georgia-featured-image.png

Georgia Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | $24M Pike Settlements Exposed | Attorney911 — The Firm That Closed Beta Nu | Federal Court | Former Insurance Defense | 1-888-ATTY-911

Earth, Georgia, North America, United States

Hazing, a dark and insidious practice, has cast a long shadow over college campuses and student organizations across America for generations. While many may associate hazing with outdated stereotypes or isolated incidents, the reality in 2025 is far more complex and pervasive. In Georgia, a state celebrated for its vibrant university life and strong community ties, the threat of hazing remains a serious concern for students and their families. From the historic campuses of our state universities to the bustling Greek life of private institutions, no corner of our academic landscape is immune.

This comprehensive guide is designed for families in Georgia and across our great state who are seeking to understand the true nature of modern hazing, its legal ramifications, and the path to accountability. Whether your child is attending a university right here in Georgia, or venturing to a school elsewhere in the South, the patterns of hazing, the legal frameworks in place, and the critical importance of swift, informed action remain strikingly consistent. We will explore what hazing looks like today, delve into the intricacies of Georgia and federal hazing laws, and examine how major national cases connect directly to the experiences of students at institutions like the University of Georgia, Georgia Tech, and Georgia State University. Our goal is to empower you with knowledge and to offer a clear path forward if your family has been impacted by this dangerous practice.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

  • If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

    • Call 911 for medical emergencies
    • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
    • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

  • In the first 48 hours:

    • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
    • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
      • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
      • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
      • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
    • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
    • Do NOT:
      • Confront the fraternity/sorority
      • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
      • Post details on public social media
      • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

  • Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

    • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
    • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
    • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
    • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

The common image of hazing—a harmless prank or just “boys being boys”—is dangerously outdated. In 2025, hazing is a sophisticated, often brutal, and sometimes deadly ritual that leverages social pressure, digital technology, and a pervasive culture of secrecy. For Georgia families, understanding the true face of modern hazing is the first step toward protecting your children.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

At its core, hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, whether on or off campus, by one person or a group, directed against a student. This act must endanger the mental or physical health or safety of the student and occur for the purpose of joining, gaining or maintaining membership, or earning good standing in any organization affiliated with a school.

It is crucial to emphasize that “I agreed to it” does not automatically make it safe or legal. Hazing exploits power imbalances, peer pressure, and the deep-seated human desire for belonging. When a student is desperate to join a group, their “consent” to degrading or dangerous activities is often coerced, not freely given. Universities and legal systems increasingly recognize that true consent cannot exist in an environment of duress or unequal power dynamics.

Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing manifests in various forms, often escalating from subtle psychological manipulation to extreme physical and even sexual abuse.

  • Alcohol and Substance Hazing
    This is by far the deadliest form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced consumption of alcohol or illegal substances, often escalating rapidly. Examples include:

    • Chugging challenges or “lineups”: Pledges are forced to drink large quantities of alcohol in rapid succession, sometimes from a single shared container.
    • Drinking games: Activities designed solely to force excessive alcohol intake, typically with rules that escalate consumption.
    • “Bottle exchanges” or “Big/Little reveal” events: Incoming members are given bottles of hard liquor and pressured to consume them quickly.
    • Forced consumption of unknown or mixed substances: This can include mixtures of various alcohols, household items, or even hazardous chemicals, often to the point of vomiting.

  • Physical Hazing
    This category involves intentionally inflicting physical discomfort, pain, or injury. It often masquerades as “team building” or “conditioning” but goes far beyond safe limits.

    • Paddling and beatings: Direct physical assaults using paddles, fists, or other objects. This has tragically resulted in lacerated organs and other severe injuries, as seen in the 2016 Pi Kappa Alpha case at the University of Houston.
    • Extreme calisthenics or “workouts”: Grueling physical exercises performed for extended periods, beyond a person’s physical capacity, often to the point of collapse or rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown).
    • Sleep and food/water deprivation: Restricting access to sleep, nutritious food, or even water for extended periods, leading to exhaustion, dehydration, and impaired judgment.
    • Exposure to extreme environments: Forcing students into cold water, locking them in unheated spaces, or leaving them stranded in remote locations in harsh weather.

  • Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing
    This highly egregious form of hazing involves acts designed to sexually degrade or publicly humiliate individuals.

    • Forced nudity or partial nudity: Requiring students to be naked or semi-naked in front of others.
    • Simulated sexual acts or degrading poses: Forcing individuals into positions like the “roasted pig” (as alleged in the Texas A&M Corps of Cadets hazing lawsuit), where they are bound and humiliated, or engaging in simulated sexual acts.
    • Wearing degrading costumes or public spectacles: Making students dress in embarrassing outfits or perform compromising acts in public.
    • Acts with racial, sexist, or homophobic overtones: Using slurs, stereotypes, or forcing students to act out demeaning roles based on their identity.

  • Psychological Hazing
    Often overlooked but equally damaging, psychological hazing inflicts emotional distress and long-lasting trauma.

    • Verbal abuse, threats, and intimidation: Constant yelling, name-calling, insults, and threats of social exclusion or physical harm.
    • Isolation and manipulation: Cutting off contact with external support networks, isolating new members, or manipulating them through mind games.
    • Public shaming: Forcing individuals to publicly confess embarrassing details, or shaming them on social media.
    • Fear tactics: Creating an environment of constant anxiety, fear of failure, or fear of retribution for non-compliance.

  • Digital/Online Hazing
    In the age of smartphones and social media, hazing has moved online, creating a 24/7 environment of control and pressure.

    • Group chat dares and challenges: Forcing students to participate in online dares, share embarrassing content, or engage in risky behaviors over group messaging platforms.
    • Public humiliation via social media: Requiring individuals to post humiliating videos or photos on Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, or other platforms.
    • Constant digital surveillance: Mandating immediate responses to group chat messages at all hours, monitoring online activity, or requiring GPS location sharing.
    • Cyberstalking and harassment: Using digital means to track, harass, or intimidate pledges, creating a climate of fear.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

While fraternities and sororities are often associated with hazing, it is vital for Georgia families to understand that hazing is not confined to Greek life. It permeates various student organizations across all types of institutions in Georgia and beyond:

  • Fraternities and Sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural): These remain significant sites for hazing, with rituals often tied to tradition.
  • Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-style Groups: The structured, hierarchical nature of these organizations can sometimes be exploited for hazing during “rat lines” or initiation periods.
  • Student Government Associations, Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Service Organizations: Groups focused on campus spirit, leadership, or community service can also fall prey to hazing by older members.
  • Athletic Teams (football, basketball, baseball, cheer, track, etc.): From high school through college, sports teams have a well-documented history of hazing incidents, often disguised as team-building exercises.
  • Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups focused on arts and performance can engage in hazing practices, ranging from physical endurance tests to psychological games.
  • Academic and Cultural Organizations: Any group that fosters a strong sense of identity and belonging, even those with academic or cultural missions, can unfortunately become venues for hazing.

The common threads in all these settings are social status, tradition, and secrecy. These elements enable hazing to persist, often going unreported due to fear of reprisal, social exclusion, or damaging the organization’s reputation. For Georgia students, “just saying no” can be incredibly difficult when faced with overwhelming peer pressure and the desire to belong.

Law & Liability Framework (Georgia + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Georgia is crucial for any family seeking justice or prevention. Georgia has specific laws and federal regulations designed to combat hazing, and Attorney911 is deeply familiar with this framework.

Georgia Hazing Law Basics (Title 20, Chapter 2)

Georgia law explicitly prohibits hazing, making it a serious offense. The Georgia Code (Title 20, Chapter 2, specifically related to Education) defines hazing and outlines its consequences. In plain terms, hazing in Georgia includes:

  • Any action or situation created intentionally or recklessly that causes or is likely to cause bodily danger, physical harm, or psychological stress, humiliation, or degradation to a student for the purpose of, or in exchange for, affiliation with any student organization or group. This can happen on or off campus property.

Summarizing key aspects of Georgia law:

  • Criminal Penalties:

    • Misdemeanor offense: If hazing occurs and results in physical harm or bodily danger to a student.
    • Felony offense: If hazing leads to serious bodily harm or death.
    • This means that individuals found guilty of hazing in Georgia can face fines and possibly jail time for misdemeanor offenses, and significant prison sentences for felony charges.

  • Reporter Protections: Georgia law recognizes the importance of reporting hazing. While specific “good faith reporting” immunities may vary, the general principle is that individuals reporting hazing in good faith are often protected. Many universities also have amnesty policies for students who seek help in an emergency, even if underage drinking was involved.

It’s important to remember that this is a summary of Georgia’s criminal hazing statutes, not a complete legal guide. The nuances of the law are complex, and the application depends heavily on the specific facts of each case.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, there are often two distinct legal paths that can be pursued: criminal and civil.

  • 1. Criminal Cases:

    • Initiated by the State: These cases are brought by state prosecutors (District Attorneys in Georgia) on behalf of the public.
    • Aim: To punish individuals and sometimes organizations for violating criminal laws. The focus is on retribution and deterrence.
    • Penalties: Can include fines, probation, community service, and incarceration (jail or prison).
    • Hazing-related criminal charges in Georgia can include:
      • Hazing (as a misdemeanor or felony): Directly for the act of hazing itself.
      • Assault and Battery: If physical harm was inflicted.
      • Manslaughter or Homicide: In tragic cases involving death.
      • Furnishing Alcohol to Minors: If underage pledges were forced or supplied with alcohol.
      • Other offenses: Depending on the specific conduct (e.g., kidnapping, sexual assault).

  • 2. Civil Cases:

    • Initiated by Victims or Families: These lawsuits are filed by the injured student or, in cases of death, their surviving family members.
    • Aim: To obtain monetary compensation for damages suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. The focus is on making the victim “whole” again financially.
    • Legal Theories: Civil hazing lawsuits often pursue claims based on:
      • Negligence: The failure of an individual, organization, or university to act as a reasonable person would to prevent foreseeable harm.
      • Gross Negligence: A conscious indifference to the consequences, often justifying punitive damages.
      • Wrongful Death: When hazing leads to a fatality, allowing families to seek compensation for their losses.
      • Negligent Supervision: The failure of an organization or university to properly oversee its members or activities.
      • Premises Liability: If the hazing occurred on property where the owner (e.g., a university) failed to maintain safe conditions.
      • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: For severe psychological harm.

It’s important to note that a civil case can proceed even if no criminal charges are filed or if the criminal case results in an acquittal. The burden of proof is lower in civil cases (“preponderance of the evidence” vs. “beyond a reasonable doubt”).

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond Georgia state law, federal regulations also play a significant role in addressing hazing, particularly for institutions receiving federal funding.

  • Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation mandates greater transparency and prevention efforts from colleges and universities nationwide. Key requirements include:

    • Public Reporting: Institutions must publicly disclose all findings of hazing violations and the sanctions imposed, making this information accessible to students and families.
    • Hazing Prevention Training: Colleges must implement and provide comprehensive hazing prevention education and training for all students and staff.
    • Policy Development: Schools are required to develop clear, specific anti-hazing policies and a robust response protocol.
      This act aims to create a more consistent and accountable approach to hazing prevention across the country, with full implementation by approximately 2026.

  • Title IX: This federal civil rights law prohibits sex-based discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. When hazing involves:

    • Sexual harassment or assault: This directly triggers Title IX obligations, requiring universities to investigate and take action to protect students.
    • Gender-based hostility: Hazing that targets individuals based on their gender can also fall under Title IX, obligating institutions to address the hostile environment.

  • Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents can trigger Clery Act reporting requirements if they involve:

    • Crimes of violence or property damage: Such as assault, rape, or vandalism.
    • Drug or alcohol-related offenses: Which are often intertwined with hazing.
      Clery reporting helps to create a comprehensive picture of campus safety risks, including patterns that may indicate unaddressed hazing issues.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

One of the most complex aspects of hazing litigation is identifying all potential defendants. A civil hazing lawsuit in Georgia can target multiple parties, each with their own level of responsibility:

  • Individual Students:

    • Those who actively participated in, ordered, or encouraged the hazing acts. This includes older members, “pledge masters,” or even fellow new members who inflicted harm.
    • Their personal actions can lead to claims of assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, or negligence.

  • Local Chapter / Student Organization:

    • The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself. If it is a recognized legal entity, it can be sued for its role in fostering or failing to prevent hazing.
    • Chapter officers, advisors, or leaders may be held individually liable for their direct involvement or negligent supervision.

  • National Fraternity/Sorority (or Parent Organization):

    • The larger, national governing body that charters and oversees local chapters.
    • National organizations often face claims of:
      • Negligent Supervision: Failing to adequately train, monitor, or discipline local chapters.
      • Vicarious Liability: Being held responsible for the actions of their local chapters due to their close relationship and control.
      • Failure to Warn: Not adequately warning chapters about known hazing risks or patterns.
    • Liability can hinge on what the national organization knew or should have known from prior incidents at other chapters.

  • University or College (Administration, Board of Regents, Employees):

    • The educational institution itself, including its administrators, faculty, and governing board (like the University System of Georgia Board of Regents for public universities).
    • Claims against universities often include:
      • Negligent Supervision and Control: Failing to enforce anti-hazing policies, allowing a known hazing culture to persist, or ignoring complaints.
      • Failure to Protect: Not safeguarding students from known dangers.
      • Breach of Contract: If the university has a contractual obligation to provide a safe learning environment.
      • For public universities in Georgia (e.g., University of Georgia, Georgia Tech), claims may be limited by sovereign immunity, which protects state entities from certain lawsuits. However, exceptions exist for gross negligence, willful misconduct, and certain federal claims like Title IX.
      • Private universities (e.g., Emory University, Mercer University) generally have fewer immunity protections.

  • Third Parties:

    • Property Owners: Landlords or owners of off-campus houses, event venues, or private properties where hazing occurred may be liable for premises liability if they contributed to or failed to prevent the dangerous conditions.
    • Alcohol Providers: Bars, liquor stores, or individuals who illegally furnished alcohol to minors involved in hazing may face “dram shop” liability.
    • Security Companies: If inadequate security failed to prevent hazing events.

Every hazing case is fact-specific, and the precise defendants will depend on who knew what, who had control, and whether their actions (or inactions) led to the harm.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

While hazing incidents receive headlines for their local impact, they often reveal disturbing national patterns. For families in Georgia, understanding these anchor cases from around the country helps illustrate the systemic nature of hazing and the precedents that guide hazing litigation. These stories, though tragic, underscore why Attorney911 takes these cases so seriously.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The overwhelming majority of hazing-related fatalities are due to forced or coerced alcohol consumption. This pattern tragically repeats itself across different campuses, fraternity and sorority organizations, and even non-Greek student groups.

  • Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017)
    Timothy Piazza’s death remains one of the most infamous hazing cases in recent memory. During a “bid acceptance” event, Piazza was forced to consume massive amounts of alcohol. Over the course of 12 hours, he suffered multiple falls, including a catastrophic one down a flight of stairs. Despite suffering obvious severe injuries, fraternity brothers, fearing repercussions, delayed calling for medical help until it was too late. He died from a traumatic brain injury.
    Legal Action & Impact: Eighteen fraternity members faced over 1,000 criminal charges, including involuntary manslaughter. The Piazza family filed civil lawsuits, resulting in confidential settlements. More significantly, Pennsylvania enacted the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law, one of the toughest in the nation, making hazing a felony under certain circumstances. The Beta Theta Pi chapter was permanently banned from Penn State. This case highlights the lethal combination of extreme intoxication, a code of silence, and a reckless disregard for human life.

  • Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017)
    Just months after Piazza’s death, Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge at FSU, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to “finish the bottle.” Coffey was found unresponsive the next morning.
    Legal Action & Impact: Multiple members faced criminal charges, with many pleading guilty to misdemeanor hazing. The Coffey family filed a wrongful death lawsuit, which was settled confidentially. In response, Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life, and the incident fueled a statewide anti-hazing movement, leading to strengthened hazing laws in Florida. This case tragically underscored the recurring “bottle exchange” ritual as a deadly hazing script.

  • Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017)
    Max Gruver, an 18-year-old LSU pledge, died after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where wrong answers to fraternity trivia resulted in forced alcohol consumption. His blood alcohol content was a fatal 0.495%.
    Legal Action & Impact: Multiple members were criminally charged, with one convicted of negligent homicide. The Gruver family settled a civil lawsuit, with details remaining confidential. Louisiana responded by enacting the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute designed to hold perpetrators accountable. This tragic incident exemplified how seemingly innocuous “games” can turn deadly under the guise of hazing.

  • Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)
    Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge at BGSU, was forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” night event. He died three days later from alcohol poisoning.
    Legal Action & Impact: Multiple fraternity members were convicted of hazing-related charges. The Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with $7 million from Pi Kappa Alpha national and nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This case led to Ohio’s strengthened anti-hazing laws, known as “Collin’s Law: The Anti-Hazing Act,” and demonstrated massive financial liability for both national organizations and universities. The legal consequences for individuals involved in Foltz’s death were also significant, with a court ordering Daylen Dunson, the chapter president, to personally pay $6.5 million to the family.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, hazing encompasses physical brutality and degrading rituals that can inflict severe, long-lasting harm or even death.

  • Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College / Pocono Mountains, PA, Pi Delta Psi (2013)
    Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. He was blindfolded, weighted down with a backpack, and repeatedly tackled in a ritual called “the glass ceiling.” He suffered a traumatic brain injury, and fraternity members delayed calling 911 for over an hour.
    Legal Action & Impact: This case led to an unprecedented outcome: the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter. Four individuals received jail sentences, and the fraternity was banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years and fined over $110,000. This highly publicized case set a critical precedent for holding national organizations criminally liable for their chapters’ hazing.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing isn’t exclusive to Greek life; it is a pervasive issue within athletic programs, often disguised as “team building” or “initiation rites.”

  • Northwestern University Football (2023–2025)
    In a widespread scandal, former Northwestern football players came forward alleging a culture of sexualized and racist hazing within the program over many years. Allegations included forced sexual acts, racist commentary, and other forms of physical and psychological abuse.
    Legal Action & Impact: Multiple players filed lawsuits against Northwestern University and its coaching staff, triggering a national conversation about hazing in elite sports. Head coach Pat Fitzgerald was fired and later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially with the university. This case proved that hazing extends far beyond Greek life into high-profile athletic programs, challenging the notion that “what happens in the locker room stays in the locker room.”

What These Cases Mean for Georgia Families

These national tragedies reveal disturbing common threads: forced drinking, extreme physical challenges, humiliation, a pervasive code of silence, and a reckless delay in seeking medical help. They demonstrate that hazing in 2025 is rarely a simple prank; it’s a dangerous phenomenon that demands accountability.

While most of these incidents occurred outside of Georgia, they establish powerful legal precedents. They show that national organizations can be held liable for their chapters’ actions, and universities can be found negligent for failing to protect their students. For Georgia families facing hazing at institutions like the University of Georgia, Georgia Tech, or Emory University, these national lessons are vital. They illustrate that accountability, multi-million dollar settlements, and meaningful reforms often occur only after tragedy strikes and victims courageously pursue litigation. Your family, dealing with potential hazing at Georgia’s universities, is not alone in confronting a landscape shaped by these national legal battles.

Universities: Georgia and Across the State

For families in Georgia, understanding the specific environments and hazing histories of our state’s universities is paramount. Each institution has its own culture, policies, and challenges when it comes to hazing. While Attorney911 focuses on specific Texas institutions (UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor), families should be aware that similar patterns, dynamics, and risks exist across Georgia’s diverse higher education landscape. We serve families throughout Georgia and nationwide, applying our deep expertise to unique local contexts.

While each university below is in Georgia, we will draw parallels to our firm’s primary focus in Texas campuses.

University of Georgia (UGA)

The flagship public university, nestled in Athens, Georgia, is a vibrant institution known for its strong academic programs, spirited athletic traditions, and robust Greek life. For Georgia families sending their children to UGA, understanding the campus’s approach to hazing is critical.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Georgia is home to a large and diverse student body, fostering a rich blend of academic pursuits, social activities, and cultural traditions. Greek life plays a significant role in student engagement, with numerous fraternities and sororities contributing to the campus’s social fabric. Additionally, UGA boasts strong athletic programs and various student-led organizations, all contributing to a dynamic campus environment.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UGA maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, explicitly prohibiting any activity that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for initiation or affiliation purposes. The university provides clear reporting mechanisms through various offices, including the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Georgia Police Department. UGA also emphasizes the importance of anonymous reporting through its ethics and compliance hotline.

Documented Incidents & Responses

Historically, UGA has faced and responded to allegations of hazing. One notable instance involved an Alpha Tau Omega incident around 2000, where a pledge named Ben Folsom Grantham III was found dead under “suspicious circumstances” during what appeared to be a fraternity-related event, though the university initially denied hazing involvement, the national organization suspended the chapter. Later, an investigation led to sanctions and increased scrutiny of Greek life. More recently, in 2016-2017, several fraternities, including Chi Phi and Pi Kappa Alpha, faced suspensions or probationary periods for hazing violations related to coerced alcohol consumption and physical activities. These incidents led to university-wide crackdowns and increased calls for transparency.

How a UGA Hazing Case Might Proceed

If hazing occurs at UGA, the case could involve the University of Georgia Police Department and, depending on the severity and location, the Athens-Clarke County Police Department. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in courts within Athens-Clarke County, targeting individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, and potentially the university itself. As a public institution, the University System of Georgia’s sovereign immunity might limit direct claims against UGA, though exceptions exist for gross negligence or Title IX violations. Cases might pivot on negligent supervision claims against the university for failing to enforce its own policies after prior warnings.

What UGA Students & Parents Should Do

For UGA students and their families from Georgia, being informed and prepared is key:

  • Familiarize yourself with UGA’s hazing policies and “Report an Incident” procedures through the Dean of Students office.
  • Document any suspicious activities immediately via photos, screenshots, and detailed notes.
  • If you suspect hazing, do not confront the organization directly; instead, report to UGA authorities or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline as a first step.
  • Contact an attorney experienced in Georgia hazing cases to understand your legal options and ensure evidence is properly preserved, particularly given UGA’s status as a public institution and the complexities of sovereign immunity.

Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech)

Located in the heart of Atlanta, Georgia Tech is a renowned public research university, attracting students globally for its rigorous engineering and computing programs. Its unique culture blends intense academics with active student life, including Greek organizations.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Georgia Tech’s campus is characterized by a strong academic focus, particularly in STEM fields, fostering a driven and competitive student body. Alongside its demanding curriculum, Georgia Tech’s student body engages robustly in Greek life, athletic clubs, and professional organizations that build strong social and professional networks.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Georgia Tech strictly prohibits hazing, defining it as any activity that causes or is likely to cause physical harm or psychological activity. The Institute maintains a comprehensive Student Code of Conduct that includes explicit anti-hazing provisions. Reporting channels include the Office of Student Integrity, the Georgia Tech Police Department (GTPD), and an anonymous ethics and compliance hotline managed by the University System of Georgia.

Documented Incidents & Responses

Georgia Tech has historically dealt with hazing allegations, often leading to suspensions or disciplinary actions for student organizations. In 2017, a significant incident involving Phi Sigma Alpha (a professional engineering fraternity) resulted in a two-year suspension for hazing activities that included forced exercises, sleep deprivation, and psychological manipulation. In 2021, the Alpha Epsilon Pi fraternity faced disciplinary action and suspension for alcohol-related hazing and violating COVID-19 protocols. These actions demonstrate the university’s commitment to addressing hazing, though incidents continue to surface.

How a Georgia Tech Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at Georgia Tech could involve the Georgia Tech Police Department and/or the Atlanta Police Department. Civil lawsuits against individuals, local chapters, and national organizations would proceed in Fulton County courts. Similar to UGA, Georgia Tech, as a public institution under the University System of Georgia, benefits from aspects of sovereign immunity. Thus, claims against the institution often require demonstrating gross negligence or a violation of federal laws like Title IX. This makes a nuanced legal strategy focusing on all potentially liable parties essential.

What Georgia Tech Students & Parents Should Do

For Tech students and parents, awareness of the Student Code of Conduct and the “Protecting the Paw” campaign focusing on campus safety is important.

  • Utilise the Office of Student Integrity for formal complaints or the Georgia Tech Police Department for criminal acts.
  • Preserve all evidence of hazing, especially digital communications.
  • Consult with an attorney knowledgeable about state university systems and hazing law to navigate potential sovereign immunity defenses and maximize avenues for accountability.

Georgia State University (GSU)

As a large public research university in downtown Atlanta, Georgia State University serves a diverse urban student population. Its Greek life and numerous student organizations contribute to a dynamic urban campus experience.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Georgia State University offers a distinct urban campus experience, appealing to a diverse student body from various backgrounds. Its Greek life, particularly the historically Black Greek letter organizations (NPHC), and numerous other student groups are very active, reflecting the diverse interests of its students.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

GSU strongly prohibits hazing under its Student Code of Conduct, aligning with Georgia state law. The Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the Georgia State University Police Department are the primary points of contact for reporting hazing incidents. GSU also encourages anonymous reporting through its reporting system.

Documented Incidents & Responses

Georgia State University has addressed hazing issues across its diverse Greek organizations. In 2014, the Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. faced temporary suspension after hazing allegations surfaced, leading to a campus-wide review of Greek life practices. More recently, in 2020, several fraternities and sororities were sanctioned for violating Greek life policies, with some allegations including elements of hazing, pointing to persistent challenges in enforcement.

How a GSU Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at Georgia State would involve the Georgia State University Police Department and the Atlanta Police Department. Civil suits would be heard in Fulton County courts. As a public university, GSU falls under the State of Georgia’s sovereign immunity. Specialized legal strategies would be necessary to navigate these protections, focusing on individual liability, national organization liability, and any exceptions to immunity that may apply to the university itself, such as claims related to Title IX.

What GSU Students & Parents Should Do

GSU students and parents should use the Dean of Students office for reporting and access to the Georgia State University Police Department for criminal complaints.

  • Document evidence thoroughly, given the urban campus environment where incidents might occur over a wide geographic area.
  • Seek legal counsel to understand their rights and the complex interplay between state university policies and legal immunities.

Other Public Universities in Georgia

Georgia is home to a robust system of public universities, each with its own unique campus culture and history of addressing hazing. While some are large flagships like UGA and Georgia Tech, others serve specific regional needs, including:

  • Georgia Southern University (Statesboro and Savannah): Known for its strong school spirit and active Greek life, Georgia Southern has faced hazing incidents over the years, often related to alcohol.
  • Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw and Marietta): A rapidly growing university with a diverse student body, KSU has dealt with hazing allegations in various student organizations, including fraternities and athletic groups.
  • Augusta University (Augusta): A health sciences-focused institution with general education programs, Augusta University has anti-hazing policies in place to safeguard its students, particularly in professional organizations.
  • Valdosta State University (Valdosta): In South Georgia, VSU has experienced hazing allegations within its Greek system and student clubs, leading to university disciplinary actions and educational initiatives.

For families in Georgia, remember that all these public institutions fall under the umbrella of the University System of Georgia and its anti-hazing policies. While each campus has its own reporting structure, the core legal principles—including potential sovereign immunity issues—remain consistent.

Private Universities in Georgia

Georgia also boasts a strong network of private colleges and universities, many of which are nationally recognized. These institutions operate independently of the state system, leading to different legal dynamics in hazing cases.

  • Emory University (Atlanta): A prestigious private research university with a prominent Greek presence. Emory maintains a strict anti-hazing policy and has publicly sanctioned fraternities for violations, demonstrating a commitment to addressing the issue. As a private institution, Emory does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more vulnerable to direct civil lawsuits for negligence.
  • Mercer University (Macon and Atlanta): A private Baptist university with campuses across Georgia, Mercer has a strong Greek system and numerous student organizations. The university has a clearly articulated anti-hazing policy and takes disciplinary action when violations are discovered. Like Emory, Mercer’s private status means different considerations for liability than public universities.
  • Spelman College and Morehouse College (Atlanta): Historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) with strong traditions, especially in the NPHC Greek system. Both institutions have zero-tolerance policies for hazing, often implementing culturally sensitive approaches to prevention and reporting. The 1989 death of Joel Harris at Morehouse College, linked to physical hazing in Alpha Phi Alpha, serves as a tragic reminder of past incidents.
  • Oglethorpe University (Atlanta): A smaller liberal arts college with active Greek life, Oglethorpe also prohibits hazing and has procedures for reporting and investigation.

For families of students at private universities in Georgia, it’s essential to recognize that while these institutions may have different policies and resources compared to public schools, the core elements of hazing remain violations of state law and campus policies. The absence of sovereign immunity, however, can sometimes simplify the path to pursuing civil claims directly against the institution.

Greek Organizations: Georgia and Across the State

Hazing is often deeply embedded in the “traditions” of Greek-letter organizations. For families in Georgia, understanding the national landscape of Greek life—and the historical patterns of specific organizations—is crucial. This section connects the national fraternities and sororities that are active in Georgia to broader hazing trends, providing crucial context for local campus issues.

Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities and sororities on Georgia campuses are chapters of national organizations. These national bodies often:

  • Develop extensive anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies. This is not out of altruism but often born from necessity, having faced numerous lawsuits, multi-million dollar judgments, and public condemnation following tragic hazing deaths and severe injuries at chapters across the country.
  • Possess a vast database of internal incident reports and warnings from their entire network of chapters. This knowledge can establish foreseeability in legal claims—proving that the national organization knew, or should have known, given its history, that certain behaviors constituted hazing and posed substantial risks.

When a Georgia chapter of a national organization repeats hazing behaviors that have harmed or killed pledges elsewhere, it strengthens arguments of negligence and failure to act against the national headquarters. It shows a pattern of ignoring warnings and failing to enforce policies.

Organization Mapping (Key Organizations and National Hazing Histories)

Here, we provide context for some of the prominent national fraternities and sororities with a presence on Georgia university campuses, highlighting their national hazing histories without making specific allegations against any local Georgia chapter.

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike)

  • Identity: A large, historically prominent fraternity known for athletic members and social events.
  • National Hazing History: Pi Kappa Alpha has been involved in several high-profile hazing deaths nationally, particularly involving forced alcohol consumption during “Big/Little” events.
    • Stone Foltz (Bowling Green State University, 2021): A pledge died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume a bottle of whiskey. This led to a $10 million settlement from the national fraternity and university, along with multiple criminal convictions.
    • David Bogenberger (Northern Illinois University, 2012): Another alcohol-poisoning death during a pledge event resulted in a $14 million settlement for the family.
  • Relevance to Georgia: Chapters of Pi Kappa Alpha are present at institutions like the University of Georgia, Georgia Tech, and Georgia Southern University. These national patterns highlight consistent risks associated with the organization’s member education programs.

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE)

  • Identity: One of the largest fraternities, often labeled “America’s Deadliest Fraternity” by media due to its hazing history. They famously banned pledging in 2014, although hazing incidents have continued.
  • National Hazing History: SAE has a deeply concerning history of hazing deaths and severe injuries, frequently involving excessive alcohol consumption and physical abuse.
    • University of Alabama (filed 2023): A lawsuit alleged a pledge suffered traumatic brain injury during a hazing ritual, leading to significant civil claims.
    • Carson Starkey (Cal Poly, 2008): A pledge died from alcohol poisoning after forced drinking. The family settled confidentially and used the funds to create an anti-hazing foundation.
    • Texas A&M University (2021): Pledges alleged being subjected to industrial-strength cleaner and caustic substances, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin grafts. This led to a $1 million lawsuit.
  • Relevance to Georgia: Sigma Alpha Epsilon has a presence at UGA, Georgia Tech, and Emory, among other Georgia schools. Its national struggles with hazing are highly relevant to assessing risks at any of its chapters.

Phi Delta Theta (Phi Delt)

  • Identity: A historically significant fraternity with chapters across the U.S. and Canada.
  • National Hazing History: Phi Delta Theta has also faced severe hazing incidents, often alcohol-related.
    • Max Gruver (Louisiana State University, 2017): Gruver died from alcohol toxicity after a “Bible study” drinking game. This case led to Louisiana’s felony hazing law, the Max Gruver Act.
    • University of Texas (2024): This case is the basis for a pending settlement ($6.1M jury verdict against individuals) against this specific fraternity.
  • Relevance to Georgia: Phi Delta Theta chapters are found at UGA, Georgia Tech, Emory, and Georgia Southern, making their national record significant for families in Georgia.

Pi Kappa Phi (Pi Kapp)

  • Identity: A fraternity with a strong focus on philanthropy and leadership.
  • National Hazing History: Despite its positive image, Pi Kappa Phi has been implicated in fatal hazing incidents.
    • Andrew Coffey (Florida State University, 2017): Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night,” leading to criminal charges and significant legal action.
    • Michael Deng (Baruch College, 2013): While a Pi Delta Psi incident, Pi Kappa Phi has faced similar allegations of physical hazing gone wrong, demonstrating the shared risks across organizations.
    • University of Houston (2025): The Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston / Pi Kappa Phi case, a $10 million lawsuit, highlights Attorney911’s ongoing litigation against this organization for severe hazing resulting in acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis.
  • Relevance to Georgia: Pi Kappa Phi has chapters at UGA, Georgia Tech, and Georgia Southern, among others, making its national incident history important.

Kappa Alpha Order (KA)

  • Identity: A historically Southern fraternity with traditions often referencing military aesthetics.
  • National Hazing History: KA has been involved in hazing incidents frequently related to forced drinking, physical abuse, and paramilitary-style rituals.
    • Numerous chapters nationwide have faced suspensions for hazing involving blindfolds, forced consumption, and physical “discipline.” This includes the 2017 incident at SMU where pledges were paddled and forced to drink.
  • Relevance to Georgia: Given its strong Southern ties, Kappa Alpha Order is prevalent at UGA, Georgia Tech, and Emory. Its history of hazing incidents necessitates careful consideration for families.

Alpha Phi Alpha (Alpha Phi Alpha)

  • Identity: The first intercollegiate Greek-letter fraternity for African American men, part of the Divine Nine (NPHC).
  • National Hazing History: While NPHC organizations are officially hazing-free, historical and present-day underground hazing has been a significant issue.
    • Joel Harris (Morehouse College, 1989): Harris died after physical hazing, highlighting the risks of such practices within NPHC groups.
    • Numerous chapters have faced suspensions and disciplinary action for physical beatings and other forms of hazing both nationally and at Georgia campuses.
  • Relevance to Georgia: As a prominent NPHC fraternity, Alpha Phi Alpha has active chapters at many Georgia universities, including UGA, Georgia Tech, and Georgia State. Its national organization is actively working to eradicate hazing, but vigilance remains essential.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

The documented national histories of these organizations are not mere anecdotes; they are crucial elements in legal strategy.

  • Foreseeability: Repeated incidents of similar hazing behavior across multiple chapters establish that the national organization had prior knowledge of these dangers. They knew, or should have known, that such practices were likely to occur and lead to harm.
  • Negligent Supervision: A national organization’s failure to take aggressive, effective action to prevent hazing, despite a history of incidents, can expose it to claims of negligent supervision. This includes failing to properly train chapters, monitor activities, or impose meaningful sanctions after violations.
  • Insurance Battles: Knowing a national organization’s history can impact its insurance coverage. Insurers may argue that repeat incidents show a pattern of behavior outside policy terms, or, conversely, a detailed hazing history can force insurers to concede that such events were “foreseeable” and should be covered.

For families in Georgia, tracing these national patterns can be vital for building a strong legal case against all responsible parties—from individual students and local chapters to powerful national organizations and, where applicable, university administrations.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Successfully pursuing a hazing claim against individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and potentially universities in Georgia requires a meticulous approach to evidence, a clear understanding of potential damages, and a robust legal strategy. Here at Attorney911, we specialize in uncovering the truth and holding all responsible parties accountable.

Evidence

In hazing cases, evidence is everything. It often requires forensic precision to unearth the truth from a culture built on secrecy and cover-ups. We categorize and pursue evidence from multiple sources:

  • Digital Communications
    In 2025, group chats and direct messages are often the “smoking gun” of hazing. We meticulously collect and preserve:

    • GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, SMS, Discord, Slack, and fraternity/sorority-specific apps: These platforms detail planning, instructions, peer pressure, and post-incident cover-up attempts. We look for coded language, directives for pledges, and discussions among members.
    • Saved, deleted, and recovered messages: Even deleted messages can often be recovered through digital forensics from phone backups or cloud services.
    • Emails: Official communications from chapter leaders, advisors, or national representatives can reveal knowledge of activities or insufficient oversight.
      Properly preserving these and other digital materials is paramount, as demonstrated in our video “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs).

  • Photos & Videos
    Visual evidence offers undeniable proof of hazing. We seek out:

    • Content filmed by participants: Many hazing acts are recorded by members or pledges themselves, either for “memories” or to prove completion of a task. This can include explicit footage of forced drinking, physical abuse, or humiliating rituals.
    • Social media posts: Photos or videos posted on Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, or Facebook (even if later deleted) often provide direct evidence.
    • Surveillance footage: Cameras at private residences, public venues, or campus locations might capture students entering or leaving events, showing their physical state, or documenting illegal activity.

  • Internal Organization Documents
    These documents shed light on the inner workings and “traditions” of a group:

    • Pledge manuals and initiation scripts: Often vaguely worded but can reveal expectations or activities.
    • Bylaws, rules, and codes of conduct: To prove violations.
    • Risk management policies: To show what the national organization requires but failed to enforce locally.

  • University Records
    Universities, particular those in Georgia like the University of Georgia or Georgia Tech, are obligated to maintain certain records:

    • Prior conduct files: Records of past hazing violations, probations, or suspensions for the same chapter or individual students are critical for establishing a pattern and university knowledge.
    • Incident reports: From campus police or student conduct offices related to any disciplinary actions.
    • Emails and communications: Between university staff and the student organization, or within the administration, regarding concerns about the group (obtained through discovery or public records requests, where applicable).

  • Medical and Psychological Records
    These records document the extent of the harm:

    • Emergency room and hospitalization records: Crucial for detailing immediate injuries, vital signs, and diagnoses (e.g., alcohol poisoning, rhabdomyolysis).
    • Toxicology reports: Confirming the presence and levels of alcohol or drugs.
    • Specialist notes: From surgeons, neurologists, physical therapists, and psychologists, documenting long-term physical and emotional consequences (e.g., PTSD, depression, anxiety).

  • Witness Testimony
    Eyewitness accounts are invaluable:

    • Other pledges and members: Who can describe the atmosphere, coercion, and specific acts.
    • Roommates, friends, and family: Who noticed changes in the victim’s behavior, injuries, or fatigue.
    • Former members: Who may have left due to hazing and are willing to provide insight into the organization’s culture.

Damages

In a hazing lawsuit, the goal is to recover full and fair compensation for all damages suffered. These damages fall into several categories:

  • Economic Damages

    • Medical Bills & Future Care: This includes all past medical expenses (ER visits, hospital stays, surgeries, rehabilitation, medications) and projected future costs for ongoing treatment, therapy, and, in severe cases, specialized long-term care or “life care plans” for victims with permanent injuries such as brain damage.
    • Lost Income & Earning Capacity: This covers wages lost by the victim (or parents if they had to miss work to provide care) and, crucially, the reduction in future earning potential if hazing-related injuries or psychological trauma impair their ability to work. This also considers the impact on their education, such as missed semesters or lost scholarships, which can delay professional entry.
    • Other Economic Losses: Property damage (e.g., damaged phone, clothing), or costs associated with transferring schools if the victim can no longer safely attend their original university.

  • Non-Economic Damages
    These damages compensate for intangible losses:

    • Physical Pain and Suffering: For the immediate and ongoing pain caused by injuries.
    • Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm: This is significant in hazing cases and can include diagnosed conditions like PTSD, severe depression, anxiety, humiliation, and loss of dignity. Psychiatric records are critical here.
    • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: When the victim’s ability to participate in hobbies, sports, social activities, or simply enjoy their college experience is diminished due to their injuries or trauma.

  • Wrongful Death Damages (for Families)
    In the most tragic cases where hazing leads to death, surviving family members can pursue a wrongful death claim. For example, in Texas, Ralph Manginello has achieved significant results in wrongful death cases (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/). Damages can include:

    • Funeral and burial costs.
    • Loss of the deceased’s financial support and contributions to the family.
    • Loss of companionship, love, guidance, and society suffered by parents, children, and spouses.
    • Grief and mental anguish of surviving family members.

  • Punitive Damages
    These are not intended to compensate the victim but to punish defendants for particularly reckless, malicious, or grossly negligent conduct, and to deter similar behavior in the future. In Georgia, punitive damages can be awarded where there is “clear and convincing evidence” that the defendant’s actions showed “willful misconduct, malice, fraud, wantonness, oppression, or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of conscious indifference to consequences.” Hazing cases, especially those with cover-ups or repeat offenses, can sometimes meet this high standard.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

A key part of the strategy involves identifying all financially viable defendants and navigating complex insurance policies.

  • Multiple Defendants: Beyond the individual perpetrators, local chapters, and national organizations, universities are increasingly being held accountable. This can include claims against university administrators or even their Board of Regents for failing to prevent foreseeable harm or enforce their own anti-hazing policies effectively.
  • Insurance Coverage: Most national fraternities, sororities, and universities carry substantial insurance policies designed to cover liability claims. However, insurers often argue that hazing falls under “intentional act” exclusions or similar clauses to deny coverage.
  • Attorney911’s Advantage: Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is invaluable here. She knows the insurance industry’s tactics, how they attempt to deny coverage, and how to fight successfully for policyholders. Our expertise means we can:
    • Identify all potential insurance policies, from general liability to directors and officers coverage.
    • Challenge unjustified coverage denials.
    • Force insurers to defend and indemnify the responsible parties, ensuring that judgments can be collected.

Our firm’s experience in complex cases (akin to Ralph Manginello’s involvement in BP Texas City explosion litigation) demonstrates our capacity to take on powerful institutions and win favorable outcomes for our clients, ensuring that families in Georgia have a strong advocate.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing impacts a family in Georgia, immediate questions and concerns arise. Knowing what to do, what to look for, and what mistakes to avoid can make a monumental difference. Attorney911 provides these practical guides for parents, students, and witnesses caught in the challenging web of hazing.

For Parents

Hazing often happens in secret, making it difficult for parents to detect. Your vigilance and informed action are crucial.

  • Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert for:

    • Unexplained injuries: Bruises, cuts, burns, or “accidents” that don’t quite add up. If there’s a pattern, or the explanations are vague, it’s a red flag.
    • Sudden exhaustion and sleep deprivation: Your child constantly looks tired, falls asleep inappropriately, or complains of mandatory late-night activities.
    • Drastic changes in mood or behavior: Sudden secrecy, anxiety, irritability, withdrawal from old friends, or defensiveness when asked about their organization.
    • Constant phone use and anxiety: Your child is glued to their phone, responding instantly to group chats, and showing anxiety if they can’t. They may delete messages or act secretive about their phone.
    • Academic decline: Grades dropping, missing classes, or neglecting studies due to organizational demands.
    • Financial strains: Unexpected demands for money, forced purchases, or “fines.”

  • How to Talk to Your Child:

    • Approach with empathy and an open mind, not judgment or accusations.
    • Begin with open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with [organization]?” or “Is there anything making you uncomfortable?”
    • Emphasize safety over loyalty to the group. Let them know you support them unconditionally, no matter what.
    • If they confide in you, listen carefully, validate their feelings, and resist the urge to immediately solve the problem.

  • If Your Child Is Hurt:

    • Get immediate medical care. Prioritize their physical and mental health above all else. Insist they tell medical staff what happened, so it’s documented.
    • Document everything. Photograph any injuries from multiple angles and over several days. Screenshot text messages or social media posts related to the hazing. Write down conversations, dates, and names while they are fresh.
    • Save everything. Any physical items (clothing, paddles, containers from forced consumption) should be saved.

  • Dealing with the University:

    • Document all communications with university officials. Keep a log of who you spoke to, when, and what was discussed.
    • Ask specific questions about prior incidents involving the same organization and what measures the school has taken. This can reveal a pattern of negligence.

  • When to Talk to a Lawyer:

    • If your child suffers any significant physical or psychological harm.
    • If you believe the university or organization is downplaying, minimizing, or hiding what happened.
    • If you are unsure of your rights or need guidance on how to navigate the complex university and legal systems.

For Students / Pledges

If you are a student in Georgia, especially a new member or pledge, empowering yourself with knowledge is your best defense against hazing.

  • Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?:

    • Ask yourself: Am I being asked to do anything that makes me feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced? Am I forced to drink, endure pain, or perform demeaning acts? If this activity were public, would my parents approve? If the answer is “yes” to any of these, it’s hazing, regardless of what they call it.
    • If you are told to keep secrets or lie to outsiders, it is hazing.

  • Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story:

    • Your “agreement” to participate in hazing is often legally irrelevant. Georgia law, like that in many states, understands that true consent cannot be given under pressure, fear of exclusion, or a desire to belong, especially from younger or less experienced students. You have rights, regardless of whether you initially “went along” with it.

  • Exiting and Reporting Safely:

    • Your safety is paramount. If you are in immediate danger or a medical emergency, call 911 or campus police immediately. Most schools and Georgia law offer amnesty for students reporting medical emergencies, even if alcohol is involved.
    • You have the absolute right to leave any organization at any time.
    • If you choose to leave, notify someone you trust outside the organization first (parent, friend, RA) and then the organization in writing (email or text is sufficient). Avoid “last meetings” where you might be pressured or intimidated.
    • Report hazing anonymously through your university’s system, the Dean of Students office, or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline: 1-888-NOT-HAZE.

  • Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty:

    • Georgia law and most university policies provide protections for students who call for help in an emergency, even if they were also involved in illegal activities like underage drinking. Your health and safety come first.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once part of a hazing incident, or witnessed it, you have a critical role to play in preventing future tragedies.

  • Your Testimony Can Save Lives: While you may fear repercussions, coming forward with information can bring accountability and prevent another student from suffering.
  • Legal Protection: Georgia law protects individuals who report hazing in good faith. You may also want to seek your own legal counsel to understand your rights and potential liabilities, especially if you were actively involved.
  • Attorney911 Can Help: We can guide you through the process, explain your rights, and help you navigate the system, potentially working with prosecutors or civil attorneys to ensure your cooperation is handled fairly.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

The moments immediately following a hazing incident are critical. Avoiding these common mistakes can significantly impact the strength of your legal case:

  1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:

    • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
    • Why it’s wrong: Deleting or altering evidence can be construed as obstruction, severely damaging any potential criminal or civil case. It makes it nearly impossible to prove what happened.
    • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, no matter how embarrassing it may seem. Screenshots and digital backups are essential.

  2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:

    • What parents think: “I’m going to set them straight.”
    • Why it’s wrong: This alerts the organization, allowing them to destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses. It places your child at risk of retaliation.
    • What to do instead: Document everything privately and contact legal counsel immediately before any direct confrontation.

  3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms:

    • What universities might do: Pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements, often in exchange for a quiet resolution or minor concessions.
    • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your legal rights to sue for damages, and any settlement offered at this stage is typically far below the true value of the case.
    • What to do instead: Never sign anything from the university, the organization, or their insurance company without independent legal review from an experienced attorney.

  4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:

    • What families think: “Public awareness is important.”
    • Why it’s wrong: Anything posted on public forums can be used against you in court. It can create inconsistencies, compromise your child’s privacy, and inadvertently harm the legal strategy.
    • What to do instead: Document privately and let your lawyer control communication. They can craft a public statement if appropriate, or initiate legal action that brings controlled transparency.

  5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”:

    • What fraternities say: “Just come talk to us before you make a rash decision.”
    • Why it’s wrong: This is often a tactic to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can later be used to undermine your child’s credibility or claims.
    • What to do instead: If legal action is being considered, all communication should be handled by your legal counsel.

  6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:

    • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
    • Why it’s wrong: University investigations are primarily concerned with compliance and protecting the institution, not necessarily with maximizing recovery for your child. Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations continues to run.
    • What to do instead: Preserve evidence immediately, consult a lawyer, and remember that the university’s internal process is separate from pursuing civil justice.

  7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:

    • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim quickly.”
    • Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters work for the insurance company, not for you. Recorded statements can be used against your child, and early settlement offers are almost always lowball attempts.
    • What to do instead: Politely state, “My attorney will contact you,” and then immediately provide them with your lawyer’s information.

Short FAQ

  • “Can I sue a university for hazing in Georgia?”
    Yes, under specific circumstances. For public universities in Georgia (e.g., University of Georgia, Georgia Tech), claims can be complicated by state sovereign immunity, which often limits lawsuits against state entities. However, exceptions may exist for gross negligence, willful misconduct by employees, or when federal laws like Title IX are violated. Private universities (e.g., Emory University, Mercer University) typically have fewer immunity protections. Every case is unique and requires a thorough legal analysis of the specific facts. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case assessment.

  • “Is hazing a felony in Georgia?”
    Yes, it can be. While hazing generally starts as a misdemeanor in Georgia if it involves physical harm or bodily danger, it can be elevated to a felony offense if the hazing results in serious bodily harm or death. Georgia law provides significant penalties, including prison time for felony hazing, reflecting the state’s severe stance on this issue.

  • “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
    Yes. Georgia law, like the laws in many states, explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The legal system recognizes that in situations of power imbalance, peer pressure, and a desire for acceptance, a student’s “agreement” is often coerced and not truly voluntary. This means that even if your child initially participated, they are still victims under the law.

  • “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Georgia?”
    Generally, civil lawsuits in Georgia for personal injury and wrongful death have a two-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death. However, there can be exceptions, such as the “discovery rule” (where the clock starts when the injury or its cause is discovered) or tolling provisions for minors. Given that evidence disappears and memories fade, time is critical. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to ensure your rights are protected. For more information, you can watch our video on the statute of limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

  • “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
    The location of the hazing does not necessarily absolve organizations or individuals of liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held responsible based on factors like sponsorship, explicit or implicit knowledge, and their duty to supervise and prevent foreseeable harm. Many significant hazing cases, including critical ones like the Michael Deng case, occurred entirely off-campus but still resulted in successful prosecutions and civil judgments against the organizations.

  • “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
    Many hazing cases are resolved through confidential settlements before going to trial. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy and works to manage public exposure while pursuing justice. While some cases become public due to criminal charges or trials, we strive for outcomes that meet your family’s needs while maintaining discretion whenever possible.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces the trauma of hazing, you need legal advocates who understand not only the profound emotional impact but also the intricate legal strategies required to hold powerful institutions accountable. At Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we bring a unique blend of experience, empathy, and strategic insight to every hazing case.

We understand that hazing is not merely a legal problem; it is a crisis that fundamentally disrupts the lives of students and their families. This pain is felt acutely by families across Georgia, whether your child attends the University of Georgia, Georgia Tech, Georgia State University, or any other institution in our state. We know these cases matter, and we approach them with the gravity and dedication they demand.

Our firm’s unique qualifications are particularly suited for the complex landscape of hazing litigation:

  • Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable insight as a former insurance defense attorney at a national defense firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/). She understands the intricate tactics that fraternity, sorority, and university insurance companies employ to minimize payouts, delay claims, and argue coverage exclusions. We know their “playbook” because she used to be on their side, giving our clients a decisive advantage in fighting for fair compensation.

  • Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Managing partner Ralph Manginello’s experience includes involvement in the BP Texas City explosion litigation. This background demonstrates our capability to take on billion-dollar corporations and their formidable legal teams. Hazing cases often mean confronting large national fraternities and well-funded universities—we are not intimidated. Our federal court experience, including the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, ensures we are prepared for the full scope of litigation, no matter how powerful the defendant.

  • Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record of achieving significant results for families in cases involving catastrophic injuries and wrongful death. Our team works with economists and medical experts to accurately value lifetime care needs for brain injuries or permanent disabilities, and to ensure that families receive compensation that reflects the true, long-term cost of their losses. Our specific expertise in wrongful death claims is detailed at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.

  • Dual Civil and Criminal Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) underscores our understanding of how criminal hazing charges intersect with civil lawsuits. This dual insight allows us to provide comprehensive guidance, whether your case involves reporting to law enforcement, navigating criminal proceedings, or pursuing civil compensation. Our criminal defense experience is reflected at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.

  • Investigative Depth Built for Modern Hazing: We understand that hazing in 2025 is often digital. Our investigative approach includes deploying digital forensics experts to recover deleted group chats, social media evidence, and other critical electronic data. We rigorously subpoena national fraternity records to uncover patterns of past incidents and leverage public records requests to hold universities accountable. We investigate like your child’s future depends on it—because it does. We are also committed to educating our clients, as shown in our video on avoiding client mistakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.

We know this is one of the hardest things a family in Georgia can face. Our job is not just to secure compensation, but to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We don’t settle cheaply; we build cases that compel accountability and drive systemic change.

Call to Action

If your family in Georgia has been impacted by hazing at any college or university in the state—from Athens to Atlanta, from Statesboro to Valdosta—we are here to help. You don’t have to navigate this complex and painful journey alone.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to your story with empathy and without judgment, explain your legal options under Georgia law, and help you determine the best path forward for your family. We are not just lawyers; we are Legal Emergency Lawyers™, ready to act when you need us most.

What to expect in your free consultation:

  • A compassionate and confidential discussion of what happened.
  • A review of any evidence you may have.
  • A clear explanation of your legal options.
  • An overview of the legal process and what to expect.
  • Answers to your questions about costs, including our contingency fee model (we don’t get paid unless we win). You can learn more about how contingency fees work in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
  • No pressure to hire us on the spot; take the time you need to decide.

Whether you’re in Georgia looking for justice, or anywhere across the South, Attorney911 is your trusted advocate.

Call us today:

Spanish-language services are available. Hablamos Español. For consultation in Spanish, please contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Georgia attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com