The Silent Epidemic: A Comprehensive Guide to Hazing in Texas for Floyd County Families

The cold night air hangs heavy, thick with the scent of cheap beer and fear. At an off-campus fraternity house, somewhere near one of Texas’s bustling university campuses, a group of pledges huddle. They are being forced to chug handles of hard liquor while answering trivia questions, each wrong answer met with another dangerous swig. Older members, some barely a year older, chant and record the scene on their phones, laughing. One student, desperate to fit in and “earn” his place, collapses, his body convulsing. Nobody wants to call 911 – the terror of getting “the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble” outweighs the primal urge to save a life. The student feels trapped, not just by the walls of the house, but by an unspoken loyalty, by months of psychological manipulation designed to make him choose the group over his own safety.

This chilling scenario, tragically common, isn’t unique to any single campus or organization. It’s a reality that could unfold at any Texas university—including those where families from Floyd County and surrounding communities like Plainview, Lubbock, and Amarillo send their children to pursue their dreams. Hazing, in its modern and often insidious forms, continues to plague college campuses, leaving a trail of physical injuries, profound psychological trauma, and, far too often, death.

This comprehensive guide is designed specifically for families in Floyd County and across the great state of Texas who need to understand the complex landscape of hazing. We will explore what hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes to reveal its modern, often digital, tactics. We will delve into how Texas and federal law address these dangerous practices, and what we can learn from major national cases that have shaped the current legal environment. Crucially, we will examine the specific context of hazing at our state’s prominent institutions: the University of Houston, Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University. Our aim is to provide clarity on legal options available to victims and families in Floyd County and throughout Texas, offering a roadmap for accountability and healing.

This article provides general information regarding hazing and the law in Texas. It is not intended as specific legal advice, and individual cases require a thorough and confidential evaluation of their unique facts. The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC works diligently to protect victims and their families throughout Texas, and we are here to serve families in Floyd County and beyond.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Your child’s well-being is paramount.
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, and direct messages immediately.
    • Photograph any injuries from multiple angles and at different stages of healing.
    • Save physical items like soiled clothing, receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used in the hazing.
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh: who was involved, what happened, when and where it occurred, and any specific details your child shared.
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly, as this often leads to evidence destruction or retaliation.
    • Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal counsel, as this could waive your rights.
    • Post details on public social media, which could compromise your legal case.
    • Allow your child to delete messages or attempt to “clean up” any digital evidence.

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast, including deleted group chats, destroyed physical items, and witnesses being coached to conceal information.
  • Universities often move quickly to control the narrative and manage public relations.
  • We can help preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s rights from the very beginning.
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

The popular image of hazing often conjures scenes from comedies or outdated movies: messy pranks and minor embarrassing rituals. The reality of hazing in 2025, however, is far more sinister, dangerous, and technologically sophisticated. For Floyd County families unfamiliar with modern Greek life or campus organizations, it’s crucial to understand that hazing has evolved into a complex web of physical, psychological, and digital abuse designed to inflict harm and maintain control.

Hazing, in plain English, is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. It is important to emphasize that a student’s assertion of “I agreed to it” does not automatically make the act safe or legal when there is inherent peer pressure, a significant power imbalance, or a threat of social exclusion or physical harm.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

At its core, hazing occurs when individuals or groups, often within the context of an organization whose members include students, engage in behaviors that inflict or intend to inflict physical or psychological distress to initiate, affiliate with, or maintain membership in that organization. The key elements are coercion, a purpose linked to group affiliation, and a tangible risk to health, safety, or dignity.

Main Categories of Hazing

Modern hazing manifests in diverse and often overlapping ways:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains one of the most prevalent and deadly forms of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking of excessive amounts of alcohol, often in rapid succession. This can include chugging challenges, “lineups” where multiple pledges drink simultaneously, and games specifically designed to require rapid alcohol consumption. Beyond alcohol, there is also pressure to consume unknown or mixed substances, including illicit drugs. The goal is often severe intoxication to induce compliance or for perceived “bonding.”

• Physical Hazing: These activities directly endanger physical health. They range from violent acts like paddling and beatings to extreme calisthenics, brutal “workouts,” or “smokings” that go far beyond healthy conditioning. Physical hazing also encompasses sleep deprivation, forced hunger or thirst, exposure to extreme weather conditions, and dangerous or precarious environmental challenges. These acts often result in injuries, exhaustion, and in severe cases, rhabdomyolysis or organ failure.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This type of hazing is designed to degrade and demean. It can include forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (sometimes referred to as “roasted pig” positions), and the wearing of degrading costumes. These rituals can be deeply traumatizing, often involving acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones, or the forced use of slurs and role-playing of stereotypes.

• Psychological Hazing: While less visible than physical harm, psychological hazing inflicts significant mental distress. This includes verbal abuse, constant threats, and deliberate social isolation from non-group members. It also encompasses psychological manipulation, forced confessions or self-incrimination, and public shaming, whether face-to-face or on social media. This continuous mental torment can lead to severe anxiety, depression, and long-lasting PTSD.

• Digital/Online Hazing: With the ubiquity of smartphones and social media, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes demands in group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp, Discord), dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok. Pledges can be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos, or be subject to constant digital surveillance and demands, leading to severe sleep deprivation and anxiety.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It is a common misconception that hazing is limited to male fraternities. The truth is, hazing is a systemic issue found across a wide spectrum of organizations on college campuses:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes those affiliated with Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and various multicultural Greek councils.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: These organizations, particularly known at institutions like Texas A&M, can involve intense “traditions” that sometimes cross the line into hazing.
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Student Organizations: Groups like “Texas Cowboys” and “Absolute Texxas” at UT Austin, along with various cultural, academic, and service organizations, have documented hazing incidents.
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to cheerleading and rowing, hazing can occur across college sports, sometimes under the guise of “team bonding” or “toughening up.”
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups have been implicated in hazing, such as the Florida A&M University marching band case that revealed brutal beatings.

The perpetuation of hazing across these diverse groups is often driven by a toxic combination of social status, reverence for “tradition,” and an overwhelming culture of secrecy. Despite widespread knowledge that hazing is illegal and dangerous, these practices persist, hidden from university oversight and often from the naive eyes of new members and their parents.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas is critical for families in Floyd County and across the state. This framework outlines the criminal and civil implications, as well as broader federal requirements that govern how universities and organizations must address hazing.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific, robust anti-hazing provisions primarily codified within the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. Our state’s law defines hazing broadly, encompassing:

“Any intentional, knowing, or reckless act” occurring on or off campus, by one person or with others, directed against a student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
• Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition clarifies several crucial points:

• Location is irrelevant: Hazing can happen anywhere—on campus, at an off-campus house, or during a remote retreat.
• Harm can be mental or physical: It’s not just about broken bones; severe psychological trauma is also hazing.
• Intent doesn’t require malice: Even if the perpetrators didn’t intend to seriously hurt someone, if their actions were “reckless” (meaning they consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk), it still counts as hazing.
• “Consent” is not a defense: As we will discuss in more detail, Texas law explicitly states that a student’s “agreement” to be hazed does not absolve the perpetrators or organization of liability.

Criminal Penalties:
Hazing carries serious criminal penalties in Texas:

• By default, hazing is a Class B Misdemeanor.
• If hazing causes an injury requiring medical treatment, it escalates to a Class A Misdemeanor.
• Crucially, if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it becomes a State Jail Felony. This means individuals involved can face significant prison time and substantial fines.
• Additionally, failing to report hazing (if you are a member or officer and knew about it) is also a criminal misdemeanor, as is retaliating against someone who reports hazing.

Organizational Liability:
Organizations themselves can be held criminally liable if they authorized or encouraged the hazing, or if an officer or senior member knew about it and failed to report. Penalties for organizations can include fines up to $10,000 per violation and, more significantly, the university can revoke their recognition and ban them from campus.

Reporter Protections:
Texas law (§ 37.154) offers immunity from civil or criminal liability for individuals who in good faith report a hazing incident to university authorities or law enforcement. This provision aims to encourage reporting, though the fear of social retribution often dissuades students. Moreover, in medical emergencies, Texas law and many university policies provide amnesty for students who call 911, even if they were underage drinking or otherwise involved.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s vital for Floyd County families to understand the distinction between criminal and civil legal actions in hazing cases:

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated and prosecuted by the state (e.g., the District Attorney’s office). Their primary goal is to punish those who broke the law. Hazing-related criminal charges can include the hazing offenses themselves, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in cases resulting in death. While a conviction can provide a sense of justice, it typically does not directly compensate the victim for their losses.

• Civil Cases: These are lawsuits brought by victims or their surviving families. The primary aim is to obtain monetary compensation for the harm suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil hazing lawsuits often focus on legal theories such as:

  • Negligence and Gross Negligence: Did the individuals, organizations, or university fail in their duty to protect the student, and did this failure lead to harm? Gross negligence involves an extreme degree of carelessness or indifference.
  • Wrongful Death: If hazing leads to a fatality, surviving family members can sue for damages tied to their profound loss.
  • Negligent Hiring/Supervising: Did the university or organization fail to properly screen or oversee employees, advisors, or student leaders who were involved in or allowed hazing?
  • Premises Liability: Were the conditions of the property where hazing occurred unsafe, leading to injury?
  • Vicarious Liability: Can a national fraternity be held responsible for the actions of its local chapter members?
  • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: For severe psychological harm.

Both criminal and civil cases can proceed simultaneously. Crucially, a criminal conviction is not required for a successful civil hazing lawsuit. The burden of proof is lower in civil cases, meaning it’s often easier to secure civil compensation than a criminal conviction.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations also impact how hazing is addressed:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding must:

  • Publicly disclose all findings of hazing violations.
  • Report comprehensive data on hazing incidents transparently.
  • Implement robust hazing education and prevention programs.
    This act, set to be phased in by around 2026, aims to bring more accountability and transparency to hazing reporting nationwide, making it easier for families in Floyd County to research hazing histories at any institution their children consider.

• Title IX & Clery Act:

  • Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in education. If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or creates a sexually hostile environment, it can trigger Title IX obligations, requiring universities to investigate and take action.
  • The Clery Act requires colleges and universities to report campus crime statistics and provide security information. Hazing incidents involving assault, sexual assault, or alcohol/drug-related offenses often overlap with Clery reporting requirements. These federal laws provide additional avenues for accountability and create pressure on institutions to act.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Civil hazing lawsuits can involve multiple defendants, reflecting the layers of responsibility in these incidents:

• Individual Students: Those who planned, initiated, carried out the acts, furnished alcohol, or participated in the cover-up can be held personally liable.
• Local Chapter / Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, if it is a legally recognized entity, can be sued. Key individuals like officers or “pledge educators” are often central figures.
• National Fraternity / Sorority: The national headquarters, which sets policies, collects dues, and is meant to supervise local chapters, can face liability. Their responsibility often hinges on what they knew or should have known from prior hazing incidents at other chapters.
• University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself may be sued under various theories, including:
  • Negligent Supervision: Failure to properly supervise organizations or maintain a safe campus environment.
  • Failure to Warn: Not adequately informing students and parents about known dangers.
  • Title IX (for sex-based hazing): Deliberate indifference to known sexual harassment or assault.
  • Sovereign Immunity: Public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) are often protected by sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist, especially for gross negligence, Title IX violations, or when suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity defenses.
• Third Parties:
  • Landlords/Property Owners: If the hazing occurred on private property, the owner might be liable for failing to maintain a safe environment.
  • Bars or Alcohol Vendors: Under Texas dram shop laws, establishments that provide alcohol to obviously intoxicated individuals or minors who then cause harm can be held responsible.
  • Security Companies or Event Organizers: If they failed to adequately ensure safety or intervene in dangerous situations.

Every case is fact-specific, and not every party is liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney understands how to identify all potential defendants and build a comprehensive case for accountability.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

The tragic stories of hazing victims nationwide have not only exposed the dark underbelly of campus culture but have also led to significant legal precedents, legislative reform, and multi-million-dollar settlements. For families in Floyd County, understanding these national patterns helps illustrate the serious legal landscape that exists for similar incidents in Texas. These cases demonstrate that accountability is possible, even against powerful institutions.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Excessive, forced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing fatalities. These cases often share common threads: pressure to consume dangerous amounts of liquor, a culture of silence, and a delayed or outright denied call for medical help.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after participating in a “bid acceptance” night filled with extreme alcohol consumption. Fraternity house security cameras famously captured him plummeting down stairs, suffering traumatic brain injuries, while members delayed calling for help for nearly 12 hours. The aftermath led to 18 fraternity members facing over 1,000 criminal counts, civil litigation against the fraternity and individuals, and the enactment of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, making severe hazing a felony. His case highlighted the extreme dangers of delayed medical care and the devastating consequences of a cover-up.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): During a “Big Brother Night,” 20-year-old Andrew Coffey was given a handle of hard liquor and forced to finish it, dying from acute alcohol poisoning. The incident triggered criminal hazing charges against multiple fraternity members and resulted in FSU temporarily suspending all Greek life. Coffey’s death underscored how formulaic, forced drinking “traditions” are dangerous scripts for disaster that repeat across chapters.

• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver died with a blood alcohol content of 0.495% after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to drink heavily if they answered questions incorrectly. His death spurred Louisiana to enact the Max Gruver Act, escalating hazing that causes serious injury or death to a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. The case demonstrated that legislative change often follows public outrage and clear proof of systemic hazing.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): On a pledge night referred to as “Big/Little,” 20-year-old Stone Foltz was coerced into drinking an entire bottle of whiskey, dying days later from alcohol poisoning. The incident resulted in multiple criminal convictions for fraternity members. Civilly, the Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement ($7 million from the national Pi Kappa Alpha organization and approximately $3 million from Bowling Green State University). This case powerfully demonstrated that universities can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities, and highlights that accountability can extend beyond the individuals directly involved.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and psychologically brutal rituals continue to claim lives and inflict severe injuries.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): During an off-campus retreat in the Pocono Mountains, Michael Deng, a pledge, was blindfolded, weighted down with a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled during a ritual known as “the glass ceiling.” He suffered fatal traumatic brain injuries, and fraternity members delayed calling 911 for hours, attempting to cover up the incident. Multiple members were convicted, and the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity itself was found guilty of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, subsequently banned from Pennsylvania for ten years. Deng’s case highlighted how off-campus “retreats” are often chosen specifically to evade university oversight, making them as dangerous or worse than on-campus events, and proved that national organizations can face criminal liability.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not confined to Greek life; it is a pervasive issue in high-stakes athletic programs, often disguised as “team building” or “toughening up.”

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): In 2023, former Northwestern University football players came forward with allegations of widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program spanning multiple years. The scandal led to the firing of long-time head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially. Multiple players filed lawsuits against the university and coaching staff, bringing significant public scrutiny and prompting a national conversation about hazing outside of Greek organizations. This case demonstrated unequivocally that hazing is not limited to fraternities; major athletic programs can harbor systemic abuse, highlighting questions of institutional oversight and accountability.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national stories, though from outside our state borders, resonate deeply for families in Floyd County and across Texas. They illustrate several critical truths:

• Common Threads of Tragedy: Many cases involve forced drinking, extreme physical or psychological humiliation, violence, and a deadly delay in or outright denial of medical care, often coupled with systematic cover-ups.
• Accountability Follows Litigation: While universities often promise internal reforms after incidents, meaningful change and multi-million-dollar settlements frequently occur only after tragedy strikes and determined families pursue litigation.
• Precedents for Texas Courts: The legal victories and legislative changes seen in these national cases establish powerful precedents. Texas families pursuing hazing claims at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor are operating within a legal landscape shaped by these hard-won lessons of accountability.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Floyd County residents, whose children attend or consider attending universities across the state, it’s essential to understand that hazing is a risk at any institution. While Floyd County itself does not host one of these major universities, families in communities like Lockney, Tulia, and Abernathy often seek higher education opportunities in larger cities. The legal system in Texas is designed to protect students no matter where in the state they encounter hazing. We will now examine the specific contexts of hazing at five of Texas’s prominent universities.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus, is a significant educational hub for many Texans. While Floyd County is some distance from Houston, many families from our region send their children to this diverse institution.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH is one of the largest public universities in Texas, with a bustling urban environment that blends commuter and residential student life. Its campus culture includes a thriving Greek life system, encompassing IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, and multicultural fraternities and sororities. Beyond Greek life, UH boasts a wide array of student organizations, including cultural groups, academic clubs, and sports teams, all of which fall under university oversight regarding student conduct.

5.1.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that prohibits hazing whether it occurs on-campus or off-campus. Their policy explicitly bans forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and mentally distressing activities as part of initiation or affiliation. UH provides clear reporting channels through the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the UH Police Department. They also release an annual Campus Safety Report, as mandated by the Clery Act, which includes certain disciplinary actions.

5.1.3 Example Incident & Response

One notable incident involved the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity chapter at UH in 2016. Pledges allegedly endured severe hazing, including being deprived of sufficient food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. The hazing reportedly culminated in one student suffering a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. The chapter faced criminal misdemeanor hazing charges and was permanently suspended by the university. Other disciplinary references at UH have highlighted patterns of behavior “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including alcohol misuse and policy violations leading to suspensions or probation for various Greek organizations.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case originating at UH for a student from Floyd County would typically involve multiple agencies. Depending on the location of the incident, the UH Police Department or the Houston Police Department would likely lead any criminal investigation. Civil lawsuits for severe injuries or wrongful death would be filed in the appropriate courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County, such as the District Courts. Potential defendants could include the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, potentially the University of Houston itself (subject to sovereign immunity considerations for public institutions), and potentially third-party property owners or alcohol providers. An attorney experienced in Houston-based hazing cases would know how to navigate this complex jurisdictional landscape.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For Floyd County families whose children attend UH, awareness and proactive measures are key:

• Understand UH’s reporting mechanisms: Familiarize yourself with how to report hazing to the Dean of Students, UHPD, or through any anonymous online forms.
• Document past incidents: If you learn of any prior complaints or incidents involving an organization, document them. This information can be crucial in establishing a pattern of negligence.
• Connect with local counsel: Speaking with a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can help uncover prior discipline and internal university files, which are often not publicly available but critical for building a strong case.
• Prioritize safety: If your child feels unsafe, encourage them to immediately remove themselves from the situation and seek assistance from a trusted adult or campus authority.
• Preserve evidence: As detailed in our “Immediate Help” section, digital evidence and medical records are paramount.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, boasting a rich history and strong traditions, is a popular choice for many students from Floyd County and across the Texas Panhandle. However, the culture of “tradition” at A&M also comes with unique hazing risks.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M in College Station is renowned for its spirit, deep-seated traditions, and the prominent Corps of Cadets—a military-style organization distinct from typical Greek life. This highly structured, tradition-heavy environment, coupled with a robust Greek system and numerous other student groups, creates a fertile ground where “tradition” can sometimes cross into dangerous hazing. Families from Floyd County often find their children drawn to A&M’s unique blend of academics and camaraderie.

5.2.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

Texas A&M has a zero-tolerance policy for hazing. Their Student Conduct Code clearly defines prohibited acts and provides clear channels for reporting to the Office of Student Conduct, the University Police Department (UPD), and specific reporting mechanisms within the Corps of Cadets. A&M, like other Texas universities, publishes annual hazing violation reports, though the level of detail can vary.

5.2.3 Example Incident & Response

Texas A&M has faced its share of concerning hazing allegations:

• In 2021, two pledges of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity chapter filed a lawsuit after allegedly being subjected to a brutal hazing ritual. They claimed they were forced to engage in strenuous activity while substances including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit were poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns that required extensive skin graft surgeries. The chapter was temporarily suspended by the university, and the lawsuit sought over $1 million in damages, highlighting the horrifying and insidious nature of physical and chemical hazing.
• In 2023, a Cadet within the Corps of Cadets also filed suit, alleging degrading hazing that included simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. While A&M stated they handled the matter under their rules, the case underscored the risks within even the university’s most traditional institutions.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a family in Floyd County whose child was hazed at Texas A&M, the legal process would likely involve investigations by the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) and potentially the College Station Police Department. Civil lawsuits would be filed in Brazos County District Courts. A substantial aspect of hazing cases at A&M often involves navigating not just Greek life issues, but also the unique cultural dynamics and disciplinary structures within the Corps of Cadets, which can present distinct challenges and potential defendants.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For families from Floyd County with Aggies:

• Question “tradition”: Understand that not all “traditions” are benign. If an activity makes your child uncomfortable or puts them at risk, it’s not true tradition—it’s hazing.
• Report internally AND externally: Utilize A&M’s reporting channels, but also contact an experienced hazing attorney.
• Focus on mental health: The pressures and trauma of hazing, particularly in high-demand environments like the Corps, can be severe. Prioritize psychological support and documentation.
• Preserve all evidence: Especially for incidents within the Corps or private fraternity/sorority houses, which are heavily influenced by a code of silence.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin, the flagship institution, attracts students from every corner of Texas, including Floyd County. UT has made strides in transparency regarding hazing, but incidents persist.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin is one of the largest and most prestigious public universities in the nation, known for its vibrant academic and social scene. It boasts a massive Greek life presence, numerous spirit organizations, and competitive athletic teams. While UT fosters a culture of free expression and academic rigor, it also contends with the pressures of large student organizations where hazing can take root.

5.3.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

UT Austin maintains a clear anti-hazing policy and provides multiple avenues for reporting hazing through the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct, and the UTPD. Crucially, UT is one of the more transparent universities in Texas, maintaining a public Hazing Violations page (hazing.utexas.edu) that lists organizations, dates of incidents, a summary of the conduct, and the resulting sanctions. This level of transparency is invaluable for parents and attorneys, as it often establishes a clear pattern of problematic behavior.

5.3.3 Example Incident & Response

UT Austin’s public Hazing Violations page lists numerous incidents. For instance:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023) was sanctioned after new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, actions clearly identified as hazing. The chapter was placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education.
• Other groups, including various spirit organizations like “Absolute Texxas,” have faced discipline for violations that included alcohol misuse, forced workouts, blindfolding, kidnapping, and verbally degrading new members.

UT’s public record is a double-edged sword: it highlights the university’s efforts to hold organizations accountable, but also proves that hazing is an ongoing, pervasive issue on campus.

5.3.4 How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed

For families from Floyd County affected by hazing at UT, investigations would likely involve the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD) or the Austin Police Department. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Travis County District Courts, which cover Austin. The presence of UT’s public log of hazing violations significantly strengthens civil cases, as it can demonstrate “foreseeability” and the university’s prior knowledge of problematic organizational behavior, even if still subject to sovereign immunity. An attorney well-versed in UT’s specific policies and history would be invaluable.

5.3.5 What UT Students & Parents Should Do

For students at UT Austin from Floyd County and their families:

• Utilize transparency: Actively review UT’s Hazing Violations page (hazing.utexas.edu) before joining any organization to understand its history.
• Document everything: Given UT’s record-keeping, any internal communications or evidence your child collects often complements existing university knowledge.
• Understand Austin jurisdiction: Be aware of how cases are handled in Austin and Travis County, and prioritize consultation with legal counsel who understands the local legal landscape.
• Reporting is critical: Leverage UTPD and the Dean of Students as formal reporting mechanisms, with the understanding that early legal intervention can significantly impact outcomes.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a private institution nestled in Dallas, is another prominent Texas school where families from Floyd County may send their children. While private, SMU also confronts hazing challenges within its Greek and other student organizations.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU is a private, well-regarded university with a reputation for a strong Greek life presence and an active social scene. Its private status means different rules and public disclosures for families in Floyd County than a public university. The affluent environment of SMU and its fraternities and sororities often comes with unspoken pressures and expectations that can lead to hazing.

5.4.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

SMU maintains clear anti-hazing policies, prohibiting any activity that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the SMU Police Department. SMU also utilizes campus safety platforms like “Real Response” to encourage anonymous reporting. As a private institution, SMU’s internal disciplinary records are generally not as publicly accessible as those of public universities like UT Austin, though the Stop Campus Hazing Act may change some of this in the coming years.

5.4.3 Example Incident & Response

One significant incident at SMU involved the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity chapter in 2017. New members were reportedly subjected to paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. The chapter was suspended by the university and faced significant restrictions on its activities and recruiting for several years. While SMU doesn’t maintain an easily searchable public database of all past violations as transparently as UT, this incident, and others that occur, highlight the ongoing challenges.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Floyd County family dealing with a hazing incident at SMU, investigations would typically involve the SMU Police Department and/or the Dallas Police Department. Civil lawsuits would be filed in Dallas County District Courts. As a private university, SMU does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially easier to sue the institution directly under standard negligence theories. However, the lack of public transparency regarding past hazing incidents means that an experienced attorney would need to use legal discovery tools (subpoenas, depositions) to uncover prior violations and internal records.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For students from Floyd County attending SMU and their parents:

• Document rigorously: Given SMU’s status as a private institution, gathering every piece of personal evidence (screenshots, photos, medical records) is even more crucial, as internal records may be harder to access initially.
• Seek full disclosure: Ask direct questions about past hazing issues if considering joining an organization, and note any evasiveness.
• Understand Dallas jurisdiction: Familiarize yourself with how the legal system operates in Dallas and Dallas County.
• Prioritize independent legal advice: Do not rely solely on SMU’s internal processes, as they may prioritize institutional reputation. Independent legal counsel can safeguard your child’s rights.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Christian university in Waco, holds a unique place in Texas higher education. While historically facing scrutiny over issues like athletic scandals and Title IX violations, hazing remains a concern for students from Floyd County and other communities.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University cultivates a distinct Christian identity, emphasizing character and academic excellence. Its campus culture includes a significant Greek life presence (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, and multicultural groups), along with fiercely competitive athletic programs. Baylor’s history of managing high-profile misconduct, particularly surrounding its football program and Title IX issues, influences its approach to student safety and accountability, including hazing.

5.5.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

Baylor maintains a clear “zero-tolerance” policy regarding hazing. Their Student Conduct Code explicitly prohibits any acts that cause or are likely to cause physical or mental discomfort, humiliation, or injury. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students office, the Baylor Police Department, and various online reporting forms. Baylor also publishes an annual report on hazing incidents as required by the state.

5.5.3 Example Incident & Response

Baylor has encountered hazing issues across different organizations:

• In 2020, 14 players from the Baylor baseball team were suspended following an investigation into hazing allegations. The university implemented staggered suspensions over the early season, impacting the team’s performance. This highlighted that, despite prior scandals concerning accountability, university athletic programs remain susceptible to hazing.
• While specific Greek life hazing incidents may not always gain widespread public attention at Baylor, the disciplinary actions that occur reflect ongoing vigilance.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Floyd County family affected by hazing at Baylor, investigations would likely involve the Baylor Police Department and/or the Waco Police Department. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in McLennan County District Courts, which cover Waco. As a private institution, Baylor does not have sovereign immunity, making it a potential direct defendant in negligence lawsuits related to hazing. Given its past high-profile legal challenges, Baylor typically engages experienced legal counsel to defend against such claims.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For students from Floyd County and their families at Baylor:

• Scrutinize “Brotherhood/Sisterhood”: Be wary of calls for unconditional loyalty that might precede dangerous activities. True brotherhood or sisterhood should not require physical or emotional harm.
• Understand Baylor’s history: Be aware of how Baylor has handled past accountability challenges, as this may inform their response to new hazing allegations.
• Seek external counsel: Given Baylor’s internal legal resources, obtaining external legal advice from an attorney experienced in Waco/McLennan County cases is crucial to ensure your child’s rights are protected.
• Document disciplinary gaps: If you perceive a discrepancy between Baylor’s stated “zero tolerance” policy and the actual response to an incident, document it thoroughly, as this can be relevant in a civil lawsuit.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

The Greek system, for all its positive aspects, often serves as a significant hotbed for hazing. For families in Floyd County, it’s vital to recognize that the behavior of a local chapter at a Texas university often mirrors patterns seen across the nation, driven by the culture (or lack thereof) of the national organization.

Why National Histories Matter

When a student from Floyd County faces hazing at a Texas university, it is rarely an isolated incident unique to that chapter. Many fraternities and sororities with chapters at institutions like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, including prominent names like Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi, and Kappa Alpha Order, are part of vast national organizations. These national headquarters:

• Develop thick anti-hazing manuals and implement risk management policies, often because they have a documented history of severe injuries and fatalities at their chapters nationwide.
• Possess internal knowledge of recurring dangerous patterns: Big/Little forced drinking nights, “initiation” paddling traditions, and psychologically brutal rituals.

When a local chapter in Texas repeats the same dangerous scripts that led to another chapter being shut down or sued in a different state, that behavior is not “unforeseeable.” Instead, it strongly suggests foreseeability and provides compelling evidence to support negligence or even punitive damages arguments against the national entity, as they had prior notice of the risks.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

Let’s look at some examples of fraternities with significant national hazing histories, many of which have chapters on Texas campuses:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has been involved in multiple tragic hazing incidents. The Stone Foltz case at Bowling Green State University (BGSU) in 2021, where Foltz died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume a bottle of whiskey, led to multiple criminal convictions and a $10 million settlement. Another notable case involved David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University in 2012, dying from alcohol poisoning during a pledge event, resulting in a $14 million settlement. These cases clearly illustrate a pattern of dangerous alcohol-related hazing within Pike, a fraternity with active chapters at UT Austin, UH, and Baylor.

• Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): The death of Timothy Piazza at Penn State in 2017 is one of the most high-profile hazing cases in U.S. history. Piazza died from injuries suffered during an extreme alcohol hazing event, exacerbated by a catastrophic delay in seeking medical help. The incident led to criminal charges against numerous members and major legislative reforms. Beta Theta Pi chapters are present at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor.

• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity was implicated in the death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017, due to a forced alcohol “Bible study” game. Gruver’s death led to Louisiana’s felony hazing statute, the Max Gruver Act. Phi Delta Theta has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor.

• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): The death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017 from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” revealed another tragic pattern. Pi Kappa Phi maintains chapters at UH and Texas A&M.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE has a long and troubling national history of hazing. In 2014, the national organization even attempted to eliminate its pledge process nationwide due to a pattern of deaths. More recently:

  • University of Alabama (2023): A lawsuit was filed alleging a pledge suffered a traumatic brain injury during a hazing ritual.
  • Texas A&M University (2021): Pledges alleged severe chemical burns from industrial-strength cleaner poured on them, requiring extensive skin grafts, leading to a $1 million lawsuit.
  • University of Texas at Austin (2024): An Australian exchange student sued for over $1 million after allegedly being assaulted by fraternity members at a party, sustaining severe injuries including a dislocated leg and multiple fractures, at a chapter already under suspension for prior hazing.
    SAE has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and SMU, and these incidents demonstrate a dangerous pattern of physical and chemical hazing alongside general misconduct.

• Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): The catastrophic brain injury suffered by Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri in 2021, rendering him permanently disabled and requiring 24/7 care after forced alcohol consumption, resulted in multi-million-dollar settlements with 22 defendants, including the national fraternity. Phi Gamma Delta has a chapter at Texas A&M.

• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): This fraternity has a documented history of severe hazing. The Chad Meredith drowning death at the University of Miami in 2001, after being pressured by fraternity members to swim across a lake while intoxicated, resulted in a $12.6 million jury verdict for his parents and a law named in his honor. At Texas A&M University (2023), allegations emerged of hazing resulting in severe rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown) requiring specialized medical intervention. Kappa Sigma has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor.

• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): In 2024, a family received more than $10 million in damages in a lawsuit against a Sigma Chi chapter at the College of Charleston, alleging physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment. Sigma Chi has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor.

This is a synthesized overview, not an exhaustive list. Many chapters and organizations at all five Texas universities have been implicated in hazing or other misconduct, some of which are documented on university disciplinary pages.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

These patterns across states and campuses are not mere coincidences. They serve as critical evidence in civil lawsuits:

• They demonstrate that certain organizations or specific hazing methods had given repeated warnings to national headquarters.
• Courts can examine whether national organizations: (1) meaningfully enforced their anti-hazing policies, (2) aggressively responded to prior incidents with sufficient penalties, or (3) simply provided “paper policies” without true institutional commitment to prevention.
• This historical context significantly affects: (1) settlement leverage for victims and families, (2) the ability to navigate insurance coverage disputes (as insurers often try to deny coverage for “intentional” acts), and (3) the potential for punitive damages against responsible parties, aiming to punish egregious conduct and deter future harm.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

When hazing leaves a family from Floyd County reeling, transforming trauma into accountability requires a sophisticated and thorough legal strategy. Building a compelling hazing case demands meticulous evidence collection, a clear understanding of potential damages, and an adept legal team capable of navigating complex institutional defenses.

Evidence: The Foundation of Any Case

In modern hazing cases, every piece of information, no matter how small, can be crucial. The burden of proof rests on the plaintiff, so comprehensive documentation is paramount.

• Digital Communications: In 2025, digital evidence is often the single most critical component. This includes:

  • GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and other messaging apps: Screenshots are vital. They show who said what, when, to whom, and within what context. Deleted messages can often be recovered through digital forensic experts.
  • Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and other social media: Direct messages, stories, posts, comments. Content filmed by members during events and shared in private chats or even publicly is powerful. Even seemingly innocent “challenges” can be evidence.
  • Our video, “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs), provides practical advice on how to properly collect and preserve this evidence.

• Photos & Videos: Beyond what is shared digitally, physical images and recordings are invaluable:

  • Physical injuries: Immediate, multiple-angle photographs of bruises, burns, cuts, or other trauma, ideally with a ruler or coin for scale, and then again over several days to show progression (bruises often worsen before healing).
  • Locations and objects: Photos of the house, room, or venue where hazing occurred, including any visible alcohol, paddles, or props.
  • Surveillance footage: Security camera footage from houses, venues, or even doorbell cameras, especially if the event was off-campus.

• Internal Organization Documents: These provide insight into the hazing culture:

  • Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, or “traditions” lists: These can outline approved (or ostensibly disapproved) rituals.
  • Emails or texts from officers: Communications discussing “what we’ll do to pledges” or organizing specific hazing events.
  • National policies and training materials: These show what the national organization ostensibly knows and prohibits, which can be critical when compared to local chapter actions.

• University Records: These are key to determining institutional knowledge and response:

  • Prior conduct files: Records of previous hazing violations, probation, or suspensions for the same organization or individuals.
  • Incident reports: Any reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices.
  • Clery Act reports: Annual safety statistics that may include relevant crime categories.
  • Title IX complaints: If the hazing had a sexual harassment component.

• Medical and Psychological Records: Documenting the harm is essential:

  • Emergency room and hospitalization records: For immediate treatment.
  • Surgery and rehabilitation notes: For physical recovery.
  • Toxicology reports: To confirm alcohol or drug use.
  • Psychological evaluations: Diagnoses of PTSD, depression, anxiety, or documentation of trauma, crucial for non-economic damages.

• Witness Testimony: Often the human heart of a case:

  • Other pledges or current members: While often fearful, their testimony can be compelling.
  • Roommates, friends, or RAs: Those who observed changes in the victim.
  • Former members: Individuals who quit or were expelled may be willing to speak out.
  • Emergency responders: Paramedics or hospital staff who saw the immediate aftermath.

Damages: Calculating the True Cost of Hazing

Civil lawsuits aim to compensate victims and their families for the full spectrum of harm caused by hazing. These are categorized into economic and non-economic damages.

• Economic Damages (Quantifiable Financial Losses):

  • Medical Bills & Future Care: Covering emergency care, hospitalization, surgeries, ongoing physical therapy, medications, and long-term care plans for catastrophic injuries like brain damage.
  • Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: Compensation for missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed entry into the workforce, and reduced earning capacity if injuries lead to permanent disability or an inability to pursue previous career paths.
  • Other Losses: This can include property damage personal belongings damaged during hazing, or the costs of transferring schools.

• Non-Economic Damages (Subjective, Yet Legally Compensable):

  • Physical Pain & Suffering: Compensation for the physical agony endured, both immediate and ongoing.
  • Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm: This includes diagnosed conditions like PTSD, severe anxiety, depression, and the profound trauma, humiliation, and loss of dignity experienced.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: An inability to participate in beloved hobbies, sports, or social activities, and a diminished quality of life.

• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): If hazing results in death, surviving family members (parents, spouses, children) can recover for:

  • Funeral and burial costs.
  • Loss of financial support the deceased would have provided.
  • Loss of companionship, love, and society, recognizing the profound emotional void left by their passing.
  • Grief and emotional suffering endured by family members.

While we are describing types of damages, we make no promises or predictions about specific dollar amounts. The value of a case depends on many factors. Attorney911 has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic cases.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing cases are frequently complicated by the involvement of multiple defendants, each with their own legal and financial interests. National fraternities and universities, in particular, often carry extensive insurance policies designed to protect them from liability.

However, insurers frequently argue that hazing or “intentional acts” are explicitly excluded from coverage, or they may deny that their policy covers certain defendants. This is where the expertise of a seasoned hazing lawyer becomes critical:

• We identify all potential coverage sources, including general liability policies, D&O policies, and even homeowners’ policies of individual perpetrators.
• We strategically navigate disputes about policy exclusions and intentional conduct, often demonstrating that even if the hazing was intentional, the failure to supervise or prevent it was negligent and therefore covered.
• Attorney Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is a distinct advantage here. She understands the tactics used by large insurance companies to delay, devalue, and deny claims, allowing us to anticipate their moves and fight more effectively for our clients.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing strikes, families in Floyd County need actionable, clear advice. This section provides immediate guidance for parents, students, and even former members and witnesses, equipping them with the knowledge to respond effectively and safeguard their rights.

8.1 For Parents

For parents in Floyd County, recognizing the signs of hazing and knowing how to respond can be life-saving.

• Warning Signs of Hazing:

  • Unexplained injuries: Look for bruises, burns, or cuts your child can’t (or won’t) explain, or “accidents” that don’t add up.
  • Sudden exhaustion: Extreme sleep deprivation and constant fatigue, far beyond normal academic stress.
  • Drastic mood changes: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, or social withdrawal.
  • Secrecy: An unwillingness to discuss their organization’s activities, often with phrases like “I can’t talk about it.”
  • Constant phone use: Anxiety about missing group chat messages or urgent calls, feeling “on call” 24/7.
  • Demeaning talk: Referring to themselves or others in a derogatory way (“pledge scum”).

• How to Talk to Your Child:

  • Ask open-ended questions: “How are things really going?” “Is anything making you uncomfortable?”
  • Listen without judgment: If they open up, prioritize their feelings and safety over anger or blame.
  • Emphasize safety over status: Reassure them that their well-being is more important than fitting into a group.
  • Reiterate your support: Let them know you’re there for them, no matter what they’ve experienced or need to do.

• If Your Child is Hurt:

  • Get immediate medical care: This is the top priority. Insist they go to the ER, campus health services, or an urgent care clinic.
  • Document everything: Take photos of injuries, screenshot any relevant text messages, group chats, or social media posts, and write down everything your child tells you about the incident, including dates, times, and names.
  • Save names and locations: Collect as much information as possible about who was involved, where the incident occurred, and any witnesses.

• Dealing with the University:

  • Document every communication: Keep a detailed log of all calls, emails, and meetings with university administrators.
  • Ask specific questions: Inquire about prior incidents involving the same organization and what disciplinary actions, if any, the school took. Transparency reports, like UT Austin’s, can be very helpful here (hazing.utexas.edu).

• When to Talk to a Lawyer:

  • If your child has significant physical or psychological harm.
  • If you feel the university or organization is minimizing or hiding what happened.
  • If you are being pressured to sign documents or make statements.
  • Immediately, to preserve evidence and understand your rights.

8.2 For Students / Pledges

To students in Floyd County who are currently pledging or newly initiating, your safety and well-being are paramount.

• Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?

  • Ask yourself: Am I being forced or pressured? Would I do this if I had a real choice? Is this activity dangerous, degrading, or illegal? Would the university or my parents approve if they knew? Are older members making new members do things they don’t have to do? Am I being told to keep secrets? If you answer yes to any of these, it’s likely hazing.
  • If you are being made to feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced; if you’re forced to drink or endure pain; if the activity is hidden from the public or administrators — it is hazing.

• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story:

  • The law recognizes that “consent” given under peer pressure, a power imbalance, fear of exclusion, or intoxication is often not true, voluntary consent. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing charges. You have rights, regardless of whether you initially “agreed” to participate.

• Exiting and Reporting Safely:

  • Safety First: If you are in immediate danger, call 911. Get to a safe place (your dorm, a friend’s apartment, a public area). You will not get in trouble for calling for help for a medical emergency (thanks to good-faith reporter protections in Texas and many university policies).
  • How to Leave: You have the legal right to de-pledge or resign at any time. If you fear confrontation, communicate your resignation via email or text to a chapter officer, stating it is effective immediately. Do not agree to “one last meeting” where you may be pressured or revictimized.
  • Reporting: You can report privately or anonymously through campus channels (Dean of Students, Title IX Coordinator, UTPD/campus police), or through national anonymous tip lines like 1-888-NOT-HAZE.

• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty:

  • Texas law offers immunity to individuals who report hazing in good faith. Many universities also have medical amnesty policies that protect students who call for help in an emergency, even if they were consuming alcohol underage. These protections are designed to save lives, not to get students in trouble.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once involved in hazing, whether as a participant or an observer, and now carry guilt or regret, your willingness to speak out can be incredibly powerful.

• Your Role in Prevention: Your testimony and evidence could be instrumental in preventing future harm and saving lives. You have the opportunity to turn a negative experience into meaningful accountability.
• Navigating Legal Exposure: While cooperating can lead to accountability for others, you may also have questions about your own legal exposure. It’s advisable to seek independent legal advice to understand your rights and potential protections. Lawyers can help you navigate your role as a witness or even if you face criminal charges related to the hazing. Your cooperation can significantly impact civil cases, helping victims get justice and institutions implement real change.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

As Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we have seen families from Floyd County and across Texas unwittingly undermine their hazing cases. Avoid these critical errors:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.

   • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This can be perceived as an active cover-up, hindering an investigation and making a case nearly impossible to build.
   • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content. Our video, “Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY), further details these pitfalls.

2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly.

   • What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This prompts them to immediately engage legal counsel, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare defenses.
   • What to do instead: Document everything privately, then call a lawyer before any confrontation.

3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms.

   • What universities do: They often pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue a civil lawsuit, and settlements offered by universities directly are often far below the case’s true value.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything without an attorney reviewing it first.

4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer.

   • What families think: “I want people to know what happened.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys screenshot everything; inconsistencies in public statements can severely harm credibility, and you might accidentally waive legal protections.
   • What to do instead: Document privately. Let your lawyer control public communication.

5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting.”

   • What fraternities say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic.”
   • Why it’s wrong: They will likely pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can be used against your child in a future legal proceeding.
   • What to do instead: Once you’re considering legal action, all communication should go through your lawyer.

6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it.”

   • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, the statute of limitations runs out, and the university often controls the narrative to protect its own interests, not necessarily your child’s.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW. Consult a lawyer immediately. The university’s internal process rarely translates to real accountability or just compensation.

7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer.

   • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Recorded statements are designed to be used against you, and adjusters are trained to secure the lowest possible settlement.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline and state, “My attorney will contact you.”

8.5 Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on specific facts—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default, but it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals, including officers of the organization, can also face charges for failing to report hazing.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing prosecution. Courts and juries increasingly recognize that “consent” under severe peer pressure, power imbalances, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas?”
  Generally, you have 2 years from the date of injury or death to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this period if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to protect your claim. Our video, “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c), provides further information.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held responsible based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and the foreseeability of hazing occurring off-campus. Many major hazing cases that resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments occurred at off-campus houses or private retreats.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  Most hazing cases settle confidentially before going to trial. We prioritize your family’s privacy and can request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. Our aim is to achieve accountability and compensation while protecting your family’s well-being.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing incident, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. This is precisely what The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, offers families in Floyd County and across Texas.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Floyd County and surrounding communities like Plainview, Tulia, and Lockney. We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects communities far beyond campus borders, impacting families in rural and urban areas alike.

We introduce Attorney911’s unique qualifications for navigating the complexities of hazing cases:

• Insurance Insider Advantage (Lupe Peña): Attorney Lupe Peña, a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm, possesses invaluable insider knowledge. She understands exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims, anticipates their delay tactics, dissects coverage exclusion arguments, and counters their settlement strategies. We know their playbook because we used to run it. Her complete credentials are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.

• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions (Ralph Manginello): Managing Partner Ralph Manginello brings unparalleled experience fighting against powerful defendants. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the historic BP Texas City explosion litigation, demonstrating his capability for complex federal court cases (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas). We are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their formidable defense teams; we’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.

• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases, working with economists to value profound loss and supporting families through unimaginable tragedy. We build cases that force accountability and don’t settle cheap.

• Dual Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides critical insight into how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. When hazing results in criminal incidents, Attorney911’s criminal defense experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) means we can advise on both criminal exposure and civil liability, offering comprehensive support, including for witnesses and former members who may face dual exposure.

• Unmatched Investigative Depth: We investigate hazing cases with the intensity and precision your situation demands. This includes leveraging a network of expert witnesses (medical professionals, digital forensic specialists, economists, psychologists), and possessing the skill to obtain often-hidden evidence like deleted group chats, social media records, chapter documents, and university files through aggressive discovery and public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments operate behind closed doors, and we know how to expose modern hazing. We balance victim privacy with the pursuit of meaningful public accountability. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face, and our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family.

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s UT Austin, Texas A&M, UH, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Floyd County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

What to expect in your free consultation:

• We’ll listen to your story without judgment.
• We’ll review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
• We’ll explain your legal options, discussing whether a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or neither is appropriate for your situation.
• We’ll discuss realistic timelines and what you can expect during the legal process.
• We’ll answer your questions about costs, as we work on a contingency fee basis – we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Our video, “How Do Contingency Fees Work?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc), explains this further.
• There is no pressure to hire us on the spot – you’ll have time to decide the best course of action for your family.
• Everything you tell us is confidential.

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Floyd County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com