Hazing Litigation Guide for Anderson, Texas Families: University Accountability & Fraternity Lawsuits

If Your Child Was Hazed at a Texas University, You’re Not Alone

For parents in Anderson, Grimes County, the college experience your children embark on represents hope, opportunity, and future success. You’ve supported them through high school in Anderson, celebrated their acceptance to Texas universities, and trusted these institutions with their safety. Yet right now, across Texas—from the University of Houston to Texas A&M, UT Austin to Baylor—a dangerous culture persists behind the letters, traditions, and campus facades: systematic hazing that injures, hospitalizes, and sometimes kills young students.

We understand this reality intimately. At Attorney911, The Manginello Law Firm, we are currently fighting one of the most serious hazing cases in Texas: representing Leonel Bermudez in his $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston, Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters, the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu housing corporation, the UH System Board of Regents, and 13 individual fraternity leaders. This isn’t a historical case study—this is active litigation happening right now in Harris County, demonstrating exactly how modern hazing operates and how institutions attempt to evade responsibility.

This comprehensive guide is written specifically for Anderson families—parents in Grimes County and throughout the Brazos Valley region who need to understand what hazing really looks like in 2025, how Texas law applies, and what legal options exist when universities and fraternities fail to protect your children. Whether your student attends a local campus like Prairie View A&M or Sam Houston State, or ventures further to major hubs like Texas A&M or UT Austin, the patterns of abuse, institutional cover-ups, and legal defenses remain remarkably consistent.

Immediate Help for Hazing Emergencies

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

Call 911 for medical emergencies
Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

In the first 48 hours:

Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
- Photograph injuries from multiple angles
- Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity/sorority
- Sign anything from the university or insurance company
- Post details on public social media
- Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
Universities move quickly to control the narrative
We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like for Anderson Students

For Anderson families unfamiliar with modern Greek life or campus traditions, hazing has evolved far beyond the stereotypes of “harmless pranks” or “boys being boys.” Today’s hazing represents calculated, systematic abuse that leverages digital surveillance, psychological manipulation, and institutional loopholes to avoid detection.

Modern Hazing: A Three-Tiered System

Tier 1: Digital Control & Psychological Manipulation
Anderson students entering fraternity or sorority life often first encounter what appears to be “community building” but quickly becomes 24/7 digital control. This includes:

Mandatory group chat participation with instant response requirements at all hours
Location tracking through apps like Find My Friends or Life360
Social media policing controlling what pledges can post or share
“Voluntary” commitments that consume 20-40 hours weekly, interfering with academics

Tier 2: Systematic Humiliation & Endurance Testing
Beyond digital control, Anderson students face traditional abuse adapted for the modern era:

Forced physical exertion masquerading as “workouts” or “conditioning”
Sleep deprivation through late-night “meetings” and early-morning summons
Food and consumption rituals like forced milk drinking or hot dog eating contests
Public degradation including humiliating costumes, nicknames, or performances

Tier 3: Dangerous Rituals with Catastrophic Potential
The most severe hazing—like what happened to Leonel Bermudez at UH—includes:

Alcohol poisoning gambles with forced consumption games
Physical restraint and torture including hog-tying and simulated waterboarding
Extreme environmental exposure in cold weather or hazardous conditions
Medical emergencies ignored due to fear of “getting the chapter in trouble”

The Leonel Bermudez Case: A Template for Modern Hazing

Right now in Harris County, we’re litigating a case that exemplifies all three tiers of modern hazing. Leonel Bermudez, a University of Houston student, endured systematic abuse from the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu chapter that included:

Digital Control & Humiliation:

24/7 “pledge fanny pack” requirement containing condoms, sex toys, and humiliating items
Mandatory dress codes and interview schedules
Group chat monitoring with punishment threats for non-compliance

Physical Endurance Testing:

Sprints, bear crawls, and wheelbarrow races at Yellowstone Boulevard Park
“Save-your-brother” drills and extreme calisthenics
Cold-weather exposure in underwear

Dangerous Rituals with Medical Consequences:

Forced consumption of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting
Immediate sprints after vomiting
Hose spraying in the face “similar to waterboarding”
November 3 workout: 100+ push-ups, 500 squats under expulsion threats

The medical outcome? Rhabdomyolysis (severe skeletal muscle breakdown) and acute kidney failure. Bermudez passed brown urine, couldn’t stand without help, and required four days of hospitalization with critically elevated creatine kinase levels confirming permanent kidney damage risk.

This case matters for Anderson families because it demonstrates that:

Modern hazing is systematic, not spontaneous
Universities know about patterns but often fail to intervene
National fraternities have historical patterns they fail to correct
Medical catastrophes are predictable outcomes of these rituals

Texas Hazing Law: What Anderson Families Need to Know

Texas Education Code Chapter 37: Clear Protections

For Anderson families navigating hazing situations, Texas law provides specific protections under Education Code Chapter 37. The statute defines hazing broadly as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that:

Endangers mental or physical health or safety of a student
Occurs for pledging, initiation, affiliation, or maintaining membership in any organization
Can happen on or off campus (location doesn’t matter)
Consent is NOT a defense (Section 37.155 explicitly says victim agreement doesn’t excuse hazing)

Criminal Penalties Under Texas Law

For individuals:

Class B Misdemeanor: Basic hazing without serious injury (up to 180 days jail, $2,000 fine)
Class A Misdemeanor: Hazing causing injury requiring medical treatment
State Jail Felony: Hazing causing serious bodily injury or death
Additional charges: Furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, manslaughter in fatal cases

For organizations:

Fines up to $10,000 per violation
University recognition revocation and campus bans
Criminal prosecution if organization authorized or encouraged hazing

Why “Consent” Doesn’t Matter in Texas Hazing Cases

Anderson families often hear defenses like “your child agreed to this” or “everyone else did it too.” Texas law explicitly rejects these arguments because:

Power imbalance: New members cannot truly “consent” when refusal means social exclusion
Group coercion: Peer pressure and tradition create coercive environments
Legal design: Texas Education Code §37.155 exists precisely because lawmakers recognized “consent” in hazing contexts is meaningless

Good-Faith Reporting Protections

Texas law encourages reporting by providing:

Immunity from liability for good-faith reports to universities or law enforcement
Medical amnesty protections when calling 911 for alcohol emergencies
Anti-retaliation provisions making it illegal to punish reporters

National Hazing Cases: Patterns That Predict Texas Outcomes

Alcohol Poisoning Pattern: The Deadliest Script

Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)

Forced to drink entire bottle of alcohol during “Big/Little” night
Died from alcohol poisoning
$10 million settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national, $3M from BGSU)
Individual liability: Chapter president ordered to pay $6.5 million personally

Why this matters for Anderson families: The same Pi Kappa Alpha national organization that paid $7 million in the Foltz case operates chapters across Texas. When patterns repeat, national liability increases.

Max Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017)

“Bible study” drinking game with wrong answers = forced drinking
Died from alcohol toxicity (BAC 0.495%)
$6.1 million verdict against fraternity
Legislative impact: Louisiana’s “Max Gruver Act” creating felony hazing statute

Physical Hazing Pattern: Beyond Alcohol

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013)

Blindfolded, weighted tackle during “glass ceiling” ritual at retreat
Traumatic brain injury death with delayed medical care
National fraternity criminally convicted of aggravated assault and manslaughter
Pi Delta Psi banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years

Danny Santulli – University of Missouri, Phi Gamma Delta (2021)

Forced excessive drinking during “pledge dad reveal”
Severe permanent brain damage (cannot walk, talk, or see)
Settlements with 22 defendants, multi-million dollar total
Non-fatal catastrophic injury case showing lifelong consequences

Athletic Program Hazing: Not Just Greek Life

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025)

Sexualized and racist hazing within football program
Multiple lawsuits against university and coaching staff
Head coach fired, then received confidential settlement for wrongful termination
Takeaway for Anderson families: Hazing extends beyond Greek life to athletic programs with similar institutional cover-up patterns

Texas University Focus: Where Anderson Students Attend

University of Houston: Active Litigation & Systemic Issues

For Anderson families with students at UH or considering Houston-area schools, the Leonel Bermudez case represents more than an isolated incident—it reveals systemic issues within UH’s Greek life oversight.

UH’s Greek Life Ecosystem:

16 IFC fraternities including Pi Kappa Phi, Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon
6 Panhellenic sororities
Multiple NPHC (Divine Nine) and multicultural organizations
1,423 Greek organizations tracked across Texas through our Hazing Intelligence Engine

UH’s Institutional Response Pattern:
In the Bermudez case, UH’s response followed a predictable institutional pattern:

November 6, 2025: Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters suspends Beta Nu chapter
November 14, 2025: Chapter members vote to surrender charter
UH statement: Conduct “deeply disturbing,” promises disciplinary measures and law enforcement cooperation
Reality: Years of prior warnings and patterns likely existed before catastrophic injury

What Anderson Families Should Know About UH:

Reporting channels: Dean of Students, UHPD, online conduct forms
Prior incident tracking: Limited public disclosure compared to UT Austin
Legal jurisdiction: Cases may involve UHPD, Houston PD, or Harris County courts
Common defendants: Individuals, local chapter, national headquarters, UH System

Texas A&M University: Corps Culture & Greek Life Intersection

For Anderson families in the Brazos Valley region, Texas A&M represents both local opportunity and unique hazing risks through its Corps of Cadets tradition.

Corps of Cadets Hazing Pattern:

2023 lawsuit: Cadet alleged “roasted pig” restraint with apple in mouth, simulated sexual acts
Military-style discipline crossing into abuse
Tradition defense: “This is how we’ve always done it”
Institutional knowledge: Decades of documented issues with minimal reform

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Chemical Burns Case (2021):

Pledges covered in industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, spit
Severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries
$1 million lawsuit against fraternity
Chapter suspension for two years
Pattern evidence: Same SAE national with multiple hazing deaths nationwide

Texas A&M’s Greek Life Landscape:

19 IFC fraternities including SAE, Pi Kappa Alpha, Phi Delta Theta
14 Panhellenic sororities
Corps-affiliated organizations with unique tradition risks
Public transparency: Limited compared to UT’s published hazing violations

University of Texas at Austin: Transparency & Repeated Violations

UT Austin maintains the most transparent hazing reporting system in Texas, which ironically demonstrates how frequently violations occur despite public knowledge.

UT’s Public Hazing Violations Log Shows Patterns:

Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): New members directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics
Multiple organizations: Forced workouts, alcohol hazing, punishment-based practices
Transparency value: Public record helps prove institutional knowledge in lawsuits
Enforcement gap: Repeated violations suggest inadequate deterrence

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Assault Case (2024):

Australian exchange student assaulted at SAE party
Injuries: dislocated leg, broken ligaments, fractured tibia, broken nose
$1+ million lawsuit against chapter
Prior suspension for hazing/safety violations already in place
Pattern: SAE national’s recurring issues across multiple Texas campuses

UT’s Greek System Scale:

60+ fraternity/sorority chapters
Multiple governing councils: IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural
Austin jurisdiction: UTPD, Austin PD, Travis County courts
Discovery advantage: Public records aid civil litigation

Southern Methodist University & Baylor University: Private School Dynamics

For Anderson families considering private Texas universities, different dynamics affect hazing response and legal strategy.

SMU’s Affluent Greek Culture:

Kappa Alpha Order incident (2017): Paddling, forced drinking, sleep deprivation
Chapter suspension with multi-year restrictions
Private university challenges: Less public transparency, wealthy defendant resources
Dallas jurisdiction: SMU PD, Dallas PD, federal court experience valuable

Baylor’s Religious Context & Athletic Hazing:

Baseball hazing (2020): 14 players suspended following investigation
Football program history: Sexual assault scandal context affects institutional response
Waco jurisdiction: Baylor PD, Waco PD, McLennan County courts
Relational dynamics: Community pressure different than public universities

The Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine: Data-Driven Accountability

At Attorney911, we maintain what no other Texas law firm has: a comprehensive database of 1,423 Greek organizations across 25 Texas metros, built from IRS filings, university records, and national databases. This isn’t academic research—it’s litigation intelligence that helps Anderson families hold every responsible party accountable.

Public Records Directory: Fraternities, Sororities & Greek Organizations Serving Anderson Families

Why This Matters for Anderson Parents:
When your child is hazed, you need to know who actually stands behind the organization—not just the chapter name, but the legal entities that own property, hold insurance, and bear ultimate responsibility. Our directory helps families understand the complex organizational structures that national fraternities use to insulate themselves from liability.

Texas-Registered Greek Organizations (IRS B83 Records):
These are actual public filings showing the legal entities operating in Texas:

KAPPA SIGMA – MU CAMMA CHAPTER INC | EIN: 133048786 | 3007 EARL RUDDER FWY S, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845-6681 | IRS B83 Public Filing
GAMMA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 161675890 | 115 WILD WICK WAY, THE WOODLANDS, TX 77382-1822 | ZETA RHO HCB | IRS B83 Public Filing
BETA NU PI KAPPA PHI FRATERNITY HOUSING CORPORATION INC | EIN: 462267515 | 10601 BIG HORN TRL, FRISCO, TX 75035-6629 | IRS B83 Public Filing
PI KAPPA ALPHA FRATERNITY | EIN: 746064445 | 1855 HIGHWAY 69 N, NEDERLAND, TX 77627-8843 | EPSILON KAPPA CHAPTER | IRS B83 Public Filing
SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY EPSILON XI CHAPTER | EIN: 746084905 | 4300 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD, HOUSTON, TX 77204-3067 | IRS B83 Public Filing
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 475370943 | 5019 CALHOUN RD, HOUSTON, TX 77204-7005 | THETA DELTA | IRS B83 Public Filing
TEXAS KAPPA SIGMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC | EIN: 741380362 | PO BOX 470061, FORT WORTH, TX 76147-0061 | IRS B83 Public Filing
HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 900293166 | 114 HENDERSON HALL 4233 TAMU, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77843-0001 | TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY | IRS B83 Public Filing
PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY | EIN: 900927378 | 13211 LOST LAKE DR, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78249-3625 | TEXAS XI | IRS B83 Public Filing
SIGMA PHI EPSILON FRATERNITY TEXAS GAMMA CHAPTER | EIN: 911981478 | 2609 S UNIVERSITY DR, FORT WORTH, TX 76109-1149 | IRS B83 Public Filing

Metro-Level Greek Organization Density:

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Metro: 510 Greek organizations
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land Metro: 188 Greek organizations
Austin-Round Rock Metro: 154 Greek organizations
College Station-Bryan Metro: 42 Greek organizations
Waco Metro: 27 Greek organizations

Why This Directory Exists:
When Anderson families come to us after a hazing incident, we don’t start from zero. We already know:

The legal names and EINs of organizations involved
Where their housing corporations are registered
How national brands appear across multiple Texas entities
Which insurers likely provide coverage
What prior incidents exist in public records

This isn’t just data—it’s leverage. When we send a preservation letter to “Beta Nu Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity Housing Corporation Inc” with their exact EIN and Frisco address, they know we’ve done our homework. When we subpoena the “Texas Kappa Sigma Educational Foundation Inc” in Fort Worth, their attorneys understand we can trace organizational relationships.

Campuses Where Anderson Families Send Students

Local & Regional Campuses:

Prairie View A&M University (Prairie View, Waller County)
Sam Houston State University (Huntsville, Walker County)
Blinn College (Bryan, Brazos County)
Texas A&M University (College Station, Brazos County)
University of Houston (Houston, Harris County)

Statewide University Hubs:

University of Texas at Austin (Austin, Travis County)
Texas Tech University (Lubbock, Lubbock County)
Texas State University (San Marcos, Hays County)
University of North Texas (Denton, Denton County)
Baylor University (Waco, McLennan County)

Understanding the Connections:
Anderson students often choose schools based on proximity, family tradition, or academic program. A student from Anderson might:

Commute to Prairie View A&M or Sam Houston State
Live on campus at Texas A&M or University of Houston
Venture further to UT Austin or Texas Tech

Wherever they attend, the Greek organizations they encounter have interconnected Texas entities that our Intelligence Engine tracks.

Building a Hazing Case: Evidence, Strategy & Damages

Critical Evidence That Wins Cases

Digital Evidence (Most Important):

GroupMe/WhatsApp messages: Planning, coordination, admissions
Deleted message recovery: Digital forensics can retrieve “disappeared” content
Social media posts: Photos, videos, comments documenting abuse
Location data: GPS timestamps placing individuals at scenes
Communication patterns: Response demands showing coercion

Physical Evidence:

Medical records: ER reports, hospitalization records, lab results
Injury documentation: Photos with scale references, progression shots
Physical objects: Paddles, alcohol containers, “pledge” items
Property evidence: House layouts, security camera footage

Institutional Records:

University conduct files: Prior violations, warnings, probation records
National fraternity records: Incident reports, risk management files
Insurance policies: Coverage details, exclusion arguments
Internal communications: Emails showing knowledge or cover-up

Witness Testimony:

Other pledges: Often afraid but willing to testify with protection
Former members: Those who quit or were expelled
Roommates/RAs: Observers of behavioral changes
Medical providers: Documentation of injuries and causation

Damages: What Anderson Families Can Recover

Economic Damages (Quantifiable):

Medical expenses: Past and future treatment costs
Lost educational opportunity: Tuition, delayed graduation, lost scholarships
Earning capacity reduction: Lifetime impact of permanent injuries
Therapy costs: Psychological treatment for PTSD, anxiety, depression

Non-Economic Damages (Substantial):

Pain and suffering: Physical pain from injuries
Emotional distress: PTSD, humiliation, loss of enjoyment
Reputational harm: Social stigma and relationship damage
Loss of consortium: Family relationship impacts

Wrongful Death Damages:

Funeral expenses: Burial and memorial costs
Lost support: Financial contributions deceased would have made
Loss of companionship: Emotional value of relationship
Parental grief: Psychological impact on family

Punitive Damages (When Applicable):

Gross negligence: Reckless disregard for safety
Intentional conduct: Deliberate harm or cover-up
Pattern evidence: Prior incidents showing knowledge
Institutional failure: Systemic policy violations

Case Strategy: Overcoming Institutional Defenses

Defense #1: “The Pledge Consented”

Our response: Texas Education Code §37.155 – consent is not a defense
Evidence: Group chat pressure, social exclusion threats, power imbalance
Strategy: Demonstrate coercive environment despite technical “agreement”

Defense #2: “Rogue Chapter – National Didn’t Know”

Our response: Pattern evidence from multiple chapters
Evidence: Prior incident reports to nationals, similar rituals across states
Strategy: Show constructive knowledge and inadequate supervision

Defense #3: “Off-Campus – Not Our Responsibility”

Our response: University sponsorship and foreseeable location use
Evidence: Chapter recognition, university benefits, prior off-campus incidents
Strategy: Establish duty based on relationship, not geography

Defense #4: “We Have Anti-Hazing Policies”

Our response: Paper policy vs. actual enforcement
Evidence: Minimal prior sanctions, inadequate training, policy violations
Strategy: Show policy as window-dressing, not meaningful prevention

Defense #5: “Sovereign Immunity” (Public Universities)

Our response: Gross negligence exceptions, individual capacity suits
Evidence: Deliberate indifference, pattern of violations
Strategy: Navigate Texas immunity law with precise pleading

Practical Guides for Anderson Families

For Parents: Warning Signs & Action Steps

Red Flags Your Child May Be Hazed:

Physical signs: Unexplained injuries, extreme fatigue, weight changes
Behavioral changes: Secrecy, withdrawal, personality shifts, anxiety
Academic decline: Falling grades, missed classes, lost scholarships
Digital patterns: 24/7 phone monitoring, deleted messages, location tracking
Financial issues: Unexpected expenses, requests for money without explanation

Questions to Ask (Non-Confrontational):

“How are you balancing Greek life with classes and sleep?”
“What do new members typically do in your organization?”
“Is there anything that’s made you uncomfortable?”
“Do you feel like you could leave if you wanted to?”
“Are there activities you’re asked to keep secret?”

Immediate Action Checklist:

Medical priority: Get medical attention for any injuries or intoxication
Evidence preservation: Screenshot messages, photograph injuries, save objects
Documentation: Write detailed notes with dates, times, participants
Legal consultation: Contact Attorney911 before reporting or confronting
University interaction: Document all communications, don’t sign anything

For Students: Rights & Safety Planning

Your Legal Rights in Texas:

You cannot be punished for calling 911 in medical emergencies
Consent is not a defense to hazing charges
Good-faith reporters have legal protections
You can leave any organization at any time without penalty

Evidence Collection Guide:

Screenshot everything: Group chats, DMs, social media posts
Record conversations: Texas is one-party consent for recording
Photograph injuries: Multiple angles, include scale references
Save physical evidence: Clothing, receipts, objects used in hazing
Document witnesses: Names and contact information for others present

Safe Exit Strategies:

Inform someone first: Parent, RA, trusted friend before notifying organization
Written notification: Email chapter president to create documentation
Avoid “final meetings”: Don’t attend gatherings where pressure may occur
Report retaliation: Document any harassment to university and police

Critical Mistakes That Destroy Hazing Cases

MISTAKE #1: Deleting Digital Evidence

What happens: Messages disappear, cases collapse, cover-up appears
Correct approach: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content
Our video on evidence preservation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs

MISTAKE #2: Confronting the Organization

What happens: Evidence destroyed, witnesses coached, defenses prepared
Correct approach: Document quietly, consult attorney first
Our video on client mistakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY

MISTAKE #3: Signing University Agreements

What happens: Rights waived, settlements minimized, accountability avoided
Correct approach: Review all documents with attorney before signing
Legal principle: Universities protect institutions first, victims second

MISTAKE #4: Social Media Posts

What happens: Defense attorneys screenshot everything, credibility damaged
Correct approach: Private documentation only, public messaging through counsel
Real case impact: Social media posts have destroyed multi-million dollar cases

MISTAKE #5: Waiting “To See What Happens”

What happens: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, statutes expire
Correct approach: Immediate action preserves options
Our video on statutes of limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c

Frequently Asked Questions for Anderson Families

“Can we sue a Texas university for hazing?”
Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities (UH, Texas A&M, UT) have sovereign immunity limitations but exceptions exist for gross negligence. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Each case requires individual analysis—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case-specific evaluation.

“What if hazing happened off-campus?”
Location doesn’t eliminate liability. Universities and nationals can still be liable based on sponsorship, control, and foreseeability. Many major hazing cases occurred off-campus and resulted in substantial judgments.

“How long do we have to file a lawsuit?”
Generally 2 years from injury or discovery in Texas, but complex tolling rules may apply. Evidence preservation needs to begin immediately—call 1-888-ATTY-911 for urgent matters.

“Will our case be public?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. We prioritize family privacy while pursuing accountability, using protective orders and sealed settlements when appropriate.

“How much does legal representation cost?”
We work on contingency fee—no upfront costs, no fee unless we recover compensation. Watch our fee explanation video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc

Why Attorney911 for Anderson Hazing Cases

Unique Qualifications for Institutional Litigation

Insurance Insider Advantage:
Mr. Lupe Peña, our associate attorney, spent years as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. He knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies:

Value and undervalue hazing claims
Use delay tactics to pressure families
Argue coverage exclusions for “intentional acts”
Deploy independent medical exams to minimize injuries

His insider knowledge means we don’t just react to insurance strategies—we anticipate them. When an adjuster argues “this is excluded as hazing,” we counter with negligent supervision theories that trigger coverage. When they delay with endless documentation requests, we set deadlines and prepare for bad faith claims.

Complex Institutional Litigation Experience:
Managing partner Ralph Manginello brings 25+ years of experience against massive defendants, including:

BP Texas City explosion litigation (one of few Texas firms involved)
Federal court practice in the Southern District of Texas
Multi-million dollar wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases
HCCLA criminal defense background for dual-track cases

When we face universities and national fraternities with unlimited legal budgets, we’ve been there before. We know how to:

Uncover institutional knowledge through aggressive discovery
Trace organizational relationships through entities like housing corporations
Work with experts to prove causation and damages
Navigate both criminal and civil proceedings simultaneously

Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine:
While other firms start from zero, we begin with:

1,423 Greek organizations tracked across 25 Texas metros
IRS B83 records for 125+ Texas-registered Greek entities
University-specific chapter rosters for every major Texas campus
National hazing incident database with pattern evidence

This means when an Anderson family comes to us about a Pi Kappa Phi incident at UH, we already know:

The Beta Nu housing corporation EIN and Frisco address
Pi Kappa Phi’s national history including Andrew Coffey’s death at FSU
UH’s prior hazing violations and response patterns
Which insurers likely provide coverage and their typical defenses

Spanish Language Services:
Mr. Peña speaks fluent Spanish, serving Hispanic families throughout Texas. He understands cultural nuances and communication preferences that affect case outcomes.

Our Approach: Empathy Meets Aggressive Advocacy

We Start by Listening:
When Anderson families contact us, we begin by listening—without judgment, without interruption. We understand this may be the hardest experience of your life. Our first goal is to understand what happened and what your family needs.

Investigation Before Litigation:
Before filing any lawsuit, we conduct thorough investigation:

Digital forensics to recover deleted messages
Witness interviews with other pledges and members
Public records requests for prior incidents
Organizational research to identify all potential defendants

Strategic Case Development:
We build cases that force accountability, not just secure settlements:

Liability mapping: Identifying every responsible party from individuals to nationals
Damages quantification: Working with economists and life care planners
Insurance analysis: Identifying all potential coverage sources
Settlement vs. trial evaluation: Preparing every case as if it will go to trial

Communication Commitment:
We keep families informed through:

Regular case updates at least every 2-3 weeks
Clear explanations of legal strategies and options
Realistic expectations about timelines and outcomes
24/7 availability for urgent matters

Contact Attorney911 for Anderson Hazing Cases

Your Next Steps

If hazing has impacted your family—whether your child attends a local campus like Prairie View A&M or Sam Houston State, or a major university like Texas A&M or UT Austin—you don’t have to navigate this alone.

Free Confidential Consultation:
Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a no-obligation consultation. We’ll:

Listen to your story without judgment
Review any evidence you’ve preserved
Explain your legal options clearly
Answer your questions about process and timing
Provide honest assessment of case strengths and challenges

What to Bring to Your Consultation:

Any screenshots or photos you’ve saved
Medical records or bills
University communications
Names of witnesses or involved individuals
Your questions and concerns

Contact Information:

24/7 Emergency Line: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct Office: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com or lupe@atty911.com
Spanish Services: Se habla Español – contact Lupe Peña directly

Office Locations:

Houston, Texas (Harris County)
Austin, Texas (Travis County)
Beaumont, Texas (Jefferson County)

We serve families throughout Texas, including Anderson, Grimes County, and the entire Brazos Valley region. Distance doesn’t matter—we handle cases wherever Texas hazing occurs.

About Our Firm

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC (operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™) represents injured victims and defendants in serious personal injury and criminal cases throughout Texas. With over 25 years of experience, our attorneys have recovered millions for clients in wrongful death, catastrophic injury, and complex institutional cases.

Our hazing litigation practice combines:

Insider insurance knowledge from defense-side experience
Complex litigation capability against billion-dollar defendants
Texas-specific expertise in state hazing laws and university systems
Compassionate client service during difficult times
Contingency fee basis – no fee unless we recover compensation

Watch our educational videos:

Evidence preservation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs
Statutes of limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c
Client mistakes to avoid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY
Contingency fee explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc

Learn more about our practice areas:

Wrongful death: https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/
Criminal defense: https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/
Attorney profiles: Ralph Manginello (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/) and Lupe Peña (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/)

Plain Text Links to Key Resources

News Coverage of Leonel Bermudez / UH Pi Kappa Phi Hazing Lawsuit:

Attorney911 Educational YouTube Videos:

Evidence Documentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs
Statutes of Limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c
Client Mistakes to Avoid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY
Contingency Fee Explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc

Attorney911 Main Website & Practice Areas:

Main Website: https://attorney911.com
Contact Page: https://attorney911.com/contact/
1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com