Hazing in Texas: A Comprehensive Guide for Parmer County Families
The phone rings late. Maybe it’s a grainy video sent through a whisper network, or a mumbled confession after a university tradition event. Perhaps it’s the quiet shame in your child’s eyes after a weekend away with their new fraternity or sorority, or a disturbing message on a group chat where they’re being pressured relentlessly. For families in Parmer County and across the Texas Panhandle, the fear that their child might be caught in the web of hazing is a chilling reality, especially as many send their students far from home to university campuses across our state.
Imagine this scenario, one that plays out with tragic frequency: It’s “initiation night” at an off-campus fraternity house near one of Texas’s proud universities. A student, eager to belong, is being pressured to drink far beyond safe limits. Older members are filming on phones, chanting, and laughing—their faces illuminated by the screens, oblivious to the danger. Someone eventually gets hurt, perhaps falling or collapsing, but a code of silence takes over. Nobody wants to call 911 because they’re afraid of “getting the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble.” Your child feels trapped between loyalty to the group and their own safety, a feeling no student from wholesome communities like Friona, Bovina, or Lazbuddie should ever experience.
This isn’t just a story; it’s a pattern of abuse that can happen at any Texas university—including those where Parmer County families send their children, from the metropolitan campuses in Houston to the diverse student bodies in Austin, and the revered traditions of College Station. We understand that residents of Parmer County and our surrounding agricultural communities value hard work, integrity, and safety. When those values are betrayed by dangerous campus activities, it can be devastating.
This comprehensive guide is designed for Parmer County families and those throughout the Texas Panhandle and beyond who need to understand the complex, often hidden, world of hazing. We will cover:
- What hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes.
- How Texas and federal law address hazing, outlining key protections and liabilities.
- Vital lessons from major national hazing cases and their direct relevance to Texas families.
- Detailed insights into hazing incidents and policies at University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University.
- The legal options available to victims and their families in Parmer County and across Texas.
This article provides general information regarding hazing law and incidents in Texas. While we aim to be as thorough and accurate as possible, it is not a substitute for specific legal advice tailored to your unique situation. The Manginello Law Firm serves families throughout Texas, including Parmer County, providing dedicated advocacy to those affected by hazing.
IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:
If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies, without hesitation.
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help—that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.
In the first 48 hours, every moment counts:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Prioritize their health and safety above all else.
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot all group chats, texts, and direct messages (DMs) immediately.
- Photograph injuries from multiple angles and over several days to document their progression.
- Save any physical items that could be evidence, such as damaged clothing, receipts for forced purchases, or disturbing objects.
- Write down everything while memory is fresh: who, what, when, where, and any relevant details.
- Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly. This can escalate the situation and compromise evidence.
- Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal counsel.
- Post details on public social media. This can harm your child’s case and privacy.
- Let your child delete messages or “clean up” any potential evidence.
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours. Evidence disappears quickly—deleted group chats, destroyed property, and coached witnesses are common tactics used by perpetrators. Universities may also move quickly to control the narrative. We can help preserve crucial evidence and protect your child’s rights from the outset. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for an immediate, confidential consultation.
Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like
For many Parmer County families, the image of hazing might be something out of a classic movie—a silly prank or an inconvenient chore. But modern hazing is far more insidious and dangerous than outdated stereotypes suggest. It’s not “just boys being boys” or “harmless tradition.” In 2025, hazing is a pervasive, often violent, and frequently hidden form of abuse that prioritizes group dominance and secrecy over the safety and well-being of individuals.
Clear, modern definition of hazing
At its core, hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status within a group. This behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. It’s crucial to understand that even if a student utters the words, “I agreed to it,” that consent is not automatically valid or legal when there is clear peer pressure, a power imbalance inherent in the group dynamic, or fear of exclusion. The law in Texas, and increasingly across the nation, recognizes that true consent cannot exist in coercive environments.
Main categories of hazing
Modern hazing takes many forms, often blending different tactics to maximize control and secrecy.
- Alcohol and substance hazing
This is the most common and often deadliest form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking of excessive amounts of alcohol, often in rapid succession. This can manifest as chugging challenges, “lineups” where multiple pledges drink simultaneously, or drinking games designed to ensure high consumption. Pledges may also be pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, or mixtures that are not alcohol, often with dangerous consequences. - Physical hazing
Physical hazing extends beyond the classic image of paddling. It includes beatings, extreme calisthenics (sometimes called “workouts” or “smokings”) pushed far beyond safe limits, and sleep deprivation that can last for days. Students may be denied food or water, or exposed to extreme cold or heat, or placed in dangerous environments without proper gear or supervision. - Sexualized and humiliating hazing
This category involves forced nudity or partial nudity, often accompanied by simulated sexual acts or degrading poses such as “roasted pig” positions. Students may be forced to wear humiliating costumes, or participate in acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones including slurs or role-play that demeans them or specific groups. These acts are deeply traumatic and long-lasting in their psychological impact. - Psychological hazing
Often overlooked but profoundly damaging, psychological hazing includes persistent verbal abuse, threats, and social isolation. It can involve subtle or overt manipulation, forced confessions, or repeated public shaming—often on social media or in private group meetings. This form of hazing erodes self-worth and creates dependency, making it harder for victims to leave. - Digital/online hazing
With the rise of smartphones and social media, hazing has evolved digitally. This includes group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation orchestrated via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Discord, and others. Students can be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos of themselves or others, blurring the lines between personal and group identity and making escape from the abuse nearly impossible as it permeates their digital lives.
Where hazing actually happens
The notion that hazing is exclusively a “frat boy” problem is outdated. While fraternities and sororities—across all councils (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural)—remain significant sites of hazing, the practice is unfortunately widespread. It can be found in:
- Corps of Cadets / ROTC / military-style groups, which often have deeply ingrained, dangerous traditions.
- Spirit squads, tradition clubs, and university organizations such as those mimicking the historical “Texas Cowboys” or various social clubs.
- Athletic teams, including football, basketball, baseball, track and field, cheerleading, and dance.
- Marching bands and other performance groups, where camaraderie can easily morph into coercive “team-building” activities.
- And even some service, cultural, and academic organizations, where students seeking professional and social connections can encounter abusive practices.
The unfortunate truth is that a powerful combination of social status, rigid traditions, and a pervasive culture of secrecy allows these dangerous practices to flourish, even when university policies and legal statutes explicitly forbid them. For parents in Parmer County, understanding that no student group is entirely immune is the first step in vigilance.
Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)
For families in Parmer County grappling with the aftermath of hazing, understanding the legal landscape can feel overwhelming. However, Texas law provides crucial frameworks for both criminal punishment and civil redress, offering avenues for accountability that extend far beyond campus disciplinary actions.
Texas hazing law basics (Education Code)
Texas has specific anti-hazing provisions outlined in the Texas Education Code. In plain terms: hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act directed at a student, whether on or off-campus, for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. This act must either:
- Endanger the physical health or safety of a student (e.g., beatings, forced exercise, coerced consumption of alcohol or drugs).
- Or substantially affect the mental health or safety of a student (e.g., extreme humiliation, isolation, intimidation, psychological abuse).
Summarizing the law:
- Criminal penalties: Hazing is a criminal offense. The severity of the penalty increases with the harm caused. Default offenses are misdemeanors, but hazing that causes serious bodily injury or death is classified as a state jail felony in Texas. This means those responsible can face significant fines and potential jail time. Additionally, individuals who are members or officers of an organization and know about hazing but fail to report it can also face misdemeanor charges.
- Reporter protections: Texas law encourages reporting. A person who, in good faith, reports a hazing incident to university authorities or law enforcement is generally immune from civil or criminal liability arising from that report. Furthermore, many university policies and state laws offer good-faith amnesty for students who call for emergency medical help during a hazing incident, even if underage drinking was involved. This aims to remove barriers to seeking life-saving assistance.
It’s important to remember that this is a summary. Actual legal statutes are technical and precise. For families in Parmer County, this means the law is a powerful tool to address harm, but navigating it effectively requires experienced legal counsel.
Criminal vs. civil cases
When a hazing incident occurs, it can trigger two distinct legal processes:
- Criminal cases: These are initiated by the state (through a prosecutor) when a crime has been committed. The aim is to punish the individuals or organizations responsible. Hazing-related criminal charges often include direct hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in cases involving severe injury or death.
- Civil cases: These are brought by the victims or their surviving family members. The primary goal of a civil lawsuit is to seek monetary compensation for the harm suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil claims typically focus on:
- Negligence and gross negligence: Alleging that individuals, organizations, or institutions failed in their duty of care.
- Wrongful death: When hazing leads to a fatality.
- Negligent hiring/supervision: When an institution fails to properly vet or oversee employees or student organizations.
- Premises liability: If the hazing occurred on property where the owner failed to maintain a safe environment.
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress: For severe psychological harm.
It’s crucial to understand that criminal and civil cases are separate. A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil lawsuit, and compensation for victims is sought through the civil system.
Federal overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery
Beyond state laws, a federal framework also impacts hazing accountability:
- Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation requires colleges and universities that receive federal funding to be more transparent about hazing incidents. By approximately 2026, institutions must publicly report hazing violations, beef up hazing education and prevention efforts, and maintain publicly accessible data on hazing incidents. This means more information will be available to Parmer County families when researching campus safety.
- Title IX / Clery: If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or hostile environments based on gender, then federal Title IX obligations are triggered, requiring universities to investigate and respond. The Clery Act mandates that colleges and universities report certain crime statistics, and hazing incidents that involve assault, alcohol, or drug offenses often fall under these reporting requirements, providing another layer of institutional disclosure.
Who can be liable in a civil hazing lawsuit
Determining liability in a civil hazing lawsuit is complex, as multiple parties can be held responsible:
- Individual students: Those who directly planned, organized, supplied substances for, carried out, or participated in the hazing acts, or helped cover them up.
- Local chapter / organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, particularly if it operates as a legal entity. Officers, “pledge educators,” or leaders within the organization who sanctioned or oversaw the hazing can be key targets.
- National fraternity / sorority: The parent organization’s national headquarters often sets policies, provides resources, collects dues, and supervises local chapters. Their liability can depend on what they knew about a chapter’s hazing history (or similar incidents nationwide) and whether they adequately intervened.
- University or governing board: The college or university itself can be sued under theories of negligence, gross negligence, or (in some cases) civil rights violations. Key questions involve whether the school had prior warnings about the organization, if it failed to enforce its own policies, or if it demonstrated deliberate indifference to known dangers. Public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin may have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions often exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, or when suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor generally have fewer such immunity protections.
- Third parties: This can include landlords or owners of off-campus houses or event spaces where hazing occurred, bars or other establishments that illegally furnished alcohol (under “dram shop” laws), and even security companies or event organizers who failed in their duties.
Every case is highly fact-specific; not all these parties will be liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney can identify all potentially responsible parties and build a comprehensive case.
National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)
When hazing claims arise in Parmer County or at any Texas university, it’s not an isolated incident. We draw vital lessons from major national cases, which expose dangerous patterns and demonstrate critical precedents for accountability. These cases also often spur legislative changes and multi-million-dollar settlements, showing Texas families what’s at stake.
Alcohol poisoning & death pattern
Tragically, forced alcohol consumption is the single most common and deadly form of hazing. Cases from across the country serve as stark warnings and legal guideposts:
-
Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a “bid acceptance” event involving extreme alcohol consumption. Horrifying surveillance footage showed Piazza suffering multiple falls and injuries over hours, with fraternity brothers delaying calling for help. The aftermath led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the passing of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania. For Texas families, this case underscores how extreme intoxication, deliberate delay in seeking medical aid, and a pervasive culture of silence can lead to devastating legal and human consequences.
-
Andrew Coffey – Florida State, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): During a “Big Brother Night” event, 20-year-old Andrew Coffey was given a bottle of hard liquor and drank to dangerous levels, ultimately dying of acute alcohol poisoning. Criminal hazing charges were brought against multiple members, and Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life and overhauled its policies. This case highlights how seemingly traditional alcohol-focused pledge events are often deeply ingrained scripts for disaster, with predictable and tragic outcomes.
-
Max Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Maxwell Gruver died after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where he was forced to consume copious amounts of alcohol as punishment for incorrect answers. His death led directly to Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing law that carries serious penalties. The Gruver case illustrates how legislative change often follows public outrage and indisputable evidence of violent hazing, establishing stronger legal recourse for victims.
-
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): During a fraternity pledge night, 20-year-old Stone Foltz was forced to drink an entire bottle of whiskey, dying afterward from alcohol poisoning. Multiple criminal convictions followed, and Bowling Green State University, a public institution, agreed to a nearly $3 million settlement with the Foltz family. Other substantial settlements were reached with the fraternity and individuals. This case emphatically shows that universities, even public ones with potential sovereign immunity defenses, along with fraternities, can face immense financial liability and reputational damage.
Physical & ritualized hazing pattern
Hazing doesn’t only involve alcohol. Physical and ritualized abuse can also have deadly consequences:
- Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a pledge, died after participating in a violent blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. He suffered a fatal head injury, and fraternity members delayed calling 911 for critical hours. Multiple members were convicted, and the national fraternity itself was banned from Pennsylvania. This case is a stark reminder that off-campus “retreats” are often chosen precisely to evade detection and can be as dangerous or even more treacherous than on-campus events. It also established criminal liability for a national fraternity organization.
Athletic program hazing & abuse
Hazing is not confined to Greek life; it also pervades athletic programs, often under the guise of “team building”:
- Northwestern University football (2023–2025): Former football players came forward with allegations of widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the prestigious football program, dating back years. This scandal resulted in multiple lawsuits against Northwestern University and its coaching staff, the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald (who later confidentially settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit), and a national reckoning for athletic departments. For Texas families in Parmer County, this case highlights that hazing can occur in high-profile sports programs, often enabled by a culture of silence and institutional oversight failures.
What these cases mean for Texas families
The common threads running through these national cases are chillingly consistent: forced drinking, physical abuse, severe humiliation, deliberate delays in calling for medical care, and concerted efforts to cover up incidents. While these tragedies occurred outside Texas, they directly shape the legal landscape for families in Parmer County and across our state:
- Foreseeability: The repeated nature of these incidents means that certain hazing methods are not “unforeseeable accidents.” National fraternities, local chapters, and universities are often on notice about the risks. This strengthens negligence arguments in civil lawsuits here in Texas.
- Accountability: These cases demonstrate that while powerful institutions like national fraternities and universities may resist, through persistent legal action, victims and their families can secure multi-million-dollar settlements and significant verdicts, forcing accountability and necessary reforms.
- Legislative Impact: Each tragedy has contributed to stronger anti-hazing legislation and increased institutional reporting requirements, setting new standards for campus safety that benefit Texas students.
Texas families facing hazing at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor are not alone. They operate within a legal and cultural landscape profoundly shaped by these national lessons, underscoring the importance of informed and tenacious legal representation.
TEXAS FOCUS: UH, TEXAS A&M, UT, SMU, BAYLOR
For Parmer County families, your children might attend any of Texas’s excellent universities. While geographically distant, the Manginello Law Firm is here to provide insight and legal support for hazing incidents impacting students across our vast state, including those whose collegiate paths lead them to our major institutions. We understand that students from communities like Friona, Bovina, and Lazbuddie often travel to these campuses, and we’re dedicated to ensuring their safety and legal rights wherever they pursue their education in Texas.
University of Houston (UH)
The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus, is home to a diverse student body and a thriving Greek life system. Many students from across Texas, including some from the Texas Panhandle who wish for a big-city experience, attend UH. Hazing incidents at UH are often investigated by the UH Police Department alongside the Houston Police Department, depending on the location of the incident, with civil suits potentially heard in the courts of Harris County, where our primary office is located.
Campus & culture snapshot
UH is a large, public research university deeply integrated into the city of Houston. It boasts a mix of commuter and residential students and features an active Greek life scene, including IFC, Panhellenic, multicultural, and National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) fraternities and sororities. Beyond Greek life, numerous student organizations, athletic teams, and clubs contribute to a diverse campus culture that, unfortunately, can also be susceptible to hazing.
Official hazing policy & reporting channels
UH maintains a clear stance against hazing. Its policy strictly prohibits hazing, whether it occurs on-campus or off-campus. The policy specifically forbids forced consumption of alcohol, food, or illegal drugs, involuntary physical activity, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, intimidation, or any activity “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort, humiliation, harassment, or ridicule.” UH provides multiple avenues for reporting, including the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the UH Police Department. The university also publishes a hazing statement and information regarding campus disciplinary actions against organizations.
Selected documented incidents & responses
UH has an unfortunate history of hazing incidents that highlight the severe risks students face:
- 2016 Pi Kappa Alpha case: This incident involved pledges allegedly being deprived of sufficient food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. Disturbingly, one student suffered a lacerated spleen after reportedly being slammed onto a table or similar surface. The incident gained significant public attention, leading to misdemeanor hazing charges against individuals and the eventual suspension of the UH chapter.
- Ongoing Disciplinary Actions: While UH’s public reporting isn’t as detailed as some institutions, there are recurring references to disciplinary actions against fraternities for behavior “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including policy violations related to alcohol misuse. These actions often result in suspensions, probation, and mandated hazing prevention programs.
These incidents underscore UH’s willingness to discipline chapters, but also the persistent challenge of hazing within its Greek system.
How a UH hazing case might proceed
For Parmer County families, a hazing case originating at UH is often handled within the Harris County legal system. Law enforcement agencies involved might include the UH Police Department or the Houston Police Department, depending on where the hazing occurred. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in the state or federal courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County. Potential defendants would include the individual students involved, the local chapter of the organization, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the university itself, particularly if there’s evidence of negligent supervision or a failure to enforce policies. Property owners where off-campus hazing occurs can also be named.
What UH students & parents should do
If you’re a Parmer County family with a student at UH, or considering sending your child there, here’s crucial advice:
- Understand UH’s reporting mechanisms: Familiarize yourself with how to report hazing at UH through the Dean of Students, UHPD, or online forms.
- Document prior incidents: If you suspect hazing, research any publicly available information on prior complaints or disciplinary actions against the specific organization. Documenting these can be vital for any future legal action.
- Consult local legal expertise early: Talking to a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can be critical. Our firm’s deep roots in the Houston legal community mean we understand the local agencies, courts, and can help uncover prior disciplinary records and internal files that inform liability.
Texas A&M University
Texas A&M University, a legendary institution with deep roots and cherished traditions, draws students from every corner of Texas, including Parmer County. Its unique blend of a vast student body, robust Greek life, and the iconic Corps of Cadets necessitates a careful look at hazing’s potential forms. Legal matters often involve Brazos County law enforcement and courts, but our firm handles cases for Texans across the state.
Campus & culture snapshot
Texas A&M is renowned for its strong traditions, including the fiercely loyal Aggie Network, and a deeply ingrained military-style environment within the Corps of Cadets. Alongside its robust Greek life, the university is defined by student organizations and traditions that foster immense camaraderie, but also, at times, contribute to an environment where hazing can become dangerously normalized.
Official hazing policy & reporting channels
Texas A&M’s commitment to prohibiting hazing is explicitly stated in its Student Rules. The university defines hazing broadly, outlawing any act that “endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student” for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. This includes physical abuse, forced alcohol or drug consumption, sleep deprivation, and any activity that is humiliating, degrading, or risky. Students and parents can report hazing through the Division of Student Affairs, the Hazing Incident Report Form, or the University Police Department (UPD).
Selected documented incidents & responses
Texas A&M’s history includes several concerning hazing incidents spanning both Greek life and the Corps of Cadets:
- Sigma Alpha Epsilon chemical burns lawsuit (around 2021): This high-profile incident involved two pledges from the SAE chapter who alleged severe physical hazing. They claimed they were forced to endure strenuous activity, followed by having mixtures including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The pledges sought substantial damages, and the fraternity chapter was ultimately suspended by the university for two years.
- Corps of Cadets hazing lawsuit (2023): A former cadet brought a lawsuit alleging degrading and dangerous hazing within the Corps. The allegations included simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth, a disturbing act of humiliation. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages, highlighting the severe psychological and emotional toll of such practices within the Corps. While A&M stated it addressed the matter through its internal rules, the lawsuit brought public attention to the issue.
These incidents demonstrate the persistent nature of hazing at A&M, both in Greek organizations and within revered traditions like the Corps of Cadets.
How a Texas A&M hazing case might proceed
Hazing cases arising from Texas A&M typically fall under the jurisdiction of Brazos County law enforcement and courts, often involving the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD). For Parmer County families, navigating these proceedings would mean working with legal counsel familiar with local procedures and university policies. Civil cases would target individuals, the local chapter, relevant national organizations (e.g., SAE), and potentially the university itself, depending on the specifics of the investigation and evidence of institutional negligence.
What Texas A&M students & parents should do
Parmer County families with connections to Texas A&M should heed this advice:
- Understand A&M’s specific policies: The Corps of Cadets and Greek life organizations have distinct traditions; familiarize yourself with hazing policies for both.
- Report promptly: Use the Hazing Incident Report Form or contact Texas A&M UPD or the Division of Student Affairs immediately if you suspect hazing.
- Document aggressively: Given the university’s strong traditions and potential for internal resolution, thorough documentation (photos, messages, witness accounts) from the outset is even more critical.
University of Texas at Austin (UT)
The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution in our state’s capital, is a popular choice for many students across Texas, including those from our Panhandle communities. UT’s proactive approach to publicizing hazing violations provides valuable transparency, yet also underscores the persistent challenges with hazing amidst its vibrant campus life. UTPD and Austin Police Department typically handle incidents, with civil cases often proceeding through Travis County courts.
Campus & culture snapshot
UT Austin is one of the largest and most prestigious universities in Texas, boasting a dynamic campus environment, powerhouse athletics, and a sprawling Greek life presence. Its cultural impact extends far beyond Travis County, and it attracts a diverse array of students from across Texas and the nation. The intersection of its academic rigor, social scene, and strong traditions creates a complex environment where hazing incidents, unfortunately, can occur.
Official hazing policy & reporting channels
The University of Texas at Austin maintains a clear and comprehensive anti-hazing policy. The university explicitly prohibits hazing, defining it broadly to include any act that causes or is likely to cause mental or physical discomfort, embarrassment, ridicule, or injury, for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. UT’s Office of the Dean of Students oversees hazing prevention and response. Crucially, UT is known for its public Hazing Violations page (https://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/hazing), which lists sanctioned organizations, the nature of their violations, and the disciplinary actions taken. Students and parents can report incidents through the Dean of Students office, the UT Police Department (UTPD), or through anonymous online forms.
Selected documented incidents & responses
UT Austin’s public Hazing Violations page offers detailed insight into recurring hazing issues, providing valuable transparency for families:
- Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): This chapter was sanctioned after new members were reportedly directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. The university’s investigation confirmed hazing violations, leading to the chapter being placed on probation and required to implement enhanced hazing-prevention education.
- Texas Wranglers (2022): A well-known spirit organization, the Texas Wranglers, was sanctioned for hazing violations that included forced workouts, alcohol-related misconduct, and other punishment-based practices designed to degrade new members. This highlights that hazing is not exclusive to Greek life.
- Sigma Alpha Epsilon (2024): Despite national pledges a decade ago to eliminate pledging, the UT Austin chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon faced a lawsuit by an exchange student alleging assault at a party, occurring while the chapter was already under suspension for prior hazing/safety violations. This demonstrates an ongoing pattern for some organizations.
UT’s commitment to listing detailed violations, while commendable for transparency, unfortunately illustrates the persistent and varied forms hazing takes on campus.
How a UT Austin hazing case might proceed
For Parmer County families, a hazing case at UT Austin would likely involve investigations by the UT Police Department (UTPD) or the Austin Police Department (APD), with civil lawsuits proceeding through the courts of Travis County. The public record of UT’s hazing violations can be a powerful asset in civil litigation, as it often provides strong evidence of an organization’s prior misconduct, a pattern of behavior, and the university’s prior knowledge of these issues. This transparency can be invaluable in establishing foreseeability and supporting negligence claims.
What UT Austin students & parents should do
If your child attends or plans to attend UT Austin:
- Review UT’s Hazing Violations page: This is an unparalleled resource (deanofstudents.utexas.edu/hazing) to research specific organizations before joining.
- Understand the local jurisdiction: Be aware that UTPD and APD investigations can occur, and civil cases will be handled in Travis County courts.
- Use UT’s transparency to your advantage: Document any hazing allegations with an eye toward how they connect to previously documented violations, which can build a stronger legal case.
Southern Methodist University (SMU)
Southern Methodist University, known for its academic excellence and vibrant campus life, is a private institution that attracts students from affluent communities across Texas and the nation. While offering a distinguished educational experience, SMU’s Greek life, like many across the country, has faced its own challenges with hazing. Legal matters typically involve Dallas City Police and Dallas County courts.
Campus & culture snapshot
SMU is a private, well-regarded university located in Dallas, with a strong emphasis on tradition, a close-knit community, and a highly active Greek life that features prominently in campus social culture. Students often come from established Texas families, including those who may have connections across the state to communities like Parmer County. The pressure to conform and uphold perceived social status can be particularly intense in such environments, making new members vulnerable to hazing.
Official hazing policy & reporting channels
SMU has a strict anti-hazing policy that is clearly communicated to students and organizations. It prohibits any act that “endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student” for the purpose of initiation, admission, or affiliation. SMU provides various reporting channels, including the Dean of Students Office, Student Affairs, and SMU Police Department, and has also promoted anonymous reporting systems such as “Real Response” to encourage students to come forward without fear of retaliation.
Selected documented incidents & responses
SMU has taken disciplinary action in response to hazing, showcasing both its commitment to its policies and the ongoing struggle to eradicate such behavior:
- Kappa Alpha Order incident (2017): The SMU chapter of Kappa Alpha Order faced a significant hazing scandal when new members reportedly endured physical abuse, including paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and severe sleep deprivation. This resulted in the chapter’s suspension and subsequent restrictions on recruiting for several years. This incident highlighted the university’s resolve to enforce its hazing policies, but also the persistence of dangerous practices within Greek organizations.
These events demonstrate that even within private university settings, where internal processes may be less publicly transparent than at public institutions, hazing does occur and is met with institutional sanctions.
How an SMU hazing case might proceed
For Parmer County families, a hazing case at SMU would typically involve investigations by the SMU Police Department or Dallas City Police, with civil lawsuits proceeding through the courts of Dallas County. As a private institution, SMU is generally not protected by sovereign immunity, potentially simplifying the process for plaintiffs seeking to hold the university directly accountable for negligence or other failures related to hazing. Civil suits would seek to compel discovery, uncovering internal reports and communications even if they are not publicly posted.
What SMU students & parents should do
If you’re a Parmer County family with a student at SMU:
- Understand SMU’s unique context: As a private institution, some information may be less publicly visible, making initial documentation by students and parents even more crucial.
- Utilize anonymous reporting tools: Encourage students to use systems like “Real Response” or the anti-hazing hotline if they fear direct confrontation.
- Seek legal counsel familiar with private university litigation: Experienced attorneys know how to navigate discovery processes for private institutions to uncover the full scope of evidence.
Baylor University
Baylor University, a top-tier Christian research institution in Waco, attracts students from across Texas, including Parmer County, known for its faith-based education and a deep sense of community. Despite its values and strong anti-hazing policies, Baylor has faced its own challenges with hazing, often amidst broader issues of institutional oversight and accountability.
Campus & culture snapshot
Baylor University offers a distinctive experience rooted in its Christian mission, fostering a strong sense of community and moral values. It maintains a significant Greek life presence, alongside numerous athletic teams and student organizations. Located in Waco, Baylor’s culture is steeped in tradition, creating an environment where group loyalty can be exceptionally powerful, sometimes leading to a normalization of behaviors that constitute hazing.
Official hazing policy & reporting channels
Baylor’s policies firmly prohibit hazing, consistent with its Christian mission and commitment to student welfare. The university defines hazing to include any act that “endangers the mental or physical health or safety” of a student for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or continued membership. This encompasses physical abuse, forced substance consumption, sleep deprivation, and any activity causing humiliation or ridicule. Baylor encourages reporting through its Student Conduct Administration, the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD), and offers confidential reporting options.
Selected documented incidents & responses
Baylor’s history with hazing has been notably intertwined with broader discussions of institutional responsibility, particularly in the wake of its past Title IX football scandal:
- Baylor baseball hazing (2020): Following a widespread hazing investigation, 14 players from the Baylor baseball team were suspended. These suspensions, staggered over the early season, brought to light the fact that hazing is not confined to Greek life and can permeate athletic programs, even within a faith-based institution.
- Prior Institutional Scrutiny: Baylor’s past Title IX failures regarding sexual assault allegations have heightened scrutiny on all aspects of student safety and institutional oversight. This context means that hazing allegations at Baylor are often viewed through a lens of broader accountability and the university’s capacity to protect its students.
These incidents highlight Baylor’s ongoing struggle despite strong policies and a values-driven approach.
How a Baylor hazing case might proceed
For Parmer County families, a hazing case at Baylor University would typically involve investigations by the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) or Waco City Police, with civil lawsuits proceeding through the courts of McLennan County. As a private institution, Baylor is generally not protected by sovereign immunity, making it potentially more straightforward to pursue claims against the university directly for negligence, gross negligence, or other failures to protect students. Evidence of prior institutional oversight challenges can be a significant factor in such cases.
What Baylor students & parents should do
Parmer County families with a student at Baylor should consider:
- Understanding Baylor’s policies and recent history: Familiarize yourself with the university’s explicit anti-hazing policies and its responses to past incidents, including those in athletics.
- Prioritize confidential reporting: Given Baylor’s unique, close-knit community, students may feel immense pressure to remain silent. Emphasize the importance of confidential reporting to BUPD, Student Conduct, or through an attorney.
- Seek counsel experienced in private university litigation: An attorney familiar with Baylor’s specific operations and its history of addressing complex student safety issues can offer invaluable guidance.
Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories
For many students from Parmer County, joining a fraternity or sorority at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor represents a profound rite of passage, a chance to build lifelong bonds. Yet, this aspiration can collide with a dark underbelly of hazing, often perpetuated by a dangerous cocktail of local chapter traditions and national organizational failings. Our firm understands this dynamic intimately, leveraging national histories to hold both local and parent organizations accountable.
Why national histories matter
When we investigate a hazing incident, particularly one involving a fraternity or sorority at a Texas university, we don’t just look at the local chapter. We look at the national organization’s entire history. Many of the fraternities and sororities present at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor—such as Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike), Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE), Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi, and Kappa Alpha Order—are part of larger national organizations.
These national headquarters often have thick anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies. They implement these policies not just out of goodwill, but because they have a documented history of hazing deaths, catastrophic injuries, and multi-million dollar lawsuits at other chapters across the country. They know the dangerous patterns: the forced drinking nights, the physical traditions, the humiliating rituals.
This background is critical in a legal case. When a Texas chapter—whether at UT Austin, Texas A&M, or SMU—repeats a script that caused severe injury or death at another chapter in another state, it demonstrates foreseeability. The national organization was on notice. They knew, or should have known, that such hazing was a dangerous pattern within their own organization. This knowledge can be powerful evidence to support claims of negligence or gross negligence, potentially leading to substantial punitive damages against national entities.
Organization mapping (synthesized)
Here’s a look at some of the prominent fraternities and sororities with a documented national history of hazing, and why their past conduct is relevant to Texas campuses:
-
Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): Present at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. Nationally, Pike has been implicated in numerous hazing incidents, most notably the Stone Foltz case at Bowling Green State University (2021), where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning after a Big/Little event, resulting in a $10 million settlement split between the national fraternity and the university. Another incident involved David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois (2012), another alcohol-related hazing death resulting in a $14 million settlement. Pike’s national history of alcohol-related hazing, particularly during “Big/Little” events, shows a pattern of high-risk behavior that is profoundly relevant to any similar hazing incident at a Texas chapter.
-
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, SAE has historically faced a pattern of alarming hazing deaths and severe injuries nationwide involving alcohol. This led the national organization to famously – but perhaps ineffectively – ban pledging in 2014. Incidents include a lawsuit against the University of Alabama chapter for a traumatic brain injury case (2023) and, closer to home, the Texas A&M chapter facing a $1 million lawsuit (2021) for pledges suffering severe chemical burns after being poured with industrial-strength cleaner during hazing. More recently, the UT Austin chapter faced a lawsuit in 2024 alleging assault, occurring while the chapter was already under suspension, demonstrating a persistent pattern of safety violations.
-
Phi Delta Theta: Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor. This fraternity was at the center of the Max Gruver (LSU) hazing death (2017), where a pledge died from alcohol toxicity during a forced “Bible study” drinking game. The case led to Louisiana’s felony hazing statute, the Max Gruver Act, and a $6.1 million verdict against individuals and their insurers. This pattern demonstrates the dangers of themed drinking games and the national’s potential liability for similar incidents.
-
Pi Kappa Phi: Present at UH and Texas A&M. Pi Kappa Phi was involved in the Andrew Coffey (Florida State) hazing death (2017), where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning after excessive drinking during a “Big Brother Night” event. This incident, like others, highlighted the extreme dangers of forced alcohol consumption structured around initiation traditions.
-
Beta Theta Pi: Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and SMU. Beta Theta Pi was involved in the infamous Timothy Piazza (Penn State) hazing death (2017), a case that garnered national attention due to surveillance video showing severe injuries and delayed medical attention. The incident resulted in numerous criminal charges and major civil litigation, and the creation of Pennsylvania’s anti-hazing law. This demonstrates a national organization’s exposure when chapters engage in severe alcohol hazing and neglect of injured pledges.
-
Phi Gamma Delta (FIJI): Chapters at Texas A&M. Phi Gamma Delta faced immense scrutiny following the Danny Santulli (University of Missouri) hazing incident (2021), where an 18-year-old pledge suffered severe, permanent brain damage after being forced to consume excessive alcohol. The Santulli family settled lawsuits with 22 defendants, leading to confidential multi-million-dollar agreements. This case illustrates the catastrophic non-fatal injuries possible and the broad scope of liability.
-
Kappa Sigma: Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and Baylor. Kappa Sigma has also had a national pattern of hazing. Most notably, the Chad Meredith (University of Miami) drowning death (2001) resulted in a $12.6 million jury verdict against the fraternity for its role in getting Meredith intoxicated and pressuring him to swim across a lake, where he drowned. There are recent allegations (2023, ongoing) at Texas A&M University for severe injuries, including rhabdomyolysis—a severe muscle breakdown—from extreme physical hazing.
It is crucial to remember that this is not an exhaustive list but highlights organizations with documented national hazing patterns that serve as critical precedents in litigation.
Tie back to legal strategy
The recurring nature of hazing within specific national fraternities and sororities, reflected in incidents across different campuses and states, forms a powerful argument in civil lawsuits. Here’s why:
- Foreseeability: If a national organization has a history of alcohol poisoning deaths or physical abuse in its chapters, then it becomes highly foreseeable that similar hazing could occur again. This makes it difficult for them to claim they “didn’t know” or “couldn’t predict” a tragedy at a Texas campus.
- Duty to Act: Given this foreseeability, national organizations have a strong duty to implement and aggressively enforce anti-hazing policies, train members, and intervene effectively when red flags appear. When they fail to do so, their liability significantly increases.
- Insurance Coverage: These national patterns can influence insurance coverage disputes. Insurers often try to deny coverage for “intentional acts,” but a repeated pattern of negligence by the national organization in failing to prevent hazing (rather than directly intending it) can bring cases within policy coverage.
- Punitive Damages: Evidence of a national organization’s widespread hazing history, coupled with a lack of meaningful intervention, can be a strong basis for demanding punitive damages. These damages aim not just to compensate the victim but to punish the responsible parties for particularly egregious or reckless conduct and deter future similar acts.
For Parmer County families, understanding these national patterns transforms an isolated, local tragedy into part of a larger narrative of institutional failure. It equips us, as your legal advocates, with critical leverage to pursue accountability against powerful national organizations.
Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy
Successfully navigating a hazing lawsuit requires methodical investigation, deep legal expertise, and a comprehensive understanding of every piece of evidence, every type of damage, and every strategic maneuver possible. For families in Parmer County, this complex process begins with documenting every detail and entrusting their case to experienced legal counsel.
Evidence
In hazing cases, evidence disappears quickly. What separates a successful outcome from a dismissed claim is often the ability to identify, preserve, and present crucial pieces of information. The Manginello Law Firm leverages modern investigative techniques to gather evidence that proves coercion, injury, and negligence.
- Digital communications: These are often the most critical pieces of evidence in modern hazing cases. We meticulously collect and analyze:
- GroupMe, WhatsApp, Signal, Discord, iMessage, and SMS group chats: These applications often contain direct commands, humiliating directives, evidence of forced activities, and even acknowledgements of hazing.
- Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook Messages (DMs): Private messages can reveal planning, peer pressure, and communications related to hazing.
- Fraternity/sorority-specific apps: Some organizations use proprietary apps for communication that can also hold vital clues.
Crucially, we work to preserve both live and deleted messages, employing digital forensics experts when necessary to recover information that defendants hoped was gone forever. For families in Parmer County, immediately screenshotting these messages before they are deleted is paramount. Our video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) provides practical advice on this.
- Photos & videos: In the age of smartphones, almost every event is documented. This evidence includes:
- Content filmed by members during hazing events, often shared in group chats or posted (briefly) on social media. This can directly show forced drinking, physical abuse, or humiliating acts.
- Security camera footage or doorbell camera (e.g., Ring) recordings from off-campus houses or venues where hazing occurred.
- Photos taken by victims or witnesses of injuries, the scene of the hazing, or relevant objects.
- Internal organization documents: We subpoena and uncover:
- Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” lists, and ritual documents that outline expectations.
- Emails and texts from officers or “pledge educators” detailing plans for new member activities.
- National anti-hazing policies and risk management training materials, which can expose inconsistencies between policy and practice.
- University records: Many universities, including UT Austin with its public Hazing Violations page, maintain records that are vital to building a case:
- Prior conduct files for organizations, detailing probation, suspensions, and letters of warning.
- Incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices related to the organization or individuals.
- Clery Act reports and other institutional disclosures that demonstrate patterns of safety issues.
- Medical and psychological records: Comprehensive medical documentation is essential:
- Emergency room and hospitalization records, including ambulance reports.
- Records of surgeries, ongoing treatment, and physical therapy.
- Toxicology reports that identify substances like alcohol or drugs.
- Psychological evaluations and therapy notes documenting PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health impacts, which are crucial for proving emotional distress damages.
- Witness testimony: The accounts of individuals who saw or participated in the hazing are invaluable:
- Other pledges, current members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, trainers, or other bystanders.
- Notably, former members who quit or were expelled for refusing to participate in hazing often provide powerful and credible testimony.
Damages
While no amount of money can truly compensate for the profound physical and emotional suffering caused by hazing, the legal system aims to provide financial recovery for all damages incurred. These damages help victims and families rebuild their lives and secure necessary future care.
- Medical bills & future care: This includes all past medical expenses from immediate emergency care (ER, ICU) to ongoing treatments, surgeries, physical therapy, and medications. For catastrophic injuries like brain damage or organ failure, it covers long-term care plans, which can be astronomically expensive over a lifetime.
- Lost earnings / educational impact: Hazing can lead to missed semesters, forced withdrawals, and delayed graduation, directly impacting a student’s ability to enter the workforce. For victims with permanent injuries, economists are employed to calculate lifelong diminishment of future earning capacity.
- Non-economic damages: These account for the subjective, yet very real, suffering:
- Physical pain and suffering from injuries.
- Intense emotional distress, trauma, and humiliation endured.
- Loss of enjoyment of life, meaning the inability to engage in activities, hobbies, or social interactions that once brought joy.
- Wrongful death damages (for families): When hazing results in a fatality, surviving family members (parents, spouses, children) can recover for:
- Funeral and burial costs.
- Loss of financial support that the deceased would have provided.
- Loss of companionship, society, and comfort from their loved one.
- Emotional harm and grief endured by the family.
The Manginello Law Firm has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases. We describe these as “types of damages,” not promises of specific amounts.
Role of different defendants and insurance coverage
Hazing litigation often involves multiple powerful defendants, each with their own legal teams and insurance carriers. National fraternities, sororities, and universities almost always carry substantial insurance policies designed to protect them from liability. However, insurers are notorious for trying to minimize payouts or deny coverage altogether by arguing:
- That hazing or “intentional acts” are excluded from their policies.
- That the policy doesn’t cover certain defendants (e.g., individual students, or even local chapters).
Experienced hazing lawyers, like our team at The Manginello Law Firm, know how to:
- Identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, from national policies to local chapter liability insurance and even homeowners’ policies that might apply to individuals.
- Navigate the complex disputes with insurance carriers regarding exclusions and the definition of intentional versus negligent conduct. Our attorney, Lupe Peña, leverages her background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) to anticipate and counter the tactics used by large insurance companies.
This ensures that all avenues for compensation are explored, and victims’ families are not left to face immense medical bills and lifelong challenges alone.
Practical Guides & FAQs
When hazing impacts a family in Parmer County, knowing what steps to take can feel paralyzing. We provide clear, actionable advice for parents, students, and even former members, empowering them to protect themselves and seek justice.
For parents
Your intuition as a parent is often your strongest tool. Trust it.
- Warning signs of hazing: Be vigilant for:
- Unexplained injuries (bruises, cuts, burns) or repeated “accidents” with dubious explanations.
- Sudden exhaustion or extreme sleep deprivation, beyond normal collegiate stress.
- Drastic changes in mood, increased anxiety, depression, or withdrawal from family and friends.
- Constant secret phone use for group chats, coupled with fear of missing “mandatory” events.
- Unaccounted-for large expenses for the organization or older members.
- How to talk to your child: Approach with empathy, not accusation. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with the fraternity/sorority?” or “Is there anything about the new member process that makes you uncomfortable?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are paramount, far exceeding any group loyalty. Assure them you will support them no matter what.
- If your child is hurt: Immediately seek medical attention. Document everything—take photos of injuries, screenshot relevant texts, and write down every detail they tell you about who, what, when, and where. Save any physical items. Do not confront the group directly. Call Attorney911 first to secure legal advice.
- Dealing with the university: Document every communication with university administrators. Specifically ask about any prior incidents involving the same organization and what actions the school took in response. Understand that the university’s primary goal is often to protect its own reputation, so proceed carefully and with legal guidance.
- When to talk to a lawyer: If your child suffers significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or hiding what happened, it’s time to consult with an attorney experienced in hazing cases. Early legal intervention can preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s rights.
For students / pledges
If you’re a student in Parmer County or attending a Texas university, what you’re experiencing might be hazing, even if it’s disguised as “tradition.”
- Is this hazing or just tradition?: Ask yourself: Do I feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced? Am I being forced to drink or endure pain? Is this activity hidden from the public or administrators? If the answer is yes to any of these, it is likely hazing, regardless of what they call it. The Manginello Law Firm’s video, “What Exactly Is a Personal Injury?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWdADo3DHRI), explains the concept of harm beyond just physical injury that can apply to psychological hazing.
- Why “consent” isn’t the end of the story: Peer pressure, the intense desire to belong, and the fear of exclusion can make you feel like you’re “agreeing.” However, Texas law (Texas Education Code § 37.155) explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that true “consent” in such power dynamics is often non-existent.
- Exiting and reporting safely: You have the right to leave a dangerous situation at any time. If you feel threatened, call 911 or campus police immediately. You can report hazing privately or anonymously through campus channels, national anonymous tip lines (1-888-NOT-HAZE), or by contacting our firm for a confidential legal review.
- Good-faith reporting and amnesty: Many schools and Texas law (Texas Education Code § 37.154) encourage calling for help in emergencies by offering protections when someone seeks aid, even if they were also involved in underage drinking or other minor infractions. Your safety is paramount.
For former members / witnesses
If you participated in hazing, or witnessed it, and now carry guilt or fear, know that your choice to come forward can be a powerful step towards accountability and preventing future harm.
- We understand the fear and conflicting loyalties. However, your testimony and any evidence you possess could be crucial in saving lives and holding dangerous organizations accountable.
- While you may need your own legal advice regarding your involvement, cooperating with an investigation or civil lawsuit can be a path towards achieving a greater good. Lawyers can help navigate your role as a witness, protecting your rights while maximizing accountability for the victims.
Critical mistakes that can destroy your case
For Parmer County families, avoiding these common errors can make all the difference in a hazing case. Understanding what not to do is as important as knowing what to do. Our video on client mistakes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) further elaborates on these critical missteps.
MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:
- Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence: What parents often think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.” Why it’s wrong: This looks like a deliberate cover-up, can be considered obstruction of justice, and makes proving your case vastly more difficult, if not impossible. What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even if it’s embarrassing.
- Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly: What parents often think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.” Why it’s wrong: They will immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses. What to do instead: Document everything, then call a lawyer BEFORE any confrontation.
- Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms: What universities often do: Pressure families to sign waivers or agree to “internal resolutions.” Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your legal right to sue; these internal “settlements” are often far below the true value of your case. What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university without an attorney reviewing it first.
- Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer: What families often think: “I want people to know what happened.” Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys screenshot everything; any inconsistencies can significantly damage credibility; and you could inadvertently waive legal privileges. What to do instead: Document privately; let your lawyer control public messaging.
- Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”: What fraternities often say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic.” Why it’s wrong: They likely intend to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that will harm your case. What to do instead: Once you’re considering legal action, all communication from the organization should be directed through your lawyer.
- Waiting “to see how the university handles it”: What universities often promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.” Why it’s wrong: Critical evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, the statute of limitations can run out, and the university often controls the narrative to protect itself. What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW; consult a lawyer immediately; the university’s internal process is not the same as legal accountability.
- Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer: What adjusters often say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.” Why it’s wrong: Recorded statements are used against you, and early settlement offers are almost always lowball. What to do instead: Politely decline and state, “My attorney will contact you.”
Short FAQ
- “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under specific circumstances. For public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT), sovereign immunity offers some protection, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, certain Title IX violations, or when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity defenses. Every case is unique, depending on specific facts; contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis. - “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It certainly can be. While hazing is a Class B misdemeanor by default in Texas, it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Additionally, officers of organizations who knowingly fail to report hazing can also face criminal charges. - “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that “consent” given under duress, peer pressure, power imbalance, or fear of social exclusion is not true voluntary consent and does not absolve perpetrators of liability. - “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally, you have 2 years from the date of injury or death to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” might extend this period if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately apparent. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute of limitations may be tolled (paused). Time is always critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to protect your rights. You can learn more about this in our video on the Statute of Limitations (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c). - “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities or organizations can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control over the group, prior knowledge of dangerous activities, and the foreseeability of hazing occurring off-campus. Many major hazing cases that resulted in multi-million dollar judgments (such as the Pi Delta Psi retreat case or the Sigma Pi “unofficial house” case) occurred completely off-campus. - “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Most hazing cases, particularly civil lawsuits, are resolved through confidential settlements before a public trial. We prioritize your family’s privacy and can seek to seal court records and ensure confidential settlement terms. Our goal is to achieve accountability without unnecessary public exposure. - “How do contingency fees work?”
Our firm works on a contingency fee basis. This means we don’t get paid unless we win your case. There are no upfront legal fees, and we absorb all case expenses, allowing you to focus on your child’s recovery without financial stress. We explain this in detail in our video, “How Do Contingency Fees Work?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).
About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action
When your family faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions like national fraternities, universities, and their insurers fight back—and, crucially, how to win anyway. The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, stands ready to serve families in Parmer County and across Texas who are seeking justice for hazing.
From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Parmer County and the surrounding High Plains region, understanding that hazing at Texas universities impacts students and their families from every community. We know that Parmer County families, deeply rooted in values of community and hard work, expect integrity and justice when their trust is broken.
We bring unique qualifications directly applicable to hazing cases:
- Insurance insider advantage with Lupe Peña: Our attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable experience as a former insurance defense attorney for a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/). She knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and often undervalue) hazing claims. She understands their delay tactics, their arguments for coverage exclusion, and their settlement strategies because she used to be on their side. We know their playbook because we used to run it.
- Complex litigation against massive institutions with Ralph Manginello: Our managing partner, Ralph P. Manginello (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), is one of the few Texas attorneys with experience in highly complex cases like the BP Texas City explosion litigation. This federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, multi-billion-dollar universities, or their formidable defense teams. We’ve taken on, and won against, billion-dollar corporations. We know how to fight powerful defendants and secure meaningful accountability.
- Multi-million dollar wrongful death and catastrophic injury experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases, collaborating with economists to meticulously value loss of life and comprehensive damages. Our experience extends to valuing lifetime care needs for brain injury and other permanent disability cases, ensuring that no expense for a victim’s future care goes unaddressed. We don’t settle cheap; we build cases that force genuine accountability.
- Dual criminal and civil hazing expertise: Ralph’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides us with a unique understanding of how criminal hazing charges intersect with civil litigation. This dual perspective allows us to expertly advise witnesses and former members who may face both criminal exposure and civil liability.
- Unmatched investigative depth: We have built an extensive network of experts, including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, economists, and psychologists. We meticulously pursue every lead, whether it’s obtaining deleted group chats and social media evidence, subpoenaing national fraternity records detailing prior incidents, or uncovering hidden university files through robust discovery and public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.
We understand, from our offices in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments actually operate behind closed doors. This knowledge allows us to effectively investigate modern hazing, balance victim privacy with public accountability, and understand the intricate cultural dynamics that enable coercion. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job, as your Legal Emergency Lawyers™, is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We pursue thorough investigations and real accountability, not just quick settlements.
You don’t have to face this alone. Contact The Manginello Law Firm today.
If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus, we want to hear from you. Families in Parmer County and throughout the surrounding High Plains and Panhandle region have the right to answers and accountability. Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family.
During your free consultation, you can expect:
- We will listen to your story without judgment.
- We will review any evidence you have (photos, texts, medical records) with absolute confidentiality.
- We will explain all your legal options: pursuing a criminal report, filing a civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
- We will discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
- We will answer your questions about costs, clearly explaining our contingency fee structure—we don’t get paid unless we win.
- There is absolutely no pressure to hire us on the spot. We want you to take the time you need to decide.
- Everything you tell us is strictly confidential.
Call us today at 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). You can also reach us directly at (713) 528-9070, or on cell at (713) 443-4781. Visit our website at https://attorney911.com for more information.
Hablamos Español: For consultation in Spanish, please contact Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles para todas las familias en Texas.
Reading this article does not create an attorney–client relationship. Every hazing case is unique, and we cannot guarantee specific outcomes. An experienced attorney can review your specific facts, explain your rights under Texas law, and help you understand your options. Whether you’re in Parmer County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.
Legal Disclaimer
This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.
Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.
If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.
The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com