Hazing in Texas: A Comprehensive Guide for Denton County Families

It’s “initiation night” at an off-campus fraternity house near one of Texas’s major universities. The air is thick with anticipation and an undercurrent of genuine fear. A young student, eager to belong and exhausted from weeks of subtle pressure, stands blindfolded, forced to consume excessive amounts of alcohol in a “game” that feels anything but fun. Cheers and taunts echo as older members film on their phones, enjoying the spectacle. Suddenly, the student stumbles, vomits, and collapses. Pledged brothers circle anxiously, whispering about calling for help, but the fear of “getting the chapter shut down” or facing expulsion from the group looms larger than the immediate danger. The intoxicated student is left on a couch, alone, as the night wears on. Between the desire for acceptance and the terrifying reality of the moment, they feel utterly trapped.

This scenario, tragically common, could unfold at any university across Texas, impacting families from communities just like ours in Denton County. From the bustling campuses in North Texas to the vibrant academic centers in Central and Southeast Texas, the shadow of hazing continues to loom large over higher education. The dreams of higher learning and vibrant campus life that many Denton County parents hold for their children can quickly turn into nightmares when hazing takes a dangerous or even deadly turn.

This comprehensive guide is designed specifically for families in Denton County and across the great state of Texas. It aims to shed light on what hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes to expose the insidious and evolving tactics used by organizations. We delve into the complexities of Texas and federal anti-hazing laws, connecting significant national cases to their profound implications for students at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University – institutions where many Denton County students pursue their education. We will explore the historical patterns of fraternities and sororities, showing how their past conduct dictates current liability and risk. Most importantly, we outline the legal options available to victims and families in Denton County and throughout Texas who have been affected by hazing, empowering them with knowledge and a path toward accountability.

Understanding these details is crucial for any family whose child attends or plans to attend a Texas university. This article provides general information and should not be considered specific legal advice. However, if your family is facing a hazing crisis, The Manginello Law Firm is here to provide dedicated support and guidance. We serve families throughout Texas, including those here in Denton County, offering confidential evaluations of individual cases based on their specific facts.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

• Call 911 for medical emergencies.
• Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

In the first 48 hours:

• Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.”
• Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
  • Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
  • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
• Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
• Do NOT:
  • Confront the fraternity/sorority.
  • Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
  • Post details on public social media.
  • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

• Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
• Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
• We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
• Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

The perception of hazing often conjures images from movies or dated news reports—a silly prank, a harmless paddle, or just “boys being boys.” However, this outdated view fails to grasp the true nature of hazing in the 21st century. For Denton County families unfamiliar with modern Greek life or campus organizations, understanding its true form is the first step toward prevention and protection. Hazing today is rarely benign and frequently involves calculated psychological manipulation, severe physical abuse, and dangerous alcohol consumption, often amplified by digital tools.

Hazing is defined as any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. A critical point is that a student’s “agreement” to participate, often spurred by intense peer pressure, the desire for acceptance, or fear of exclusion, does not automatically make the activity safe or legal when there is a power imbalance.

Main Categories of Hazing

Modern hazing tactics are diverse and insidious, continually evolving to avoid detection:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is the most common and often the deadliest form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking of alcohol, often to dangerous levels. Examples include chugging challenges, “lineups” where pledges consume multiple drinks in rapid succession, drinking games that require excessive consumption, or being pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances.

• Physical Hazing: This category encompasses acts that inflict physical pain or discomfort. It includes direct violence such as paddling and beatings; extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” that push individuals far beyond safe physical limits; and severe deprivation such as sleep, food, or water restriction. Other forms include exposure to extreme cold or heat, or being forced into dangerous environments.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts are designed to degrade and demean individuals. This includes forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (often for the entertainment of older members, such as “roasted pig” positions), wearing degrading costumes, or engaging in acts with racial, sexist, or homophobic overtones, including the use of slurs or forced role-play of stereotypes.

• Psychological Hazing: This form of hazing targets an individual’s mental and emotional well-being. It can involve verbal abuse, relentless insults, threats, social isolation, and forced confessions or manipulation. Public shaming, whether in person or on social media, profoundly impacts a student’s self-esteem and mental health.

• Digital/Online Hazing: A rapidly growing and particularly pervasive form of hazing in the digital age. This includes constant monitoring through group chats on platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, and Discord, where new members are required to respond instantly at all hours, leading to sleep deprivation. It also involves digital dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation via Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok. Pledges can be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos and may be tracked via location-sharing apps.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It’s imperative for Denton County families to understand that hazing is not confined to a single type of organization or campus. While often associated with fraternities, it can occur in a wide array of student groups:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes the national interfraternity councils (IFC), panhellenic councils (NPC), national pan-hellenic council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: These tradition-rich organizations can sometimes foster environments where hazing is disguised as “leadership development” or “team building.”
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Student Groups: Organizations like those focused on campus spirit, historical traditions (e.g., Texas Cowboys-type groups at UT, Big Event crews at Texas A&M), or even academic and service groups can fall prey to hazing rituals.
• Athletic Teams: From football to basketball, baseball, cheer, and even club sports, hazing can occur within team environments, framed as “bonding” or “toughness.”
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups can normalize abusive practices under the guise of building cohesion or tradition.
• Other Organizations: Some service, cultural, and academic organizations, though less frequently, can also experience hazing.

Regardless of the type of organization, hazing persists due to ingrained cultural factors such as a desire for social status, the sanctity of “tradition,” and a powerful code of silence. This combination allows harmful practices to thrive, often unchecked, even when everyone “knows” hazing is forbidden by university policy and illegal under the law.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is crucial for Denton County families seeking justice or preventing future harm. In Texas, specific laws, alongside federal regulations, provide pathways for both criminal prosecution and civil recourse.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has clear anti-hazing provisions outlined in the state’s Education Code, specifically Chapter 37, Subchapter F. Texas Education Code § 37.151 broadly defines hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student. This act must:

• Endanger the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and
• Occur for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This means that if someone makes you do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a group, and they either intended to do it or were reckless about the risk, that’s hazing under Texas law. Crucially, the law explicitly states in § 37.155 that consent is not a defense. Even if a student technically “agrees” to participate, the presence of peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion often negates true voluntary consent in the eyes of the law.

• Criminal Penalties:

  • Class B Misdemeanor: The default charge for hazing that does not result in serious injury, carrying up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
  • Class A Misdemeanor: If hazing causes injury that requires medical treatment.
  • State Jail Felony: If hazing causes serious bodily injury or death.
  • Additionally, § 37.152 states that failing to report hazing (if you are a member or officer and knew about it) is a misdemeanor. Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

• Organizational Liability: Under § 37.153, organizations can be criminally prosecuted for hazing if they authorized or encouraged the hazing, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it. Penalties for organizations can include fines up to $10,000 per violation, and universities can revoke recognition, effectively banning the organization from campus.

• Reporter Protections: Texas law, specifically § 37.154, encourages reporting by granting immunity from civil or criminal liability to individuals who in good faith report a hazing incident to university or law enforcement authorities. Furthermore, in medical emergencies, Texas law and university policies often provide amnesty for students who call 911 seeking help, even if they were consuming alcohol underage or involved in the hazing themselves.

This summary provides a foundational understanding; the actual Texas Education Code is more technical, but the core principles make it clear that hazing is a serious offense in our state.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, two distinct legal pathways can emerge:

• Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state (the prosecutor) with the primary aim of punishing the perpetrator(s). Outcomes can include jail time, fines, or probation. In hazing contexts, criminal charges can range from misdemeanor hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, and battery, all the way up to negligent homicide or even manslaughter in fatal cases.

• Civil Cases: These are initiated by victims or their surviving families. The goal is monetary compensation for damages suffered and holding responsible parties accountable. Civil lawsuits often focus on legal theories such as negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

It is vital for Denton County families to understand that a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil case. Both types of proceedings can occur simultaneously, and a civil lawsuit can succeed even if criminal charges are not filed or do not result in a conviction.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery Act

Beyond state law, federal regulations also play a role in addressing campus hazing:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding must:

  • Publicly report hazing incidents in a transparent manner.
  • Implement strengthened hazing education and prevention programs.
  • Maintain public, aggregated data on hazing incidents. This act, with full implementation by approximately 2026, aims to improve accountability and prevent future tragedies.

• Title IX: This federal law prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity. When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or creates a gender-based hostile environment, Title IX obligations are triggered for the university. This means schools must investigate promptly and effectively, and take steps to prevent recurrence and remedy effects.

• Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents, particularly those involving assaults, alcohol or drug offenses, or even sexual violence, often fall under the reporting requirements of the Clery Act, contributing to broader safety statistics.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Determining who is legally responsible in a civil hazing lawsuit can be complex, but generally, several parties may be held accountable:

• Individual Students: The students who actively planned, enforced, supplied alcohol, carried out, or helped conceal the hazing acts can face individual liability.
• Local Chapter / Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, if it operates as a legal entity, can be sued. This often includes officers or “pledge educators” who directly orchestrated or oversaw the hazing.
• National Fraternity / Sorority: The national headquarters that sanctions and oversees local chapters can be held liable. Their responsibility often hinges on whether they set adequate policies, provided proper training, knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing from prior incidents (either at that chapter or other chapters), and failed to intervene.
• University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself may be sued under various legal theories, including negligence, gross negligence, premises liability, or failure to supervise. In some cases involving allegations of deliberate indifference or systemic issues, even claims under Title IX or other civil rights statutes may be applicable. Public universities in Texas, such as UH, Texas A&M, and UT, may assert sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist (as discussed in the FAQ section). Private universities like SMU and Baylor generally have fewer immunity protections.
• Third Parties: Other entities can also be implicated, such as landlords or owners of houses or event spaces where hazing occurred, bars or alcohol suppliers (under “dram shop” laws if they served obviously intoxicated individuals or minors), and even security companies or event organizers who had a duty to ensure safety.

It’s important to remember that every case is fact-specific, and not every party will be liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney can unravel these complexities and identify all potentially responsible parties.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

While the specifics of hazing incidents vary, certain tragic patterns emerge from national cases. These anchor stories demonstrate the profound and often fatal consequences of hazing, the legal actions that follow, and why they bear direct relevance for Denton County families whose children attend Texas universities. These cases set precedents and highlight the responsibilities of both individuals and the powerful organizations involved.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced or excessive alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing-related death and catastrophic injury.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most high-profile hazing deaths, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after a “bid acceptance” event where he was forced to consume large amounts of alcohol. Fraternity members captured his severe falls on chapter security cameras but delayed calling for medical help for nearly 12 hours. The aftermath led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation with confidential settlements, and the passage of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, a landmark felony hazing statute. This case demonstrated that extreme intoxication, a callous delay in calling 911, and a pervasive culture of silence can lead to devastating legal consequences for individuals and institutions.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a pledge, died from alcohol poisoning after a “Big Brother Night” event. He was given an entire handle of liquor and consumed it to dangerous levels. Criminal hazing charges were brought against multiple members, and Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life, overhauling its policies in response. Coffey’s death underscores how formulaic “tradition” drinking nights often form a repeating script for disaster at campuses nationwide.

• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver died with a blood alcohol content of 0.495% after a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to drink whenever they answered questions incorrectly. His death directly led to the enactment of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, a powerful felony hazing law. This case is a stark example of how legislative change frequently follows public outrage and clear proof of lethal hazing practices. The family later settled with LSU and won a $6.1 million verdict against an individual and insurer.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): During a pledge night, 20-year-old Stone Foltz was forced to consume nearly a full bottle of whiskey and died from alcohol poisoning. The incident resulted in multiple criminal convictions against fraternity members. Bowling Green State University, a public institution, agreed to a nearly $3 million settlement with the family, with additional settlements made with fraternity entities and individuals. This case illustrates that universities, even public ones with potential sovereign immunity defenses, can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities when hazing occurs. The total settlement for the Foltz family reached $10 million ($7 million from Pi Kappa Alpha national, ~$3 million from BGSU). Separately, a court ordered the chapter president, Daylen Dunson, personally to pay $6.5 million to the Foltz family.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and ritualized hazing can also lead to grave injuries and fatalities.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a pledge, was subjected to a brutal blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus fraternity retreat in Pennsylvania’s Pocono Mountains. During the ritual, he was repeatedly tackled while wearing a heavy backpack. He suffered fatal head injuries, and fraternity members delayed calling for help for crucial hours. The incident led to multiple criminal convictions for members, and the Pi Delta Psi national fraternity was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. This case highlights that hazing moved to off-campus “retreats” is often more dangerous due to isolation and lack of oversight, and national organizations can face severe sanctions, including criminal liability, when such patterns are established.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it plagues various student organizations, including high-profile athletic programs.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): In a scandal that rocked collegiate athletics, former football players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the Northwestern University football program over many years. This included forced sexual acts, racial intimidation, and physical abuse. The allegations led to multiple lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff, the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald (who later confidentially settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit), and extensive institutional reckoning. This case proved that hazing is not limited to Greek organizations but can infest major athletic programs, raising serious questions about institutional oversight and accountability.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies share common threads: forced intoxication, physical humiliation and abuse, a dangerous delay or denial of medical care, and concerted efforts to cover up incidents. For Denton County families, these cases provide critical insights:

• Foreseeability: The repeated nature of these incidents demonstrates a clear pattern of risk that national organizations and universities are undeniably aware of. This foreknowledge is a cornerstone of negligence arguments in civil lawsuits.
• Institutional Responsibility: These cases highlight that accountability extends far beyond individual students to local chapters, national fraternities/sororities, and the universities themselves.
• High Stakes: Multi-million-dollar settlements and verdicts are not uncommon in hazing lawsuits, reflecting the profound damages suffered by victims and their families. They also serve as a powerful deterrent.
• Legislative Impact: Public outrage and successful litigation often spur new state laws, making it easier to prosecute hazing and hold institutions accountable. The Max Gruver Act in Louisiana and the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania are prime examples.

Texas families facing hazing at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor are operating within a legal landscape shaped by these national lessons. Accessing justice requires legal counsel who understands these historical patterns and how they bolster a claim for accountability and compensation right here in Texas.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Denton County families, understanding the specific contexts of hazing at leading Texas universities is crucial. Many students from our community attend these institutions, making local knowledge of their hazing policies, records, and judicial landscapes incredibly relevant. While our firm is based in Houston, we serve families across Texas, and our expertise extends to campus-specific issues at each of these major universities.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus in the heart of Houston, draws students from across Texas, including Denton County. With its diverse student body and active Greek life, UH faces ongoing challenges with hazing in both recognized and unrecognized organizations.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH is a large, public-research university with a significant residential and commuter student population. Its Greek life is robust, featuring multiple fraternities and sororities under various councils (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, Multicultural Greek Council). Beyond Greek life, a wide range of student organizations, cultural groups, and sports clubs contributes to a dynamic campus environment.

5.1.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

UH maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, clearly stating that hazing is prohibited whether it occurs on-campus or off-campus. The policy prohibits any act that endangers mental or physical health or safety, specifically listing activities such as forced consumption of alcohol/food/drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and acts that cause mental distress as initiation. UH provides several reporting channels through the Dean of Students’ office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). The university also posts a publicly accessible hazing statement and information on disciplinary actions.

5.1.3 Example Incident & Response

In 2016, a Pi Kappa Alpha chapter at UH faced severe scrutiny following allegations of hazing. Pledges reported being deprived of sufficient food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. One student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and was ultimately suspended by the university. While this incident garnered significant attention, other disciplinary references involving fraternities at UH have continued for behavior “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including alcohol misuse and policy violations, often leading to suspensions or probations. These incidents highlight UH’s willingness to officially suspend chapters.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Denton County family whose child experiences hazing at UH, legal action would typically involve agencies within the Houston area. Depending on where the incident occurred, the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) and/or the Houston Police Department (HPD) might be involved. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in state district courts within Harris County, which encompasses Houston. Potential defendants in such cases could include individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, and potentially the university itself, along with any property owners involved.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For students and parents from Denton County with connections to UH:

• Report Internally Immediately: Utilize UH’s official reporting channels, such as the Dean of Students’ office, UHPD, or online reporting forms found on the university’s website.
• Document Everything: Beyond reporting, meticulously document all evidence. Prior complaints and past incidents involving the same organization can be crucial.
• Seek Legal Counsel: Talking to a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can help a Denton County family navigate the complexities of UH’s system, uncover prior disciplinary actions, and ensure all internal files are properly obtained and analyzed. An experienced attorney can guide victims through a system that can be overwhelming to confront alone.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University in College Station holds a unique place in Texas higher education, known for its vibrant traditions, strong alumni network, and the prominent Corps of Cadets. Denton County families often choose A&M for its academic rigor and unique culture, but like all large universities, it is not immune to hazing.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M is renowned for its traditions, including its deep-rooted military-style Corps of Cadets, which fosters a distinct environment. Greek life, while present, often exists alongside the powerful influence of student organizations and Corps outfits. This tradition-heavy environment, while fostering strong bonds, has also, at times, faced scrutiny for allegations of hazing within both Greek and Corps settings.

5.2.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

Texas A&M explicitly prohibits hazing and has updated policies to address it comprehensively. The university defines hazing in line with Texas law, covering acts that endanger mental or physical health or safety for purposes of initiation or affiliation. A&M emphasizes reporting through various channels, including the Division of Student Affairs, the Corps of Cadets leadership, and the University Police Department (UPD). The university also provides an online reporting system and anonymous tip lines.

5.2.3 Example Incident & Response

Texas A&M has faced multiple high-profile hazing allegations across different organizations.

• In 2021, a Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) chapter at Texas A&M was sued by two pledges. They alleged being forced to participate in strenuous activity and then having substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, eggs, and spit, poured on them. This resulted in severe chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The chapter was suspended by the university for two years, and the pledges pursued a civil lawsuit seeking $1 million in damages. The outcome of that suit was not publicly disclosed.
• More recently, in 2023, a lawsuit was filed by a former cadet against Texas A&M, alleging degrading and physically abusive hazing within the Corps of Cadets. The cadet claimed he was forced into simulated sexual acts and endured a “roasted pig” pose (bound between beds with an apple in his mouth). The lawsuit sought over $1 million, asserting that the university failed to adequately address known hazing problems within the Corps. While the university stated it handled the matter under its internal rules, the civil litigation highlights the ongoing challenges of hazing within this revered campus organization.

These incidents demonstrate that hazing at A&M can occur in both Greek life and within the Corps, sometimes involving extreme physical acts and psychological humiliation.

5.2.4 How an A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Denton County family dealing with a hazing incident at Texas A&M, the legal process would typically involve local authorities in Bryan-College Station. The Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD), alongside the Bryan Police Department or College Station Police Department (depending on the incident’s location), would investigate criminal aspects. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in district courts within Brazos County, where College Station is located. When considering civil action, potential defendants would include individual students, the local chapter, the national organization (whether Greek or Corps-affiliated), and potentially Texas A&M University itself.

5.2.5 What A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For Denton County students and parents connected to Texas A&M:

• Engage with Official Channels Carefully: Report incidents to the Division of Student Affairs or Corps leadership, but be sure to document all communications.
• Preserve Digital Evidence: In a campus culture influenced by social media, capturing screenshots of group chats, photos, or videos that document hazing is critical.
• Understand Institutional History: A&M’s history with hazing, particularly within the Corps, can be a relevant factor in civil litigation. An attorney experienced in hazing cases can assess how prior incidents and A&M’s responses might affect your case.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution in the state, is a major destination for college-bound students from Denton County and across Texas. UT’s campus culture is vibrant and diverse, with a significant Greek presence and numerous student organizations. It’s also notable for its proactive approach to publishing hazing violation data.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin is a sprawling public university nestled in the heart of the state capital. Its campus life is characterized by strong academic programs, a passionate student body, and a highly visible Greek system. Beyond fraternities and sororities, numerous spirit organizations and student clubs thrive, often with deep-seated traditions.

5.3.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

UT Austin maintains a robust anti-hazing policy that aligns with Texas state law, prohibiting any act that endangers mental or physical health for purposes of initiation or affiliation. What distinguishes UT is its commitment to transparency. The university operates a publicly accessible website, hazing.utexas.edu, which lists organizations found responsible for hazing violations, along with details of the conduct and sanctions imposed. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students’ office, the Student Conduct and Academic Integrity office, the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD), and various anonymous reporting hotlines.

5.3.3 Example Incident & Response

UT Austin’s public Hazing Violations page provides invaluable insight into the ongoing nature of hazing.

• In 2023, the Pi Kappa Alpha chapter at UT was sanctioned after new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. This was deemed hazing, and the chapter was placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education. This specific incident is part of a broader pattern.
• Other groups, including prominent spirit organizations like the Texas Wranglers, have faced sanctions for infractions often involving forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, or punishment-based initiation practices.

UT’s relatively high transparency significantly helps in evaluating patterns of misconduct. While repeated violations indicate persistent challenges, the clear public record can strongly support civil lawsuits by demonstrating prior knowledge and institutional failure to prevent similar incidents.

5.3.4 How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Denton County family whose child experiences hazing at UT, legal action often involves authorities in Austin. Investigations might include the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD) and/or the Austin Police Department (APD). Civil lawsuits would invariably be filed in state district courts within Travis County, where Austin is located. In such cases, potential defendants could encompass individual students, the local chapter, the national Greek organization, and potentially the University of Texas at Austin itself. Critically, information from UT’s public hazing log can be highly valuable in civil litigation, establishing prior warnings, patterns of behavior, and the university’s awareness of ongoing issues.

5.3.5 What UT Students & Parents Should Do

For Denton County students and parents connected to UT Austin:

• Review UT’s Hazing Violations Page: Before joining or during membership, regularly check hazing.utexas.edu for any disciplinary history of organizations your child is involved with.
• Report Via UTPD or Dean of Students: For official action, file a report through UTPD or the Dean of Students.
• Document Vigilantly: Given UT’s commitment to transparency, detailed documentation of any hazing incident, including digital evidence and medical records, will be crucial for any legal action. An attorney can help ensure this evidence is correctly preserved and presented.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a private university in Dallas, is a popular choice for many Denton County students due to its academic prestige and relatively close proximity. SMU’s affluent campus culture fosters a strong Greek presence that, despite official policies, has encountered hazing challenges.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU is a selective private university known for its beautiful campus and strong academic programs. Greek life plays a significant role in student social life, with a robust presence of fraternities and sororities under both the Panhellenic Council and the Interfraternity Council (IFC), alongside diverse multicultural Greek organizations. The university’s wealthy demographic and social scene sometimes amplify the pressures associated with Greek affiliation.

5.4.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

SMU maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that is consistent with Texas state law, prohibiting any activity that causes physical or mental harm for initiation or affiliation purposes. As a private institution, SMU emphasizes its commitment to student safety and accountability. The university provides various reporting mechanisms, including through the Office of the Dean of Students, SMU Police Department, and anonymous systems like Real Response, designed to encourage students to report concerning behavior without fear of retaliation.

5.4.3 Example Incident & Response

In 2017, the Kappa Alpha Order chapter at SMU faced significant disciplinary action following hazing allegations. Reports circulated that new members were subjected to physical abuse, including paddling, forced excessive alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. The university responded by suspending the chapter, imposing restrictions on its activities, and limiting its ability to recruit for several years. While SMU does not maintain a public hazing violations database comparable to UT Austin’s, such incidents are typically handled through its internal conduct processes, often resulting in official suspensions or revocations of recognition.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Denton County family whose child is involved in a hazing incident at SMU, legal proceedings would typically unfold within Dallas County courts. The SMU Police Department and/or the Dallas Police Department would be relevant for criminal investigations. Civil lawsuits against individual students, the local chapter, or the national organization would fall under the jurisdiction of Dallas County district courts. As a private university, SMU itself generally faces fewer sovereign immunity protections than public institutions, making it a more direct potential defendant in civil suits. Experienced legal counsel can use discovery processes (which compel production of evidence such as internal reports and emails) to uncover details of incidents and the university’s awareness, even if such information is not publicly posted.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For Denton County students and parents connected to SMU:

• Utilize Anonymous Reporting Systems: Tools like Real Response can be a safer initial option for students to report concerns without immediate identification.
• Understand Private University Dynamics: Be aware that information on hazing incidents at private universities like SMU may be less public. This makes thorough documentation of incidents by affected students and families even more critical.
• Consult Legal Counsel Early: An attorney can advise on how to navigate SMU’s internal disciplinary processes, which can be complex, and ensure that your legal rights are protected while pursuing accountability.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, a prominent private Christian university in Waco, McLennan County, is another institution that attracts many students from Denton County. Despite its religious affiliation and stated values, Baylor has contended with significant challenges regarding campus safety and organizational conduct, including hazing.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor is one of the largest Baptist universities in the world, known for its strong academic tradition and commitment to faith-based education. Its campus culture emphasizes community and tradition. While Greek life is present, numerous faith-based organizations, athletic teams, and spirit groups also contribute to student life. Baylor’s recent history, marked by high-profile scandals involving sexual assault, has brought intense scrutiny to its institutional oversight and accountability mechanisms.

5.5.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

Baylor University strictly prohibits hazing, defining it broadly to include any act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation with an organization. Rooted in its Christian mission, Baylor emphasizes student well-being and safety. The university outlines reporting channels through the Dean of Students’ office, the Baylor Police Department, and various anonymous reporting platforms. Baylor’s official statements frequently stress a “zero tolerance” policy for any form of hazing.

5.5.3 Example Incident & Response

Baylor’s commitment to rooting out misconduct has been tested by various incidents, including those involving hazing.

• In 2020, the Baylor baseball team faced a significant hazing investigation. As a result, 14 players were suspended following findings of hazing, impacting the team’s early season play as suspensions were staggered. This incident underscored that hazing problems can extend to athletic programs, even within institutions that publicly espouse strong ethical guidelines.
• In a separate incident in 2016, the Phi Gamma Delta (FIJI) fraternity at Baylor was temporarily suspended for hazing-related sexual misconduct and drug abuse.

These incidents, alongside wider institutional challenges regarding campus safety, highlight a persistent struggle between official “zero tolerance” policies and recurring misconduct.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Denton County family whose child suffers hazing at Baylor, legal action would typically involve authorities in Waco. The Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) and/or the Waco Police Department would conduct criminal investigations. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in state district courts within McLennan County. Pursuing claims against Baylor University itself, as a private institution, carries fewer sovereign immunity barriers than public universities. However, navigating Baylor’s history, its religious branding, and its internal processes requires counsel who understand the unique aspects of litigating against a private, faith-based university.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For Denton County students and parents connected to Baylor University:

• Review Baylor’s Policies Closely: Familiarize yourself with their hazing definitions and reporting mechanisms.
• Document Everything Thoroughly: Given the potential for less public transparency at private institutions, meticulous documentation of any hazing incident (texts, photos, medical records) is critically important.
• Seek Experienced Legal Counsel for Private Institutions: An attorney familiar with managing claims against private universities in Texas can offer invaluable guidance, particularly due to the specific legal and public relations dynamics involved.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For Denton County families, understanding the role of national fraternities and sororities, beyond their local chapters, is essential when confronting hazing. Many of the organizations present at Texas universities—including UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor—are part of larger national structures. These powerful national organizations often have extensive histories, which, while offering unique opportunities, also carry patterns of misconduct that can strengthen a legal claim against them.

6.1 Why National Histories Matter

National Greek organizations, such as Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike), Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE), Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi (PKP), and Kappa Alpha Order, maintain a presence on many Texas campuses. These national headquarters typically have thick anti-hazing manuals and elaborate risk management policies. They implement extensive training programs and issue warnings, not merely out of an abundance of caution, but because they have seen deaths and catastrophic injuries in the past. They are keenly aware of common hazing patterns: forced drinking nights, paddling traditions, humiliating rituals, and the consistent code of silence.

When a local chapter at a Texas university replicates the same dangerous script that led to a national chapter being shut down or sued in another state, this creates a crucial legal argument: foreseeability. It demonstrates that the national entity knew, or should have known, the risks associated with such behaviors within their organization. This can significantly bolster arguments for negligence or even support claims for punitive damages against both the local chapter and the national organization, demanding accountability for repeated failures to prevent harm.

6.2 Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

While an exhaustive list of all chapters and their full histories is impossible here, we can highlight some prominent national organizations present at Texas universities and their documented hazing patterns:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has chapters across Texas campuses, including UH, Texas A&M, and UT. Nationally, Pi Kappa Alpha has a deeply troubling hazing history. The tragic death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021, where he died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume a bottle of whiskey, resulted in a $10 million settlement and multiple criminal convictions. Another incident involved David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University in 2012, who also died from alcohol poisoning, leading to a $14 million settlement for his family. These patterns demonstrate a foreseeable risk when Pike chapters engage in “Big/Little” drinking events, making the organization vulnerable to claims of negligent supervision when such incidents repeat at Texas chapters, such as the 2016 incident at UH and the 2023 incident at UT Austin.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): With a significant presence at Texas universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT, and SMU, SAE has faced numerous hazing-related incidents nationwide. A turning point came when SAE announced the elimination of its traditional pledge process in 2014, a direct response to a pattern of hazing deaths. Despite this, incidents persist. In 2021, two pledges at Texas A&M sued the chapter for $1 million after allegedly suffering severe chemical burns from being covered in industrial cleaner and other substances during a hazing ritual. In January 2024, a lawsuit was filed against the UT Austin SAE chapter after an exchange student alleged assault during a party, resulting in severe physical injuries. These events, alongside a traumatic brain injury case filed against an SAE chapter at the University of Alabama in 2023, illustrate a persistent pattern of severe physical and chemical hazing, often leading to debilitating injuries or wrongful death, despite national policy changes.

• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity, active at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, became nationally recognized for the tragic death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017. Gruver died from alcohol toxicity with a BAC of 0.495% after a forced drinking game called “Bible study.” His death led to the passing of the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute in Louisiana. For chapters in Texas, this national history establishes a clear precedent for the lethal consequences of coerced drinking games.

• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Present at UH, Texas A&M, and UT, Pi Kappa Phi was involved in the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017. Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event where pledges were given handles of hard liquor. This incident led to prosecutions against members and a temporary suspension of all Greek life at FSU, highlighting the national organization’s ongoing struggle with alcohol-related hazing.

• Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, SMU and Baylor, this fraternity is infamous for the Timothy Piazza tragedy at Penn State University in 2017. Piazza died from traumatic brain injuries after an extreme alcohol consumption event, with chapter members delaying medical help for hours. Criminal charges were filed against numerous members, and the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law was enacted in Pennsylvania. This case fundamentally altered hazing jurisprudence, emphasizing the accountability of both individual members and the national fraternity for a culture of negligence.

• Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): Active at Texas A&M and Baylor, this fraternity was at the center of the Danny Santulli case at the University of Missouri in 2021. Santulli suffered severe, permanent brain damage after being forced to consume excessive alcohol during a “pledge dad reveal” night. His family settled lawsuits with 22 defendants for multi-million-dollar confidential amounts, illustrating the comprehensive nature of liability when multiple parties contribute to a catastrophic hazing event.

• Omega Psi Phi (ΩΨΦ): A prominent NPHC fraternity with chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, Omega Psi Phi has also faced hazing allegations. Joseph Snell, a former member at Bowie State University in 1997, received $375,000 after enduring severe beatings, including burns, during hazing. More recently, in April 2023, a former student at the University of Southern Mississippi alleged severe hazing, including repeated beatings with a wooden paddle, resulting in emergency surgery and months of rehabilitation, leading to a federal lawsuit. These incidents underscore the deep-seated nature of hazing issues across different types of Greek organizations, with specific patterns of physical abuse.

• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor, Kappa Sigma has a national hazing history including the Chad Meredith drowning death at the University of Miami in 2001, where a jury awarded his parents $12.6 million in a negligence suit. In 2023, at Texas A&M, there were allegations of hazing resulting in severe injuries linked to rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown from extreme physical activity), leading to ongoing litigation. In 2018, at TCU, a member was arrested for allegedly hazing pledges.

This selective overview illustrates how specific national organizations have repeated patterns of hazing behavior, ranging from alcohol-fueled tragedies to severe physical and psychological abuse. When such patterns emerge at local chapters on campuses like those in Texas, they provide powerful evidence of foreseeability and systemic failure.

6.3 Tie Back to Legal Strategy

The documented national histories of these Greek organizations are not just historical footnotes; they are crucial elements of legal strategy for Denton County families pursuing hazing claims.

• Foreseeability and Pattern Evidence: When a national organization has a history of alcohol-related deaths or specific types of physical hazing, it becomes extremely difficult for them to argue that a similar incident at a Texas chapter was “unforeseeable.” This pattern evidence can demonstrate that the national organization had prior warnings and should have taken more aggressive steps to prevent recurrence.
• Enforcement of Policy: Defense teams often point to thick anti-hazing policy manuals as proof of diligence. However, our investigation will scrutinize whether these policies were genuinely enforced, or merely served as “paper policies” to be pulled out after a tragedy. If prior incidents were met with minimal punishment or ineffective interventions, it suggests a failure to enforce, strengthening claims of negligence.
• Settlement Leverage and Insurance Coverage: A national organization’s documented hazing history significantly impacts settlement leverage. Their insurance carriers are acutely aware of the substantial verdicts and settlements in prior cases. This knowledge can influence their willingness to negotiate and cover damages, although they often fight claims based on specific policy exclusions for intentional conduct.
• Potential for Punitive Damages: In cases involving egregious conduct or a repeated pattern of indifference to known risks, evidence of a national organization’s hazing history can support claims for punitive damages. These damages, designed to punish particularly wrongful conduct and deter future similar acts, can represent a substantial portion of a court award, depending on the jurisdiction and specific claims made.

By understanding how these national histories intersect with local chapter conduct, The Manginello Law Firm is better equipped to build a compelling case for accountability and compensation for Denton County families affected by hazing at Texas universities.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Successfully pursuing a hazing lawsuit requires meticulous investigation, a deep understanding of the law, and a strategic approach to litigation. For Denton County families, navigating this complex process often begins with gathering and preserving crucial evidence, understanding the full scope of potential damages, and anticipating the strategies necessary to hold powerful institutions accountable.

Our firm’s experience, ranging from complex personal injury to wrongful death, provides a unique advantage in hazing litigation. We approach these cases with the same investigative rigor used when taking on massive corporations in environmental disasters or large trucking companies in catastrophic accidents.

7.1 Evidence

In today’s digital world, evidence is everywhere, and preserving it immediately is paramount. The Manginello Law Firm knows how to identify, collect, and protect the evidence that wins hazing cases. For Denton County families, evidence collection starts immediately after an incident. Our video “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) offers valuable insights into this critical first step.

• Digital Communications: These are often the single most critical source of evidence in modern hazing cases. They include:

  • GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, SMS group texts, Discord, Slack, and fraternity/sorority-specific apps. These platforms reveal planning, intent, knowledge, and execution of hazing activities.
  • Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok comments, and other social media exchanges. These can show who was involved, what was said, and what happened before, during, and after an incident.
  • Crucially, evidence includes both live communications and messages that have been deleted but can be recovered through digital forensics protocols. For Denton County families, screenshots taken immediately are gold, as explained in our video.

• Photos & Videos:

  • Content filmed by members during events, whether for “fun” or to document coercion.
  • Footage shared in group chats or posted on private social media accounts.
  • Important security camera or Ring/doorbell footage from houses and venues where hazing occurred. This can show who entered, who left, and what activities took place.

• Internal Organization Documents: These provide insight into the organization’s culture, rules, and knowledge of hazing.

  • Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, or lists of “ritual traditions.”
  • Emails or texts from officers giving instructions or making comments about pledges.
  • National policies, training materials, and risk management guidelines that show what the organization should have done versus what it actually did.

• University Records: These shed light on the institution’s awareness and response to hazing.

  • Prior conduct files, probation/suspension records, and letters of warning for the specific organization.
  • Incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices.
  • Clery reports and other public safety disclosures that might indicate patterns of misconduct.

• Medical and Psychological Records: These document the extent of the harm.

  • Emergency room reports, ambulance records, and hospitalization notes (ICU, surgery, inpatient care).
  • Medical imaging (X-rays, CT scans, MRI results) and toxicology reports (blood alcohol, drug screenings).
  • Ongoing treatment notes from physical therapy, rehabilitation, and psychiatric care (documenting PTSD, depression, anxiety).

• Witness Testimony: Often crucial, this includes:

  • Other pledges, members who quit, roommates, Resident Assistants (RAs), coaches, trainers, or other bystanders.
  • Former members who left the organization over hazing concerns, who can provide invaluable insight into a chapter’s deeper history.

7.2 Damages

Hazing can inflict profound and lasting harm. Our firm meticulously assesses all categories of damages to ensure Denton County families receive full and fair compensation.

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This category includes all costs associated with physical and mental recovery.

  • Immediate care: ambulance transport, emergency room visits, and intensive care unit (ICU) stays.
  • Ongoing treatment: surgeries, physical and occupational therapy, medications, and rehabilitation.
  • Long-term care: For catastrophic injuries like brain damage or organ failure, this includes comprehensive life care plans, specialist consultations, and adaptive equipment.

• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: Hazing can disrupt a student’s academic and professional trajectory.

  • Missed semesters and educational setbacks: This can include tuition and fees for dropped courses or semesters, lost scholarships (academic, athletic, or Greek-based), and the direct costs of transferring schools if necessary.
  • Lost earning capacity: If injuries result in permanent disability or psychological trauma that affects a student’s ability to work, expert economists calculate the lifetime impact on future earnings.

• Non-Economic Damages: These address the intangible but often devastating consequences of hazing.

  • Physical pain and suffering: From immediate injuries to chronic pain and loss of physical abilities.
  • Emotional distress: Trauma, humiliation, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and the profoundly damaging sense of betrayal.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: The inability to participate in activities, hobbies, or social events that once brought joy, leading to isolation and a diminished quality of life.

• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the most tragic cases, hazing can lead to death. Families can seek compensation for:

  • Funeral and burial costs.
  • Loss of financial support: If the deceased would have contributed to family income or supported parents in old age.
  • Loss of companionship, love, and society: The profound emotional void left by the loss of a child, sibling, or spouse.
  • Grief and mental anguish: The intense emotional suffering experienced by surviving family members.

We emphasize that we are describing types of damages, not promising specific dollar amounts. The value of each case is unique, depending on the specific facts and extent of harm.

7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Holding powerful institutions accountable in hazing cases involves complex legal battles, particularly regarding insurance. National fraternities, national sororities, and universities often carry substantial insurance policies designed to protect them from liability.

• Insurance Disputes: These entities’ insurers frequently argue that hazing or intentional acts are excluded from coverage under their policies. They may also contend that their policy doesn’t cover certain defendants (e.g., individual students vs. the national organization).
• Expertise in Insurance Tactics: This is where Lupe Peña’s background is invaluable. As a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), she knows precisely how these companies value (and often undervalue) hazing claims. She understands their delay tactics, their arguments for coverage exclusions, and their settlement strategies because “we know their playbook because we used to run it.” This insider knowledge helps us bypass common defense maneuvers and identify all potential avenues for recovery.
• Comprehensive Coverage Search: Our firm meticulously identifies all potential sources of insurance coverage, including individual members’ homeowner policies, local chapter policies, national organization policies, and university umbrella policies. We understand the nuances of trigger dates, notice requirements, and the specific language of exclusion clauses.

Our firm’s experience in complex litigation, honed through cases like the BP Texas City explosion and other multi-million-dollar wrongful death suits, means we are not intimidated by these powerful defendants or their well-funded legal teams. We are prepared to engage in protracted legal battles, conduct extensive discovery, and, if necessary, take cases to trial to achieve justice for Denton County families.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing strikes, families in Denton County often feel overwhelmed and unsure of where to turn. This section provides direct, actionable guidance for parents, students, and witnesses, empowering them with the knowledge to respond effectively and protect their rights.

8.1 For Parents

For parents in Denton County, recognizing the signs of hazing and knowing how to respond can be life-saving.

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Be vigilant for:

  • Unexplained injuries: Bruises, burns, cuts, or “repeated accidents” without credible explanations.
  • Extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation: Your child is constantly exhausted, showing signs of sleep deprivation, or receiving late-night calls/texts for “mandatory” events.
  • Drastic changes in mood: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, withdrawal from family or old friends, or secrecy about organizational activities (“I can’t talk about it”).
  • Constant phone use: Obsessive monitoring of group chats, anxiety when the phone pings, or rapid deletion of messages.
  • Academic decline: Sudden drops in grades, missing classes, or neglecting assignments due to organizational demands.
  • Financial red flags: Unexpected large expenses, being forced to buy items for older members, or unexplained requests for money.

• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach with empathy, not judgment. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things truly going with your group?” or “Is there anything making you uncomfortable?” Emphasize that your child’s safety is paramount, and you will support them regardless of the situation. Reiterate that they can leave without fear of consequences from you.

• If Your Child is Hurt:

  • Get them medical care immediately. Prioritize their health over any concerns about “getting in trouble” for underage drinking or other rule violations.
  • Document everything. Photograph injuries from multiple angles and over several days to show progression. Screenshot any texts, photos, or group chats your child shows you. Write down everything they tell you, including names, dates, times, and locations.
  • Save relevant items. Keep clothing worn during the incident, receipts for forced purchases, or any physical objects involved.

• Dealing with the University: Document every conversation with university administrators (Dean of Students, Greek Life office). Ask probing questions about prior incidents involving the same organization and what the school did or did not do in response. Be aware that universities may try to manage the narrative or push for internal resolutions that do not fully compensate your family.

• When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or hiding what happened, contact an experienced hazing attorney. We can help you understand your legal options beyond campus discipline.

8.2 For Students / Pledges

For students in Denton County, navigating the pressures of initiation can be incredibly difficult. Knowing your rights and identifying true hazing can empower you to protect yourself.

• Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? If you feel unsafe, humiliated, coerced, or forced to drink or endure pain; if the activity is hidden from the public or administrators; or if older members are making new members do things they themselves don’t have to do – it probably is hazing. The Texas Education Code defines it broadly to include acts endangering mental or physical health for initiation into an organization.

• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Organizations may claim you “consented” or “volunteered,” but the law often views “consent” given under duress, peer pressure, power imbalance, or fear of exclusion as coerced and therefore invalid. You have the right to be safe, regardless of what’s been “tradition.”

• Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave an organization at any time. If you are in immediate danger, call 911. If you wish to de-pledge, you can notify the chapter president or new member educator via email or text. Avoid “one last meeting” where you might face pressure or retaliation. If you fear retaliation, report those concerns to the Dean of Students or campus police; in Texas, harassment and stalking are crimes, and you can seek protective orders.

• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and Texas law offer amnesty or protections for students who call for help in an emergency, even if underage drinking or other rule violations were involved. Your health and safety are the priority.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses

If you are a former member or witness to hazing, you may be struggling with guilt, fear, or a desire to do the right thing.

• Your Role in Accountability: Your testimony and any evidence you possess can be vital in preventing future harm and saving lives. Recognizing your moral obligation to speak out is an important first step.
• Seek Legal Advice: While cooperating with authorities or victims’ attorneys can be crucial for accountability, it’s wise to seek your own legal advice to understand your rights, potential exposure, and how to navigate being a witness or, in some cases, a co-defendant. Our criminal defense expertise (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) is relevant here, allowing us to advise on both criminal exposure and civil liability for witnesses.
• Protection: An attorney can assist in ensuring your safety and protecting you from retaliation if you decide to speak out.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

To protect your family’s rights and potential legal remedies, it’s vital to avoid common mistakes that can severely damage a hazing case:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:

   • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This can look like a cover-up, potentially constitute obstruction of justice, and makes proving your case nearly impossible. If something is deleted, it’s assumed it was incriminating.
   • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, no matter how embarrassing it may seem. This includes screenshots of group chats, texts, photos, and social media posts. Our video on “Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) emphasizes this point.

2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:

   • What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This usually triggers an immediate defensive reaction. The organization and its members will lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses, making it harder to gather unbiased information later.
   • What to do instead: Document everything you can, then contact an experienced attorney before any direct confrontation.

3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms without legal review:

   • What universities do: They may pressure families to sign waivers or agree to “internal resolution” processes quickly.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may unknowingly waive your right to pursue a civil lawsuit, and any internal settlements are often far below the true value of your case.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or an insurance company without having an attorney review it first.

4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:

   • What families think: “I want people to know what happened.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Anything posted online can be used by defense attorneys, who will screenshot and scrutinize every detail. Inconsistencies or emotional language can hurt your credibility, and you might inadvertently waive certain legal privileges.
   • What to do instead: Keep documentation private and let your lawyer develop a controlled public relations strategy if one is needed.

5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting” with the organization:

   • What fraternities/sororities say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic” or “Let’s clear the air.”
   • Why it’s wrong: These meetings are often designed to pressure the student, extract statements that can be used against them, or intimidate them into silence.
   • What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communications should go through your attorney.

6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:

   • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: While university discipline is important, it often does not provide compensation for damages. Evidence disappears quickly, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations may run out. The university’s internal process prioritizes its own interests, not necessarily your child’s legal rights and compensation.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence now and consult a lawyer immediately. The university process is separate from pursuing proper legal accountability and compensation.

7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:

   • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim” or “We want to help.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Recorded statements can be manipulative and used against you. Early settlement offers are almost always lowball attempts to resolve the case for minimal cost to the insurer.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with any insurance adjuster directly and state, “My attorney will contact you.”

These mistakes can be costly. When in doubt, prioritize preserving evidence and consulting with an experienced attorney.

8.5 Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (UH, Texas A&M, UT) benefit from some sovereign immunity protections under Texas law. However, exceptions exist for gross negligence, certain civil rights violations (like Title IX), and when suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on specific facts—contact Attorney911 (1-888-ATTY-911) for case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default. However, it becomes a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individual officers or members can also face criminal charges for failing to report hazing or for direct involvement in serious incidents.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” given under immense peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent, and it does not negate the unlawful nature of hazing.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas?”
  Generally, you have 2 years from the date of injury or death to file most personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this period if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. For precise guidance, call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately. Our video on “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c) provides more detail.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities or sororities can still be liable based on their sponsorship, control over the organization, knowledge of the activities, and the foreseeability of hazing occurring off-campus. Many major hazing cases, such as the fatal Pi Delta Psi retreat in Pennsylvania or the Sigma Pi death at an unofficial house in Ohio, occurred off-campus and still resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  While we cannot guarantee absolute privacy, many hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. It is often possible to request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. We prioritize your family’s privacy interests while aggressively pursuing accountability. We will discuss these options with you from the outset.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family in Denton County faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand the intricate web of campus politics, powerful institutional defenses, and how to effectively fight back to achieve justice. You need a legal team with specialized knowledge—the kind that The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, brings to every case.

We are a Houston-based Texas personal injury firm with deep experience in serious injury, wrongful death, and institutional accountability cases across the state, including in Denton County and its surrounding areas. From our Houston headquarters, with additional offices in Austin and Beaumont, we serve families throughout Texas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families in Denton County who send their children to schools across the state.

Why Attorney911 for Hazing Cases

Our firm offers unique qualifications specifically for complex hazing litigation:

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), previously worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. This invaluable background means we know exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims. Lupe understands their delay tactics, coverage exclusion arguments for “intentional acts,” and settlement strategies. We know their playbook because we used to run it.

• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), has extensive experience handling complex multi-district litigation against massive corporations. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in litigation stemming from the BP Texas City explosion, and his federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) means our firm is not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants.

• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), often collaborating with economists and life care planners to value future care needs for victims with brain injuries or permanent disabilities. We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force accountability and prioritize long-term recovery.

• Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a critical advantage. He understands how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, allowing us to advise witnesses, former members, or even directly affected students on their rights and potential exposure in both criminal and civil contexts.

• Investigative Depth: We leverage a network of experts—medical professionals, digital forensics specialists, economists, and psychologists—to build comprehensive cases. We excel at obtaining hidden evidence, such as deleted group chats, internal chapter records, and university files that may be difficult for families to access alone. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it – because it does.

We understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments actually work behind closed doors. Our team knows how to investigate modern hazing, from subpoenaing national fraternity records to uncover prior incidents to unearthing university files through meticulous discovery and public records requests. We navigate the unique complexities of balancing victim privacy with the need for public accountability, all while skillfully proving coercion in seemingly voluntary situations.

We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. For Denton County families, The Manginello Law Firm offers not just legal representation, but dedicated victim advocacy built on thorough investigation and a genuine commitment to justice.

9.2 Call to Action

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s UNT in Denton, Texas Woman's University in Denton, or a larger institution like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, or Baylor University—we want to hear from you. Families in Denton County, Flower Mound, Lewisville, Carrollton, Frisco, Little Elm, and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers, accountability, and justice.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family.

Here’s what to expect in your free consultation:

• We will listen to your story about your child’s experience without judgment.
• We’ll review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records, to understand the facts.
• We will clearly explain your legal options, which may include reporting to the police, pursuing a civil lawsuit, both, or neither, and discuss realistic timelines.
• We’ll address your questions about costs. We work on a contingency fee basis (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc), which means we don’t get paid unless we win your case.
• There is no pressure to hire us on the spot – we want you to take the time you need to decide what’s best for your family.
• Everything you tell us is confidential.

To schedule your free consultation, contact us today:

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña by email at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Denton County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Let us be your Legal Emergency Lawyers™. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors. If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com