The Hidden Epidemic: A Texas Guide to Hazing, Accountability, and Justice for Alabama Families

The autumn air in Alabama carries the scent of pine and homecoming, a time when many families proudly send their children off to college. Perhaps they head to Auburn, the University of Alabama, or perhaps they venture beyond state lines to the vibrant campuses of Texas. Imagine a bright Texas evening, a new university student, full of hope, is at an off-campus fraternity event—celebrating “bid acceptance” or “pledge night.” The music is loud, the camaraderie intoxicating, but beneath the surface, a sinister pressure builds. They’re told to drink, quickly and excessively, as part of a “bonding ritual.” The lines blur between fun and forced, and soon, their body rebels. They fall, vomit, or collapse, but instead of calling for immediate help, older members deliberate, delay, and prioritize secrecy over a life. The new student is left, a life hanging precariously, caught between loyalty to a group and their own rapidly fading safety.

This isn’t a fictional scenario. It’s the terrifying reality that has unfolded at campuses across the nation, and right here in Texas, where many Alabama families have children studying at state universities like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor.

This guide is dedicated to you, the families in Alabama and across Texas, who need to understand the true nature of hazing in 2025. We will explore:

• What hazing really looks like today, stripping away old stereotypes to reveal its modern, insidious forms.
• The Texas legal framework that governs hazing, outlining both criminal penalties and civil avenues for accountability.
• National cases that have shaped legal precedents and public awareness, showing how these lessons apply directly to Texas universities.
• Specific insights into hazing incidents and cultures at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, providing a localized perspective crucial for Texas families.
• The long histories of national fraternities and sororities and how their patterns of misconduct impact local chapters and legal strategies.
• How The Manginello Law Firm / Attorney911 brings unmatched expertise to the fight against hazing, from preserving crucial evidence to navigating complex litigation.

While this article provides comprehensive information, it is important to remember that it offers general insights, not specific legal advice for your unique situation. If hazing has touched your family, legal paths depend on the specific facts. The Manginello Law Firm is here to provide confidential, experienced guidance, serving families throughout Texas, including those in Alabama, who send their children to our state’s universities.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies.
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911).
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”.
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority.
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
    • Post details on public social media.
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

HAZING IN 2025: WHAT IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE

For families in Alabama and across Texas, understanding modern hazing means shedding old notions of harmless pranks. Today’s hazing is more insidious, often cloaked in tradition and evolving with technology, but always fundamentally about power, control, and humiliation. Its consequences, tragically, can include severe injury, psychological trauma, and even death.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

At its core, hazing refers to any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of that student, and occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition clarifies several critical points for Alabama families:

• Location doesn’t matter: Hazing can happen anywhere—in a dorm, at an off-campus house, in a public park, or even digitally.
• Intent doesn’t have to be malicious: Recklessness (knowing the risk and proceeding anyway) is enough to meet the legal standard.
• “Consent” is irrelevant: As we will discuss, legal definitions and courts recognize that true consent is impossible when there’s an inherent power imbalance and pressure to conform. The fear of exclusion or retribution makes genuine choice an illusion for many pledges.

Main Categories of Hazing

Modern hazing manifests in various interconnected categories, often escalating over time:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is the most common contributing factor in hazing deaths. It involves forced or coerced drinking of excessive amounts of alcohol, often mixed with other substances. This includes:

  • Chugging challenges, “lineups,” or games requiring rapid, dangerous consumption.
  • “Big/Little” events where new members are expected or implicitly required to finish entire bottles of hard liquor.
  • Forced consumption of unknown or unpleasant substances, often to the point of vomiting.

• Physical Hazing: These acts cause direct bodily harm or extreme physical discomfort, often disguised as “workouts” or “team-building.”

  • Paddling, beatings, or violent physical encounters.
  • Extreme calisthenics or “smokings” for hours until exhaustion or collapse.
  • Sleep and food/water deprivation, leaving pledges utterly exhausted and vulnerable.
  • Exposure to extreme weather or dangerous environments.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: Designed to degrade, shame, and assert dominance.

  • Forced nudity or partial nudity.
  • Simulated sexual acts, often graphic and non-consensual (e.g., “roasted pig” formations, “elephant walks”).
  • Wearing degrading costumes or performing embarrassing acts in public.
  • Rituals with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones, including slurs or role-playing stereotypes designed to demean individuals based on their identity.

• Psychological Hazing: These tactics inflict emotional and mental distress, often leaving lasting trauma.

  • Verbal abuse, threats, or constant intimidation.
  • Isolation tactics, cutting new members off from outside support systems.
  • Manipulation, gaslighting, or forced confessions designed to break down self-esteem.
  • Public shaming in meetings, in person, or increasingly, on social media platforms.

• Digital/Online Hazing: A newer but rapidly evolving frontier, leveraging technology to extend hazing’s reach and impact.

  • Constant group chat demands, text messages or calls requiring immediate responses at all hours, leading to sleep deprivation.
  • Forced participation in humiliating dares or “challenges” on Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok.
  • Pressure to create or share compromising images or videos of themselves or others.
  • Geo-location tracking (e.g., “Find My Friends,” Life360) to monitor pledges’ movements, blurring lines between social connection and surveillance.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

For Alabama families whose children attend universities across Texas, it’s crucial to understand that hazing is not confined to what you might see in Hollywood movies. It is a pervasive issue found in a wide array of campus organizations, not just the stereotypical “frat house”:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This remains the most visible category, encompassing Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations. Chapters, both officially recognized and operating “underground,” can engage in severe hazing.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: Highly structured environments, often with traditions framed as “discipline” or “training,” can mask hazing involving physical abuse, sleep deprivation, and psychological intimidation.
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Student Organizations: From university spirit groups like the Texas Cowboys at UT Austin to club sports, academic, or cultural associations, the desire for belonging and perpetuating “tradition” can lead to dangerous hazing rituals.
• Athletic Teams: Hazing permeates sports at all levels, from high school to NCAA Division I. This can include forced drinking, sexualized rituals, physical beatings, and other forms of abuse (as seen in the Northwestern University football scandal).
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly benign organizations like marching bands have been exposed for severe hazing practices, often involving physical abuse and extreme degradation, as tragically demonstrated at Florida A&M.

These practices persist largely due to underlying factors like the powerful desire for social status, misguided interpretations of “tradition,” and a deeply ingrained culture of secrecy. New members are often told that only those who endure the hazing are truly “committed,” making it difficult to resist the pressure.

LAW & LIABILITY FRAMEWORK (TEXAS + FEDERAL)

For families in Alabama grappling with hazing on a Texas campus, navigating the legal landscape can be daunting. Thankfully, Texas law provides victims with clear avenues for justice, while federal regulations add layers of institutional accountability.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has clear and robust anti-hazing provisions enshrined in the Texas Education Code – Chapter 37, Subchapter F. This statute defines hazing broadly, covering nearly any act that endangers a student’s well-being for the purpose of group affiliation.

Texas Education Code § 37.151. Definition:
Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition is powerful because:

• “Reckless act” is sufficient. Even if hazers didn’t maliciously intend harm, if they should have known their actions created a risk, they can be liable.
• “Endangers the mental or physical health or safety” covers a wide range of harms beyond just physical injury, including psychological trauma and humiliation.
• “On or off campus” makes it clear that hiding hazing in an off-campus house or remote location doesn’t exempt participants or organizations from legal consequences. What happened at a fraternity house in College Station or an Airbnb in Austin is just as actionable as an incident on campus.

Criminal Penalties (§ 37.152):
Hazing is a crime in Texas. The severity of criminal charges depends on the harm inflicted:

• Class B Misdemeanor: Standard hazing offense (e.g., if it doesn’t cause serious injury). This can carry up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
• Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical attention.
• State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This is a significant charge, carrying potential imprisonment.

Furthermore, individuals who fail to report hazing (if they are members or officers and knew about it) can face misdemeanor charges. Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

Organizational Liability (§ 37.153):
Beyond individuals, organizations themselves can be held criminally responsible:

• Organizations (fraternities, sororities, clubs) can be prosecuted if they authorized or encouraged the hazing, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about it and failed to report it.
• Penalties for organizations can include fines up to $10,000 per violation, and universities can revoke recognition or ban the group from campus.

Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting (§ 37.154):
Crucially, Texas law provides immunity for individuals who report hazing in good faith. This is designed to encourage students to come forward without fear of personal criminal or civil liability for the act of reporting. Many universities also have medical amnesty policies that protect students who call for help in an emergency, even if underage drinking was involved.

Consent Not a Defense (§ 37.155):
One of the most important provisions explicitly states: “It is not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the hazing activity.” This directly addresses the common defense that “they agreed to it,” recognizing the coercive nature of hazing.

Reporting by Educational Institutions (§ 37.156):
Texas universities are required to provide hazing prevention education, publish their policies, and publicly report hazing violations and disciplinary actions annually. This public record can be invaluable for families investigating incidents or pursuing legal action.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Understanding Your Options

When hazing occurs, there are generally two parallel legal tracks: criminal and civil.

• Criminal Cases:

  • Initiated and pursued by the state (prosecutors).
  • Goal: To punish the individuals or organizations that broke the law.
  • Outcomes: Fines, imprisonment, probation for individuals; fines and loss of recognition for organizations.
  • Common hazing-related criminal charges: Hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, and in tragic cases, manslaughter.

• Civil Cases:

  • Initiated and pursued by the victim or their family.
  • Goal: To obtain financial compensation (“damages”) for the harm suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable.
  • Outcomes: Monetary settlements or jury verdicts.
  • Common hazing-related civil claims: Negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, premises liability, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and assault/battery.

It’s vital for Alabama families to understand that a criminal prosecution is not required to pursue a civil case. The standards of proof and legal arguments differ, and civil litigation can often proceed even if criminal charges are not filed or do not result in a conviction.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond Texas state law, federal regulations add layers of accountability for universities:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This new federal law (which will be phased in by 2026) imposes stricter requirements on colleges and universities that receive federal funding. It mandates greater transparency in reporting hazing incidents, enhances hazing prevention training, and requires institutions to publish comprehensive hazing data. This will provide more clarity and public information for families in Alabama and across the nation.
• Title IX: If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based discrimination, or creates a sexually hostile environment, Title IX (which prohibits sex-based discrimination in federally funded education programs) can be triggered. Universities have an obligation to investigate and address such conduct seriously, and failure to do so can lead to legal action.
• Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents involving assault, sexual assault, or alcohol/drug violations often fall under Clery reporting requirements, providing another data point for families.

This multi-layered legal framework ensures that hazing is treated seriously, both as a criminal act and as a basis for civil action, with increasing pressure on universities to take proactive measures.

NATIONAL HAZING CASE PATTERNS (ANCHOR STORIES)

The devastating stories of hazing victims nationwide serve as more than just cautionary tales; they are powerful legal precedents that demonstrate patterns of organizational negligence and the potential for multi-million-dollar accountability. For Alabama families with children at Texas universities, these national anchor cases illustrate the legal landscape, highlight recurring dangers, and underscore why The Manginello Law Firm fights for every victim.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death: A Recurring Tragedy

Forced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing fatalities, a chilling script that repeats across campuses, regardless of state lines.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (February 2017):
  This case became a national flashpoint, exposing the barbaric depths of alcohol hazing and the horrifying consequences of delayed medical care. Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, was forced to consume a dangerous amount of alcohol during a “bid acceptance” event. Security cameras captured his subsequent falls and injuries. Despite his obvious and severe distress, fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for nearly 12 hours, fearing “getting the chapter shut down.” Piazza died from traumatic brain injuries. The aftermath saw dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the passage of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, making felony hazing easier to prosecute. This case hammered home the legal consequences of delayed medical care and a culture of silence.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (November 2017):
  Just months after Piazza’s death, Andrew Coffey, an FSU pledge, also died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to consume them quickly. The incident spurred criminal hazing charges against multiple members and led FSU to temporarily suspend all Greek life, initiating a comprehensive policy overhaul. Coffey’s death highlighted the dangers of deeply ingrained “tradition” drinking nights that defy anti-hazing policies.

• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (September 2017):
  Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, died after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where wrong answers to fraternity questions resulted in forced consumption of excessive alcohol. His blood-alcohol content was a lethal 0.495%. The profound tragedy led to the passage of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, a felony hazing law with serious teeth. Gruver’s family later received a $6.1 million verdict, underscoring the severe financial accountability for such negligence.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (March 2021):
  In Ohio, Stone Foltz’s death echoed the same tragic narrative. As part of a “Big/Little” pledge night, he was allegedly forced to consume an entire handle of alcohol and later died from alcohol poisoning. This resulted in multiple criminal convictions for fraternity members and a $10 million settlement received by his family in 2023, with $7 million coming from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University. His death prompted “Collin’s Law: The Anti-Hazing Act” in Ohio, making hazing a felony when it involves drugs or alcohol causing physical harm. Foltz’s case is a stark reminder that both fraternities and universities can be held financially liable.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing: Beyond Alcohol

While alcohol is a prominent factor, other forms of physical and psychological hazing can be equally devastating.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (December 2013):
  Deng’s death exposed the horrific dangers of ritualized physical hazing. At an off-campus retreat in the Pocono Mountains, Deng, a pledge, was blindfolded, forced to wear a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled during a “glass ceiling” ritual. He suffered a traumatic brain injury. Fraternity members delayed seeking help for over an hour, contributing to his death. This case led to multiple criminal convictions, and in a landmark decision, the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, subsequently banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. This demonstrated that off-campus locations and “retreats” offer no legal shield.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse: A Broader Problem

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it plagues many student organizations, including high-profile athletic programs that often operate with less public scrutiny.

• Northwestern University Football Scandal (2023–2025):
  In a series of shocking revelations, former Northwestern football players alleged a systemic culture of sexualized and racist hazing within the program stretching back years. Activities allegedly included forced sexual acts, racial discrimination, and physical abuse. The scandal led to the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who later filed his own wrongful-termination suit, and multiple lawsuits against the university and coaching staff. This national incident served as a powerful reminder that hazing can occur in any prominent campus organization, challenging the notion that it’s solely a “fraternity problem.”

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies illuminate critical patterns relevant to Alabama families whose children attend Texas universities:

• Predictable Dangers: The common threads of forced drinking, sleep deprivation, physical and psychological abuse, delayed medical care, and systematic cover-ups are undeniable. When these patterns recur, it demonstrates foreseeability, directly strengthening negligence arguments against organizations and institutions that failed to act on repeated warnings.
• Accountability is Possible: These cases prove that victims and their families can achieve significant legal accountability, leading to felony charges, multi-million-dollar settlements and verdicts, and crucial legislative reforms.
• No Stone Unturned: Litigation forces transparency, compelling universities and national organizations to disclose internal documents, emails, and prior incident reports that often expose a deliberate indifference to known dangers.

For Alabama families navigating the complexities of Texas hazing, these cases provide a foundation of precedent. They show that when tragedy strikes, the legal system—with experienced counsel—can demand justice and drive change.

TEXAS FOCUS: UH, TEXAS A&M, UT, SMU, BAYLOR

Texas is home to some of the nation’s largest and most prestigious universities, attracting students from across the country, including many from Alabama. While each campus boasts a unique culture, they share a common challenge: the persistent threat of hazing. For Alabama families, understanding the specific contexts of these institutions is crucial.

University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston stands as Texas’s third-largest university, a vast urban campus that blends a significant commuter population with a growing residential and vibrant Greek life scene. Its proximity to downtown Houston and its diverse student body make it a dynamic institution.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Alabama Connection)

UH serves over 47,000 students and features an active Greek life community recognized by Interfraternity Council (IFC) and Panhellenic organizations, among others. Its athletic programs are nationally recognized, and numerous student organizations thrive. For Alabama families, particularly those in the southern counties or those with ties to major urban centers, UH can be an attractive choice far from home, offering a different college experience.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, prohibiting any activity that meets the Texas Education Code definition of hazing, whether on-campus or off-campus. This includes forced consumption of alcohol or drugs, physical mistreatment, sleep deprivation, and psychological distress as part of initiation or affiliation. UH provides several reporting channels, including the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). An anonymous reporting option is usually available via their website.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UH has not been immune to hazing incidents.

• In 2016, a Pi Kappa Alpha pledge suffered a lacerated spleen after being allegedly slammed onto a table during a hazing event where pledges were deprived of food, water, and sleep. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and university suspension, highlighting the severe physical risks involved.
• Later disciplinary actions have involved fraternities facing sanctions for “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including alcohol misuse and policy violations. These incidents, while not always resulting in public lawsuits, demonstrate an ongoing pattern that the university and national organizations are aware of.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case at the University of Houston would typically involve:

• Jurisdiction: Law enforcement could include UHPD and/or the Houston Police Department, depending on whether the incident occurred on university property or off-campus in Harris County. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in the state or federal courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County.
• Potential Defendants: Claims could target individual students, the local fraternity chapter, the national fraternity organization, potentially the University of Houston itself (subject to Texas sovereign immunity rules for public universities), and property owners (if the incident occurred at a private residence).
• For Alabama families whose children attend UH, this means navigating resources in a major metropolitan area. An experienced local Houston attorney would be essential to navigate the city’s complex legal landscape.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

• Report Immediately: If hazing occurs, report it to the UH Dean of Students office or UHPD. Use anonymous channels if fear of retaliation is a concern.
• Document Everything: Screenshot all digital communications, photograph injuries, save any relevant physical evidence. Document every instance with dates, times, and specific details.
• Seek Legal Counsel: Contact a hazing lawyer with experience in Houston to ensure evidence is preserved, your child’s rights are protected, and the legal process is effectively managed. This is especially vital given the complexities of suing a public institution.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, located in College Station, is deeply defined by its revered traditions, particularly its Corps of Cadets, and a powerful sense of community that draws students from across Texas and the South, including many from Alabama.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Alabama Connection)

Texas A&M boasts one of the nation’s largest student bodies, with a unique culture heavily influenced by its military-style Corps of Cadets, historically a source of immense pride and, at times, controversy. Greek life is also prevalent, offering another avenue for student involvement. Families from Alabama, especially those valuing tradition and a strong, community-oriented campus, often see A&M as a top choice. It’s critical that these families understand that even in such esteemed environments, hazing can take root, disguised as “tradition” or “toughness.”

5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M strictly prohibits hazing, adhering to Texas Education Code statutes for all recognized student organizations and within the Corps of Cadets. Their policies clearly define hazing and outline consequences up to expulsion for students and permanent loss of recognition for organizations. Reporting can be made through the Dean of Student Life, the Office of Institutional Effectivness & Transformation, the Texas A&M Police Department, or a dedicated online reporting portal.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced its share of hazing incidents, often highlighting the fine line between rigorous tradition and abusive practices.

• The Corps of Cadets has wrestled with hazing allegations, notably a 2023 lawsuit where a cadet alleged egregious hazing, including simulated sexual acts and being bound in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The university, while acknowledging the incident, primarily addressed it through internal disciplinary measures rather than broader public releases.
• In 2021, the Sigma Alpha Epsilon chapter at Texas A&M faced a lawsuit after two pledges claimed they were subjected to severe hazing that involved having substances like industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit poured on them, resulting in serious chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The fraternity was suspended, and the pledges sought $1 million in damages.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

Civil cases at Texas A&M can be complex due to the size and unique culture of the institution. Suits would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over College Station/Brazos County.

• Corps Context: Cases involving the Corps often require a deep understanding of military-style training versus unlawful hazing. Legal strategy often focuses on whether the conduct was beyond legitimate training parameters and whether leadership was aware or deliberately indifferent.
• Public Entity: As a state university, Texas A&M benefits from some protections under sovereign immunity. However, as noted, exceptions exist, particularly when gross negligence or federal due process/civil rights violations are alleged.
• For Alabama families, understanding Brazos County legal nuances and the specific historical precedent required for a case against A&M is critical.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

• Understand the Nuances: Recognize that “tradition” or “discipline” does not excuse hazing. A&M’s rich history should not be conflated with harmful rituals.
• Report to Appropriate Channels: Use the university’s official reporting forms, which are designed to capture specific details, or immediately contact the Texas A&M Police Department if criminal hazing is suspected.
• Seek Legal Advice Pronto: Because of the unique culture and institutional defenses, early legal intervention from an experienced hazing attorney is essential to distinguish hazing from legitimate tradition and build a strong case.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The flagship institution of the University of Texas System, UT Austin is celebrated for its academic prowess, vibrant campus life, and passionate Longhorn spirit. It attracts students from every corner of Texas, including many from Alabama who seek a top-tier public university experience.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Alabama Connection)

UT Austin is a massive public university in the heart of the state capital, with a dynamic Greek system, an array of spirit organizations, and competitive athletic programs. The strong bonds fostered in these groups can, unfortunately, create environments where hazing is rationalized as a rite of passage. For Alabama families looking for a large, prestigious university with strong alumni networks, UT Austin is often a prime consideration.

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UT Austin adheres strictly to the Texas Education Code regarding hazing prohibitions. Their policies extend to all student organizations, athletic teams, and university-sponsored groups, regardless of whether the activities occur on or off campus. UT takes pride in its relatively transparent reporting. Their “Hazing Violations” webpage publicly lists organizations and individuals found responsible for hazing, the nature of their violations, and the sanctions imposed. This public log provides invaluable, proactive data for affected families. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct, and the UT Police Department (UTPD).

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin has a well-documented history of hazing incidents across a variety of student groups:

• The Texas Cowboys, a highly visible spirit organization, has faced multiple hazing allegations. In 1995, a pledge drowned during a hazing ritual, and in 2018, the death of a “New Man” after a truck accident during initiation led to expulsions and a ban. In 2019, the organization was suspended until at least 2025 for repeat hazing offenses.
• In 2023, the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) fraternity faced sanctions for directing new members to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, a classic hazing pattern. The university imposed probation and mandated new hazing-prevention education.
• UT’s publicly available records show an ongoing pattern of violations, from forced alcohol consumption to sleep deprivation and physical abuse, indicating that despite sanctions, the problem persists across various student organizations.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing litigation connected to UT Austin would be handled through courts with jurisdiction in Austin/Travis County.

• Evidence from Transparency: The university’s public Hazing Violations page is a significant asset to plaintiffs, demonstrating prior institutional knowledge and patterns of misconduct.
• Jurisdiction: Incidents can involve UTPD or the Austin Police Department. Civil lawsuits may name individual students, local chapters, national organizations, and the UT System (again, with sovereign immunity considerations for public entities).
• For Alabama families, collecting initial evidence (screenshots, photos, witness contacts) is no different here, but an attorney familiar with UT’s extensive disciplinary history can leverage that public data effectively.

5.3.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

• Review Public Records: Familiarize yourself with UT’s official Hazing Violations page (hazing.utexas.edu) to understand the history of organizations your child might join.
• Utilize Anonymity: If you fear retaliation, use UT’s anonymous reporting options, but know that full investigations may be hampered without identifying information.
• Act Swiftly on Legal Advice: Given UT’s proactive stance on publishing violations, an attorney can help connect dots between your child’s experience and documented patterns, strengthening your case.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a private institution nestled in Dallas, exudes a reputation for academic excellence and a vibrant, often prominent, Greek life. It attracts students from affluent backgrounds who often prioritize tradition and social connections.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Alabama Connection)

SMU is known for its beautiful campus, rigorous academics, and a strong Greek presence that plays a central role in social life. Many families from Alabama, particularly those seeking a selective private university with a robust social scene, choose SMU. The strong emphasis on tradition within its Greek organizations can sometimes blur the lines between cherished rituals and dangerous hazing practices.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

As a private university, SMU unequivocally prohibits hazing in accordance with Texas law and its own institutional policies. Student reporting channels include the Office of the Dean of Students, Student Conduct & Community Standards, Title IX Coordinator (for sex-based incidents), and the SMU Police Department. SMU also promotes anonymous reporting via platforms like “Real Response,” aiming to provide a safe space for students to come forward.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

SMU has also faced significant hazing incidents that highlight the challenges of enforcement within its prestigious Greek system:

• In 2017, the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity chapter was suspended for several years after new members reportedly experienced paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and severe sleep deprivation. This incident spurred a university-wide reevaluation of Greek life culture and a commitment to stricter enforcement against hazing.
• Other fraternities and sororities have periodically faced disciplinary action, ranging from social probation to suspension, for violations of SMU’s anti-hazing policies, often involving alcohol and degrading activities. While SMU doesn’t maintain as public a database as UT Austin, these incidents are typically documented in student conduct records.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

Litigation stemming from hazing at SMU would typically be heard in courts with jurisdiction over Dallas/Dallas County.

• Private University Advantages for Plaintiffs: As a private institution, SMU generally does not have the same sovereign immunity protections that public universities like UH or UT Austin do. This can simplify certain legal arguments related to institutional liability.
• Document Discovery: While public records may be less abundant for a private university, civil litigation allows for extensive discovery, compelling SMU to produce internal investigation records, past disciplinary actions, and communications that shed light on systemic issues.
• For Alabama families, the absence of sovereign immunity often presents a more direct path to holding the university itself accountable, making experienced legal counsel crucial.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

• Utilize Internal Resources: Encourage students to use SMU’s reporting mechanisms, including confidential options, as a first step to alert the university.
• Understand Private School Dynamics: Be aware that private schools may manage incidents with less public transparency than state institutions, making diligent personal documentation even more critical.
• Consult with Counsel: Given SMU’s private status, a lawyer experienced in hazing cases can efficiently navigate the discovery process to uncover relevant internal documents and past incidents.

Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, prides itself on its Christian values, rigorous academics, and a strong sense of community. While Greek life exists, it operates within a unique framework influenced by the university’s faith-based mission.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Alabama Connection)

Baylor is one of the oldest universities in Texas, offering a distinctive faith-informed environment that appeals to many families seeking a values-driven education. It draws students from across the South, including Alabama, who are attracted to its strong academic programs and close-knit community. The university’s emphasis on character development and ethical conduct sets a high standard, but even within this framework, the pressures that lead to hazing can emerge.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor University’s anti-hazing policy mirrors the Texas Education Code definition, strictly prohibiting any activities that endanger student welfare or dignify membership through abusive rituals. Baylor’s policies are often integrated into its broader student conduct code, emphasizing a commitment to a safe and respectful campus environment aligned with Christian principles. Reporting can be made through the Dean of Students office, the Baylor University Police Department, or specific reporting forms for student conduct.

5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor has faced scrutiny over student safety, particularly concerning sexual assault and judicial processes, which intersect with how hazing incidents are handled:

• In 2020, the Baylor baseball team faced a significant hazing investigation, resulting in the suspension of 14 players. This incident highlighted that hazing extends beyond Greek life even in faith-based institutions and demonstrated Baylor’s willingness to take action within its athletic programs. The details of the hazing were not publicly released to protect student privacy, though the university confirmed serious violations of its anti-hazing policy.
• Historically, Baylor has also dealt with various student organization violations related to alcohol and conduct, which sometimes involved elements fitting the definition of hazing, even if not explicitly labeled as such in initial reports.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases involving Baylor University would proceed in courts with jurisdiction in Waco/McLennan County.

• Faith-Based Context: Baylor’s private, religious affiliation can impact internal investigations and responses. Legal strategy must account for both secular law and the university’s stated mission and values.
• No Sovereign Immunity: Like SMU, as a private university, Baylor generally does not benefit from sovereign immunity, potentially allowing for more direct legal action against the institution itself in cases of negligence or deliberate indifference.
• For Alabama families, understanding how Baylor’s unique institutional identity shapes its approach to hazing investigations and legal responses is a crucial element an experienced attorney can help unravel.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

• Familiarize with Student Life: Understand Baylor’s specific conduct codes and reporting mechanisms, as they may differ in emphasis from secular institutions.
• Immediate Documentation: Due to potentially less public information, diligent personal documentation of any hazing incidents (photos, texts, witness accounts) is paramount.
• Secure Expert Legal Counsel: A lawyer with experience in hazing cases can help navigate Baylor’s internal processes and assess the potential for civil claims, leveraging discovery to uncover necessary information.

FRATERNITIES & SORORITIES: CAMPUS-SPECIFIC + NATIONAL HISTORIES

For Alabama families, understanding the deep-seated histories of national Greek organizations is as critical as knowing what happens on Texas campuses. These national bodies, and their chapters within UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, operate under decades of tradition, policies, and unsettling patterns that directly impact accountability for hazing.

Why National Histories Matter

When a student in Texas is hazed by a local chapter, whether on a sprawling campus like UT Austin or within the intimate community of Baylor, that chapter is typically a branch of a larger national (or international) organization. These national HQs often:

• Possess extensive policy manuals and sophisticated anti-hazing programs. They have these not simply because it’s good practice, but because they have faced numerous lawsuits, criminal charges, and catastrophic incidents, including deaths and severe injuries, across their chapters nationwide.
• Are well aware of recurring hazing “scripts” – a particular drinking game that goes wrong, a brutal physical challenge, a humiliating ritual – that seem to repeat from one university to another, often decades apart.

When a local Texas chapter repeats a hazing behavior that has previously led to injury, death, or institutional sanctions in another state, this creates a powerful legal argument for foreseeability. It means the National organization, with its knowledge of its own history, knew or should have known the risks. This knowledge becomes a cornerstone of negligence arguments against both the national body and sometimes even the university for failing to intervene effectively.

Key Texas Campuses and National Organizations: A Pattern of Risk

While nearly every national Greek organization has faced hazing allegations, some have histories that are particularly relevant for Texas families. Here, we highlight some organizations known to be on Texas campuses and their national hazing patterns.

Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike)

• Present at: UT Austin, Texas A&M.
• National History: Pi Kappa Alpha has a deeply troubling history of hazing, particularly involving excessive alcohol consumption.
  • Stone Foltz (Bowling Green State University, 2021): Perhaps the most prominent recent case involved Foltz, an underage pledge forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” night. He died of alcohol poisoning, leading to multiple criminal convictions for fraternity members and a $10 million settlement from the national fraternity and university.
  • David Bogenberger (Northern Illinois University, 2012): Another pledge died from alcohol poisoning after a hazing event, resulting in a $14 million settlement to his family.
• Why it matters for Texas: These cases demonstrate a recurring pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing within Pike chapters. If a Pike chapter at UT Austin or Texas A&M engages in similar conduct, the national organization’s history serves as powerful evidence of their prior knowledge and failure to prevent these foreseeable harms.

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE)

• Present at: UT Austin, Texas A&M, SMU.
• National History: SAE has been infamous, at one point labeling itself “America’s deadliest fraternity” due to a high number of hazing-related deaths over decades. While they attempted to reform by abolishing pledging, incidents persist.
  • Texas A&M University (2021): Pledges alleged being subjected to brutal hazing, including having industrial-strength cleaner poured on them, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin grafts. This incident occurred right here in Texas.
  • University of Alabama (2023): A lawsuit alleged a pledge suffered a traumatic brain injury during hazing, indicating continued severe physical abuse.
  • University of Texas at Austin (2024): An Australian exchange student alleged assault by fraternity members at a party, which added to the chapter’s hazing and safety violation record.
• Why it matters for Texas: SAE’s national pattern of severe physical and alcohol hazing, combined with recent incidents AT Texas A&M and UT, underscore an ongoing, foreseeable risk at its local chapters.

Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ)

• Present at: Texas A&M, Baylor.
• National History: Phi Delta Theta has also contended with tragic hazing incidents.
  • Maxwell “Max” Gruver (Louisiana State University, 2017): Gruver died from alcohol poisoning after a “Bible study” drinking game. This case led to Louisiana’s felony hazing law and a $6.1 million verdict against those responsible.
• Why it matters for Texas: This national tragedy demonstrates the dangers of alcohol-based “initiation games” and provides a clear precedent a Phi Delta Theta chapter anywhere near Alabama or in the state should be aware of.

Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ)

• Present at: University of Houston, Texas A&M.
• National History: Pi Kappa Phi has faced significant hazing-related litigation and sanctions.
  • Andrew Coffey (Florida State University, 2017): Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night,” where pledges were given excessive alcohol. This led to criminal charges and FSU’s campus-wide Greek life suspension.
  • University of Houston (2016): As mentioned, a Pike pledge suffered a lacerated spleen at UH, demonstrating local chapter engagement in severe physical hazing.
• Why it matters for Texas: The national pattern of excessive alcohol hazing combined with a local, severe physical hazing incident at UH creates a strong argument for foreseeability for any Pi Kappa Phi chapter in Texas.

Kappa Alpha Order

• Present at: SMU, UT Austin, Texas A&M.
• National History: Kappa Alpha Order has a national history of hazing violations and suspensions, often involving alcohol and physical abuse.
  • SMU (2017): As noted, the SMU chapter was suspended for several years following allegations of paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation.
• Why it matters for Texas: The repeated nature of these allegations, and their occurrence at a prominent Texas campus like SMU, reinforces the national organization’s awareness of its issues.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy: Proving Foreseeability

For Alabama families, understanding these national histories dramatically strengthens a legal case. An experienced hazing attorney uses this pattern evidence to argue:

• Prior Notice: The national organization had prior notice of the dangerous behaviors that led to your child’s injuries or death. They can’t claim ignorance when similar incidents previously happened within their own system.
• Foreseeability: Given these recurring patterns, the national organization had a foreseeable duty to implement and enforce effective anti-hazing measures, to train local chapters rigorously, and to discipline violations severely.
• Deliberate Indifference: A failure to adequately address these known, repeated dangers can be argued as deliberate indifference or gross negligence, potentially leading to increased damages, including punitive damages.

By meticulously researching the national organization’s history, The Manginello Law Firm helps build a stronger case for accountability against all responsible parties, from individual hazers to the national governing bodies and the universities that host them.

BUILDING A CASE: EVIDENCE, DAMAGES, STRATEGY

Building a compelling hazing case requires a comprehensive and aggressive legal strategy focused on evidence preservation and a thorough understanding of all potential damages. For Alabama families, knowing what to expect in this process is vital.

7.1 Evidence: The Foundation of Your Claim

Modern hazing cases often rely heavily on digital evidence, which can be quickly corrupted or deleted without swift action.

• Digital Communications: These are often the “smoking gun” in today’s hazing cases. This includes:

  • GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Signal, Discord, Slack, and other messaging apps. These platforms capture the planning, coercion, and discussions surrounding hazing. Content reveals instructions, threats, and cover-up attempts by members.
  • Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok comments, and other social media interactions. These can show humiliating “challenges,” forced content creation, or even real-time sharing of hazing acts.
  • Key Action: Screenshot everything immediately. Preserve full threads with timestamps and sender names. Back up all digital evidence to a secure cloud or external drive. Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos. Digital forensics experts can also often recover deleted messages, but original screenshots are invaluable.

• Photos & Videos:

  • Content filmed by hazers or participants: Often meant for internal “entertainment,” these unvarnished recordings are irrefutable proof of what occurred.
  • Surveillance footage: Security cameras at chapter houses, bars, or off-campus venues can capture key events.
  • Key Action: If your child has photos or videos of the hazing, ensure they are saved. If they witnessed others filming, note who was recording.

• Internal Organization Documents: Subpoenas can compel the release of crucial documents.

  • Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” lists: These show formalized hazing practices.
  • Emails or texts from officers: These reveal instructions given to new members or plans for “events.”
  • National organization risk management documents: These disclose what the national body knew and their official stance on specific behaviors, often showing a gap between policy and practice.

• University Records: Thorough investigation includes obtaining campus records.

  • Prior conduct files: Histories of disciplinary actions, probation, or suspensions for the offending organization. UT Austin’s public Hazing Violations page is a prime example of this data.
  • Campus police reports: Incident reports related to the organization or individuals.
  • Clery Act disclosures: Annual crime statistics can highlight recurring issues or areas of concern.

• Medical and Psychological Records: These document the extent of the victim’s harm.

  • Emergency room reports, hospitalization records, toxicology reports: Crucial for physical injuries, especially in alcohol poisoning cases.
  • Surgery and rehabilitation notes: Essential for catastrophic injuries like brain damage or organ failure.
  • Psychological evaluations: Diagnoses of PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health issues demonstrate lasting emotional and mental harm.

• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts are powerful.

  • Other pledges or members: Often the most direct witnesses, though fear of retaliation can make them hesitant to speak initially.
  • Roommates, RAs, coaches, faculty members: Individuals who noticed changes in behavior or overheard conversations.

7.2 Damages: Recovering All Losses

Hazing incidents, especially those resulting in severe injury or death, inflict profound losses. The legal system seeks to compensate for these, covering both tangible financial costs and intangible harms. Attorney911’s wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/) is crucial here.

• Medical Bills & Future Care:

  • Past medical expenses: Ambulance, ER visits, surgeries, hospital stays (ICU, inpatient care), medications, specialized equipment. These bills can quickly run into hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
  • Future medical expenses: For catastrophic injuries, a victim may require lifelong physical therapy, long-term psychiatric care for PTSD, future surgeries, or even 24/7 skilled nursing facilities. These are calculated through a “life care plan.”

• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact:

  • Lost wages: If the victim (or a parent caring for them) had to miss work.
  • Lost educational opportunities: Many hazing victims withdraw from school, lose scholarships, or have their academic careers derailed. This can delay graduation and entry into the workforce.
  • Diminished future earning capacity: For permanent injuries like brain damage (e.g., Danny Santulli’s case), an economist will calculate the lifetime loss of potential earnings, often amounting to millions.

• Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for pain and suffering that do not have a direct bill.

  • Physical Pain and Suffering: The subjective experience of pain from injuries, both immediate and long-term.
  • Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm: This can be immense—humiliation, shame, fear, nightmares, flashbacks, and mental health diagnoses like PTSD, anxiety, or severe depression. These are often as devastating as physical injuries.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Compensation for the inability to participate in activities, hobbies, or relationships due to injuries or trauma, impacting quality of life.

• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the most tragic cases, families can sue for wrongful death.

  • Funeral and burial expenses.
  • Loss of financial support: If the deceased would have contributed income or support to the family over their lifetime.
  • Loss of companionship, love, and society: The immeasurable grief and loss experienced by parents, siblings, or spouses.
  • Grief and emotional suffering endured by family members.

• Punitive Damages: In cases of egregious misconduct, gross negligence, or deliberate indifference, courts may award punitive damages. These are meant to punish the defendants for their reckless behavior and to deter similar actions in the future, providing a powerful incentive for organizations to prevent hazing.

7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing cases are rarely simple, involving multiple layers of potential defendants and complex insurance battles. The Manginello Law Firm’s experience in complex litigation means we can navigate this intricate web:

• Identifying All Responsible Parties: Beyond the immediate hazers, a thorough investigation determines liability for the local chapter, the national organization, the university, and potentially landlords or other third parties.
• Insurance Battles: National fraternities and universities typically carry substantial liability insurance. However, these insurers often attempt to deny coverage, arguing that hazing, especially “intentional” acts, falls under policy exclusions. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is crucial here. She understands their tactics, having used them herself, and knows how to counter arguments about coverage exclusions or delayed payments.
• Expertise in Complex Litigation: From its involvement in major cases like the BP Texas City explosion litigation, The Manginello Law Firm has proven its ability to take on well-resourced institutional defendants and their sophisticated legal teams. This experience ensures that large organizations cannot simply “out-lawyer” victims and their families. Our civil and criminal defense experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) is invaluable for addressing all facets of a hazing case.

Building a hazing case is a monumental undertaking, but with the right legal team, it is possible to hold accountable those responsible for the devastating harm inflicted.

PRACTICAL GUIDES & FAQS

For Alabama families, understanding how to navigate the aftermath of hazing—whether you’re a parent, a student, or a witness—is paramount. Knowledge empowers action and can be the first step toward justice and healing. We’ve compiled essential guides and answered common questions.

8.1 For Parents: Recognizing & Responding to Hazing

Your intuition as a parent is one of your most powerful tools. If something feels off, investigate.

Warning Signs Your Child May Be Being Hazed

• Physical Signs: Unexplained injuries (bruises, burns, cuts), extreme fatigue or constant exhaustion, sudden weight loss or gain attributed to weird eating patterns, noticeable sleep deprivation (e.g., constant late nights, calls at 3 AM).
• Behavioral & Emotional Changes: A new level of secrecy around organization activities (“I can’t talk about it”), withdrawal from family or non-Greek friends, sudden anxiety, irritability, or depression, defensiveness when asked about the organization, or phrases like “I just have to get through this” or “everyone did it before me.”
• Academic Red Flags: Grades dropping unexpectedly, missing classes or assignments due to “mandatory” events.
• Financial Red Flags: Unexplained requests for money, seemingly excessive dues, paying for items for older members, or “fines.”
• Digital/Social Behavior: Constant checking of group chats, anxiety when the phone buzzes, an obsession with deleting messages, or social media posts depicting humiliating situations.

How to Talk to Your Child

• Approach with empathy: Avoid accusations or judgment. Start gently: “How are things going with [organization]? Are you enjoying it?”
• Listen more than you speak: If they open up, let them share without interruption. Validate their feelings.
• Emphasize safety and support: Reassure them that their well-being is your top priority, not “getting in trouble” or protecting the organization. “If you ever feel unsafe or uncomfortable, I’m here for you, no matter what.”

What to Do If You Suspect Hazing

• Prioritize Safety & Medical Care: If your child is injured, sick, or intoxicated, get immediate medical help. Call 911 if necessary. Most Texas laws and university policies offer varying degrees of immunity for those who call for help in an emergency.
• Document Everything: Contemporaneous notes of dates, times, and what your child tells you are crucial. If they show you messages or media, screenshot it immediately. Photograph any injuries, and save any physical evidence.
• Contact a Lawyer Immediately: This is perhaps the most critical step. An experienced hazing attorney can act swiftly to preserve evidence that disappears rapidly and advise you through the complex reporting process.

Dealing with the University

• Document all communications with university staff (Dean of Students, Greek Life advisors, etc.).
• Ask specific questions about prior incidents involving the same organization.
• Do not let the university’s internal processes be the only path to justice if your child suffered significant harm.

8.2 For Students / Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning

If you’re a new member or pledge in Alabama attending college in Texas, you have rights, and your safety is paramount.

Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?

Ask yourself these questions:

• Would I do this if I had a real choice, without fear of social exclusion or being “cut”?
• Does this activity endanger my physical or mental health, humiliate me, or make me feel unsafe?
• Would the university or my parents approve if they knew specifically what was happening?
• Am I being told to keep secrets, lie, or hide this from outsiders?
  If the answer is YES to any of these, it is hazing, regardless of what anyone calls it.

Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story

Texas law explicitly states consent is not a defense to hazing. You cannot truly “consent” under pressure. The fear of exclusion, the desire to belong, and the power dynamic between new members and older members often negate genuine choice.

Exiting and Reporting Safely

• You have the right to leave any pledging process at any time, for any reason, without fear of retribution.
• If you feel unsafe or fear retaliation for leaving, confidentially inform a trusted adult outside the organization (parent, resident advisor, professor) or the Dean of Students’ office.
• Use university anonymous reporting channels or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline: 1-888-NOT-HAZE.
• Always prioritize your safety. If you are in immediate danger, call 911.

Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty

Texas law and many university policies encourage calling for help in alcohol or drug-related medical emergencies. If you call 911 for someone in distress, neither you nor the individual in danger will typically face disciplinary action for underage drinking or drug possession.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses: Breaking the Silence

If you witnessed hazing, or even participated in it but now regret your role, you have a critical opportunity to prevent future harm.

• Your Voice Matters: Your testimony can be crucial in holding individuals and institutions accountable and saving lives.
• Seek Legal Counsel: If you have concerns about your own liability, consult with a lawyer who understands both criminal and civil hazing cases. They can advise you on your rights and potential protections.
• Report What You Know: Even anonymous reports can be valuable starting points for investigations. Use university reporting mechanisms, campus police, or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

The Manginello Law Firm has seen too many families inadvertently damage their own hazing cases through common mistakes. Avoid these pitfalls:

1. Letting Your Child Delete or “Clean Up” Evidence:

   • Mistake: Thinking you’re protecting your child by removing incriminating messages or photos.
   • Why it’s wrong: This looks like a cover-up, can be considered obstruction of justice, and makes proving hazing significantly harder.
   • Instead: Preserve absolutely everything immediately. Attorney911’s video on client mistakes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) emphasizes the importance of evidence.

2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly:

   • Mistake: Parents wanting to angrily confront the hazers or organization leaders.
   • Why it’s wrong: This immediately puts them on alert. They will destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses. It compromises your investigation.
   • Instead: Document everything privately, then contact an attorney before any direct confrontation.

3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms:

   • Mistake: Accepting an internal university solution without legal review, especially if it involves waivers.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may unknowingly waive your right to pursue further legal action or settle for far less than your child’s case is worth.
   • Instead: Never sign any document from the university or an insurance adjuster without your lawyer’s review.

4. Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer:

   • Mistake: Sharing sensitive information about the incident online out of anger or frustration.
   • Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys constantly monitor social media. Your posts can be used against you, expose your child to further scrutiny, and unintentionally compromise your legal strategy.
   • Instead: Document privately, and let your attorney guide any public statements.

5. Letting Your Child Return to “One Last Meeting” or “Talk it Out”:

   • Mistake: Believing an organization’s promise to “talk things over” or “resolve it internally” with your child.
   • Why it’s wrong: This is an opportunity for them to gauge your child’s resolve, pressure them into silence, or get statements that hurt a future legal case.
   • Instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communications with the organization should be through your attorney.

6. Waiting to “See How the University Handles It”:

   • Mistake: Relying solely on the university’s internal investigation process.
   • Why it’s wrong: University investigations are for campus policy violations, not necessarily for criminal justice or civil compensation. Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and your legal options may expire.
   • Instead: Preserve evidence immediately and contact a lawyer. The university’s process and a civil legal case are entirely separate.

7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer:

   • Mistake: Giving a statement to an insurance adjuster who contacts you.
   • Why it’s wrong: Adjusters represent the insurance company, not you. Any statement you give can be used to minimize or deny your claim. Early settlement offers are almost always lowball.
   • Instead: Politely decline to talk and say, “My attorney will contact you.”

8.5 Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”

  • Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities here in Texas (like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin) benefit from some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, willful misconduct, and violations of federal laws like Title IX. Private universities (such as SMU and Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its specific facts—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”

  • It can be. Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default. However, it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who are members or officers and fail to report hazing they knew about can also face misdemeanor charges.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”

  • Yes, absolutely. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that “consent” given under immense peer pressure, fear of exclusion, or duress is not true voluntary consent.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”

  • Generally, you have two years from the date of injury or death to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas. However, certain legal principles, such as the “discovery rule” (where the clock starts when you reasonably became aware of the harm) or fraudulent concealment, can sometimes extend this period. Because evidence disappears and memories fade, time is critical. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to protect your rights. Our video on the statute of limitations (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c) provides more detail.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”

  • The location of hazing activities does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities or sororities can still be liable based on their sponsorship of the organization, their knowledge of the activities, and the foreseeability of harm. Many landmark hazing cases, including deaths, occurred at off-campus houses or private retreats.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”

  • Most hazing cases are settled confidentially before they ever reach a public trial. We prioritize your family’s privacy while aggressively pursuing accountability. Any decision regarding public disclosure is made with your family’s best interests at heart.

ABOUT THE MANGINELLO LAW FIRM + CALL TO ACTION

When your family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than just legal representation. You need tenacious advocates who understand the powerful institutions involved—the national fraternities, the major universities, their defense attorneys, and their insurance companies—and know how to fight them effectively. That’s precisely what The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, offers.

As the “Legal Emergency Lawyers™,” we bring a unique and formidable set of qualifications to hazing cases, distinguishing us from general personal injury firms. We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects families in Alabama and across the region.

Why Attorney911 for Hazing Cases

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Our Associate Attorney, Lupe Peña, brings an invaluable perspective. Having previously worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), she understands exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies operate. She knows their playbooks for denying, delaying, and undervaluing claims because she used to run them. This “inside knowledge” is a critical advantage for our clients in securing fair compensation.

• Complex Litigation Against Major Institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, has a formidable track record in complex litigation. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, a multi-party, federal court case against one of the world’s largest corporations. This experience means The Manginello Law Firm is not intimidated by national fraternities, multi-billion-dollar universities, or their high-powered defense teams. We’ve taken on huge entities and won, demonstrating our capability to pursue justice in the most challenging environments.

• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Our firm has a proven history of securing multi-million dollar results for families in wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. This directly translates to hazing cases, which often involve severe physical and psychological trauma or tragic fatalities. We work with leading experts—medical professionals, digital forensics specialists, economists, and psychologists—to fully document and value all damages, from immediate medical care to lifelong needs and the profound non-economic losses. Our wrongful death page (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/) provides more insight into our commitment to these sensitive cases.

• Dual Criminal and Civil Hazing Expertise: Hazing is a crime in Texas. Ralph Manginello’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) demonstrates our firm’s deep understanding of both criminal and civil law. This dual expertise is crucial in hazing cases, where criminal charges against individuals often run parallel to civil lawsuits seeking compensation. We can advise clients on how criminal proceedings may impact their civil case, and vice versa.

• Investigative Depth and Modern Evidence Collection: Modern hazing leaves a digital footprint. We are experts at investigating modern hazing, including working with digital forensics specialists to unearth deleted GroupMe chats, Snapchat messages, and other crucial electronic evidence. We meticulously subpoena national fraternity records to uncover patterns of prior misconduct and leverage public records requests and discovery to obtain university files. Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) exemplifies our proactive approach to evidence.

• Empathy and Advocacy: We understand that facing hazing is one of the hardest things a family can endure. Our approach balances aggressive legal action with compassionate client care. We aim to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent future tragedies, honoring your child’s experience.

From our Houston offices, we serve families throughout Texas, with additional offices in Austin and Beaumont. Whether you’re in Alabama seeking justice for an incident on a Texas campus, or located anywhere across the Lone Star State, we stand ready to help.

Call to Action: Your Next Step Towards Accountability

If you or your child has experienced hazing at any Texas university—be it the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Alabama and across the state have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm today for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will compassionately listen to your story, explain your legal options under Texas law, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family. There is no pressure to hire us, but there is every reason to understand your rights.

• Expect a thorough review: We’ll examine what happened, identify key evidence, and discuss who might be held responsible.
• Understand your options: We’ll clearly explain whether criminal reporting, civil litigation, or other avenues are appropriate for your situation.
• Learn about costs: We work on a contingency fee basis (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc), meaning you don’t pay us a dime unless we win your case.

Don’t wait. Evidence disappears quickly, and time is often critical.

Call us for immediate assistance:

• Emergency Hotline: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: For Spanish-speaking families, please contact Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Alabama or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com