Standing Against Hazing: A Complete Guide for Camp County Families

The silence in the dorm room is heavy, broken only by the frantic buzz of a phone. Your child, a bright student from Camp County, Texas, stares at a group chat showing photos of pledges passed out, covered in strange symbols, after a “mandatory” late-night event somewhere near campus. A knot tightens in their stomach. They’ve been told to keep silent, to protect the “brotherhood” or “sisterhood,” to endure because “everyone else went through it.” But the line has clearly been crossed. Bruises, psychological exhaustion, and mounting fear replace the excitement of college life. Perhaps they’ve seen a friend struggle after a forced drinking game, or they themselves have been subjected to degrading rituals that leave them feeling broken and alone. They wonder, is this just “tradition,” or is it something far more sinister?

This guide is for you, Camp County families, if this scenario resonates. While our firm is based in Houston, we understand that issues like hazing at Texas universities deeply affect families in Camp County and all over our state. We see the pain and confusion firsthand. We understand the fear your child might feel, caught between wanting to belong and compromising their safety and values. We are Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, and we’ve built this comprehensive guide to help you recognize the signs of modern hazing, understand your legal rights in Texas, and know what steps you can take to protect your child and seek accountability.

This guide is more than a simple overview; it’s a deep dive into the harsh reality of hazing on college campuses in 2025. We’ll cover:

• What hazing truly looks like today, beyond outdated stereotypes.
• The specific legal framework in Texas and how federal laws play a role.
• Lessons from major national cases, and how these patterns are unfortunately repeated in Texas universities.
• A focused look at the environments at University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University.
• The national history of Greek organizations and how it impacts local chapters.
• Practical steps for building a strong legal case, understanding potential damages, and developing a strategic response.
• Concrete advice and FAQs for parents, students, and witnesses, empowering you with knowledge.

This article provides general information and is not specific legal advice. If you need a personalized evaluation of your situation, the experienced legal team at Attorney911 is ready to help. We serve families throughout Texas, including those here in Camp County.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority.
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
    • Post details on public social media.
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Camp County families unfamiliar with modern Greek life or university culture, hazing can be misunderstood, often conjuring images from old movies or news reports about isolated incidents. However, hazing in 2025 is far more insidious, prevalent, and dangerous—and it impacts a wider range of campus organizations than many realize. It’s not “boys will be boys,” nor is it simple horseplay. Modern hazing involves complex power dynamics, sophisticated digital coercion, and a culture of enforced secrecy that can have devastating, even fatal, consequences.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

At its core, hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act conducted by a group or individual, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. This definition, largely aligned with Texas law, emphasizes key points:

• Intent isn’t always malice: Even if hazers don’t intend to harm, acting recklessly (knowing the risk and doing it anyway) can qualify.
• Mental or physical harm: Hazing doesn’t have to leave bruises to be illegal. Psychological torment, humiliation, and sleep deprivation are equally harmful.
• “Consent” is irrelevant: Saying “I agreed to it” does not make dangerous or degrading acts safe or legal. Under pressure to join, students are rarely in a position to give true, voluntary consent.

Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing tactics have evolved, adapting to avoid detection while maintaining coercive control. We often categorize hazing into three tiers of escalating severity, from subtle manipulation to outright violence. This tiered system helps families in Camp County and across Texas recognize the full spectrum of harmful behaviors.

Tier 1: Subtle Hazing

These are behaviors that subtly reinforce power imbalances and can seem harmless, but they lay the groundwork for more severe hazing and can cause significant psychological distress.

• Deception/Secrecy Oaths: Pledges are forced to lie to parents, university officials, or outsiders about their activities.
• Degrading Names/Identities: Requiring new members to answer to demeaning nicknames or titles.
• Forced Servitude: Pledges compelled to perform duties for older members, acting as designated drivers, cleaning rooms, or running errands at all hours. This fosters a belief that “pledges are on call 24/7.”
• Social Isolation: Restricting contact with friends outside the organization or requiring permission to socialize.
• Deprivation of Privileges: New members forbidden from speaking unless spoken to, sitting in certain seats, or using specific entrances.
• Academic Interference: Mandatory late-night events or meetings that conflict with studies, exams, or sleep schedules.
• Humiliating Tasks: “Scavenger hunts” or other tasks designed to embarrass pledges in public.

Modern Evolutions of Subtle Hazing:

• Digital Control: Pledges are required to respond instantly to group messages 24/7. Failure to do so can result in punishment.
• Location Tracking: Mandating the use of location-sharing apps (e.g., Find My Friends, Life360).
• Social Media Policing: Dictating what pledges can post, or forcing them to engage with organizational content.

Tier 2: Harassment Hazing

These acts cause emotional or physical discomfort, often creating a hostile and abusive environment, even if they don’t result in lasting physical injury.

• Verbal Abuse: Subjecting pledges to constant yelling, insults, degrading language, or verbal threats.
• Sleep Deprivation: Orchestrating late-night “meetings,” tasks, or multi-day events with minimal sleep, leading to severe exhaustion.
• Food/Water Restriction: Limiting access to food or water, or forcing consumption of unpleasant substances like spoiled food, excessive hot sauce, or large quantities of bland items (e.g., milk or raw onions).
• Excessive Physical Exertion: Mandating strenuous calisthenics (“smokings”), forced runs, or other physical activities beyond safe limits, often framed as “conditioning” but used punitively.
• Public Humiliation: Forcing pledges to perform embarrassing acts in public or subjecting them to “roasts” where they are verbally attacked by older members.
• Exposure to Unsanitary Conditions: Forcing pledges into dirty spaces or covering them with food, condiments, or other non-harmful but humiliating substances.

Modern Evolutions of Harassment Hazing:

• Coerced Participation: Presenting hazing activities as “optional” while creating social pressure and repercussions for those who decline.
• Digital Humiliation: Forcing pledges to post embarrassing content on social media or participate in humiliating online trends.
• Livestreaming/Recording: Documenting degrading acts for sharing within private group chats or social media.

Tier 3: Violent Hazing

These are the most dangerous forms of hazing, carrying a high risk of severe physical injury, psychological trauma, sexual assault, or even death. These are considered serious crimes under Texas law.

• Forced Alcohol/Drug Consumption:
  • “Lineup” drinking games, where specific amounts of alcohol are consumed rapidly.
  • “Big/Little reveal” nights involving large amounts of hard liquor.
  • “Bible study” or “family tree” games where incorrect answers result in forced drinking.
  • Forced chugging, funneling, or keg stands.
  • Coercion to consume illicit drugs.
• Physical Beatings: Paddling, punching, kicking, or slapping pledges.
• Dangerous Physical Tests: Blindfolded tackling (“glass ceiling”), forced fights, or other stunts like jumping from heights or swimming while intoxicated.
• Sexualized Hazing: Forced nudity, simulated sexual acts, sexual assault, or coercion. This can include sexually explicit displays or behavior.
• Abusive Environments: Exposure to extreme cold or heat, denial of access to restrooms, or being confined in small, uncomfortable spaces.
• Vile Consumption: Forcing pledges to ingest vomit, urine, or other disgusting substances.

Modern Evolutions of Violent Hazing:

• “Retreat” Hazing: Moving dangerous hazing activities off-campus to remote locations (Airbnbs, private properties) to evade university oversight and law enforcement.
• Disguised Activities: Framing violent hazing as “team building” or “fitness challenges” (e.g., extreme workouts that result in rhabdomyolysis or severe injury).
• Fire/Burn Hazing: Incidents involving pledges being branded, burned, or even set on fire with flammable liquids.
• Chemical Hazing: Using industrial cleaners, vomit, or other substances poured on pledges, causing chemical burns and severe skin damage.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is not confined to any single type of student organization. While Greek life often receives the most media attention, it’s a problem found across various groups, often fueled by misguided notions of “tradition” and loyalty. Families in Camp County should be aware that hazing can occur in:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations.
• Corps of Cadets/ROTC: Military-style groups, including at institution like Texas A&M, can have deeply entrenched hazing traditions centered around physical and psychological endurance.
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to cheerleading and club sports, hazing can be used as a perverse method of “team building” or weeding out perceived weaknesses.
• Spirit Squads/Tradition Clubs: Groups focused on school spirit or upholding specific traditions sometimes engage in hazing rituals.
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: The pressure to perform and conform can lead to hazing in musical and other performing arts ensembles.
• Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Even groups with noble missions can fall prey to hazing, where new members are forced to “earn” their place through demeaning tasks.

The pervasive nature of hazing stems from a toxic mix of social status, a desire for conformity, the upholding of “tradition,” and a strict culture of secrecy that protects perpetrators from accountability.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas is crucial for Camp County families seeking justice. Both state and federal laws provide avenues for criminal prosecution and civil litigation, holding individuals, organizations, and sometimes even universities accountable.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has clear statutes under the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F, specifically addressing hazing. These laws provide a robust framework, classifying hazing as a criminal offense and establishing the grounds for civil liability.

Texas Education Code § 37.151. Definition

Under Texas law, hazing is defined as: “Any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

1. Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student; AND
2. Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.”

Plain English: For individuals in Camp County, this means if someone (or a group) makes a student do something dangerous, unhealthy, or humiliating to join or stay in a school-related group, and they did so intentionally or recklessly, it is hazing. This applies regardless of whether the act occurs on or off school grounds, and it covers harm to both mental and physical well-being.

Key Legal Points:

• On or Off-Campus: The physical location of the hazing does not shield perpetrators or organizations from liability.
• Mental or Physical Harm: Proving physical injury is not always necessary; severe psychological distress and humiliation can also meet the criteria.
• Reckless Act: There doesn’t need to be malicious intent to harm. If the individual or group knew the act was dangerous but proceeded anyway, it can be considered hazing.
• “Consent” is Not a Defense: Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that the victim’s “consent” to hazing is not a valid legal defense. This recognizes the power imbalance inherent in hazing situations, where students feel coerced into participation.

Texas Education Code § 37.152. Criminal Penalties

Individuals found guilty of hazing can face criminal charges:

• Class B Misdemeanor: The default classification, carrying potential penalties of up to 180 days in county jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
• Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical attention.
• State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This is a critical provision that escalates the severity of charges for severe outcomes.

Additionally, under Texas law:

• Failing to Report: An officer or active member of an organization who knows about hazing and fails to report it can also face misdemeanor charges.
• Retaliation: Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is a misdemeanor.

Texas Education Code § 37.153. Organizational Liability

Organizations themselves can face criminal charges and penalties:

• An organization can be found guilty of hazing if it “authorized or encouraged” the hazing activity, or if an officer or senior member knew about the hazing and failed to report it.
• Penalties for organizations can include fines up to $10,000. Additionally, the educational institution can revoke the organization’s recognition and prohibit it from operating on campus.

These provisions demonstrate that Texas law aims to hold both individual perpetrators and the organizations they belong to accountable for hazing.

Texas Education Code § 37.154. Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting

A person who reports hazing in good faith to a university or law enforcement agency is immune from civil or criminal liability stemming from that report. This protection aims to encourage reporting without fear of legal repercussions for the person stepping forward. Additionally, Texas law, like many state laws, often includes provisions for medical amnesty, protecting individuals from prosecution for certain offenses (like underage drinking) if they call for help in a medical emergency.

Texas Education Code § 37.156. Reporting by Educational Institutions

Texas colleges and universities are mandated to:

• Provide hazing prevention education to their students.
• Publish clear anti-hazing policies.
• Report annually on hazing violations, including the names of organizations involved and disciplinary actions taken. This public reporting creates a valuable record for families and can be instrumental in civil litigation.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, families in Camp County often encounter two distinct but sometimes overlapping legal processes:

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations for violating anti-hazing laws. The goal is to punish offenders through fines, imprisonment, or probation. Common hazing-related criminal charges beyond the specific hazing offense itself can include assault, furnishing alcohol to minors, or, in tragic cases, manslaughter or negligent homicide.
• Civil Cases: These are lawsuits filed by the victim or their surviving family members (plaintiffs) against the individuals and entities responsible for the harm (defendants). The primary goal in civil litigation is to obtain monetary compensation for damages suffered, as well as to achieve accountability and prevent future incidents. Civil claims often involve allegations of negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, or premises liability, among others.

It’s vital for families to understand that a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for filing a civil lawsuit. Each process has its own burden of proof and objectives, and they can proceed independently or concurrently.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond Texas state laws, federal legislation also significantly impacts hazing accountability:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal law requires colleges and universities receiving federal funding to be significantly more transparent about hazing incidents. By 2026, these institutions must publicly report all hazing violations, including the date, location, organizations involved, and sanctions imposed. The Act also emphasizes stronger hazing education and prevention efforts. For Camp County families, this means greater access to data on which organizations on Texas campuses have a history of hazing.
• Title IX: This federal civil rights law prohibits sex-based discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based bullying, or creates a sexually hostile environment, Title IX obligations are triggered. This can compel universities to investigate, take corrective action, and provide support to victims.
• Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents, especially those involving assaults, significant injuries, or alcohol/drug offenses, can fall under Clery reporting requirements, further contributing to transparency.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

In complex hazing cases, accountability can extend far beyond just the student perpetrators. The Manginello Law Firm often investigates multiple parties who may share legal responsibility:

• Individual Students: The students who actively planned, encouraged, or carried out the hazing acts are often primary defendants. This includes ringleaders, “pledge educators,” or those who supplied alcohol to minors.
• Local Chapter/Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself can be sued as a legal entity. Even if unincorporated, key officers may be held personally liable.
• National Fraternity/Sorority: For many Greek organizations in Texas, the national headquarters plays a significant role in setting policies, collecting dues, and supervising local chapters. Nationals can be held liable for negligent supervision if they knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing within their chapters but failed to take adequate preventative measures.
• University or Governing Board: Educational institutions themselves can be held liable in certain circumstances. This typically involves demonstrating negligence (e.g., failure to enforce their own anti-hazing policies, ignoring repeated warnings, or exhibiting deliberate indifference to known patterns of hazing). Sovereign immunity can offer some protection to public universities in Texas as discussed in our FAQ, but exceptions and strategic approaches exist.
• Third Parties: Depending on the specifics of the incident, other parties might also bear responsibility. This could include landlords of off-campus houses where hazing occurred, property owners, or even alcohol vendors who negligently served minors.

Every hazing case is fact-specific, and identifying all potentially liable parties requires a thorough investigation by experienced legal counsel.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

Hazing
victims and families can feel alone, but the patterns of abuse seen at Texas
universities are tragically mirrored across the nation. The following
high-profile cases serve as stark reminders of the dangers of hazing and the
potential for both criminal and civil accountability. These incidents have not
only resulted in immense personal tragedy but have also shaped hazing laws and
legal strategy across the country, influencing how cases might proceed for
families in Camp County.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced or coerced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing-related deaths. The stories below highlight how these events often unfold and the broad scope of liability.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017)

Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a “bid acceptance” initiation at the Beta Theta Pi fraternity house. During the event, pledges were forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. Piazza then suffered multiple falls, captured on the fraternity’s security cameras. Tragically, fraternity members delayed calling for help for nearly 12 hours, exacerbating his traumatic brain injuries.

This case led to unprecedented legal action:

• Criminal Charges: Over 1,000 criminal counts were filed against 18 fraternity members, including charges of involuntary manslaughter, aggravated assault, and hazing. While many were reduced or dismissed, it highlighted the potential for severe criminal penalties.
• Civil Litigation: Piazza’s family pursued civil lawsuits against the fraternity and individual members, resulting in confidential multi-million-dollar settlements.
• Legislative Impact: Pennsylvania enacted the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law, one of the toughest in the nation, increasing penalties for hazing.
• Takeaway for Texas families: The tragic delay in calling 911 is a recurring theme in hazing deaths. This case underscores that a “culture of silence” not only leads to criminal charges but can devastate civil cases by demonstrating extreme negligence. The $10 million lawsuit for Leonel Bermudez against the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi, being handled by Attorney911, similarly focuses on the delayed response to severe injuries.

Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017)

Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during an off-campus “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were reportedly given bottles of hard liquor and forced to consume them rapidly. In the aftermath, multiple members faced criminal prosecution, predominantly misdemeanors for hazing.

• Institutional Response: Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life activities in response to Coffey’s death, leading to a broader conversation about hazing culture in Florida.
• Takeaway for Texas families: “Big Brother/Little Brother” events involving forced alcohol consumption are a deadly national pattern. If your child is pressured to attend such an event at a Texas institution, it’s a massive red flag.

Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017)

Max Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, died during a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to drink large quantities of 190-proof alcohol if they answered questions incorrectly or hesitated. His blood alcohol content was a fatal 0.495%.

• Criminal and Civil Outcomes: Multiple fraternity members were charged, and one was convicted of negligent homicide. Gruver’s family also pursued a civil wrongful death lawsuit, settling with defendants for a confidential amount and receiving a $6.1 million verdict against key individuals and the insurer.
• Legislative Impact: Louisiana passed the Max Gruver Act, significantly strengthening its anti-hazing laws and making felony hazing easier to prosecute.
• Takeaway for Texas families: This case, like the Bermudez case Ralph Manginello and Lupe Peña are handling, highlights that legislative change often follows public outrage fueled by tragic hazing deaths.

Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)

Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died after being forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” initiation ritual. He was found unconscious and died days later from alcohol poisoning.

• Criminal and Civil Outcomes: Multiple fraternity members faced criminal charges, with several convicted of hazing-related misdemeanors and felonies. The Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023––$7 million from the national Pi Kappa Alpha organization and approximately $3 million from Bowling Green State University––one of the largest hazing settlements in U.S. history.
• Takeaway for Texas families: This case demonstrates that both national fraternities and universities face significant financial liability for hazing deaths, even if the hazing happens off-campus. The multi-million-dollar figure should reassure families facing similar tragedies that significant compensation is possible.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Hazing isn’t just about alcohol. Physical abuse and degrading rituals also pose severe risks.

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013)

Michael Deng, an 18-year-old pledge, died during a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus fraternity retreat in Pennsylvania’s Pocono Mountains. Blindfolded and wearing a heavy backpack, he was repeatedly tackled by fraternity members. After suffering a traumatic brain injury, members delayed calling 911 for over an hour.

• Landmark Criminal Conviction: Multiple individuals were convicted, and, critically, the national fraternity itself was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, incurring a fine of over $110,000 and a 10-year ban from Pennsylvania.
• Takeaway for Texas families: This case establishes a precedent for holding national organizations criminally liable and shows that off-campus locations (like Airbnbs or remote properties) do not shield perpetrators from the law. This is why Attorney911’s case for Leonel Bermudez against Pi Kappa Phi (see media coverage on Click2Houston: https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/ and ABC13: https://abc13.com/post/waterboarding-forced-eating-physical-punishment-lawsuit-alleges-abuse-faced-injured-pledge-uhs-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity/18186418/) is so important: it seeks to hold multiple entities accountable for extreme physical hazing.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing extends beyond Greek life to other campus groups, including sports teams.

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025)

In 2023, former Northwestern football players came forward with allegations of widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the prestigious athletic program, claiming physical abuse and forced degrading acts.

• Legal and Institutional Fallout: Multiple lawsuits were filed against Northwestern University and its coaching staff, leading to the firing of long-time head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially with the university.
• Takeaway for Texas families: This high-profile scandal demonstrates that hazing is not exclusive to Greek organizations. It can deeply embed itself in athletic programs, even at academically elite institutions, raising questions about institutional oversight in areas often seen as separate from “student life.”

What These Cases Mean for Camp County Families

These national stories, horrifying as they are, offer critical lessons:

• Common Threads: Forced alcohol consumption, humiliating rituals, physical abuse, and, most tragically, delays in seeking medical attention are recurring patterns.
• Serious Consequences: Perpetrators face criminal charges, and both national organizations and universities can incur multi-million-dollar civil liabilities.
• Catalysts for Change: These heartbreaking incidents often spur legislative reforms and stricter university policies, signaling a growing intolerance for hazing.

For Camp County families whose children attend or plan to attend any Texas university, understanding these patterns is essential. When a tragic “tradition” from a national organization leads to death or severe injury on one campus, it creates a precedent. It demonstrates that the organization, and often the university, knew or should have known the risks involved, thereby strengthening a plaintiff’s case for negligence and accountability if similar events unfold in Texas.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Camp County families, understanding the environment at major Texas universities is paramount. Each institution has its unique culture, hazing policies, and history of incidents. While hazing is illegal statewide, how it manifests and is addressed can vary significantly from campus to campus. Here, we delve into five prominent Texas universities, offering insight into their hazing landscapes.

University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, located in the heart of our firm’s home city, serves a diverse population of over 47,000 students. For many Camp County families whose children venture to the bustling, dynamic city of Houston, UH represents a prime educational opportunity. However, it also has a significant Greek life community and a history of hazing incidents that require vigilance.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH is a large urban university with a vibrant campus life that blends residential and commuter student experiences. Its Greek life is extensive, encompassing numerous Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural fraternities and sororities. Beyond Greek life, UH boasts a wide array of student organizations, sports clubs, and spirit groups, all contributing to its energetic campus culture. This rich organizational landscape unfortunately also presents numerous contexts in which hazing can occur.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, clearly stating that hazing is prohibited whether on-campus or off-campus. Its policies explicitly forbid forced consumption of alcohol, drugs, or food; sleep deprivation; physical mistreatment; and any acts designed to cause mental distress as part of initiation or membership. UH provides multiple reporting channels, including the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). The university also posts information about hazing incidents and disciplinary actions on its website, though the level of detail can vary.

Example Incident & Response: The Leonel Bermudez Lawsuit (2025)

Attorney911 is currently representing Leonel Bermudez, a University of Houston student, in a $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston, its Board of Regents, the Pi Kappa Phi national fraternity, its Beta Nu chapter, and 13 individual fraternity leaders and members. This case, filed in late November 2025, has sent shockwaves through the UH community and the national Greek system.

Key Allegations in the Bermudez Lawsuit:

• Extreme Physical Hazing: Bermudez, a fall 2025 pledge, was allegedly subjected to severe physical abuse at the Pi Kappa Phi chapter house, an off-campus Culmore Drive residence, and Yellowstone Boulevard Park in Houston.
• Degrading Rituals: Pledges were forced to carry a “pledge fanny pack” 24/7 containing condoms, sex toys, and nicotine devices. They endured enforced dress codes and hours-long “study/work” blocks.
• Forced Physical Exertion: Activities included sprints, bear crawls, and “save-your-brother” drills. In one instance, Bermudez was subjected to over 100 push-ups and 500 squats, leaving him unable to stand. He also reportedly lost consciousness during a late-night workout.
• Waterboarding Simulation: Bermudez described being sprayed with a hose in a manner “similar to waterboarding,” and was threatened with actual waterboarding.
• Forced Consumption: Pledges were made to consume milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until they vomited, followed by immediate sprints.
• Severe Medical Outcome: Bermudez developed rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown) and acute kidney failure, passing brown urine. He was hospitalized for four days and faces ongoing risks of permanent kidney damage. As Attorney Ralph Manginello stated, “His urine was brown” – a clear sign of the severe renal damage.
• Institutional Response: The Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters suspended the Beta Nu chapter on November 6, 2025, and the chapter voted to surrender its charter on November 14, just days before the lawsuit was filed. UH called the conduct “deeply disturbing” and promised disciplinary measures.

This case is a stark example of hazing’s devastating impact and Attorney911’s proactive fight for justice. As Attorney Lupe Peña noted, “If this prevents harm to another person…Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.” (See news reports from Hoodline: https://hoodline.com/2025/11/university-of-houston-and-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity-face-10m-lawsuit-over-alleged-hazing-and-abuse/ and Click2Houston: https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/).

How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Camp County families filing a hazing lawsuit stemming from incidents at UH, the legal process will involve Harris County courts, as Houston is the county seat. Law enforcement investigations could involve both UHPD and the Houston Police Department, depending on the hazing location. Potential defendants in a civil suit, besides individual students and the local chapter, include the Pi Kappa Phi national organization and the University of Houston itself. Our firm’s experience with complex litigation against large institutions, such as our involvement in the BP Texas City explosion cases, is particularly relevant when taking on such powerful defendants.

What UH Students & Parents Should Do

• Report Immediately: Utilize UH’s official reporting channels (Dean of Students, UHPD) after consulting with legal counsel.
• Document Thoroughly: Gather all digital evidence, photos, witness contacts, and medical records.
• Seek Legal Counsel: Contact a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases, such as Attorney911, to understand your rights and to navigate the complexities of filing a lawsuit against institutional defendants. This is especially important given the detailed allegations in the Bermudez case.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University in College Station is a significant destination for many students across Texas, including Camp County families. It’s renowned for its deep-rooted traditions, particularly its Corps of Cadets, and a large Greek life presence. This strong emphasis on tradition, however, sometimes unfortunately intersects with problematic hazing practices. The cultural environment, steeped in history and loyalty, means that hazing incidents often take on unique forms.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M is one of the largest universities in the nation, known for its strong Aggie spirit, military traditions, and a highly engaged alumni network. The Corps of Cadets, with its own specific hierarchy and traditions, plays a prominent role in campus identity. Alongside the Corps, Texas A&M hosts a thriving Greek life system with numerous fraternities and sororities, contributing to a vibrant, and sometimes intense, student organizational culture. This rich tapestry of groups, while fostering strong bonds, also creates environments susceptible to hazing.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M has clear anti-hazing policies, explicitly prohibiting any activity that endangers mental or physical health for the purpose of initiation, admission, or affiliation. Their policies apply to all student organizations, including Greek life, the Corps of Cadets, and athletic teams. Students and families can report hazing through the university’s Student Conduct Office, the Texas A&M University Police Department (TAMU PD), or through anonymous reporting mechanisms. They also maintain public records of hazing violations and disciplinary actions, though often less detailed than UT’s.

Example Incident & Response: Chemical Burns (2021) and Corps Hazing (2023)

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Chemical Burns (around 2021): Two pledges of the SAE chapter at Texas A&M alleged they were subjected to severe hazing that included being doused with substances such as industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, causing severe chemical burns that required multiple skin graft surgeries. The pledges filed a lawsuit against the fraternity seeking over $1 million, and the university suspended the chapter for two years.
• Corps of Cadets Hazing (2023): A lawsuit was filed in 2023 by a former cadet who alleged degrading and physically abusive hazing within the Corps. The allegations included forced consumption of raw onions and butter, physical assaults, and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages, and the university stated it addressed the matter through its internal conduct processes.
• Phi Gamma Delta Hazing Death (2018): Joseph Little, 18, collapsed and died during pledging activities. Investigators found that the activities were hazing. Allegations of physical and emotional abuse were later made. This further solidified a pattern of hazing at A&M, linking back to the 1997 Phi Gamma Delta incident involving Trey Walker’s death.

These incidents underscore that hazing at Texas A&M is not limited to Greek life, but also extends to its revered Corps of Cadets and other organizations.

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases arising from Texas A&M will typically proceed in Brazos County courts. Investigations would involve TAMU PD, and potentially other local law enforcement. For Camp County families, navigating the unique cultural and legal aspects of Texas A&M requires specialized legal insight, particularly when dealing with the deeply entrenched traditions of some organizations. Our firm’s broad litigation experience allows us to effectively pursue claims against both Greek organizations and complex institutional bodies like the Corps of Cadets, as well as the university itself.

What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

• Be Aware of Traditions: Educate yourselves on both positive Aggie traditions and the potential for certain “traditions” to cross the line into hazing.
• Document Evidence: Screenshots of Corps or Greek life group chats, photos of injuries, or any specific “tasks” are critical.
• Legal Consultation: Contact a hazing lawyer with knowledge of Texas A&M’s unique cultural landscape to discuss your options.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is a flagship institution for many Texans, including a significant number of students from Camp County who aspire to its academic excellence and vibrant student life. UT-Austin, like other large universities, has an active and prominent Greek system, along with numerous other student organizations that, despite university prohibitions, sometimes engage in hazing.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT-Austin boasts a massive student body, a highly competitive academic environment, and a rich array of extracurricular activities. Its Greek system is one of the largest in the state, featuring a diverse range of fraternities and sororities with historical roots and significant social presence. Beyond Greek life, UT is home to countless spirit groups, athletic clubs, and student organizations that contribute to its dynamic campus energy.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Texas at Austin has a clear-cut anti-hazing policy that prohibits all forms of hazing. It explicitly defines prohibited acts and provides multiple avenues for reporting, including the Dean of Students office, the UT Police Department (UTPD), and an anonymous online reporting form. Notably, UT-Austin is one of the more transparent universities in Texas, maintaining a publicly accessible Hazing Violations page (hazing.utexas.edu) that lists organizations found responsible for hazing, the nature of the violation, and the sanctions imposed. This transparency is a valuable resource for families in Camp County and beyond.

Example Incidents & Response: Recurring Violations

UT-Austin’s public Hazing Violations page reveals a recurring pattern of violations across various groups:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): This fraternity, relevant to the Bermudez case at UH, was sanctioned for requiring new members to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, activities deemed hazing. The chapter received probation and mandated education.
• Texas Cowboys (2018): This spirit organization has faced multiple hazing allegations, including reports of “new men” being subjected to physical abuse, forced sleep deprivation, and alcohol consumption. This group was investigated following the death of a “new man” in 2018 during a vehicle accident, with allegations that sleep deprivation from hazing was a contributing factor.
• Other Groups: UT’s log also documents sanctions against groups like Texas Wranglers for forced workouts and alcohol-related misconduct, and various fraternities for “pledge activities” involving alcohol, sleep deprivation, and degrading tasks.

The very existence of this transparent violations log highlights an ongoing battle against hazing at UT.

How a UT-Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at UT-Austin would typically be adjudicated in Travis County courts. Law enforcement investigation may involve UTPD and/or the Austin Police Department. For Camp County families, the public availability of UT’s hazing violation data can be a significant advantage in civil litigation. This transparency provides strong pattern evidence, demonstrating that the university likely had knowledge of ongoing hazing issues within specific organizations, bolstering claims of negligent supervision or enforcement.

What UT-Austin Students & Parents Should Do

• Check the Hazing Violations Page: Regularly review UT’s public database (hazing.utexas.edu) for any disciplinary history of organizations your child is interested in.
• Document Everything: Given the frequency of reported hazing, it’s critical to meticulously document any incidents.
• Seek Legal Counsel: An attorney familiar with UT-Austin’s policies and the nuances of Texas hazing law can effectively leverage the available public information to build a strong case.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a private institution in Dallas, attracts students from across Texas, including Camp County families. Known for its strong alumni network and vibrant social scene, SMU’s Greek life plays a significant role in campus culture. This blend of tradition and high-profile social activities often creates a challenging environment for hazing prevention.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU is a private university noted for its beautiful campus, competitive academics, and a generally affluent student body. Greek life is extremely prominent and influential, with a high percentage of students participating in fraternities and sororities. This creates a powerful social structure where the desire for membership and acceptance can unfortunately override concerns about hazing. Beyond Greek life, SMU has numerous clubs and organizations, all part of its dynamic campus environment.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU strictly prohibits hazing across all student organizations. Their policy aligns with Texas law, defining hazing as any act that endangers mental or physical health for the purpose of initiation or membership. SMU provides reporting mechanisms through the Dean of Students office, the SMU Police Department, and various online reporting forms, including anonymous options like “Real Response.” As a private university, SMU’s internal disciplinary records are generally not as publicly accessible as those of state-funded institutions like UT-Austin.

Example Incident & Response: Kappa Alpha Order (2017)

• Kappa Alpha Order Suspension (2017): The Kappa Alpha Order chapter at SMU was suspended by the university for hazing violations that included reports of new members being paddled, forced to consume alcohol, and deprived of sleep. The chapter faced restrictions on recruitment and operations for several years. This incident highlighted the prevalence of traditional physical and alcohol hazing within SMU’s Greek system.
• Phi Gamma Delta Suspension (2020): Following investigations into hazing, including alcohol incidents and physical mistreatment of new members, SMU suspended its Phi Gamma Delta chapter, underscoring ongoing challenges in hazing enforcement.

These past incidents reflect a consistent pattern of hazing at SMU, particularly within its influential Greek organizations.

How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at SMU would typically proceed in Dallas County courts. Law enforcement investigations could involve the SMU Police Department and/or the Dallas Police Department. As a private university, SMU does not have the same sovereign immunity protections as public institutions, potentially making them more directly susceptible to certain types of civil claims. While their internal records are not publicly posted, civil discovery processes in a lawsuit can compel the release of disciplinary records, incident reports, and internal communications, which can expose patterns of negligence.

What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

• Investigate Privately: Due to less public transparency, Camp County families should conduct their own research by speaking with current or former students if their child is considering an SMU organization.
• Report Internally (with Caution): Utilize SMU’s reporting channels, but be aware of the internal nature of private university investigations. Consulting a lawyer before reporting can help strategize the best approach.
• Consider Legal Action: Given SMU’s private status, civil litigation may be a more direct route to accountability and transparency compared to a public university where sovereign immunity may pose higher hurdles.

Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, draws students from across Texas, including Camp County. With its distinct religious affiliation and a national profile shadowed by past institutional scandals, Baylor presents a unique context for understanding hazing and institutional accountability.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University is known for its strong Christian identity, robust academic programs, and a passionate student body. While it has a Greek life presence, it is generally smaller and operates under stricter guidance compared to some other large Texas universities. However, the culture of “tradition” and tightly-knit organizations, including athletic teams, can still create environments where hazing develops. Baylor’s history includes significant scrutiny over its handling of sexual assault cases within its football program, which has raised broad questions about institutional oversight and responsiveness to student welfare issues.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that prohibits all forms of hazing by any student organization, extending to both on-campus and off-campus activities. Their policy is consistent with Texas law. Baylor provides reporting channels through its Student Conduct Office, the Baylor Police Department (BUPD), and other university-designated contacts. The university emphasizes a “zero tolerance” stance against hazing, especially in light of its commitment to a faith-based educational environment.

Example Incidents & Response: Baseball Team Hazing (2020) and Football Scandal Overlap

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): Following an internal investigation into hazing allegations within the baseball program, Baylor suspended 14 players, with sanctions varying based on individual involvement. The hazing reportedly included a range of activities from physical mistreatment to forced embarrassing acts, though specific details were not publicly disseminated.
• Football Scandal Overlap: While primarily related to sexual assault, Baylor’s past Title IX scandal highlighted broader systemic issues of institutional control, reporting failures, and a permissive culture around student misconduct, particularly within influential athletic programs. This context can be relevant in demonstrating a general lack of oversight or delayed response to student welfare issues, even if not directly involving hazing.
• Baylor Chamber of Commerce Hazing Death (1967): John E. Clifton died after choking down a foul concoction and laxatives administered by members of the Baylor Chamber of Commerce, a social club. While the death was initially ruled an accident and not defined as hazing, the incident reflects a long history of dangerous initiation rituals.

These examples illustrate that despite its religious mission and efforts to control student conduct, Baylor, like other universities, grapples with hazing, sometimes in unexpected places.

How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at Baylor University would typically be heard in McLennan County courts. Law enforcement investigation may involve BUPD and/or the Waco Police Department. As a private institution, Baylor does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more vulnerable to direct civil claims for negligence or oversight failures. The broader context of Baylor’s previous institutional scandals has created a heightened level of public scrutiny and, arguably, greater pressure for accountability in any allegations of student misconduct, including hazing.

What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

• Understand the Institution: Be aware of Baylor’s specific cultural and institutional commitments, and how these might influence the handling of hazing allegations.
• Scrutinize All Organizations: Given the diversity of groups that hazing can occur in, Camp County families should advise their children to scrutinize any organization, not just Greek life, for signs of hazing.
• Legal Strategy: An attorney with experience in hazing cases can assess how Baylor’s unique institutional history and structure might impact legal strategy and the potential for compelling change and compensation.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

The landscape of hazing at Texas universities is deeply intertwined with the histories and cultures of national Greek organizations. While local chapters operate independently for daily activities, they are bound by the rules and reputations of their national headquarters. For Camp County families, understanding this connection is crucial: an organization with a history of hazing incidents at one campus may perpetuate similar, high-risk behaviors thousands of miles away.

Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities and sororities at institutions like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor are chapters of national organizations. These national bodies provide charters, collect dues, offer risk management training, and often have detailed anti-hazing policies. Crucially, many of these national policies were developed because
of severe injuries and deaths due to hazing at other campuses.

When a local chapter in Texas engages in hazing tactics that mirror incidents at other chapters (e.g., forced drinking “Big/Little” rituals, physical endurance tests, degrading acts), it demonstrates a pattern. This pattern evidence can be critical in legal proceedings, showing that:

• Foreseeability: The national organization, and often the university, knew or should have known these types of hazing acts were dangerous and likely to cause harm.
• Negligent Supervision: The national organization failed in its duty to adequately supervise, control, or discipline its chapters, despite having prior warnings.
• Punitive Damages: In some cases, a history of ignoring repeated hazing can support claims for punitive damages, designed to punish egregious conduct and deter future wrongdoing.

This is exactly the type of argument Attorney911 is making in the Leonel Bermudez case against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston. The national organization’s awareness of hazing at other chapters strengthens the claim that they should have prevented a similar tragedy at UH.

Organization Mapping: Key National Organizations and Their Hazing Histories

Below, we synthesize a selection of national Greek organizations with a documented history of hazing incidents nationwide, often including chapters at prominent Texas universities. It’s important to remember that this list is not exhaustive, and the absence of an organization does not mean it is hazing-free.

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has faced numerous high-profile hazing cases involving forced alcohol consumption. The tragic death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021, who died from alcohol poisoning after a “Big/Little” drinking ritual, resulted in criminal convictions and a $10 million settlement with his family. Another significant case involved the death of David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University in 2012 from alcohol poisoning, leading to a $14 million settlement. These patterns indicate a foreseeable risk of alcohol-related hazing. Attorney911 investigated a Pi Kappa Alpha chapter at the University of Houston for alleged hazing involving milk consumption and physical exercise.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE has been dubbed “America’s deadliest fraternity” by some media outlets due to multiple hazing-related deaths, many involving alcohol. This led SAE to famously ban pledging in 2014, although incidents have still occurred. Recent cases include:

  • Allegations of a pledge suffering a traumatic brain injury during hazing at the University of Alabama (2023).
  • Two pledges at Texas A&M University (around 2021) alleged they suffered severe chemical burns after being doused with industrial cleaner and other substances, leading to a civil lawsuit.
  • An Australian exchange student alleged assault with a dislocated leg, fractured tibia, and broken nose by SAE members at a party at the University of Texas at Austin (2024), where the chapter was already suspended.
    These cases show a continued pattern of physical and alcohol-related hazing, even after national policy changes.

• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity was involved in the death of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University (2017), where he died from severe alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game, leading to criminal convictions and the Max Gruver Act hazing law. Attorney911 investigated a Phi Delta Theta chapter at the University of Houston for alleged hazing.

• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): The death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University (2017) from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” put Pi Kappa Phi under national scrutiny. Pi Kappa Phi is now a defendant in Attorney911’s Leonel Bermudez $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston, its Beta Nu chapter, and several individuals for severe physical hazing, rhabdomyolysis, and acute kidney failure allegedly suffered by Bermudez (see Hoodline: https://hoodline.com/2025/11/university-of-houston-and-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity-face-10m-lawsuit-over-alleged-hazing-and-abuse/ and ABC13: https://abc13.com/post/waterboarding-forced-eating-physical-punishment-lawsuit-alleges-abuse-faced-injured-pledge-uhs-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity/18186418/).

• Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): This fraternity made national headlines with the catastrophic brain injury suffered by Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri (2021). Santulli was forced to consume excessive alcohol, leading to permanent brain damage. His family settled with 22 defendants for confidential, multi-million-dollar sums. Joseph Little’s death at Texas A&M University (2018) also involved Phi Gamma Delta and allegations of physical hazing, reinforcing the pattern of high-risk behavior within this organization.

• Pi Delta Psi (ΠΔΨ): This Asian-interest fraternity was infamously convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter in the death of Chun “Michael” Deng (Baruch College, 2013), who died during a brutal “glass ceiling” physical hazing ritual at an off-campus retreat. This case set a precedent for holding national fraternities criminally liable.

• Kappa Alpha Order (KA): This historically Southern fraternity has faced numerous hazing-related suspensions and investigations, often involving traditional physical hazing and alcohol at campuses nationwide, including the suspension of its chapter at SMU in 2017 for paddling and forced drinking.

• Omega Psi Phi (ΩΨΦ): This historically Black fraternity, while emphasizing scholarship and service, has faced repeated hazing allegations involving physical beatings and ritualized abuse. Joseph Snell’s $375,000 verdict in 1997 against Omega Psi Phi for severe beatings during hazing set an early precedent for national organization liability. More recently, a former student filed a federal lawsuit against the national organization and the University of Southern Mississippi (2023) alleging severe beatings with a wooden paddle and emergency surgery from “Hell Night” hazing.

• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): This fraternity has faced significant hazing litigation, including a jury award of over $10 million in damages to a family for severe hazing allegations at the College of Charleston (2024). This underscores the financial exposure for organizations involved in hazing.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

For families in Camp County and throughout Texas, these national histories are not just cautionary tales; they are crucial elements of a potential legal strategy. When a particular national organization has a documented pattern of hazing incidents—especially those involving forced alcohol, physical abuse, or delayed medical help—it becomes increasingly difficult for that organization to claim ignorance or deny foreseeability.

In a civil lawsuit, an experienced hazing lawyer can connect these dots. We can argue that the national organization:

• Had Actual or Constructive Knowledge: They knew about the dangerous practices or, given the sheer number of incidents, should have known that such practices were likely occurring within their chapters.
• Failed to Act Decisively: Despite this knowledge, they failed to implement effective preventative measures, adequately train their members, or rigorously enforce their anti-hazing policies.
• Contributed to a Permissive Culture: By tolerating or minimally punishing past hazing, they implicitly allowed a culture where such harmful acts could persist.

This strategic approach can significantly strengthen claims of negligence against national organizations, affect insurance coverage disputes, and potentially increase the likelihood of securing punitive damages where warranted. It transforms isolated incidents into evidence of systemic failure, pushing beyond local chapter misconduct to hold the broader entities responsible.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

For Camp County families whose children have been victimized by hazing, building a robust legal case is a meticulous process that combines aggressive investigation, expert testimony, and a keen understanding of the law. Time is of the essence, as digital evidence can vanish and memories can fade.

Evidence: The Cornerstones of a Hazing Lawsuit

In hazing cases, securing and preserving evidence is paramount. Perpetrators often seek to destroy or conceal incriminating information. Attorney911 understands the critical role of comprehensive evidence collection, focusing on both traditional and modern digital sources.

• Digital Communications: These are often the “smoking gun” in modern hazing cases.

  • Group Messaging Apps: Platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, and even fraternity-specific apps are commonly used to plan, command, and document hazing activities. Messages can reveal schedules, instructions for pledges, peer pressure, threats, and even discussions about covering up incidents.
  • Social Media: Instagram stories, Snapchat messages, TikTok videos, and Facebook posts can inadvertently (or deliberately) capture hazing in progress, reveal injuries, or display humiliating acts. Location tags or hashtags can further pinpoint details.
  • Text Messages and DMs: Direct messages between individuals can expose specific directives, threats, or admissions related to hazing.
  • Preservation is Key: Screenshots must capture full conversations, usernames, and timestamps. Even “disappearing” messages on apps like Snapchat can sometimes be retrieved through digital forensics, but immediate screenshots are always best. Attorney911’s video, “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs), provides valuable guidance on this.

• Photos & Videos: Beyond screenshots of social media, direct photo and video evidence can be powerful.

  • Captured Incidents: Recordings of hazing acts, whether by perpetrators or bystanders, can provide undeniable proof.
  • Injury Documentation: Photos of bruises, burns, cuts, or other physical injuries, taken at multiple angles with clear dating, are vital. Documenting the progression of injuries over days or weeks can further strengthen a case.
  • Venue Documentation: Photos of the location where hazing occurred, including any objects or conditions relevant to the incident.

• Internal Organization Documents: These can reveal official policies and unofficial practices.

  • Pledge Manuals/Initiation Scripts: These may outline official (or pseudo-official) “traditions” that cross the line into hazing.
  • Ritual Materials: Any physical objects, costumes, or scripts used in initiation rites (e.g., paddles, blindfolds, specific attire).
  • National Policies: The anti-hazing policies and risk management guidelines of the national fraternity or sorority, which can be compared against the local chapter’s actions to show negligence.

• University Records: Public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT-Austin are subject to public information laws (e.g., FOIA in Texas) and must disclose certain records.

  • Prior Conduct Files: Disciplinary records, probationary periods, or past suspensions of the specific organization.
  • Incident Reports: Reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices about hazing, assaults, or alcohol violations.
  • Clery Act Reports: Annual campus crime statistics that can highlight patterns of related offenses.
  • Internal Communications: Emails or memoranda among university administrators that may reveal knowledge of hazing.

• Medical and Psychological Records: Crucial for documenting the extent of harm.

  • Emergency Room/Hospital Records: Detailed accounts of injuries, particularly for severe cases like Leonel Bermudez’s rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure. Toxicology reports are critical for alcohol/drug-related hazing.
  • Rehabilitation Notes: Records from physical therapy, occupational therapy, or speech therapy for long-term injuries.
  • Psychological Evaluations: Diagnoses of PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health impacts due to hazing, supported by therapy notes and expert assessments.

• Witness Testimony: Direct accounts from individuals can paint a vivid picture of the hazing.

  • Other Pledges/Members: Testimonies from those who endured or observed the hazing.
  • Roommates, RAs, Coaches: Individuals who observed behavioral changes, injuries, or odd schedules.
  • Former Members/Advisors: Individuals who left the organization due to hazing concerns or who can attest to a pattern of misconduct.

Damages: Seeking Comprehensive Recovery

Hazing can inflict profound and lasting harm, and the legal system aims to provide financial compensation (damages) to victims and their families. While every amount necessarily changes, it is important to remember what these amounts cover. In particular, the Leonel Bermudez lawsuit being handled by Attorney911 seeks over $10 million for the severe injuries and long-term suffering endured. Damages typically fall into several categories:

• Economic Damages: These are quantifiable financial losses.

  • Medical Expenses: Covering past treatments (ER visits, hospital stays, surgeries, medications, therapy) and projected future medical care (ongoing rehabilitation, psychiatric support, specialized long-term care plans for catastrophic injuries).
  • Lost Income & Earning Capacity: Compensation for wages lost due to injury or inability to work, tuition fees for missed semesters, and, significantly, reduced future earning potential if permanent disabilities result.
  • Other Costs: Relocation expenses if a student must transfer schools, or property damage.

• Non-Economic Damages: These are subjective, non-monetary losses that compensate for suffering.

  • Physical Pain & Suffering: For the immediate and ongoing pain from injuries (e.g., broken bones, burns, internal damage) and any chronic pain.
  • Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm: Addressing diagnoses like PTSD, depression, anxiety, humiliation, loss of dignity, and the profound psychological impact of trauma.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Compensating for the inability to participate in hobbies, social activities, or to simply enjoy the college experience.

• Wrongful Death Damages: In the tragic event of a hazing-related death, families can seek:

  • Funeral and Burial Costs: Reimbursement for direct expenses.
  • Loss of Financial Support: Compensation for the future financial contributions the deceased would have made to their family.
  • Loss of Companionship & Society: Acknowledging the profound emotional loss for parents, spouses, and children.
  • Grief and Emotional Suffering: Compensation for the family’s immense pain and mental anguish.

• Punitive Damages: In cases of extreme recklessness, malice, or willful misconduct, punitive damages may be awarded. These are not to compensate the victim but to punish the defendants and deter similar conduct in the future. Texas law allows for punitive damages, although caps may apply depending on the nature of the claim.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Understanding liability is complex. National fraternities and universities often have extensive legal teams and insurance policies designed to protect them. Insurers may attempt to deny coverage by arguing that hazing, as an “intentional act” or “criminal conduct,” falls under policy exclusions. However, an experienced hazing lawyer can:

• Identify All Potential Parties: Pursuing claims against individual students, local chapters, national organizations, and the university.
• Navigate Insurance Disputes: Argue that even if hazing involved intentional acts, the negligent supervision or failure to prevent by the organization or university may still be covered by insurance. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney is invaluable here, as she understands how these companies operate and how to counter their tactics.
• Uncover All Policies: Identify multiple layers of insurance coverage from various defendants that can contribute to a settlement or judgment.

Strategy: Fighting for Accountability

Building a hazing case requires a multi-faceted approach. Attorney911’s strategy focuses on:

• Aggressive Investigation: Unearthing all available evidence, often necessitating the use of digital forensics experts, medical consultants, and private investigators.
• Expert Collaboration: Working with medical doctors, neurologists, psychologists, and economists to fully document the extent of harm and calculate a fair value for damages.
• Holding Institutions Accountable: Challenging the narrative that hazing is merely “rogue individual” behavior by demonstrating patterns of institutional negligence, a lack of enforcement, or deliberate indifference. This applies whether suing public universities under exceptions to sovereign immunity or directly pursuing private institutions.
• Litigating Against Experienced Defense: Expecting that national fraternities and universities will deploy seasoned defense attorneys. Our firm’s experience in complex cases (such as the BP Texas City explosion litigation) means we are prepared to face powerful adversaries.

For Camp County families, this process is about more than just money; it’s about forcing accountability, changing dangerous cultures, and preventing similar tragedies from befalling other students. Our firm’s experience in civil and criminal law (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) provides a unique advantage in understanding how both systems can impact a hazing case.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing impacts a family, the emotional toll is immense, and practical information can provide a lifeline. This section offers guidance for parents, students, and witnesses, as well as answers to frequently asked questions for Camp County residents.

For Parents

No parent wants to imagine their child experiencing hazing. Knowing key warning signs and what steps to take can protect your child and empower you to seek justice.

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to changes in your child’s behavior, physical well-being, academics, and finances.

  • Physical Signs: Unexplained bruises, cuts, or physical injuries (especially if explanations seem rehearsed or don’t make sense), extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation, significant weight changes, or signs of chemical burns.
  • Behavioral/Emotional Changes: Sudden secrecy about organizational activities, withdrawal from family or old friends, increased anxiety, irritability, depression, or defensiveness when asked about the group.
  • Academic Red Flags: A sudden drop in grades, missed classes, or prioritizing group activities over schoolwork.
  • Financial Red Flags: Unexplained requests for money, unexpected large expenses, or “fines” for minor infractions.
  • Digital Obsession: Constant checking of group chats, anxiety related to phone notifications, or attempts to hide phone activity.

• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not accusation.

  • Start with open-ended questions like, “How are things going with [organization]? Are you enjoying it?”
  • Emphasize their safety and well-being over loyalty to the group. Reassure them you will support them no matter what.
  • Ask direct questions: “Are they asking you to keep secrets?” “Are you being made to do anything that makes you uncomfortable?”

• If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize medical care and evidence collection.

  • Get Medical Attention: Seek immediate medical care if there are injuries or signs of alcohol poisoning. Insist that medical staff document everything, and tell healthcare providers that hazing was involved for accurate records.
  • Document Everything: Photograph injuries, screenshot all digital communications, save relevant documents or objects, and create detailed written notes of events, dates, and names. This is where Attorney911’s video on “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) can be incredibly helpful.

• Dealing with the University:

  • Document all communications. Understand that the university’s priority may be institutional reputation.
  • Inquire about previous hazing incidents involving the organization.

• When to Talk to a Lawyer: Contact an experienced hazing lawyer immediately if your child has suffered significant harm, if you suspect a cover-up, or if the university’s response is inadequate.

For Students / Pledges

If you are a student or pledge in Camp County facing hazing, remember that your safety and well-being are paramount. You have rights, and help is available.

• Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? If an activity makes you feel unsafe, humiliated, exploited, or coerced, it is hazing. If you’re told to keep it a secret, if it involves alcohol or physical discomfort, or if older members wouldn’t do it themselves, it’s hazing. Your “consent” is not true consent when there’s an imbalance of power.
• How to Exit Safely: You have the right to leave any organization at any time without fear of retaliation. If you feel unsafe, remove yourself from the situation immediately and contact a trusted individual (parent, RA, counselor). If in immediate danger, call 911.
• Reporting Safely: Many universities have anonymous reporting systems and offer medical amnesty if you call for help during an emergency. The National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE) provides an anonymous reporting option.
• Evidence is Your Voice: Your phone is a powerful tool. Screenshot group chats, take pictures of injuries, or record conversations if legal in your state. This evidence can protect you. Please refer to Attorney911’s video, “Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY), to avoid common errors.

For Former Members / Witnesses

You may feel a mix of guilt, fear, or a desire for justice. Your information can be critical in preventing future harm.

• Acknowledge that speaking out is courageous. Your testimony and any evidence you possess can literally save lives and hold powerful institutions accountable.
• Understand that you may also need legal advice to navigate your situation, especially if you had any involvement in illegal activities. Confidential legal consultation can clarify your rights and potential exposures. Lawyers can help you understand how to cooperate with investigations while protecting your own interests. Contact Attorney911 for confidential guidance.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

Hazing cases are complex, and subtle missteps can severely jeopardize your ability to seek justice. Camp County families should be aware of these common pitfalls:

1. Letting Your Child Delete “Embarrassing” Evidence: Parents often want to protect their child from further scrutiny, but deleting social media, texts, or group chats (even if degrading) can destroy critical evidence and look like a cover-up.

   • Instead: Preserve everything immediately. Digital forensics can sometimes retrieve deleted data, but original copies are strongest.

2. Confronting Perpetrators or Organizations Directly: An emotional direct confrontation puts the other side on high alert, leading to destruction of evidence and coordinated defenses.

   • Instead: Document quietly, then contact an attorney before any direct communication.

3. Signing Documents from the University or Insurance Companies Without Legal Review: These documents can waive your legal rights, release the university or fraternity from liability, or offer inadequate settlements.

   • Instead: Politely decline to sign anything until an attorney has reviewed it.

4. Posting Details on Social Media: Publicizing your story online can damage your legal case by creating inconsistencies, making your child a target, or alerting defendants prematurely.

   • Instead: Document Privately. Your attorney will advise on public statements.

5. Delaying Legal Consultation: Hazing evidence (digital and witness testimony) is extremely perishable. The longer you wait, the harder it becomes to build a strong case.

   • Instead: Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately for a confidential case evaluation. Attorney911’s video, “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c) emphasizes the urgency.

Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, UT-Austin) may have sovereign immunity, which limits their liability, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, civil rights violations (e.g., Title IX), or suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case is fact-specific; consult Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a personalized legal analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. While hazing is typically a Class B misdemeanor, it becomes a state jail felony under Texas Education Code § 37.152 if it causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that a victim’s consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and laws recognize that true voluntary consent is impossible under conditions of peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion inherent in hazing.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas?”
  Generally, there is a two-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit in Texas. However, exceptions like the “discovery rule” (when the harm wasn’t immediately apparent) or fraudulent concealment can extend this period. Because evidence disappears quickly, time is critical. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location does not negate liability. Universities and national organizations can still be held responsible based on their sponsorship, knowledge of off-campus activities, failure to enforce policies, and the foreseeability of hazing occurring. Many significant national hazing cases have involved incidents at off-campus houses, Airbnbs, or remote retreats.

• “Will pursuing a lawsuit be confidential, or will my child’s name be publicized?”
  Many hazing cases resolve through confidential settlements, especially if a victim prefers privacy. While some details may become public if a lawsuit proceeds to trial or if it involves criminal charges, specific steps can often be taken to protect the privacy of victims. We prioritize your family’s privacy while seeking justice.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need a legal team that understands the complex game played by powerful institutions – and knows how to win. Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, stands as that formidable ally, ready to fight for families like yours in Camp County and across Texas.

Our firm’s unique qualifications provide a distinct advantage in challenging hazing cases:

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Attorney Lupe Peña brings invaluable insight from her previous career as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. This means we understand the intricate strategies fraternity and university insurance companies use to minimize or deny hazing claims. We know their playbook because we used to help write it, and now we use that knowledge to fight for your child.

• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello is not intimidated by large, well-funded defendants. Our firm was involved in the intricate and challenging BP Texas City explosion litigation, taking on one of the world’s largest corporations. With extensive federal court experience, we are prepared to face national fraternities, university systems, and their formidable defense teams head-on. As Ralph Manginello has stated, “We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants.”

• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record of securing substantial results in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. This includes collaborating with economists and life care planners to accurately value long-term needs for victims of severe hazing, such as those with brain injuries or permanent disabilities. This expertise is directly relevant to cases like Leonel Bermudez’s $10 million lawsuit, where we seek comprehensive recovery for devastating injuries. Learn more about our wrongful death practice at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.

• Dual Criminal and Civil Expertise: Ralph Manginello’s active membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) means we understand how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual perspective is crucial for providing holistic advice, especially when individuals involved in hazing may face both criminal prosecution and civil claims. Visit our criminal defense page for more information at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.

• Unmatched Investigative Deep Dive: We deploy a wide network of experts, including digital forensics specialists to recover deleted communications, medical experts to detail injuries and long-term prognoses, and economists to calculate future losses. We meticulously examine pledge manuals, internal emails, and university conduct files to uncover patterns of negligence and responsibility. We investigate like your child’s future depends on it—because it does.

We understand that you’re not just seeking a payout; you’re seeking answers, accountability, and a guarantee that this won’t happen to another family. Our firm is deeply rooted in Texas, with main offices in Houston, and additional presence in Austin and Beaumont, allowing us to serve clients across the entire Lone Star State, including families in Camp County.

Call to Action

If your child has been subjected to hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s at UH, Texas A&M, UT-Austin, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Camp County and throughout Texas have the right to demand answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to your story with empathy, explain your legal options clearly, and help you decide the best path forward for your family. There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot; our priority is to equip you with the knowledge you need. During your free consultation, you can expect us to:

• Listen to your experience without judgment.
• Review any evidence you may have.
• Explain your legal options, including reporting, civil lawsuits, or both.
• Discuss realistic timelines and expectations for the legal process.
• Answer your questions about costs; we work on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. For a detailed explanation, watch our video on “How Do Contingency Fees Work?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).

You don’t have to face this alone. Evidence disappears quickly, and time is critical. Whether you’re in Camp County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, reach out for help.

Call Attorney911 today:

• Emergency Hotline: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Website: https://attorney911.com/contact/
• Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español. Contact Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com for consultation services in Spanish.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com