Texas Hazing: A Guide for Menard County Families on Campus Abuse, Law, and Accountability

A sudden, anxious call from your child. They sound distant, tired, maybe even scared. They vaguely mention a “pledge event” or “initiation ritual” that went too far. Perhaps they’re now at an off-campus house where the pressure to drink is overwhelming, or they recount a humiliating task they were forced to endure, with peers filming and chanting. Someone got hurt – a bad fall, severe vomiting, or a sudden collapse – but no one wanted to call 911 for fear of “getting their fraternity suspended” or “being ostracized.” Your child, a student from Menard County, Texas, now feels trapped between their desire to belong and their instinct for self-preservation.

This scenario is not a distant nightmare; it is a harsh reality playing out on college campuses across Texas every semester. Menard County, a vibrant community in the heart of Texas, proudly sends its young people to universities across the state. Whether they attend Texas A&M in College Station, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Houston, SMU in Dallas, or Baylor in Waco, our students deserve to pursue their education in safe environments. Sadly, hazing continues to cast a long shadow, turning dreams into trauma.

We at The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, understand the profound anxiety and heartbreak that hazing incidents cause. We are dedicated to providing clear, authoritative guidance for families in Menard County and throughout Texas who are navigating the complexities of campus abuse. This comprehensive guide will equip you with vital information to understand what hazing truly looks like in 2025, how Texas and federal laws address it, what we’ve learned from major national cases, and the specific concerns at institutions like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor. Most importantly, we will outline the legal options available to victims and families in Menard County and across Texas seeking accountability.

Please note, this article is intended as general information and not specific legal advice. Every case has unique facts. The Manginello Law Firm is here to evaluate individual cases and provide bespoke counsel based on your specific circumstances. We serve families across the entire state of Texas, including those residents of Menard County and the surrounding Texas Hill Country who need experienced legal representation.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  - Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
  - Photograph injuries from multiple angles
  - Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
- Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
- Do NOT:
  - Confront the fraternity/sorority
  - Sign anything from the university or insurance company
  - Post details on public social media
  - Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
- Universities move quickly to control the narrative
- We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For many families in Menard County, the word “hazing” might conjure images of mischievous pranks or silly dares. However, the reality of hazing on college campuses in 2025 is far more sinister and dangerous. Hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits.

The outdated notion of “boys will be boys” or “it’s just tradition” simply does not apply when students are subjected to physical abuse, extreme psychological torment, or forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. In hazing, “consent” is often illusory. The immense peer pressure, the desire to belong, and the fear of social exclusion can create an environment where a student feels they have no real choice but to comply, even if it puts their mental or physical well-being at risk.

Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing practices have evolved, becoming more insidious and often harder to detect. For Menard County families unfamiliar with the modern Greek life or student organization landscape, understanding these categories is crucial.

Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains one of the most prevalent and deadly forms of hazing. It involves forcing or coercing new members to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol, participate in chugging challenges or “lineups,” or play drinking games where incorrect answers or performance lead to forced drinking. Pledges may also be pressured to consume unknown substances or illicit drugs. The consequences can range from severe alcohol poisoning and organ damage to death.
Physical Hazing: Traditional forms of physical hazing like paddling and beatings persist. Beyond direct violence, this category includes extreme calisthenics, forced “workouts,” or “smokings” (punitive physical exercises) that far exceed safe limits. Students may be subjected to sleep deprivation, food or water deprivation, or forced exposure to extreme cold or heat, leading to exhaustion, injury, and illness.
Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These activities are deeply demeaning and psychologically scarring. They can involve forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (such as the “elephant walk” or “roasted pig” positions), or being made to wear degrading costumes. Hazing can also manifest as acts with racist, homophobic, or sexist overtones, including the use of slurs or forced role-playing of stereotypes.
Psychological Hazing: This type of abuse targets a student’s mental and emotional well-being. It includes relentless verbal abuse, threats, intimidation, and isolation tactics designed to break down a new member. Psychological hazing may also involve manipulation, forced confessions, and public shaming, often amplified through relentless group chat torment.
Digital/Online Hazing: With the rise of social media and rapid communication, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Discord, and others. Pledges may be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos, or constantly monitor group messages, fearing punishment if they don’t respond immediately.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is not confined to the stereotypes of fraternity houses. It can occur in a wide variety of student organizations and environments on Texas campuses, including universities where Menard County students matriculate.

Fraternities and Sororities: This includes chapters under various councils, such as Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations.
Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: Highly structured environments, often with strong traditions, can sometimes be susceptible to hazing, blurring the lines between structured discipline and abuse.
Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs: Groups like the Texas Cowboys (UT Austin) or similar campus organizations, focused on tradition and school pride, have faced hazing allegations.
Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball, swimming, and cheerleading squads, hazing can be a pervasive issue in collegiate sports programs.
Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous academic or performance-based groups have reported hazing incidents.
Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Any group with an “initiation” or “new member” process can, unfortunately, become a breeding ground for hazing.

The common threads that allow these practices to persist across diverse groups are the pursuit of social status, the veneration of “tradition,” and a deeply ingrained culture of secrecy. These factors allow hazing to hide in plain sight, often shielded by a code of silence among members, even when everyone “knows” hazing is illegal and damaging.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For families in Menard County and across Texas grappling with a hazing incident, understanding the legal landscape is paramount. Texas has specific anti-hazing laws, and a federal framework also plays a crucial role in university accountability.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas law clearly defines and prohibits hazing. Our Education Code – Chapter 37, Subchapter F – outlines these provisions in plain terms. Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition is deliberately broad, ensuring that dangerous, harmful, or degrading actions undertaken to join or remain in a group are considered hazing, regardless of whether malice was the primary intent. “Reckless” behavior—meaning the individual knew the risk and proceeded anyway—is sufficient for the act to be deemed hazing. Crucially, the location does not matter: hazing can happen on or off campus, and it can cause mental or physical harm.

Criminal Penalties:
Hazing carries significant criminal penalties in Texas. While a basic hazing offense is typically a Class B Misdemeanor, it escalates:

If hazing causes injury requiring medical treatment, it can be a Class A Misdemeanor.
If hazing results in serious bodily injury or death, it can be a State Jail Felony.

Additionally, individuals who are members or officers of an organization and fail to report hazing they knew about can face misdemeanor charges. Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

Organizational Liability ($$$ 37.153):
Under Texas law, organizations themselves (fraternities, sororities, clubs, teams) can also be criminally prosecuted. This occurs if the organization authorized or encouraged the hazing, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it. Penalties for organizations include fines up to $10,000 per violation, and universities can revoke recognition, banning the organization from campus.

Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting ($$$ 37.154):
To encourage reporting, Texas law provides immunity from civil or criminal liability for individuals who report hazing incidents in good faith to university authorities or law enforcement. Furthermore, many university policies and Texas law extend amnesty for minor offenses (like underage drinking) to students who call 911 in a medical emergency. These protections are vital, even if fear of social consequences still makes reporting difficult for students.

Consent Not a Defense ($$$ 37.155):
One of the most critical aspects of Texas hazing law is that consent is not a defense. Even if the person being hazed seemingly “agreed” or said “yes” to the activity, it remains hazing if it meets the statutory definition. This provision acknowledges the inherent power imbalance and coercive nature of hazing.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s important for Menard County families to understand the distinction between criminal and civil legal actions in hazing cases, as both can seek justice and accountability.

Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (prosecutor) in response to a violation of criminal law. The primary aim is to punish the accused, with potential outcomes including jail time, fines, or probation. In hazing, criminal charges often include hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, and, sadly, manslaughter in fatal cases.
Civil Cases: These are brought by victims or their surviving families. The goal of a civil lawsuit is typically monetary compensation for damages and to hold responsible parties accountable. In hazing litigation, civil claims often focus on theories such as negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Both criminal and civil actions can run concurrently. A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil case. In fact, a civil case can often succeed by a “preponderance of the evidence” (meaning it is more likely than not that fault exists), a lower legal threshold than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard required for criminal convictions.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations also impose responsibilities on colleges and universities, adding another layer of protection and accountability for students from Menard County and elsewhere.

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation mandates greater transparency and prevention efforts from colleges and universities receiving federal aid. By around 2026, institutions will be required to publicly report hazing incidents and outcomes, enhance education initiatives, and maintain publicly accessible hazing data. This act, while still in its early implementation phase, promises to bring much-needed sunlight to hazing incidents.
Title IX / Clery Act: When hazing involves elements of sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based discrimination, or hostile environment, it can trigger obligations under Title IX. Similarly, the Clery Act requires institutions to report certain campus crimes and maintain safety statistics, a category hazing incidents often fall into when assaults, alcohol violations, or drug-related offenses occur.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Determining liability in a civil hazing lawsuit is complex, but key parties are frequently implicated:

Individual Students: Those directly involved in planning, executing, facilitating, or covering up the hazing can be held personally liable. This includes members who supply alcohol, wield paddles, or coerce pledges into dangerous acts.
Local Chapter / Organization: The fraternity, sorority, or student group itself, as a recognized entity, can be sued for its role, especially if officers or “pledge educators” were involved or had knowledge of the hazing.
National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters often holds significant responsibility. Their liability can stem from what they knew (or should have known) about a chapter’s hazing history, their failure to enforce anti-hazing policies, or their insufficient oversight despite collecting dues and maintaining advisory roles.
University or Governing Board: The institution itself can be held accountable, particularly if there is evidence of negligence, gross negligence, or “deliberate indifference.” Key factors include the university’s awareness of prior hazing incidents, their enforcement (or lack thereof) of anti-hazing policies, or failure to intervene when dangers were foreseeable. Public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT may invoke sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist, especially in cases of gross negligence or Title IX violations.
Third Parties: Other entities can also be implicated, such as landlords or owners of properties where hazing occurred, bars or alcohol suppliers (under dram shop laws), or even event organizers who facilitated dangerous activities.

Each hazing case is distinct, and the specific facts dictate which parties can be held liable. Our firm diligently investigates every potential defendant to pursue comprehensive accountability.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

Understanding the national context of hazing is vital for Menard County families, as these landmark cases consistently demonstrate dangerous patterns, legal thresholds, and the potential for life-altering consequences. What happens at one university often mirrors incidents at others, highlighting systemic issues.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The most tragic and common pattern in hazing involves extreme alcohol consumption, often leading to death.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most high-profile hazing deaths, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after a “bid acceptance” event where he was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. Fraternity surveillance cameras captured his multiple falls and the disturbing delay in seeking medical help, as brothers initially attempted to cover up the incident. This tragedy led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the enactment of Pennsylvania’s Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. This case underscored how extreme intoxication, a callous delay in calling 911, and a culture of enforced silence can have legally devastating consequences for both individuals and institutions.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” where pledges were given handles of hard liquor. This incident directly resulted in criminal hazing charges against multiple fraternity members and prompted Florida State University to temporarily suspend all Greek life before overhauling its policies. Coffey’s death highlighted how formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster in many fraternities.
Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver died from alcohol toxicity after being forced to participate in a “Bible study” drinking game where he had to drink if he answered questions incorrectly. His blood alcohol content measured a staggering 0.495%. Max’s tragic death galvanized Louisiana lawmakers, leading to the passage of the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing law. The case demonstrated how clear evidence of hazing, coupled with public outrage, can drive significant legislative change.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died after being forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” pledge night. The incident resulted in multiple criminal convictions for hazing-related charges against fraternity members. In a significant civil outcome, Foltz’s family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with $7 million coming from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and approximately $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This outcome made clear that universities, even public ones, can face substantial financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities when hazing occurs.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and ritualized abuse also represents a clear and persistent hazing pattern.

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng died from a traumatic brain injury after being subjected to a violent, blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. Members delayed calling 911, and a subsequent investigation uncovered a pattern of abuse. Multiple members were convicted, and the national fraternity was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, ultimately leading to Pi Delta Psi being banned from Pennsylvania for a decade. This case demonstrated that off-campus “retreats” are not immune from hazing laws and that national organizations themselves can face severe criminal sanctions.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it is a pervasive issue that can impact athletic programs at any university.

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): Widespread allegations of sexualized and racist hazing within Northwestern’s football program rocked the university. Former players described a culture of abuse that forced extreme, inappropriate acts. Multiple lawsuits were filed against Northwestern and its coaching staff, leading to the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who subsequently filed a wrongful-termination suit, which was confidentially settled in August 2025. This scandal demonstrated that hazing extends far beyond Greek organizations, permeating major athletic programs, and raising critical questions about institutional oversight.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies reveal common threads that reverberate through hazing incidents in Texas, affecting students from Menard County and beyond. Forced drinking, humiliating rituals, violence, delayed medical care, and systematic cover-ups are recurrent themes. Crucially, these cases underline that meaningful reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements often only follow after immense tragedy and dedicated legal action. Families in Menard County whose children attend or plan to attend Texas universities are part of a broader landscape shaped by these powerful, often devastating, national lessons concerning hazing.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, is deeply familiar with the campus cultures and legal landscapes of Texas’s major universities. For Menard County families, understanding the specific environments of these institutions is key to recognizing and addressing hazing. While Menard County is located in the Texas Hill Country, its families send students to all corners of the state. We’ll offer specific insights into institutions that attract students from Menard County and the surrounding region, including nearby Texas A&M.

5.1 Texas A&M University

As one of the closest major universities to Menard County, Texas A&M University in College Station is a popular choice for many local families, with its strong traditions and dedicated alumni network.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M is renowned for its deep-rooted traditions, including the iconic Corps of Cadets, a large and influential Greek life system, and fiercely loyal spirit organizations. This culture, while fostering immense pride, can sometimes give rise to an environment where hazing is disguised as “tradition” or “testing commitment.” Students from Menard County attending A&M may encounter these traditions firsthand. Brazos County, where College Station is located, hosts a dynamic blend of student life and community, drawing from surrounding areas like Menard County.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

Texas A&M unequivocally prohibits hazing, whether on or off campus, as part of Student Rule 24. They define hazing broadly to include any activity that endangers mental or physical health or safety for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. A&M emphasizes that “consent” is not a defense under university policy or state law. The university provides multiple avenues for reporting hazing, including the Dean of Students Office, the Student Conduct Office, and the Texas A&M University Police Department (TAMU PD). Additionally, an anonymous online reporting form is available.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced its share of hazing allegations, both within its Greek system and the Corps of Cadets:

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Lawsuit (around 2021): Two pledges alleged severe physical hazing, including being forced to participate in strenuous activity while substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, were poured on them. This resulted in severe chemical burns requiring multiple skin graft surgeries. The pledges filed a lawsuit seeking $1 million against the fraternity, which was subsequently suspended by the university for two years.
Corps of Cadets Sexualized Hazing (2023): A former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading hazing within the Corps, including forced simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The lawsuit sought over $1 million. While A&M stated it handled the matter under its internal rules, the case brought significant scrutiny to Corps traditions.
Kappa Sigma (2023, ongoing): Allegations of hazing resulting in severe injuries, specifically rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown from extreme physical exertion), have led to ongoing litigation involving the Kappa Sigma chapter at Texas A&M.

These incidents highlight the persistent challenges A&M faces in distinguishing between rigorous tradition and harmful hazing.

5.1.4 How an A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

In a hazing case originating at Texas A&M, the involved law enforcement agencies could include TAMU PD and the Bryan Police Department or College Station Police Department, depending on where the incident occurred. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in courts within Brazos County, impacting families from Menard County who may be involved. Potential defendants could include individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, and potentially the university itself, given its unique legal status. Our firm, from our Houston offices, is well-equipped to navigate these local and state-level legal processes for Menard County families.

5.1.5 What A&M Students and Parents Should Do

For students and parents from Menard County connected to Texas A&M:

Familiarize yourself with A&M’s strong anti-hazing stance and reporting mechanisms.
Document everything: If you suspect hazing, immediately screenshot group chats, photographs of injuries, and notes detailing incidents.
Prioritize safety: If a student is in medical distress, call 911 immediately. Texas A&M’s Good Samaritan policy is in place to protect those who report emergencies.
Consult legal counsel early: A lawyer experienced in A&M hazing cases can help preserve critical evidence, navigate university investigations, and advise on pursuing civil claims against responsible parties.
Understand the “tradition” versus “hazing” line: While A&M prides itself on tradition, no tradition should require physical abuse, mental anguish, or illegal activity.

5.2 University of Houston (UH)

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Houston, a large urban campus, serves a diverse student body from across Texas, including students whose families reside in Menard County. UH boasts an active Greek life with a multitude of fraternities and sororities, alongside numerous spirit and cultural organizations. This dynamic environment, while enriching, necessitates vigilance against hazing practices that can emerge within any student group striving for internal cohesion and tradition.

5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

UH maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, clearly stating it prohibits any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. This prohibition applies to both on-campus and off-campus activities. UH provides multiple avenues for reporting alleged hazing, including the Dean of Students Office, the Student Conduct Office, the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD), and an anonymous online reporting system. The university publicly affirms its commitment to hazing prevention and a safe campus environment.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

While UH does not maintain as comprehensive a public violations log as some other Texas universities, documented incidents highlight ongoing vigilance:

Pi Kappa Alpha (2016): This chapter faced significant scrutiny and misdemeanor hazing charges after pledges were allegedly subjected to deprivation of food, water, and sleep during multi-day events. One student, in particular, suffered a lacerated spleen after reportedly being slammed onto a table during the hazing, leading to the chapter’s suspension.
Ongoing Disciplinary Actions: UH’s Dean of Students office has regularly disciplined fraternities and other student organizations for violations that include “behavior likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” alcohol misuse, and failure to comply with university policies related to new member education. These actions demonstrate the university’s response to reported incidents, even if the public details are sometimes limited to general categories.

5.2.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

In hazing cases involving the University of Houston, law enforcement oversight could involve UHPD and/or the Houston Police Department, depending on the incident’s specifics and location. Civil lawsuits would be filed in courts within Harris County, encompassing the legal system of Houston. Potential defendants could range from individual students and the local chapter to the national fraternity/sorority and potentially the university itself, along with any relevant third-party property owners. For Menard County families, these cases are often handled by experienced Houston-based firms like ours, leveraging our proximity and deep understanding of the local legal landscape.

5.2.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For students from Menard County attending UH, and their families:

Understand the definition: Be clear that any act endangering mental or physical health for affiliation is hazing, regardless of how it’s framed.
Utilize reporting channels: Know how to access the Dean of Students Office, UHPD, or the anonymous reporting system.
Document everything: Screenshot digital communications (GroupMe, texts), photograph any injuries, and meticulously record details of alleged incidents.
Seek legal counsel early: A lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can help navigate the university’s internal processes and advise on civil legal options to uncover prior discipline and ensure accountability.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin, one of the state’s largest and most prominent institutions, attracts many students from Menard County and across Texas. UT has a vast and active Greek life, well-established campus traditions, and a wide array of student organizations. The prestige of joining certain groups often leads to intense competition, which can unfortunately create conditions ripe for hazing. UT’s campus environment, situated within the capital city of Austin, is closely intertwined with the city’s broader culture.

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

UT Austin maintains a robust anti-hazing policy and is notably more transparent about violations than many other universities. Its policy forbids any act that causes or is likely to cause mental or physical harm, fear, humiliation, or serious discomfort, in connection with initiation or affiliation. UT’s Dean of Students office publicly lists hazing violations and the resulting disciplinary actions on its “Hazing Violations” website, providing a valuable resource for students, parents, and researchers. Students can report incidents through the Office of Student Conduct, the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD), or various anonymous channels.

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s public hazing log showcases numerous incidents across various organizations, underscoring the persistent challenges:

Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): The UT chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) was disciplined for directing new members to consume milk until they vomited and perform strenuous calisthenics. These actions were deemed hazing, leading to the chapter being placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (2024): This chapter faced a lawsuit from an Australian exchange student alleging assault at a fraternity party, resulting in severe injuries including a dislocated leg and broken bones. The chapter was already under previous suspension for hazing and safety violations.
Texas Wranglers (2022): This spirit organization was sanctioned for hazing violations that included forced physical exertion, blindfolds, and sleep deprivation, demonstrating that hazing extends beyond traditional Greek life.
“Absolute Texxas” Spirit Group (2022): This spirit organization was disciplined for hazing violations involving alcohol/drug misconduct, blindfolding, forced degradation, and even implied kidnapping.

UT’s commitment to publicizing hazing violations, while commendable for transparency, also highlights the ongoing struggle to eliminate these dangerous behaviors across campus organizations.

5.3.4 How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases arising from UT Austin often involve UTPD and/or the Austin Police Department, especially for incidents occurring off-campus. Civil lawsuits would typically be heard in courts within Travis County, near the firm’s Austin office. The transparent nature of UT’s public hazing log can be a critical asset in civil cases, providing clear evidence of prior warnings and patterns of misconduct that can strengthen arguments against the university or specific organizations. Menard County families pursuing such cases would engage with the legal system active in the state’s capital.

5.3.5 What UT Students & Parents Should Do

For Menard County students at UT and their families:

Review the UT Hazing Violations website: This resource offers invaluable insight into which organizations have a history of misconduct.
Report promptly: Utilize UTPD, the Student Conduct Office, or anonymous reporting options if hazing is suspected.
Document thoroughly: Screenshot any communications, take photos of physical evidence, and keep detailed notes. UT’s transparency means that documented evidence often carries significant weight.
Consult an attorney: Given the complexity of UT’s system and the legal precedents involved, contacting a lawyer specializing in hazing cases is crucial for navigating investigations and pursuing full legal recourse. Our Austin office is ready to assist.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Southern Methodist University, a private institution nestled in Dallas, is known for its affluent student body and a prominent Greek life that is central to its social scene. Many students from across Texas, including Menard County families seeking a private university experience, attend SMU. The pressure to join exclusive fraternities and sororities can sometimes unfortunately fuel hazing practices, despite the university’s official stance against them.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

SMU explicitly prohibits hazing, adhering to Texas law. Its policy defines hazing broadly to include any physical or mental abuse connected to initiation or membership, regardless of location or consent. SMU encourages students to report hazing incidents through the Dean of Students Office, the Student Conduct & Community Standards office, the SMU Police Department, or its anonymous “SMU Aware” reporting system. The university emphasizes education and prevention efforts, including training for student leaders and advisors.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

As a private university, SMU’s public disclosures of hazing violations may not be as extensive as those of public institutions like UT Austin. However, incidents have been publicly documented and have led to significant disciplinary actions:

Kappa Alpha Order (2017): This chapter faced severe penalties after allegations of pledges being paddled, forced to consume excessive alcohol, and deprived of sleep. The national organization also suspended the chapter, resulting in a ban on recruiting until approximately 2021. This incident highlighted the university’s willingness to impose strict sanctions on offending organizations.
Multiple Suspensions: SMU has, at various times, placed other fraternities and sororities on suspension or probation for violations of hazing policies, often involving alcohol misuse and activities that compromise student welfare.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing incidents at SMU could involve investigations by the SMU Police Department and/or the Dallas Police Department. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in courts within Dallas County. As a private university, SMU does not enjoy sovereign immunity, potentially simplifying certain legal avenues compared to public institutions. However, private university status can sometimes mean less public information on prior incidents. An experienced hazing attorney would need to utilize the discovery process to uncover a pattern of neglected warnings or institutional failures. For Menard County families, legal proceedings would take place in the Dallas metropolitan area.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For Menard County students attending SMU and their families:

Be aware of the culture: Understand the social pressures and expectations within SMU’s Greek and student organizations.
Utilize SMU Aware: Make use of the university’s anonymous reporting system if uncomfortable reporting directly.
Document everything: Screenshots of texts, group chats, and photos are crucial. Even seemingly minor details can form vital evidence.
Seek private legal counsel: Given the typically less public nature of private university disciplinary actions, an attorney can be instrumental in investigating incidents, preserving evidence, and ensuring your child’s rights are protected outside of internal university channels.

5.5 Baylor University

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, is known for its strong Christian values and vibrant campus community. Students from Menard County and throughout the state are often drawn to Baylor for its academic reputation and faith-based environment. While Baylor emphasizes spiritual and personal growth, its athletic programs and student organizations are not immune to hazing, despite the university’s stated commitment to student welfare.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

Baylor University strictly prohibits hazing, defining it in alignment with Texas law as any act that causes or is likely to cause mental or physical harm in connection with initiation or affiliation. Baylor’s policies emphasize that such acts are never excusable, regardless of consent or tradition. The university provides various reporting mechanisms, including through the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD), Student Conduct Administration, and an anonymous hotline, reinforcing its “zero-tolerance” stance.

5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor’s history of handling student misconduct, particularly in the wake of its high-profile sexual assault scandal involving its football program, has placed immense scrutiny on its official policies and their enforcement.

Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): An investigation found that hazing occurred within the baseball program, leading to the suspension of 14 players. The suspensions were staggered over the early season, indicating the university’s acknowledgment of serious misconduct. This incident demonstrated that hazing is a concern across all types of student groups at Baylor, not just Greek life.
Continuing Vigilance: Baylor’s administration has consistently reaffirmed its commitment to combating hazing and has taken disciplinary action against student organizations found in violation of its policies. However, the shadow of previous institutional failures means all allegations are scrutinized carefully by external parties.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing investigations at Baylor University typically involve the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) and/or the Waco Police Department. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in courts within McLennan County. As a private university, Baylor does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more directly liable in civil actions than public institutions. Given its past challenges with institutional oversight, hazing claims against Baylor and its affiliated organizations would likely be met with rigorous defense, underscoring the need for highly experienced legal counsel. Families from Menard County would typically navigate the McLennan County legal system.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For Menard County students attending Baylor and their families:

Prioritize safety: Emphasize that no tradition or group affiliation is worth enduring physical or mental harm.
Know the reporting avenues: Familiarize yourself with BUPD, Student Conduct Administration, and anonymous reporting.
Document comprehensively: Collect screenshots, photos, and detailed notes on any concerning incidents, as all evidence can be crucial.
Consult legal experts early: Given Baylor’s unique institutional history and the potential for a complex legal battle, engaging an attorney specializing in hazing claims is vital to ensure robust advocacy and thorough investigation.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

When hazing occurs at a Texas university, it is rarely an isolated incident. More often, it follows a dangerous script, one that has been repeated by chapters of the same national organization across the country. Understanding this pattern, and the national histories behind it, is critical for Menard County families seeking accountability.

Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities and sororities at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor are part of larger national organizations. These national headquarters:

Develop their own anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies. They do this because their chapters have historically been involved in incidents, sometimes resulting in deaths and catastrophic injuries.
Accumulate knowledge of dangerous patterns: forced drinking nights, “Big/Little” events involving excessive alcohol, paddling “traditions,” and humiliating rituals.

When a chapter in Texas, say a Pi Kappa Alpha chapter at UH, repeats the same script (e.g., forced alcohol consumption) that led to a death at another Pike chapter in a different state (e.g., Bowling Green State), it creates a powerful argument for foreseeability and supports claims of negligence against the national organization. This pattern demonstrates that the national entity had prior knowledge of the risks associated with particular hazing methods but allegedly failed to intervene effectively or enforce policies.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

While we cannot list every single chapter at every university, several national fraternities and sororities with chapters at Texas A&M, UT, UH, SMU, and Baylor have well-documented national histories of hazing. Recognizing these patterns can be crucial for Menard County families.

Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has an extensive national history of severe hazing, particularly involving forced alcohol consumption. The tragic death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021, and the $10 million settlement that followed, is a stark reminder. Our firm also sees incidents with Pike chapters in Texas, including at UT Austin and UH, often involving similar scripts of alcohol-related physical hazing.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE has faced numerous hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide over the years, leading to significant reforms in 2014 when they abolished the pledge process (a policy often not fully followed by local chapters). Lawsuits against SAE have included a traumatic brain injury case at the University of Alabama, as well as severe chemical burn allegations at Texas A&M and an assault case at the University of Texas at Austin. These cases underscore a pattern of dangerous behavior.
Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity was at the center of the Max Gruver hazing death at LSU in 2017, involving fatal alcohol toxicity from a “Bible study” drinking game, leading to Louisiana’s felony hazing statute. Chapters exist at Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor.
Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Involved in the Andrew Coffey hazing death at Florida State University in 2017, where a pledge died from severe alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night,” leading to significant criminal prosecutions and Greek life suspensions. Chapters are present at UH and Texas A&M.
Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): This fraternity was responsible for the Timothy Piazza hazing death at Penn State in 2017, a case synonymous with extreme alcohol consumption, delayed medical care, and a subsequent cover-up caught on camera. Chapters can be found at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor.
Kappa Alpha Order (ΚΑ): Historically, this fraternity has faced various hazing allegations, including reports of paddling and forced alcohol consumption. The SMU chapter, for instance, faced a multi-year suspension starting in 2017 due to hazing incidents. Chapters are present at Texas A&M and SMU.
Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor, Sigma Chi chapters have also faced hazing allegations. A significant case at the College of Charleston in 2024 resulted in a $10 million-plus settlement for a pledge who suffered severe physical, psychological, and drug/alcohol-related abuse.
Omega Psi Phi (ΩΨΦ): As part of the NPHC Divine Nine, this fraternity has faced hazing allegations, including a recent federal lawsuit against a University of Southern Mississippi chapter in 2023 alleging severe beatings with a wooden paddle. Chapters exist at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor.

These examples underscore that specific fraternities have national patterns of conduct that can be central to a legal strategy in Texas.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

For families in Menard County and beyond, understanding these national patterns is crucial because they directly impact legal strategy. When a particular hazing method or outcome is repeated across an organization’s chapters, it often establishes that the national entity had prior warnings about the inherent dangers. This makes it harder for them to claim ignorance or that an incident was “unforeseeable.”

In Texas hazing litigation, this evidence can be used to:

Increase settlement leverage: Demonstrating a pattern of negligence pressures national organizations and their insurers to settle.
Strengthen arguments for punitive damages: If an organization repeatedly ignored warnings or failed to enforce its policies, a court or jury may decide to punish them with exemplary damages to deter future misconduct.
Navigate insurance coverage disputes: Knowledge of similar incidents helps attorneys counter claims that hazing is an “excluded” or “unforeseeable” event under insurance policies.

We leverage this in-depth understanding of organizational histories to build powerful cases that hold responsible parties accountable, not just locally but nationally.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Building a successful hazing case for Menard County families requires meticulous investigation, a comprehensive understanding of damages, and a strategic approach to litigation. The evidence gathered must paint a clear picture of what happened, who is responsible, and the full extent of the harm.

Evidence

Modern hazing cases often hinge on digital and intangible evidence, meaning quick action to preserve it is paramount.

Digital Communications: These are often the most critical pieces of evidence. GroupMe, WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and even fraternity-specific apps contain the planning, coercion, and sometimes the direct execution of hazing. Our firm utilizes digital forensics experts to recover deleted messages and uncover vital context. Screenshots of full message threads with timestamps and participant names are invaluable. Our video “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs offers guidance on best practices for preserving this crucial information.
Photos & Videos: Visual evidence filmed by members during events, footage shared in private chats or social media, and security camera footage (e.g., Ring doorbell cameras at off-campus houses) can directly prove what transpired. Prompt preservation before deletion is essential.
Internal Organization Documents: Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” lists, emails, and texts from officers or advisors can reveal institutional knowledge and planned activities. Our investigations work to uncover these documents.
University Records: Prior conduct files, probation orders, disciplinary records, incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, and Clery reports often reveal a pattern of behavior or prior warnings that the university allegedly ignored. We know how to navigate public records requests and the discovery process to obtain these.
Medical and Psychological Records: Emergency room reports, hospitalization records, surgery notes, physical therapy records, and toxicology reports (for alcohol/drug-related hazing) are crucial. Additionally, psychological evaluations diagnosing PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health impacts are essential for demonstrating the full scope of damages.
Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts from other pledges, members, roommates, Resident Assistants (RAs), coaches, trainers, or bystanders can be powerful. Even former members who quit or were expelled often provide critical testimony once provided appropriate legal guidance.

Damages

Recovering damages in a hazing case is about acknowledging and compensating the profound and multifaceted harm suffered by victims and their families.

Medical Bills & Future Care: This includes immediate costs (ambulance, ER visits, hospital stays in places like Houston or San Antonio for Menard County students), but also projected future expenses for surgeries, ongoing physical or occupational therapy, medications, and long-term care plans for catastrophic injuries like brain damage (as seen in the Danny Santulli case).
Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This covers wages lost by a student who misses semesters or has to withdraw, as well as the long-term impact on their earning capacity if injuries prevent them from pursuing their chosen career. It also includes the financial cost of lost scholarships or delayed graduation.
Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for the profound emotional and psychological trauma. This includes physical pain and suffering from injuries, emotional distress, humiliation, and the long-lasting impact of trauma (e.g., PTSD, anxiety, depression). It also accounts for the loss of enjoyment of life – the inability to participate in activities, hobbies, or the typical college experience.
Wrongful Death Damages (for families): In the tragic event of a hazing death, surviving family members (parents, spouses, children) can pursue compensation for funeral and burial costs, the loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and the profound emotional harm of losing companionship, love, and guidance. Attorney911 has extensive experience in wrongful death claims, which you can learn more about by visiting https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.

We understand that these damages types are not just legal categories; they represent real pain, suffering, and financial hardship for families from Menard County.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation often involves multiple powerful defendants, each with their own legal teams and insurance carriers. National fraternities and universities, in particular, commonly carry substantial insurance policies designed to protect them from liability. However, their insurers may fight coverage, arguing that hazing, especially “intentional” acts, falls under policy exclusions.

Our firm is well-versed in these complex dynamics. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney, detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/, gives us invaluable insight into how these companies operate. We identify all potential sources of coverage, meticulously review policy language, and strategically argue against unjustified exclusions to maximize recovery. We know how to navigate disputes about “intentional conduct” by focusing on the other parties’ “negligent supervision” or failure to prevent foreseeable harm, which often is covered by insurance. This strategic approach ensures that no stone is left unturned in our pursuit of justice for Menard County families.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When a hazing crisis strikes, families and students in Menard County need immediate, actionable advice. Here are practical guides and answers to common questions.

For Parents

For parents in Menard County who fear their child is being hazed, vigilance and swift action are paramount.

Warning Signs of Hazing: Look for physical indicators like unexplained bruises, burns, or cuts; extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation; and sudden changes in weight or appearance. Behavioral changes include sudden secrecy about group activities (“I can’t talk about it”), withdrawal from friends or family, increased anxiety or depression, and defensiveness when asked about the organization. Academic red flags include dropping grades or missing classes due to “mandatory” events. Digital signs might include constant phone use for group chats, anxiety when the phone pings, or obsessive deletion of messages.
How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation calmly and empathetically. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things going with your group? Are you enjoying it?” Emphasize their safety and well-being above any loyalty to a group. Reassure them that you will support them regardless of what they share.
If Your Child Is Hurt: Immediately get them medical attention. Document everything: take clear photos of injuries, screenshot any text messages or group chats they show you, and meticulously write down dates, times, and everything they tell you.
Dealing with the University: Document all communications with university administrators. Ask specific questions about prior incidents involving the organization and the university’s response. Be aware that the university’s primary goal may be institutional protection, not justice for your child.
When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or covering up what happened, contact an experienced hazing attorney immediately.

For Students / Pledges

For students from Menard County caught in a hazing situation, self-awareness and knowing your rights can be lifesaving.

Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself: Am I being forced to do something I don’t want to do? Is this dangerous, degrading, or illegal? Would university officials or my parents approve if they knew? Are older members making me do things they don’t have to do? If you answer yes to any of these, it’s likely hazing. Your gut feeling matters.
Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Despite what older members might say, “I agreed to do it” is not a legal defense to hazing. The law recognizes the immense power imbalance, social pressure, and fear of exclusion that can force members into “agreeing” to harmful activities. You are a victim, not a willing participant, under these circumstances.
Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, get to a secure location (your dorm, a friend’s place, a public area), then tell someone outside the organization. You can send an email to leadership stating your resignation. If you fear retaliation, report this concern to the Dean of Students or campus police. Texas and university policies often protect those who report in good faith.
Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: In Texas (and at most universities), if you call 911 in a medical emergency, you are generally protected from criminal or university sanctions for minor offenses, like underage drinking, that might have been involved. This “Good Samaritan” protection is designed to encourage seeking help.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once involved in hazing, or witnessed it, and now carry guilt or fear, know that your testimony can prevent future tragedies and save lives.

Acknowledge that breaking the code of silence is difficult. However, your testimony and any evidence you have could be crucial in holding perpetrators and institutions accountable.
While you may face your own legal concerns, cooperating with authorities or an attorney can be an important step towards justice. Experienced hazing lawyers can help you navigate your role, advise on potential legal protections, and ensure your rights are respected.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

Protecting your legal rights and ensuring accountability in a hazing case requires careful action. Menard County families should be aware of these common pitfalls:

Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence: This is a critical error. While you might seek to protect your child from further trouble, deleting evidence can be seen as obstruction of justice and severely weaken any legal case. Instead: Preserve all digital communications immediately, including embarrassing ones.
Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly: Emotional confrontations typically backfire. The organization will immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, and coach witnesses. Instead: Document everything privately and contact a lawyer before any direct engagement.
Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms: Universities may pressure you to sign documents that waive your right to sue or commit you to an internal resolution that might not adequately compensate for the harm. Instead: Never sign any university document without review by an independent attorney.
Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer: Information shared publicly can be screenshot by defense attorneys, used against your child, and potentially waive legal privileges. Instead: Document privately and let your legal team manage public communications strategically.
Letting your child go back to “one last meeting” or “talk it out”: These settings are often designed to pressure or intimidate, or to gather statements that can be used against your child later. Instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication with the organization should cease and be managed by your lawyer.
Waiting “to see how the university handles it”: Universities often prioritize their own reputation and may delay, minimize, or internally manage incidents without real accountability. Evidence disappears rapidly, witnesses graduate, and statutes of limitations expire. Instead: Preserve evidence immediately and consult a lawyer. University processes are separate from your right to pursue individual accountability.
Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer: Insurance adjusters, representing the fraternity or university, will seek to obtain recorded statements and offer low-ball settlements. Instead: Kindly decline to speak with them and inform them that your attorney will be in contact. You can see our video on client mistakes that can ruin your injury case at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.

Short FAQ

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin) typically have sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, certain intentional torts, and Title IX violations. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) generally do not have sovereign immunity. Every case depends on its specific facts. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. While basic hazing is a Class B misdemeanor, it elevates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who are members or officers and fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” given under duress, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally, there is a 2-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death in Texas. However, certain legal principles, such as the “discovery rule” (when the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known) or “tolling” (pausing the clock for minors or fraudulent concealment), can extend this period. Time is critical, as evidence disappears quickly. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately. Our video “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c provides more information.
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and whether the hazing was foreseeable. Many significant hazing cases, including deaths and catastrophic injuries, have occurred off-campus.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Many hazing cases resolve through confidential settlements before going to trial. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy and can seek sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. We balance the desire for public accountability with discretion concerning your child’s name.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces the aftermath of a hazing incident, you need more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need tenacious legal professionals who understand the intricate playbook of powerful institutions and know how to achieve justice against them. That’s why Attorney911, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, stands ready to serve families from Menard County and across Texas.

From our Houston, Austin, and Beaumont offices, we bring a level of expertise to hazing litigation that few firms can match. Our unique qualifications are critical in these complex cases:

Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable insight as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm. Visit https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/ to learn more about her background. She understands exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, their coverage exclusion arguments, and their intricate settlement strategies. Essentially, we know their playbook because we used to run it.
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, has extensive experience taking on formidable defendants. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, a monumental case against a global corporation. His federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won, applying that same relentless drive to hazing cases. You can read more about Ralph’s credentials at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases, building cases that force accountability and secure significant compensation. We work with economists and medical experts to thoroughly value a lifetime of care needs for brain injuries or other permanent disabilities, ensuring comprehensive recovery.
Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the elite Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a deep understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual perspective is invaluable when advising witnesses or former members who may face their own legal exposure while seeking to cooperate.
Investigative Depth: We investigate hazing incidents like your child’s future depends on it – because it does. We utilize a network of experts, including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, and psychologists, to obtain hidden evidence like deleted group chats, social media records, and crucial university files. We understand the inner workings of Greek life, student organizations, and campus politics, allowing us to uncover the truth.

We understand that hazing cases present unique challenges, pitting a victim or their family against powerful institutions with vast resources. We pursue accountability not with bravado, but with rigorous investigation, precise legal strategy, and an unwavering commitment to holding the responsible parties accountable. We know that this is one of the hardest things a family can face, which is why we approach every case with empathy and dedication. Our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family.

Empowering Menard County Families: Your Call to Action

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s at Texas A&M, UT Austin, UH, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Menard County and throughout the surrounding Texas Hill Country have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide the best path forward for your family.

What to expect in your free consultation:

We will listen to your story without judgment, providing a compassionate and understanding ear.
We will review any evidence you have, such as photos, screenshots of texts, GroupMe chats, or medical records.
We will clearly explain your legal options, discussing whether a criminal report, civil lawsuit, both, or neither is appropriate for your situation.
We will provide realistic timelines and discuss what you can expect during the legal process.
We will answer any questions you have about costs. We work on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. You can watch our video on how contingency fees work at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
There is absolutely no pressure to hire us on the spot; we encourage you to take the time you need to make the right decision for your family.
Everything you tell us is confidential, protected by attorney-client privilege.

Contact Attorney911 today:

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email Ralph Manginello: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – Servicios legales en español disponibles. Contact Lupe Peña directly for a consultation in Spanish: lupe@atty911.com.

Whether you’re in Menard County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today. We are the Legal Emergency Lawyers™ and we are here to help.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com