If you’re a family in Coke County, Texas, the well-being of your child as they embark on their college journey is undoubtedly a top priority. While the promise of higher education often includes vibrant social experiences, there’s a darker side that can emerge within student organizations: hazing. This often-hidden practice can turn dreams into nightmares, leaving students with physical and psychological scars, and in the most tragic cases, taking their lives.

Here in Coke County, and across the Lone Star State, families send their children to universities with hope and expectation. Yet, the reality is that hazing is a persistent and dangerous problem, even at Texas’s most respected institutions. When the unthinkable happens, understanding your rights and options can be overwhelming.

This is why we at Attorney911, The Manginello Law Firm, have created this comprehensive guide. We’re here to help families in Coke County and throughout Texas understand:

• What hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes.
• The complex legal landscape, covering both Texas state laws and federal regulations.
• The critical lessons learned from major national hazing cases and how they apply here in Texas.
• What has been happening at prominent Texas universities like the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University.
• The specific legal options available to victims and their families in Coke County and across our great state.

This article offers general information and is not a substitute for personalized legal advice. If you are facing a hazing crisis, the time to act is now. Attorney911 is ready to stand with you and fight for accountability.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
    • Post details on public social media
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

HAZING IN 2025: WHAT IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE

For Coke County families, the image of hazing might be something out of a decades-old movie: a silly prank or a bit of harmless roughhousing. The reality in 2025 is far more insidious, dangerous, and technologically advanced. Modern hazing preys on a student’s desire to belong, using psychological manipulation, physical abuse, and digital coercion to enforce loyalty and secrecy. It’s often disguised as “tradition,” “team-building,” or “bonding,” but its true purpose is to exert power and control, often with devastating consequences.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

Hazing, in its simplest terms, is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. This definition broadens the scope significantly beyond physical acts, encompassing emotional and psychological manipulation.

A crucial point to understand, especially in a legal context in Texas, is that “I agreed to it” does not automatically make an activity safe or legal when there is peer pressure and a clear power imbalance within a group. The law often recognizes that true consent cannot be given under duress or the threat of social exclusion.

Main Categories of Hazing

To fully grasp the scope of modern hazing, it’s helpful to categorize the tactics used. Many incidents involve a combination of these elements, escalating in severity:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is arguably the most prevalent and dangerous form of hazing, directly linked to a majority of recent hazing fatalities. It includes:

  • Forced or coerced drinking games, chugging challenges, and “lineups” designed for rapid, excessive alcohol consumption.
  • Pressure to consume unknown or mixed substances, including illicit drugs.
  • “Big/Little” events where new members are expected to consume a full bottle of hard liquor.

• Physical Hazing: While some focus on psychological tactics, physical abuse remains a grim reality. This can involve:

  • Paddling and beatings, often inflicted with objects or fists.
  • Extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” that push individuals far beyond safe physical limits, often resulting in severe dehydration, heatstroke, or rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown).
  • Sleep deprivation for days on end, and intentional food or water deprivation.
  • Exposure to extreme cold, heat, or dangerous environments without proper preparation or safety measures.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts are deeply degrading and can inflict lasting psychological trauma:

  • Forced nudity or partial nudity, often for the amusement of older members.
  • Simulated sexual acts, such as the infamous “roasted pig” position or “elephant walks.”
  • Demeaning rituals involving costumes or public displays designed to embarrass.
  • Acts with explicit racial, sexist, homophobic, or other discriminatory overtones, including the use of slurs or forced role-playing of stereotypes.

• Psychological Hazing: Often subtle and insidious, this form of hazing can be just as damaging as physical abuse, eroding a student’s self-esteem and mental well-being.

  • Verbal abuse, constant yelling, insults, threats, and degrading language.
  • Manipulation, gaslighting, and forced confessions of personal or embarrassing information.
  • Social isolation and ostracization from non-group members or even within the group, unless specific demands are met.
  • Public shaming on social media, in meetings, or in campus-wide settings.

• Digital/Online Hazing: This is a rapidly evolving frontier for hazing, leveraging technology to extend control and humiliation beyond physical gatherings.

  • Demands via group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp, Discord) for instant responses, often at all hours, leading to sleep deprivation and anxiety.
  • Online “challenges” or dares that require students to perform embarrassing acts on TikTok, Instagram, or Snapchat.
  • Pressure to create, share, or participate in compromising images or videos.
  • Using GPS tracking applications (like “Find My Friends”) to monitor a new member’s location, ensuring compliance with demands.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It’s a common misconception that hazing is exclusively a “fraternity problem.” While Greek life often sees the most reported incidents, hazing plagues a wide range of organizations across college campuses. For Coke County families sending their children to schools across Texas, it’s vital to recognize that the risk can exist anywhere youth gather in hierarchies:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations. Pressure to conform and uphold “traditions” can foster dangerous environments.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: The structured, often hierarchical nature of these organizations, particularly at institutions like Texas A&M, can unfortunately create fertile ground for hazing under the guise of “discipline” or “earning your keep.”
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Campus Organizations: Groups like “Texas Cowboys” at UT Austin, various spirit organizations, and other clubs with strong institutional histories are not immune. The desire to preserve “tradition” can sometimes override safety concerns.
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball, soccer, track, and cheerleading squads, professional hazing investigations have revealed widespread issues. Athletes may face pressure to engage in dangerous activities for team “bonding.”
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly benign organizations, such as marching bands or theater groups, have documented hazing incidents involving physical and psychological torment.
• Some Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Any group with an “initiation” or “new member” process can potentially engage in hazing, regardless of its stated mission.

Ultimately, hazing thrives where social status, tradition, and secrecy are valued above individual safety and well-being. It exploits the inherent human desire for belonging and acceptance, turning that vulnerability into a tool for control and abuse. No student organization is inherently immune to this dangerous practice.

LAW & LIABILITY FRAMEWORK (TEXAS + FEDERAL)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is crucial for families in Coke County, Texas, who may find themselves dealing with its devastating effects. Both Texas state law and federal regulations provide frameworks for addressing hazing, from criminal penalties for perpetrators to civil pathways for victims to seek accountability and compensation.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific, robust anti-hazing provisions outlined in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. For any incident occurring in Coke County, or at any university attended by a Texas resident, this is the primary state law that applies.

§ 37.151. Definition: Texas law broadly defines hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
• Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition is critical. It clarifies that hazing:

• Can happen anywhere: The location (on or off campus) is irrelevant to whether an act constitutes hazing.
• Encompasses mental and physical harm: It’s not just about physical injuries; severe psychological distress or degradation also qualifies.
• Doesn’t require malice: The act merely needs to be intentional, knowing, or reckless, meaning the perpetrators either intended the harm or knew (or should have known) the risks and disregarded them.
• “Consent” is not a defense: A key provision of Texas law explicitly states that the victim’s “agreement” to participate does not excuse hazing behavior, recognizing the inherent power imbalances and coercion involved.

§ 37.152. Criminal Penalties: Individuals who engage in hazing can face criminal charges:

• By default, hazing is a Class B Misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and/or a fine up to $2,000.
• If hazing causes bodily injury, it can be elevated to a Class A Misdemeanor.
• Most critically, if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it can be prosecuted as a State Jail Felony.

Additionally, Texas law makes it a misdemeanor for:

• Any person who has knowledge of a hazing incident and intentionally or knowingly fails to report it to college or university officials.
• Any organization officer or faculty member to fail to report hazing.
• Any person to retaliate against someone for reporting hazing.

§ 37.153. Organizational Liability: Entire organizations can also be held criminally accountable:

• An organization can be found guilty of a crime if it authorized or encouraged hazing, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about hazing and failed to report it.
• Penalties for organizations can include fines up to $10,000 per violation, and the university can revoke its recognition, effectively banning it from campus.

§ 37.154. Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting: To encourage reporting, Texas law provides protections:

• A person who reports hazing in good faith to school officials or law enforcement is immune from civil or criminal liability for making that report.
• Many universities, including those relevant to Coke County families, have policies offering amnesty to students who call for medical help in a hazing emergency, even if they were drinking underage or involved in the hazing. Your child’s safety is always the priority.

§ 37.155. Consent Not a Defense: This critical provision explicitly states:

• It is not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the hazing activity. This recognizes that when someone is facing intense peer pressure, the desire for acceptance, or fear of exclusion, their “consent” is not truly voluntary.

§ 37.156. Reporting by Educational Institutions: Texas universities are mandated to:

• Provide hazing prevention education to students.
• Publish their hazing policies prominently.
• Publicly report hazing violations and disciplinary actions annually. This public record can be invaluable evidence in civil cases, demonstrating a pattern of issues or a lack of effective enforcement by the institution.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, there are typically two distinct legal avenues:

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (prosecutors) to punish individuals for breaking the law. For hazing, the goal is often to deter future misconduct through jail time, fines, or probation. Common criminal charges can include hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or even negligent homicide or manslaughter in cases of serious injury or death.

• Civil Cases: These are brought by the victims or their surviving families to seek monetary compensation for the harm suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil claims often revolve around negligence (e.g., duty of care, breach of duty, causation, damages), gross negligence, wrongful death, and intentional torts like assault and battery. Unlike criminal cases, which require proof “beyond a reasonable doubt,” civil cases only require a “preponderance of the evidence” (more likely than not) standard, making them a more accessible route for victims to achieve justice.

It’s important to understand that criminal and civil cases can proceed independently or simultaneously. A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for a successful civil lawsuit, nor does a lack of criminal charges preclude a victim from pursuing civil damages.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond Texas state law, federal regulations also impact how hazing cases are handled, particularly concerning universities that receive federal funding:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation, effective for reporting by 2026, aims to increase transparency and accountability for hazing nationwide. It requires colleges and universities receiving federal student aid to:

  • Publicly report all hazing incidents, including sanctions imposed on individuals and organizations.
  • Establish clear definitions of hazing and provide comprehensive educational programs for students and staff.
  • Implement a process for tracking and addressing hazing complaints.
    This act will provide invaluable public data for Coke County families researching a school and pursuing potential legal action.

• Title IX: This federal law prohibits sex discrimination in education programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based violence, or perpetuates a hostile environment based on sex, Title IX obligations are triggered. Universities must investigate such allegations promptly and equitably, and failure to do so can lead to liability.

• Clery Act: The Clery Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents involving assaults, alcohol or drug violations, or other reportable crimes contribute to a campus’s Clery data. This transparency can help identify patterns of misconduct and assess a university’s responsiveness to safety issues.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

The web of potential liability in a hazing case can be complex, often involving multiple parties:

• Individual Students: Those who actively planned, participated in, or coerced others into hazing acts can be held personally liable for assault, battery, negligence, and other harms.
• Local Chapter / Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team directly involved can be sued as a legal entity. This liability can extend to the chapter’s officers who oversaw or permitted the hazing.
• National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which sets policies, charters chapters, and receives dues, can be held liable. Arguments often focus on their failure to supervise, train, or intervene despite knowledge of repeated hazing incidents (a concept known as “foreseeability”).
• University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, along with its board of regents, may be sued for negligence, especially if they knew or should have known about hazing and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it. This could involve claims of negligent supervision, negligent hiring of staff or advisors, or creating an environment where hazing was permitted to flourish.
• Third Parties: In some cases, other entities might bear responsibility:
  • Property Owners/Landlords: If hazing occurred on property they controlled and they had knowledge of hazardous activities.
  • Bars or Alcohol Providers: Under “dram shop” laws, establishments that negligently serve alcohol to visibly intoxicated individuals or minors may be liable for subsequent injuries.
  • Facility Rental Companies or Event Organizers: If they failed to provide a safe environment or adequately supervise an event where hazing occurred.

Each hazing case is fact-specific, and an experienced attorney will meticulously investigate to identify all potentially liable parties.

NATIONAL HAZING CASE PATTERNS (ANCHOR STORIES)

The tragic headlines from across the nation paint a stark picture: hazing is a systemic issue with predictable patterns and devastating consequences. While each case is unique, the common threads of alcohol addiction, physical abuse, psychological torment, and a code of silence reveal a cycle that continues to claim lives and irreparably alter others. For Coke County families, these national precedents demonstrate the severe risks, the institutional failures, and the legal accountability that can follow.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The vast majority of hazing-related deaths are attributed to forced or coerced alcohol consumption. These incidents highlight not only the immediate danger of alcohol poisoning but also the callous disregard for human life when medical attention is delayed.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): This is one of the most widely publicized hazing tragedies. During a “bid acceptance” event, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. Over a harrowing 12 hours, security cameras captured him falling down stairs, unconscious, and suffering repeated injuries, including a ruptured spleen and a non-recoverable traumatic brain injury. Fraternity brothers allegedly waited nearly 12 hours before calling for medical help, attempting to conceal the severity of his condition. Dozens of criminal charges were filed against fraternity members, and civil litigation led to an undisclosed settlement. Penn State also enacted some of the toughest anti-hazing laws in the nation, known as the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law.

  • Takeaway for Texas families: The Piazza case starkly illustrates how extreme intoxication, deliberate delays in calling 911, and a pervasive culture of silence can lead to horrifying outcomes and severe legal repercussions.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and forced to consume them rapidly. His death sparked a statewide anti-hazing movement in Florida, and FSU temporarily suspended all Greek life. The incident led to multiple criminal prosecutions, primarily for misdemeanor hazing. Coffey’s family later filed a wrongful death lawsuit, settling on confidential terms.

  • Takeaway for Texas families: Formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a tragically repeating script for disaster, demonstrating national fraternities’ foreseeability of such risks.

• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, died in a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to drink heavily whenever they answered a question incorrectly. His blood alcohol content was a fatal 0.495%. His death led to the enactment of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, making felony hazing a crime, which can result in five years jail time and a $10,000 fine. Multiple members were charged, and one was convicted of negligent homicide. The Gruver family settled a lawsuit with LSU for $6.1 million before obtaining an unspecified settlement with the fraternity and its members.

  • Takeaway for Texas families: Legislative change can follow public outrage when hazing deaths occur, but proving hazing often requires meticulous evidence collection.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): During a “Big/Little” night, 20-year-old pledge Stone Foltz was forced to consume an entire handle of alcohol and died from alcohol poisoning. This case resonated deeply. Criminal charges led to convictions for multiple fraternity members, including Daylen Dunson, the chapter president, who was personally ordered to pay $6.5 million to the Foltz family. In a significant civil victory, Stone Foltz’s family also reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University. His family also advocated for Collin’s Law: The Anti-Hazing Act in Ohio, which went into effect in October 2021, and makes hazing a third-degree felony when alcohol or drugs cause physical harm.

  • Takeaway for Texas families: The sheer magnitude of the Foltz settlement and the accountability of individuals demonstrate that universities and national fraternities face severe financial and reputational consequences for hazing, especially when their policies are insufficient or unenforced.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical abuse and torturous rituals are tragically common hazing tactics. These cases show the devastating impact of physical violence and delayed medical attention.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania. He was subjected to a brutal ritual called “glass ceiling” where he was blindfolded, weighted with a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled by fraternity brothers. Despite his obvious injuries, members delayed calling 911 for over an hour. This case was particularly significant because the national fraternity itself was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and individuals received jail sentences. Pi Delta Psi was banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years and fined over $110,000.

  • Takeaway for Texas families: This case proves that off-campus “retreats” are not safe havens from liability; national organizations can be held criminally and civilly liable for the actions of their chapters, especially when prior incidents show a pattern of similar ritualized harm.

• Joseph Snell – Omega Psi Phi, Bowie State University, Maryland (1997): Joseph Snell endured severe beatings over a four-week period during hazing, including burns from a space heater placed near his face, requiring hospitalization. He initially rejected a $5,000 settlement offer but, through determined litigation, secured a $375,000 verdict. The judgment was collected by seizing fraternity bank assets across multiple states, establishing a precedent that both the international organization and its local chapter are liable for hazing.

  • Takeaway for Texas families: This case, though older, serves as a powerful precedent for holding national organizations accountable and demonstrates the long-term impact of physical hazing.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not confined to Greek life; it deeply infiltrates athletic programs, often rationalized as “team building” or “toughening up” new recruits.

• Northwestern University Athletic Hazing Scandal (2023–2025): This scandal involved widespread allegations of sexualized and racist hazing within the football program, including forced sexual acts and racial discrimination. Former players filed multiple lawsuits against Northwestern University and the coaching staff. Head coach Pat Fitzgerald was fired and later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially. The university faced immense scrutiny and pledged institutional reforms.

  • Takeaway for Texas families: This high-profile case underscores that hazing exists in major athletic programs, involving serious allegations of sexualized and racial abuse. It exposes the potential for institutional negligence and the significant financial and reputational costs for universities when these issues are exposed.

• Robert Champion – Florida A&M University Marching Band (2011): Robert Champion, a 26-year-old drum major, died from brutal physical beatings during a hazing ritual known as “Crossing Bus C” on the band’s bus. Multiple band members were convicted, some for felonies. This case made national headlines, proving hazing extends far beyond Greek life into other student organizations. Florida A&M University was held fully liable for Champion’s death, agreeing to a $1 million settlement with his family in 2015, and implementing comprehensive anti-hazing policy reforms across its system.

  • Takeaway for Texas families: This case highlights that hazing liability extends to marching bands and other non-Greek organizations, and that the institution can be held directly responsible for failing to prevent known dangers.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies share common insidious threads: forced drinking, humiliation, physical violence, dangerous rituals, deliberate delays in medical care, and concerted cover-up attempts by members. They demonstrate that the immense pressure for conformity and secrecy can tragically outweigh basic human compassion.

While families in Coke County might hope that such incidents are distant, isolated occurrences, the reality is that the patterns observed nationally are often replicated at Texas universities. The precedents set by these cases—from multi-million-dollar settlements to criminal convictions and new anti-hazing legislation—show that accountability is possible, but often only after tragedy strikes and victims courageously step forward. Texas families facing hazing at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor are part of a national conversation, and their pursuit of justice contributes to a broader movement for change.

TEXAS FOCUS: UH, TEXAS A&M, UT, SMU, BAYLOR

For families in Coke County, Texas, understanding the landscape of hazing at the state’s most prominent universities is paramount. These institutions attract students from across the state and beyond, including many from our local communities in Coke County. While our firm handles cases statewide, our focus on these five universities is due to their large student populations, active Greek life and student organizations, and documented histories with hazing incidents. Knowing the specifics of each campus’s culture, policies, and past responses to hazing can be critical for any Coke County parent or student.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, located in the heart of our state’s largest city, is a dynamic institution with a sprawling urban campus serving a diverse student body. Many Coke County residents consider UH a top choice, and its active Greek life, vibrant athletic programs, and numerous student organizations create a bustling environment.

5.1.1 Campus & culture snapshot

UH fosters a bustling, diverse environment, drawing students from all over Texas and beyond. Greek life here is active and varied, with chapters from Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic Council, and National Pan-Hellenic Council organizations, alongside numerous cultural and service-based student groups. This creates a rich social fabric, but also complex dynamics regarding student integration and organizational “traditions.”

5.1.2 Hazing policy & reporting

The University of Houston maintains a strict policy prohibiting hazing, defining it broadly to include any act that causes mental or physical discomfort, embarrassment, harassment, or ridicule for the purpose of initiation or affiliation with a student organization. This prohibition extends to activities both on and off campus. UH emphasizes clear reporting channels, including the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). Their official policy and forms are available online.

5.1.3 Example incidents & response

UH has a painful history with hazing, highlighted by one of Attorney911’s most significant cases. In late 2025, Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston / Pi Kappa Phi ($10M lawsuit) became a landmark case. Leonel Bermudez, a transfer student and pledge of the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu chapter, allegedly suffered acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis after severe hazing. Details included being forced to carry a degrading “pledge fanny pack,” being hosed down in freezing weather “like waterboarding,” forced physical exertion at Yellowstone Boulevard Park, and compulsory consumption of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting. Attorney911, represented by Ralph Manginello and Lupe Peña, filed a lawsuit seeking over $10 million in damages against UH, the UH Board of Regents, Pi Kappa Phi national, its housing corporation, and 13 individuals. The chapter was suspended on November 6, 2025, and permanently shut down on November 14, 2025.

Other incidents include a 2016 Pi Kappa Alpha case where pledges allegedly suffered physical and sleep deprivation, with one student sustaining a lacerated spleen, leading to misdemeanor hazing charges and university suspension. UH has a track record of suspending chapters, but cases like Bermudez demonstrate the persistent struggle to enforce policies effectively.

5.1.4 How a UH hazing case might proceed

For Coke County families, a hazing incident at UH means the legal proceedings would primarily involve Harris County, Texas. This includes the Houston Police Department (HPD) or UHPD for criminal investigations, and civil lawsuits filed in Harris County District Courts. Potential defendants could include individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, and the University of Houston itself. Navigating these systems requires deep local knowledge of Houston’s legal landscape and experience with public university defendants.

5.1.5 What UH students & parents should do

• Understand the policies: Familiarize yourself with UH’s specific hazing policies and reporting mechanisms.
• Document relentlessly: Screenshots of group chats, photos/videos of events, and medical records are crucial. Our video, “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs), offers critical guidance.
• Prioritize safety: If hazing is occurring, remove your child from the situation immediately. If medical attention is needed, seek it without delay.
• Contact a Houston-based hazing lawyer: An attorney experienced with cases against UH and Harris County’s jurisdiction, like Attorney911, can help evaluate your options, preserve critical evidence, and navigate the complex legal process effectively.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, a storied institution in College Station, is known for its deep-rooted traditions, powerful alumni network, and the prominent Corps of Cadets. Many Coke County families proudly send their children to Aggieland, where collegiate life is often intertwined with these unique customs.

5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Texas A&M’s identity is heavily influenced by its military heritage and the Corps of Cadets, one of the largest uniformed student bodies in the nation. Alongside this, a vibrant Greek life and numerous student organizations contribute to a campus culture that values tradition, loyalty, and a strong sense of community. This environment, while fostering camaraderie, can also inadvertently create conditions ripe for hazing under the guise of “earning your Aggie Ring” or “upholding tradition.”

5.2.2 Hazing policy & reporting

Texas A&M prohibits hazing both on and off campus, explicitly outlawing acts that endanger mental or physical health for initiation into any student organization. Reporting channels include the Dean of Student Life, the University Police Department (UPD), and various online reporting forms. A&M, like all state universities in Texas, is subject to the Texas Education Code regarding hazing.

5.2.3 Example incidents & response

Texas A&M has faced multiple high-profile hazing incidents:

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon Lawsuit (around 2021): This case involved two pledges who alleged being forced to endure strenuous physical activity and substances such as industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The chapter was suspended by the university, and the pledges filed a $1 million lawsuit. This highlights the dangers of physical and chemical hazing.
• Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): A former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading hazing, including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The university stated it addressed the matter through its internal processes, but the public nature of the allegations underscored deep-seated concerns within the Corps.
• Aggie Bonfire Collapse (1999): While not traditional hazing, the collapse that killed 12 and injured 27 students raised serious questions about student-led high-risk activities and institutional oversight. Multiple lawsuits against university officials resulted in settlements exceeding $6 million, forcing the university to re-evaluate its supervision of student “traditions.” This incident is a stark reminder of the potential for tragic outcomes when student-led events lack proper oversight.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M hazing case might proceed

For Coke County families, a hazing incident at Texas A&M would involve investigations by UPD and/or Bryan/College Station Police. Civil lawsuits would typically fall under Brazos County, Texas, jurisdiction. Navigating claims against the state of Texas and a public university like A&M requires a firm well-versed in sovereign immunity laws and experienced in complex institutional litigation.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M students & parents should do

• Question “tradition”: For Coke County students considering groups like the Corps or social fraternities, critically evaluate activities labeled “tradition” for hazing elements.
• Document evidence: Keep records of communications, photos, or videos related to concerning activities.
• Seek external counsel promptly: Due to the complexity of cases involving public universities and the potential for sovereign immunity defenses, contacting an experienced hazing attorney early is essential to determine liability exceptions or other avenues for justice.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin, the flagship institution of the UT System, is a sprawling campus in the state capital, with a vibrant social scene and deep-rooted traditions. It’s a popular destination for many Coke County students, and its active Greek life has unfortunately experienced numerous hazing incidents.

5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot

UT Austin is a major hub of academic and social activity, particularly known for its spirited student body and passionate loyalty to the Longhorn traditions. Greek life is robust, with a multitude of fraternities and sororities, including some of the oldest and largest chapters in the state. Beyond Greek life, numerous spirit organizations and athletic teams are integral to the campus experience, all of which have, at times, faced allegations of hazing.

5.2.2 Hazing policy & reporting

UT Austin has a strict anti-hazing policy that is clearly communicated to students. They utilize the Texas definition of hazing, prohibiting any act on or off campus that endangers mental or physical health for membership or affiliation. UT is one of the more transparent universities, maintaining a public “Hazing Violations” page online, listing organizations, dates, specific conduct, and sanctions imposed. Reporting can be made through the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct, or UTPD.

5.2.3 Example incidents & response

UT Austin’s public Hazing Violations page is a chilling testament to the persistence of hazing despite clear policies.

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): New members were allegedly directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, actions clearly identified as hazing. The chapter was placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education.
• Texas Wranglers (Spirit Organization): This well-known spirit organization has, at times, faced sanctions for hazing violations involving forced physical activities and other inappropriate “initiation” behavior.
• Texas Cowboys (Spirit Organization): This historic organization has also been sanctioned multiple times for hazing, with allegations ranging from forced calisthenics to alcohol misuse. A 2018 incident involving a “New Man” who died from injuries sustained after being sleep-deprived from a Texas Cowboys hazing event, led to serious university review and changes in the organization’s structure.

The fact that UT publicly lists these violations is a double-edged sword: it offers transparency, but also reveals a persistent pattern of hazing across various types of student groups.

5.2.4 How a UT hazing case might proceed

For Coke County families, hazing incidents at UT Austin would involve investigations by UTPD and/or Austin Police. Civil lawsuits would typically fall under Travis County, Texas, jurisdiction. The public record of hazing violations maintained by UT Austin can be a powerful tool for civil litigation, establishing prior knowledge and a pattern of issues that the university or specific organizations were aware of, but failed to address effectively.

5.2.5 What UT students & parents should do

• Check the public record: For Coke County students considering fraternities, sororities, or spirit groups at UT, check UT Austin’s Hazing Violations page (a valuable public resource) for any history of misconduct.
• Understand reporting mechanisms: Familiarize yourself with UT’s official reporting channels and policies.
• Consider legal counsel before internal reporting: While reporting to the university is important, consulting an experienced attorney first, especially if serious injury has occurred, can ensure evidence is preserved and your child’s rights are protected before being drawn into an internal investigation.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, nestled in an affluent area of Dallas, is a private university renowned for its strong academics and vibrant social scene. Many Coke County families consider SMU for its prestige and robust student life, which includes a significant Greek presence.

5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot

SMU boasts a highly engaged student body, with Greek life playing a central role in campus social dynamics. A large percentage of undergraduates participate in fraternities and sororities, alongside numerous other professional, social, and academic organizations. The emphasis on tradition and social standing, while creating strong bonds, can sometimes lead to an environment where hazing practices are perpetuated.

5.2.2 Hazing policy & reporting

SMU strictly prohibits hazing, adhering to the Texas Education Code’s definition. Their policies outline clear disciplinary actions for both individuals and organizations found responsible. SMU provides reporting channels through the Dean of Students, student affairs offices, and SMU Police. As a private institution, SMU’s internal disciplinary records and incident reports are not subject to the same public disclosure requirements as state universities, which can affect the transparency of hazing investigations.

5.2.3 Example incidents & response

SMU has had to address significant hazing issues within its Greek system:

• Kappa Alpha Order (2017): A high-profile incident where new members were reportedly paddled, forced to consume alcohol, and deprived of sleep. This led to a multi-year suspension for the chapter and severe restrictions on its activities and recruiting.
• Other Greek suspensions: SMU’s disciplinary records have shown various fraternities and sororities facing sanctions for violations including underage drinking, forced physical activity, and degrading rituals. These incidents underscore the persistent challenge SMU faces in curbing hazing within its social organizations.

5.2.4 How an SMU hazing case might proceed

For Coke County families, a hazing incident at SMU would involve investigations by SMU Police and/or Dallas Police. Civil lawsuits would be filed in Dallas County, Texas. As a private university, SMU does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more straightforward to sue the institution directly for negligence compared to public universities. However, the private nature of its records means that evidence may need to be obtained through formal legal discovery processes.

5.2.5 What SMU students & parents should do

• Research chapter history: For Coke County students interested in SMU Greek life, active investigation into a chapter’s recent history is vital, as internal sanctions may not always be publicly visible.
• Utilize SMU’s reporting tools: Familiarize yourself with SMU’s anonymous reporting options, such as their Real Response system.
• Secure legal representation: If your child has been seriously harmed, obtaining experienced legal counsel is crucial. A lawyer can efficiently pursue discovery to uncover internal reports and communications that SMU is not legally compelled to make public.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, located in Waco, Texas, is a private, Christian research university with a strong academic reputation and a deeply ingrained religious identity. Many Coke County families are drawn to Baylor for its values-based education and vibrant campus community.

5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Baylor’s culture is steeped in Christian traditions, a strong emphasis on service, and a spirited approach to its athletic programs. While Greek life is present, it operates within the university’s faith-based framework, leading to unique supervision models. The expectation of ethical conduct and community values shapes students’ experiences, yet like any university, it is not immune to issues of student misconduct, including hazing.

5.2.2 Hazing policy & reporting

Baylor University strictly prohibits hazing consistent with Texas law, emphasizing a “zero tolerance” stance. Their anti-hazing policy is integrated into the university’s broader student conduct code, underscoring ethical behavior and respect. Reporting channels include the Department of Student Conduct, Baylor Police, and anonymous online forms. Baylor’s faith-based mission adds another layer to its approach, with disciplinary actions often framed within a context of community standards and ethical accountability.

5.2.3 Example incidents & response

Baylor, like other universities, has contended with instances of hazing, often against the backdrop of its broader institutional challenges concerning student welfare:

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): A significant incident involved the men’s baseball team, where a hazing investigation led to the suspension of 14 players. These suspensions were strategically staggered to mitigate impact on the team’s season, highlighting the tension between team discipline and athletic continuity. The hazing involved forced consumption of alcohol and other degrading acts.
• Alpha Phi Alpha (2019): This fraternity, along with several others, was sanctioned by Baylor for hazing violations after investigations into reports of misconduct.
• Broader institutional scrutiny: Baylor has faced extensive national criticism and legal action related to its handling of sexual assault allegations within its football program. While not directly hazing, this history underscores the potential for systemic issues in student organizational oversight and the severe consequences for institutional negligence.

5.2.4 How a Baylor hazing case might proceed

For Coke County families, a hazing incident at Baylor would typically involve investigations by Baylor Police and/or Waco Police. Civil lawsuits would be filed in McLennan County, Texas. As a private university, Baylor does not have sovereign immunity protections, making it more akin to SMU in terms of potential direct institutional liability. Cases would likely focus on the university’s knowledge of hazing, its enforcement of ethical and conduct policies, and any prior patterns of misconduct.

5.2.5 What Baylor students & parents should do

• Align with Baylor’s values: For Coke County students considering Baylor, understanding the university’s strong stance against hazing and its emphasis on ethical conduct is important. Report any activities that contradict these values.
• Utilize official channels: Utilize Baylor’s confidential reporting avenues to voice concerns about hazing.
• Consult independent legal counsel: Given Baylor’s prior institutional challenges and its private status, seeking legal advice from a hazing attorney ensures an independent assessment of the situation and guidance on navigating both university disciplinary processes and potential civil claims.

FRATERNITIES & SORORITIES: CAMPUS-SPECIFIC + NATIONAL HISTORIES

For families in Coke County, it’s critical to understand that the fraternity or sorority chapter your child joins at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor isn’t an isolated entity. These local chapters are extensions of vast national organizations, many of which carry a heavy history of hazing incidents across the country. This national context profoundly impacts legal strategy, demonstrating patterns of behavior and “foreseeability” that can hold national headquarters accountable.

Why National Histories Matter

The unfortunate truth is that many national fraternities and sororities have confronted multiple hazing incidents, injuries, and even deaths over the decades. These incidents frequently exhibit recurring themes:

• Forced alcohol consumption: Often during “Big/Little” rituals or initiation events.
• Physical abuse: Such as paddling, extreme calisthenics, or sleep deprivation.
• Humiliating rituals: Designing events to degrade new members.
• Cover-ups and delayed medical aid: Which almost always exacerbate injuries and fatalities.

National headquarters, in response to these tragedies and ensuing multi-million dollar lawsuits, have implemented detailed anti-hazing manuals, risk management policies, and mandatory training. This means that:

• They know the risks: These national organizations are fully aware of what hazing looks like, how it happens, and its potential for harm. They have been warned countless times by legal judgments and public outcry.
• They have a duty to act: With this knowledge, they bear a responsibility to actively prevent hazing, enforce their policies, and rigorously supervise their chapters.

When a local chapter in Texas – whether at UH, A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor – repeats the same dangerous script that has led to injury or death at another chapter in a different state, it creates a powerful legal argument for foreseeability. It becomes far more difficult for the national organization to claim ignorance or that the incident was “unforeseeable.” This pattern of behavior can significantly strengthen arguments for negligence, gross negligence, and even punitive damages against national entities.

Organization Mapping: Connecting Local Chapters to National Patterns

While we cannot list every single fraternity or sorority chapter at every Texas university, we can highlight some of the major national organizations with documented histories of serious hazing incidents. This table provides a snapshot of such organizations, emphasizing their national patterns rather than targeting specific Texas chapters unless explicitly cited in public records.

National Organization	Notable National Hazing Incidents/Patterns	Legal Implications for Texas
Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike)	Stone Foltz (BGSU, 2021) – died alcohol poisoning, $10M settlement; David Bogenberger (NIU, 2012) – died alcohol poisoning, $14M settlement. Pattern of extreme “Big/Little” drinking.	High foreseeability for alcohol-related hazing anywhere a chapter operates, including Texas.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE)	Multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide; Lawsuit at University of Alabama for traumatic brain injury; Texas A&M SAE (c.2021) – chemical burns; UT Austin SAE (2006) – alcohol death.	Long history suggests foreseeability of physical and alcohol hazing across chapters, including those in Texas.
Phi Delta Theta	Max Gruver (LSU, 2017) – died alcohol poisoning, $6.1M verdict/settlement. Pattern of forced drinking games.	Foreseeability of alcohol hazing, especially “game”-related. The Max Gruver Act in Louisiana is also a national precedent.
Pi Kappa Phi	Andrew Coffey (FSU, 2017) – died alcohol poisoning. Leonel Bermudez (UH, 2025) – acute kidney failure, rhabdomyolysis, $10M lawsuit by Attorney911.	Demonstrated pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing and physical torment at multiple campuses, including very recent litigation in Texas.
Kappa Sigma	Chad Meredith (University of Miami, 2001) – drowned, $12.6M verdict; Texas Christian University (2018) – hazing arrest; Texas A&M (2023) – rhabdomyolysis from physical hazing.	Known history of alcohol-related deaths and physical hazing; established a specific Texas connection with recent injury cases.
Beta Theta Pi	Timothy Piazza (Penn State, 2017) – died traumatic brain injury after extreme alcohol hazing, multi-million dollar settlements.	The Piazza case is a benchmark for severe alcohol hazing and delayed medical treatment, setting high standards for institutional accountability.
Phi Gamma Delta (FIJI)	Danny Santulli (Univ. of Missouri, 2021) – permanent brain damage from alcohol poisoning, multi-million dollar settlements.	This case highlights catastrophic non-fatal injuries and the potential for large settlements against multiple defendants.
Pi Delta Psi	Chun “Michael” Deng (Baruch College, 2013) – died brain injury from physical hazing, national fraternity convicted of assault/manslaughter.	Landmark case for criminal organizational liability and extreme physical ritualized hazing.
Omega Psi Phi	Joseph Snell (Bowie State, 1997) – severe beatings, $375K verdict; University of Southern Mississippi (2023) – allegations of severe beatings, federal lawsuit.	History of physical beatings and ritualized violence, with recent allegations of severe injury.
Kappa Alpha Order	Cases of physical hazing and forced alcohol consumption across campuses, including SMU (2017) – chapter suspended for paddling, forced drinking, sleep deprivation.	A Texas-specific local incident (SMU) ties directly into broader national patterns of physical and alcohol hazing.
Sigma Chi	College of Charleston (2024) – $10M+ settlement for physical hazing, forced drugs/alcohol; University of Texas at Arlington (2020) – pledge hospitalized for alcohol poisoning.	Recent large settlements and Texas-specific incidents underscore severe risks and high financial accountability.

(Note: This list is illustrative and not exhaustive. Hazing incidents can occur in any organization, and a lack of mention does not imply a group is without risk.)

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

For Coke County families pursuing a hazing claim, connecting a local incident to these national patterns is a cornerstone of our legal strategy. It allows us to argue that:

• Foreseeability: The national organization, and often the university, knew or should have known about the substantial risk of hazing given their past experiences. They can’t claim ignorance.
• Negligent Supervision and Endorsement: Their failure to prevent recurrent hazing, despite clear prior warnings and policy violations across chapters, demonstrates a pattern of negligent supervision or even tacit endorsement of unsafe “traditions.”
• Insurance Coverage: Knowledge of these repeated national incidents can help counter arguments from insurers who try to deny coverage by claiming “intentional acts” or “unforeseeable harm.” Lupe Peña’s specialized background as a former insurance defense attorney is invaluable in dissecting these complex arguments and ensuring all possible avenues for compensation are explored.

Ultimately, by thoroughly examining the history of an organization, Attorney911 builds a more compelling case for accountability, ensuring that entities with significant resources—like national fraternities and universities—cannot evade responsibility for the harm caused by their negligence.

BUILDING A CASE: EVIDENCE, DAMAGES, STRATEGY

When facing a hazing incident, particularly one involving serious injury or death, the immediate aftermath can be chaotic and emotionally overwhelming. However, this is also a critical window for building a strong legal case. The thorough collection and preservation of evidence, understanding the full scope of damages, and a clear legal strategy are paramount. This process is complex, often adversarial, and requires the expertise of attorneys who specialize in this unique field. For Coke County families, acting quickly and methodically is key to securing justice.

7.1 Evidence

In today’s interconnected world, evidence in hazing cases is increasingly digital, comprehensive, and often fleeting. We approach investigations with the diligence required to uncover every piece of the puzzle:

• Digital Communications: This is often the single most critical category of evidence.

  • GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, Fraternity Apps: These platforms are frequently used by student organizations for communication, coordination, and even the planning and execution of hazing. Messages can reveal who was involved, what was said, timings, demands, and discussions about cover-ups. We prioritize recovering these.
  • Social Media: Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok comments, and Facebook posts can contain photos, videos, or discussions related to hazing. These platforms can show the public nature of some activities or even direct demands made to new members.
  • Importance: Such evidence shows not just what happened, but who knew, who directed it, and often, the coercive nature of the demands. Our video, “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs), explains critical steps for preserving these digital footprints immediately.

• Photos & Videos: Beyond what’s on social media, individuals often record incidents.

  • Member-generated content: Photos or videos taken by members or pledges during events can be irrefutable proof.
  • Surveillance Footage: Security cameras (at houses, university buildings, local businesses) or private doorbells (Ring, etc.) can capture arrival/departure times, events in progress, or injuries.

• Internal Organization Documents: Subpoenas can uncover official or unofficial operational guides.

  • Pledge Manuals/Initiation Scripts: These may outline “traditions” that constitute hazing.
  • Emails/Texts: Between officers, members, alumni, or advisors discussing “new member education” can reveal problematic intentions.
  • National Policies/Training Materials: These crucial documents establish what the national organization knew or should have known about hazing risks and their policies for prevention.

• University Records: These shed light on the institution’s awareness and response.

  • Prior Conduct Files: Documenting previous hazing violations, probations, or suspensions involving the same organization or individuals. This establishes a pattern and knowledge base.
  • Incident Reports: Filed with campus police or student conduct offices, detailing complaints or investigations.
  • Clery Reports: Annual crime statistics can highlight broader campus safety issues.
  • Internal Communications: Emails among administrators about the organization’s conduct, especially if there were prior warnings or complaints.

• Medical and Psychological Records: Crucial for documenting harm.

  • Emergency Room/Hospital Records: Detail the immediate injuries, treatments, and toxicology reports (e.g., blood alcohol content, drug screenings).
  • Rehab/Therapy Notes: For ongoing physical therapy, occupational therapy, or psychiatric care for PTSD, anxiety, or depression.
  • Expert Evaluations: Independent medical or psychological evaluations can provide critical diagnoses and prognoses for long-term health.

• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts are irreplaceable.

  • Pledges/Members: Other new members present, or even older members, can provide firsthand accounts.
  • Bystanders: Roommates, RAs, coaches, or other students who observed changes in behavior or overheard conversations.
  • Former Members: Individuals who left the organization due to hazing practices can offer powerful insights into historical patterns.

7.2 Damages

When hazing leads to injury or death, the financial and emotional costs can be devastating. Our legal team meticulously calculates and pursues damages to ensure full compensation for your family’s losses:

• Medical Bills & Future Care:

  • Past Medical Expenses: Covering emergency room visits, ambulance transport, hospitalization (including ICU stays, surgeries), medications, and medical equipment.
  • Future Medical Expenses: Projecting costs for ongoing therapies (physical, occupational, speech), psychiatric care, long-term medication, and potential future surgeries. For catastrophic injuries like brain damage, this may include sophisticated “life care plans” covering decades of specialized care.

• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact:

  • Lost Wages: Compensating for income lost by the victim or by parents/guardians who had to take time off work to provide care.
  • Educational Losses: Reimbursement for tuition, fees, and housing for semesters missed. Compensation for lost scholarships, delayed graduation, and the subsequent impact on career launch.
  • Diminished Earning Capacity: If hazing results in permanent physical or mental disabilities, we work with economists to calculate the victim’s projected loss of lifetime earning capacity.

• Non-Economic Damages: These address the profound, non-monetary suffering.

  • Physical Pain and Suffering: For the immediate and ongoing pain from injuries.
  • Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm: Including severe anxiety, depression, PTSD, humiliation, loss of dignity, and the profound mental anguish inflicted by hazing.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: When injuries prevent a student from engaging in activities they once loved, impacting their quality of life and college experience.

• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the tragic event of a hazing-related death, eligible family members (typically parents, children, and spouses in Texas) can recover:

  • Funeral and Burial Costs.
  • Loss of Companionship, Love, and Society: Compensating for the irreplaceable emotional support and relationship with the deceased.
  • Loss of Financial Support: If the deceased would have contributed to family income or support.
  • Grief and Mental Anguish: For the severe emotional pain experienced by surviving family members.

• Punitive Damages (when applicable): In cases where defendants’ conduct was exceptionally reckless, malicious, or grossly negligent, punitive damages may be sought. These are designed to punish the wrongdoers and deter similar behavior in the future, providing an additional layer of accountability beyond mere compensation.

7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation often involves powerful defendants with significant resources, backed by sophisticated insurance policies. These entities, particularly national fraternities and universities, typically carry extensive liability coverage. However, their insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage by arguing that hazing, as an “intentional act” or “criminal conduct,” falls under policy exclusions.

This is where Attorney911’s experience, particularly Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), becomes invaluable. We understand how these insurance companies operate:

• Identifying All Policies: We meticulously identify all potential insurance policies, from general liability to directors and officers (D&O) coverage for national organizations, and various university policies.
• Navigating Exclusions: We strategically argue that while the individual acts may be intentional, the failure to prevent hazing (negligent supervision, failure to enforce policies) is an act of negligence that is covered.
• Forcing Defense: We work to ensure that insurance companies fulfill their “duty to defend” the policyholders, even if they initially dispute coverage.

This complex dance with insurers is critical. It often determines the financial resources available for a settlement or judgment. Our firm’s experience in confronting powerful, well-insured defendants ensures that no stone is left unturned in seeking maximum possible compensation for our clients.

PRACTICAL GUIDES & FAQS

Hazing is often shrouded in secrecy, making it difficult for parents and students in Coke County to identify and address. Knowing what to look for, how to respond, and who to trust can make all the difference. These practical guides offer actionable steps for parents, students, and witnesses, empowering them to navigate these challenging situations.

8.1 For Parents

Parents are often the first to notice subtle changes in their child that may indicate hazing is occurring. Your intuition is a powerful tool.

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to a combination of these indicators:

  • Unexplained injuries: Bruises, cuts, sprains, or burns without plausible explanations.
  • Sudden exhaustion: Your child seems constantly tired, sleep-deprived, or falls asleep anywhere.
  • Drastic mood changes: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, withdrawal from friends or family, or unusual secrecy.
  • Constant phone use/anxiety: Obsessive checking of group chats, fear of missing a “mandatory” message, or sudden anxiety when the phone buzzes.
  • Changes in appearance: Neglecting hygiene, wearing specific clothes daily, or appearing disheveled.
  • Academic decline: Grades dropping, missing classes, or an inability to focus on studies due to commitments.
  • Financial strain: Sudden requests for money for “dues,” “fines,” or unexplained expenses.

• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy and without judgment.

  • Start with open-ended questions like, “How are things really going in [organization name]?” or “Is everything okay?”
  • Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priority, not their membership status.
  • Reassure them that you will support them no matter what, and that they are not “ratting out” anyone by seeking help for dangerous activities.

• If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize medical care and evidence collection.

  • Seek medical attention immediately: Do not delay, even if your child insists they are “fine.” Critical injuries or internal damage might not be immediately apparent. Tell medical providers hazing occurred so it is documented.
  • Document everything: Photos of any visible injuries (with dates and timestamps), screenshots of any relevant texts or social media messages, and detailed notes of what your child says about the incident.
  • Save everything: Keep any physical items (e.g., damaged clothing, peculiar objects used in rituals, receipts for forced purchases).

• Dealing with the University: Document all interactions and understand the university’s response.

  • Keep a log of every conversation: who you spoke to, when, what was discussed, and any promises or actions taken.
  • Ask direct questions about: prior incidents involving the same organization, what steps the school will take to ensure safety, and the disciplinary process.
  • Beware of universities attempting to control the narrative or minimize incidents; seek independent counsel.

• When to Talk to a Lawyer: The sooner, the better.

  • Contact Attorney911 if your child has experienced significant physical or psychological harm.
  • If you feel the university or organization is minimizing the incident, delaying, or attempting to cover up what happened.
  • If you want a thorough, independent investigation and to ensure your child’s rights are fully protected.

8.2 For Students / Pledges

If you’re a student or new member in Coke County, Texas, faced with questionable activities, know that you have rights and options.

• Is this hazing or just tradition? Ask yourself:

  • Am I being forced, pressured, or coerced into activities I don’t want to do?
  • Does this activity put my mental or physical health at risk, or is it humiliating or degrading?
  • Would older members of this group engage in this activity themselves?
  • Am I being told to keep secrets or lie about this activity to outsiders (parents, faculty, non-members)?
  • If you answered yes to any of these, it’s very likely hazing, regardless of how others label it.

• Why “consent” isn’t the end of the story:

  • The desire to belong and the fear of exclusion are powerful motivators. No one should have to endure abuse to “earn” friendship or membership.
  • Texas law explicitly states that your “consent” to hazing is NOT a defense for those who perpetuate it. You are protected.

• Exiting and reporting safely:

  • Your safety is paramount. You have the right to leave any situation that makes you uncomfortable or unsafe.
  • If you feel threatened, call 911 immediately. Protect yourself first.
  • Many universities and state laws offer amnesty for individuals who report hazing or seek help in good faith, especially in medical emergencies.
  • You can report anonymously through campus hotlines or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE).

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses

If you are a former member or witness to hazing, your decision to speak up can be the crucial turning point for victims and may prevent future tragedies.

• Your role is vital: The code of silence around hazing is only broken when insiders are brave enough to share what they know. Your testimony or evidence could be key to holding powerful institutions accountable.
• Navigate cautiously: While your information is valuable, seek legal counsel before giving statements. An attorney can advise you on your rights, potential implications, and how to best provide information while protecting yourself.
• Cooperation can prevent harm: Even if you feel regret or fear about past involvement, coming forward (with legal guidance) can lead to significant positive change and help a victim or family find justice.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

Families in Coke County must be aware of common missteps that can significantly undermine a hazing case. The stakes are too high to navigate this without expert legal guidance, especially given the rapid disappearance of evidence and the sophisticated defense tactics employed by institutions:

1. Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence:

   • Why it’s wrong: Deleting evidence (group chats, photos, videos) can appear as a cover-up, makes your claim harder to prove, and can even carry legal consequences.
   • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, no matter how embarrassing. Screenshot and back up to multiple locations. Our video, “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs), explains exactly how.

2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly:

   • Why it’s wrong: Direct confrontation will immediately put the organization on high alert. They will likely lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defense, eliminating invaluable evidence.
   • What to do instead: Document everything in secret, then call Attorney911 (1-888-ATTY-911) before any direct contact.

3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms:

   • Why it’s wrong: Universities may pressure you to sign forms that offer an “internal resolution” or small concessions. These documents often include clauses that waive your right to pursue further legal action, potentially sacrificing your ability to seek justice and full compensation.
   • What to do instead: Never sign any document from the university or the organization without having an independent attorney review it first.

4. Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer:

   • Why it’s wrong: While the urge to share your story is natural, anything posted publicly can be used by defense attorneys to scrutinize your child’s credibility, find inconsistencies, or argue against their claims.
   • What to do instead: Document privately for your legal team. Let your lawyer control if and when any information becomes public.

5. Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting” or Discussion:

   • Why it’s wrong: If an organization learns your child is considering legal action, they may attempt to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that could seriously harm a potential case.
   • What to do instead: Once you’re considering legal action, all communications with the organization or university’s legal counsel should go through your attorney.

6. Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”:

   • Why it’s wrong: Universities, especially public ones, may move slowly or prioritize their institution’s reputation over a student’s individual rights. Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations can run out.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence now and consult a lawyer immediately. The university’s internal process is separate from your legal right to pursue accountability in court.

7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer:

   • Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters, no matter how friendly, represent the insurance company’s interests, not yours. Recorded statements can be used against you, and initial offers are almost always lowball.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline to offer a statement and explain that your attorney will be in contact.

8.5 Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities in Texas, such as UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, often have sovereign immunity protections. However, exceptions can apply for cases of gross negligence, Title IX violations, or when individual employees are sued in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor, have fewer immunity protections and can be sued more directly for negligence. Every case depends on its unique facts, so it’s essential to contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. While hazing generally starts as a Class B misdemeanor under Texas law, it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Additionally, individuals who knowingly fail to report hazing can face misdemeanor charges, emphasizing the legal responsibility to intervene.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes, absolutely. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that true consent often cannot be given under the immense pressure, fear of exclusion, and power imbalances inherent in hazing rituals. What might appear as “willing participation” is often coerced, and the law protects victims from this duress.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  In Texas, there is generally a 2-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death for most personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits. However, certain legal principles, such as the “discovery rule” (where the clock starts when the harm or its cause was discovered, or reasonably should have been), or cases involving fraudulent concealment, might extend this period. Time is extremely critical; evidence disappears quickly, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. For these reasons, call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to avoid missing crucial deadlines. Learn more about this by watching our video, “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c).

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of hazing—whether on campus, at a private residence, an Airbnb, or a remote retreat—does not eliminate liability for the individuals, organizations, or even the university. Entities like universities and national fraternities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship of the group, their knowledge of hazing risks, and their failure to supervise or intervene. Many major hazing cases nationally (e.g., the Pi Delta Psi retreat case, the Sigma Pi unofficial house case) occurred off-campus and still resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments against the responsible parties.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  We understand the sensitive nature of hazing incidents and prioritize your family’s privacy. Most hazing cases ultimately resolve through confidential settlements before going to trial. While complete anonymity is rarely guaranteed in litigation, we can often request sealed court records and negotiate confidential settlement terms. Our focus is to achieve accountability and justice while protecting your child’s well-being and future.

ABOUT THE MANGINELLO LAW FIRM + CALL TO ACTION

When your child is harmed by hazing, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who intimately understand the complex dynamics of campus abuse, how powerful institutions fight back, and how to effectively secure justice for victims. Attorney911, The Manginello Law Firm, is uniquely equipped to handle these challenging cases, offering a blend of seasoned legal expertise, strategic insight, and compassionate advocacy.

9.1 Why Attorney911 for Hazing Cases

Our firm’s qualifications are built on decades of experience confronting formidable opponents and navigating intricate legal landscapes. Here’s why families in Coke County, and across Texas, trust us with their hazing cases:

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Lupe Peña: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), brings a critical advantage to every hazing case. As a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm, she knows precisely how fraternity and university insurance companies evaluate—and often undervalue—hazing claims. She understands their delay tactics, coverage exclusion arguments, and settlement strategies because she used to be on their side. This insider knowledge is invaluable when we force institutions and their insurers to pay what is fair.

• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), has a distinguished record of taking on some of the largest corporations and institutions. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, a multi-district case against a global giant. This federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We’ve proven we know how to fight powerful defendants and secure significant results.

• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Our firm has a proven track record in complex wrongful death (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/) and catastrophic injury cases, recovering millions for families across Texas. We understand how to meticulously calculate lifetime care needs for victims with brain injuries or permanent disabilities, working collaboratively with economists and medical experts. We don’t settle cheap; we build cases that force genuine accountability.

• Dual Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) underscores our understanding of how criminal hazing charges (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) interact with civil litigation. We can advise clients on both the criminal exposure and civil liability aspects of hazing, offering a comprehensive legal strategy.

• Unmatched Investigative Depth: Winning hazing cases demands more than just legal theory; it requires relentless investigation. We leverage a network of experts—including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, and psychologists—to uncover hidden evidence. This includes obtaining deleted group chats, social media evidence, subpoenaing national fraternity records that expose prior incidents, and compelling universities to release internal files through discovery or public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Coke County and surrounding areas. We recognize that hazing at Texas universities impacts families far beyond campus borders, and we are dedicated to providing expert legal representation wherever hazing occurs. We deeply understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments operate, including their internal mechanisms for covering up misconduct. We balance aggressive legal pursuit with empathetic advocacy, knowing this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and work to prevent such tragedies from happening to another family.

9.2 Call to Action

If you or your child has experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or any other institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Coke County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers, accountability, and justice.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm today for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to your story without judgment, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family.

In your free consultation, you can expect us to:

• Listen carefully to what happened, providing a safe space to share your experience.
• Review any evidence you may already have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
• Clearly explain your legal options: whether to pursue a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
• Discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
• Answer all your questions about costs. Remember, we operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. To learn more, watch our video: “How Do Contingency Fees Work?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).
• There is absolutely no pressure to hire us on the spot; we want you to take the time needed to make an informed decision.

Whether you’re in Coke County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone.

Call Attorney911 today.

Contact Attorney911:

• Emergency Hotline: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781 (Available 24/7 for legal emergencies)
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español:

• Contact Lupe Peña (lupe@atty911.com) for consultation in Spanish.
• Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

COMPLETE TEXAS UNIVERSITY DIRECTORY

Attorney911 tracks every higher education institution in Texas. For reference:

• Abilene Christian University | Abilene, Taylor County | Private Non-Profit
• Howard Payne University | Brownwood, Brown County | Private Non-Profit
• McMurry University | Abilene, Taylor County | Private Non-Profit
• Hardin-Simmons University | Abilene, Taylor County | Private Non-Profit
• Sul Ross State University | Alpine, Brewster County | Public University
• Amberton University | Garland, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• University of Texas at Arlington, The | Arlington, Tarrant County | Public University
• Arlington Baptist University | Arlington, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Trinity Valley Community College | Athens, Henderson County | Public University
• Stephen F Austin State University | Nacogdoches, Nacogdoches County | Public University
• Texas Health and Science University | Austin, Travis County | Private For-Profit
• Episcopal Theological Seminary of the Southwest | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Concordia University Texas | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Huston-Tillotson University | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Austin Graduate School of Theology | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Saint Edward’s University | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• AOMA Graduate School of Integrative Medicine | Austin, Travis County | Private For-Profit
• Austin Community College District | Austin, Travis County | Public University
• University of Texas at Austin, The | Austin, Travis County | Public University
• University of Texas System Office, The | Austin, Travis County | Public University
• Lamar University | Beaumont, Jefferson County | Public University
• Messenger College | Bedford, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• University of Mary Hardin-Baylor | Belton, Bell County | Private Non-Profit
• Brazosport College | Lake Jackson, Brazoria County | Public University
• West Texas A & M University | Canyon, Randall County | Public University
• Texas A & M University-College Station | College Station, Brazos County | Public University
• Texas A & M University-System Office | College Station, Brazos County | Public University
• Texas A & M University-Commerce | Commerce, Hunt County | Public University
• Grace School of Theology | Conroe, Montgomery County | Private Non-Profit
• Del Mar College | Corpus Christi, Nueces County | Public University
• Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi | Corpus Christi, Nueces County | Public University
• University of North Texas at Dallas | Dallas, Dallas County | Public University
• Dallas Baptist University | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Parker University | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Wade College | Dallas, Dallas County | Private For-Profit
• Criswell College | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Southern Methodist University | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Dallas Christian College | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Dallas Theological Seminary | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Dallas College | Dallas, Dallas County | Public University
• University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas, Dallas County | Public University
• University of North Texas System | Dallas, Dallas County | Public University
• Miami International University of Art & Design-Art Institute Dallas | Dallas, Dallas County | Private For-Profit
• Bakke Graduate University | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Arizona College of Nursing-Dallas | Dallas, Dallas County | Private For-Profit
• Southern Methodist University | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Grayson College | Denison, Grayson County | Public University
• Texas Woman’s University | Denton, Denton County | Public University
• University of North Texas | Denton, Denton County | Public University
• University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, The | Edinburg, Hidalgo County | Public University
• The University of Texas at El Paso | El Paso, El Paso County | Public University
• Southwest University at El Paso | El Paso, El Paso County | Private For-Profit
• Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center-El Paso | El Paso, El Paso County | Public University
• Western Technical College | El Paso, El Paso County | Private For-Profit
• Western Technical College | El Paso, El Paso County | Private For-Profit
• Strayer University-Texas | Farmers Branch, Dallas County | Private For-Profit
• University of North Texas Health Science Center | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Public University
• Texas Christian University | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas Wesleyan University | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Brite Divinity School | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Remington College-Fort Worth Campus | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, The | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Galveston College | Galveston, Galveston County | Public University
• University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, The | Galveston, Galveston County | Public University
• Southwestern University | Georgetown, Williamson County | Private Non-Profit
• RCCGNA Seminary | Greenville, Hunt County | Private Non-Profit
• Jarvis Christian University | Hawkins, Wood County | Private Non-Profit
• American College of Acupuncture and Oriental Med | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• University of St Thomas | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas Southern University | Houston, Harris County | Public University
• South Texas College of Law Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Remington College-North Houston Campus | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Houston Baptist University | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• University of Houston-Downtown | Houston, Harris County | Public University
• University of Houston-Clear Lake | Houston, Harris County | Public University
• University of Houston | Houston, Harris County | Public University
• University of Houston-System Administration | Houston, Harris County | Public University
• Rice University | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• The College of Health Care Professions-Northwest | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• Houston Graduate School of Theology | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Chamberlain University-Texas | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• The Art Institute of Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• American InterContinental University-Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, The | Houston, Harris County | Public University
• College of Biblical Studies-Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• University of Phoenix-Texas | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• Galen Health Institutes-Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• Baylor College of Medicine | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Sam Houston State University | Huntsville, Walker County | Public University
• University of Dallas | Irving, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• DeVry University-Texas | Irving, Dallas County | Private For-Profit
• Baptist Missionary Association Theological Seminary | Jacksonville, Cherokee County | Private Non-Profit
• Southwestern Adventist University | Keene, Johnson County | Private Non-Profit
• Schreiner University | Kerrville, Kerr County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas A&M University-Central Texas | Killeen, Bell County | Public University
• Texas A & M University-Kingsville | Kingsville, Kleberg County | Public University
• Laredo College | Laredo, Webb County | Public University
• Texas A & M International University | Laredo, Webb County | Public University
• LeTourneau University | Longview, Gregg County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas Tech University | Lubbock, Lubbock County | Public University
• Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center | Lubbock, Lubbock County | Public University
• Lubbock Christian University | Lubbock, Lubbock County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas Tech University System Administration | Lubbock, Lubbock County | Public University
• East Texas Baptist University | Marshall, Harrison County | Private Non-Profit
• Wiley College | Marshall, Harrison County | Private Non-Profit
• South Texas College | McAllen, Hidalgo County | Public University
• Collin County Community College District | McKinney, Collin County | Public University
• Midland College | Midland, Midland County | Public University
• Odessa College | Odessa, Ector County | Public University
• University of Texas Permian Basin, The | Odessa, Ector County | Public University
• San Jacinto Community College | Pasadena, Harris County | Public University
• Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc | Pasadena, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Wayland Baptist University | Plainview, Hale County | Private Non-Profit
• Prairie View A & M University | Prairie View, Waller County | Public University
• University of Texas at Dallas, The | Richardson, Dallas County | Public University
• Chicago School of Professional Psychology at Dallas | Richardson, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• West Coast University-Dallas | Richardson, Dallas County | Private For-Profit
• South University-Austin | Round Rock, Williamson County | Private For-Profit
• Angelo State University | San Angelo, Tom Green County | Public University
• University of the Incarnate Word | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Trinity University | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, The | San Antonio, Bexar County | Public University
• University of Texas at San Antonio, The | San Antonio, Bexar County | Public University
• Texas A&M University-San Antonio | San Antonio, Bexar County | Public University
• St. Mary’s University | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Our Lady of the Lake University | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Baptist University of the Americas | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Hallmark University | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Baptist Health System School of Health Professions | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private For-Profit
• Christ Mission College | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• San Antonio College | San Antonio, Bexar County | Public University
• Oblate School of Theology | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Galen College of Nursing-San Antonio | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private For-Profit
• Texas State University | San Marcos, Hays County | Public University
• Texas Lutheran University | Seguin, Guadalupe County | Private Non-Profit
• Austin College | Sherman, Grayson County | Private Non-Profit
• King’s University, The | Southlake, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• North American University | Stafford, Fort Bend County | Private Non-Profit
• Tarleton State University | Stephenville, Erath County | Public University
• Southwestern Christian College | Terrell, Kaufman County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas A&M University-Texarkana | Texarkana, Bowie County | Public University
• College of the Mainland | Texas City, Galveston County | Public University
• Lone Star College System | The Woodlands, Montgomery County | Public University
• Texas College | Tyler, Smith County | Private Non-Profit
• University of Texas at Tyler, The | Tyler, Smith County | Public University
• Tyler Junior College | Tyler, Smith County | Public University
• University of Houston-Victoria | Victoria, Victoria County | Public University
• Baylor University | Waco, McLennan County | Private Non-Profit
• Weatherford College | Weatherford, Parker County | Public University
• Midwestern State University | Wichita Falls, Wichita County | Public University

COMPLETE TEXAS GREEK ORGANIZATION DIRECTORY

Attorney911 tracks every IRS-registered fraternity and sorority in Texas:

• UPSILON ZETA BUILDING ASSOCIATION OF CHI OMEGA | EIN: 75-2290669 | AMARILLO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• LAMBDA ETA CHAPTER CHI ETA PHI SORORITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 75-2273565 | ARLINGTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• OMICRON GAMMA GAMMA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2819136 | ARLINGTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• KAPPA EPSILON CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 75-1727080 | ARLINGTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• IOTA ALPHA CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 51-0225632 | ARLINGTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• TEJAS FOUNDATION | EIN: 74-6062730 | AUSTIN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA LAMBDA ALPHA SORORITY INC | EIN: 90-0956019 | AUSTIN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY INC | EIN: 74-6084912 | AUSTIN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA ALPHA OMEGA CHRISTIAN SORORITY INC | EIN: 85-1262394 | AUSTIN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 46-3831593 | AUSTIN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 74-1130606 | AUSTIN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY | EIN: 74-0555581 | AUSTIN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• BUILDING CORPORATION OF DELTA CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA PI | EIN: 74-6047117 | AUSTIN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA OMEGA EPSILON | EIN: 56-2652714 | BEAUMONT, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SOUTH TEXAS COTILLON INC | EIN: 26-2378154 | BROWNSVILLE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• FRANK HEFLIN FOUNDATION | EIN: 20-3507402 | CANYON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• NATIONAL PAN-HELLENIC COUNCIL NORTH DALLAS SUBURBIA | EIN: 26-4080411 | CARROLLTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 81-2525354 | COLLEGE STA, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ETA ALPHA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA DELTA SORORITY | EIN: 74-2930349 | COLLEGE STA, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• GENTLEMEN OF AGGIE TRADITION | EIN: 88-0537463 | COLLEGE STA, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• TEXAS NU-PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY | EIN: 81-4123811 | COLLEGE STA, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• KAPPA SIGMA – MU CAMMA CHAPTER INC | EIN: 13-3048786 | COLLEGE STATION, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 90-0293166 | COLLEGE STATION, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA NU CORPORATION OF OKLAHOMA | EIN: 73-6098935 | COLLEYVILLE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY ZETA ETA | EIN: 75-6060974 | COMMERCE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY | EIN: 75-2609909 | COMMERCE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• LAMBDA NU GAMMA FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 93-2103520 | CONROE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• LAMBDA OMEGA EPSILON SORORITY INC | EIN: 86-1854073 | CONROE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 82-3971493 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA | EIN: 83-3053639 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 20-2203769 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA ALPHA CHI CHAPTER | EIN: 86-3999517 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 20-1237505 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 32-0217610 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA ALPHA PSI CHAPTER | EIN: 87-4252223 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 81-4575228 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 90-0657756 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 26-0805977 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 46-0766525 | CORINTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 83-1418972 | CORPUS CHRISTI, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• AGGIE ADPI FAMILY CLUB | EIN: 93-2357531 | CYPRESS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• DELTA ALPHA SIGMA MULTICULTURAL SORORITY | EIN: 36-4806998 | DALLAS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• CHI EPSILON SIGMA INC | EIN: 45-1677063 | DALLAS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• FRIENDSHIP-WEST MIZPAH FOUNDATION | EIN: 27-1863731 | DALLAS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• DELTA PHI CHAPTER OF THETA CHI FRATERNITY ALUMNI HOUSING | EIN: 90-0239693 | DALLAS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY | EIN: 52-1278573 | DALLAS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ZETA SIGMA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 75-2620706 | DALLAS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 26-3170920 | DENTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA EPSILON PI FRATERNITY | EIN: 26-2025321 | DENTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 87-2222906 | EL PASO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 38-3742830 | EL PASO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• DENTON-LEWISVILLE GUIDE RIGHT FOUNDATION | EIN: 86-1205340 | FLOWER MOUND, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• BETA UPSILON CHI | EIN: 74-2911848 | FORT WORTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• GAMMA PHI DELTA CHRISTIAN FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 74-2893931 | FORT WORTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• EPSILON MU CHAPTER OF THE SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 75-6203190 | FORT WORTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY | EIN: 75-6067776 | FORT WORTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• FORT WORTH ALUMNI CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 75-2755600 | FORT WORTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• FIRST COMMAND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | EIN: 75-1973894 | FORT WORTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI EPSILON FRATERNITY TEXAS GAMMA CHAPTER | EIN: 91-1981478 | FORT WORTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• PSI ZETA CHAPTER OF ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 52-1345182 | FORT WORTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• TEXAS KAPPA SIGMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC | EIN: 74-1380362 | FORT WORTH, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• BETA NU PI KAPPA PHI FRATERNITY HOUSING CORPORATION INC | EIN: 46-2267515 | FRISCO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• FRISCO TX ALUMNI CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI INCORPORATED | EIN: 92-0575785 | FRISCO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ETA KAPPA CHAPTER OF SIGMA SIGMA SIGMA HOUSE CORPORATION | EIN: 75-2935462 | FRISCO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• KAPPA THETA PI – MU CHAPTER CORPORATION | EIN: 33-1294470 | FRISCO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ARLINGTON-GRAND PRAIRIE ALUMNI CHAP OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRAT INC | EIN: 23-2452759 | GRAND PRAIRIE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – SIGMA GAMMA CHAPTER | EIN: 39-2352450 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• HELLENIC PROFESSIONAL SOCIETY OF TEXAS | EIN: 74-2020182 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• DELTA PHI UPSILON FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 80-0209640 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• BETA LAMBDA CHAPTER – ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 99-0483761 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SOUTHWESTERN REGION OF IOTA PHI LAMBDA SORORITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 51-0194762 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• LELAND COLLEGE PREP PTO | EIN: 47-2160315 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI EPSILON NEW YORK CHI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC | EIN: 26-2710856 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY EPSILON XI CHAPTER | EIN: 74-6084905 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 47-5370943 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS INC | EIN: 76-0221936 | HOUSTON, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 92-1490845 | HUNTSVILLE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ONE CHAPTER ONE SHIELD | EIN: 92-1743777 | IOWA COLONY, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• OMICRON GAMMA SIGMA ALUMNI CHAPTER OF PHI BETA SIGMA FRATERNITY | EIN: 92-1672050 | IRVING, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 83-1418666 | KINGSVILLE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 61-1562040 | LEWISVILLE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA OMEGA EPSILON-BETA ALPHA CHAPTER | EIN: 47-3967233 | LUBBOCK, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• EPSILON NU HOUSING CORPORATION | EIN: 23-7359384 | LUBBOCK, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• FARM HOUSE FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 75-1565336 | LUBBOCK, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• GAMMA PHI HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA ALPHA THETA FRATERNITY | EIN: 75-1283953 | LUBBOCK, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 82-0644459 | LUBBOCK, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• TKE OP HOUSING | EIN: 47-5033161 | LUBBOCK, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• KAPPA SIGMA – MU GAMMA CHAPTER INC | EIN: 27-3662583 | LUFKIN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 45-3325054 | MANSFIELD, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA DELTA | EIN: 81-2724215 | MCALLEN, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• GULF COAST ALUMNI ET OF OX INC | EIN: 45-2717861 | MEXIA, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• PI KAPPA PHI DELTA OMEGA CHAPTER BUILDING CORPORATION | EIN: 37-1768785 | MISSOURI CITY, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA TAU OMEGA HOUSING CORPORATION OF ETA IOTA CHAPTER | EIN: 30-0517788 | NACOGDOCHES, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY | EIN: 75-6041410 | NACOGDOCHES, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• EPSILON TAU CHAPTER OF THETA CHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 75-6053083 | NACOGDOCHES, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• PHI KAPPA PSI TEXAS EPSILON CHAPTER | EIN: 45-2729519 | NACOGDOCHES, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• PI KAPPA ALPHA FRATERNITY | EIN: 74-6064445 | NEDERLAND, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• TEXAS EPSILON UPSILON CHAPTER | EIN: 76-0366414 | NEEDVILLE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 52-1345951 | NOLANVILLE, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ZETA OMICRON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC | EIN: 90-0949447 | PONDER, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY | EIN: 23-7279532 | PRAIRIE VIEW, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ZETA BETA CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 23-7098953 | PRAIRIE VIEW, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA PHI EPSILON TEXAS ETA | EIN: 82-4398421 | RICHMOND, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• EPSILON PI PHI EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HONOR SOCIETY | EIN: 47-4643399 | ROUND ROCK, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• 9THD BROTHERS KEEPER | EIN: 93-4008573 | ROWLETT, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ZETA XI PEARLS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC | EIN: 88-3484848 | ROWLETT, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA EPSILON DELTA | EIN: 52-1850764 | SAN ANTONIO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 81-5229133 | SAN ANTONIO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY | EIN: 90-0927378 | SAN ANTONIO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• PHI UPSILON ZETA OF LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY | EIN: 74-1016658 | SAN ANTONIO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• UTSA SIGMA CHI | EIN: 84-2643090 | SAN ANTONIO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 47-5381060 | SAN MARCOS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON – TEXAS SIGMA INCORPORATED | EIN: 88-2755427 | SAN MARCOS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• TEXAS BETA PSI CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA KAPPA SORORITY INC | EIN: 74-6088185 | SHAVANO PARK, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• THE ETHEL HEDGEMON LYLE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS | EIN: 76-0592907 | SPRING, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• RHO DELTA CHI NATIONAL BOARD | EIN: 93-4247450 | SUGAR LAND, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• GAMMA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 16-1675890 | THE WOODLANDS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 35-2335400 | TYLER, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 90-0293167 | VICTORIA, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY | EIN: 36-4091267 | WACO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• TEXAS RHO CHAPTER OF THE SIGMA PHI EPSILON FRATERNITY | EIN: 74-1942292 | WACO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED NU IOTA CHAPTER BAYLOR UNIVERSITY | EIN: 52-1346485 | WACO, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• BETA ALUMNAE CHAPTER OF ALPHA SIGMA KAPPA WOMEN IN TECHNICAL STUDIES | EIN: 73-1568644 | WEATHERFORD, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• REDWINE HONORS PROGRAM STUDENT COUNCIL | EIN: 84-5090974 | WICHITA FALLS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)
• GAMMA IOTA CHAPTER OF GAMMA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 75-1225585 | WICHITA FALLS, TX | Greek Organization (IRS B83)