alaska-featured-image.png

Alaska Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | $24M Pike Settlements | Attorney911 — The Firm That Shut Down Pi Kappa Phi | Federal Court | Former Insurance Defense | 1-888-ATTY-911

If you’re reading this in Alaska, your family may be facing one of the most terrifying moments of your life. Your child went off to college, eager to forge new friendships and build a future. Instead, they were subjected to abuse, humiliation, and potentially life-threatening rituals that left them traumatized, injured, or worse. We’re here to help families in Alaska fight back against the pervasive and dangerous culture of hazing that continues to plague our nation’s campuses.

Across America, from the vibrant university towns to the quiet communities that send their children off to college, hazing remains a terrifying secret. It’s a secret that institutions, fraternities, and individuals try to keep buried, often at the expense of our children’s health, safety, and well-being. But we want you to know: you are not alone. There are attorneys fighting this fight right now, aggressively pursuing justice for hazing victims and their families. We understand what you’re going through, and we are ready to stand with you.

The Haunting Echoes of Hazing: What Happened in Houston Can Happen in Alaska

Just weeks ago, a case filed in Houston sent shockwaves through the national Greek life community – a case that speaks directly to the nightmare many Alaska parents are discovering their children have endured. This isn’t a hypothetical situation; this is happening right now, in Harris County Civil District Court, and it illustrates precisely the kind of relentless advocacy we bring to every hazing case, including those from Alaska.

In November 2025, Attorney911 filed a $10 million lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity, the University of Houston, and 13 individual fraternity members. The victim, Leonel Bermudez, a young man who was not even officially enrolled at the University of Houston yet, endured weeks of horrific hazing that left him hospitalized for four days with severe rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure.

This wasn’t a prank gone wrong. This was systematic torture. Leonel was waterboarded with a garden hose, hog-tied, forced to eat until he vomited, subjected to sleep deprivation, and pushed through physical exertion so extreme his muscles broke down and his kidneys began to fail. He passed brown urine, a terrifying symptom of his body breaking down. This is what hazing looks like today. This is what colleges and fraternities allow to fester in the shadows, not just in Texas, but also in Alaska and beyond.

Within days of the hazing being reported and Leonel’s hospitalization, the Pi Kappa Phi chapter was suspended. The members, facing mounting pressure, voted to surrender their charter. The chapter was permanently closed. Criminal referrals against those involved were initiated. Our lawsuit aggressively targeted every entity responsible: the university that owned the house where the hazing occurred, the national fraternity that oversees chapters on over 150 campuses, and every individual who participated or enabled the abuse.

This case, Bermudez v. Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity, Inc., et al., is our flagship, demonstrating our commitment to aggressive, data-driven litigation in the fight against hazing. If your child has been hazed in Alaska, we want you to understand that the same national fraternities operate there, the same dangerous “traditions” can take root on any campus, and the same institutional failures that led to Leonel’s suffering can occur within Alaska’s universities and colleges. We are actively fighting this battle in the courts, and we are ready to bring that same fight to your family in Alaska.

We invite you to hear directly from the news coverage that exposed this ongoing battle:

What Happened to Leonel Bermudez: A Timeline of Torture

Leonel Bermudez accepted a bid to join the University of Houston’s Pi Kappa Phi chapter on September 16, 2025. What followed was an agonizing display of systematic abuse, designed not to build character, but to break it.

  • Sept 16, 2025: Leonel accepts a bid to Pi Kappa Phi, beginning his pledge period.
  • Sept 16 – Nov 3: For weeks, he endures a campaign of hazing. This included being sprayed in the face with a garden hose during calisthenics – a brutal act that mirrors waterboarding, a recognized form of torture. He was forced to carry a fanny pack containing sexual objects, endure extreme early-morning workouts, and repeatedly drive fraternity members until he was utterly exhausted. Punishment for perceived failures often meant grueling physical tasks, mental abuse, and threats of expulsion.
  • Oct 13, 2025: Another pledge was hog-tied face-down on a table with an object in his mouth for over an hour, while fraternity members calmly prepared for a meeting. This level of casual cruelty highlights the normalized depravity within the chapter.
  • Oct 15, 2025: During a forced workout session, a pledge lost consciousness and collapsed. Other pledges had to elevate his legs until he recovered. This incident should have triggered alarms, yet the hazing continued.
  • Nov 3, 2025: Leonel was subjected to a particularly brutal hazing session for missing an event. He was forced to execute over 100 push-ups, 500 squats, high-volume “suicides,” bear crawls, wheelbarrows, and repeated 100-yard crawls while reciting the fraternity creed. He was threatened with immediate expulsion if he stopped. He was pushed beyond all limits until he collapsed, unable to stand without help.
  • Nov 4-5, 2025: Leonel struggled home, barely able to move. His condition worsened, his body screaming in protest.
  • Nov 6, 2025: His mother, recognizing the severity of his condition, rushed him to the hospital. There, he exhibited brown urine, a classic sign of severe muscle breakdown.
  • Nov 6-10, 2025: Leonel was hospitalized for three nights and four days, diagnosed with severe rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure. This life-threatening condition requires aggressive medical intervention and can lead to permanent kidney damage or death.
  • Nov 14, 2025: Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters, in a desperate attempt to mitigate fallout, announced the closure of its Beta Nu chapter at the University of Houston, effective this date.
  • Nov 21, 2025: Attorney911 filed the $10 million lawsuit.

As former insurance defense attorneys, both Ralph Manginello and Lupe Peña know exactly how these powerful organizations operate, and we are not intimidated. Mr. Manginello told ABC13, “When he finally made it home, he crawled up the stairs and went to bed. The next day, he was really sore and couldn’t really move. The next day was worse, and the next day, his mom rushed him to the hospital, and he had some kidney failure.” Mr. Peña added, “If this prevents harm to another person, that’s what we’re hoping to do. Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.”

The University of Houston’s spokesperson called the events “deeply disturbing” and stated that anyone found responsible would face “disciplinary action, up to and including expulsion and potential criminal charges.” But these words ring hollow when you consider the prior incidents on their watch. Our lawsuit aims to ensure these organizations pay for their negligence, not just issue empty apologies.

What Hazing Really Looks Like: Beyond the Stereotypes

Many parents, particularly those whose children pursue higher education in Alaska, harbor an outdated image of hazing—harmless pranks, silly rituals, maybe a bit of inconvenience. The truth, as revealed in Leonel Bermudez’s case and countless others across the country, is far more sinister and dangerous. Hazing today is rarely about team-building; it’s about control, subjugation, and often, outright abuse. It operates in environments where secrecy is enforced through fear, loyalty is twisted into complicity, and silence becomes the greatest weapon of the perpetrators.

This isn’t a few roughhousing teenagers; this is often systematic, intentional, and physically and psychologically damaging. Here are some of the horrifying realities exposed in hazing incidents, including those we are currently litigating:

  • Waterboarding and Simulated Drowning: Leonel was subjected to “simulated waterboarding with a garden hose.” This is not a harmless initiation; it is a form of torture that mimics drowning, inducing panic, fear, and a profound sense of helplessness. It is considered a war crime when inflicted upon enemy combatants. That such an act could be perpetrated on a prospective college student in Alaska or anywhere else is reprehensible and demands accountability.
  • Extreme Physical Abuse and Exertion: From “500 squats” to “100-yard crawls,” “bear crawls,” and “suicides” – pledges are often forced to endure physical challenges far beyond their limits. This leads to severe injuries like rhabdomyolysis, where muscle tissue breaks down and poisons the bloodstream. Paddling, as detailed in Leonel’s case with “being struck with wooden paddles,” is a direct physical assault, causing pain, bruising, and humiliation.
  • Forced Consumption and Intoxication: Pledges are made to consume massive amounts of alcohol, sometimes an entire bottle, leading to life-threatening alcohol poisoning. The forced ingestion of vile concoctions, or, as in Leonel’s case, large quantities of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting, is a degrading and dangerous act that can cause choking, aspiration, and severe gastrointestinal distress, often followed by forced sprints in their own vomit.
  • Psychological Torture and Humiliation: This aspect of hazing can leave scars deeper than any physical wound. Being “hog-tied face-down on a table with an object in his mouth,” forced to carry sexually explicit items, or stripped to underwear in cold weather are acts designed to break a person’s spirit, instill fear, and create an absolute power dynamic. Sleep deprivation, enforced curfews, and constant demands further erode mental and physical resilience, leading to exhaustion and increased vulnerability.
  • Sexual Harassment and Assault: Hazing tragically crosses into sexual abuse. Forced nudity, sexually degrading acts, or the carrying of sexually explicit items are not uncommon. These acts are not merely “hazing”; they are criminal sexual offenses that devastate victims.
  • Neglect and Denial of Medical Care: Perhaps one of the most insidious aspects of hazing is the intentional delay or denial of medical attention to injured pledges. As Timothy Piazza’s case tragically showed, fraternity members often wait hours or even days to call for help, fearing reprisal or exposure. This conscious disregard for human life turns hazing into attempted murder.

This is not the bonding experience parents in Alaska envision for their children. It is not character-building. It is a systematic erosion of dignity, safety, and health that demands forceful legal intervention. The danger for students attending universities or colleges in Alaska, whether at the University of Alaska Anchorage, University of Alaska Fairbanks, or any other institution, is very real.

Who Is Responsible: Every Entity That Participated or Enabled

When tragedy strikes due to hazing, the immediate finger-pointing often lands on the individual college students directly involved. However, our aggressive litigation strategy, demonstrated powerfully in the Bermudez case, recognizes that the responsibility extends far beyond a few misguided young adults. We pursue every entity that had a hand in the hazing or a duty to prevent it. We want Alaska families to understand that there are multiple layers of accountability.

  1. The Local Chapter and Its Officers:

    • The Perpetrators: These are the individuals who directly organize, participate in, and enforce the hazing. In Leonel’s case, the fraternity president, pledgemaster, and other members are individually named. They are often direct participants in assault, battery, and other criminal acts.
    • Liability: They face direct liability for intentional torts (assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress) and negligence. Often, these individuals hold positions of authority within the chapter, leveraging peer pressure and fear to compel participation.
  2. The National Fraternity/Sorority Organization:

    • The Architects of Culture: These are powerful, well-funded corporations with substantial assets and liability insurance. They establish rules, anti-hazing policies, and risk management guidelines for all their chapters, including those across Alaska. Yet, time and again, they fail to enforce them.
    • Liability: National organizations are held liable for negligent supervision, failure to train, failure to monitor, and maintaining a culture that tacitly or explicitly condones hazing. In Leonel’s case, we allege Pi Kappa Phi National “failed to enforce anti-hazing rules and policies despite knowledge of ‘a hazing crisis.'” This demonstrates actual knowledge of a systemic problem, which tragically extends to their chapters in Alaska. The 2017 death of Andrew Coffey at an FSU Pi Kappa Phi chapter is irrefutable proof that the national organization has known about deadly hazing within its ranks for years.
    • Deep Pockets: These are the primary targets for significant financial compensation, as they possess the resources to truly impact victims’ lives and to force systemic change.
  3. The University or College:

    • The Overseers: Universities, whether a large state university or a smaller private college in Alaska, have a fundamental duty to provide a safe environment for their students. They hold immense power over Greek life, including the ability to recognize, suspend, or permanently ban organizations.
    • Liability: Universities can be held liable for negligent supervision, failure to protect students, failure to enforce their own anti-hazing policies, and even premises liability if hazing occurs on university-owned or controlled property. In Leonel’s case, the University of Houston is a defendant because it owned the fraternity house where much of the hazing took place. This is a critical point: they owned the very building where torture occurred, collected rent, and failed to prevent abuse despite explicit duties and prior incidents. The 2017 hospitalization of another student from hazing at UH demonstrated that the university had actual knowledge of hazing dangers on its campus.
    • Reputation and Resources: Universities have substantial endowments and insurance coverage, making them crucial defendants in hazing litigation.
  4. Housing Corporations and Alumni Boards:

    • The Hidden Hands: Many fraternities operate through separate housing corporations, often managed by alumni. These entities own or manage the physical fraternity houses. Alumni boards often provide oversight, funding, and guidance to undergraduate chapters.
    • Liability: They can be held liable for premises liability (failure to maintain safe property), negligent supervision, and for failing to intervene when they knew or should have known hazing was occurring. In Leonel’s case, even a former member and his spouse who allowed hazing to occur at their private residence are named defendants due to their complicity.
  5. Individual Members:

    • Every Participant: Every student who actively participates in hazing, directs it, encourages it, or even stands by and allows it to happen, can be held personally liable. This includes members who are not officers but are complicit.
    • Legal Consequences: They face personal injury lawsuits and potential criminal charges. The $6.5 million judgment against Daylen Dunson, a former chapter president in the Stone Foltz case, demonstrates the severe personal financial repercussions individuals can face.

When hazing leaves a child injured or dead in Alaska, we don’t just point fingers at the obvious culprits. We meticulously investigate every layer of responsibility, uncovering the institutional failures and individual complicity that allowed the tragedy to occur. We pursue comprehensive accountability, ensuring that every responsible party, from the college freshman to the national organization’s executive board, is held to account.

What These Cases Win: Multi-Million Dollar Proof Points

For Alaska parents grappling with the aftermath of hazing, understanding what kind of justice is possible can be a daunting prospect. How do you put a price on physical suffering, psychological trauma, or the loss of a child? Our answer is clear: families have recovered multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements, forcing powerful institutions to pay for their negligence and change their dangerous practices. These cases, proven in courtrooms across the nation, demonstrate the significant financial accountability that can be achieved.

Our $10 million lawsuit for Leonel Bermudez is not an arbitrary number; it is a demand backed by compelling facts and a strong history of precedent. Here are some of the landmark cases that pave the way for victims in Alaska and elsewhere:

  • STONE FOLTZ — Bowling Green State University / Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Total Recovery ~$10.1 Million+

    • What Happened: In March 2021, Stone Foltz, a pledge at Pi Kappa Alpha, was forced to drink an entire bottle of alcohol as part of a hazing ritual. He died of alcohol poisoning.
    • The Outcome: The university settled for $2.9 million, and the national fraternity, along with individual members, contributed to a settlement exceeding $7.2 million. Most recently, in December 2024, a judgment of $6.5 million was awarded against Daylen Dunson, the former chapter president, for his personal role in Foltz’s death. This is the largest public university hazing payout in Ohio history.
    • Significance for Alaska: This case unequivocally demonstrates that both universities and national fraternities face multi-million dollar liabilities for hazing deaths. Our $10 million demand in the Bermudez case aligns directly with this precedent, even for a non-fatal (though severe) injury, emphasizing the egregious nature of the conduct involved.
  • MAXWELL GRUVER — Louisiana State University / Phi Delta Theta (2017): $6.1 Million Jury Verdict

    • What Happened: In September 2017, Max Gruver, an 18-year-old freshman pledge at LSU, was forced to participate in a hazing ritual called “Bible Study,” where he was made to chug alcohol if he answered questions incorrectly. His blood alcohol content reached a staggering 0.495, leading to his death from acute alcohol poisoning.
    • The Outcome: A jury awarded his family $6.1 million. One fraternity member was convicted of negligent homicide and sentenced to prison. The tragedy also led to the passage of the “Max Gruver Act,” making hazing a felony in Louisiana.
    • Significance for Alaska: This massive jury verdict proves that juries are willing to impose significant financial penalties on those responsible for hazing. It also shows how such cases can catalyze legislative change, strengthening anti-hazing laws. The horrific events in Leonel’s case, including waterboarding and extreme physical abuse, are likely to evoke a similar outrage in a jury.
  • TIMOTHY PIAZZA — Penn State University / Beta Theta Pi (2017): $110+ Million (Estimated Confidential Settlements)

    • What Happened: In February 2017, Timothy Piazza, a pledge at Penn State’s Beta Theta Pi chapter, was forced to participate in a “gauntlet” of drinking stations. He consumed 18 drinks in 82 minutes, fell down stairs, and suffered a traumatic brain injury and internal bleeding. Fraternity members notoriously waited 12 hours before calling 911. Security cameras captured the entire agonizing ordeal.
    • The Outcome: Although the exact settlement amount is confidential, it is widely estimated to exceed $110 million from various parties, including the university and the national fraternity. Many fraternity members faced criminal charges, with several convictions for hazing and involuntary manslaughter. Pennsylvania passed the “Timothy J. Piazza Antihazing Law.”
    • Significance for Alaska: This case underscores that when evidence is clear and conduct is undeniably egregious, settlements can reach astronomical figures. It highlights the importance of thorough evidence collection, demonstrating how institutional negligence and individual culpability can lead to devastating consequences and massive payouts.
  • ANDREW COFFEY — Florida State University / Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Same Fraternity as Bermudez!

    • What Happened: In November 2017, Andrew Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink an entire bottle of bourbon during a Pi Kappa Phi “Big Brother Night” at FSU.
    • The Outcome: Nine fraternity members faced criminal charges, and the chapter was permanently closed. A civil suit by his family resulted in a confidential settlement.
    • Significance for Alaska: This is perhaps the most damning precedent for the Bermudez case. It confirms that Pi Kappa Phi National has a documented history of deadly hazing. The fact that Leonel Bermudez endured such severe hazing symptoms eight years later within the same national organization speaks volumes about their complete failure to address a known, deadly problem. This establishes a powerful “pattern of negligence” that strengthens our client’s claim for substantial damages, including punitive damages.

These multi-million dollar outcomes send a clear message: hazing is not tolerated, and those who allow it to happen will pay dearly. For Alaska students and their families, these precedents mean that pathways to justice are robust, and substantial recovery is achievable. The same legal strategies, aggressive tactics, and deep understanding of liability that led to these outcomes will be brought to bear on every hazing case we undertake, including those arising in Alaska.

Texas Law Protects You: Understanding Your Rights

While our firm is headquartered in Texas, the foundational legal principles that underscore our successes are often mirrored in Alaska’s legal landscape, and federal laws apply nationwide. Understanding what protections you have under the law is the first step toward seeking justice.

Texas Hazing Laws (Education Code § 37.151-37.157)

In Texas, where the Bermudez case is being litigated, anti-hazing laws are robust, defining hazing broadly and attaching severe penalties, including criminal charges. These laws set a strong precedent that can inform cases in Alaska as well.

  • What Constitutes Hazing? (§ 37.151): Texas law defines hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or membership in an organization. This includes:
    • Physical brutality (whipping, beating, striking, branding).
    • Sleep deprivation, exposure to elements, confinement, or excessive calisthenics that pose an “unreasonable risk of harm.” Leonel’s 500 squats, waterboarding, and wooden paddle beatings clearly fall under this definition.
    • Forced consumption of food, liquid, alcohol, or other substances that pose an “unreasonable risk.” Leonel’s forced eating until vomiting is a direct violation.
  • Criminal Penalties (§ 37.152): Individuals who engage in hazing face misdemeanor charges. If hazing causes “serious bodily injury” (like Leonel’s rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure), it escalates to a Class A Misdemeanor, potentially carrying up to a year in jail. If it causes death, it’s a State Jail Felony.
  • Organizational Liability (§ 37.153): Organizations, not just individuals, can be penalized. If a chapter “condones or encourages hazing,” or if officers or members commit hazing, the organization itself can face fines, denial of campus operating rights, and forfeiture of property. This is why our lawsuit names Pi Kappa Phi National and the University of Houston.
  • Consent is NOT a Defense (§ 37.154): This is perhaps the most crucial aspect of modern anti-hazing law, and one we aggressively champion. Texas law explicitly states: “It is not a defense to prosecution… that the person against whom the hazing was directed consented to or acquiesced in the hazing activity.” Fraternities, universities, and their lawyers will inevitably argue that the victim “voluntarily participated” or “knew what they were getting into.” Under Texas law, and increasingly in other states, this argument is powerless. You cannot consent to criminal assault or torture.

Civil Liability Theories Applicable Nationwide (Including Alaska)

Even without specific state hazing statutes, victims across Alaska and the nation have strong civil grounds to pursue justice. These legal theories form the backbone of our multi-million dollar cases:

  • Negligence: This is typically the primary legal claim. We must prove that the defendants (individuals, fraternity, university) owed a duty of care to the victim, breached that duty through their hazing or failure to prevent it, and that this breach directly caused the victim’s injuries and damages.
  • Gross Negligence: When actions demonstrate an “extreme degree of risk” and “conscious indifference” to a student’s safety, as proven by Pi Kappa Phi’s history repeating itself or UH’s inaction after prior hazing incidents, punitive damages can be awarded. These are designed to punish egregious behavior and deter future misconduct.
  • Premises Liability: If hazing occurs on property owned or controlled by the university or fraternity, they have a duty to ensure the safety of that property. The University of Houston’s ownership of the fraternity house where Leonel was hazed is a powerful example of this. Universities in Alaska that own or lease properties to Greek organizations face identical responsibilities.
  • Negligent Supervision: This applies to national fraternities and universities that fail to adequately supervise their chapters or student organizations, allowing hazing culture to fester unchecked.
  • Assault and Battery: These are intentional torts directly applicable to physical hazing acts like paddling, forced physical contact, or waterboarding. Every individual who participated can be held personally liable.
  • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED): Reserved for truly “extreme and outrageous” conduct that causes severe emotional suffering. Leonel’s psychological trauma from waterboarding and other humiliations clearly supports such a claim.
  • Wrongful Death: When hazing leads to a fatality, families can pursue wrongful death claims for their immense losses, including funeral expenses, lost financial support, and invaluable loss of companionship.

It’s crucial for Alaska families to understand that our firm has the federal court authority and dual-state bar admissions (Texas and New York) to litigate against national fraternities and universities across the country, wherever their chapters operate. Distance is not a barrier to justice. If your child attends a university in Alaska or anywhere else, the fundamental legal principles apply, and we are prepared to fight for them.

Why Attorney911: Your Champion in the Fight Against Hazing

Choosing the right legal team after a hazing incident is one of the most critical decisions an Alaska family will make. You need more than just a lawyer; you need a tireless advocate, someone who understands the nuanced brutality of hazing, and who possesses the legal acumen and unwavering commitment to stand against powerful institutions. We are Attorney911, and we believe we are uniquely positioned to be that champion for Alaska families.

Here’s why Alaska families should choose us to fight their hazing case:

  1. Currently Litigating a $10 Million Hazing Lawsuit: We don’t just talk about hazing; we’re actively fighting it right now in court. Our multi-million dollar lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston is proof of our aggressive, data-driven approach. This isn’t theoretical; it’s tangible, ongoing litigation that demonstrates our commitment and expertise. Alaska families get the benefit of this active, cutting-edge experience.

  2. Unfair Advantage: Former Insurance Defense Attorneys: Both our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, and Associate Attorney, Lupe Peña, spent significant portions of their careers working for national insurance defense firms. This isn’t just experience; it’s battlefield intelligence. We know the insurance companies’ playbooks. We know their strategies for minimizing claims, their tactics for denying liability, and their negotiation thresholds because we were on the inside. Now, we use that insider knowledge to dismantle their defenses and maximize recovery for our hazing victims in Alaska.

    • Ralph Manginello’s 25+ years of experience includes high-stakes mass tort litigation like the BP Texas City explosion, demonstrating his capacity to take on massive corporate defendants. His journalism background also means he knows how to uncover facts and tell compelling stories, which is crucial for hazing cases where institutions try to hide the truth.
    • Lupe Peña’s experience at Litchfield Cavo LLP, a national insurance defense firm, gives him a deep understanding of how large corporate defendants and their insurers operate across the country. His “outwork, outsmart, outfight” philosophy is tailor-made for challenging the Goliaths of the Greek life world.
  3. Nationwide Reach with Federal Court Authority & Dual-State Bar Admissions: While our primary offices are in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, hazing doesn’t respect state lines. The national fraternities operating in Alaska are the same ones operating in Texas, with similar structures and vulnerabilities. Our attorneys are admitted to federal courts, including the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, allowing us to pursue cases in federal jurisdiction. Furthermore, Ralph Manginello possesses dual-state bar admissions in Texas AND New York, providing a strategic advantage when facing national fraternity organizations often headquartered elsewhere. This means we are equipped to pursue your Alaska hazing case, no matter where it occurred.

  4. Specialized Hazing Expertise (Including Rhabdomyolysis): Ralph Manginello has direct experience with fraternity litigation, including specific expertise in rhabdomyolysis cases like Leonel’s. This is a critical differentiator: we understand the medical complexities of hazing injuries and how to prove them in court. This specialized knowledge is crucial for building a strong case grounded in medical fact.

  5. No Upfront Cost: Contingency Fee Basis: We understand that dealing with medical bills, emotional trauma, and academic disruption leaves families in a difficult financial position. That’s why we take hazing cases on a contingency fee basis. This means:

    • You pay $0 upfront.
    • We don’t get paid unless we win your case.
    • This aligns our interests directly with yours; our success is your success. Financial concerns should never be a barrier to seeking justice.
  6. Strategic Data & Intelligence: We Don’t Guess, We Know: We maintain one of the most comprehensive private directories of Greek organizations in Texas, including IRS-registered entities, legal names, EINs, and corporate structures, which allows us to track national brands across various metros and campuses. This intelligence-driven approach ensures we identify every liable entity when hazing occurs, from the local chapter to the national headquarters and their associated housing corporations. We apply this same strategic rigor to any hazing case nationwide.

  7. Empathetic, Parent-Facing Approach: We are not cold, clinical, or filled with legal jargon. We write to you, the worried parent searching for help at 2 AM. We speak directly to your fears, your anger, and your desire for justice. Ralph Manginello, a father of three and a youth coach, understands firsthand the pressures young people face and the devastating impact when trust is betrayed. Lupe Peña, a third-generation Texan and father, provides a compassionate yet aggressive approach to client advocacy. Our bilingual staff ensures that Spanish-speaking families in Alaska receive comprehensive support without language barriers.

  8. Willingness to Travel: Our services are not confined to Texas. We regularly conduct remote consultations via phone and video, making our counsel accessible to families throughout Alaska. For critical depositions, hearings, and trials, our attorneys are fully prepared to travel to Alaska to represent your child’s best interests. Distance will never deter us from pursuing justice.

We want Alaska families to choose us because we bring a unique blend of compassion, insider knowledge, and aggressive litigation experience to every hazing case. We fight not just for compensation, but for accountability and change. When your child has been subjected to the horrors of hazing, you need a firm that treats your family like their own and fights like theirs is on the line. That’s Attorney911.

What To Do Right Now: Actionable Steps for Alaska Families

If your child has been hazed on a college campus in Alaska, you are likely overwhelmed, scared, and unsure of what to do next. Taking immediate, decisive action is critical to preserving evidence and protecting your legal rights. The window for seeking justice can be surprisingly short, and any delay can severely complicate your case. Here are the crucial steps you should take right now:

  1. Prioritize Medical Attention and Documentation:

    • Seek Medical Care Immediately: Even if injuries seem minor, or if the full extent of psychological trauma isn’t immediately apparent, get your child to a doctor, emergency room, or mental health professional. Some injuries, like rhabdomyolysis, can have delayed symptoms but severe consequences. Adrenaline can mask pain.
    • Document Everything: Ensure all physical injuries (bruises, cuts, burns, swelling) and symptoms (pain, nausea, exhaustion, psychological distress) are thoroughly documented by medical professionals. Keep copies of all medical records, test results, hospital bills, and prescriptions. For hazing cases, physical evidence of abuse and any signs of alcohol poisoning or extreme exhaustion are paramount.
    • Photograph Injuries: Take clear, well-lit photographs of any visible injuries at every stage of healing. This visual evidence can be incredibly powerful in court. As Ralph Manginello emphasizes, “Take pictures. Take pictures. Take pictures. Take more pictures than you think you need to. Pictures are going to tell the story. Help your lawyer tell your story.”
    • We discuss the importance of medical documentation in this video: Why Seeing a Doctor Right After an Accident Is Critical | Attorney911
  2. Preserve All Communications and Evidence:

    • DO NOT Delete Anything: Do not delete any text messages, emails, GroupMe chats, Snapchat archives, Instagram DMs, or any other digital communications related to the hazing. These are often invaluable sources of evidence, showing directives, threats, coercion, and discussions among perpetrators. Even seemingly innocuous messages can be crucial.
    • Screenshot Everything: If possible, screenshot relevant conversations and store them securely.
    • Save Physical Evidence: If there are any physical items associated with the hazing (clothing, objects, specific items mentioned in rituals), preserve them without altering them.
    • Identify Witnesses: Note down the names and contact information of any other pledges, fraternity/sorority members, or bystanders who witnessed the hazing or have relevant information. Their testimony can be vital.
    • Document the Environment: If accessible and safe to do so, document the locations where hazing occurred (fraternity house, off-campus residence, specific rooms, outdoor areas) with photos or videos.
    • Learn more about evidence preservation: Can You Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case? | Attorney911 Explains
  3. Refrain from Engaging with Involved Parties (and Social Media):

    • Do NOT Speak to the Fraternity/Sorority: Do not communicate with chapter members, advisors, alumni, or national representatives. They are not on your side and any statements you make can be used against you. They will try to get you to sign documents that waive your rights or provide statements that minimize the incident.
    • Do NOT Speak to University Administrators Alone: While you may feel compelled to report the incident to the university, do so only after consulting with an attorney. University administrators often prioritize protecting the institution’s reputation over the well-being of the victim. Your attorney can guide you on what to say and ensure your rights are protected during any university investigation (such as a Title IX review).
    • Avoid Social Media: Do NOT post about the incident on any social media platform. Do not post photos of yourself appearing “fine” or engaging in normal activities. Defense attorneys and insurance adjusters will look for anything to undermine your claim about injuries or emotional distress. Assume everything you post can and will be scrutinized.
    • Avoid common pitfalls: Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case | Attorney911 with Ralph Manginello
    • The social media warning: [Don’t Post on Social Media After an Accident | Attorney911 Injury Tip](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCox4Lq7zBM – this is an accident video but the message on social media is universal)
  4. Contact an Experienced Hazing Attorney Immediately:

    • The Statute of Limitations: Most states, including Texas, have a Statute of Limitations for personal injury cases (typically two years from the date of injury or death). This means you have a limited window to file a lawsuit. If you miss this deadline, you forfeit your right to seek compensation forever. In Alaska, it is critical to consult legal counsel to understand the specific filing deadlines that apply to your case.
    • Evidence Disappears: The longer you wait, the more likely physical evidence will be cleaned up, digital evidence will be deleted (intentionally or not), and witness memories will fade. Institutions will implement damage control, closing ranks and attempting to build their defense.
    • Free Consultation: We offer free, confidential consultations to Alaska families. There is no risk in calling us to discuss your situation and understand your legal options. We can conduct these consultations remotely via phone or video, ensuring you receive timely advice regardless of your location in Alaska.
    • Understand time limits: Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case? | Attorney911 with Ralph Manginello

The emotional toll of hazing is immense, and you don’t have to face the powerful fraternities and universities alone. By taking these steps, you empower your legal team to build the strongest possible case for your family and pursue the justice your child deserves. Distance is not an issue; we serve hazing victims in Alaska and nationwide, willing to travel to advocate for your child.

Contact Us: Your Legal 911 for Hazing in Alaska

If your child has been a victim of hazing in Alaska – whether at the University of Alaska Anchorage, University of Alaska Fairbanks, or any other institution – your urgent legal emergency is our call to action. We understand the profound terror, anger, and betrayal you must feel. Here at Attorney911, we are ready to respond with the same immediate, aggressive, and professional help that defines our firm, and which we are actively demonstrating in our $10 million lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston.

🚨 Alaska FAMILIES: Your Child Deserves Justice. Let Us Fight For Them.

Our attorneys, Ralph Manginello and Lupe Peña, are not just lawyers; they are dedicated advocates for hazing victims. They are currently leading the charge in a high-profile $10 million lawsuit, bringing national attention to the horrors of hazing and holding powerful institutions accountable. This isn’t theoretical – it’s real, it’s now, and we’re ready to bring that relentless fight to your case in Alaska.

Alaska Families, Don’t Wait – Call Our Legal Emergency Hotline Now for a FREE Consultation:

📞 1-888-ATTY-911

Available 24/7 for Hazing Emergencies in Alaska.
Email: ralph@atty911.com
Website: attorney911.com

Why Call Us? We Make Justice Accessible for Alaska Families:

  • Zero Upfront Cost: We work on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay $0 upfront for our legal services. We only get paid if and when we win your case. This eliminates financial barriers, ensuring every Alaska family has access to top-tier legal representation, regardless of their current economic situation.
  • Nationwide Reach: While our primary offices are in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, hazing incidents know no geographical limits. We proudly serve hazing victims in Alaska and across the United States. Our federal court admissions and dual-state bar licenses (Texas and New York) allow us to pursue national fraternities and universities, irrespective of location.
  • Remote & On-Site Support for Alaska: We offer convenient video and phone consultations, enabling Alaska families to connect with our experienced attorneys from the comfort of their homes. For critical stages such as depositions, client meetings, or trials, our team is prepared to travel to Alaska, ensuring personalized and dedicated representation.
  • Insider Knowledge: With both Ralph Manginello and Lupe Peña having served as former insurance defense attorneys, we possess invaluable insight into how powerful institutions and their insurance companies strategize. We know their weaknesses, and we use that knowledge to your advantage.
  • Comprehensive Experience: From wrongful death to severe physical and psychological trauma, our firm has a proven track record in complex personal injury cases, including those against massive corporate defendants. Our active litigation in the Bermudez case demonstrates our direct experience with hazing, rhabdomyolysis, and institutional negligence.
  • Bilingual Services (Se Habla Español): We are proud to offer services in Spanish, ensuring that all Alaska families, including our Hispanic community, receive clear communication and dedicated legal support without language barriers.

Take the First Step Towards Healing and Accountability

We know this is an incredibly difficult time. You may feel alone, intimidated by the system, or pressured to stay silent. But your child deserves better, and you deserve justice. By contacting us, you empower a team of dedicated legal professionals to:

  • Immediately begin preserving crucial evidence before it disappears.
  • Navigate complex legal and university investigations on your behalf.
  • Aggressively pursue every responsible party, from individual perpetrators to powerful national organizations and universities.
  • Fight for maximum compensation for medical bills, lost earnings, pain, suffering, and emotional trauma.
  • Send a resounding message that hazing will no longer be tolerated.

Lupe Peña said it best when discussing the Bermudez case: “If this prevents harm to another person, that’s what we’re hoping to do. Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.” Your decision to seek justice for hazing in Alaska can not only bring healing to your family but could also prevent another student from enduring the same torment.

Do not hesitate. The clock is ticking, and evidence can disappear. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 now for your free, confidential consultation. Let us be your Legal 911.