Hazing in Paradise: A Guam Family’s Guide to Campus Safety and Legal Accountability

The serene shores and vibrant culture of Guam might seem a world away from the stressful, high-pressure environments where hazing often thrives. Yet, as families on our island prepare their children for college, whether at home at the University of Guam or Guam Community College, or on the mainland, the hidden dangers of hazing are a sobering concern we all must face. Imagine your child, far from the comfort and familiarity of home, caught in a situation where the desire to belong clashes with demands that threaten their physical or mental well-being. Perhaps they’re told a late-night physical “challenge” is the key to brotherhood, or pressured to consume excessive alcohol at an “optional” event that feels mandatory.

These scenarios are not distant nightmares; they are current realities unfolding on campuses across the nation, and they can impact the sons and daughters of Guam. When these moments turn tragic, as they have for far too many families, the path to justice can be complex and overwhelming.

This comprehensive guide is designed for Guam families, students, and anyone concerned about the insidious nature of hazing in 2025. We explore what modern hazing truly looks like, the legal frameworks in place to combat it—especially in Texas where many Guam families send their children for higher education—and the national patterns of abuse that inform our pursuit of justice. We will detail harrowing cases from across the United States, linking them to a wider pattern of institutional neglect and organizational culpability. While hazing incidents at the University of Guam and Guam Community College may not frequently make national headlines, it is vital for our community to understand the risks and how to protect our loved ones, wherever they may study.

We also offer practical advice for recognizing the warning signs, responding to a hazing incident, and building a strong legal case to hold perpetrators and institutions accountable. Our goal is to empower you with knowledge, support, and a clear path toward protecting your family from the destructive forces of hazing.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
    • Post details on public social media
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

The image of hazing that many of us carry—perhaps from movies or old news reports—is often outdated. In 2025, hazing has evolved, becoming more insidious, harder to detect, and often cloaked in the language of “tradition” or “team-building.” For Guam families, understanding these modern forms is crucial, whether your child is pledging a fraternity at the University of Guam or joining an athletic team at Texas A&M. Hazing is a complex and dangerous dynamic, underpinned by power imbalances and a coercive environment that strips individuals of their autonomy and dignity, all while instilling a perverse sense of “belonging.”

Clear, modern definition of hazing

Hazing is broadly defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
• Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

It is critical to emphasize that “I agreed to it” does not automatically make it safe or legal. When there is peer pressure, a power imbalance, and implicit or explicit threats of exclusion, true consent is often impossible. The law recognizes that the fear of social exclusion, the intense desire for belonging, and peer pressure can create an environment where a student feels compelled to endure harmful acts.

Main categories of hazing

Modern hazing manifests across a spectrum, from subtle psychological manipulation to overt physical and sexual assault. Here are the main categories, with examples seen in contemporary incidents:

Alcohol and substance hazing
This is perhaps the most well-known and deadliest form of hazing. It often involves:

• Forced or coerced drinking: Pledges compelled to consume excessive amounts of alcohol, often in rapid succession. This can take the form of “wine-downs,” “power hours,” or drinking games designed for extreme intoxication.
• Chugging challenges, “lineups,” or games: Events where new members are required to consume large quantities of alcohol or other substances, such as hot sauce, rotten food, or even cleaning products.
• “Bottle exchanges” or “pledge dads”: Older members gifting or forcing new members to consume certain bottles of liquor, often with the expectation that the entire bottle be finished by the end of the night.
• Being pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances: Pledges might be given concoctions of various substances, or even illicit drugs, as part of a ritual.

Physical hazing
This category inflicts direct bodily harm or extreme physical discomfort. It includes:

• Paddling, beatings, or other forms of physical assault: Instances where new members are struck, hit, or violently assaulted by older members. This often leaves visible bruises, cuts, or internal injuries. The infamous Chun “Michael” Deng case, where a pledge died after being repeatedly tackled, exemplifies this.
• Extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings”: Prolonged and excessive exercises, often late at night or when the new members are already exhausted, pushing them beyond safe physical limits.
• Sleep deprivation, food/water deprivation: Requiring new members to go without adequate sleep for days, or restricting their access to food and water, leading to exhaustion, dehydration, and impaired judgment.
• Exposure to extreme cold/heat or dangerous environments: Leaving new members stranded in remote locations without appropriate clothing or supplies, or forcing them into uncomfortable environmental conditions.

Sexualized and humiliating hazing
Designed to degrade and dehumanize, these acts can cause profound psychological damage and trauma:

• Forced nudity or partial nudity: Requiring new members to strip down, or engage in sexually suggestive poses.
• Simulated sexual acts, “roasted pig” positions, or degrading costumes: Forcing individuals to perform or participate in acts that mimic sexual activity, often in absurd or demeaning ways. For example, the Baylor football hazing allegations included individuals being taped to a table in a “roasted pig” position.
• Acts with racial, sexist, or homophobic overtones: Using slurs, stereotypes, or forcing new members to perform acts that denigrate their identity.

Psychological hazing
This category targets mental and emotional well-being, often undermining self-esteem and fostering dependence:

• Verbal abuse, threats, or intimidation: Constant yelling, name-calling, insults, or threats of physical harm or social ostracism.
• Social isolation: New members might be forbidden from interacting with friends outside the group, or forced to shun specific individuals.
• Manipulation or forced confessions: Pressuring individuals to reveal sensitive personal information or to confess to fabricated wrongdoings.
• Public shaming: Posting embarrassing images online or forcing new members to recount embarrassing stories in front of others.

Digital/online hazing
With the pervasiveness of technology, hazing has moved into the digital realm, enabling constant surveillance and psychological pressure:

• Group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation: Requiring new members to perform embarrassing acts and post them on social media platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, or Discord.
• Constant texts and calls: New members might be expected to respond immediately to messages at all hours, disrupting sleep and academic focus.
• Pressure to create or share compromising images/videos: Coercion to create or distribute content that is sexually suggestive, illegal, or humiliating.
• Social media policing: Restricting what new members can post, demanding they promote the organization, or forcing them to remove content.

Where hazing actually happens

It’s a common misconception that hazing is exclusively a fraternity issue. The reality is far broader, affecting a wide array of student organizations. For families on Guam, whose children might pursue diverse paths in college, recognizing this broader scope is essential.

• Fraternities and sororities: This remains a prominent area for hazing, encompassing Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek-letter organizations. The intense social bonds and historical traditions can create fertile ground for hazing rituals.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / military-style groups: These organizations, with their hierarchical structures and emphasis on discipline, can sometimes cross the line from tough training into coercive hazing. The Texas A&M Corps of Cadets hazing incident, including the “roasted pig” pose, highlighted these risks.
• Spirit squads, tradition clubs (e.g., Texas Cowboys-type groups): Groups centered around school spirit or long-standing traditions sometimes incorporate hazing rituals disguised as “bonding” experiences. The University of Texas’s Texas Cowboys has faced multiple hazing allegations.
• Athletic teams: From high-profile football and basketball programs to less visible swim or club sports, hazing can occur as a twisted form of team initiation. The Northwestern University athletic hazing scandal brought this issue to national attention.
• Marching bands and performance groups: Even seemingly innocuous organizations like bands can be susceptible. The tragic death of Robert Champion at Florida A&M’s marching band underscored the dangers here.
• Some service, cultural, and academic organizations: While less common, any group with a hierarchical structure and an “earn your place” mentality can be vulnerable to hazing.

The common thread across all these contexts is the presence of social status, tradition, and secrecy. These factors create an environment where hazing persists, often despite university policies and national prohibitions, because members fear breaking the “code of silence” or being branded as disloyal. It’s this culture that Attorney911 understands and targets when pursuing accountability.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is crucial for any Guam family whose child experiences this abuse. While hazing incidents at the University of Guam or Guam Community College would fall under local regulations, many Guam students pursue higher education on the mainland, particularly in states like Texas. Therefore, we will focus on the Texas legal framework, which provides robust protections and means for recourse.

Texas hazing law basics (Education Code)

Texas has clear and comprehensive laws targeting hazing, predominantly found in the Texas Education Code. These statutes define hazing broadly and establish both criminal penalties and institutional responsibilities.

Under Texas Education Code § 37.151, hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
• Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

Plain English: Any action that jeopardizes a student’s physical or mental health, conducted as part of an initiation or group affiliation, can be considered hazing under Texas law, regardless of whether it happens on or off campus. The intent does not have to be malicious; simply being reckless about the act and its potential harm is enough. Crucially, the law explicitly states that a student’s “consent” to the activity is not a defense to hazing charges.

Criminal penalties (Texas Education Code § 37.152)

• Class B Misdemeanor (default): For hazing that does not result in serious injury, penalties can include up to 180 days in jail and/or a fine up to $2,000.
• Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical attention.
• State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This is a critical distinction, escalating the severity of criminal charges significantly in tragic cases.
• Failure to report: Individuals (including officers or members of an organization involved in hazing) who know about hazing and fail to report it can also face misdemeanor charges.
• Retaliation: Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is a misdemeanor.

Organizational Liability (Texas Education Code § 37.153)
Organizations themselves can be criminally prosecuted for hazing if:

• They authorized or encouraged the hazing, OR
• An officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it.
  Organizations found liable can face fines up to $10,000 per violation. Additionally, universities have the authority to revoke recognition and ban the organization from campus, a severe consequence that can effectively end a chapter’s presence.

Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting (Texas Education Code § 37.154)
Texas law grants immunity from civil or criminal liability for individuals who report a hazing incident in good faith to university authorities or law enforcement. This provision aims to encourage reporting without fear of personal legal repercussions. Furthermore, in many medical emergencies related to hazing, “good Samaritan” and amnesty laws protect students who call 911, even if underage drinking or other minor infractions were involved.

Consent Not a Defense (Texas Education Code § 37.155)
This key provision directly addresses one of the most common defenses employed by hazing perpetrators: the claim that the victim “agreed” to the activity. Under Texas law, consent is irrelevant; if the act fits the definition of hazing, it is illegal. This recognizes the inherent power imbalance in hazing scenarios, where true voluntary consent is compromised by social pressure and fear.

Reporting by Educational Institutions (Texas Education Code § 37.156)
Texas colleges and universities are mandated to:

• Provide hazing prevention education to students.
• Publish clear hazing policies.
• Maintain and publicly disclose annual reports of hazing violations and the disciplinary actions taken. This transparency is invaluable for families researching organizations and for building civil cases, as it can demonstrate patterns of misconduct and institutional knowledge.

Criminal vs civil cases

It’s important for Guam families to understand that legal actions in hazing cases can unfold on two distinct fronts:

• Criminal cases: These are initiated by the state (through prosecutors) and focus on punishing illegal behavior. If hazing leads to charges like assault, furnishing alcohol to minors, or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in fatal cases, students and organizations can face jail time, fines, and criminal records. The burden of proof in criminal cases, “beyond a reasonable doubt,” is high.
• Civil cases: These are pursued by victims or their surviving families. The goal is not punishment but compensation—to recover monetary damages for the harm suffered. Civil claims typically revolve around negligence, such as a university’s negligent supervision or a fraternity’s failure to prevent foreseeable harm. The burden of proof is lower than in criminal cases, typically a “preponderance of the evidence.” A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for a civil lawsuit; civil cases can proceed even if criminal charges are never filed or result in acquittal. This offers an additional path to accountability and recovery for victims.

Federal overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations also play a significant role in hazing accountability, especially for colleges receiving federal funding:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark legislation, set to be fully implemented by 2026, requires colleges that receive federal aid to report hazing incidents more transparently, strengthen prevention efforts, and maintain public data on hazing violations. This will provide more accessible information for Guam families to assess campus safety.
• Title IX: If hazing involves elements of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based discrimination, Title IX, a federal civil rights law, is triggered. Universities have a legal obligation to respond to such complaints promptly and effectively, regardless of where the incident occurred. This opens a powerful avenue for redress when hazing is sexualized.
• Clery Act: This federal law mandates that colleges and universities disclose information about crime on and around their campuses, including statistics and safety policies. Hazing incidents involving assaults, alcohol-related misconduct, or other crimes must be reported, contributing to a broader understanding of campus safety.

Who can be liable in a civil hazing lawsuit

Determining who is legally responsible for hazing injuries or deaths can be complex, involving multiple parties. Our firm carefully investigates every potential defendant to pursue maximum accountability:

• Individual students: Those who planned, directly perpetrated, supplied alcohol, or assisted in covering up the hazing can be held personally liable for their actions.
• Local chapter/organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team involved, often operating as an independent legal entity, can be sued for its role in permitting or encouraging hazing.
• National fraternity/sorority: The larger national organization, which governs local chapters, issues policy, and collects dues, can be held liable. Their liability often stems from their knowledge of systemic hazing patterns (foreseeability) and their failure to adequately supervise, intervene, or enforce anti-hazing policies across their chapters.
• University or governing board: The educational institution itself, along with its governing board (like the Board of Regents for public universities), can be sued. Theories of liability often include negligent supervision, premises liability (for incidents on campus property), failure to warn, or in some cases, deliberate indifference to known patterns of student misconduct.
• Third parties: Other entities may also bear responsibility, such as landlords or owners of off-campus properties where hazing occurred, or commercial vendors who illegally supplied alcohol to minors.

While public universities in Texas, such as the University of Houston or Texas A&M, benefit from some degree of sovereign immunity, exceptions exist, particularly in cases of gross negligence, willful misconduct, or when federal civil rights like Title IX are implicated. Private institutions like Baylor or SMU generally have fewer immunity protections. Our firm thoroughly examines all avenues to ensure that every culpable party is held accountable.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

To understand hazing in Texas, it’s essential to look at national patterns. The tragic events unfolding at universities across the United States are not isolated incidents but rather recurring scripts often rooted in similar organizational cultures. These cases establish what is legally “foreseeable” and demonstrate the severe consequences of unchecked hazing. For Guam families, these stories illuminate the very real dangers that exist wherever their children choose to pursue higher education.

Alcohol poisoning & death pattern

Alcohol-related hazing remains the leading cause of hazing deaths, a pattern often characterized by forced consumption, delayed medical care, and subsequent cover-up attempts.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most publicized hazing cases in recent history, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after an extreme “bid acceptance” event. He was forced to rapidly consume large quantities of alcohol, then fell repeatedly, sustaining grave injuries that eventually led to his death. Crucially, fraternity members delayed calling 911 for nearly 12 hours, fearing repercussions. This horrific incident led to significant criminal charges against multiple members, extensive civil litigation, and the enactment of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania. The case underscored how a culture of silence, secrecy, and self-preservation within an organization can be legally devastating.
• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night.” The event involved new members being given handles of hard liquor, with the expectation of heavy consumption. This incident involved criminal charges against multiple members of the Pi Kappa Phi chapter and prompted Florida State University to temporarily suspend all Greek life. Coffey’s death, along with others, spurred a significant anti-hazing movement and legislative changes in Florida, including the Chad Meredith Law. It tragically demonstrated how traditional drinking events, even if called celebratory, are often structured as dangerous hazing rituals.
• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver died with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.495% after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game. During this ritual, pledges were forced to drink whenever they answered questions incorrectly. Max’s death, which occurred in the same year as Piazza’s and Coffey’s, led to national outrage. Criminal charges against multiple members resulted in convictions, and Louisiana enacted the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute. Max’s family received a $6.1 million verdict in civil litigation against an individual and an insurer, highlighting the weighty financial consequences of such negligence.
• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, an 18-year-old pledge, was reportedly forced to consume a nearly full bottle of whiskey within minutes during a “Big/Little” night. He died three days later from alcohol poisoning. This event resulted in criminal charges and convictions against eight fraternity members. Bowling Green State University, a public institution, recognized its role and agreed to a nearly $3 million settlement with the Foltz family, with Pi Kappa Alpha national contributing an estimated $7 million. This collective $9.9 million settlement, one of the largest in hazing history, reinforced that universities and national organizations bear significant accountability. It also led to the enactment of Collin’s Law in Ohio, making hazing a felony when drugs or alcohol cause physical harm.

Physical & ritualized hazing pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical abuse and degrading rituals are persistent forms of hazing that can lead to severe injury or death.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng died after participating in a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. Blindfolded and weighted down with a heavy backpack, he was repeatedly tackled. Fraternity members delayed calling for help for over an hour, further exacerbating his traumatic brain injury. This case resulted in criminal convictions for multiple individuals, and notably, the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. It was a landmark case that established organizational criminal liability for hazing.

Athletic program hazing & abuse

Hazing is unfortunately not confined to Greek letter organizations and can infest other groups focused on peer membership, loyalty, and rigid hierarchy.

• Northwestern University football (2023–2025): A massive scandal erupted at Northwestern following allegations from former football players describing widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the prestigious athletic program. These claims included forced naked inversions, inappropriate sexual acts, and racial discrimination. The fallout involved the firing of the longtime head coach, Pat Fitzgerald, who subsequently settled a wrongful termination lawsuit confidentially. This series of events led to multiple civil lawsuits against the university and its leadership, demonstrating that hazing can permeate even high-profile collegiate sports teams, necessitating comprehensive legal intervention.

What these cases mean for Guam families

These national precedents carry profound implications for Guam families whose children attend universities in Texas or elsewhere:

• Common threads of danger: Time and again, these cases reveal recurring elements: forced drinking, extreme physical exertion, humiliation, deliberate secrecy, delayed or denied medical care, and active cover-ups.
• Accountability follows tragedy: While heartbreaking, these cases have led to real consequences, including criminal convictions, multi-million dollar civil settlements and verdicts, new anti-hazing legislation, and institutional reforms. The Chad Meredith Law in Florida and Collin’s Law in Ohio are direct results of these tragedies.
• Guam families are not alone: The pattern of institutional failure and organizational liability seen in these national stories provides a framework for pursuing justice for any student impacted by hazing, whether it happens at home on Guam or far away at a Texas university. These national lessons have shaped the legal landscape, giving experienced attorneys the tools to fight for accountability.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Guam families, the colleges and universities across Texas represent diverse opportunities, yet they also present potential risks. Many students from our island choose to attend institutions in Texas, making it critical to understand the hazing landscape at these prominent schools. Our firm, deeply rooted in Texas, monitors these patterns closely to protect students wherever they may study.

University of Guam (UOG) and Guam Community College (GCC)

While much of our analysis focuses on mainland institutions, it is vital to acknowledge higher education right here on Guam. The University of Guam and Guam Community College are pillars of our community, offering essential educational pathways. Hazing, while perhaps less publicized here than on larger mainland campuses, is a risk at any institution with student organizations, sports teams, and social Greek life. Our sons and daughters attend these schools, and their safety is paramount.

Campus & culture snapshot

The University of Guam (UOG), nestled in Mangilao, Barrigada, serves as the premier public university on our island. It boasts a diverse student body drawn from Guam, Micronesia, and beyond. UOG cultivates a close-knit campus culture, emphasizing academic achievement, cultural preservation, and community engagement. Greek life, while present, is typically smaller in scale and more integrated into the broader campus community compared to large mainland institutions. Students also participate deeply in cultural organizations, clubs, and athletic programs.

Guam Community College (GCC), also located in Mangilao, plays a crucial role in providing vocational, technical, and academic education essential for our workforce. GCC’s focus is on practical skills and career readiness, with a more open and flexible campus environment. Student life often includes professional organizations, student government, and intramural sports.

For Guam families, these institutions represent accessible and culturally relevant educational options. However, even within these familiar environments, the dynamics of group initiation can sometimes veer into hazing if unchecked, highlighting the need for vigilance and clear communication.

Official hazing policy & reporting channels

Both UOG and GCC maintain a clear stance against hazing, reflecting national best practices and local regulations. Their policies typically define hazing broadly, prohibiting any action that endangers mental or physical health for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. These policies apply to all student organizations, clubs, athletic teams, and any informal groups of students.

Reporting channels usually include:

• Dean of Students Office: The primary contact for student conduct issues and reporting hazing.
• Campus Security/Police: For incidents involving physical harm or criminal activity.
• Student Affairs Office: Often oversees student organizations and their compliance with policies.
• Anonymous Reporting Systems: Many institutions offer online forms or hotline numbers for confidential reporting.

It is crucial for students and families to familiarize themselves with UOG and GCC’s specific anti-hazing policies, which can typically be found on their respective websites or in student handbooks. These policies are foundational for ensuring a safe campus environment.

Selected documented incidents & responses

Publicly documented hazing incidents at the University of Guam and Guam Community College receive less national media attention than those on the mainland, given their smaller scale and regional focus. However, this does not mean the risk is absent. Local news and internal campus reports have occasionally highlighted concerns related to:

• Athletic team initiations: Cases in similar institutions have involved excessive physical demands or social isolation rituals that have caused discomfort or minor injuries among new team members.
• Social club “traditions”: Instances where new members of social or cultural clubs were subjected to embarrassing tasks or minor deprivations, often dismissed as “just part of joining.”
• Informal group pressures: Beyond officially recognized organizations, informal groups of students can also engage in “hazing-like” activities, particularly if centered around competitive social dynamics.

The responses from both UOG and GCC typically involve robust internal investigations, disciplinary actions against individuals and organizations, and enhanced educational programming on hazing prevention. The emphasis in our close-knit community is often on restorative justice and immediate intervention to prevent escalation.

How a UOG or GCC hazing case might proceed

If a hazing incident were to occur at UOG or GCC, the legal proceedings would involve local authorities and courts, rather than the Texas system discussed in the broader guide.

• Local Law Enforcement: The Guam Police Department (GPD) would investigate any criminal allegations of hazing, assault, or related offenses. Due to the clear Texas hazing law outlined in the Education Code, any Guam student going to college in the Texas area in particular should be aware of stringent criminal prosecution. Due to Guam’s close ties with the United States legal system, these cases are often handled with a similar approach and rigor as cases on the mainland, aligning with federal anti-hazing initiatives.
• Guam Courts: Civil lawsuits for damages would proceed through the Superior Court of Guam. Potential defendants could include the individuals involved, the organization, and potentially the institution if there was evidence of negligence or failure to meet their duty of care.
• Unique Community Context: Given our island’s close-knit community, these cases often have a more significant social impact, with a strong emphasis on addressing root causes and fostering cultural respect within student groups. Our firm recognizes these cultural nuances while upholding the highest legal standards.

What UOG and GCC students & parents should do

For students and parents here on Guam, proactive engagement and knowledge are your best defenses:

• Familiarize yourselves with UOG/GCC policies: Understand what constitutes hazing and the official reporting procedures at your child’s institution.
• Maintain open communication: Encourage your child to share their experiences and be aware of warning signs (changes in behavior, health, or academics) that might indicate hazing.
• Document everything: If you suspect hazing, immediately gather evidence (texts, photos, medical records), even for local incidents.
• Report promptly: Utilize the official reporting channels provided by UOG and GCC, or local law enforcement if concerns escalate to criminal activity.
• Seek local legal counsel: If a serious incident occurs, consult with a Guam-based attorney who understands local laws and the specific community context, while also having knowledge of broader US legal standards.
• Prioritize well-being: Always place your child’s physical and mental health above group loyalty or fear of repercussions.

Texas Christian University (TCU)

TCU, located in Fort Worth, is a private university with a prominent Greek life system and highly regarded athletic programs. Many Guam families choose TCU for its strong academic reputation and vibrant campus environment.

Campus & culture snapshot

Texas Christian University (TCU) is a private institution with a tight-knit campus community known for its strong school spirit, particularly around its successful athletic teams. Greek life is a significant part of the social fabric, with a high percentage of students participating in fraternities and sororities recognized by the Interfraternity Council (IFC), National Panhellenic Conference (NPC), and National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC). The campus emphasizes tradition and community, fostering a sense of belonging that, unfortunately, can sometimes be exploited in hazing scenarios. Students from Guam often appreciate TCU’s balance of academic rigor, athletic excitement, and social opportunities.

Official hazing policy & reporting channels

TCU maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, explicitly prohibiting any activity that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of group affiliation. Their policy covers all student organizations, including Greek-letter organizations, athletic teams, and clubs, applying both on and off campus. Designated reporting channels include the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Campus Recreation (for sports clubs), the Department of Athletics, and the TCU Police Department. TCU encourages anonymous reporting through various online forms and dedicated reporting hotlines, emphasizing a commitment to investigating all allegations.

Selected documented incidents & responses

TCU has faced its share of hazing allegations and disciplinary actions, underscoring that no institution is immune, regardless of its private status or stated policies:

• Kappa Sigma (2018): This incident gained attention when a 19-year-old Kappa Sigma member was arrested following allegations of hazing pledges. While specific details of the hazing were not fully released, the arrest highlighted that active members can face direct legal consequences for their involvement. The university acted promptly, suspending the fraternity. In a tragic turn, the arrested member, Andrew Walker, later committed suicide, raising complex questions about the pressures on both victims and perpetrators in hazing cases. This incident served as a potent reminder of the severe mental health toll that can accompany hazing, for all involved.
• Other Greek Life Suspensions: Over the years, other TCU fraternities and sororities have faced suspensions or probation for hazing violations, often involving alcohol misuse, forced activities, or psychological coercion. These actions underscore TCU’s commitment to enforce its policies, but also show the persistent challenges in eradicating hazing.

How a TCU hazing case might proceed

A hazing case at TCU, a private university in Fort Worth (Tarrant County), would involve several jurisdictional aspects:

• Local Law Enforcement: The Fort Worth Police Department would investigate any criminal allegations, such as assault or furnishing alcohol to minors, potentially leading to charges under Texas state law.
• Civil Jurisdiction: Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Tarrant County courts. Potential defendants could include the individual students involved, the local Kappa Sigma chapter, the national Kappa Sigma fraternity, and potentially TCU itself, depending on evidence of institutional negligence or complicity.
• Private University Dynamics: As a private institution, TCU does not have the same sovereign immunity protections as public Texas universities. This can make the university more directly vulnerable to civil litigation if negligence is proven. Discovering internal records, communications, and prior disciplinary actions would be a critical step for victims pursuing legal action.

What TCU students & parents should do

For Guam students attending TCU and their families, these steps can help ensure safety and seek justice:

• Understand TCU’s reporting mechanisms: Familiarize yourselves with the university’s official channels and anonymous hotlines for reporting hazing.
• Document evidence meticulously: Any suspicion of hazing should be met with immediate and careful documentation—screenshots of texts or social media, photos of injuries or problematic activities. The rapid response of firms like Attorney911 is vital here, as evidence can quickly disappear.
• Communicate openly with your child: Foster an environment where your child feels safe discussing uncomfortable demands or experiences. Reiterate that their safety and well-being are paramount over group loyalty.
• Seek experienced legal counsel: If hazing is suspected or confirmed, contact an attorney experienced in Texas hazing laws. An attorney can advise on navigating both university disciplinary processes and potential criminal or civil action, ensuring your child’s rights are protected. Attorney911 operates across Texas, including Fort Worth, making us accessible to Guam families dealing with TCU-related incidents.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

On Guam, our community values strong family ties and cultural traditions. When our children venture to mainland universities like those in Texas, they often seek new communities, including fraternities and sororities. Understanding the national history of these organizations, particularly concerning hazing, is crucial because it directly influences the risks present at local chapters, wherever they may be.

Why national histories matter

Most fraternities and sororities are not standalone local groups; they are chapters of larger national organizations that govern thousands of members across the country. These national headquarters have:

• Extensive anti-hazing policies: Often developed in response to past tragedies, these policies explicitly prohibit hazing.
• Risk management programs: Designed to prevent incidents, although often honored more in theory than practice.
• Historical knowledge of devastating patterns: National headquarters are keenly aware of the types of hazing (e.g., forced alcohol consumption, physical abuse, sleep deprivation) that have led to injuries, deaths, multi-million dollar lawsuits, and criminal convictions at their various chapters over decades.

When a local chapter in Texas—whether at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor—engages in hazing practices that have previously caused harm in other states, it creates a powerful legal argument for foreseeability. It demonstrates that the national organization knew or should have known such practices were dangerous and likely to occur, yet failed to prevent them effectively. This pattern evidence is a cornerstone of our legal strategy at Attorney911 against national defendants.

Organization mapping (synthesized)

While it’s impossible to list every single Greek organization and every hazing incident, understanding the national organizations with a history of severe hazing is critical for Guam families. Here, we highlight some national organizations frequently present on Texas campuses and their documented national hazing patterns:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): This fraternity has been involved in multiple tragic hazing incidents nationally. The death of Stone Foltz in 2021 at Bowling Green State University, due to forced alcohol consumption, is a stark example, leading to a nearly $10 million settlement and criminal convictions. Another notable case involved David Bogenberger’s death at Northern Illinois University in 2012, which resulted in a $14 million settlement. These cases clearly establish a pattern of dangerous alcohol-related hazing within the organization, making similar incidents in Texas highly foreseeable to the national body.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): Often labeled “America’s deadliest fraternity” by some media outlets due to a disproportionate number of hazing-related deaths, SAE has a documented history of severe alcohol and physical abuse. Incidents include a traumatic brain injury lawsuit at the University of Alabama, and a $1 million lawsuit at Texas A&M University for chemical burns after pledges were doused with industrial-strength cleaner. In January 2024, an SAE chapter at the University of Texas at Austin faced a new $1 million lawsuit for a brutal assault on an exchange student. These repeated incidents highlight a national pattern of hazing that the national organization is undoubtedly aware of.
• Phi Delta Theta: This fraternity gained notoriety from the death of Max Gruver at LSU in 2017, where a “Bible study” drinking game led to fatal alcohol poisoning, resulting in a $6.1 million verdict and a felony hazing law. Another historical case involves a $5.35 million lawsuit filed against Phi Delta Theta after a death due to alcohol poisoning in 1980 at the University of Missouri. These patterns demonstrate a foreseeable risk of alcohol-related hazing within the organization.
• Pi Kappa Phi: Involved in the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017 due to alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night,” which led to criminal charges and civil litigation. Another national case includes the death of Adrian Heideman at Chico State University in 2000. These tragedies underscore a pattern of dangerous initiation rituals that the national organization should be actively preventing.
• Phi Gamma Delta (FIJI): This fraternity was responsible for the catastrophic brain injury suffered by Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri in 2021, a case involving extreme alcohol consumption that resulted in multi-million dollar settlements from 22 defendants. The national organization faces continuous scrutiny over its risk management.
• Kappa Sigma: This fraternity’s national incidents include the $12.6 million verdict against them in the Chad Meredith drowning death at the University of Miami in 2001, which spurred Florida’s anti-hazing legislation. Recently, in 2023, allegations of hazing resulting in severe physical injuries (rhabdomyolysis) at Texas A&M University continue to highlight ongoing issues.

Tie back to legal strategy

This history of repeated hazing, injuries, and deaths across national organizations is not merely anecdotal; it forms a critical basis for legal action. Attorney911 leverages this “national pattern evidence” in several ways:

• Foreseeability: We argue that national organizations cannot claim ignorance when similar incidents have occurred multiple times at their chapters. They have a duty to anticipate and prevent such tragedies.
• Negligent Supervision: Showing a pattern of incidents allows us to prove that national organizations often fail to adequately supervise their chapters, enforce their own policies, or respond effectively to warnings.
• Punitive Damages: In cases where egregious patterns are ignored, courts may award punitive damages, designed not just to compensate victims but to punish the defendant and deter future misconduct.
• Settlement Leverage: This evidence significantly strengthens a victim’s position, demonstrating widespread liability and increasing the pressure on national organizations and their insurers to settle.

By understanding these national tides of hazing, Guam families can grasp the comprehensive nature of the legal fight ahead and why an experienced firm like Attorney911 is essential for navigating these complex waters.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

For Guam families, building a case against hazing perpetrators and negligent institutions is a meticulous and often emotionally challenging process. However, a strong evidence base is paramount to securing justice and accountability. In today’s digital age, the nature of evidence in hazing cases has evolved, requiring a sophisticated and aggressive approach. Our firm excels in identifying, preserving, and leveraging every piece of available evidence.

Evidence

Modern hazing cases are won or lost based on the quality and breadth of evidence. We systematically gather and analyze various forms of proof:

• Digital communications: This is often the most critical category of evidence in contemporary hazing cases.

  • GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, fraternity apps: These platforms are goldmines, capturing planning discussions, coercive demands, instructions for hazing activities, and reactions to incidents. They reveal who knew what, when, and how. We pursue comprehensive data extraction from these sources.
  • Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok comments: Social media often contains direct evidence or subtle clues of hazing, from public posts mocking pledges to private messages coordinating activities.
  • Recovered/deleted messages: With digital forensics expertise, even messages that perpetrators believed were permanently deleted can often be recovered, providing irrefutable proof. Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.

• Photos & videos:

  • Content filmed by members during events: Videos captured by participants or bystanders are incredibly powerful, showing hazing in progress, the condition of victims, and the actions (or inaction) of others.
  • Footage shared in group chats or social media: Even if intended for a private audience, this content often becomes crucial evidence.
  • Security camera or doorbell footage: Recordings from houses, venues, or nearby businesses can corroborate timelines and establish presence.

• Internal organization documents:

  • Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” lists: These documents, if obtained, can expose the formalized nature of hazing rituals.
  • Emails/texts from officers: Communications about “new member education,” recruiting, or event planning can reveal a veiled intent to haze.
  • National policies: The national organization’s own anti-hazing rules can be used to show internal guidelines were violated by their chapters.

• University records:

  • Prior conduct files: Records of previous hazing violations, probation, or sanctions against the same organization demonstrate a pattern and the university’s knowledge.
  • Campus police/student conduct reports: Official reports documenting incidents.
  • Clery reports: These federally mandated disclosures can expose broader safety issues.

• Medical and psychological records: These are vital for quantifying the harm.

  • Emergency room and hospitalization records: Document initial injuries, treatments, and toxicology results (e.g., blood alcohol content, drug screenings).
  • Surgery and rehab notes: Detail the extent of physical recovery required.
  • Toxicology reports: Confirm alcohol or drug levels.
  • Psychological evaluations: Diagnoses of PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health impacts directly attributable to the hazing.

• Witness testimony:

  • Pledges, members, roommates, coaches, bystanders: Accounts from individuals who observed or participated in the hazing are often invaluable. Our firm works to ensure witnesses feel safe providing truthful testimony.
  • Expert witnesses: Medical professionals, psychologists, former Greek life administrators, and forensic experts can provide crucial context and analysis.

Damages

In a civil hazing lawsuit, victims and their families seek to recover damages for all losses incurred. While no amount of money can truly compensate for the trauma or loss of life, these damages aim to alleviate financial burdens and acknowledge suffering. Attorney911 seeks maximum compensation for our clients, encompassing:

• Economic damages (quantifiable financial losses):

  • Medical expenses: Past and future costs for emergency care, hospitalization, surgeries, therapy, medications, and any long-term care plans for catastrophic injuries.
  • Lost income & earning capacity: Compensation for wages lost due to injury or recovery, as well as projected future income loss if hazing resulted in permanent disability or hindered career progression.
  • Lost educational opportunities: Costs related to missed tuition, forfeited scholarships, or the economic impact of delayed graduation.

• Non-economic damages (subjective losses):

  • Physical pain and suffering: Compensation for the actual pain endured from injuries and any ongoing discomfort.
  • Emotional distress & psychological harm: This can be immense, including compensation for conditions like PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), depression, anxiety, and the profound psychological impact of humiliation and trauma.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: When hazing robs a victim of their ability to participate in activities they once loved, or diminishes their quality of life.
  • Reputational harm: If public exposure to the hazing incident negatively impacts a victim’s social standing or future prospects.

• Wrongful death damages (for families): In tragic cases resulting in death, parents, spouses, and children may recover:

  • Funeral and burial costs.
  • Loss of financial support and companionship: Compensation for the financial contributions and emotional guidance the deceased would have provided.
  • Grief and emotional suffering: Acknowledgment of the profound sorrow and trauma experienced by surviving family members.

• Punitive damages: These are not to compensate the victim but to punish defendants for particularly egregious, reckless, or malicious conduct and to deter future hazing. They are sought when there’s clear evidence that institutions or individuals showed a deliberate indifference to known risks. While Texas imposes caps on punitive damages in many cases, demonstrating gross negligence or intentional conduct can lead to substantial awards aimed at accountability.

Role of different defendants and insurance coverage

Pursuing a hazing case often means confronting powerful entities like national fraternities and universities, which are typically well-funded and heavily insured. Insurers often attempt to deny coverage by arguing that hazing, as an “intentional act,” falls under policy exclusions.

However, experienced hazing lawyers like those at Attorney911 understand how to navigate these complex insurance battles. We argue that while the hazing act itself may be intentional, the organization’s negligent supervision or failure to implement effective risk management is a separate, insurable event. Our firm identifies all potential insurance policies—from homeowner’s policies of individual members, to local chapter and national organization policies, and large university umbrella coverages—to ensure maximum recovery. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is crucial for navigating these disputes.

Practical Guides & FAQs

Hazing is a complex problem that requires vigilance from parents, students, and institutions alike. For Guam families, preparing for college means also preparing your child with the knowledge to recognize and avoid hazing, and to know their rights if it occurs.

For parents

Your role as a parent is critical, both in prevention and in response.

• Warning signs of hazing: Be watchful for changes that might indicate hazing, especially if your child is away from home.

  • Unexplained injuries: Bruises, burns, cuts, or “accidents” that don’t add up. Photograph any visible injuries.
  • Sudden exhaustion: Extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation, missing classes, falling asleep inappropriately.
  • Drastic mood changes: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, withdrawal from friends or family.
  • Secrecy: Refusal to talk about group activities, or saying “I can’t talk about it.”
  • Constant phone use: Excessive checking of group chats, often with stress or anxiety.
  • Academic decline: Sudden drops in grades, missed assignments.
  • Financial strain: Unexpected requests for money for “fines” or forced purchases.
  • Altered appearance: Being forced to wear specific clothing, or having their head shaved against their will.

• How to talk to your child: Create a safe space for communication. Ask open-ended questions like, “What does bonding look like in your group?” or “Are there any activities that make you feel uncomfortable?” Reassure them that their safety is paramount, and that you will support them regardless of the consequences for the group.

• If your child is hurt:

  • Prioritize medical care: Get them medical attention immediately, even if they minimize their injuries. Insist medical providers document that hazing caused the injury.
  • Document everything: Take photos of injuries from multiple angles, screenshot any relevant texts or social media messages, and keep a dated log of what they tell you.
  • Keep physical evidence: Save any clothing, notes, or objects involved in the hazing.

• Dealing with the university: Approach the university systematically. Document every interaction, including who you spoke to, when, and what was discussed. Ask about past incidents involving the organization. Be aware that universities may prioritize institutional reputation; your child’s well-being is your priority.

• When to talk to a lawyer: If your child experiences significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university is unresponsive or trying to downplay the incident, it’s time to consult with an attorney experienced in hazing cases. Attorney911 can help you navigate these complex situations.

For students / pledges

If you are a student, especially a new member or pledge, it’s vital to protect yourself and know your rights.

• Is this hazing or just tradition? Ask yourself: “Would I be doing this if it weren’t for joining/staying in this group?” If an activity makes you feel unsafe, humiliated, coerced, or anxious, or if you’re told to keep it secret, it’s hazing. It’s not about tradition; it’s about power and control.
• Why “consent” isn’t the end of the story: You may feel you “agreed” to certain activities, but under pressure, true consent is often impossible. The law, and the courts, understand that the desire to belong, fear of exclusion, and group dynamics can strip away your ability to freely choose.
• Exiting and reporting safely: You always have the right to leave a situation or an organization that is making you feel unsafe or uncomfortable. You are not alone.
  • If in immediate danger: Call 911. Get to a safe place.
  • Report to trusted adults: Talk to a parent, a resident advisor (RA), a professor, a coach, or a university counselor.
  • Use anonymous hotlines: The National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE) is available 24/7.
• Good-faith reporting and amnesty: Many schools and state laws, including in Texas, offer “amnesty” or “immunity” for students who seek medical help in an emergency, even if related to underage drinking or other minor rule violations. Your safety is always the priority.

For former members / witnesses

If you are a former member, a current member who witnessed hazing, or a peer with information, your role can be crucial in preventing future harm and seeking justice.

• Your perspective matters: You have unique insights into the culture of an organization. Your testimony can be vital in establishing patterns of behavior and holding the right people accountable.
• Support victims: If you know someone being hazed, offer support and encourage them to report. Be a proactive bystander.
• Legal counsel for yourself: If you participated in hazing, you might have your own legal exposure. Consulting an attorney can help you understand your rights and obligations, and how to cooperate with investigators responsibly. Attorney911 has expertise in both civil and criminal hazing matters and can help those who come forward.

Critical mistakes that can destroy your case

Protecting a hazing victim and securing justice involves careful navigation of legal and institutional challenges. Families from Guam and beyond often make critical mistakes that can inadvertently damage their case. Attorney911’s video on client mistakes that can ruin your injury case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) provides valuable insights, but here’s a focused summary for hazing cases:

MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

   • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This makes a case nearly impossible, looks like a cover-up, and can be considered obstruction of justice.
   • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing or seemingly minor content. Take screenshots of all relevant group chats, texts, and social media.

2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly

   • What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Direct confrontation usually leads organizations to immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses.
   • What to do instead: Document everything quietly, then call a lawyer before initiating any confrontation. Let your attorney manage communications.

3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms

   • What universities do: They may pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue legal action. Campus-based resolutions often result in minimal consequences for the organization and typically offer no financial compensation for victims.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or insurance company without an attorney reviewing it first.

4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer

   • What families think: “I want people to know what happened.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Posts can be misinterpreted, create inconsistencies, and used by defense attorneys to undermine credibility. It can also waive your right to privacy.
   • What to do instead: Document internally and privately. Let your lawyer guide any public statements or social media strategy.

5. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”

   • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Evidence disappears quickly, witnesses graduate and scatter, the statute of limitations continues to tick, and the university controls the narrative, often with an outcome focused on its own interests, not necessarily justice for your child.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW. Consult a lawyer immediately. The university’s internal process is separate from a legal claim.

6. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer

   • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Any statement you give can be used against you, and initial settlement offers are typically low.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline to speak and state, “My attorney will contact you.”

Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like the University of Houston or Texas A&M) benefit from some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, specific Title IX violations, and when suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities (such as SMU or Baylor) generally have fewer immunity defenses. The specifics of each case are crucial—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for an individual analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It certainly can be. While Texas law classifies general hazing as a Class B misdemeanor, it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing results in serious bodily injury or death. Furthermore, individuals in leadership positions who fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Unequivocally, yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that a student’s consent is not a defense to hazing charges. Legal precedent recognizes that “agreement” made under extreme peer pressure, a significant power imbalance, or fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  Generally, there is a 2-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death in Texas. However, certain legal principles like the “discovery rule” or “fraudulent concealment” can extend this period, especially if the harm was not immediately apparent or actively hidden. Time is a critical factor in these cases—evidence can disappear, and memories fade. We strongly urge immediate consultation with Attorney911 by calling 1-888-ATTY-911. Learn about Texas statute of limitations in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not necessarily relieve universities or national organizations of liability. Many major hazing cases resulting in multi-million-dollar judgments, such as the Chun “Michael” Deng case, occurred at off-campus retreats. Liability can still arise from an institution’s sponsorship, actual or constructive knowledge, foreseeability of such conduct, and its failure to intervene.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  While legal proceedings are generally public, many hazing cases, especially civil lawsuits, are resolved through confidential settlements before going to trial. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy and works to ensure that sensitive details are handled discreetly while still pursuing full accountability.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

For Guam families confronting the aftermath of a hazing incident, the legal journey can be intimidating, especially when powerful institutions and national organizations stand on the other side. This is precisely when you need more than just a lawyer; you need a legal team that understands the nuanced fight against campus abuse and has a proven track record of taking on formidable defendants.

Why Attorney911 for hazing cases

At The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, we are the Legal Emergency Lawyers™—a Houston-based Texas personal injury firm with deep roots in complex litigation. We are uniquely equipped to handle the challenges hazing cases present:

Our strength comes from a profound understanding of how powerful institutions operate and how to challenge them effectively. We know that these institutions will mount a vigorous defense; our job is to dismantle it.

• Insurance insider advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings a critical perspective. As a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), she understands the intricate strategies used by fraternity and university insurance companies to deny or lowball claims. She knows their playbook—their delay tactics, their coverage exclusion arguments, and their settlement strategies—because she used to run it. This insight gives our clients an unparalleled advantage in negotiations and litigation.

• Complex litigation against massive institutions: Managing Partner Ralph Manginello has a distinguished career marked by taking on and winning against some of the largest entities. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in litigation stemming from the BP Texas City explosion, demonstrating our firm’s capability to challenge billion-dollar corporations and well-resourced defense teams. We are federally admitted to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, and are not intimidated by the resources of national fraternities, major universities, or their legal counsel.

• Multi-million dollar wrongful death and catastrophic injury experience: Hazing often leads to devastating outcomes. Attorney911 has a proven track record in complex wrongful death (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/) and catastrophic injury cases, working with economists and medical experts to accurately value lifetime care needs for victims of brain injury or permanent disability. We meticulously build strong cases designed to maximize recovery and ensure future security.

• Dual civil and criminal expertise: Ralph Manginello’s active membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) underscores our firm’s comprehensive approach. We understand how criminal charges related to hazing—such as assault or furnishing alcohol to minors—interact with civil litigation. This dual expertise allows us to provide holistic advice, whether your child is a victim, a witness, or a former participant, ensuring all legal angles are covered.

• Investigative depth: Hazing cases are often shrouded in secrecy and involve the rapid destruction of evidence. We leverage a network of digital forensics experts, medical professionals, economists, and psychologists to uncover hidden truths. Our team is adept at obtaining deleted group chats, social media exchanges, internal chapter records, and university documents, building a compelling case from all available data. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because for some, it tragically does. Attorney911’s YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/@Manginellolawfirm) features numerous educational videos, including advice on documenting evidence, like “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs).

We approach every case with deep empathy, knowing that hazing inflicts profound pain and trauma on families. Our job is not just to pursue legal action but to be a supportive advocate, seeking answers, ensuring accountability, and striving to prevent future tragedies.

Call to action (Guam-Customized)

If you or your child has experienced hazing at any Texas campus—or any other institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Guam, Saipan, or anywhere in Oceania, whose children study on the mainland, have the right to answers and accountability. The distance from Guam does not diminish your rights.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will attentively listen to your family’s story without judgment, explain your legal options under Texas law, and help you decide the best path forward. We offer contingency fee arrangements (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc), meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case.

What to expect in your free consultation:

• We’ll listen to your story without judgment.
• We’ll review any evidence you have (photos, texts, medical records).
• We’ll explain your legal options: criminal report, civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
• We’ll discuss realistic timelines and what to expect.
• We’ll answer your questions about costs – with a contingency fee, you pay nothing upfront, and we don’t get paid unless we win.
• There is no pressure to hire us on the spot – take your time to decide.
• Everything you tell us is confidential.

Whether you’re concerned about events at the University of Guam, Guam Community College, or a mainland school, our expertise in complex hazing litigation can benefit your family.

Contact Attorney911 today:

• Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español. For consultation in Spanish, please contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re on Guam or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com