It’s late on a Tuesday night, and a group chat lights up on your child’s phone, scrolling through images of a “bonding” ritual in a secluded field just beyond the edges of campus. New members, dressed in makeshift uniforms, are performing strenuous exercises under the watchful eyes of their older counterparts, some holding cameras, others cheering. The messages quickly shift from camaraderie to darker humor, hinting at a new level of “initiation” planned for the weekend. Your child, a bright student from Dickens County, Texas, who ventured to a university outside our close-knit community, seemed a little more withdrawn and anxious than usual during your last video call. They brushed off your questions, saying, “Oh, it’s just normal fraternity stuff, Mom, Dad. Everyone goes through it.” But the photos in that group chat, the hushed tones on the phone, and the vague excuses for unexplained bruises tell a different story.
This scenario, or something very much like it, plays out across Texas campuses every semester, impacting families from our rural communities in Dickens County to the bustling metropolitan areas. What many dismiss as “tradition” or “harmless fun” can quickly escalate into devastating hazing, leaving students physically injured, psychologically scarred, or worse. The line between harmless bonding and dangerous abuse is often crossed, leaving families like yours feeling helpless and alone.
This comprehensive guide is designed for you—families in Dickens County and across Texas—who are grappling with the complex issue of hazing. We at The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, also known as Attorney911, understand the fear, confusion, and anger that hazing incidents can cause. We aim to equip you with critical information:
- What hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes.
- A clear understanding of Texas and federal laws designed to protect students.
- Analysis of major national hazing cases and their direct relevance to Texas students and universities.
- Detailed insights into hazing incidents and trends at prominent Texas institutions like the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University.
- Your legal options, rights, and what steps to take if you suspect your child has been subjected to hazing.
Even if your child attends a school far from Dickens County, the legal framework and experienced legal counsel available in Texas are equipped to address these challenges. Hazing is a serious issue that demands attention and action, and we are here to help guide you through it.
IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:
-
If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™
-
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Prioritize their health and safety.
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot group chats, texts, and direct messages (DMs) immediately. Capture full threads with timestamps and participant names.
- Photograph any visible injuries from multiple angles and regularly over several days to document progression.
- Save any physical items connected to the hazing, such as damaged clothing, receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used in the hazing.
- Write down everything while memory is fresh: Who was involved, what exactly happened, when and where it took place, and any specific details your child shares.
- Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly.
- Sign anything from the university or an insurance company.
- Post details or evidence on public social media.
- Allow your child to delete messages or “clean up” any physical or digital evidence.
-
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears rapidly through deleted messages, destroyed items, and coached witnesses.
- Universities and organizations often move quickly to manage the narrative.
- We can help ensure vital evidence is preserved and protect your child’s legal rights.
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.
HAZING IN 2025: WHAT IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE
Hazing is not simply “boys will be boys” or another college tradition; it’s a dangerous, often illegal, and deeply harmful practice that endangers students. For families in Dickens County, it’s crucial to understand that hazing has evolved significantly. It’s no longer just about classic “Hell Week” stereotypes. Modern hazing is often more subtle, psychologically manipulative, and deeply integrated with digital technologies, making it harder to detect but no less damaging. We define hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, directed against a student for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or maintaining membership in an organization, where that act endangers the mental or physical health or safety of that student. This includes acts occurring both on and off campus. It is a critical distinction that “I agreed to it” does not automatically make the activity safe or legal, especially when peer pressure and power imbalances are at play.
Main Categories of Hazing
Understanding the different faces of hazing is the first step toward recognizing and combating it.
-
Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is one of the most common and deadliest forms. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often through “lineups,” drinking games, chugging challenges, or events disguised as “big/little” reveal nights, which require rapid and excessive consumption. Students may also be pressured to consume unknown substances or dangerous drug combinations. The goal is to induce intoxication as part of membership, often leading to alcohol poisoning, injury, or death.
-
Physical Hazing: This category includes direct physical abuse, such as paddling, beatings, and forced strenuous calisthenics (often called “smokings” or “workouts”) that exceed safe limits. Other forms include sleep deprivation, food or water restriction, exposure to extreme weather conditions, or being forced into dangerous environments. These acts are designed to break down individuals, instill fear, and create a sense of subservience.
-
Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts are profoundly damaging, involving forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (like “roasted pig” poses or “elephant walks”), or being coerced into wearing degrading costumes. Hazing can also feature acts with racist, homophobic, or sexist overtones, including the use of slurs or forcing members to role-play degrading stereotypes. Such activities strip individuals of their dignity and can inflict lasting psychological trauma.
-
Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but incredibly damaging, psychological hazing involves sustained verbal abuse, threats, intimidation, and social isolation. It can include manipulation, forced confessions, and public shaming on social media or during meetings. These tactics aim to control and dehumanize new members, fostering a climate of fear and loyalty through psychological torment rather than physical pain.
-
Digital/Online Hazing: In the current digital age, hazing has moved online. This includes group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation orchestrated through platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Discord, and others. Students might be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos, or to post embarrassing content online as part of their “initiation.” Geo-location tracking and constant digital monitoring are also emerging tactics.
Where Hazing Actually Happens
It’s a common misconception that hazing is limited to Greek life. While fraternities and sororities, including Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural organizations, are frequently implicated, hazing pervades many types of student groups. This could include:
- Corps of Cadets, ROTC, and other military-style groups.
- Spirit squads, dance teams, and cheerleading.
- Athletic teams, from football and basketball to baseball, swimming, and even lesser-known sports.
- Marching bands and other performing arts ensembles.
- Many tradition-heavy clubs, academic societies, and cultural organizations.
The insidious nature of social status, intense pressure to conform, and a culture of secrecy ensures these practices endure, even when students are fully aware that hazing is officially prohibited and illegal. For Dickens County families, understanding that hazing can affect any student in almost any extracurricular context at any Texas university is vital.
LAW & LIABILITY FRAMEWORK (TEXAS + FEDERAL)
Navigating the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas can be complex. For families in Dickens County, understanding the specific laws and frameworks that apply is crucial when considering how to address an incident. Texas has specific statutes designed to combat hazing, and federal regulations add further layers of accountability.
Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)
Texas law clearly defines and prohibits hazing, primarily under the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. In plain terms, hazing is considered any intentional, knowing, or reckless act against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. Crucially, this act must endanger the mental or physical health or safety of the student. This means hazing doesn’t have to result in physical injury to be illegal; severe psychological harm is also covered.
Key aspects of the Texas law include:
- Location is Irrelevant: Hazing is prohibited whether it occurs on or off campus, meaning organizations cannot escape liability by simply moving activities to private residences or remote locations.
- Mental or Physical Harm: The law protects against both physical dangers (like beatings, forced exercise, or coerced alcohol/drug consumption) and significant mental health risks (such as extreme humiliation, intimidation, or prolonged psychological abuse).
- “Reckless” Standard: The law does not require malicious intent. If someone knew—or should have known—that their actions carried a significant risk of harm and proceeded anyway, that can be sufficient to meet the legal definition of hazing.
- “Consent” is Not a Defense: One of the most critical provisions in Texas law (§ 37.155) explicitly states that it is not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the activity. This acknowledges the inherent power imbalance and peer pressure that often negate true consent in these situations.
Criminal Penalties: Individuals involved in hazing can face criminal charges ranging from:
- Class B Misdemeanor: For incidents that do not cause bodily injury (punishable by fines up to $2,000 and/or up to 180 days in county jail).
- Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical treatment.
- State Jail Felony: In cases where hazing results in serious bodily injury or death. This is a significant escalation from a misdemeanor and carries much harsher penalties, including state jail time.
Furthermore, the law also criminalizes failing to report hazing if you are a member or officer aware of it, and retaliating against someone who reports hazing.
Criminal vs Civil Cases
It’s important for Dickens County families to understand that a hazing incident can lead to two distinct legal processes:
- Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (through prosecutors) and aim to punish individuals or organizations for violating criminal laws. If hazing leads to criminal charges, these could include hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in fatal instances. The outcome can be jail time, fines, or probation.
- Civil Cases: These are brought by victims or their surviving family members seeking monetary compensation for the harm they have suffered. The focus here is on holding responsible parties accountable for negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, or premises liability. A successful civil claim can help families cover medical costs, lost income, and pain and suffering.
Crucially, a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for filing a civil lawsuit. Even if criminal charges are not pursued or do not result in a conviction, victims and their families can still pursue civil action to seek justice and compensation.
Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery
Beyond state law, federal regulations also play a role in addressing hazing and campus safety:
- Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding must increase transparency regarding hazing incidents. By around 2026, institutions will be required to publicly report hazing violations and strengthen their hazing prevention and education programs, providing invaluable data for families and advocates.
- Title IX: When hazing involves elements of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based discrimination, Title IX obligations are triggered. This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education and requires institutions to investigate and respond appropriately to such incidents, regardless of where they occur.
- Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (Clery Act) requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents, especially those involving assault, sexual assault, or alcohol/drug violations, often fall under Clery reporting requirements, providing another layer of transparency and accountability.
Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit
In a civil hazing lawsuit, especially for families from Dickens County whose child attends a university in Texas, multiple parties can be held accountable, depending on the specific facts of the case:
- Individual Students: Those who actively planned, encouraged, or participated in the hazing, supplied dangerous substances, or engaged in cover-ups can be held personally liable for their actions.
- Local Chapter/Organization: The fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, particularly if it operates as a recognized legal entity, can be sued. Key individuals like officers or “pledge educators” who orchestrated or permitted the hazing also bear significant responsibility.
- National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which typically governs local chapters, sets policies, collects dues, and supervises chapter activities, can be found liable. This liability often hinges on whether the national organization knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing within its chapters and failed to intervene effectively.
- University or Governing Board: The institution itself can be held accountable under theories of negligence, gross negligence, or even civil rights violations. This is particularly true if the university had prior warnings about the organization’s hazing activities, failed to enforce its own policies, or demonstrated deliberate indifference to risks. Specific considerations may include sovereign immunity for public universities, though exceptions for gross negligence or Title IX claims exist.
- Third Parties: Other entities can also be implicated, including landlords or owners of properties where hazing occurred, bars or alcohol suppliers (under dram shop laws), or security companies and event organizers if their negligence contributed to the incident.
It’s important to remember that every case is unique, and the determination of liability depends heavily on the specific facts and evidence presented. Our firm works diligently to identify all responsible parties to ensure full accountability and fair compensation for victims.
NATIONAL HAZING CASE PATTERNS (ANCHOR STORIES)
While a hazing incident affecting a student from Dickens County might feel uniquely devastating, these tragedies are part of a grim national pattern. Major cases across the country have shaped legal precedents and driven legislative changes, and they serve as stark reminders of the pervasive dangers. These anchor stories highlight critical patterns that are highly relevant to hazing cases in Texas, including those involving students at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor. They demonstrate that national fraternities, universities, and individuals have been held accountable in multi-million dollar lawsuits and even criminal prosecutions.
Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern
Forced or extreme alcohol consumption is consistently the leading cause of hazing fatalities. These cases often involve similar scenarios: young pledges pressured to drink beyond their limits, often as part of a “tradition,” with tragic consequences exacerbated by a delay in seeking medical help.
-
Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a “bid-acceptance” challenge involving a “gauntlet” of drinking stations. He suffered severe falls, including one backward down a flight of stairs. Despite his visible injuries and distress captured on chapter house security cameras, fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for nearly 12 hours. The aftermath led to over a thousand criminal charges against numerous fraternity members for offenses including involuntary manslaughter and hazing. Civil litigation also ensued, and Pennsylvania enacted the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law, strengthening its anti-hazing statutes. This case remains a powerful indicator that extreme intoxication, tragic delays in medical aid, and a pervasive culture of silence are legally devastating for all involved.
-
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and forced to consume them rapidly. In the wake of his death, multiple fraternity members were prosecuted, and Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life, leading to significant policy overhauls. The tragic outcome of this formulaic “tradition” of forced drinking highlights a recurring script for disaster, serving as a warning to all Greek organizations about their practices.
-
Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, died from alcohol toxicity with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.495% during a fraternity “Bible study” drinking game. During this ritual, pledges were required to answer questions, and incorrect responses resulted in forced drinking. Following his death, multiple members faced criminal charges, with one convicted of negligent homicide. Louisiana subsequently enacted the Max Gruver Act, creating a felony hazing statute. This case vividly illustrates how legislative change and enhanced penalties often follow public outrage and clear evidence of systematic hazing.
-
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died of alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume a nearly full bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” reveal event. The incident led to multiple criminal convictions for fraternity members involved in his death. In civil litigation, his family reached a $10 million settlement, with approximately $7 million from the national Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity and nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University (BGSU). This case underscores that universities themselves can face significant financial and reputational consequences, alongside the fraternities directly involved.
These cases collectively demonstrate how these dangerous practices are not isolated incidents but rather part of a pattern of negligence and institutional failure.
Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern
Beyond alcohol, physically brutal and ritualized hazing continues to cause severe injury and death, often under the guise of “tradition” or “bonding.”
- Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, an 18-year-old pledge, died after a remote fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania. During a ritual called “the glass ceiling,” blindfolded pledges carrying heavy backpacks were repeatedly tackled. Michael sustained a traumatic brain injury, and fraternity members delayed calling 911 for several hours. This led to criminal convictions for multiple members, and the national fraternity itself was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, the first time a national fraternity was found criminally liable for a hazing death. Pi Delta Psi was banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years. This case tragically illustrates that off-campus “retreats” often become prime locations for egregious hazing, demonstrating that location does not diminish liability.
Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse
Hazing extends beyond Greek life, infiltrating other prominent student organizations, including high-profile athletic programs.
- Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): In a widespread scandal, former Northwestern football players came forward with allegations of systemic sexualized and racist hazing within the program over multiple years. This included practices forcing players to perform sexual acts. The fallout involved multiple lawsuits against the university and coaching staff, the termination of head coach Pat Fitzgerald (who later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially), and deep dives into the institutional culture. This case serves as a critical reminder that hazing is pervasive across university organizations, affecting major athletic programs where financial stakes and institutional reputations are immense.
What These Cases Mean for Texas Families
These national anchor stories share common, tragic threads: forced drinking, extreme humiliation, pervasive violence, deliberate delays in medical care, and concerted efforts to cover up incidents. For families in Dickens County and throughout our wide Texas community who send their children to universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these cases offer crucial lessons. They reveal that significant reforms and multi-million dollar settlements often occur only after tragedy strikes and victims’ families pursue relentless legal action. Faced with such profound grief and injustice, Texas families are not alone in this fight; they operate within a legal landscape increasingly shaped by these national lessons of accountability.
TEXAS FOCUS: UH, TEXAS A&M, UT, SMU, BAYLOR
For families in Dickens County, the experiences and policies of Texas’s major universities are of paramount concern. While Dickens County may be a considerable distance from the metropolitan hubs where these institutions reside, students from our community frequently attend these schools. Understanding each university’s specific culture around Greek life and student organizations, their hazing policies, and their track record for handling incidents is vital for any concerned parent or student.
5.1 University of Houston (UH)
Families from Dickens County who have students attending or considering the University of Houston will find a large, dynamic urban campus known for its diversity and a bustling student life that includes a robust Greek system and numerous student organizations. UH is a prominent institution within the Houston metropolitan area.
5.1.1 Campus & culture snapshot
The University of Houston boasts a significant urban campus in the heart of Houston. It attracts a diverse student body, comprising both commuters and a growing residential population. UH’s Greek life is active and vibrant, featuring a wide array of fraternities and sororities across various councils (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, Multicultural Greek Council), alongside a multitude of other student organizations, cultural groups, and sports clubs. This rich campus environment offers many opportunities for involvement but also presents potential risks associated with initiation culture.
5.1.2 Hazing policy & reporting
The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, clearly articulated in its student handbooks and online resources. UH’s policy explicitly prohibits hazing, both on and off campus. It specifically bans forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and acts that cause mental distress as part of initiation or affiliation. UH encourages reporting through various channels, including the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). The university also provides information on its website regarding hazing policies and, to some extent, disciplinary actions against organizations.
5.1.3 Example incident & response
A notable incident involving the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity at UH in 2016 illustrated the severe consequences of hazing. Pledges allegedly experienced deprivation of sufficient food, water, and sleep during protracted events. One student sustained a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface, highlighting the physical dangers. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges, and the university responded with suspension. Subsequent internal reports and disciplinary actions over the years have continued to reference other fraternities for behavior described as “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including dangerous alcohol misuse and other policy violations, leading to further suspensions or probationary periods for various organizations. These responses highlight the university’s commitment to addressing violations, yet also reveal the persistent challenges in eradicating hazing.
5.1.4 How a UH hazing case might proceed
In a hazing case at the University of Houston, investigations could involve the UHPD and, depending on the off-campus location, potentially the Houston Police Department (HPD). Civil lawsuits would typically fall under the jurisdiction of courts in Harris County. Potential defendants would include individual students directly involved, the local fraternity chapter, the national fraternity organization, and potentially the University of Houston itself, along with any relevant property owners where the hazing occurred. For families from Dickens County, understanding this jurisdictional landscape is crucial when contemplating legal action.
5.1.5 What UH students & parents should do
For parents and students from Dickens County connected to the University of Houston, proactive measures are key:
- Familiarize yourself with UH’s hazing policy and all available reporting channels, including the Dean of Students, UHPD, and anonymous online forms.
- Document any suspicions rigorously. If your student shares concerning details, encourage them to save screenshots of group chats, photos, or videos, and to note dates, times, and specific events.
- Research prior incidents. While not always comprehensively public, understanding UH’s disciplinary history with specific organizations can inform your decisions.
- If hazing is suspected or confirmed, contact an experienced Houston-based hazing attorney immediately. An attorney can help navigate the complex university processes, safeguard evidence before it disappears, and uncover prior disciplinary actions and internal records that may not be publicly accessible.
5.2 Texas A&M University
Texas A&M University in College Station holds a unique place in the hearts of many Texans, including those from Dickens County. Its rich traditions, particularly around the Corps of Cadets and a passionate Greek life, cultivate a strong sense of belonging, but also present distinct challenges regarding hazing.
5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot
Texas A&M is renowned for its deep-seated traditions, loyal alumni network, and, most notably, the Aggie Spirit. The university hosts a large and active Greek system (IFC, Panhellenic, MGC, NPHC), but its most iconic student organization is the Corps of Cadets, a uniformed military-style organization steeped in tradition. This culture, while fostering leadership and camaraderie, has historically faced scrutiny over intense “training” and initiation rituals that can sometimes cross into hazing. Students from Dickens County often find themselves drawn to these traditions, making an understanding of associated risks crucial.
5.2.2 Hazing policy & reporting
Texas A&M maintains a stringent anti-hazing policy that applies to all student organizations, including Greek life and the Corps of Cadets. Their policy strictly prohibits acts that endanger the mental or physical health or safety of a student for initiation or membership. Reporting channels include the Dean of Student Life, the Texas A&M Police Department (TAMUPD), and specific reporting avenues within the Corps of Cadets chain of command. The university emphasizes transparency and encourages immediate reporting of all suspected hazing activities.
5.2.3 Example incident & response
Texas A&M has faced several high-profile hazing incidents:
- In 2021, the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity faced allegations that two pledges were forced to endure strenuous physical activity and were covered in various substances, including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit. This resulted in severe chemical burns on the pledges requiring skin graft surgeries. The pledges filed a $1 million lawsuit against the fraternity and individuals, leading to the chapter’s suspension by the university.
- Another significant case emerged in 2023 involving the Corps of Cadets. A cadet alleged degrading hazing, which included forced blindfolds, simulated sexual acts, and being bound in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages, leading to a public statement from A&M indicating the matter was handled under university rules. These cases highlight that hazing concerns at Texas A&M apply to both Greek life and its iconic Corps program.
5.2.4 How a Texas A&M hazing case might proceed
Hazing cases at Texas A&M can involve investigations by the TAMUPD and, if occurring off-campus, the College Station Police Department or Brazos County Sheriff’s Office. Civil claims against the university would be processed considering Texas’s sovereign immunity laws, though exceptions exist for gross negligence or certain constitutional violations. Lawsuits might target individual members, the local chapter, relevant national organizations, and potentially the university. For Dickens County families, the nearest major legal counsel for such complex cases would typically be found in Houston or Austin, necessitating travel for consultations.
5.2.5 What Texas A&M students & parents should do
For Dickens County students attending Texas A&M and their families:
- Understand the traditions thoroughly but critically. Be aware that some “traditions” can mask prohibited hazing activities.
- Review Texas A&M’s specific policies on hazing for both Greek life and the Corps of Cadets.
- Document everything. If you suspect hazing, immediately secure any digital evidence and written accounts.
- If a student is injured or feels unsafe, withdraw them from the situation immediately. Prioritize safety over allegiance to any group.
- For comprehensive legal guidance, contact a Texas hazing attorney. They can help distinguish between legitimate challenges and illegal hazing, and advise on preserving evidence crucial for a potential civil claim against multiple responsible parties.
5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)
The University of Texas at Austin is a flagship institution for many students from Dickens County and across Texas. Its vibrant campus culture is well-known, including a significant Greek presence and numerous diverse student organizations.
5.3.1 Campus & culture snapshot
The University of Texas at Austin is one of the largest and most prestigious universities in Texas, with an active social scene. Its Greek system is extensive, encompassing the University Panhellenic Council (UPC), Interfraternity Council (IFC), Texas Asian Pan-Hellenic Council (TAPC), Multicultural Greek Council (MGC), and National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), totaling around 60 chapters. Additionally, UT hosts a vast array of spirit organizations, sports clubs, and unique student traditions. The sprawling campus and off-campus student housing areas are common sites for both official and unofficial student activities.
5.3.2 Hazing policy & reporting
UT Austin has a clearly articulated zero-tolerance hazing policy, consistently enforced through the Dean of Students office and the Office of Student Conduct. The university’s policy broadly defines hazing to include any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that endangers the mental or physical well-being of a student for the purpose of initiation, membership, or affiliation. UT maintains publicly accessible reporting channels, including online forms and direct contact with student conduct officials. Critically, UT Austin is one of the more transparent universities, maintaining a public “Hazing Violations and Disciplinary Actions” website that lists organizations, dates of incidents, specific conduct violations, and resulting sanctions.
5.3.3 Example incident & response
UT Austin’s public hazing log showcases numerous incidents across various organizations. For example:
- In 2023, the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity faced sanctions after new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, activities deemed to be hazing. The chapter was placed on probation and required to implement enhanced hazing-prevention education.
- Other student groups, including spirit organizations like the Texas Wranglers, have also been sanctioned for similar violations involving forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, degradation, and punishment-based practices.
- In January 2024, a highly publicized lawsuit was filed against the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) chapter by an Australian exchange student who alleged severe assault during a party, resulting in injuries including a dislocated leg, fractured tibia, and broken nose. The SAE chapter was already under suspension for prior hazing and safety violations at the time of the alleged assault.
These public records are invaluable for showing patterns of misconduct and the university’s awareness and response, or lack thereof.
5.3.4 How a UT hazing case might proceed
Hazing incidents at UT Austin can trigger investigations by both the UT Police Department (UTPD) and the Austin Police Department (APD), particularly if the events occur off-campus in an area like West Campus or North Campus. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed within Travis County courts. The presence of UT’s public hazing log is a significant factor in litigation, as it often provides strong evidence of prior warnings and the university’s official response (or lack of effective prevention). Suits might involve individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and potentially the University of Texas System. Families from Dickens County seeking legal counsel would likely consult with attorneys based in Austin or Houston.
5.3.5 What UT students & parents should do
For Dickens County students attending UT Austin and their families:
- Regularly check UT’s official “Hazing Violations” website (hazing.utexas.edu) to understand the history of organizations your student is considering joining.
- Utilize UT’s robust reporting structure if you suspect or confirm hazing. The transparency of the university’s records can work in a victim’s favor.
- Document everything with precision. The digital age means group chats, social media posts, and messages are key evidence—screenshot and preserve them securely.
- Consult immediately with a hazing attorney experienced in Texas law. The public nature of UT’s hazing records can provide a clear foundation for legal action, demonstrating a pattern of institutional knowledge and potential negligence.
5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)
Southern Methodist University in Dallas is a private institution with a strong Greek system and an affluent culture. Students from Dickens County often travel to SMU for its academic rigor and opportunities, but should be aware of its hazing history as well.
5.4.1 Campus & culture snapshot
Southern Methodist University is a private, well-regarded university located in Dallas, Texas. It is well-known for its beautiful campus, competitive academics, and a vibrant social scene heavily influenced by its active Greek life. The campus hosts a bustling Panhellenic Council (sororities) and Interfraternity Council (fraternities), as well as National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) and Multicultural Greek Council (MGC) organizations. SMU’s culture, while fostering strong alumni networks and social connections, has also faced scrutiny concerning traditions within its Greek system.
5.4.2 Hazing policy & reporting
SMU has clear policies prohibiting hazing, outlined in its student code of conduct. These policies apply to all student organizations, both on and off campus, and define hazing broadly to include any activity that risks mental or physical harm for the purpose of initiation or membership. SMU offers multiple reporting channels, including the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities, the Dean of Students, and through anonymous reporting systems like its “Real Response” tool. The university actively promotes hazing prevention education and awareness among its student body.
5.4.3 Example incident & response
A notable incident at SMU involved the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity in 2017. New members were reportedly subjected to physical hazing, including paddling, forced excessive alcohol consumption, and severe sleep deprivation. The university launched an investigation, suspending the chapter and imposing strict restrictions on its recruiting activities for several years. This incident, while not resulting in a fatality, underscored the persistent challenges of hazing even at private institutions with well-established anti-hazing policies. SMU has had other hazing-related suspensions and probations, though the details may not be as readily publicly available as those from public universities like UT Austin due to the private nature of the institution.
5.4.4 How an SMU hazing case might proceed
Hazing cases at SMU would typically involve investigations by the SMU Police Department and, if off-campus, the Dallas Police Department or relevant local law enforcement. As a private university, SMU does not have the same sovereign immunity protections as public institutions, potentially making direct claims against the university more straightforward under certain circumstances. Lawsuits might target individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and SMU itself. For families from Dickens County, consulting with experienced hazing attorneys in Dallas or Houston would be the next step to navigate the specifics of a private university’s liability.
5.4.5 What SMU students & parents should do
For Dickens County students at SMU and their families:
- Deeply familiarize yourself with SMU’s student code of conduct and specific hazing policies, including any anonymous reporting mechanisms provided.
- Maintain meticulous records of any concerning interactions, messages, or incidents. Digital evidence is crucial.
- Do not hesitate to use SMU’s reporting channels, but be aware that reporting to the university does not preclude legal action; in fact, it can help solidify the school’s knowledge of the issue.
- If hazing leads to injury or significant distress, promptly seek medical attention and contact a Texas hazing attorney. An experienced attorney can guide you through the process of pursuing claims against a private institution and its affiliated organizations.
5.5 Baylor University
Baylor University in Waco, Texas, is another significant institution for students from Dickens County and across the state. Known for its strong Baptist affiliations and robust athletic programs, Baylor has faced its own challenges, including hazing incidents that interact with its unique institutional culture.
5.5.1 Campus & culture snapshot
Baylor University, located in Waco, is the oldest continuously operating university in Texas. It is a private Christian university with a strong emphasis on faith, academics, and highly competitive athletics. Baylor’s Greek life ecosystem includes IFC, Panhellenic, MGC, and NPHC organizations, which play a significant role in student social life. The university’s culture, while emphasizing community and shared values, has also navigated periods of intense scrutiny, particularly concerning issues of student safety and institutional oversight, notably in relation to its football program and Title IX compliance.
5.5.2 Hazing policy & reporting
Baylor University maintains a comprehensive anti-hazing policy that clearly prohibits any act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation, admission into, affiliation with, or continued membership in an organization. This policy applies to all student groups, including Greek chapters and athletic teams, and covers activities both on and off campus. Baylor provides multiple avenues for reporting hazing, including the Dean of Students office, the Baylor Department of Public Safety (BUDPS), and an anonymous online reporting form. The university emphasizes its “zero tolerance” stance on hazing.
5.5.3 Example incident & response
Baylor has encountered its share of hazing incidents, highlighting the broad reach of such behavior even within institutions with strong moral directives.
- In 2020, the Baylor baseball program came under scrutiny after a hazing investigation led to the suspension of 14 players. The suspensions were staggered to allow student-athletes to miss playing time without jeopardizing the entire season. This incident underscored that hazing is not confined to Greek life and can manifest in high-profile athletic programs, even within an institution that has faced intense public and legal pressure over student welfare issues in the past. These events illustrate the tension between Baylor’s stated “zero tolerance” and the recurring misconduct that sometimes emerges within its student organizations.
5.4.4 How a Baylor hazing case might proceed
Hazing incidents at Baylor would prompt investigations by the Baylor Department of Public Safety (BUDPS) and, if off-campus, the Waco Police Department or McLennan County Sheriff’s Office. As a private institution, Baylor does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more directly accountable in civil litigation compared to public universities. Lawsuits could name individual students, local chapters, national organizations, and Baylor University itself. Families from Dickens County pursuing legal claims against Baylor would typically seek counsel from experienced hazing attorneys in Houston or Dallas.
5.4.5 What Baylor students & parents should do
For Dickens County students attending Baylor and their families:
- Scrutinize Baylor’s anti-hazing policies and be aware of their “zero tolerance” stance.
- Ensure robust documentation of any hazing incidents, including digital communications and physical evidence.
- Understand that reporting to Baylor should be strategic. While reporting is crucial for institutional response, consult with a lawyer to ensure your actions do not inadvertently compromise future legal claims.
- If hazing causes injury or significant emotional distress, seek legal counsel immediately. An experienced Texas hazing attorney can help assess the specific facts, navigate Baylor’s unique institutional context, and identify all potential avenues for accountability.
FRATERNITIES & SORORITIES: CAMPUS-SPECIFIC + NATIONAL HISTORIES
When a student from Dickens County joins a fraternity or sorority at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, they are not just joining a local chapter—they are becoming part of a national organization with a complex history, including many chapters that have been implicated in hazing. This is a critical distinction, as national histories can profoundly influence the legal outcomes of hazing cases in Texas.
Why National Histories Matter
Many fraternities and sororities present on Texas campuses are branches of larger, national organizations. These national headquarters often invest heavily in “anti-hazing manuals,” risk management training, and elaborate policy documents. This is not coincidental; these protocols are developed precisely because national organizations have witnessed, and been held liable for, countless deaths, catastrophic injuries, and devastating lawsuits stemming from hazing incidents across the country. They are acutely aware of the dangerous patterns: forced drinking rituals, brutal paddling traditions, humiliating “pledge tasks,” and secretive initiation rites.
What happens in a hazing case in Texas against a local chapter often hinges on what the national organization knew—or should have known—from its history. If a local chapter in Austin, College Station, Houston, Dallas, or Waco repeats a hazing script that has previously led to suspensions, lawsuits, or fatalities for another chapter of the same national organization in a different state, that constitutes powerful evidence of foreseeability. Such pattern evidence can significantly strengthen arguments for negligence or even punitive damages against the national entity, demonstrating a failure to adequately prevent known dangers.
Organization Mapping (Synthesized)
Below we outline some of the major fraternities and sororities with chapters at the target Texas universities and highlight their national hazing histories. This is not an exhaustive list but focuses on organizations with well-documented national patterns of hazing.
-
Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): Present at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor.
- National History: Pi Kappa Alpha has a deeply troubling national hazing history. The tragic death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021 was a direct result of a “Big/Little” pledge night involving forced consumption of a lethal amount of alcohol, leading to a $10 million settlement with the family. Earlier, in 2012, David Bogenberger died from alcohol poisoning during a fraternity event at Northern Illinois University, resulting in a $14 million settlement. These and other cases, like the cyberstalking arrests at Pi Kappa Alpha – University of Mississippi (2025), demonstrate a recurring pattern of dangerous “traditions” and a failure to protect new members.
-
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): Present at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and SMU.
- National History: SAE has tragically been associated with more hazing-related deaths than any other fraternity since 2000. These include the death of Carson Starkey in 2008 at California Polytechnic State University (due to alcohol hazing, leading to a substantial confidential settlement and the formation of the Aware Awake Alive foundation). Recent lawsuits include allegations of a traumatic brain injury during hazing at the University of Alabama (2023) and severe chemical burns from industrial-strength cleaner poured on pledges at Texas A&M (2021). The UT Austin chapter also faced a significant lawsuit in 2024 for alleged assault by members, despite a prior suspension. SAE’s repeated incidents point to systemic, widespread issues within the organization.
-
Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): Present at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, Baylor, and SMU.
- National History: Phi Delta Theta is tragically linked to the death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017. He died from alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game, leading to criminal convictions, substantial civil settlements, and the enactment of Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act (a felony hazing statute). This case, along with others, highlights a recurring pattern of dangerous drinking games and initiation rituals.
-
Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Present at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin.
- National History: Pi Kappa Phi was involved in the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017, who died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Multiple members were prosecuted, and the incident led to significant anti-hazing reforms at FSU.
-
Kappa Alpha Order (ΚΑ): Present at Texas A&M and SMU.
- National History: Kappa Alpha Order has faced numerous hazing allegations and disciplinary actions across the country, including the SMU chapter’s suspension in 2017 for alleged paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation. These incidents demonstrate a pattern of physical and alcohol-related hazing within the organization.
-
Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin.
- National History: Beta Theta Pi’s national profile was irrevocably altered by the death of Timothy Piazza at Penn State University in 2017, a case involving extreme alcohol hazing, traumatic injuries, and a criminal cover-up that led to one of the largest hazing prosecutions in U.S. history and the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania.
-
Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, Baylor, and SMU.
- National History: Sigma Chi has been repeatedly implicated in hazing incidents. A 2024 case at the College of Charleston resulted in a family receiving more than $10 million in damages for severe physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment of a pledge, marking one of the largest known hazing settlements. Other incidents include a pledge hospitalized for alcohol poisoning at UT Arlington in 2020.
-
Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): Present at UH, Texas A&M, Baylor, and UT Austin.
- National History: Kappa Sigma has a historical pattern of severe hazing. The $12.6 million jury verdict awarded to the family of Chad Meredith who drowned in an unsupervised hazing event at the University of Miami in 2001, led to Florida’s hazing criminalization law. More recently, allegations of hazing resulting in severe injuries like rhabdomyolysis were litigated against Kappa Sigma at Texas A&M in 2023.
It is important to remember that fraternity and sorority rosters can change. For the most current information, families should always consult the official Greek Life directories on each university’s website.
Tie Back to Legal Strategy
These long national histories of hazing are not mere footnotes; they are crucial components of a legal strategy against fraternities, sororities, and sometimes even universities. The documented patterns of abuse across different chapters of the same national organization establish a clear record that these entities had prior warnings. This evidence is vital for proving that national organizations had foreseeability of the dangers their local chapters posed.
In court, this means:
- Overcoming the “Rogue Chapter” Defense: Nationals often claim they had no knowledge of a specific chapter’s hazing and that the local members acted against policy. However, a history of similar incidents across other chapters of the same organization can demonstrate that the national entity had constructive notice of the inherent risks and failed to implement adequate controls.
- Demonstrating Negligent Supervision: Showing a pattern of systemic hazing across a national fraternity can argue that the national organization was negligent in supervising its chapters, enforcing its own anti-hazing policies, or promptly intervening after previous warnings.
- Justifying Punitive Damages: When defendants ignore repeated warnings and continue to allow dangerous practices, a jury may find that their conduct was grossly negligent or willfully indifferent. This can open the door to punitive damages, which are designed not just to compensate the victim but to punish the wrongdoer and deter similar conduct in the future.
For families in Dickens County pursuing a hazing claim against a university organization, connecting local incidents to this broader national context is a powerful legal strategy that underscores the pervasive nature of hazing and the deep institutional failures that allow it to continue.
BUILDING A CASE: EVIDENCE, DAMAGES, STRATEGY
For families from Dickens County facing the aftermath of a hazing incident, understanding how a legal case is built is crucial. It’s not just about what happened, but what proof exists, what losses can be recovered, and how a strategic legal approach can overcome the formidable defenses of powerful institutions. Building a strong hazing case requires meticulous evidence collection and sophisticated legal arguments, fields where Attorney911 brings deep expertise.
Evidence
The cornerstone of any successful hazing lawsuit is irrefutable evidence. Modern hazing leaves a digital footprint, making digital communications the most critical category of evidence today.
-
Digital Communications: These are often the smoking gun in hazing cases. Applications like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, and even fraternity-specific apps are where hazing is planned, executed, and documented.
- What to look for: Messages planning hazing events, assigning degrading tasks, discussions about intimidating new members, calls for secrecy, or even evidence of celebrations after a “successful” hazing event.
- Preservation is key: Screenshots of full threads, showing sender names, timestamps, and sufficient context, are invaluable. Even if messages are quickly deleted (as in Snapchat or Instagram vanish mode), digital forensics experts can often recover them, but initial screenshots remain gold. Ralph Manginello, the managing partner at Attorney911, emphasizes the importance of using your cellphone to document a legal case as detailed in our educational video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs.
-
Photos & Videos: These can be damning. Members often film hazing for their own entertainment or to prove new members endured “the tradition.”
- Sources: Content filmed by participants, footage shared in private group chats or on social media (even if quickly taken down), or even security camera footage from houses or venues where events took place.
- What they show: Injuries, humiliating acts, forced drinking, specific locations, and who was present.
-
Internal Organization Documents: These can reveal a pattern of knowledge or deliberate indifference.
- Examples: Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “traditions” lists, emails or texts from officers giving orders, or even minutes from meetings where hazing was discussed or implicitly condoned.
- National policies: The national organization’s anti-hazing policies and risk management training materials, which often contradict the actual practices of local chapters.
-
University Records: A university’s own records can prove prior knowledge.
- What to obtain: Prior conduct files documenting a specific organization’s probationary periods, suspensions, or warnings related to hazing. Incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices. Publicly available records like UT Austin’s hazing violations log.
- Significance: These records demonstrate if the university knew or should have known about a pattern of misconduct and failed to act effectively.
-
Medical and Psychological Records: These document the extent of the harm.
- Physical injuries: Emergency room reports, ambulance records, hospitalization notes, toxicology reports (for alcohol/drugs), imaging scans (X-rays, CTs, MRIs) for brain or physical injuries, and subsequent rehabilitation notes.
- Psychological trauma: Evaluations from psychologists or psychiatrists diagnosing conditions like PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation directly linked to the hazing. These records are critical for proving emotional damages.
-
Witness Testimony: The accounts of individuals who saw or know about the hazing are invaluable.
- Who to identify: Other pledges, current or former members who are willing to speak, roommates, Residence Assistants (RAs), coaches, trainers, or even bystanders who observed the events. Former members who quit or were expelled for refusing to participate often become key witnesses.
Damages
When a student from Dickens County is harmed by hazing, families can pursue compensation for a wide array of losses, both tangible and intangible.
- Medical Bills & Future Care: This includes all costs associated with both immediate and long-term medical needs. From emergency room visits and ambulance transport to lengthy hospital stays, surgeries, physical therapy, medications, and mental health counseling. For catastrophic injuries like brain damage or organ failure, this can include a life care plan to cover decades of specialized care.
- Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This covers lost wages if the student was unable to work, and more significantly, lost educational opportunities. This can include tuition for missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed graduation, and future diminished earning capacity if the injuries result in permanent disability or psychological conditions that affect career potential.
- Non-Economic Damages: These are subjective but profoundly real losses, including physical pain and suffering (from injuries, chronic pain), emotional distress (trauma, humiliation, shame, fear, PTSD), and the loss of enjoyment of life (inability to participate in activities, social withdrawal, damaged relationships).
- Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the most tragic cases, when hazing results in death, surviving family members can recover for funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support from the deceased, and non-economic damages for the profound “loss of companionship, love, and society,” as well as their own grief and mental suffering.
Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage
Hazing cases often involve multiple defendants, each with their own legal counsel and, crucially, insurance policies. National fraternities, sororities, and universities almost always carry substantial liability insurance. However, their insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage by arguing that hazing constitutes “intentional conduct” or “criminal acts,” which are often excluded from standard policies.
Experienced hazing lawyers at Attorney911 understand these tactics. We work to:
- Identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, including policies held by the local chapter, the national organization, individual members (e.g., homeowner’s policies), and the university’s umbrella policies.
- Navigate disputes regarding policy exclusions. We argue that even if the hazing itself was an intentional act, the negligent supervision or failure to intervene by the national organization or university—which allowed the hazing to occur—is a covered event.
- Force insurers to fulfill their duty to defend and indemnify, through negotiation or litigation, to ensure that victims receive the compensation they deserve.
This is a complex area, but Attorney911’s founder, Ralph Manginello, with deep federal court and complex litigation experience, coupled with Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney, means we know how to challenge insurance companies and hold them accountable.
PRACTICAL GUIDES & FAQS
When hazing impacts a student from Dickens County, immediate, actionable guidance is paramount. The Manginello Law Firm offers practical advice for parents, students, and witnesses, designed to empower them during a deeply challenging time.
8.1 For Parents
For parents in Dickens County, recognizing the often-subtle signs of hazing and knowing how to respond effectively can make all the difference.
- Warning Signs of Hazing: Look for unexplained bruises, cuts, or other injuries, especially if the explanations don’t add up. Observe extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation, drastic changes in mood, increased anxiety, or withdrawal from friends and family. Your child might suddenly become secretive about their organization’s activities, spend excessive time on their phone for group chats, or express fear of missing “mandatory” events.
- How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not judgment. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with your group?” or “Is there anything they’re asking you to do that makes you uncomfortable?” Emphasize their safety and well-being over any group affiliation, and let them know you will support them without judgment if they need to leave the organization.
- If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize their medical care immediately. Document everything meticulously: photograph any injuries from multiple angles and over several days, screenshot all relevant texts or social media posts, and write down every detail your child shares (dates, times, names, what happened). This contemporaneous preservation is critical.
- Dealing with the University: Document every interaction with university officials. Ask direct questions about prior incidents involving the specific organization and what actions the school took. Be aware that the university’s primary goal may be institutional reputation management.
- When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child sustains significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing the incident or stonewalling, it’s time to contact an attorney experienced in hazing cases.
8.2 For Students / Pledges
For students from Dickens County who might be experiencing or witnessing hazing, knowing your rights and how to act can be life-saving.
- Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? If an activity makes you feel unsafe, humiliated, coerced, or uncomfortable; if you’re forced to consume alcohol or endure pain; or if the activity is hidden from parents, the public, or administrators—it is likely hazing. True traditions do not involve degradation or danger.
- Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Despite what older members might say, your “consent” under pressure is often not viewed as true, voluntary agreement under the law. The power dynamics and intense desire to belong often negate genuine consent, and Texas law explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing.
- Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, remove yourself from the situation immediately and contact a trusted individual (parent, RA, friend outside the group). Report internally through campus channels (Dean of Students), anonymously via university hotlines, or externally via the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE).
- Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and Texas law offer immunity or leniency for students who seek medical help in an emergency, even if they were involved in illegal activities like underage drinking or hazing themselves. Your safety, or the safety of another student, is paramount.
8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses
If you were once involved in hazing, or witnessed it, and now carry guilt or fear, your voice can be powerful.
- Acknowledge Your Role, But Act: Your testimony and evidence can prevent future harm and save lives. While seeking your own legal advice is prudent, cooperating with investigations can be a crucial step towards personal and institutional accountability.
- Legal Guidance: An experienced attorney can help you navigate your unique position, protect your rights, and guide you through the process of providing crucial testimony or evidence while addressing any fears of legal exposure.
8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case
For families from Dickens County and across Texas, avoiding common pitfalls in hazing cases is as important as collecting evidence. The defense will exploit any misstep.
MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:
- Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence: What parents might think: “I don’t want them getting in more trouble.” Why it’s wrong: This looks like a cover-up, can be considered obstruction of justice, and makes proving your case nearly impossible. What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, no matter how embarrassing it seems.
- Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly: What parents might think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.” Why it’s wrong: They will immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses. What to do instead: Document everything you can, then call a lawyer before any direct confrontation.
- Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms: What universities often do: Pressure families to sign waivers or agree to “internal resolution” that limits their options. Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue a lawsuit, and the proposed settlements are often far below the true value of the case. What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything without an attorney reviewing it first.
- Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer: What families might think: “I want people to know what happened.” Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys screenshot everything; inconsistencies or emotional statements can be used against your child, and it can waive certain legal privileges. What to do instead: Document privately and allow your lawyer to control any public messaging strategically.
- Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”: What fraternities might say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic.” Why it’s wrong: They may pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that could harm your child’s legal position. What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication should go through your attorney.
- Waiting “to see how the university handles it”: What universities might promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.” Why it’s wrong: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, the statute of limitations continues to run, and the university often controls the narrative to protect itself. What to do instead: Preserve evidence now, consult a lawyer immediately, and understand that an internal university process is distinct from real legal accountability.
- Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer: What adjusters might say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.” Why it’s wrong: Any recorded statements can be used against you, and initial settlement offers are typically lowball. What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with them and state, “My attorney will contact you.”
8.5 Short FAQ
-
“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT enjoy some sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, or when suing individual university employees in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its unique facts; Attorney911 can provide case-specific analysis if you call 1-888-ATTY-911. -
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. While hazing typically starts as a Class B misdemeanor in Texas, it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This carries significantly harsher penalties, including potential prison time. Individual officers of organizations can also face criminal charges for knowingly failing to report hazing. -
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing charges. Courts recognize that “agreement” under intense peer pressure, a significant power imbalance, or fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent. -
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas?”
Generally, you have 2 years from the date of injury or death to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute of limitations may be “tolled” or paused. Time is always critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. We strongly advise calling 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to discuss your specific timeline. -
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship of the organization, their control over its members, their knowledge of harmful patterns, and the foreseeability of such events. Many major hazing cases resulting in multi-million-dollar judgments have occurred at off-campus houses or private retreat locations. -
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
The vast majority of hazing cases settle confidentially before ever reaching a public trial. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy and can work to ensure court records are sealed and settlement terms remain confidential. While we pursue accountability, we balance that with your desire for discretion.
Remember, when the law is complex or depends on specific details, always consult with an attorney to review your unique facts and understand your rights.
ABOUT THE MANGINELLO LAW FIRM + CALL TO ACTION
When your family in Dickens County faces the unthinkable reality of hazing, you need far more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need tenacious legal advocates who deeply understand the convoluted web of university policies, fraternity structures, legal precedents, and the insidious ways powerful institutions fight back—and how to overcome them. That’s precisely why The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, stands ready to serve families like yours throughout Texas.
From our Houston office, we serve families across Greater Houston, Harris County, and throughout Texas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities can deeply affect families in Dickens County and across the wider region. Our firm brings a unique blend of strategic expertise and compassionate advocacy to every hazing case. Ralph Manginello’s comprehensive credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
Our firm offers unique qualifications for hazing litigation:
Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, leverages her background as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm. This experience is invaluable; she knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies operate—how they value hazing claims, their delay tactics, their arguments to exclude coverage, and their settlement strategies. We know their playbook because we used to run it, giving us an insider’s edge in dismantling their defenses. You can learn more about Lupe Peña’s profile at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
Managing Partner Ralph Manginello brings extensive experience in complex litigation against massive institutions. Our firm was one of the few Texas firms involved in the significant BP Texas City explosion litigation, a testament to our capacity to take on powerful defendants with deep pockets. With a strong background in federal court (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) and membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA), we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-resourced defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won; we know how to fight for accountability.
We have a proven track record in securing multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements in wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. This experience means we don’t settle cheap. We meticulously build cases that account for all damages—from immediate medical bills to long-term care needs for brain injuries or other permanent disabilities, working with economists and medical experts to ensure that fair value is sought. Attorney911 has extensive wrongful death experience, which you can read about at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.
Our expertise also encompasses both the criminal and civil sides of hazing. Ralph’s background in criminal defense allows us to advise witnesses and former members who may face dual criminal and civil exposure, ensuring a comprehensive legal strategy. Our criminal defense experience means we understand how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, which you can review at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.
We combine this legal prowess with exceptional investigative depth. We work with a network of experts—medical, digital forensics, economists, and psychologists—to uncover crucial evidence. This includes obtaining deleted group chats and social media evidence, subpoenaing national fraternity records that show prior incidents, and uncovering university files through discovery and public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.
We understand that hazing is not just a legal battle; it’s a deeply emotional ordeal. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face, which is why our approach is rooted in empathy and unwavering victim advocacy. Our mission is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We believe in thorough investigation and pursuing real accountability, not just quick settlements. We invite you to learn about how transparent we are by watching our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus, we want to hear from you. Families in Dickens County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.
Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to your story, explain your legal options transparently, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family. We will review any evidence you have, discuss realistic timelines, answer your questions about costs (our contingency fee means we don’t get paid unless we win), and there’s no pressure to hire us on the spot. Everything you tell us is confidential.
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com
Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for a confidential consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.
Reading this article does not create an attorney–client relationship. Every case is unique, and we cannot guarantee specific outcomes. An experienced attorney can review your specific facts, explain your rights under Texas law, and help you understand your options.
Whether you’re in Dickens County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.
Legal Disclaimer
This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.
Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.
If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.
The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com