Hazing in Texas: A Comprehensive Guide for Garza County Families

A phone rings late at night. On the other end, a panicked student whispers about an “initiation night” gone horribly wrong at an off-campus fraternity house. There were forced drinks, degrading acts, and now someone is hurt, unresponsive, but no one wants to call for help, fearing the repercussions for their chapter. The student feels trapped between loyalty to the group and the very real danger to a friend.

This isn’t a fictional scenario; it’s a chilling reality for too many students and their families across Texas. This could happen at any Texas university—including schools where Garza County families send their children. If you are a parent or student in Garza County, navigating the complex world of college life – especially Greek life, athletic teams, or other campus organizations – can feel overwhelming. The lines between tradition and abuse are often blurred, and the consequences of hazing can be devastating.

This comprehensive guide aims to illuminate the landscape of hazing and the law in Texas, specifically for families in Garza County and across our great state. We’ll delve into:

What hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes.
The intricacies of Texas and federal laws governing hazing.
Lessons learned from major national cases and their direct relevance to Texas families.
The specific hazing patterns and institutional responses at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University.
The legal recourse available to victims and families in Garza County and other communities throughout Texas.

This article provides general information and should not be considered specific legal advice. The Manginello Law Firm is dedicated to evaluating individual cases based on their unique facts. We proudly serve families throughout Texas, including those in Garza County, bringing our expertise and advocacy to wherever it is needed.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

Call 911 for medical emergencies, without delay.
Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate support—that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

In the first 48 hours:

Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Prioritize their health above all else.
Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot group chats, texts, and direct messages (DMs) immediately.
- Photograph any injuries from multiple angles, showing scale if possible.
- Save physical items involved in the hazing (e.g., clothing that might have stains, receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used).
Write down everything while memory is fresh: who, what, when, where, and any relevant details.
Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly. This can lead to evidence destruction or retaliation.
- Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal counsel.
- Post details on public social media. Such posts can compromise a future legal case.
- Let your child delete messages or “clean up” any evidence.

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

Evidence can disappear rapidly through deleted group chats, destroyed items, and coached witnesses.
Universities often move quickly to control the narrative following an incident.
We can help preserve crucial evidence and protect your child’s rights during these critical initial hours.
Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for an immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

When many people hear the word “hazing,” they might picture a scene from an old movie: silly pranks, being forced to sing. However, modern hazing is far more insidious, dangerous, and technologically enabled. For Garza County families unfamiliar with the evolving landscape of campus life, it’s crucial to understand how hazing truly manifests in today’s universities and colleges.

Hazing, in plain English, is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits an individual. This broad definition is critical because it moves beyond mere “pranks” to encompass a wide range of harmful activities. Importantly, the argument “I agreed to it” does not automatically make the activity safe or legal, especially when peer pressure and power imbalances are at play.

Main Categories of Hazing

Modern hazing takes on many forms, often escalating through three tiers, from subtle pressure to outright violence. It can involve:

Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains one of the most common and dangerous forms of hazing.

Forced or coerced drinking, often to dangerous levels, as part of “initiation” or “bonding” rituals.
“Chugging challenges,” “lineups,” or drinking games designed to induce rapid and excessive alcohol consumption.
Pressure to consume unknown substances or illicit drugs.

Physical Hazing: This category involves acts that directly endanger a person’s physical well-being.

Paddling, striking, or other forms of physical beatings.
Extreme calisthenics, forced “workouts,” or “smokings” (intense physical drills) that go far beyond healthy athletic conditioning and can lead to injury or rhabdomyolysis.
Severe sleep deprivation through mandatory late-night activities and early morning wake-ups.
Food or water deprivation, sometimes coupled with forced consumption of non-food items or noxious substances.
Exposure to extreme cold or heat, or forcing individuals into dangerous or unsanitary environments.

Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts are highly damaging to a person’s dignity and self-esteem.

Forced nudity, partial nudity, or sexually explicit acts.
Simulated sexual acts, such as the “elephant walk” or “roasted pig” positions (where members are bound in degrading poses).
Acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones, including the use of slurs or forced role-play of stereotypes.
Public shaming, embarrassing costumes, or forced performances in public.

Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked, psychological hazing causes significant mental and emotional distress.

Constant verbal abuse, yelling, screaming, insults, and threats.
Isolation from friends, family, or other non-group activities.
Manipulation or forced confessions of personal details.
Public shaming, often on social media or during group meetings.
Requiring secrecy and lying to parents, professors, and university officials.

Digital/Online Hazing: With the rise of technology, hazing has found new, pervasive platforms.

Group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation orchestrated via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Discord.
Pressure to create or share compromising images or videos.
Constant demands for immediate responses to messages at all hours, leading to sleep deprivation and anxiety.
Geo-tracking or forced location sharing using apps like Find My Friends or Life360.
Demands to post specific content or to delete embarrassing or incriminating evidence.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It is a common misconception that hazing is limited to Greek-letter fraternities. The unfortunate reality is that hazing is a pervasive issue across a wide range of campus organizations. It thrives wherever there are power imbalances, desires for conformity, and traditions cloaked in secrecy.

It occurs in:

Fraternities and Sororities: This includes Interfraternity Council (IFC) chapters, Panhellenic Council (NPC) sororities, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) “Divine Nine” historically Black Greek-letter organizations, and various multicultural Greek organizations.
Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: Organizations at institutions like Texas A&M have faced scrutiny for hazing practices masked as “tradition” or “discipline.”
Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Campus Organizations: Groups like “Absolute Texxas” at UT Austin or other student spirit groups, honor societies, or even some service organizations can engage in hazing.
Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball, cheerleading, and even club sports, hazing can be prevalent, sometimes under the guise of “team building.”
Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even organizations dedicated to arts and culture have been implicated in hazing incidents.

The unfortunate truth is that social status, the allure of tradition, and an intense culture of secrecy often allow these practices to persist, even when participants know hazing is illegal and explicitly prohibited by university policies. For families in Garza County, understanding the diverse venues where hazing can occur is the first step toward prevention and protection.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For families in Garza County, understanding the legal landscape of hazing in Texas is essential. Our state has clear laws aimed at preventing hazing and holding those responsible accountable, complemented by federal mandates that add another layer of protection.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific, robust anti-hazing provisions outlined in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. Fundamentally, Texas law broadly defines hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, whether on or off campus, performed by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, such as beatings, forced exercise, or coerced consumption of alcohol or drugs.
It occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This means if someone makes you do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a group, and they intended to do it or were reckless about the risks involved, that constitutes hazing under Texas law.

Texas law also establishes:

Criminal Penalties: Hazing can lead to fines and potential jail time. While a basic hazing offense is a Class B Misdemeanor, its severity increases if it causes injury, becoming a Class A Misdemeanor for medical treatment and a State Jail Felony if it results in serious bodily injury or death. Furthermore, individuals in leadership positions who fail to report hazing can face misdemeanor charges, as can those who retaliate against a reporter. Organizations themselves can face fines up to $10,000 and even lose university recognition if they authorize or encourage hazing.
Reporter Protections: A crucial provision, spelled out in Texas Education Code § 37.154, grants immunity from civil or criminal liability to individuals who in good faith report a hazing incident to university authorities or law enforcement. This aims to encourage reporting, though fear of social consequences can still be a barrier for many students.
Consent is Not a Defense: Under Texas Education Code § 37.155, it is explicitly not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the activity. This legal clarity is vital, as courts recognize that “consent” given under duress, peer pressure, or fear of social exclusion is not true voluntary consent.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, there are typically two distinct legal avenues that can be pursued:

Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state through a prosecutor and aim to punish individuals for breaking the law. Hazing-related criminal charges can range from basic hazing offenses and furnishing alcohol to minors, to more severe charges like assault, battery, or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in cases involving death. A criminal conviction can result in jail time, fines, and probation.
Civil Cases: These are brought by the victims or their surviving family members. The primary goal of a civil lawsuit is to obtain monetary compensation for the harm suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil claims often focus on negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and emotional distress. It is important to note that a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil case; both can proceed independently.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations also impact how hazing incidents are addressed:

The Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024) mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funds enhance transparency around hazing. This includes clearer reporting of incidents, strengthened prevention and education efforts, and the maintenance of publicly accessible hazing data, with provisions phased in by around 2026.
Title IX applies when hazing incidents involve sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based discrimination. Under such circumstances, universities have specific obligations to investigate and respond, regardless of where the incident occurred.
The Clery Act requires colleges to report campus crime statistics and provide timely warnings about threats to campus safety. Hazing incidents, particularly those involving assaults, alcohol/drug violations, or other crimes, often overlap with Clery reporting requirements, increasing institutional accountability.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Bringing a civil hazing lawsuit in Texas involves identifying all potentially liable parties. This multifaceted approach is crucial, as responsibility often extends beyond the immediate perpetrators:

Individual Students: Those who actively planned, carried out, supplied alcohol, or helped cover up the hazing act.
Local Chapter / Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, particularly if it operates as a legal entity. Key individuals include current and former officers or “pledge educators.”
National Organization: The national headquarters of a fraternity or sorority, which sets policies, collects dues, and is responsible for overseeing its chapters. Liability can arise from their knowledge of previous incidents, their failure to enforce policies effectively, or their direct negligence.
University or Governing Board: The educational institution may be liable under theories of negligence (e.g., negligent supervision, failure to warn, creating a dangerous environment), breach of contract, or Title IX violations. Public universities in Texas (like UT, Texas A&M, UH) might sometimes claim sovereign immunity, but exceptions often apply for gross negligence, willful misconduct, or when suing individual administrators in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) typically have fewer immunity protections.
Third Parties: This can include landlords or property owners where hazing occurred, bars or alcohol vendors under dram shop liability laws (for over-serving minors or intoxicated individuals), or even security companies and event organizers who failed in their duty of care.

It is important to remember that not every party is liable in every situation. Each case is fact-specific, and a thorough investigation is required to determine the full scope of liability.

National Hazing Case Patterns

Hazing tragedies often make national headlines, revealing disturbing patterns of abuse, negligence, and institutional failure. These high-profile cases are more than just news stories; they are crucial anchors for understanding the legal landscape and precedents that profoundly impact Texas families, including those in Garza County, who might be seeking justice for hazing incidents at our state’s universities.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The most frequent and deadly form of hazing involves forced or coerced alcohol consumption. The pattern is tragically consistent, leading to preventable deaths and life-altering injuries:

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a bid-acceptance event where he was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. He fell repeatedly, sustaining traumatic brain injuries, with fraternity members delaying medical help for nearly 12 hours. The shocking details, many captured on security cameras, led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the enactment of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania. This case underscores how extreme intoxication, delayed emergency response, and a pervasive culture of silence can be legally devastating for both individuals and the organization.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old FSU pledge, died from alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to drink excessively. This tragedy led to criminal hazing charges against multiple members and resulted in Florida State University temporarily suspending all Greek life, prompting a comprehensive overhaul of its hazing policies. This case highlights how formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster, regardless of the university.
Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old LSU pledge, died from acute alcohol toxicity (with a blood alcohol content of 0.495%) after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where wrong answers meant forced drinking. His death spurred Louisiana to enact the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute. This incident shows how legislative change often directly follows public outrage and clear, undeniable proof of hazing. The family reached a confidential settlement in their civil suit but pursued a path of advocacy and legislative reform.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old BGSU pledge, died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink nearly a full handle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” pledge night. Multiple criminal convictions followed, and in a landmark development, the Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with approximately $3 million coming from Bowling Green State University and $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity. This case serves as a powerful reminder that universities can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities when hazing occurs on their watch.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, hazing often involves extreme physical abuse and degrading rituals:

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Chun “Michael” Deng, a pledge from Baruch College, died from severe traumatic brain injury during a fraternity retreat in Pennsylvania. He was blindfolded, weighted with a backpack, and repeatedly tackled in a brutal ritual known as the “glass ceiling.” Fraternity members tragically delayed calling 911. The horrific nature of this incident led to criminal convictions for multiple members and, significantly, the national fraternity itself was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and subsequent banned from operating in Pennsylvania. This tragic case demonstrates how off-campus “retreats” can be as dangerous or even more hazardous than traditional parties, showcasing how national organizations can face severe criminal and civil sanctions for their chapters’ conduct, even when it occurs off university property.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not confined to Greek life. Prestigious athletic programs, which often wield significant influence and resources, can also become breeding grounds for systemic abuse:

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): Multiple former football players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the university’s highly celebrated football program, spanning multiple years. The ensuing scandal triggered multiple lawsuits against Northwestern University and members of its coaching staff. Head coach Pat Fitzgerald was fired and later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially. This high-profile case powerfully illustrates that hazing is not limited to Greek organizations but can deeply permeate major athletic programs, raising profound questions about institutional oversight and accountability.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies share common, disturbing threads: forced drinking, humiliation, physical violence, deliberate delays in seeking medical attention, and concerted efforts to cover up the truth. While these individual stories unfolded outside of Texas’s borders, they lay the groundwork for legal precedent and public expectation that directly impact hazing cases within our state.

Crucially, meaningful reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements often only follow after tragedy and determined litigation. For Garza County families, facing similar challenges involving hazing at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, it’s vital to know that these individuals and institutions were eventually held accountable. These national lessons shape the legal landscape in Texas, providing pathways for justice and, hopefully, preventing future harm.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For families in Garza County, understanding the specific environments and histories of hazing at Texas’s major universities is crucial. While our firm is based in Houston, serving clients throughout the state, we recognize that families across Garza County often send their children to these institutions. The dynamics of hazing, institutional responses, and legal challenges can vary, even among schools within the same state.

Garza County is geographically located in the South Plains region of Texas, a considerable distance from the major metropolitan areas where schools like UH, SMU, and Baylor are located. However, countless students from Garza County and its surrounding communities attend these universities. Texas A&M and UT Austin, with their statewide draw, are significant destinations for students who grow up in smaller towns like those found within Garza County. Therefore, while our Houston office may be a drive, our legal expertise readily extends to serve Garza County families, and we understand the logistical considerations involved.

University of Houston (UH)

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Houston is a large, dynamic urban campus in the heart of Houston, a hub for students from all over the world, including those who once called Garza County home. It boasts a vibrant mix of commuter and residential students, supported by active Greek life with a diverse array of fraternities and sororities (including HPC, IFC, MGC, UGC, and NPHC councils). A wide range of student organizations, from cultural groups to sports clubs, also contribute to the campus experience.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UH maintains a clear stance against hazing, prohibiting it whether on-campus or off-campus. Their policies explicitly forbid forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and acts causing mental distress as initiation requirements. The university provides various reporting channels through the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). UH also generally publishes a hazing statement and some disciplinary information on its website.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

While UH strives to address hazing, incidents do occur. A notable case involved Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) in 2016. Pledges were allegedly deprived of sufficient food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event, with one student reportedly suffering a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. This incident led to misdemeanor hazing charges against fraternity members and a university suspension for the chapter. More recently, other disciplinary actions have been taken against fraternities for behavior “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including alcohol misuse and policy violations, resulting in suspensions or probation. These cases highlight UH’s willingness to suspend chapters, even if the depth of public detail on these violations can sometimes be limited compared to other institutions.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a hazing case originating at UH, several agencies might be involved. The University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) or the Houston Police Department (HPD) would typically handle criminal investigations, depending on the exact location of the incident. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County. Potential defendants could include individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the university and property owners. Given our firm’s Houston base, we have direct experience with the local courts and law enforcement, which is beneficial for serving Garza County families whose children attend UH.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

Report immediately: Contact the UH Dean of Students Office, UHPD, or use the university’s online reporting forms if you suspect hazing.
Document everything: Keep meticulous notes of dates, times, specific incidents, and involved individuals. Take screenshots of any group chats, social media posts, or text messages.
Seek medical care: If there are any injuries or health concerns, get professional medical attention immediately and ensure the cause (hazing) is documented.
Understand university processes: UH has an internal disciplinary process, but it’s separate from legal action. While necessary, it may not address financial damages or full accountability.
Consult with an attorney: Talking to a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases early can help preserve crucial evidence, navigate university procedures, and protect your child from retaliation. We can help uncover prior disciplinary actions and internal files that may strengthen a civil case.

Texas A&M University

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M University, a proud land-grant institution, is renowned for its deep-seated traditions, strong alumni network, and, notably, its Corps of Cadets. Aggieland’s culture emphasizes loyalty, camaraderie, and an intense sense of belonging, drawing students from all corners of Texas, including Garza County. This environment, while fostering strong bonds, has also seen its challenges with hazing, affecting both Greek life and the highly structured Corps.

5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M maintains strict anti-hazing policies, asserting that hazing is a violation of university rules, state law, and for Greek organizations, national policies. Hazing is broadly defined to prevent physical, mental, or emotional harm or humiliation. The university encourages reporting through the Division of Student Affairs, the Department of Fraternity & Sorority Life, and the Texas A&M University Police Department (TAMUPD). The Corps of Cadets also has its own specified conduct and reporting procedures.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Hazing controversies at Texas A&M have drawn significant attention over the years.

In 2021, a lawsuit involving Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) alleged that two pledges suffered severe chemical burns after industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit were poured on them during a forced strenuous activity. These injuries required skin graft surgeries, and the pledges sued the fraternity for $1 million, leading to the chapter’s two-year suspension by the university.
The Corps of Cadets has also faced allegations. In a 2023 lawsuit, a cadet claimed degrading hazing involving simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over $1 million, while A&M stated it had addressed the matter under its internal rules.
These incidents underscore that hazing at A&M, while officially condemned, can persist in both its Greek system and highly traditional Corps.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases arising from Texas A&M would typically involve the TAMUPD or the Bryan Police Department/Brazos County Sheriff’s Office for criminal matters. Civil litigation would proceed in Brazos County courts. Cases often explore the unique cultural aspects of A&M, including the influence of tradition within Greek chapters and the Corps of Cadets. Civil suits might target individual perpetrators, the local chapter, relevant national organizations (e.g., specific fraternities), and potentially Texas A&M University itself, depending on proven negligence or complicity. For Garza County families, understanding the jurisdiction in Brazos County and the specifics of A&M’s systems is vital.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

Report to appropriate channels: File a report with the Division of Student Affairs, the Department of Fraternity & Sorority Life, TAMUPD, or for Corps members, through Corps leadership.
Document Corps traditions: If part of the Corps, document any practices that seem questionable or abusive. Some Corps traditions have faced scrutiny for blurring the line into hazing.
Preserve all communications: This is especially critical in environments like A&M where group chats and unofficial communications are common. Screenshot everything.
Seek medical care immediately: Document injuries thoroughly, especially those resulting from physical exertion, beatings, or chemical exposure. Rhabdomyolysis is a particular concern from extreme physical hazing.
Consider legal counsel early: An experienced hazing attorney understands the unique dynamics of Texas A&M and can help families from Garza County navigate the university’s internal processes while simultaneously pursuing legal remedies if appropriate.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution, is a bustling urban campus known for its vibrant academic and social scene, including a large and active Greek system. Students from diverse backgrounds, including many from Garza County, are drawn to its intellectual rigor and rich traditions. While Greek life and student organizations are central to many students’ experiences, they have also been the site of numerous hazing incidents.

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UT Austin maintains a robust anti-hazing policy that applies to all student organizations, on or off campus. Their policy aligns with Texas Education Code, explicitly prohibiting acts that endanger physical or mental well-being for initiation or membership purposes. Notably, UT has a comparatively transparent system, publicly listing hazing violations on its website. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD), and the Austin Police Department (APD) for off-campus incidents.

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s publicly updated “Hazing Violations” page provides valuable insight into ongoing issues.

In 2023, Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) was found responsible for hazing after new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. The chapter received probation and was mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education.
Other spirit organizations and clubs, such as the Texas Wranglers, have also faced disciplinary action for practices like forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, and punishment-based behavior. These incidents, among many others detailed on UT’s public log, highlight the persistent challenge of hazing across various types of student groups.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

For hazing incidents at UT Austin, criminal investigations may involve UTPD or APD. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Travis County, where Austin is located. UT’s commitment to publishing hazing violations is a significant asset for victims, as this information can strongly support civil suits by demonstrating patterns of misconduct and the university’s prior knowledge of an organization’s issues. For Garza County families, understanding the jurisdiction of Travis County and how to access UT’s public records is crucial.

5.3.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

Review UT’s Hazing Violations page: Familiarize yourself with recent incidents and disciplinary actions at hazing.utexas.edu. This can offer crucial insights into specific organizations.
Report promptly: Utilize the Dean of Students office, UTPD, or APD for reporting. UT’s online reporting system is also a confidential avenue.
Preserve evidence: As with any hazing case, immediate preservation of digital evidence (group chats, photos) and meticulous notes is paramount.
Seek mental health support: UT provides counseling services which can offer vital support and help document psychological impact.
Consult with an attorney experienced in Austin cases: An attorney can leverage UT’s public records and navigate the specific legal landscape of Travis County, crucial for Garza County families seeking accountability.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Southern Methodist University, a private institution nestled in University Park, a wealthy enclave within Dallas, is known for its prestigious academic programs, affluent student body, and deeply ingrained Greek life. Its campus culture often emphasizes social connections and traditions, making participation in fraternities and sororities a significant draw for many students, including those from Garza County seeking an elite university experience.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU’s Student Code of Conduct strictly prohibits hazing in any form, aligning with Texas state law. Their policy covers behaviors that endanger mental or physical health, or subject individuals to humiliation. As a private university, SMU manages its own disciplinary processes and has designated reporting channels through the Office of the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards, and the SMU Police Department. They also promote anonymous reporting tools like Real Response.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

SMU has also grappled with hazing incidents, demonstrating that these issues are not confined to public institutions.

In 2017, the Kappa Alpha Order chapter faced severe repercussions after allegations of new members being paddled, forced to consume alcohol, and deprived of sleep. The chapter was suspended and placed under strict restrictions on recruitment for several years.
Given SMU’s reputation and Greek life prominence, incidents often receive public attention, even if a private university’s internal investigations are not always as transparent as public institutions’ records (like UT Austin’s public hazing log).

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For hazing incidents at SMU, criminal investigations would typically involve the University Park Police Department or the Dallas Police Department, depending on the exact location of the incident. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in Dallas County courts. Cases against private universities like SMU often mean that aspects of sovereign immunity are not applicable, potentially broadening the scope of claims. Civil discovery processes can compel SMU to provide internal reports and communications, even if not publicly posted, which is valuable for Garza County families pursuing claims.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

Understand private university dynamics: While SMU has anti-hazing policies, the internal investigative process differs from public schools. It’s crucial to document every university communication.
Report diligently: Utilize the SMU Dean of Students office, SMU Police, or anonymous reporting tools.
Immediate evidence preservation: Prioritize screenshots of digital communications and meticulous notes on timelines and involved parties.
Consider the cost of attendance: For Garza County families paying high tuition, if hazing disrupts education or causes injury, the financial damages can be considerable, adding another layer to claims.
Seek specialized legal counsel: An attorney experienced in hazing and private university litigation can help navigate SMU’s specific processes and identify all avenues for accountability.

Baylor University

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, holds a unique position among Texas institutions. Known for its strong spiritual identity and commitment to academic excellence, it also has a significant Greek life presence and diverse student organizations. Students from Garza County and across the state are drawn to Baylor for its distinct community, but this community has also faced challenges, including hazing and past broader issues concerning student welfare.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor explicitly prohibits hazing, stating it as a violation of both university policy and Texas law. Their policy condemns any act that causes physical, mental, or emotional harm or humiliation, especially for initiation or membership. Baylor encourages reporting through the Dean of Students office, the Department of Student Activities (which oversees Greek life), and the Baylor University Police Department. The university has made efforts to reinforce its commitment to student safety, particularly in the wake of past scandals.

5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor has encountered hazing controversies across its campus life.

In 2020, the Baylor baseball team faced a hazing investigation that resulted in the suspension of 14 players. The suspensions were staggered over the early season, highlighting that hazing is not confined to Greek organizations but can occur within prestigious athletic programs even in a religiously affiliated institution.
These incidents, against the backdrop of Baylor’s prior highly publicized sexual assault scandal and its institutional response, underscore broader questions about university oversight and the protection of student safety.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For hazing incidents at Baylor, criminal investigations might involve the Baylor University Police Department or the Waco Police Department. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in McLennan County courts. Claims against Baylor often need to consider the institution’s specific policies, its religious affiliation, and its history of addressing student misconduct. Like other private universities, Baylor lacks sovereign immunity, which can simplify some aspects of civil litigation. For Garza County families, understanding the Waco/McLennan County legal system and how to navigate claims against a private, religiously-affiliated university is key.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

Engage with university resources: Utilize Baylor’s Dean of Students office and Student Activities department. Their policies and response procedures are critical to understand.
Document all communications: Keep records of any interactions with university officials, as well as any hazing-related digital evidence.
Understand Baylor’s context: Be aware of Baylor’s past challenges regarding student safety and how the university has (or hasn’t) addressed issues, as this historic context can be relevant in litigation.
Prioritize well-being: For student victims, seeking counseling through Baylor’s resources can be important for recovery and can help document emotional distress.
Contact a specialized attorney: An attorney with experience addressing hazing at private Texas universities can provide strategic guidance, especially for Garza County families seeking to hold Baylor and its affiliated organizations accountable.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

The Greek-letter organizations active at Texas universities—whether at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor—are not isolated campus clubs. They are often local chapters of larger national and international organizations. This connection to a national entity is profoundly significant in hazing cases because it means a local chapter’s actions are rarely unprecedented within the broader organization. For Garza County families, understanding this dynamic is key to pursuing comprehensive accountability.

Why National Histories Matter

Many fraternities and sororities with chapters on Texas campuses, such as Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi, and Kappa Alpha Order, are part of national organizations that have faced significant scrutiny and litigation over hazing. These national headquarters often:

Develop extensive anti-hazing manuals and elaborate risk management policies. They do so not out of proactive virtue, but usually because they have already encountered deaths, catastrophic injuries, and multi-million-dollar lawsuits in other chapters across the country.
Possess detailed institutional knowledge of common hazing patterns within their own organization—including forced drinking nights, paddling rituals, humiliating acts, and secrecy vows.

Therefore, when a local Texas chapter repeats the same dangerous script that led to a different chapter being shut down or sued in another state, it powerfully demonstrates foreseeability. The national organization had prior notice, often explicit, that these activities were dangerous and could cause harm. This pattern evidence can significantly strengthen negligence arguments and claims for punitive damages against national entities in both civil and criminal proceedings.

Organization Mapping: National Chapters and Their Hazing Histories

While we cannot list every single chapter or incident, a narrative of some prominent national organizations and their known hazing patterns is crucial:

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): Present at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. Nationally, Pike has been at the center of several high-profile hazing tragedies, most notably the Stone Foltz death at Bowling Green State University in 2021, where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink nearly a full handle of liquor. Earlier, in 2012, David Bogenberger died from alcohol poisoning at Northern Illinois University, leading to a $14 million settlement. These incidents reveal a recurring pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing, particularly during “Big/Little” events. Chapters in Texas that engage in similar forced alcohol rituals do so with a clear history of national warnings and fatal outcomes.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, SAE has faced widespread allegations and sanctions for hazing across the country for decades. SAE was involved in the 2008 Carson Starkey death at California Polytechnic State University, where a pledge died of alcohol poisoning, prompting SAE to publicly ban pledging. Despite this, incidents continue. In Texas, SAE at A&M faced a $1 million lawsuit around 2021 alleging pledges suffered chemical burns from being covered in industrial cleaner and other substances. In January 2024, at UT Austin, an Australian exchange student sued the SAE chapter for over $1 million following an alleged assault. Nationally, an SAE chapter at the University of Alabama faced a lawsuit in 2023 for a pledge allegedly suffering a traumatic brain injury during a hazing ritual. These incidents collectively illustrate a concerning pattern of physical, chemical, and alcohol-related abuse that has persisted despite organizational policies.
Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor, Phi Delta Theta was involved in the tragic death of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017. Gruver died from extreme alcohol toxicity after being forced to participate in a “Bible study” drinking game where incorrect answers led to forced liquor consumption. His death led directly to the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute in Louisiana. This history means that any Phi Delta Theta chapter in Texas engaging in similar forced-drinking games is repeating behavior known to be lethal.
Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Chapters are active at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. Nationally, Pi Kappa Phi was implicated in the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017. Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” where pledges were given handles of hard liquor. This event contributed to FSU temporarily suspending all Greek life. The recurring nature of such alcohol-fueled events in Pi Kappa Phi chapters nationwide makes similar incidents in Texas highly foreseeable.
Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor. Beta Theta Pi was involved in one of the most infamous hazing deaths: Timothy Piazza at Penn State in 2017. Piazza died from falls induced by alcohol poisoning, with the incident marked by extreme delays in calling for help and deliberate cover-ups. The scandal led to major criminal prosecutions and a landmark anti-hazing law in Pennsylvania. This case fundamentally altered how universities and national fraternities perceive their liability and responsibility in managing student safety.
Kappa Alpha Order (KA): With chapters at Texas A&M and SMU, national Kappa Alpha Order has several incidents in its history. At SMU in 2017, new members allegedly were paddled and forced to drink, leading to the chapter’s suspension for several years. This history signals foreknowledge of certain hazing methods within the organization.
Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): Present at Texas A&M, Phi Gamma Delta was linked to the Danny Santulli tragedy at the University of Missouri in 2021. Santulli suffered severe, permanent brain damage (rendering him unable to walk, talk, or see) after being forced to consume excessive alcohol during a “pledge dad reveal” night. His family secured multi-million-dollar settlements from numerous defendants. This case serves as a stark reminder that while death is the worst outcome, life-altering injuries are devastating and frequent.
Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor, Sigma Chi has also faced hazing allegations. One of the largest known hazing settlements, exceeding $10 million, was awarded to a family whose son was subjected to physical beatings, forced consumption of drugs and alcohol, and psychological torment at a College of Charleston Sigma Chi chapter in 2024. This demonstrates the immense financial and human cost of severe hazing.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

These national histories are not mere anecdotes. They are foundational to building a legal case for Garza County families. They can demonstrate that:

Certain organizations, through a pattern of incidents across states and campuses, have received repeated warnings about their dangerous practices.
Courts can assess whether national organizations genuinely enforced their anti-hazing policies, or if they were merely “paper policies” designed to avoid liability.
The national’s response (or lack thereof) to prior incidents, and their efforts (or failures) to prevent recurrence, can affect settlement leverage.
Such patterns can be crucial in arguing for punitive damages, which are designed to punish egregious conduct and deter future harm, depending on the jurisdiction and specific claims.

When a family in Garza County seeks justice for hazing, we investigate how often the involved organization’s national headquarters was aware of or should have been aware of similar harmful behavior. This deep dive into a fraternity’s or university’s past is not about blame, but about proving a pattern of negligence and ensuring accountability.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Bringing a civil hazing case requires a meticulous approach, strong evidence, and a deep understanding of legal strategy. For Garza County families seeking accountability, knowing what evidence matters and how an experienced legal team builds a case is empowering. We understand the physical, emotional, and financial toll hazing takes, and our strategy focuses on comprehensive recovery.

Evidence

The strength of any hazing case hinges on the evidence collected and preserved. Modern hazing often leaves a digital footprint that is crucial for building a strong claim.

Digital Communications: These are often the most critical pieces of evidence. Group chat messages (from GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, fraternity/sorority-specific apps), DMs on Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok, and even text messages can reveal planning, intent, knowledge of hazing, the identities of those involved, and the content of illicit activities before, during, and after an incident. Evidence includes both live messages and potentially recovered deleted messages. Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.
Photos & Videos: These can be highly compelling. Content filmed by members during hazing events, footage shared in group chats or on social media, and surveillance footage (like security cameras or Ring/doorbell footage at houses or venues) can demonstrate exactly what happened, who was present, and the level of harm caused.
Internal Organization Documents: This can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, lists of “traditions,” emails or texts from officers discussing “new member education,” and official national policies and training materials. These documents can show a pattern of behavior or a failure to enforce rules.
University Records: Through legal discovery or public records requests, we can often obtain university conduct files, records of prior probation or suspensions for the involved organization, incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, and even Clery reports. These records help establish a pattern of misconduct and the university’s knowledge.
Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical records are vital for documenting physical injuries. These include emergency room reports, hospitalization records, surgery details, toxicology reports, and ongoing treatment notes. Equally important are psychological evaluations that diagnose conditions like PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation resulting from the hazing, helping to quantify emotional distress.
Witness Testimony: The accounts of pledges, members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, trainers, or bystanders who observed the hazing are invaluable. Former members who quit or were expelled, having witnessed or participated in hazing, can also provide compelling testimony about an organization’s practices.

Damages

In plain English, damages in hazing cases aim to compensate victims and their families for the full scope of harm endured. These often fall into several key categories:

Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all expenses for treating injuries caused by hazing, both current and projected. This includes emergency room visits, ambulance transport, hospitalization, surgeries, follow-up treatments, physical therapy, medications, and long-term care plans for catastrophic injuries such as brain damage or organ failure.
Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: If hazing leads to a student being unable to attend classes, withdraw from school, or experience a decline in academic performance, the damages can cover missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed entry into the workforce, and reduced future earning capacity if injuries lead to permanent disabilities.
Non-Economic Damages: These address the subjective, non-financial harms. They include compensation for physical pain and suffering, intense emotional distress, trauma, humiliation, and the profound loss of enjoyment of life.
Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the most tragic hazing cases, where a student loses their life, surviving family members can pursue a wrongful death claim. This covers funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and the immeasurable loss of companionship, love, and emotional support suffered by parents, siblings, and other close family members.

It is crucial to remember that we describe the types of damages recoverable, not promised or predicted specific dollar amounts. The value of a case depends entirely on its unique facts.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing cases often involve multiple defendants, each with their own legal counsel and potentially disparate insurance policies.

National fraternities, local chapters, and universities typically carry various insurance policies that might come into play, including general liability policies or professional liability policies.
Insurers frequently try to deny coverage, arguing that hazing or intentional acts are excluded from their policies (e.g., claiming “intentional acts” are not covered).
Experienced hazing lawyers are adept at identifying all potential sources of coverage, navigating complex disputes about policy exclusions, and strategically arguing that even if certain acts were intentional, the organization’s overarching “negligent supervision” or “failure to warn” should be covered. This expertise, like that offered by Lupe Peña (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), a former insurance defense attorney, is critical to ensuring maximum recovery.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing strikes, whether in Garza County or anywhere in Texas, confusion and fear can quickly set in. We provide actionable advice for parents, students, and witnesses, along with answers to common legal questions.

For Parents

For Garza County parents, recognizing the signs and knowing how to act quickly can make all the difference.

Warning Signs of Hazing: Be vigilant for unexplained or repeated injuries (especially if explanations don’t add up), sudden exhaustion or extreme sleep deprivation, drastic changes in mood, increased anxiety, or withdrawal from family and old friends. Watch for constant secret phone use for group chats, especially if your child seems anxious about missing “mandatory” events.
How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with open questions, avoiding judgmental language. Emphasize that their safety and well-being are paramount, far exceeding any social status or group loyalty. Reassure them that you will support them, no matter what.
If Your Child Is Hurt: Get medical professional attention immediately, even for seemingly minor injuries, and ensure that the medical providers document the suspected cause (hazing) in their records. Document everything yourself: take clear photos of injuries, keep screenshots of texts or social media, and note names, dates, and locations.
Dealing with the University: Document all communications with university administrators. Ask specifically about prior incidents involving the same organization and what measures the school took in response. Universities have internal processes, but these are distinct from legal action and may not fully address financial damages or comprehensive accountability.
When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or hiding what happened, it is time to contact an attorney. Remember, evidence disappears quickly, and universities tend to control the narrative.

For Students / Pledges

To students reading this in Garza County or across Texas, your safety is our utmost concern.

Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?: Ask yourself: Am I being forced to do something unsafe, humiliating, or illegal? Would I do this if I had a real choice, free from social consequences? Am I being told to keep secrets or lie to authorities? If the answer is yes, it’s likely hazing. Tradition should never inflict harm.
Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: You might feel like you “agreed” to participate, but if there’s peer pressure, a power imbalance, or fear of exclusion, the law often views this as coerced conduct, not true consent. You are allowed to feel unsafe and to say no, regardless of what older members imply.
Exiting and Reporting Safely: If you’re in immediate danger, call 911. If you want to leave a situation or an organization, you have the legal right to do so. Inform a trusted adult (parent, RA, friend outside the group) and send a clear message to the organization stating your resignation. You can report hazing confidentially through campus channels or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE). Many schools and state laws offer good-faith reporter protection, meaning you won’t get in trouble for calling for help in an emergency, even if alcohol was involved.
Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Texas law (and many university policies) encourages students to call for help in medical emergencies. You will generally be protected from disciplinary action for certain policy violations (like underage drinking) if you are calling to save a life or prevent further harm. Your safety and the safety of others must come first.

For Former Members / Witnesses

For those who may have participated in hazing or witnessed it, and now carry guilt or fear, we understand the complexities of your position.

Your testimony and evidence can be life-saving. By coming forward, you can help prevent future harm and ensure accountability.
Cooperating with authorities or a legal team can be a crucial step towards addressing your moral responsibility, potentially aiding in your own legal standing. You may seek independent legal advice to understand your rights and protections as a witness.
We work with witnesses to ensure their safety and help navigate the often-challenging process of giving testimony or providing information.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For Garza County families, protecting their child from further harm and preserving their legal options requires vigilance and strategic action. Avoid these common pitfalls:

Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence: Parents might mistakenly believe they are protecting their child from further trouble. However, deleting crucial evidence can be seen as a cover-up, severely damaging a potential case or even constituting obstruction. Instead, preserve everything immediately, no matter how embarrassing it may seem. Watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.
Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly: While emotions run high, directly confronting those involved without legal guidance prompts them to immediately secure legal counsel, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defense. Instead, document everything discreetly, then call a lawyer before any direct confrontation.
Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms: Universities may pressure families into signing waivers or agreeing to internal resolutions to manage their liability. These documents can inadvertently waive your right to pursue a lawsuit or settle claims for far less than their true value. Instead, do NOT sign anything from the university or any other party without an attorney reviewing it first.
Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer: Sharing information about the incident publicly, even with good intentions, provides defense attorneys with ammunition. Inconsistencies or emotional posts can destroy credibility or waive legal protections. Instead, document privately and let your legal counsel guide any public messaging.
Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”: Organizations often request a final meeting to “talk things out” or “understand what happened.” This is frequently a tactic to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can later be used against the victim. Instead, once legal action is being considered, all communication should go through your lawyer.
Waiting “to see how the university handles it”: Universities have their own interests and processes, which typically focus on internal discipline rather than civil compensation or criminal prosecution. Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations can run out. Instead, preserve evidence immediately, consult legal counsel, and understand that the university’s process is separate from comprehensive legal accountability. Also, understand that a statute of limitations applies to your civil claim; learn more in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.
Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer: Insurance adjusters, representing the defendant’s insurer, are trained to minimize payouts. Any recorded statement or early settlement offer you accept can be used against you and is typically a lowball offer. Instead, politely decline any conversations and refer them directly to your attorney.

Short FAQ

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) benefit from some sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, willful misconduct, and Title IX violations. Private universities (SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case is fact-specific, so contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
Yes, it can be. While basic hazing is a Class B misdemeanor, Texas law elevates it to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Additionally, individuals in leadership who fail to report hazing can face criminal charges.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts acknowledge that “consent” given under duress, peer pressure, or fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally, in Texas, you have 2 years from the date of injury or death to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. However, the “discovery rule” can extend this period if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately apparent. Given the rapid disappearance of evidence and the fleeting nature of witness memories, time is critical. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to protect your rights.
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of the hazing does not automatically eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and the foreseeability of hazing occurring off-campus. Many prominent hazing cases, including those that resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments, happened off-campus.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Most hazing cases are resolved through confidential settlements before going to trial. We prioritize your family’s privacy and work to secure confidential settlement terms, sensitive to the potential for public scrutiny while pursuing full accountability.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action for Garza County Families

When your family faces a hazing incident, especially one involving the powerful institutions of universities and national organizations, you need more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who intimately understand the tactics these institutions use to fight back—and, crucially, how to win anyway. This is precisely the expertise The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, brings to Garza County families and all Texans.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Garza County and its surrounding communities. We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects families like yours, no matter where you are located. Our firm stands ready to bring our unique qualifications to your case:

Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), previously worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. This experience means she knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies operate, how they value (and often undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, their coverage exclusion arguments, and their settlement strategies. In essence, we know their playbook because we used to run it.
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), our managing partner, has an impressive background that includes being one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation. With extensive federal court experience (United States District Court, Southern District of Texas) and practice since 1998, we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants effectively.
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases, collaborating with economists to ensure fair valuation. Our experience includes valuing the lifetime care needs for catastrophic injuries, such as brain damage or permanent disability. We don’t settle cheap; we build cases that compel accountability and secure maximum compensation for our clients. Learn more about our wrongful death experience at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.
Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a distinct advantage. We understand how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, allowing us to advise witnesses and former members who may face dual exposure. Our criminal defense experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) means we can navigate both the criminal and civil tracks your case may take.
Investigative Depth: We leverage a robust network of experts, including medical professionals, digital forensics specialists, economists, and psychologists. Our experience allows us to meticulously obtain hidden evidence, such as deleted group chats, chapter records, university files, and unmask patterns of negligence. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We intimately understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments operate behind closed doors. We know how to investigate modern hazing, from subpoenaing national fraternity records that reveal prior incidents to uncovering university files through discovery. Our approach is characterized by thorough investigation and unwavering victim advocacy, ensuring that while your family’s privacy is protected, accountability is relentlessly pursued.

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether at Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or UH—we want to hear from you. Families in Garza County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911 for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll attentively listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family. During your free consultation, you can expect us to listen without judgment, review any evidence you have, explain legal options (criminal reporting, civil lawsuit, or neither), discuss realistic timelines, and answer your questions about costs. We operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. You’ll never feel pressured to hire us on the spot; take the time you need to decide.

Call us today to schedule your consultation:

Toll-Free: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Visit our website: https://attorney911.com
Email Ralph Manginello: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Please contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Garza County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com