Texas Hazing Laws: A Comprehensive Guide for Franklin County Families and Beyond

For families in Franklin County and across Texas, the dream of a college education often includes the vibrant campus life, the academic opportunities, and the chance for students to forge lifelong bonds. However, beneath the surface of camaraderie and tradition, a dangerous reality can lurk: hazing. Imagine this: It’s a Friday night, the air thick with unspoken rules and the pressure to belong. Your child, a bright student from Mount Vernon, attends a “mandatory” off-campus gathering of a fraternity at Texas A&M. What started as fun turns into a night of forced drinking, sleep deprivation, and psychological mind games—all in the name of “brotherhood.” Someone gets hurt, but fear of repercussions silences everyone. The group’s leaders hesitate, worried about “getting the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble” with university officials or law enforcement in College Station. Your student feels utterly trapped between loyalty to the group and their own safety.

This scenario isn’t an isolated incident; it’s a chillingly common pattern repeating across Texas universities. Our firm, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, understands the profound fear and confusion that can come when a student from Franklin County, or any other Texas community, experiences hazing. We see the real-world impact of these dangerous “traditions” and the desperation of families seeking help.

This comprehensive guide is designed specifically for families in Franklin County and throughout Texas who want to understand the modern landscape of hazing, the specific laws that govern it, and the legal options available. We will delve into:

• What hazing truly looks like in 2025, far beyond outdated stereotypes.
• The intricacies of Texas and federal laws concerning hazing.
• The critical lessons from major national hazing cases and their relevance to Texas families.
• A detailed look at incidents and patterns at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University.
• How the histories of national fraternities and sororities contribute to liability.
• The vital steps involved in building a strong hazing case, collecting evidence, and anticipating common legal defenses.
• Practical guides for parents, students, and witnesses, providing actionable advice on recognizing, reporting, and responding to hazing.

While this article provides general information, it is not specific legal advice. Hazing cases are complex, and every situation has unique facts. We encourage you to contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential evaluation of your specific circumstances. We serve families throughout Texas, including our neighbors in Franklin County, ensuring that even if your child attends a university far from Mount Vernon, they have access to expert legal representation focused on their safety and well-being.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies.
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911).
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority.
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
    • Post details on public social media.
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

2. Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For many Franklin County families, the image of hazing might be outdated—perhaps a scene from a movie or an exaggerated campus legend. However, modern hazing is far more insidious, often leveraging technology and psychological manipulation alongside physical and alcohol abuse. It’s no longer just “a dumb prank” or an innocent “rite of passage”; it is a dangerous, often criminal, abuse of power.

At its core, hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status in a group. These actions endanger physical or mental health, humiliate, or exploit new members. Crucially, the defense of “I agreed to it” does not automatically make it safe or legal when there is inherent peer pressure, a significant power imbalance, or a fear of social exclusion.

2.1 Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

We define hazing as any act that:

• Is inflicted upon a prospective member, new member, or current member of an organization.
• Is done for the purpose of affiliation, initiation, or maintaining membership.
• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of that individual.
• Occurs regardless of the victim’s willingness to participate, given the power dynamics at play.

This definition goes beyond the dramatic, physically violent acts to include subtle forms of psychological manipulation that can inflict profound, lasting harm.

2.2 Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing manifests in various escalating forms, often overlapping, each designed to subordinate and control new members:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is the most common and often the most deadly form. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often to dangerous levels.

  • Examples: “Lineups” where large amounts of alcohol are consumed rapidly, drinking games where wrong answers lead to forced consumption, “Big/Little” events involving handles of hard liquor, or being pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances. Alcohol poisoning can lead to severe health crises or death.

• Physical Hazing: These acts directly inflict bodily harm or extreme discomfort.

  • Examples: Paddling and beatings, extreme calisthenics or “workouts” (often called “smokings” or “conditioning”) far beyond safe limits, sleep deprivation, food or water deprivation, or exposure to extreme cold or heat. These methods can cause rhabdomyolysis, severe dehydration, or traumatic injuries.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: Designed to degrade and strip away dignity, these often leave deep emotional scars.

  • Examples: Forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (e.g., “roasted pig” positions), wearing degrading costumes, or engaging in acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones. Sexual assault can also occur under the guise of hazing.

• Psychological Hazing: These forms inflict mental and emotional distress, creating a climate of fear and anxiety.

  • Examples: Verbal abuse, threats, forced isolation from non-group members, manipulation, forced confessions, or public shaming on social media or in meetings. This category can lead to severe anxiety, depression, and PTSD.

• Digital/Online Hazing: Leveraging technology to extend control and humiliation, often 24/7.

  • Examples: Constant monitoring via group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp, Discord), requiring members to respond instantly to demanding calls or texts, online dares or “challenges,” creating or sharing embarrassing content on platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok, or tracking location via apps. This allows hazing to occur even when members are physically separated.

2.3 Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is not confined to one type of organization or a single campus. While fraternities and sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural) are frequently associated with incidents, hazing occurs across a much broader spectrum of student groups:

• College Fraternities and Sororities: Both social Greek letter organizations and professional/service-oriented Greek groups.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: These groups, like the highly respected Corps of Cadets at Texas A&M, often have traditions that, when taken too far, cross into hazing.
• Spirit Squads and Tradition Clubs: Groups like the Texas Wranglers at UT Austin or other campus spirit organizations.
• Athletic Teams: From high school to collegiate levels, football, basketball, baseball, cheerleading, and other sports teams have all faced hazing allegations. The Northwestern University scandal vividly illustrates this.
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous musical or performance ensembles are not immune. The tragic death of Robert Champion from Florida A&M’s marching band is a stark reminder.
• Some Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Any group with a “new member” or “initiation” period can foster hazing, regardless of its noble mission.

The pervasive nature of hazing is maintained by factors such as the desire for social status, a misguided belief in preserving “traditions,” and a pervasive culture of secrecy and fear among members—even when everyone “knows” hazing is illegal. For our students from Franklin County attending these diverse organizations, understanding these realities is critical.

3. Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For Franklin County families grappling with hazing, understanding the legal landscape is paramount. Texas has a robust, though imperfect, framework to address hazing, supplemented by federal laws that provide additional layers of protection and recourse.

3.1 Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific anti-hazing provisions primarily outlined in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. This crucial legislation defines hazing and establishes both criminal penalties and reporting requirements.

The law broadly defines hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student,
• AND occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

Key aspects of Texas hazing law:

• Broad Scope: Hazing can occur on or off campus and still fall under the statute. This means incidents at private residences, off-campus venues, or even remote retreats are covered, regardless of whether students are from Franklin County or elsewhere.
• Mental or Physical Harm: The law recognizes that hazing isn’t just about physical injury; it can also cause severe psychological and emotional trauma.
• Recklessness is Enough: The act doesn’t have to be malicious or intentionally cruel. If individuals or organizations knew, or should have known, that their actions created a risk of harm and proceeded anyway, they can be found liable.
• No “Consent” Defense: This is a crucial point many students and families misunderstand. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that it is not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the activity. Courts understand that “consent” given under duress, peer pressure, or fear of social exclusion is not genuine.

Criminal Penalties:

• Class B Misdemeanor (standard): Hazing that does not result in serious injury can lead to fines and potential jail time (up to 180 days, fine up to $2,000).
• Class A Misdemeanor: If hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical attention.
• State Jail Felony: If hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This carries far more severe penalties, including incarceration in a state jail facility.
• Additionally, individuals who are aware of hazing and fail to report it can face misdemeanor charges. Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

Organizational Liability (§ 37.153):
The law extends criminal liability beyond individuals to the organizations themselves. An organization (like a fraternity, sorority, or club) can be criminally prosecuted and fined up to $10,000 per violation if:

• It authorized or encouraged the hazing, OR
• An officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it.
  Beyond criminal fines, universities often revoke recognition or permanently ban organizations convicted of hazing from campus.

Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting (§ 37.154):
Texas law also seeks to encourage reporting by granting immunity from civil or criminal liability to individuals who, in good faith, report a hazing incident to university officials or law enforcement. Furthermore, many university policies, echoing Texas’s “Good Samaritan” principles, offer amnesty for students who call 911 in a medical emergency, even if underage drinking or hazing were involved.

This framework demonstrates that Texas takes hazing seriously, aiming to punish offenders, deter future incidents, and protect students. However, navigating these laws requires deep legal expertise.

3.2 Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s vital for Franklin County families to understand the distinction between criminal and civil legal actions, as both may apply in hazing cases:

• Criminal Cases:

  • These are prosecutions brought by the state (through a district attorney or prosecutor) against individuals or organizations for violating criminal laws.
  • The primary goal is punishment, which can include imprisonment, fines, probation, or community service.
  • Examples of potential hazing-related criminal charges in Texas include hazing offenses (as outlined above), furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, sexual assault, or even negligent homicide or manslaughter in cases resulting in death.
  • The burden of proof in a criminal case is “beyond a reasonable doubt,” a very high standard.

• Civil Cases:

  • These are lawsuits brought by victims or their surviving families against individuals and entities responsible for the harm.
  • The primary goal is monetary compensation (damages) for losses suffered, as well as holding parties accountable.
  • Civil hazing lawsuits typically focus on legal theories such as:
    • Negligence and Gross Negligence: Arguing that individuals, the organization, or the university failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent harm.
    • Wrongful Death: When a hazing incident leads to a student’s death, surviving family members can sue for their losses, including loss of companionship, financial support, and emotional distress.
    • Negligent Hiring/Supervision: If a university or national organization failed to properly vet or oversee advisors, coaches, or staff who contributed to the hazing.
    • Premises Liability: When hazing occurs on property where the owner (e.g., fraternity house owner, university) failed to maintain a safe environment.
    • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress or Assault/Battery: Directly addressing the psychological and physical harm.
  • The burden of proof in a civil case is typically “preponderance of the evidence” (more likely than not), which is a lower standard than criminal cases.

Critically, a criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case. Even if criminal charges are not filed or do not result in a conviction, a victim or family may still have a strong civil claim. Both types of cases can proceed simultaneously, and the evidence uncovered in one can often benefit the other.

3.3 Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, several federal provisions also address hazing and student safety, adding layers of oversight and potential legal avenues for Franklin County families:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding (which includes most institutions) must:

  • Strengthen Hazing Reporting: Report hazing incidents more transparently, including details about the organization, the nature of the violation, and the sanctions imposed. This data is expected to become publicly accessible by approximately 2026.
  • Enhance Prevention Efforts: Implement robust hazing education and prevention programs for students, staff, and faculty.
  • Share Data: Maintain and publicly disseminate comprehensive hazing data, similar to prior federal mandates like the Clery Act.
    The Act aims to create greater transparency and accountability, making it harder for institutions to conceal hazing incidents.

• Title IX: This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. When hazing involves:

  • Sexual harassment or sexual assault,
  • Gender-based violence,
  • Or creates a hostile environment that disproportionately affects students based on sex,
    Title IX obligations may be triggered. This means universities have a duty to investigate and respond promptly and effectively. A failure to do so can lead to liability against the institution. Our firm understands how to leverage Title IX claims where appropriate to secure justice for victims.

• The Clery Act: Named after Jeanne Clery, a student murdered on campus, this federal law requires colleges and universities to collect, retain, and report information about crime on or near their campuses. Hazing incidents often involve actions that fall under the Clery Act’s umbrella, such as:

  • Assault,
  • Alcohol or drug-related offenses,
  • Or sexual offenses.
    If a hazing incident involves these elements, the university may have a duty to report it. Failures in Clery Act compliance can also form a basis for legal claims, as they demonstrate a pattern of neglect or a lack of accountability from the institution.

These federal laws underscore a national commitment to combating hazing and ensuring campus safety. They provide essential tools for students and families to demand justice and protection from institutions that fail to uphold these standards.

3.4 Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

One of the complexities of hazing litigation is identifying all potentially liable parties. An experienced hazing attorney understands that holding multiple parties accountable increases the chances of a victim receiving fair compensation and drives broader institutional change. The responsible parties can include:

• Individual Students:

  • Those who actively planned, facilitated, participated in, or directly carried out the hazing acts. This includes student leaders, “pledge educators,” or any member whose actions caused harm.
  • Their individual actions can lead to claims of assault, battery, negligence, or intentional infliction of emotional distress.

• Local Chapter / Organization:

  • The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or athletic team itself (if it operates as a recognized legal entity).
  • The chapter can be held liable for the collective actions of its members, especially if the hazing was endorsed, encouraged, or even negligently overseen by its officers or advisors.

• National Fraternity / Sorority:

  • The national headquarters of Greek-letter organizations often have substantial assets and can be a primary target in severe hazing cases.
  • Liability can hinge on whether the national organization knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing (at that chapter or others), failed to enforce its anti-hazing policies, or provided inadequate oversight or training. Their past history of similar incidents across the country becomes critical evidence of “foreseeability.”

• University or Governing Board:

  • The educational institution itself (e.g., UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor) can be held liable under various negligence theories.
  • Key questions include: Did the university have prior warnings about hazing, did it fail to enforce its own policies, or did it demonstrate “deliberate indifference” to known dangers?
  • Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) may assert sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, certain operational failures, and Title IX violations. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections.

• Third Parties:

  • Property Owners/Landlords: If hazing occurred at a private residence (like a fraternity house) or off-campus venue, the owner of that property could be liable under premises liability laws if they knew or should have known about dangerous activities.
  • Alcohol Providers: Bars, stores, or individuals who illegally furnished alcohol to minors that contributed to hazing injuries might be liable under Texas’s dram shop laws or other negligence theories.
  • Security Companies or Event Organizers: If these entities failed in their duty to provide a safe environment for an event where hazing occurred.

It’s crucial for Franklin County families to understand that every hazing case is fact-specific, and not every party mentioned above will be liable in every situation. A thorough investigation is necessary to identify all potential defendants and build the strongest possible case.

4. National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

When we discuss hazing in Texas, we are not just talking about isolated incidents. We are talking about a systemic problem, one that has led to tragic outcomes across the country and echoes through the halls of our own Texas universities. The cases below are not just news headlines; they are precedents, cautionary tales, and powerful reminders of the consequences of hazing. They demonstrate common patterns and highlight why institutions and individuals are increasingly held accountable. These stories help Franklin County families understand the severe risks involved and the legal landscape that has evolved in response.

4.1 Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced or excessive alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing-related fatalities. These cases reveal disturbing common threads: a culture of extreme drinking, delayed medical care, and a code of silence.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017):
  Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a “bid acceptance” event turned into a night of extreme drinking. Security cameras captured Piazza falling repeatedly, sustaining severe head injuries. Fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for nearly 12 hours, attempting instead to “treat” him themselves. In the aftermath, dozens of fraternity members were charged with over 1,000 criminal counts, including involuntary manslaughter and aggravated assault. The Piazza family also pursued extensive civil litigation, resulting in confidential settlements. This tragedy led to the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, one of the nation’s toughest, and permanently banned Beta Theta Pi from Penn State.

  • Takeaway for Texans: This case set a national benchmark, demonstrating that extreme intoxication, deliberate delays in seeking medical help, and a pervasive culture of silence and cover-up significantly increase legal liability. It showed how detailed evidence (like surveillance footage) can expose the truth.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017):
  Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died of acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. He was allegedly forced to consume an entire handle of hard liquor. Multiple fraternity members were prosecuted, mostly pleading guilty to misdemeanor hazing. Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life and enacted sweeping policy changes.

  • Takeaway for Texans: Coffey’s death, like many others, highlighted how ritualized drinking games and “tradition” driven by older members can be lethal. It underscores that even seemingly innocuous events can turn deadly when excessive alcohol consumption is coerced.

• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017):
  Max Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, died after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to consume dangerously large amounts of high-proof alcohol for answering questions incorrectly. His blood alcohol content was 0.495% at the time of his death. Following his death, Louisiana enacted the Max Gruver Act, which upgraded hazing to a felony with significant prison time. One fraternity member was convicted of negligent homicide. The family also secured a $6.1 million verdict in a civil case, after some initial confidential settlements.

  • Takeaway for Texans: The Max Gruver Act is a powerful example of how legislative change often follows public outrage and clear proof of lethal hazing. It showed that juries are willing to deliver substantial verdicts against those responsible for creating such dangerous environments.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021):
  Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink an entire bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” night. This incident led to multiple criminal convictions for hazing-related charges against fraternity members. Civilly, the Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with approximately $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and $3 million from Bowling Green State University.

  • Takeaway for Texans: This landmark settlement underscored that universities can face significant financial and reputational consequences for their role in hazing deaths, alongside the national fraternities. It demonstrated that even public universities, despite potential immunity claims, will settle for substantial amounts when evidence of negligence is strong.

4.2 Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical abuse and brutal rituals remain a dangerous aspect of hazing, often occurring in attempts to maintain secrecy or “build character.”

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013):
  Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died during a “crossing” ritual at an off-campus retreat in the Pocono Mountains. During the “glass ceiling” ritual, he was blindfolded, forced to wear a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled by fraternity members. Help was delayed for hours while members tried to figure out a cover-up. Multiple members were convicted, and significantly, the national fraternity, Pi Delta Psi, was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, receiving a multi-year ban from Pennsylvania.
  • Takeaway for Texans: This case proved that hazing at off-campus “retreats” is equally, if not more, dangerous due to isolation and lack of oversight. Furthermore, it established a precedent for holding national organizations criminally liable for their chapters’ actions.

4.3 Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life. High-profile incidents have revealed its presence in elite athletic programs, marching bands, and other student organizations.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025):
  Former players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the Northwestern football program over several years, including forced naked “dry-humping” drills and other degrading acts. This scandal rocked the university, leading to the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who later filed a wrongful-termination lawsuit (settled confidentially in August 2025). Multiple players have filed civil lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff, raising questions about institutional oversight.

  • Takeaway for Texans: This illustrates that hazing extends far beyond Greek life; prestigious athletic programs can also harbor systemic abuse, and universities face severe consequences for failing to protect their athletes.

• Robert Champion – Florida A&M University Marching Band (2011):
  Robert Champion, a 26-year-old drum major, died after a brutal hazing ritual involving severe physical beatings on a band bus. Multiple band members were convicted, some for felony hazing. Florida A&M University was held fully liable and ultimately agreed to a $1 million settlement with the family.

  • Takeaway for Texans: This tragic case demonstrated that hazing liability extends to marching bands and other non-Greek organizations, compelling comprehensive anti-hazing policy reforms across the FAMU system.

4.4 What These Cases Mean for Franklin County Families

These national tragedies share common threads: forced drinking, physical abuse, humiliation, delayed or denied medical care, and concerted cover-up efforts. Yet, they also show a powerful truth: victim advocacy and determined legal action can lead to significant accountability. Multi-million-dollar settlements, criminal convictions, new anti-hazing laws, and wide-ranging institutional reforms have often followed only after tragedy and persistent litigation.

Franklin County families need to know that if their student experiences hazing at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these national lessons form the backdrop of modern hazing litigation. The legal landscape has shifted, creating avenues for justice and accountability that were previously unavailable. Our firm leverages this national expertise and applies it to the unique context of Texas law and our state’s universities.

5. Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For families in Franklin County, the journey to finding the right college for their children often leads to one of Texas’s renowned universities. Yet, even at these esteemed institutions, the shadow of hazing can sometimes fall. Our Houston-based office, Attorney911, serves clients across Texas, and we are intimately familiar with the culture and policies at each of these major universities. Below, we’ve broken down the hazing landscape for each, providing crucial context for Franklin County parents and students. The specific details of jurisdiction and local support can be particularly relevant for families from communities like Mount Vernon considering these schools.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

Families from Franklin County may consider the University of Houston for its robust urban campus, diverse programs, and proximity to Houston’s thriving job market. UH is a dynamic institution with a significant mix of commuter and residential students, and its vibrant Greek life, encompassing Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council (HPC), National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and Multicultural Greek Council (MGC) organizations, is a major part of its student experience.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Houston, located in the heart of the nation’s fourth-largest city, boasts a sizable student population. While it has traditionally served a large commuter base, its residential footprint continues to grow, fostering a rich campus experience. Greek life is highly active, with numerous chapters providing social, academic, and community service opportunities, but also presenting risks for hazing if not properly supervised. Diverse student organizations, from cultural groups to sports clubs, also contribute to the campus fabric, and sometimes, unfortunate hazing incidents.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UH maintains a clear, explicit anti-hazing policy, prohibiting such activities both on and off campus. Their policy broadly defines hazing to include any act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. This includes, but is not limited to, forced consumption of alcohol/food/drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and any act that causes mental distress.

UH encourages reporting through various channels:

• The Dean of Students office
• The Office of Student Conduct
• UH Police Department (UHPD) for immediate danger or criminal activity
• Anonymous reporting options often available through online forms or hotline numbers.
  UH also provides a hazing statement and, in compliance with state and federal laws, publicly reports some disciplinary information on its website.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

While UH has worked to combat hazing, notable incidents have occurred:

• 2016 Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) Incident: Pledges of the UH chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha allegedly faced extreme hazing, including severe sleep, food, and water deprivation over several days. One student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface during an “initiation” event. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and a university suspension. This case underscored the severe physical injuries that can result from hazing and UH’s response to suspend the responsible organization.
• Later Disciplinary Actions: UH has disciplined other fraternities and sororities for behaviors “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” often involving alcohol misuse, physical exercises, and policy violations. These have resulted in varying degrees of sanctions, from probation to temporary or permanent suspension of recognition. The details of these incidents highlight the ongoing struggle to prevent hazing despite clear policies.

These incidents demonstrate UH’s efforts to enforce its anti-hazing policies, but also the persistent challenges. Public detail on specific violations at UH may be less extensive than at some other Texas universities, making thorough outside investigation even more critical for families from Franklin County.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a student from Franklin County affected by hazing at UH, navigating the legal process would involve key Houston-based agencies:

• Law Enforcement: Depending on where the hazing occurred, the UH Police Department (UHPD) and/or the Houston Police Department (HPD) would be involved in criminal investigations. UHPD has jurisdiction on campus, while HPD covers the broader Houston metropolitan area.
• Civil Lawsuits: Civil actions would typically be filed in courts within Harris County, which encompasses Houston. This means Franklin County families might need to travel to Houston for legal proceedings, though much of the initial work can be handled remotely.
• Potential Defendants: In a civil suit, potential defendants could include individual students involved, the local chapter itself (e.g., Pi Kappa Alpha), the national fraternity or sorority organization, and potentially the University of Houston (though as a public university, UH may assert sovereign immunity, requiring specific legal strategies to overcome). Property owners where off-campus hazing occurred could also be named.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For Franklin County students at UH and their parents, taking proactive steps is crucial:

• Report Internally: If you suspect or experience hazing, report it to the UH Dean of Students Office or the Office of Student Conduct. You can also contact UHPD for criminal matters.
• Document Everything: Immediately screenshot any group chats, social media posts, or texts related to hazing. Photograph any injuries or evidence. This evidence is critical for both university investigations and potential legal action.
• Understand Your Rights: Be aware of UH’s policies and your rights as a student. Do not allow university officials to pressure you into silence or accepting an inadequate resolution without legal counsel.
• Seek Legal Counsel: Contact a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases like Attorney911. Our understanding of local jurisdiction, combined with our experience against large institutions, is invaluable. We can help uncover prior discipline, navigate university bureaucracy, and protect your child from retaliation.

5.2 Texas A&M University

For many Franklin County families, Texas A&M University in College Station represents a proud tradition, embodying values like loyalty, integrity, and selfless service. Brazos County families, in particular, often view A&M as their local university. However, even within this unique culture, hazing can take root, sometimes under the guise of “tradition,” demanding vigilance from students and their families across Texas.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M is renowned for its deep-seated traditions, particularly its venerated Corps of Cadets, which fosters a military-style environment. With a massive student body, A&M also hosts a large and active Greek life, alongside numerous other student organizations, including spirit groups and athletic teams. The strong emphasis on tradition, while a point of pride, can sometimes be manipulated to perpetuate hazing, as new members feel immense pressure to “earn” their place and respect.

5.2.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M has a strict anti-hazing policy, explicitly outlining that hazing, whether on or off campus, is forbidden. Their policy aligns with Texas state law, defining hazing broadly to include any mental or physical endangerment for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. They strongly emphasize that “consent” is not a defense to hazing.

Reporting channels at A&M include:

• The Dean of Student Life
• The Office of Student Conduct
• The Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) for criminal offenses
• For Corps of Cadets specific issues, the Commandant’s Office or Corps staff.
• Anonymous reporting mechanisms are available through confidential hotlines or online forms.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced several significant hazing incidents:

• 2021 Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Lawsuit: This incident brought national attention to a severe form of hazing. Two pledges allegedly suffered severe chemical burns on their bodies after being forced to endure strenuous physical activity and then having substances, including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, poured on them. The burns were so severe they required skin graft surgeries. The pledges subsequently sued the fraternity for $1 million. The SAE chapter was suspended by the university, highlighting the potential for extreme physical harm from hazing and the high-stakes legal response.
• 2023 Corps of Cadets Lawsuit: A former cadet alleged degrading and psychologically abusive hazing within the Corps of Cadets, including sexually suggestive acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The lawsuit sought over $1 million, alleging violations of the Texas Hazing Law and Title IX. While A&M stated it addressed the matter internally, the case underscored the fact that hazing can occur even in highly structured, respected organizations like the Corps.
• Kappa Sigma (2023): Allegations surfaced involving hazing resulting in severe injuries, specifically rhabdomyolysis (a severe muscle breakdown from extreme physical exertion and dehydration), indicating dangerous physical hazing. This ongoing litigation highlights the need for specialized legal representation focusing on these specific types of injuries.

These incidents underscore the challenges A&M faces in mitigating hazing, particularly when it’s cloaked in tradition or involves dangerous physical acts.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a student from Franklin County affected by hazing at Texas A&M, the legal pathway would primarily involve:

• Law Enforcement: The Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) would typically be the initial contact for any criminal hazing allegations in College Station or on campus. For off-campus incidents in College Station or Bryan, local College Station Police Department or Bryan Police Department would have jurisdiction.
• Civil Lawsuits: Civil suits would generally be filed in state district courts in Brazos County, where College Station is located. This would involve Franklin County families traveling to College Station for legal proceedings.
• Potential Defendants: Litigation might target individual fraternity/Corps members, the local chapter, the national fraternity, and potentially Texas A&M University. As a public university, A&M may assert sovereign immunity, but our firm understands the strategies to overcome or circumvent these defenses to secure justice for victims.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For Franklin County students at Texas A&M from Mount Vernon, Winnsboro, or any other community, and their parents, taking prompt and decisive action is critical:

• Report to A&M: Contact the Dean of Student Life or the Student Conduct Office. For Corps-specific issues, communicate directly with the Commandant’s Office.
• Collect Evidence: Immediately preserve all digital communications (GroupMe, texts, social media), photos of injuries or events, and any physical items related to hazing. Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) offers valuable guidance on this.
• Seek Medical Attention: Document all physical and psychological injuries with medical professionals. This creates an official record crucial for any legal claim.
• Legal Consultation: Contact a lawyer experienced in Texas hazing cases, especially those familiar with the specific cultural nuances of Texas A&M and the complexities of public university liability. Attorney911 can help Franklin County families navigate the unique challenges of hazing incidents involving the Corps or other A&M organizations.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is an iconic institution, drawing bright students from Franklin County and across the globe. Known for its rigorous academics and vibrant campus in the state capital, UT also has a prominent Greek life presence and numerous student organizations. Families in Franklin County value UT for its academic excellence, but like any large university, it is not immune to the risks of hazing.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin sits at the heart of a dynamic city, attracting a diverse student body known for its spirited traditions and deep academic engagement. Its Greek system is extensive, encompassing Panhellenic, Interfraternity Council (IFC), National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and various multicultural Greek organizations. Beyond Greek life, UT is home to countless social clubs, spirit groups (like the Texas Cowboys and Texas Wranglers), and athletic teams, all of which have, at times, faced hazing allegations.

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Texas at Austin has a comprehensive anti-hazing policy that strictly prohibits hazing both on and off campus. Their policy is clear: any conduct that endangers the physical or mental health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation is strictly forbidden. A critical aspect of UT’s approach is its relatively high level of transparency.

UT’s reporting channels include:

• The Dean of Students Office
• The Office of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity
• The UT Austin Police Department (UTPD) for criminal incidents
• Numerous online forms for confidential or anonymous reporting.

Crucially, UT Austin maintains a publicly accessible Hazing Violations website, which lists organizations, dates of incidents, a summary of the conduct, and the disciplinary actions taken. This commitment to transparency is a valuable resource for Franklin County families and for legal investigations.

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT’s Hazing Violations website provides a detailed record of past disciplinary actions, underscoring the ongoing challenge of hazing:

• 2023 Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) Incident: The UT chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha (the same national organization involved in the Stone Foltz tragedy) was disciplined after new members were allegedly directed to consume milk and participate in strenuous calisthenics, among other activities. This was found to be hazing, leading to the chapter being placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education.
• Numerous Other Organizations: The public records show that other groups, including social fraternities, sororities, and spirit organizations (such as the Texas Wranglers), have faced sanctions for various hazing behaviors. Common violations include forced alcohol consumption, “pledge family” activities involving degrading acts, excessive physical exercises, and other practices designed to exert power and control over new members.
• Ongoing Trends: The repeated appearances of certain organizations on this list, or the recurrence of similar types of hazing activities, indicates a persistent issue that sometimes defies university intervention.

UT’s willingness to publish these details, while commendable for transparency, also highlights that even with robust policies, hazing remains a significant concern.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a student from Franklin County experiencing hazing at UT, the legal and investigative process would typically involve:

• Law Enforcement: The UT Austin Police Department (UTPD) patrols campus and has jurisdiction over crimes occurring on university property. For incidents in the wider city of Austin, the Austin Police Department (APD) would be involved.
• Civil Lawsuits: Civil claims would likely be filed in state district courts in Travis County, where Austin is located. This means Franklin County families might need to travel to Austin for legal proceedings.
• Potential Defendants: Key defendants could include individual perpetrating students, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the University of Texas at Austin. As a public university, UT may, like UH and A&M, raise sovereign immunity defenses, requiring experienced counsel to navigate.

The existence of UT’s public hazing log is particularly powerful for civil suits, as it provides strong evidence of prior notice and a clear pattern of violations. This information can be crucial in proving that the university or national organization knew, or should have known, about ongoing hazing risks.

5.3.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

For Franklin County students at UT and their parents, immediate and informed action is vital:

• Consult UT’s Violations Website: Familiarize yourself with the university’s public hazing violations page (hazing.utexas.edu) to understand patterns and past issues. This is a unique resource for Franklin County families enrolling students from Mount Vernon, Scroggins, and other nearby towns.
• Report Promptly: Use UT’s reporting channels (Dean of Students, UTPD, or anonymous online forms). The university’s published data on hazing can be a valuable starting point.
• Gather Evidence: Immediately preserve all relevant digital evidence (text messages, GroupMe chats, social media posts) and document any physical injuries.
• Seek Legal Counsel: Contact an attorney experienced in Texas hazing litigation. Attorney911 understands how to leverage UT’s specific reporting mechanisms and public records to build a compelling case, confronting institutional defenses that may arise even for Franklin County residents.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University (SMU), nestled in an affluent Dallas neighborhood, is a highly regarded private institution that draws students from prestigious backgrounds, including many from Franklin County who seek an elite private university experience. SMU is known for its strong academic programs and a vibrant, often prominent, Greek life. This blend of status and tradition can, however, sometimes obscure the dangers of hazing.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU is characterized by its beautiful campus, rigorous academics, and a generally affluent student body. Greek life plays a significant role in the social fabric, with a well-established presence of Panhellenic and Interfraternity Council (IFC) chapters, alongside National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) and multicultural organizations. The social scene is often dominated by Greek events, creating an environment where pressure to join and conform can be intense.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that aligns with Texas state law, prohibiting hazing both on and off campus. Their policy is comprehensive, covering physical abuse, forced consumption of substances, mental distress, and any act that diminishes self-esteem or dignity, all tied to group affiliation. SMU explicitly states that any form of consent does not excuse hazing.

Reporting channels at SMU include:

• The Dean of Students Office
• The Office of the Vice President for the Student Experience
• SMU Police Department for criminal offenses
• Anonymous reporting options, including online forms and platforms like “Real Response” which some universities use for confidential student feedback and reporting.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

SMU has had its share of hazing incidents leading to disciplinary action:

• 2017 Kappa Alpha Order Incident: The SMU chapter of Kappa Alpha Order faced significant sanctions following reports of hazing. Allegations included new members being paddled, forced to consume excessive alcohol, and deprived of sleep during initiation activities. The chapter was suspended by the university, and a national investigation was launched. This incident led to severe restrictions on the chapter’s recruiting and activities for an extended period, ultimately not being fully active until around 2021.
• Other Disciplinary Actions: SMU’s Student Affairs website or similar sections may list other disciplinary actions taken against fraternities, sororities, and other student organizations for hazing violations. These often involve alcohol-related misconduct, physical challenges, and behaviors that create a demeaning or unsafe environment for new members.

These incidents demonstrate that even at private institutions with strict policies, hazing remains a challenge. The relative privacy of internal disciplinary actions at private universities may mean that publicly reported incidents are fewer than at public institutions, making proactive investigation by legal teams even more valuable.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a student from Franklin County affected by hazing at SMU, the legal process would typically involve:

• Law Enforcement: The Southern Methodist University Police Department (SMUPD) has jurisdiction on campus. For off-campus incidents in Dallas, the Dallas Police Department (DPD) would be the primary law enforcement agency.
• Civil Lawsuits: Civil claims would be filed in state district courts in Dallas County, which encompasses SMU. This means Franklin County families might need to travel to Dallas for legal proceedings, though much initial work can often be done remotely.
• Potential Defendants: Key defendants could include individual perpetrating students, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and Southern Methodist University. As a private institution, SMU generally does not have the same sovereign immunity protections as public universities, which can sometimes simplify the litigation process against the institution itself.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For Franklin County students at SMU and their parents, taking an informed approach to hazing is essential:

• Report Internally & Externally: Utilize SMU’s reporting mechanisms, including anonymous options. Also, be aware that you can report criminal acts to SMUPD or DPD.
• Document Thoroughly: Immediately collect and preserve all digital evidence, photos, and any physical evidence related to the hazing. Documentation is crucial, especially in cases where internal university reports might not be as publicly transparent as at state schools.
• Seek Medical Care: Ensure any physical or psychological injuries are immediately evaluated and documented by medical professionals.
• Legal Consultation: Contact an attorney experienced in Texas hazing litigation. Attorney911 is well-versed in the specific dynamics of private universities like SMU and can help Franklin County families navigate potential insurance coverage disputes and institutional defenses, even for students coming from Mount Vernon, Scroggins, or Purley.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, located in Waco, holds a unique place in the hearts of many Texas families, including those from Franklin County, particularly for its Christian mission and strong academic reputation. It is a private Baptist university with a significant Greek life presence and numerous other student organizations. While Baylor emphasizes spiritual growth and community, it has also faced scrutiny over student welfare issues, underscoring the importance of vigilance against hazing.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University offers a distinctive campus culture centered on its Christian identity, rigorous academics, and a strong sense of community. The university attracts students from diverse backgrounds, including many from Franklin County seeking a values-based education. Greek life is active, encompassing Panhellenic, Interfraternity Council (IFC), National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations, providing social and philanthropic opportunities. Beyond Greek life, Baylor boasts numerous athletic teams, spirit groups, and other student organizations that contribute to its vibrant campus life.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor University maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that is consistent with Texas state law. Their policy explicitly prohibits hazing through any act, on or off campus, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation, membership, or participation in any organization. Baylor’s policy clarifies that the willingness of a student to participate in hazing activities does not serve as a defense.

Reporting channels at Baylor include:

• The Dean of Students Office
• The Student Conduct Administration
• The Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) for criminal matters
• Anonymous reporting options are available through online forms or a confidential referral line.

Baylor explicitly states its commitment to preventing hazing and holding individuals and organizations accountable, often emphasizing a “zero-tolerance” approach.

5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor has faced challenges related to student welfare and misconduct, including hazing allegations:

• 2020 Baylor Baseball Hazing: A significant incident involved the Baylor baseball team when 14 players were suspended following a hazing investigation. The university determined that hazing had occurred, leading to staggered suspensions over the early part of the baseball season. This incident, while not involving Greek life, highlighted that hazing can affect any student group, including highly visible athletic teams, and underscore the need for constant vigilance, even from student-athletes from Franklin County.
• Prior Scrutiny: Baylor has previously faced intense scrutiny for its handling of sexual assault allegations within its football program, which led to significant leadership changes and reforms. While not directly hazing, this history underscores the university’s broader challenges with institutional oversight and its impact on student safety. This background shapes how hazing allegations are viewed and managed at Baylor today.

These incidents reflect the ongoing nature of hazing challenges at Baylor, despite its strong institutional values and policies.

5.4.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a student from Franklin County affected by hazing at Baylor, the legal process would typically involve:

• Law Enforcement: The Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) has jurisdiction on campus. For off-campus incidents in Waco, the Waco Police Department would be the primary law enforcement agency.
• Civil Lawsuits: Civil claims would be filed in state district courts in McLennan County, where Waco is situated. This means Franklin County families might need to travel to Waco for legal proceedings.
• Potential Defendants: Key defendants could include individual perpetrating students, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and Baylor University. As a private university, Baylor generally lacks the sovereign immunity protections of public universities, which can simplify the legal strategy for claims against the institution itself.

5.4.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For Franklin County students at Baylor from Mount Vernon, Scroggins, or other surrounding communities, and their parents, proactive engagement and legal counsel are key:

• Report All Suspicions: Use Baylor’s official reporting channels (Dean of Students, BUPD, or anonymous options). Given Baylor’s history, the university is often keenly aware of the need to respond to student safety concerns.
• Document Relentlessly: Immediately capture and preserve all digital communications, photos, videos, and any physical evidence related to the hazing. This evidence is critical for both internal university investigations and potential legal claims.
• Seek Medical and Psychological Care: Ensure any physical or psychological injuries are promptly evaluated, documented, and treated by medical professionals. This creates a contemporaneous record of harm.
• Legal Consultation: Contact an attorney experienced in Texas hazing litigation. Attorney911 understands the specific institutional context of private universities like Baylor and can help Franklin County families navigate the university’s internal processes while simultaneously pursuing all available legal avenues for accountability and compensation.

6. Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For Franklin County families, understanding the national and local histories of fraternities and sororities is crucial when considering hazing. The organizations operating at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor are rarely independent entities; they are local chapters of larger national or international organizations. These national bodies set policies, offer guidance, collect dues, and crucially, they have often encountered hazing incidents at their chapters across the country—or even within Texas—before. This history is not merely anecdotal; it is a powerful legal tool.

6.1 Why National Histories Matter

The reality is that many fraternities and sororities (such as Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi, and Kappa Alpha Order) actively recruit at Texas universities and are part of extensive national organizations. These national headquarters typically have voluminous anti-hazing manuals, extensive risk management policies, and dedicated staff addressing student safety. They have these resources because they have been forced to confront fatalities, catastrophic injuries, and significant lawsuits stemming from hazing at their chapters nationwide.

This recurring pattern of incidents means that a national organization, in almost every instance, has prior notice of the types of hazing that can occur. If a local chapter at UT Austin, for example, engages in a “Big/Little” drinking event that mirrors a fatal incident at another chapter of the same national fraternity, it’s very difficult for the national organization to claim ignorance or that the event was an “unforeseeable accident.”

When a Texas chapter repeats the same dangerous script that has caused harm or led to severe sanctions for another chapter in Kansas, Florida, or Pennsylvania, it provides compelling evidence of foreseeability. This foreseeability is a cornerstone of negligence claims. It shows that the national organization knew, or should have known, about the risks inherent in certain “traditions” and failed to adequately prevent or address them. Such a pattern can significantly bolster negligence arguments and, in some cases, support claims for punitive damages against national entities.

6.2 Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

While an exhaustive list of every chapter’s history at every Texas university is beyond this guide, it’s important for Franklin County families to recognize that certain national organizations have unfortunately been associated with recurring hazing issues that have gained national attention.

Here’s a look at some of the major fraternities and sororities frequently found at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, alongside key national hazing incidents that illustrate patterns of behavior:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity is present on many Texas campuses, including UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor.

  • Pattern of Incident: National Pike has unfortunately been linked to multiple severe hazing incidents involving alcohol. The tragic Stone Foltz case at Bowling Green State University (BGSU) in 2021, where Foltz died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume a bottle of whiskey, resulted in a $10 million settlement from the fraternity and university. This followed the David Bogenberger death at Northern Illinois University in 2012, which also involved alcohol hazing and led to a $14 million settlement.
  • Relevance: When chapters of Pi Kappa Alpha at Texas universities are accused of alcohol-related hazing, these national incidents demonstrate a clear pattern of organizational knowledge and often, a failure to effectively intervene.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and SMU.

  • Pattern of Incident: SAE has faced intense scrutiny and disciplinary action repeatedly for hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide, often involving alcohol and physical abuse. A traumatic brain injury lawsuit was filed in 2023 against an SAE chapter at the University of Alabama. In Texas, the Texas A&M SAE chapter faced a $1 million lawsuit after pledges alleged suffering severe chemical burns in 2021 (as discussed above). The UT Austin SAE chapter was sued in January 2024 by an exchange student alleging assault at a party, occurring while the chapter was already under suspension for prior hazing/safety violations.
  • Relevance: The repeated nature of these incidents, both in Texas and nationally, paints a picture of a consistent organizational challenge that impacts students from Franklin County attending these universities.

• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity is present at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor.

  • Pattern of Incident: The most notable incident is the 2017 death of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University from alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” hazing ritual. This led to the Max Gruver Act (making felony hazing a crime in Louisiana) and a $6.1 million verdict against individuals responsible.
  • Relevance: The parallels between Gruver’s death and other collegiate alcohol hazing incidents reinforce how certain forms of hazing are prevalent within specific national organizations.

• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Chapters are active at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin.

  • Pattern of Incident: The 2017 death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University from alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” cemented Pi Kappa Phi’s place in the tragic history of hazing. Multiple members were prosecuted.
  • Relevance: Coffey’s death, much like Foltz and Gruver, highlights a dangerous, recurring “tradition” of forced alcohol consumption in fraternities.

• Kappa Alpha Order (ΚΑ): Chapters are present at Texas A&M and SMU.

  • Pattern of Incident: Kappa Alpha Order chapters have been involved in hazing suspensions and allegations across the country, including the 2017 incident at SMU (mentioned above) where new members were allegedly paddled and forced to drink.
  • Relevance: This demonstrates that even organizations with long-standing traditions can fall into dangerous patterns if oversight is insufficient.

• Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): Found at Texas A&M.

  • Pattern of Incident: The catastrophic 2021 incident involving Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri, where forced alcohol consumption during a “pledge dad reveal” left him with severe, permanent brain damage, stands as a stark warning. The Santulli family settled lawsuits with 22 defendants, reportedly for multi-million-dollar amounts.
  • Relevance: This case highlights the potential for non-fatal hazing to cause lifelong, devastating injuries and the extent of multi-defendant litigation.

• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor.

  • Pattern of Incident: A recent 2024 case at the College of Charleston involved a jury awarding a family more than $10 million in damages for brutal hazing that included physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment. This indicates that Sigma Chi has faced severe hazing allegations with significant legal penalties.
  • Relevance: This verdict specifically demonstrates that juries are increasingly willing to award massive amounts for severe hazing, recognizing the profound and lasting harm it causes.

It is important to note that university Greek life rosters can change, and this list is illustrative, not exhaustive. Students and parents in Franklin County should always check the most current information directly from university Greek Life sites.

6.3 Tie Back to Legal Strategy

These national histories and recurring patterns are not mere statistics; they are critical components of a successful legal strategy:

• Proving Foreseeability: When a national organization sees the same dangerous hazing ritual (e.g., a “Big/Little” alcohol night or a physical “initiation” exercise) cause injury or death repeatedly across its chapters, it becomes very difficult for them to claim they “couldn’t have foreseen” the harm. This creates a strong argument for negligence.
• Challenging “Paper” Policies: National fraternities and universities often point to their extensive anti-hazing policies and training as a defense. However, if previous incidents show these policies were not meaningfully enforced, or if discipline was too lenient to deter future hazing, an attorney can argue that these were merely “paper policies” and not genuinely committed efforts.
• Impact on Settlement and Insurance: A strong showing of pattern evidence and foreseeability puts significant pressure on national organizations and their insurance carriers. It can increase settlement leverage and helps navigate disputes about insurance policy exclusions (e.g., arguments that hazing is an “intentional act” not covered by insurance). Our firm, with Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), understands exactly how to counter these insurance tactics.
• Potential for Punitive Damages: In cases where defendants showed extreme recklessness or a callous indifference to known risks—often evidenced by a history of ignoring warnings and repeated incidents—a jury may award punitive damages. These damages are designed not just to compensate the victim but to punish the wrongdoer and deter others.

For Franklin County families, understanding these legal connections is empowering. It means that an attorney doesn’t start from scratch; they build on a foundation of documented historical incidents to demand accountability from powerful organizations.

7. Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Successfully pursuing a hazing claim against individuals, a local chapter, a national organization, or a university requires a meticulous, aggressive, and strategically executed legal approach. For families in Franklin County, this process can feel overwhelming, but an experienced firm like Attorney911 knows how to navigate these complexities, turning raw facts into a compelling case for accountability and justice.

7.1 Evidence

In modern hazing cases, evidence is king, and much of it is digital. Our firm focuses on a multi-pronged approach to evidence collection and preservation:

• Digital Communications: These are often the most critical pieces of evidence. Group chat messages from platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and even fraternity-specific apps can reveal everything: planning the hazing, assigning tasks, discussing the events, and even attempts at cover-up. Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, and TikTok comments also play a role. Our firm works quickly to preserve this evidence, often leveraging digital forensics experts to recover deleted messages or content. We also advise families on critical steps like immediately screenshotting messages, capturing full conversations with timestamps, and backing them up to cloud storage. Watch Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) for guidance.

• Photos & Videos: Members often film hazing activities, sometimes for “fun” or to document “tradition.” This can be invaluable evidence. We look for:

  • Content filmed by participants during the events.
  • Footage shared in private group chats or on social media.
  • Security camera footage from houses or venues, including Ring doorbell cameras.
  • Photographs of injuries, rooms where hazing occurred, or objects used in the hazing.

• Internal Organization Documents: Through legal discovery, we can compel the production of crucial documents such as:

  • Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, or “ritual” documents.
  • Emails, texts, or internal memos from officers regarding new member activities.
  • National anti-hazing policies, risk management guidelines, and training materials.
  • Records of previous hazing complaints or disciplinary actions against the chapter or other chapters of the same national organization.

• University Records: We actively seek to obtain records from the university through discovery or public records requests (for public institutions like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin):

  • Prior conduct files, records of probation or suspension against the organization.
  • Incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices.
  • Clery Act reports and other legally mandated disclosures.
  • Emails or communications among administrators concerning the organization or hazing incidents.

• Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive documentation of injuries is vital:

  • Emergency room reports, ambulance records, and hospitalization charts.
  • Detailed notes from surgeries, rehabilitation, or ongoing physical therapy.
  • Toxicology reports (blood alcohol content, drug screenings).
  • Records from psychologists, psychiatrists, or counselors, documenting PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health impacts. These records are critical for proving not just physical, but also severe emotional distress and trauma.

• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts are crucial for corroborating other evidence:

  • Other pledges who experienced the hazing.
  • Current or former members who are willing to speak out.
  • Roommates, RAs, coaches, trainers, or other bystanders who observed changes in the victim or heard about the hazing.
  • Former members who quit the organization due to hazing, or those who were expelled, can provide context and previous patterns.

7.2 Damages

When hazing results in injury, illness, or death, victims and their families can pursue various categories of damages aimed at compensating them for their losses and holding wrongdoers accountable. We don’t settle cheap; we build cases that force accountability.

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This category includes all costs associated with treatment:

  • Immediate emergency room visits, ambulance transport, and hospitalization (including ICU stays).
  • Surgeries, medications, and ongoing physical therapy or rehabilitation.
  • For catastrophic injuries (e.g., brain injuries from alcohol poisoning or falls), this can include a life care plan—a detailed projection of future medical needs, home care, and adaptive equipment for the victim’s entire lifespan.

• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: Hazing can severely disrupt a student’s academic and future professional life:

  • Lost wages if the victim (or a parent caring for them) misses work.
  • Tuition and fees for semesters missed due to medical leave or withdrawal from school.
  • Lost scholarships (academic, athletic, or Greek-based).
  • Diminished future earning capacity if injuries result in a permanent disability that affects their ability to work. This requires expert economists to calculate potential lifetime earnings loss.

• Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for subjective, but very real, suffering:

  • Physical Pain and Suffering: Both immediate and ongoing pain from injuries.
  • Emotional Distress, Trauma, and Humiliation: This includes diagnoses like PTSD, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic attacks, or even suicidal ideation. It also encompasses the profound humiliation and loss of dignity.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Compensation for the inability to participate in hobbies, sports, social activities, and the overall reduced quality of life due to injuries or psychological trauma.

• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the most tragic cases, when hazing leads to a student’s death, the surviving family members can pursue damages for:

  • Funeral and burial costs.
  • Loss of financial support the deceased would have provided (calculated by an economist).
  • Loss of companionship, comfort, love, and society of the deceased for parents, spouses, or children.
  • Grief and emotional suffering endured by the family.
    Attorney911 has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases.

• Punitive Damages: In cases of extreme recklessness, malicious conduct, or gross negligence, courts may award punitive damages. These are designed to punish the defendants and deter similar future conduct. Texas law allows for punitive damages but may cap them in certain circumstances. A pattern of ignoring warnings or repeated incidents can strengthen a claim for punitive damages.

7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation is complex because it often involves multiple defendants and intricate insurance coverage disputes.

• Insurance Coverage: National fraternities, universities, and individual members often have various insurance policies (liability, homeowner’s, umbrella) that may cover hazing claims. However, insurers frequently argue that hazing constitutes “intentional conduct” or a “criminal act,” which could be excluded from coverage. This is where expertise matters. Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, with her background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), provides invaluable insight into how insurance companies operate. She knows their tactics, how they value (and undervalue) claims, and how to fight coverage exclusions.

• Navigating Defenses: Defendants will employ a range of defenses. They may argue:

  • “The pledge consented”: As discussed, Texas law explicitly rejects this.
  • “It was a rogue chapter”: Our analysis of national hazing histories (Section 6) shows how we counter this by demonstrating foreseeability and a pattern of failures.
  • “It happened off-campus”: Location alone does not absolve liability if the organization sponsored the event or the university knew about it.
  • “We have anti-hazing policies”: We examine whether these were “paper policies” or genuinely enforced.
  • “Unforeseeable accident”: We use expert testimony and prior incident history to show hazing risks were known.
  • Sovereign immunity (for public universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT): We pursue exceptions and strategies to overcome these arguments.

• Strategic Litigation: Our firm’s experience in complex litigation against massive institutions, including Ralph Manginello’s involvement in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, means we are not intimidated by powerful defendants or their deep-pocketed legal teams. We have the resources and expertise to:

  • Identify all potential sources of liability and insurance coverage.
  • Aggressively pursue discovery to uncover hidden evidence.
  • Engage top experts in digital forensics, medicine, psychology, and economics.
  • We prepare every case for trial, ensuring that if insurers or defendants will not make a fair offer, we are ready to take them to court.

For Franklin County families seeking justice, a firm that understands these intricate evidentiary, damages, and strategic components is essential to achieving true accountability and securing the compensation your family deserves.

8. Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing impacts a student from Franklin County, the immediate aftermath can be chaotic and frightening. Knowing what to do, who to trust, and what mistakes to avoid is critical. This section offers practical, actionable advice for parents, students, and witnesses, designed to empower them during a crisis.

8.1 For Parents

For Franklin County parents, watching your child struggle with hazing-related issues can be excruciating. Here’s what you need to know and how you can support them:

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Be aware of sudden, unexplained changes in your child’s behavior or physical state. These can often be subtle initially:
  • Physical Signs: Unexplained bruises, cuts, burns, or “accidents” with dubious explanations. Extreme fatigue, exhaustion, or sleep deprivation. Sudden weight loss or gain. Signs of alcohol poisoning or frequent intoxication, even if your child isn’t typically a heavy drinker.
  • Behavioral & Emotional Changes: Marked secrecy about their activities or friends (“I can’t talk about it”). Withdrawal from family, old friends, or non-Greek activities. Sudden personality shifts—increased anxiety, depression, irritability, or anger. Defensiveness when asked about the organization. Talking about “just having to get through this” or “everyone did it before me.”
  • Academic Red Flags: A sudden and significant drop in grades. Missing classes or falling asleep during lectures due to late-night “mandatory” events.
• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach them with empathy and without judgment. Start with open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with the fraternity/sorority?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are paramount, and you will support them regardless of their choices. Reassure them that they can tell you anything without judgment.
• If Your Child Is Hurt: Prioritize their health. Get them immediate medical attention, even if they insist they are “fine.” Document everything: take clear photos of injuries (multiple angles, with a scale like a coin), write down details of what they tell you (who, what, when, where) while it’s fresh, and save any relevant items like damaged clothing or receipts.
• Dealing with the University: Document every communication with university administrators. Ask specific questions about their knowledge of prior incidents involving the same organization and what actions were taken. Be wary of university officials who seek to quickly resolve the issue internally without proper investigation or transparency.
• When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has experienced significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing what happened, contact an experienced attorney immediately. We can help preserve critical evidence, navigate the complex university investigation process, and protect your child’s rights.

8.2 For Students / Pledges

If you are a student from Franklin County and are questioning whether what you’re experiencing is hazing, you are not alone. Many students feel trapped between wanting to belong and feeling unsafe.

• Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself: Am I being forced or pressured to do something that makes me uncomfortable, feels unsafe, or is degrading? Would I do this if I had a real choice, free from fear of social exclusion or punishment? If the activity is hidden from parents, professors, or administrators, it is likely hazing. Remember, if it makes you question your safety, dignity, or mental well-being, it is hazing.
• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: In Texas, the law is clear: consent is not a defense to hazing. You may feel like you “agreed” to participate, but courts and universities recognize that a power imbalance, intense peer pressure, and the strong desire to belong create a coercive environment where genuine consent is impossible. You have the right to feel safe and respected.
• Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, get to a secure location and contact a trusted adult (parent, RA, school counselor, or the authorities) immediately. If you wish to de-pledge, you can often do so by sending a simple email or text to the chapter leadership, stating your decision to resign. Do not feel compelled to attend “one last meeting” where you might be pressured or intimidated.
• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many Texas universities, and Texas state law, offer protections for students who call 911 or report hazing in good faith, even if alcohol or minor infractions were involved. Your safety, and the safety of others, comes first.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once involved in hazing, either as a participant or an observer, and now feel guilt or a moral obligation to speak out, your actions can be incredibly powerful in preventing future harm.

• Your Role in Accountability: Your testimony and evidence can be the key to preventing another tragedy and holding individuals and organizations accountable. We understand that cooperating can be frightening and may raise concerns about your own legal exposure.
• Seek Legal Advice: It is crucial for you to seek your own independent legal counsel. An attorney can advise you on your rights, potential liabilities, and how to navigate cooperation with authorities or in a civil lawsuit. In some cases, cooperating can lead to leniency or protection.
• Speak Out for Change: Many former members have found a path to redemption by providing critical information that led to justice for victims and reforms within organizations. Your voice can make a difference.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For Franklin County families facing the aftermath of hazing, making the right decisions in the crucial early days and weeks can determine the outcome of a case. Conversely, certain common mistakes can severely undermine or even destroy a valid claim. Attorney911 urges you to pay close attention to the following:

MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:

   • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This looks like a deliberate cover-up and can be perceived as obstruction of justice. It makes proving the hazing incredibly difficult, if not impossible.
   • What to do instead: Preserve and backup everything immediately, even if it’s embarrassing. Digital forensics might be able to recover deleted items, but original, unedited screenshots and messages are gold.

2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:

   • What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
   • Why it’s wrong: While emotionally understandable, this almost always backfires. The organization will immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses.
   • What to do instead: Document everything, then contact a lawyer before any direct confrontation. Let your attorney handle communication.

3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms:

   • What universities do: They may pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements to avoid public scrutiny and legal action.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your legal right to sue or settle for an amount far below the true value of your case.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or organization without having an attorney review it first.

4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:

   • What families think: “I want people to know what happened.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Anything posted online can be used by defense attorneys against you. Inconsistencies between social media posts and formal statements can damage credibility, and public posts might waive attorney-client privilege.
   • What to do instead: Document privately. Share information only with your legal counsel, who can then strategically control public messaging if necessary.

5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”:

   • What fraternities say: “Come meet with us face-to-face before making any rash decisions.”
   • Why it’s wrong: These meetings are often designed to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can later harm your legal case.
   • What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication from the organization should be directed through your attorney.

6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:

   • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Critical evidence disappears rapidly, witnesses graduate or move away, the statute of limitations continues to run, and the university’s internal process prioritizes institutional reputation, not necessarily your child’s full legal rights or compensation.
   • What to do instead: Preserve all evidence NOW. Consult with a lawyer immediately. The university’s internal process is distinct from achieving real civil accountability and compensation.

7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:

   • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters work for the insurance company, not for you. Recorded statements are typically used to find reasons to deny or minimize your claim. Early settlement offers are almost always lowball.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with any insurance adjuster and tell them, “My attorney will contact you.”

For more insights into mistakes to avoid, watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes that can ruin your injury case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.

8.5 Short FAQ

Here are answers to common questions Franklin County families have about hazing:

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin) have some protections under sovereign immunity, but exceptions apply for gross negligence, certain operational failures, and violations of federal laws like Title IX. Private universities (such as SMU and Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends heavily on its unique facts. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. While hazing is typically a Class B misdemeanor, it becomes a state jail felony in Texas if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to prosecution for hazing. Courts recognize that “agreement” under intense peer pressure, a power imbalance within a group, or fear of social exclusion is not genuine voluntary consent.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  Generally, in Texas, you have two years from the date of injury or death to file most personal injury or wrongful death lawsuits. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute of limitations might be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. We strongly advise calling 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to discuss your specific timeline. For more information, watch our video on the statute of limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held responsible if they sponsored the event, maintained control over the organization, or had knowledge of the hazing and failed to act. Many major hazing cases that resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments (like the Pi Delta Psi retreat case or the Sigma Pi “unofficial house” case) occurred completely off-campus.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy. While some high-profile cases do garner media attention, most hazing lawsuits resolve through confidential settlements before going to trial. We can work to request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms to protect your child’s identity and privacy while still pursuing accountability.

9. About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing incident, especially one that leads to severe injury or tragic loss, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions—national fraternities, major universities, and their insurers—fight back, and how to win anyway. At The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we bring a unique blend of expertise, tenacity, and compassion to every hazing case.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including our neighbors in Franklin County and communities like Mount Vernon, Scroggins, and Purley that send students to universities across the state. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families far beyond the campus grounds. Our firm is uniquely qualified to handle these complex and emotionally charged cases.

Our capabilities are built on several key advantages:

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable insight. As a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm, she knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and often undervalue) hazing claims. She understands their delay tactics, their coverage exclusion arguments, and their settlement strategies. In essence, we know their playbook because we used to run it. Her complete credentials can be found at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.

• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, has extensive experience in complex litigation, including his involvement in the landmark BP Texas City explosion litigation. This means we are not intimidated by taking on massive corporations, national fraternities with deep pockets, or major universities and their formidable defense teams. Our federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) ensures we are prepared for any legal battle. Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials and case history are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.

• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases, working with top economists to value lifetime losses. We understand the profound impact a brain injury or permanent disability has on a victim and their family, and we build cases that demand full compensation. We don’t settle cheap; we build cases that force accountability.

• Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a critical edge. We understand how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, allowing us to advise witnesses and former members who may face dual exposure. Attorney911’s criminal defense expertise (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) means we can navigate both legal tracks.

• Investigative Depth: We meticulously investigate every detail. Our firm leverages a network of experts—digital forensics specialists to recover deleted evidence (like group chats), medical professionals to document injuries, psychologists to assess trauma, and economists to calculate damages. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments actually operate, often behind closed doors. We know how to uncover hidden evidence—from deleted group chats and social media posts to subpoenaing national fraternity records that reveal a history of similar incidents and university files through diligent discovery and public records requests. What makes hazing cases different is the combination of powerful institutional defendants, intricate insurance coverage fights, and the delicate balance of victim privacy versus public accountability. We also understand the nuances of Greek culture, tradition, and how to effectively prove coercion in a court of law.

We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We focus on thorough investigation and real accountability, not just quick settlements. For Franklin County families, you don’t have to face this battle alone.

Call to Action

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus – be it the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or any other institution – we want to hear from you. Families in Franklin County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm today for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

During your free consultation, you can expect us to:

• Listen to your story without judgment, respecting the sensitivity of the situation.
• Review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
• Explain your legal options, discussing whether a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or other actions might be appropriate.
• Discuss realistic timelines and what to expect during the legal process.
• Answer your questions about costs. We work on a contingency fee basis (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc), meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case.
• There is no pressure to hire us on the spot; we encourage you to take the time you need to decide.
• Everything you tell us is strictly confidential.

To reach Attorney911 for immediate assistance or a consultation:

• Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Email: ralph@atty911.com
• Website: https://attorney911.com

Se Habla Español: We are proud to offer legal services in Spanish. For consultation in Spanish, please contact Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com.

Whether you’re in Franklin County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Let our experience be your strength. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com