Texas Hazing Laws, Cases, and Campus Accountability: A Comprehensive Guide for Kaufman County Families

A typical Friday night. The air in Kaufman County is crisp as families settle into their weekend routines. But miles away, on a college campus, a different kind of night unfolds. It’s “initiation night” for a fraternity, one that draws students from communities like Kaufman County and across Texas. A young man, eager to fit in, is being pressured to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol—a “tradition” passed down through generations of members. Others are filming on phones, chanting, and laughing. Then, the laughter stops. He collapses, unconscious. Panic flickers, but quickly gives way to a chilling silence. Nobody wants to call 911, afraid of “getting the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble.” The student is trapped, not just by the alcohol in his system, but by a twisted code of loyalty that prioritizes the group over his own safety.

This scenario is far too common at Texas universities, affecting families right here in Kaufman County and across our great state. If this story resonates with you, or if you’ve seen the subtle warning signs in your own child, we understand the fear and uncertainty you might be feeling.

This comprehensive guide is designed for families in Kaufman County and throughout Texas who need to understand the complex world of hazing. We will cover:

• What modern hazing truly looks like in 2025, far beyond outdated stereotypes.
• How Texas and federal law address hazing, both criminally and civilly.
• Crucial lessons from major national hazing cases and how they apply here in Texas.
• Specific insights into hazing dynamics at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University, as well as other Texas schools.
• The legal options and paths to accountability available to victims and their families in Kaufman County and across Texas.

While this article provides general information, it is not specific legal advice. The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, is here to evaluate individual cases based on their specific facts. We serve families throughout Texas, including Kaufman County, and are dedicated to bringing powerful institutions to account.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

• Call 911 for medical emergencies.
• Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

In the first 48 hours, every second counts:

• Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Prioritize their health and safety above all else.
• Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  • Screenshot all group chats, texts, and DMs immediately.
  • Photograph any visible injuries from multiple angles and lighting, including a ruler or coin for scale.
  • Save any physical items that may be evidence, such as damaged clothing, receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used in the hazing.
• Write down everything you remember while the details are fresh. Include who was involved, what exactly happened, when it occurred, and where.
• Do NOT:
  • Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly.
  • Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal counsel.
  • Post any details or allegations on public social media.
  • Allow your child to delete messages or attempt to “clean up” any evidence.

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

• Evidence disappears remarkably fast, with deleted group chats, destroyed property, and coached witnesses.
• Universities often move quickly to control the narrative.
• We can help preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s legal rights.
• Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like Across Texas

When families in Kaufman County hear the word “hazing,” they might picture something out of a 1980s movie—a prank, a silly ritual, or a bit of roughhousing. However, modern hazing is far more insidious, dangerous, and often hidden. It’s a complex spectrum of abuse, meticulously designed to create power imbalances, instill fear, and force loyalty, all under the guise of “tradition” or “bonding.” It’s not just “boys being boys” or “just partying”; it’s a calculated breakdown of an individual for the sake of group control.

Hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, whether on or off campus, done by one person or a group, directed against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, maintaining membership, or obtaining office in any organization whose members include students, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student. This applies to prospective members, new members, or current members. If someone is forced, coerced, or strongly pressured to endure something dangerous, harmful, or humiliating to join or remain in a group—even if they technically “agree”—that’s hazing under Texas law. The false notion of “I agreed to it” does not make it safe or lawful when there’s an inherent power imbalance and intense peer pressure.

Main Categories of Modern Hazing

The landscape of hazing has evolved, becoming more covert and often relying on digital means, alongside the traditional physical and psychological abuse. For Kaufman County families, understanding these categories is crucial:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains the most common and deadliest form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often excessive and rapid, through chugging challenges, “lineups” where pledges drink a set number of drinks, or games that require dangerous levels of alcohol consumption. It can also include pressure to consume unknown substances or drugs. The goal is often to incapacitate pledges, making them vulnerable and easier to control, while eroding their judgment.

• Physical Hazing: This category covers any forced physical activity that endangers health. It ranges from paddling, beatings, and violent assaults to extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” that go far beyond healthy limits, causing exhaustion and injury. Sleep deprivation, food and water deprivation, and exposure to extreme temperatures or dangerous environments are also common tactics designed to break down physical and mental resistance.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts are profoundly damaging and often involve forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (such as the “roasted pig” position), or wearing degrading costumes. Hazing can also involve acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones, including the use of slurs or forcing individuals to role-play degrading stereotypes. Such acts are violations of a student’s dignity and can have lasting psychological scars.

• Psychological Hazing: This insidious form of hazing operates on the mind, often leaving no visible marks but deep emotional wounds. It includes verbal abuse, constant threats, social isolation, and emotional manipulation. Forced confessions, extreme public shaming—whether in person or online—and intimidation are all tactics used to exert control and erode self-worth.

• Digital/Online Hazing: With the rise of technology, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation orchestrated via Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Discord, and other social media platforms. There’s also immense pressure to create or share compromising images or videos and to respond constantly to late-night demands, leading to sleep deprivation and anxiety.

Where Hazing Actually Happens in Texas

It’s vital to recognize that hazing is not confined to one type of organization or a single campus culture. While fraternities and sororities (including Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural organizations) are frequently associated with hazing incidents, the problem extends far beyond them. For Kaufman County students attending any Texas college, hazing can occur in:

• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / military-style groups: These tradition-rich training environments, such as the storied Texas A&M Corps of Cadets, can sometimes harbor hazing hidden beneath the guise of “discipline” or “team building.”
• Spirit squads, tradition clubs, and honor societies: Groups like the University of Texas’s “Texas Cowboys” or various spirit organizations, while meant to foster school pride, can sometimes engage in hazing practices.
• Athletic teams: From football and basketball to baseball, cheer, and even esports teams, hazing is a documented problem across collegiate sports.
• Marching bands and performance groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups can engage in hazing rituals.
• Some service, cultural, and academic organizations: While less common, the desire for belonging can make any group a potential setting for hazing.

The common threads running through all these groups are social status, tradition, and a code of intense secrecy. These factors allow hazing practices to persist, even when participants, administrators, and the public know such actions are illegal and dangerous. The pressure to conform, to “earn” your place, and to protect the group often outweighs personal safety and ethical conduct.

Law & Liability Framework: Texas and Federal Anti-Hazing Statutes

The legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas is robust, providing multiple avenues for accountability, both criminally and civilly. For Kaufman County families grappling with a hazing incident, understanding this framework is the first step toward seeking justice. We break down the key elements without overwhelming you with technical jargon.

Texas Hazing Law Basics: Education Code Provisions

Texas has specific anti-hazing provisions embedded in the Texas Education Code, primarily within Chapter 37, Subchapter F. These laws broadly define and prohibit hazing across all public and private educational institutions in the state.

Definition of Hazing (§ 37.151. Definition):

Under Texas law, hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, occurring on or off campus, by a person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
• Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

In plain English: If an action causes harm, either physically or mentally, and it’s tied to joining or staying in a student group, whether someone meant to cause harm or just acted recklessly, it’s considered hazing. Importantly, this can happen on or off campus – the location doesn’t somehow make it lawful. The harm caused can be to mental or physical health, acknowledging the profound psychological impact of hazing. The reckless part is crucial: someone doesn’t have to intend to severely injure a student; if they knew the act could endanger health or safety and proceeds anyway, that falls under the definition.

Key Points from Texas Law:

• “Consent” is not a defense (§ 37.155.): Even if a student “agreed” or “volunteered” to participate, Texas law explicitly states that their consent is not a defense to prosecution for hazing. This recognizes the inherent power imbalances and extreme social pressure that often negate true consent in initiation rituals.
• Criminal Penalties (§ 37.152.): Hazing is a criminal offense in Texas.
  • A basic hazing offense is a Class B Misdemeanor.
  • If the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical attention, it can be a Class A Misdemeanor.
  • Most critically for severe cases, if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it becomes a State Jail Felony.
  • Additionally, those who have knowledge of a hazing incident and fail to report it can also face misdemeanor charges.
• Organizational Liability (§ 37.153.): Beyond individuals, organizations (like fraternities, sororities, athletic teams, or clubs) can also be held criminally liable if they authorized, condoned, or were negligent in preventing hazing. An organization can be fined up to $10,000 per violation, and universities can revoke their recognition.
• Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting (§ 37.154.): Texas law provides immunity from civil or criminal liability for individuals who report a hazing incident in good faith. This is designed to encourage witnesses and victims to come forward without fear of retribution, alongside “good Samaritan” (medical amnesty) provisions that protect those who call for help in an emergency, even if underage drinking was involved.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Understanding the Pathways to Justice

When a hazing incident occurs, families in Kaufman County often encounter two distinct legal processes simultaneously: criminal and civil. While both aim for justice, their purposes, methods, and outcomes differ significantly.

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated and pursued by the State of Texas (or the federal government) through prosecutors. Their primary goal is to punish illegal conduct and deter future crimes. In a hazing context, this involves prosecuting individuals and, in some cases, the organization itself. Charges can range from misdemeanor hazing or furnishing alcohol to minors, to serious felony charges like assault or even manslaughter, depending on the severity of the injury or death. A conviction typically results in fines, probation, or incarceration. A criminal conviction is about upholding societal laws and standards.

• Civil Cases: These cases are filed by the victims or their surviving family members. The aim of a civil lawsuit is monetary compensation (damages) for the harm suffered and to hold responsible parties financially accountable. Civil cases in hazing often revolve around legal concepts like negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, premises liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Unlike criminal cases, clear responsibility in civil court does not require an associated criminal charge or conviction. The standards of proof also differ: criminal cases require “beyond a reasonable doubt,” while civil cases seek “a preponderance of the evidence.”

It is important for Kaufman County families to understand that a criminal conviction is absolutely not required to pursue a successful civil case. The two processes operate independently, and a civil lawsuit can provide a pathway to recovery and systemic change even if criminal charges are never filed or result in acquittal.

Federal Overlay: Broader Accountability

Beyond state laws, federal regulations also influence how universities must address hazing:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation, passed in early 2024, mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding must enhance their hazing prevention and reporting efforts. By 2026, these institutions will be required to:

  • Publicly report hazing incidents and disciplinary actions.
  • Provide clearer hazing education to students.
  • Establish comprehensive hazing prevention programs.
    This creates a new level of transparency and accountability for schools attended by Kaufman County students.

• Title IX / Clery Act: When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based hostility, or other specific crimes, federal laws like Title IX and the Clery Act come into play. Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in education and can trigger university investigations and civil liability if hazing creates a hostile environment based on sex. The Clery Act requires universities to collect and report campus crime statistics, including certain hazing incidents that fall under categories like assault, alcohol violations, or drug offenses.

Who Can Be Held Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit?

A comprehensive hazing lawsuit often names multiple defendants, reflecting the systemic nature of the problem. For Kaufman County families considering legal action, understanding the potential parties to sue is crucial:

• Individual Student Perpetrators: The students who actively planned, participated in, or directly caused the hazing, including those who supplied alcohol to minors or physically assaulted others, can be held personally liable.
• Local Fraternity/Sorority Chapter or Organization: The specific student chapter or organization (if it is a legally recognized entity) can be liable for its actions, policies, and the conduct it allowed on its premises or at its events. This also includes individuals acting in leadership roles, such as the chapter president or “pledge educator.”
• National Fraternity/Sorority Organization: The national (or international) headquarters often has significant control over local chapters through policies, risk management guidelines, and regular oversight. They can be held liable, especially if there’s a pattern of similar hazing incidents across their network that they failed to address, indicating knowledge (actual or constructive) and deliberate indifference.
• University or College: The educational institution itself can be sued under various theories, particularly for negligence or wrongful death. Key factors include:
  • Did the university know or should it have known about the hazing incidents?
  • Did it fail to enforce its own anti-hazing policies?
  • Was there a pattern of deliberate indifference to known dangers?
  • For public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT), sovereign immunity can be a defense, but exceptions often apply for gross negligence, willful misconduct, or certain federal claims like Title IX violations. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally do not have sovereign immunity.
• Third Parties: Depending on the specifics, other entities can also be implicated:
  • Landlords or Property Owners: If hazing occurred at an off-campus rental property, the landlord might be liable if they knew or should have known about dangerous activities.
  • Alcohol Vendors/Bars: Under Texas dram shop laws, establishments that overserve visibly intoxicated patrons or serve minors who then cause harm can be held liable.
  • Event Organizers/Security Companies: If hired for an event where hazing occurred, their negligence could be a factor.

Each hazing case is fact-specific, and the liable parties will vary. Our firm’s expertise lies in meticulously investigating all angles to identify every responsible entity and hold them accountable.

National Hazing Case Patterns: Lessons from Tragedy

While a hazing incident deeply affects families in Kaufman County individually, it’s crucial to understand that these tragedies are rarely isolated. They are often part of national patterns, repeated across campuses by organizations with documented histories of similar misconduct. Examining major national cases reveals common threads, exposes institutional failures, and highlights the high stakes involved for victims and defendants alike. These anchor stories underscore why prior warnings and organizational knowledge are so critical in Texas hazing lawsuits.

The Deadly Pattern of Alcohol Poisoning and Death

Forced or coerced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing fatalities. These incidents often share chilling similarities:

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most high-profile hazing cases in U.S. history, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after an extreme “bid acceptance” night. He was forced to drink dangerous quantities of alcohol, then fell repeatedly, sustaining traumatic brain injuries. Fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for nearly 12 hours, a cover-up attempt caught on the chapter’s own security cameras. The aftermath saw dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the enactment of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania. This case vividly demonstrated how extreme intoxication, delayed medical care, and a pervasive culture of silence can escalate to fatal consequences, sparking a national outcry for accountability.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Just months after Piazza’s death, Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of liquor and pressured to consume them rapidly. This tragic death led to criminal hazing charges against multiple members, Florida State University temporarily suspending all Greek life, and a significant overhaul of campus policies. The incident sadly showed that formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster, with fatal consequences often ignored by national organizations.

• Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Another young life was lost to alcohol hazing when 18-year-old Max Gruver died with a blood alcohol content of 0.495% after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game. Pledges were forced to drink whenever they answered questions incorrectly. This case resulted in criminal convictions, civil settlements, and the passage of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, which made felony hazing a reality. Gruver’s death became a symbol of how legislative change often follows public outrage and clear proof of hazing’s lethal nature.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): The tragic death of 20-year-old Stone Foltz from alcohol poisoning after a fraternity pledge event received national attention. He was forced to consume a nearly full bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” night. Multiple fraternity members faced criminal charges and convictions. In a landmark civil resolution, Foltz’s family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with $7 million paid by the national Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity and nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This case highlighted that universities, even public ones, can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities when hazing flourishes. Days before a trial regarding personal liability, Stone’s family was also awarded $6.5 million from the former Pi Kappa Alpha president for his role in the fatal hazing.

The Dangers of Physical and Ritualized Hazing

While alcohol often plays a central role, physical and ritualistic hazing can be equally deadly or permanently debilitating:

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng died after a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania. He was subjected to a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual, blindfolded, made to wear a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled by fraternity brothers. He suffered fatal head injuries, and, just like in other cases, members delayed seeking medical help. This chilling incident resulted in multiple criminal convictions, and the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity was banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years, showing that off-campus “retreats” can be as dangerous or worse than on-campus parties, and that national organizations face serious sanctions.

• Danny Santulli – University of Missouri, Phi Gamma Delta (2021): While not fatal, this case vividly illustrates the potential for life-altering injury. Danny Santulli suffered severe, permanent brain damage after being forced to consume a full handle of vodka and beer during a “pledge dad reveal” night. He is now unable to walk, talk, or see, and requires 24/7 care. His family settled lawsuits with 22 defendants, including the national fraternity, for multi-million-dollar confidential amounts. This case is a stark reminder that hazing can leave victims with catastrophic injuries that require lifelong support.

Hazing Beyond Greek Life: Athletic Programs Under Scrutiny

Hazing is not exclusive to fraternities and sororities. Other groups, including highly prominent athletic programs, have been exposed for systemic hazing:

• Northwestern University Athletic Hazing Scandal (2023–2025): This very recent and ongoing scandal revealed widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the university’s football program, lasting for years. Former players filed multiple lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff, leading to the termination of head football coach Pat Fitzgerald. While Fitzgerald later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially, the incident demonstrated that hazing extends beyond Greek life into major athletic programs, often fueled by power dynamics and a culture of silence, and raises significant questions about institutional oversight.

What These National Cases Mean for Texas Families

The common threads in these national hazing tragedies are clear: forced drinking, physical abuse, psychological torment, humiliating rituals, and, tragically, delayed or denied medical care followed by frantic attempts at cover-ups. For families in Kaufman County, these cases underscore several critical points:

• Foresight and Pattern Evidence: Many national fraternities and universities have faced repeated warnings regarding specific hazing practices. When a Texas chapter—whether at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor—replicates the same dangerous “traditions” that have led to deaths or injuries elsewhere, it provides strong evidence of foreseeability. This pattern is crucial for proving negligence and the need for punitive damages in civil lawsuits.
• Accountability Through Litigation: While legislative reforms and increased awareness are vital, true accountability and multi-million-dollar settlements often follow only after tragedy and through rigorous civil litigation. These lawsuits force institutions to confront their failures and provide compensation for profound losses.
• Impact on Texas Institutions: The lessons from these national cases directly shape how Texas courts, universities, and national organizations respond to hazing. Kaufman County families navigating a hazing incident operate within a legal landscape profoundly influenced by these tragic national precedents.

Texas Focus: Universites Near and Far from Kaufman County

While Kaufman County may not have a major university within its borders, families here send their children to colleges across Texas. Whether it’s to the large public institutions like the University of Houston or Texas A&M, or the private schools like SMU or Baylor, the threat of hazing remains a serious concern. Our firm, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, is dedicated to supporting these families and ensuring that no matter where your child attends university in Texas, they are protected, and any wrongdoing is brought to light. We understand that a hazing incident affecting a student from Kaufman County demands experienced Texas counsel who can expertly navigate the complexities of campus abuse.

For families in Kaufman County, it’s particularly important to be aware of the dynamics at major Texas universities. Below, we outline the hazing landscape at some of the most prominent institutions in Texas, providing crucial context for parents and students.

5.1 University of Houston (UH): An Urban Campus in the State’s Largest City

As a large, diverse urban campus, the University of Houston serves a significant number of students from Greater Houston, including families in Kaufman County whose children may choose to attend a school that provides a blend of academic rigor and city life. UH features a vibrant Greek life, with numerous fraternities and sororities from various councils, alongside a multitude of student organizations and athletic programs.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Houston, located in the heart of the state’s most populous city, is a tier-one research institution with a dynamic and diverse student body. Its campus culture blends academic ambition with a lively social scene, supported by a strong Greek life presence, numerous student organizations, and competitive athletics. This environment, while enriching, also presents scenarios where hazing can occur across various student groups.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at UH

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that prohibits any form of hazing, whether on-campus or off-campus. The policy broadly defines hazing to include acts like forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and actions causing mental distress, all conducted for initiation or membership purposes. UH encourages reporting through its Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the UH Police Department. They also provide online forms for anonymous reporting and publish some disciplinary information related to student organization misconduct.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at UH

UH has experienced and responded to various hazing allegations over the years:

• 2016 Pi Kappa Alpha Case: This notable incident at UH involved allegations that pledges of the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity chapter were subjected to extreme physical hazing, including being deprived of adequate food, water, and sleep during multi-day events. One student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. The chapter eventually faced misdemeanor hazing charges and was suspended by the university for its actions.
• Other Disciplinary Actions: Public records and university reports indicate that UH has issued sanctions against other fraternities for behaviors deemed to be hazing-related, such as forced alcohol consumption, activities “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” and violations of university policy or state law. These sanctions have included suspensions, probation, and requirements for additional hazing-prevention education.

These incidents highlight the university’s attempts to enforce its policies, although the consistent nature of hazing allegations underscores the ongoing challenges faced by large urban campuses.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Kaufman County family whose child attends UH and experiences hazing, the legal path will involve navigating both university and external authorities.

• Jurisdiction: Incident investigations may involve the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) for on-campus incidents or the Houston Police Department for off-campus events. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in state or federal courts within Harris County, where Houston is located.
• Potential Defendants: A civil suit could name individual students involved, the local chapter of the fraternity/sorority, the national organization, and potentially the University of Houston itself. As a public institution, UH may assert sovereign immunity, but exceptions often apply in cases of gross negligence, willful misconduct, or certain federal claims. Our firm has significant experience litigating against public institutions and navigating sovereign immunity defenses.
• Uncovering Evidence: Our team would diligently work to uncover evidence that might be dismissed or hidden. This includes digital communications, eyewitness accounts, university conduct records, and, importantly, the national fraternity’s history of hazing incidents across its chapters, which can establish a pattern of knowledge and foreseeability.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents from Kaufman County Should Do

If your child attends the University of Houston and you suspect or confirm hazing:

• Document Everything Thoroughly: Preserve all digital evidence—screenshots of group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp, text messages), social media posts, and any photos or videos. Photograph any injuries, including a ruler or coin for scale.
• Seek Medical Attention: Prioritize your child’s physical and mental health. Ensure any injuries are documented by medical professionals.
• Understand UH Reporting Channels: Familiarize yourself with how to report hazing to the UH Dean of Students, UHPD, or via anonymous online systems. However, be cautious about providing detailed statements without legal counsel.
• Contact a Lawyer Experienced in Houston-Based Hazing Cases: An attorney knowledgeable about the nuances of hazing liability in Texas can help you understand the history of prior complaints or disciplinary actions against the organization at UH and uncover internal files that might be difficult to access otherwise. Early legal consultation is key to preserving evidence and building a strong case.

5.2 Texas A&M University: Tradition, Corps, and Greek Life

Texas A&M University, a legendary institution with deep roots in military tradition and “Aggie Spirit,” attracts students from every corner of Texas, including Kaufman County. While known for its close-knit community and values, A&M has also seen its share of hazing incidents, encompassing both its robust Greek life and its iconic Corps of Cadets.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M’s campus in College Station is steeped in tradition, from its famed Corps of Cadets to its vibrant Greek life and numerous student organizations. The “Aggie Spirit” fosters fierce loyalty and camaraderie. However, this intense group identity, combined with powerful traditions, can sometimes create an environment ripe for hazing, where “earning your place” becomes a dangerous ritual. The university draws students from across Texas, making this a relevant concern for Kaufman County families.

5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at Texas A&M

Texas A&M strictly prohibits hazing across all its student organizations, including Greek life and the Corps of Cadets. Its comprehensive Student Conduct Code outlines these prohibitions, classifying hazing as a serious offense with disciplinary consequences. The university provides various reporting channels through the Dean of Student Life, the Office of Student Conduct, the Texas A&M University Police Department (TAMU PD), and an anonymous “Stop Hazing” reporting system. Information about university actions related to hazing is also typically available through public records requests or aggregated statistics.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at Texas A&M

Texas A&M has faced scrutiny over hazing within both its Greek system and its Corps of Cadets:

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon Lawsuit (circa 2021): This particularly egregious incident involved allegations that pledges of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity chapter were subjected to physical abuse including having industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns that required emergency skin graft surgeries. The pledges filed a $1 million lawsuit against the fraternity, which was subsequently suspended by the university for two years. This case tragically demonstrates the dangerous and creative forms hazing can take beyond just alcohol.
• Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): A former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging severe and degrading hazing within the Corps. The allegations included simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The lawsuit sought over $1 million in damages, highlighting that even in highly structured military-style groups, hazing can occur. Texas A&M stated it addressed the matter through its internal processes, but such incidents often reflect a deeper cultural issue.
• Kappa Sigma Allegations (2023, ongoing): There have also been ongoing allegations and litigation involving the Kappa Sigma fraternity at Texas A&M, including claims of hazing leading to severe injuries such as rhabdomyolysis (a serious muscle breakdown often caused by extreme physical exertion). These cases bring to light the sustained physical trauma that can result from hazing.

These incidents underscore the challenges Texas A&M faces in curbing entrenched hazing practices, despite official policies.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Kaufman County family whose child experiences hazing at Texas A&M, the legal process will be complex, particularly if it involves the Corps of Cadets.

• Jurisdiction: Investigations could involve TAMU PD for campus incidents or Bryan/College Station law enforcement for off-campus events. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Brazos County courts or applicable federal courts.
• Potential Defendants: Defendants could include individual students, the local chapter, the national organization (for Greek life), and Texas A&M University. As a public university, A&M frequently asserts sovereign immunity, but our firm extensively leverages exceptions for gross negligence and other legal avenues.
• Navigating Unique Cultures: Cases involving the Corps of Cadets demand an attorney familiar with military-style organizational structures and traditions, as well as the specific cultural nuances of Texas A&M, to effectively build a case.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents from Kaufman County Should Do

If your child attends Texas A&M and you suspect or confirm hazing:

• Understand the Reporting Structure: Be aware of how to report to the Dean of Student Life, TAMU PD, or the anonymous “Stop Hazing” system. Be informed that internal reporting may trigger investigations that can move quickly.
• Prioritize Evidence, Especially Digital: Promptly capture and save all digital communications (GroupMe, texts, social media posts). If hazing occurred within the Corps, documentation of “cadet life” or “outings” can be vital. Our firm’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) is a key resource for proper preservation.
• Document Medical Care: Ensure all injuries, both physical and psychological, are thoroughly documented by medical professionals in College Station or elsewhere.
• Consult an Attorney Immediately: Given the highly traditional and sometimes insular culture at A&M, and the complexities of litigating against a major public university, retaining an attorney experienced in Texas hazing, especially with knowledge of military-style hazing, is crucial from the outset.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT): Academic Excellence and Consistent Challenges

The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution, draws a significant number of students from Kaufman County and across the state, promising a world-class education and vibrant campus life. While renowned for its academic prowess, UT has a well-documented history of hazing incidents across a wide array of student organizations, including its large Greek system.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin is a major research university and a cultural hub. Its “Longhorn” spirit permeates a diverse campus, home to a massive Greek system, numerous tradition clubs, athletic teams, and spirit organizations. This energetic, tradition-rich environment, however, has also been a breeding ground for hazing, often camouflaged by a focus on school pride and deep-seated rituals.

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at UT

UT Austin has a clear anti-hazing policy, prohibiting any intentional, knowing, or reckless act related to initiation or membership that endangers a student’s mental or physical health or safety. UT encourages reporting to the Dean of Students, Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, Title IX Office, and the UTPD. Crucially, UT maintains a publicly accessible Hazing Violations page (hazing.utexas.edu) that lists organizations, the nature of their violations, and the sanctions imposed. This transparency is a valuable resource for Kaufman County parents researching their child’s chosen organization.

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at UT

The transparency of UT’s public Hazing Violations page reveals a consistent pattern of incidents:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): The UT chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) was disciplined for hazing offenses that included directing new members to consume excessive amounts of milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. This incident resulted in the chapter being placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education, indicating an ongoing struggle with basic hazing behaviors.
• Texas Wranglers (Spirit Organization): This well-known spirit organization has appeared on UT’s hazing list for various infractions, including forced physical activities, sleep deprivation, and alcohol-related hazing, underscoring that hazing extends beyond the traditional Greek system.
• Other Greek and Non-Greek Groups: Numerous other fraternities, sororities, and non-Greek student organizations have faced sanctions for infractions ranging from forced sleep deprivation and alcohol consumption to inappropriate or degrading initiations. This consistent record on UT’s public list highlights that repeated violations are a recurring theme, even for organizations with prior disciplinary history.

These examples confirm that despite clear policies and public reporting, hazing remains a persistent challenge at UT Austin.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Kaufman County family facing hazing at UT, the case would involve a multi-faceted approach.

• Jurisdiction: Cases may involve the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD) for on-campus incidents or the Austin Police Department for off-campus events. Civil suits would typically be filed in state or federal courts within Travis County, where Austin is located.
• Leveraging Public Records: UT’s public hazing log is an invaluable resource. Our firm actively reviews these records to establish patterns of misconduct, foreseeability, and the university’s knowledge of repeat offenders. These prior violations can significantly strengthen a civil claim against the organization and, potentially, the university.
• Potential Defendants: Similar to other cases, defendants could include individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, and the University of Texas at Austin. As a public university, UT will also assert sovereign immunity, requiring experienced counsel to navigate the legal exceptions.

5.3.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents from Kaufman County Should Do

If your child attends UT Austin and you suspect or confirm hazing:

• Consult UT’s Public Hazing Log: Review the hazing.utexas.edu website to see if the organization, or similar groups, has a history of violations. This information is crucial for understanding institutional knowledge.
• Document Everything Electronically: Secure screenshots of group chats, social media activity, photos, and videos. Given the prevalent use of digital communication, this evidence is often central to proving hazing.
• Seek Prompt Medical and Psychological Care: Document all physical injuries and any mental health impacts (anxiety, depression, PTSD) through qualified professionals.
• Contact a Texas Hazing Attorney: An attorney experienced in UT Austin hazing cases can help you understand how the university’s policies and recorded violations impact your case. Our firm knows how to interpret UT’s public data and use it to build a compelling claim for accountability.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU): Private University, Public Problem

Southern Methodist University, known for its picturesque campus, strong academic programs, and vibrant Greek life, is a private institution that attracts students from affluent communities across Texas, including Kaufman County. Despite its private status and often exclusive reputation, SMU is not immune to the widespread problem of hazing.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU, located in Dallas, is a distinguished private university with a strong emphasis on tradition, community, and leadership. Its Greek life is a dominant force in campus social culture, with many students participating in fraternities and sororities. The social dynamics, combined with the pressure to excel and conform, can unfortunately provide fertile ground for hazing practices.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at SMU

SMU has a clear anti-hazing policy as part of its Student Code of Conduct, which strictly prohibits all forms of hazing for student organizations. The university encourages reporting through the Dean of Students, Student Affairs, and the SMU Police Department. SMU also utilizes tools like “Real Response,” an anonymous reporting system, to encourage students to come forward. While public transparency differs from state universities due to its private status, SMU’s policies aim to deter and address misconduct rigorously.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at SMU

SMU has taken action against various Greek organizations suspected or found responsible for hazing:

• Kappa Alpha Order (2017) & Others: SMU has disciplined multiple fraternities for hazing violations over the years. A notable incident involved the Kappa Alpha Order chapter, which was suspected of paddling new members, forced alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. The chapter faced suspension and stringent restrictions on recruiting, highlighting the university’s response to such allegations. Similar incidents have led to probationary periods or suspensions for other fraternities found in violation of hazing policies.
• Ongoing Monitoring: SMU’s Greek life remains under close scrutiny, with the university periodically issuing statements regarding its commitment to hazing prevention and a willingness to take disciplinary action when policies are violated.

These incidents underscore that private universities like SMU, despite their efforts, continue to grapple with hazing culture.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Kaufman County family whose child experiences hazing at SMU, the legal process will differ slightly from public university cases.

• Jurisdiction: Incident investigations may involve SMU Police Department for campus events or Dallas Police Department for off-campus locations. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in state or federal courts within Dallas County.
• No Sovereign Immunity: As a private university, SMU does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more straightforward to pursue claims directly against the institution.
• Discovery and Internal Records: While SMU may not have a public hazing log like UT, a civil lawsuit allows for extensive discovery, compelling the university and national organizations to produce internal records, disciplinary histories, and communications that shed light on systemic issues and prior knowledge.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents from Kaufman County Should Do

If your child attends SMU and you suspect or confirm hazing:

• Document Thoroughly: Immediately save all digital evidence (texts, GroupMe messages, social media posts, photos, videos) that could relate to hazing incidents.
• Seek Medical and Psychological Support: Ensure all physical and mental health impacts are documented by healthcare professionals.
• Report Internally, But with Caution: Utilize SMU’s reporting channels, but consult a lawyer before providing formal statements to university officials. A lawyer can help ensure your rights are protected and that your statement is strategically provided.
• Contact a Lawyer Experienced in Hazing Cases: An attorney with experience navigating private university hazing cases, particularly in Texas, can help you understand the nuances of building a case against an institution like SMU, which has different legal vulnerabilities than a public university.

5.5 Baylor University: Faith, Tradition, and Accountabiity

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, is known for its strong academic programs, Christian mission, and competitive athletics. It attracts students from across Texas, including Kaufman County families seeking a values-based education. However, despite its mission and deep-rooted traditions, Baylor has also faced its share of hazing allegations, raising questions about accountability within organizations steeped in long-standing practices.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor’s campus culture is distinct, blending a strong Christian identity with a vibrant academic and social scene. Its Greek life, athletic programs, and numerous student organizations are integral to the student experience. The emphasis on tradition and unity, while positive in many respects, can also be misused to justify dangerous or demeaning hazing rituals. Baylor’s well-publicized history of scrutiny over its handling of abuse allegations, particularly within its football program, provides an important context for understanding its approach to student safety.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at Baylor

Baylor University unequivocally prohibits hazing, articulating this firmly in its Code of Conduct. The university defines hazing broadly to include any action that places a student’s mental or physical health at risk for the purpose of initiation, admission, or affiliation. Baylor encourages reporting through its Dean of Students office, the Title IX Office (if applicable), and Baylor University Police Department (BUPD). The university also provides an anonymous reporting option through its “Baylor Reporting Hotline” for students to voice concerns without fear of direct identification.

5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at Baylor

Baylor has taken disciplinary action in various hazing cases, reflecting its commitment to addressing misconduct, though challenges persist:

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): This widely publicized incident involved hazing within Baylor’s baseball program. Following an investigation, 14 players were suspended by the university. These suspensions were “staggered” over the early part of the season, indicating a careful balancing act between disciplinary action and maintaining team operations. This case clearly demonstrates that hazing extends beyond Greek life into prominent athletic programs, challenging institutions like Baylor to uphold their “zero tolerance” policies.
• Other Student Organization Incidents: While less frequently publicized, Baylor has also addressed hazing allegations within its Greek life and other student groups, leading to probation, suspensions, and mandatory training sessions.

These incidents highlight the ongoing struggle to eradicate hazing, even within institutions with strong ethical foundations and a clear commitment to student welfare.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Kaufman County family pursuing a hazing case against Baylor University, similar to SMU, the legal pathway involves private institution dynamics.

• Jurisdiction: Incident investigations may involve the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) or Waco Police Department for incidents occurring off-campus. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in state or federal courts within McLennan County, where Waco is located.
• No Sovereign Immunity: As a private university, Baylor does not enjoy sovereign immunity, which can simplify the legal process for victims seeking to hold the institution directly accountable.
• Uncovering Internal Records: Through civil discovery, an attorney can compel Baylor to produce internal investigative reports, disciplinary records, communications related to prior hazing incidents, and documents revealing how such matters were handled. This helps to establish patterns of knowledge, inaction, or negligent supervision.

5.4.5 What Baylor Students & Parents from Kaufman County Should Do

If your child attends Baylor and you suspect or confirm hazing:

• Document All Evidence: Immediately capture and save all digital communications (texts, social media posts, GroupMe messages), photos, and videos related to any hazing activities.
• Prioritize Medical Documentation: Ensure all physical injuries and psychological trauma are promptly and thoroughly documented by medical and mental health professionals, including seeking care at Waco-area facilities or back home in Kaufman County if preferred.
• Consider Anonymous Reporting, But Consult an Attorney: Utilize Baylor’s anonymous reporting options if necessary, but understand that for a legal case, direct engagement and evidence are vital. Consult an attorney before making detailed official statements to the university to ensure your rights and case strategy are protected.
• Engage a Hazing-Experienced Attorney: An attorney with a deep understanding of hazing law and litigation against private universities in Texas is crucial to navigate Baylor’s internal processes and build a strong civil claim.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For Kaufman County families, understanding that many local chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor are part of larger national organizations is critical. These national entities, while often proclaiming strong anti-hazing policies, frequently have extensive and troubling hazing histories across their various chapters, stretching back years or even decades. These national patterns are not mere historical footnotes; they are powerful evidence that can be leveraged in a civil lawsuit.

Why National Histories Matter in Hazing Cases

National fraternities and sororities, such as Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi, Kappa Alpha Order, and Beta Theta Pi, operate far beyond a single campus. They maintain headquarters, collect dues, provide training, and set policies for hundreds of chapters nationwide. Because of this structure, their histories matter immensely:

• Foreseeability: Many national organizations have witnessed recurrent hazing deaths, severe injuries, and costly lawsuits. They often have thick anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies specifically because they know the dangerous patterns: forced drinking nights, paddling traditions, degrading rituals, and the inherent risks of initiation. When a Texas chapter replicates a hazing ritual that has caused harm at another chapter in a different state, it demonstrates foreseeability. The national organization knew or should have known these types of incidents were likely.
• Prior Notice and Deliberate Indifference: If a national organization has been repeatedly warned about specific hazing methods, either through internal reports, prior lawsuits, or media attention, yet fails to implement meaningful change or enforce its policies, it can be seen as acting with deliberate indifference. This can significantly strengthen arguments for negligence or even punitive damages against the national entity.
• Settlement and Accountability: The pattern of national organizations being implicated in hazing lawsuits means they often have deeper pockets and insurance policies that can provide compensation to victims. Their repeated involvement demonstrates that they are powerful entities that can be held accountable, and that litigation is frequently the most effective way to force systemic change.

Organizations with Documented National Hazing Issues

While we cannot list every instance, here are examples of some prominent fraternities with well-documented national hazing histories, many of which have chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor. Their national histories underscore that hazing is a systemic issue, not just a few “bad apples”:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has a tragic national history of hazing. Most recently, the Stone Foltz case at Bowling Green State University (2021) involved a pledge dying from alcohol poisoning after a forced hazing event, leading to a $10 million settlement from the national fraternity and university. Before that, the David Bogenberger case at Northern Illinois University (2012) also involved alcohol poisoning and resulted in a $14 million settlement. These cases demonstrate a recurring pattern of dangerous “Big/Little” or “pledge night” alcohol hazing within the organization.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE has a particularly dark national record, with multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries across the country. In Texas, their chapters have faced significant allegations. At Texas A&M University (2021), two pledges alleged they suffered severe chemical burns requiring skin grafts after substances including industrial cleaner were poured on them. At the University of Texas at Austin (January 2024), an exchange student sued SAE after allegedly suffering serious injuries including a dislocated leg and broken bones during an assault at a fraternity party, with the chapter already under suspension for prior violations. Nationally, an ongoing lawsuit against SAE from the University of Alabama (2023) alleges a pledge sustained a traumatic brain injury during hazing. SAE even attempted to abolish its traditional pledge process nationwide in 2014 due to its grim record, yet hazing persists.

• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This national fraternity is tragically linked to the Max Gruver case at Louisiana State University (2017), where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning after a forced drinking game. The case spurred Louisiana’s felony hazing statute, the Max Gruver Act.

• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): The Andrew Coffey case at Florida State University (2017) involved a pledge dying from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. This led to national scrutiny and significant changes at FSU.

• Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): The Timothy Piazza case at Penn State University (2017) involved a pledge dying from traumatic brain injuries and internal bleeding after an extreme alcohol hazing ritual and a fraternity-wide cover-up. This case, extensively prosecuted, brought national attention to the severe consequences of delayed medical intervention.

• Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): The Danny Santulli case at the University of Missouri (2021) is a stark example of long-term catastrophic injury. Santulli suffered severe, permanent brain damage from forced alcohol consumption during a hazing event, leading to multi-million-dollar settlements with 22 defendants.

• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): This fraternity has also faced numerous hazing allegations and lawsuits. Notably, the Chad Meredith case at the University of Miami (2001) resulted in a $12.6 million jury verdict after a pledge drowned during a hazing ritual. More recently, allegations of severe injuries, including rhabdomyolysis, have emerged from the Texas A&M University (2023) chapter.

• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): This national fraternity was recently involved in a hazing lawsuit at the College of Charleston (2024), which resulted in a settlement of more than $10 million in damages for a pledge who alleged physical beatings, forced consumption of drugs and alcohol, and psychological torment. This stands as one of the largest known hazing settlements.

Tying National Histories to Legal Strategy for Kaufman County Families

For families in Kaufman County, understanding these national histories is not just for awareness; it is a critical component of legal strategy. When we investigate a hazing incident at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, our firm leverages this knowledge to support our case:

• Establishing Foresight and Prior Notice: If a national organization has a documented history of hazing, especially with methods similar to what occurred in Texas, it becomes demonstrably harder for them to claim they “didn’t know” or that the event was “unforeseeable.” This pattern of prior incidents creates a powerful argument for their negligence in supervising or adequately punishing their chapters.
• Combatting “Rogue Chapter” Defenses: National organizations often argue that a local chapter acted “rogue” and outside of their control. By presenting a history of similar incidents across multiple chapters, we can show that the national organization’s policies were mere “paper policies,” inconsistently enforced, or that their risk management was fundamentally flawed.
• Maximizing Accountability: This pattern evidence helps secure significant settlements or verdicts. It forces national organizations to acknowledge their systemic failures, which can include punitive damages in certain cases, aimed not just at compensation but at deterring future misconduct. This legal pressure translates into real accountability and, hopefully, prevention of future tragedies.

Our firm’s experience in complex litigation means we are adept at conducting the deep discovery necessary to uncover these national patterns, link them to the specific incident affecting your family, and build a powerful argument for justice.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, and Strategy

For Kaufman County families affected by hazing, pursuing a lawsuit is about more than just compensation; it’s about answers, accountability, and preventing future tragedies. Building a strong hazing case requires meticulous evidence collection, a deep understanding of recoverable damages, and a strategic legal approach designed to overcome formidable institutional defenses.

The Power of Evidence in Modern Hazing Cases

Today’s hazing cases are often won or lost based on the quality and breadth of evidence, particularly digital evidence. Fraternities and other organizations frequently delete messages and try to enforce a “code of silence,” but experienced legal teams know how to uncover and preserve critical information.

• Digital Communications: This is often the most critical category.

  • GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, Snapchat, Instagram DMs, TikTok comments: These platforms are goldmines. They show planning, intent, specific instructions, participant lists, and real-time reactions. We work with digital forensics experts to recover deleted messages, group chats, and social media posts, which often contain direct evidence of hazing, humiliation, and attempts at cover-up.
  • Full Context: Screenshots need to capture the full thread, including sender names, profile pictures, and timestamps to establish context.

• Photos & Videos:

  • Member-Generated Content: Pledges or fraternity/sorority members themselves often record hazing activities, sometimes for “fun” or as proof of compliance. This content, if secured, is irrefutable.
  • Surveillance Footage: Security cameras at houses, venues, or even Ring/doorbell cameras from neighbors can capture events, arrivals, departures, or a student’s declining condition.
  • Injury Documentation: Immediate and ongoing photos of physical injuries (bruises, burns, swelling) are crucial for medical and emotional damages. Medical records confirm the nature and extent of harm.

• Internal Organization Documents: These can reveal a history of neglect or knowledge.

  • Pledge Manuals, Membership Education Guides: These sometimes contain euphemisms for hazing activities.
  • Emails/Texts from Officers: Communications planning “pledge events” or discussing expectations for new members.
  • National Policies & Training Materials: These show what the national organization claims to do versus what actually happens.

• University Records:

  • Prior Conduct Files: History of disciplinary actions, probation, or suspensions against the specific organization. (For UT Austin, the public hazing log is invaluable here.)
  • Incident Reports: Filings with campus police or student conduct offices.
  • Clery Act Reports: Statistical data that can show patterns of crime on campus relevant to hazing.
  • Emails & Communications: Internal communications among university administrators regarding the organization and any prior concerns.

• Medical and Psychological Records: Crucial for documenting the full spectrum of harm.

  • Emergency Room & Hospitalization Records: Document immediate physical injuries, toxicology reports (blood alcohol content, drugs), and diagnoses.
  • Ongoing Treatment: Records from physical therapy, occupational therapy, and follow-up medical care.
  • Mental Health Documentation: Evaluations and treatment records from psychiatrists or psychologists for conditions like PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation resulting from the hazing.

• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts are powerful.

  • Fellow Pledges/Members: Often the most direct witnesses, their testimony may be difficult to obtain due to fear of retaliation but is invaluable.
  • Roommates, RAs, Coaches, University Staff: Individuals who observed changes in behavior or overheard conversations.
  • Former Members: Those who quit the organization due to hazing are often willing to speak out.

Recoverable Damages in Hazing Cases in Texas

A hazing lawsuit aims to compensate victims and their families for the full range of harm suffered. Damages are generally categorized into economic (quantifiable financial losses) and non-economic (subjective losses like pain and suffering).

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs related to physical and mental health treatment.

  • Immediate emergency care (ambulance, ER, ICU stays).
  • Surgeries, ongoing treatments, medications.
  • Physical, occupational, speech, and psychological therapy.
  • For catastrophic injuries (e.g., brain damage), this includes a “life care plan” to cover lifelong medical needs and personal assistance.

• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact:

  • Lost wages if the victim or a parent had to take time off work.
  • Compensation for missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed graduation, and its impact on entering the workforce.
  • If the injury results in permanent disability, damages for diminished future earning capacity are sought, calculated by expert economists over the victim’s projected lifetime.

• Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for the profound, often invisible, suffering:

  • Physical pain and suffering: From the initial injuries through long-term chronic pain.
  • Emotional distress and psychological harm: This includes PTSD, severe anxiety, depression, humiliation, loss of dignity, fear, and nightmares. Therapy and counseling records are critical here.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: The inability to participate in activities once enjoyed (sports, hobbies, social life), withdrawal from college experiences, and strained relationships.

• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): When hazing results in a fatality, surviving family members (parents, children, spouses, and sometimes siblings) can seek:

  • Funeral and burial costs.
  • Loss of financial support the deceased would have provided.
  • Loss of companionship, love, guidance, and society.
  • Grief and emotional suffering experienced by the family.

• Exemplary (Punitive) Damages: In cases of gross negligence, malicious conduct, or deliberate indifference, punitive damages may be awarded to punish defendants and deter future misconduct. While Texas law may cap these in some instances, they are a powerful tool to hold institutions accountable for egregious behavior.

It is critical to remember that while we meticulously calculate and pursue these damages, we cannot guarantee specific outcomes. However, a comprehensive valuation of all losses is essential to truly address the harm inflicted by hazing.

Navigating the Battlefield: Defense Tactics and Insurance Coverage

Defendants in hazing lawsuits—individuals, chapters, national organizations, and universities—employ sophisticated legal teams and insurance carriers to defend against claims. Our firm is prepared for these common tactics:

• “Consent” Defense: Defendants often claim “the pledge agreed to it.” However, Texas law explicitly states consent is not a defense to hazing. Our firm argues that true consent is absent in coercive environments.
• “Rogue Chapter” Defense: National organizations attempt to distance themselves, claiming they had no knowledge or control over a “rogue” local chapter. We counter this by exposing patterns of prior incidents, showing that the national failed to enforce its own policies, or that their “training” was inadequate.
• “Off-Campus, Not Our Responsibility”: Hazing often occurs at off-campus houses or retreats. Defendants argue they lack jurisdiction. We demonstrate foreseeability and control, arguing that the university or national organization still bears responsibility due to its sponsorship and knowledge of chapter activities.
• Insurance Coverage Disputes: Insurance companies frequently try to deny coverage for hazing claims, arguing that “intentional acts” or “criminal conduct” are excluded. Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, leverages her background as a former insurance defense attorney to skillfully identify all potential policies, challenge wrongful denials, and force insurers to meet their obligations.

Our strategy is to anticipate these defenses, uncover the evidence that disproves them, and relentlessly advocate for our clients. We understand that this is a battle against powerful institutions, but we are equipped and ready to fight it.

Practical Guides & FAQs for Kaufman County Families

For families in Kaufman County, navigating the aftermath of a hazing incident can feel overwhelming. You’re facing emotional distress, potential physical injuries, and a complex legal system. This section provides immediate, practical advice for parents, students, and witnesses, empowering you with information and actionable steps.

8.1 For Parents: Recognizing & Responding to Hazing

Your child’s safety is paramount. Being attuned to subtle changes can be critical.

Warning Signs Your Child May Be Being Hazed:

• Physical Signs: Look for unexplained bruises, burns, cuts, or other injuries, especially if their explanations don’t quite make sense. Observe extreme fatigue, chronic exhaustion, or significant changes in weight (loss or gain). Sleep deprivation is a hallmark of hazing, often due to late-night “meetings” or mandatory activities at odd hours.
• Behavioral & Emotional Changes: A sudden shift toward secrecy about their organization’s activities, often accompanied by phrases like “I can’t talk about it” or “it’s confidential.” They might withdraw from family, old friends, or non-Greek activities. Watch for increased anxiety, depression, irritability, or anger. They might become overly defensive when asked about their group or show an unusual obsession with pleasing older members, often saying things like “I just have to get through this” or “everyone before me did it.”
• Academic Red Flags: A sudden drop in grades, missing classes, falling asleep in lectures, or neglecting assignments due to “mandatory” events are serious indicators.
• Financial Red Flags: Unexpected and unexplained large expenses, requests for money without clear reasons, forced purchases of alcohol or items for older members, or maxed-out credit cards can signal hazing.
• Digital/Social Behavior: Constant anxiety around their phone, fear of missing messages, obsessive deletion of group chats, or receiving calls/texts at all hours demanding immediate responses are common. Be aware of social media posts showing humiliating activities or the sudden use of geo-location tracking apps like Find My Friends demanded by the organization.

How to Talk to Your Child (Non-Confrontationally):

Approach with empathy, not accusation:

1. “How are things going with [fraternity/sorority/team]? Are you enjoying it?”
2. “Have they been respectful of your time for classes and sleep?”
3. “What do they ask you to do as a new member, and how do you feel about it?”
4. “Is there anything that makes you uncomfortable or that you wish you didn’t have to do?”
5. “Have you seen anyone get hurt, or have you been hurt during these activities?”
6. “Do you feel like you can leave if you want to, or would there be negative consequences?”
7. “Are they asking you to keep secrets from me or the university?”

If your child opens up, listen without judgment. Reassure them that their safety and well-being are your priority. If they shut down, don’t force it, but monitor them closely and be ready to intervene.

What to Do If Your Child is Hurt or You Suspect Hazing:

• Immediate Safety: If your child is in physical danger (heavily intoxicated, injured, threatened), call 911 or campus police immediately. Prioritize medical attention; their health comes first, regardless of potential “trouble.”
• Document Everything (Early Preservation is Key):
  • Write down the dates, times, and everything your child tells you, while the details are fresh.
  • If your child shows you digital evidence, screenshot everything immediately, or ask permission to photograph their phone. This includes texts, group chats, social media posts, and photos.
  • Take clear photos of any visible injuries, from multiple angles, with a scale (like a coin or ruler).
  • Save any physical items that could serve as evidence, like damaged clothing or receipts for forced purchases.
• Reporting Options:
  • Campus Authorities: Contact the Dean of Students, Office of Student Conduct, or campus police.
  • Local Police: If the hazing involved crimes like assault, sexual assault, or furnishing alcohol to minors, file a report with the city or county police.
  • University Hotlines: Many schools have anonymous hazing hotlines or online reporting forms.
  • National Anti-Hazing Hotline: 1-888-NOT-HAZE (anonymous and monitored 24/7).
• Legal Consultation: Contact a lawyer experienced in hazing cases early in the process. An attorney can help preserve evidence, navigate university processes, advise on criminal vs. civil options, and protect your child from pressure or retaliation.

What NOT to Do:

• Do not confront the fraternity/sorority directly. This often leads to immediate cover-up efforts, destruction of evidence, and coached witnesses.
• Do not sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal advice. These documents may waive your child’s rights.
• Do not post details on public social media before consulting a lawyer, as this can compromise your case.
• Do not let your child delete messages or try to “clean up” any evidence.

48-Hour Action Checklist for Parents:

HOUR 1–6 (IMMEDIATE CRISIS):

✅ Medical: If injured or intoxicated, get to the ER immediately.
✅ Safety: Remove your child from the dangerous situation or environment.
✅ Evidence: Screenshot any messages shown to you; photograph visible injuries.
✅ Notes: Write down everything your child recounts (date, time, what happened, who was there).
✅ Call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate legal guidance.

HOUR 6–24 (EVIDENCE PRESERVATION):

✅ Digital: Help your child preserve all group chats, DMs, and texts, making sure absolutely nothing is deleted.
✅ Physical: Secure any relevant physical items such as specific clothing, receipts, or objects used in the hazing.
✅ Medical Records: Request and secure copies of all ER and hospital records.
✅ Witnesses: Write down names and contact information for other pledges or bystanders.
✅ University Contact: Note any communications received from the school (emails, calls, meeting requests), but do NOT respond without legal counsel.

HOUR 24–48 (STRATEGIC DECISIONS):

✅ Legal Consultation: Speak with an experienced hazing attorney from Attorney911 (1-888-ATTY-911).
✅ Reporting Decision: Strategize whether and how to report to campus police, local police, or the Dean of Students, informed by legal advice.
✅ University Response: If the school contacts you, direct them to your attorney for all communications.
✅ Insurance: Do NOT speak with any insurance adjusters without your lawyer present.
✅ Evidence Backup: Upload all screenshots and photos to cloud storage or email them to yourself for redundancy.

WEEK ONE PRIORITIES:

✅ Medical Follow-up: Continue to document any injuries, seek specialist care if needed, and consider a psychological evaluation if trauma is present.
✅ Evidence Gathering: Your attorney will begin the process of subpoenaing records and potentially using forensics to recover deleted messages.
✅ Witness Interviews: Your attorney will contact other pledges and potential witnesses.
✅ Strategy Session: Work with your legal team to decide on the best course of action: criminal report, civil lawsuit, both, or navigating solely the university’s internal process.
✅ Protection: Document and report any instances of retaliation immediately.

8.2 For Students / Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning

If you’re a student from Kaufman County involved in a fraternity, sorority, athletic team, or any other organization, it’s vital to recognize the line between genuine bonding and dangerous hazing.

Is This Hazing? A Decision Guide:

Ask yourself these questions honestly:

• Am I being forced or pressured to do something I genuinely don’t want to do?
• Would I do this if I had a real choice, without fear of social repercussions or being cut from the group?
• Is this activity dangerous, degrading, humiliating, or illegal in any way?
• Would the university, my parents, or the public approve if they knew exactly what was happening?
• Are older members making new members do things they don’t have to do themselves?
• Is this “tradition” truly about initiation, or is it just fun for older members at my expense?
• Am I being told to keep secrets, lie, or hide these activities from outsiders?

If you answered YES to any of these questions, it is highly likely you are being hazed, regardless of how it’s labeled.

Remember the Three-Tier System from earlier:

• Tier 1 (Subtle): Servitude, social control, deception, “optional” but mandatory tasks. This is still hazing.
• Tier 2 (Harassment): Yelling, forced uncomfortable activities, public humiliation, sleep deprivation. This is illegal hazing.
• Tier 3 (Violent): Forced drinking, beatings, sexual acts, dangerous tests. This is a serious crime; get help immediately.

How to Exit Safely:

• If you are in immediate danger: Call 911 or campus police immediately. In Texas and on most campuses, you will not get in trouble for calling for help in a medical emergency (thanks to good-faith reporter protections). Your life is worth more than any membership.
• If you want to quit/de-pledge: You have the legal right to leave at any time.
  • Tell someone outside the organization first (parent, trusted friend, RA) to establish a record of your intentions.
  • Send a clear email or text to the chapter president or new member educator stating: “I am resigning my pledge/membership effective immediately.” This creates a timestamped record.
  • Do not go to “one last meeting” where you might be pressured, intimidated, or retaliated against.
  • If you fear retaliation after leaving, report those fears to the Dean of Students and campus police.

Protecting Yourself from Retaliation: Document any threats, harassment, or negative consequences (screenshots, dates, witnesses). In Texas, harassment and stalking are crimes, and you can seek protective orders through the university or legal system.

Evidence Collection (While it’s happening or immediately after):

1. Screenshots of Group Chats: Capture full conversations, including names, timestamps, and sufficient context. Screenshot immediately if messages auto-delete.
2. Voice Memos/Recordings: In Texas, you can legally record conversations you are a party to (one-party consent state). Use this discretely to capture meetings, phone calls, or coercive conversations related to hazing.
3. Photos/Videos: Take photos of injuries (with a scale), locations where hazing occurred, and any objects used. Use your phone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs).
4. Save all digital data: Do not delete anything. Back up screenshots and recordings to cloud storage or email them to a trusted adult.
5. Medical Documentation: If you seek care, explicitly state you were hazed so it’s in your medical record. Request all medical documents.
6. Witness Information: Collect names and contact info for other pledges, members who left, or bystanders who witnessed events.

Who to Trust / Where to Report:

• On Campus: Dean of Students or Office of Student Conduct (for formal investigations); Title IX Coordinator (if sexual harassment/assault involved); Campus Police (if crimes occurred); Counseling Center (for confidential mental health support); a trusted professor or academic advisor.
• Off Campus: Local Police (if crimes occurred); National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE); a lawyer specializing in hazing cases.
• Be Cautious With: Fraternity/sorority advisors (may prioritize the organization); the “Greek Life” office at some schools (may prioritize the Greek system); friends still in the organization (may feel conflicted or report back to leadership).

Your Legal Rights in Texas:

• You cannot be punished for calling 911 or seeking medical help in an emergency, even if underage drinking was involved.
• Hazing is a crime in Texas, and you are the victim, even if you initially “agreed.”
• You can file a civil lawsuit for damages even if no criminal charges are pursued.
• You can request a no-contact order from the university (or legal system) if you are harassed after reporting.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses: A Path to Accountability

If you were a part of a hazing organization or witnessed hazing, and now carry guilt or feel a moral obligation to act, know that your contribution can be transformative. We understand the fear of repercussions, but your testimony can prevent future harm and save lives.

• Your Role in Accountability: Your unique perspective and potential evidence (messages, photos, knowledge of traditions) are invaluable. You can provide crucial insight into the organization’s culture, prior incidents, and attempts to conceal hazing.
• Legal Protection: While you may have legal exposure for your past involvement, many states, including Texas, offer immunity for good-faith reporting. An attorney can advise you on your rights, potential liabilities, and strategies for cooperating with authorities in a way that protects you while advancing justice.
• Helping Future Victims: Coming forward can be a powerful act of conscience, helping to shut down dangerous practices and ensure that no other student from Kaufman County or anywhere else has to endure what you witnessed or experienced.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Hazing Case

For Kaufman County families and students, the immediate aftermath of a hazing incident is critical. The actions you take—or fail to take—can significantly impact any future legal claim. Avoid these common, yet devastating, mistakes:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:

   • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This not only looks like a cover-up but can also constitute obstruction of justice or spoliation of evidence, making a civil case nearly impossible to prove.
   • What to do instead: Preserve absolutely everything immediately, even if it seems embarrassing or incriminating. It’s better for your legal team to have it than for it to be gone forever.

2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:

   • What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This is the fastest way for the organization to lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and solidify their defenses.
   • What to do instead: Document everything you know, then call a lawyer immediately before any confrontation.

3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms without legal review:

   • What universities do: They may pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements to quickly close a case.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue a civil lawsuit, and any internal compensation offered is often far below the actual value of your claim.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or organization without an attorney reviewing it first.

4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:

   • What families think: “I want people to know what happened.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Everything you post can be screenshot by defense attorneys, used against your child, create inconsistencies in future testimony, or even inadvertently waive legal privilege.
   • What to do instead: Document privately. Let your legal team control public messaging strategically.

5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting” with the organization:

   • What fraternities say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This is a tactic to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can later be used against your child or weaken your case.
   • What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication with the organization should go through your lawyer.

6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:

   • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Evidence disappears rapidly, witnesses graduate or forget details, and the statute of limitations can run out. University processes are internal and often prioritize the school’s reputation over true victim accountability.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW and consult a lawyer immediately. University disciplinary processes are not a substitute for real accountability in a court of law.

7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:

   • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Recorded statements are used against you, and initial settlement offers are almost always lowball. Adjusters work for the insurance company, not for you.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline and say, “My attorney will contact you.“

8.5 Short FAQs for Kaufman County Families

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) have some sovereign immunity protection under Texas law, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, willful misconduct, and certain federal claims (e.g., Title IX). Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) typically have fewer such protections. Every case depends on its specific facts. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  Yes, it can be. While basic hazing is typically a Class B misdemeanor, it elevates to a state jail felony under Texas law if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who know about hazing and fail to report it can also face misdemeanor charges.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes. The Texas Education Code explicitly states at § 37.155 that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and juries recognize that “agreement” under intense peer pressure, threat of social exclusion, and power imbalances is not true, voluntary consent.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas?”
  Generally, the statute of limitations for personal injury and wrongful death cases in Texas is 2 years from the date of injury or death. However, the “discovery rule” can sometimes extend this if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. In cases involving deliberate cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be “tolled” (paused). Time is critical: evidence vanishes, witnesses graduate, and memories fade. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to protect your rights. Our video on the statute of limitations (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c) provides more information.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Many major hazing judgments (e.g., the Pi Delta Psi retreat case, Sigma Pi unofficial house death) occurred off-campus. Universities and national fraternities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge of activities, and foreseeability of risk, regardless of whether the event was on university grounds.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  Most hazing cases settle confidentially before ever going to trial. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy and works to secure confidential settlement terms, as well as requests for sealed court records, while still pursuing maxed-out accountability.

About The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC + Your Call to Action

When your family faces the devastation of a hazing incident, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand the complex web of university politics, national fraternity structures, and insurance company defenses. You need a legal team that isn’t intimidated by powerful institutions and knows how to uncover hidden truths. That’s precisely what The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, offers.

We are Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, and we specialize in complex litigation against even the most formidable defendants. From our Houston headquarters, we serve families throughout Texas, including Kaufman County and surrounding regions. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families in Terrell, Kaufman, Forney, and throughout the region, and we are prepared to fight for justice no matter where your child attends school.

Our firm brings a unique blend of experience and strategic advantages to hazing cases:

• Insurance Insider Knowledge (Lupe Peña): Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), previously worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She knows their playbook—how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, their coverage exclusion arguments, and their settlement strategies. “We know their playbook because we used to run it,” she often says. This invaluable insight is a significant advantage in every case we handle.

• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions (Ralph Manginello): Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), is no stranger to taking on powerful defendants. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in litigation surrounding the BP Texas City refinery explosion, a case against one of the world’s largest corporations. His extensive federal court experience means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. “We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants,” Ralph states, reflecting our firm’s resolve.

• Multi-Million-Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), recovering millions for families who have suffered unimaginable loss. We work with leading economists, medical experts, and life care planners to ensure that all damages are meticulously calculated, from immediate medical costs to lifelong care needs for catastrophic brain injuries or permanent disabilities. “We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force accountability.”

• Dual Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides us with a unique understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual perspective is invaluable, especially when advising witnesses or former members who may face criminal exposure while seeking to contribute to a civil case. Our criminal defense experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) means we’re equipped to navigate both sides of the legal system.

• Unparalleled Investigative Depth: We investigate hazing cases like your child’s life depends on it—because it often does. Our network of experts includes digital forensics specialists (crucial for recovering deleted group chats and social media evidence), medical and psychological specialists (to document physical and emotional trauma), and economists. We know how to subpoena national fraternity records showing prior incidents and uncover university files through tenacious discovery and public records requests.

“We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face,” Ralph Manginello says. “Our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We balance empathy for your struggle with an aggressive pursuit of justice.”

Your Call to Action: Connect with Attorney911 Today

If you or your child has experienced hazing at any Texas campus – be it the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or any other institution – we want to hear from you. Families in Kaufman County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options without judgment, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family.

What to Expect in Your Free Consultation:

• We will listen to your story with compassion and without judgment.
• We will review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
• We will explain your legal options clearly: whether to pursue a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
• We will discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
• We will answer all your questions about legal fees, explaining our contingency fee basis – meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case (you can learn more about how contingency fees work in our video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).
• There is no pressure to hire us on the spot; we encourage you to take the time you need to decide what’s best for your family.
• Everything you tell us is kept strictly confidential.

Whether you’re in Kaufman County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Don’t let precious time and critical evidence disappear. Our video on common client mistakes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) emphasizes the importance of acting quickly.

Call Attorney911 today.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com