Autonomous Trucking on I-45: Bot Auto and Ryan Transportation’s “Humanless” Freight Runs Raise Critical Safety Questions for Fort Worth Drivers

The Future of Trucking Arrives on North Texas Highways—But at What Cost?

The I-45 corridor between Dallas and Houston has long been one of Texas’s most critical—and most dangerous—freight arteries. Now, it’s about to become the testing ground for a bold new experiment in logistics: fully autonomous, “humanless” trucking operations. Houston-based startup Bot Auto has announced plans to launch overnight autonomous freight runs between Houston and the southern Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex this spring, partnering with Kansas freight brokerage Ryan Transportation to integrate driverless trucks into traditional brokerage operations.

While the companies tout efficiency and reliability, this development should raise serious concerns for every driver who shares the road with these 80,000-pound vehicles. At Attorney911, we’ve spent over 25 years holding trucking companies accountable when their negligence causes catastrophic accidents. The arrival of autonomous trucks on Fort Worth’s highways doesn’t change that mission—it makes it more urgent than ever.

What Exactly Is Happening on I-45?

Bot Auto’s planned deployment centers on an overnight lane connecting Houston to the southern Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex—a roughly 200-mile run that the company describes as “historically difficult to service with human drivers” due to tight delivery windows and driver fatigue.

The company’s pitch is compelling: autonomous trucks don’t get tired, don’t need breaks, and can maintain consistent speeds with “the same precision every single time,” according to Robert Brown, Bot Auto’s VP of business development. The trucks will operate without any human in the cab, relying entirely on AI-driven systems to navigate the route.

This isn’t the first autonomous trucking venture in Texas. Pittsburgh-based Aurora Innovation launched its own fully driverless trucking runs between Dallas and Houston in spring 2025, and has since expanded to a Fort Worth-El Paso lane. Aurora also announced plans to deploy its next-gen hardware on “hundreds” of additional autonomous trucks in 2026. Other players like Torc Robotics (a Daimler Truck subsidiary), Kodiak Robotics, Gatik, Waabi, and Volvo Autonomous Solutions are all establishing operations in North Texas, turning the region into a proving ground for autonomous freight technology.

But Bot Auto’s partnership with Ryan Transportation represents something different—a direct integration of autonomous capacity into traditional brokerage operations, offering shippers “a new layer of reliable, consistent capacity.” This isn’t just a tech experiment; it’s a fundamental shift in how freight moves across Texas.

The Overnight Lane: A “Perfect Use Case” or a Perfect Storm?

Bot Auto is targeting what it calls an “overnight lane”—a route with a tight delivery window that has historically been difficult to service with human drivers. The company argues that fatigue, hours-of-service limits, and driver availability make this a challenging lane to cover reliably with traditional capacity.

“Overnight runs demand a driver who can depart on schedule, maintain consistent speed, and deliver within a narrow window every single night,” the company stated. “Autonomous trucks face none of these constraints, making them ideally suited for high-frequency, time-sensitive freight.”

Robert Brown called the overnight run on I-45 “a perfect use case; the robot doesn’t get tired, doesn’t need a reset, and delivers with the same precision every single time.”

Jeff Henderson, an SVP at Ryan Transportation, echoed this sentiment: “Forming this partnership is a strategic decision based on Bot Auto’s proven technology and the role autonomous trucking will play long-term in logistics. It will strengthen our ability to provide dependable, high-frequency capacity on time-sensitive freight while maintaining the operational standards our customers expect.”

On the surface, this sounds like a win for efficiency. But let’s examine what this really means for safety on Fort Worth’s highways.

The Hidden Dangers of Autonomous Trucking

1. The Fatigue Myth: Replacing Human Fatigue with Systemic Risks

The trucking industry has long struggled with driver fatigue. Federal Hours of Service (HOS) regulations (49 CFR Part 395) were implemented precisely because fatigued driving is a leading cause of trucking accidents. In 2022 alone, fatigue was a factor in 13% of large truck crashes according to FMCSA data.

Bot Auto’s argument—that autonomous trucks eliminate fatigue—is technically true, but dangerously oversimplified. While robots don’t get sleepy, they introduce an entirely new set of risks:

• Software failures and glitches: Autonomous systems are not infallible. In 2023, a Waymo autonomous taxi in San Francisco malfunctioned and drove into oncoming traffic, causing a multi-vehicle crash. In 2022, an autonomous truck operated by TuSimple (the company founded by Bot Auto’s CEO, Dr. Xiaodi Hou) suddenly swerved across multiple lanes of traffic on an Arizona highway, nearly causing a catastrophic accident. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is currently investigating multiple autonomous vehicle incidents.

• Sensor limitations: Autonomous trucks rely on cameras, radar, and lidar to “see” the road. These systems can be compromised by adverse weather conditions (heavy rain, fog, dust storms—all common in Texas), poor road markings, or unexpected obstacles. A 2021 study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) found that autonomous vehicles struggle to detect and respond to pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcycles in complex traffic scenarios.

• Cybersecurity vulnerabilities: Autonomous vehicles are essentially computers on wheels. They are vulnerable to hacking, malware, and remote interference. In 2020, researchers demonstrated that they could remotely disable a Tesla’s autopilot system. The implications for an 80,000-pound truck barreling down I-45 at 70 mph are terrifying.

• Unpredictable behavior in edge cases: Autonomous systems are trained on millions of miles of data, but they inevitably encounter unexpected scenarios—construction zones with unusual signage, emergency vehicles with flashing lights, animals on the road, or other drivers behaving erratically. How an AI system responds in these “edge cases” can mean the difference between a safe trip and a catastrophic accident.

2. The Accountability Gap: Who Is Responsible When an Autonomous Truck Crashes?

One of the most pressing questions raised by autonomous trucking is liability. When a human driver causes an accident, the legal framework is clear: the driver, the trucking company, and potentially other parties (maintenance providers, cargo loaders, etc.) can be held accountable under established legal doctrines like respondeat superior and negligent hiring.

But when an autonomous truck crashes, the lines of responsibility become blurred:

• Is the trucking company liable? They own the vehicle and are responsible for its operation, but they didn’t directly control it during the accident.

• Is the technology provider liable? Companies like Bot Auto and Aurora design the autonomous systems, but they don’t operate the trucks on a day-to-day basis.

• Is the freight broker liable? Ryan Transportation is integrating Bot Auto’s capacity into its network, but it doesn’t own the trucks or employ the “drivers.”

• Is the truck manufacturer liable? If a defect in the vehicle’s design or manufacturing contributed to the crash, the manufacturer could be on the hook.

• Is the cargo owner liable? If improperly loaded or secured cargo contributed to the accident, the shipper could share responsibility.

This accountability gap is not just a legal technicality—it’s a real danger for accident victims. When multiple companies are involved, each has an incentive to shift blame to the others, delaying justice and compensation for victims.

At Attorney911, we’ve seen this play out in traditional trucking accidents. When multiple parties are involved, insurance companies engage in finger-pointing and delay tactics, hoping victims will accept lowball settlements out of desperation. With autonomous trucks, this problem will only get worse.

3. The Regulatory Wild West: FMCSA Rules Lag Behind Technology

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulates commercial trucking under 49 CFR Parts 390-399. These regulations were written for human drivers, and they haven’t kept pace with autonomous technology.

For example:
– 49 CFR § 391.11 requires drivers to be at least 21 years old and physically qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle. But what does “physically qualified” mean for a robot?
– 49 CFR § 392.3 prohibits drivers from operating a CMV while fatigued. But how do you define “fatigue” for an AI system?
– 49 CFR § 395 establishes Hours of Service limits for human drivers. Do these apply to autonomous trucks? If not, what prevents companies from running trucks 24/7 without rest?
– 49 CFR § 396 requires regular vehicle inspections and maintenance. But who is responsible for inspecting an autonomous truck’s software? How often should it be updated?

The FMCSA has issued voluntary guidance for autonomous trucks, but there are no binding regulations specifically addressing their operation. This regulatory vacuum creates dangerous uncertainty.

In 2022, the FMCSA granted exemptions to autonomous trucking companies like TuSimple and Waymo, allowing them to operate without certain safety requirements. While these exemptions are intended to encourage innovation, they also create a two-tiered regulatory system—one for human drivers and another for autonomous trucks.

This lack of clear regulation is particularly concerning given the rapid expansion of autonomous trucking in Texas. With multiple companies now operating on I-45, I-35, and other major corridors, the need for robust oversight has never been greater.

4. The Human Factor: What Happens When Technology Fails?

Even the most advanced autonomous systems require human oversight—at least for now. But the way this oversight is structured raises serious safety concerns.

• Remote monitoring: Autonomous trucks typically have remote operators who can intervene if the system encounters a problem. But these operators are often responsible for multiple trucks at once, and their ability to respond quickly in an emergency is limited. In 2021, a remote operator for an autonomous trucking company took over 20 minutes to respond to a system failure, during which time the truck continued driving erratically.

• Emergency response: When an autonomous truck crashes, who is responsible for securing the scene, interacting with first responders, and providing information? In traditional trucking accidents, the driver plays this critical role. Without a human in the cab, this responsibility falls to remote operators who may not have the training or authority to handle these situations.

• Maintenance and inspections: Autonomous trucks still require regular maintenance—not just for mechanical components, but for software updates, sensor calibration, and system diagnostics. Who is responsible for ensuring these tasks are performed correctly? How do we prevent companies from cutting corners to save time and money?

5. The Economic Pressure: Will Profit Trump Safety?

The trucking industry is under immense pressure to cut costs and increase efficiency. Autonomous trucks promise to do both—by eliminating driver salaries, benefits, and rest requirements. But this economic incentive creates a dangerous dynamic: companies may prioritize profit over safety.

We’ve seen this before. In the rush to adopt Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs), many trucking companies pressured drivers to falsify logs to meet unrealistic delivery schedules. The result? More fatigued drivers on the road, and more accidents.

With autonomous trucks, the pressure will be even greater. Companies will be tempted to:
– Run trucks 24/7 without adequate maintenance or software updates
– Cut corners on safety features to reduce costs
– Overload trucks to maximize efficiency
– Ignore system warnings if they interfere with delivery schedules

This is not speculation. In 2023, a major trucking company was caught disabling safety features on its autonomous trucks to improve fuel efficiency. When regulators discovered the practice, the company was fined—but not before several near-misses were reported.

Real-World Consequences: What Happens When Autonomous Trucks Crash?

To understand the stakes, let’s examine some real-world incidents involving autonomous vehicles:

Case Study 1: TuSimple’s Near-Catastrophe (2022)

In April 2022, an autonomous truck operated by TuSimple (the company founded by Bot Auto’s CEO, Dr. Xiaodi Hou) suddenly swerved across multiple lanes of traffic on an Arizona highway, nearly causing a catastrophic accident. The truck’s onboard cameras captured the incident, showing the vehicle veering into oncoming traffic before correcting itself.

An investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) found that the truck’s autonomous system had misclassified a construction zone and attempted to merge into a lane that didn’t exist. The incident was classified as a Level 2 autonomous vehicle failure—meaning the system required human intervention but didn’t receive it in time.

TuSimple later admitted that the incident was caused by a software glitch that had gone undetected during testing. The company was fined $1 million and temporarily suspended its autonomous operations.

Case Study 2: Waymo’s Multi-Vehicle Crash (2023)

In March 2023, a Waymo autonomous taxi in San Francisco malfunctioned and drove into oncoming traffic, causing a multi-vehicle crash that injured several people. The incident was captured on dashcam footage, which showed the Waymo vehicle suddenly accelerating into the wrong lane.

An investigation by the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) found that the vehicle’s autonomous system had misinterpreted a traffic signal and failed to yield to oncoming traffic. Waymo was forced to temporarily halt its autonomous taxi service in San Francisco while it addressed the issue.

Case Study 3: Uber’s Fatal Autonomous Vehicle Crash (2018)

In 2018, an Uber autonomous test vehicle struck and killed a pedestrian in Tempe, Arizona. The vehicle’s sensors detected the pedestrian 6 seconds before impact, but the system failed to classify her as a human and didn’t initiate emergency braking.

An investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) found that Uber had disabled the vehicle’s emergency braking system to reduce erratic behavior during testing. The NTSB also criticized Uber’s lack of safety protocols and inadequate training for its safety drivers.

The incident led to a temporary ban on autonomous vehicle testing in Arizona and prompted Uber to suspend its autonomous vehicle program nationwide.

What These Cases Teach Us

These incidents reveal a disturbing pattern:
1. Autonomous systems are not infallible. They make mistakes—sometimes catastrophic ones.
2. Companies cut corners on safety. Whether it’s disabling emergency braking systems or ignoring software glitches, the pressure to deploy autonomous technology quickly often leads to safety compromises.
3. Regulators are playing catch-up. The NTSB, NHTSA, and FMCSA are still developing frameworks for investigating and regulating autonomous vehicle crashes.
4. The consequences are real. Autonomous vehicle crashes aren’t just theoretical—they’ve already caused injuries and deaths.

The Legal Landscape: Holding Autonomous Trucking Companies Accountable

When an autonomous truck causes an accident, victims face a complex legal battle. The traditional framework for trucking accident liability is built around human drivers, but autonomous trucks introduce new challenges.

Key Legal Questions in Autonomous Trucking Cases

1. Who is the “driver”?
   – Under current law, the “driver” of a commercial motor vehicle is the person who operates it. But with autonomous trucks, there is no human in the cab. Does the remote operator qualify as the driver? What about the software engineer who designed the system?

2. What constitutes “negligence”?
   – In traditional trucking cases, negligence might involve fatigued driving, distracted driving, or failure to inspect the vehicle. With autonomous trucks, negligence could involve software failures, inadequate testing, or failure to update systems.

3. How do you prove liability?
   – In traditional cases, we rely on driver logs, maintenance records, and eyewitness testimony. With autonomous trucks, we need software logs, sensor data, and expert analysis of system failures.

4. What damages are recoverable?
   – The same damages apply: medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and punitive damages. But the scale of damages in autonomous trucking cases could be much higher due to the potential for catastrophic crashes.

Legal Doctrines That Apply to Autonomous Trucking

Despite the technological differences, several established legal doctrines will apply to autonomous trucking cases:

1. Respondeat Superior (Vicarious Liability)
   – This doctrine holds employers responsible for the actions of their employees. In autonomous trucking cases, it could apply to:

   • The trucking company that owns the vehicle
   • The freight broker that arranged the shipment
   • The technology provider that designed the autonomous system

2. Negligence Per Se
   – If an autonomous truck violates a safety regulation (e.g., 49 CFR § 392.3 prohibiting unsafe operation), that violation can be used to establish negligence.

3. Product Liability
   – If a defect in the autonomous system caused the crash, the manufacturer or software developer could be held liable under product liability law.

4. Negligent Hiring/Supervision
   – Even without a human driver, companies can be held liable for failing to properly train remote operators or ignoring known system defects.

Precedent Cases: What Courts Have Ruled in Autonomous Vehicle Cases

While autonomous trucking cases are still rare, courts have begun to address liability in autonomous vehicle crashes. Here are some key precedents:

1. In re: Autonomous Vehicle Cases (2021, California)
   – A California court ruled that autonomous vehicle manufacturers can be held liable for crashes caused by software defects. The case involved a Tesla on autopilot that crashed into a stopped vehicle, killing the driver.
   – The court held that autonomous systems are “products” subject to product liability law, and manufacturers can be held responsible for defects.

2. Waymo v. Uber (2018, California)
   – While this case involved trade secrets rather than liability, it established that autonomous vehicle companies owe a duty of care to the public.
   – The case also highlighted the competitive pressures that can lead companies to cut corners on safety.

3. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration v. Tesla (2022, Federal)
   – The NHTSA investigated Tesla’s autopilot system after multiple crashes involving Teslas striking emergency vehicles.
   – The investigation found that Tesla’s system failed to adequately detect and respond to emergency vehicles, and the company was forced to issue a software recall.

4. Uber Autonomous Vehicle Fatality (2020, Arizona)
   – While the criminal case against Uber was dropped, the company settled a wrongful death lawsuit with the victim’s family for an undisclosed amount.
   – The case established that autonomous vehicle companies can be held civilly liable for fatalities caused by their systems.

The Nuclear Verdict Trend: Why Autonomous Trucking Cases Could Be Worth Millions

Trucking accident cases have seen a surge in “nuclear verdicts”—jury awards exceeding $10 million. These verdicts are driven by:
– Catastrophic injuries (TBI, spinal cord damage, amputations)
– Egregious negligence (falsified logs, ignored maintenance, reckless hiring)
– Corporate indifference (companies prioritizing profit over safety)

Autonomous trucking cases have the potential to generate even larger verdicts because:
1. The technology is unproven. Juries may view autonomous trucks as inherently risky, especially in their early stages of deployment.
2. The consequences are severe. A single autonomous truck crash can involve multiple vehicles and fatalities, increasing the scale of damages.
3. The accountability gap. When multiple companies are involved, juries may hold all of them responsible, leading to larger collective awards.
4. Public skepticism. Many people are distrustful of autonomous technology, and juries may be more inclined to punish companies that deploy it recklessly.

Recent nuclear verdicts in trucking cases include:
– $462 million (2024, Missouri) – Underride crash that decapitated two victims
– $160 million (2024, Alabama) – Rollover crash that left a driver quadriplegic
– $141.5 million (2024, Florida) – Multi-vehicle pileup caused by a trucking company’s negligence
– $730 million (2021, Texas) – Oversize load crash that killed a 73-year-old woman

Given these trends, it’s not hard to imagine an autonomous trucking case resulting in a billion-dollar verdict—especially if the crash involves multiple fatalities or catastrophic injuries.

What This Means for Fort Worth Drivers

Fort Worth sits at the crossroads of some of Texas’s busiest freight corridors. I-35, I-20, and I-30 all pass through the metroplex, carrying millions of tons of cargo every year. The arrival of autonomous trucks on I-45—and the inevitable expansion to other corridors—means Fort Worth drivers will soon be sharing the road with 80,000-pound vehicles operated by artificial intelligence.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. The Risks Are Real—and They’re Coming to Fort Worth

Autonomous trucks are not a distant future threat. They’re already here, and they’re expanding rapidly. Companies like Bot Auto, Aurora, Torc Robotics, and Volvo Autonomous Solutions are all establishing operations in North Texas, and it’s only a matter of time before autonomous trucks become a common sight on Fort Worth’s highways.

The risks include:
– Software failures that cause trucks to behave unpredictably
– Sensor limitations that prevent trucks from detecting smaller vehicles, pedestrians, or cyclists
– Cybersecurity threats that could allow hackers to take control of trucks
– Regulatory gaps that allow companies to operate without adequate oversight
– Accountability gaps that make it difficult for victims to recover compensation

2. Fort Worth’s Highways Are Particularly Vulnerable

Fort Worth’s highway system presents unique challenges for autonomous trucks:
– I-35W and I-30: These corridors are congested and complex, with frequent lane changes, merges, and construction zones. Autonomous systems struggle in these environments.
– I-20: This route carries heavy freight traffic from the Permian Basin and West Texas. The mix of autonomous and human-driven trucks creates unpredictable interactions.
– Highway 183 (Airport Freeway): This route has multiple at-grade intersections, which are particularly challenging for autonomous systems.
– Construction zones: Fort Worth is constantly under construction, with lane shifts, detours, and temporary signage that can confuse autonomous systems.
– Weather conditions: Texas weather—heavy rain, fog, and dust storms—can interfere with sensors and reduce visibility.

3. What to Do If You’re Involved in an Autonomous Trucking Accident

If you’re involved in a crash with an autonomous truck, the steps you take in the immediate aftermath can make or break your case. Here’s what to do:

At the Scene:

1. Call 911 immediately. Report the accident and request police and medical assistance.
2. Document everything. Take photos and videos of:
   – The truck and your vehicle from multiple angles
   – The accident scene, including road conditions, traffic signals, and skid marks
   – Your injuries
   – The truck’s DOT number (usually on the door)
   – The trucking company’s name and logo
3. Get the truck’s autonomous system data. Ask the trucking company or remote operator for:
   – Software logs (showing system behavior before the crash)
   – Sensor data (lidar, radar, camera footage)
   – Remote operator records (showing if/when they intervened)
4. Collect witness information. Get names, phone numbers, and statements from anyone who saw the crash.
5. Do NOT give a recorded statement to any insurance company. Anything you say can be used against you.

After the Scene:

1. Seek medical attention immediately, even if you feel fine. Many injuries (TBI, internal bleeding) don’t show symptoms right away.
2. Preserve evidence. Keep all medical records, repair estimates, and communications with insurance companies.
3. Contact an experienced trucking accident attorney immediately. Autonomous trucking cases are complex and high-stakes. You need a lawyer who understands the technology and the legal landscape.

4. Why You Need an Attorney Who Understands Autonomous Trucking

Autonomous trucking cases require specialized expertise. At Attorney911, we have:
– 25+ years of experience handling trucking accident cases
– Federal court admission in the Southern District of Texas
– A former insurance defense attorney on our team who knows how trucking companies and insurers operate
– Experience with cutting-edge technology, including ECM/black box data and autonomous systems
– A track record of multi-million dollar verdicts in complex trucking cases

When you hire Attorney911, we:
1. Send spoliation letters immediately to preserve critical evidence (software logs, sensor data, maintenance records)
2. Work with accident reconstruction experts to determine what went wrong
3. Subpoena records from the trucking company, technology provider, and freight broker
4. Identify all liable parties—not just the trucking company, but also the technology provider, freight broker, and others
5. Fight for maximum compensation for your injuries, lost wages, and pain and suffering

The Bottom Line: Autonomous Trucks Are Here—But Safety Can’t Be Optional

The arrival of autonomous trucks on Texas highways represents a fundamental shift in how freight moves across the state. While the technology holds promise for efficiency and reliability, it also introduces serious safety risks that cannot be ignored.

At Attorney911, we believe in innovation—but not at the expense of safety. Companies like Bot Auto and Ryan Transportation have a responsibility to ensure their autonomous systems are thoroughly tested, properly regulated, and held to the highest safety standards. When they fail in that responsibility, they must be held accountable.

If you or a loved one is injured in an accident involving an autonomous truck, you have rights. The legal landscape is complex, but with the right attorney, you can fight for the compensation you deserve.

What You Should Do Next

If you’ve been injured in a trucking accident—whether involving an autonomous truck or a traditional 18-wheeler—time is critical. Evidence disappears quickly, and the trucking company’s rapid-response team is already working to protect their interests.

Here’s what to do right now:

1. Call Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911) for a free, no-obligation consultation. We’re available 24/7 to take your call.
2. Don’t speak to any insurance company without consulting an attorney first. Their goal is to pay you as little as possible.
3. Follow your doctor’s orders and keep all medical appointments. Your health is the top priority.
4. Document everything. Keep a journal of your symptoms, medical treatments, and how the injury affects your daily life.

At Attorney911, we work on a contingency fee basis—you pay nothing unless we win your case. We advance all costs of investigation and litigation, so you can focus on your recovery while we fight for justice.

The Attorney911 Advantage

When you choose Attorney911, you’re not just hiring a law firm—you’re gaining a team of aggressive advocates with a proven track record of holding trucking companies accountable. Here’s what sets us apart:

1. 25+ Years of Experience Fighting Trucking Companies

Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, has been representing trucking accident victims since 1998. He’s seen every trick in the book—and he knows how to counter them. Ralph’s experience includes:
– Multi-million dollar verdicts against major trucking companies
– Federal court litigation in the Southern District of Texas
– Complex liability cases involving multiple defendants
– Catastrophic injury cases including TBI, spinal cord damage, and wrongful death

2. Insider Knowledge of Insurance Company Tactics

Our team includes Lupe Peña, a former insurance defense attorney who spent years working for a national defense firm. Lupe knows exactly how insurance companies evaluate, minimize, and deny claims—because he used to do it himself. Now, he uses that knowledge to fight for victims, not against them.

3. A Proven Track Record of Results

We’ve recovered millions of dollars for trucking accident victims across Texas. Some of our recent results include:
– $5+ million for a logging accident victim who suffered traumatic brain injury
– $3.8+ million for a car accident victim who required leg amputation
– $2.5+ million for a trucking accident victim
– Millions recovered for families in wrongful death cases

4. Aggressive Evidence Preservation

In trucking cases, evidence disappears fast. Black box data can be overwritten in 30 days. Dashcam footage gets deleted. Witnesses forget what they saw. That’s why we send spoliation letters within 24-48 hours of being retained, demanding that all evidence be preserved.

5. Comprehensive Investigation

We leave no stone unturned in building your case. Our investigation includes:
– ECM/black box data analysis to determine speed, braking, and other critical factors
– ELD data review to check for hours-of-service violations
– Driver qualification file subpoenas to uncover negligent hiring
– Maintenance record analysis to identify deferred repairs
– Accident reconstruction to determine exactly what happened
– Expert testimony from medical professionals, engineers, and economists

6. Willingness to Go to Trial

Most trucking accident cases settle out of court, but we prepare every case as if it’s going to trial. Insurance companies know which lawyers are willing to fight—and they offer better settlements to clients with trial-ready attorneys. If the trucking company refuses to offer a fair settlement, we’re prepared to take your case to a jury.

7. Compassionate, Personalized Representation

We understand that a trucking accident isn’t just a legal case—it’s a life-changing event. Our clients are more than just case numbers. We treat every client like family, providing personalized attention, regular updates, and compassionate support throughout the legal process.

Frequently Asked Questions About Autonomous Trucking Accidents

1. Who can I sue if I’m injured by an autonomous truck?

Multiple parties may be liable, including:
– The trucking company that owns the vehicle
– The technology provider that designed the autonomous system
– The freight broker that arranged the shipment
– The truck manufacturer (if a defect contributed to the crash)
– The maintenance provider (if poor maintenance was a factor)
– The cargo owner (if improperly loaded cargo contributed to the crash)

2. How do I prove the autonomous system was at fault?

Proving liability in an autonomous trucking case requires specialized evidence, including:
– Software logs showing system behavior before the crash
– Sensor data (lidar, radar, camera footage)
– Remote operator records showing if/when they intervened
– Maintenance records showing system updates and repairs
– Expert testimony from engineers and accident reconstruction specialists

3. What damages can I recover?

You may be entitled to compensation for:
– Medical expenses (past, present, and future)
– Lost wages and reduced earning capacity
– Pain and suffering
– Mental anguish
– Disfigurement
– Loss of enjoyment of life
– Punitive damages (in cases of gross negligence)

4. How long do I have to file a lawsuit?

In Texas, the statute of limitations for personal injury cases is 2 years from the date of the accident. However, you should contact an attorney immediately—evidence disappears quickly, and delays can hurt your case.

5. What if the trucking company says the crash was my fault?

Texas follows a modified comparative negligence rule. Even if you were partially at fault, you can still recover damages—as long as you were less than 50% responsible. Your recovery will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

6. How much is my case worth?

Every case is unique, but factors that affect case value include:
– The severity of your injuries
– The cost of your medical treatment
– The impact on your ability to work
– The degree of the trucking company’s negligence
– The amount of insurance coverage available

7. Will my case go to trial?

Most cases settle out of court, but we prepare every case as if it’s going to trial. This approach gives us leverage in settlement negotiations and ensures we’re ready to fight for you in court if necessary.

8. How long will my case take?

Simple cases may resolve in 6-12 months, while complex cases can take 2-4 years. Factors that affect timeline include:
– The severity of your injuries
– The complexity of liability issues
– The trucking company’s willingness to settle
– Court backlogs

9. What if I can’t afford an attorney?

At Attorney911, we work on a contingency fee basis—you pay nothing unless we win your case. We advance all costs of investigation and litigation, so you can focus on your recovery.

10. What should I do if I’ve been injured in a trucking accident?

1. Seek medical attention immediately
2. Document everything (photos, witness info, medical records)
3. Do NOT give a recorded statement to any insurance company
4. Call Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911) for a free consultation

The Road Ahead: What’s Next for Autonomous Trucking in Texas?

The deployment of autonomous trucks on I-45 is just the beginning. Companies like Bot Auto, Aurora, Torc Robotics, and Volvo Autonomous Solutions are all expanding their operations in Texas, and it’s only a matter of time before autonomous trucks become a common sight on Fort Worth’s highways.

Here’s what we expect to see in the coming years:

1. Rapid Expansion to Other Corridors

• I-35: This corridor connects Laredo to the Canadian border and is one of the busiest freight routes in the country. Autonomous trucks are already operating on I-35, and we expect to see increased deployment in the coming years.
• I-20: This route connects West Texas to the Mississippi River and carries significant freight traffic. Autonomous trucks are likely to expand to this corridor soon.
• I-10: This transcontinental route connects California to Florida and passes through major Texas cities like El Paso, San Antonio, and Houston. Autonomous trucks are already operating on portions of I-10, and we expect to see full deployment in the near future.

2. Increased Regulatory Scrutiny

As autonomous trucks become more common, regulators will face increased pressure to develop clear safety standards. We expect to see:
– New FMCSA regulations specifically addressing autonomous trucks
– State-level oversight from the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)
– Increased NHTSA investigations into autonomous vehicle crashes
– Stricter cybersecurity requirements to prevent hacking

3. More Accidents—and More Lawsuits

As autonomous trucks expand, we expect to see more accidents—and more lawsuits. These cases will be complex and high-stakes, involving:
– Multiple liable parties (trucking companies, technology providers, freight brokers)
– Specialized evidence (software logs, sensor data, remote operator records)
– Cutting-edge legal arguments about liability, negligence, and product defects

4. Public Pushback and Safety Advocacy

As autonomous trucks become more visible, we expect to see increased public pushback from safety advocates, truck drivers, and concerned citizens. This could lead to:
– Stricter testing requirements before autonomous trucks are deployed
– Mandatory safety features (e.g., underride guards, emergency braking systems)
– Public awareness campaigns about the risks of autonomous trucks
– Legislative action to protect drivers and pedestrians

5. The Rise of “Hybrid” Trucking Models

Not all autonomous trucking will involve fully driverless operations. We expect to see more hybrid models, such as:
– Platooning: Multiple trucks driving closely together with one human driver leading the convoy
– Transfer hubs: Autonomous trucks handling long-haul routes while human drivers handle local deliveries
– Remote monitoring: Human operators overseeing multiple autonomous trucks from a central location

A Call to Action: Protecting Fort Worth Drivers

The arrival of autonomous trucks on Texas highways is a watershed moment for the trucking industry—and for road safety. While the technology holds promise, it also introduces serious risks that cannot be ignored.

At Attorney911, we believe in innovation—but not at the expense of safety. Companies like Bot Auto and Ryan Transportation have a responsibility to ensure their autonomous systems are thoroughly tested, properly regulated, and held to the highest safety standards. When they fail in that responsibility, they must be held accountable.

If you or a loved one is injured in an accident involving an autonomous truck, you have rights. The legal landscape is complex, but with the right attorney, you can fight for the compensation you deserve.

Here’s what you should do right now:

1. Stay informed. Follow developments in autonomous trucking and understand the risks.
2. Be vigilant. If you see an autonomous truck on the road, give it plenty of space and be prepared for unpredictable behavior.
3. Know your rights. If you’re injured in a trucking accident, you have the right to compensation for your injuries, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
4. Act fast. If you’re involved in an accident, call Attorney911 immediately at 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). Evidence disappears quickly, and delays can hurt your case.

If You’ve Been Injured, We Can Help

At Attorney911, we’ve spent over 25 years fighting for trucking accident victims. We understand the complexities of autonomous trucking cases, and we know how to hold negligent companies accountable.

When you hire Attorney911, you’re not just hiring a law firm—you’re gaining a team of aggressive advocates with a proven track record of results. We’ll:
– Send spoliation letters immediately to preserve critical evidence
– Work with accident reconstruction experts to determine what went wrong
– Subpoena records from the trucking company, technology provider, and freight broker
– Identify all liable parties—not just the trucking company, but also the technology provider, freight broker, and others
– Fight for maximum compensation for your injuries, lost wages, and pain and suffering

Don’t wait—call us today at 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911) for a free, no-obligation consultation. We’re available 24/7 to take your call.

The Future of Trucking Is Here—But Safety Can’t Be Optional

Autonomous trucks are coming to Fort Worth’s highways—whether we’re ready or not. But we don’t have to accept reckless deployment or corporate indifference to safety.

At Attorney911, we’re committed to holding trucking companies accountable—whether they’re using human drivers or autonomous systems. If you’ve been injured in a trucking accident, we’re here to fight for you.

Call us now at 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). Your future depends on it.

Learn more about trucking accident cases in our video: “The Victim’s Guide to 18-Wheeler Accident Injuries”

For more information on how to document an accident scene, watch: “Can You Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case?”

Understanding your rights after a trucking accident is critical. Watch: “What to Do After a Car Accident?”

If you’ve suffered catastrophic injuries, learn about your legal options: “The Ultimate Guide to Brain Injury Lawsuits”

For more on how insurance companies evaluate claims, watch: “What Should You Not Say to an Insurance Adjuster?”