Texas Hazing Lawyers: A Critical Guide for Crosby County Families on Campus Abuse

A Texas night, far from the quiet fields of Crosby County, darkens around a familiar campus landmark. For a moment, let’s imagine the scene: an 18-year-old from Crosbyton or Ralls, perhaps a first-year student, is at an off-campus house near the University of Houston. This is meant to be “initiation night” for a fraternity he hopes will be his new family. He’s exhausted, having had little sleep for days, and deeply uncomfortable. He’s holding a half-empty bottle of cheap liquor, his throat burning, his head spinning. Around him, older members are chanting, some filming with their phones, laughing as he stumbles through a ridiculous dare. He wants to stop, but the pressure to belong, the fear of “getting cut,” is immense. Suddenly, his vision blurs, and he feels a sharp pain in his side as he collapses, hitting the floor hard. While some brothers initially panic, others quickly work to move him and delete messages, worried about “getting the chapter shut down.” He lies there, unconscious, as precious minutes tick by.

This isn’t just a hypothetical scenario. It’s a collage of real incidents that have unfolded across Texas campuses, including the very universities our Crosby County families choose for their children. Whether your student attends the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, the dangers of hazing are real and evolving. The tragic incident described above mirrors elements of the Leonel Bermudez case, which our firm, Attorney911, is actively litigating against the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi fraternity. Leonel’s story, like so many others, involved forced alcohol consumption, degrading rituals, and delayed medical care, resulting in devastating injuries.

This guide is for you, the parents and students of Crosby County, and indeed all Texans. We aim to cut through the noise and provide clear, actionable information on what hazing truly looks like in 2025, the laws designed to prevent it, and how to fight back when it harms your family. We are Attorney911, and we know that behind every hazing incident is a human tragedy demanding justice.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” This is paramount.
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  - Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
  - Photograph visible injuries from multiple angles.
  - Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
- Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
- Do NOT:
  - Confront the fraternity/sorority directly.
  - Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal advice.
  - Post details on public social media before consulting an attorney.
  - Let your child delete messages or “clean up” any evidence.
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
- Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
- We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Crosby County families, understanding modern hazing means shedding old stereotypes. Hazing is no longer just about silly pranks or harmless initiation rituals. It’s an insidious pattern of abuse, perpetuated through peer pressure and power dynamics, that can inflict severe physical injury, psychological trauma, and, tragically, death. The methods have evolved, often becoming more covert and incorporating digital elements, but the underlying intent to degrade and coerce remains the same.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

Hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student; and
Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

It’s crucial to understand that if the activity meets this legal definition, a student’s “agreement” or “consent” does not make it legal or safe. When someone is under immense peer pressure, facing social exclusion, or fears being rejected by a group they desperately want to join, their “consent” is not truly free.

Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing manifests in various forms, often escalating through three tiers of severity:

Tier 1: Subtle Hazing
These acts often seem harmless but establish a power imbalance, fostering a culture of obedience. Examples include forced servitude (running errands for older members), requiring new members to carry degrading items (as in the Leonel Bermudez case where pledges carried fanny packs with condoms and sex toys), social isolation from non-members, or deception about organizational activities. Modern subtle hazing might involve constant group chat monitoring or mandatory social media engagement.
Tier 2: Harassment Hazing
These behaviors cause emotional or physical discomfort, often pushing physical or psychological boundaries. Examples include verbal abuse, sleep deprivation (like the “100+ push-ups, 500 squats” demanded of Leonel Bermudez late at night), forced exercise beyond reasonable limits, or public humiliation. Digital harassment can include forcing pledges to post embarrassing content online.
Tier 3: Violent Hazing
This category involves acts with a high potential for severe injury, sexual assault, or death. Key examples include forced alcohol or substance consumption (Leonel Bermudez was allegedly forced to drink until he vomited), physical beatings or paddling, forced exposure to extreme environmental conditions (e.g., cold water hose sprays as suffered by Leonel), or dangerous physical challenges. Violent hazing episodes often occur at off-campus locations, dubbed “retreats” to evade detection.

Modern hazing frequently blurs the lines between these categories, making it harder to identify but no less dangerous. Crosby County parents and students should be aware that these acts are far beyond harmless “tradition.”

Where Hazing Actually Happens

While fraternities are often in the spotlight, hazing isn’t confined to Greek life. It can occur in a wide array of campus groups where hierarchical structures and traditions of initiation are strong. For families in Crosby County, whose children participate in various activities, it’s important to recognize that hazing can affect:

Fraternities and Sororities: This includes social Greek letter organizations across Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek councils.
Student Groups: Any organization that requires members to “earn” their place can foster hazing, from spirit squads to debate clubs, and even academic honor societies.
Athletic Teams: From college football to swimming, basketball, cheerleading, and club sports, team initiations frequently involve elements of hazing, including forced alcohol consumption or degrading acts disguised as “team bonding.”
Military-Style Organizations: Groups like the Corps of Cadets or ROTC programs, prevalent at schools such as Texas A&M, have traditions that can cross the line into hazing, with emphasis on physical endurement and obedience.
Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups can engage in hazing under the guise of building discipline or camaraderie.

At its core, hazing persists due to a potent mix of social status, ingrained traditions, and a code of silence. When families in Crosby County send their children off to college, they must remain vigilant regardless of the organizations their students join.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas is crucial for Crosby County families seeking justice. Hazing is not merely a university policy violation; it’s a crime with criminal and civil consequences for individuals, organizations, and sometimes even the university itself.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has clear statutory provisions against hazing, primarily outlined in the Texas Education Code – Chapter 37, Subchapter F. This law is foundational for any hazing case across the state, including those originating in Crosby County or affecting its residents.

Definition of Hazing (Texas Education Code § 37.151): Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.
- Key Plain English Takeaways:
  - Location Doesn’t Matter: It doesn’t matter if the hazing happens on university grounds or far afield in a private house.
  - Harm is Broad: It covers dangers to both the mind (mental health) and body (physical health). This includes psychological torment as much as physical harm. Leonel Bermudez’s alleged hazing, for instance, involved both physical and deeply degrading acts.
  - Intent: The perpetrator doesn’t need to specifically intend to “haze.” If their actions are “reckless”—meaning they knew or should have known the risks but proceeded anyway—it still falls under the law.
  - “Consent” is Irrelevant: As confirmed by Texas Education Code § 37.155, it is not a defense that the person being hazed consented to the activity. The law recognizes that true consent is impossible in coercive environments.
Criminal Penalties (Texas Education Code § 37.152): Hazing is a serious offense in Texas, with penalties varying by severity:
- Class B Misdemeanor: The default classification, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine up to $2,000.
- Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes an injury requiring medical attention.
- State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury (like Leonel Bermudez’s acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis) or death.
- Failure to Report: Members or officers who know about hazing and fail to report it can also face misdemeanor charges.
- Retaliation: Threatening or harming someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.
Organizational Liability (Texas Education Code § 37.153): Organizations themselves can be held criminally responsible, not just the individuals involved. An organization can be fined up to $10,000 if it authorized or encouraged hazing, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about it and failed to report. Universities can also revoke recognition and ban organizations.
Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting (Texas Education Code § 37.154): Texas law protects individuals who report hazing incidents in good faith, granting them immunity from civil or criminal liability related to that report. This is designed to encourage reporting and prevent further harm.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, Crosby County families may encounter two distinct legal paths:

Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations accused of violating hazing laws. The goal is to determine guilt and impose punishment, which can range from fines and probation to jail time. Common charges include hazing, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in cases involving severe injury or death.
Civil Cases: These are brought by victims or their families. The goal is to seek monetary compensation for the damages suffered and to hold responsible parties (individuals, local and national organizations, and often universities) accountable. Civil claims typically revolve around negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring/supervision, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. A pivotal aspect is that a criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case. The standards of proof differ, and civil cases often uncover deeper patterns of institutional failure.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond Texas state law, federal regulations also impact how hazing is addressed:

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant piece of legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding must:
- Increase transparency in reporting hazing incidents.
- Invest more in hazing education and prevention strategies.
- Publicly maintain data on hazing incidents, with full implementation expected by 2026. This act aims to provide families, including those in Crosby County, with much-needed information about hazing at their chosen institutions.
Title IX: If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based discrimination or hostility, Title IX may be triggered. Universities have a legal obligation to respond promptly and effectively to such allegations, regardless of where they occur.
Clery Act: This act requires colleges to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses, including statistics related to alcohol and drug violations, assaults, and other criminal offenses that often overlap with hazing incidents.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Civil hazing lawsuits can involve multiple defendants, reflecting the layers of responsibility in complex campus environments:

Individual Students: Those directly involved in perpetrating the hazing acts, including organizers, participants, and those who supplied prohibited substances or delayed medical aid. In the Leonel Bermudez case, 13 individuals were named as defendants.
Local Chapter / Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, or student group that planned and executed the hazing.
National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which sets policies, trains local chapters, collects dues, and is often aware of hazing patterns across its network. Their liability often hinges on whether they failed to adequately supervise, warn, or intervene, especially given a history of similar incidents in other chapters.
University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, along with its board of regents, can be held liable for negligent supervision, failure to enforce policies, or showing deliberate indifference to known hazing and safety risks. This is a common battleground in hazing litigation, often encountering defenses like sovereign immunity for public institutions.
Third Parties: This can include property owners (if hazing occurred in a privately owned facility), alcohol vendors (under dram shop laws if alcohol was illegally served), or event organizers.

Each hazing case is fact-specific, and the identification of liable parties requires a thorough investigation by experienced legal counsel.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

The tragic stories of hazing victims nationwide are not isolated incidents but patterns that reveal systemic failures and predictable dangers. These cases, often resulting in multi-million dollar settlements and new anti-hazing laws, are crucial precedents for Crosby County families understanding the fight for justice in Texas. They underscore that hazing is a foreseeable problem with severe consequences.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The most common, and deadliest, form of hazing involves forced or coerced alcohol consumption.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most publicized hazing deaths, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after a “bid acceptance” night. He was forced to drink massive amounts of alcohol, then fell repeatedly, sustaining multiple injuries, including a traumatic brain injury, which were captured on the fraternity’s security cameras. Fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for nearly 12 hours. The aftermath included dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, civil litigation, and the powerful Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania. This case highlighted the lethal combination of extreme intoxication, delayed medical help, and a pervasive culture of silence and cover-up.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning after a “Big Brother Night” ritual. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and expected to consume them quickly. Criminal hazing charges were brought against multiple members, and Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life, leading to significant policy overhauls. This case demonstrates how formulaic “bottle exchange” or “gifting” rituals are a repeating script for disaster.
Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old freshman, died after a “Bible study” drinking game where he was forced to consume excessive amounts of alcohol (his BAC was 0.495%). Reciting the Greek alphabet or answering trivia incorrectly led to forced shots. One fraternity member was convicted of negligent homicide, and others faced hazing charges. Max’s death led to the passing of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, a felony hazing statute. This case vividly illustrates how legislative change often follows public outrage and undeniable proof of hazing’s dangers.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” event. Multiple fraternity members were convicted of hazing-related charges. His family later reached a $10 million settlement ($7 million from Pi Kappa Alpha national and approximately $3 million from BGSU). This case, like Leonel Bermudez’s, highlights the life-threatening risks of forced alcohol consumption and the significant accountability faced by both national fraternities and universities.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical hazing and degrading rituals remain a persistent threat.

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died after participating in a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus retreat in the Pocono Mountains. Blindfolded and wearing a heavy backpack, he was repeatedly tackled. Fraternity members delayed calling for help for over an hour. Multiple members were convicted, and, significantly, the national fraternity was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter—a landmark case for organizational criminal liability. This demonstrates that off-campus “retreats” can be as dangerous or even more dangerous than campus parties, and national organizations can be held directly responsible.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life, often permeating athletic programs where team cohesion can be built on abusive “traditions.”

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): A major scandal erupted when former football players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program over many years. Multiple lawsuits were filed against the university and coaching staff, leading to the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald (who later settled a wrongful termination suit confidentially with the university). This case demonstrated that hazing can occur in high-profile, non-Greek organizations, raising critical questions about institutional oversight and responsibility.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national patterns carry profound implications for Crosby County families. The common threads—forced drinking, humiliation, violence, delayed medical care, and systematic cover-ups—are not confined by state lines. The multi-million dollar settlements and legislative reforms that follow these tragedies create a landscape where accountability is demanded.

When Crosby County families face hazing at Texas universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, the lessons from these national precedents are invaluable. They underscore that such incidents are often foreseeable, not isolated accidents, especially for national organizations with documented histories of similar misconduct. Our firm, Attorney911, stands on the shoulders of these critical cases, using the established legal precedents to fight for justice for your family in Texas.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Crosby County families navigating college life in the Lone Star State, understanding the specific environments of Texas’s major universities is paramount. While Crosby County may feel distant from these bustling campuses, many of our children attend them, and the patterns of hazing seen nationally are echoed with local specificity.

Our firm, Attorney911, operates from Houston and serves families across Texas, including Crosby County. We are intimately familiar with the legal challenges and unique cultures of institutions like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, as well as the broader Texas Greek life system.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston is a large, dynamic urban campus located in the heart of the nation’s fourth-largest city. It boasts a diverse student body, a mix of commuter and residential students, and a vibrant Greek life community along with numerous other student organizations and athletic teams. UH has been at the forefront of recent hazing litigation involving our firm. While geographically removed from Crosby County, UH is a major destination for many Texans seeking higher education.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH’s Greek life is extensive, with dozens of fraternities and sororities recognized by Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic Council, and the National Pan-Hellenic Council. The campus fosters a strong sense of Cougar pride, and student organizations play a significant role in campus social life. The sheer size and urban setting can sometimes lead to incidents occurring off-campus, making oversight more complex than in a traditional college town.

5.1.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that explicitly prohibits any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation with any student organization. Their policies cover both on-campus and off-campus activities, clearly outlining prohibited behaviors such as forced consumption of alcohol or drugs, physical mistreatment, sleep deprivation, and degrading acts. Students and parents can report hazing incidents through the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, or directly to the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD).

5.1.3 Documented Incidents & Responses

The University of Houston has faced its share of hazing-related challenges. One prominent example is the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) case in 2016, where pledges were allegedly deprived of food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. One student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being forced into strenuous physical activity. This incident led to misdemeanor hazing charges and university suspension for the chapter.

More recently, our firm, Attorney911, brought a $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston, its Board of Regents, and the Pi Kappa Phi fraternity on behalf of our client, Leonel Bermudez. Filed in late 2025 in Harris County, this case alleges severe hazing that resulted in his hospitalization with acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis. The hazing allegedly included:

The “pledge fanny pack” rule, requiring pledges to carry demeaning items.
Hose spraying “like waterboarding.”
Forced physical exertion, including more than “100+ push-ups and 500 squats” until he couldn’t stand, at Yellowstone Boulevard Park.
Forced consumption of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting, followed by sprints.
Developing brown urine, a classic symptom of rhabdomyolysis.

The lawsuit highlights UH’s alleged failure to effectively prevent or respond to hazing despite prior incidents, including a 2017 incident involving a fraternity member being hospitalized with a head injury during a hazing ritual. The Pi Kappa Phi chapter was suspended on November 6, 2025, and voted to surrender its charter eight days later, demonstrating the university’s and national organization’s response when faced with serious allegations and legal action.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases arising from UH present unique jurisdictional aspects. Depending on the exact location of the incident, investigations could involve the UHPD, the Houston Police Department, and the Harris County District Attorney’s Office. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in Harris County, where our firm has extensive experience. Potential defendants include the individual perpetrators, the local Pi Kappa Phi chapter, the national Pi Kappa Phi organization, and the University of Houston itself. Our firm’s work on the Bermudez case directly demonstrates our capability to litigate against all these parties.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For Crosby County families with students at UH, recognizing the signs and reacting swiftly is critical:

Familiarize yourself with UH’s hazing policies and anonymous reporting options.
Document any suspicious activities, social media posts, or physical signs of hazing.
If you suspect hazing, especially involving physical danger or forced consumption, contact the UHPD immediately.
Seek legal counsel from an attorney experienced in Houston hazing cases, particularly those who have successfully litigated against the University of Houston, to understand your rights and options.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, located in College Station, is deeply connected to Crosby County through its “Aggie network” and as a major destination for Texas students. Known for its rich traditions, strong sense of community, and the deeply ingrained Corps of Cadets culture, A&M presents a unique environment when it comes to hazing. As a public university, Texas A&M has sovereign immunity protections, which our firm, Attorney911, is experienced in navigating.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M’s identity is shaped by its military traditions, its enormous and passionate alumni base, and its extensive Greek life. The Corps of Cadets, a demanding military training program, has its own complex set of traditions. The university’s emphasis on honor and tradition, while fostering loyalty, can sometimes lead to a culture where certain “rites of passage” are protected, even if they cross into hazing.

5.2.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

Texas A&M’s anti-hazing policies are clearly articulated, prohibiting mental or physical harassment, forced consumption of substances, and any conduct that threatens the health or safety of students for initiation purposes. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students Office, the Student Conduct Office, the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD), and specific reporting mechanisms within the Corps of Cadets. Like UT, A&M is required to report hazing violations and sanctions, which can be found on their website.

5.2.3 Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced multiple hazing allegations across Greek life and the Corps:

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): In 2021, two pledges alleged that during hazing, they were subjected to forced strenuous physical activity and had various substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, poured on them. This resulted in severe chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The pledges sued the fraternity for $1 million, and the university suspended the chapter for two years. This case grimly highlights the dangers of physical and chemical hazing.
Corps of Cadets: In 2023, a lawsuit was filed by a former cadet alleging degrading hazing that included simulated sexual acts and being bound in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. While Texas A&M stated it addressed the matter under its student conduct rules, such incidents underscore the challenges of maintaining safe traditions within highly disciplined organizations.
Phi Gamma Delta (Fiji): Joseph Little collapsed and died in August 2018 during pledging activities that the university later determined were hazing. This occurred at the same chapter where Trey Walker died in 1997, highlighting a disturbing pattern of repeat incidents within the same organization.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at Texas A&M often involve the UPD and Brazos County law enforcement. Civil lawsuits, while facing the challenge of sovereign immunity for the public university, can target individuals, the local chapter, and the national organization. Our firm, Attorney911, has extensive experience challenging sovereign immunity protections and has successfully handled cases against large institutional defendants. We dig deep to prove gross negligence, which can bypass these immunities.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

Crosby County families with Aggie students should:

Be vigilant for physical and behavioral signs of hazing within ANY A&M organization, including the Corps.
Understand that “tradition” is no excuse for illegal and harmful acts.
Preserve all digital evidence related to hazing activities, including group chats and photos.
Given the complexity of sovereign immunity for public universities, promptly consulting an attorney experienced in Texas university litigation is crucial.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution and a popular choice for Crosby County students, is a frequent site of hazing incidents. While geographically distant from Crosby County, its influence spans the state. UT Austin stands out for its relatively transparent reporting of hazing violations, offering a public list of sanctioned organizations, which provides valuable insight for families and legal teams.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin boasts a massive, diverse student body and a vibrant, often intense, Greek life. The university is home to numerous spirit groups and clubs, such as the Texas Cowboys, which maintain deep-rooted traditions. This rich social environment, coupled with the pressure to excel, can create fertile ground for hazing.

5.3.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

UT’s anti-hazing policies are comprehensive, mirroring state law in their prohibition of any act that endangers physical or mental health for initiation purposes. The university explicitly lists prohibited conduct and provides multiple reporting channels, including the Dean of Students, the Office for Student Conduct, and the UTPD. Most significantly, UT maintains a public, online database of hazing violations, which is a rare but vital tool for accountability.

5.3.3 Documented Incidents & Responses

UT’s hazing report provides a detailed overview of repeated violations:

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): The chapter faced sanctions in 2023 for directing new members to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics—acts deemed hazing. The university placed them on probation and mandated new hazing-prevention education. This demonstrates a recurring pattern for this national organization, similar to the Stone Foltz case.
Texas Cowboys: This prestigious spirit group has a history of hazing, including a 2018 incident linked to a pledge’s death from a vehicle accident after alleged sleep deprivation. The group has faced suspensions and permanent removal from campus, highlighting how hazing transcends traditional Greek life.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): In January 2024, an Australian exchange student alleged assault by fraternity members, suffering a dislocated leg, broken ligaments, fractured tibia, and broken nose. The student has sued the chapter, which was already under suspension for prior hazing and safety violations, underscoring systemic issues within certain organizations.

UT’s public database reveals that numerous other fraternities, sororities, and student groups have faced sanctions for everything from forced alcohol consumption to degrading tasks and physical abuse.

5.4.4 How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed

Cases involving UT Austin are typically handled by the UTPD or Austin Police Department and fall under Travis County jurisdiction for civil claims. While UT, as a public university, benefits from sovereign immunity, our firm, Attorney911, is adept at identifying and pursuing exceptions related to gross negligence or violations of federal law. The public record of hazing violations published by UT can serve as powerful evidence of prior knowledge and foreseeability in civil actions.

5.4.5 What UT Students & Parents Should Do

For Crosby County families with students attending UT:

Regularly check UT’s public hazing violations page to be aware of sanctioned organizations.
Emphasize to your student that “tradition” does not excuse illegal behavior.
Immediately document any incidents with screenshots, photos, and detailed notes.
Seek legal advice promptly from attorneys knowledgeable about Texas hazing laws and skilled in navigating complaints against public universities.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

SMU, a private university in Dallas, is a cornerstone institution for many Texas families, including those from Crosby County. It’s known for its strong academic programs and a prominent Greek life system that, like other universities, has seen its share of hazing incidents. As a private institution, SMU generally faces fewer sovereign immunity barriers than public universities like UT or Texas A&M, potentially simplifying some aspects of civil litigation.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU cultivates a vibrant campus culture with a highly engaged student body and a significant Greek presence. The university prides itself on its traditions and community, yet these elements can also, unfortunately, contribute to situations ripe for hazing. Due to its private status, SMU’s internal disciplinary processes are not always as publicly transparent as those of public institutions.

5.4.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

SMU’s anti-hazing policy aligns with Texas law, strictly prohibiting any act that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of initiation, admission into, or affiliation with an organization. The university provides several avenues for reporting, including its Dean of Students office, Student Conduct & Community Standards, and even anonymous reporting options like “Real Response” to encourage students to come forward without fear of retaliation.

5.4.3 Documented Incidents & Responses

SMU has taken strong action against hazing, reflecting a commitment to safety, though challenges persist:

Kappa Alpha Order: In 2017, the SMU chapter faced severe sanctions following allegations that new members were paddled, forced to drink excessive alcohol, and deprived of sleep. This led to a multi-year suspension for the chapter, with restrictions on recruiting and social activities. This incident highlights that even in prestigious private institutions, traditional physical and alcohol hazing remains a serious issue.
Beyond Greek life, SMU’s student conduct records, while not as readily public as UT’s, indicate various disciplinary actions against other student organizations for hazing-related offenses over the years.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

Civil hazing lawsuits against a private university like SMU typically bypass the sovereign immunity defenses common in cases against public institutions. This means that pursuing claims directly against the university for negligence or failure to protect students can be a more straightforward legal pathway in terms of overcoming jurisdictional hurdles. Cases would typically be filed in Dallas County courts. Our firm, Attorney911, has extensive experience in holding both private and public institutions accountable for their failures.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For Crosby County families with students at SMU:

Be proactive in discussing hazing with your student, encouraging them to utilize SMU’s anonymous reporting tools if they witness or experience mistreatment.
Carefully document any suspected hazing, including digital evidence and eyewitness accounts.
Due to the private nature of SMU’s internal investigations, engaging an experienced hazing attorney early is crucial to ensure proper investigation and to protect your family’s rights effectively.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, is a revered institution for many Texans, including those from Crosby County. Known for its strong spiritual foundation and athletic programs, Baylor has also faced significant scrutiny over issues of campus culture, particularly concerning sexual assault and general student welfare. This history adds a complex layer to any hazing allegations that may arise.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor’s campus culture is deeply influenced by its Christian mission and its fervent athletic spirit, particularly its football program. This environment nurtures a strong community, but also, in certain corners, can inadvertently foster conditions where “traditions” might morph into hazing. The university has been under a microscope for its institutional responses to student misconduct, making transparency and accountability a key focus for its administration.

5.5.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

Baylor maintains a “zero-tolerance” policy on hazing, mirroring Texas state law in its prohibition of any activity that risks physical or mental harm for purposes of initiation or affiliation. Baylor provides reporting mechanisms through its Student Conduct Administration, the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD), and an ethics point hotline, encouraging a safe environment for students to report concerns. The university has emphasized its commitment to protecting students following past controversies.

5.5.3 Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor’s history includes incidents across various student groups:

Baylor Baseball Hazing: In 2020, 14 baseball players faced suspensions following an investigation into hazing allegations. While specific details were not fully released, the incident led to significant disciplinary action within the athletic department (suspensions were staggered to avoid disrupting the team season). This demonstrates that hazing can occur even within highly regulated and visible athletic programs at institutions committed to ethical conduct.
In the broader context of campus culture, Baylor has grappled with allegations of misconduct within student organizations, prompting renewed institutional focus on oversight and accountability. While a major hazing death has not occurred at Baylor, the university’s past challenges highlight the imperative for constant vigilance.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

As a private university, Baylor does not shield itself with sovereign immunity, making it similar to SMU in terms of civil litigation accessibility. Lawsuits against Baylor and its affiliated organizations would typically be heard in McLennan County courts. The firm’s experience, Attorney911, in handling high-profile cases and navigating complex institutional structures makes us well-equipped to manage legal actions against Baylor, focusing on the university’s duty of care and its enforcement of policies.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

Crosby County families with students at Baylor should:

Be acutely aware of Baylor’s strong stance against hazing and encourage students to report any questionable conduct leveraging the university’s improved reporting systems.
Document any signs of hazing, paying close attention to practices that might be disguised as “team building” or “brotherhood/sisterhood” within religious contexts, which can still be detrimental.
Given Baylor’s institutional history, contacting an experienced hazing attorney is advisable to ensure that any hazing allegations are taken seriously and thoroughly investigated, protecting your student’s rights and well-being.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For Crosby County families navigating the complex world of college, understanding the Greek organizations — from their local chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, to their national headquarters — is paramount. The history of hazing, often sweeping across multiple chapters nationwide, creates a pattern of foreseeability and a powerful legal weapon for victims.

6.1 Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities and sororities present at Texas institutions are part of larger national or international organizations. These national bodies, whether they are Interfraternity Council (IFC), National Panhellenic Conference (NPC), National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), or multicultural Greek groups, share a common brand, an anti-hazing philosophy (on paper), and often, tragically, a history of hazing incidents across their chapters.

National headquarters typically:

Set anti-hazing policies and risk management guidelines.
Provide training to local chapter officers.
Collect dues and maintain oversight (to varying degrees) of their chapters.

Because of this, when a local Texas chapter repeats a hazing ritual—be it forced drinking, physical abuse, or humiliating acts—that has caused injury or death at another chapter in a different state, it strengthens the argument for foreseeability. It means the National organization had not only prior knowledge but also a history of warnings that such dangerous activities could occur. This pattern evidence is critical in our legal strategy at Attorney911. It shows that the national body was, or should have been, aware of the risks but failed to prevent them.

6.2 Organization Mapping: From Texas Campuses to National Patterns

Here, we don’t need to list every single chapter, but rather highlight the major organizations present at Texas universities and connect them to their national reputation regarding hazing.

Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ)

Who they are: A national social fraternity with chapters at many Texas schools, including the University of Houston.
National Hazing History: Pi Kappa Phi has faced severe scrutiny, notably after the 2017 death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University due to acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night.” The national organization, therefore, has been acutely aware of the dangers of forced alcohol consumption.
Texas Connection: As seen in the Leonel Bermudez case against the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi, this national organization’s history, combined with repeated local incidents alleged, suggests a pattern of behavior they should have predicted and prevented.

Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike)

Who they are: A large national social fraternity with a significant presence at Texas A&M, UT Austin, and other state universities.
National Hazing History: Pi Kappa Alpha has a particularly grim national record, including the 2021 death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University, where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning after hazing. The Foltz family received a $10 million settlement from the national fraternity and university. Another notable incident was the 2012 death of David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University, also due to alcohol poisoning during a hazing event, which resulted in a $14 million settlement.
Texas Connection: Chapters at UT Austin (2023) and Texas A&M have faced sanctions for hazing involving dangerous alcohol consumption and physical activities, directly mirroring the national pattern of incidents.

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE)

Who they are: One of the largest national fraternities, present at virtually all major Texas universities like Texas A&M, UT Austin, and SMU. Often referred to as “America’s deadliest fraternity” by some media outlets.
National Hazing History: SAE has a documented history of hazing-related deaths and severe injuries across the country, prompting them to famously (and controversially) eliminate their traditional pledging process in 2014. Key incidents include the 2008 death of Carson Starkey at Cal Poly, a freshman who died of alcohol poisoning, leading to a substantial confidential settlement with his family. The 2019 death of Noah Domingo at UC Irvine from alcohol poisoning also involved an SAE chapter.
Texas Connection: The Texas A&M SAE chapter faced a $1 million lawsuit in 2021 (settlement terms not publicly disclosed) for chemical burns sustained by pledges during hazing. More recently, the UT Austin SAE chapter was sued in January 2024 by an exchange student alleging severe assault during hazing at a party. The pattern of severe physical abuse, alcohol poisoning, and negligence is particularly stark within SAE.

Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ)

Who they are: A national social fraternity with chapters at many Texas universities, including UT Austin and Texas A&M.
National Hazing History: Most tragically, Phi Delta Theta was involved in the 2017 death of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University. Max died from extreme alcohol poisoning (BAC 0.495%) after a “Bible study” hazing ritual. This case led to Louisiana’s felony hazing statute, the Max Gruver Act.
Texas Connection: Chapters across Texas have faced penalties for hazing, with university records often citing alcohol-related violations consistent with their national patterns.

Kappa Alpha Order (KA)

Who they are: A national social fraternity with a strong historical presence, particularly in the South, including at SMU and Texas A&M.
National Hazing History: Kappa Alpha Order has had numerous chapters nationwide sanctioned or suspended for hazing, often involving forced drinking, physical abuse, and degrading rituals.
Texas Connection: At SMU, the Kappa Alpha Order chapter was suspended for multiple years in 2017 due to allegations of paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. Similar incidents have been documented at other Texas campuses, demonstrating a pattern of physical and alcohol-related hazing for this organization.

Sigma Nu (ΣΝ)

Who they are: A national social fraternity with chapters at schools like UT Austin and Texas A&M.
National Hazing History: Sigma Nu has faced multiple suspensions and lawsuits across the country for incidents involving physical hazing and alcohol abuse.
Texas Connection: Chapters at Texas schools have undergone disciplinary action for hazing, contributing to the pattern of violations.

6.3 Tie Back to Legal Strategy

These national histories, combined with local chapter incidents, are instrumental in building a strong legal case for Crosby County families. Our firm, Attorney911, uses this information to show:

Foreseeability: That the national organization should have foreseen the potential for harm at its Texas chapters given its history.
Pattern Evidence: Similar hazing acts across different chapters demonstrate a systemic issue, not just isolated “rogue” incidents.
Negligent Supervision: This evidence supports claims that the national organization failed in its duty to adequately supervise, warn, or intervene, despite repeated warnings from its own past.

This strategy strengthens our position in negotiations and litigation, increasing the leverage for accountability against national fraternities and, where applicable, the universities that oversee them. Understanding these patterns is key to navigating insurance coverage disputes and pursuing punitive damages when justified.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

For families in Crosby County facing the aftermath of hazing, the path to justice requires a meticulous approach to evidence collection, a clear understanding of recoverable damages, and a robust legal strategy. Our firm, Attorney911, specializes in building these complex cases.

7.1 Evidence: The Foundation of Any Strong Case

Hazing cases are won or lost on evidence, and in the digital age, much of that evidence is ephemeral. Speed and thoroughness are critical.

Digital Communications: These are often the most crucial pieces of evidence.
- Group Messaging Apps: Platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, Discord, and even fraternity-specific apps are where hazing is planned, executed, and documented. Messages contain orders, taunts, plans for events, and even admissions of guilt. Our firm utilizes digital forensics experts to recover deleted messages and analyze chat histories to reconstruct events definitively.
- Social Media: Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Facebook often contain photos and videos of hazing events, even if subtly veiled, along with comments, DMs, and location tags. This content, even if deleted, can often be recovered.
- Text Messages & Emails: Direct communications between individuals or official chapter emails can unveil plans, threats, and attempts at cover-up.
- Attorney911 provides a valuable resource on this critical area: Watch Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs), which explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.
Photos & Videos: Beyond social media, direct photo and video evidence, especially taken by participants, can be devastating. This includes footage of hazing in progress, injuries, and even “confession” videos made by members. Security camera footage from houses, venues, or nearby businesses can also be vital.
Internal Organization Documents: Through discovery in a lawsuit, we can obtain pledge manuals, initiation scripts, lists of “traditions,” and internal emails from officers detailing hazing activities. These documents often reveal the institutional knowledge of hazing practices.
University Records: These include prior conduct files (probation, suspensions), incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, Clery Act reports, and internal emails among administrators discussing the organization. Such records demonstrate the university’s knowledge of prior problems and its response (or lack thereof).
Medical and Psychological Records: Crucial for proving damages, these include emergency room reports, hospitalization records, lab results (e.g., blood alcohol content, toxicology, kidney function for rhabdomyolysis like Leonel Bermudez suffered), imaging (X-rays, CT scans, MRIs), and psychological evaluations. It’s vital that medical providers are informed that the injury is hazing-related to ensure proper documentation.
Witness Testimony: Other pledges, current members, former members who quit, roommates, RAs, coaches, trainers, and any bystanders can provide firsthand accounts. Many will be reluctant to come forward, but our teams are experienced in ethical witness outreach.

7.2 Damages: Recovering What Was Lost

When hazing causes injury or death, victims and their families can pursue various categories of damages to compensate for their losses. Our expertise, honed in complex personal injury cases from BP explosion litigation to wrongful death claims, enables us to meticulously calculate these damages.

Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs, from emergency services and hospitalization to ongoing therapies (physical, occupational, psychological), medications, and adaptive equipment. For catastrophic injuries like permanent brain damage or chronic organ issues, this can extend to a lifetime of care, necessitating detailed “life care plans.”
Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes lost wages for time missed from work, the value of lost scholarships, tuition for unused or delayed semesters, and the long-term impact on earning capacity if the victim suffers permanent disability or career setbacks.
Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for subjective but very real suffering:
- Physical Pain and Suffering: From the initial injury to chronic pain.
- Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm: Including PTSD, anxiety, depression, humiliation, shame, and loss of dignity. This is particularly prevalent and often severe in hazing cases.
- Loss of Enjoyment of Life: The inability to participate in activities, hobbies, or social life as before the hazing.
Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In cases tragically resulting in death, as in many listed national incidents, surviving family members can recover for:
- Funeral and burial costs.
- Loss of financial support the deceased would have provided.
- Loss of companionship, love, and society.
- The severe grief and mental suffering of parents, siblings, or spouses.
  Attorney911 has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases.
Punitive Damages: In egregious cases involving gross negligence, willful misconduct, or a callous disregard for safety, punitive damages may be awarded. These are not to compensate the victim but to punish the defendants and deter similar behavior in the future. Proving that an organization knew about hazing patterns and did nothing to stop them often opens the door to punitive damages.

7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing cases are complex because they often involve multiple defendants and intricate insurance coverage disputes.

Insurance Policies: National fraternities, local chapters, and universities typically carry various insurance policies (general liability, directors & officers, umbrella policies). These policies are meant to cover the defendants for negligence claims.
Exclusions & Disputes: However, insurance companies often try to deny coverage by arguing that hazing, especially involving intentional acts or criminal behavior, falls under policy exclusions.
Attorney911’s Advantage: This is where our firm’s unique experience becomes invaluable. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) means she understands exactly how these insurance companies operate. She knows their “playbook” for denying claims, exploiting loopholes, and employing delay tactics. This insider knowledge allows us to anticipate their moves, challenge wrongful denials, and maximize recovery for our clients.

Our strategy identifies all potentially liable parties, navigates complex insurance issues, and tenaciously pursues maximum compensation and accountability for your family.

Practical Guides & FAQs

Hazing is a crisis that often leaves families feeling powerless and isolated. For Crosby County parents and students, knowing how to recognize, respond to, and report hazing safely is crucial. This section provides practical guidance for those directly affected and for potential witnesses.

8.1 For Parents: Recognizing & Responding to Hazing

Your intuition as a parent is your strongest tool. Pay attention to subtle changes.

Warning Signs of Hazing:
- Physical Changes: Unexplained bruises, cuts, or burns; extreme fatigue or persistent illness; sudden weight loss or gain; signs of sleep deprivation; chronic dehydration; or developing brown urine, indicative of kidney issues, like Leonel Bermudez.
- Behavioral & Emotional Shifts: Increased secrecy about activities (“I can’t talk about it”); withdrawal from family or old friends; extreme anxiety, stress, or paranoia; sudden drop in self-esteem; defensiveness when asked about their group; or a sudden obsession with pleasing older members, often expressed as “just having to get through this.”
- Academic Red Flags: Unexplained drops in grades; missing classes; falling asleep during lectures; or prioritizing mandatory group events over academic responsibilities.
- Digital Changes: Constant monitoring of group chats; anxiety if they miss a message; sudden deletion of social media accounts or messages; or unexplained photos or videos showing degrading activities.
How to Talk to Your Child:
- Choose a calm, private moment.
- Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with [organization name]? Are you enjoying it?”
- Emphasize their safety and well-being above all else. Reassure them you will support them regardless of their choices.
- Validate their feelings: “It sounds like you’re under a lot of pressure.”
- Express concern for their health, not judgment for their choices.
If Your Child is Hurt or in Immediate Danger:
- Seek Immediate Medical Attention: Get them to an ER or Urgent Care. Crucially, ensure that medical staff document that the injuries or illness are hazing-related.
- Document Everything: Take clear photos of injuries over several days. Screenshot all relevant texts, group chats, images, or social media posts your child has. Write down everything immediately—who, what, when, where, and what your child told you.
- Involve Law Enforcement: If hazing involves assault, force, or excessive alcohol leading to medical emergencies (like Leonel Bermudez’s case), contact campus police (e.g., UHPD, UTPD, UPD) or local law enforcement (e.g., Houston PD, Austin PD).
Dealing with the University:
- Document all communications you have with university officials.
- When appropriate, ask specific questions about the university’s knowledge of prior incidents involving the group, their enforcement of anti-hazing policies, and their disciplinary history.
When to Talk to a Lawyer:
- Immediately if your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm.
- If you feel the university or organization is minimizing the incident or attempting a cover-up.
- Before you sign any documents from the university or an insurance company. Our firm, Attorney911, can protect your rights and guide you through this complex process.

8.2 For Students / Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning

If you’re a student weighing the risks of a potential campus organization in Crosby County or elsewhere, or if you’re already caught in a hazing situation, remember: your safety and well-being are non-negotiable.

Is This Hazing or Just “Tradition”? Ask yourself:
- Am I being forced or pressured to do something I don’t want to do?
- Would older members participate in this same activity?
- Does this activity cause me physical pain, mental distress, or humiliation?
- Am I being told to keep secrets from my family or the university?
- Could this activity lead to injury (like forced “workouts” at Yellowstone Park), illness (like acute kidney failure from forced consumption), or legal trouble?
  If the answer is yes to any of these, it’s likely hazing.
Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: In a hazing environment, “consent” is often coerced. The desire for belonging, the fear of missing out, or the threat of social exclusion can overwhelm individual choice. Texas law acknowledges this: consent is not a defense to hazing. You have the right to say no and to leave.
Exiting and Reporting Safely:
- In Immediate Danger: If you or a friend are in danger, call 911 immediately. Texas “Good Samaritan” laws offer some protections for individuals seeking help for an intoxicated person.
- De-pledging: You can leave any organization at any time. You are not obligated to complete any “rites of passage” that make you uncomfortable or endanger you. Tell a trusted non-member friend, a Resident Advisor (RA), or your parents about your decision.
- Reporting Options: Utilize anonymous reporting hotlines (e.g., National Anti-Hazing Hotline: 1-888-NOT-HAZE) or official university channels (Dean of Students, Title IX Coordinator, campus police).

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses: Coming Forward

If you witnessed or participated in hazing, you might feel conflicted, guilty, or scared of repercussions. However, your testimony and evidence could prevent future harm and save lives.

Your Role in Accountability: Your decision to come forward can be pivotal in holding individuals and institutions accountable. This could involve providing evidence in a university investigation, acting as a witness in a civil lawsuit, or cooperating with criminal investigations.
Seek Legal Counsel: It is advisable to consult with an attorney experienced in hazing cases. They can help you understand your rights, responsibilities, and any potential legal exposures you may face, guiding you through the process confidentially. Our criminal defense page (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) details our dual civil/criminal capability.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For Crosby County families, navigating a hazing case is fraught with potential missteps. Avoiding these common mistakes can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:
- Why it’s wrong: Digital evidence can be irreplaceable. Deleting messages can look like a cover-up, obstruct justice, and make it nearly impossible to prove your case.
- What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately. Screenshot all relevant group chats, texts, DMs, photos, and videos. Even embarrassing content can be crucial.
Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:
- Why it’s wrong: A direct confrontation will alert them, leading to immediate destruction of evidence, coaching of witnesses, and preparation of legal defenses.
- What to do instead: Document everything in secret. Then, call a lawyer before any direct communication with the organization.
Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms without legal review:
- Why it’s wrong: These documents might waive your right to sue or bind you to internal resolutions that offer inadequate compensation and no true accountability.
- What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or an insurance company without having an attorney review it first.
Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:
- Why it’s wrong: Public posts can be used by defense attorneys to scrutinize your credibility, find inconsistencies, and potentially harm your case.
- What to do instead: Document everything privately. Let your lawyer guide all public messaging.
Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:
- Why it’s wrong: Universities often prioritize protecting their reputation over full victim recovery. Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and statutes of limitations expire while internal investigations drag on.
- What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW and consult a lawyer immediately. The university’s internal process is separate from pursuing legal accountability.
Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:
- Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters represent the interests of the insurance company, not yours. Any statement you give can be used against you, and early settlement offers are often lowball amounts.
- What to do instead: Politely decline to provide a statement and inform them your attorney will contact them.
For more insights, watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.

8.5 Short FAQ

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) have sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, unlawful conduct, or Title IX violations. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Every case is fact-specific—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
Yes. While a Class B misdemeanor by default, it becomes a state jail felony if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, as alleged in the Leonel Bermudez case. Individuals who fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law understands that “agreement” under duress, peer pressure, or fear of exclusion is not true consent.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally two years from the date of injury or death in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases of cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, and witnesses’ memories fade. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately. Learn more about Texas statute of limitations in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
Location doesn’t eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and whether the hazing was foreseeable. Many major hazing cases (like Michael Deng’s death at an off-campus retreat) occurred entirely off-campus but still resulted in significant judgments.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
We prioritize your family’s privacy. Many hazing cases settle confidentially before trial, and we can request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. We will discuss strategies to balance privacy with the pursuit of justice.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. At The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we bring a unique blend of experience, empathy, and strategic insight to hazing cases. From our Houston office, we serve families across Texas, including Crosby County and surrounding areas, who have been impacted by campus abuse.

We understand that hazing at Texas universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor affects families in Crosby County and across the South Plains region. Your child deserves to pursue their education in a safe environment, and when that trust is broken, you deserve answers and accountability.

Why Attorney911 for Hazing Cases

Our firm is uniquely positioned to handle the complexities of hazing litigation:

Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable insight as a former insurance defense attorney for a national firm. She knows their tactics—how they value hazing claims, their delay strategies, and how they challenge coverage for “intentional acts.” This insider knowledge of their playbook allows us to anticipate their moves and strengthens our negotiation and litigation positions from day one, ensuring your family isn’t outmatched. Lupe Peña’s professional background is detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, has a proven track record of taking on formidable defendants. Our firm was one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, a monumental case against a billion-dollar corporation. This experience in federal court and complex multi-party litigation means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, large universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We know how to fight powerful defendants and secure meaningful results for our clients. Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Hazing injuries can be life-altering or fatal. Our firm has a proven track record in securing multi-million dollar results for families in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases. We understand how to work with economists to calculate lost lifetime earning capacity and how to develop comprehensive “life care plans” for victims with permanent disabilities, ensuring they receive the care and compensation they need for the rest of their lives.
Dual Civil & Criminal Expertise: When hazing leads to criminal charges against perpetrators, our firm brings crucial dual perspective. Ralph’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) ensures we understand how criminal proceedings impact your civil case. We can advise on both the criminal exposure of individuals and the civil liability of all parties.
Relentless Investigative Depth: Hazing evidence is often hidden, deleted, or covered up. We utilize a robust network of experts, including digital forensics specialists to unearth deleted messages, medical experts to document injuries, and psychologists to assess mental trauma. We know how to subpoena national fraternity records to uncover prior incidents, use public records requests to gain university documents, and work tirelessly to piece together every detail of what happened. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

Call to Action for Crosby County Families

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus, from the extensive Greek life at the University of Texas in Austin to the traditions of Texas A&M in College Station, we want to hear from you. Families in Crosby County and throughout the South Plains region have the right to answers, accountability, and justice when hazing strikes.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family. There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot; our priority is to provide you with the information and clarity you need in a difficult time. Everything you tell us is confidential. We also offer a clear contingency fee agreement, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Watch our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.

Don’t face this alone. Evidence disappears rapidly, and the legal landscape is complex. Let our experienced team advocate for your child’s rights and future.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Crosby County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com