Guide to Hazing in Texas: Protecting Scurry County Families from Campus Abuse

The phone rings late at night. It’s your child, a freshman at a Texas university, their voice shaking. They’ve just returned from an “initiation event” with their new fraternity or sorority, or perhaps a club on campus. They’re bruised, exhausted, and desperately trying to cover for what happened, muttering phrases like “It’s just tradition, Mom,” or “Everyone does it, Dad.” Yet, the fear in their eyes tells you a different story. They were forced to drink past their limit, endure humiliating acts, or perform physical tasks that left them injured and traumatized. Others at the event were laughing, filming on phones, and chanting. Now, your child feels trapped between a fierce desire to belong to their new group and a sinking dread for what might come next. This isn’t just a hypothetical scenario; it’s a painful reality playing out far too often, including for students from Scurry County and across West Texas who pursue their education at campuses across our state.

This comprehensive guide is designed for families in Scurry County and throughout Texas who are facing the complex and painful reality of hazing. We understand the unique challenges and concerns that arise when your student goes off to college, whether it’s at a major institution like Texas Tech in Lubbock, Abilene Christian University, or any other school where Scurry County residents often send their children. Here, we will demystify:

What hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes to expose its modern forms.
The intricate Texas and federal legal framework governing hazing incidents.
How national hazing cases set precedents that impact Texas universities and families.
Specific insights into hazing patterns and responses at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University, as well as their relevance for students from Scurry County.
The legal options and pathways to accountability available to victims and their families in Scurry County and beyond.

Please remember that this article provides general information and is not a substitute for specific legal advice. Every case is unique, and we encourage you to seek a confidential consultation for your particular situation. The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, is dedicated to serving victims of hazing throughout Texas, including families in Scurry County.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies, prioritizing their safety above all else.
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help—that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.
In the first 48 hours, quick action is crucial:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Injuries, especially those involving alcohol poisoning or trauma, can worsen rapidly.
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted. This includes screenshots of group chats, texts, or direct messages. Photograph any visible injuries from multiple angles and save physical items such as clothing or receipts related to the events.
- Write down everything while your memory is fresh: who was there, what happened, when it occurred, and where.
- Do NOT:
  - Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization’s members directly. This can lead to evidence destruction or witness coaching.
  - Sign anything from the university or insurance company without legal counsel.
  - Post details on public social media, as this can compromise your case.
  - Allow your child to delete messages or attempt to “clean up” any evidence.
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours. Evidence disappears rapidly—group chats are deleted, physical objects are discarded, and witnesses are coached. Universities often move quickly to control the narrative. We can help preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s rights. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Scurry County families, understanding hazing today requires looking beyond the “dumb prank” stereotypes of decades past. Modern hazing is often insidious, digitally driven, and designed to evade detection while inflicting severe physical and psychological harm. It’s not just a rite of passage; it’s abusive and illegal behavior that leaves lasting scars.

At its core, hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured act connected to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status within a group. This behavior endangers the physical or mental health of a student, humiliates them, or exploits them. A critical point to understand is that your child’s “agreement” or “consent” does not automatically make the act safe or legal when significant peer pressure and power imbalances are at play.

Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing manifests in various forms, often escalating in severity:

Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is arguably the most dangerous and prevalent form. Students are often forced or pressured to consume excessive alcohol, participate in chugging challenges, “lineups” where they drink in rapid succession, or games designed for extreme intoxication. They may also be coerced into consuming unknown or mixed substances. Many hazing fatalities across the nation stem from alcohol poisoning.
Physical Hazing: This includes direct physical abuse such as paddling and beatings. It also encompasses extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” (forced strenuous physical activity) that go far beyond healthy conditioning. Sleep deprivation, food or water deprivation, and exposure to extreme environmental conditions like cold or heat are also common tactics aimed at physical exhaustion and disorientation.
Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts are profoundly degrading and can be deeply traumatizing. They include forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (such as “elephant walks” or “roasted pig” positions), wearing humiliating costumes, and acts with racist, sexist, or homophobic overtones, including slurs or role-playing stereotypes.
Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but equally damaging, psychological hazing involves verbal abuse, threats, and deliberate social isolation. It includes manipulation, forced confessions, public shaming through social media or within group meetings, and tactics designed to break down a person’s self-esteem and independence.
Digital/Online Hazing: This is the newer, evolving front of hazing. It leverages technology like GroupMe, WhatsApp, Discord, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok to create continuous pressure. This includes group chat dares, forced “challenges,” public humiliation through posts or comments, and pressure to create or share compromising images or videos. The constant digital barrage can lead to chronic sleep deprivation and severe anxiety.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

The misconception that hazing is limited to “frat boys” is dangerous. While fraternities and sororities (including Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations) are frequently involved, hazing unfortunately permeates many other student groups:

Corps of Cadets / ROTC / military-style groups: These organizations, particularly strong at institutions like Texas A&M, often have long-standing, tradition-heavy environments where “initiation” can cross the line into hazing.
Spirit squads and tradition clubs: Groups like the Texas Cowboys at UT Austin, cheerleading squads, and other spirit organizations can be susceptible.
Athletic teams: Hazing occurs across all levels of collegiate sports, including football, basketball, baseball, track and field, and cheerleading.
Marching bands and performing arts groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups can have problematic initiation rituals.
Some service, cultural, and academic organizations: Any group where there’s a strong desire to belong, combined with a power imbalance, can develop hazing practices.

The unfortunate truth is that a powerful combination of social status, reverence for “tradition,” and a fierce culture of secrecy allows these practices to persist, even when everyone involved knows hazing is strictly illegal and dangerous. For Scurry County students who travel across the state to join these groups, the pressure to conform can be immense.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas is crucial for Scurry County families seeking justice and accountability. While complex, the law provides clear pathways for holding individuals and institutions responsible.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has robust anti-hazing provisions outlined in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. Simply put, under Texas law, hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by one person or with others, on or off campus, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition is critical because:

Location is irrelevant: Hazing can happen on campus, at an off-campus house, or during a retreat in a remote location.
Harm can be mental or physical: The law recognizes that emotional and psychological trauma is as damaging as physical injury.
Intent is broad: You don’t have to prove malicious intent; “reckless” behavior—meaning the individual knew or should have known of the risk and disregarded it—is enough.
“Consent” is not a defense: Even if a student appears to “agree” to participate, Texas law (Education Code § 37.155) explicitly states that consent is not a defense if the act meets the definition of hazing. This accounts for the overwhelming peer pressure and power dynamics involved in initiation rituals.

Criminal Penalties for Hazing:

The severity of criminal penalties in Texas depends on the harm caused:

Class B Misdemeanor: This is the default charge for hazing that doesn’t result in serious injury. Penalties can include up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes an injury requiring medical treatment.
State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This carries much more severe penalties, including potential state jail time.

Additionally, key provisions hold individuals and organizations accountable:

Failure to report: An individual who is aware of hazing and fails to report it can face misdemeanor charges.
Retaliation: Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

Organizational Liability:

Texas law extends liability to organizations themselves. Organizations (such as fraternities, sororities, clubs, or teams) can be criminally fined up to $10,000 per violation if they:

Authorized or encouraged the hazing, OR
An officer or member acting in their official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it.

Beyond criminal fines, universities often revoke recognition and ban organizations from campus. This means that both individuals and the organizations they belong to can face legal consequences, a crucial point for Scurry County families seeking comprehensive justice.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s important for Scurry County families to understand the distinction between criminal and civil legal actions concerning hazing:

Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (Texas prosecutors or district attorneys) and aim primarily for punishment of the perpetrator(s) through jail time, fines, or probation. Common hazing-related criminal charges can range from hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, and assault to, in the most tragic cases, manslaughter.
Civil Cases: These are brought by victims or their surviving families. The primary goal is monetary compensation for damages suffered and holding responsible parties accountable. Civil claims often focus on negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and emotional distress.

A critical point: these two types of cases can proceed simultaneously. A criminal conviction is not required to pursue a successful civil claim for damages.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal provisions also impact hazing accountability:

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This federal law significantly increases transparency and prevention efforts at colleges and universities receiving federal funding. Institutions are now required to report hazing incidents more transparently, strengthen their hazing education and prevention programs, and maintain public data on hazing (with data collection and reporting to be fully phased in by around 2026). This act empowers students, parents, and advocates with more information than ever before.
Title IX: If hazing involves elements of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based discrimination or hostile environment, Title IX obligations—which prohibit sex-based discrimination in federally funded education programs—are triggered. This can compel universities to investigate and take action.
Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents that involve assault, hate crimes, or alcohol/drug violations can fall under Clery reporting requirements, providing another layer of institutional accountability and data for concerned Scurry County families.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Determining who can be held responsible in a civil hazing lawsuit is critical for ensuring comprehensive accountability. Multiple parties may bear legal liability:

Individual Students: Those who actively planned, encouraged, supplied alcohol, carried out the hazing acts, or participated in cover-ups can face direct legal claims.
Local Chapter/Organization: The fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, as a legal entity, can be sued. This often involves individuals acting as officers, “pledge educators,” or those in leadership roles who directly oversaw or facilitated the hazing.
National Fraternity/Sorority Organization: The national headquarters, which sets policies, collects dues, and supervises local chapters, can be held liable. Liability often hinges on whether the national organization knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing at the local or other chapters and failed to intervene effectively.
University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself (public or private) can face lawsuits under theories of negligence, gross negligence, or sometimes civil rights violations (e.g., Title IX). Key questions include whether the university had prior warnings, adequately enforced its policies, or demonstrated deliberate indifference to known risks.
Third Parties: Other entities can also be responsible, such as:
- Landlords/Property Owners: If hazing occurred at a rented house or off-campus venue, the property owner could be liable if they knew or should have known about dangerous activities.
- Bars or Alcohol Providers: Under “dram shop” laws in Texas, establishments that serve alcohol to noticeably intoxicated individuals who then cause harm can be held liable.
- Security Companies or Event Organizers: If an event was professionally organized, these entities might bear responsibility for safety failures.

It’s crucial to understand that every case is fact-specific, and not every party will be liable in every situation. Identifying all potential defendants requires detailed investigation and a thorough understanding of the applicable laws.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

When a Scurry County family is grappling with a hazing incident, it can feel incredibly isolating. However, lessons from national cases illustrate powerful patterns, demonstrate judicial willingness to hold institutions accountable, and highlight the steep price of negligence. These cases, although often occurring outside of Texas, set crucial precedents shaping hazing litigation across the country.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced alcohol consumption has tragically become the most common and deadly form of hazing. Repeatedly, “initiation” or “big/little reveal” events turn fatal due to extreme intoxication and a culture of delayed medical care.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a “bid acceptance” event involving excessive drinking. Security cameras captured him falling repeatedly, sustaining traumatic brain injuries, while fraternity brothers delayed seeking medical help for hours. This deeply disturbing evidence led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, comprehensive civil litigation, and the landmark Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, which significantly strengthened the state’s anti-hazing statutes. This case remains a stark example of how extreme intoxication, deliberate delay in calling 911, and a pervasive culture of silence can lead to devastating legal consequences for all involved.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew, a 20-year-old FSU pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and forced to consume them rapidly. In the wake of his death, criminal hazing charges were brought against multiple fraternity members, and Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life, implementing sweeping policy changes. Coffey’s case underscores how formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a recurring script for disaster, signaling a foreseeable risk to universities and national organizations.
Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max, an 18-year-old freshman, died with a blood alcohol level of 0.495% after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where wrong answers meant forced consumption. His death led to the enactment of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, a felony hazing statute with strict penalties. This legislative change, often spurred by public outrage and clear proof of hazing, demonstrates how tragedies can drive legal reforms nationwide.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone, a 20-year-old pledge, was forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” night and died from alcohol poisoning. The incident resulted in multiple criminal convictions for fraternity members. In the civil sphere, Stone’s family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with approximately $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This case highlights that universities, a critical point for Scurry County families, can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside the fraternities themselves.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and ritualistic hazing, designed to inflict pain or severe psychological distress, continues to be a pattern leading to catastrophic outcomes.

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael, a pledge, died from a traumatic brain injury during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania. He was blindfolded, forced to wear a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled during a ritual known as the “glass ceiling.” The delay in calling 911 proved fatal. This case was particularly significant because the national fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and subsequently banned from Pennsylvania for a decade. It demonstrates that off-campus “retreats” are not immune from accountability and that national organizations are liable for the actions of their chapters.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not confined to Greek life; it sadly impacts other student organizations, including high-profile athletic programs.

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): Multiple former football players came forward alleging widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the university’s football program. These claims led to numerous lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff, the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald (who later confidentially settled a wrongful-termination suit with the university). This scandal underscored that hazing extends beyond Greek organizations, impacting major athletic programs with significant institutional oversight failures. It serves as a reminder to Scurry County families that no student group is inherently immune from these issues.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national anchor stories, and countless others like them, reveal common threads: forced drinking, extreme humiliation, physical violence, deliberate delays in calling for medical help, and pervasive cover-up attempts. While tragic, these cases also demonstrate that families seeking justice can achieve significant accountability. Multi-million-dollar settlements, legislative reforms, and institutional overhauls often follow only after tragedy and determined litigation. For Scurry County families facing hazing at university campuses like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, these national lessons provide a valuable framework for understanding the potential legal avenues and what to expect in their pursuit of justice.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Scurry County families, the choice of university is a significant decision. Texas is home to some of the nation’s largest and most respected institutions, but no campus is entirely immune from the pervasive issue of hazing. Students from Scurry County attend schools across the state, and understanding how hazing manifests and is addressed at these major universities is crucial. While our primary office is in Houston, we serve families from Scurry County and across Texas, and we are well-versed in the specific cultures and policies of these institutions.

Given Scurry County’s location in West Texas, many families in our area send their children to universities closer to home, though the allure of larger institutions statewide remains strong. We’ll start our specific focus on Texas A&M University, which has a distinct culture often drawing students from across the state’s rural and agricultural communities, including Scurry County.

5.1 Texas A&M University

5.1.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Texas A&M in College Station boasts a proud, tradition-rich culture, known for its strong Aggie Spirit, the Corps of Cadets, and a large, active Greek life system. Many students from Scurry County and other parts of West Texas feel a strong connection to A&M’s values and community. The campus environment, particularly within the Corps, emphasizes discipline and hierarchical structures. Its proximity to Scurry County makes it a significant draw for local students.

5.1.2 Official hazing policy & reporting channels

Texas A&M’s Student Code of Conduct strictly prohibits hazing, both on and off campus. The university defines hazing broadly to include any act that endangers mental or physical health or safety for initiation or affiliation with a student organization. Reporting channels include the Office of Student Conduct, the Dean of Students, and the University Police Department (UPD). Texas A&M actively encourages anonymous reporting through a dedicated hotline and online forms.

5.1.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

Texas A&M has faced significant hazing challenges, particularly within its Greek life and Corps of Cadets:

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Lawsuit (around 2021): This highly publicized civil case involved allegations from two pledges that they were subjected to extreme physical hazing, including being covered with industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit. This resulted in severe chemical burns requiring emergency skin graft surgeries. The national fraternity chapter was suspended for two years by the university, and the hazing was tied directly to a $1 million lawsuit filed by the affected pledges. This case highlights the dangerous escalation of physical hazing and the significant financial liability.
Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): A former Air Force ROTC cadet from the Corps alleged degrading and sexualized hazing, including being forced into a “roasted pig” pose (bound between beds with an apple in his mouth) and explicit taunts. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages. While A&M stated it handled the matter internally, this case brought national attention to hazing risks within military-style organizations and their “traditions.”

These incidents demonstrate an ongoing struggle for A&M to balance its cherished traditions with strong anti-hazing enforcement.

5.1.4 How a Texas A&M hazing case might proceed

A hazing case originating at Texas A&M would likely involve Brazos County law enforcement (College Station Police Department or Brazos County Sheriff’s Office) and/or the Texas A&M UPD. Civil suits would typically be filed in state district courts within Brazos County, or federal court if applicable. For Scurry County residents, the logistics of pursuing such a case would involve coordinating with legal counsel experienced in Brazos County courts, but our firm is equipped to handle cases across Texas. Potential defendants include individual students, the local chapter, national headquarters, and possibly the university and property owners.

5.1.5 What Texas A&M students & parents should do

For students and parents in Scurry County with connections to Texas A&M:

Utilize A&M’s reporting channels: Report concerns immediately to the Office of Student Conduct or UPD.
Document Everything: Keep a meticulous record of any hazing incidents, including screenshots of communications from GroupMe or other platforms, photos of injuries, and detailed notes. Our firm’s video “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) provides valuable guidance.
Be aware of Corps culture: Understand that “tradition” is sometimes used to normalize harmful practices. Differentiate between camaraderie and abuse.
Engage legal counsel early: A lawyer experienced in Texas A&M hazing cases can help navigate the university’s internal processes, which may prioritize institutional reputation, while also building a strong civil case.
Know your rights: Remember Texas law protects victims, and “consent” is not a defense to hazing.

5.2 University of Houston (UH)

5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot

The University of Houston, located in the heart of our firm’s home city, is a large, diverse urban campus with a vibrant mix of commuter and residential students. UH prides itself on its energetic Greek life and a wide array of student organizations, including multicultural groups and sports clubs. Many Scurry County alumni, particularly those working in energy, healthcare, or technology, hold careers in Houston, and their children may also consider attending UH.

5.2.2 Official hazing policy & reporting channels

UH strictly prohibits hazing both on and off campus, as detailed in its Student Code of Conduct. The policy explicitly bans forced alcohol consumption, physical mistreatment, sleep deprivation, and any act causing mental distress related to initiation or affiliation. UH provides clear reporting avenues through its Dean of Students office, Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD), and maintains a hazing statement with some disciplinary information on its website.

5.2.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

UH has dealt with its share of hazing incidents, illustrating the real-world impact of these abuses:

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) Case (2016): Pledges of the UH chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha allegedly faced severe deprivation of food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. A particularly egregious incident involved one student suffering a lacerated spleen after reportedly being slammed onto a table or similar hard surface. This led to misdemeanor hazing charges against individuals and a significant suspension for the chapter, underscoring UH’s commitment to taking action against severe violations.
Recent Disciplinary Actions: UH’s public records also show other disciplinary actions against fraternities and sororities for behaviors “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including various forms of alcohol misuse and policy violations that resulted in suspensions or probation. While detailed incident reports are not always publicly disseminated, the disciplinary actions themselves offer a glimpse into ongoing campus issues.

These cases highlight UH’s active stance in suspending and sanctioning chapters, though the full scope of internal findings is often less public than at other institutions.

5.2.4 How a UH hazing case might proceed

In a UH hazing incident, jurisdiction could involve UHPD for on-campus incidents, and/or the Houston Police Department (HPD) for off-campus events in the city. Civil lawsuits would be filed in local state district courts within Harris County, or potentially federal court. Our firm, situated right here in Houston, has extensive experience navigating the legal landscape and court systems of Harris County. Potential defendants would include individual perpetrators, the local chapter, the national organization, and potentially the university itself and any property owners involved.

5.2.5 What UH students & parents should do

For Scurry County families with students at UH or considering attendance:

Report promptly: Use UH’s dedicated reporting channels through the Dean of Students office, UHPD, or online forms, remembering that anonymity options exist.
Document thoroughly: Preserve all digital communications and physical evidence immediately.
Understand UH’s policy: Familiarize yourself with the university’s Student Code of Conduct regarding hazing.
Consult Houston-based legal experts: A lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can help families navigate UH’s specific response, uncover prior disciplinary actions, and build a strong civil case.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

5.3.1 Campus & culture snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin is the flagship institution of the UT System, known for its vibrant campus life, prestigious academics, and dynamic Greek organizations. Numerous Scurry County students attend UT, drawn by its academic reputation and diverse opportunities. UT’s campus culture is highly visible, with traditions and organizations that become powerful forces in student life.

5.3.2 Official hazing policy & reporting channels

UT Austin maintains a rigorous anti-hazing policy, clearly outlined in its institutional rules. The university defines hazing in alignment with Texas Education Code and strictly prohibits any acts, on or off campus, that endanger mental or physical health for membership in an organization. UT is notably transparent, publishing a Hazing Violations page on its website (hazing.utexas.edu) that lists organizations, dates of incidents, a summary of conduct, and disciplinary sanctions. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students, Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, UTPD, and a dedicated online reporting form.

5.3.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

UT’s public Hazing Violations page offers open documentation of ongoing issues:

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) (2023): This chapter was found responsible for hazing violations where new members were directed to consume excessive amounts of milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. The chapter was placed on probation, required to suspend new member activities, and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education programs. This incident, like the BGSU Foltz case, involved the Pi Kappa Alpha national organization, highlighting a pattern.
Other Organizations: UT’s public list frequently includes various fraternities, sororities, and other student groups (such as the Texas Wranglers, spirit organizations, and even some academic clubs) sanctioned for a range of hazing behaviors, including forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, and punishment-based practices.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Assault (January 2024): This case involved an Australian exchange student who alleged severe assault by fraternity members at a party, resulting in a dislocated leg, torn ligaments, a fractured tibia, and a broken nose. A lawsuit seeking over $1 million was filed against the SAE chapter, which was already under suspension for prior hazing and safety violations.

UT’s commitment to publicizing violations provides a crucial tool for Scurry County parents and students to research organizations and to build legal cases by demonstrating patterns of misconduct and institutional knowledge.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin hazing case might proceed

Hazing incidents at UT Austin would involve the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD) for campus-related matters, or the Austin Police Department for off-campus incidents within the city. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in state district courts in Travis County or federal court. Our firm has experience with litigation in Austin, and our statewide reach ensures that Scurry County families can receive expert legal guidance regardless of the university’s location. The existence of UT’s public hazing log can be a powerful piece of evidence, demonstrating prior notice and a pattern of behavior that can strengthen civil claims.

5.3.5 What UT Austin students & parents should do

For Scurry County families connected to UT Austin:

Review the Hazing Violations page: Before joining any organization, refer to hazing.utexas.edu to check an organization’s history.
Report all incidents: Use UT’s transparent reporting channels, knowing that the university publishes these records.
Document thoroughly: Screenshot all digital communications, photograph injuries, and keep detailed notes to support reporting and potential legal action.
Consult legal counsel: An attorney with experience in UT Austin hazing cases can help leverage the university’s public records and navigate the complexities of suing a public institution (given potential sovereign immunity issues, though exceptions exist).

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

5.4.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Southern Methodist University, in Dallas, is a private university renowned for its strong academic programs and affluent student body. Greek life plays a prominent role in SMU’s social scene, attracting many students from families who prioritize networking and tradition. Its location within the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex means students from Scurry County (approximately 3 hours away) often consider SMU due to family ties or specific academic interests in North Texas.

5.4.2 Official hazing policy & reporting channels

SMU strictly prohibits hazing and has clear policies in its Student Code of Conduct addressing physically and psychologically abusive behavior related to student organizations. As a private institution, SMU maintains its own internal disciplinary processes. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and confidential reporting options like its “Real Response” tool and online reporting forms.

5.4.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

SMU has had its share of hazing incidents, indicating that even private institutions with robust internal systems face ongoing challenges:

Kappa Alpha Order Incident (2017): This case involved allegations that new members of the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity were subjected to paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and severe sleep deprivation. The chapter faced a multi-year suspension, significantly restricting its activities and new member recruitment until around 2021. This demonstrates SMU’s capacity to levy serious institutional penalties.
Ongoing Monitoring: SMU actively monitors its Greek organizations and other student groups, with incidents of alcohol misuse and harassment frequently leading to investigations and sanctions, though the level of public detail on these incidents may vary compared to public universities like UT Austin.

While private universities may have different levels of public transparency for disciplinary actions, that does not mean hazing incidents are less severe or less frequent.

5.4.4 How an SMU hazing case might proceed

A hazing case at SMU would involve the Dallas Police Department for criminal matters. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in state district courts in Dallas County or occasionally in federal court, depending on the legal theories. Being a private university, SMU generally does not have the same sovereign immunity protections as public institutions, potentially simplifying some aspects of litigation against the school itself. Our firm is well-equipped to navigate the complexities of litigation in Dallas and surrounding North Texas counties.

5.4.5 What SMU students & parents should do

For Scurry County families with students at SMU:

Understand SMU’s internal reporting: Familiarize yourself with SMU’s private reporting mechanisms, including “Real Response,” and utilize them aggressively.
Document everything: As with all hazing cases, detailed documentation (screenshots, photos, notes) is paramount before it disappears.
Don’t rely solely on internal processes: While SMU investigates, its internal findings may not be publicly accessible, and a private resolution may not fully address the damages or systemic issues.
Seek legal counsel: A lawyer experienced in SMU hazing cases can help compel discovery even when incident reports aren’t publicly posted, and effectively pursue claims against private institutions and their affiliated national organizations.

5.5 Baylor University

5.5.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Baylor University, a private Christian university in Waco, holds a unique position among Texas institutions. Its strong religious affiliation and commitment to faith-based education attract many students from Scurry County seeking a values-aligned campus. Baylor has a significant Greek life presence and robust athletic programs, both of which contribute to its campus culture, but also create potential environments for hazing.

5.5.2 Official hazing policy & reporting channels

Baylor stringently prohibits hazing, articulating its zero-tolerance policy in the university’s Student Policies and Procedures. It defines hazing broadly to include any physical, mental, or emotional harm related to joining or maintaining membership in an organization. Baylor encourages reporting through its Title IX Office, Dean of Students, Baylor Police Department (BUPD), and an ethics point hotline, emphasizing its commitment to student safety.

5.5.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

Baylor has faced considerable university-wide scrutiny, particularly in the realm of athletic misconduct and Title IX violations, which can sometimes provide context for hazing patterns:

Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): An internal investigation uncovered hazing within the Baylor baseball program, leading to the suspension of 14 players. These suspensions were staggered over the early season to mitigate impact, indicating the university’s efforts to address the issue while managing athletic interests.
Broader Oversight Challenges: Baylor’s history of high-profile scandals, particularly concerning its football program and Title IX enforcement, highlight broader institutional oversight challenges that can create an environment where hazing and other forms of abuse are underreported or mishandled. Official statements of “zero tolerance” must always be weighed against actual recurring misconduct.

These incidents demonstrate the ongoing tension between a desire for ethical conduct and the realities of student culture, even at faith-based institutions.

5.5.4 How a Baylor hazing case might proceed

Criminal hazing incidents at Baylor would involve the Baylor Police Department (BUPD) or the Waco Police Department. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in state district courts within McLennan County or potentially federal court. Our firm has the experience and statewide presence to represent Scurry County families in Waco’s legal system. The interplay of Baylor’s private university status, its religious branding, and its history of high-profile abuse claims means that litigation against the university and its affiliated organizations can be particularly nuanced.

5.5.5 What Baylor students & parents should do

For Scurry County families considering or connected to Baylor:

Understand Baylor’s context: Be aware of Baylor’s prior institutional challenges and how they might influence responses to misconduct.
Use reporting mechanisms: Familiarize yourself with Baylor’s ethics point hotline and reporting channels, which are designed to protect students.
Document meticulously: As with any hazing incident, concrete evidence (screenshots, medical records, detailed notes) is vital.
Consult legal counsel: An attorney experienced in Baylor hazing cases can help navigate the specific institutional dynamics at play, including the university’s internal processes, and effectively pursue civil claims against a private institution.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For Scurry County families, understanding the complex world of fraternities and sororities goes beyond their local chapters. Many of these organizations at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor are part of vast national networks, and their history of hazing incidents across the country is a critical factor in understanding liability and seeking justice.

Why National Histories Matter

The national headquarters of fraternities and sororities often possess extensive anti-hazing manuals and sophisticated risk management policies. These exist not merely as formalities, but precisely because they have witnessed repeated deaths, catastrophic injuries, and multi-million-dollar lawsuits tied to hazing across their chapters nationwide. National organizations are well aware of the dangerous patterns: the forced drinking events, the paddling traditions, the humiliating rituals, and the culture of silence that enables them.

When a local chapter at a Texas university—whether it’s Pi Kappa Alpha at UT, Sigma Alpha Epsilon at Texas A&M, or Phi Delta Theta at Baylor—repeats the same hazing script that led to another chapter being suspended or sued in a different state, this establishes foreseeability. Such a pattern often forms strong grounds for arguments of negligence or even gross negligence against the national entity, as it demonstrates a failure to take sufficient action despite repeated warnings.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

Below we examine some of the national fraternities and sororities commonly found at our major Texas universities and their documented national hazing patterns. This is not an exhaustive list, but it highlights recurring issues relevant to Scurry County families.

Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and UT. Nationally, Pi Kappa Alpha has been involved in several high-profile hazing cases, most notably the Stone Foltz death at Bowling Green State University in 2021, which resulted in a $10 million settlement for the family. The Foltz case involved forced alcohol consumption during a “Big/Little Reveal” night, a ritualistic form of hazing that has appeared in other Pi Kappa Alpha incidents, including the 2012 death of David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University, which resulted in a $14 million settlement. These repeated patterns of alcohol-related hazing, particularly during “Big/Little” events, are critical for demonstrating national foreseeability to Texas chapters.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and UT, SAE has a history of hazing incidents nationwide, leading to significant reforms including a ban on pledgeship at one point. Texas A&M itself saw a 2021 civil suit where two pledges alleged severe chemical burns from substances poured on them during hazing, resulting in a $1 million lawsuit and chapter suspension. More recently, allegations of assault and severe injury at the University of Texas at Austin chapter in January 2024 and a traumatic brain injury lawsuit against an SAE chapter at the University of Alabama (2023) highlight continued concerns about physical hazing and serious bodily harm within the organization.
Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): Chapters are active at UH, Texas A&M, and Baylor. The fraternity is nationally linked to the tragic death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017. Gruver died from extreme alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game, leading to criminal convictions and the Max Gruver Act (felony hazing) in Louisiana. This incident firmly places national Phi Delta Theta on record for dangerous alcohol-related hazing.
Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Present at UH, Texas A&M, and UT. Pi Kappa Phi unfortunately bears responsibility for the 2017 death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University, also from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” involving forced liquor consumption. This national pattern contributes to the argument that such incidents are foreseeable within the organization.
Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and Baylor, Beta Theta Pi is tied to the notorious Timothy Piazza death at Penn State University in 2017. Piazza died from traumatic brain injuries after hours of extreme alcohol consumption and delayed medical care during a “bid acceptance” event. This case led to over 1,000 criminal charges against members, significant civil litigation, and the powerful anti-hazing law in Pennsylvania, marking a national precedent for institutional liability.
Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): Chapters are found at UH, Texas A&M, and Baylor. This organization has a history of severe incidents, including the 2001 death of Chad Meredith at the University of Miami, where a pledge drowned after being coerced into swimming while intoxicated, resulting in a $12.6 million jury verdict against the fraternity and a Florida law named in his honor. More recently, allegations at Texas A&M (2023) of hazing causing severe rhabdomyolysis (extreme muscle breakdown from forced physical activity) demonstrate ongoing concerns with physical hazing.
Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, and Baylor. Sigma Chi was involved in a recent 2024 case at the College of Charleston where a family received more than $10 million in damages for a pledge who alleged physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment. This significant settlement showcases what juries will award for severe hazing.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

These recurring patterns across states and campuses are crucial for legal strategy. They help demonstrate that certain organizations have received repeated warnings about specific hazing behaviors, yet often fail to take adequate preventative measures. In a civil lawsuit, our firm works to show:

Whether national organizations meaningfully enforced their anti-hazing policies, or if these were merely “paper policies.”
Whether they responded to prior incidents aggressively enough to deter future misconduct.
The extent to which chapter leadership was trained, funded, and supervised by the national entity.

Such evidence can significantly impact settlement leverage, influence insurance coverage disputes (showing that hazing was a foreseeable, not “rogue,” act), and strengthen arguments for punitive damages against national organizations for their deliberate indifference to known risks. For Scurry County families, linking local incidents to national patterns is often key to achieving comprehensive justice.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Successfully pursuing a hazing lawsuit requires meticulous investigation, a deep understanding of unique evidence, and a strategic legal approach. For Scurry County families, initiating this process immediately is paramount, as evidence can disappear rapidly. The Manginello Law Firm employs a sophisticated and aggressive strategy to build compelling hazing cases.

Evidence

In hazing cases, particularly those involving students in Scurry County and across Texas, critical evidence can exist in many forms, some of which are unique to the digital age:

Digital Communications: These are often the most crucial pieces of evidence in modern hazing cases. This includes messages from platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and fraternity/sorority-specific apps, as well as communications from Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, and TikTok comments. These messages can reveal planning, peer pressure, instructions, threats, details of events, and even cover-up attempts. Learning how to properly screenshot and preserve full threads with timestamps is vital. Our firm’s video “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) provides essential guidance on safeguarding this evidence.
Photos & Videos: Content filmed by members during events—even if seemingly “harmless” or captioned ironically—can reveal hazing in action. This includes footage shared in group chats, posted on social media, or even “disappearing” snaps. We also look for security camera footage or doorbell camera recordings from houses and venues where incidents occurred. Photos of injuries, humiliating acts, or forced drinking are incredibly powerful.
Internal Organization Documents: These can provide insights into an organization’s protocols, or lack thereof. We seek pledge manuals, initiation scripts, lists of “traditions,” and emails or texts from officers discussing new member activities. Also critical are the national anti-hazing policies and training materials, which can expose discrepancies between stated rules and actual behavior.
University Records: Through discovery and open records requests (for public universities like UH, A&M, UT), we can obtain critical internal university documents. This includes prior conduct files related to the organization or individuals, probation/suspension records, letters of warning, incident reports submitted to campus police or student conduct offices, and Clery reports that detail campus crime statistics. These records establish a pattern of misconduct and the university’s knowledge.
Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical documentation is essential. This includes emergency room records, hospitalization notes, surgical and rehabilitation reports, and toxicology results (for alcohol/drug poisoning). Equally important are psychological evaluations that document conditions like PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation resulting from the trauma. These records quantify the physical and emotional harm suffered.
Witness Testimony: The accounts of other pledges, active members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, and even bystanders can be invaluable. Former members who quit or were expelled, often feeling guilt or a desire to right wrongs, can be particularly powerful witnesses. Identifying and securing the testimony of these individuals is a core part of our investigative process.

Damages

When hazing results in injury or death for students from Scurry County and across Texas, victims and their families can pursue various categories of damages aimed at compensating for their losses and holding responsible parties accountable:

Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs of treatment, from immediate emergency room visits and ambulance transport to surgeries, extended hospital stays (including ICU), medications, and ongoing physical therapy. For catastrophic injuries like traumatic brain injury or organ damage, this can also include the cost of life care plans, which estimate continuous medical and personal care for the victim’s lifetime.
Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes compensation for any missed income if the student or a parent (who had to care for the student) was unable to work. Crucially, it also accounts for the lost value of their education, such as missed semesters, tuition expenses, lost scholarships, and any setbacks in their academic and career progression. If injuries are permanent, it can include the diminished future earning capacity over their expected working life.
Non-Economic Damages: These address the more subjective, yet deeply impactful, aspects of suffering:
- Physical Pain and Suffering: Compensation for the actual physical pain from injuries, both immediate and long-term.
- Emotional Distress, Trauma, and Humiliation: This covers psychological harm like PTSD, severe anxiety, depression, a sense of betrayal, and the profound humiliation suffered.
- Loss of Enjoyment of Life: This addresses the inability to participate in activities, hobbies, social life, and typical college experiences the victim once enjoyed.
Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): If hazing leads to a student’s death, surviving family members (parents, children, and sometimes siblings) can seek significant damages, including:
- Funeral and Burial Costs: Direct expenses related to the student’s passing.
- Loss of Companionship, Society, and Support: Compensation for the profound emotional loss of their loved one’s presence, guidance, and expected contributions.
- Emotional Harm: For the grief and suffering experienced by parents and siblings.

It is important to remember that we are describing types of damages, not promising specific dollar amounts. Every case’s value is unique and depends heavily on the specific facts and prevailing legal standards.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

A key challenge in hazing litigation is navigating the multiple layers of potential defendants and their associated insurance policies. National fraternities and universities often carry substantial insurance, but their insurers are highly motivated to deny coverage. They frequently argue that:

Hazing, often classified as an “intentional act” or “criminal conduct,” is excluded from coverage under their policies.
The policy in question doesn’t cover certain specific defendants (e.g., individuals versus the organization).

This is where the expertise of an experienced hazing attorney, like those at The Manginello Law Firm, becomes critical. Our team, benefiting from Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney, knows exactly how these insurers operate. We navigate these disputes by:

Identifying all potential insurance policies—local chapter policies, national organization policies, university umbrella policies, and even individual homeowner’s policies—to maximize sources of recovery.
Arguing that even if hazing was intentional, the national or university’s failure to supervise or prevent the hazing was a negligent act, which can be covered by insurance.
Aggressively challenging any wrongful denial of coverage and, if necessary, pursuing bad faith claims against insurers who fail in their duty.

This complex interplay of multiple defendants and intricate insurance coverage means that a hazing lawsuit is far more complicated than a typical personal injury case. It requires attorneys who understand not only the legal issues but also the nuanced playbook of institutional defense.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing strikes, families in Scurry County often feel overwhelmed and unsure of the next steps. This section provides actionable advice for key stakeholders.

For Parents

For parents watching their child embark on college life, recognizing the subtle (and not-so-subtle) signs of hazing is key.

Warning Signs of Hazing: Look for unexplained bruises, burns, cuts, or repeated “accidents” with weak explanations. Observe sudden, extreme exhaustion or sleep deprivation. Note drastic changes in their mood, increased anxiety, social withdrawal, or secrecy about their organization’s activities. A child constantly on their phone for group chats, fear of missing “mandatory” events, or an abrupt decline in academic performance are also major red flags.
How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation calmly and empathetically. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with your new group?” or “Is there anything about it that makes you uncomfortable?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your highest priority, far outweighing membership in any group. Assure them that you will support them without judgment.
If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize medical care immediately. Document everything meticulously: take clear, dated photos of injuries (and continue to do so as they heal), screenshot any relevant texts or social media posts your child shares, and write down every detail they tell you about who, what, when, and where.
Dealing with the University: Document all communications with university administrators (emails, calls, meeting notes). Don’t be afraid to ask direct questions about prior incidents involving the same organization and what measures the school has taken in response. Remember, universities, particularly public ones, have internal processes that may not align with your child’s best interest.
When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or the organization is minimizing, hiding, or stonewalling about what happened, it is crucial to consult with an experienced hazing attorney. The initial consultation is often free and confidential, providing you with clear legal options for Scurry County families, or any family across Texas.

For Students / Pledges

For students from Scurry County facing hazing, understanding your rights and options offers a crucial lifeline.

Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself: Do I feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced? Am I being forced to drink or endure pain? Is this activity hidden from the public or administrators? If the answer to any of these is yes, then it is hazing. True tradition should not damage your mental or physical health.
Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Texas law and courts recognize that “consent” given under immense peer pressure, fear of exclusion, or intoxication is often not true, voluntary consent. You cannot truly “consent” to illegal acts.
Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the absolute right to leave any organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, get to a safe location (dorm, friend’s place, public area) and then notify the organization via email or text that you are resigning. If you fear retaliation, report that fear to the Dean of Students and campus police. Look for anonymous reporting channels within your university.
Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and Texas law encourage students to call for help in medical emergencies by offering amnesty—meaning you won’t be punished for underage drinking or other minor infractions if you’re seeking aid. Prioritize your safety and the safety of others.

For Former Members / Witnesses

Sometimes, former members or witnesses carry the burden of what they’ve seen or participated in.

Why Your Voice Matters: Your testimony and evidence can be pivotal in preventing future harm and saving lives. Coming forward, despite any personal fear or guilt, is a powerful act of responsibility.
Navigating Your Role: You may have your own legal questions or concerns about potential exposure. An attorney can advise you on your rights, help you navigate the process of cooperating with authorities or a civil lawsuit, and ensure your interests are protected.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For Scurry County families and anyone impacted by hazing, avoiding key missteps can make all the difference in the pursuit of justice. Watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) for further comprehensive guidance.

Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence: What parents might think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.” Why it’s wrong: This looks like a cover-up, can constitute obstruction of justice, and makes proving your case nearly impossible. What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately—every text, every photo, every group chat—even if it’s embarrassing.
Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly: What parents might think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.” Why it’s wrong: Opposing parties will immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare defenses. What to do instead: Document everything in private, then call a lawyer before any direct confrontation.
Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms: What universities sometimes do: Pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements. Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue a civil lawsuit, and these settlements are often far below the true value of your case. What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or an insurance adjuster without an attorney reviewing it first.
Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer: What families might think: “I want people to know what happened.” Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys screenshot everything posted publicly; inconsistencies can hurt credibility, and it might inadvertently waive legal privileges. What to do instead: Document privately, and let your lawyer control any public messaging strategy.
Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting”: What fraternities might say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic.” Why it’s wrong: These meetings are often designed to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can be used against your child later. What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication with the organization should go through your lawyer.
Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”: What universities might promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.” Why it’s wrong: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, the statute of limitations runs, and the university’s priority may be its own reputation rather than true accountability. What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW, consult a lawyer immediately, and understand that the university’s internal process is distinct from real legal accountability.
Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer: What adjusters might say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.” Why it’s wrong: Recorded statements are often used against claimants, and early settlement offers are typically lowball. What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with them and state, “My attorney will contact you.”

Short FAQ

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, and UT) have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU and Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its specific facts—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It certainly can be. Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default, but it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Furthermore, individual officers or members can face criminal charges for failing to report known hazing incidents.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and juries recognize that “agreement” made under extreme peer pressure, the threat of exclusion, or while intoxicated is not truly voluntary. Your child is a victim, not a willing participant, under the law.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally, there is a 2-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be “tolled” (paused). Time is absolutely critical in hazing cases—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to discuss your specific timeline, or learn more in our video “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c).
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship of the organization, their control over its activities, their knowledge of hazing risks, and the foreseeability of incidents. Many major hazing cases that resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments (like the Pi Delta Psi retreat case or the Sigma Pi unofficial house case) occurred at off-campus locations.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
While some high-profile cases do garner media attention, most hazing cases settle confidentially before ever reaching a trial. Our firm can pursue strategies that allow you to request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms, prioritizing your family’s privacy while still seeking accountability and justice.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing incident, especially one involving a Texas university, you need more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions—national fraternities, major universities, and their insurers—fight back hard, and precisely how to overcome their defenses.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, brings a unique and powerful combination of expertise to hazing litigation. From our primary office in Houston, and additional locations in Austin and Beaumont, we serve families throughout Texas, including Scurry County and its surrounding communities. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families across the entire state. Our firm is built to secure accountability for campus abuse wherever it occurs.

Our unique qualifications are especially suited for the complexities of hazing cases:

Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable “insider” knowledge. Before joining Attorney911, Lupe was an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She knows their playbook—how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and often undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, their arguments for coverage exclusion, and how they approach settlements. This experience allows us to anticipate their moves and develop strategies to counter them effectively. You can learn more about Lupe Peña at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, has a proven track record of taking on formidable opponents. He was one of the few Texas firms directly involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, handling complex federal court cases in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, and other jurisdictions. This experience means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, large universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won; we know how to fight powerful defendants and deliver results. Ralph’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases, working with economists to value the full extent of losses for families. Our experience also extends to catastrophic injury cases, where we collaborate with life care planners and medical experts to secure funding for lifetime care for victims with brain injuries or permanent disabilities.
Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a distinct advantage. We understand how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, allowing us to advise witnesses and former members who may face dual criminal and civil exposure.
Investigative Depth: We know hazing doesn’t happen in the open. Our team leverages a network of experts—medical professionals, digital forensics specialists, economists, and psychologists—to uncover hidden evidence. We have the experience to obtain deleted group chats and social media evidence, subpoena national fraternity records to expose prior incidents, and access university files through aggressive discovery tactics and public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We understand that hazing cases are not just about legal principles; they’re deeply personal. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We pursue thorough investigations and real accountability, not just quick settlements.

For Scurry County families, or any family across Texas, if your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s Texas A&M in College Station, the University of Houston, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Scurry County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened without judgment, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

What to expect in your free consultation:

We listen to your story empathetically and confidentially.
We’ll review any initial evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
We’ll explain your potential legal options: reporting to law enforcement, pursuing a civil lawsuit, or both.
We’ll discuss realistic timelines and the steps involved in a hazing case.
We’ll answer your questions about costs, explaining our contingency fee basis—we don’t get paid unless we win your case. You can learn more about this in our video “How Do Contingency Fees Work?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).
There is no pressure to hire us on the spot—we want you to make an informed decision when you are ready.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911:
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781 (for immediate emergencies)
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Reading this article does not create an attorney–client relationship. Every hazing case is unique, and we cannot guarantee specific outcomes. An experienced attorney can review your specific facts, explain your rights under Texas law, and help you understand your options. Whether you’re in Scurry County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com