The humid Texas night hangs heavy in the air, a familiar backdrop for weekend events. Inside a dimly lit off-campus house near a prominent Texas university—perhaps one your child from Colorado County attends—a group of freshmen pledges stands stiffly in a lineup. They are being forced to consume handles of hard liquor while older members chant and film on their phones. One student, desperate to fit in, forces down another drink. The room spins, the music blurs, and fear tightens its icy grip. Soon, someone collapses, vomiting violently. The chanting stops, replaced by hushed whispers. No one calls for help immediately; the fear of “getting the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble” is palpable. This student, once full of youthful optimism, now lies vulnerable and alone, trapped between a destructive loyalty and their own fading safety.
This isn’t just a hypothetical scenario. It’s a tragic reality that unfolds far too often at campuses across our state. For families in Colorado County, who send their children to universities throughout Texas, understanding the insidious nature of modern hazing is critical. Every year, students from Fayette County, Austin County, Lavaca County, and throughout this beautiful region leave their homes for college, sometimes encountering dangerous and illegal practices disguised as tradition. While Colorado County itself may feel far removed from the bustling university towns, the impact of hazing can reach any family, anywhere.
This comprehensive guide is written for parents, students, and concerned community members in Colorado County and across Texas who need to understand the realities of hazing in 2025. We will delve into what modern hazing looks like, review the Texas legal framework, examine major national cases that set precedent, and discuss specific incidents and patterns at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University. Crucially, we will also outline the legal options available to victims and families. Our firm, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, advocates for victims of hazing across Texas, including families from rural communities like Colorado County whose children may be attending universities elsewhere in the state.
This article provides general information and is not specific legal advice. If you or your child has been affected by hazing, our firm can evaluate your individual situation based on its unique facts. We serve families throughout Texas, reaching from the Gulf Coast to the Panhandle.
IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:
-
If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies.
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911).
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.
-
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.”
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot group chats, texts, or direct messages (DMs) immediately.
- Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
- Save physical items, such as clothing, receipts, or any objects involved.
- Write down everything while memory is fresh: who, what, when, and where.
- Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization yourself.
- Sign anything from the university or an insurance company.
- Post details on public social media.
- Let your child delete messages or “clean up” any evidence.
-
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears fast – group chats are deleted, paddles are destroyed, and witnesses can be coached.
- Universities often move quickly to control the narrative.
- We can help preserve essential evidence and protect your child’s rights.
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.
HAZING IN 2025: WHAT IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE
For families in Colorado County, the word “hazing” might conjure images from movies – absurd pranks or harmless initiations. However, modern hazing, especially in 2025, is far more insidious and dangerous than most people realize. It’s not just about silly rites of passage; it’s about coercion, control, and often, severe harm. We define hazing simply as any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. This means that a student’s “agreement” to participation does not automatically make the act safe or legal, especially when peer pressure, power imbalance, and a desire to belong are at play.
MAIN CATEGORIES OF HAZING
Hazing manifests in various forms, often escalating through subtle, harassment, and violent tiers.
Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is, unfortunately, the most common and often deadliest form of hazing. It involves:
- Forced or coerced drinking: Pledges are pressured to consume alcohol far beyond their limits, often in a short period.
- Chugging challenges, “lineups,” and games: Events designed to make new members drink rapidly, often culminating in severe alcohol poisoning.
- Pressure to consume unknown or mixed substances: Pledges may be encouraged or forced to take drugs or substances without knowing what they are.
Physical Hazing: These acts directly endanger the body and often involve:
- Paddling and beatings: Direct physical assault resulting in bruises, cuts, or more severe internal injuries.
- Extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings”: Forced strenuous exercises, sometimes to the point of exhaustion, injury, or rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown).
- Sleep, food, or water deprivation: Denying new members basic human needs for extended periods, leading to physical and mental deterioration.
- Exposure to extreme environments: Forcing pledges into extreme cold or heat, or dangerous, isolated locations, without proper protection.
Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These psychologically damaging acts are often about degradation and control:
- Forced nudity or partial nudity: Requiring new members to strip or appear unclothed against their will.
- Simulated sexual acts: Forcing participation in or observation of explicit sexual acts, such as the “elephant walk” or “roasted pig” positions.
- Degrading costumes and rituals: Making pledges wear embarrassing outfits or perform acts designed to shame them publicly.
- Acts with racial, sexist, or homophobic overtones: Using slurs or forcing role-play that denigrates a person’s identity.
Psychological Hazing: While less visible, psychological hazing can cause profound and lasting trauma:
- Verbal abuse and threats: Constant yelling, insults, intimidation, and isolation tactics.
- Manipulation or forced confessions: Pressuring new members to disclose personal information or create false narratives.
- Public shaming: Humiliating individuals in front of others, whether in person or online.
Digital/Online Hazing: This is a rapidly evolving area of hazing, leveraging technology for control and humiliation:
- Group chat dares and “challenges”: Using apps like GroupMe, WhatsApp, or Discord to issue degrading or illegal tasks.
- Social media humiliation: Forcing pledges to post embarrassing content on Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok, or creating memes to mock them.
- Cyberstalking and surveillance: Demanding real-time location sharing, constant check-ins, or monitoring online activity.
WHERE HAZING ACTUALLY HAPPENS
It is a common misconception that hazing is limited to “frat boys” or Greek life. While fraternities and sororities (including Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council, and multicultural organizations) are prominent settings for hazing, it occurs in a much wider array of student groups, including:
- Corps of Cadets / ROTC / military-style groups: These tradition-rich organizations can sometimes foster environments where hazing is mistaken for discipline or team-building.
- Spirit squads and tradition clubs: Groups like cheerleading teams, dance squads, or highly exclusive spirit organizations have faced hazing allegations.
- Athletic teams: Football, basketball, baseball, track and field, and even swim teams have been implicated in hazing rituals.
- Marching bands and performing arts groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups can engage in hazing under the guise of “bonding” or “tough love.”
- Other student organizations: Hazing has been reported in academic clubs, service organizations, and cultural groups.
The underlying commonalities—social status, adherence to perceived tradition, and a powerful code of secrecy—allow these dangerous practices to persist and thrive, even when everyone involved “knows” hazing is illegal and harmful. This culture of silence makes it incredibly difficult for victims to come forward, leaving many Colorado County families wondering what to do if their child is impacted.
LAW & LIABILITY FRAMEWORK (TEXAS + FEDERAL)
Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is crucial for families in Colorado County. Texas has clear laws prohibiting hazing, and these state-level protections are complemented by federal regulations that add layers of accountability for universities.
TEXAS HAZING LAW BASICS (EDUCATION CODE)
Texas law, found primarily in the Texas Education Code, defines hazing broadly to capture a wide range of harmful activities. In simple terms, hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, occurring either on or off campus, directed at a student for the purpose of pledging membership, initiation, affiliation, maintaining membership, or holding office in any student organization; and this act endangers the mental or physical health or safety of that student.
This definition is critical because:
- It covers acts occurring on or off campus, ensuring that location doesn’t shield perpetrators or organizations from liability.
- It protects against harm to both mental and physical health, acknowledging the profound psychological toll hazing can take.
- The “intentional, knowing, or reckless” standard means perpetrators and organizations don’t have to maliciously intend harm; merely being reckless about the risk—knowing it could cause harm and doing it anyway—is enough.
Criminal Penalties for Hazing:
In Texas, hazing is not just a university policy violation; it’s a crime.
- The default offense for hazing is a Class B Misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
- If hazing results in an injury requiring medical attention, it can be elevated to a Class A Misdemeanor.
- Crucially, if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it becomes a State Jail Felony, carrying a potential sentence of up to two years in a state jail facility.
- Beyond direct hazing, Texas law also criminalizes failing to report a hazing incident (for those who knew about it) and retaliating against someone who reports hazing.
Reporter Protections: Texas law provides some immunity for individuals who report hazing incidents in good faith to university officials or law enforcement. This provision, along with medical amnesty policies at many universities, aims to encourage reporting and seeking help in emergencies, even if the reporter was involved in the hazing or underage drinking.
It is important to remember that while this is a summary, the actual statute is more technical. That’s why having knowledgeable legal counsel is invaluable.
CRIMINAL VS. CIVIL CASES
When hazing occurs, there are typically two separate legal avenues that can be pursued:
- Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state (through a prosecutor) against individuals or organizations accused of violating criminal hazing laws. The aim of a criminal case is to punish the offender through jail time, fines, or probation. Common criminal charges related to hazing can include hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, and even manslaughter in cases involving fatalities.
- Civil Cases: These lawsuits are brought by the victims of hazing, or by their surviving family members in cases of wrongful death. The primary aim of a civil case is to provide monetary compensation to the victims for their suffering and losses, and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil cases often focus on legal theories such as negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
It is critical to understand that criminal and civil cases can proceed simultaneously. A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil lawsuit. For example, individuals might not be criminally charged but can still be held liable for compensatory damages in a civil court.
FEDERAL OVERLAY: STOP CAMPUS HAZING ACT, TITLE IX, CLERY
Beyond Texas state laws, federal regulations also impact how hazing cases are handled and reported, particularly at institutions receiving federal funding.
- Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation requires colleges and universities that receive federal financial aid to be more transparent about hazing incidents. By around 2026, these institutions must publicly report hazing incidents, enhance hazing education and prevention efforts, and maintain accessible data on hazing for the public. This act aims to create more accountability and discourage cover-ups.
- Title IX and Clery Act:
- Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in federally funded education programs. When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or creates a sexually hostile environment, it can trigger Title IX obligations for the university. This can lead to investigations into the university’s response and potentially claims against the institution.
- The Clery Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents often overlap with categories of crimes that must be reported under Clery, such as assaults, alcohol-related offenses, and drug violations, especially when they result in injuries or fatalities.
WHO CAN BE LIABLE IN A CIVIL HAZING LAWSUIT
In a civil hazing lawsuit, multiple parties can be held accountable for the harm caused. Identifying all potentially liable parties is a key part of building a strong case.
- Individual Students: These are the members who actively planned, carried out, supplied alcohol, or participated in the hazing acts. This includes those who participated in cover-ups or failed to call for help.
- Local Chapter / Organization: The fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself can be held liable if it’s a legal entity. Officers or “pledge educators” who organized or oversaw these activities often bear significant responsibility.
- National Fraternity / Sorority: The national headquarters of Greek organizations can be held liable. Their liability often hinges on whether they knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing at a local chapter, whether they enforced their own anti-hazing policies, and what kind of oversight they provided.
- University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, or its governing board (like the Board of Regents for public universities), may be sued under theories of negligence, gross negligence, or even civil rights violations. Liability often depends on factors such as prior knowledge of hazing, failure to enforce policies vigorously, or displaying deliberate indifference to known risks.
- Third Parties: Other entities can also bear responsibility, including:
- Landlords or property owners of houses, event spaces, or off-campus venues where hazing occurred.
- Bars or other alcohol providers that may have illegally furnished alcohol to minors or to visibly intoxicated individuals under “dram shop” laws.
- Security companies or event organizers that failed to ensure a safe environment.
Every hazing case is highly fact-specific, and not every party listed above will be liable in every situation. For families in Colorado County, understanding these potential avenues for accountability is the first step toward seeking justice.
NATIONAL HAZING CASE PATTERNS (ANCHOR STORIES)
The tragic stories of students from across the country serve as powerful, heartbreaking precedents. These cases, while geographically distant from Colorado County, establish legal patterns, highlight institutional failures, and demonstrate the potential for both criminal and civil accountability that can profoundly impact hazing lawsuits here in Texas.
ALCOHOL POISONING & DEATH PATTERN
Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017):
Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a “bid acceptance” event involving extreme alcohol consumption. Footage from the fraternity house’s security cameras revealed Piazza suffering severe falls for hours after becoming intoxicated; fraternity members delayed calling for medical help for crucial hours until he was found unconscious the next morning. This case led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the enactment of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, a landmark piece of legislation. The takeaway for Colorado County families is clear: a culture of extreme intoxication, deliberate delay in seeking medical help, and a code of silence can have devastating legal consequences for all involved.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017):
Andrew Coffey, a pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. He was given a handle of hard liquor and consumed it rapidly, leading to his death. This tragedy resulted in criminal hazing charges against multiple fraternity members and prompted Florida State University to temporarily suspend all Greek life, overhauling its anti-hazing policies. For families in Texas, this case underscores how seemingly traditional “big/little” drinking rituals are a recurring script for disaster, signaling a clear pattern of negligence by these organizations.
Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017):
Max Gruver, a pledge at LSU, died during a “Bible study” drinking game where he was forced to consume excessive amounts of alcohol for answering questions incorrectly. His blood alcohol content was dangerously high at 0.495%. Max’s death propelled Louisiana to enact the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute with serious penalties. This case vividly illustrates that legislative change frequently follows public outrage and irrefutable proof of egregious hazing, demonstrating strong societal demand for accountability in these types of incidents.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021):
Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink an entire bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” night. This incident led to multiple criminal convictions for fraternity members involved. Civilly, Bowling Green State University agreed to a nearly $3 million settlement with the Foltz family, and other settlements with the national fraternity and individuals followed, bringing the total compensation to $10 million. The Foltz case demonstrated that universities, even public ones, can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities when hazing flourishes on their watch.
PHYSICAL & RITUALIZED HAZING PATTERN
Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013):
Chun “Michael” Deng, a pledge, was subjected to a violent blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. During this ritual, pledges were tackled and physically abused. Deng suffered a fatal traumatic brain injury, and fraternity members delayed calling for help. Ultimately, multiple members were convicted of crimes, and the national fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, leading to its ban from Pennsylvania for 10 years. This case is a critical reminder that off-campus “retreats” or private venues are frequently chosen precisely to conceal hazing and can be equally, if not more, dangerous than on-campus events.
ATHLETIC PROGRAM HAZING & ABUSE
Northwestern University Football (2023–2025):
In a highly publicized scandal, former Northwestern football players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the university’s football program over multiple years. This led to multiple lawsuits against the university and coaching staff. Head coach Pat Fitzgerald was fired and later confidentially settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit. This case is crucial for Colorado County families because it proves that hazing is not confined to Greek life; it infiltrates high-profile, big-money athletic programs, exposing students to systemic abuse and raising questions about institutional oversight at the highest levels of university administration.
WHAT THESE CASES MEAN FOR TEXAS FAMILIES
These national anchor cases, while sometimes occurring far from Colorado County, share common, heartbreaking threads: forced drinking, humiliation, physical violence, deliberate delays in calling for medical aid, and extensive cover-up attempts. They demonstrate that meaningful reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements often only come about after a tragedy has spurred both litigation and public outcry. For Texas families facing the reality of hazing at schools like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these national lessons establish crucial precedents, proving that justice and accountability are possible. These cases shape how hazing cases in Texas are understood, investigated, and ultimately resolved.
TEXAS FOCUS: UH, TEXAS A&M, UT, SMU, BAYLOR
For families in Colorado County, whose children attend colleges throughout the state, understanding the specific environments at Texas’s major universities is crucial. While our firm is based in Houston, we serve families across Texas, connecting with clients from Columbus to Glidden, and from Eagle Lake to Weimar, who may need assistance with incidents occurring at any of these institutions.
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (UH)
The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus in the heart of Texas’s largest city, blends commuter and residential life with a diverse student body. Its Greek life is active, comprising various fraternities and sororities under traditional, NPHC, and multicultural councils. Other student organizations, from cultural groups to sports clubs, also contribute to the campus environment.
UH’s Hazing Policy & Reporting:
The University of Houston maintains a strict hazing policy, clearly stating that hazing is prohibited both on and off campus. Their policy specifically bans forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and acts causing mental distress for initiation or membership purposes. UH provides several official channels for reporting hazing through the Dean of Students office, various student conduct departments, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). The university also posts its general hazing statement and some limited disciplinary information on its website.
Example Incident & Response:
A notable incident involved the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity in 2016. Pledges allegedly endured sleep, food, and water deprivation over several days, with one student reportedly suffering a lacerated spleen after being violently slammed onto a table or similar surface. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and a university suspension. While public details can be scarce, UH has shown a willingness to suspend chapters, and later disciplinary references have involved other fraternities for behavior “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” along with alcohol misuse and policy violations. For Colorado County families, these incidents highlight that hazing can lead to severe physical harm and that the university does take some disciplinary action.
How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed:
Hazing cases originating at UH may involve multiple law enforcement agencies, including the UHPD and/or the Houston Police Department, depending on where the incident occurred. Civil lawsuits might proceed in Harris County courts, considering Houston’s jurisdiction over the campus. Potential defendants in such a case could include the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the University of Houston itself, along with any property owners where the hazing took place.
What UH Students & Parents in Colorado County Should Do:
- Familiarize yourselves with UH’s official reporting channels for hazing complaints.
- Document everything, including dates, times, and specific acts.
- Retain any prior complaints or information about past incidents if known.
- For Colorado County families, contacting a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can be critical. Our firm understands how to navigate the UH system and can help uncover internal files and prior disciplinary actions that may not be publicly available.
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
Texas A&M University in College Station is renowned for its deep-rooted traditions, including the distinctive Corps of Cadets, which fosters a military-style environment. Its Greek life is extensive, encompassing traditional fraternities and sororities, as well as multicultural organizations.
Texas A&M Hazing Policy & Reporting:
Texas A&M’s hazing policy, consistent with state law, strictly prohibits any intentional, knowing, or reckless act on or off campus, directed against a student, that endangers mental or physical health or safety for group affiliation. Reporting channels are routed through Student Conduct and also through specific Corps regulations for cadet-related incidents. The university emphasizes education and has publicly stated its commitment to a hazing-free environment.
Example Incidents & Response:
Texas A&M has faced multiple high-profile hazing allegations:
- In 2021, a Sigma Alpha Epsilon lawsuit alleged that two pledges suffered severe chemical burns requiring skin grafts after substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, were poured on them during a hazing ritual. The fraternity was suspended for two years by the university, and the pledges sought $1 million in damages.
- In 2023, a lawsuit against the Corps of Cadets brought to light allegations of degrading hazing tactics, including simulated sexual acts and a cadet being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over $1 million, while Texas A&M stated it handled the matter under its internal rules.
- Ongoing incidents include allegations of hazing within Kappa Sigma in 2023, resulting in severe injuries like rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown from extreme physical hazing).
These incidents demonstrate that hazing at Texas A&M affects both Greek life and deeply ingrained Corps traditions, despite the university’s policies.
How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed:
Given its location, Hazing cases at Texas A&M would likely involve the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) and potentially the Bryan or College Station Police Departments, as well as the Brazos County Sheriff’s Office. Civil cases would likely be filed in Brazos County district courts. Due to Texas A&M’s status as a public university, claims against the institution itself may involve navigating sovereign immunity laws, making skilled legal representation essential. Potential defendants could include individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, the university, and potentially Corps leadership.
What Texas A&M Students & Parents in Colorado County Should Do:
- Understand that Texas A&M has clear policies, but hazing can persist, particularly in the Corps and Greek organizations.
- Report any suspected hazing immediately to Student Conduct or UPD.
- Specifically document any incidents, noting the involvement of Corps traditions or Greek rituals.
- For families from Colorado County, Bryan-College Station is a significant drive, but our firm can handle cases from anywhere in the state, ensuring that the critical evidence collection and timely legal action needed for Complex cases is taken.
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (UT)
The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution in the state capital, has a vibrant and diverse Greek life, alongside numerous spirit and tradition-based organizations.
UT’s Hazing Policy & Reporting:
UT Austin has a well-publicized stance against hazing and is notably more transparent about violations than many other schools. Its Hazing Violations webpage (hazing.utexas.edu) lists organizations, incident dates, specific conduct details, and sanctions imposed. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students, Student Conduct, and UTPD. UT also actively promotes its hazing prevention education programs.
Example Incidents & Response:
UT’s public log frequently details violations. For example:
- In 2023, Pi Kappa Alpha was sanctioned after new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, actions deemed hazing. The chapter was placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education.
- Other groups, including spirit organizations like the Texas Wranglers, have faced sanctions for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, and other punishment-based practices.
- A recent lawsuit in January 2024 involved Sigma Alpha Epsilon, where an exchange student alleged assault during a party, resulting in severe injuries including a dislocated leg and fractured bones.
UT’s transparency, though commendable, also reveals a recurring issue of hazing despite continued disciplinary action.
How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed:
Hazing cases at UT Austin would involve the UTPD and/or the Austin Police Department, with civil cases often filed in Travis County district courts. One distinct advantage for plaintiffs in hazing cases at UT is the university’s public hazing log, which can provide powerful evidence of prior violations, demonstrating institutional knowledge and patterns of misconduct that can strengthen negligence arguments against the university and specific organizations.
What UT Austin Students & Parents in Colorado County Should Do:
- Regularly check UT’s Hazing Violations webpage if you have concerns about a specific organization.
- Utilize UT’s clear reporting mechanisms, but understand that internal university processes are distinct from legal action.
- For families from Colorado County, Austin is usually two to three hours away. Our firm is prepared to meet families where they are and initiate necessary legal proceedings, providing the direct and authoritative counsel needed for complex hazing cases, even from a distance.
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY (SMU)
Southern Methodist University, a private institution located in Dallas, is known for its strong Greek presence and affluent campus culture.
SMU’s Hazing Policy & Reporting:
SMU maintains a strong anti-hazing policy, prohibiting any act causing mental or physical harm in connection with initiation or membership. As a private university, its internal reporting (Student Affairs, Fraternity & Sorority Life office) and disciplinary processes are typically less transparent to the public compared to state-funded schools. SMU also utilizes platforms like Real Response for anonymous reporting.
Example Incident & Response:
A significant incident occurred in 2017 involving Kappa Alpha Order, where new members reportedly endured paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. The chapter was suspended for several years, with restrictions on recruiting until around 2021. This event highlighted the challenges even private universities face in controlling hazing.
How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed:
Hazing cases at SMU would largely be handled by the SMU Police Department and/or the Dallas Police Department, with civil suits typically filed in Dallas County district courts. As a private institution, SMU generally has fewer sovereign immunity protections than public universities. This means that pursuing claims directly against the university for negligence may be more straightforward. However, the private nature of the institution often means less public documentation of prior incidents, requiring more extensive discovery through litigation to uncover patterns of misconduct.
What SMU Students & Parents in Colorado County Should Do:
- Be aware that SMU’s prestigious reputation does not exempt it from hazing issues.
- Utilize SMU’s internal reporting mechanisms, but recognize that a private university’s focus may differ from that of a public institution.
- Families from Colorado County considering SMU or with children there should understand that private university hazing cases, while potentially different in their legal pathways, can lead to substantial accountability.
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, has a unique blend of strong academic and religious identity alongside an active Greek life and athletic programs. Baylor has faced intense scrutiny in the past over issues related to Title IX and sexual assault, creating a context in which discussions of student well-being and institutional accountability are particularly sensitive.
Baylor’s Hazing Policy & Reporting:
Baylor’s anti-hazing policy aligns with Texas law, proscribing any actions that endanger the physical or mental health of students for the purpose of joining or maintaining membership in an organization. Reporting is managed through the Dean of Students office and the Baylor University Police Department. The university promotes a “zero tolerance” stance on hazing due to its historical challenges with student safety.
Example Incident & Response:
In 2020, the Baylor baseball team faced a hazing investigation that resulted in the suspension of 14 players, with suspensions staggered throughout the early season. This incident, while not in Greek life, demonstrated that hazing can occur across various student groups at Baylor, despite the university’s renewed efforts to foster a safer environment. It also underscored the ongoing tension between official “zero tolerance” statements and recurring misconduct.
How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed:
Hazing cases at Baylor would involve the Baylor University Police Department and/or the Waco Police Department, with civil claims filed in McLennan County district courts. Similar to SMU, Baylor’s private status means potential claims against the university are generally not subject to the same sovereign immunity defenses that public universities might employ. However, the university’s prior history with high-profile misconduct investigations can influence how such cases are handled, both legally and in the court of public opinion.
What Baylor Students & Parents in Colorado County Should Do:
- Recognize that Baylor’s strong stance against hazing and its past challenges underscore the importance of vigilance.
- Report incidents via Baylor’s Dean of Students office or Baylor UPD.
- For Colorado County families, understanding how Baylor’s policies, religious branding, and unique history interact with hazing and abuse claims is complex. Legal counsel familiar with institutional accountability can navigate these nuances.
FRATERNITIES & SORORITIES: CAMPUS-SPECIFIC + NATIONAL HISTORIES
For families in Colorado County, it’s vital to recognize that the local chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor are not isolated entities. They are often part of larger, national organizations with specific, often troubling, histories of hazing. Understanding these national patterns is crucial, as they can directly influence the legal arguments in hazing cases here in Texas.
WHY NATIONAL HISTORIES MATTER
National fraternity and sorority headquarters operate with extensive policy manuals and risk management protocols. These exist precisely because their chapters have experienced deaths, catastrophic injuries, and numerous lawsuits across the country. These national bodies are keenly aware of common hazing patterns – the forced drinking nights, the paddling rituals, the humiliating “traditions.”
When a local chapter at a Texas university replicates these same dangerous “traditions” that have led to suspensions, injuries, or even deaths at other chapters in other states, it creates a powerful legal argument: foreseeability. It suggests that the national organization knew, or should have known, about the dangers inherent in these practices. This knowledge underpins claims of negligence and can justify arguments for punitive damages, especially if the national organization failed to meaningfully intervene or enforce its own policies.
ORGANIZATION MAPPING (SYNTHESIZED)
While we can’t list every single chapter, many prominent fraternities and sororities at Texas’s major universities have national counterparts with documented hazing issues. Here’s a brief overview:
-
Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor, the national Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity has a history marred by severe hazing. The death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University from alcohol poisoning during a “Big/Little” night is a stark example, leading to a $10 million settlement and other serious cases. This pattern of alcohol-related hazing, particularly during “Big/Little” events, demonstrates a recurring and foreseeable risk.
-
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): Present at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and SMU, SAE has been involved in multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide. Lawsuits include a traumatic brain injury claim at the University of Alabama. In Texas, their Texas A&M chapter faced a lawsuit after pledges allegedly suffered chemical burns from industrial cleaner, while the UT chapter was sued after an exchange student was allegedly assaulted, sustaining severe injuries. These cases highlight a pervasive pattern of dangerous behavior.
-
Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, the tragic death of Max Gruver at LSU during a “Bible study” drinking game serves as a national anchor demonstrating extreme alcohol hazing. This incident was a catalyst for the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, a felony hazing statute, and underscores the national organization’s history with life-threatening rituals.
-
Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, and UT, Pi Kappa Phi was involved in the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University due to acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. This case illustrates a recurrent dangerous “tradition” associated with forced drinking during initiation.
-
Kappa Alpha Order (KA): With chapters at Texas A&M and SMU, Kappa Alpha Order has a history of hazing suspensions across various campuses, including a past incident at its SMU chapter which led to its suspension. This pattern of disciplinary actions showcases recurring issues with initiation practices.
-
Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): Found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, Beta Theta Pi is tragically linked to the death of Timothy Piazza at Penn State. His death from multiple injuries after alcohol-induced falls, combined with a delayed medical response, became a landmark case, resulting in comprehensive anti-hazing legislation and significant legal battles.
-
Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor, Kappa Sigma has been connected to several serious incidents. The wrongful death of Chad Meredith at the University of Miami in 2001, where he drowned after being persuaded by members to swim while intoxicated, resulted in a $12.6 million jury verdict based on hazing. More recently, allegations of hazing at Texas A&M in 2023 involved severe injuries such as rhabdomyolysis.
-
Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): Present at Texas A&M, Phi Gamma Delta was involved in the harrowing case of Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri, where a pledge suffered severe, permanent brain damage from excessive alcohol consumption during a ritual. This case led to multi-million-dollar settlements with 22 defendants and highlights the catastrophic potential of hazing activities.
-
Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor, Sigma Chi has also faced substantial legal challenges. A case involving the College of Charleston in 2024 resulted in the family receiving more than $10 million in damages for physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment during hazing. This verdict underscores the severe consequences for organizations that allow such behavior.
TIE BACK TO LEGAL STRATEGY
These patterns across different states and campuses are central to our legal strategy. They help us demonstrate that certain organizations had repeated warnings that particular “traditions” or methods of initiation were inherently dangerous. In court, we can contend that national organizations failed in their duty to:
- Meaningly enforce their own anti-hazing policies.
- Respond aggressively enough to prior incidents.
- Provide adequate supervision and training to prevent recurrence.
This evidence of pattern and foreseeability directly impacts:
- Settlement leverage: Showing a history of neglect can compel national organizations to settle for higher amounts.
- Insurance coverage disputes: Our understanding, particularly Lupe Peña’s background as an insurance defense attorney, allows us to challenge arguments that hazing is an “unforeseeable accident” or “intentional act” not covered by insurance.
- Punitive damages: Depending on the jurisdiction and specific claims, a documented history of ignoring warnings can be crucial in arguing for punitive damages, which are designed to punish egregious conduct and deter future harm.
For Colorado County families, understanding that their child’s local chapter is part of this larger, often problematic, national framework provides essential context and leverage in holding these powerful entities accountable.
BUILDING A CASE: EVIDENCE, DAMAGES, STRATEGY
Building a strong hazing case requires meticulous investigation, deep legal expertise, and a comprehensive understanding of how to gather and present evidence. Unlike conventional personal injury cases, hazing involves a complex web of group dynamics, secrecy, and often, deliberate cover-ups. We approach each case as a detailed forensic examination.
EVIDENCE
Modern hazing cases are often won or lost based on the quality and breadth of the evidence collected. This is why immediate action to preserve evidence is so critical, especially for families in communities like Colorado County whose children may be away at college.
-
Digital Communications: These are often the lifeblood of a hazing investigation. We seek to obtain and analyze all forms of digital communication:
- GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and fraternity/sorority-specific apps: These channels often contain detailed planning, instructions, reactions, and discussions before, during, and after hazing events. Deleting messages is common, but digital forensics can often recover them.
- Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok comments: These platforms frequently host evidence of humiliation, directives, or even proof of participation.
- Evidence includes both live and recovered/deleted messages. The context of these messages—who said what, when, and how others responded—can reveal intent, coercion, and knowledge.
-
Photos & Videos: In the age of smartphones, hazing is often documented, even if participants later regret it.
- Content filmed by members during events: This can be invaluable evidence of what exactly transpired.
- Footage shared in group chats or posted on social media: Even if deleted, copies may exist on other devices or in cloud storage.
- Security camera or Ring/doorbell footage: Houses, venues, or neighboring properties may have surveillance relevant to the incident.
- If you have immediate photos of injuries, these are critical. Take multiple angles, include a ruler or coin for scale, and reshoot over several days to show evolution of bruising.
-
Internal Organization Documents: These documents can reveal the organization’s policies, their awareness of risks, and communications regarding the incident.
- Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, ritual “traditions” lists: These can provide proof of a formal (or informal) hazing system.
- Emails/texts from officers: Especially those detailing plans for new members.
- National policies and training materials: These documents show what the national organization claims to do versus what actually happens.
-
University Records: We meticulously seek out official university documentation.
- Prior conduct files, probation/suspensions, letters of warning: These establish a pattern of misconduct and the university’s knowledge of it. UT Austin’s public hazing log at hazing.utexas.edu, for example, is a valuable resource.
- Incident reports to campus police or student conduct offices.
- Clery reports and similar disclosures: These often show general crime patterns on campus.
-
Medical and Psychological Records: Documenting the harm is as important as documenting the act itself.
- Emergency room and hospitalization records: Proof of immediate injury and treatment.
- Surgery and rehab notes: Details of long-term physical recovery.
- Toxicology reports: Crucial in alcohol or substance hazing cases.
- Psychological evaluations: Diagnosis of PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health impacts. These are vital for demonstrating non-economic damages.
-
Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts are powerful.
- Pledges, members, roommates, Resident Assistants (RAs), coaches, trainers, bystanders: Anyone who observed the events or the victim’s decline.
- Former members who quit or were expelled: Often willing to speak out.
- Emergency responders: EMTs or hospital staff who saw the immediate aftermath.
DAMAGES
In hazing cases, financial compensation is not just about “revenge” or profiting from tragedy; it’s about covering real losses, ensuring long-term care, and holding negligent parties accountable. Here are the main categories of damages we seek:
-
Medical Bills & Future Care: This includes all costs associated with physical healing and mental health support.
- Immediate care: ER visits, ambulance transport, ICU stays.
- Ongoing treatment: Surgeries, physical therapy, medications.
- Long-term care: For catastrophic injuries like brain damage (as in the Danny Santulli case) or life-altering organ damage due to alcohol poisoning.
-
Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: Hazing can derail a student’s entire future.
- Missed semesters and tuition costs for withdrawal or medical leave.
- Lost scholarships (academic, athletic, Greek-related).
- Delayed graduation and entry into the workforce.
- Reduced earning capacity if injuries are permanent, impacting lifetime income potential.
-
Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for the profound, non-financial suffering.
- Physical pain and suffering: For injuries, surgeries, and ongoing discomfort.
- Emotional distress, trauma, humiliation: Including PTSD, anxiety, depression, and the deep emotional scars left by degrading acts.
- Loss of enjoyment of life: The inability to participate in activities, hobbies, or social events that once brought joy.
-
Wrongful Death Damages (for families): When hazing tragically results in death, the surviving family members can recover:
- Funeral and burial costs.
- Loss of financial support the deceased would have provided.
- Loss of companionship, love, and support for parents, siblings, or spouses.
- Grief and emotional suffering of the family.
- Costs for the family’s own mental health treatment.
While we are describing types of damages, we cannot promise or predict specific dollar amounts for any individual case, as each is unique.
ROLE OF DIFFERENT DEFENDANTS AND INSURANCE COVERAGE
We recognize that national fraternities, sororities, and universities are large institutions typically protected by substantial insurance policies. However, we also know how to navigate these complexities.
- Insurance policies often play a critical role. These policies may cover the actions of local chapters, individual members, or the national organization itself.
- A common defense tactic from insurers is to argue that hazing involves “intentional acts” or falls under coverage exclusions. They may claim that intentional hazing is not covered, or that the specific type of incident is excluded from liability.
- Our experienced hazing lawyers, particularly informed by Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney, have an intimate understanding of these defense strategies. We know how to identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, challenge wrongful denials, and navigate disputes about exclusions and intentional conduct. We understand their playbook and use that knowledge to our clients’ advantage.
PRACTICAL GUIDES & FAQS
For families in Colorado County and students across Texas, knowing what to do immediately and what to expect can make all the difference. This section offers practical advice for parents, students, and witnesses caught in the difficult reality of hazing.
FOR PARENTS
As parents, trusting that the university environments in Houston, College Station, Austin, Dallas, or Waco are safe for your children is paramount. However, vigilance is key.
- Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to subtle and overt changes in your child:
- Unexplained injuries or frequent “accidents,” especially if the explanations don’t ring true.
- Chronic exhaustion and extreme sleep deprivation.
- Sudden, drastic changes in mood, increased anxiety, irritability, or social withdrawal from old friends or family.
- Obsessive or secretive phone use, often tied to demanding group chats; fear of missing “mandatory” events.
- A significant drop in academic performance.
- Unusual financial requests or inexplicable expenses.
- How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not accusation:
- Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with [organization name]?” or “Is there anything you’ve felt uncomfortable about?”
- Emphasize that their safety and well-being are far more important than any social status or loyalty to a group. Assure them you will support whatever decision they make.
- If Your Child is Hurt:
- Priority one is always medical care. Get them to an emergency room, urgent care, or student health services immediately.
- Document everything: Take clear photos of injuries from multiple angles, screenshot any relevant texts or social media messages, and write down exactly what your child tells you, including names, dates, and locations.
- Dealing with the University:
- Carefully document every communication you have with university administrators, including dates, names, and summaries of conversations.
- Ask direct questions about: prior incidents involving the same organization, and what specific actions the school has (or hasn’t) taken in response.
- When to Talk to a Lawyer:
- If your child suffers significant physical or psychological harm.
- If you feel the university or the organization is minimizing, stonewalling, or actively hiding what happened.
- We can help you navigate university bureaucracy, preserve evidence, and protect your child’s legal rights.
FOR STUDENTS / PLEDGES
For students from Colorado County pledging at Texas universities, it can be incredibly difficult to discern between genuine bonding and illegal hazing, especially when you desperately want to fit in.
- Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself:
- Am I being forced or pressured to do something I genuinely don’t want to do?
- Would I do this if there were no social consequences or fear of being “cut”?
- Is this activity dangerous, degrading, embarrassing, or illegal?
- Would my parents or the university approve if they knew exactly what was happening?
- Are older members making new members do things they don’t have to do themselves?
- Am I being told to keep secrets, lie, or hide this from “outsiders”?
- If you answered YES to any of these questions, it is likely hazing, regardless of how it’s framed.
- Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: In Texas, the law is clear: consent is not a defense to hazing. You cannot legally “consent” to activity that is illegal or harmful. The law recognizes the immense power dynamics, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion that make true, voluntary consent virtually impossible in these situations.
- Exiting and Reporting Safely:
- If you are in immediate danger, call 911. Getting help is the priority, and you are generally protected by medical amnesty laws.
- You have the absolute right to leave an organization at any time. If you fear retaliation, inform a trusted adult, campus official, or our firm.
- You can report anonymously through campus channels or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline: 1-888-NOT-HAZE (1-888-668-4293).
- Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and Texas law encourage students to call for help in an emergency by offering protections or leniency to those who report, even if they were involved in underage drinking or the hazing itself. Your life, or the life of a friend, is worth more than any potential disciplinary action.
FOR FORMER MEMBERS / WITNESSES
If you were once a part of a hazing culture, whether as a participant or observer, and now carry guilt or regret, know that your voice can prevent future harm.
- Your testimony and evidence can be instrumental in holding perpetrators and organizations accountable, potentially saving lives and sparing other families the pain you or others experienced.
- While we understand fears about self-incrimination, experienced lawyers can help you explore options for cooperating with authorities, often with legal protections in place for witnesses.
CRITICAL MISTAKES THAT CAN DESTROY YOUR CASE
For any Colorado County family grappling with a hazing incident, knowing what not to do is as crucial as knowing what to do. These common mistakes can severely undermine your legal options:
-
Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.
- What parents might think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
- Why it’s wrong: Your child is the victim; deleting evidence can look like a cover-up, makes investigation nearly impossible, and can even be obstruction.
- What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even content that seems embarrassing or sensitive. Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices.
-
Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly.
- What parents might think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
- Why it’s wrong: Such a confrontation will cause them to immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare robust legal defenses.
- What to do instead: Document everything you know, then call a lawyer from Attorney911 before any confrontation.
-
Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms.
- What universities do: They may pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements often designed to protect the institution.
- Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue a lawsuit, or agree to settlements that are far below the actual value of your case.
- What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university without having an attorney at Attorney911 review it first.
-
Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer.
- What families might think: “I want people to know what happened publicly.”
- Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys scour social media; inconsistencies or emotional posts can be used to discredit your child or hurt crucial credibility. It can also waive legal privilege.
- What to do instead: Document thoroughly in private. Let your lawyer control public messaging strategically.
-
Letting your child go back to “one last meeting” with the organization.
- What fraternities/sororities might say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic; let’s talk this out.”
- Why it’s wrong: This is often a tactic to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can be used against your child in a future legal proceeding.
- What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication from or to the organization should go through your lawyer.
-
Waiting “to see how the university handles it.”
- What universities might promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
- Why it’s wrong: While an investigation might occur, crucial evidence disappears quickly, witnesses graduate and scatter, and the statute of limitations can run out. Furthermore, a university’s internal process is aimed at its own policies, not necessarily full civil accountability.
- What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW. Consult with an Attorney911 lawyer immediately. University disciplinary processes and civil litigation are distinct, and one doesn’t replace the other.
-
Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer.
- What adjusters might say: “We just need your statement to process this claim.”
- Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters work for the insurance company, not for you. Recorded statements can be twisted and used against you, and early settlement offers are almost always lowball.
- What to do instead: Politely decline any conversations and state, “My attorney from Attorney911 will contact you.”
These mistakes, detailed in Attorney911’s video on client mistakes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY), highlight why immediate legal counsel is so vital.
SHORT FAQ
-
“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its specific facts – contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis. -
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default, but it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individual officers of an organization can also face misdemeanor charges for failing to report known hazing. -
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and juries recognize that “consent” given under immense peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent. -
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally, there is a 2-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical – evidence disappears, witnesses forget, and organizations destroy records. Learn more about the Texas statute of limitations in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately. -
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities or organizations can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, prior knowledge, and the foreseeability of the hazing. Many major hazing cases, such as the Pi Delta Psi retreat in the Pocono Mountains or the Sigma Pi “unofficial” house incident, occurred off-campus yet resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments against the organizations involved. -
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Most hazing cases ultimately settle confidentially before ever going to trial. As part of a settlement agreement, you can request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy while diligently pursuing full accountability.
ABOUT THE MANGINELLO LAW FIRM + CALL TO ACTION
When your family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. This is precisely what The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, brings to the table for families in Colorado County and across Texas. We understand how the deep-seated traditions at institutions like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor can sometimes foster environments where hazing thrives, impacting students from across the state.
From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Colorado County and surrounding areas, who find their children victimized by hazing at universities in College Station, Austin, Dallas, Waco, or Houston. We know that the distance from Columbus or Eagle Lake to a university campus shouldn’t be a barrier to justice.
Our firm is uniquely qualified to handle the complexities of hazing litigation:
- Insurance Insider Advantage: Our Associate Attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable experience as a former insurance defense attorney at a national defense firm. She understands precisely how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and often undervalue) hazing claims. She knows their tactics—delay, deny, and find coverage exclusions—because she used to run their playbook. Lupe Peña’s complete professional background is detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
- Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Our Managing Partner, Ralph P. Manginello, has a proven track record of taking on formidable defendants. He was involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, demonstrating his ability to fight against billion-dollar corporations. This federal court experience (United States District Court, Southern District of Texas) means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We know how to build cases that force powerful defendants to the table. Ralph Manginello’s extensive credentials can be reviewed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
- Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have secured multi-million dollar settlements in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. This includes working with economists to correctly value the lifetime care needs for brain injury victims and ensuring comprehensive damages analysis. We build cases that force accountability, not accept quick settlements. Our experience in wrongful death claims is detailed at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.
- Combined Criminal and Civil Expertise in Hazing: Ralph’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a critical advantage. We understand the intricate interplay between criminal hazing charges—which are increasingly common in Texas—and civil litigation. This dual expertise allows us to provide comprehensive guidance, even advising witnesses or former members who may face dual exposure.
- Investigative Depth: We leverage a vast network of experts, including medical specialists, digital forensics teams, economists, and psychologists. We are experts at obtaining hidden evidence—from deleted group chats and social media content to subpoenaing national fraternity records and uncovering university files through robust discovery and public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.
We understand that hazing is one of the hardest things a family from Colorado County (or anywhere in Texas) can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We are not about bravado; we are about thorough investigation, strategic litigation, and achieving real accountability.
Call to Action for Colorado County Families
If you or your child has experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Colorado County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.
Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to your story without judgment, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.
What to expect in your free consultation:
- We’ll listen to your story without judgment, providing a safe space to share what happened.
- We’ll review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records. Attorney911’s YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/@Manginellolawfirm) offers valuable videos on collecting such evidence and more.
- We’ll explain your legal options: whether a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or neither, is the right choice for your family.
- We’ll discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
- All our hazing cases operate on a contingency fee basis—meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Our video explaining contingency fees (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc) details how this works.
- There is absolutely no pressure to hire us on the spot—take all the time you need to make your decision.
- Everything you tell us is strictly confidential.
Contact Attorney911 today:
- Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- Direct: (713) 528-9070
- Cell: (713) 443-4781
- Website: https://attorney911.com
- Email: ralph@atty911.com
Hablamos Español. For consultation in Spanish, please contact Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles.
Reading this article does not create an attorney–client relationship. Every case is unique, and we cannot guarantee specific outcomes. An experienced attorney from our team can review your specific facts and help you understand your rights under Texas law.
Whether you’re in Colorado County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.
Legal Disclaimer
This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.
Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.
If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.
The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com