# Hazing in Texas: A Definitive Guide for Coppell Families
It started like any other week for a Coppell family. Their child, a vibrant student from Denton County, headed off to a Texas university excited about new friendships and joining a campus organization. But then the phone calls changed. Late-night texts, strange requests for money, vague explanations of “bonding activities,” and then, a hushed voice admitting to things that just didn’t feel right. Maybe it was the pressure to drink until they blacked out, the forced calisthenics until they collapsed, the humiliating tasks, or the constant fear of being “cut” from the group. One night, the call is different—a desperate plea for help, or worse, silence.
This isn’t a rare scenario. It’s a stark reality for parents across Texas, including many in Coppell, whose children attend colleges and universities renowned for their vibrant — and sometimes dangerous — campus cultures. Hazing isn’t a relic of the past; it’s a pervasive and evolving danger that impacts students in fraternities and sororities, athletic teams, Corps programs, and other student organizations across our state.
This comprehensive guide is written specifically for families in Coppell and throughout North Texas who need to understand the complex landscape of hazing. We will explore what hazing truly looks like in 2025, dissect the Texas and federal legal frameworks that govern it, examine critical national cases that shape our understanding, and delve into specific challenges at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University. Most importantly, we will outline the legal options available to victims and their families in Coppell and across Texas, offering practical advice and demonstrating how an experienced legal team can navigate these incredibly difficult situations.
While this article provides general information, the specifics of every case vary. For a personalized review of your situation, The Manginello Law Firm is here to help. We serve families throughout Texas, including Coppell, and we are ready to stand with you.
### IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:
If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
* **Call 911** for medical emergencies.
* **Then call Attorney911:** 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.
In the first 48 hours:
* Get **medical attention** immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.”
* **Preserve evidence** BEFORE it’s deleted:
* Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
* Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
* Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
* **Write down everything** while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
* **Do NOT:**
* Confront the fraternity/sorority.
* Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
* Post details on public social media.
* Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.
* Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
* Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
* Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
* We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
* **Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.**
## Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like
For Coppell families, understanding modern hazing is crucial—it bears little resemblance to the “harmless pranks” of old movies. Hazing today is sophisticated, often insidious, and carries severe physical, psychological, and legal consequences. At its core, hazing is any **forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action** tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. The critical takeaway is that “I agreed to it” does **not** automatically make it safe or legal when there is peer pressure and a power imbalance.
### Main Categories of Hazing
Modern hazing manifests in several forms, often blending tactics to create a coercive and damaging environment. These categories align with the “Three-Tier Classification System” used by hazing prevention researchers, starting from subtle manipulation and escalating to severe violence.
#### Tier 1: Subtle Hazing – The Foundation of Control
These are behaviors that emphasize power imbalance, often dismissed as “harmless” or “tradition.” However, they create psychological harm and set the stage for more severe hazing.
* **Deception / Secrecy Oaths:** Pledges are told to lie to parents, university officials, or outsiders about group activities. This creates a moral conflict and isolates them from support systems.
* **Assigning Derogatory Names or Identities:** Forced to answer to demeaning nicknames or wear specific clothing that sets them apart as “lesser.”
* **Requiring New Members to Perform Duties for Older Members:** This can include being a designated driver at all hours, cleaning rooms, doing laundry, or running errands. The mentality often conveyed is that “pledges are on call 24/7.”
* **Social Isolation:** Cutting off contact with non-members, or requiring permission to socialize, thus increasing dependence on the group.
* **Deprivation of Privileges:** Not allowed to speak unless spoken to, sit in certain seats, or use certain entrances.
* **Interference with Academics:** Requiring attendance at events that conflict with classes or study time, especially late-night “meetings” during exam periods.
* **”Scavenger Hunts” or “Tasks”:** These might seem innocent but are designed to humiliate (e.g., performing embarrassing public stunts) or endanger (e.g., stealing items, trespassing).
* **Modern Digital Evolutions:**
* **Group Chat Monitoring / Control:** Pledges are required to respond instantly to group messages at all hours, with failure resulting in punishment.
* **Geo-tracking / Location Sharing:** Requiring pledges to share live location via apps like Find My Friends or Snapchat Maps, eroding personal privacy.
* **Social Media Policing:** Controlling what pledges can post, requiring them to “like” or share organizational content, and creating an online persona dictated by the group.
#### Tier 2: Harassment Hazing – Emotional and Physical Discomfort
These behaviors cause emotional or physical discomfort and create a hostile, abusive environment, even if they don’t cause lasting injury.
* **Verbal Abuse:** Yelling, screaming, insults, degrading language, and threats.
* **Sleep Deprivation:** Late-night “meetings” or tasks, wake-up calls at 3 AM for supposed mandatory activities, or multi-day events with minimal sleep.
* **Food / Water Restriction:** Limiting meals, forcing consumption of unpleasant substances (spoiled food, hot sauce, excessive amounts of bland food), or preventing access to water.
* **Forced Physical Activity Beyond Safe Limits:** Often disguised as “conditioning,” these include “smokings” or extreme calisthenics (hundreds of push-ups, wall sits until collapse), or forced runs that are punitive.
* **Public Humiliation:** Forcing pledges to perform embarrassing acts in public (singing, dancing, wearing degrading costumes) or participating in “roasts” where members verbally tear them down.
* **Exposure to Disgusting or Uncomfortable Conditions:** Forcing pledges into filthy spaces or covering them in unpleasant substances like food, condiments, or raw eggs.
* **Modern Digital Evolutions:**
* **”Voluntary” but Coerced Participation:** Framing hazing as “optional” but making it clear that refusing will lead to social exclusion or being denied “big/little” assignments.
* **Digital Humiliation:** Forcing pledges to post embarrassing content on social media (TikTok, Instagram), or participate in online “challenges” designed to degrade.
* **Livestreaming / Recording Hazing:** Using phones to film degrading acts, then sharing in private group chats or on private social media for entertainment.
* **”Meme Culture” Hazing:** Creating memes that mock specific pledges and sharing them within group chats, spreading humiliation.
#### Tier 3: Violent Hazing – High Potential for Injury or Death
These activities carry a high potential for physical injury, sexual assault, or even death.
* **Forced / Coerced Alcohol and Substance Consumption:**
* “Lineup” drinking games, “Big/Little” reveal nights involving handles of hard liquor.
* “Bible study,” “family tree,” or trivia games where incorrect answers result in forced drinking.
* Forced chugging, funneling, or keg stands beyond safe limits.
* Coercing pledges to consume marijuana, pills, or other unknown substances.
* **Physical Beatings and Paddling:** Punches, kicks, slaps, or the use of wooden paddles, often in the guise of “tradition” (officially prohibited by most national organizations). “Branding” or other physical markings (burns, cuts, forced tattoos) are also forms of violent hazing.
* **Dangerous Physical “Tests”:**
* “Glass ceiling” rituals where pledges are blindfolded and tackled.
* Forced fights (“gladiator” matches amongst pledges).
* Jumping from heights while intoxicated, swimming while impaired, or dangerous driving challenges.
* **Sexualized Hazing:** Forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (oral, anal, “elephant walk,” “roasted pig” positions), sexual assault or coercion, or forcing pledges to watch pornography or engage in sexually degrading acts.
* **Racist / Homophobic / Sexist Hazing:** Use of slurs, role-playing stereotypes, or forcing minority members to perform racially degrading acts.
* **Kidnapping / Restraint:** “Kidnapping” pledges and transporting them blindfolded, tying up, binding, or physically restraining them (e.g., the Texas A&M Corps “roasted pig” case).
* **Exposure to Extreme Environments:** Being locked in freezing rooms, left outside in extreme cold or heat, or denied access to bathrooms for extended periods.
* **Modern Evolutions:**
* **”Retreat” Hazing:** Moving violent hazing to unsupervised off-campus locations (Airbnbs, lodges, rural properties) to avoid university detection, security cameras, and accountability.
* **Disguised as “Team Building” or “Bonding”:** Extreme workouts framed as “fitness challenges” or “trust falls” that are actually dangerous physical tests.
* **Fire / Burn Hazing:** As seen in the recent San Diego State Phi Kappa Psi case where a pledge was set on fire during a “skit,” resulting in third-degree burns.
* **Chemical Hazing:** The Texas A&M Sigma Alpha Epsilon case where industrial-strength cleaner was poured on pledges, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin grafts.
### Where Hazing Actually Happens
Hazing is not confined to just one type of student group or a particular image. It proliferates in many types of campus organizations:
* **Fraternities and Sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, Multicultural):** These are the most commonly recognized settings for hazing, but the methods vary widely across councils and chapters.
* **Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups:** Highly structured environments can sometimes foster traditions that cross the line into hazing, emphasizing strict discipline and endurance.
* **Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs:** Such as cheerleading teams, dance teams, and university-affiliated spirit organizations (e.g., many historically problematic groups at UT Austin).
* **Athletic Teams:** From varsity football to club sports, hazing can occur within team environments, often involving physical discomfort, forced substance use, or psychological degradation.
* **Marching Bands and Performance Groups:** Even seemingly innocuous groups can engage in hazing rituals aimed at establishing hierarchy or proving commitment.
* **Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations:** These groups, too, can sometimes fall prey to hazing practices under the guise of “team bonding” or “earning your stripes.”
The underlying factors — social status, tradition, the desire for belonging, and a code of secrecy — continue to enable these harmful practices, often despite official university prohibitions. The constant pressure to conform and the fear of social exclusion make it incredibly difficult for students to speak out, leaving many in Coppell and across Texas vulnerable.
## Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)
Understanding the legal landscape is crucial for Coppell families whose children may encounter hazing environments at Texas universities. Both state and federal laws define hazing, prohibit it, and provide avenues for accountability.
### Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)
Texas has specific anti-hazing provisions primarily housed in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. These laws make it clear that hazing is a serious offense, both criminally and from an organizational liability standpoint.
**Definition of Hazing (§ 37.151):**
Hazing means **any intentional, knowing, or reckless act**, committed by one person alone or with others, on or off campus, directed against a student, that:
* **Endangers the mental or physical health or safety** of a student, AND
* Occurs for the purpose of **pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership** in any organization whose members include students.
In plain English, if someone makes your child do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a group, and they meant to do it or were reckless about the risk (meaning they knew the risk and did it anyway), **that’s hazing under Texas law**. Key aspects are:
* **Location Doesn’t Matter:** It can happen **on or off campus**.
* **Harm Types:** Can involve **mental or physical** harm.
* **Intent:** Doesn’t have to be malicious; “reckless” behavior is enough.
* **”Consent” is Not a Defense:** Even if the victim agreed to the activity, it can still be legally classified as hazing if it meets the definition. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states this.
**Criminal Penalties (§ 37.152):**
The severity of criminal penalties for hazing in Texas depends on the outcome of the incident:
* **Class B Misdemeanor (default):** This applies to hazing that does not result in serious injury. Penalties can include up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to \$2,000.
* **Class A Misdemeanor:** If the hazing causes personal injury that requires medical attention, the charge can be elevated.
* **State Jail Felony:** Critically, if hazing causes **serious bodily injury** or **death**, the charge is elevated to a State Jail Felony.
Texas law also holds individuals accountable for not reporting:
* **Failing to Report:** If a student, faculty member, or organizational officer knows about hazing and fails to report it, they can face misdemeanor charges.
* **Retaliating Against Reporters:** Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.
**Organizational Liability (§ 37.153):**
Student organizations, including fraternities, sororities, and clubs, can be criminally prosecuted for hazing if:
* The organization **authorized or encouraged** the hazing, OR
* An officer or member **acting in an official capacity knew** about the hazing and failed to report it.
Organizational penalties can include a **fine of up to \$10,000** per violation, and the university can **revoke recognition** and ban the organization from campus. This is why civil lawsuits often target not only individuals but also the local chapters and their national organizations.
**Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting (§ 37.154):**
Texas law provides a measure of protection for those who do the right thing:
* A person who, **in good faith**, reports a hazing incident to university authorities or law enforcement is generally **immune from civil or criminal liability** that might result from that report.
* Furthermore, in medical emergencies, Texas law and university policies often grant **amnesty** for students who call 911 (or seek help), even if they were underage drinking or otherwise involved in the hazing. This is designed to encourage students to prioritize safety without fear of severe punishment for minor offenses.
**Reporting by Educational Institutions (§ 37.156):**
Texas colleges and universities are mandated to:
* Provide hazing prevention education to students.
* Prominently publish their hazing policies.
* Maintain and **publish annual reports** of hazing violations and disciplinary actions.
For Coppell parents, these public records, like those found on UT Austin’s hazing website, are invaluable tools for research and, if necessary, for use as evidence in civil litigation, demonstrating a pattern of prior violations and institutional awareness.
### Criminal vs. Civil Cases
It’s vital to understand the distinction between criminal and civil legal actions, as both can arise from a hazing incident.
* **Criminal Cases:** These are brought by the state (prosecutor) against individuals or organizations accused of breaking the law. The aim is punishment—jail time, fines, or probation. Common hazing-related criminal charges beyond direct hazing offenses can include assault, battery, furnishing alcohol to minors, or even manslaughter in cases of death. A criminal conviction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
* **Civil Cases:** These are brought by victims or their surviving families against individuals or entities responsible for the harm. The aim is monetary compensation for damages and holding parties accountable. Civil lawsuits focus on legal concepts like negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and emotional distress. Civil cases require a lower standard of proof (preponderance of the evidence).
Crucially, **a criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case**. They are separate legal paths, and often, both run concurrently.
### Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery
Beyond state laws, federal regulations also play a role in addressing hazing on college campuses.
* **Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024):** This landmark federal legislation requires colleges and universities that receive federal funding to be more transparent about hazing incidents. By around 2026, these institutions must publicly report hazing data, strengthen prevention efforts, and enhance student education. This act is a significant step towards greater accountability and information for families in Coppell and nationwide.
* **Title IX:** If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based hostility, it can trigger Title IX obligations. This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs and activities. Universities have a duty to investigate and respond appropriately to such allegations, regardless of where they occur.
* **Clery Act:** The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents, particularly if they involve assault, alcohol or drug violations, or other criminal acts, may fall under Clery reporting requirements, providing another layer of transparency.
### Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit
One of the complexities of hazing litigation is identifying all potentially liable parties. An experienced attorney can meticulously investigate to ensure all responsible individuals and entities are held accountable.
* **Individual Students:** These are the members who directly participated in, planned, or orchestrated the hazing, supplied dangerous substances, or engaged in a cover-up.
* **Local Chapter / Organization:** The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself can be a defendant if it is legally recognized or operates as an entity. Officers of the organization, especially “pledge educators” or “new member coordinators”, often bear significant responsibility.
* **National Fraternity / Sorority:** Many local chapters are part of larger national organizations. These national bodies often set policies, collect dues, provide guidance, and have the power to sanction local chapters. If a national organization knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing (especially similar to past incidents at other chapters) and failed to take effective action, they can be held liable. The “rogue chapter” defense often fails when a pattern of similar incidents can be proven.
* **University or Governing Board:** The educational institution itself can be sued for negligence if it failed to adequately supervise student organizations, enforce its own anti-hazing policies, investigate prior complaints, or if it demonstrated deliberate indifference to known dangers. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) in Texas have some sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist, especially in cases of gross negligence, Title IX violations, or when suing individual administrators in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections.
* **Third Parties:** Liability can extend further to:
* **Landlords/Property Owners:** If hazing occurs at a private residence, rental property, or off-campus venue, the owner might be responsible if they knew or should have known about dangerous activities on their property.
* **Alcohol Providers:** Bars, stores, or individuals who illegally furnish alcohol to minors or visibly intoxicated individuals under “dram shop laws” could be liable.
* **Security Companies / Event Organizers:** If these entities failed to provide adequate security or oversight at events where hazing occurred.
Every hazing case is fact-specific, and not every party is liable in every situation. A thorough investigation is required to identify all potential defendants and build a strong case.
## National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)
The tragic stories of hazing victims across the United States are not isolated incidents; they reveal disturbing patterns that experienced legal teams use to demonstrate foreseeability, negligence, and institutional culpability. For families in Coppell dealing with a hazing incident, understanding these anchor stories shows that the struggles they face are part of a larger, systemic problem, and that accountability is achievable.
### Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern
The most frequent and deadly form of hazing involves forced or coerced alcohol consumption. These cases have unfortunately become alarmingly common, setting critical legal precedents.
* **Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (February 2017):** In one of the most widely publicized cases, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after a “bid acceptance” event involving extreme alcohol consumption. Security cameras within the fraternity house captured Piazza falling repeatedly, suffering severe head injuries, for hours before fraternity brothers finally called for help. The delay in seeking medical attention was a critical factor. The aftermath involved over 1,000 criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation leading to confidential settlements, and the passage of Pennsylvania’s **Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law**, one of the toughest in the nation. This case showed how extreme intoxication, a deliberate delay in calling 911, and a culture of silence within a fraternity can be legally devastating for all involved.
* **Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (November 2017):** Pledge Andrew Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” where pledges were given handles of hard liquor. Multiple fraternity members were prosecuted, mostly pleading guilty to misdemeanor hazing. The incident led to FSU temporarily suspending all Greek life and fueled a statewide anti-hazing movement in Florida. The pattern here underscores how formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster that fraternities should foresee.
* **Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (September 2017):** During a “Bible study” drinking game, 18-year-old Max Gruver was forced to drink heavily if he answered questions incorrectly. He died from alcohol toxicity, with a blood alcohol content of 0.495%. Multiple members faced criminal charges, with one convicted of negligent homicide. Gruver’s family later settled a wrongful death lawsuit for a confidential amount against the fraternity. This tragedy spurred Louisiana to enact the **Max Gruver Act**, a felony hazing statute, demonstrating how legislative change often follows public outrage and clear proof of systematic hazing.
* **Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (March 2021):** Another tragic pledge night saw 20-year-old Stone Foltz forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey. He died from alcohol poisoning. In the criminal proceedings, multiple fraternity members were convicted of hazing-related charges. Civilly, his family reached a **\$10 million settlement** in 2023, with \$7 million coming from the Pi Kappa Alpha national organization and an additional \$3 million from Bowling Green State University. This case highlights that universities, even public ones, can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities when they fail in their duty to protect students.
### Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern
Beyond alcohol, physical violence and degrading rituals continue to be a dangerous pattern in hazing.
* **Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (December 2013):** During a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains, 19-year-old Michael Deng was subjected to a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual. Blindfolded, weighted down with a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled, he suffered a fatal traumatic brain injury. Fraternity members again delayed calling 911. In a landmark ruling, multiple members were convicted, and the **national fraternity itself was convicted** of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, leading to its permanent ban from Pennsylvania for a decade. This case clearly shows that off-campus “retreats” are not immune from legal accountability and can be as dangerous or worse than on-campus events.
### Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse Pattern
Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it is a pervasive issue that can impact any student group, including highly visible athletic programs.
* **Northwestern University Football Hazing Scandal (2023–2025):** This case revealed widespread **sexualized and racist hazing** within the university’s football program over multiple years. Multiple former players came forward with allegations, leading to lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff. Head coach Pat Fitzgerald was fired and later confidentially settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit. This incident underscored that hazing extends far beyond Greek life, permeating major athletic programs, and raises critical questions about institutional oversight.
### What These Cases Mean for Coppell Families in Texas
These national anchor cases, while geographically distant, establish crucial legal precedents and patterns of conduct that directly impact hazing litigation in Texas. Whether a family in Coppell is dealing with an incident at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these cases inform how judges, juries, and even opposing counsel view the issues.
* **Common Threads:** The recurring elements are undeniable: forced drinking, extreme physical calisthenics, humiliation, psychological torment, deliberate delay or denial of medical care, and concerted efforts to cover up incidents. These patterns demonstrate a consistent failure of duty by individuals and institutions.
* **Foreseeability:** The extensive history of hazing tragedies nationwide means that universities and national organizations have **foreseeable knowledge** of the inherent dangers. They can no longer credibly claim ignorance when similar incidents occur.
* **Accountability:** These multi-million-dollar settlements and criminal prosecutions prove that accountability is not only possible but necessary. Litigation often drives the systemic reforms that prevention efforts alone cannot achieve.
* **Legal Landscape:** Texas families are operating in a legal landscape shaped by these national lessons, both in terms of statutory changes and judicial interpretations of organizational liability.
For Coppell families seeking justice, these cases serve as powerful reminders that while the journey is difficult, successful outcomes are achievable when experienced legal counsel is involved.
## Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor
For Coppell families, these prominent Texas universities are often where their children attend or contemplate attending. Each institution has its own unique campus culture, hazing history, and policy responses, but all operate under the same Texas hazing laws. Parents in Coppell and throughout Denton County need to be aware of the specific environments their students may encounter.
### 5.1 University of Houston (UH)
The University of Houston, located in the heart of the nation’s fourth-largest city, is a large, diverse urban campus. Many students from Coppell and surrounding Dallas-Fort Worth communities choose UH for its strong academic programs and dynamic environment. As a public institution, UH operates under specific regulations regarding student organizations, but its size and rapid growth present unique challenges for oversight.
#### 5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
UH serves a vast student body, comprising both commuters and a growing residential population. Its Greek life is active and encompasses a wide range of fraternities and sororities, including Interfraternity Council (IFC), Houston Panhellenic Council (HPC), National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and several multicultural Greek organizations. Beyond Greek life, numerous student groups, cultural associations, and sports clubs offer a rich, varied student experience. This vibrant blend of organizations can, unfortunately, also be fertile ground for hazing if not properly monitored.
#### 5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
The University of Houston maintains a clear anti-hazing policy, prohibiting any activity that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. This prohibition applies whether an incident occurs on-campus or off-campus. The policy specifically bans forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and activities causing mental distress.
UH provides several avenues for reporting hazing, including:
* The Dean of Students Office
* The Office of Student Conduct
* The University of Houston Police Department (UHPD)
* Online reporting forms, some allowing for anonymous submissions.
UH also publishes (to varying degrees of detail) a statement on its website affirming its commitment to hazing prevention and provides some information regarding student organization disciplinary actions.
#### 5.1.3 Example Incident & Response
One notable incident involved the **Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) fraternity** at UH in 2016. Pledges alleged they were subjected to repeated physical abuse and deprived of sufficient food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. One student reportedly suffered a **lacerated spleen** after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. The incident gained public attention, leading to misdemeanor hazing charges against individuals and the suspension of the UH chapter by both the university and the national fraternity.
Beyond this high-profile case, UH’s disciplinary records have indicated other instances involving fraternities and various student groups where behaviors such as “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” alcohol misuse, and violations of organizational policies led to suspensions or probationary periods. These incidents, even when details are limited in public reports, highlight the continuous challenge UH faces in enforcing its anti-hazing stance.
#### 5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed
For a Coppell family whose child experiences hazing at UH, legal proceedings can involve multiple layers. Criminal investigations might be conducted by **UHPD** for on-campus incidents or by the **Houston Police Department** for off-campus events, depending on the exact location in Houston or Harris County.
Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County. Potential defendants in such a case could include:
* The individual students directly involved in the hazing.
* The local chapter of the fraternity or organization.
* The national fraternity or sorority headquartered in another state.
* Potentially the University of Houston itself, through claims of negligence (though as a public university, UH benefits from some sovereign immunity protections, which an experienced attorney can navigate).
* Any third-party property owners or alcohol providers involved.
5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do
Families from Coppell with students at UH should be particularly vigilant:
- Monitor for Warning Signs: Look for classic signs like unexplained injuries, sudden secrecy, academic decline, or changes in mood, recognizing that modern hazing is often psychological and digital.
- Understand Reporting Channels: Familiarize yourselves with the UH Dean of Students Office and UHPD reporting options. In an emergency, always call 911 immediately.
- Document Everything: If hazing is suspected, assist your child in taking screenshots of all digital communications (group chats, DMs), photographing any injuries, and writing down detailed notes of events, dates, and names.
- Seek Immediate Legal Counsel: Contacting a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases, like Attorney911, can be critical. We understand local jurisdiction, can help identify prior disciplinary actions against organizations at UH, and navigate the complexities of suing a public university.
- Avoid Alone Confrontation: Do not confront the organization directly or rely solely on university internal processes if serious harm has occurred. University investigations often prioritize university interests.
### 5.2 Texas A&M University
Texas A&M University, a storied institution in College Station, holds unique cultural significance, particularly with its deeply ingrained traditions and the prestigious Corps of Cadets. Many students from Coppell and the broader Dallas-Fort Worth area are drawn to A&M for its strong engineering, agriculture, and business programs, as well as its distinctive spirit and sense of community. Its blend of traditional values and a robust Greek system creates a complex environment when it comes to hazing.
#### 5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
Texas A&M’s identity is heavily influenced by the **Corps of Cadets**, which has its own strict hierarchy and a long history of traditions, some of which have unfortunately bordered on or crossed into hazing. The university also boasts a sprawling Greek life with numerous fraternities and sororities (IFC, Collegiate Panhellenic Council, NPHC, Multicultural Greek Council), all contributing to a vibrant social scene in College Station. For families right here in Coppell, the pull of A&M’s traditions is strong, but so is the need to understand the potential risks.
#### 5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
Texas A&M unequivocally prohibits hazing, outlining its definition and disciplinary actions in its Student Rules. The university’s policy mirrors state law, defining hazing as any act that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. This applies to all student organizations and to activities both on and off campus.
A&M’s reporting channels include:
* The Division of Student Affairs, particularly the Office of Student Conduct.
* The Corps of Cadets leadership and staff.
* The University Police Department (UPD).
* Anonymous reporting via the university’s “EthicsPoint” hotline.
A&M posts information about its hazing regulations and may disclose disciplinary actions, though the level of detail can vary.
#### 5.2.3 Example Incidents & Response
Texas A&M has faced significant hazing allegations and incidents, notably within both its Greek system and the Corps of Cadets.
* **Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Lawsuit (around 2021):** This case involved harrowing allegations from pledges who reported being forced to engage in strenuous activity and having various substances, including **industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit**, poured on them. The incident resulted in **severe chemical burns** for two pledges, requiring **skin graft surgeries**. The SAE chapter was suspended for two years by the university. The pledges subsequently sued the fraternity for **\$1 million**, highlighting how physical hazing can lead to devastating, lasting injuries. The outcome of the civil case remains confidentially undisclosed.
* **Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023):** A former cadet filed a federal lawsuit alleging egregious hazing, including being forced to participate in **simulated sexual acts** and being bound between beds in a humiliating “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over **\$1 million** in damages. Texas A&M responded publicly by stating it had handled the matter appropriately under its internal rules, illustrating the often contentious nature of investigations within the Corps.
* **Kappa Sigma (2023, ongoing):** Another Kappa Sigma incident at Texas A&M in 2023 involved allegations of hazing resulting in severe injury, specifically **rhabdomyolysis** (severe muscle breakdown from extreme physical overexertion). This ongoing litigation highlights the need for specialized legal representation for such specific and debilitating injuries.
These incidents underscore that hazing at Texas A&M can manifest in both the Greek system and the Corps of Cadets, often involving extreme physical or humiliating acts.
#### 5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed
For Coppell families pursuing a hazing case originating at Texas A&M, the process will involve considerations specific to the Bryan-College Station area. Criminal investigations would typically involve the **College Station Police Department** (CSPD) or the **Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD)** within the university’s jurisdiction.
Civil lawsuits would proceed in courts with jurisdiction over Brazos County. Due to A&M being a public university, any lawsuit against the institution itself would need to navigate the complexities of **sovereign immunity** as defined by Texas law. However, claims against individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, and potentially individual university employees (in their personal capacities) can still proceed.
#### 5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do
Families from Coppell with students attending Texas A&M and the wider Brazos Valley should be proactive:
* **Understand A&M’s Culture:** Be aware of the strong traditions within both Greek life and the Corps of Cadets, and question activities that seem overly secretive, demeaning, or physically perilous.
* **Document Corps Traditions:** If your child is in the Corps, document their experiences carefully. Anecdotal or veiled descriptions of “challenges” can sometimes hide concerning hazing.
* **Preserve Digital Evidence:** Given the nature of modern hazing, prompt screenshots of group chats (GroupMe is very common at A&M), photos, and videos are crucial.
* **Contact Legal Experts:** An attorney experienced in hazing and complex litigation can help preserve evidence (especially within a system like the Corps), deal with university administrators, and determine the best approach if a child is harmed at A&M.
* **Know Your Rights on Campus:** While A&M enforces rules, students have rights. Understand that “consent” to hazing is not a legal defense in Texas.
### 5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)
The flagship institution of the University of Texas System, UT Austin, is a vibrant and immense campus in the state capital. Many students from Coppell and the extended DFW Metroplex attend UT, making it a crucial focus point for understanding hazing. UT’s large and diverse student body, coupled with a highly active Greek scene and numerous student organizations, means hazing risks are unfortunately ever-present.
#### 5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
UT Austin is famous for its energetic campus life, strong academics, and passionate school spirit anchored by traditions such as the Texas Longhorns football team. Its Greek system is one of the largest and most influential in the state, comprising numerous fraternities and sororities from various councils (University Panhellenic Council, Interfraternity Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council, Texas Asian Pan-Hellenic, and other multicultural groups). Beyond Greek life, a myriad of spirit groups, honor societies, and athletic clubs thrive, though some of these have also faced hazing allegations.
#### 5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
The University of Texas at Austin maintains one of the most transparent anti-hazing policies and reporting systems among Texas universities. UT’s policy strictly prohibits hazing, defining it in alignment with the Texas Education Code. This prohibition covers all student organizations and occurs regardless of location (on or off campus).
UT’s commitment to transparency is notable through its **Hazing Violations webpage** (hazing.utexas.edu), which publicly lists organizations found responsible for hazing, the specific conduct, the dates of the incidents, and the disciplinary sanctions imposed. This site is an invaluable resource for parents, students, and legal professionals.
Reporting channels at UT include:
* The Dean of Students Office
* The Office of Student Conduct
* The University of Texas Police Department (UTPD)
* Via confidential online forms.
#### 5.3.3 Example Documented Incidents & Responses
UT’s public Hazing Violations webpage reveals a continuous stream of incidents and disciplinary actions. It allows families from Coppell to check the history of any organization their child might consider joining.
* **Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) (2023):** This chapter faced disciplinary action after new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. The university’s investigation found it to be hazing, resulting in the chapter being placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education. This incident, occurring less than two years after the fatal Pike hazing at Bowling Green State, highlights the persistent nature of hazing despite national attention and sanctions.
* **Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) (January 2024):** This chapter, already under suspension for prior violations, made headlines when an Australian exchange student alleged assault during a party, resulting in a dislocated leg, broken ligaments, fractured tibia, and a broken nose. The student filed a **\$1 million lawsuit** against the chapter.
* **”Absolute Texxas” Spirit Group (2022):** This non-Greek spirit organization was disciplined for hazing violations that included alcohol/drug misconduct, blindfolding, kidnapping, and the degrading of new members. The widespread nature of these violations underscores that hazing is not confined to Greek life alone.
* Other well-documented instances involve groups like the **Texas Wranglers**, various club sports teams, and other fraternities and sororities consistently sanctioned for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, sleep deprivation, and other punishment-based practices.
UT’s relatively high transparency offers a clear record of repeated violations, which can significantly strengthen civil lawsuits by demonstrating institutional knowledge and patterns of conduct.
#### 5.3.4 How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed
For Coppell families seeking legal recourse for hazing at UT Austin, criminal investigations may involve both the **University of Texas Police Department (UTPD)** and the **Austin Police Department (APD)**, depending on where the incident occurred in Austin or Travis County.
Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in courts within Travis County. As a public institution, the University of Texas at Austin benefits from some **sovereign immunity**. However, claims against individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, and potentially university employees (in their personal capacities) are common and necessary. Furthermore, the documented history on UT’s hazing webpage serves as concrete evidence of prior notice, known patterns, and often, insufficient institutional response, all critical elements in proving liability.
#### 5.3.5 What UT Students & Parents Should Do
Families from Coppell with students at UT Austin should utilize the available resources:
* **Consult UT’s Hazing Violations Page:** Regularly check hazing.utexas.edu for any organization your child is considering. Prior violations are a major red flag.
* **Report Directly and Anonymously:** Understand the channels for reporting to the Dean of Students, UTPD, or using confidential online forms.
* **Preserve Digital Evidence:** Given UT students’ tech-savviness, digital evidence (group chats from GroupMe or Snapchat, photos/videos taken by event participants) is often plentiful and critical. Secure it immediately.
* **Understand UTPD vs. APD:** Know which law enforcement agency has jurisdiction based on incident location.
* **Seek Experienced Legal Advocacy:** Contacting an attorney well-versed in hazing cases and proficient in navigating the UT system, like Attorney911, is essential for uncovering evidence, dealing with the university’s legal teams, and pursuing full accountability.
### 5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)
Southern Methodist University, nestled in an affluent area of Dallas, represents a distinct collegiate environment. Many Coppell families have strong ties to SMU, whether through alumni networks, sending their children to its respected programs, or simply by its proximity in North Texas. As a private institution, SMU’s internal processes and transparency differ from public universities.
#### 5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
SMU is known for its beautiful campus, strong academic programs, and a vibrant, often prominent, Greek life. While it has cultivated a reputation for tradition and excellence, it also faces unique challenges common to private universities, where Greek organizations can hold significant social sway. The Greek system at SMU is robust, encompassing Panhellenic Council sororities and Interfraternity Council (IFC) fraternities, along with NPHC and multicultural organizations. The social dynamics, often intertwined with Greek life, heighten the risk for hazing incidents.
#### 5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
SMU maintains clear anti-hazing policies and actively promotes a culture of safety. The university’s hazing policy explicitly prohibits any activity that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of initiation, membership, or affiliation. This policy applies to all university-recognized student organizations, regardless of whether the activity occurs on or off campus.
SMU provides several reporting mechanisms, including:
* The Office of the Dean of Students.
* Student Conduct and Community Standards.
* SMU Police Department.
* Anonymous reporting options, such as the “Real Response” system, which encourages students to report concerning incidents without fear of direct identification.
While SMU details its policies online, as a private institution, its public reporting of specific disciplinary actions against student organizations may be less comprehensive than that of public universities like UT Austin, though patterns can often be revealed through legal discovery.
#### 5.4.3 Example Documented Incidents & Response
SMU has had its share of hazing incidents, highlighting the persistent nature of the problem even within private, highly resourced institutions.
* **Kappa Alpha Order Incident (2017):** This fraternity chapter faced disciplinary action after new members reportedly experienced paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. The university responded with a suspension for the chapter, imposing strict restrictions on its recruiting activities and operations for several years. This incident put a spotlight on the challenges of traditional, physical hazing at SMU.
* While specific details for all incidents may not be as readily available in the public domain as with public universities, SMU’s internal records and investigation files are crucial sources of evidence in civil litigation against the university or its student organizations.
#### 5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed
For Coppell families seeking legal action for a hazing incident at SMU, criminal investigations would typically fall under the jurisdiction of the **SMU Police Department** for on-campus incidents or the **Dallas Police Department** for off-campus events within Dallas County.
Civil lawsuits against SMU or its affiliated organizations would proceed in courts within Dallas County or the broader DFW Metroplex. As a private university, SMU generally carries fewer protections from **sovereign immunity** compared to public institutions. This means that direct negligence claims against the university can often be more straightforward to pursue, alongside claims against individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, and any third parties. An experienced attorney can navigate the nuances of private university liability.
#### 5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do
Families from Coppell with students at SMU in Dallas should take specific steps:
* **Be Aware of Social Pressures:** Recognize that the social emphasis on Greek life in private institutions can create strong conformity pressures for students.
* **Utilize Anonymous Reporting Systems:** Encourage students to use SMU’s confidential reporting options like “Real Response” if they witness or experience hazing.
* **Document Everything Thoroughly:** Emphasize the collection of digital evidence—screenshots of group chats, social media posts, and any photographic or video evidence, given the prevalence of smartphones.
* **Consider Private University Nuances:** Understand that while private universities may not publish detailed disciplinary records as public schools do, legal discovery can reveal internal investigations and prior incidents.
* **Consult Experienced Legal Counsel Immediately:** For complex cases at private universities like SMU, engaging a law firm like Attorney911 that has experience dealing with such institutions is vital to ensure all legal avenues are explored and evidence is gathered effectively.
### 5.5 Baylor University
Baylor University, situated in Waco, is a private Christian university with a strong tradition and identity. Students from Coppell and across the Dallas-Fort Worth area are drawn to Baylor’s academic rigor and spiritual emphasis. However, Baylor has faced significant scrutiny over its handling of student safety and misconduct, including hazing, making it a critical focus for Coppell families.
#### 5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot
Baylor’s campus culture is deeply rooted in its Baptist heritage, which shapes many aspects of student life, including its strict behavioral codes. Greek life is present and active, with Panhellenic Council sororities, Interfraternity Council (IFC) fraternities, and NPHC organizations. Beyond Greek life, numerous faith-based groups, athletic teams, and spirit organizations contribute to a vibrant but often inward-looking community. Baylor’s well-publicized past struggles with Title IX violations and the handling of sexual assault cases have placed it under an intense spotlight regarding institutional oversight and student well-being, creating a heightened awareness of a “code of silence” that families in Coppell should understand.
#### 5.5.1 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels
Baylor University maintains a “zero-tolerance” policy against hazing, defining it in accordance with Texas law as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that endangers a student’s mental or physical health for membership purposes. This policy applies to all student organizations, athletic teams, and individuals, whether on or off campus, ensuring a broad scope of prohibition.
Baylor’s reporting channels include:
* The Division of Student Life.
* Baylor Police Department (BUPD).
* Online reporting forms, including an anonymous option, via Ethicspoint.
However, the effectiveness and transparency of these channels have been subjects of past public criticism regarding the university’s broader handling of student misconduct.
#### 5.5.3 Example Documented Incidents & Response
Baylor’s history, particularly its highly publicized sexual assault scandal, has cast a long shadow, highlighting the challenges of institutional accountability and a potential culture of prioritizing reputation over student safety. Hazing incidents, though sometimes internal, are inevitably viewed through this lens.
* **Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020):** This incident involved a significant hazing investigation within the university’s baseball team. Fourteen players were ultimately suspended, with the suspensions staggered over the early season to mitigate the impact on team performance. The investigation underscored that hazing can occur even within highly regulated and visible athletic programs, requiring university intervention.
* While official public records of all hazing incidents may be limited (similar to other private institutions), the pattern of institutional challenges at Baylor means that any hazing incident needs rigorous investigation, as the university’s response strategy can be intricate. The impact of such incidents, even in their reporting, can be magnified given Baylor’s past.
#### 5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed
For Coppell families pursuing legal action for a hazing incident at Baylor, criminal investigations would typically involve the **Baylor University Police Department (BUPD)** for on-campus occurrences or the **Waco Police Department** for incidents within Waco or McLennan County.
Civil lawsuits against Baylor University or its student organizations would proceed in courts within McLennan County. As a private institution, Baylor generally has fewer direct protections from sovereign immunity than public Texas universities. However, its legal team is robust. Cases may involve complex arguments around negligence, institutional awareness, and the scope of a university’s duty of care, especially considering its history of oversight challenges. Claims would typically target individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, and the university itself.
#### 5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do
Families from Coppell with students at Baylor should approach student involvement with heightened vigilance:
* **Question “Tradition” Carefully:** While Baylor cherishes tradition, parents and students must critically assess activities, particularly in Greek life, athletic teams, or other groups, that involve secrecy, degradation, or physical risk.
* **Prioritize Safety Over Reputation:** Understand that your child’s well-being is paramount. Do not allow fears of institutional retaliation, or damaging “Baylor Family” harmony, to prevent reporting serious hazing.
* **Document and Report Externally:** Promptly document any hazing with photos, screenshots, and detailed notes. If local reporting channels seem insufficient or biased, consider external options like calling the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE) or contacting an experienced attorney.
* **Be Cognizant of Legal Complexities:** For institutions with a history of significant legal challenges, like Baylor, immediate legal consultation with a firm experienced in institutional negligence is critical, as the university’s legal defense can be particularly assertive.
* **Know Your Rights:** Despite Baylor’s private status, students still have fundamental rights. Texas law regarding hazing and its “consent is not a defense” provision still applies.
## Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories
For Coppell families seeking justice or simply to understand hazing, it’s crucial to look beyond the local chapter and examine the national organizations. Many fraternities and sororities active at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor are part of vast national networks. These national bodies often have a lengthy history of hazing incidents across the country, creating a pattern of knowledge that is legally significant.
### Why National Histories Matter
The national headquarters of fraternities and sororities, despite their often lofty ideals and extensive anti-hazing manuals, frequently have a disturbing pattern of involvement (or lack of effective intervention) in hazing tragedies. They often:
* Maintain thick anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies **precisely because** they have faced numerous lawsuits, deaths, and catastrophic injuries in the past. They know the risks.
* Have access to detailed reports of patterns of hazing, such as forced drinking nights, physical “traditions,” and humiliating rituals, that occur repeatedly across their various chapters.
When a local chapter in Texas, whether at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, repeats the same scripts that led to another chapter being shut down or sued in another state, that demonstrates **foreseeability**. Such a pattern strongly supports arguments for negligence, gross negligence, and even punitive damages against the national entity, because it shows they knew the risk and failed to prevent it.
### Organization Mapping: Connecting Local Chapters to National Patterns
While we cannot list every single chapter and incident, here’s a synthesized look at some major fraternities and sororities prevalent at Texas universities and their associated national hazing histories. This information can be vital for Coppell families doing their research or considering legal action.
* **Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike):** This fraternity has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. Nationally, it has one of the most tragic and well-documented hazing histories.
* **Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University (2021):** A 20-year-old pledge died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” night. The family later reached a **\$10 million settlement** from the fraternity and university.
* **David Bogenberger – Northern Illinois University (2012):** Pledge died from alcohol poisoning. Civil lawsuit resulted in a **\$14 million settlement** to his family.
* These incidents highlight a national pattern of dangerous alcohol-related hazing within Pike that should put any chapter or university on notice.
* **Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE):** SAE has a presence at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, along with others. It has a long and particularly grim national history regarding hazing and alcohol-related deaths. In 2014, in response to a pattern of fatalities, SAE became the first national fraternity to eliminate pledging, converting new members immediately to active status. Yet, incidents persist.
* **University of Alabama (2023):** Lawsuit filed alleging a pledge sustained a **traumatic brain injury** during a hazing ritual.
* **Texas A&M University (2021):** Two pledges alleged they suffered **severe chemical burns** requiring skin graft surgeries after being doused with substances including industrial-strength cleaner during hazing. They sued the fraternity for \$1 million.
* **University of Texas at Austin (2024):** An international student sustained severe injuries, including a dislocated leg and broken bones, during an alleged assault at a party, with the chapter already under suspension.
* These cases demonstrate that despite changing national policies, severe hazing, both physical and alcohol-related, continues to be a pattern for SAE.
* **Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ):** This fraternity has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and SMU.
* **Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University (2017):** Died from alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to drink heavily for answering questions incorrectly. This case led to Louisiana’s **Max Gruver Act**, making felony hazing a reality.
* This incident and its aftermath are a clear national precedent for the severe consequences of forced drinking games within Phi Delta Theta.
* **Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ):** Present at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin.
* **Andrew Coffey – Florida State University (2017):** Died from acute alcohol poisoning at a “Big Brother Night” where pledges were given handles of hard liquor.
* This is another prominent national case underscoring the lethal nature of alcohol-fueled initiation rituals within Pi Kappa Phi.
* **Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ):** Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor.
* **Chad Meredith – University of Miami (2001):** Died after being persuaded by fraternity members to swim across a lake while intoxicated. A jury awarded his parents a **\$12.6 million verdict** based on hazing and negligence. This case led to pioneering anti-hazing legislation in Florida.
* **Texas A&M University (2023):** Allegations of hazing that resulted in **rhabdomyolysis** (severe muscle breakdown from extreme physical activity).
* **Texas Christian University (2018):** A member arrested for allegedly hazing pledges.
* These incidents show a wide range of hazing, from physical to alcohol-related, within Kappa Sigma, resulting in significant injuries and legal liability.
* **Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ):** Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor.
* **Timothy Piazza – Penn State University (2017):** Died from traumatic brain injuries after extreme alcohol consumption and falls, with delayed medical assistance. This case was a national turning point, leading to broad criminal charges and Pennsylvania’s **Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law**.
* Despite being one of the largest hazing prosecutions, the continued presence of Beta Theta Pi at numerous Texas schools necessitates awareness of its history.
* **Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI):** Chapters at Texas A&M.
* **Danny Santulli – University of Missouri (2021):** Suffered **severe, permanent brain damage** after forced alcohol consumption during a “pledge dad reveal,” requiring 24/7 care. His family settled lawsuits with **22 defendants** for reportedly multi-million-dollar amounts. This case became a nationwide example of catastrophic non-fatal hazing injury.
* **Sigma Chi (ΣΧ):** Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor.
* **College of Charleston (2024):** A family received **more than \$10 million in damages** after a pledge alleged physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment. This is one of the largest known hazing settlements.
* **University of Texas at Arlington (2020):** A pledge was hospitalized with alcohol poisoning from hazing, leading to a lawsuit that settled in 2021.
* Sigma Chi also demonstrates a national pattern of severe hazing with devastating consequences.
* **Kappa Kappa Gamma (ΚΚΓ):** This sorority, with chapters at Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, reminds us that hazing is not exclusive to fraternities.
* **DePauw University (1997):** Three members were accused of branding pledges with cigarettes after heavy drinking. This incident, while older, became a potent example of physical hazing within a sorority, challenging common stereotypes.
### Tie Back to Legal Strategy
For Coppell families pursuing legal action, directly connecting local hazing incidents to a national organization’s history is a powerful legal strategy:
* **Foreseeability:** It shows that the national organization had **prior knowledge** of dangerous patterns and, therefore, a legal duty to prevent similar harm. They can’t claim ignorance when the “same thing” has happened before.
* **Evidence of Negligence:** It helps prove that national organizations may have been negligent in supervising their chapters, failing to enforce policies, or providing insufficient training, given their historical awareness of hazing risks.
* **Increased Settlement Leverage:** Documented national patterns can increase the financial exposure of the national organization, leading to greater leverage in settlement negotiations and potentially larger verdicts.
* **Insurance Coverage:** It helps navigate complex insurance coverage disputes, as insurers often try to deny coverage by claiming incidents were “unforeseeable” or “intentional.”
* **Punitive Damages:** In egregious cases, national patterns can contribute to arguments for punitive damages, which are designed to punish grossly negligent behavior and deter future misconduct.
By meticulously researching and presenting these connections, experienced hazing attorneys can transform isolated incidents into compelling cases that hold powerful institutions accountable for their systemic failures.
## Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy
Building a successful hazing case requires a meticulous investigation, a comprehensive understanding of all potential damages, and a strategic approach to litigation. For Coppell families, knowing what goes into such a case is crucial for navigating the legal process effectively and ensuring justice for their loved one.
### 7.1 Evidence: The Foundation of Any Strong Case
Modern hazing leaves a digital footprint, making evidence collection a critical starting point. Our firm investigates relentlessly, knowing that key pieces of evidence can disappear rapidly.
* **Digital Communications:** This is often the **most critical category** of evidence in modern hazing cases.
* **Group Messaging Apps:** Messages from GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage/SMS, Discord, Signal, Telegram, and even specific fraternity/sorority apps. These reveal planning, direct orders, reactions, cover-up attempts, and the coercion involved. We prioritize securing screenshots of full conversations, including timestamps and participant names.
* **Social Media:** Posts, stories, DMs, and comments on Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, and Twitter/X can show hazing in progress, humiliating acts, forced drinking, and social pressures. This includes location tags or hashtags that provide context.
* **Deleted Messages:** While often challenging, digital forensics experts can sometimes recover deleted messages from phones, cloud backups, or even app servers.
* **Photos & Videos:**
* **Content Captured by Members:** Images and footage filmed by participants during hazing events, often shared in group chats or on private social media, are damning.
* **Surveillance Footage:** Security cameras (e.g., Ring/doorbell cameras) at private houses or commercial venues where hazing occurred can provide objective evidence of what transpired.
* **Injuries:** Detailed photographs of any physical injuries (bruises, burns, cuts) taken immediately after the incident and over subsequent days, showing progression and scale.
* **Internal Organization Documents:**
* **Pledge Manuals/Scripts:** Any documents outlining initiation rites, “traditions,” or expectations handed out to new members.
* **Correspondence:** Emails, texts, or memos from officers, advisors, or national representatives discussing new member activities, event planning, or prior concerns about hazing.
* **National Policies:** The national fraternity/sorority’s anti-hazing policies, risk management guidelines, and training materials are critical to compare against actual conduct.
* **University Records:**
* **Prior Conduct Files:** Crucial in determining if the university had prior warnings about the chapter or individuals implicated in the hazing. This includes past probations, suspensions, and letters of warning.
* **Police Reports:** Incident reports filed with campus police (e.g., UHPD, UTPD, BUPD, SMU PD) or local law enforcement (e.g., Houston PD, College Station PD, Austin PD, Dallas PD, Waco PD).
* **Clery Act Reports:** Information about crime statistics and incidents, if applicable.
* **Internal Communications:** Emails and memos among university administrators discussing the chapter, student safety, or hazing concerns (often obtained through discovery in a lawsuit).
* **Medical and Psychological Records:**
* **Emergency Room/Hospital Records:** Documentation of immediate injuries, diagnoses, treatments, and toxicology reports (blood alcohol content, drug screenings).
* **Ongoing Treatment:** Records from specialists, physical therapy, rehabilitation, and long-term care plans.
* **Psychological Evaluations:** Documentation from psychologists or psychiatrists diagnosing PTSD, depression, anxiety, trauma-related disorders, or suicidal ideation resulting from the hazing. These are vital for non-economic damages.
* **Witness Testimony:**
* Accounts from other pledges, current or former members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, trainers, or other bystanders who observed the hazing or its aftermath. We work to secure their statements, understanding the fear they may face.
### 7.2 Damages: Compensating for the Full Scope of Harm
Hazing incidents cause a wide range of harm, from immediate physical injuries to profound psychological trauma and long-term financial burdens. Our firm meticulously calculates all possible damages to ensure full and fair compensation. We quantify economic losses and establish the often-immeasurable impact of non-economic harm.
#### Economic Damages (Quantifiable Financial Losses)
* **Medical Expenses:**
* **Past Medical Bills:** Costs for ambulance, emergency room, hospitalization, surgeries, diagnostic tests, medications, and medical equipment.
* **Future Medical Expenses:** Projections for ongoing therapy (physical, occupational, speech), psychiatric care, long-term medication, future surgeries, and specialized “life care plans” for catastrophic injuries (e.g., for victims like Danny Santulli who require lifelong care).
* **Lost Income & Earning Capacity:**
* **Lost Wages:** Income lost by the victim (or a parent who missed work to care for them).
* **Lost Educational Opportunities:** Tuition for missed semesters, loss of scholarships (academic, athletic, Greek-related), and the financial impact of delayed graduation, which can delay entry into the workforce.
* **Diminished Future Earning Capacity:** If injuries (like brain damage, severe PTSD, or physical disability) permanently impair the victim’s ability to work, economists calculate the projected lifetime loss of earnings.
#### Non-Economic Damages (Subjective, Yet Legally Compensable)
* **Physical Pain & Suffering:** Compensation for the actual pain from injuries, discomfort, and any ongoing chronic pain or physical limitations.
* **Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm:** This can be immense and often includes:
* Diagnosed conditions: PTSD, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic attacks, and suicidal ideation.
* Less quantifiable harm: Humiliation, shame, degradation, loss of dignity, pervasive fear, nightmares, flashbacks, and a profound loss of trust in peers and institutions.
* **Loss of Enjoyment of Life:** When injuries or trauma prevent a person from participating in activities they once loved (sports, hobbies, social events), impacting their quality of life.
* **Reputational Harm:** If the hazing incident becomes public, the victim may suffer social stigma or difficulty transferring to other schools or securing employment.
#### Wrongful Death Damages (For Families)
When hazing results in death, the surviving family members (spouse, children, parents, and sometimes siblings) can recover a variety of damages:
* **Funeral and Burial Costs:** The direct expenses incurred.
* **Loss of Financial Support:** If the deceased would have contributed financially to the family over their lifetime.
* **Loss of Companionship, Love, and Society:** The profound emotional void left by the loss of a loved one.
* **Grief and Emotional Suffering:** The deep emotional pain experienced by surviving family members.
* **Loss of Guidance and Counsel:** Especially for younger siblings who lose an older role model.
#### Punitive Damages (When Available)
In cases of extreme negligence, malice, or willful misconduct, punitive damages may be awarded. These are intended to **punish** the defendants for their reckless behavior and **deter** others from similar conduct. Punitive damages are often awarded when:
* Defendants had **prior warnings** about hazing and ignored them.
* The hazing was **particularly cruel or degrading**.
* There were efforts to **cover up** the incident or lie to investigators.
* Defendants showed a **callous indifference** to known risks.
In Texas, punitive damages are available but usually capped, except in certain intentional tort cases.
### 7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage
Hazing cases are rarely simple, “single defendant” lawsuits. Universities and national fraternities are powerful institutions with significant resources and legal teams. Our firm’s experience in complex litigation against massive corporations, like our involvement in the **BP Texas City explosion litigation**, means we are uniquely prepared to take on such formidable opponents.
* **Insurance Companies:** National fraternities and universities often carry extensive insurance policies. However, these insurers frequently try to deny coverage by arguing that hazing or “intentional acts” are excluded, or that the policy doesn’t cover certain defendants.
* **Our Advantage:** Lupe Peña, one of our firm’s associate attorneys, previously worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She possesses invaluable **insider knowledge** of how insurance companies evaluate claims, negotiate, and defend against them. We know their “playbook” because we used to run it. This expertise is critical in identifying all potential sources of coverage (chapter policies, national policies, university umbrella policies, even individual homeowner policies), navigating complex exclusions, and fighting for a full and fair settlement.
* **Building a Case:** We argue that even if a hazing act was intentional, the national organization’s or university’s **failure to adequately supervise, prevent, or intervene** was negligent, which can trigger coverage. We are prepared to expose bad faith insurance practices if coverage is wrongfully denied.
Our strategic approach focuses not only on direct actors but also on the institutional failures that allowed hazing to occur, often leveraging patterns of prior incidents to establish knowledge and foreseeability. We don’t settle cheap; we build cases that force accountability.
## 8. Practical Guides & FAQs
For Coppell families, knowing how to navigate the immediate aftermath of a suspected hazing incident is paramount. Delays can mean lost evidence and crucial opportunities for intervention. Here, we provide actionable guidance for parents, students, and potential witnesses.
### 8.1 For Parents: Recognizing & Responding to Hazing
Parents are often the first line of defense, even if they’re far from campus. Vigilance and informed action are key.
* **Warning Signs of Hazing:**
* **Physical Signs:** Unexplained bruises, burns, cuts, or other injuries, especially if explanations don’t add up. Extreme fatigue, exhaustion, sudden weight loss or gain, and sleep deprivation. Signs of alcohol poisoning or drug use that are out of character.
* **Behavioral & Emotional Changes:** Sudden secrecy about group activities (“I can’t talk about it”), withdrawal from family or old friends, drastic shifts in mood (anxiety, depression, irritability), defensiveness when asked about the organization, fear of “getting in trouble” for speaking out.
* **Academic Red Flags:** Unexpected and significant drop in grades, missed classes, or prioritizing “mandatory” group events over academics.
* **Financial Red Flags:** Unexplained large expenses, requests for money without clear explanation, or purchasing excessive alcohol for older members.
* **Digital Behavior:** Constant phone use for group chat monitoring, anxiety when the phone buzzes, or obsessive deletion of messages.
* **How to Talk to Your Child:** Approach conversations with empathy and without judgment. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with [group name]?” or “Have they been respectful of your time for classes and sleep?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priorities, and you will support them no matter what.
* **If Your Child is Hurt:**
* **Get Medical Care Immediately:** Your child’s health is paramount. Call 911 if there’s a medical emergency. Do not delay for fear of “getting in trouble.”
* **Document Everything:** Take photos of injuries, screenshots of texts or group chats, and write down every detail your child shares (dates, times, names, locations) as soon as possible.
* **Save Evidence:** Preserve clothing, receipts, or any physical objects related to the hazing.
* **Dealing with the University:** Document every conversation or email with university administrators (Dean of Students, student conduct, campus police). Ask specifically about prior incidents involving the same organization and what measures the school took. Remember, university investigations often focus on institutional image.
* **When to Talk to a Lawyer:** If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or hiding what happened, contact an experienced hazing attorney.
### 8.2 For Students / Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning
If you are a student from Coppell experiencing or witnessing hazing at a Texas university, your safety and well-being are paramount.
* **Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?**
* Ask yourself: Am I being forced to do something I don’t want to? Would I do this if there were no social consequences? Is this activity dangerous, degrading, or illegal? Would the university or my parents approve? Am I being told to keep secrets? If the answer is yes to any of these, it’s likely hazing.
* Remember the **Three-Tier Classification System** from Section 2: Subtle hazing (servitude, social control), harassment hazing (yelling, sleep deprivation, humiliation), and violent hazing (forced drinking, beatings, sexual acts) are *all hazing*.
* **Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story:** Texas law explicitly states that consent is **not a defense** to hazing. The law recognizes that fear of exclusion, peer pressure, and the desire to belong create an environment where true consent is impossible. You have the right to be safe.
* **Exiting and Reporting Safely:**
* **Immediate Danger:** If you are in immediate danger, **call 911**. Most Texas schools and state law offer **amnesty** for medical emergencies, even if underage drinking was involved.
* **If You Want to Quit:** You have the legal right to leave at any time. Inform trusted individuals outside the organization first (parent, RA, friend). Send an email or text to leadership stating your resignation. Avoid “one last meeting” where you might be pressured.
* **Protecting from Retaliation:** Document any threats or harassment. Report fears of retaliation to the Dean of Students or campus police. Texas law makes harassment and stalking crimes.
* **Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty:** Texas law encourages calling for help in emergencies by offering immunity for good-faith reporting. You will not get in trouble for seeking medical assistance in an overdose or injury situation, even if it involved illegal activities.
### 8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses: A Path to Accountability
If you were part of a hazing incident, or witnessed one, you may feel guilt, fear of reprisal, or a desire for redemption. Your actions can prevent future tragedy.
* **Your Role in Accountability:** Your testimony and evidence—especially digital communications—can be instrumental in holding perpetrators and institutions accountable, and in potentially saving lives.
* **Navigating Legal Exposure:** Lawyers can help you understand your rights and potential legal exposure, advising you on how to cooperate with investigators or civil litigation in a way that protects you while seeking justice.
* **Cooperation is Powerful:** While daunting, cooperating with authorities or victims’ attorneys can be an important step towards true accountability and healing.
### 8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case
For Coppell families pursuing a hazing claim, avoiding these common errors is essential. These mistakes can fatally undermine a case before it even begins. This is why immediate legal counsel is so vital. Watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes that can ruin a personal injury case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY
1. **Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence:**
* **Why it’s wrong:** Deleting crucial texts, photos, or group chats looks like a cover-up, can be construed as obstruction of justice, and makes proving your claim nearly impossible.
* **What to do instead:** Preserve everything immediately, even if it feels embarrassing or incriminating.
2. **Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly:**
* **Why it’s wrong:** This immediately puts the organization on alert, prompting them to destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare defenses.
* **What to do instead:** Document everything, then call a lawyer *before* any confrontation.
3. **Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms Without Legal Review:**
* **Why it’s wrong:** Universities may pressure you to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements that effectively waive your right to pursue a civil lawsuit, often for a minimal settlement far below the true value of the case.
* **What to do instead:** Do NOT sign *anything* from the university or an insurance company without an attorney reviewing it first.
4. **Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer:**
* **Why it’s wrong:** Anything posted online will be scrutinized by defense attorneys. Inconsistencies or emotional posts can be used against your credibility or used to allege you waived privacy.
* **What to do instead:** Document privately. Your legal team can advise on how and when to best manage public communication.
5. **Letting Your Child Go Back for a “Last Meeting” with the Organization:**
* **Why it’s wrong:** Organizations may offer a “talk” to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can harm a future legal case.
* **What to do instead:** Once you’re considering legal action, all communication with the student organization should go through your legal counsel.
6. **Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”:**
* **Why it’s wrong:** Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations can run out. Universities often prioritize their own image and legal protection over the victim’s full recovery or accountability.
* **What to do instead:** Preserve evidence NOW and consult a lawyer immediately. The university’s internal process is not a substitute for legal action.
7. **Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer:**
* **Why it’s wrong:** Insurance adjusters are trained to minimize payouts. Recorded statements can be used against you, and initial settlement offers are typically lowball.
* **What to do instead:** Politely decline to speak and state, “My attorney will contact you.”
For more detailed guidance on evidence collection, Attorney911’s video on using your cell phone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots, photos, and digital communications.
### 8.5 Short FAQ
* **”Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”**
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, and UT) have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU and Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its specific facts. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
* **”Is hazing a felony in Texas?”**
It can be. While hazing is typically a Class B misdemeanor by default in Texas, it becomes a **state jail felony** if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who are officers of an organization and fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.
* **”Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”**
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that **consent is not a defense** to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” given under peer pressure, a power imbalance, or fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent and does not absolve the perpetrators or institutions of liability.
* **”How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”**
Generally, you have **2 years from the date of injury or death** to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be “tolled” (paused). **Time is critical**—evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and organizations destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to understand the specific deadline for your case. Learn more about the statute of limitations in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c
* **”What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”**
The location of the hazing does not automatically eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held liable based on sponsorship, control over the organization, prior knowledge of dangerous activities, and the foreseeability of harm. Many major hazing cases, such as the Pi Delta Psi retreat death and the Sigma Pi unofficial house death, occurred off-campus and still resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments against both local and national entities.
* **”Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”**
We understand confidentiality is a major concern. Most hazing cases achieve a settlement before going to trial. Often, these settlements include confidentiality agreements. You can also request that court records be sealed to protect your child’s identity. We prioritize your family’s privacy while aggressively pursuing accountability.
* **”How much is my hazing case worth?”**
There is no average or set amount for hazing cases because each case is unique. The value depends on numerous factors, including the severity of injuries (physical and psychological), long-term impact on health and earning potential, the number of liable parties, the strength of the evidence, and the specific damages incurred. Our firm will meticulously evaluate all potential economic and non-economic damages to determine a fair assessment for your specific situation. Watch our video explaining how personal injury settlements are determined: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onBzdkIWadY
## About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action
When your family faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who intimately understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. For families in Coppell whose children attend Texas universities, navigating the legal complexities of hazing requires specialized expertise to ensure true accountability.
The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as **Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™**, is a Houston-based Texas personal injury firm with deep experience in serious injury, wrongful death, and institutional accountability cases. From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Coppell, Denton County, and surrounding areas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects families in Coppell and across the region, and we are prepared to bring our comprehensive expertise to your fight.
Our firm brings a unique blend of strengths to hazing litigation:
* **Insurance Insider Advantage:** Lupe Peña, one of our firm’s associate attorneys, was formerly an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She knows their playbook inside and out—how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, their coverage exclusion arguments, and their settlement strategies. We know their game plan because we used to run it. Lupe Peña’s complete professional background is available at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/
* **Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions:** Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, has an impressive background, including being one of the few Texas firms involved in the **BP Texas City explosion litigation**. This experience in federal court and against billion-dollar corporations means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their formidable defense teams. We fight for our clients, no matter how powerful the opponent. Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/
* **Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience:** We have a proven track record in obtaining multi-million dollar settlements and verdicts in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. We meticulously work with economists and medical experts to value lifetime care needs for brain injuries or permanent disabilities, ensuring our clients receive the full compensation they deserve. Our wrongful death practice area information can be found at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.
* **Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise:** Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a crucial understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual perspective allows us to advise witnesses and former members who may face criminal exposure while also building a strong civil case. Our criminal defense experience is critical in these complex hazing cases, detailed further at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.
* **Investigative Depth:** We leverage a vast network of experts, including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, economists, and psychologists. Our investigative prowess extends to obtaining hidden evidence—from deleted group chats and social media content to subpoenaed national fraternity records and university files discovered through rigorous legal processes. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it often does.
We understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments often operate behind closed doors. We know how to investigate modern hazing, uncover a culture of secrecy, and bring to light the truth. We address the nuances of powerhouse defense lawyers and insurance coverage fights, all while balancing your family’s privacy with the pursuit of public accountability. Our firm approaches hazing cases with profound empathy and unwavering victim advocacy. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face, and our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We aim for thorough investigation and real accountability, not just quick settlements. Attorney911’s YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/@Manginellolawfirm) features 37 educational videos on personal injury law, wrongful death, and client rights, demonstrating our commitment to client education.
If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus – be it the University of Houston, Texas A&M, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, Baylor, or any other institution – we want to hear from you. Families in Coppell, Denton County, and throughout North Texas have the right to answers and accountability.
For a confidential, no-obligation consultation, contact The Manginello Law Firm. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.
**What to expect in your free consultation:**
* We’ll listen to your story without judgment.
* We’ll review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
* We’ll explain your legal options: pursuing a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
* We’ll discuss realistic timelines and what you can expect during the legal process.
* We’ll answer your questions about costs. We operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning **we don’t get paid unless we win your case**. Watch our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc
* There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot—we want you to take the time you need to decide.
* Everything you tell us is completely confidential.
**Call us today.** You don’t have to face this alone.
**The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911**
**Call:** 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
**Direct:** (713) 528-9070
**Cell:** (713) 443-4781
**Website:** https://attorney911.com
**Email:** ralph@atty911.com
**Hablamos Español:** Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.
Whether you’re in Coppell or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone.
—
**Legal Disclaimer**
This article is provided for **informational and educational purposes only**. It is **not legal advice** and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.
Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.
If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.
**The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911**
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
**Call:** 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
**Direct:** (713) 528-9070 | **Cell:** (713) 443-4781
**Website:** https://attorney911.com
**Email:** ralph@atty911.com