Texas Hazing Laws: A Comprehensive Guide for Borden County Families

The cold night air hung heavy over the campus, the kind of stillness that grips West Texas after sunset. Inside an off-campus house, away from the watchful eyes of university staff, a group of students gathered. Tensions were high; it was “initiation night.” A young man, a proud new member from Borden County, felt the pressure mount. He was told to drink, faster and faster, participating in a “tradition” that felt less like bonding and more like abuse. Others chanted, filming on phones, their faces a blur of excitement and complicity. Then, he faltered, collapsed, his body giving out under the strain. Fear rippled through the room. No one wanted to call 911, afraid of “getting the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble.” Trapped between loyalty to a group he desperately wanted to join and his own rapidly failing health, the Borden County student’s life hung in the balance.

This chilling scenario, while fictional, mirrors countless real incidents that devastate families across Texas and the nation. Hazing is a pervasive and dangerous problem, often hiding in plain sight behind the guise of “tradition” or “team-building.” For families in Borden County and across the vast landscapes of Texas, understanding the realities of modern hazing, its profound legal implications, and the avenues for accountability is crucial.

This comprehensive guide is designed for families in Borden County and throughout Texas who need to understand the true scope of this problem. We will explore:

What hazing looks like in 2025 – far beyond typical stereotypes.
How Texas and federal law specifically address hazing.
The critical lessons learned from major national hazing cases and their relevance to Texas families.
Detailed insights into the hazing landscape at prominent Texas institutions like the University of Houston, Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University.
The legal options and strategies available to victims and their families in Borden County and all of Texas.

This article provides general information and is not specific legal advice for any individual situation. The Manginello Law Firm can evaluate individual cases based on their unique facts. We serve families throughout Texas, including Borden County and its surrounding communities.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies, prioritizing their health and safety above all else.
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.
In the first 48 hours, every moment counts:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Injuries from hazing can be internal, severe, and rapidly escalating.
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  - Screenshot group chats, texts, and direct messages instantly. These digital breadcrumbs are often the most vital evidence.
  - Photograph any visible injuries from multiple angles and in different lighting conditions.
  - Save physical items like clothing worn during the hazing, suspicious receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used in the hazing.
- Write down everything while memory is fresh: who was involved, what precisely happened, when it occurred, and where.
- Do NOT:
  - Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly. Doing so can cause them to destroy evidence or retaliate.
  - Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal counsel. You could waive vital rights.
  - Post details on public social media platforms, as this can compromise your case.
  - Allow your child to delete messages or “clean up” any evidence.
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears rapidly, from deleted group chats to shattered objects and coached witnesses.
- Universities and organizations move swiftly to control the narrative and conduct their own internal (often biased) investigations.
- We can help preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s legal rights.
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate, confidential consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Borden County families, understanding modern hazing means moving beyond outdated stereotypes. Hazing is no longer just “a dumb prank” or “just what college kids do.” It’s an insidious, evolving practice that takes many forms, often designed to evade detection while inflicting severe physical and psychological harm.

Hazing is defined as any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action directed at a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, or maintaining membership in a group. These actions typically endanger physical or mental health, humiliate, degrade, or exploit the individual. The critical element is the power imbalance and coercion, meaning that “I agreed to it” does not automatically make the activity safe, legal, or consensual when genuine choice is effectively removed.

Main Categories of Hazing in Action

Through years of investigation and legal advocacy, we’ve identified several main categories of hazing that continue to haunt campuses and communities:

Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is the most common and often deadliest form. It involves forced or coerced drinking, which can include chugging challenges, “lineups” where pledges consume drinks rapidly, or games designed to ensure dangerous levels of intoxication. It can also extend to pressure to consume unknown or mixed substances, endangering lives in multiple ways. The Foltz, Coffey, and Gruver cases (discussed later) are tragic examples of this pervasive danger.
Physical Hazing: This category spans from overt violence to extreme endurance. It includes paddling and beatings; extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” (exercises far beyond normal conditioning); and forced sleep, food, or water deprivation. Pledges may be exposed to extreme cold or heat, or placed in dangerous environments, leading to hypothermia, dehydration, or serious injury.
Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: Designed to degrade and strip individuals of dignity, this can involve forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (sometimes referred to with crude terms like “roasted pig” positions), degrading costumes, or acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones. Such hazing wounds the spirit as deeply as the body.
Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but equally damaging, psychological hazing uses verbal abuse, threats, and isolation to exert control. It can involve manipulation, forced confessions, and public shaming campaigns on social media or during group “interrogations.” The goal is to break down an individual’s will and instill absolute submission.
Digital/Online Hazing: This is the modern frontier of hazing. Group chat dares, “challenges,” and orchestrated public humiliation are carried out via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Discord, and others. It might involve pressure to create or share compromising images or videos and constant digital monitoring, leading to relentless sleep deprivation and anxiety.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is unfortunately not exclusive to any single type of group or institution. While fraternities and sororities (including Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural chapters) are frequent settings, we have seen it manifest across a wide spectrum of organizations. This includes:

Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-style groups, which often have deeply ingrained traditions that can cross the line into hazing.
Spirit squads, club sports, and tradition clubs, such as those involved in campus spirit activities or local community events.
Athletic teams of all levels, from football and basketball to baseball, cheerleading, and even golf.
Marching bands and other performing arts groups, where the pursuit of excellence can sometimes lead to harmful practices.
Some service, cultural, and academic organizations, demonstrating that hazing can appear in unexpected places.

The common thread across these diverse groups is the powerful combination of social status, tradition, and secrecy. These elements create an environment where hazing can persist, even when participants know it is explicitly illegal and devastatingly harmful.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For Borden County families seeking to understand their rights and the legal landscape of hazing, a clear grasp of Texas and federal law is essential. Hazing is not merely a university disciplinary issue; it is a serious legal matter with criminal and civil penalties.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific, robust anti-hazing provisions outlined in Chapter 37, Subchapter F of the Texas Education Code. In plain terms, hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and
Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition covers acts both on or off campus, highlighting that location does not diminish liability. The inclusion of “reckless” behavior means that even if there was no malicious intent to cause harm, proceeding with actions that clearly carry a foreseeable risk of injury or mental distress can still constitute hazing.

Texas law classifies specific hazing acts:

Criminal Penalties:
- Hazing that does not cause serious bodily injury is generally a Class B Misdemeanor. If it causes injury requiring medical treatment, it can be a Class A Misdemeanor.
- Crucially, if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it escalates to a State Jail Felony. These felony charges carry significant prison time and fines.
- Furthermore, Texas law penalizes individuals who fail to report hazing: any student, faculty member, or organizational officer who knows about hazing and fails to report it can face misdemeanor charges.
- Retaliation against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor, designed to protect whistleblowers.
Organizational Liability: Beyond individuals, organizations themselves can be held criminally responsible. An organization (such as a fraternity, sorority, or club) can be criminally prosecuted for hazing if it authorized or encouraged the hazing, or if an officer or member acting in their official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it. Penalties for organizations can include fines up to $10,000 per violation, and importantly, the university can revoke recognition and ban the organization from campus.
Reporter Protections: A person who, in good faith, reports a hazing incident to a university or law enforcement agency is immune from civil or criminal liability that might otherwise arise from that report. In medical emergencies, Texas law and university policies often provide amnesty for students who call 911, even if underage drinking or hazing was involved, encouraging timely medical intervention without fear of punishment for minor offenses.
Consent Not a Defense: Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that it is not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the activity. This is a critical provision that recognizes the inherent power imbalance in hazing scenarios, where “consent” is often given under duress, coercion, and fear of social exclusion.

It is vital to remember this is a summary. The full legal language is more technical, but the intent is clear: Texas takes hazing seriously.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, two distinct legal processes can unfold simultaneously:

Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (through a prosecutor’s office) and aim to punish individuals or organizations for violating criminal laws. In hazing incidents, typical criminal charges can range from specific hazing offenses to furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or, tragically, even manslaughter or negligent homicide in fatal cases. The focus is on justice for the state and public safety.
Civil Cases: These are brought directly by victims or their surviving families. The primary goal in civil litigation is monetary compensation for the harm suffered and holding liable parties accountable. Civil lawsuits associated with hazing often involve claims of:
- Negligence or Gross Negligence: Failure to exercise reasonable care in preventing hazing.
- Wrongful Death: When a hazing incident results in a fatality.
- Negligent Hiring/Supervision: The failure of an institution or organization to properly monitor or train its staff or members.
- Premises Liability: If the hazing occurred on property where the owner failed to provide a safe environment.
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress or Assault/Battery.

Crucially, a criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case. The burden of proof is lower in civil cases, and even if criminal charges are not filed or result in acquittal, a civil lawsuit can still succeed. Our firm has deep experience navigating both criminal defense (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) and complex civil litigation.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, federal regulations also play a role in addressing hazing:

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal financial aid must enhance their transparency and prevention efforts around hazing. By around 2026, these institutions will be required to publicly report hazing incidents, strengthen education and prevention programs, and maintain readily accessible hazing data. This will provide unprecedented insight into hazing patterns and institutional responses.
Title IX / Clery Act: When hazing incidents involve sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based hostility, Title IX obligations are triggered, requiring universities to investigate and respond appropriately. The Clery Act mandates that colleges report campus crime statistics and implement safety policies; hazing incidents often overlap with categories like assault, alcohol, and drug-related offenses, and must be included in these reports.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Determining liability in a hazing case often involves multiple parties, reflecting the complex web of individuals and institutions that foster or enable these dangerous practices:

Individual Students: The students who actively planned, encouraged, supplied substances, carried out the acts, or participated in the cover-up of hazing can be held personally liable.
Local Chapter / Organization: The fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself (if structured as a legal entity) can be sued. Key individuals such as officers, “pledge educators,” or coaches who played active roles are often central to these claims.
National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which maintains policies, collects dues, and supervises local chapters, can face significant liability. This often hinges on what the national organization knew or should have known regarding prior hazing incidents, their failure to enforce anti-hazing policies, or their general negligence in overseeing the chapter.
University or Governing Board: The institution itself may be sued under various legal theories, including negligence, gross negligence, or, in some cases, civil rights violations. Key factors include the university’s prior knowledge of hazing, their enforcement (or lack thereof) of anti-hazing policies, and any demonstrated deliberate indifference to known dangers.
Third Parties: Other entities can sometimes be held responsible, such as:
- Landlords or property owners of off-campus houses or event spaces where hazing occurred, particularly if they were aware or should have been aware of dangerous activities.
- Bars or alcohol providers who unlawfully served minors or visibly intoxicated individuals, potentially under dram shop liability theories.
- Security companies or event organizers who failed in their duty to provide a safe environment.

Every case is fact-specific, and not every party will be liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney meticulously investigates each potential defendant to ensure all responsible parties are held accountable.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

The tragic pattern of hazing has led to devastating outcomes across the country, fundamentally reshaping how we understand and litigate these cases. For Borden County families, these national stories are not distant news; they establish precedents and highlight the profound risks that exist at every Texas university.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing fatalities. These are just a few of the high-profile cases that demonstrate this heartbreaking pattern:

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Tim Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a bid-acceptance event involving extreme alcohol consumption. Fraternity members recorded his severe falls and injury on security cameras, yet delayed calling for medical help for nearly 12 hours. The aftermath involved dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the enactment of the comprehensive Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania. This case grimly illustrated how extreme intoxication combined with a culture of silence and delayed medical intervention can have devastatingly fatal consequences.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, also 19, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event, where pledges were given handles of hard liquor. Multiple fraternity members were prosecuted, and many pled guilty to misdemeanor hazing. Florida State University responded by temporarily suspending all Greek life, prompting a statewide anti-hazing movement in Florida. Coffey’s death underscores how “traditional” drinking nights, presented as bonding events, are frequently dangerous scripts for disaster.
Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, died from alcohol toxicity with a BAC of 0.495% after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game. Pledges were forced to drink whenever they answered questions incorrectly. Max’s death led to the passing of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, a felony hazing statute. One member was convicted of negligent homicide. This case vividly demonstrates how public outrage and clear proof of hazing often directly lead to significant legislative change and enhanced criminal penalties.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, was forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” night and died from alcohol poisoning. Multiple criminal convictions followed, with the local chapter president ordered to pay $6.5 million to the family. Furthermore, Bowling Green State University, a public institution, agreed to a nearly $3 million settlement with the family, in addition to other substantial settlements from the fraternity and individuals. The Foltz case highlights that universities, even public ones with claims of sovereign immunity, can face immense financial liability and reputational consequences alongside fraternities.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Hazing is not always about alcohol. Brutal physical and ritualized abuse also leaves a trail of severe injuries and fatalities:

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a pledge, was subjected to a violent, blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania. Fraternity members tackled him repeatedly, causing a fatal traumatic brain injury. After his collapse, medical help was tragically and deliberately delayed. Multiple members were convicted, and the national fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, a landmark ruling for organizational criminal liability. Pi Delta Psi was banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. This case tragically demonstrates that off-campus retreats, specifically chosen to evade university oversight, can be even more dangerous than on-campus incidents, and that national organizations are facing increasingly severe sanctions.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not confined to Greek life. High-stakes athletic programs, often with immense institutional support and devoted fan bases, can also harbor systemic abuse:

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): Former football players came forward with disturbing allegations of widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the prestigious football program over several years. This scandal resulted in multiple lawsuits against Northwestern University and various coaching staff members. The head coach, Pat Fitzgerald, was fired, then filed his own wrongful-termination lawsuit which was confidentially settled. This case profoundly illustrated that hazing permeates beyond Greek life into major, money-generating athletic programs, raising critical questions about institutional oversight and the “win-at-all-costs” culture.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies share common threads: forced intoxication, severe humiliation, physical endurance tests, deliberate delays in seeking medical care, and concerted efforts to cover up the abuse. For Borden County families, these are not isolated incidents; they serve as critical warnings.

Major reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements often follow only after these kinds of tragedies and subsequent litigation. The legal landscape for hazing is constantly being shaped by these cases, influencing court decisions and legislative action across the country. Borden County families whose children attend universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor are operating within a legal and cultural environment profoundly shaped by these national lessons. Recognizing these patterns is the first step toward seeking justice and preventing further harm.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Borden County families, the reality of hazing often hits closest to home when it involves the universities their children attend or plan to attend. While Borden County itself is a rural community in West Texas, its families send students to colleges across the state, including the major institutions where hazing remains a persistent concern. We understand that a child experiencing hazing at a university far from home can feel incredibly isolating. However, Texas law applies universally, and experienced legal counsel can protect your family regardless of where the incident occurred within the state.

University of Houston (UH)

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus in the heart of the nation’s fourth-largest city, serves a diverse student body that balances commuter life with a growing residential population. UH boasts an active and dynamic Greek life, encompassing a wide array of fraternities and sororities, including IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, and multicultural chapters. Beyond Greek life, the university supports numerous student organizations, cultural groups, and sports clubs, all of which contribute to the rich tapestry of campus life. For Borden County families whose students venture to the bustling metropolis of Houston, UH offers a distinct collegiate experience.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Houston maintains clear policies against hazing, applicable whether incidents occur on or off campus. UH explicitly prohibits activities such as forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and actions designed to cause mental distress as part of any initiation or affiliation process. The university provides multiple avenues for reporting hazing, including the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). While UH issues statements condemning hazing and takes disciplinary action, a comprehensive public database of specific violations and sanctions, such as that maintained by UT Austin, is not as readily available.

5.1.3 Example Incidents & Responses

UH has faced its share of hazing allegations and disciplinary actions. Notably, a 2016 incident involving the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity chapter brought significant scrutiny. Pledges were allegedly deprived of adequate food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. In a severe escalation, one student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being violently slammed onto a table or similar surface. Following an investigation, the chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and was subjected to university suspension. Over the years, UH has also taken disciplinary action against other fraternities and student organizations for behavior deemed “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including instances of egregious alcohol misuse and repeated violations of university policy. These responses underscore UH’s commitment to addressing hazing, though the full extent of disciplinary outcomes isn’t always widely publicized.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case originating at the University of Houston can involve a complex interplay of different authorities. Criminal investigations into serious injury or death could fall under the jurisdiction of UHPD if the incident occurred on campus, or the Houston Police Department and Harris County Sheriff’s Office if it happened off-campus within city or county limits. Civil lawsuits related to UH hazing would typically be filed in state district courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County, or potentially in federal court if there are federal claims (e.g., Title IX). Potential defendants in such actions could include the individual students involved, the local chapter itself, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the University of Houston and the owners of any property where the hazing took place.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For Borden County families with students at UH, or considering enrollment, proactive steps are vital:

Understand that reporting channels include the UH Dean of Students, UHPD, and the anonymous online reporting forms available via the university website.
If you have knowledge of prior complaints or past incidents involving a specific organization, gather that documentation, as it can be crucial evidence.
Recognize that speaking with a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can significantly aid in uncovering prior disciplinary actions and internal university files that may not be publicly accessible.
Document every detail: any physical injuries, behavioral changes, or troubling digital communications.
Prioritize medical attention immediately if your child is injured, and ensure medical records accurately reflect the suspected cause of injury.

Texas A&M University

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M University in College Station stands as one of the state’s most iconic institutions, deeply rooted in tradition and known for its distinctive spirit, epitomized by the Corps of Cadets. While Greek life is active, the Corps plays a uniquely central role in certain aspects of campus culture, often fostering a highly disciplined, military-style environment. This blend of strong traditions, Greek organizations, and a powerful Corps culture creates a unique microcosm where hazing concerns must be closely monitored. For Borden County families, Texas A&M is a prominent destination, with students often traveling significant distances across West Texas to become Aggies.

5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M unequivocally prohibits hazing, articulating clear policies through its Student Conduct Code that apply to all student organizations, including the Corps of Cadets, athletic teams, and fraternities/sororities. These policies specifically ban physical or mental brutality, harassment, or abuse used as a condition for affiliation. Reporting channels include the Dean of Student Life, the Office of the Commandant for Corps-related issues, and the Texas A&M University Police Department (TAMU PD). The university publishes an annual report of hazing incidents and disciplinary actions, offering some level of transparency.

5.2.3 Example Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced significant allegations of hazing:

A prominent 2021 lawsuit involved the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity at Texas A&M. Pledges alleged they were subjected to strenuous physical activity and then had various substances, including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, poured on them. This resulted in severe chemical burns that required extensive skin graft surgeries. The chapter was suspended by the university, and the injured pledges subsequently filed a multi-million-dollar lawsuit against the fraternity. This incident highlights the extreme and dangerous forms physical and chemical hazing can take.
In 2023, a lawsuit was filed by a former Corps of Cadets cadet alleging degrading hazing over multiple months. The allegations included being forced to endure simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages, drawing significant attention to hazing risks within the Corps. While the university stated it handled the matter under its rules, the case brought important scrutiny to Corps traditions and oversight.

These incidents demonstrate that hazing at Texas A&M is not confined to Greek life but can tragically occur within its revered Corps traditions.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at Texas A&M would involve TAMU PD for on-campus incidents or the College Station Police Department and Brazos County Sheriff’s Office for off-campus events in the immediate vicinity. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in state district courts in Brazos County or occasionally federal court. Potential defendants include individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and often the university itself, given the university’s deep involvement in student life and the Corps. The firm’s Houston office is well-versed in handling cases in College Station and Brazos County, managing the logistical and jurisdictional aspects seamlessly for Borden County families seeking justice.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For Borden County residents connected to Texas A&M, specific guidance is invaluable:

Familiarize yourself with Texas A&M’s annual hazing report found on their website, which lists organizations disciplined for hazing.
For Corps-related hazing, contact the Office of the Commandant in addition to the Dean of Students.
Be particularly vigilant for signs of physical or psychological distress that might stem from demanding Corps activities or fraternity/sorority events.
Document any and all communications, directives, or events that seem coercive or dangerous, especially through digital means.
Do not hesitate to seek confidential legal advice immediately, as College Station and Brazos County authorities, like others, will control the narrative if you do not have an advocate.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin, the flagship institution of the UT System, defines a dynamic and often intense academic and social environment in the state capital. Its expansive Greek life is robust, featuring a wide array of fraternities and sororities, alongside numerous spirit organizations and active student groups. Borden County families frequently send their brightest to UT Austin, making awareness of campus-specific issues paramount. The university’s sheer size and influence mean that incidents here capture statewide attention.

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UT Austin maintains a clearly articulated anti-hazing policy, emphasizing that hazing is illegal under Texas law and strictly prohibited by university regulations. The policy extends to behaviors occurring both on and off campus and includes physical, mental, and reputational harm. UT is notable for its commitment to transparency regarding hazing, maintaining a public Hazing Violations webpage (hazing.utexas.edu) that lists sanctioned organizations, the nature of their violations, and the disciplinary actions taken. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct, the Title IX Office (if sexual harassment is involved), and the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD).

5.3.3 Example Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s public database offers invaluable insight into hazing patterns. For example:

In 2023, the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity was sanctioned after new members were directed to consume milk excessively and perform strenuous calisthenics. This was deemed hazing, resulting in the chapter being placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education.
Other prominent student groups, including spirit organizations like the Texas Wranglers, have faced sanctions for various forms of hazing, including forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, and other punishment-based practices targeting new members.
In early 2024, the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) chapter at UT Austin faced a lawsuit alleging that an Australian exchange student suffered severe injuries, including a dislocated leg, broken ligaments, and a fractured tibia, after an assault at a fraternity party. This chapter was already under suspension for prior hazing and safety violations earlier in the academic year.

UT’s dedication to listing these violations, despite demonstrating persistent issues, provides crucial data for families and legal teams to establish patterns of misconduct.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case at UT Austin could involve the UTPD for on-campus incidents, or the Austin Police Department and Travis County Sheriff’s Office for off-campus events within the state capital’s jurisdiction. Civil lawsuits would typically proceed in state district courts in Travis County, or potentially federal court. The public hazing log maintained by UT can be a powerful tool for plaintiffs, demonstrating a history of violations and the university’s prior knowledge of an organization’s misconduct, which is crucial for proving negligence. Our Austin office is perfectly situated to handle these cases, providing seamless legal support to Borden County families whose children have been victimized at UT.

5.3.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

For Borden County families with students at UT Austin:

Regularly check UT’s Hazing Violations webpage at hazing.utexas.edu to see if any organization your student is involved with has a disciplinary history.
Recognize that UT’s specific reporting channels include the Dean of Students, UTPD, and the Title IX Coordinator for relevant cases.
Be aware that prior violations listed on UT’s official records can greatly strengthen a civil lawsuit by demonstrating pattern evidence and institutional knowledge.
Gather all photographic, video, and digital evidence from group chats or social media if you suspect hazing, as this evidence is critical for building a compelling case.
Do not delay in seeking legal advice, as the university’s internal processes may not fully align with achieving the justice and compensation your family deserves.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Southern Methodist University, nestled in an affluent area of Dallas, is renowned for its academic rigor and vibrant social scene, with Greek life playing an exceptionally prominent role. Many students from affluent families across Texas, including some from Borden County and the broader West Texas region, are drawn to SMU’s prestigious programs. The close-knit campus environment and strong alumni networks mean that events, including those within Greek organizations, carry significant weight.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU maintains and enforces strict anti-hazing policies, prohibiting any activity that causes mental or physical harm for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. As a private university, SMU’s policies are often less publicly transparent than state institutions, but they can be equally rigorous in their internal disciplinary processes. Reporting channels include the Office of the Dean of Students, the SMU Police Department, and anonymous reporting systems like “Real Response” that aim to encourage students to come forward without fear of retribution.

5.4.3 Example Incidents & Responses

SMU has had its own share of hazing incidents leading to disciplinary action against prominent Greek organizations.

A notable case around 2017 involved the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity. New members allegedly endured paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and significant sleep deprivation. Following an investigation, the chapter was suspended and faced severe restrictions on recruiting for several years. This incident, while not resulting in a national death, highlighted the pervasive nature of physical hazing and forced drinking even at private, well-resourced institutions.
SMU’s consistent efforts to combat hazing include proactive education and the use of anonymous reporting tools. However, these measures underscore the ongoing challenge of eradicating deeply entrenched “traditions.”

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases arising from SMU would typically involve the SMU Police Department for on-campus incidents or the Dallas Police Department and Dallas County Sheriff’s Office for off-campus events. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in state district courts in Dallas County. As a private university, SMU does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially easier to sue the institution directly for negligence compared to public universities. The challenge often lies in compelling discovery from private institutions to uncover internal reports and prior disciplinary actions that are not publicly disclosed.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For Borden County families with students at SMU:

Familiarize yourselves with SMU’s student conduct policies, particularly those pertaining to hazing and student organizational life.
Actively encourage your student to utilize anonymous reporting systems if they witness or experience hazing, emphasizing that their safety and well-being are paramount.
Understand that while SMU’s internal disciplinary records may not be public, an experienced attorney can leverage legal discovery processes to obtain crucial evidence regarding an organization’s history of misconduct.
Seek immediate legal counsel if you suspect hazing, as early intervention allows for crucial evidence preservation and strategic planning in navigating a private university’s internal systems and pursuing legal action.

Baylor University

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Nestled in Waco, Baylor University is Texas’s oldest continuously operating university, distinguished by its strong Baptist Christian heritage and a close-knit campus community. While upholding conservative values, Baylor also hosts a vibrant Greek life and a passionate athletic culture. Many Borden County families choose Baylor for its academic reputation and faith-based environment. However, the university has faced significant past scrutiny over its handling of abuse allegations, particularly involving its football program and Title IX issues, which provides a unique context for any hazing concerns.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor University strictly prohibits hazing, stating it is illegal under Texas law and contrary to its Christian mission and values. Its policies apply to all student organizations, athletic teams, and university-affiliated groups. Baylor’s reporting channels include the Office of Student Conduct, the Baylor University Police Department, and the Title IX Office (especially pertinent given the university’s history with sexual assault allegations). Baylor also provides resources and information on its website regarding hazing prevention.

5.5.3 Example Incidents & Responses

Baylor’s history of institutional oversight has faced intense public and legal scrutiny, setting a unique backdrop for current hazing concerns.

In 2020, Baylor’s baseball program made headlines when 14 players were suspended following a hazing investigation. The suspensions were staggered to allow the team to compete, raising questions about the severity of the hazing and the university’s balancing act between discipline and athletic performance. This demonstrated that hazing occurs even within athletic programs at religiously affiliated institutions.
The broader context of Baylor’s sexual assault scandal in the mid-2010s, which led to the firing of prominent figures and significant reforms in how the university handles Title IX cases, means that any allegations of misconduct, including hazing, are viewed through a lens of heightened scrutiny and a need for greater institutional accountability.

These incidents highlight the complexities of addressing misconduct, including hazing, within an institution with a history of oversight challenges and a strong, proud athletic program.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at Baylor University would typically involve the Baylor University Police Department for on-campus incidents or the Waco Police Department and McLennan County Sheriff’s Office for off-campus events. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in state district courts in McLennan County. As a private university, Baylor does not possess sovereign immunity, making it a more direct target for negligence claims compared to public institutions. However, Baylor’s robust legal defense and the complexities of navigating its internal systems, often tied to its religious identity, require highly experienced legal counsel. Our firm’s reach across Texas means we can effectively represent Borden County families in Waco and McLennan County.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For Borden County families with students attending Baylor:

Be particularly vigilant given Baylor’s past challenges with institutional oversight and its strong athletic culture; this means taking all hazing concerns seriously.
Understand that reporting hazing at Baylor involves the Office of Student Conduct, the Baylor Police Department, and, if applicable, the Title IX Office.
Document any and all instances of hazing, whether physical, emotional, or digital, as these records are crucial for any potential internal investigation or external legal action.
Consider that a lawyer experienced in institutional liability and hazing cases can navigate Baylor’s specific policies and internal workings, advocating fiercely for your child’s rights and ensuring accountability.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

When hazing occurs at a Texas university, it’s rarely an isolated incident from a truly “rogue” chapter. Instead, what we often see is a disturbing pattern reflecting both local chapter culture and a broader national organizational history of misconduct. For Borden County families, recognizing these patterns is key to understanding liability.

Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities and sororities, including those with chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, are part of larger national organizations. These national headquarters (often situated far from Texas) have significant responsibilities. They:

Create and disseminate anti-hazing policies, risk management manuals, and educational materials.
Collect dues, provide resources, and offer oversight to their local chapters.
Are (or should be) aware of hazing incidents that occur across their vast networks of chapters nationwide.

The unfortunate reality is that many national organizations have observed, investigated, and settled (often confidentially) numerous hazing incidents over decades. They have seen the same dangerous “traditions” – the forced drinking nights, the paddling rituals, the humiliating “pledge tasks” – repeat themselves year after year, campus after campus.

When a local chapter in Texas repeats this same script, causing injury, or even death, it indicates more than just an isolated incident. It suggests:

Foreseeability: The national organization could, and should, have foreseen that such hazing was likely to occur, given their history.
Negligence: Their failure to adequately prevent, monitor, or punish such behavior, despite prior warnings and incidents, constitutes negligence.
Institutional Indifference: It can point to a pattern of systemic indifference to student safety, prioritizing organizational growth or tradition over the well-being of their members.

This understanding of national patterns is crucial in civil litigation against national entities, affecting settlement leverage and potentially strengthening arguments for punitive damages.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

Many of the fraternities and sororities active at Texas’s major universities have national counterparts with documented hazing histories. Below is a narrative summary of some organizations and the types of incidents that reflect this pattern, drawing from our National Hazing Incident Reference Database:

Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): Widely present across Texas campuses, Pi Kappa Alpha has been at the center of multiple high-profile hazing deaths. The tragic death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021, where he was forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol, resulted in criminal convictions and a $10 million settlement ($7M from the national fraternity and ~$3M from BGSU). Earlier, David Bogenberger died in 2012 at Northern Illinois University under similar circumstances, leading to a $14 million settlement. These cases underscore a disturbing pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing within the fraternity, making it a significant concern for any Pi Kappa Alpha chapter in Texas.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE has been involved in several hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide. Their repeated tragic incidents led SAE to famously, but unsuccessfully, attempt to abolish their pledge process in 2014. More recently, allegations include a traumatic brain injury during a hazing ritual at the University of Alabama (2023 lawsuit). Closer to home, a 2021 incident at Texas A&M University alleged pledges suffered severe chemical burns from industrial-strength cleaner, requiring skin grafts. The University of Texas at Austin chapter faced a 2024 lawsuit after an international student allegedly suffered severe orthopedic injuries at a fraternity party while the chapter was under suspension for prior hazing. This history strongly suggests a national pattern of physical and alcohol-related abuse.
Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): The death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017 from extreme alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game is directly tied to Phi Delta Theta. This case spurred the Max Gruver Act (felony hazing) in Louisiana. Any Phi Delta Theta chapter, including those at Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, operates under the shadow of this national tragedy, which highlights the dangers of coerced drinking games.
Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): The highly publicized death of Timothy Piazza at Penn State University in 2017 after egregious alcohol consumption and delayed medical care during a “bid acceptance” night brought national attention to Beta Theta Pi. This led to significant criminal prosecutions, confidential civil settlements, and Pennsylvania’s robust anti-hazing legislation. While there are active chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, the national organization carries the weight of this tragic history.
Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Similar to other organizations, Pi Kappa Phi chapters in Texas operate with the knowledge of prior tragedies like the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017 from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. This incident led to criminal prosecutions and a temporary suspension of all Greek life at FSU.
Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): The catastrophic injury of Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri in 2021, who suffered permanent brain damage from forced alcohol consumption, illustrates the extreme danger associated with Phi Gamma Delta hazing. The Santulli family settled with 22 defendants, reportedly for multi-million-dollar amounts, highlighting the severe consequences of such abuse.
Omega Psi Phi (ΩΨΦ): National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) fraternities, while distinct, have also faced hazing allegations. Omega Psi Phi, active at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, was sued in 2023 by a former University of Southern Mississippi student alleging severe physical hazing, including repeated beatings with a wooden paddle that required emergency surgery. This points to ongoing concerns about physical hazing within the organization.
Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): Chapters of Kappa Sigma, present at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor, operate in the context of cases like Chad Meredith’s drowning death in 2001 at the University of Miami, which resulted in a $12.6 million jury verdict against the fraternity and led to Florida’s criminal hazing law. Recent allegations at Texas A&M University (2023) of hazing causing rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown) further emphasize its ongoing risks.

These patterns are not exhaustive lists, but rather illustrative examples. The key takeaway for Borden County families is that these national incidents create a blueprint of foreseeable harm. When a Texas chapter of one of these organizations engages in similar hazing, it significantly strengthens arguments for accountability against the national entity, as they had clear prior notice of the inherent dangers.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

The documented history of hazing, both nationally and at specific Texas campuses like UT Austin’s public hazing log, directly informs our legal strategy. Repeated patterns of misconduct, especially when involving the same type of hazing or the same organizations, are crucial for demonstrating:

Foreseeability: Proving that the national organization or university knew, or should have known, that hazing was likely to occur and presented a grave danger.
Pattern Evidence: Establishing a track record of similar incidents strengthens claims of institutional negligence or deliberate indifference.
Lack of Enforcement: When national organizations or universities have policies against hazing but fail to enforce them consistently or meaningfully, it undermines their defense that the hazing was an “unforeseeable act” by a “rogue chapter.”

This strategic use of historical data profoundly impacts:

Settlement Leverage: Defendants, aware of their track record and exposure, are often more inclined to negotiate fair settlements.
Insurance Coverage Disputes: Documenting a pattern of foreseeability helps overcome common insurance company arguments that hazing was an “intentional act” and thus excluded from coverage.
Potential for Punitive Damages: In cases where organizations or institutions have demonstrated a conscious disregard for safety despite prior warnings, courts may award punitive damages to punish egregious conduct and deter future harm.

Understanding these intertwined local and national histories is a powerful tool in seeking justice for hazing victims.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Successfully pursuing a hazing case requires a meticulous, strategic approach, drawing on cutting-edge investigative techniques and a deep understanding of the law. For Borden County families, knowing what evidence matters and how it translates into potential recovery is critical.

Evidence: The Foundation of Every Hazing Case

Modern hazing leaves a digital footprint that is often more damning than traditional physical evidence. Our firm excels at uncovering and preserving these crucial pieces:

Digital Communications: These are often the most critical evidence. We meticulously collect and analyze:
- GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and fraternity/sorority-specific apps: These platforms are central to planning, executing, and covering up hazing. Messages can reveal explicit instructions, threats, derogatory nicknames, details of events, and discussions designed to coerce silence.
- Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok comments: Social media provides a trove of information, including boasts, shaming, or even visual evidence of hazing.
- Evidence includes both live messages and data recovered from deleted messages, which digital forensics experts can often unearth even after deliberate attempts to erase them. Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.
Photos & Videos: These can be undeniable proof:
- Content filmed by members during hazing events, often captured on phones, showing forced consumption, physical abuse, or humiliation.
- Footage shared in private group chats or posted (even briefly) on social media.
- Security camera footage from campus buildings, off-campus houses, or venues, as well as Ring/doorbell footage, can place individuals at the scene or expose the extent of injuries.
Internal Organization Documents: Often obtained through formal legal discovery, these documents reveal institutional knowledge and intent:
- Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, ritual “traditions” lists, and internal communications from officers discussing “what we’ll do to pledges.”
- National anti-hazing policies, risk management guidelines, and training materials, which can expose the gap between stated policy and actual practice.
University Records: These records can establish a pattern of misconduct and institutional knowledge:
- Prior conduct files related to the organization, including records of probation, suspensions, or letters of warning.
- Incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices.
- Clery Act reports and similar disclosures that indicate patterns of crime or misconduct on campus.
Medical and Psychological Records: These documents quantify the harm suffered:
- Emergency room and hospitalization records, including ambulance reports.
- Documentation of surgeries, ongoing treatment, physical therapy, and medications.
- Toxicology reports, blood alcohol levels, and specialized tests (e.g., for rhabdomyolysis or organ damage).
- Psychological evaluations that diagnose PTSD, depression, anxiety, or document suicidal ideation, crucial for emotional distress claims.
Witness Testimony: Beyond the victim, the accounts of others are vital:
- Other pledges or members who witnessed the hazing, or even participated in it.
- Roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, trainers, or bystanders who noticed changes in the victim or observed suspicious activities.
- Former members who quit or were expelled, often willing to share critical insights into the organization’s culture.

Damages: Recovering What Was Lost

Hazing wreaks havoc on lives, and the law aims to provide compensation for the full extent of this harm. In a hazing case, damages can fall into several categories:

Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs, from immediate emergency room visits and ambulance transport to intensive care, surgeries, ongoing physical therapy, medications, and long-term care plans for catastrophic injuries such as brain damage or permanent organ damage.
Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes lost wages if the victim or a parent had to take time off work, as well as the significant impact on the victim’s educational trajectory, including missed semesters, lost scholarships, and delays in entering their chosen profession. For permanent injuries, economists can calculate the diminished future earning capacity over a lifetime.
Non-Economic Damages: These address the non-monetary, but equally devastating, harms:
- Physical pain and suffering from injuries, both immediate and long-term.
- Emotional distress, trauma, and humiliation, including diagnosable psychological conditions like PTSD, depression, and anxiety.
- Loss of enjoyment of life, representing the inability to participate in activities, hobbies, and social interactions that once brought joy.
Wrongful Death Damages (for families): In the most tragic cases, hazing can be fatal. Surviving family members can recover for:
- Funeral and burial costs.
- Loss of financial support and inheritance.
- Loss of companionship, love, and support.
- The profound grief and emotional suffering of parents, children, and siblings. Attorney911 has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic cases.

It’s crucial to understand that we are describing types of damages, not promising specific dollar amounts. Each case’s value is determined by its unique facts and the severity of the harm.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation often involves powerful defendants like national fraternities, universities, and their insurers. These entities often carry substantial insurance policies designed to cover such incidents. However, insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage by arguing that:

Hazing or assault falls under an “intentional acts” exclusion in their policy.
The policy doesn’t cover certain defendants (e.g., individual students vs. the national organization).

Experienced hazing lawyers at our firm understand these tactics. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) provides invaluable insight into how these companies operate, allowing us to:

Identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, including chapter, national, and university umbrella policies.
Navigate complex disputes about policy exclusions and the definition of “intentional conduct,” often arguing that the oversight or negligence of the institution made the intentional acts foreseeable and therefore covered.
Force insurers to fulfill their duty to defend and indemnify.

Our firm’s experience in complex litigation means we are not intimidated by the resources of national organizations or universities. We are adept at uncovering every layer of liability and relentlessly pursuing the maximum recovery on behalf of our clients.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing strikes, families in Borden County and across Texas need clear, actionable guidance. Knowing what to do – and what not to do – in the critical moments can make all the difference in protecting your child and preserving a legal case.

For Parents: Your Role in Recognizing & Responding to Hazing

As a parent, you are often the first line of defense. Here’s what to look for and how to react:

Warning Signs of Hazing:
- Unexplained injuries like bruises, burns, or cuts, especially if your child’s explanations don’t add up or they seem overly secretive.
- Sudden, extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation, with your child constantly exhausted, falling asleep in strange places, or receiving incessant late-night calls or demands.
- Drastic changes in mood, such as increased anxiety, depression, irritability, or withdrawal from activities and friends they once enjoyed.
- Constant, secretive phone use for group chats, coupled with an intense fear of missing “mandatory” events or messages.
- Significant financial strain, unexpected requests for money, or unusual purchases for the organization.
- “Blind loyalty” language, such as “I just have to get through this,” or “everyone else did it,” even when clearly uncomfortable.
How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation calmly and empathetically. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with the fraternity/sorority?” or “Is there anything about the initiation process that makes you uncomfortable?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priority, not the organization’s status, and that you will support them without judgment.
If Your Child is Hurt or in Danger:
- Get them immediate medical care. Your child’s health is paramount; do not delay due to fear of repercussions. Ensure medical professionals are aware that injuries are suspected to be hazing-related.
- Document everything. Photograph injuries from multiple angles and over several days to show healing progression. Screenshot any digital communications (texts, group chats, social media posts) your child shows you. Write down details of what happened, who was involved, when, and where, while memories are fresh.
- Save physical items like clothing worn during the hazing, suspicious receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used in the hazing.
Dealing with the University: If you decide to engage with the university, document every communication. Ask specific questions about:
- Any prior incidents or disciplinary actions involving the same organization.
- Steps the school took, or failed to take, in response to previous issues.
- Remember, the university’s priority may be to manage its reputation, not solely to achieve justice for your child.
When to Talk to a Lawyer: Consult with an experienced hazing lawyer immediately if your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing what happened. Early legal intervention is critical for evidence preservation and strategic planning.

For Students / Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning

If you are a student or pledge in Borden County or at any Texas university, knowing your rights and how to protect yourself is vital.

“Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?” Decision Guide: Ask yourself: “Am I being forced or pressured to do something I genuinely don’t want to do? Would I do this if there were no social consequences or fear of being ‘cut’? Is this activity dangerous, degrading, or illegal? Would my parents or the university approve if they knew exactly what was happening?” If you answered “yes” to any of these, it is likely hazing. Remember, Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing, recognizing the power imbalance and coercion involved.
Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Groups often tell new members that they “consented” to everything. However, the law understands that “consent” given under immense peer pressure, fear of social exclusion, or the desire to belong is not true voluntary consent. You have the right to be safe, regardless of what anyone told you.
Exiting and Reporting Safely: If you are in immediate danger, call 911 or campus police. Get to a safe location. If you wish to de-pledge or leave the organization, you have the legal right to do so at any time. Send an email or text (to document it) to the chapter leadership stating your resignation. If you fear retaliation, report this concern to your university’s Dean of Students.
Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Texas law and many university policies encourage reporting hazing or calling for medical help in emergencies by offering protections. This means you may have some immunity from repercussions for minor offenses (like underage drinking) if you report in good faith or seek aid during an emergency. Your safety is more important than any organizational loyalty.

For Former Members / Witnesses: A Path to Accountability

If you were once involved in hazing, or witnessed it, and now carry the burden of conscience, know that your courage can prevent future tragedies.

Your Action Can Prevent Harm: Your testimony and any evidence you possess can be instrumental in holding perpetrators accountable and preventing future harm to other students. This is a powerful step towards justice.
Seek Legal Advice: While your involvement may raise concerns about your own legal exposure, an attorney can help you understand your rights, including potential immunity as a good-faith reporter, and advise you on how to cooperate responsibly. Often, prosecutors and civil attorneys are far more interested in an honest account of events that leads to accountability than in prosecuting every participant.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

In hazing cases, every action (or inaction) can have profound consequences. Avoid these critical errors:

Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence: What parents think is protecting their child often destroys the case. It looks like a cover-up, makes investigation nearly impossible, and can even be obstruction of justice. Instead, preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content.
Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly: Approaching the organization directly will likely cause them to immediately seek legal counsel, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare defenses against your claims. Document everything, then call a lawyer before any confrontation.
Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms: Universities often pressure families into signing waivers or “internal resolution” agreements. These documents can waive your right to sue, and typically offer settlements far below the true value of your case. Do NOT sign anything without an attorney reviewing it first.
Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer: While you may want to share your story, defense attorneys will screenshot everything. Inconsistencies or misstatements can severely damage your credibility and even waive certain legal protections. Document privately and let your lawyer control public messaging.
Letting your child go back to “one last meeting” or conversation: If you’re considering legal action, the organization will likely attempt to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can harm your case. All communication should go through your lawyer.
Waiting “to see how the university handles it”: Universities’ internal processes are often slow, lack transparency, and prioritize institutional reputation over individual justice. Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations continues to run. Preserve evidence NOW and consult a lawyer immediately alongside any university process.
Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer: Insurance adjusters are trained to minimize payouts. Any statement you make can be used against you. Politely decline to speak with them and state, “My attorney will contact you.”

Short FAQ

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on specific facts—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case-specific analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default, but it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individual officers can also face misdemeanor charges for failing to report hazing. Criminal defense expertise (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) is often needed.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” given under peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally 2 years from the date of injury or death in Texas, but the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses forget, and organizations destroy records. Learn more about the statute of limitations in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately.
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
Location doesn’t eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be liable based on sponsorship, control, knowledge, and foreseeability. Many major hazing cases (like the Pi Delta Psi retreat death) occurred off-campus and still resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. While we prioritize justice and accountability, we can also explore options for sealed court records and confidential settlement terms to protect your family’s privacy where possible.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. This is precisely the expertise that The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, brings to Borden County families and all Texans.

We are not just personal injury lawyers; we are Legal Emergency Lawyers™. Our firm is uniquely qualified to tackle the complexities of hazing litigation, standing against well-resourced universities and national fraternal organizations.

Our strength lies in:

Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable experience as a former insurance defense attorney for a national firm. She knows their playbook because she used to run it. This insider knowledge means we understand exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims, anticipate their delay tactics, dissect coverage exclusion arguments, and strategically approach settlement negotiations. Lupe Peña’s complete credentials are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, has extensive federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) and was notably one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation. We are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their formidable defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won, applying the same aggressive, meticulous approach to secure justice for hazing victims. Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases, collaborating with economists to meticulously calculate long-term losses. Our experience includes valuing lifetime care needs for victims of brain injury and other permanent disabilities. We don’t settle cheap; we build cases that compel accountability and secure comprehensive compensation.
Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a crucial advantage. We understand how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, enabling us to advise victims, witnesses, and even former members on both criminal exposure and civil liability.
Investigative Depth: We have built a robust network of experts, including medical professionals, digital forensics specialists, economists, and psychologists. Our experience in crisis management and evidence gathering means we know how to obtain critical, often hidden, evidence—from deleted group chats and social media data to subpoenaed national fraternity records and university files. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it often does.

From our Houston office, with additional offices in Austin and Beaumont, we serve families throughout Texas, including Borden County and its surrounding regions. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families far and wide, and we are committed to being accessible wherever our clients need us.

We understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments operate behind closed doors. We know how to investigate modern hazing, what makes these cases different, and how to navigate the complex interplay of powerful institutional defendants, insurance coverage fights, and the delicate balance between victim privacy and public accountability. Our firm approaches each case with empathy and a steadfast commitment to victim advocacy, knowing this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family.

Call to Action

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it be the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or any other institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Borden County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm today for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

In your free consultation, you can expect us to:

Listen to your story without judgment.
Review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
Explain your legal options, including the possibility of a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
Discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
Answer your questions about costs, as we work on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Watch our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
Provide clear information with no pressure to hire us on the spot—take the time you need to decide.
Everything you discuss with us is strictly confidential.

You don’t have to face this alone. Contact us today:

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Borden County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com