Halting Hazing: A Texas Guide to Accountability for Families in Galveston County

The phone rings in the middle of the night. It’s your child, a student at a Texas university – perhaps attending a rush event, a “big/little” reveal, or an initiation for a spirit organization. They sound disoriented, sick, or terrified. They whisper about forced drinking, physical beatings, or humiliating acts they were made to do “to be part of the group.” They beg you not to tell anyone, especially not the university, because they’ll “get in trouble” or the “chapter will be shut down.” You’re a parent in Galveston County, and your heart sinks. This nightmare scenario, often dismissed as harmless tradition, is a serious and potentially deadly problem across Texas campuses, impacting students from Galveston County to the farthest corners of our state.

This comprehensive guide is designed for families in Galveston County and across Texas who are grappling with the devastating realities of hazing. We understand the confusion, the fear, and the desire for answers when your child faces harm while pursuing their education. Here, we will demystify what modern hazing truly entails, explain the crucial Texas legal framework, and connect major national hazing cases to the specific realities at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University. Our aim is to empower you with knowledge about your legal options and to demonstrate how The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC stands ready to advocate for victims and their families throughout Texas.

Even if your child attends school far from Galveston County, Texas hazing law and experienced Texas counsel can provide the support and legal representation needed. This article serves as general information, not specific legal advice, but we are here to evaluate individual cases based on their unique facts. We serve families throughout Texas, including Galveston County, its adjacent communities like League City, Texas City, La Marque, and Dickinson, and the wider Gulf Coast region.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Prioritize their health and safety above all else.
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, and direct messages immediately, with timestamps and sender names visible.
    • Photograph any visible injuries from multiple angles and over several days to show progression.
    • Save physical items like clothing worn during the incident, receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used in the hazing.
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh: who was involved, what happened, when and where it occurred, and any specifics your child recalls.
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly, as this can lead to evidence destruction or witness coaching.
    • Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without consulting legal counsel.
    • Post details about the incident on public social media, as this can compromise a future legal case.
    • Allow your child to delete messages or “clean up” any evidence.

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast, including deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, and coached witnesses.
  • Universities often move quickly to control the narrative following an incident.
  • We can help preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s rights from the very beginning.
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For many, the word “hazing” conjures images of silly pranks from old movies – perhaps a pledge being made to wear funny clothes or run an errand. The reality in 2025 across Texas, including universities where students from Galveston County attend, is far grimmer. Hazing today is rarely harmless; it is often dangerous, illegal, and can have lifelong physical and psychological consequences, or even be fatal.

Hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. It is crucial to understand that if someone makes you do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a group, and they meant to do it or were reckless about the risk, that’s hazing under Texas law. The argument, “I agreed to it,” does not automatically make it safe or legal when there is inherent peer pressure and a power imbalance.

Clear, Modern Categories of Hazing

Modern hazing takes many forms, often escalating in severity and secrecy:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is tragically common and often fatal. It includes forced or coerced drinking of large quantities of alcohol, often during specific “lineups,” chugging challenges, or games designed to ensure rapid, dangerous consumption. Pledges may be pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, placing them at severe risk of alcohol poisoning, overdose, and long-term health complications.
• Physical Hazing: This category involves acts that inflict bodily harm or extreme physical discomfort. Examples include paddling, beatings, forced extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” that go far beyond healthy conditioning. Students are often subjected to sleep deprivation, forced food or water deprivation, or exposure to extreme cold or heat, sometimes for prolonged periods, leading to exhaustion, dehydration, and hypothermia.
• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts are deeply degrading and violate an individual’s dignity. They can involve forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (such as “elephant walks” or “roasted pig” positions), wearing degrading costumes, or participating in activities with racist, sexist, or homophobic overtones, including the use of slurs or role-playing stereotypes.
• Psychological Hazing: While not always leaving visible scars, psychological hazing can inflict profound and lasting trauma. This includes verbal abuse, constant threats, social isolation designed to break down an individual, manipulation, or forced “confessions” of personal information. Public shaming, whether face-to-face or on social media, contributes to a hostile and abusive environment.
• Digital/Online Hazing: This is a rapidly evolving form of hazing that leverages modern technology. It includes group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation orchestrated via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Discord. Students may be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos of themselves or others, leading to lasting reputational damage and emotional distress. Constant demands for responses in group chats at all hours can also lead to severe sleep deprivation.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is not confined to one type of student organization. While often associated with fraternities and sororities, it permeates many university groups across Texas:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes traditional Interfraternity Council (IFC) and Panhellenic Council organizations, as well as historically Black National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) “Divine Nine” fraternities and sororities, and various multicultural Greek organizations.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: At universities like Texas A&M, the Corps of Cadets, with its emphasis on tradition and discipline, has faced allegations of hazing.
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Student Organizations: Groups like the Texas Cowboys at UT, “Absolute Texxas” spirit group, or even specific cultural and academic organizations can engage in hazing practices.
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball, cheerleading, and swimming, hazing has been documented in collegiate athletic programs at regional campuses and major universities alike.
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even organizations dedicated to performance and artistry can have hidden hazing rituals.

The common threads that allow these dangerous practices to flourish are social status, tradition, and a pervasive culture of secrecy. Despite “zero tolerance” policies and widespread awareness campaigns, many students continue to face immense pressure to endure hazing “to be part of the group” or “earn their letters,” even when everyone “knows” hazing is illegal and dangerous.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape around hazing in Texas is crucial for families in Galveston County and across the state seeking justice and accountability. While universities implement their own conduct codes, state and federal laws provide powerful avenues for recourse.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific anti-hazing provisions outlined in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. Texas law defines hazing broadly as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by an individual or group, on or off campus, against a student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, or
• Occurs for the purpose of initiating, affiliating, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition covers a wide range of harmful activities, from forced excessive alcohol consumption that endangers physical health, to extreme psychological manipulation that harms mental well-being. It is important to note that the location does not matter; hazing is illegal whether it occurs on campus or at an off-campus house in League City or a private retreat deep in the Texas Hill Country. Furthermore, the law explicitly states that a student’s prior consent is not a defense to hazing under Texas Education Code § 37.155 — an essential protection against coercion and peer pressure.

Criminal Penalties for Hazing in Texas:

• Class B Misdemeanor: Most hazing incidents, carrying penalties of up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
• Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical treatment.
• State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. For example, a hazing incident in which a student suffers severe burns, a traumatic brain injury, or dies from alcohol poisoning could lead to felony charges.
• Failure to Report: Texas law also makes it a misdemeanor for an officer or member of an organization who has personal knowledge of hazing to fail to report it.
• Retaliation: Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

Organizational Liability: Organizations themselves (fraternities, sororities, clubs, teams) can face criminal prosecution and substantial fines up to $10,000 per violation if they authorized, encouraged, or knew about hazing and failed to report it. Universities can also revoke recognition and ban organizations found responsible for hazing. This dual liability approach – targeting both individuals and the organizational entity – is critical for addressing systemic issues.

Reporter Protections: Texas law provides limited immunity for individuals who report hazing incidents in good faith, which aims to encourage students and witnesses to come forward without fear of civil or criminal repercussions for their reporting. Additionally, the state’s “medical amnesty” policies frequently protect students from legal trouble when they call for emergency medical help due to alcohol or drug-related incidents, even if they were involved in underage drinking or illicit drug use.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, families from Galveston County should be aware of the distinct legal paths that may be pursued:

• Criminal Cases: These are brought by the State of Texas (through district or county attorneys) against individuals or organizations found to have violated criminal hazing statutes or other related laws (e.g., assault, unlawful restraint, furnishing alcohol to minors, or, in tragic cases, manslaughter). The primary goal of criminal proceedings is to punish offenders and deter future illegal acts, potentially resulting in jail time, fines, and probation.
• Civil Cases: These are initiated by victims or their surviving family members. The objective is to seek monetary compensation for damages suffered (medical bills, pain and suffering, lost income) and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil lawsuits often involve claims of:
  • Negligence or Gross Negligence: Failure to act with reasonable care, or acting with a conscious indifference to extreme risk, leading to injury.
  • Wrongful Death: When a fatality occurs due to another party’s negligence or misconduct.
  • Negligent Hiring/Supervision: Allegations against universities or national organizations for failing to properly train, supervise, or monitor their employees, members, or chapters.
  • Premises Liability: Cases against property owners where the hazing occurred if conditions or actions on the property contributed to the harm.
  • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: For severe psychological trauma caused by extreme or outrageous conduct.

It is crucial to understand that criminal and civil cases can proceed simultaneously. A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for a civil lawsuit; even if criminal charges are not filed or result in acquittal, victims can still pursue civil claims for damages.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations also play a role in campus safety and hazing accountability:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal law, set to be fully implemented by around 2026, mandates greater transparency from colleges and universities that receive federal funding. It requires them to publicly report all hazing incidents, strengthen prevention and education efforts, and maintain publicly accessible data on confirmed hazing violations and disciplinary actions. This will provide families in Galveston County with crucial information about the safety records of organizations on campuses across the country.
• Title IX: If hazing involves elements of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based discrimination or hostility, it can trigger Title IX obligations. This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education and requires institutions to investigate and respond appropriately to such allegations.
• Clery Act: This federal law mandates that colleges and universities disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents, particularly those involving assaults, alcohol offenses, or other crimes, often fall under Clery reporting requirements, providing another layer of transparency.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit?

Civil hazing lawsuits can cast a wide net to hold all responsible parties accountable:

• Individual Students: Those who actively planned, carried out, supplied alcohol, or directly participated in the hazing acts can be held personally liable.
• Local Chapters/Organizations: The fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, if it operates as a legal entity, can be sued for authorizing or encouraging the hazing. Key individuals like “pledge educators” or officers often face direct liability.
• National Fraternities/Sororities: The national headquarters, which charters, supervises, and collects dues from local chapters, can be held liable. This often depends on whether they knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing within the chapter or the national organization, and failed to act.
• Universities or Governing Boards: The educational institution itself, or its governing board, may be sued under theories of negligence if they had prior knowledge of hazing, failed to enforce their own policies, or demonstrated deliberate indifference to known risks. While public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT may assert sovereign immunity, exceptions exist, particularly for gross negligence or Title IX violations, and claims against individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor generally have fewer immunity protections.
• Third Parties: This can include landlords or property owners of off-campus houses or event venues where hazing occurred, particularly if they were aware of dangerous activities. Additionally, bars or alcohol providers could face liability under “dram shop” laws if they served alcohol to obviously intoxicated individuals or minors, contributing to a hazing incident.

It is important for families in Galveston County to remember that every case is fact-specific, and not every party will be liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney can thoroughly investigate the incident to identify all potential defendants and build a strong case.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

The tragic stories of hazing victims across the nation serve as stark reminders of the dangers involved and the precedents for accountability. These national anchor cases underscore the severe risks and have shaped legal strategies, even for families in Galveston County seeking justice at Texas universities.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced or coerced alcohol consumption remains a leading cause of hazing fatalities, mirroring incidents that could tragically occur at any Texas campus.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most high-profile hazing deaths, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after a “bid acceptance” event where he was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. Security cameras within the Beta Theta Pi chapter house captured Timothy falling multiple times, suffering severe brain injuries, yet fraternity members delayed calling for medical help for over 12 hours. This case led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the creation of Pennsylvania’s Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. The takeaway is clear: extreme intoxication coupled with a deliberate delay in calling 911 and a pervasive culture of silence can lead to devastating legal and human consequences.
• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. He was allegedly given a handle of hard liquor, which he consumed rapidly and dangerously. Multiple members faced criminal hazing charges, and Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life activities in response. The takeaway for Galveston County families is that formulaic “tradition” drinking nights, often disguised as bonding rituals, are a repeating script for disaster with known, tragic outcomes.
• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, 18, died after a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to drink heavily if they answered questions incorrectly. His blood alcohol content was 0.495%. His death led to the enactment of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, making felony hazing punishable by up to five years in prison. The tragic impact of his death demonstrated that legislative change often follows public outrage and clear proof of hazing, establishing stronger legal frameworks for victims.
• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): During a fraternity pledge night, 20-year-old Stone Foltz was forced to drink nearly an entire bottle of whiskey. He later died from alcohol poisoning. This incident resulted in multiple criminal convictions for fraternity members. In the civil realm, Bowling Green State University (a public institution) agreed to a nearly $3 million settlement with the Foltz family, with further significant settlements from the national fraternity and individuals. This case illustrates that universities can face substantial financial and reputational consequences alongside the fraternities themselves.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and ritualized hazing, often intended to “break down” new members, can also have fatal results, as these examples show.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng was a pledge at a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains when he was subjected to a violent blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual. During this ritual, he was repeatedly tackled while wearing a heavy backpack, suffering fatal head injuries. Fraternity members initially delayed calling for help for several hours. This horrific incident resulted in multiple members being convicted, and the national fraternity itself was banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years. This case highlights that off-campus “retreats,” designed to evade university oversight, can be even more dangerous and can still lead to severe sanctions against national organizations.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it infiltrates other campus organizations, including prestigious athletic programs.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): This scandal rocked the collegiate sports world when former players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the university’s football program. The allegations included forced sexual acts, racial discrimination, and a culture of extreme physical and psychological abuse. This led to multiple lawsuits against Northwestern University and coaching staff, the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald (who later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially), and deep investigations into the institutional culture. This case serves as a critical reminder that hazing is not limited to Greek life; even big-money, high-profile athletic programs can harbor systemic abuse, raising serious questions about institutional oversight.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national cases share common, distressing threads: forced drinking, humiliation, violence, a shocking delay or denial of medical care, and concerted efforts to cover up the truth. For families in Galveston County whose children attend or plan to attend Texas universities, these lessons are directly applicable. Reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements often follow only after tragedy occurs and tenacious litigation brings the facts to light. Families facing hazing at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor are not alone; they are operating in a legal landscape shaped by these national lessons, where their rights for accountability are firmly established.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Galveston County families considering higher education options or those currently with students at major Texas universities, understanding the specific context of hazing at each institution is vital. While the general patterns of hazing apply across the state, each campus has its unique culture, policies, and history of addressing – or sometimes failing to adequately address – this pervasive issue.

University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus, draws many students from Galveston County and the greater Houston metropolitan area. Its active Greek life and diverse student organizations mean that hazing remains a serious concern.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH is a large, diverse public research university located in the heart of Houston. It serves a significant commuter population alongside a growing residential student body. Its Greek life is robust, with numerous fraternities and sororities, including traditional IFC and Panhellenic chapters, as well as many multicultural and NPHC organizations. UH also boasts a wide array of other student groups, from cultural associations to sports clubs, all of which are susceptible to hazing. The proximity to Galveston County is significant, as many students from League City, Texas City, La Marque, and other communities attend UH, making the issue of campus safety directly relevant to our local families.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UH maintains a clear anti-hazing policy, prohibiting any act, on or off campus, that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. The policy specifically forbids forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and acts that cause mental distress. UH provides several reporting channels, including the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). The university also often publishes a hazing statement and some limited disciplinary information on its website.

Example Incident & Response

One notable incident involved the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) fraternity at UH in 2016. Pledges allegedly suffered from insufficient food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event, leading to at least one student sustaining a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. The incident gained public attention, leading to criminal misdemeanor hazing charges against some members and a university suspension for the chapter. While this was a high-profile case, other disciplinary references at UH have involved fraternities for behavior “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including alcohol misuse and other policy violations, leading to suspensions or probation. These incidents highlight UH’s willingness to suspend chapters, even if public reporting about the specifics of all violations can be somewhat limited compared to other institutions.

How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For students and families from Galveston County, a hazing incident at UH could involve multiple agencies. Depending on the location of the incident, investigations might be conducted by UHPD and/or the Houston Police Department. Civil lawsuits against individuals, the chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, and potentially the university itself would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County, such as the Harris County District Courts. Because Houston is such a large legal market, securing experienced counsel who understands the local courts and university systems, like The Manginello Law Firm, is vital.

What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For families in Galveston County with children attending UH, specific steps are crucial:

• Report promptly: Utilize UH’s reporting channels through the Dean of Students, UHPD, or online forms.
• Document everything: Keep meticulous records of all communications, disciplinary actions, and any evidence you or your child collects.
• Understand the legal landscape: Be aware of the interplay between university investigations and potential criminal or civil actions.
• Consult legal counsel: Talking to a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can help uncover prior discipline on file at UH and navigate complex university procedures.
• Prioritize safety: If your child is in danger or needs medical attention, act immediately.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University in College Station is renowned for its traditions, particularly the Corps of Cadets, and its robust Greek life. Students from Galveston County often choose Texas A&M for its strong academic programs and unique culture, making hazing a direct concern for our local families.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M is a prominent public research university with a deeply ingrained culture of tradition, loyalty, and community. Its Corps of Cadets is a distinctive feature, fostering a military-style environment that, while emphasizing leadership and discipline, has sometimes faced scrutiny over hazing allegations. The university also supports a large and active Greek system, including IFC, Panhellenic, and multicultural chapters. The institution’s strong sense of tradition and the intensity of its student organizations can, unfortunately, create conditions where hazing can be normalized or overlooked.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M strictly prohibits hazing across all student organizations. Their policy aligns with state law, defining hazing as any act that causes physical or mental harm for initiation or membership. The university provides various reporting mechanisms, including links to confidential reporting services, the Dean of Student Life, and the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD). They also make efforts to educate students on what constitutes hazing and their right to report it.

Example Incident & Response

Texas A&M has faced multiple hazing allegations. In 2021, two pledges of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity alleged severe hazing that included being covered in various substances, one of which was an industrial-strength cleaner. This caused severe chemical burns on their bodies, requiring emergency skin graft surgeries. The students subsequently filed a $1 million lawsuit against the fraternity, which was temporarily suspended by the university. In another high-profile case in 2023, a cadet from the Corps of Cadets filed a lawsuit alleging degrading hazing, including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” position with an apple in his mouth. These cases highlight that hazing at Texas A&M can stem from both Greek life and deeply rooted Corps traditions.

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

Given Texas A&M’s status as a public university, any hazing case might involve their campus police alongside the College Station Police Department. Civil actions would primarily be brought in Brazos County district courts. Cases stemming from the Corps introduce unique dynamics compared to Greek organizations, often involving more direct university oversight structures. The firm’s experience with the complexities of state universities and their potential assertions of sovereign immunity, as well as the unique aspects of military-style organizations, is invaluable.

What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For Galveston County families with children at Texas A&M:

• Be aware of traditions: Understand the cultural pressures within the Corps and Greek life.
• Document thoroughly: Especially if incidents occur off-campus, gather evidence like texts or photos quickly.
• Seek support: Contact the Dean of Student Life or UPD if hazing is suspected.
• Consider legal action: Civil cases, even against a large institution like Texas A&M, can serve as powerful tools for accountability, particularly when policies are breached or ignored.
• Prioritize medical care: Ensure any student harmed receives immediate medical attention, documenting the source of injuries.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution recognized for its academic prowess and vibrant campus life, attracts students from Galveston County and across the state. With its strong Greek presence and numerous student organizations, UT Austin has a complex history surrounding hazing.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin is a large, public university with a dynamic and diverse student body. Its campus culture is rich with traditions, including a large and influential Greek system that encompasses IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, and various multicultural organizations. The university also hosts countless other student groups, from spirit organizations like the Texas Cowboys and Orange Jackets to athletic teams and academic clubs. The sheer size and prominence of UT, combined with its strong Greek presence, mean that hazing incidents often attract significant public and media attention.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UT Austin boasts one of the most transparent hazing reporting systems in the state. Its comprehensive anti-hazing policy aligns with Texas law, unequivocally prohibiting all forms of hazing. Importantly, UT maintains a publicly accessible Hazing Violations page on its website, which lists organizations, the dates of their violations, the nature of the conduct, and the disciplinary sanctions imposed. This transparency, while commendable, also continuously highlights the ongoing challenges of hazing on campus. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD).

Example Incident & Response

The UT Austin Hazing Violations page frequently lists disciplinary actions. For instance, in 2023, the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) fraternity, an organization with a national history of severe hazing, was sanctioned after new members were directed to consume milk excessively and perform strenuous calisthenics, which was deemed hazing. The chapter was placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education. Other organizations, including spirit groups like “Absolute Texxas,” have faced sanctions for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, and punishment-based practices such as blindfolding and degrading new members. These repeated violations demonstrate that despite official policies and public reporting, hazing persists.
The availability of UT’s public log of previous violations is significant for families in Galveston County, as it can strongly support civil lawsuits by illustrating a pattern of misconduct and the university’s knowledge of such behaviors.

How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at UT Austin can involve both UTPD and the Austin Police Department, depending on the nature and location of the incident. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Travis County district courts. Given UT’s policy of publicizing hazing violations, attorneys can leverage this information to strengthen negligence claims against the university and affiliated organizations, demonstrating a history of known issues. The university’s public status means that while issues of sovereign immunity may arise, there are often avenues to pursue accountability, particularly for gross negligence or Title IX violations.

What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

For Galveston County families with children at UT Austin:

• Review public records: Familiarize yourself with UT’s Hazing Violations page to understand the history of organizations your child might join.
• Utilize reporting channels: Contact the Dean of Students or UTPD immediately if hazing is suspected.
• Document thoroughly: Preserve all texts, photos, and medical records, as these are critical for any legal action.
• Consult legal experts: An attorney experienced in Texas hazing cases can analyze UT’s compliance with its own policies and state law, and navigate the complexities of a public university system.
• Seek legal advice regarding prior sanctions: UT’s history of prior findings against specific organizations can be a powerful tool for establishing institutional knowledge and negligence in a civil suit.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a private institution in Dallas known for its strong academics and affluent student body, also presents unique considerations for Galveston County families regarding hazing, particularly within its active Greek community.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU is a private university located in a vibrant urban environment and has a reputation for a robust and influential Greek system. Its campus culture often emphasizes tradition and social engagement, which contribute to a very active fraternity and sorority presence on campus. Students attending SMU from Galveston County are part of a community where Greek life plays a significant social role, making the issue of hazing particularly relevant within that context.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that is clearly communicated to its students and organizations. It prohibits any activity that could endanger the mental or physical health of a student under the guise of initiation or membership. SMU offers various hazing prevention resources, including reporting forms, anonymous hotlines, and platforms like “Real Response” to encourage students to report concerns without fear of reprisal.

Example Incident & Response

SMU’s history includes incidents such as the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity facing allegations in 2017. Reports detailed new members being subjected to paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation during their pledge period. This led to an investigation, a chapter suspension, and significant restrictions on the fraternity’s ability to recruit new members for several years. While SMU strives for transparency, as a private institution, the public availability of detailed disciplinary actions may differ from public universities. However, its policies and the severity of past incidents underscore the university’s commitment to addressing hazing.

How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For hazing incidents at SMU, investigations typically involve the SMU Police Department and the Dean of Students. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in Dallas County district courts. As a private university, SMU does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more susceptible to direct legal action than public institutions. This status facilitates discovery in litigation, allowing attorneys to compel access to internal university reports, communications, and disciplinary records that might be protected in sovereign immunity contexts. This can be a significant advantage for families seeking full accountability.

What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For Galveston County families with children at SMU:

• Understand institutional responsibilities: Recognize that private universities like SMU have a direct and significant responsibility for student safety, potentially with less governmental immunity.
• Utilize SMU’s reporting tools: Make use of anonymous reporting systems to flag concerns.
• Document extensively: Keep records of all university communications and evidence related to any hazing incident.
• Seek legal expertise: Because SMU is a private institution, the legal approach to securing documents and pursuing claims can differ significantly from public universities. Experienced counsel can navigate these nuanced differences effectively.
• Demand transparency: Encourage SMU to publicly report any disciplinary actions related to hazing.

Baylor University

Baylor University in Waco, a private Christian institution, has also navigated its share of campus safety and misconduct issues, making hazing a focal point for families from Galveston County and across Texas.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University is a private Baptist research university with a distinct religious identity and a strong emphasis on community and faith. Located in Central Texas, it has a significant Greek life presence with IFC, Panhellenic, and NPHC chapters, alongside numerous other student organizations. Baylor’s campus culture, while rooted in its Christian mission, has faced public scrutiny over past institutional misconduct, particularly related to sexual assault and Title IX compliance. This history informs how hazing allegations are perceived and handled at the university, affecting students from Galveston County and beyond.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor strictly prohibits hazing, articulating in its policies that any such activity is contrary to its values and state law. The university defines hazing in accordance with the Texas Education Code and provides clear guidance on how to report suspected incidents, including contacts within Student Affairs, the Baylor Police Department, and an anonymous reporting hotline. They emphasize a “zero tolerance” approach to hazing.

Example Incident & Response

Baylor has faced hazing investigations across different student groups. In 2020, for instance, the university’s baseball team became the subject of a hazing investigation. This resulted in the suspension of 14 players, with these suspensions staggered over the early part of the season. This incident, while specific to athletics, occurs against the backdrop of Baylor’s broader cultural and oversight challenges, particularly its past struggles with managing high-profile misconduct cases. Such incidents reinforce the reality that despite official statements of “zero tolerance,” misconduct can recur.

How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at Baylor University would typically involve the Baylor Police Department and Student Life for investigations. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in McLennan County district courts. Like SMU, as a private institution, Baylor does not have the protection of sovereign immunity, potentially simplifying the process of holding the institution directly responsible. However, given Baylor’s deeply religious and tradition-rich environment, navigating a legal case requires an attorney who understands these cultural nuances and can effectively address them within a legal framework.

What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For Galveston County families with children at Baylor:

• Understand the institutional context: Be aware of Baylor’s unique culture and its history of addressing campus misconduct.
• Scrutinize organization histories: Research whether Greek chapters or other student groups at Baylor have documented hazing violations.
• Report all concerns: Utilize Baylor’s official reporting channels immediately, especially the anonymous hotline if anonymity is desired.
• Preserve evidence: Collect and secure all digital and physical evidence related to hazing.
• Seek legal consultation: An attorney can provide crucial guidance on navigating Baylor’s internal processes and pursuing civil remedies, particularly given the university’s private status.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

The patterns of hazing seen across the nation are not isolated incidents but often reflect long-standing practices within specific national fraternities and sororities, practices that can reappear at chapters on campuses in Texas. For families in Galveston County, understanding this connection is vital, as a national organization’s history can provide critical evidence in holding a local chapter and its overseeing body accountable.

Why National Histories Matter

When a student from Galveston County becomes a pledge or new member at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, they are not just joining a local chapter; they are affiliating with a national organization. These national entities often:

• Possess extensive anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies, created explicitly because they have faced numerous prior incidents of severe injuries and fatalities across their chapters.
• Are intimately aware of common hazing patterns within their organizations: ritualized forced alcohol consumption, “traditional” paddling events, degrading initiation rituals, and intense sleep deprivation.

When a Texas chapter repeats a dangerous hazing script that has previously led to suspensions, lawsuits, or deaths at another chapter in another state, it can be powerful evidence of foreseeability. This demonstrates that the national organization knew or should have known about the potential for harm, strengthening arguments for negligence or even punitive damages against national entities.

Organization Mapping: Connecting Local Chapters to National Realities

Below we synthesize the national hazing histories of some major fraternities and sororities present at Texas universities, illustrating how these patterns can manifest locally. This is not an exhaustive list of every chapter, but focuses on organizations with well-documented prior incidents nationally.

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has a particularly troubling national hazing history tied to severe alcohol hazing.

  • At Bowling Green State University in March 2021, 20-year-old Stone Foltz died from alcohol poisoning after a “Big/Little” night forced him to consume an entire bottle of whiskey. This led to criminal convictions, and a $10 million settlement for the family.
  • In 2012, David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University died from alcohol poisoning during a fraternity event, resulting in a $14 million settlement.
  • At the University of Mississippi in 2025, seven members were arrested for cyberstalking related to hazing.
  • Relevance for Texas families: Pike chapters exist at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor. The consistent pattern of alcohol-related events and severe hazing across chapters demonstrates a foreseeable risk that national Pike should be aware of and proactively prevent.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE has faced a multitude of hazing incidents and fatalities nationwide, leading to its national organization eliminating its traditional pledge process for a time (a policy later reversed).

  • Multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries have occurred across SAE chapters.
  • A recent lawsuit (2023) at the University of Alabama alleged a pledge suffered a traumatic brain injury during hazing rituals.
  • The Texas A&M University chapter (2021) faced a $1 million lawsuit after pledges allegedly suffered severe chemical burns from industrial-strength cleaner, requiring skin grafts.
  • At the University of Texas at Austin in January 2024, an exchange student sued the chapter for over $1 million after an alleged assault that resulted in significant physical injuries.
  • Relevance for Texas families: Chapters across UH, Texas A&M, UT, and SMU belong to SAE. These incidents demonstrate a consistent pattern of severe physical and chemical hazing, in addition to alcohol-related risks, which national SAE has a clear history of knowing about.

• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity is linked to another high-profile alcohol-related death.

  • At Louisiana State University in 2017, Maxwell “Max” Gruver died from alcohol toxicity after a forced drinking game. This tragic event spurred the Max Gruver Act, Louisiana’s felony hazing statute.
  • Relevance for Texas families: Phi Delta Theta chapters appear at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor. The national organization’s history with the Max Gruver case highlights direct knowledge of dangerous alcohol-related hazing outcomes.

• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): This fraternity is notably associated with a fatal alcohol hazing incident.

  • At Florida State University in 2017, Andrew Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event where pledges were given handles of hard liquor.
  • Relevance for Texas families: Pi Kappa Phi chapters exist at UH and Texas A&M. This case reinforces the pattern of high-risk alcohol hazing and national organizations’ responsibility.

• Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): This fraternity is inextricably linked to the landmark Timothy Piazza case.

  • At Penn State University in 2017, Timothy Piazza died from traumatic brain injuries after extreme alcohol consumption and falls during a “bid acceptance” night. The shocking delay in calling for help and subsequent criminal charges against members fundamentally altered hazing litigation.
  • Relevance for Texas families: Beta Theta Pi chapters are present at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and SMU. The national organization’s experience with the Piazza case means it has been directly put on notice about the extreme dangers of alcohol hazing and delayed medical care.

• phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): This fraternity is unfortunately relevant for a case involving catastrophic non-fatal injury.

  • At the University of Missouri in 2021, Danny Santulli suffered severe, permanent brain damage after being forced to consume excessive alcohol during a “pledge dad reveal” night. His family settled lawsuits with 22 defendants, including the fraternity, in multi-million-dollar settlements.
  • Relevance for Texas families: Phi Gamma Delta chapters exist at Texas A&M. This case proves that non-fatal hazing can still result in devastating, lifelong injuries and significant legal accountability.

• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): This fraternity has multiple hazing incidents, some with fatal outcomes.

  • At the University of Miami in 2001, Chad Meredith drowned after being persuaded by fraternity members to swim across a lake while intoxicated. His parents were awarded a $12.6 million verdict in a negligence suit based on hazing. This led to a law in Florida making hazing a criminal offense.
  • At Texas A&M University (2023, ongoing), the chapter has faced allegations of hazing resulting in severe injuries, specifically rhabdomyolysis, a dangerous muscle breakdown from extreme physical activity, leading to ongoing litigation.
  • Relevance for Texas families: Kappa Sigma chapters are at UH, Texas A&M, UT, and Baylor. The Texas A&M incident shows direct relevance to our state, with severe physical hazing causing critical medical conditions.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

These patterns across states and campuses are crucial for families in Galveston County and their legal team. They demonstrate that certain organizations have received repeated warnings regarding their hazing practices. In a civil lawsuit, courts can examine whether national organizations:

• Meaningfully enforced their stated anti-hazing policies, or if these were merely “paper policies” without actual impact.
• Responded to prior incidents with aggressive and effective deterrence, or if punishments were insufficient to prevent recurrence.

This historical context can significantly impact several aspects of litigation:

• Settlement leverage: A strong history of national hazing violations can significantly increase a plaintiff’s bargaining power.
• Insurance coverage disputes: Knowing an organization’s history can help challenge insurance companies that try to deny coverage based on “intentional acts” exclusions, arguing instead for foreseeable negligence.
• Punitive damages: In cases of extreme recklessness or deliberate indifference to known dangers, a pattern of prior misconduct can support claims for punitive damages, designed to punish wrongdoers and deter future harm.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Building a compelling hazing case demands a sophisticated and meticulous approach. For families in Galveston County, the process involves painstakingly collecting evidence, understanding the full scope of damages, and developing a strategic legal plan to hold all responsible parties accountable.

Evidence in Modern Hazing Cases

The digital age has transformed evidence collection in hazing cases. What once relied heavily on witness testimony now increasingly depends on electronic footprints.

• Digital Communications: These are often the most critical pieces of evidence. This includes group chats and direct messages from platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and other fraternity/sorority-specific apps. These messages can reveal planning, intent, knowledge, past patterns, who was involved, and what was said before, during, and after an incident. Our firm leverages digital forensics to recover deleted messages, but original screenshots with visible timestamps and sender names are invaluable.
• Photos & Videos: Any content filmed by members during hazing events, footage shared in group chats, or publicly posted on social media (even if quickly deleted) provides irrefutable proof. Additionally, security camera or doorbell footage from houses, bars, or other venues can capture key moments before or after an incident.
• Internal Organization Documents: These include new member manuals, initiation scripts, ritual “traditions” lists, emails or texts from officers giving instructions, and national anti-hazing policies and training materials. These documents can expose official knowledge, planned activities, and the discrepancy between stated policies and actual practices.
• University Records: Through subpoena and public records requests, we seek prior conduct files, probation lists, disciplinary actions, letters of warning, incident reports from campus police or student conduct offices, and Clery reports (annual campus safety statistics). These help establish a university’s prior knowledge of hazing within a specific organization.
• Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical records are crucial for documenting physical injuries, including emergency room reports, hospitalization notes, surgery and rehabilitation records, and toxicology reports. For mental health, psychological evaluations and therapy records can establish Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation, demonstrating profound emotional harm.
• Witness Testimony: While digital evidence is powerful, the human element remains vital. This includes testimony from other pledges, active members, roommates, Resident Assistants (RAs), coaches, trainers, or any bystanders. Former members who quit or were expelled, having experienced or witnessed hazing firsthand, can also provide compelling testimony.

Damages in Hazing Cases

Hazing can result in a range of devastating consequences, both economic and non-economic. In plain English, victims and their families can seek compensation for:

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs, from immediate emergency room visits and ambulance transport to subsequent hospitalizations (including ICU care), surgeries, ongoing treatment, physical therapy, medications, and specialized care. For catastrophic injuries like traumatic brain injuries or organ damage, it includes the often staggering costs of long-term care and life care plans.
• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes income lost if the student or a parent (who had to care for the student) missed work. It also encompasses academic setbacks such as missed semesters, tuition fees for delayed graduation, the loss of scholarships, and the delayed entry into the workforce, particularly if injuries are permanent and affect earning capacity.
• Non-Economic Damages: These are harder to quantify but are legally compensable parts of the suffering. They include intense physical pain and suffering from injuries, severe emotional distress (such as PTSD, anxiety, and depression), profound humiliation and loss of dignity, and the loss of enjoyment of life, meaning the inability to participate in activities or experience life as they once did.
• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the most tragic cases, when hazing results in death, surviving family members (parents, children, and sometimes siblings, depending on Texas law) can recover for funeral and burial costs, the loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and the immeasurable loss of companionship, love, and emotional support. They can also seek compensation for their own grief and mental health treatment.

While we are describing types of damages, it’s crucial to understand we are not promising or predicting specific dollar amounts. Every case is unique.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing cases often involve multiple defendants, each with their own legal counsel and insurance policies.

• National Fraternities and Universities: These powerful entities typically carry substantial insurance policies designed to cover such incidents. However, their insurers frequently argue that hazing or intentional acts are excluded from coverage, or they may dispute which policy (e.g., general liability versus crime policy) applies.
• Experienced Hazing Lawyers: Our firm identifies all potential sources of insurance coverage, from individual homeowner policies to chapter, national, and university umbrella policies. We meticulously navigate disputes about exclusions and “intentional conduct” clauses, often asserting that while the hazing itself might be intentional, the national organization’s or university’s failure to supervise or prevent it was negligent, making it a covered event. This specialized knowledge is critical for securing maximum compensation for our clients.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing impacts a family in Galveston County, immediate, actionable guidance is paramount. Here, we offer practical advice for parents, students, and even former members or witnesses.

For Parents in Galveston County

We understand the fear and confusion you feel. Here’s what you need to know:

• Warning Signs of Hazing:
  • Physical: Unexplained bruises, cuts, burns, or physical injuries. Extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation. Significant weight changes. Injuries from forced exercise.
  • Behavioral: Sudden secrecy about organization activities (“I can’t talk about it”). Withdrawal from family, friends, or other interests. Drastic changes in mood, increased anxiety, irritability, or depression. Fear of “getting in trouble” or “letting the group down.”
  • Academic: Sudden drop in grades, missed classes or assignments due to “mandatory” events.
  • Financial: Unexplained expenses, requests for money without clear explanation, or excessive spending on others.
  • Digital: Constant phone use for group chats late at night, anxiety when the phone pings, or reluctance to show you their phone screen.
• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach them with empathy, not judgment. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with the fraternity?” or “Is there anything that makes you uncomfortable?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priorities, and you will support them regardless.
• If Your Child is Hurt: Get them immediate medical attention. Document everything: take detailed photos of injuries, screenshot any relevant texts, and write down everything your child tells you, including names, dates, and locations.
• Dealing with the University: Document every communication with administrators. Ask direct questions about prior incidents involving the same organization and what the school did in response. Universities have a legal and ethical responsibility to address hazing.
• When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has experienced significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing the incident, it is time to contact an experienced hazing attorney.

For Students / Pledges in Galveston County

Your safety and well-being are the most important things. Remember your rights.

• “Is this hazing or just tradition?” If an activity makes you feel unsafe, humiliated, exploited, or coerced; if you’re forced to drink or endure pain; if the activity is shrouded in secrecy from the public or administrators – it is probably hazing and is illegal.
• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Texas law explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing charges. The law recognizes the immense power dynamics at play, the fear of exclusion, and the psychological coercion that makes “agreement” less than voluntary.
• Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the right to leave a dangerous situation or withdraw your membership at any time. If you fear retaliation, report that fear to the Dean of Students or campus police immediately. Many universities, including those relevant to Galveston County students, offer anonymous reporting channels.
• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and Texas law offer protections (amnesty) to students who call for help in an emergency, even if they were involved in conduct like underage drinking. Your life, or the life of a friend, is more important than “getting in trouble.”

For Former Members / Witnesses

We understand the complex emotions you might be facing, including guilt, fear, or a desire to right wrongs.

• Your Testimony Matters: Your perspective and evidence can be pivotal in preventing future harm and saving lives.
• Seeking Counsel: You may want to seek your own legal advice before engaging with investigations, but cooperating can be a crucial step toward accountability and personal healing. Our firm can help witnesses navigate their role.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Hazing Case

Hazing cases are complex and time-sensitive. Families in Galveston County should be aware of common missteps that can severely weaken or even destroy their claims:

1. Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence: What parents might intend as a protective measure can be disastrous. While you might think you’re shielding your child from further trouble, deleting evidence looks like a cover-up and makes proving the case nearly impossible for your legal team. Instead, preserve everything immediately, even if it’s embarrassing or incriminating for the organization.
2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly: The instinct to confront those who harmed your child is natural. However, doing so without legal representation will likely lead the organization to immediately engage their lawyers, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defense, putting you at a significant disadvantage. Instead, document everything and then call a lawyer before any direct confrontation.
3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms: Universities often pressure families to sign waivers or internal “resolution” agreements to keep matters confidential. Signing these documents without legal review can mean you inadvertently waive your right to sue or settle for a value far below what your child’s case is truly worth. Do NOT sign anything from the university or an insurance company without an experienced attorney reviewing it first.
4. Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer: While the desire to share your story is understandable, any public posts can be scrutinized by defense attorneys. Inconsistencies or unguarded statements can hurt your credibility and potentially waive certain legal protections. Instead, document privately and allow your lawyer to control any public messaging strategically.
5. Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting”: Organizations might try to lure your child back for a “final conversation” or “reconciliation meeting.” These are often tactics to apply pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that could harm your case. Once you are considering legal action, all communication should go through your lawyer.
6. Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”: Universities often promise to “handle this internally.” However, evidence disappears quickly, witnesses graduate, the statute of limitations continues to run, and the university often prioritizes its own reputation over full accountability for your child. Preserve evidence NOW, consult with a lawyer immediately, and understand that the university’s internal process is aimed at its own disciplinary needs, not necessarily full civil justice.
7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer: Insurance adjusters, representing the fraternity, university, or individuals, are not on your side. Their goal is to minimize payouts. Any recorded statements or information you provide can be used against you. Politely decline to speak with them and state, “My attorney will contact you.”

Short FAQ for Galveston County Families

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. While public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) have some sovereign immunity prote tions, exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on specific facts—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. While most hazing begins as a Class B misdemeanor, it becomes a state jail felony under Texas law if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This means jail time and significant fines are possible. Individuals in leadership positions can also face charges for failing to report hazing.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “agreement” under peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent. Your child’s “consent” does not absolve those who committed hazing from legal liability.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas?”
  Generally, you have 2 years from the date of injury or death to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups, lies, or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to protect your rights. Our video, “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?”, provides more information: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held responsible based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and the foreseeability of the hazing. Many major hazing cases, such as the Pi Delta Psi retreat death (Michael Deng) or the Sigma Pi death at an “unofficial” off-campus house (Collin Wiant), occurred off-campus and still resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments against the organizations.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  While some high-profile hazing cases make headlines, most hazing cases settle confidentially before trial. It is often possible to request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy while aggressively pursuing accountability.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing case in Texas, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who intimately understand how powerful institutions — whether national fraternities or major state universities — fight back, and who possess the specialized knowledge and experience to prevail.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, stands ready to serve families in Galveston County and across the state. Our firm is uniquely qualified to tackle the complexities of hazing litigation for several reasons:

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable insight as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies analyze, value, and, often, undervalue hazing claims. Her experience enables us to anticipate their delay tactics, challenge coverage exclusion arguments, and strategically approach settlement negotiations. We know their playbook because we used to run it. Lupe Peña’s professional background is detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, has a proven track record in complex litigation. He was one of the few Texas firms involved in the significant BP Texas City explosion litigation, demonstrating his capacity to take on massive corporations. With extensive experience in federal courts, including the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, our firm is not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar entities and secured accountability. Ralph Manginello’s full credentials and experience are available at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We don’t settle cheap. We have successfully represented families in high-stakes wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases, working with economists and medical experts to accurately value lifetime care needs for victims with traumatic brain injuries or other permanent disabilities. Our approach is to build cases that compel accountability and secure meaningful compensation. Our wrongful death practice area is detailed at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.
• Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph Manginello’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a distinct advantage. We understand how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, allowing us to advise witnesses and former members who may face dual exposure, ensuring every aspect of the case is strategically handled. Our firm’s criminal defense capabilities are outlined at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.
• Investigative Depth: We recognize that evidence in hazing cases can be fleeting. Our network of experts, including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, economists, and psychologists, allows us to meticulously obtain hidden evidence, from deleted group chats and social media content to subpoenaed national fraternity records and university files. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does. Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs, highlights key strategies for evidence preservation.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Galveston County, its communities like League City, Texas City, Santa Fe, and Hitchcock and other vibrant cities along the Gulf Coast. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families in Galveston County and across the region, regardless of where their student attends school.

We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We focus on thorough investigation and real accountability, not just quick settlements. We want to underscore how our contingency fee structure works, ensuring access to justice without upfront costs; our video, “How Do Contingency Fees Work?”, explains this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.

Call to Action for Galveston County Families

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus – be it the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or another institution – we want to hear from you. Families in Galveston County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will attentively listen to your story, explain your legal options, and help you determine the best path forward.

During your free consultation, you can expect:

• A non-judgmental space to share your experience.
• A review of any evidence you have collected.
• A clear explanation of your legal choices: initiating a criminal report, pursuing a civil lawsuit, or both.
• Guidance on realistic timelines and what to anticipate during the legal process.
• Answers to your questions about our contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case.
• No pressure to commit: You will have the time and information needed to make an informed decision.
• Complete confidentiality for everything you share with us.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911 today:

• Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Servicios legales en español están disponibles. Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish.

Whether you’re in Galveston County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com