Understanding Hazing in Texas: A Definitive Guide for Families in Reagan County

A chill bites the night air, carrying the muffled shouts of a gathering not far from a Texas college campus. Your child, far from home in Reagan County, is just a text away—or so you hope. They’re at a “brotherhood event,” a “new member challenge,” or simply “hanging out” at an off-campus house. But the texts grew more infrequent, their phone went straight to voicemail, and the worry in your gut starts to churn. You hear stories on the news, things that happen at “initiation rituals” that go too far. Someone gets hurt, or worse. You ask yourself, could this be happening to my child, a student who left our home in Reagan County for college?

This scenario, tragically, is all too common at universities across Texas, including those our local Reagan County students attend, from the vast campus of Texas A&M to the bustling urban environment of the University of Houston, the sprawling grounds of UT Austin, the prestigious Southern Methodist University, or the faith-based community of Baylor. When young people leave home for college, they often seek community and belonging, sometimes in fraternities, sororities, athletic teams, or other student groups. Sadly, this search for belonging can lead them down a dangerous path where “tradition” gives way to abuse, intimidation, and even violence under the guise of hazing.

This guide is committed to shedding light on the insidious nature of hazing in 2025. We have crafted this comprehensive resource for families in Reagan County and throughout Texas who need to understand exactly what hazing looks like today, how Texas and federal laws address it, what lessons we can draw from major national cases, and what specific patterns and incidents have occurred at the major Texas universities your children might attend: the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University. Most importantly, we will outline the legal options available to victims and their families in Reagan County and across our great state, helping you seek accountability and justice.

While this article provides general information to empower and inform, please remember that it is not specific legal advice. Each hazing case is unique, and its outcome depends entirely on its particular facts. Our team at The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, is dedicated to evaluating individual cases based on their specific details, serving families throughout Texas, including those from Reagan County and the surrounding communities.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES IN TEXAS

We understand that reading about hazing can be deeply distressing, especially for parents and students in Reagan County who care about the safety of those around them. If you suspect hazing is happening right now, or if someone you know is in danger, immediate action is critical.

If your child or a student is in danger RIGHT NOW:

• Call 911 for any medical emergency or immediate threat. Prioritize their health and safety above all else.
• Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help—that’s why we’re known as the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

In the first 48 hours following a hazing incident, these steps are crucial:

• Get professional medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Injuries, especially those related to alcohol poisoning or head trauma, may not be immediately apparent.

• Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:

  • Screenshot group chats, texts, and direct messages (DMs) immediately. This is often the most critical evidence.
  • Photograph injuries from multiple angles. Take pictures over several days to document changes.
  • Save physical items such as damaged clothing, receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used in the hazing.

• Write down everything while your memory is fresh: who was involved, what happened, when it happened, and where it occurred. Include names, dates, times, and specific details.

• Do NOT:

  • Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly. This can lead them to destroy evidence or retaliate.
  • Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without consulting with an attorney. You might inadvertently waive important legal rights.
  • Post details on public social media. This can compromise your case and invite unwanted scrutiny.
  • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” any evidence. It’s critical to preserve everything exactly as it is.

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours. Evidence disappears quickly—deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses. Universities often move fast to control the narrative. We can help preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s rights. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

The image of hazing often conjures outdated stereotypes—perhaps silly pranks or benign traditions. However, the reality of hazing in 2025 is far more sinister and complex. Hazing has evolved, becoming more covert, psychologically damaging, and, in far too many cases, lethal. It’s crucial for families in Reagan County sending their children to Texas universities to understand this modern landscape.

In plain English, hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, whether performed by an individual or a group, directed against a student for the purpose of joining, initiating into, affiliating with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization. This act endangers the physical or mental health or safety of a student, humiliates, or exploits them.

A critical point: when there’s a significant power imbalance and group pressure, asserting “I agreed to it” does not automatically make the activity safe or legal. The law—and common decency—recognizes that consent under duress is not true consent.

Main Categories of Hazing

Modern hazing takes many forms, often blending into what might seem like innocent activities until the pressure and danger become undeniable.

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains one of the most prevalent and deadly forms of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often through “lineups,” chugging contests, or games designed to ensure rapid and excessive consumption. Pledges can be pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, leading to alcohol poisoning, illicit drug use, or allergic reactions. The goal is often to incapacitate, creating vulnerability and diminishing resistance.

• Physical Hazing: Beyond the infamous paddling, physical hazing today includes extreme calisthenics, brutal “workouts” or “smokings” far beyond normal athletic conditioning, fostering exhaustion and physical breakdown. Other forms involve sleep deprivation, food and water deprivation, exposure to extreme cold or heat, or forcing pledges into dangerous environments. These acts can lead to severe injuries, organ damage, and even death, as seen in cases involving rhabdomyolysis—a severe muscle breakdown from extreme exertion without proper hydration.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This deeply degrading category includes forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (like “roasted pig” positions), and wearing demeaning costumes or outfits. These acts often have racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones, using slurs and role-playing stereotypes to further dehumanize and control new members. The psychological scars from such acts can last a lifetime.

• Psychological Hazing: Often subtle but equally devastating, psychological hazing involves verbal abuse, threats, and intentional isolation from friends and family. It can include manipulation, forced confessions, or public shaming, sometimes orchestrated through online platforms or in demanding group meetings. This form of hazing targets a student’s mental well-being, fostering chronic anxiety, depression, and a loss of personal identity.

• Digital/Online Hazing: With the ubiquity of smartphones and social media, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes forced “challenges” or dares within group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp, Discord, iMessage), public humiliation orchestrated via Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok, and pressure to create or share compromising images or videos. Pledges might be subjected to constant monitoring, forced “location sharing,” or subjected to abusive messages at all hours, creating a 24/7 environment of control and fear.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It’s a common misconception that hazing is exclusively a “frat boy” problem. In reality, hazing permeates a wide array of student organizations, driven by dynamics of power, tradition, and secrecy that often override official prohibitions. For students from Reagan County attending any Texas university, it’s critical to understand the breadth of where hazing activities occur:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes those under the Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council (HPC/CPC/UPC), National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC – Divine Nine), and various multicultural Greek councils.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: Organizations like the Texas A&M Corps of Cadets, with their deep traditions and hierarchical structures, are not immune to hazing allegations.
• Spirit Squads and Tradition Clubs: Groups like the University of Texas at Austin’s Texas Cowboys or other spirit organizations have faced disciplinary action for hazing.
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball, cheerleading, and even club sports, hazing can occur across collegiate athletics nationwide, as highlighted by recent scandals.
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly benign organizations such as marching bands and other student performance groups have faced allegations of ritualistic abuse.
• Other Student Organizations: Some service, cultural, and academic organizations can also fall prey to hazing, with new members pressured to participate in activities to prove their dedication or earn their place.

The persistence of hazing in such diverse environments often stems from deeply ingrained traditions, a desire for social status, and a strict code of secrecy among members. These factors create an environment where dangerous practices are perpetuated, often with new members feeling immense pressure to conform, even when officially prohibited and widely recognized as illegal.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas is critical for families in Reagan County and across the state. This framework exists to protect students, hold individuals and institutions accountable, and hopefully deter future incidents.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

In Texas, specific anti-hazing provisions are codified within the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. This legislation provides a clear foundation for accountability:

• Hazing is broadly defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, performed alone or with others, directed against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members are predominantly students. Crucially, these acts must endanger the physical or mental health or safety of a student. This can include physical abuse, forced consumption of alcohol or drugs, severe calisthenics, or prolonged psychological torment and humiliation.
• A key aspect of Texas law is that it applies whether the hazing occurs on or off campus. The location does not diminish the illegality of the act.
• “Consent” is explicitly not a defense in Texas. This means that even if a student appeared to “agree” to participate in hazing, the act remains illegal under Texas law due to the inherent power imbalance and coercive nature of hazing.

Criminal Penalties:
Hazing in Texas carries significant criminal penalties, which escalate depending on the severity of the harm inflicted:

• For acts of hazing that do not result in serious injury, it is generally a Class B Misdemeanor.
• If the hazing causes bodily injury and requires medical treatment, it can be elevated to a Class A Misdemeanor.
• Critically, if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it becomes a State Jail Felony. Felony convictions can lead to imprisonment and substantial fines.
• Additionally, knowingly failing to report hazing, or retaliating against someone who reports it, can also result in misdemeanor charges.

Reporter Protections:
Texas law attempts to encourage reporting by granting some immunity. A person who in good faith reports a hazing incident to university authorities or law enforcement is generally immune from civil or criminal liability that might arise from that report. Furthermore, in cases of medical emergencies related to hazing, Texas law and university policies often provide amnesty for students who call 911 for assistance, even if they were underage drinking or involved in the hazing itself. This measure is designed to save lives by removing barriers to seeking urgent medical help.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s important to understand the two distinct legal avenues for addressing hazing:

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated and pursued by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or even organizations. The primary goal of a criminal case is punishment—imposing jail time, fines, or probation. Common criminal charges related to hazing can include the specific hazing offenses outlined in the Education Code, as well as furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or, in tragic fatal incidents, even manslaughter or negligent homicide.
• Civil Cases: These are brought by the victims of hazing or their surviving family members (plaintiffs), as opposed to the state. The main objective of a civil case is to seek monetary compensation for damages suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil hazing lawsuits often involve claims of negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Unlike criminal cases, a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil lawsuit. Both types of cases can proceed concurrently, each focusing on different aspects of justice.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, federal regulations also play a significant role in addressing campus hazing, providing additional layers of protection and accountability:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation, signed into law, requires colleges and universities that receive federal funding to:
  • More transparently report hazing incidents, similar to how they report other campus crimes.
  • Implement and strengthen hazing education and prevention measures.
  • Maintain and make publicly available hazing data, providing greater insight into the scope of the problem. These transparency requirements are being phased in, with full compliance expected around 2026.
• Title IX / Clery Act:
  • Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in federally funded education programs. When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based violence, or hostile environments related to sex, Title IX obligations can be triggered. Universities have a duty to investigate and address such complaints decisively.
  • The Clery Act mandates that colleges and universities disclose information about crime on and around their campuses, including statistics and safety policies. Hazing incidents, especially those involving assault, sexual assault, or alcohol/drug-related crimes, often intersect with Clery reporting requirements, further compelling transparency from institutions.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

The web of liability in a civil hazing lawsuit can be complex, often extending far beyond the individual students directly involved. For families in Reagan County seeking justice, understanding the potential defendants is crucial:

• Individual Students: Those who planned, initiated, carried out, supplied prohibited substances, or participated in the hazing acts can be held personally liable. This also includes individuals who knew about the hazing and failed to report it or intervene.
• Local Chapter / Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself can be sued if it is recognized as a legal entity. This liability often extends to officers or “pledge educators” who organized or oversaw hazing activities.
• National Fraternity / Sorority: Most local chapters are part of larger national organizations. These national headquarters often set policies, collect dues, and have oversight responsibilities over their chapters. Their liability can stem from what they knew (or should have known) about a chapter’s hazing history, their failure to adequately train or supervise, or their lack of enforcement of anti-hazing policies, especially if similar incidents have occurred at other chapters.
• University or Governing Board: Colleges and universities themselves can be held liable under various legal theories, including negligence, gross negligence, negligent supervision, or for failing to address Title IX violations. Key factors include the school’s knowledge of prior hazing, its enforcement of policies, and whether it acted with deliberate indifference to risks. Note that public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) may assert sovereign immunity, though exceptions exist, particularly in cases of gross negligence or when individual employees are sued in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU and Baylor) typically have fewer immunity protections.
• Third Parties: Liability can also extend to others, such as landlords or owners of properties where hazing occurred, bars or liquor stores that furnished alcohol to minors (under Texas dram shop laws), or event organizers who created or allowed a dangerous environment.

It is essential to remember that not every party listed here is liable in every situation. Each case is uniquely fact-specific, and an experienced hazing attorney can help identify all potentially liable parties and the strongest legal avenues for pursuing a claim.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

While the specifics of each hazing incident are unique, certain patterns emerge across tragic cases nationwide. These anchor stories serve as stark reminders of the inherent dangers of hazing and underscore the precedents for accountability that can apply to incidents right here in Texas, impacting families from Reagan County.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced or excessive alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing fatalities. These cases demonstrate a recurring script of peer pressure, dangerous drinking rituals, and often, a tragic delay in seeking medical help.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza died following a “bid acceptance” night where he was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. Fraternity members watched him endure severe falls and injuries for hours, deliberately delaying calling for medical help even as his condition worsened. His tragic death led to numerous criminal charges against fraternity members, substantial civil litigation, and the enactment of a new, stricter anti-hazing law in Pennsylvania named after him. This case is a chilling example of how extreme intoxication, a willful delay in calling 911, and a pervasive culture of silence can be legally devastating for both individuals and organizations.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to drink heavily. Criminal hazing charges were brought against multiple members, and Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life, leading to a comprehensive overhaul of its policies. This case tragically illustrates how formulaic “traditional” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster, signaling red flags that national organizations should recognize and address.

• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver died from severe alcohol toxicity after participating in a hazing ritual known as “Bible study,” where pledges were forced to drink whenever they answered questions incorrectly. His death spurred legislative change, leading to the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, which made felony hazing a reality in the state. This case underscores how legislative action often follows public outrage and clear proof of harmful hazing practices. The family settled with LSU and later secured a significant verdict against individuals and the fraternity’s insurer, highlighting both institutional and individual accountability.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz suffered a fatal alcohol overdose during a fraternity “pledge night” where he was forced to consume a full bottle of whiskey. His death led to multiple criminal convictions for hazing-related charges against fraternity members. In 2023, his family reached a $10 million settlement for wrongful death, including $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national organization and an additional settlement of nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This case demonstrates that universities, especially public ones, can face significant financial and reputational consequences, along with fraternities, when they fail to adequately prevent hazing.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, hazing rituals can involve extreme physical acts, often hidden from public view, leading to severe injuries and death.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng died after participating in a brutal hazing ritual known as the “glass ceiling” during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. Blindfolded and weighted with a backpack, he was repeatedly tackled. He suffered a traumatic brain injury, and fraternity members dangerously delayed calling for emergency services. This case resulted in multiple criminal convictions, and the national fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, subsequently being banned from Pennsylvania for a decade. This landmark case illustrates that off-campus “retreats” can be as dangerous as or worse than on-campus incidents, and national organizations can face severe criminal and civil sanctions for their chapters’ actions.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it is a pervasive issue that can affect prestigious athletic programs and other student organizations, revealing institutional failures in oversight and prevention.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): In a scandal that rocked collegiate athletics, former Northwestern football players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program over multiple years. These allegations included forced “dry-humping” by teammates, often in dark locker rooms, and other deeply degrading acts. The scandal led to multiple lawsuits against Northwestern University and its coaching staff, the swift firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald (who later filed a wrongful-termination lawsuit which was confidentially settled), and questions about institutional oversight at the highest levels. This case brought national attention to how hazing can permeate major athletic programs, often protected by a culture of silence, and is not limited to Greek life.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national stories, while geographically distant from Reagan County, share common threads that are chillingly relevant to students attending Texas universities. They reveal patterns of:

• Forced drinking and substance abuse, leading to incapacitation and death.
• Physical violence and ritualized abuse, often under the guise of “tradition.”
• Dehumanization and humiliation, designed to break down new members.
• A pervasive culture of silence and cover-ups, including dangerous delays in seeking medical attention.

Tragically, significant reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements often only follow after these horrendous tragedies and the pursuit of determined litigation. For families in Reagan County who have students at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these national lessons are not distant news stories but critical precedents that shape the landscape of accountability right here in Texas. An experienced hazing attorney understands these patterns and how to apply them to arguments of foreseeability and negligence against responsible parties.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For families in Reagan County, understanding the specific landscape of hazing at major Texas universities is key. While Reagan County is located far from these institutions, many students from our community and the surrounding areas attend these schools. Therefore, we provide specific insights into each, starting with the University of Houston, given Houston is where our firm is primarily based.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

Students from Reagan County might choose the University of Houston for its extensive academic programs, diverse urban setting, and opportunities in the state’s largest city. While Houston might be a drive from Reagan County, the impact of events at UH resonates statewide.

5.1.1 Campus & culture snapshot

The University of Houston is a large, dynamic urban campus with a vibrant mix of commuter and residential students. Its Greek life is notably active, encompassing various fraternities and sororities under the Panhellenic Council, Interfraternity Council, and multiple multicultural Greek councils. Beyond Greek life, UH boasts a broad spectrum of student organizations, ranging from cultural groups to sports clubs, all of which are subject to the university’s anti-hazing policies.

5.1.2 Hazing policy & reporting

UH’s hazing policy, accessible through its Dean of Students office, strictly prohibits hazing both on and off campus. The policy clearly forbids forced consumption of alcohol, food, or illicit substances, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and actions causing mental distress as part of initiation or membership. UH provides a range of reporting channels, including the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD), along with online reporting forms. While UH publishes general statements about hazing, detailed public violation lists can be limited compared to some other Texas institutions.

5.1.3 Example incident & response

In 2016, the UH chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha faced allegations of severe hazing. Pledges were reportedly deprived of sufficient food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. Disturbingly, one student allegedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. This incident led to misdemeanor hazing charges and a university suspension for the chapter. Subsequent years have seen other disciplinary actions against fraternities involved in alcohol misuse and behaviors “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” leading to further suspensions or probations, highlighting the university’s ongoing challenges in fully eradicating hazing.

5.1.4 How a UH hazing case might proceed

In a hazing incident at UH, the involved law enforcement agencies could include the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) and/or the Houston Police Department, depending on where the incident occurred (on-campus vs. off-campus facilities within Houston). Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in the appropriate courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County. Potential defendants would include the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the University of Houston itself, along with any relevant property owners or third-party event organizers. Our firm, based right here in Houston, has extensive experience navigating these local legal systems.

5.1.5 What UH students & parents should do

For students and parents from Reagan County with ties to UH, taking proactive steps is vital:

• Understand UH’s reporting mechanisms: Familiarize yourself with how to report hazing through the Dean of Students, UHPD, or anonymous online forms.
• Document everything: If you suspect hazing, immediately start gathering evidence—screenshot group chats, take photos of injuries, and write down details.
• Preserve prior complaints: If you have knowledge of or find existing records of past incidents or disciplinary actions against a specific UH chapter, preserve this information as it can be crucial evidence.
• Consult an attorney early: Talking to a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can provide insight into uncovering prior disciplinary actions and internal files that may not be publicly available, which can be critical for building a strong case.
• Prioritize safety: If a student from Reagan County is in immediate danger at UH, do not hesitate to call 911.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M holds a special place in the hearts of many Texans, including those from Reagan County, known for its unique traditions, strong alumni network, and the revered Corps of Cadets. Students from Reagan County often aspire to be Aggies, traveling to College Station, which is a significant drive from our county but represents a major destination for Texas students.

5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Texas A&M University, located in College Station, is deeply rooted in tradition, particularly through its iconic Corps of Cadets, which fosters a military-style environment emphasizing discipline and brotherhood. The university also hosts a vast and active Greek life, alongside numerous other student organizations that contribute to its distinctive culture. The Aggie spirit, while promoting unity, can sometimes—tragically—be co-opted to justify dangerous hazing practices under the guise of tradition.

5.2.2 Hazing policy & reporting

Texas A&M maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, clearly prohibiting any activity that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for admission, affiliation, or membership in an organization. The university enforces this through its Student Conduct Office and the Corps of Cadets regulations. A&M encourages reporting through its online reporting system, the Dean of Students, and the University Police Department (UPD). The university also provides education on hazing prevention and encourages bystander intervention.

5.2.3 Example incidents & responses

Texas A&M has faced significant hazing allegations:

• In 2021, two pledges from Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) filed a lawsuit alleging they were subjected to brutal hazing. During a “line-up,” they claimed substances including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit were poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The SAE chapter was suspended for two years by the university, and the lawsuit sought over $1 million in damages. This case highlights the extreme physical and chemical hazing that can occur.
• In 2023, a former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading hazing within the Corps of Cadets. The allegations included forced consumption of spoiled milk, physical abuse, simulated sexual acts, and being tied up between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages, accusing the university of failing to protect him. This incident underscores that hazing is not confined to Greek life and can manifest even in highly disciplined, tradition-bound organizations. Texas A&M stated it handled the matter under its rules, but cases like this show the persistent challenge of ensuring student safety.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M hazing case might proceed

Hazing incidents at Texas A&M, given their location in College Station and Brazos County, would involve investigation by the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) and potentially the College Station Police Department or Brazos County Sheriff’s Office. Civil lawsuits would be pursued in courts with jurisdiction over Brazos County. Similar to UH, potential defendants would include individuals, the specific chapter, the national organization (if Greek life), and Texas A&M University itself. Successfully litigating against a public institution like A&M requires a deep understanding of sovereign immunity and its exceptions under Texas law.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M students & parents should do

For students at Texas A&M and their families from Reagan County:

• Understand the unique culture: Given the strong traditions within the Corps and Greek life, recognize the potential for hazing disguised as “bonding” or “toughness.”
• Know the policies: Familiarize yourself with A&M’s anti-hazing policies and its reporting system through the Student Conduct Office and UPD.
• Document Corps complaints: If hazing involves the Corps of Cadets, meticulously document all incidents, as these cases can be particularly challenging due to the organizational structure.
• Seek legal counsel who knows Texas A&M: An attorney familiar with A&M’s internal processes, Corps traditions, and past hazing incidents can better navigate investigations and potential civil actions. Attorney911 has experience with institutional cases against large public entities.
• Prioritize well-being: For Texas A&M students, regardless of their connection to their Reagan County homes, never hesitate to seek medical help or report a dangerous situation.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is another flagship institution that draws students from across Texas, including Reagan County. Its vibrant campus culture and large Greek system make it a frequent site for hazing incidents.

5.3.1 Campus & culture snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin is a vast, bustling campus renowned for its academic excellence, spirited traditions, and a large, complex Greek life system comprising diverse fraternities and sororities. Beyond Greek organizations, UT also has numerous spirit groups, athletic teams, and other student associations, all of which are subject to the university’s strict policies against hazing. The pervasive influence of “Longhorn culture” creates a unique environment where tradition is deeply valued, sometimes making it difficult for students to discern between harmless rituals and dangerous hazing.

5.3.2 Hazing policy & reporting

UT Austin has one of the more transparent hazing policies among Texas universities. It explicitly prohibits any hazing activity by individuals or organizations and is committed to comprehensive prevention efforts. UT maintains an accessible online hub, hazing.utexas.edu, where it publicly lists hazing violations, the organizations involved, the nature of the misconduct, and the resulting disciplinary actions. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students, Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD), and anonymous reporting options.

5.3.3 Example incidents & response

UT Austin’s public database reveals a recurring pattern of hazing:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): The chapter was found to have directed new members to consume excessive amounts of milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, actions clearly falling under UT’s hazing definition. The chapter was placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education programs.
• Texas Wranglers (2018): This spirit organization faced sanctions for hazing violations, which included forced workouts, alcohol-related misconduct, and other activities that endangered new members. The transparency of UT’s reporting shows that hazing is a systemic issue affecting various types of student groups, not just Greek life.
• Other historical incidents have involved various fraternities receiving multi-year suspensions for forced drinking, physical abuse, and other forms of ritualistic hazing.

The University of Texas at Austin’s willingness to publicize these violations, while commendable for transparency, also highlights that despite policies, hazing remains a persistent challenge that requires continuous vigilance and rigorous enforcement.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin hazing case might proceed

For a hazing incident at UT Austin affecting students potentially from Reagan County, investigations could involve the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD) and/or the Austin Police Department (APD), depending on the incident’s location. Civil lawsuits would be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Travis County, where Austin is located. The strong public record of hazing violations maintained by UT can be a crucial asset in civil litigation. This public log provides powerful pattern evidence, demonstrating that the university often had prior knowledge of an organization’s propensity for hazing, which can strengthen arguments for institutional negligence.

5.3.5 What UT Austin students & parents should do

For students from Reagan County attending UT Austin and their families:

• Utilize UT’s transparency: Regularly check hazing.utexas.edu to review the disciplinary history of any organization a student is considering joining. This public record is a unique resource for making informed decisions.
• Report promptly: Use UT’s multiple reporting channels (Dean of Students, UTPD, or anonymous options) if hazing is suspected or experienced.
• Document meticulously: The prevalence of digital communication means screenshots of group chats, photos, and videos are extremely valuable.
• Consult a lawyer experienced in UT cases: An attorney familiar with UT’s public record system and its history of hazing enforcement can leverage this information effectively to build a compelling case and hold relevant parties accountable.
• Prioritize mental and physical well-being: Despite being away from Reagan County, seeking immediate medical or psychological assistance at the first sign of abuse is paramount.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

SMU, a private university in Dallas, is often chosen by students from affluent backgrounds across Texas, including some from Reagan County, seeking a prestigious education with a vibrant social scene.

5.4.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Southern Methodist University (SMU), located in Dallas, is a private institution known for its strong academic programs, beautiful campus, and a prominent Greek life culture. Its fraternities and sororities play a central role in student social life, and its athletic programs also foster a competitive environment. The university emphasizes community and tradition, which, like other institutions, can sometimes be vulnerable to hazing practices masked as rites of passage. Given its status as a private university, SMU can often make the handling of internal disciplinary actions less transparent to the public compared to state-funded schools.

5.4.2 Hazing policy & reporting

SMU has clear policies prohibiting hazing, defining it broadly to include any activity that endangers the physical or mental well-being of a student for admission or affiliation with an organization. The university encourages reporting through its Dean of Students, Office of Student Conduct, SMU Police Department, and an anonymous reporting system (e.g., Real Response). SMU regularly educates its student body on hazing prevention and the severe consequences of engaging in such activities.

5.4.3 Example incident & response

In 2017, the Kappa Alpha Order chapter at SMU faced allegations of severe hazing activities. Reports included new members being paddled, forced to consume excessive amounts of alcohol, and subjected to sleep deprivation. The chapter was swiftly suspended by the university, with restrictions placed on its recruiting activities and operations for several years. Other instances of hazing at SMU, some leading to organizational probation or suspension, have also occurred involving various fraternities and sororities for violations related to alcohol misuse, physical abuse, and psychological torment during new-member periods. These incidents underscore the challenges SMU faces despite its stated commitment to hazing prevention.

5.4.4 How a SMU hazing case might proceed

As a private institution, SMU cases would typically involve the SMU Police Department and potentially the Dallas Police Department (DPD) if incidents occur off-campus in the city of Dallas. Civil lawsuits would be filed in courts within Dallas County. Because private universities do not have the same sovereign immunity protections as public institutions, civil cases against SMU itself can sometimes navigate different legal pathways. For families in Reagan County whose children attend SMU, pursuing claims against a private university means that internal reports and past disciplinary actions, though often not publicly posted, can be compelled through legal discovery processes.

5.4.5 What SMU students & parents should do

For students from Reagan County at SMU and their families:

• Understand private university dynamics: Be aware that disciplinary actions at private universities like SMU are not always as publicly transparent as at state schools. However, this does not diminish the university’s responsibility.
• Meticulous documentation: Collect all possible digital and physical evidence, as this can be crucial for compelling the university to disclose internal records that might not be publicly available.
• Report internally: Utilize SMU’s reporting mechanisms—the Dean of Students, SMU Police, or anonymous systems—to create an official record of the incident.
• Seek experienced legal counsel: An attorney with experience litigating against private universities understands how to compel discovery of internal and often confidential records that are vital for building a hazing case against an institution like SMU.
• Prioritize mental health: Given the often hidden nature of hazing at private institutions, seeking confidential mental health support is crucial for students grappling with the psychological impact.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Christian university in Waco, is known for its strong values and sense of community. Despite its mission, Baylor has faced significant institutional challenges, particularly concerning its handling of student welfare. Students from Reagan County who choose Baylor often seek its unique academic and faith-based environment.

5.5.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Baylor University, nestled in Waco, is a private Christian institution with a strong emphasis on faith, academic rigor, and a tight-knit community. While its Greek life is active, Baylor also hosts numerous other student organizations, athletic programs, and faith-based groups, all contributing to its distinct culture. Baylor’s historical commitment to student well-being has been challenged by past scandals, specifically concerning its handling of sexual assault cases within its athletic department, leading to heightened scrutiny of its institutional oversight and student safety protocols.

5.5.2 Hazing policy & reporting

Baylor maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that prohibits any act, on or off campus, that endangers the physical or mental health of a student for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or membership. Its policy aligns with Texas law and goes further, emphasizing a “no tolerance” stance. Baylor encourages reporting through its Division of Student Life, campus police (Baylor Police Department), and various anonymous reporting avenues, including its ethics and compliance hotline. The university provides educational resources to prevent hazing and promote a safe campus environment.

5.5.3 Example incident & response

Baylor’s history includes incidents such as:

• Baylor Baseball Team Hazing (2020): An internal investigation into hazing allegations within the Baylor baseball program led to the suspension of 14 players. The suspensions were staggered over the early season to mitigate the impact on team performance, but the incident underscored that hazing can occur even in high-profile athletic programs at Baylor, despite the university’s stated commitment to ethical conduct.
• Broader issues: While specific high-profile hazing lawsuits like those at other major Texas universities may not always be public, Baylor’s past Title IX failures have significantly informed its current approach to student misconduct and institutional accountability. These past challenges mean that any hazing incident at Baylor is likely to be met with intense scrutiny, both internally and externally.

5.5.4 How a Baylor hazing case might proceed

For hazing incidents at Baylor, investigations would involve the Baylor Police Department and potentially the Waco Police Department or McLennan County Sheriff’s Office. Civil lawsuits would be pursued in courts within McLennan County, where Waco is located. As a private university, Baylor does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more directly liable in civil actions compared to public institutions. However, Baylor’s robust legal team and history of defending against institutional liability mean that hazing cases require immensely experienced legal counsel. Pursuing claims against Baylor necessitates a thorough understanding of their specific policies, their past responses to misconduct allegations, and the intricacies of litigation against well-resourced private entities.

5.3.5 What Baylor students & parents should do

For students from Reagan County attending Baylor and their families:

• Be aware of the context: Understand Baylor’s history and the heightened scrutiny it faces regarding student safety. This awareness can inform decisions about joining organizations and reporting misconduct.
• Document and report: Meticulously collect evidence—digital, photographic, and testimonial—and report all hazing incidents through Baylor’s official channels (Student Life, Baylor PD, ethics hotline).
• Seek specialized legal counsel: Given Baylor’s unique institutional context and its experience with high-profile lawsuits, it is imperative to consult with an attorney who has a strong background in complex litigation against well-resourced institutions. This expertise is crucial for successfully navigating a hazing case.
• Prioritize well-being: Students, regardless of their connection to their homes in Reagan County, should not suffer in silence. Baylor’s counseling services or external support systems should be utilized immediately if hazing causes emotional or physical distress.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

When hazing occurs at a Texas university, it’s rarely an isolated incident confined to a single chapter. Most fraternities and sororities, including those at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, are part of vast national organizations. Understanding the interconnectedness between local chapter conduct and their national leadership’s history of hazing is essential for families in Reagan County seeking accountability.

6.1 Why National Histories Matter

All too often, a campus hazing incident mirrors patterns seen in similar chapters across the country. National fraternities and sororities:

• Possess extensive anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies. These policies are not arbitrary; they are the direct result of decades of tragic incidents, including deaths and catastrophic injuries at their chapters nationwide.
• Are acutely aware of common hazing patterns, such as forced drinking rituals, physical abuse, paddling traditions, and humiliating initiation rites. These organizations have been repeatedly warned through litigation, internal investigations, and public scrutiny.

When a local chapter at a Texas university repeats a hazing script that has previously led to another chapter’s closure or a multi-million dollar lawsuit in a different state, it demonstrates foreseeability. This pattern of repeated, dangerous conduct can significantly strengthen arguments for negligence or even punitive damages against the national entity in civil claims. It suggests that the national organization knew or should have known about its chapters’ propensity for hazing but failed to take adequate preventative or corrective action.

6.2 Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

While an exhaustive list is beyond the scope of this guide, specific national fraternities and sororities operating at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor have been repeatedly implicated in hazing incidents, both locally and nationally. Here, we connect common organizations at these campuses to their broader national histories.

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor. Nationally, Pi Kappa Alpha has a tragic history of hazing fatalities. The most prominent is the Stone Foltz case (2021) at Bowling Green State University, where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink an entire bottle of whiskey. This led to a $10 million settlement and criminal convictions. Another case, David Bogenberger (2012) at Northern Illinois University, also involved a pledge dying from alcohol poisoning during a fraternity event, resulting in a $14 million settlement. These repeated alcohol-related deaths underscore a national pattern of dangerous “Big/Little” hazing rituals within the organization, making the national entity aware of the inherent risks.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): Present at UH, Texas A&M, and UT. SAE has faced multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide. At the University of Alabama, a lawsuit filed in 2023 alleged a pledge suffered a traumatic brain injury during a hazing ritual. Closer to home, a 2021 lawsuit at Texas A&M University alleged two pledges suffered severe chemical burns after industrial-strength cleaner was poured on them during hazing, leading to a $1 million claim. In January 2024, at the University of Texas at Austin, an exchange student alleged assault by fraternity members, leading to severe injuries and a lawsuit for over $1 million, occurring while the chapter was already under suspension. SAE famously eliminated its pledging process in 2014 due to its pattern of deaths, yet hazing persists, highlighting a systemic challenge.

• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor. The national organization is tragically known for the Max Gruver (2017) hazing death at Louisiana State University. A pledge died from alcohol toxicity during a “Bible study” drinking game, leading to criminal convictions and the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute in Louisiana. This incident demonstrates explicit knowledge of the national organization regarding dangerous alcohol hazing.

• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, and UT. The organization is linked to the Andrew Coffey (2017) hazing death at Florida State University, where a pledge died of acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” involving forced hard liquor consumption. While the family settlement was confidential, the incident led to FSU suspending all Greek life. The repeated emphasis on “Big Brother” events for forced drinking across national organizations indicates a known pattern.

• Kappa Alpha Order (ΚΑ): Present at Texas A&M and SMU. This fraternity has a history of hazing suspensions and alleged physical abuse. At SMU in 2017, new members were reportedly paddled, forced to drink, and subjected to sleep deprivation, leading to the chapter’s suspension. While specific national fatalities are less public than some peer organizations, the pattern of physical and alcohol-related abuse is documented.

• Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): Found at Texas A&M and UT. The national organization is linked to the catastrophic Danny Santulli (2021) case at the University of Missouri, where a pledge suffered severe, permanent brain damage after being forced to consume excessive alcohol. The Santulli family settled with 22 defendants for multi-million-dollar confidential amounts, illustrating the potential for severe, non-fatal injuries.

• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor. This fraternity has faced significant hazing litigation. In a 2024 case at the College of Charleston, a family received more than $10 million in damages for physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment. A 2020 incident at the University of Texas at Arlington involved a pledge hospitalized with alcohol poisoning from hazing, which settled in 2021.

• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor. Kappa Sigma was held liable in the landmark Chad Meredith (2001) case at the University of Miami, where a jury awarded a $12.6 million verdict after a pledge drowned after being pressured to swim while intoxicated. More recently, in 2023 at Texas A&M University, allegations of hazing led to severe injuries consistent with rhabdomyolysis, leading to ongoing litigation.

6.3 Tie Back to Legal Strategy

These repeated patterns across various chapters of the same national organizations, spanning different states and universities, are more than mere statistics. They form a critical basis for legal strategy, especially for the Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

• Foreseeability: These histories demonstrate that national organizations had explicit, repeated warnings about the dangers of hazing tactics commonly used by their chapters. This establishes foreseeability—the argument that they knew or should have known these incidents were likely to occur.
• Failure to Enforce: If national organizations maintain anti-hazing policies but consistently fail to meaningfully enforce them, allowing chapters to perpetuate dangerous practices with minimal consequence, this can expose them to significant liability for negligent supervision or deliberate indifference.
• Impact on Settlements and Damages: Documenting a national organization’s pattern of hazing can significantly increase settlement leverage. It can also support arguments for greater punitive damages (where available), which are awarded to punish egregious conduct and deter future harm, depending on the specific state laws and case facts.

By meticulously researching and presenting these patterns, our legal team can demonstrate that hazing is often not a “rogue incident” but rather a foreseeable outcome of institutional failures, compelling accountability from powerful defendants.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Successfully pursuing a hazing lawsuit requires far more than just compelling testimony; it demands a meticulous collection of diverse evidence, a sophisticated understanding of damages, and a strategic approach to litigation. For families in Reagan County, this process can feel overwhelming, but an experienced hazing attorney knows exactly how to navigate it within the context of Texas law.

7.1 Evidence: The Foundation of Your Case

In modern hazing cases, evidence is everything, and much of it is digital. We understand how to uncover, preserve, and present this crucial information:

• Digital Communications: These are often the most potent forms of evidence. Group chats on platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, and Slack, as well as DMs on Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok, can reveal incriminating details. This includes not only live messages but also potentially recovered or deleted messages through forensic analysis. These communications often show the planning, intent, knowledge, and patterns of hazing, establishing who was involved and what was said both before, during, and after incidents.
• Photos & Videos: In today’s highly digital world, members often film or photograph hazing events. This content, whether shared in private group chats, posted on social media, or even captured unwittingly on someone’s phone, provides irrefutable proof. Additionally, security camera footage or doorbell cameras (e.g., Ring footage) at private residences or event venues can capture activity relevant to the incident.
• Internal Organization Documents: These can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, ritual “traditions” lists, and emails or texts from officers discussing new member activities. National organization policies and training materials, especially those outlining anti-hazing measures, can also be crucial to show what the organization knew or should have known.
• University Records: Through subpoena and public records requests, we can access university files such as prior conduct records, probationary sanctions, and letters of warning concerning the specific organization. Incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, along with Clery reports and other institutional disclosures, can demonstrate a university’s awareness of an organization’s history of misconduct.
• Medical and Psychological Records: These are vital for proving damages. This includes emergency room reports, hospitalization records, surgery and rehabilitation notes, toxicology reports (for alcohol or drug involvement), and crucially, psychological evaluations documenting PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation resulting from the hazing.
• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts from other pledges, current or former members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, trainers, or even bystanders can provide critical details. Former members who have left the organization due to hazing can be particularly powerful witnesses.

7.2 Damages: Recovering What Was Lost

Hazing can inflict profound and lasting harm. Our role is to ensure all aspects of that harm are recognized and properly compensated through damages. We do not promise specific results, but we fight for the maximum compensation possible based on the facts of each case.

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs related to physical injuries. It includes ambulance fees, emergency room visits, hospital stays (including ICU), surgeries, ongoing treatment, physical and occupational therapy, specialist consultations, and prescription medications. For catastrophic injuries (e.g., severe brain damage, major burns), this can extend to life care plans that project decades of future medical needs and specialized care.
• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: Hazing can disrupt a student’s academic career, leading to missed semesters, academic setbacks, and even withdrawal from college. This translates into lost tuition, revoked scholarships, delayed entry into the workforce, and, in severe cases, a diminished future earning capacity if permanent injuries affect their ability to work or pursue their chosen career.
• Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for the profound intangible losses. They include physical pain and suffering (both past and future), emotional distress, trauma, humiliation, and loss of dignity. Victims often experience Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), severe anxiety, depression, and a loss of enjoyment of life, where they can no longer participate in activities they once loved.
• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the most tragic hazing cases, where a student dies, families can pursue wrongful death claims. This includes compensation for funeral and burial costs, the loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and critically, the loss of companionship, love, and society. Parents, siblings, and spouses can claim for their own grief, emotional suffering, and the permanent void left by their loved one.

We meticulously assess all potential damages, often working with economists, medical experts, and vocational specialists, to ensure a comprehensive valuation of your or your child’s losses.

7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing lawsuits often involve powerful institutions with sophisticated legal teams and extensive insurance coverage. Understanding how these entities operate is key to successfully navigating a claim.

• Institutional Defenders: National fraternities, universities, and their insurers often mount aggressive defenses. They may argue that hazing was an “unforeseeable accident,” that “the pledge consented,” or that “it was a rogue chapter” acting against official policies.
• Insurance Coverage Disputes: Insurance policies often contain clauses excluding coverage for “intentional acts” or “criminal conduct.” Insurers frequently use these clauses to deny coverage or refuse to defend a hazing lawsuit.
• Expert Legal Navigation: Attorney911’s unique advantage comes from our deep insight into these defense tactics. Lupe Peña, our associate attorney, is a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She possesses insider knowledge of how large insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, their coverage exclusion arguments, and their settlement strategies. This allows us to:
  • Identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, including chapter policies, national policies, and university umbrella policies.
  • Force insurers to defend cases, often by arguing that while the hazing act itself may have been intentional, the institution’s negligent supervision or failure to prevent was the cause of injury, which may be covered.
  • Navigate complex disputes about policy exclusions, trigger dates, and notice requirements to maximize recovery.

This expertise is paramount in hazing cases, where the ability to compel powerful defendants and their insurers to pay fair compensation often hinges on a nuanced understanding of their own internal strategies.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When your family in Reagan County faces the aftermath of hazing, clear, actionable advice can make all the difference. Here, we offer guidance for parents, students, and even former members or witnesses.

8.1 For Parents: Your Crucial Role in Recognizing & Responding to Hazing

As parents in Reagan County, your intuition and vigilance are your greatest tools. Look for these warning signs and follow these steps if you suspect hazing:

• Warning Signs of Hazing:

  • Unexplained injuries (bruises, cuts, burns) or repeated “accidents” with inconsistent stories.
  • Sudden, extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation, with signs of exhaustion.
  • Drastic changes in mood, such as increased anxiety, depression, irritability, or withdrawal from friends and family.
  • A sudden obsession with constant secret phone use for group chats, coupled with an intense fear of missing “mandatory” events or losing their phone.
  • Reluctance to discuss their organization’s activities, often using phrases like “I can’t talk about it” or “It’s a secret.”
  • Sudden poor academic performance due to missed classes or lack of sleep.
  • Forced “fines” or sudden requests for funds without clear explanation.

• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation calmly. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with your group?” or “Is there anything happening that makes you uncomfortable?” Emphasize that your primary concern is their safety and well-being, and that you will support them no matter what. Reassure them that leaving the organization is always an option without judgment.

• If Your Child is Hurt:

  • Get them immediate medical care. Prioritize their physical and mental health above all else. Do not worry about “getting the group in trouble” with the university.
  • Document everything. Take clear, time-stamped photos of all injuries from multiple angles. Screenshot every relevant text message, group chat conversation, or social media post. Write down every detail your child tells you while their memory is fresh—who, what, when, where.
  • Save physical evidence like damaged clothing, receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used in the hazing.

• Dealing with the University: Document every communication you have with university administrators. Ask specific questions about prior incidents involving the same organization and what disciplinary actions were taken. Be cautious about accepting internal university “resolutions” without independent legal advice, as these may not fully protect your child’s rights.

• When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or the organization is minimizing, hiding, or stonewalling about what happened, it is crucial to consult with an attorney. Early intervention can preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s legal options.

8.2 For Students / Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safe Exits

If you’re a student from Reagan County at a Texas university, and you’re questioning whether an activity is hazing, trust your gut.

• Is This Hazing or Just “Tradition”? If you feel unsafe, humiliated, coerced, or forced to drink or endure pain; if the activity is hidden from the public or administrators; if older members are making new members do things they didn’t have to do—it’s very likely hazing, regardless of what they call it. The Texas Education Code defines hazing quite broadly, encompassing acts that endanger your mental or physical health for membership.

• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Even if you outwardly “agreed” to an initiation activity, the law recognizes that your consent is often not truly voluntary when you’re under immense peer pressure, fear of exclusion, or the threat of not achieving membership. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. You are the victim of an illegal act.

• Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the right to leave any organization or situation that makes you uncomfortable or unsafe. You can do so by declining participation, or by sending a clear email or text message to the organization’s leadership stating you are resigning your pledge or membership. If you fear retaliation, immediately report this fear to the Dean of Students, campus police, or a trusted advisor. Many schools and Texas law offer good-faith protections for students who report hazing or call for help in an emergency, even if underage drinking was involved. The National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE) also provides an anonymous reporting option.

• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: If you or a friend is in a medical emergency due to hazing, call 911 immediately. In Texas, you are protected from prosecution for certain offenses, including underage drinking, if you report in good faith a medical emergency and cooperate with emergency services. Your safety and that of your peers are paramount.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses: A Path to Accountability

If you are a former member, or a current member who witnessed hazing and now regrets involvement, you are not alone. Many individuals carry guilt or fear, but your knowledge can prevent future tragedies.

• Your Role in Preventing Harm: Your testimony and any evidence you possess can be crucial in holding individuals and institutions accountable. More importantly, it can prevent similar harm from happening to other students.
• Seeking Legal Advice: If you have concerns about your own legal exposure, you should seek independent legal counsel. Our firm, with its dual expertise in personal injury and criminal defense, can advise you on your rights and obligations, and how cooperation might be managed to protect your interests while aiding justice.
• A Path to Accountability: While the path to come forward can be challenging, contributing to accountability can be an important step toward healing and preventing future harm.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Hazing Case

For families in Reagan County navigating a hazing incident, understanding common pitfalls can be as important as knowing what to do. These mistakes can severely undermine a potential legal claim.

MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:

1. Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence:

   • Why it’s wrong: While you might think you’re protecting your child from further trouble, deleting evidence can look like a cover-up, may constitute obstruction of justice, and makes proving your case significantly harder. Digital forensics can often recover deleted messages, but original screenshots are best.
   • What to do instead: Preserve every single piece of evidence immediately, even if it feels embarrassing or incriminating. This includes every text, photo, video, and group chat.

2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority or Individuals Directly:

   • Why it’s wrong: Direct confrontation will immediately alert the organization, leading them to lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses. This removes any element of surprise or advantage you might have.
   • What to do instead: Document everything in secret first, then contact an attorney before any direct communication with the implicated parties.

3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms Without Legal Review:

   • Why it’s wrong: Universities may pressure families into signing agreements or accepting internal resolutions quickly. These documents often include clauses that waive your right to pursue further legal action, and the compensation or “justice” offered is typically far below what a full legal claim might yield.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign any document from the university or organization without having an experienced attorney review it thoroughly.

4. Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer:

   • Why it’s wrong: While it’s natural to want to share your story, anything posted on public social media can be screenshotted by defense attorneys and used against your case. Inconsistencies or emotional posts can hurt your credibility and potentially waive certain legal protections.
   • What to do instead: Document your experiences privately. Let your legal team control the public messaging to protect the integrity of your case.

5. Letting Your Child Go Back for “One Last Meeting” or “To Explain”:

   • Why it’s wrong: Once you’re considering legal action, any further direct communication with the organization, even if framed as conciliatory, can be used to pressure your child, intimidate them, or extract statements that could harm your case.
   • What to do instead: If you are pursuing legal action, all future communication with the organization should typically go through your attorney.

6. Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”:

   • Why it’s wrong: Universities often conduct internal investigations, but these are primarily aimed at institutional compliance and public relations, not necessarily full compensation or accountability for your child’s injuries. Evidence disappears rapidly, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations (time limit for filing a lawsuit) can run out.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence immediately and consult a lawyer. The university process and your legal options are often separate tracks.

7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer Present:

   • Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters are trained to minimize payouts. Any recorded statements you give or early settlement offers you accept are designed to protect the insurance company’s interests, not yours.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline to speak to any insurance adjuster and inform them, “My attorney will contact you.”

You can learn more about how to avoid common errors that can harm your case by watching Attorney911’s video, “Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case,” available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.

8.5 Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) benefit from sovereign immunity, which can limit lawsuits unless exceptions such as gross negligence, Title IX violations, or suits against individuals in their personal capacity apply. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case is highly fact-dependent; contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. While hazing is typically a Class B misdemeanor in Texas (Texas Education Code § 37.152), it becomes a state jail felony if it causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who are officers of an organization and fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes. Texas law (Texas Education Code § 37.155) explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and juries understand that “agreement” under peer pressure, power imbalance, or fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  Generally, the statute of limitations in Texas for personal injury and wrongful death cases is two years from the date of injury or death. However, the “discovery rule” might extend this period if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical for preserving evidence and witness testimony, so contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately. You can find more information about statutes of limitations in our video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship of the organization, control over its activities, knowledge of prior incidents, and the foreseeability of hazing occurring off-campus. Many major hazing judgments have resulted from incidents that took place off-campus.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  Most hazing cases are resolved through confidential settlements negotiated outside of a public trial. We prioritize your family’s privacy and work to ensure that information is protected whenever possible, while still pursuing a just resolution.

Because the law is complex and each case has unique facts, it is crucial to consult with a qualified attorney to review your specific situation and understand your exact rights and options.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing case in Texas, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. This is precisely the expertise The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, brings to the table.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Reagan County and the surrounding areas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families across our entire state, regardless of their proximity to the campuses. Whether your child attends one of the major universities discussed (UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor), or any other college in Texas, our team is equipped to assist.

Our firm offers unique qualifications specifically suited for complex hazing litigation:

• Insurance Insider Advantage with Lupe Peña: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, is a former insurance defense attorney for a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/). She possesses an intimate, insider understanding of exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies operate. She knows how they value (and undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, their coverage exclusion arguments, and their settlement strategies. In hazing cases, this is an invaluable asset—we know their playbook because we used to run it.

• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions with Ralph Manginello: Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), has a proven track record of taking on formidable defendants. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, a case against a billion-dollar corporation. His extensive federal court experience, particularly in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, means he is not intimidated by national fraternities, multi-million dollar universities, or their well-resourced defense teams. We’ve taken on giant corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants and secure justice.

• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Hazing too often leads to tragic deaths or life-altering injuries. Our firm has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having secured multi-million dollar settlements for families in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases. We don’t settle cheap; we diligently build cases that accurately value human life and force true accountability, working with economists and medical experts to project lifetime care needs for severe brain injuries or permanent disabilities.

• Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph Manginello’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides us with a deep understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual perspective is crucial for understanding the full scope of a hazing incident and advising witnesses or former members who may face dual criminal and civil exposure. Our criminal defense expertise can be explored at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.

• Unparalleled Investigative Depth: We leverage a vast network of experts, including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, economists, and psychologists. Our experience in complex investigations, akin to those used in refinery or maritime accidents, means we know how to effectively obtain hidden evidence—deleted group chats, internal chapter records, university files, and social media data. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments actually operate behind closed doors, often with a culture of secrecy and unwritten rules that defy official policies. We know what makes hazing cases profoundly different: powerful institutional defendants, complex insurance coverage battles, and the delicate balance of victim privacy against the imperative of public accountability.

We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job, as Legal Emergency Lawyers™, is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We focus on thorough investigation and real accountability, not just quick settlements.

Call to Action for Reagan County Families

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s a major university like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Reagan County and throughout the surrounding communities have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to what happened without judgment, explain your legal options at no cost, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family. We operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case.

What to expect in your free consultation:

• We will listen attentively to your story and the full scope of what happened.
• We will review any evidence you have already collected—photos, texts, medical records, or other documentation.
• We will explain your legal options, which may include pursuing a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, or both, based on the specifics of your case.
• We will discuss realistic timelines and what you can expect during the legal process.
• We will answer all your questions about our contingency fee structure, ensuring you understand that there are no upfront costs from you. Learn more about how contingency fees work in our video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
• There will be no pressure to hire us on the spot; we encourage you to take the time you need to make an informed decision.
• Everything you share with us during your consultation is confidential.

Whether you’re in Reagan County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Don’t let your legal rights expire. Call us today.

Contact Attorney911:

• Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Please contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for a confidential consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com