roberts-county-featured-image.png

In Roberts County, Attorney911 offers experienced legal representation for fraternity and sorority hazing injuries and wrongful death cases. Our former insurance defense attorney understands fraternity insurance tactics, and our federal court experience includes taking on national fraternities and universities. With over 25 years of experience, including multi-million dollar proven results from cases like the BP Explosion litigation, we fight massive institutions. We handle cases from UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, specializing in evidence preservation. Hablamos Español. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for a free consultation; contingency fee means no win, no fee.

Earth, North America, Roberts County, Texas, United States

When Tradition Turns Toxic: A Comprehensive Guide to Hazing in Texas for Roberts County Families

The cold night air hangs heavy, thick with anticipation and the scent of stale beer. Inside an off-campus house near a Texas university campus, new recruits are pushed to their limits – chugging handle after handle of liquor, enduring humiliating chants, or performing endless, grueling calisthenics. Someone collapses, their blood alcohol content far past a safe level, but the group hesitates. Fear of getting the chapter shut down, or personal legal trouble, overrides the urgency to call for help. For a student caught between loyalty to a new group and their own safety, it’s a terrifying dilemma. For parents, it’s a nightmare unfolding hundreds of miles away from their home in Roberts County.

This scenario isn’t a scene from a movie; it’s a recurring tragedy playing out at universities across Texas, including those where families from Roberts County send their children. What starts as a desire to belong can quickly escalate into a dangerous, life-altering, or even fatal experience. We understand that for families in Roberts County, this issue might seem distant, concentrated in university towns like College Station, Austin, or Houston. However, the impact of hazing ripples across our state, affecting Texans from all walks of life.

This comprehensive guide aims to shed light on the stark realities of hazing in 2025. We will explore what hazing truly looks like, stepping beyond outdated stereotypes to reveal the insidious tactics employed today. We’ll demystify the Texas legal framework for hazing, outlining both criminal and civil avenues for accountability. By examining major national hazing cases, we’ll draw parallels to what happens at our state’s prominent institutions: the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University. Crucially, we’ll explore how the historical conduct of national fraternities and sororities, along with local chapter actions, fuels liability and risk. Finally, we’ll provide practical guidance for victims and families in Roberts County and throughout Texas, empowering you with the knowledge to protect yourselves and seek justice.

This article is intended as general information, not specific legal advice. Every case is unique, and we at The Manginello Law Firm offer confidential consultations to evaluate individual circumstances. We serve families throughout Texas, including Roberts County, providing experienced legal counsel in these complex and sensitive cases.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

  • If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

    • Call 911 for medical emergencies.
    • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911).
    • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

  • In the first 48 hours:

    • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.”
    • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
      • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
      • Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
      • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
    • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
    • Do NOT:
      • Confront the fraternity/sorority.
      • Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
      • Post details on public social media.
      • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.

  • Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

    • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
    • Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
    • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
    • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Roberts County families, understanding modern hazing is crucial because it often deviates from the public’s perception of simple pranks. Hazing, in its current form, is a sophisticated and often hidden practice designed to assert power, enforce conformity, and create a false sense of unity. It’s not just “a little roughhousing” or “boys being boys”; it’s a dangerous manipulation of human psychology and group dynamics.

We define hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, whether on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety. This behavior occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. It’s important to emphasize that a student’s “agreement” or “consent” to these acts does not automatically make them safe or lawful, especially when peer pressure, power imbalances, and the desire to belong are at play.

Main Categories of Hazing

Modern hazing has evolved, often hiding behind euphemisms like “team-building” or “tradition.” However, its core remains exploitative and harmful.

  • Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is arguably the most common and deadliest form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often to extreme levels. Pledges can be subjected to chugging challenges, “lineups” where they must rapidly consume multiple alcoholic beverages, or drinking games where mistakes are punished with more alcohol. There’s also the insidious pressure to consume unknown or mixed substances, putting students at severe risk of overdose or poisoning.

  • Physical Hazing: Beyond the well-known image of paddling, physical hazing includes extreme calisthenics, often called “workouts” or “smokings,” pushed far beyond normal athletic conditioning. Victims can endure sleep deprivation, food and water deprivation, or forced exposure to extreme cold or heat, or dangerous environments. These acts can lead to serious injuries, organ damage, or long-term health consequences.

  • Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This particularly egregious form of hazing often leaves deep psychological scars. It can involve forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (such as “elephant walks” or “roasted pig” positions), wearing degrading costumes, or engaging in acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones. These acts are designed to degrade, shame, and break down a new member’s sense of self.

  • Psychological Hazing: While less visible, psychological hazing is incredibly damaging. It includes constant verbal abuse, threats, forced isolation from friends and family, and manipulation designed to erode self-esteem. Public shaming, whether offline or on social media, forced “confessions,” or incessant intimidation, can lead to severe anxiety, depression, and even suicidal ideation.

  • Digital/Online Hazing: With the ubiquity of smartphones and social media, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, “challenges” on platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Discord, and public humiliation via these channels. There is also immense pressure to create or share compromising images or videos of oneself or others, which can have devastating long-term consequences. For example, pledges might be forced to post embarrassing content online or participate in online “challenges” that are degrading or risky. Geo-location tracking apps might be demanded, allowing older members to monitor a pledge’s every move.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is not confined to the stereotypical “frat house.” While fraternities and sororities (including Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council, and multicultural organizations) are frequently implicated, hazing manifests across a wide spectrum of campus groups.

We have seen hazing occur in:

  • Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-style groups: These often have strong traditions that can be twisted into hazing.
  • Spirit squads, tradition clubs: Organizations that uphold campus traditions can sometimes engage in harmful initiation rituals.
  • Athletic teams: Football, basketball, baseball, cheerleading, and other sports teams are not immune.
  • Marching bands and performance groups: The pressure to perform and belong can lead to hazing in these creative organizations.
  • Service, cultural, and academic organizations: Even organizations dedicated to positive community impact can fall prey to hazing.

The common threads running through all these environments are social status, tradition, and secrecy. The desire to belong, the perceived honor of tradition, and the implicit (or explicit) code of silence are powerful forces that allow these dangerous practices to persist, even when participants know hazing is illegal and universally condemned. For families in Roberts County who are sending their children to any university, it’s important to understand that no student group is immune from these behaviors.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For Roberts County families navigating the aftermath of a hazing incident, understanding the legal landscape is essential. Texas law, combined with federal regulations, provides avenues for both criminal prosecution and civil recourse, ensuring accountability for those responsible.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has clear statutory language addressing hazing within the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. In plain terms, hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, directed against a student, on or off campus, for the purpose of affiliation or membership in any student organization, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student. This definition makes it clear that both physical harm (like beatings or forced drinking) and mental harm (like extreme humiliation or sustained intimidation) fall under the umbrella of hazing. The reckless component means that even if the perpetrators didn’t intend to cause serious injury but knew their actions carried a high risk of harm, they can still be held accountable.

  • Criminal Penalties: In Texas, hazing can lead to severe criminal charges.

    • A basic hazing offense, not involving serious injury, is typically a Class B Misdemeanor.
    • If the hazing causes an injury requiring medical treatment, it can escalate to a Class A Misdemeanor.
    • Most critically, if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it can be prosecuted as a State Jail Felony.
      Furthermore, individuals who are aware of hazing and fail to report it can face misdemeanor charges, as can those who retaliate against someone for reporting.

  • Organizational Liability: Texas law also addresses the accountability of the organizations themselves. Student organizations can be held criminally responsible for hazing if they authorized or encouraged the activity, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it. Penalties for organizations can include fines and the revocation of university recognition.

  • Reporter Protections: Texas law provides a limited form of immunity for individuals who, in good faith, report a hazing incident to university or law enforcement authorities. This is designed to encourage witnesses and victims to come forward without fear of personal legal repercussions. Additionally, “good Samaritan” laws and many university policies offer amnesty for students who call 911 in a medical emergency, even if underage drinking or other minor offenses were involved.

It is important to remember that this is a summary of the law. The actual statutes contain more technical language and specific provisions, but the intent is clear: hazing is a serious offense in Texas.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, there are generally two distinct legal paths that can be pursued:

  • Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state through a prosecutor (the District Attorney in a county like Roberts County) and aim to punish the individuals or organizations found guilty of violating criminal laws. The focus is on justice for the broader society. Convictions can lead to jail time, fines, and probation. In hazing incidents, prosecutors might pursue charges for hazing itself, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in cases resulting in death.

  • Civil Cases: These cases are brought by victims or their surviving families, with the goal of securing monetary compensation for the harm suffered and holding negligent parties accountable. Civil lawsuits focus on concepts like negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The outcome of a civil case is typically financial restitution rather than incarceration.

Crucially, a criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case. The standards of proof differ, and a civil lawsuit can succeed even if criminal charges are never filed or do not result in a conviction. Both types of cases can run simultaneously.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations also impact how hazing is addressed at universities:

  • Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation, expected to be fully implemented by 2026, requires colleges and universities that receive federal funding to be more transparent about hazing incidents. This includes publicly reporting hazing violations, strengthening hazing education and prevention efforts, and maintaining comprehensive data on alleged and proven incidents. This act will provide Roberts County families (and all families) with more accessible information when researching schools and holding them accountable.

  • Title IX / Clery Act: When hazing involves elements of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based discrimination, Title IX may be triggered. This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education and places obligations on universities to respond to such incidents. The Clery Act requires colleges to report campus crime statistics and issue timely warnings about threats to campus safety. Hazing incidents often involve behaviors (like assault, sexual assault, or alcohol/drug offenses) that fall under Clery reporting requirements, adding another layer of accountability for institutions.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Determining liability in a civil hazing lawsuit often involves identifying multiple parties who contributed to the harm:

  • Individual Students: Those who directly planned, facilitated, carried out, or even passively allowed the hazing activities can be held personally liable. This includes officers of the organization, “pledge educators,” or any member actively involved.
  • Local Chapter / Organization: If the fraternity, sorority, club, or team is a recognized legal entity, it can be sued directly for its role in authorizing, encouraging, or overlooking the hazing.
  • National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which charters local chapters, provides policies and training, and collects dues, can be held liable. This often depends on what the national organization knew or should have known about a chapter’s propensity for hazing, especially if there’s a history of similar incidents across different chapters.
  • University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself can face liability if it was negligent in its supervision, failed to enforce its own anti-hazing policies, ignored clear warning signs, or showed deliberate indifference to known patterns of hazing. Public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT, while often protected by sovereign immunity, may still face liability under specific exceptions, such as gross negligence or Title IX violations. Private institutions like SMU and Baylor typically have fewer immunity protections.
  • Third Parties: Other entities may also be implicated. This could include:
    • Landlords or property owners of off-campus houses or venues where hazing occurred, if they knew about the activities or provided an unsafe environment.
    • Bars or alcohol vendors that illegally served minors, potentially under “dram shop” liability laws.
    • Security companies or event organizers who failed to ensure safety at an event.

Every hazing case is unique, and the specific facts dictate which parties can be held liable. An experienced hazing attorney can thoroughly investigate and identify all potential defendants.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

When a hazing incident impacts a family in Roberts County, it’s natural to feel isolated. However, it’s crucial to understand that these tragedies are part of a larger pattern across the nation. The following national cases illustrate common threads and demonstrate the severe legal consequences that can arise from hazing. These cases have not only brought justice to victims but have also shaped hazing law and accountability standards, setting precedents that extend to hazing incidents occurring at Texas universities.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

This is the deadliest and most frequently cited pattern in hazing. Forced alcohol consumption, often during “pledge events” or “initiation nights,” has led to numerous preventable deaths.

  • Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died from traumatic brain injuries after a “bid acceptance” event involving extreme alcohol consumption. Fraternity members witnessed his repeated falls and suffering on security cameras but delayed calling for medical help for nearly 12 hours. The aftermath led to over a thousand criminal counts against 18 fraternity members, including involuntary manslaughter. Civil litigation resulted in confidential settlements. This case was instrumental in the passage of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, making hazing a felony under certain circumstances. Takeaway for Texas families: The delay in calling 911, captured by security footage and group chat messages, demonstrates how a culture of silence exacerbates harm and legally devastates those involved.

  • Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old FSU pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and forced to consume them rapidly. Criminal prosecution followed against multiple members, mostly resulting in misdemeanor hazing convictions. Florida State temporarily suspended all Greek life programs in response. Takeaway for Texas families: This case highlights how “formulaic truyền thống” drinking nights, where pledges are intentionally over-served, are a recurring script for disaster, signaling a clear pattern of negligence by national organizations.

  • Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old LSU pledge, died after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where incorrect answers to questions resulted in forced drinking. He succumbed to alcohol toxicity with a blood alcohol content of 0.495%. One member was convicted of negligent homicide, and others faced hazing charges. This tragedy directly led to the passage of Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute. Takeaway for Texas families: Legislative change and increased criminal penalties for hazing often follow public outrage and clear proof of intentional harm, serving as a warning to all student organizations.

  • Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, was forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” night and died from alcohol poisoning. Multiple fraternity members were convicted of hazing-related criminal charges. The Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and approximately $3 million from Bowling Green State University. Takeaway for Texas families: This significant settlement demonstrates that universities, particularly public ones, can face substantial financial and reputational consequences in addition to national fraternities when they fail to prevent hazing, even if they claim sovereign immunity.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Hazing is not limited to alcohol. Brutal physical rituals, often under the guise of “tradition” or “trust-building,” can also lead to catastrophic injury or death.

  • Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died after being blindfolded, weighted with a backpack, and repeatedly tackled during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. Fraternity members delayed calling 911. Several members were convicted, and, notably, the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. Takeaway for Texas families: This landmark case proves that off-campus “retreats” are not safe havens from liability; national organizations can be held criminally and civilly responsible, especially when they exercise control over such events.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing extends beyond Greek life, impacting various student organizations, including high-profile athletic programs.

  • Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): Multiple former football players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program over many years. The scandal led to the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who subsequently filed a wrongful-termination lawsuit that was confidentially settled in August 2025. Numerous player lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff further exposed the depth of the issue. Takeaway for Texas families: Hazing is pervasive and can affect major athletic programs with significant institutional backing, challenging the notion that it’s solely a Greek life problem. This highlights the importance of holding universities accountable for systemic abuse across all student activities.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies share common, disturbing threads: forced drinking, physical abuse, humiliation, delayed or denied medical care, and systematic cover-ups. While the incidents occurred in other states, the lessons learned are directly applicable to Texas. The reforms, legislative changes, and multi-million dollar settlements that followed these cases demonstrate a growing legal standard for accountability.

For Roberts County families, this means that hazing incidents at Texas universities – whether at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor – operate within a legal landscape shaped by these precedents. The principles of foreseeability, institutional negligence, and organizational liability are well-established. If your child has been a victim of hazing, you are not alone, and there are clear legal pathways to seek justice and prevent future tragedies.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

Roberts County families send their children to universities across Texas. While Roberts County itself is geographically distant from the major metropolitan areas where these universities are located, incidents at these campuses directly affect students and families from our community. Understanding the specific context of hazing at these flagship Texas institutions is vital. While we are a Houston-based firm, we serve families across Texas, including those from Roberts County, providing legal guidance wherever their children attend school.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

Students from Roberts County attending UH typically make the journey southeast to Houston, becoming part of a diverse, urban campus community.

5.1.1 Campus & culture snapshot

The University of Houston is a large, vibrant urban campus, known for its diverse student body and strong academic programs. It has a significant commuter population but also a growing residential presence. UH boasts an active Greek life, encompassing Interfraternity Council (IFC), National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), Multicultural Greek Council (MGC), and Panhellenic Council organizations. Beyond Greek life, numerous cultural groups, sports clubs, and academic associations contribute to a bustling campus environment.

5.1.2 Hazing policy & reporting

UH maintains a clear stance against hazing, prohibiting any such acts whether they occur on or off campus. Its policy explicitly forbids forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and acts causing mental distress as part of initiation or membership. UH provides multiple reporting channels through its Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the UH Police Department. The university also publishes a general statement on hazing prevention and some limited disciplinary information online.

5.1.3 Example incident & response

One notable incident involved the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity chapter at UH in 2016. Pledges allegedly faced severe hazing, including deprivation of food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. One student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface during the hazing. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and a university suspension, highlighting UH’s willingness to impose disciplinary action. Other fraternities at UH have also faced disciplinary action for conduct “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” involving alcohol misuse and policy violations, leading to suspensions and probation. These incidents underscore the ongoing challenge of hazing even with official prohibitions in place.

5.1.4 How a UH hazing case might proceed

Given UH’s location in Houston, hazing cases can involve several law enforcement agencies. Depending on where the incident occurred, the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) or the Houston Police Department (HPD) might take criminal jurisdiction. Civil lawsuits stemming from UH hazing incidents would typically be filed in courts within Harris County. Potential defendants often include the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the university itself or property owners where the hazing took place. Attorneys practicing in Houston are accustomed to navigating these multi-jurisdictional issues.

5.1.5 What UH students & parents should do

For Roberts County families with students at UH, proactive steps are critical:

  • Reporting Hazing at UH: Utilize UH’s official channels: the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct, or the UH Police Department. Anonymous online reporting forms are also available.
  • Documenting Prior Complaints: If you have knowledge of prior complaints or incidents involving a specific UH student organization, carefully document this information. Such a history can be crucial evidence in demonstrating a pattern of negligence.
  • Legal Consultation: Talking to a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can help uncover prior disciplinary actions and internal university files, which are often not publicly available, but can be crucial to a civil suit. We understand the specific nuances of Houston’s legal and university environment.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Families from Roberts County are often deeply connected to the traditions of Texas A&M. College Station, while a significant distance from Roberts County, is a cultural touchstone for many across Texas.

5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Texas A&M University, located in College Station, is renowned for its rich traditions, strong Aggie Spirit, and the unique presence of the Corps of Cadets. Greek life is robust, alongside numerous other student organizations and deeply ingrained traditions. The university’s culture often emphasizes loyalty, tradition, and collective identity, which, while positive in many aspects, can sometimes create an environment where hazing is rationalized as “earning your place” or “building character.”

5.2.2 Hazing policy & reporting

Texas A&M unequivocally prohibits hazing, articulating a clear policy against any activity that endangers a student’s mental or physical health for initiation or affiliation purposes. The university provides avenues for reporting hazing through the Office of Student Conduct, the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD), and specific reporting channels within the Corps of Cadets. Education Code § 37.151 provides the legal underpinning for these policies, which also mandate that administrators provide prevention education and publicly report hazing violations.

5.2.3 Example incident & response

Hazing at Texas A&M has not been confined to traditional Greek life. In 2021, two pledges from Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) filed a $1 million lawsuit against the fraternity. They alleged forced strenuous activity, followed by substances including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit being poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The university suspended the fraternity for two years.

More recently, in 2023, a lawsuit highlighted hazing within the prestigious Corps of Cadets. A cadet alleged degrading hazing, including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. He sought over $1 million in damages. Texas A&M stated it handled the matter according to its internal rules, underscoring the complexities of accountability within highly traditional, institutionally integrated groups.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M hazing case might proceed

For Roberts County families, navigating a hazing case in College Station would likely involve the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) for criminal matters, and civil lawsuits would typically proceed in Brazos County courts. The unique presence of the Corps of Cadets can mean that cases involve both established university disciplinary processes and the specific chain of command and traditions within the Corps. Potential defendants could include individual cadets, fraternity members, the local chapter, the national organization, and potentially the university itself, with particular attention to how A&M’s strong institutional oversight and emphasis on tradition interacts with its duty to prevent hazing.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M students & parents should do

For Roberts County families with students at Texas A&M:

  • Understand A&M’s Specific Reporting: Familiarize yourself with how hazing is reported within the Corps of Cadets (if applicable) and through the Office of Student Conduct.
  • Document All Communications: Keep meticulous records of any interactions with university officials, especially if you believe there’s an attempt to downplay or dismiss an incident.
  • Pay Attention to University Culture: Recognize that A&M’s emphasis on tradition can sometimes create unique pressures. Be vigilant if “traditions” seem to compromise safety or dignity.
  • Legal Counsel: Engage an attorney experienced with hazing cases to navigate both Greek life and Corps-related incidents. Our firm understands the intricacies of the Texas A&M environment.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin draws students from across Texas, including many from Roberts County seeking higher education in the state capital.

5.3.1 Campus & culture snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin is the flagship institution of the UT System, known for its vibrant campus life, strong athletics, and robust Greek system. UT’s campus culture is dynamic, blending academic rigor with numerous social and activist groups. A robust Greek system, comprising Panhellenic, Interfraternity Council (IFC), NPHC, and various multicultural Greek organizations, offers diverse opportunities for student involvement.

5.3.2 Hazing policy & reporting

UT Austin’s policies strictly prohibit hazing and adhere to Texas state law (Education Code § 37.151, et seq.). The university emphasizes its “zero tolerance” policy for any acts that endanger student health or safety, whether physical or mental. UT provides clear reporting channels through the Office of the Dean of Students, the Student Conduct and Academic Integrity office, and the UT Police Department (UTPD). Notably, UT Austin often posts a public list of hazing violations and disciplinary actions taken against student organizations, a step toward transparency that many other Texas universities do not emulate.

5.3.3 Example incident & response

UT Austin’s transparency page frequently lists hazing violations. For example, the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) chapter at UT was disciplined in 2023 after new members were reportedly directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. This was deemed hazing, resulting in the chapter being placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education. Other organizations, including traditional spirit groups like the Texas Wranglers, have also faced sanctions for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, blindfolding, degrading new members, and other violations. These repeated entries on UT’s public log, accessible to Roberts County families and indeed anyone, demonstrate that hazing is an ongoing concern despite vigilant efforts.

5.3.4 How a UT hazing case might proceed

Hazing cases at UT Austin would involve investigations by UT Police Department (UTPD) or the Austin Police Department (APD), depending on where an incident occurred. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in state courts within Travis County. A critical aspect of hazing litigation involving UT organizations is the university’s public log of violations. This readily available information can be instrumental in establishing a pattern of misconduct and the university’s knowledge of a chapter’s history, strengthening claims of negligence against the university and national organizations. Knowledge of these records is a distinct advantage for a skilled hazing attorney.

5.3.5 What UT students & parents should do

For Roberts County families with students at UT Austin:

  • Review UT’s Hazing Violations Page: Regularly check the official UT website for updated information on organizations disciplined for hazing. This can provide crucial early warnings.
  • Utilize Official UT Reporting: Use the Dean of Students or Student Conduct forms to report suspected hazing, ensuring an official record is created.
  • Document Everything: Keep detailed records of any incidents, including screenshots of communications from a chapter, and any interactions with university officials.
  • Seek Legal Counsel: An attorney experienced with UT Austin hazing cases can utilize the university’s public records and extensive knowledge of campus culture to build a strong case.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Roberts County families sending students to SMU embrace a different educational and social environment in Dallas.

5.4.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Southern Methodist University (SMU), located in Dallas, is a private institution with a reputation for academic excellence and a prominent Greek life. The campus culture is heavily influenced by its strong Greek system, often characterized by active social calendars and an emphasis on traditional organizational structures. A significant number of students participate in fraternities and sororities, making Greek life a central component of social life at SMU.

5.4.2 Hazing policy & reporting

SMU strictly prohibits hazing, consistent with Texas law. Its policies outline clear definitions of prohibited conduct, including physical abuse, alcohol and drug misuse, forced activities, and mental or emotional harm. SMU encourages reporting through its Office of the Dean of Students, the SMU Police Department, and an anonymous reporting system (such as Real Response) designed to ensure student safety and compliance. As a private institution, SMU’s internal disciplinary processes are often less publicly transparent than those of public universities.

5.4.3 Example incident & response

In 2017, the Kappa Alpha Order chapter at SMU faced significant disciplinary action following allegations of hazing that included verbal abuse, forced alcohol consumption, sleep deprivation, and physical abuse. The chapter was suspended, and severe restrictions were placed on its recruiting activities for several years. This incident, while not resulting in a fatality, underscored the pervasive nature of hazing even within well-established, traditional fraternities at private institutions. Disciplining private university groups requires navigating specific challenges related to internal investigations and less public-facing accountability.

5.4.4 How a SMU hazing case might proceed

For Roberts County families, hazing cases involving SMU would likely involve investigations by the SMU Police Department or the Dallas Police Department (DPD), with civil lawsuits generally filed in Dallas County courts. As a private university, SMU’s records are not subject to public information laws in the same way as public universities. This means that an attorney would need to utilize discovery processes within a civil lawsuit to obtain records of prior incidents, internal communications, and disciplinary actions. The legal strategy would focus on establishing SMU’s negligence, the local chapter’s and national organization’s liability, and the conduct of individual students.

5.4.5 What SMU students & parents should do

For Roberts County families with students at SMU:

  • Understand Private Institution Nuances: Recognize that information on hazing incidents at private schools might be less public. This makes thorough documentation and prompt legal action even more crucial.
  • Utilize Anonymous Reporting: While information may be less public, SMU’s anonymous reporting systems can be a valuable first step for students fearing retaliation.
  • Early Legal Consultation: Due to the less public nature of private university disciplinary actions, early engagement with an experienced hazing attorney is vital to ensure that evidence is preserved and all avenues for discovery are pursued.

5.5 Baylor University

Students from Roberts County who attend Baylor University become part of a distinct community in Waco.

5.5.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, Texas, is known for its strong Christian identity, academic programs, and competitive athletic teams. Greek life is active, alongside numerous faith-based and service organizations. Baylor’s culture places a strong emphasis on community, ethics, and “intentional living,” which makes any hazing incident particularly contradictory to its stated values.

5.5.2 Hazing policy & reporting

Baylor University has a strict anti-hazing policy, emphasizing that hazing violates its Christian mission and state law. The policy defines prohibited acts broadly, covering physical, mental, and emotional harm. Baylor provides reporting channels through its Office of Student Conduct, the Baylor Police Department, and various other university resources designed to support student welfare. The university makes statements about its “zero tolerance” for hazing, but like all institutions, faces ongoing challenges in enforcement.

5.5.3 Example incident & response

Baylor University has, in recent years, faced significant scrutiny over institutional oversight, particularly concerning its football program and Title IX issues (sexual assault scandal). These broader challenges provide important context for how hazing incidents are managed. In 2020, Baylor’s baseball team faced a hazing scandal resulting in the suspension of 14 players. While the details of the hazing were not fully disclosed, the incident highlighted that hazing extends beyond Greek life and into high-profile athletic programs, even at institutions committed to strong ethical guidelines. It reinforces that “zero tolerance” policies require constant vigilance and robust enforcement to be effective.

5.5.4 How a Baylor hazing case might proceed

For Roberts County families, hazing cases involving Baylor would likely involve investigations by the Baylor Police Department or the Waco Police Department (WPD), with civil lawsuits generally filed in McLennan County courts. As a private university, records are not subject to public information laws. Legal strategies would focus on Baylor’s institutional responsibility, particularly in light of its history of scrutiny over student safety and compliance. Proving foreseeability and institutional negligence would be key, often relying on internal records obtained through civil discovery and expert testimony regarding institutional culture.

5.2.5 What Baylor students & parents should do

For Roberts County families with students at Baylor:

  • Be Aware of Institutional History: Baylor’s past challenges regarding student safety should prompt heightened vigilance for any hazing concerns.
  • Document Violations of Stated Values: If hazing contradicts Baylor’s explicit Christian mission or ethical statements, document this discrepancy. Such contradictions can be powerful in legal arguments.
  • Seek Legal Counsel Swiftly: Due to Baylor’s private status and potential for internal resolution that is not fully public, prompt consultation with a hazing attorney is essential to protect your child’s rights and ensure proper investigation.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

On any of these university campuses – from Houston to College Station, Austin, Dallas, or Waco – many of the student organizations students join are chapters of larger national fraternities and sororities. For Roberts County families, it’s critical to understand that a local chapter’s actions are often deeply intertwined with the history and policies of its national organization. The national context can be key to holding both the local chapter and the larger entity accountable.

Why National Histories Matter

Many of the fraternities and sororities with chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor are part of vast national organizations. These national headquarters typically:

  • Possess Extensive Anti-Hazing Policies and Risk Management Manuals: They have these rules because they have faced deaths, severe injuries, and multi-million dollar lawsuits in the past. These policies are often a direct response to prior tragedies.
  • Maintain Knowledge of Hazing Patterns: National organizations are aware of common hazing methods specific to their own fraternities/sororities, such as forced alcohol consumption during “Big/Little” events, physical traditions, or ritualized humiliation, as these actions have occurred in chapters across the country.

When a local Texas chapter repeats a dangerous “tradition” that has already led to injury or death in another state or at another university, this establishes foreseeability. It demonstrates that the national organization had prior knowledge that such hazing could occur within its system and had a duty to effectively prevent it. This prior knowledge can significantly strengthen a civil negligence case or claims for punitive damages against both the local chapter and the national entity.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

While specific chapter rosters can change, many well-known national organizations with significant hazing histories maintain a presence at Texas universities. Here, we outline some prevalent organizations and their known national hazing-related incidents, illustrating the patterns that can appear:

  • Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike):

    • Presence: Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, Baylor.
    • National Hazing History:
      • Stone Foltz (Bowling Green State University, 2021): Died from alcohol poisoning after forced consumption during a “Big/Little” event. Resulted in a $10 million settlement ($7M from national, ~$3M from university) and criminal convictions.
      • David Bogenberger (Northern Illinois University, 2012): Died from alcohol poisoning. Led to a $14 million settlement for the family.
    • Pattern: Repeated involvement in severe alcohol hazing, particularly during “Big/Little” or “pledge” events. National organization has faced multiple large settlements.

  • Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE):

    • Presence: Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU.
    • National Hazing History: SAE has faced numerous hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide over decades.
      • University of Alabama (2023): Pledge alleged traumatic brain injury from hazing. Lawsuit filed.
      • Texas A&M University (2021): Two pledges alleged severe chemical burns from industrial cleaner and other substances poured on them; faced a $1 million lawsuit.
      • University of Texas at Austin (2024): Exchange student alleged assault by members at a party, resulting in severe bone and ligament injuries, leading to a lawsuit seeking over $1 million.
    • Pattern: A long history of alcohol hazing, physical mistreatment, abuse, and often serious injuries across multiple chapters, demonstrating a recurring risk management failure.

  • Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ):

    • Presence: Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, Baylor, SMU.
    • National Hazing History:
      • Max Gruver (Louisiana State University, 2017): Died from alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game. Led to criminal convictions and the Max Gruver Act (felony hazing law).
      • Cornell University (2014): Involved in the death of George Desdunes during a kidnapping and alcohol hazing ritual.
    • Pattern: Repeatedly implicated in severe alcohol hazing and ritualized drinking games.

  • Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ):

    • Presence: Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT.
    • National Hazing History:
      • Andrew Coffey (Florida State University, 2017): Died from alcohol poisoning during “Big Brother Night,” emphasizing severe forced drinking.
    • Pattern: Often involved in forced alcohol consumption during “initiation” periods.

  • Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ):

    • Presence: Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor.
    • National Hazing History:
      • Timothy Piazza (Penn State University, 2017): Died from injuries after extreme drinking and falls, with delayed medical care. Led to significant criminal prosecution and the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law.
    • Pattern: Multiple incidents involving severe alcohol hazing and often a dangerous delay in seeking medical help.

  • Kappa Alpha Order (ΚΑ):

    • Presence: Found at Texas A&M, SMU.
    • National Hazing History: Chapters have faced numerous suspensions and accusations of hazing involving physical mistreatment and alcohol across the country, including the previously mentioned incident at SMU (2017) where members were allegedly paddled, forced to drink, and deprived of sleep.
    • Pattern: A history of physical hazing and alcohol-related violations leading to suspensions.

  • Sigma Chi (ΣΧ):

    • Presence: Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor.
    • National Hazing History:
      • College of Charleston (2024): Pledge alleged physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment. Led to a settlement of more than $10 million in damages.
      • University of Texas at Arlington (2020): Pledge hospitalized with alcohol poisoning from hazing, resulting in a lawsuit and settlement.
    • Pattern: Known for incidents involving severe physical abuse and alcohol hazing, leading to substantial jury awards or settlements.

  • Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ):

    • Presence: Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, Baylor.
    • National Hazing History:
      • Chad Meredith (University of Miami, 2001): Died after being persuaded by fraternity members to swim across a lake while intoxicated. A jury awarded his parents a $12.6 million verdict in a negligence suit, establishing a legal precedent in Florida.
      • Texas A&M University (2023): Ongoing allegations of severe hazing resulting in rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown from extreme physical activity).
    • Pattern: History of both alcohol-related and intensely physical hazing, often pushing pledges to dangerous limits.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

These recurring patterns and national histories are not mere anecdotes; they are critical evidence in a civil lawsuit. For Roberts County families pursuing a hazing claim, an experienced attorney can demonstrate that:

  • Foreseeability: The national fraternity or university had clear notice through prior incidents that a particular type of hazing (e.g., forced alcohol consumption during “Big/Little” night) presented a specific, foreseeable risk.
  • Knowledge and Negligence: The national organization’s (or university’s) repeated failure to adequately enforce policies, investigate incidents, or meaningfully punish prior violations, despite this knowledge, can demonstrate a pattern of negligence or even gross negligence.
  • Institutional Responsibility: These patterns show that hazing is not merely the act of a few “bad apples” but often a systemic issue embedded in organizational culture, pointing to institutional breakdowns in oversight and risk management.

This understanding directly impacts settlement leverage, helps combat insurance coverage disputes, and can influence potential awards of punitive damages against organizations found to be egregiously negligent or reckless.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

For Roberts County families who have had a child injured by hazing, building a strong legal case requires meticulous evidence collection, a clear understanding of potential damages, and a sophisticated strategy. The Manginello Law Firm leverages its deep experience in complex litigation to navigate these challenging cases.

Evidence

Modern hazing cases are often won or lost based on the quality and breadth of the evidence collected. This is why immediate action to preserve information is critical.

  • Digital Communications: In 2025, group chats and direct messages (DMs) are often the most fertile ground for evidence. Platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and even fraternity/sorority-specific apps can contain a treasure trove of information. These messages reveal:

    • Planning of hazing events, including instructions, demands, and attendance requirements.
    • Evidence of coercion, threats, and fear, showing that “consent” was not genuinely given.
    • Photos or videos shared within the group.
    • Coaching on what to say (or not say) to authorities, demonstrating a cover-up.
      Even deleted messages can often be recovered by digital forensics experts working with experienced attorneys, but original screenshots are always preferred.

  • Photos & Videos: Beyond group chat content, any photos or videos filmed by members during hazing events are critical. This includes footage shared privately or publicly on social media (Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok). Security camera footage, such as from Ring doorbells at off-campus houses or surveillance at local venues, can also provide irrefutable proof of activities.

  • Internal Organization Documents: These provide crucial insight into the culture and directives of the organization.

    • Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, or “ritual traditions” lists.
    • Emails or texts from officers outlining expectations for new members.
    • National organization policies and training materials, which can highlight a discrepancy between stated rules and actual practice.

  • University Records: Universities maintain a wealth of potentially relevant documents.

    • Prior conduct files, probation notices, suspensions, and letters of warning against the implicated organization.
    • Incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices regarding previous hazing or related misconduct.
    • Clery reports and other disclosures related to campus crime and safety.
      An experienced attorney can utilize public records laws (for public universities) or civil discovery (for private universities) to uncover these vital documents.

  • Medical and Psychological Records: These quantify the harm suffered.

    • Emergency room reports, ambulance records, and hospitalization notes.
    • Surgery and rehabilitation records.
    • Toxicology reports, especially in alcohol or drug-related incidents.
    • Psychological evaluations that diagnose PTSD, depression, anxiety, or document suicidal ideation directly related to the hazing trauma are crucial for establishing non-economic damages.

  • Witness Testimony: The accounts of individuals present are invaluable. This includes:

    • Other pledges or new members (who may be reluctant but often come forward once legal action is initiated).
    • Older members, roommates, Resident Assistants (RAs), coaches, trainers, or even bystanders.
    • Former members who left the organization due to hazing, as they can provide critical insider perspectives on patterns of behavior.

Damages

The legal system provides avenues for victims and their families to recover compensation for the various harms caused by hazing. These “damages” fall into several categories:

  • Economic Damages: These are quantifiable financial losses.

    • Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers immediate emergency room visits, ambulance transport, hospitalization, medications, and medical equipment. For severe injuries, it can include the projected costs of ongoing physical, occupational, or speech therapy, future surgeries, and psychiatric care for long-term psychological trauma. In catastrophic cases, expert life care planners develop comprehensive plans for 24/7 care over a lifetime.
    • Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This accounts for immediate lost wages (if a student misses work or a parent misses work to care for them). It also includes tuition and fees for missed semesters, lost scholarships, and the financial impact of delayed graduation. If injuries cause permanent disability, economists calculate the diminished future earning capacity over the victim’s lifetime.

  • Non-Economic Damages: These are subjective but legally compensable harms.

    • Physical Pain and Suffering: Compensation for the immediate pain from injuries (e.g., broken bones, burns, internal injuries) and any chronic pain from permanent conditions. It also includes the loss of physical abilities, such as the inability to participate in sports or hobbies.
    • Emotional Distress, Trauma, and Humiliation: This covers the profound psychological impact of hazing, including diagnosed conditions like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety. It also includes the less tangible but deeply felt humiliation, shame, loss of dignity, fear, and even suicidal ideation that can result from abusive experiences.
    • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: This category compensates for the victim’s inability to participate in activities they once loved, withdrawal from social life, damage to relationships, and the overall reduced quality of life.

  • Wrongful Death Damages (for families): When hazing tragically results in a student’s death, surviving family members (parents, children, and a spouse, in Texas) can seek substantial recovery.

    • Economic Losses: This includes funeral and burial costs, and critically, the loss of financial support the deceased would have provided to their family. Economists project this loss over the deceased’s expected lifespan.
    • Non-Economic Losses: This recognizes the profound emotional toll, encompassing the loss of companionship, love, and society, grief, and mental anguish of the family members. It also accounts for the loss of guidance and counsel for younger siblings or future children.

  • Punitive Damages: These are not intended to compensate the victim but to punish defendants for particularly reckless, willful, or malicious conduct and to deter future hazing. In Texas, punitive damages are available but often capped by statute. They are typically awarded when the defendant had prior warnings and ignored them, engaged in particularly cruel conduct, or attempted a cover-up. Our firm strives to prove gross negligence or intentional misconduct to seek these damages, which can be substantial.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Holding multiple parties accountable is a cornerstone of hazing litigation. National fraternities/sororities, universities, and individuals often carry various insurance policies that may apply. However, insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage, arguing that hazing constitutes “intentional conduct” or “criminal acts” which are excluded from their policies.

This is where the expertise of a firm like ours becomes invaluable. We meticulously identify all potential insurance policies—including national organizational policies, local chapter policies, university umbrella policies, and even homeowners’ policies of individual perpetrators. Our strategy focuses on demonstrating that even if the hazing was intentional, the national organization’s or university’s failure to supervise, implement robust risk management, or intervene based on prior warnings was negligent, which can be covered. Lupe Peña, with her background as a former insurance defense attorney, offers an insider’s perspective, allowing us to anticipate and effectively counter common insurance tactics, ultimately working to secure maximum recovery for our clients.

Practical Guides & FAQs

For Roberts County parents and students, navigating the aftermath of a hazing incident can feel overwhelming. We’ve compiled practical advice tailored for different situations, along with answers to common legal questions.

8.1 For Parents: Recognizing & Responding to Hazing

The most powerful tool a parent has is vigilance and informed action.

  • Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert for these subtle (and not-so-subtle) indicators:

    • Physical: Unexplained bruises, burns, cuts or frequent “accidents”; extreme fatigue and sleep deprivation; noticeable weight loss or gain; signs of alcohol or drug misuse.
    • Behavioral/Emotional: Sudden secrecy about Greek life activities (“I can’t talk about it”); withdrawal from social circles or hobbies; dramatic changes in mood (anxiety, depression, irritability); defensiveness when asked about the organization; preoccupation with pleasing older members; using phrases like “just have to get through this.”
    • Academic: Unexplained drop in grades; missed classes; appearing exhausted in class.
    • Digital: Obsessive phone use, especially late at night; anxiety when the phone pings; unexplained deletion of messages or social media content.

  • How to Talk to Your Child: If you suspect hazing, approach the conversation with empathy, not accusation. Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priority, far above any organizational membership. Ask open-ended questions like, “Are you truly enjoying this experience?” or “Is there anything happening that makes you uncomfortable?” Reassure them that you will support them regardless of their decision.

  • If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize medical attention immediately. Then, document everything. Take comprehensive photos of any injuries from multiple angles and over several days to show progression. Save screenshots of any texts, group chats, or social media posts your child shows you. Write down every detail your child shares, including names, dates, times, and locations, while the memory is fresh.

  • Dealing with the University: Keep meticulous records of all communications with university administrators. Ask specific questions about any prior incidents involving the same student organization and what disciplinary actions were taken. Be prepared for universities to, at times, prioritize institutional image, making thorough documentation crucial for your own case.

  • When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or being less than transparent about what happened, contact an attorney immediately. Evidence can disappear quickly, and an experienced lawyer can ensure your child’s rights are protected.

8.2 For Students / Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning

If you are a student in Roberts County attending college in Texas, and you are questioning your new member experience, this section is for you.

  • Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?: Ask yourself: Does this activity make me feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced? Am I forced to drink, endure pain, or perform degrading acts? Would older members or university administrators approve if they knew every detail? If the answer to any of these is yes, it’s likely hazing. The desire for belonging should never come at the cost of your dignity or safety.

  • Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: You might feel pressured to agree to demeaning or dangerous acts to “fit in” or “earn your letters.” However, Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes the immense peer pressure and power imbalances that make true voluntary consent impossible in these situations.

  • Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the absolute right to leave a situation that makes you uncomfortable or unsafe. You can formally de-pledge or resign from any organization at any time. If you fear retaliation, report this fear to the Dean of Students or campus police. Many schools and Texas law offer protections (like good-faith reporter immunity) to students who report hazing or call for medical help, preventing you from facing disciplinary action for being involved in the incident itself.

  • Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: If you or someone else is in a medical emergency due to hazing (e.g., alcohol poisoning), call 911 immediately. Most Texas universities and state law protect individuals who seek medical help in good faith, even if underage drinking was involved. Your priority is saving a life; legal concerns come second.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses: A Path to Accountability

If you were once involved in hazing, or witnessed it, and now grapple with guilt or fear of consequences, know that your choice to come forward can be a critical step toward justice and preventing future harm.

  • Your testimony and evidence can quite literally save lives and hold powerful institutions accountable.
  • While confronting your past actions can be daunting, an attorney can advise you on your rights and potential protections. Cooperating with an investigation, even if you were previously involved, can be an integral part of advocating for victims and fostering meaningful change.
  • Lawyers can help navigate your role as a witness, and in some cases, address potential legal exposure you might face as a former participant.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For families in Roberts County facing a hazing incident, understanding common pitfalls is as crucial as knowing what to do right. These mistakes can fatally undermine a potential lawsuit or criminal investigation. Watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes that can ruin your injury case at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.

MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:

  1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:

    • Why it’s wrong: This looks like a cover-up, can be considered obstruction of justice, and makes building a credible legal case nearly impossible. If defense attorneys suspect spoliation of evidence, it severely damages your credibility.
    • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing digital content. Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs, photos, and videos as soon as possible.

  2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:

    • Why it’s wrong: An immediate confrontation will cause the organization to “lawyer up.” They will destroy evidence, coach witnesses on what to say, and begin preparing their defense, often blaming the victim.
    • What to do instead: Document everything privately first. Then, contact a lawyer before any confrontation. Your attorney can advise on the proper and strategic approach.

  3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms:

    • Why it’s wrong: Universities will often pressure families to sign waivers or accept internal “resolutions” that seem to resolve the issue. However, these documents can waive your child’s right to sue later, and any financial compensation offered is typically far below the actual value of a case.
    • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or any other party without an experienced attorney reviewing it first.

  4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:

    • Why it’s wrong: Anything posted on social media can be collected by defense attorneys. Inconsistencies between public statements and later legal testimony can severely damage credibility. It can also inadvertently waive legal protections like attorney-client privilege.
    • What to do instead: Document privately. Let your legal team control public messaging and strategic releases of information.

  5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting” with the organization:

    • Why it’s wrong: Once you are considering legal action, any request for your child to meet with the organization or its members is likely an attempt to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can later be used against them in a legal context.
    • What to do instead: If you suspect hazing and plan legal action, all communications with the organization should be directed through your attorney.

  6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:

    • Why it’s wrong: University internal processes are distinct from legal proceedings. While universities investigate, crucial evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, (and in some locations) the statute of limitations can expire. The university’s priority may be institutional reputation, not your child’s full legal rights.
    • What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW. Consult a lawyer immediately to understand your legal options parallel to any university process.

  7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:

    • Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters, whether for the fraternity, university, or individuals, are trained to minimize payouts. They will try to get a recorded statement that can be used against you or offer a quick, lowball settlement before you understand the full extent of damages.
    • What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with any insurance adjuster and tell them your attorney will contact them.

8.5 Short FAQ

  • “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
    Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin) often claim sovereign immunity under Texas law, making it harder but not impossible to sue them. Exceptions exist for gross negligence, willful misconduct, and violations of federal laws like Title IX. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case hinges on its specific facts; contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

  • “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
    Yes, it can be. While basic hazing is a Class B misdemeanor, it escalates to a State Jail Felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Additionally, individuals who are aware of hazing and fail to report it can face misdemeanor charges.

  • “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
    Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” given under peer pressure, power imbalance, or fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.

  • “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
    In Texas, the general statute of limitations for personal injury and wrongful death cases is two years from the date of injury or death. However, the “discovery rule” can sometimes extend this period if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. For cases involving severe cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and organizations destroy records. For precise timelines relevant to your situation, call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately.

  • “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
    The location of the hazing does not automatically eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held responsible based on factors like sponsorship, control, knowledge of prior incidents, and foreseeability. Many prominent hazing cases, such as the fatal incident involving Pi Delta Psi at an off-campus retreat in Pennsylvania, or the death at an “unofficial” fraternity house in Ohio, occurred off-campus and still resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments.

  • “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
    We prioritize your family’s privacy. While filing a lawsuit makes it a public record, most hazing cases eventually settle confidentially before going to trial. We work to ensure court records can be sealed and confidential settlement terms are maintained, balancing public accountability with your family’s desire for discretion.

9. About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing incident, especially one involving the powerful institutions of a university or a national fraternity, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand the intricate dynamics of campus culture, how sophisticated organizations fight back, and precisely how to prove negligence and secure accountability.

That’s where The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, stands apart. From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including those from Roberts County and the surrounding areas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects families across our state, and we are prepared to represent you wherever the incident occurred, be it Houston, College Station, Austin, Dallas, or Waco.

Our firm brings a unique blend of experience critical to hazing litigation:

  • Insurance Insider Advantage (Lupe Peña): Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, spent years as a defense lawyer for national insurance companies. This background provides us with unparalleled insight into how fraternity and university insurers value (and, more often, undervalue) hazing claims. We understand their delay tactics, coverage exclusion arguments, and settlement strategies precisely because we used to defend against such claims. We know their playbook because we used to run it, giving you a distinct advantage in negotiations. Learn more about Lupe Peña at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.

  • Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions (Ralph Manginello): Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, has a proven track record of taking on formidable opponents. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the historic BP Texas City explosion litigation, where he fought against a multi-billion-dollar corporation and secured justice for victims. This experience in federal court and complex litigation means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We know how to fight powerful defendants and secure meaningful results. Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.

  • Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We don’t settle cheap. We have extensive experience in wrongful death cases and catastrophic injury claims, where stakes are highest. We collaborate with economists to value the true loss of life and work with life care planners to project the lifetime care needs for victims with brain injuries or permanent disabilities. This expertise ensures that your recovery reflects the full scope of your family’s damages. Explore our wrongful death practice at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.

  • Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph Manginello’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides us with critical insight into how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual understanding allows us to advise not only victims but also witnesses or former members who may face criminal exposure, ensuring a comprehensive legal strategy.

  • Investigative Depth: Winning hazing cases in 2025 demands cutting-edge investigative techniques. We work with a network of experts, including digital forensic specialists, medical professionals, and psychologists. We meticulously obtain hidden evidence, from deleted group chats and social media content to national fraternity records of prior incidents and university files sought through discovery or public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does. Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving critical information.

We understand that a hazing tragedy is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We believe in thorough investigation and real accountability, not just quick settlements. We’ll keep you updated on your case; watch our video on communication: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JrQowOLv1k.

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor—we want to hear from you. Families in Roberts County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward. We offer appointments in person at our Houston, Austin, or Beaumont offices, or virtually, to accommodate families across Texas. Watch our video explaining contingency fees (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc): we don’t get paid unless we win your case.

In your free consultation, you can expect us to:

  • Listen to your story with empathy and without judgment.
  • Review any evidence you have collected (photos, texts, medical records).
  • Explain your legal options, discussing whether a criminal report, civil lawsuit, or both, are appropriate.
  • Discuss realistic timelines and what the legal process might entail.
  • Answer your questions about costs – with our contingency fee basis, you pay nothing upfront.
  • Provide a clear understanding of what happens next, without any pressure to hire us on the spot.

Don’t face this alone. Evidence disappears fast, and universities and organizations work quickly to control the narrative. Protect your child’s future and seek justice.

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Roberts County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com