Protecting Tennessee Families: A Comprehensive Guide to Hazing Incidents, Laws, and Justice

The sun dips below the rolling hills of Tennessee, casting long shadows across a campus renowned for its vibrant student life. A young man, barely out of high school, walks toward an off-campus house, nervous but excited. Tonight is “initiation.” He’s been promised brotherhood, connections, and memories—the full college experience that families across Tennessee dream of for their children. Inside, the music is loud, the air is thick with anticipation, and a line of older students awaits. What starts as playful banter quickly escalates. He’s told to drink. Rapidly. Without question. The room spins, a dull ache throbs behind his eyes, but he can’t stop. He doesn’t want to let his new brothers down. He falls, he vomits, then he collapses, just like others have before. The laughter falters, panic flickers, and the phone in a senior’s hand hovers over 911, but the fear of “getting the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble” weighs heavier than the fear for a fallen friend.

This scenario isn’t isolated to a specific campus; it’s a chilling reality that could unfold at any Texas university—including those where Tennessee families send their children. What begins as a quest for belonging can quickly turn into a nightmare of physical harm, psychological trauma, or even death. When calls for help are delayed, when evidence is destroyed, and when institutions protect their image over student safety, the consequences can be devastating, echoing tragedies seen across the nation.

This is more than just a guide; it’s a lifeline for parents and students in Tennessee struggling to understand the hidden dangers of hazing. We will uncover:

• What hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes.
• The intricate web of Texas and federal laws designed to combat these practices.
• Critical insights from major national cases, demonstrating their profound relevance to Tennessee families.
• The specific hazing landscapes at prominent Texas institutions like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor.
• The national histories of fraternities and sororities that contribute to patterns of misconduct.
• Actionable steps for parents and students to build a compelling legal case, protect their rights, and seek justice.

While this article provides comprehensive information, it is not a substitute for specific legal advice. Every hazing incident is unique, and circumstances can vary greatly. The Manginello Law Firm is dedicated to serving families throughout Texas, including those in Tennessee, offering experienced legal counsel to navigate these challenging situations.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

• Call 911 for medical emergencies
• Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

In the first 48 hours:

• Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”

• Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:

  • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
  • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
  • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)

• Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)

• Do NOT:

  • Confront the fraternity/sorority
  • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
  • Post details on public social media
  • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For families in Tennessee who may not be familiar with modern campus culture, the term “hazing” often conjures images of stereotypical college pranks or the gentle “pledge activities” from movies. However, in 2025, the reality is far more insidious and dangerous. Today’s hazing has evolved into a complex, often brutal system of initiation and control, capable of causing severe physical injury, psychological trauma, and even death. It’s critical for students and parents across Tennessee to understand the true nature of these hidden rituals.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

At its core, hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status within a group. This behavior, whether on or off campus, endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits a student. It’s defined by power imbalance, not by consent. The argument “I agreed to it” does not automatically validate the activity or absolve those involved of responsibility, especially when there’s an overwhelming element of peer pressure and fear of exclusion.

Main Categories of Hazing

Modern hazing manifests in various forms, often escalating in severity. We categorize these practices into discrete but often overlapping areas, reflecting the comprehensive understanding needed to identify and combat them:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is arguably the most common and deadliest form of hazing. It involves forcing or coercing individuals to consume excessive amounts of alcohol or other substances. This can include chugging contests, “lineups” where pledges are forced to rapidly consume drinks, or games designed to promote extreme intoxication. The danger escalates when unknown or mixed substances are involved, pushing students beyond their physical limits with potentially lethal consequences.

• Physical Hazing: This category encompasses direct physical abuse and deprivation. It ranges from paddling and beatings to extreme calisthenics, often colloquially termed “workouts” or “smokings,” which push individuals far beyond safe physical limits. Other forms include severe sleep, food, or water deprivation, and exposure to extreme temperatures or dangerous environments, all designed to break down psychological and physical resistance.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This type of hazing inflicts severe psychological and emotional damage. It can involve forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts, and degrading poses, sometimes referred to as “roasted pig” positions. Humiliating costumes, acts with racial or sexist overtones, slurs, and forced role-playing of stereotypes are also common, aiming to degrade individuals’ self-worth and identity.

• Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but deeply damaging, psychological hazing includes verbal abuse, threats, and deliberate isolation. It involves manipulation, coercion into making false confessions, and various forms of public shaming, whether online or in person. These tactics are designed to instill fear, anxiety, and subservience, leaving lasting mental scars.

• Digital/Online Hazing: With the pervasive use of technology, hazing has found new, insidious channels. This includes demanding participation in group chat dares, online “challenges,” and orchestrating public humiliation via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Discord. There is often pressure to create or share compromising images or videos, or to respond instantly to instructions, creating a constant state of anxiety and control.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is not confined to the traditional “frat boy” stereotype, nor is it exclusive to any particular type of campus group. It infiltrates a wide array of student organizations across universities, including those popular with students from Tennessee. This includes:

• Fraternities and Sororities: Both Interfraternity Council (IFC) and National Panhellenic Conference (NPC) chapters, as well as historically Black (NPHC) and multicultural Greek organizations, despite national policies strictly prohibiting hazing.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: These groups, with their emphasis on discipline and tradition, can sometimes have environments where hazing is disguised as “team building” or “discipline.”
• Spirit Squads and Tradition Clubs: Organizations like the Texas Cowboys or other spirit groups, which are often deeply woven into campus identity, can fall prey to harmful initiation rituals disguised as tradition.
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball, cheerleading, and smaller club sports, hazing can be prevalent as a misguided attempt to foster team cohesion or assert seniority.
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups can harbor hazing, under the guise of “toughening up” new members or maintaining group legacy.
• Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: While less common, some of these groups can also adopt hazing practices, particularly if they have hierarchical structures or long-standing, unexamined “traditions.”

In reality, hazing persists because of a complex interplay of social status, tradition, and secrecy. New members, eager to belong and advance, often submit to these practices, while older members, having endured similar experiences, perpetuate them. This cycle is reinforced by a code of silence, making it incredibly difficult to expose and eradicate, even when everyone “knows” hazing is illegal and explicitly prohibited by university and national guidelines. Understanding this pervasive nature is the first step for Tennessee families seeking to protect their loved ones.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For families in Tennessee dealing with the realities of hazing in Texas, understanding the legal landscape is paramount. Both state and federal laws provide frameworks for addressing hazing, establishing criminal penalties and creating avenues for civil accountability. It’s a complex area, but knowing the basics can empower you to seek justice.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Under Texas law—which applies to all incidents within the state, regardless of your child’s home in Tennessee—hazing is explicitly prohibited and defined in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. The law’s reach is broad, designed to encompass various harmful acts, irrespective of the victim’s supposed “consent.”

• Hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by a person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:
  • Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, or
  • Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.
• This means if someone makes you do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a group, and they were either deliberate or reckless about the risk, that’s hazing under Texas law. The act can happen on or off campus, and can cause mental or physical harm. Crucially, the law focuses on the act, not necessarily the intent to harm; “reckless” behavior is enough.
• “Consent” is not a defense: Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that even if the person being hazed agrees to the activity, it is still hazing if it meets the legal definition. This is a critical point, as peer pressure and the desire to belong often compel individuals to participate in activities they would otherwise refuse.

Criminal Penalties for Hazing:

• Hazing that doesn’t cause serious injury is typically a Class B Misdemeanor, punishable by fines and possible jail time (up to 180 days and a $2,000 fine).
• If the hazing causes injury requiring medical treatment, it escalates to a Class A Misdemeanor.
• Most severely, hazing that results in serious bodily injury or death is classified as a State Jail Felony, carrying more significant imprisonment terms.
• Additionally, failing to report hazing (if you’re a member or officer with knowledge) or retaliating against someone who reports hazing are also misdemeanors.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

Understanding the distinction between criminal and civil hazing cases is vital for Tennessee families seeking justice. They operate on different tracks, pursue different aims, and utilize different legal standards:

• Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations accused of violating hazing laws. The primary aim is punishment, which can include fines, jail time, or probation. In hazing contexts, criminal charges can range from basic hazing offenses and furnishing alcohol to minors, to more severe charges like assault, battery, or even manslaughter in fatal cases. The burden of proof in criminal cases is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

• Civil Cases: These are initiated by victims or their surviving families against individuals, organizations, or institutions deemed responsible for the hazing. The goal of a civil case is monetary compensation for damages suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil claims often involve allegations of negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, premises liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The burden of proof in civil cases is typically lower (“preponderance of the evidence”).

It is important to note that these two types of cases can (and often do) proceed simultaneously. A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil lawsuit, and vice-versa.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, federal regulations also play an increasingly significant role in addressing campus hazing, providing additional layers of protection and accountability for students from Tennessee.

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding must:
  • Publicly report hazing incidents in a transparent manner.
  • Implement stronger hazing education and prevention programs.
  • Maintain comprehensive public data on hazing violations and disciplinary actions. This will be phased in by approximately 2026, offering greater visibility into campus-specific hazing issues.
• Title IX: When hazing involves elements of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or creates a gender-biased hostile environment, Title IX obligations are triggered. This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs that receive federal funding, compelling institutions to investigate and address such incidents.
• Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents, especially those involving assault, battery, alcohol, or drug-related offenses, often overlap with crimes that must be reported under Clery, contributing to broader campus safety statistics.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

In a civil lawsuit arising from hazing, various parties can be held liable depending on their involvement and their duty of care. Understanding this is crucial for Tennessee families aiming to seek comprehensive accountability.

• Individual Students: Those directly involved in planning, coercing, or carrying out the hazing acts, including individuals who supplied alcohol or participated in cover-ups.
• Local Chapter/Organization: The fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, particularly if it operates as a distinct legal entity. This also extends to individuals acting in official capacities, such as officers or “pledge educators.”
• National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which typically sets policies, collects dues, and provides oversight to local chapters. Their liability often hinges on whether they knew or should have known about prior hazing incidents within their system and failed to take adequate preventive measures.
• University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, including its regents or administrators, may be sued under various theories, including negligent supervision, premises liability, or deliberate indifference to known patterns of hazing. Public universities like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, and UT Austin have some sovereign immunity protection, but exceptions exist, particularly in cases of gross negligence or Title IX violations. Private universities such as SMU and Baylor generally have fewer immunity protections.
• Third Parties: This can include landlords or property owners of off-campus houses or event venues where hazing occurred, particularly if there was knowledge of hazardous activities. Additionally, bars or alcohol providers may be liable under dram shop laws if they illegally served minors who were subsequently harmed or caused harm. Security companies or event organizers might also face liability if their negligence contributed to the incident.

Every case is fact-specific, and the exact parties named in a lawsuit will depend on the unique circumstances and the strength of the evidence. However, identifying all potential defendants is a key part of building a robust case for accountability.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

Hazing incidents, particularly those involving severe injury or death, often follow predictable patterns, regardless of the state or specific campus. These tragic “anchor stories” from across the United States serve as stark reminders of the risks and demonstrate the enduring challenges in combating hazing. For Tennessee families who may feel isolated by a local incident, understanding these national precedents reveals a broader, recurring narrative that powerfully informs legal strategies in Texas.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Excessive alcohol consumption, often forced and rapid, remains the leading cause of hazing-related fatalities. These cases underscore critical legal lessons about foreseeability, delayed medical attention, and institutional responsibility.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In a case that shocked the nation, 19-year-old pledge Timothy Piazza endured a night of forced drinking during a “bid acceptance” event. Security cameras within the fraternity house documented him suffering multiple severe falls and injuries before eventually dying from a traumatic brain injury. Fraternity members delayed calling for medical help for hours, allegedly out of fear of getting in trouble. The aftermath included dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, civil litigation that led to confidential settlements, and the passage of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, a hallmark of anti-hazing legislation. This case vividly illustrates how extreme intoxication, a deliberate delay in seeking emergency medical attention, and a pervasive culture of silence can lead to devastating and legally indefensible outcomes.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): On “Big Brother Night,” pledge Andrew Coffey, 20, was pressured to consume a handle of hard liquor supplied by his “Big.” He died from acute alcohol poisoning. The incident led to multiple criminal charges against fraternity members and prompted Florida State University to temporarily suspend all Greek life. Coffey’s death, along with others, spurred a statewide anti-hazing movement, highlighting how formulaic “bottle exchange” or “gifting” drinking nights are a dangerously repeating script for tragedy in Greek life.

• Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): During a perverse “Bible study” drinking game, 18-year-old pledge Max Gruver was forced to drink copious amounts of alcohol as punishment for answering questions incorrectly. His blood alcohol content measured a lethal 0.495%. Gruver’s death led to multiple criminal convictions against fraternity members, including one for negligent homicide. The subsequent legislative response was the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, which upgraded hazing to a felony, demonstrating how clear proof of hazing and public outcry can directly influence legal reform.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Another tragic instance of forced alcohol consumption involved Stone Foltz, 20, who died after being made to drink nearly a full bottle of whiskey during a pledge event. This resulted in several criminal convictions for hazing-related offenses. Critically, Foltz’s family secured a $10 million settlement in 2023, with approximately $7 million from Pi Kappa Alpha national and $3 million from Bowling Green State University (a public institution). This case serves as a powerful reminder that universities, regardless of their public or private status, can face substantial financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities. The individual president of the chapter was also ordered to pay $6.5 million to the family.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical abuse and dehumanizing rituals are hallmarks of hazing, often leading to severe injury or death, sometimes deliberately concealed from authorities until it’s too late.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): During a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains, 19-year-old pledge Michael Deng was subjected to a violent blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual, where he was repeatedly tackled while wearing a heavy backpack. He died from a traumatic brain injury after fraternity members delayed calling 911 for over an hour. This case was particularly significant because the national fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter—a rare instance of organizational criminal liability. The chapter was also effectively banned from Pennsylvania, demonstrating that even off-campus “retreats” hidden from university oversight can lead to severe legal and organizational consequences.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek letter organizations. Elite athletic programs, often seen as bastions of discipline and unity, can also be breeding grounds for brutal initiation rituals, highlighting systemic issues and the need for broad institutional accountability.

• Northwestern University Football Scandal (2023–2025): Widespread allegations of sexualized and racist hazing emerged from the Northwestern University football program. Former players described disturbing practices within the team, leading to multiple lawsuits against the university and its coaching staff. Head coach Pat Fitzgerald was fired and later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially. This scandal showcased that hazing extends significantly beyond Greek life, infiltrating major college athletic programs, and raising critical questions about institutional oversight and bystander accountability.

What These Cases Mean for Tennessee Families

The patterns highlighted in these national tragedies are not mere distant headlines; they represent recurring dangers that can affect any student from Tennessee attending a Texas university. The common threads—forced drinking, humiliation, physical violence, delayed or denied medical care, and systematic cover-ups—are distressingly consistent.

These cases establish clear foreseeability. When a national fraternity has faced multiple incidents of alcohol poisoning across its chapters, it becomes extremely difficult for them to argue they could not foresee the risks of similar behavior at a Texas chapter. Likewise, these precedents strengthen claims of negligent supervision against universities that fail to adequately monitor and enforce anti-hazing policies, especially if they have been warned of specific chapter behaviors.

Furthermore, these cases underscore that meaningful reforms often only occur after a tragedy has resulted in public outrage and aggressive legal action. Multi-million-dollar settlements and significant jury verdicts in these anchor stories demonstrate the profound financial consequences for organizations and institutions that fail to prevent hazing, providing a powerful incentive for systemic change. For Tennessee families grappling with hazing, these national lessons are not just cautionary tales; they are crucial components in building a compelling case for justice and driving future prevention.

Texas Focus: Tennessee, Houston, College Station, Austin, Dallas, Waco

For families in Tennessee, understanding the specific hazing culture and institutional responses at major Texas universities is key. While hazing is a nationwide problem, its manifestation varies by campus environment, type of organization, and administrative history. We’ll focus on the University of Houston, one of the schools most frequently sought out by Houston-area students, before covering a range of other prominent Texas universities. The Manginello Law Firm often assists families from Tennessee who have children attending these large, respected institutions.

University of Houston (UH)

Nestled in the heart of Houston, a significant draw for students from the wider region and beyond that connects with families in Tennessee, the University of Houston is a sprawling, diverse institution with a large student body. Its campus culture, combining a strong academic focus with a vibrant urban setting, creates a unique environment for student organizations, including a large and active Greek life.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Houston, a Tier One research institution, serves over 47,000 students. Its campus reflects the city’s diversity, with a dynamic mix of commuter and residential students. Greek life at UH is extensive, with dozens of fraternities and sororities recognized by various governing councils (Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council, Multicultural Greek Council). Beyond Greek life, numerous student organizations, including cultural associations, academic societies, and sports clubs, contribute to a bustling campus experience. UH’s central location in Houston makes it a focal point for the Legal Emergency Lawyers at Attorney911, especially given our proximity and active involvement in the community.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Houston maintains a strict, publicly accessible anti-hazing policy. This policy explicitly prohibits hazing, whether it occurs on-campus or off-campus. It strictly forbids various egregious acts such as the forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and any activity that causes mental distress as a condition of initiation or membership. Students and families can report suspected hazing through the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, or directly to the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). UH also posts a hazing statement and, in some cases, disciplinary information on its website, though the level of detail publically available can vary.

Documented Incidents & Responses

One of the most significant hazing cases connected to UH involves Leonel Bermudez and the Pi Kappa Phi fraternity, and is a case that Attorney911 is actively litigating. Bermudez, a transfer student and pledge, suffered acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis after alleged hazing that included forced physical exertion and degrading rituals. The lawsuit, filed in late 2025 by Attorneys Ralph Manginello and Lupe Peña, seeks over $10 million in damages from the University of Houston, its Board of Regents, Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters, the Beta Nu housing corporation, and 13 individual fraternity leaders and members. Allegations include:

• Pledges being required to carry a fanny pack 24/7 containing condoms, a sex toy, and other humiliating items.
• Forced physical exertion, including more than 100 push-ups and 500 squats in a single session at Yellowstone Boulevard Park, leaving Bermudez unable to stand.
• A “waterboarding” style hosing, and threats of actual waterboarding.
• Forced consumption of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting, followed by immediate sprints.
• Degrading “study/work” blocks with mandatory attendance and overnight driving duties.
• This incident highlights that despite clear policies, severe hazing can occur. In response, Pi Kappa Phi’s national HQ swiftly suspended the Beta Nu chapter, which then opted to surrender its charter, leading to the chapter’s permanent closure. UH publicly condemned the conduct and promised disciplinary measures.

Earlier incidents also highlight persistent issues. For example, in 2016, a Pi Kappa Alpha case involved allegations of pledges being deprived of food, water, and sleep, with one student reportedly suffering a lacerated spleen after being violently slammed. This incident resulted in misdemeanor hazing charges and university suspension, showcasing the seriousness with which some hazing acts are treated under Texas law. UH’s response to such events typically involves suspending chapters found to be in violation, though repeated occurrences demonstrate the ongoing challenge of enforcement.

How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For families in Tennessee considering legal action for incidents at UH, understanding the procedural path is important. Cases might involve collaboration between UHPD and the Houston Police Department, especially if incidents occur off-campus but within city limits. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in Harris County courts, the jurisdiction for Houston, allowing for comprehensive legal proceedings against all responsible parties. Potential defendants could include individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, and potentially the university and responsible property owners. The detailed public record and recent litigation, such as the Bermudez case, highlight the firm commitment of Attorney911 to pursuing justice in complex hazing scenarios.

What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For students and parents involved with the University of Houston:

• Understand the UH Policy: Familiarize yourself with the explicit anti-hazing standards outlined by the university. Ignorance of the policy is not a defense.
• Utilize Reporting Channels: If you suspect or experience hazing, report it to the Dean of Students, the UHPD, or use any online reporting forms provided by the university.
• Document Everything: Keep detailed notes of any suspicious activities, injuries, or communications. Take photos or screenshots of digital evidence (messages, social media posts) immediately.
• Seek Legal Counsel: If hazing has occurred, especially if it involved physical or psychological harm, contact an attorney experienced in Houston-based hazing cases right away. They can help navigate the complexities of local jurisdiction and uncover prior incidents that may support your case.
• Prioritize Safety: If a student is in immediate danger, call 911 first, then contact legal support.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, a storied institution popular with many families throughout Tennessee, presents a unique campus culture heavily influenced by its military traditions. The presence of the Corps of Cadets alongside a vibrant Greek life creates a distinct environment that shapes hazing dynamics.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Located in College Station, Texas A&M boasts the largest student body in Texas and is known for its deep-rooted traditions, including the iconic Corps of Cadets, a large military-style organization. Alongside the Corps, A&M has a thriving Greek life, with numerous fraternities and sororities. This blend of strong traditions and diverse student organizations can unfortunately create conditions ripe for hazing, often cloaked in the guise of “tradition” or “discipline.” Many Tennessee families find themselves drawn to Texas A&M for its prestige and strong alumni network.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M maintains rigorous anti-hazing policies, prohibiting any activity that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student. The university utilizes its Student Conduct Office, the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD), and specific reporting channels within the Corps of Cadets to address incidents. Like other state universities, A&M is subject to the Texas Education Code regarding hazing.

Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has a history of hazing incidents across both its Greek life and the Corps. A particularly disturbing case involved Sigma Alpha Epsilon around 2021, where pledges alleged being subjected to an ordeal that included exposure to substances like industrial-strength cleaner, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The fraternity was suspended, and legal action was initiated by affected pledges, highlighting the extreme physical forms hazing can take.

The Corps of Cadets also faced scrutiny in 2023 when a cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading hazing that included simulated sexual acts and being bound in a humiliating “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. While Texas A&M stated it handled the matter according to its internal rules, the lawsuit underscores the persistent challenges of hazing within traditional, hierarchical student groups. In 2018, Phi Gamma Delta was involved in the death of Joseph Little, who collapsed during reported hazing activities.

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Tennessee families, a hazing case at Texas A&M would typically fall under the jurisdiction of Brazos County courts. Investigations might involve the Texas A&M UPD, and civil actions could target individual perpetrators, local chapters, national organizations, and potentially the university itself, particularly if a pattern of negligence or deliberate indifference can be established. The unique structure of the Corps often means additional levels of institutional review and procedural complexities that an experienced hazing attorney can help navigate.

What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

• Research Organizations Thoroughly: Before joining any group, investigate its history, especially for hazing violations, both locally and nationally.
• Understand Corps Regulations: If involved with the Corps, be acutely aware of its specific anti-hazing and conduct policies.
• Document Evidence Discreetly: If hazing is suspected, safely and covertly collect evidence, such as photographs, videos, or screenshots of communications.
• Seek External Advice: Report concerns to a trusted faculty member or, ideally, an independent attorney, before solely relying on internal university processes that might protect the institution’s image.
• Prioritize Health: Do not hesitate to call 911 for medical emergencies. The student’s safety is paramount.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is a flagship public university in the state, drawing students from all corners of the country, including a significant number of families in Tennessee. Its vast campus, extensive student body, and prominent Greek and spirit organizations make it a common site for hazing incidents.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin is home to over 50,000 students and boasts one of the most vibrant and extensive Greek life systems in the country. Beyond fraternities and sororities, numerous spirit groups (such as the Texas Cowboys, recently at the center of hazing controversies), athletic teams, and cultural organizations contribute to a bustling campus environment. Its reputation for academic excellence and energetic campus life has consistently attracted students from Tennessee.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UT Austin strictly prohibits hazing, adhering vigorously to the Texas Education Code. The university is notably transparent, publishing a comprehensive “Hazing Violations” page on its website that details sanctioned organizations, the nature of their violations, and the disciplinary actions taken. Reporting channels include the Office of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, the UT Police Department (UTPD), and anonymous online reporting forms. The public nature of its reporting allows parents from Tennessee to research prospective organizations.

Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s public database reveals a recurring pattern of hazing violations. For example, in 2023, the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity was sanctioned after new members were subjected to forced milk consumption and strenuous calisthenics—activities explicitly defined as hazing. The chapter faced probation and mandatory hazing-prevention education. Other organizations, including traditional spirit groups like the Texas Cowboys, have faced sanctions for practices involving forced workouts, alcohol distribution to minors, and degrading rituals. These repeated violations, despite the university’s transparency, underscore the ongoing challenge of eradicating hazing.

Historically, UT has seen its share of tragedies. In 1998, Phi Kappa Sigma experienced the alcohol-related death of member Jack L. Ivey Jr., who died after pledges engaged him in a drinking game. This incident highlighted the dangers of both forced alcohol consumption and the blurring lines between member and pledge involvement in risky activities.

How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at UT Austin would involve investigations by UTPD and/or Austin Police Department, with civil legal actions typically proceeding in Travis County courts. The university’s detailed public record of hazing violations is a critical resource for families pursuing civil litigation, as it can demonstrate a pattern of organizational misconduct and the university’s prior knowledge of these issues, strengthening claims of negligence or deliberate indifference.

What UT Students & Parents Should Do

• Consult the Hazing Violations Page: Before joining any organization, new students and their parents should review UT’s public record of hazing incidents (hazing.utexas.edu).
• Report all Violations: Use UT’s reporting mechanisms if you encounter or witness hazing. Your report helps to build a case against repeat offenders.
• Preserve Digital Evidence: Collect screenshots of any relevant digital communications, photos, or videos that document hazing activities.
• Connect with Legal Experts: For serious incidents, contact an attorney who understands the nuances of Texas hazing law and UT’s specific reporting and disciplinary processes.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a private institution in Dallas, is known for its strong academic programs, beautiful campus, and prominent Greek life, attracting students from Tennessee and across the South. Its status as a private university influences how hazing incidents are handled and how information is disseminated.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU is a selective private university with a significant, highly visible Greek presence. Fraternities and sororities play a central role in campus social life, and student organizations are abundant. The university fosters a strong sense of tradition and community, but this can inadvertently create environments where hazing, disguised as “tradition,” may persist. Given its independent status, SMU has a different legal framework than public universities in Texas.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU has a comprehensive anti-hazing policy that strictly prohibits all forms of hazing. It explicitly states that hazing is a violation of the Dignity and Respect Policy, the Student Code of Conduct, and Texas law. SMU uses its Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards, as well as the SMU Police Department (SMU PD), as primary reporting and investigative bodies. The university also supports anonymous reporting channels, recognizing the sensitive nature of these incidents.

Documented Incidents & Responses

SMU has faced its share of hazing challenges. In 2017, the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity was suspended following credible allegations of severe hazing, including paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. The chapter faced a multi-year suspension, with restrictions on recruiting and activities. This incident, while not publicly detailed to the same extent as at public universities, reflected common hazing patterns seen nationally. Subsequent reports of misconduct by other Greek organizations have led to further suspensions, demonstrating an ongoing struggle to fully eliminate hazing.

In 2013, SMU also lost a student during a fraternity trip, with some reports alluding that hazing was a component. This underscores the need for continuous vigilance both from the university’s side and from students and their families.

How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

As a private institution, SMU does not have the same sovereign immunity protections as public Texas universities. This can simplify certain aspects of litigation against the university, potentially allowing for broader claims than might be feasible against state-funded schools. Cases would be initiated in Dallas County courts. Civil lawsuits would aim to uncover internal reports and disciplinary actions, which, while not publicly posted like at UT, can be compelled through legal discovery processes. An experienced hazing attorney understands how to navigate the differences between litigation against public versus private institutions.

What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

• Review SMU’s Student Conduct Code: Familiarize yourself with the university’s specific definitions of hazing and prohibited behaviors.
• Utilize Anonymous Reporting: For students in Tennessee who fear retaliation, anonymous reporting apps or hotlines supported by SMU can be a less daunting initial step.
• Be Aware of Social Pressures: Recognize that private universities with strong social scenes might have subtle but powerful social pressures to engage in “traditions” that cross the line into hazing.
• Consult an Attorney: Due to the private nature of SMU’s internal reporting, securing legal counsel early is crucial to access potential evidence and understand legal avenues for accountability.

Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, holds a unique place among Texas institutions, known for its religious affiliation and recent history of intense scrutiny over student safety, particularly concerning sexual assault, which indirectly informs its approach to hazing. Many families in Tennessee are drawn to Baylor for its values-based education.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor is characterized by its strong Christian identity, robust academic programs, and passionate athletic traditions. While Greek life exists, it operates within a framework often influenced by the university’s spiritual mission. After highly publicized scandals involving failures to address sexual assault and misconduct, Baylor has been under immense pressure to reform its institutional oversight and student protection policies, creating a heightened awareness of student welfare.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor’s anti-hazing policy is stringent, reflecting its commitment to student safety and its journey through past controversies. The policy prohibits any action that could harm a student physically or mentally, including “any activity that could be perceived as demeaning, embarrassing, or degrading.” Reporting is handled through the Department of Student Conduct, the Baylor Police Department (BUPD), and the university encourages confidential reporting via online portals. The university emphasizes a “zero tolerance” approach to hazing and other forms of student misconduct.

Documented Incidents & Responses

Despite its strict policies and the recent history of calls for institutional accountability, hazing incidents have still occurred at Baylor. In 2020, the Baylor baseball team faced a significant hazing investigation that resulted in 14 players being suspended. These suspensions, staggered over the early season, illustrated that hazing patterns persist even in high-profile athletic programs at institutions committed to reform. This incident, while not as severe in outcome as some national cases, demonstrated the ongoing challenge for universities to fully eradicate such practices.

Baylor’s broader cultural and oversight challenges, particularly revealed in the sexual assault scandal, have created a context where any form of student misconduct, including hazing, is met with intensified scrutiny. This may offer limited benefits to students from Tennessee, in that there is a lower tolerance for such violations.

How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

Similar to SMU, Baylor’s status as a private university means it does not benefit from sovereign immunity. This allows for direct litigation against the university in McLennan County courts. Civil lawsuits would likely focus on demonstrating institutional negligence or a failure to uphold its duty of care, especially given the backdrop of its recent history of safety reform. While internal investigation details may not be publicly accessible, legal discovery processes allow for the comprehensive collection of evidence.

What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

• Engage with Baylor’s Comprehensive Policies: Understand how Baylor’s anti-hazing policy intersects with its broader student protection policies, especially in light of past reforms regarding sexual misconduct.
• Report All Concerns: Utilize Baylor’s reporting channels without hesitation, as the university is under significant external and internal pressure to ensure compliance.
• Be Mindful of Underlying Cultural Issues: Recognize that even with strict policies, some groups may still harbor subtle forms of hazing, necessitating vigilance.
• Seek Independent Legal Counsel Early: For incidents resulting in injury or significant distress, an early consultation with an attorney can help preserve evidence and develop a strategy tailored to Baylor’s specific institutional context.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For Tennessee families, understanding the Greek system, from local chapters at Texas universities to their formidable national organizations, is crucial when navigating hazing. Many of these chapters are not isolated entities but branches of larger, often century-old, national fraternities and sororities. These national bodies, while providing valuable resources, often carry a burdensome history of hazing incidents that directly impact liability and legal strategy today.

Why National Histories Matter

The presence of a specific fraternity or sorority chapter on a Texas campus, whether at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, connects to a wider network of policies, precedents, and often, prior hazing incidents. Many of these organizations, such as Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi, and Kappa Alpha Order, have national anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies. These policies, dense as they often are, exist precisely because these organizations have experienced deaths, catastrophic injuries, and significant lawsuits in other states.

When a local Texas chapter repeats a hazing script that has led to tragedy elsewhere—whether it’s an alcohol-fueled “Big Brother/Little Brother” night or a brutal physical initiation ritual—it demonstrates a critical legal principle: foreseeability. The national organization can no longer credibly claim ignorance or that such an event was unforeseeable. Their own past incidents, policies, and prior lawsuits establish a pattern of knowing risk, which can significantly strengthen claims of negligence, gross negligence, and even arguments for punitive damages against both the local chapter and the national body.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

While it’s impossible to list every single Greek chapter and its full history, we can illustrate the connection between prominent national organizations (those with documented hazing incidents) and their potential presence at Texas universities:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike):

  • National History: Known for devastating alcohol hazing. The death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University (2021) from forced alcohol consumption led to a $10 million settlement and criminal convictions. Another major case involved David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University (2012), also an alcohol poisoning death, resulting in a $14 million settlement.
  • Relevance to Texas: Chapters of Pi Kappa Alpha are present at schools including the University of Houston (where a 2016 incident involved pledges experiencing significant deprivation) and the University of Texas at Austin (where a 2023 incident involved forced milk consumption). These prior national patterns make any subsequent alcohol-related hazing at Texas chapters highly foreseeable and expose the national organization to significant liability.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE):

  • National History: Often labeled “America’s deadliest fraternity” due to a high number of hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide, particularly stemming from alcohol. Notable cases include a traumatic brain injury lawsuit at the University of Alabama (filed 2023), allegations of chemical burns from industrial cleaner at Texas A&M (2021), and an alleged assault on an exchange student at UT Austin (2024). In response to its history, SAE officially banned pledging nationwide in 2014, making subsequent pledging-related hazing violations particularly egregious.
  • Relevance to Texas: With chapters at Texas A&M and UT Austin, SAE’s national history of severe hazing, including deaths and grave injuries involving alcohol and physical abuse, creates a strong basis for arguments of foreseeability in Texas courts. The alleged chemical burns incident at Texas A&M and the assault at UT Austin demonstrate this direct link.

• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ):

  • National History: The tragic alcohol-poisoning death of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University (2017) during a “Bible study” drinking game is a grim reminder of this organization’s hazing risks. This incident led to criminal convictions and the enactment of Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act.
  • Relevance to Texas: Phi Delta Theta chapters are found across Texas, including at Texas A&M. Any hazing incidents, especially those involving forced drinking or degrading rituals, could directly draw on the national precedent set by the Gruver case to establish national liability.

• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ):

  • National History: The alcohol-poisoning death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University (2017) during “Big Brother Night” is a key reminder of Pi Kappa Phi’s national hazing challenges, leading to criminal prosecutions.
  • Relevance to Texas: The Leonel Bermudez case at the University of Houston, actively being litigated by Attorney911, clearly links Pi Kappa Phi’s national history to a severe incident at a Texas chapter. The allegations of forced physical exertion, degrading rituals, and delayed medical attention align with patterns seen elsewhere, making the national foreseeability argument exceptionally strong.

• Kappa Alpha Order (KA):

  • National History: Kappa Alpha Order has faced numerous hazing suspensions across the country, often involving alcohol and physical abuse.
  • Relevance to Texas: The SMU chapter of Kappa Alpha Order faced a multi-year suspension in 2017 due to allegations of paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation. These local incidents often mirror national patterns, providing clear evidence of repeated misconduct.

• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ):

  • National History: A lawsuit against Sigma Chi at the College of Charleston (2024) resulted in a $10 million+ settlement for a pledge who alleged physical beatings and forced substance consumption. Another incident at the University of Texas at Arlington (2020) involved a pledge hospitalized for alcohol poisoning.
  • Relevance to Texas: With chapters at UT Austin, Texas A&M, and other Texas schools, local incidents involving this organization can draw on national patterns to illustrate a history of hazing.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

The documented national histories of these organizations are not mere anecdotes; they are powerful tools in hazing litigation. For a Tennessee family pursuing a case in Texas:

• Demonstrating Foreseeability: Evidence of similar hazing incidents at other chapters of the same national organization proves that the national headquarters was on notice of the inherent dangers. They can’t claim this was a “rogue chapter” or “unforeseeable.”
• Challenging “Paper” Policies: When nationals present extensive anti-hazing policies, previous incidents can be used to show these policies were either ignored, weakly enforced, or mere window dressing, rather than genuinely effective prevention measures.
• Strengthening Negligence Claims: A pattern of incidents can bolster arguments that the national organization failed in its duty to adequately supervise, train, and discipline its local chapters, contributing directly to the harm.
• Impacting Insurance Coverage: Knowledge of repeated incidents can influence how insurance companies approach claims. Lupe Peña’s insider knowledge from years as an insurance defense attorney is particularly invaluable here, as she understands how to counter arguments attempting to deny coverage based on “intentional acts” or chapter autonomy.
• Supporting Punitive Damages: In egregious cases, especially where a national organization has a long and documented history of similar misconduct that it failed to adequately address, the potential for punitive damages increases. These damages aim not just to compensate the victim but to punish the defendant and deter future wrongdoing.

For Tennessee families whose children have suffered hazing at a Texas university, connecting a local incident to this broader national context is a crucial step in building a compelling case for justice and holding all responsible parties accountable.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

When a student from Tennessee is harmed by hazing at a Texas university, pursuing justice requires a meticulous approach to evidence collection, a clear understanding of potential damages, and a strategic legal plan. At Attorney911, we approach these cases with the same rigor and detail as complex corporate litigation, understanding that every piece of information is vital to uncovering the truth and holding responsible parties accountable.

Evidence: The Cornerstones of a Hazing Case

Modern hazing cases are often won or lost based on the quality and quantity of evidence, particularly digital evidence. This is why immediate action to secure and preserve information is paramount.

• Digital Communications: These are the most critical pieces of evidence in 2025. Group messaging apps like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, and even fraternity-specific apps are where hazing is often planned, executed, and documented. Instagram DMs, Snapchat, and TikTok messages also play a role. These communications reveal planning, intent, knowledge, who was involved, and what was said before, during, and after incidents. Attorney911’s video, “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs), provides invaluable guidance on how to properly screenshot and preserve this volatile evidence. It’s crucial to capture full message threads with sender names, timestamps, and sufficient context, always backing them up to secure cloud storage immediately. Even deleted messages can often be forensically recovered by experts if action is taken quickly.

• Photos & Videos: Content filmed by members during hazing events, either shared in group chats or posted on social media, serves as powerful direct evidence. Security camera footage (from houses, campus, or nearby businesses) can also capture incidents. Photos documenting injuries, humiliating acts, or forced drinking are vital. Always prioritize safety, but if possible and safe, capture visual evidence.

• Internal Organization Documents: These include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, lists of “traditions,” and emails or texts from officers relaying instructions. National fraternity policies and training materials are also vital to demonstrate what the national organization knew or should have known about hazing risks. These documents can be obtained through legal discovery once a lawsuit is filed.

• University Records: Through discovery and public records requests, university records can reveal prior disciplinary actions against a chapter (probation, suspensions), incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, and even internal communications among administrators regarding the organization. For public Texas universities like UT Austin, their publicly available hazing violation databases can be a key starting point. This paper trail helps establish a pattern of misconduct and the university’s awareness.

• Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical documentation is essential. This includes emergency room records, ambulance reports, hospitalization records (ICU, surgery, inpatient care), toxicology reports, and lab results (e.g., creatine kinase levels for rhabdomyolysis). Equally important are psychological evaluations that document conditions such as PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation resulting from the trauma. These records quantify the physical and mental harm suffered, directly informing damages claims.

• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts from other pledges, current or former members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, or bystanders provide critical context and corroboration. Timely interviews with these individuals are crucial, as memories fade and fear of retaliation can lead to silence.

Damages: Recovering What Was Lost

Hazing incidents can cause profound, multifaceted harm. Texas law allows victims and their families to seek compensation for a wide range of damages, both economic and non-economic.

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs associated with the physical and mental injuries, including emergency care, hospitalization, surgeries, ongoing treatments, physical therapy, medications, and long-term care for catastrophic injuries like brain damage or organ failure. For severe, permanent injuries, a “life care plan” estimates decades of future medical and supportive care needs.

• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: Compensation can include wages lost due to recovery or parental care, as well as the profound impact on a student’s educational trajectory. This covers tuition and fees for missed semesters, lost scholarships (academic, athletic, or Greek-based), delayed graduation, and the potentially reduced earning capacity if permanent injuries hinder their future career.

• Non-Economic Damages: These intangible harms are still legally compensable and are often central to hazing cases. They include:

  • Physical pain and suffering: From injuries as well as ongoing chronic pain.
  • Emotional distress and psychological harm: Such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), severe anxiety, depression, humiliation, loss of dignity, and the pervasive fear and nightmares that can follow trauma.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: The inability to participate in activities once cherished, withdrawal from social life, and the loss of the expected college experience.

• Wrongful Death Damages (for families): In the most tragic cases, where hazing results in death, surviving family members can pursue a wrongful death claim. This covers funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and profound non-economic damages for the loss of companionship, love, and support. For a comprehensive understanding, Attorney911’s Wrongful Death Claim Lawyer page (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/) offers detailed information.

• Punitive Damages: In cases involving particularly reckless, willful, or malicious conduct, punitive damages may be sought. These are designed not just to compensate the victim but to punish the wrongdoer and deter similar conduct in the future. They are often awarded when defendants ignored prior warnings, engaged in cruel and degrading acts, or attempted extensive cover-ups.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation involves powerful defendants, often including national organizations and institutions that are well-versed in defending against lawsuits.

• National fraternities, sororities, and universities almost invariably carry extensive insurance policies. However, their insurers often attempt to deny coverage by arguing that hazing constitutes “intentional acts” or “criminal conduct” falling outside policy terms.
• An experienced hazing lawyer understands how to challenge these exclusions. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is particularly valuable here; she knows “their playbook” and how to argue that even if the hazing was intentional, the national organization’s or university’s negligent supervision or failure to enforce policies led to the incident, which is covered.
• Identifying all potential sources of insurance coverage—including the policies of individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and university umbrella policies—is essential to ensuring full compensation for victims and their families.

Practical Guides & FAQs

For parents, students, and witnesses in Tennessee navigating a hazing situation, accurate information and clear action steps are essential. This section provides practical guidance to empower you to recognize, respond to, and seek justice for hazing.

For Parents

Parents from Tennessee facing the possibility of hazing involving their child need to be observant, supportive, and strategic.

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to both physical and behavioral changes. Unexplained bruises, burns, or “accident-prone” behaviors are red flags. Look for extreme fatigue, sleep deprivation, or sudden weight changes. Emotionally, be concerned by sudden secrecy, withdrawal from friends and family, defensiveness about the organization, or expressions of fear about “getting in trouble” if they leave. Digitally, notice constant checking of group chats or anxiety when the phone rings at odd hours.
• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not judgment. Emphasize their safety over any organizational status. Let them know you will support them regardless of what they choose. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things going with [group name]? Are you enjoying it?” or “Is there anything making you uncomfortable?”
• If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize medical care immediately. Call 911 if there’s any doubt about their condition. As soon as possible and discreetly, document everything: take photos of injuries, screenshot texts, and write down details of what your child tells you, including dates and locations.
• Dealing with the University: Every communication with university officials should be documented. This includes names, dates, times, and summaries of conversations. Ask probing questions about prior incidents involving the same organization and what measures were taken.
• When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm due to hazing, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing the incident, it is time to contact an attorney. An early consultation can help preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s rights.

For Students / Pledges

Students, particularly those new to campus life in Texas, might struggle to differentiate between legitimate group activities and hazing. If you’re from Tennessee and attending a Texas university, your well-being matters.

• Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself: Am I being forced or pressured to do something I don’t want to do? Is this activity humiliating, dangerous, or illegal? Would university officials or my parents approve if they knew? If older members are making new members do things they don’t have to do, or if there’s a culture of secrecy, it’s likely hazing.
• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: The pressure to fit in, to prove oneself, and the fear of exclusion can be immense. Texas law understands this; it explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing charges. You should never feel obligated to endure harm to gain acceptance.
• Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the absolute right to leave any group at any time. If in immediate danger, call 911. If you want to de-pledge, inform a trusted adult outside the organization, then send a clear email or text to the chapter leadership stating your resignation. Do not go to a “final meeting” alone, as this can be a high-pressure situation. You can report hazing confidentially to campus officials or anonymously through the National Anti-Hazing Hotline: 1-888-NOT-HAZE (1-888-668-4293).
• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many Texas universities, in line with state law, offer amnesty for students who seek medical help for themselves or others in an alcohol or drug-related emergency, overriding concerns about underage drinking or other minor policy violations.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once part of the hazing process, either as a perpetrator or a silent witness, you have a crucial role to play in preventing future harm.

• Acknowledge the weight of your past involvement or silence. Your testimony and any evidence you possess can prevent future incidents and potentially save lives.
• While it’s wise to seek your own legal advice, understand that courts and universities often value cooperation. A lawyer can help navigate your options, clarify potential protections, and guide you through the process of providing information responsibly. Your decision to speak up can be a powerful step towards a safer campus environment for students from Tennessee and beyond.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For Tennessee families, navigating the aftermath of a hazing incident is fraught with emotional and legal complexities. Unfortunately, certain missteps can severely jeopardize a potential case for justice. Attorney911 urges you to be aware of these common, critical mistakes:

MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:

   • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This looks like a cover-up, can be considered obstruction of justice, and makes building a case nearly impossible. If evidence is destroyed, it can be extremely difficult to prove what happened.
   • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content. Screenshot all group chats, social media messages, and any other digital evidence.

2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:

   • What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Direct confrontation will alert them immediately. They will likely lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and begin preparing their defenses, making successful legal action much harder.
   • What to do instead: Document everything discreetly, then call a lawyer before any direct confrontation.

3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms:

   • What universities do: Universities may pressure families into signing waivers or “internal resolution” agreements, often implying this is the quickest path to closure.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue a lawsuit. These settlements are often far below the true value of your case and prioritize the university’s interests over yours.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or an insurance company without an experienced attorney reviewing it first.

4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:

   • What families think: “I want people to know what happened.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Anything posted online can be used against you. Defense attorneys will screenshot everything, inconsistencies can hurt credibility, and you might inadvertently waive legal privileges.
   • What to do instead: Document privately and confidentially. Let your lawyer control public messaging strategically.

5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”:

   • What fraternities say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic.”
   • Why it’s wrong: These meetings are often designed to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can be used against your child in later legal proceedings.
   • What to do instead: Once you’re considering legal action, all future communication with the organization should go through your lawyer.

6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:

   • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Evidence rapidly disappears, witnesses graduate and scatter, the statute of limitations continues to run, and the university’s process is often designed to protect its own reputation, not necessarily secure full justice for your child.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW. Consult with a lawyer immediately. The internal university process is different from legal accountability.

7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:

   • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters represent the interests of the defendants, not yours. Any recorded statement can be used against your child, and early settlement offers are typically lowball.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline to provide a statement and say, “My attorney will contact you.”

Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin) have some sovereign immunity protections, but clear exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity safeguards. Every case depends on its specific facts—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. While basic hazing is often a Class B misdemeanor, it becomes a state jail felony under Texas law if it directly causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals, including organization officers, can also face misdemeanor charges for failing to report known hazing.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes, absolutely. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to prosecution for hazing. This is because the law recognizes that “agreement” under duress, peer pressure, and fear of social exclusion is not truly voluntary consent. This is a critical legal protection for students from Tennessee.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  Generally, you have 2 years from the date of injury or death to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit in Texas. However, certain legal principles like the “discovery rule” or fraudulent concealment can sometimes extend this deadline if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. Regardless, time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and memories fade. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to ensure your rights are protected.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities or sororities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, knowledge of past incidents, control over the organization, and the foreseeability of hazing activities, regardless of where they physically occur. Many major hazing cases nationally have occurred off-campus.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  While every case is different, many hazing lawsuits ultimately resolve through confidential settlements before going to trial. We work to protect your family’s privacy interests. We can discuss options for requesting sealed court records and negotiating confidential terms, if appropriate, while still pursuing accountability.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family in Tennessee faces the unthinkable—the harm caused by hazing at a Texas university—you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who intimately understand how powerful institutions fight back and how to hold them accountable regardless. At Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we bring a unique blend of empathy, strategic insight, and a proven track record of fighting for justice in complex hazing cases. From our Houston office, we serve families across Texas, including Tennessee and surrounding areas, who find themselves caught in these distressing situations.

Our firm, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, is not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their formidable defense teams. We have handled complex litigation against some of the largest corporations, including our involvement in the BP Texas City explosion litigation. This deep experience fighting billion-dollar companies means we possess the legal muscle and strategic foresight to take on any defendant, no matter how powerful, in a hazing lawsuit. Our federal court experience, particularly in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, further enhances our ability to handle cases that often involve multi-state organizations or complex federal regulations.

What truly sets us apart in hazing litigation is our insurance insider advantage, brought by Attorney Lupe Peña. As a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), Lupe knows firsthand how fraternity and university insurance companies analyze, value, and attempt to undervalue hazing claims. She understands their delay tactics, their arguments for coverage exclusions, and their settlement strategies because she used to run that playbook. This insider knowledge is invaluable, allowing us to anticipate their moves and counter their tactics effectively, ultimately benefiting the families we represent.

Ralph Manginello’s background, including membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), provides crucial expertise for hazing cases, which often involve both civil damages and criminal charges. This dual perspective ensures we can advise on all aspects of a hazing incident, from navigating criminal investigations for involved individuals to meticulously building a civil case for maximum accountability.

For students from Tennessee, hazing at a Texas university demands a legal team that understands the intersection of campus culture, complex legal frameworks, and the devastating human cost. We approach hazing cases with an investigative depth that includes:

• Utilizing digital forensics to uncover hidden evidence, including deleted group chats and social media records. Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.
• Subpoenaing national fraternity records to expose patterns of prior incidents and demonstrate foreseeability.
• Demanding university files through discovery and public records requests to reveal institutional knowledge and negligence.
• Collaborating with a network of medical experts, psychologists, and economists to precisely quantify all damages, from physical injuries and psychological trauma (PTSD, anxiety, depression) to lost earning capacity and the long-term cost of future care.

We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our approach is characterized by deep empathy and unwavering advocacy. We don’t just see a case; we see a young life altered, a family struggling to cope, and an injustice that demands redress. Our job is to get you answers, ensure comprehensive accountability from all responsible parties, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We believe in meticulous investigation and real, measurable accountability, not quick, undervalued settlements. Our firm’s success in multi-million dollar wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/) speaks to our capability and commitment.

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor—we want to hear from you. Families in Tennessee and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family. There’s no cost to you upfront, as we work on a contingency fee basis; you don’t pay us unless we win your case. Learn more about how contingency fees work in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.

You can expect from your free consultation:

• We’ll listen to your story without judgment.
• We’ll review any evidence you have (photos, texts, medical records) and advise on critical mistakes that can ruin your injury case, as detailed in our video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY).
• We’ll explain your legal options: criminal report, civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
• We’ll discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
• We’ll answer your questions about costs and our contingency fee structure.
• There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot; we want you to make the best decision for your family.
• Everything you tell us is confidential.

Whether you’re in Tennessee or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Contact Attorney911 for a Legal Emergency:

• Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781 (For immediate, urgent contact)
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email: ralph@atty911.com | lupe@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: For consultation in Spanish, please contact Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com