If you’re reading this, your family may be facing one of the most terrifying moments of your life. Your child was supposed to make friends at college. Instead, they were tortured. We’re here to help families in Gilmer County, Georgia fight back. For generations, sending a child off to college has been a moment of immense pride and hope for families throughout Gilmer County. We envision our children thriving academically, building lifelong friendships, and discovering their paths in a safe, nurturing environment. Yet, for an alarming number of students, this dream quickly devolves into a nightmare, shattered by the insidious practice of hazing.

In Gilmer County, nestled in the North Georgia Mountains, our community values are strong: family, integrity, and the well-being of our youth. When a child from Gilmer County leaves for a university, whether it’s the University of Georgia in Athens, Georgia Tech in Atlanta, Kennesaw State University closer to home, North Georgia in Dahlonega, or even institutions further afield like the University of Alabama or Florida State, parents expect them to be safe. They trust that the institutions chosen, and the organizations their children seek to join, will uphold a basic standard of care and respect. Sometimes, as heartbreaking recent events have shown, this trust is profoundly betrayed.

We are Attorney911, and we are at the forefront of the fight against the brutal reality of hazing in America. Our commitment stems from a deep understanding of the devastation hazing inflicts – not just physical injuries, but deep psychological scars that can last a lifetime. We know that when a Gilmer County child is targeted by hazing, it’s not just a breach of trust; it’s often an act of criminal assault, battery, and torture. We are dedicated to aggressively representing hazing victims and their families from Gilmer County, holding every responsible party accountable, from individual perpetrators to entire national organizations and negligent universities.

The Haunting Echoes of Hazing: What Gilmer County Families Need to Know

The hazing crisis in America is not a distant problem; it is a pervasive issue that impacts students from communities like Gilmer County who attend colleges and universities across the nation. The idyllic image of college life, particularly within Greek organizations, often masks a dark underbelly of abuse, humiliation, and senseless violence designed to “build brotherhood” or “prove loyalty.” But the reality is far from harmless pranks. These are calculated acts that break spirits and bodies, sometimes with fatal consequences.

For parents in Gilmer County, the statistics are grim, but they underscore why vigilance and aggressive legal action are more critical than ever:

• Pervasive Problem: Over half of students in Greek organizations and 40% of student athletes report experiencing hazing. This isn’t just an occasional bad apple; it’s a deeply ingrained culture in many organizations.
• A Silent Epidemic: A staggering 95% of students who are hazed do NOT report it. The reasons are complex: fear of retribution, loyalty to the group, shame, or simply not recognizing the abuse as hazing. This silence allows the cycle of violence to continue unchecked.
• Annual Tragedies: Since 2000, there has been at least one hazing-related death every single year in the United States. These aren’t accidents; they are preventable deaths directly linked to institutional failure and a culture of silence.
• Beyond Greek Life: Hazing isn’t exclusive to fraternities and sororities. It plagues sports teams, marching bands, ROTC programs, and various other student organizations, threatening any student seeking community.

When a child from Gilmer County leaves home for college, they become vulnerable to these dangers. They are often away from their families for the first time, eager to fit in, and susceptible to peer pressure. The very institutions entrusted with their safety—universities and national organizations—too often turn a blind eye until a tragedy forces action. They feign shock and condemn the behavior, but rarely do they address the systemic failures that allow hazing to fester.

We understand that seeing your child leave Gilmer County to pursue higher education is a significant milestone. The thought that they could be subjected to torture, humiliation, or life-threatening abuse is unbearable. That’s why we bring an unwavering commitment to holding these powerful entities accountable. We want Gilmer County families to know that if their child becomes a victim of hazing, they do not have to endure it alone. We are here to fight for justice, compensation, and to ensure that such acts have severe and lasting consequences for those responsible.

The Landmark Case: Attorney911 vs. Pi Kappa Phi & University of Houston (2025)

Our commitment to fighting hazing isn’t theoretical; it’s active and aggressive right now. We are currently embroiled in a high-stakes legal battle, a $10 million lawsuit filed in November 2025 against Pi Kappa Phi, the University of Houston, and 13 individual fraternity members. This case, Leonel Bermudez v. Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity, Inc., et al., is more than just a lawsuit; it is the cornerstone of everything we stand for: aggressive representation of hazing victims, a data-driven litigation strategy, and relentless pursuit of accountability for every entity responsible for hazing injuries.

Gilmer County families: This is what moden hazing looks like, and this is what we do about it. The events in Houston are a stark warning, but what happened to Leonel Bermudez could happen to any student from Gilmer County attending a college with Greek life. The same national fraternities operate chapters near schools your children attend, and the same negligence exists at institutions all over the country. We will bring the same aggression and meticulous strategy to fight for Gilmer County families as we are demonstrating in this pivotal case.

A Deeper Look into the Bermudez Case

Leonel Bermudez was a “ghost rush”—a prospective member who hadn’t even officially enrolled at the University of Houston yet, planning to transfer for the upcoming spring semester. This detail alone underscores the reckless disregard of the fraternity: they subjected someone who wasn’t even a registered student to weeks of systematic abuse. He accepted a bid to join Pi Kappa Phi on September 16, 2025, and what followed was a horrific period of torture that ended with him spending four days in the hospital, battling severe rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure.

The hazing activities Leonel endured are chilling, exposing the true depravity of modern hazing:

• Waterboarding: Leonel was subjected to “simulated waterboarding with a garden hose,” sprayed in the face during calisthenics, and forced to run under the threat of further waterboarding. This wasn’t merely a prank; it was a form of torture, a war crime when inflicted on enemy combatants.
• Forced Eating Until Vomiting: He was compelled to consume large amounts of milk, hot dogs, and even peppercorns until he vomited. After expelling the contents of his stomach, he was forced to continue sprints while clearly in physical distress and lie in his own vomit-soaked grass.
• Extreme Physical Punishment: Leonel was forced to perform over 100 push-ups, 500 squats, and a variety of other grueling exercises like “high-volume suicides,” bear crawls, wheelbarrows, and lengthy crawls, all while reciting the fraternity creed under threat of immediate expulsion. He was struck with wooden paddles. This relentless exertion pushed his body past its limits, leading to his severe injuries.
• Psychological Torture & Humiliation: Beyond the physical abuse, Leonel suffered immense psychological torment. He was forced to carry a fanny pack containing “objects of a sexual nature” at all times, was compelled to strip to his underwear in cold weather, and witnessed another pledge being hog-tied face-down on a table with an object in his mouth for over an hour. Threats and constant exhaustion contributed to a climate of terror.
• Sleep Deprivation: Forced to drive fraternity members during early morning hours, Leonel’s exhaustion was intentionally induced, further compromising his physical and mental state.

Within days of Leonel’s hospitalization, the Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters suspended the Beta Nu chapter. Within weeks, the chapter voted to surrender its charter and was permanently closed. University officials called the conduct “deeply disturbing” and initiated criminal referrals. Our firm, Attorney911, wasted no time, filing a $10 million lawsuit in Harris County Civil District Court, naming every entity and individual we could: Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters, its housing corporation, the University of Houston, the UH Board of Regents, and 13 individual fraternity members, including the president, pledgemaster, risk manager, and even a former member and his spouse who hosted hazing at their residence.

This case is being widely covered by Houston news outlets like ABC13 Houston, KHOU 11, and Houston Public Media, cementing our firm’s place at the forefront of hazing litigation. Pi Kappa Phi National even issued its own statement, admitting to “violations” but still expressing a desire to “return to campus,” a chilling display of unremorsefulness.

From Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, to ABC13: “When he finally made it home, he crawled up the stairs and went to bed. The next day, he was really sore and couldn’t really move. The next day was worse, and the next day, his mom rushed him to the hospital, and he had some kidney failure.” This narrative vividly captures the progression of Leonel’s terrifying ordeal.

And as Lupe Pena, our associate attorney stated to ABC13: “If this prevents harm to another person, that’s what we’re hoping to do. Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.” This sentiment drives our relentless pursuit of justice – not just for Leonel, but for every student in Gilmer County and nationwide who might suffer a similar fate.

Why This Case Resonates with Gilmer County Families

The Bermudez v. Pi Kappa Phi case is a critical warning for Gilmer County parents and students for several reasons:

1. “Ghost Rush” Status: Leonel wasn’t even an enrolled student yet. This demonstrates the fraternity’s profound lack of care and extends the reach of liability to individuals who may not technically be “members” but are nevertheless targeted by these organizations. Your child, even if only considering a transfer or attending events, can be at risk.
2. University Complicity: The University of Houston owned the fraternity house where much of the hazing took place. This is crucial for establishing direct university liability. This is not unique to UH; universities need to be held accountable for actively allowing hazing on their property, or by organizations under their watch. Many universities near Gilmer County have similar relationships with their Greek chapters.
3. National Organization’s Pattern: Pi Kappa Phi has 150+ chapters across America, including at universities where Gilmer County students may attend. The national headquarters’ quick action to close the chapter, while claiming it takes hazing “seriously,” highlights a systemic issue and their awareness of violations. Alarmingly, Pi Kappa Phi has a prior hazing death on its record: Andrew Coffey died in 2017 at Florida State University during a Pi Kappa Phi hazing event. This establishes a pattern of negligence and a failure by the national organization to curb deadly activities within its chapters over an eight-year period.
4. Institutional Negligence at UH: This isn’t the first hazing incident at the University of Houston. In 2017, another student, Jared Munoz, was hospitalized with a lacerated spleen after hazing at a different fraternity (Pi Kappa Alpha), leading to a $1 million lawsuit. This means UH had clear notice that hazing was a problem on its campus and failed to implement adequate safeguards. Gilmer County parents must understand that institutions often prioritize reputation over student safety, making them liable.
5. Waterboarding is Torture: This explicit accusation in the lawsuit moves the narrative beyond “pranks” or “traditions” into the realm of severe criminal conduct. It exposes the true brutality of what these organizations inflict.
6. $10 Million Sends a Message: The significant damages sought in this lawsuit are not arbitrary. They are designed to send an unequivocal message to universities and national fraternities across the country: hazing will no longer be tolerated, and the financial consequences for allowing it will be severe. Gilmer County families deserve to send the same message when their children are victimized.

The Bermudez case is a live, active testament to our firm’s aggressive approach. We are not just talking about hazing; we are in the courtroom fighting it, exposing its ugliness, and demanding justice for victims and their families. This is the firm that will fight for Gilmer County families caught in the same nightmare.

What Hazing Really Looks Like Today for Students from Gilmer County

Many people, especially parents in our Gilmer County community, might have outdated ideas about hazing. They might remember innocent pranks or mild inconveniences from their own high school or college days. But let us be clear: modern hazing, as exemplified by the Bermudez case, bears no resemblance to harmless initiation rituals. It is systematic abuse, psychological torture, and often outright criminal assault, battery, and even sexual violence.

If your child from Gilmer County is pledging a fraternity, joining a sports team, or any other student organization today, they face risks far beyond what you might imagine. We cannot stress this enough: this is not “boys being boys.” This is not “tradition.” This is not “building brotherhood.”

It is:

• Assault and Battery: Physical beatings, paddling, forced physical exertion, and aggressive roughhousing are common.
• Torture: Simulated waterboarding, as in the Bermudez case, or exposure to extreme hot or cold conditions, confinement, and sleep deprivation are tactics directly aimed at breaking a person’s will.
• Reckless Endangerment: Forcing excessive alcohol consumption, drug use, or physical activities well beyond a person’s limits falls squarely into this category. The injuries are often severe, life-threatening, and sometimes fatal.
• Psychological Warfare: Humiliation, degradation, verbal abuse, isolation, and threats create an environment of fear and anxiety, leaving lasting emotional scars that can be more debilitating than physical wounds.
• Sexual Abuse: Forced nudity, sexual acts, or carrying objects of a sexual nature are unfortunately also part of some hazing rituals, leaving victims deeply traumatized and violated.
• Sometimes Manslaughter or Murder: The most tragic outcome, hazing deaths are invariably preventable and result from gross negligence and extreme disregard for human life.

In the Bermudez case, the tactics employed by Pi Kappa Phi illustrate the dark spectrum of today’s hazing:

• Simulated Waterboarding: Being sprayed in the face with a garden hose during calisthenics, effectively simulating drowning, is a tactic ripped from the playbook of torturers, not college students.
• Forced Eating Until Vomiting: Mandating the consumption of large quantities of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until a student vomits, then forcing them to continue exercising or lie in their own vomit, is pure degradation.
• Extreme Physical Exertion: The lawsuit detailed endless push-ups, squats, “suicide” drills, bear crawls, and wheelbarrows—physically brutal activities that lead to muscle breakdown and organ damage, like rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure.
• Paddling: Being struck with wooden paddles is simple assault, often leaving painful bruises and physical trauma.
• Humiliation and Psychological Abuse: From forcing candidates to carry degrading items (like the “fanny pack with objects of a sexual nature”) to sleep deprivation and threats of expulsion, the goal is often to strip individuals of their dignity and control.
• Foreseeable Collapse: Alarmingly, another pledge in the Pi Kappa Phi chapter lost consciousness during a forced workout just weeks before Leonel’s hospitalization, yet the hazing continued unabated. This demonstrates a conscious disregard for the safety and well-being of the students.

The Medical Consequences are Real

The injuries from modern hazing are often severe and life-altering, as Leonel Bermudez’s diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure brutally illustrates. Rhabdomyolysis occurs when damaged muscle tissue releases proteins into the bloodstream that can overwhelm and destroy the kidneys. The tell-tale sign of brown urine, signaling myoglobin in the waste, is a dangerous indicator that medical intervention is urgently needed. Leonel’s four-day hospitalization was a critical intervention to prevent permanent organ damage or even death, and he faces ongoing risks to his kidney health.

Other devastating medical consequences directly attributable to hazing include:

• Alcohol Poisoning: A leading cause of hazing deaths, often from forced binge drinking, as seen in the tragic cases of Andrew Coffey, Stone Foltz, and Maxwell Gruver.
• Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): From beatings, falls, or other physical assaults.
• Hypothermia/Hyperthermia: Exposure to extreme cold or heat.
• Cardiac Arrest: From extreme physical exertion or pre-existing conditions exacerbated by hazing.
• Sexual Assault Injuries: The profound physical and psychological trauma of sexual abuse.
• Severe Dehydration and Malnutrition: From forced deprivation or coerced unhealthy consumption.
• Psychological Trauma: PTSD, severe anxiety, depression, and even suicidal ideation are common, long-lasting consequences, requiring extensive therapy and support.

For families in Gilmer County, it is crucial to understand that these aren’t isolated incidents or harmless freshman antics. They are dangerous, often criminal acts perpetrated within a culture of secrecy and enabled by institutional negligence. When your child from Gilmer County suffers such an ordeal, Attorney911 is here to expose the truth, hold every responsible party accountable, and seek the maximum compensation for the deep wounds inflicted.

Who Is Responsible? Holding All Parties Accountable for Hazing in Gilmer County

When a child from Gilmer County is subjected to the horrors of hazing, the responsibility extends far beyond the immediate perpetrators. At Attorney911, our data-driven approach means we never guess who is responsible; we know. Our comprehensive investigations aim to identify and hold accountable every single entity that enabled, condoned, or directly participated in the abuse. This includes individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and the universities themselves. We understand the complex web of liability that surrounds hazing incidents and we aggressively pursue justice against all “deep pockets” that are culpable.

Our $10 million lawsuit in the Bermudez v. Pi Kappa Phi case is a prime example of this exhaustive approach, naming defendants across multiple levels of responsibility. The same theories of liability apply to hazing incidents affecting students from Gilmer County, regardless of where they attend college.

1. The Individual Perpetrators: “Just College Kids” — But Now Facing Life-Altering Consequences

This category includes the students directly involved in the hazing, from those who planned and directed it to those who actively participated. In the Bermudez case, our lawsuit names 13 individual fraternity members, including the chapter president, pledgemaster, risk manager, and other current and former members. It even includes a former member’s spouse, as some hazing occurred at their residence.

• Why they are liable: Every person who directly commits an act of assault, battery, or torture is personally liable. Those who facilitate or encourage the abuse are also culpable. Texas law regarding hazing carries criminal penalties, and consent from the victim is explicitly not a defense.
• Their exposure: While often portrayed as “just college kids,” these individuals can face personal financial liability. The Stone Foltz case, where a chapter president was personally ordered to pay $6.5 million, proves that individuals cannot hide behind the fraternity shield. They also face disciplinary action from their university, potential criminal charges, and lasting damage to their academic and professional careers. For students in Gilmer County, facing such charges can derail futures built on hard work and promise.
• Our strategy: We work to identify every individual involved, ensuring that the burden of accountability is shared, and that future students are deterred from participating in such brutal acts.

2. The Local Chapter: The Immediate Conduit of Abuse

The Beta Nu Chapter of Pi Kappa Phi at the University of Houston directly organized and conducted the hazing of Leonel Bermudez. This local entity serves as the epicenter of abuse.

• Why they are liable: The local chapter, as an organized group, is directly responsible for coordinating and executing hazing activities. They often hold status as a recognized student organization and operate with a degree of autonomy while still being under the umbrella of a national body.
• Their exposure: Beyond financial penalties, local chapters typically face suspension, expulsion, or permanent closure by the university and their national organization, as happened with the Pi Kappa Phi chapter at UH. Such actions can end the chapter’s presence on campus for years, if not permanently.
• Our strategy: We sue the local chapter as a distinct entity, ensuring that their collective actions lead to direct consequences and that the history of their misconduct is permanently recorded.

3. The National Organization: The “Deep Pockets” with a History of Negligence

Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters is a key defendant in the Bermudez case. This is often the entity with the most financial resources (“deep pockets”) and the ultimate authority over its local chapters.

• Why they are liable: National organizations hold a duty to supervise their chapters, implement and enforce anti-hazing policies, and ensure a safe environment for their members. Their liability often stems from:
  • Failure to Supervise: Not adequately monitoring local chapters for hazing activities.
  • Failure to Enforce Policies: Having anti-hazing policies on paper but failing to ensure compliance.
  • Pattern of Negligence: Ignoring previous hazing incidents or deaths within other chapters, creating a foreseeable risk of future harm. As evidenced by the Andrew Coffey death in 2017 at Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi National had clear prior notice of deadly hazing. Our lawsuit alleges they knew about “a hazing crisis” and did nothing.
• Their exposure: National fraternities possess substantial assets and comprehensive liability insurance policies, which are critical for securing significant compensation for victims. They face massive lawsuits, damage to their national reputation, and pressure from universities to clean up their act.
• Our strategy: We leverage our dual-state bar admissions (Texas and New York) and federal court experience to aggressively pursue national organizations, regardless of their headquarters location. We track their corporate structures, insurance policies, and extensive history of hazing incidents across all their chapters to establish a clear pattern of negligence.

4. The University/College: The Ultimate Stewards of Student Safety

The University of Houston and its Board of Regents are also named defendants in Leonel’s lawsuit. Universities have a paramount responsibility to protect their students from harm.

• Why they are liable: University liability can arise from:
  • Institutional Negligence: Failing to adequately oversee Greek life or other student organizations despite knowledge of hazing risks. The Munoz hazing incident in 2017 at UH gave the university explicit notice of hazing on its campus.
  • Premises Liability: As in the Bermudez case, the University of Houston owned the fraternity house where the hazing occurred. This creates a direct responsibility for ensuring safety on its property.
  • Failure to Implement Policies: Not establishing or enforcing strong anti-hazing programs.
  • Failure to Act: Ignoring reports of hazing or implementing inadequate disciplinary measures.
• Their exposure: Universities have significant financial resources—large endowments, state funding, and extensive liability insurance. They face substantial lawsuits, loss of federal funding (via Title IX implications), damage to their reputation, and intense public scrutiny. For universities near Gilmer County, like the University of Georgia or Kennesaw State, the potential for such liability should be a grave concern.
• Our strategy: We tirelessly investigate the university’s role, examining their policies, response history, and any direct connections to the hazing location. When universities own the “torture chamber,” as UH did, their accountability is undeniable.

5. Other Related Entities: Housing Corporations and Alumni Boards

In the Bermudez case, the Pi Kappa Phi Housing Corporation is also a defendant. These entities often own or manage the physical property where hazing happens and can play a significant role in enabling abuse.

• Why they are liable: Housing corporations and alumni boards often have financial and oversight connections to the local chapter, influencing its operations and providing resources. Their negligence can range from failing to ensure a safe environment on their property to actively funding or promoting practices that lead to hazing.
• Their exposure: These entities typically hold assets (e.g., real estate) and carry insurance that can be tapped for compensation.
• Our strategy: Attorney911 maintains a meticulous database of IRS-registered Greek organizations in Texas, including house corporations. This ensures we can identify and sue every single entity associated with a fraternity, leaving no stone unturned in our pursuit of justice. For Gilmer County families, we maintain the same vigilance to track all associated entities, wherever the hazing occurs.

Our firm’s strength lies in our comprehensive approach. We don’t just sue the “college kids”; we target every entity that failed to protect your child. We know their corporate structures, their insurance policies, and their history. We will not allow Gilmer County students to be sacrificed on the altar of “tradition” without severe and lasting consequences for those truly responsible.

What These Cases Win: Multi-Million Dollar Proof for Gilmer County Families

For Gilmer County families reeling from a hazing injury or death, a critical question often arises: can justice truly be served, and what can be recovered? The answer, unequivocally, is yes. History shows that victims of hazing and their families can and do win multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements, holding powerful fraternities and universities accountable. These precedent-setting cases send a clear message: hazing costs millions.

Our $10 million lawsuit for Leonel Bermudez against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston aligns directly with these established precedents. The legal strategies and determination that secured these landmark awards are precisely what we bring to every hazing case, whether it occurs in a bustling city like Houston or impacts a family in our Gilmer County community.

Let’s look at some of the most significant hazing settlements and verdicts that pave the way for successful outcomes in cases like Leonel’s and those involving students from Gilmer County:

1. Stone Foltz — Bowling Green State University / Pi Kappa Alpha (2021-2024)

Total: $10.1 Million+

• What Happened: In March 2021, Stone Foltz, an 18-year-old pledge at Bowling Green State University, was forced to drink an entire bottle of alcohol during a Pi Kappa Alpha initiation event. He died three days later from alcohol poisoning.
• The Outcome: The university settled for $2.9 million, and the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and other defendants settled for $7.2 million, totaling over $10.1 million. This was the largest public university hazing payout in Ohio history. Most recently, in December 2024, a jury ordered the former chapter president, Daylen Dunson, to personally pay $6.5 million in survivorship and wrongful death damages.
• Significance for Gilmer County: This case directly supports our $10 million demand for Leonel Bermudez. It demonstrates that both universities and national fraternities are willing to pay millions, and crucially, individual perpetrators will be held personally accountable for massive sums. The egregiousness of forced alcohol consumption parallels the physical torture Leonel endured.

2. Maxwell Gruver — Louisiana State University / Phi Delta Theta (2017)

Total: $6.1 Million Verdict

• What Happened: In September 2017, Max Gruver, an 18-year-old freshman, died from acute alcohol poisoning (BAC 0.495) during a Phi Delta Theta hazing event at LSU called “Bible Study,” where he was forced to chug alcohol for incorrect answers.
• The Outcome: A jury awarded his family $6.1 million. Several fraternity members faced criminal charges, with one convicted of negligent homicide. The tragedy also spurred the passage of the “Max Gruver Act,” making hazing a felony in Louisiana.
• Significance for Gilmer County: A jury unequivocally delivered a multi-million dollar message. This shows that when national and local fraternities deny responsibility, ordinary citizens on a jury will hold them accountable with substantial verdicts. The potential for both civil and criminal consequences is very real.

3. Timothy Piazza — Penn State University / Beta Theta Pi (2017)

Total: $110+ Million (Estimated Settlements)

• What Happened: In February 2017, Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old Penn State pledge, was forced to consume 18 drinks in 82 minutes during a Beta Theta Pi hazing ritual. Highly intoxicated, he fell down stairs multiple times, suffering a catastrophic brain injury and internal bleeding. Fraternity members waited 12 hours to call 911. He died two days later. Security cameras captured the entire agonizing ordeal.
• The Outcome: While exact settlement figures are confidential, reports indicate settlements totaling over $110 million from various defendants. Eighteen fraternity members were charged, with multiple convictions for involuntary manslaughter and hazing. Pennsylvania passed the “Timothy J. Piazza Antihazing Law.”
• Significance for Gilmer County: This case highlights the immense value of clear evidence (like the security footage) in securing colossal settlements. It also underscores that even without a trial, the sheer weight of discovery and public pressure can force defendants to pay astronomical sums to resolve these cases. Our firm, in cases like Bermudez, works painstakingly to gather all available evidence to build an undeniable case.

4. Adam Oakes — Virginia Commonwealth University / Delta Chi (2021-2024)

Total: $4+ Million Settlement

• What Happened: In February 2021, Adam Oakes, a freshman pledge at VCU, died from acute alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume a liter of Jack Daniel’s whiskey during a Delta Chi hazing event.
• The Outcome: Adam’s family recently reached a $4+ million settlement with the university and the fraternity. Several fraternity members pleaded guilty to hazing charges. The “Love Like Adam” Foundation was created to promote hazing awareness, and “Adam’s Law” was passed in Virginia.
• Significance for Gilmer County: This further reinforces that universities and national fraternities face multi-million dollar liability for hazing deaths, even those occurring in recent years.

Other Notable Cases: Damages and Accountability

• Andrew Coffey (Florida State University / Pi Kappa Phi, 2017): Died from alcohol poisoning during hazing. While his family’s settlement was confidential, nine fraternity members faced criminal charges, and the chapter was permanently closed. Critically, this is the same national fraternity as in the Bermudez case, establishing a devastating pattern of negligence for Pi Kappa Phi.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (University of Alabama, 2023): A lawsuit was filed alleging a student suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI) during hazing. This demonstrates that even non-fatal, yet severe, injuries lead to significant litigation.
• University of Texas at Austin / Sigma Chi (November 2025): The same week we filed the Bermudez lawsuit in Houston, a wrongful death lawsuit was filed against Sigma Chi at UT Austin after an 18-year-old freshman died by suicide following alleged “horrific abuse.” This tragic case underscores the widespread nature of hazing’s devastating impacts, including psychological, right here in Texas.

Why These Precedents Matter for Gilmer County Families:

• Foreseeable Harm: These cases prove that universities and national fraternities have been on clear notice for years that hazing causes severe injury and death. Claiming ignorance is no longer a defense.
• Institutional Accountability: The multi-million dollar payouts demonstrate that the responsibility extends beyond student perpetrators to the institutions that permit and enable hazing cultures to thrive.
• Legislative Change: Many of these tragedies have led to new, tougher anti-hazing laws. Your child’s case from Gilmer County could contribute to critical legal reforms that save lives.
• Support for $10 Million Demands: Our $10 million demand in the Bermudez case is not arbitrary. It is grounded in the proven value of similar hazing cases nationwide, reflecting the profound physical, emotional, and financial damages inflicted.

For families in Gilmer County whose child has suffered due to hazing, the path to justice can seem daunting. But these precedents are concrete proof that victims can and do win. We use this history, combined with our aggressive litigation strategies, to fight tirelessly for every dollar your family deserves, sending an unequivocal message that hazing will not go unpunished.

Texas Law Protects You: A Legal Shield for Gilmer County Hazing Victims

For Gilmer County families dealing with the aftermath of hazing, understanding your legal rights is paramount. While hazing is a deplorable act wherever it occurs, Texas has particularly strong anti-hazing laws designed to protect students and hold perpetrators and institutions accountable. Our firm, Attorney911, operates under this robust legal framework, and importantly, our federal court authority and dual-state bar licenses (Texas and New York) allow us to pursue justice for Gilmer County victims no matter where the hazing incident occurred in the United States.

Here’s how Texas law directly applies to and strengthens hazing cases like Leonel Bermudez’s and those involving students from Gilmer County:

Texas Education Code § 37.151-37.157 — Anti-Hazing Law: The Foundation of Accountability

The very definition of hazing under Texas law is broad and comprehensive, encompassing almost any act that endangers a student for the purpose of joining or maintaining membership in an organization. This is not about intent to harm, but the act itself and the risk it creates.

Definition of Hazing (§ 37.151): This statute defines hazing as “any intentional, knowing, or reckless act occurring on or off the campus of an educational institution…directed against a student for the purpose of pledging…if the act:”

• Includes Physical Brutality: “such as whipping, beating, striking, branding, electronic shocking, placing of a harmful substance on the body, or similar activity.” (Leonel was struck with wooden paddles, a clear violation).
• Involves Sleep Deprivation, Exposure, Calisthenics: “sleep deprivation, exposure to the elements, confinement in a small space, calisthenics, or other similar activity that subjects the student to an unreasonable risk of harm or that adversely affects the mental or physical health or safety of the student.” (Leonel endured forced early morning driving, was made to strip in cold weather, and performed 500 squats and 100+ pushups leading to rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure — directly violating this section).
• Constitutes Forced Consumption: “involves consumption of a food, liquid, alcoholic beverage…that subjects the student to an unreasonable risk of harm or that adversely affects the mental or physical health or safety of the student.” (Leonel was forced to eat milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until he vomited).
• Violates the Penal Code: “any activity that induces, causes, or requires the student to perform a duty or task that involves a violation of the Penal Code.” (Acts like assault and battery fall under the Penal Code).

For Gilmer County families: The waterboarding Leonel endured, while not explicitly listed, falls under “physical brutality” and torture. The fact that his case meets multiple points of this legal definition makes the hazing undeniable under Texas law.

Criminal Penalties: Real Consequences for Perpetrators

Texas law doesn’t just define hazing; it prescribes serious criminal penalties for those involved.

• Class B Misdemeanor: Engaging in hazing, soliciting, encouraging, aiding, or failing to report hazing with firsthand knowledge can result in up to 180 days in jail and a $2,000 fine.
• Class A Misdemeanor: If hazing causes “serious bodily injury,” the offense escalates to a Class A Misdemeanor, carrying up to one year in jail and a $4,000 fine. (Leonel’s rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure clearly qualify as serious bodily injury).
• State Jail Felony: Tragically, if hazing causes “death,” it becomes a State Jail Felony, with penalties ranging from 180 days to two years in state jail and a $10,000 fine.

For Gilmer County families: The University of Houston spokesperson herself mentioned “potential criminal charges” in relation to the Bermudez case. We work closely with law enforcement when appropriate to ensure that criminal accountability, alongside civil justice, is pursued.

Organizational Liability (§ 37.153): Entities Cannot Escape Blame

This critical section ensures that the organization itself, not just individuals, can be held responsible. An organization commits an offense if it “condones or encourages hazing or if an officer or any combination of members, pledges, or alumni…commits or assists in the commission of hazing.”

• Penalties: Organizations can face fines up to $10,000, denial of the right to operate on campus, and even forfeiture of property.

For Gilmer County families: This means that the local chapter of Pi Kappa Phi and the national organization itself are directly liable under state law for the hazing Leonel suffered. This isn’t just about individual misbehavior; it’s about systemic organizational failure.

Consent is NOT a Defense (§ 37.154): A Game-Changer for Victims

This is perhaps the most crucial aspect of Texas’s anti-hazing law, and one that directly dismantles a common defense used by fraternities:

“It is not a defense to prosecution for an offense under this subchapter that the person against whom the hazing was directed consented to or acquiesced in the hazing activity.”

For Gilmer County families: This means no fraternity or university can claim, “He knew what he was getting into,” or “He agreed to participate.” The Texas legislature explicitly removed consent as a legal defense for hazing. This is a powerful shield for victims and a critical tool in our litigation strategy. We challenge any attempt by defendants to shift blame onto the victim with this strong statutory language.

University Reporting Requirements (§ 37.155): Accountability for Institutions

Universities in Texas are legally mandated to report hazing incidents to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board within 30 days of becoming aware of them. A failure to report is a Class B Misdemeanor. This creates a paper trail and holds universities accountable for transparency, even if they would prefer to keep incidents quiet.

Beyond Texas Law: Broader Civil Liability Theories for Gilmer County Victims

While Texas law provides a strong foundation, hazing lawsuits often employ broader civil liability theories that apply in all states, allowing us to pursue justice for Gilmer County victims nationwide.

• Negligence: This is the most common claim. Universities, national organizations, and individuals have a “duty of care” to protect students. When they breach that duty (e.g., by failing to supervise, ignoring warning signs, or actively participating in hazing), and that breach causes injury, they are negligent.
• Premises Liability: If hazing occurs on property owned or controlled by the university (like the UH-owned fraternity house), the institution can be held liable for creating or allowing a dangerous condition to exist.
• Negligent Supervision/Retention: This applies when national organizations fail to properly oversee their chapters, or universities fail to supervise their student organizations, allowing dangerous members or activities to persist.
• Assault and Battery: Direct, intentional harmful or offensive contact (like paddling or waterboarding) constitutes assault and battery, for which individual perpetrators and potentially organizations can be liable.
• Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED): Reserved for truly “outrageous” conduct that causes severe emotional distress, such as the systematic psychological torture seen in the Bermudez case.
• Wrongful Death: When hazing leads to a fatality, families can pursue wrongful death claims for their devastating loss.
• Federal Civil Rights Claims: In some instances, hazing may involve allegations of discrimination or other civil rights violations that can be pursued in federal court, leveraging our firm’s federal court admissions.

Our deep knowledge of these legal frameworks, coupled with our aggressive litigation tactics, ensures that Gilmer County hazing victims receive the full protection and power of the law. We meticulously construct each case to expose every layer of culpability and maximize the compensation your family deserves.

Why Attorney911? Our Unrivaled Edge for Gilmer County Hazing Victims

When a hazing tragedy strikes a family from Gilmer County, the choice of legal representation can define the path to justice. You need more than just a lawyer; you need a relentless advocate who understands the nuances of hazing litigation, who is not intimidated by powerful institutions, and who genuinely cares about your child’s well-being. Attorney911 offers an unrivaled combination of experience, strategic insight, and unwavering commitment that makes us the obvious choice for Gilmer County families.

We are not a general personal injury firm that dabbles in hazing cases. We are actively fighting this battle on the front lines, as evidenced by our $10 million lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston in the Bermudez case. This isn’t theoretical; it’s tangible proof of our dedication and expertise. We bring this same fervor and forensic detail to every case we accept, including for families in Gilmer County.

Here’s why Attorney911 stands apart:

1. Expertise Born from Experience: The “Insurance Counter-Intelligence System”

Our firm is uniquely structured with a critical advantage: both our managing partner, Ralph P. Manginello, and our associate attorney, Lupe Eleno Peña, are former insurance defense attorneys. This isn’t a coincidence; it’s a strategic design.

• Ralph P. Manginello (Male): With over 25 years of courtroom experience, Ralph has literally seen the insurance industry’s playbook from the inside. He knows their strategies, their tactics for minimizing payouts, and their thresholds for settlement. This insider knowledge is invaluable when dismantling their defenses and maximizing recovery for our Gilmer County clients. His experience in complex mass tort litigation, such as the BP Texas City explosion, demonstrates his capacity to take on massive corporate defendants, a skill directly applicable to university and national fraternity hazing cases.
• Lupe Eleno Peña (Male): Lupe’s background at Litchfield Cavo LLP, a national insurance defense firm, gave him firsthand insight into how large insurance companies value claims, strategize defenses, and attempt to delay or deny payouts across the country. He knows every trick in their book. Now, he uses that “battlefield intelligence” to benefit hazing victims from Gilmer County, outworking, outsmarting, and outfighting the other side. His expertise in wrongful death, dram shop liability (relevant for forced alcohol consumption hazing), and catastrophic injury cases directly applies to the severe outcomes of hazing.

What this means for Gilmer County families: You’re not just hiring lawyers; you’re hiring former insiders who know exactly how the defense thinks and how to effectively counteract their every move. This “unfair advantage” levels the playing field against well-funded national fraternities and universities.

2. Nationwide Reach, Local Dedication

While our primary offices are in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas, our commitment to hazing victims extends far beyond state lines, including to Gilmer County, Georgia, and nationwide.

• Federal Court Authority: Ralph and Lupe are both admitted to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas. This federal court admission empowers us to pursue hazing cases in federal jurisdictions across the country, particularly when federal civil rights issues or multi-state defendants (like national fraternities) are involved.
• Dual-State Bar Admission: Ralph is licensed in both Texas AND New York. This is a critical strategic advantage for hazing cases involving national fraternities, many of which are headquartered or have significant operations in the Northeast. It provides invaluable flexibility and authority when dealing with national organizations that span state lines.
• Willingness to Travel: We routinely travel for depositions, client meetings, and trials wherever justice demands. Distance will not be a barrier to representing a Gilmer County family effectively.
• Remote Consultations: For families in Gilmer County who cannot easily travel, we offer convenient video consultations, ensuring you can access expert legal advice from the comfort and privacy of your home.

What this means for Gilmer County families: Whether your child attends a local institution like North Georgia or Emory, or a university out-of-state, we possess the legal authority and logistical capability to represent you.

3. Deep Hazing-Specific Expertise

Our attorneys have a specialized focus on the complexities of hazing litigation.

• Rhabdomyolysis Litigation: Ralph Manginello has specific expertise in rhabdomyolysis hazing cases, making our firm uniquely qualified to handle cases mirroring Leonel Bermudez’s severe kidney and muscle damage.
• Kappa Sigma and Texas A&M Litigation: Ralph has prior experience with Kappa Sigma fraternity litigation and Texas A&M hazing cases, demonstrating direct experience with prominent Greek organizations and universities.
• Wrongful Death Cases: Both Ralph and Lupe have extensive experience in wrongful death cases, essential for the most tragic hazing outcomes.
• Dram Shop Expertise: Lupe’s background in dram shop liability cases (holding bars accountable for over-serving alcohol) is highly relevant for hazing incidents involving forced alcohol consumption, a leading cause of hazing deaths.

What this means for Gilmer County families: We speak the language of hazing litigation. We anticipate the defenses, understand the medical complexities, and know how to connect national patterns to local chapter failures.

4. Client-Centered Approach: “You are Family”

Despite our aggressive litigation style, our firm is built on empathy and genuine care for our clients. Families in Gilmer County are treated like family.

• “Se Habla Español”: Lupe Peña is fluent in Spanish, ensuring comprehensive legal services for Spanish-speaking families in Gilmer County, removing language barriers to justice.
• 24/7 Availability: Legal emergencies don’t adhere to business hours. We are available around the clock at 1-888-ATTY-911, offering immediate support when you need it most.
• Contingency Fees: We understand the financial strain that medical bills and lost wages can place on families. We take hazing cases on a contingency basis, meaning you pay $0 upfront. We don’t get paid unless and until you win your case. This removes the financial barrier to accessing top-tier legal representation, empowering Gilmer County families to fight powerful institutions.
• Transparent Communication: Our clients consistently praise our responsiveness and clear communication. We keep you informed at every step, ensuring you understand the process and your options.
• Emotional Investment: We are genuinely passionate about helping hazing victims. We’ve seen the devastation hazing causes, and our fight is fueled by a desire to prevent further tragedies. As Ralph is a father of three, he deeply understands what’s at stake when a child is harmed.

5. Proven Track Record and Respected Reputation

Our Google My Business rating of 4.9 stars with over 250 reviews speaks volumes about our commitment to client satisfaction and successful outcomes. Testimonials highlight our empathetic approach, aggressive advocacy, and ability to secure substantial settlements. From securing multi-million dollar settlements in complex personal injury cases to dismissing criminal charges, our firm consistently delivers results. Celebrity endorsements, like from Houston’s own Trae Tha Truth, further attest to our standing in the community.

What this means for Gilmer County families: You are choosing a firm with a documented track record of success, built on a foundation of genuine client care and a formidable legal team. We don’t just talk about fighting; we deliver.

When your Gilmer County child endures the unspeakable trauma of hazing, you need a firm that is ready to go to war for them. Attorney911 has the expertise, the resources, the insider knowledge, and the unwavering commitment to justice to be your champion.

What to Do Right Now: Actionable Steps for Gilmer County Families After Hazing

The moment a hazing incident comes to light, particularly one causing injury or psychological trauma, can be overwhelming and terrifying for families in Gilmer County. However, acting swiftly and strategically is critical to protecting your child’s legal rights and building a strong case. Every minute counts, as evidence can disappear, memories can fade, and powerful institutions may begin to control the narrative.

Here are the essential, actionable steps Gilmer County families must take immediately:

Step 1: Prioritize Immediate Safety and Medical Attention

Your child’s physical and mental well-being is the absolute priority.

• Remove Your Child from the Situation: Ensure they are safe and no longer in contact with the perpetrators or the hazing environment.
• Seek Medical Attention Immediately: Even if the injuries seem minor or your child is reluctant, get them to a doctor, urgent care, or emergency room. This is non-negotiable.
  • Document Everything: Ask the medical staff to thoroughly document all injuries, symptoms, and your child’s account of how the injuries occurred. This creates an official medical record—a cornerstone of any legal claim.
  • Be Specific: If your child reports pain, unusual urine color (like Leonel Bermudez’s brown urine), difficulty moving, or any other symptom, ensure it is recorded.
  • Follow All Medical Advice: Adhere strictly to doctor’s orders, including follow-up appointments, medication, and referrals to specialists (e.g., orthopedic surgeons, neurologists, nephrologists for kidney issues, or mental health professionals). Failure to do so can be used by the defense to claim the injuries weren’t severe.
• Seek Psychological Support: Hazing inflicts deep emotional and psychological wounds. Connect your child with a mental health professional specializing in trauma. Therapy records will be crucial evidence of emotional distress and psychological harm, such as PTSD, anxiety, or depression.

Step 2: Preserve All Evidence Relentlessly

The legal strength of your hazing case hinges on the evidence. Hazing perpetrators and institutions will often attempt to destroy or conceal incriminating information. You must counteract this.

• Text Messages, Group Chats, Social Media:
  • DO NOT DELETE ANYTHING. Screenshot every message, post, photo, or video your child received or sent related to the hazing. This includes texts, GroupMe, Snapchat, Instagram DMs, Facebook messages, and any other communication platforms.
  • Preserve messages from other pledges, fraternity members, or anyone else discussing activities, threats, or instructions.
  • Take photos of “streaks” or read receipts if they show who has viewed messages.
• Photos and Videos:
  • If your child has any photos or videos of hazing activities, injuries (from the day of the incident and as they heal), or the locations where hazing occurred, secure them immediately.
  • Even if they were deleted, sometimes data recovery services can retrieve them.
• Documents:
  • Save any pledge manuals, schedules, rules, “big-little” reveal documents, or codes of conduct provided by the organization or university.
  • Keep all medical bills, hospital records, therapy notes, and pharmacy receipts.
  • Preserve academic records, especially if grades or enrollment were negatively impacted.
• Witness Information:
  • Write down the names and contact information of any other pledges, witnesses (students, alumni, off-campus residents), or bystanders who may have observed the hazing or its aftermath. Even if your child doesn’t want to speak to us, other victims or concerned individuals might.
• Physical Evidence:
  • If any clothing or personal items were damaged during hazing, preserve them.
  • If the incident occurred at a specific location, note its address and any distinguishing features.

Step 3: Crucial “DO NOT” Actions

These missteps can severely jeopardize your case:

• DO NOT Delete Communications: This is critical. Deleting evidence can be seen as obstruction and harm your credibility.
• DO NOT Talk to the Fraternity/Sorority Leadership: They are not your child’s friends. They will attempt to cover up, intimidate, or get your child to sign away rights.
• DO NOT Sign Anything: Never sign any documents presented by the organization, university, or their representatives without legal counsel. You could inadvertently waive your rights to compensation.
• DO NOT Post on Social Media: Anything posted about the incident, or even seemingly innocuous posts showing your child “fine” or at parties, can be twisted by the defense to diminish their injuries or credibility. Stay completely silent about the incident online.
• DO NOT Give Statements to University Administration Alone: Universities have a vested interest in protecting their reputation and limiting liability. Any statement your child gives without legal representation can be used against them. If an interview is required (e.g., for Title IX), ensure an attorney is present.
• DO NOT Confront Perpetrators: This can escalate the situation, destroy evidence, or create new legal problems.
• DO NOT Delay Seeking Legal Counsel: The longer you wait, the harder it becomes to gather evidence and build a strong case.

Step 4: Contact an Experienced Hazing Litigation Attorney Immediately

This is perhaps the most critical step. The institutions and individuals responsible for hazing will immediately begin protecting themselves. You need an aggressive legal team on your side from day one.

• Call 1-888-ATTY-911: Our legal emergency hotline is available 24/7 for Gilmer County families. Do not hesitate. The initial consultation is absolutely FREE, and you are under no obligation.
• Understand the Statute of Limitations: In Texas, you typically have two years from the date of injury or death to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. While this may seem like a long time, the investigative process is complex and time-consuming. Any delay can be fatal to your case. For Gilmer County students who attend college in other states, similar deadlines apply, and they vary from state to state. We will advise you on the specific deadlines.
• We Work on Contingency: Financial concerns should never prevent you from seeking justice. We take hazing cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay $0 upfront. We only get paid when we win your case. This allows Gilmer County families to fight powerful institutions without financial risk.
• Distance is Not a Barrier: Even if you are in Gilmer County or your child attends an out-of-state university, our federal court authority, dual-state bar licenses, and willingness to travel ensure we can effectively represent you. We offer video consultations for your convenience.

By following these steps, Gilmer County families can effectively lay the groundwork for a successful legal claim, protecting their child’s rights and ensuring that those responsible for the horrors of hazing are held fully accountable.

Contact Us: Your First Call for Justice in Gilmer County

If your Gilmer County family is facing the nightmare of a hazing injury or a tragic death, you are not alone. The time for silence, shame, and fear is over. It’s time to fight back, and Attorney911 is ready to be your champion. We are actively engaged in the battle against hazing right now, leading a $10 million lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston for the horrific abuse of Leonel Bermudez. We know how to build these complex cases, how to dismantle their defenses, and how to hold powerful institutions accountable. We are ready to bring that relentless fight to Gilmer County and wherever else justice is needed.

Gilmer County Families: Your Legal Emergency Hotline Is Open

We understand that reaching out in such trying times can be difficult. Your family needs empathy, understanding, and aggressive legal action. Your first call should be to Attorney911.

📞 1-888-ATTY-911

This legal emergency hotline is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Night or day, a compassionate professional is ready to listen without judgment and guide you on the crucial next steps.

Email Us: If you prefer to communicate via email, reach out to Ralph Manginello directly at ralph@atty911.com. We respond promptly because we know the urgency of your situation.

Visit Our Website: Learn more about our commitment to hazing victims at attorney911.com.

What to Expect When You Contact Us:

• Free, Confidential Consultation: Your initial conversation with our attorneys is completely free. We will listen to your story, discuss the details of the hazing incident, and provide a frank assessment of your legal options. This is a safe space to share your experience without any obligation.
• No Upfront Fees (Contingency Basis): We understand that the financial stress after a hazing incident can be immense. That’s why we take hazing cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay $0 upfront to hire us. We only get paid if, and when, we successfully secure compensation for you. Our success is directly tied to yours. (Learn more about contingency fees here).
• Remote & In-Person Options: For Gilmer County families, we offer convenient video consultations so you can speak with our team from the comfort and privacy of your home. If necessary for depositions, client meetings, or trial, our attorneys are prepared to travel to Gilmer County, Georgia. Distance will not be a barrier to justice.
• A Team That Cares: Our staff is bilingual, genuinely compassionate, and dedicated to supporting you through every step of this challenging legal journey. We treat our Gilmer County clients like family because we understand the profound impact hazing has.

We Are Your National Solution for Hazing Litigation

The institutions that perpetuate hazing often operate nationwide. So do we.

• Federal Court Authority: Admitted to U.S. District Courts, we can pursue hazing cases in federal court, essential for taking on national fraternities and universities with multi-state operations.
• Dual-State Bar Licenses: Ralph Manginello holds licenses in both Texas and New York, giving us a strategic advantage when litigating against national organizations often headquartered in the Northeast.
• Unwavering Commitment: We will pursue every responsible party, from individual students to their parents, local chapters, alumni groups, national organizations, and the universities themselves. We leave no stone unturned.

To Other Victims of Hazing (including those from the UH Pi Kappa Phi Chapter):

We know there are more victims out there. Leonel Bermudez was not the only one. Another pledge lost consciousness during a forced workout. Others endured the same waterboarding, forced eating, and physical abuse. If you were harmed, or if you witnessed hazing in the Pi Kappa Phi chapter at the University of Houston, or at any other school or organization, please know that you have rights. Your courage can make a difference.

As Lupe Pena said, “If this prevents harm to another person, that’s what we’re hoping to do. Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.”

Call us. Let’s bring them ALL to justice.

Don’t let fear, shame, or the intimidation tactics of powerful institutions silence you. The time to act is now. Your strength, combined with our legal expertise, can create a powerful force for change, ensuring that what happened to your child from Gilmer County doesn’t happen to anyone else’s.

Reach out to Attorney911 today. Let us be your first responder in this legal emergency.