Hazing on Texas Campuses: A Complete Guide for Town of Highland Park Families

It’s an ordinary Friday night, but for a college student from Town of Highland Park, attending a university like SMU just down the road, this evening takes a dark turn. What began as a “brotherhood event” at an off-campus fraternity house—a ritual that included forced excessive drinking and degrading acts—escalates quickly. They’re called to rapid-fire drink until they vomit, then clean it up, all while older members film on phones, chanting and laughing. Later, exhausted and disoriented, another pledge collapses, but no one calls 911 immediately because of a code of silence, a fear of “getting the chapter shut down,” or “getting in trouble.” The student finds themselves trapped between an unspoken loyalty to the group and their own safety, a dangerous spiral fueled by tradition and coercion.

This isn’t a fictional scenario; it’s a chilling reality that unfolds too often on college campuses across Texas and the nation. For Town of Highland Park families, whose sons and daughters attend some of the state’s most prestigious universities, the threat of hazing is a serious concern, often disguised under the guise of “tradition” or “bonding.”

This comprehensive guide aims to shed light on hazing and the law in Texas, offering critical insights for families in Town of Highland Park and across Texas. We want you to understand:

• What hazing actually looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes.
• The intricate framework of Texas and federal law regarding hazing.
• Essential lessons from major national hazing cases and their direct relevance to Texas families.
• The specific challenges and incidents that have occurred at Southern Methodist University (SMU), along with University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, University of Texas at Austin (UT), and Baylor University.
• The legal recourse and options available to victims and families in Town of Highland Park and throughout Texas.

This article provides general information, not specific legal advice. The Manginello Law Firm is always prepared to evaluate individual cases based on their unique facts to offer tailored guidance. We serve families throughout Texas, including those residing in Town of Highland Park and its vibrant community within University Park, Highland Park, and the broader Dallas County area.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
  • Call 911 for medical emergencies, without hesitation.
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help—that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.
• In the first 48 hours, every minute counts:
  • Prioritize getting medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Their health comes first.
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted. This includes screencapturing group chats, texts, and direct messages, photographing injuries from multiple angles, and saving any physical items such as clothing or receipts.
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh: who was involved, what happened, when it occurred, and where.
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity or sorority leader directly.
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company without legal counsel.
    • Post details on public social media, as this can compromise a future legal case.
    • Allow your child to delete messages or “clean up” any evidence.
• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
  • Evidence disappears alarmingly fast. Group chats are routinely deleted, paddles and other props are destroyed, and witnesses may be coerced or coached to alter their stories.
  • Universities often move quickly to control the narrative, which may not align with your child’s best interests.
  • We can help preserve crucial evidence and protect your child’s rights during this critical period.
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Town of Highland Park families, the common image of hazing might be a scene from an old movie—some harmless pranks, perhaps a push-up or two. However, hazing in 2025 is far more insidious, dangerous, and often digitally driven. It is no longer just about “a dumb prank” or “just partying”; it delves into psychological manipulation, severe physical abuse, and even life-threatening situations, often under the cloak of secrecy.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

At its core, hazing refers to any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, whether occurring on or off campus, by one person or a group, directed against a student. This act is committed for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. Crucially, this act endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student.

It’s vital to recognize that an individual’s statement of “I agreed to it” does not automatically render an activity safe or legal, particularly where there’s a significant power imbalance, intense peer pressure, or an implied threat of social or group exclusion. The coercive environment inherent in many hazing scenarios negates true consent. We understand that for Town of Highland Park residents sending their children off to college, recognizing hazing can be difficult, as tactics have evolved significantly.

Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing has evolved into several distinct, often overlapping, categories, ranging from the subtle to the violently explicit:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is one of the most prevalent and deadly forms of hazing. It includes forced or coerced drinking, often through elaborate “chugging challenges,” “lineups” where multiple drinks are consumed in rapid succession, or dangerous games that demand excessive alcohol intake. Pledges are also pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, putting them at extreme risk. The focus is often on achieving dangerous levels of intoxication, leading to alcohol poisoning and, tragically, death.
• Physical Hazing: Beyond stereotypical paddling, physical hazing today can involve severe and prolonged physical abuse. This encompasses vicious beatings, brutal “workouts,” and “smokings”—intense calisthenics or exercises that push individuals far beyond their physical limits. Sleep deprivation, enforced food and water deprivation, and exposure to extreme environmental conditions (hot or cold) are also common tactics designed to break down a new member’s will and resilience.
• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This category is particularly degrading and psychologically damaging. It may involve forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts, demeaning positions like “roasted pig,” or forcing individuals to wear degrading costumes. Hazing can also feature acts with racial, homophobic, or misogynistic overtones, including the use of slurs and forced role-playing of stereotypes, leaving lasting scars.
• Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but profoundly impactful, psychological hazing centers on manipulation and emotional abuse. This includes constant verbal abuse, threats, forced social isolation, and sleep deprivation that affects mental clarity. Pledges may be subjected to intense interrogation, forced confessions, or public shaming, both in person and increasingly on social media, aimed at breaking their spirit and fostering absolute obedience.
• Digital/Online Hazing: A newer and rapidly evolving form, digital hazing leverages technology to extend the reach of abuse. This includes demanding participation in group chat dares, online “challenges,” and public humiliation via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Discord, and others. Pledges are often pressured to create or share compromising images or videos and are subjected to round-the-clock monitoring and demands through digital communication channels. For Town of Highland Park students, this digital aspect means hazing can follow them everywhere, even within the perceived safety of their dorms.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is not confined to the stereotypical “frat boy” image often depicted in media. It permeates various student organizations across university campuses, impacting students from diverse backgrounds. While fraternities and sororities, including Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations, are frequently associated with hazing incidents, the problem extends much further.

Beyond Greek life, hazing has been documented within:

• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / military-style groups: These organizations, often built on tradition and discipline, can sometimes cross the line into abusive “rites of passage.”
• Spirit squads and tradition clubs: Groups like the notorious Texas Cowboys-type organizations, dedicated to fostering school spirit, have also been implicated in hazing practices.
• Athletic teams: Across all sports—football, basketball, baseball, cheerleading, and more—hazing can occur, often under the guise of “team building” or “strengthening bonds.”
• Marching bands and performance groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups can harbor hazing rituals.
• Service, cultural, and academic organizations: Any group with a hierarchical structure and initiation process can potentially engage in hazing.

The prevalence of hazing across such a broad spectrum of student groups highlights how deeply embedded these practices can be within campus culture. Social status, tradition, and a code of secrecy are powerful forces that allow these harmful practices to persist, even when participants, organizers, and institutions are fully aware that hazing is illegal and explicitly prohibited. For families in Town of Highland Park, understanding this widespread nature of hazing is crucial, as their children might be vulnerable in many different campus environments.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas is critical for Town of Highland Park families and affected students. While the emotional and physical toll of hazing is immense, the law provides avenues for accountability and compensation.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has clear, explicit anti-hazing provisions outlined in the Texas Education Code, specifically Chapter 37, Subchapter F. Under this law, hazing is defined broadly as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, perpetrated on or off campus, by one person or with others, directed against a student. This act is committed for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. Crucially, the act must endanger the physical health or safety of a student (such as beatings, forced exercise, or coerced alcohol/drug consumption) or substantially affect their mental health or safety (e.g., extreme humiliation, intimidation).

For Town of Highland Park families, it’s particularly important to note:

• On or Off-Campus: The location of the hazing does not impact its legality. Hazing is illegal whether it occurs on university grounds, at an off-campus house, or during a remote retreat.
• Mental or Physical Harm: Hazing is not limited to physical violence. Psychological abuse, severe emotional distress, and intimidation are explicitly covered.
• Intent: An individual does not need to have malicious intent to be found in violation. “Reckless” conduct—meaning they knew of the risk and disregarded it—is sufficient.
• “Consent” is Not a Defense: Texas law explicitly states that the victim’s “consent” to the hazing activity is not a valid defense. This crucial point recognizes the coercive power dynamics at play.

Criminal Penalties: Hazing can lead to serious criminal charges:

• Class B Misdemeanor: This is the default classification for hazing that does not result in serious injury, carrying penalties of up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
• Class A Misdemeanor: If hazing causes an injury requiring medical treatment, the charge elevates.
• State Jail Felony: This applies if hazing results in serious bodily injury or death, carrying significant prison time and larger fines.
• Failure to Report: Individuals or officers who know about hazing and fail to report it can also face misdemeanor charges.
• Retaliation: Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

Organizational Liability: Texas law extends criminal accountability to organizations. An organization (such as a fraternity, sorority, or club) can face criminal prosecution if it authorized or encouraged the hazing, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it. Penalties for organizations can include fines up to $10,000 per violation and revocation of university recognition.

Reporter Protections: To encourage reporting, Texas law provides immunity from civil or criminal liability for individuals who report hazing in good faith. Furthermore, in medical emergencies, many university policies and state laws offer amnesty for students who call 911, even if underage drinking or other minor offenses were involved.

It is critical to remember that this is a summary of the law. The actual Texas Education Code contains more technical and specific language. For Town of Highland Park families dealing with a hazing incident, understanding these legal fundamentals is the first step toward seeking justice.

Criminal vs Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, two distinct legal pathways often emerge: criminal cases and civil cases. While both aim to address the harm caused, their goals, initiating parties, and outcomes differ significantly.

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (through a prosecutor’s office) against individuals suspected of breaking the law. The primary objective is to punish the offender for their actions, which can include incarceration, fines, and probation. In the context of hazing, typical criminal charges beyond direct hazing offenses can include:

  • Assault, aggravated assault, or even manslaughter in fatal cases.
  • Furnishing alcohol to minors, particularly when it leads to severe intoxication or death.
  • Drug offenses if illicit substances are part of the hazing.
  • Obstruction of justice or witness tampering if there’s a cover-up.

• Civil Cases: These are brought by the victims (or their surviving families in wrongful death cases) against the individuals and organizations responsible for the harm. The core purpose is monetary compensation to cover the victim’s losses and injuries, and to seek accountability. Civil hazing lawsuits often focus on legal theories such as:

  • Negligence and Gross Negligence: Failure to exercise reasonable care, or a conscious indifference to the welfare of others, leading to harm.
  • Wrongful Death: If hazing results in a fatality, family members can sue for their losses.
  • Premises Liability: If the hazing occurred on property where the owner failed to maintain a safe environment or prevent foreseeable harm.
  • Negligent Hiring/Supervision: If a university or national organization failed to properly vet or oversee individuals or chapters.
  • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: For severe psychological trauma.

It’s important for Town of Highland Park families to understand that criminal and civil cases can proceed concurrently. A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil case. The standards of proof differ, and even if criminal charges are not filed or do not result in a conviction, a civil case can still be successful in securing compensation and accountability for the victim.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, hazing incidents on college campuses are increasingly subject to federal oversight, which can offer additional avenues for accountability and protection for Town of Highland Park students.

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant piece of federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding enhance their transparency and preventative measures regarding hazing. Key requirements, being phased in by around 2026, include:

  • Increased Reporting: Campuses must report hazing incidents more transparently, including details on the organizations involved, the nature of the incidents, and the disciplinary actions taken.
  • Strengthened Prevention: Universities are required to implement more robust hazing education and prevention programs for students and staff.
  • Public Data: This act aims to make hazing data publicly accessible, allowing families to research institutional histories and evaluate risks more effectively.

• Title IX / Clery Act: These federal laws, while not exclusively focused on hazing, often become relevant when hazing incidents involve specific elements:

  • Title IX: This federal civil rights law prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded education programs. If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based hostility, or forces individuals into sexually degrading acts, Title IX obligations are triggered for the university. This can lead to internal investigations, disciplinary actions, and sometimes civil litigation against the institution for failing to protect students.
  • Clery Act: This law requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents often overlap with categories of crime covered by Clery, such as assault, alcohol-related offenses, and drug offenses. Accurate reporting under Clery can provide evidence of a pattern of incidents that universities were aware of but failed to address adequately.

These federal mandates underscore a growing national recognition of the severity of hazing and place additional responsibilities on universities to protect their students. For Town of Highland Park families, this federal framework means that institutions cannot simply dismiss grievous hazing incidents, especially those with sexual or criminal elements.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

One of the most critical aspects of pursuing a civil hazing lawsuit is identifying all potentially liable parties. Hazing incidents are rarely the fault of a single individual; they often stem from systemic issues and a chain of responsibility. For Town of Highland Park families considering legal action, understanding who can be held accountable is paramount:

• Individual Students: Those directly involved in planning, carrying out, or facilitating the hazing acts (e.g., forcing alcohol consumption, physical assault, coordinating degrading rituals) can be held personally liable. This also extends to those who, despite knowing about the hazing, failed to intervene or actively participated in covering it up.
• Local Chapter / Organization: The specific campus fraternity, sorority, club, or student organization itself can be sued if it is recognized as a legal entity. This includes the officers and “pledge educators” who authorized or actively oversaw the hazing activities.
• National Fraternity/Sorority: Most college Greek organizations operate under a national or international headquarters. These national entities set policies, provide training, collect dues, and often have a level of oversight over their local chapters. They can be held liable if:
  • They had knowledge of previous hazing incidents within the chapter or similar patterns across other chapters but failed to take effective preventative or disciplinary action.
  • Their national policies were negligently enforced.
  • They tacitly condoned or encouraged hazing through a culture of looking the other way.
• University or Governing Board: The educational institution can be a defendant if its negligence contributed to the hazing. This could involve:
  • Negligent Supervision: Failing to adequately supervise recognized student organizations, especially after prior complaints.
  • Failure to Enforce Policies: Having anti-hazing policies but failing to enforce them consistently or meaningfully.
  • Ignoring Warnings: Not acting on known or foreseeable dangers of hazing, particularly if there were prior incidents.
  • Deliberate Indifference: In cases involving sexual hazing or harassment, universities can be held liable under Title IX for demonstrating deliberate indifference.
  • Premises Liability: If the hazing occurred on university property where unsafe conditions contributed to the injury.
• Third Parties: Depending on the specific circumstances, other entities might also bear responsibility:
  • Landlords/Property Owners: If hazing occurred at an off-campus house where the owner had knowledge of dangerous activities and failed to act.
  • Alcohol Providers: Bars, liquor stores, or even social hosts who illegally provided alcohol to minors where it directly contributed to the hazing injury or death (under dram shop laws in Texas).
  • Security Companies or Event Organizers: If they were responsible for providing a safe environment at an event where hazing occurred.

It is crucial to understand that every hazing case is fact-specific. Not every party listed above will automatically be liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney meticulously investigates the chain of events to identify all negligent parties, ensuring that all avenues for accountability and compensation are explored for Town of Highland Park families.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

The tragic legacy of hazing has etched itself into legal precedents across the nation. While these incidents may have occurred outside Texas, their outcomes profoundly influence how hazing cases are pursued and resolved for families in Town of Highland Park and throughout the state. They demonstrate patterns, legal strategies that work, and the severe consequences for individuals and institutions involved in hazing.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The most common and devastating pattern in hazing involves coerced, excessive alcohol consumption, often leading to alcohol poisoning and death. These cases underscore a tragic script that repeats itself far too often:

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a “bid acceptance” night involving extreme alcohol consumption. Horrifying security camera footage from the Beta Theta Pi house showed Piazza falling repeatedly down stairs, suffering traumatic brain injuries, and fraternity brothers delaying critical medical help for nearly 12 hours. The aftermath led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the enactment of Pennsylvania’s landmark Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. This case set a precedent for holding individuals and institutions accountable for delayed medical intervention and a culture of silence.
• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a freshman pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to consume them rapidly. His death led to criminal hazing charges against multiple fraternity members, most of whom pled guilty to misdemeanors. Florida State University responded by temporarily suspending all Greek life activities and overhauling its anti-hazing policies, highlighting the systemic failures often revealed after such tragedies.
• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): During a “Bible study” drinking game, Max Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, was forced to drink copious amounts of alcohol as punishment for answering fraternity questions incorrectly. He died with a blood alcohol content of 0.495%. The profound public outrage and legal action that followed resulted in the passage of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, making felony hazing a reality in the state. A jury later awarded the family $6.1 million, affirming the fraternity’s role in creating a lethal environment.
• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, was forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” night ritual and subsequently died of alcohol poisoning. The incident drew national attention, leading to multiple criminal convictions for fraternity members involved in the hazing. In 2023, the Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national and approximately $3M from Bowling Green State University), demonstrating the severe financial and reputational consequences for both national organizations and educational institutions. This case further strengthened Ohio’s anti-hazing laws.

These cases collectively illustrate that extreme intoxication, the tragic delay in calling 911, and a pervasive culture of silence are recurring legal and ethical failures that families in Town of Highland Park may face challenges against when seeking justice.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and ritualized hazing inflict severe bodily harm and psychological trauma, often under the guise of “tradition” or “initiation.” These incidents are often moved to remote locations to avoid detection.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, suffered a fatal traumatic brain injury during a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual at a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. Blindfolded and weighted down with a heavy backpack, he was repeatedly tackled. Fraternity members delayed calling 911 to concoct a cover-up story. The fallout was severe: multiple members were convicted, and the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, a landmark decision that held an organization criminally liable. This case underscores that off-campus “retreats” are not insulated from accountability and can be as dangerous, if not more so, than on-campus events.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it deeply affects athletic programs, where strong team loyalties and a hierarchical structure can foster environments ripe for abuse.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): A widespread scandal erupted when former football players alleged a pattern of systemic, sexualized, and racist hazing within the highly-regarded football program over several years. Accusations included coaches ignoring or perpetuating a culture of hazing that involved sexual acts and racial discrimination. The scandal led to the firing of long-time head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who later confidentially settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit. Multiple former players also filed civil lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff. This case profoundly demonstrates that hazing extends beyond Greek organizations, permeating major athletic programs and raising critical questions about institutional oversight and responsibility in Town of Highland Park-connected university systems.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These harrowing national cases, from the death of Timothy Piazza to the systemic abuse at Northwestern, reveal common, tragic threads: forced drinking to dangerous levels, severe humiliation and violence, tragic delays or denials of medical care, and concerted efforts to cover up incidents. They also highlight a disturbing truth: meaningful reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements often only materialize after litigation brings public scrutiny and demands accountability.

For families in Town of Highland Park who may have children attending UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these national lessons are not just cautionary tales; they inform the legal landscape in Texas. The legal precedents set in these cases provide a blueprint for how to demonstrate foreseeability, prove negligence, and establish a pattern of institutional indifference. When a Texas chapter of a national organization repeats the same dangerous script seen in another state, it strengthens the argument for holding the national entity and the university accountable. These cases ensure that Town of Highland Park families pursuing justice against hazing on Texas campuses are not navigating uncharted waters, but rather leveraging a growing body of legal victories.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Town of Highland Park families, the impact of hazing can feel particularly close to home, especially with their children attending universities like Southern Methodist University (SMU) right here in Dallas County, or other major Texas institutions. While SMU is geographically closest, serving a significant number of Town of Highland Park students, the issues of hazing are pervasive across all major Texas universities, demanding attention from families throughout the region. We will begin with SMU, given its direct relevance to Town of Highland Park, and then address other key Texas universities.

5.1 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Southern Methodist University (SMU), situated in the vibrant heart of University Park, Dallas County—just moments from Town of Highland Park—is renowned for its strong academic programs and a robust Greek life presence, attracting many students from affluent communities like Town of Highland Park and its surrounding areas. SMU’s campus culture, often characterized by its diverse student organizations and Greek affiliations, makes it a central point of interest for local families when it comes to understanding hazing risks. The close proximity means that many Town of Highland Park families maintain strong connections with SMU, often through alumni networks, local student attendance, or community involvement.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU maintains clear anti-hazing policies, which are published online and in student handbooks. These policies explicitly define hazing as any activity that endangers mental or physical health for initiation or affiliation within an organization. SMU prohibits forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and activities that cause mental distress.

SMU provides various reporting channels for hazing incidents, including:

• The Dean of Students Office.
• The Office of Student Conduct.
• SMU Police Department (SMU PD).
• An anonymous online reporting form.
• Through their hazing prevention efforts, SMU uses systems like Real Response for anonymous reporting.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Despite SMU’s policies, hazing incidents have unfortunately occurred on its campus. A notable example is the Kappa Alpha Order incident around 2017. Reports emerged of new members allegedly being paddled, forced to consume alcohol, and deprived of sleep. This led to the temporary suspension of the Kappa Alpha Order chapter and restrictions on its recruiting activities for several years.

Another incident in 2021 involved a social fraternity that was suspended after an investigation into hazing allegations, demonstrating SMU’s willingness to take action against violating organizations. Such incidents highlight that even prestigious universities like SMU, closely tied to the Town of Highland Park community, wrestle with persistent hazing issues.

• SMU Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): In November 2022, SMU announced a four-year suspension of its Sigma Alpha Epsilon chapter for hazing and alcohol violations, following an investigation that found the fraternity responsible. This severe penalty underscores SMU’s commitment to holding organizations accountable for dangerous behaviors.

5.1.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Town of Highland Park families, understanding the jurisdiction for a hazing incident at SMU is crucial. Since SMU is a private university located within Dallas County, any criminal investigation might involve SMU PD (for on-campus incidents) and/or the University Park Police Department or Dallas County Sheriff’s Office (for off-campus incidents in the surrounding areas). Civil lawsuits against SMU or its affiliated organizations would typically be filed in a Dallas County court, where the relevant local laws and judicial processes apply.

Potential defendants in an SMU hazing case could include:

• Individual students directly involved.
• The local fraternity or sorority chapter.
• The national organization.
• Southern Methodist University itself, depending on its knowledge and actions.
• Property owners of off-campus residences where hazing occurred.

5.1.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For Town of Highland Park students and parents connected to SMU, active vigilance and swift action are paramount:

• Understand SMU’s Policies: Familiarize yourselves with SMU’s anti-hazing policies and the official reporting mechanisms.
• Document Everything: Keep detailed records of any suspicious activities, communications, or mood changes related to Greek life or other student organizations.
• Report Concerns: Use SMU’s anonymous reporting systems or reach out directly to the Dean of Students or SMU PD if hazing is suspected.
• Prioritize Safety: If an SMU student from Town of Highland Park is in immediate danger, call 911 first, then contact SMU PD.
• Seek Legal Counsel Promptly: Given the university’s location directly in Dallas County, securing legal advice quickly from an attorney experienced in Dallas-area hazing cases, such as Attorney911, can help preserve evidence and navigate both university and legal processes effectively. We understand the local jurisdictional nuances impacting Town of Highland Park families and students.

5.2 University of Houston (UH)

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Houston (UH), a large, dynamic urban campus in Houston, Texas, serves a diverse student body comprised of both commuters and residents. Its active Greek life, encompassing a wide array of fraternities and sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, and multicultural groups), along with numerous other student organizations, contributes to a bustling campus environment. Town of Highland Park families, often sending students across the state for diverse educational opportunities, should recognize UH’s vibrant social scene as a potential environment where hazing can occur.

5.2.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UH maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, clearly stating that hazing is prohibited both on and off campus. Their policy aligns with Texas law, proscribing any activity that endangers mental or physical health for initiation or affiliation purposes. This includes forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and any activity designed to cause mental distress.

UH provides comprehensive channels for reporting hazing incidents:

• The Dean of Students Office.
• The Office of Student Conduct.
• University of Houston Police Department (UHPD).
• Online reporting forms and anonymous tip lines via their website.

5.2.3 Example Incident & Response

UH has faced its share of hazing allegations and disciplinary actions. A significant case involved Pi Kappa Alpha in 2016. Pledges allegedly experienced severe sleep and food deprivation during a multi-day event, with one student reportedly suffering a lacerated spleen after a violent physical act. The chapter faced criminal charges for misdemeanor hazing and was subsequently suspended by the university, highlighting the severe consequences that can arise. Other fraternities at UH have faced disciplinary actions, including suspensions and probation, for behaviors “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort” associated with alcohol misuse and policy violations.

These incidents demonstrate UH’s willingness to suspend chapters, though full public details concerning ongoing violations and internal investigations are not always as transparent as some other public universities.

5.2.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Town of Highland Park families whose children attend UH, understanding the legal jurisdiction is key. Depending on the incident’s location, investigations could involve the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) or the Houston Police Department (HPD) for off-campus events within Houston city limits. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Harris County courts, where Houston is located.

Potential defendants in a UH hazing case are similar to other universities and could include the individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, the university itself (though public universities in Texas enjoy some sovereign immunity), and potentially property owners.

5.2.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For Town of Highland Park families with connections to UH, it’s crucial to be proactive:

• Reporting: Utilize UH’s official reporting channels, including contacting the Dean of Students or UHPD, or using anonymous online reporting forms.
• Documentation: Actively document any suspected hazing, including dates, times, descriptions, and any communication that supports concerns about hazing.
• Seek Legal Counsel: Contacting a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases, such as Attorney911, can be instrumental in navigating both university procedures and legal avenues. We are equipped to uncover prior disciplinary actions and internal university files, which are often key to building a strong case.

5.3 Texas A&M University

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M University in College Station, a cornerstone for many Texas families, including those from Town of Highland Park, boasts a culture deeply intertwined with tradition, including its renowned Corps of Cadets and a robust Greek life. Students from Town of Highland Park often travel to College Station, making this university a significant point of concern for hazing. The university’s emphasis on tradition and loyalty, while positive in many respects, also creates an environment where hazing can sometimes be inadvertently or intentionally perpetuated under the guises of “rite of passage” or “Aggie Spirit.”

5.3.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M unequivocally prohibits hazing, with a policy that mirrors state law in its breadth, covering both on-campus and off-campus activities. The university is explicit about forbidding any act that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation.

Texas A&M provides several avenues for reporting hazing concerns:

• The Division of Student Affairs.
• Student Conduct Office.
• Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD).
• An anonymous online reporting system called “Ethics Point.”

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced severe hazing incidents, not only within its Greek system but also within its iconic Corps of Cadets and other organizations.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (2021): Two pledges alleged facing extreme hazing rituals involving strenuous physical activity. Worse, they claimed substances, including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, were poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns that necessitated skin graft surgeries. The Sigma Alpha Epsilon chapter was suspended for two years by the university, and the pledges subsequently sued for $1 million. This incident highlights the extreme dangers of physical and chemical hazing.
• Corps of Cadets Hazing (2023): A high-profile federal lawsuit was filed by a former cadet alleging degrading hazing practices within the Corps. These included forced participation in simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a humiliating “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages, drawing national attention to hazing within military-style organizations. Texas A&M stated it addressed the matter under its student conduct rules, but such incidents raise serious questions about institutional oversight.
• Kappa Sigma (2023, ongoing): Allegations of hazing surfaced that resulted in severe injuries, specifically rhabdomyolysis—a serious condition involving muscle breakdown from extreme physical hazing. This ongoing litigation emphasizes the long-term physical consequences and the need for specialized medical and legal attention for such injuries.

These incidents underscore the challenges Texas A&M faces in balancing tradition with student safety and demonstrate that hazing is a pervasive issue that spans across various student organizations, including Greek life and the revered Corps of Cadets.

5.3.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Town of Highland Park families with connections to Texas A&M, any criminal investigation could involve the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) for on-campus incidents or the Bryan Police Department/Brazos County Sheriff’s Office for off-campus occurrences in the College Station-Bryan metropolitan area. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in Brazos County courts. Due to Texas A&M’s status as a public university, sovereign immunity could be a factor, though exceptions for gross negligence or systemic failures can apply.

Potential defendants often include: individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, Texas A&M University, and property owners.

5.3.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For Town of Highland Park families interacting with Texas A&M:

• Familiarize with Policies: Understand Texas A&M’s specific anti-hazing policies, especially within Greek life and the Corps of Cadets.
• Document: Meticulously document any suspected hazing, whether it involves Greek life or Corps activities, including specific dates, times, and detailed descriptions.
• Report: Utilize A&M’s various reporting channels, including UPD, the Student Conduct Office, or their anonymous Ethics Point system.
• Prioritize Medical Care: If a student is injured, ensure immediate medical attention and clearly state that injuries are hazing-related for documentation.
• Consult Legal Expertise: Given the unique complexities of A&M’s culture, seeking legal counsel from an attorney experienced in Texas A&M hazing cases is crucial. Attorney911 can help navigate both specific university processes and the local legal framework to seek accountability.

5.4 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin, one of the state’s largest and most prestigious public universities, is a popular choice for many Town of Highland Park students branching out from Dallas County. Its vibrant campus life includes a large and active Greek system, esteemed athletic programs, and numerous student organizations. While UT Austin is celebrated for its academic excellence and rich traditions, it has also grappled with serious hazing issues across its diverse student groups. Proximity to the state capital means that UT cases often receive significant public and legislative attention.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UT Austin maintains a clear and robust anti-hazing policy, rigorously enforced through the Dean of Students Office and the Office of Student Conduct. The policy aligns with Texas state law, prohibiting any act on or off campus that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or continued membership in an organization.

Notably, UT Austin distinguishes itself with a relatively high degree of transparency regarding hazing. The university publishes a public Hazing Violations webpage (hazing.utexas.edu) that lists organizations found responsible for hazing, the specific conduct involved, and the sanctions imposed.

Reporting channels at UT Austin include:

• The Dean of Students Office.
• The Office of Student Conduct.
• The Title IX Office (if sexual harassment or assault is involved).
• University of Texas Police Department (UTPD).
• Anonymous online reporting forms.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s public hazing violations page provides a stark record of ongoing issues:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): This fraternity faced sanctions after new members were reportedly directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, actions deemed hazing. The chapter was placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education, demonstrating the continued presence of traditional hazing rituals.
• Texas Wranglers (2022): A well-known spirit organization, the Texas Wranglers, was disciplined for hazing violations, including alcohol misuse and forced physical activities, underscoring that hazing extends beyond the Greek system to other campus traditions.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (2024): Despite previous sanctions and suspensions, the UT Austin chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) has continued to face scrutiny for incidents involving alcohol and alleged assault. In January 2024, an Australian exchange student filed a lawsuit against the chapter alleging assault at a party, resulting in severe injuries including a dislocated leg, broken ligaments, and a fractured tibia. This incident occurred while the chapter was already under suspension for prior violations, highlighting a pattern of disregard for rules.

UT Austin’s transparency, while commendable for public awareness, also plainly reveals the persistent challenges it faces in eradicating hazing. Repeated violations suggest that cultural changes within certain organizations are slow despite official sanctions.

5.4.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Town of Highland Park families with students at UT Austin, criminal investigations may involve the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD) for incidents occurring on campus or the Austin Police Department (APD) for off-campus events. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Travis County courts. While UT Austin, as a public university, might raise sovereign immunity defenses, the university’s own detailed records of prior hazing incidents can be powerful evidence in civil suits demonstrating institutional knowledge and foreseeability.

Potential defendants in a UT Austin hazing case commonly include: individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, the University of Texas at Austin itself, and potentially property owners.

5.4.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

For Town of Highland Park families involved with UT Austin:

• Consult UT’s Hazing Violations Page: This public resource (https://hazing.utexas.edu) is invaluable for transparency, allowing families to research any prior incidents involving specific organizations.
• Proactive Documentation: Given the transparency of UT’s reporting, use this to bolster any documentation of hazing from private photos, text messages, and eyewitness accounts.
• Prompt Reporting: Utilize UT’s official channels, including the Dean of Students or UTPD, for reporting.
• Seek Legal Counsel: An attorney experienced in UT Austin hazing cases, such as Attorney911, can effectively leverage the university’s public records against responsible parties and navigate the Travis County legal system, offering Town of Highland Park families a robust path to accountability.

5.5 Baylor University

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University, a prominent private Christian institution located in Waco, Texas, is known for its strong values, competitive academics, and passionate athletic programs. While many Town of Highland Park students are drawn to Baylor for its unique environment and academic offerings, the university has also faced significant challenges related to campus misconduct, including hazing, particularly in the wake of past scandals concerning sexual assault reporting. The emphasis on faith and community at Baylor might lead some Town of Highland Park families to mistakenly believe their students are insulated from hazing, but this is rarely the case.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor University maintains a comprehensive anti-hazing policy that is clearly articulated in its student code of conduct and through its student activities office. The policy prohibits any act that causes or is likely to cause physical or psychological harm or humiliation to an individual for the purpose of initiation, admission, affiliation, or continued membership in any organization.

Baylor’s reporting channels include:

• The Division of Student Life.
• The Office of Student Conduct.
• The Baylor University Police Department (BUPD).
• An anonymous reporting system available via their website.

5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor has encountered hazing incidents, demonstrating that no institution is entirely immune, regardless of its mission or values:

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): Following an internal investigation, 14 players on the Baylor baseball team were suspended due to hazing violations. The suspensions were staggered over the early season, impacting the team’s performance and highlighting that hazing can occur within prestigious athletic programs at Baylor. This incident underscored the university’s commitment to taking disciplinary action against athletes involved in such conduct.
• Additional Disciplinary Actions: While Baylor does not maintain a public online log of all hazing violations similar to UT Austin, internal records and periodic campus announcements indicate that various student organizations, including Greek chapters, have faced disciplinary action, probation, or suspension for hazing-related offenses, particularly involving alcohol misuse and forced activities.

These incidents are viewed against the backdrop of Baylor’s past controversies, including a major sexual assault scandal and Title IX violations that drew national scrutiny. These past challenges underscore the importance of robust internal oversight and accountability mechanisms when allegations of student misconduct, including hazing, arise.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Town of Highland Park families dealing with a hazing incident at Baylor, criminal investigations would typically involve the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) for on-campus incidents or the Waco Police Department and McLennan County Sheriff’s Office for off-campus occurrences. As a private university, Baylor does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it more directly susceptible to civil lawsuits. Hazing cases would generally be filed in McLennan County courts.

Potential defendants in a Baylor hazing case typically include: individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, and Baylor University itself.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For Town of Highland Park families whose children attend Baylor:

• Review Baylor’s Policies: Carefully examine Baylor’s anti-hazing policies and reporting mechanisms, as well as their broader student conduct guidelines.
• Documentation: Maintain thorough records of any suspected hazing, including details of dates, times, locations, and any distressing communications.
• Report: Utilize Baylor’s official reporting channels, including Student Life or BUPD, or their anonymous reporting system for sensitive matters.
• Prioritize Safety & Medical Care: Ensure immediate medical attention for any injured students, clearly documenting that injuries are hazing-related to secure comprehensive medical records.
• Seek Experienced Legal Counsel: Contacting an attorney with experience in hazing cases at private universities, such as Attorney911, can provide invaluable guidance. We can help navigate specific campus politics and the legal framework in McLennan County, ensuring that Town of Highland Park families have strong advocacy in their pursuit of justice.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For Town of Highland Park families, understanding the complex relationship between local chapters on Texas campuses and their national Greek organizations is crucial in hazing cases. The issues that arise at SMU, UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor are often not isolated incidents; they can be part of a broader, systemic pattern of misconduct linked to national organizations.

Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities and sororities active at Texas campuses—such as Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi, and Kappa Alpha Order—are chapters of larger, national organizations. These national headquarters typically:

• Draft and mandate anti-hazing policies: They often possess extensive policy manuals and risk management guidelines. IRONICALLY, these policies are usually in place because the organizations themselves have a documented history of hazing incidents, including deaths and catastrophic injuries, at chapters nationwide.
• Are aware of patterns: National HQs often track disciplinary actions and are cognizant of recurring hazing methods, such as forced drinking nights, aggressive physical rituals, and humiliating initiation practices.

When a Texas chapter—whether at SMU in Dallas County or at any other major university—engages in hazing activities that mirror those that have led to punitive actions, suspensions, or lawsuits against other chapters in different states, it provides critical evidence of foreseeability. This pattern of repeated behavior strengthens arguments for negligence, gross negligence, and even punitive damages against the national entities. It demonstrates that the national organization had prior knowledge of such dangers and failed to implement effective measures to prevent them.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

Here, we synthesize information regarding some prominent national Greek organizations with a documented history of hazing incidents, some of which have chapters at universities attended by Town of Highland Park students:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has a concerning national history of severe hazing. The tragic death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021 from forced alcohol consumption during a “Big/Little” night exemplifies the dangerous rituals that have plagued some Pike chapters. Another case involved David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University in 2012, who also died of alcohol poisoning, leading to a $14 million settlement. Chapters of Pi Kappa Alpha have existed at campuses like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor, and its national pattern of alcohol-related hazing is a key concern.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE has been implicated in numerous hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide. Its national pattern of misconduct includes cases such as the highly publicized incident at the University of Alabama (2023) where a pledge allegedly suffered a traumatic brain injury during hazing. Closer to Town of Highland Park, SAE chapters at Texas A&M University (2021) faced a lawsuit after pledges suffered severe chemical burns from industrial-strength cleaner, and at UT Austin (2024), a student sued for over $1 million after an assault at a party, which occurred while the chapter was under suspension for prior violations. The SMU chapter was suspended for four years in 2022 for hazing and alcohol violations.
• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity faced national scrutiny following the death of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017, who died from alcohol toxicity during a forced “Bible study” drinking game. Chapters are present at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, underscoring that similar alcohol-related hazing risks can be present across different campuses.
• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Pi Kappa Phi has a national incident involving the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017 due to acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night.” Chapters have been active at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, leading to concerns about similar “tradition” events fostering dangerous drinking.
• Kappa Alpha Order (ΚΑ): This fraternity has faced various hazing allegations and disciplinary actions across the country, including incidents involving physical abuse and forced alcohol consumption. Its chapter at SMU was suspended around 2017 following reports of paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation. Chapters are also active at Texas A&M.
• Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): The death of Timothy Piazza at Penn State University in 2017, due to traumatic brain injuries after extreme alcohol consumption and delayed medical attention, is one of the most infamous hazing cases nationally involving Beta Theta Pi. Chapters are active at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and UT.
• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): Sigma Chi chapters have a history of hazing incidents, including a significant multi-million dollar settlement at the College of Charleston (2024) for severe psychological and physical torment through hazing, and cases at UT Arlington (2020) involving alcohol poisoning. Chapters are present at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor.
• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): This fraternity has been involved in several high-profile hazing incidents, including the $12.6 million jury verdict awarded to the family of Chad Meredith, who drowned during a hazing ritual at the University of Miami in 2001. More recently, allegations of hazing leading to rhabdomyolysis have surfaced at the Texas A&M University chapter (2023), highlighting ongoing concerns about extreme physical hazing. Chapters are at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor.

This pattern of repeated high-risk behaviors across multiple chapters indicates that these national organizations often have a clear record of similar incidents. Families in Town of Highland Park and across Texas must recognize that membership in these organizations carries known, well-documented risks.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

The documented national and campus-specific histories of these organizations are not mere historical footnotes; they are crucial components of a robust legal strategy.

• By demonstrating patterns of similar conduct across different chapters and over time, experienced hazing attorneys can establish that national organizations had prior notice and foreseeability of the risks associated with their chapters’ activities. This makes it challenging for them to claim ignorance or dismiss incidents as “rogue” behavior.
• Such patterns can significantly impact settlement leverage and insurance coverage disputes. Insurance companies, which often attempt to deny coverage based on “intentional acts” or policy exclusions, face a tougher battle when a pattern of negligence by the national organization can be proven. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney at Attorney911 is particularly advantageous here, as she intimately understands how these powerful entities dispute claims and deny coverage.
• Critically, established patterns of misconduct can support claims for punitive damages. When an organization has a documented history of ignoring warnings, failing to enforce policies, or condoning dangerous “traditions,” a jury may decide to award punitive damages to punish egregious behavior and deter future hazing. This sends a powerful message that accountability will be enforced.

For Town of Highland Park families, understanding these legal connections from our experienced team can transform a seemingly isolated local incident into a powerful case for institutional accountability, leveraging national precedents to achieve justice in Texas courts.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Successfully navigating a hazing lawsuit requires meticulous attention to detail, a deep understanding of legal strategy, and an aggressive approach to evidence collection. For families in Town of Highland Park facing the aftermath of hazing, the path to justice often hinges on how effectively these elements are managed.

Evidence

In today’s interconnected world, much of the crucial evidence in hazing cases is digital, but physical and testimonial evidence remain vital. For Town of Highland Park families, preserving and compiling this evidence immediately is paramount due to its transient nature.

• Digital Communications: These are often the most direct and damning sources of evidence. This includes messages from:
  • Group messaging apps: GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and even fraternity- or university-specific apps. These messages can reveal planning, peer pressure, instructions for hazing activities, and evidence of cover-ups.
  • Social media: Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok comments, and private Facebook groups or chats. Posts and stories can inadvertently document hazing activities, injuries, or related alcohol/drug abuse.
  • Crucially, Attorney911 always advises securing screenshots of full threads with timestamps and sender names visibly included. For disappearing messages (like Snapchat), immediate screen recording or detailed notes are essential. Even “deleted” messages can often be recovered by digital forensics experts.
• Photos & Videos: Content filmed by members during hazing events, shared in private group chats, or even inadvertently appearing on social media, can provide undeniable proof. This also includes security camera footage or doorbell camera recordings at fraternity/sorority houses or event venues. Parents should also photograph any injuries repeatedly over several days to document progression. Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.
• Internal Organization Documents: These can expose the inner workings and history of hazing. This might involve pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” lists, or emails/texts from officers discussing activities with new members. National fraternity policies and training materials can also demonstrate a gap between stated rules and actual enforcement.
• University Records: These records are powerful because they document the institution’s knowledge. This includes prior conduct files, records of probation or suspensions for hazing, warning letters, incident reports to campus police or student conduct offices, and Clery reports that detail campus crime statistics. In many public universities, these may be accessible via public records requests, and in private universities, they can be obtained through legal discovery.
• Medical and Psychological Records: These documents provide objective proof of harm. They include:
  • Emergency room and hospitalization records, particularly those noting cause of injury.
  • Surgery and rehabilitation notes.
  • Toxicology reports for alcohol and drugs.
  • Evaluations from psychologists or psychiatrists diagnosing PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidality resulting from the hazing trauma.
• Witness Testimony: Beyond the victim, testimony from other pledges, current or past members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, trainers, or any bystanders who observed the hazing or its aftermath can be pivotal. Former members who quit or were expelled for opposing hazing can be particularly compelling witnesses.

Damages

In civil hazing lawsuits, damages represent the monetary compensation awarded to victims or their families for the harm suffered. For Town of Highland Park families, understanding the scope of potential damages is key to seeking comprehensive justice. These typically fall into several categories:

• Economic Damages: These are quantifiable financial losses:
  • Medical Bills & Future Care: Immediate costs for emergency care, hospitalization, surgeries, physical therapy, medications, and mental health counseling. For severe, life-altering injuries (like traumatic brain injury), this can include a “life care plan” estimating future care costs for decades.
  • Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes lost wages if the victim or a parent had to miss work. For students, it covers missed tuition for withdrawn semesters, lost scholarships, and even the diminished future earning capacity if the hazing led to permanent disability or delayed career entry.
• Non-Economic Damages: These address subjective, non-financial losses but are legally compensable:
  • Physical Pain and Suffering: Compensation for the immediate and ongoing physical pain from injuries, and the impact on daily life.
  • Emotional Distress, Trauma, and Humiliation: For diagnosed conditions like PTSD, severe anxiety, depression, or for the deep psychological wounds of public shaming, fear, and loss of dignity.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: When the hazing prevents the victim from participating in activities they once loved, damages are awarded for this lost quality of life.
• Wrongful Death Damages (for families): If hazing results in a fatality, specific damages are available to surviving family members:
  • Funeral and Burial Costs.
  • Loss of Financial Support: For the income the deceased would have contributed to the family.
  • Loss of Companionship, Love, and Society: For the profound emotional void left by the loss of a child, sibling, or spouse.
  • Grief and Emotional Suffering: For the intense pain and mental anguish experienced by family members.
• Punitive Damages: These are not meant to compensate the victim but to punish defendants for particularly egregious, reckless, or malicious conduct and to deter future hazing. Punitive damages are typically awarded when the defendant ignored prior warnings, engaged in a cover-up, or showed a willful disregard for safety. (In Texas, punitive damages are available but often capped.)

It is important to remember that describing these damages outlines the types of recovery; it does not promise or predict specific monetary amounts. Attorney911 has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic cases, and can evaluate the specific value of your claim.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation often involves powerful institutional defendants—national fraternities, universities, and their insurers—who employ aggressive defense tactics. Navigating this landscape effectively requires specialized legal expertise.

Many national fraternities, sororities, and universities carry extensive insurance policies that are designed to protect them from liability. However, identifying all potential policies, understanding their exclusions, and compelling insurers to pay can be a complex battle. Insurers frequently argue that:

• Hazing or intentional acts are explicitly excluded from coverage, claiming that the organization did not intend for harm to occur.
• The insurance policy does not cover certain individuals or entities involved in the incident.

This is where the experience of a firm like Attorney911 becomes invaluable. We meticulously identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, including national organization policies, local chapter policies, university umbrella policies, and even homeowners’ policies of individual members. Attorney Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is particularly critical here. She brings an insider’s knowledge of how large insurance companies value claims, interpret policy language, and strategically deny coverage. This foresight allows our firm to anticipate defense tactics, counter arguments about exclusions, and effectively negotiate or litigate to secure the full coverage available.

Our goal is not just to prove liability but to ensure that there are financial resources to compensate victims fully. This often means battling insurance companies directly, pushing for settlement within policy limits, or pursuing bad faith actions when providers wrongfully deny legitimate claims. This comprehensive approach ensures that Town of Highland Park families can achieve meaningful recovery, even against well-resourced opponents.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing impacts a family in Town of Highland Park, immediate action and accurate information are vital. Here, we offer practical guidance and answer common questions for parents, students, and witnesses navigating this traumatic experience.

8.1 For Parents

It can be devastating for Town of Highland Park parents to learn their child has been hazed. Knowing the warning signs and how to react can make all the difference.

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Look for changes that seem out of character. These can include:
  • Unexplained injuries (bruises, burns, cuts) or repeated “accidents” with unconvincing explanations.
  • Sudden exhaustion and extreme sleep deprivation, leading to falling asleep in class or irritability.
  • Drastic changes in mood, such as increased anxiety, depression, withdrawal from old friends or family, or unusual secrecy about group activities (“I can’t talk about it”).
  • Constant secret phone use for group chats, coupled with anxiety about missing “mandatory” events or responding immediately.
  • Sudden financial strain, requests for unexplained money, or buying alcohol/items for older members.
• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not judgment. Start with open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with [organization]?” or “Is there anything making you uncomfortable?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priorities, and you will support them regardless of their choices. Reassure them that they are not to blame.
• If Your Child is Hurt: Secure immediate medical attention, even if their injuries seem minor or they insist they are “fine.” Clearly state that the injuries are related to hazing so it’s documented in medical records. Then, document everything: take high-quality photos of injuries (multiple angles, over several days), save any suspicious texts or emails, and write down a detailed account of what happened, including dates, times, and locations. Save names of any individuals involved.
• Dealing with the University: Keep a precise log of all communications with university administrators (Dean of Students, Greek Life office, student conduct, etc.). Specifically ask about any prior incidents involving the same organization and what actions the school took. Universities sometimes try to “handle things internally,” but this may not lead to adequate accountability or compensation.
• When to Talk to a Lawyer: It’s crucial to contact an experienced hazing attorney if your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you believe the university or organization is minimizing or hiding what happened. A lawyer can help preserve evidence, navigate complex university procedures, and protect your child’s legal rights.

8.2 For Students / Pledges

For students from Town of Highland Park who may be experiencing hazing, it’s vital to recognize the behavior and understand your rights and options.

• Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?: Ask yourself: Am I being coerced or pressured to do something I genuinely don’t want to do? Is this activity dangerous, degrading, humiliating, or illegal? Would the university or my parents approve if they knew? Am I being told to keep secrets or lie about this? If the answer to any of these is yes, it’s hazing. Tradition should never involve harm or humiliation.
• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: You may have said “yes” under immense peer pressure, fear of exclusion, or the desire to belong. The law in Texas (Texas Education Code § 37.155) explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that true voluntary consent is impossible under such coercive circumstances.
• Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the right to leave a pledging process or organization at any time, regardless of what anyone tells you. If in immediate danger, call 911. If you wish to de-pledge, tell a trusted adult outside the organization first. If you fear retaliation, report this concern to the Dean of Students or campus police. You can also report anonymously through campus hotlines or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE).
• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many universities and Texas law offer “amnesty” or “good-faith reporter” protections for students who call for help in an emergency, even if underage drinking or other minor rule violations were involved. Your safety and the safety of others always come first.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once involved in hazing, or witnessed it, and now carry guilt or regret, your actions can be pivotal in preventing future harm.

• Your Role in Accountability: Your testimony and evidence can be instrumental in preventing similar incidents and potentially saving lives. While coming forward can be daunting, it’s a critical step toward accountability for the victims and institutional change.
• Seeking Legal Advice: If you have concerns about your own legal exposure, it is wise to consult with an attorney to understand your rights and potential protections. An experienced lawyer can help navigate your role as a witness, advise on the implications of cooperation, and provide guidance if you face any threats or retaliation. Ralph Manginello holds membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA), giving Attorney911 valuable insight into how criminal hazing charges intersect with civil litigation.
• Protecting Victims: By providing information and evidence, you can help expose harmful practices and ensure justice for those who were harmed. This can be an important step toward personal and organizational redemption.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For families in Town of Highland Park and across Texas, the aftermath of hazing is emotionally taxing. Unfortunately, well-meaning but ill-advised actions can inadvertently jeopardize a potential legal case. Avoid these critical mistakes:

1. Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence
   • What parents might think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble, so let’s erase everything.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Destroying evidence not only damages the credibility of your case but can also be considered obstruction of justice, making a successful legal outcome nearly impossible.
   • What to do instead: Preserve every single piece of evidence immediately, no matter how embarrassing. Screenshots, photos, and digital communications are often the backbone of a hazing case.
2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly
   • What parents might think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind for what they did to my child.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Direct confrontation almost always prompts the organization to immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and solidify their defense. You inadvertently tip them off.
   • What to do instead: Document everything privately, then contact an experienced hazing attorney before any direct engagement with the organization.
3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms
   • What universities often do: Pressure families into signing waivers or “internal resolution” agreements, sometimes offering minor concessions or a quick, low payout.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your fundamental right to sue for full compensation, and any early settlement is almost certainly far below the true value of your case.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or any organization without having an attorney review it thoroughly on your behalf.
4. Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer
   • What families might think: “I want the world to know what happened and how outraged I am.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys scour social media for anything they can use against your child’s credibility. Inconsistencies between public posts and official statements can harm your case, and public sharing can sometimes unintentionally waive legal privileges.
   • What to do instead: Document everything privately and let your lawyer develop a strategic and controlled approach to public disclosures.
5. Letting Your Child Go Back for “One Last Meeting”
   • What organizations might say: “Let’s just talk it out before you do anything drastic.”
   • Why it’s wrong: These meetings are often designed to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can be used to discredit your child or undermine your case. They are rarely genuine attempts at reconciliation after a serious hazing incident.
   • What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication from or with the organization should be handled by your attorney.
6. Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”
   • What universities often promise: “We’re investigating; please let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: While universities have a role, their investigations are often focused on internal policy violations, not full legal accountability and compensation. Evidence disappears rapidly, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations continues to run.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW. Consult with an experienced hazing lawyer immediately, as the university’s internal process is fundamentally different from a civil pursuit of justice.
7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer
   • What adjusters might say: “We just need your statement to process the claim quickly and easily.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters are trained to minimize payouts. Any recorded statement or early conversation can be used against you, and initial settlement offers are almost always lowball.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline any conversation and inform them, “My attorney will contact you.”

Watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY. This resource highlights further pitfalls to avoid when pursuing a personal injury claim, including those arising from hazing.

8.5 Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT enjoy some sovereign immunity, which can limit lawsuits, but exceptions apply for gross negligence, failure to act on known Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor have fewer immunity protections. The viability of a lawsuit depends heavily on the specific facts of the case. For a case-specific analysis, contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911.
• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It certainly can be. While hazing is generally classified as a Class B misdemeanor, it escalates to a state jail felony under Texas law if it causes serious bodily injury or death. Furthermore, individuals in leadership positions can face criminal charges for failing to report known hazing.
• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes, absolutely. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that “consent” given under duress, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion or social repercussions in a power-imbalanced environment is not truly voluntary.
• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  Generally, the statute of limitations in Texas is two years from the date of injury or death. However, exceptions such as the “discovery rule” (if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately apparent) or tolling for minors can extend this period. Crucially, time is a critical factor because evidence can vanish, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations destroy records. It is vital to contact Attorney911 immediately at 1-888-ATTY-911. Learn about Texas statute of limitations in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.
• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship of the organization, control over its members, prior knowledge of dangerous activities, and foreseeability of harm. Many landmark hazing cases, including deaths at off-campus retreats and unofficial houses, have resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments against both individuals and organizations.
• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  While some high-profile cases generate media attention, most hazing lawsuits are resolved through confidential settlements long before a public trial. We prioritize your family’s privacy and can work to request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. Our focus is to seek accountability while protecting your child’s future.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces the profound trauma of a hazing incident, you need more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions—national fraternities, universities, and their deep-pocketed insurers—fight back relentlessly, and how to effectively navigate and win these battles. This is precisely where The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, The Legal Emergency Lawyers™, stands apart.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Town of Highland Park and its surrounding areas, understanding that hazing at Texas universities impacts students and their loved ones across the region. We are more than just legal advocates; we are deeply committed to holding responsible parties accountable and preventing future tragedies.

Our firm brings a unique combination of expertise to hazing cases:

• The Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable insight as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She knows their playbook inside and out—how large insurance companies value (and often undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, their arguments for coverage exclusions, and their settlement negotiation strategies. This insider perspective allows us to anticipate their moves and build a more formidable case against them. Lupe Peña’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Managing Partner Ralph Manginello has a distinguished track record of taking on formidable opponents. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the historic BP Texas City explosion litigation, demonstrating our firm’s capability to challenge billion-dollar corporations and win. This federal court and complex litigation experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) means we are not intimidated by the resources of national fraternities, universities, or their defense teams. We know how to fight powerful defendants and secure justice. Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven history of securing substantial settlements and verdicts in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. We work with leading economists to accurately value the profound loss of life and future earning potential, and we understand the intricate needs for lifetime care plans in cases involving traumatic brain injuries or permanent disabilities. We don’t settle for less than true accountability; we build cases that compel significant institutional change.
• Dual Criminal and Civil Hazing Expertise: Hazing incidents often have both criminal and civil ramifications. Ralph Manginello’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides our firm with a unique understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual perspective allows us to advise victims, witnesses, and even former members on both criminal exposure and civil liability with unparalleled insight. When hazing results in criminal charges, Attorney911’s criminal defense experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) means we understand the complexities of both criminal and civil tracks.
• Unrivaled Investigative Depth: We understand that hazing often happens in the shadows. Our firm leverages a vast network of experts—medical professionals, digital forensics specialists, economists, and psychologists—to uncover the truth. We are adept at obtaining crucial, often hidden, evidence such as deleted group chats, internal chapter records showing prior incidents, and university files through meticulous discovery and public records requests. We investigate as though your child’s life depends on it—because it often does.

We intimately understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments operate behind closed doors. We know what makes hazing cases distinct: the powerful institutional defendants, the intricate insurance coverage fights, the delicate balance between victim privacy and public accountability, and the nuanced understanding of Greek culture and coercion necessary to prove liability. We approach every case with profound empathy, recognizing the immense emotional toll hazing takes on families. Our job is not just to secure compensation, but to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We pursue thorough investigation and real accountability, not just quick settlements. We invite you to learn more about our firm and our commitment to justice at https://attorney911.com.

Call to Action for Town of Highland Park Families

If you or your child has experienced hazing at Southern Methodist University, or any other Texas campus, we want to hear from you. Families in Town of Highland Park and throughout the surrounding Dallas County region have the right to answers, accountability, and justice.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to your story without judgment, explain your legal options, and help you determine the best path forward for your family. During this free consultation, you can expect us to:

• Listen empathetically to your experience.
• Review any evidence you might have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
• Explain your legal options, including criminal reporting, civil lawsuit, or both.
• Discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
• Answer all your questions, including how our contingency fee structure works—we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Learn more about contingency fees in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
• There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot; take the time you need to decide. Everything you share with us is confidential.

Reach out to Attorney911 today:

• Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Servicios legales en español disponibles. Contact Lupe Peña directly for consultation in Spanish at lupe@atty911.com.

Whether you’re in Town of Highland Park or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com