mercer-county-featured-image.png

Mercer County Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | $24M Pike Settlements | Attorney911 — The Firm That Shut Down Pi Kappa Phi | Federal Court | Former Insurance Defense | 1-888-ATTY-911

If you’re reading this in Mercer County, New Jersey, your family may be facing one of the most terrifying moments of your life. Your child went to college with hopes of making friends and finding a community. Instead, they were subjected to abuse, humiliation, and potentially life-threatening harm through hazing. We understand what you’re going through. Your child was supposed to make friends at college. Instead, they were tortured. We’re here to help families in Mercer County fight back.

Hazing is a crisis that extends far beyond the borders of Texas, where our firm, Attorney911, is based. It’s a dark shadow that falls over college campuses across America, including institutions that students from Mercer County might attend. Whether your child chose a local university in New Jersey, ventured to a state school in Pennsylvania, or traveled to a distant campus like the University of Houston, the risks of hazing are unfortunately widespread and devastatingly real. We’ve seen this firsthand, and we’re actively fighting against it in courtrooms right now. Our expertise and aggressive approach are available to families in Mercer County, regardless of where the hazing incident occurred.

The Landmark Case: Attorney911 is Fighting This Battle Right Now – And We’ll Fight for Mercer County Families Too

We believe that the best way to demonstrate our commitment to eliminating hazing is to show, not just tell, you what we do. Our firm, Attorney911, is currently engaged in landmark litigation against one of the largest national fraternities in America and a major public university. This is not theoretical legal advice; this is an active, ongoing fight that encapsulates our firm’s dedication to justice for hazing victims.

Mercer County families: This is what hazing looks like today. This is what we do about it. The same fraternities that operate in Texas have chapters at universities near Mercer County. The same cultural pressures exist. The same institutional failures allow these horrifying events to unfold. If your child has been subjected to hazing, we will bring the same aggressive, data-driven, and relentless representation to your case in Mercer County as we are bringing to our client in Houston.

The $10 Million Lawsuit Against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston

On November 21, 2025, Attorney911 filed a $10 million lawsuit in Harris County Civil District Court, targeting Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity, the University of Houston, and 13 individual fraternity members. This case is a stark reminder of the brutal reality of modern hazing and how far institutions will go to protect their own reputations over student safety.

The Victim: Leonel Bermudez, A “Ghost Rush”

Our client, Leonel Bermudez, was a “ghost rush” – a prospective member who wasn’t even enrolled at the University of Houston at the time. He was planning to transfer for the upcoming Spring 2026 semester, yet he was still initiated into weeks of systematic abuse and torture. They did this to someone who wasn’t even officially their student.

Leonel accepted a bid to join Pi Kappa Phi on September 16, 2025. What followed were weeks of calculated, escalating hazing rituals designed to break him down physically and psychologically. This culminated in an incident on November 3, 2025, after which Leonel was rushed to the hospital with severe medical complications. He spent three nights and four days hospitalized, diagnosed with severe rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure.

We believe this case sends an unequivocal message: enough is enough.

What Happened: A Timeline of Abuse and Betrayal

  • September 16, 2025: Leonel Bermudez accepts a bid to Pi Kappa Phi at the University of Houston.
  • September 16 – November 3, 2025: Leonel endures weeks of systematic physical and psychological hazing. This included being forced to carry a fanny pack with objects of a sexual nature, enduring an enforced dress code, mandatory long study hours, weekly interviews with members, and being forced to drive fraternity members during early morning hours, leading to extreme exhaustion.
  • October 13, 2025: In a separate incident highlighted in our lawsuit, another pledge was hog-tied face-down on a table with an object in his mouth for over an hour.
  • October 15, 2025: Shockingly, another pledge lost consciousness and collapsed during one of the forced workouts, requiring other pledges to elevate his legs to revive him. This incident clearly demonstrated the extreme risks involved, yet the hazing continued.
  • Multiple Occasions: Leonel was subjected to “simulated waterboarding with a garden hose,” a dehumanizing act where water was sprayed directly into his face during calisthenics. He was also subjected to “forced consumption of milk and food to the point of vomiting,” followed by being compelled to continue running sprints while in physical distress, and even forced to “lie in vomit-soaked grass.” He was made to strip to his underwear in cold weather while being sprayed with a hose and was struck with wooden paddles.
  • November 3, 2025 (The Incident): As punishment for missing an event, Leonel was forced into an excruciating regimen of 100+ pushups, 500 squats, high-volume “suicides” (running drills), bear crawls, wheelbarrows, “save-you-brother” drills, two-mile warmups, and repeated 100-yard crawls, all while reciting the fraternity creed under threat of immediate expulsion. He became so exhausted he couldn’t stand without help.
  • November 4-5, 2025: Leonel’s condition worsened. As our attorney Ralph Manginello told ABC13, “When he finally made it home, he crawled up the stairs and went to bed. The next day, he was really sore and couldn’t really move. The next day was worse, and the next day, his mom rushed him to the hospital, and he had some kidney failure.”
  • November 6, 2025: Leonel’s mother rushed him to the hospital. He was “passing brown urine,” a clear sign of muscle breakdown. He was diagnosed with severe rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure, requiring three nights and four days of inpatient care.
  • November 14, 2025: Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters officially closed its Beta Nu Chapter at UH, a week before our lawsuit was filed. This action was announced on their website, acknowledging “violations of the Fraternity’s risk management policy and membership conduct standards.”
  • November 21, 2025: Attorney911 files the $10 million lawsuit. Immediate media coverage followed from ABC13, KHOU 11, and the Houston Chronicle.
  • November 24, 2025: Houston Public Media confirms the $10 million figure and reports on the University of Houston’s statement.

The Medical Consequences: Rhabdomyolysis

Leonel Bermudez suffered rhabdomyolysis, a severe medical condition where damaged muscle tissue releases harmful proteins into the bloodstream, leading to acute kidney failure. His urine turned brown, his creatine kinase levels were dangerously high, and he required extensive hospitalization. This is a life-threatening condition that can lead to permanent kidney damage or even death. We know that Ralph Manginello has specific expertise in rhabdomyolysis hazing cases, making him uniquely qualified for this type of litigation.

Institutional Responses: A Culture of Denial and Damage Control

The responses from the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters following the incident were telling.

The University of Houston spokesperson stated, “The events investigated are deeply disturbing and represent a clear violation of our community standards… any individual found responsible for hazing will face disciplinary action, up to and including expulsion and potential criminal charges.” While seemingly contrite, this statement subtly admits that the university’s internal mechanisms failed and points to potential criminal conduct by individuals, shifting focus from institutional responsibility.

Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters, in its own website statement, announced the closure of the Beta Nu Chapter effective November 14, 2025, citing “violations of the Fraternity’s risk management policy and membership conduct standards.” Crucially, they added, “We thank the University of Houston for its collaboration and leadership… we look forward to returning to campus at the appropriate time.” This statement, issued before our lawsuit went public, demonstrates a clear attempt at damage control and a disturbing lack of remorse, as they are already planning their return while our client recovers from their chapter’s actions. It implies the coordination of efforts between the national fraternity and the university to manage public perception rather than truly address the underlying issues.

Why This Case Matters to Mercer County Families

  1. Proof That “Tradition” is Torture: Hazing is not harmless fun. Leonel’s case, with its descriptions of waterboarding, forced eating, extreme exercise, and wooden paddles, exposes the barbaric reality of modern hazing. These are not isolated incidents; such “traditions” exist at universities across the nation, including those attended by students from Mercer County.
  2. Universities Are Complicit: The fact that the University of Houston owned and controlled the fraternity house where much of the hazing took place is critical. Universities near Mercer County have the same power and obligation to oversee Greek life and ensure student safety. When they fail, they are liable.
  3. National Organizations Are Aware: Pi Kappa Phi’s national leadership suspended and dissolved the chapter almost immediately upon learning of the incident, indicating their understanding of its severity and likelihood of liability. The same national organizations operate chapters near Mercer County, and they too are aware of the potential for hazing within their ranks.
  4. Victims Are Afraid: Leonel Bermudez fears retribution for speaking out. This fear is a common and powerful deterrent for hazing victims in Mercer County and everywhere else. Our firm specializes in protecting victims and ensuring their voices are heard without fear of further harm.
  5. One Brave Victim Can Protect Others: As Attorney Lupe Pena said, “If this prevents harm to another person, that’s what we’re hoping to do. Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.” Leonel’s courage to come forward can inspire and protect other students in Mercer County. Your family’s case could be the catalyst for change.
  6. $10 Million Sends a Message: The substantial damages sought in this lawsuit send an undeniable message that torturing students comes with enormous consequences. Mercer County families can leverage this precedent to seek similar accountability for their loved ones.

What Hazing Really Looks Like: Beyond the Stereotypes

For many parents in Mercer County, hazing might conjure images of silly pranks or benign rituals from movies. The grim reality, however, is far more sinister and dangerous. Hazing is a calculated form of abuse designed to break down a prospective member, strip them of their individuality, and instill unwavering loyalty through fear and suffering. It is psychological torture, physical degradation, and, as we’ve seen, can be deadly.

Categories of Hazing and Their Real-World Examples

Drawing directly from our current litigation and other documented incidents, here’s what hazing truly looks like:

  • Physical Abuse: This is not a shove or a playful punch. This can involve sustained beatings, paddling with wooden objects (as was done to Leonel Bermudez), branding, and forced physical exertion that extends far beyond normal athletic training. Leonel was forced into an agonizing regimen of over 500 squats and 100 pushups, along with other demanding exercises that led to serious medical complications. He was struck with wooden paddles.
  • Forced Consumption: This often involves large quantities of alcohol, leading to binge drinking and sometimes fatal alcohol poisoning, as tragically happened to Andrew Coffey at a Pi Kappa Phi chapter in 2017. It can also include forcing pledges to consume excessive amounts of food until they vomit, or even non-food substances. Leonel was forced to eat milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until he vomited, then made to continue exercising and lie in his own vomit.
  • Psychological Torture and Humiliation: Hazing aims to strip dignity. This includes verbal abuse, threats, isolation, ridicule, and forced participation in demeaning acts. Leonel was compelled to carry a fanny pack containing sexual objects and witnessed another pledge being hog-tied with an object in his mouth for over an hour. These acts are designed to humiliate and assert dominance.
  • Sleep Deprivation and Exhaustion: Pledges are often deprived of sleep, forced to perform tasks late into the night or early in the morning, leading to extreme fatigue, impaired judgment, and increased vulnerability. Leonel was forced to drive fraternity members at all hours, contributing to his exhaustion.
  • Exposure to the Elements: This can involve being forced outdoors in extreme weather conditions with inadequate clothing, or prolonged exposure to heat or cold without protection. Leonel was sprayed with a garden hose in cold weather while stripped to his underwear.
  • Simulated Drowning/Waterboarding: As occurred to Leonel Bermudez, this is a form of torture where individuals are made to feel like they are drowning. Media outlets, in reporting on our case, explicitly called waterboarding “a form of torture,” highlighting its extreme and barbaric nature.
  • Sexual Exploitation/Harassment: While not always physical, hazing can involve sexually demeaning acts, forced nudity, or even sexual assault. The forced carrying of sexual objects, as Leonel suffered, falls into this category of psychological and sexual harassment.

The Devastating Medical and Psychological Consequences

The physical manifestations of hazing can range from bruises, broken bones, and frostbite to critical organ failure, as in Leonel’s case. Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure are direct outcomes of extreme physical overexertion, often combined with dehydration, and can lead to permanent organ damage or death. Alcohol poisoning, traumatic brain injuries, and hypothermia are common as well.

Beyond the physical, the psychological scars are deep and lasting. Victims often suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), severe anxiety, depression, and long-term trust issues. The humiliation and fear experienced can lead to academic decline, social withdrawal, and, tragically, suicidal ideation. As Attorney Ralph Manginello stated about our client, Leonel is “fearful of doing an interview due to retribution,” a poignant illustration of the profound psychological impact of hazing and the culture of fear it creates.

To Mercer County parents: These are not isolated incidents in far-off states. The same pressure to conform, the same dangerous “traditions,” and the same tragic outcomes can occur at any university, including those where your Mercer County child might study.

Who Is Responsible: Holding Every Party Accountable

One of the most crucial aspects of hazing litigation is identifying and holding every responsible party accountable. Hazing is rarely the fault of just one individual or entity. Instead, it is a web of negligence and culpability, often spanning individual perpetrators, local chapters, national organizations, and the universities themselves. Our firm is skilled at unraveling this web and ensuring that those with “deep pockets” who enabled the abuse are held accountable.

In the case of Leonel Bermudez, our lawsuit names a comprehensive list of defendants, illustrating the multi-layered liability we pursue:

  1. The Local Chapter (UH Beta Nu Chapter of Pi Kappa Phi): This is the immediate perpetrator. The local chapter directly organized and conducted all the hazing activities that led to Leonel’s hospitalization. They are responsible for the physical and psychological abuse inflicted upon him.
  2. Chapter Officers (Fraternity President, Pledgemaster): These individuals hold leadership roles within the chapter and are directly responsible for directing and overseeing pledge activities. They typically have full knowledge of, and often actively participate in or orchestrate, the hazing. In many states, like Texas, they can face criminal charges for their involvement. In other cases, like Stone Foltz, Chapter Presidents have been personally held liable for millions.
  3. Individual Members: Every member who participated in the hazing, or even witnessed it and failed to intervene or report it, can be held individually liable. This includes current members who actively engaged in the abuse and former members who may have hosted hazing events at their residences, as is alleged in Leonel’s case.
  4. Spouses of Former Members: In a unique aspect of our current lawsuit, a former member and his spouse are named as defendants because some of the major hazing sessions occurred at their private residence. This extends liability to property owners who enable or permit illegal hazing activities on their premises.
  5. The National Organization (Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity, Inc.): National fraternities have a significant responsibility to oversee their chapters, enforce anti-hazing policies, and ensure the safety of pledges. When they fail in this duty, particularly when there’s a documented history of hazing within their organization (like Andrew Coffey’s death in 2017), they are held liable. National organizations typically have substantial assets and insurance policies, making them a primary target in hazing lawsuits. KHOU 11 reported that the national organization was “alleged to have enabled the harmful environment by failing to enforce anti-hazing rules and policies despite knowledge of ‘a hazing crisis.'”
  6. The Housing Corporation (Beta Nu Housing Corporation): Many fraternities have separate housing corporations that own or manage the chapter houses. These entities have a duty to ensure the safety of the premises and can be held liable if hazing occurs on properties they control, particularly if they were aware or should have been aware of the activities.
  7. The University (University of Houston): Universities have a fundamental duty to provide a safe environment for their students and to oversee student organizations. In Leonel’s case, the University of Houston is a defendant because it owned the fraternity house where the hazing occurred. This establishes clear premises liability. Furthermore, the University had prior knowledge of hazing risks, stemming from another student being hospitalized in 2017 due to hazing at a different fraternity on its campus. Their failure to implement adequate safeguards makes them culpable.
  8. The University’s Governing Body (UH Board of Regents): As the ultimate governing body for the University, the Board of Regents is responsible for institutional oversight and policy. Their inclusion in the lawsuit reflects a pursuit of accountability at the highest levels of university administration.
  9. Insurance Carriers: Behind many of these defendants are insurance policies – the national organization’s liability insurance, the university’s institutional insurance, and even homeowners’ insurance for individual members. Our firm, with both Ralph Manginello and Lupe Peña being former insurance defense attorneys, possesses unique insider knowledge of how these carriers operate, value claims, and defend against them. This insight is invaluable in maximizing our clients’ recovery.

This multi-faceted approach to identifying defendants means we don’t just target the most obvious culprits. We meticulously investigate every link in the chain of command and responsibility, ensuring that every entity that contributed to or allowed the hazing is brought to justice. This is not about suing “broke college kids”; it’s about holding powerful institutions and their enablers fully accountable. This comprehensive strategy is exactly what we bring to Mercer County hazing cases.

What These Cases Win: Multi-Million Dollar Proof for Mercer County Families

For families in Mercer County facing the unimaginable pain of a hazing injury or death, one of the most pressing questions is often: “Can we truly fight these powerful institutions and win?” The answer, unequivocally, is yes. Across the nation, juries and courts have sent powerful messages, awarding multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements that prove accountability is possible. These precedents are not just numbers; they are stories of justice, deterrence, and the unwavering fight against a culture of abuse. Similar outcomes are absolutely possible for hazing victims in Mercer County.

Here are some of the landmark cases that show what is possible:

Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University / Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)

Total Payout: Over $10.1 Million

In 2021, Stone Foltz, a pledge at Pi Kappa Alpha (PIKE) at Bowling Green State University, tragically died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink an entire bottle of alcohol during a hazing ritual. The national fraternity has a presence at universities where students from Mercer County may attend. The subsequent legal actions resulted in a monumental financial reckoning:

  • Bowling Green State University settled for $2.9 million. This payout, the largest public university hazing settlement in Ohio’s history, highlights the significant liability universities face when they fail to prevent hazing on their campuses.
  • Pi Kappa Alpha National and several individual members settled for $7.2 million. This demonstrates that both the national organization and its perpetrators are held directly responsible.
  • Most recently, in December 2024, Daylen Dunson, the former chapter president, was ordered to pay $6.5 million in a personal judgment. This is a critical precedent, showing that individual perpetrators can and will face massive personal liability, regardless of prior settlements.

Why this matters to Mercer County: The total recovery in the Foltz case, exceeding $10.1 million, is a direct benchmark for the $10 million we are seeking in the Bermudez case. It confirms that such demands are justifiable and achievable, even though Leonel Bermudez survived. It also shows that the same national fraternities that have paid millions nationally maintain chapters at universities accessible to Mercer County students.

Maxwell Gruver – Louisiana State University / Phi Delta Theta (2017)

Total Payout: $6.1 Million Verdict

In 2017, Max Gruver, an 18-year-old freshman at LSU, died from acute alcohol poisoning with a BAC of 0.495—over six times the legal limit—after participating in a Phi Delta Theta hazing event called “Bible Study.” He was forced to drink heavily every time he answered a fraternity-related question incorrectly.

  • A jury returned a $6.1 million verdict against the perpetrators.
  • Matthew Naquin, one of the fraternity members, was convicted of negligent homicide and sentenced to prison.
  • The tragedy spurred the creation of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, making hazing a felony.

Why this matters to Mercer County: This case, especially the jury verdict, sends a powerful message: juries are outraged by hazing and are willing to award substantial sums to victims and their families. It underscores the potential for both civil and criminal accountability, and how a single case can drive statewide legislative change.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University / Beta Theta Pi (2017)

Total Payout: Over $110 Million (Estimated Settlements)

Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old sophomore at Penn State, died in 2017 after a Beta Theta Pi hazing event where he was forced to consume 18 alcoholic drinks in 82 minutes. He fell down a flight of stairs, suffering a traumatic brain injury and internal bleeding. Fraternity members waited 12 agonizing hours before calling 911.

  • The numerous civil lawsuits resulted in estimated settlements exceeding $110 million, though the exact figure remains confidential.
  • Multiple fraternity members faced criminal charges, with several convicted of involuntary manslaughter, hazing, and assault.
  • Pennsylvania enacted Timothy’s Law, a comprehensive anti-hazing statute.

Why this matters to Mercer County: The Piazza case is a testament to what is possible when egregious conduct is meticulously documented, as much of the hazing at the Pi Kappa Phi house was captured on security cameras. It highlights that in cases of severe institutional negligence and cover-ups, damages can be astronomical. The fact that fraternities like Beta Theta Pi also have chapters at schools near Mercer County means these exact dangers are present.

Andrew Coffey – Florida State University / Pi Kappa Phi (2017)

Same Fraternity as Bermudez Case

Tragically, Andrew Coffey, a freshman pledge at Florida State University, died in 2017 from acute alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink an entire bottle of bourbon at a Pi Kappa Phi “Big Brother Night” event.

  • Nine fraternity members faced criminal charges.
  • The FSU chapter was permanently closed.
  • The family pursued a civil lawsuit, which resulted in a confidential settlement.

Why this matters to Mercer County: This is a smoking gun for our Leonel Bermudez case against Pi Kappa Phi. It proves that Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters knew about deadly hazing within its chapters as early as 2017. They had eight years between Andrew Coffey’s death and Leonel Bermudez’s hospitalization to fix their systemic issues. They failed, leading to Leonel’s kidney failure. This pattern of negligence strengthens our argument for substantial punitive damages against the national organization. Mercer County students are at risk from the same national organization.

Other Significant Cases

  • Adam Oakes (VCU / Delta Chi, 2021): A recent settlement of over $4 million following his death from alcohol poisoning. The family originally sought $28 million.
  • Tucker Hipps (Clemson / Sigma Phi Epsilon, 2014): A $500,000+ settlement after his death from falling off a bridge during a pledge run.
  • Sigma Alpha Epsilon (University of Alabama, 2023): A lawsuit filed for Traumatic Brain Injury suffered by a pledge, showing high-value claims for serious, non-fatal injuries.

The incontrovertible truth for Mercer County families: These multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements are proof that the legal system can, and will, hold fraternities, universities, and individuals accountable. The emotional trauma, physical injuries, and even death caused by hazing carry enormous financial and ethical costs. The same legal strategies, the same pursuit of justice, and the same potential for multi-million dollar recoveries apply directly to Mercer County hazing cases. We have dedicated a national hazing death and injury tracker to document these very patterns across America so that no fraternity or university can claim ignorance when tragedy strikes at a campus near Mercer County.

Texas Law Protects You: Understanding Your Rights in Hazing Cases

While our current landmark case is rooted in Texas law, it’s vital for families in Mercer County to understand that the spirit of these laws, and the fundamental legal principles behind them, apply across the United States. Many states have enacted strict anti-hazing legislation, and common law theories of negligence, assault, and liability provide broad protections for victims, regardless of location. The core message is clear: consent is NOT a defense to hazing.

Understanding the Legal Definition of Hazing

In Texas, the Education Code, Sections 37.151 through 37.157, clearly defines and criminalizes hazing. This definition is comprehensive and captures the egregious acts committed against Leonel Bermudez:

“Hazing” means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, occurring on or off the campus of an educational institution, by one person alone or acting with others, directed against a student for the purpose of pledging, being initiated into, affiliating with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in an organization if the act:

  • Is any type of physical brutality: This includes striking (like being hit with wooden paddles), beating, branding, or placing harmful substances on the body. Leonel’s physical assault clearly falls under this.
  • Involves sleep deprivation, exposure to the elements, confinement, calisthenics, or other similar activity that subjects the student to an unreasonable risk of harm or adversely affects physical/mental health: When Leonel was forced to do 500 squats and 100 pushups to the point of kidney failure, subjected to sleep deprivation, or stripped and sprayed with water in cold weather, this element is met.
  • Involves consumption of a food, liquid, alcoholic beverage, or other substance that subjects the student to an unreasonable risk of harm: Leonel being forced to eat milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until he vomited explicitly falls under this category.
  • Is any activity that induces, causes, or requires the student to perform a duty or task that involves a violation of the Penal Code: This covers any act that is independently illegal.
  • Involves coercing the student to consume a drug or an excessive amount of alcohol: This directly addresses forced binge drinking, a common element in fatal hazing.

The actions against Leonel Bermudez satisfy multiple points of this legal definition, reinforcing the strength of our case and providing a clear legal basis for civil action. Similar, if not identical, definitions of hazing apply in New Jersey and other states where Mercer County students attend college.

Criminal Penalties: Hazing is a Serious Crime

Under Texas law, hazing is not just a regulatory violation; it’s a crime. The penalties escalate with the severity of the harm:

  • Class B Misdemeanor: For merely engaging in hazing, soliciting it, or failing to report it with firsthand knowledge.
  • Class A Misdemeanor: If hazing causes serious bodily injury, which includes conditions like severe rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure that Leonel suffered, individuals can face up to a year in jail and thousands in fines.
  • State Jail Felony: If hazing causes death, individuals can face up to two years in state jail and substantial fines.

The University of Houston spokesperson’s reference to “potential criminal charges” after Leonel’s incident highlights that these laws are actively enforced. The same criminal charges may apply to hazing incidents occurring in New Jersey, depending on your state’s statutes.

Organizational Liability: Holding Institutions Accountable

Texas law also holds organizations directly responsible: “An organization commits an offense if the organization condones or encourages hazing or if an officer or any combination of members, pledges, or alumni of the organization commits or assists in the commission of hazing.” This means local chapters, national fraternities, and even housing corporations can face fines, denial of permission to operate, and forfeiture of property. This principle of organizational liability is crucial for cases in Mercer County, ensuring that the entities behind the Greek letters cannot escape responsibility.

Consent is NOT a Defense: A Cornerstone of Anti-Hazing Law

One of the most insidious defenses often raised by fraternities and universities is that the victim “consented” to the hazing. Texas law, like that in many other states, unequivocally rejects this argument: “It is not a defense to prosecution for an offense under this subchapter that the person against whom the hazing was directed consented to or acquiesced in the hazing activity.”

This is a critical legal shield for hazing victims in Mercer County. It recognizes that true consent cannot exist in manipulative, coercive environments where social pressure, fear of ostracism, and the desire to belong override free will. No student can legally consent to being tortured, abused, or endangered. This means that whether your child “went along with it” or not, their rights to seek justice remain fully intact.

Civil Liability: Beyond Criminal Prosecution

While criminal charges target individual perpetrators, civil lawsuits provide the means for victims and families in Mercer County to recover damages for their suffering. We pursue multiple civil liability theories, just as we are doing in the Bermudez case:

  • Negligence Claims: We argue that universities, national fraternities, and individual members had a duty of care to protect students, breached that duty through their actions or inactions, and directly caused the injuries.
  • Premises Liability: If hazing occurs on university-owned or controlled property, or at the residence of a member, the property owner may be liable for failing to maintain a safe environment.
  • Negligent Supervision: This applies when national organizations fail to adequately oversee their chapters, or universities fail to monitor Greek life activities.
  • Assault and Battery: Individual hazing acts often constitute intentional torts like assault (the threat of physical harm) and battery (unwanted physical contact), for which perpetrators can be held personally responsible.
  • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED): The outrageous and extreme nature of much hazing, particularly acts like waterboarding and psychological torture, can form the basis for IIED claims.

Mercer County families, if your child has been subjected to hazing, please know this: The law is on your side. These legal frameworks, whether in Texas, New Jersey, or other states, are designed to protect students and hold perpetrators and institutions accountable. We have the expertise to navigate these complex laws and apply them aggressively to your case.

Why Attorney911 Is the Obvious Choice for Mercer County Hazing Victims

When your family in Mercer County is grappling with the aftermath of a hazing incident, choosing the right legal representation is paramount. This isn’t just any personal injury case; it requires specialized expertise, an aggressive approach, and an unwavering commitment to holding powerful institutions accountable. Attorney911 offers a unique blend of experience, insight, and dedication that makes us the obvious choice for families in Mercer County and beyond.

1. We’re Actively Fighting This Battle Right Now

Unlike firms that may list hazing as one of many practice areas, we are currently immersed in the trenches of a $10 million hazing lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston. This is not theoretical; this is real-time, high-stakes litigation demonstrating our deep commitment and capability in hazing cases. Mercer County families benefit from our immediate, front-line experience in this complex and rapidly evolving area of law. Our current litigation against Pi Kappa Phi further proves our capacity to handle cases against national Greek organizations that often have chapters at universities attended by Mercer County students.

2. Ralph P. Manginello: Battle-Tested and Unapologetic

Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, brings over 25 years of courtroom experience to every case.

  • Former Insurance Defense Attorney: Crucially, Ralph began his career defending insurance companies. He knows their playbook, their strategies to delay and deny, and their weaknesses. This insider knowledge is a massive advantage for Mercer County hazing victims, allowing us to anticipate and dismantle their defenses.
  • Multi-Billion Dollar Case Experience: Ralph was involved in the BP Texas City Explosion litigation, a mass tort case involving 15 deaths and 180+ injuries against a corporate giant. This experience speaks volumes about his capacity to take on and win against large, well-resourced institutional defendants like universities and national fraternities.
  • Dual-State Bar Admission: Licensed in both Texas AND New York, Ralph possesses a strategic advantage when dealing with national fraternities often headquartered in states like New York or with operations crossing state lines. This is a critical asset for Mercer County clients whose cases may involve national organizations.
  • Federal Court Authority: Admitted to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, and with appellate experience in the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals, our firm can pursue hazing cases in federal court, providing broader jurisdiction against national defendants, crucial for Mercer County families seeking justice against institutions operating across state lines.
  • Specialized Hazing Expertise: Ralph has direct experience with fraternity litigation, rhabdomyolysis cases (like Leonel Bermudez’s medical condition), and securing university accountability. His background as a collegiate athlete and youth coach also gives him a unique understanding of group dynamics where hazing often breeds.
  • Journalism Background: With a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism, Ralph is trained to investigate, uncover hidden facts, and tell compelling stories – essential skills for exposing what institutions want to hide in Mercer County hazing cases and presenting them powerfully to a jury.

3. Lupe E. Peña: The Insider Advantage

Lupe Peña, our associate attorney, is a third-generation Texan who is also a former insurance defense attorney.

  • National Defense Firm Insight: Lupe worked for Litchfield Cavo LLP, a nationwide insurance defense firm. He spent years defending large corporations and insurance companies against claims just like yours. He learned firsthand how they value cases, strategize, and work to minimize payouts.
  • Now He Uses That Knowledge Against Them: Lupe’s experience is our clients’ superpower. Every tactic they taught him to use against victims, he now uses to dismantle their defenses and maximize recovery for our clients. This is invaluable intelligence for Mercer County families.
  • Fluent in Spanish: With a significant Hispanic population in Mercer County, Lupe’s fluency in Spanish ensures that Spanish-speaking families affected by hazing receive comprehensive legal services without language barriers.

4. A Data-Driven Approach: We Don’t Guess Who to Sue; We Know.

Attorney911 maintains one of the most comprehensive private directories of Greek organizations in Texas and nationwide. This intelligence database allows us to identify every entity behind the Greek letters – including their precise legal names, EINs, officers, and corporate structures. When hazing happens, we know exactly who is responsible and who to sue. This capability is applied directly to hazing incidents occurring in or affecting students from Mercer County.

5. We Come to You: Nationwide Reach for Mercer County Families

While our main offices are in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, we proudly serve hazing victims in Mercer County and across America. We eliminate geographic barriers through:

  • Remote Consultations: Mercer County families can meet with us via video conference from the comfort and privacy of their homes.
  • Travel Commitment: We are prepared to travel to Mercer County for key depositions, client meetings, and trial, ensuring a personal presence when it matters most.
  • Federal Court Authority: Our admission to federal courts allows us to pursue national defendants regardless of state borders.

6. No Upfront Cost: Contingency Fee Basis

We understand that pursuing justice against powerful institutions can seem financially daunting, especially for families already burdened by medical bills and emotional distress. That’s why we take hazing cases on a contingency fee basis for our Mercer County clients:

  • You pay $0 upfront.
  • We don’t get paid unless and until you get paid.
  • This aligns our interests directly with yours and removes any financial barrier to aggressive legal representation. Watch our video explaining “How Contingency Fees Work” for more details.

7. Empathy and Aggression: The Heart of Attorney911

We are parents, and we understand what it means to send a child off to college. We approach every hazing case with profound empathy for the victim and their family, combined with an aggressive, no-holds-barred strategy against the perpetrators. As Lupe Peña expressed, “If this prevents harm to another person, that’s what we’re hoping to do. Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.” This is our motivation, and it’s what we offer to every Mercer County family seeking our help.

Client Testimonials: Real Voices of Trust and Success

Our dedication is reflected in our 4.9-star rating from over 250 Google reviews. Clients consistently praise our commitment, communication, and results.

  • “You are FAMILY to them and they protect and fight for you as such.” — Chad Harris
  • “A true PITT BULL and fighter. He don’t play!” — Chad Harris (about Ralph Manginello)
  • “Special thank you to my attorney, Mr. Pena, for your kindness and patience.” — Chelsea Martinez

When you choose Attorney911, you’re not just hiring lawyers; you’re gaining a team that combines compassion, insider knowledge, and a proven track record of securing significant victories against formidable opponents. We are ready to bring this fight to Mercer County.

What to Do Right Now: Actionable Steps for Mercer County Families

If your child has been subjected to hazing, the moments immediately following the incident are critical. While panic, anger, and fear are natural responses, taking swift, decisive action can significantly impact the strength and success of any future legal claim. Here are the immediate steps families in Mercer County should take:

1. Prioritize Medical Attention and Document Everything

The physical and psychological well-being of the hazing victim is paramount.

  • Seek Immediate Medical Care: Whether sustained injuries seem minor or severe, get your child to a doctor, urgent care, or emergency room immediately. Some injuries, like rhabdomyolysis or concussions, may have delayed symptoms or serious underlying issues. Do not delay, as this can be used by defense attorneys to downplay the severity of the injuries. Ensure the medical provider understands the injuries resulted from a hazing incident.
  • Preserve Medical Records: Request copies of all medical records, including emergency room reports, diagnostic test results, physician’s notes, discharge summaries, and bills. These form the bedrock of your personal injury claim. Watch our video “Why Seeing a Doctor Right After an Accident Is Critical” for more insights.

2. Preserve All Evidence – Digital and Physical

Hazing thrives in secrecy, and perpetrators often attempt to destroy evidence. You must act quickly to secure anything that could support your case.

  • Photographs and Videos: If safe to do so, take photos and videos of any visible injuries (bruises, cuts, burns, swelling) at all stages of healing. Document the location where the hazing occurred, any physical objects used, uniforms, or other relevant items. If your child is incapacitated, ask a trusted friend or family member to help. Our video “Can You Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case?” emphasizes the importance of visual evidence.
  • Digital Communications: This is often the most critical evidence. DO NOT DELETE ANYTHING. Save all text messages, GroupMe chats, Snapchat conversations, Instagram DMs, Facebook messages, emails, or any other digital communications related to the hazing. This includes threats, coercion, rules, schedules, and any discussions among members. Convert these to PDFs or take screenshots that show dates and participants.
  • Witness Information: Collect names, phone numbers, and any contact information for other pledges, witnesses, former members who can corroborate the hazing, or anyone who may have relevant information.
  • Fraternity/Sorority Documents: Preserve any “pledge manuals,” schedules, rules, or communications received from the organization.
  • Academic and Financial Records: Keep records of tuition payments, grades, any lost scholarships, or proof of lost income if your child missed work or internships due to the hazing.

3. Do NOT Communicate with the Fraternity/Sorority or University Officials Without Legal Counsel

This is a critical mistake many families make.

  • No Statements to Organizations: Do not speak with fraternity or sorority leadership, alumni advisors, or national representatives. They will often try to minimize the incident, obtain information from you that can be used against you, or pressure you into signing documents that waive your rights.
  • No Statements to University Administration Alone: Universities have extensive legal resources and their primary interest is often protecting the institution’s reputation, not necessarily the individual victim. While you may need to file an internal report for university policy violations (e.g., Title IX), do so only after consulting with an attorney who can guide you on what to say and ensure your child’s rights are protected.
  • Do NOT Sign Anything: Never sign any documents from the fraternity, university, or their representatives without having an attorney review them first.
  • Stay Off Social Media: Refrain from posting about the hazing incident on social media. Anything you post can be twisted and used by defense attorneys to discredit your claim. Our video “Don’t Post on Social Media After an Accident” covers this crucial advice.

4. Understand Your Rights and the Legal Protections

  • Consent Is Not a Defense: Remember that under Texas law, and similar statutes in many states like New Jersey, a student cannot legally consent to hazing activities. The defense that “they knew what they were signing up for” is invalid.
  • Statute of Limitations: There are strict deadlines, known as the statute of limitations (often two years from the date of injury or death), to file a lawsuit. Waiting too long can mean losing your right to seek compensation forever. Evidence disappears, and memories fade. Our video “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” explains this urgency.

5. Contact Attorney911 Immediately

This is perhaps the most crucial step. Our firm specializes in hazing litigation and can provide immediate, aggressive, and professional help.

  • We Offer Free Consultations: We provide a free, confidential consultation to discuss your specific situation, evaluate the viability of your case, and outline your legal options.
  • We Work on Contingency: There are no upfront costs to you. We only get paid if we win your case.
  • We Will Protect You: We will handle all communications with the involved parties, shielding you from their tactics and allowing you to focus on your child’s recovery.
  • We Are Ready to Travel: While based in Texas, our federal court authority and willingness to travel ensure we can represent Mercer County victims, wherever the hazing occurred.

Mercer County families, you are not alone in this fight. We have seen the patterns of institutional negligence, the attempts to cover up, and the deep-seated cultural problems that allow hazing to persist. We have the experience, the knowledge, and the fierce dedication to fight for your child’s rights and secure the justice they deserve.

Contact Us: Your Legal Emergency Hotline for Hazing Victims in Mercer County

At Attorney911, we understand that finding yourself in the aftermath of a hazing incident is a frightening and confusing time for families in Mercer County, New Jersey. Your child was supposed to thrive, to learn, to grow. Instead, they endured pain, humiliation, and potentially grievous harm. You are scared, you are angry, and you are searching for answers in the middle of the night. We are here, 24/7, ready to answer your call.

Mercer County Families: We Are Fighting This Fight RIGHT NOW. And We’ll Fight for You.

Our firm is not just talking about hazing; we are actively litigating a $10 million lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston for severe hazing that resulted in rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure. We are in the courtroom. We are gathering evidence. We are holding powerful institutions accountable. This firsthand, current experience means we bring unparalleled insight and ferocity to every hazing case, including yours in Mercer County.

If your child has been subjected to hazing, whether in New Jersey or elsewhere, you have legal rights. We know how to build these cases. We know how to hold institutions accountable. We know how to WIN. Mercer County families deserve the same aggressive representation.

Your Legal Emergency Hotline for Hazing Victims in Mercer County:

📞 1-888-ATTY-911

Email Us: ralph@atty911.com
Visit Our Website: attorney911.com

We are available 24/7 for Mercer County hazing emergencies. Don’t wait. Time is critical.

What You Can Expect When You Call Attorney911:

  • Immediate and Free Consultation: We will listen to your story with empathy and without judgment. Your initial consultation is completely free, and you are under no obligation to hire us. This is your chance to get expert legal advice during a terrifying time.
  • No Upfront Cost: We take hazing cases on a contingency fee basis for our Mercer County clients. This means you pay absolutely $0 upfront to hire our firm. We only get paid if and when we win your case. Our interests are aligned with yours: we collect a fee only if we secure compensation for you. This payment structure removes financial barriers and allows you to focus on your child’s recovery.
  • Nationwide Reach, Local Commitment for Mercer County: While our primary offices are in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas, our federal court authority and dual-state bar licenses (Texas and New York) allow us to pursue cases against national organizations and universities anywhere in the United States, including those affecting Mercer County. We offer convenient video consultations for families who cannot travel, and our attorneys are prepared to travel to Mercer County for depositions, client meetings, and trials as needed. Distance is not a barrier to justice.
  • A Deep Understanding of Hazing: We recognize that hazing is not limited to fraternities and sororities. We represent victims of hazing in a wide range of organizations, including:
    • Fraternities and sororities with chapters near Mercer County universities
    • Sports teams at colleges and high schools that students from Mercer County attend
    • Marching bands and other student organizations
    • ROTC programs
    • Military academies
    • Any organization where abuse is disguised as “initiation.”
  • Protection for Immigrant Students: We understand that international students or students from immigrant families facing hazing may have unique fears regarding their immigration status. Please know this: your immigration status does NOT affect your right to seek justice. We can protect your privacy and your case. Our bilingual staff (Se habla español) ensures clear communication and support for Hispanic families in Mercer County.

The Urgency of Action: Why You Must Call Now

The courage shown by Leonel Bermudez in coming forward is an inspiration, and his case highlights the critical importance of acting swiftly.

  • Statute of Limitations: Most states, including New Jersey, have a statute of limitations (often two years) from the date of injury or death to file a lawsuit. If you delay, you risk losing your legal rights forever.
  • Evidence Preservation: Critical evidence, such as text messages, social media posts, videos, and witness memories, can disappear or be destroyed over time. The sooner we get involved, the more effectively we can secure and preserve this vital information.
  • Protect Your Child: The hazing culture often involves retaliation and intimidation. Our immediate intervention can protect your child from further harassment and ensure they have a powerful advocate to speak for them.

Mercer County families, if you suspect or know that your child has been a victim of hazing, do not face this nightmare alone. You don’t have to navigate the complex legal system, powerful university administrations, and well-funded national fraternities by yourself. We have proven that we can take on these defendants and win.

Call Attorney911 immediately at 1-888-ATTY-911, email ralph@atty911.com, or visit attorney911.com. Your family deserves justice. Your child deserves to heal. And the perpetrators deserve to be held accountable. Let us fight for you.