / Pledges

If you’re a student from Lavaca County involved in a new member process, understanding your rights and how to protect yourself is paramount.

Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?

Ask yourself these critical questions:

• Does this activity make me feel physically or mentally unsafe, humiliated, or degraded?
• Would I participate in this activity if it weren’t for the pressure of joining/being accepted into this group?
• Am I being told to keep secrets about this activity from family, friends outside the group, or university officials?
• Would active members of the group do this themselves, or is it only for new members?
• Does this activity interfere with my academic responsibilities or sleep?

If you answered “yes” to any of these, it is likely hazing. The desire to belong is powerful, but it should never come at the cost of your safety or dignity.

Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story

Hazing thrives on the idea that “everyone agrees to it.” However, in situations where there’s a clear power imbalance, intense peer pressure, and fear of social exclusion or punishment, true consent is often impossible. Texas law explicitly states that your “consent” is not a defense to hazing allegations. You are the victim, not an accomplice.

Exiting and Reporting Safely

• Prioritize Your Safety: If you feel physically or mentally threatened, remove yourself from the situation immediately. Call 911 if in immediate danger.
• “De-Pledging”: You have the right to leave any organization at any time. You can send a simple email or text to the chapter president or new member educator stating your resignation. You do not need to attend “one last meeting” where you might be pressured or intimidated.
• Reporting:
  • On-Campus: Your university’s Dean of Students, Office of Student Conduct, or campus police are resources. Many schools offer anonymous reporting options.
  • Off-Campus: The National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE) offers anonymous reporting 24/7.
• Good Samaritan / Amnesty Policies: Many universities and Texas law offer protections (sometimes called “Good Samaritan” or “medical amnesty”) for students who call for help in an emergency, even if alcohol or drugs were involved. Your life (or a friend’s life) is always more important than getting in trouble.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once part of a hazing incident, or witnessed one, and are now struggling with guilt or know someone was harmed, your actions can be pivotal.

• Your Role in Accountability: Your testimony and evidence can be crucial in preventing future harms and holding responsible parties accountable. While you may fear personal consequences, cooperating can be a significant step toward redemption and justice.
• Seeking Your Own Counsel: An attorney can advise you on your rights and potential legal exposure, and help you navigate the process if you choose to cooperate with authorities or victims’ families.
• Protecting Others: Even if you fear repercussions, consider the lasting impact your story could have. You might be the only person who can provide the missing piece of evidence to protect other students from similar abuse.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

The initial hours and days following a hazing incident are critical. Mistakes made during this time can severely damage your child’s legal case. To ensure Lavaca County families are well-informed, here are common pitfalls to avoid:

1. Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence: What parents might think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.” Why it’s wrong: Deleting evidence can look like a cover-up, can be considered obstruction in criminal investigations, and makes proving a civil case incredibly difficult. What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing or seemingly minor content. Take screenshots, back up data.
2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly: What parents might think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.” Why it’s wrong: This tactic immediately puts the organization on alert, prompting them to destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their legal defenses. What to do instead: Document everything you can, then contact an attorney before any direct confrontation.
3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms: What universities might do: Pressure families to sign waivers, non-disclosure agreements, or internal “resolution” agreements. Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your child’s right to sue later, and university solutions often fall far short of fair compensation or true accountability. What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or the organization without an attorney reviewing it first.
4. Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer: What families might think: “I want people to know what happened.” Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys screenshot everything posted publicly, and any inconsistencies (even minor ones) can be used to discredit your child’s testimony. It can also waive important legal privileges. What to do instead: Document all details privately and thoroughly; let your legal counsel guide any public statements or media engagement.
5. Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting”: What fraternities might say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic; let’s work this out internally.” Why it’s wrong: These are often attempts to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can be used against your child in a legal proceeding. What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication with the group should go through your attorney.
6. Waiting “To See How the University Handles It”: What universities might promise: “We’re investigating this thoroughly; let us handle this internally.” Why it’s wrong: While universities must investigate, their primary goal is often to protect the institution’s reputation, not to secure full compensation for your child. Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and the crucial statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit can run out while you wait. What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW, consult an attorney immediately, and remember that the university’s internal process is separate from securing real legal accountability.
7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer: What adjusters might say: “We just need your statement to process the claim quickly.” Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters work for the insurance company, not for you. Recorded statements are often used to find ways to deny or minimize your claim, and early settlement offers are almost always lowball. What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with any insurance adjuster directly and tell them, “My attorney will contact you.”

These mistakes can be costly and irreversible. Recognizing and avoiding them is the first critical step toward building a strong hazing case. You can learn more by watching Attorney911’s video on client mistakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.

Short FAQ

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, and UT Austin have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, specific types of injuries, or when suing individual administrators in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor generally have fewer immunity protections and can be more directly sued. Each case depends on specific facts—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case-specific analysis.

“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. While hazing is typically a Class B misdemeanor in Texas (Education Code § 37.152), it becomes a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who are officers of an organization and fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.

“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that “consent” given under duress, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion or social repercussions is not true voluntary consent.

“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas?”
Generally, the statute of limitations for personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits in Texas is two years from the date of injury or death. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses forget, and organizations destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to discuss your specific timeline. Learn more about Texas statute of limitations in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of the hazing does not necessarily eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be liable based on their sponsorship of the organization, their knowledge of hazing risks, their control over the organization, and the foreseeability of hazing occurring off-campus. Many major national hazing cases, including one at a remote retreat and another at an “unofficial” off-campus house, have resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments against responsible parties despite the off-campus location.

“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before going to trial. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy and works to secure confidential settlement terms to protect your child’s identity and future. While public trials can attract media attention, many families find justice and accountability through confidential resolutions.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. At The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, we are the Legal Emergency Lawyers™ because we provide immediate, decisive action when you need it most. We understand the profound impact hazing has on students and families, and we are dedicated to securing justice and accountability.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Lavaca County and surrounding areas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects families across our diverse communities, from the major metropolitan areas to the small, close-knit towns like those in Lavaca County. Our firm is uniquely qualified to handle the complexities of hazing litigation due to our distinct advantages:

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable experience as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims. She understands their delay tactics, coverage exclusion arguments, and settlement strategies. We know their playbook because we used to run it. Lupe Peña’s background is detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Led by Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, our firm has a proven track record of taking on formidable defendants. Ralph was one of the few Texas attorneys deeply involved in the complex BP Texas City explosion litigation—a testament to our ability to litigate against billion-dollar corporations in state and federal courts. We are not intimidated by national fraternities, powerful universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We’ve taken on massive corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants. Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have secured substantial settlements and verdicts for families in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. Our team works with experts, including economists and life care planners, to accurately value the devastating impact of hazing-related injuries or deaths—from immediate medical needs to long-term care and lost earning capacity. We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force accountability.
• Dual Criminal and Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph Manginello’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a crucial understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual perspective is invaluable for advising clients who may face both civil and criminal aspects within their case, and for guiding witnesses who may have dual exposure. When hazing results in criminal charges, Attorney911’s criminal defense experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) means we can advise on both criminal exposure and civil liability.
• Investigative Depth: We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does. Our firm utilizes a network of experts, including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, and psychologists, to uncover and preserve critical evidence that often disappears quickly. This means meticulously obtaining deleted group chats, accessing chapter records, and navigating university files through discovery and public records requests.

We understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments actually operate behind closed doors. We know how to investigate modern hazing, uncover hidden evidence, and build compelling cases that expose institutional knowledge and failure.

We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We approach every case with empathy and a steadfast commitment to victim advocacy, balancing the need for public accountability with your family’s privacy.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm today for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options without judgment, and help you decide the best path forward. We understand the financial strain that comes with such hardships, and we want to remove any barriers to seeking justice. Learn more by watching our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.

Whether your child attends the University of Houston, Texas A&M in College Station, the University of Texas in Austin, SMU in Dallas, Baylor in Waco, or any other institution in our state, families in Lavaca County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability. You don’t have to face this alone.

Call us today.

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español. Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for a consultation in Spanish.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com