Hazing in Texas: A Guide for Oldham County Families on Campus Abuse, Law & Accountability

When your child leaves home for college, whether it’s to Texas A&M, UT Austin, UH, SMU, Baylor, or any other institution across our vast state, you hope for an environment where they can thrive, learn, and grow. You envision them making lifelong friends, exploring new ideas, and preparing for a bright future. What no parent ever imagines is their student being called at 3 AM for a secret meeting, forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol, enduring degrading acts, or suffering physical abuse—all in the name of “tradition” or “belonging.”

Imagine this scenario: A student from a close-knit community in Oldham County, known for its wide-open spaces and strong local values, heads off to a major university. Eager to make connections, they join a popular fraternity or another student organization. Late one night, after weeks of subtle psychological pressure, they’re whisked away to an off-campus house. There, under pressure from older members, they are forced to participate in a “pledge activity” involving excessive drinking. As the night progresses, the situation escalates. The student, now highly intoxicated, falls and hits their head, briefly losing consciousness. Other members, fearful of getting caught, hesitate to call for help, trying frantically to sober them up instead. The student feels a terrifying blend of loyalty, fear, and confusion—trapped between seeking help and betraying their new “brothers.” This isn’t an isolated incident; it’s a chillingly common pattern across Texas campuses, and it resonates deeply with families from communities like Oldham County who value safety and accountability.

This comprehensive guide is designed for families in Oldham County and across Texas who need to understand the complex and often hidden world of hazing. We will explore:

• What hazing truly looks like in 2025, far beyond mere pranks.
• The specific legal framework in Texas and federal laws designed to combat hazing.
• How major national hazing cases set crucial precedents for incidents in Texas.
• The realities of hazing incidents at major Texas universities, including the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University.
• The critical role of national fraternities and sororities, and their histories, in understanding local chapter behavior.
• The legal options and strategies available to victims and families in Oldham County and throughout the state.

We understand that hazing incidents can be deeply personal and traumatic. This article provides general information and insights, not specific legal advice. Every hazing situation is unique. The Manginello Law Firm is here to offer a confidential consultation to Oldham County families and individuals affected by hazing, evaluating the specific facts of their case. We serve families throughout Texas, bringing our expertise right to those who need it most.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Prioritize their health and safety above all else.
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, and DMs immediately. These digital records are often the most crucial evidence.
    • Photograph any visible injuries from multiple angles and over several days to show progression.
    • Save any physical items associated with the incident (clothing, receipts, paddles or props if available).
  • Write down everything while your memory is fresh: who was involved, what happened, when and where it took place.
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority or student organization directly. This can lead to evidence destruction or retaliation.
    • Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal advice.
    • Post details on public social media, as this can compromise your case.
    • Let your child delete messages or attempt to “clean up” any evidence.

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast as digital messages are deleted, physical objects are discarded, and witnesses are coached.
  • Universities and organizations often move quickly to control the narrative and conduct internal investigations that may not prioritize victim rights.
  • We can help preserve critical evidence, guide you through official reporting channels, and protect your student’s rights.
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation. We are ready to help families from Oldham County and across Texas navigate these urgent situations.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

The popular image of hazing—a little bit of horseplay or a harmless prank—is dangerously outdated. In 2025, hazing is far more insidious, sophisticated, and often brutal. It’s no longer confined to dimly lit basements but thrives in group chats, private retreats, and even public spaces, frequently disguised as “tradition” or “team-building.” Understanding modern hazing is the first step toward combating it and protecting our students.

Hazing, simply put, is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by one person or with others, against a student, for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members are primarily students. Critically, this act must endanger the mental or physical health or safety of a student. The key takeaway here is that “I agreed to it” is rarely a valid defense when there’s a power imbalance and intense peer pressure.

Main Categories of Hazing: Beyond the Stereotypes

Modern hazing tactics have evolved, often exploiting technology and psychological manipulation alongside traditional physical abuse:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains the most common and often deadliest form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking of excessive amounts of alcohol, often in rapid succession during “lineups,” drinking games, or designated “pledge nights.” Students may be pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, leading to alcohol poisoning, injury, or death. These events are frequently orchestrated by older members with little regard for the health of pledges.
• Physical Hazing: While some aspects persist from decades past, physical hazing today is often more extreme and hidden. It includes:
  • Paddling and Beatings: Though officially banned by nearly all national organizations, physical assaults including punches, kicks, slaps, and the use of wooden paddles still occur, often in secret.
  • Extreme Calisthenics and “Workouts”: Pledges are forced into grueling exercises, often to the point of exhaustion, injury, or rhabdomyolysis (a severe muscle breakdown). These are frequently called “smokings” or “conditioning.”
  • Sleep, Food, and Water Deprivation: Students are kept awake for days with mandatory activities, denied regular meals, or given insufficient water, leading to severe fatigue, dehydration, and impaired judgment.
  • Exposure to Dangerous Environments: This can involve forcing students into extreme cold or heat, abandoning them in remote locations, or making them swim while intoxicated.
• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This dehumanizing form of hazing targets a student’s dignity and self-worth. It includes:
  • Forced Nudity or Simulated Sexual Acts: Students are coerced into being partially or fully nude, or performing humiliating and sexually degrading acts like the “elephant walk” or “roasted pig” positions.
  • Degrading Costumes and Public Shaming: Pledges are forced to wear embarrassing outfits or perform humiliating stunts in public, often at the behest of older members.
  • Discriminatory Harassment: Acts with racial, sexist, homophobic, or other discriminatory overtones, including the use of slurs or role-playing stereotypes.
• Psychological Hazing: This often leaves invisible scars, involving intense mental and emotional abuse such as:
  • Verbal Abuse and Threats: Constant yelling, screaming, insults, personal attacks, and threats of social isolation or expulsion from the group if specific demands aren’t met.
  • Manipulation and Coercion: Creating a sense of fear, shame, or intense pressure to conform, often compelling students to act against their own values or ethical boundaries.
  • Isolation and Control: Limiting contact with family and non-member friends, constant surveillance, and demanding immediate responses to communications at all hours.
• Digital/Online Hazing: The advent of smartphones and social media has created new avenues for hazing, making it 24/7 and harder to escape. This includes:
  • Group Chat Coercion: Constant demands and tasks issued via GroupMe, WhatsApp, or other platforms, often in the middle of the night, with penalties for non-compliance.
  • Social Media Shaming: Forcing pledges to post embarrassing content online, participate in degrading “challenges,” or face online humiliation if they refuse.
  • Geolocation Tracking: Demanding pledges share their live location via apps like Find My Friends or Life360, turning their phones into instruments of constant surveillance.

Where Hazing Actually Happens: A Broader Problem

While fraternities and sororities often capture headlines, hazing is not limited to Greek life. It permeates a wide range of organizations across Texas and national campuses:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes those under Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and various multicultural Greek councils.
• Military Programs: Corps of Cadets, ROTC programs, and other military-style groups.
• Spirit Squads & Tradition Clubs: These groups, often deeply ingrained in campus culture, can be breeding grounds for dangerous “traditions.”
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to cheerleading and club sports, hazing can occur across collegiate athletics.
• Marching Bands & Performance Groups: Even organizations dedicated to the arts can fall prey to harmful initiation rituals.
• Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Any group with a hierarchical structure and initiation process can potentially engage in hazing.

The prevalence of hazing across such diverse organizations highlights a deeper societal issue rooted in power dynamics, tradition, and the unfortunate pursuit of belonging through harmful means. For Oldham County families, it means that any student, regardless of their chosen extracurricular activity, could potentially be at risk. Secrecy and a misguided sense of “loyalty” continue to enable these practices, even when organizations have clear anti-hazing policies on paper.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is crucial for victims and their families. In Texas, we have a specific framework designed to combat hazing, augmented by federal provisions that impact universities. The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC specializes in navigating these complex legal pathways.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas takes hazing seriously, defining it within the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. In plain language, this law states that hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, performed by a person alone or with others, on or off campus, directed against a student for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, pledging, or maintaining membership in an organization, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student. This can include physical abuse, forced consumption of alcohol or drugs, excessive exercise, or exposure to harsh environmental conditions that risk physical health. It also covers profound psychological harm such as extreme humiliation, intimidation, or social isolation.

Crucially for Oldham County families and students:

• Location Doesn’t Matter: Hazing can happen anywhere—on or off campus, at a fraternity house, a private retreat, or even in a remote area. The law still applies.
• “Reckless” is Enough: The law doesn’t require malicious intent. If someone acts carelessly, knowing there’s a risk of harm, that’s enough to qualify as hazing.
• Consent is Not a Defense: One of the most important provisions in Texas law is that consent by the victim is NOT a defense to prosecution for hazing. This means even if a student “agrees” to participate, it’s still illegal and actionable.

Texas law also outlines penalties and responsibilities:

• Criminal Penalties: Individuals who engage in hazing can face criminal charges. These can range from a Class B misdemeanor (for hazing that doesn’t cause serious injury, carrying potential jail time and fines) to a Class A misdemeanor if medical treatment is required. Most gravely, hazing can be elevated to a state jail felony if it results in serious bodily injury or death. Additionally, individuals who know about hazing and fail to report it can face misdemeanor charges, as can those who retaliate against someone for reporting hazing.
• Organizational Liability: Under Texas law, organizations can also be held criminally responsible for hazing. This occurs if the organization authorized or encouraged the hazing, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about it and failed to report it. Penalties for organizations can include fines up to $10,000 per violation and loss of university recognition.
• Good-Faith Reporter Protections: Texas law provides some immunity for individuals who report hazing incidents in good faith to university authorities or law enforcement. This aims to encourage reporting without fear of personal legal repercussions. Furthermore, in medical emergencies, Texas law (and many university policies) offer amnesty for students who call 911, even if underage drinking or other violations occurred.

It’s important to remember that this is a summary. The actual Texas Education Code provisions (e.g., § 37.151, § 37.152, § 37.153, § 37.154, § 37.155, § 37.156) are technical. An experienced hazing attorney can help you navigate the specifics.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, two distinct legal pathways can emerge, often operating simultaneously:

• Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state (Texas, in this context) through district attorneys or local prosecutors. The primary aim is punishment of individuals who violated the law, potentially leading to jail time, fines, or probation. Hazing-related criminal charges can involve the specific hazing statutes, but also overlap with broader laws such as furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, sexual assault, and even manslaughter or negligent homicide in fatal incidents.
• Civil Cases: These are initiated by victims or their surviving family members (plaintiffs). The goal here is monetary compensation for damages suffered and holding responsible parties accountable. Civil claims for hazing often revolve around theories of negligence (e.g., universities or fraternities negligently failing to supervise or enforce policies), gross negligence, wrongful death, premises liability (if the incident occurred on a property that was unsafe or improperly managed), and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

A crucial point for Oldham County families to understand is that a criminal conviction is NOT required to pursue a civil case. The standards of proof differ, and it’s possible for individuals or organizations to be held liable in a civil court even if no criminal charges are filed or stick.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond Texas state law, federal provisions add layers of oversight and accountability for colleges and universities:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation requires institutions of higher education that receive federal funding to be more transparent about hazing incidents. By approximately 2026, it will mandate that these colleges:
  • Publicly report all hazing violations and disciplinary actions.
  • Strengthen hazing education and prevention efforts.
  • Maintain accessible records of hazing data, similar to existing Clery Act reporting for other campus crimes. This increased transparency will be invaluable for families from Oldham County researching universities.
• Title IX and the Clery Act:
  • Title IX is a federal civil rights law prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded education programs. When hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based bullying, or creates a sexually hostile environment, Title IX obligations are triggered. This requires universities to investigate promptly and address such conduct.
  • The Clery Act mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents often involve actions that also qualify as Clery crimes, such as alcohol/drug offenses, assaults, or even sexual offenses. Universities must report these statistics, offering a glimpse into campus safety.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Identifying all potentially liable parties is a key part of building a strong civil hazing case. These typically include:

• Individual Students: Those who actively planned, executed, or even encouraged the hazing acts, supplied alcohol, or participated in cover-ups can be held personally liable.
• Local Chapter/Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself—if it operates as a legal entity—can be sued. Officers, “pledge educators,” or other leaders of the organization often bear heightened responsibility.
• National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which maintains policies, collects dues, and oversees local chapters, often faces liability. This liability frequently hinges on whether the national organization knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing (either at that specific chapter or across its system) and failed to intervene effectively.
• University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, or its governing regents, can be sued for negligence, gross negligence, or federal civil rights violations. Liability often turns on factors like prior warnings, the university’s enforcement of its own anti-hazing policies, and whether it demonstrated “deliberate indifference” to known risks. Public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin) may invoke sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist, especially for gross negligence or Title IX violations. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections.
• Third Parties: Other entities can sometimes be brought into a lawsuit, such as:
  • Owners of off-campus houses or event spaces where hazing occurred.
  • Providers of alcohol (bars, liquor stores) under dram shop laws if they illegally served minors who then caused injury.
  • Security companies or event organizers who failed to ensure safety.

Every hazing case has its own unique set of facts, and not every one of these parties will be liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney from The Manginello Law Firm can conduct a thorough investigation to identify all responsible parties and hold them accountable.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

To understand the severity and recurring nature of hazing, it’s essential to look at national incidents that have tragically shaped the legal landscape. These cases reveal patterns that empower Oldham County families and their legal teams when pursuing justice in Texas. They demonstrate that the issues encountered at Texas universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor are not isolated but part of a predictable, and preventable, cycle of abuse.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced alcohol consumption is consistently the deadliest form of hazing. The stories of these young men highlight how fraternity practices have repeatedly led to tragedy:

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most highly publicized cases, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after a “bid acceptance” initiation event where he was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. Security cameras within the Beta Theta Pi house captured his repeated falls down a flight of stairs and the prolonged delay of hours before fraternity brothers called for medical help. The incident led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the passing of the landmark Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, which significantly toughened penalties and reporting requirements. This case is a stark reminder for Oldham County families that hesitation to call 911 in a medical emergency dramatically worsens outcomes and increases legal liability.
• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): During a “Big Brother Night,” 20-year-old Andrew Coffey was given a handle of liquor by his designated “big brother” and died from acute alcohol poisoning. Multiple fraternity members were prosecuted, and FSU temporarily suspended all Greek life, leading to sweeping policy changes. Coffey’s death highlighted the tragic predictability of “formulaic” drinking rituals and their widespread danger.
• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, 18, died with a blood alcohol content of 0.495% after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game. Pledges were forced to drink heavily whenever they answered questions incorrectly. His death spurred Louisiana to enact the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute, and resulted in criminal convictions for culpable fraternity members. This case demonstrates that legislative change often follows sustained public outrage and clear proof of hazing’s lethal consequences. Max Gruver’s family later received a $6.1 million verdict in a civil suit, setting a powerful precedent.
• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): During a required “Big/Little” pledge event, 20-year-old Stone Foltz was forced to consume a full bottle of alcohol in approximately 20 minutes. He died days later from alcohol poisoning. The case led to multiple criminal convictions, including hazing-related charges, and a $10 million settlement for his family, split between the national Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity and Bowling Green State University (a public institution that settled for nearly $3 million). This tragic outcome underscored that universities, even public ones, face significant financial and reputational consequences for failures in oversight and enforcement of anti-hazing policies.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and psychologically brutal rituals continue to claim lives or cause catastrophic injuries:

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, 18, suffered a fatal brain injury during a remote “pledge retreat” in the Pocono Mountains. Blindfolded and wearing a heavy backpack, he was repeatedly tackled in a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual. Fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for hours, trying to cover up the incident. Multiple members were convicted, and landmark legal action saw the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity itself criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. This tragedy is a powerful example that hazing at off-campus “retreats” is equally, if not more, dangerous, and that national organizations are liable when their pattern of abuse goes unchecked.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it runs deep in athletics and other student organizations.

• Northwestern University Athletic Hazing Scandal (2023–2025): This incident exposed widespread alleged sexualized and racist hazing within Northwestern’s highly visible football program. Former players filed multiple lawsuits against the university and coaching staff, asserting that the hazing was pervasive and long-standing and included forced sexual acts. Head football coach Pat Fitzgerald was ultimately fired, then filed his own wrongful-termination suit before reaching a confidential settlement. This scandal broadened the national conversation, showing that hazing exists within major athletic programs and highlighting questions around institutional oversight and the “win-at-all-costs” culture.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies share chillingly similar themes that resonate deeply with Oldham County families considering an education for their children at Texas universities:

• Predictable Patterns: Forced drinking, brutal physical rituals, humiliation, and deliberate efforts to delay medical care or cover up incidents are recurrent motifs.
• Institutional Silence: Despite anti-hazing policies, a culture of secrecy and fear often prevails, delaying intervention until it’s too late.
• Accountability Through Litigation: Significant reforms, multi-million-dollar settlements, and even criminal prosecutions often only occur after tragedy strikes and victims’ families bravely pursue legal action.
• Precedent Setting: These cases collectively create a foundation of legal precedent that strengthens the arguments made in Texas courts, making it easier to hold fraternities, universities, and individuals accountable.

Texas families from Oldham County and across the state, whose children attend UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, are operating in a legal and cultural landscape profoundly shaped by these national lessons. Our firm leverages this national understanding to protect Texans.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For families in Oldham County, sending a child to college in Texas involves weighing many factors. While these institutions offer incredible opportunities, they are not immune to the pervasive problem of hazing. The Manginello Law Firm is here to provide specific insight into the hazing landscape at five of Texas’s major universities.

University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, a large, dynamic urban campus, combines a significant commuter population with growing residential life. Its diverse student body supports active Greek life and numerous student organizations. For Oldham County families, UH can be an attractive option, but like all large universities, it requires diligence regarding student safety.

• Campus & Culture Snapshot: UH is known for its strong academic programs and its vibrant, multicultural campus in the heart of Houston. Greek life is a central part of the social scene, with many fraternities and sororities from various councils (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, Multicultural Greek Council) actively recruiting on campus.
• Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels: UH strictly prohibits hazing both on and off campus. Their policy is comprehensive, banning forced alcohol/food/drug consumption, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, mental distress, and other exploitative behaviors related to initiation or membership. Students and families can report hazing to the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, அல்லது the UH Police Department (UHPD). UH, like other Texas public universities, publishes an annual report of hazing violations and disciplinary actions on its website, though the level of detail can vary.
• Selected Documented Incidents & Responses:
  • Pi Kappa Alpha (2016): One notable incident involved the UH chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike), where pledges allegedly suffered sleep, food, and water deprivation over several days. One student reportedly sustained a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface during a hazing activity. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and was suspended by the university, with several individuals also facing criminal charges.
  • Subsequent disciplinary actions at UH have seen other fraternities placed on probation or suspended for “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort” violations, which often include alcohol misuse and other policy breaches consistent with hazing.
• How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed: Given UH’s location in Houston, investigations into hazing incidents may involve the UHPD and/or the Houston Police Department, depending on where the hazing occurred. Civil lawsuits for incidents at UH would typically be filed in courts within Harris County, where Houston is located. Potential defendants could include the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the university itself, along with any property owners where the hazing took place. Families from Oldham County would find our Houston-based firm uniquely positioned to navigate these local legal landscapes.
• What UH Students & Parents Should Do:
  • Familiarize yourselves with UH’s specific anti-hazing policies and reporting mechanisms.
  • Document any suspicious behavior or incidents with timestamps and details.
  • If you suspect hazing, report it through the Dean of Students, UHPD, or confidential online forms.
  • For Oldham County parents, if your child expresses concern, listen without judgment and ensure their safety.
  • Consult with a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases to understand how past campus discipline and internal files can support a civil claim. The Manginello Law Firm, with our Houston office, is uniquely equipped to assist.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, located in College Station, is deeply rooted in tradition, pride, and a strong sense of community. Its unique culture includes a highly regarded Greek life system and the iconic Corps of Cadets. For many Oldham County families, Texas A&M represents a quintessential Texas college experience. However, beneath the surface of tradition, organizations at A&M have faced challenges with hazing in both Greek life and the Corps.

• Campus & Culture Snapshot: Texas A&M is renowned for its traditions, particularly its deeply ingrained military-style Corps of Cadets, which fosters strict discipline and a profound sense of camaraderie. Alongside this, a vibrant Greek life system thrives, comprising various fraternities and sororities. The Aggie spirit is palpable, but sometimes intense pressures to conform to “tradition” can blur lines into hazing.
• Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels: Texas A&M has robust anti-hazing policies applicable to all student organizations, including the Corps of Cadets and Greek life. It explicitly defines and prohibits hazing, stating that consent is not a defense. Reporting can be made through the Dean of Student Life, the Texas A&M Police Department (TAMU PD), or via the university’s anonymous reporting options. The university also publishes a list of alleged and confirmed hazing violations online.
• Selected Documented Incidents & Responses:
  • Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) (2021): Perhaps one of the most disturbing recent incidents involved the SAE chapter. Two pledges alleged being subjected to brutal hazing that included having industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The pledges subsequently sued the fraternity for $1 million, and the university suspended the chapter for two years.
  • Corps of Cadets (2023): A federal lawsuit was filed by a cadet who alleged degrading and explicit hazing within the Corps. The allegations included forced nudity, simulated sexual acts (being bound in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth), and other forms of physical and psychological abuse. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages, illustrating that both Greek life and the Corps can present similar hazing risks.
• How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed: Hazing investigations at Texas A&M would involve TAMU PD and the university’s Student Conduct office. Civil lawsuits would typically be heard in courts within Brazos County, where College Station is located. Cases can involve not only individual students and chapters but also the national fraternity/sorority, and potentially the university in its role overseeing the Corps or Greek life. For Oldham County families, we understand the distinctive cultural layers at A&M and how they might impact a case.
• What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do:
  • Oldham County families with students at A&M are encouraged to understand the unique intricacies of both Greek life and Corps culture.
  • Be diligent in observing for unusual changes in behavior or secrecy around “traditions.”
  • Promptly report any suspected hazing directly to the Dean of Student Life or TAMU PD.
  • For serious injuries, seek immediate medical attention and then contact an attorney experienced with Texas A&M hazing cases. Our firm knows how to navigate the institutional dynamics of College Station and Brazos County.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin stands as a flagship institution, drawing students from across Texas, including many bright young people from Oldham County seeking a top-tier education. UT has a massive and influential Greek system, alongside countless other student organizations. While the university has made efforts to increase transparency regarding hazing, incidents continue to occur.

• Campus & Culture Snapshot: UT Austin is a sprawling campus known for its vibrant academic life, competitive spirit, and rich social scene. Its Greek system is one of the largest and most influential in the state, with numerous IFC fraternities, Panhellenic sororities, and other councils fostering a dynamic social environment. However, this popularity can sometimes contribute to intense pressure to “fit in.”
• Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels: UT Austin maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that applies to all student organizations. The university publicly lists hazing violations and disciplinary actions on its website (hazing.utexas.edu), offering a level of transparency that is commendable but also reveals the ongoing challenge. Reports can be made to the Dean of Students, the UT Austin Police Department (UTPD), or through an anonymous reporting system.
• Selected Documented Incidents & Responses:
  • Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) (2023): The UT chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha was sanctioned after new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics—clearly crossing the line into hazing. The chapter was placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education. This specific incident illustrates that even with public reporting, chapters repeat known hazing behaviors.
  • Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) (January 2024): The UT Austin chapter of SAE faced another lawsuit (it was already under suspension from a previous hazing incident) after an Australian exchange student alleged he was brutally assaulted by fraternity members at a party, sustaining a dislocated leg, broken ligaments, a fractured tibia, and a broken nose. This case highlights the grave danger when hazing intertwines with violence and the repeated nature of violations for some organizations.
  • “Absolute Texxas” Spirit Group (2022): This incident proves hazing extends beyond Greek life. The spirit organization was disciplined for multiple hazing violations, including alcohol/drug misconduct, blindfolding, simulated kidnapping, and degrading new members.
• How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed: For hazing incidents at UT Austin, both UTPD and the Austin Police Department might be involved in investigations. Civil lawsuits would likely proceed in Travis County courts, given Austin’s location as the county seat. UT’s public hazing log can be a powerful tool for plaintiffs, demonstrating a pattern of institutional knowledge and prior warnings that can strengthen claims against the university and student organizations. For Oldham County families, our firm understands the nuances of the Austin legal and campus environment.
• What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do:
  • Oldham County families considering UT or with students already enrolled should regularly check UT’s dedicated hazing website (hazing.utexas.edu) for violation reports.
  • Be aware of the pressures associated with UT’s large Greek system and traditions.
  • If hazing occurs, ensure all digital evidence is preserved, as UT’s campus is digitally savvy.
  • Contact an attorney with specific experience in UT Austin hazing cases. Our firm knows how to leverage the university’s public records and navigate the Travis County court system.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a private institution located in Dallas, is known for its prestigious academics and a strong, often affluent, Greek life presence. For families from Oldham County and across Texas, SMU offers a distinct educational experience. However, like many universities with prominent social organizations, it has grappled with significant hazing issues.

• Campus & Culture Snapshot: SMU’s campus culture is characterized by its high-achieving student body and a very active Greek system that plays a central role in social life. The pressure to join certain fraternities or sororities can be intense, sometimes contributing to a culture where hazing, even if subtle, is normalized or implicitly tolerated.
• Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels: SMU maintains a strict anti-hazing policy applicable to all student organizations. As a private university, its transparency around specific incidents may differ from public institutions, but all hazing is prohibited. SMU encourages reporting through its Dean of Students office, the SMU Police Department, and anonymous reporting systems like “Real Response.”
• Selected Documented Incidents & Responses:
  • Kappa Alpha Order (2017): One of the prominent incidents involved the Kappa Alpha Order chapter at SMU. New members allegedly endured physical abuse, including paddling, forced excessive alcohol consumption, and severe sleep deprivation. The chapter was suspended and faced stringent restrictions on recruitment for several years. This incident underscores that deeply ingrained, violent hazing rituals persist even at private institutions with high social standing.
  • SMU has also faced investigations into other organizations over alcohol-related hazing and public nudity allegations, demonstrating a recurring struggle with these behaviors within its Greek system.
• How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed: As a private university, SMU’s internal investigative processes differ from public schools. Law enforcement involvement for hazing incidents would typically fall under the Dallas Police Department. Civil lawsuits against SMU, its fraternities, or individuals would be filed in courts within Dallas County. Our firm has experience navigating the specific legal challenges of private universities, which can involve complex issues of internal policies versus external civil liability. For Oldham County families, we understand the environment their students might encounter at SMU.
• What SMU Students & Parents Should Do:
  • Oldham County families with students attending SMU should be particularly vigilant given the social pressures of a strong Greek system and SMU’s historical hazing issues.
  • Document everything, even seemingly minor “traditions” that create discomfort or secrecy.
  • Remember that as a private institution, some details of SMU investigations may not be publicly available, making early legal consultation crucial to compel disclosure of information through discovery.
  • Contact an attorney with experience in private university hazing cases. Our firm knows how to effectively pursue claims in the Dallas County legal system.

Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, emphasizes its Christian mission and commitment to community. For Oldham County parents seeking a values-based education for their children, Baylor is a compelling choice. However, even with this strong moral foundation, Baylor has faced its share of controversies, particularly regarding institutional oversight (such as its well-publicized sexual assault scandal), which creates a critical lens through which to view its handling of hazing.

• Campus & Culture Snapshot: Baylor offers a vibrant campus life with a significant Greek presence and numerous other student organizations, all operating under the university’s faith-based principles. This environment ideally fosters good conduct, but like any institution, it faces challenges ensuring universal compliance with its high standards.
• Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels: Baylor University explicitly prohibits hazing in any form, aligning its policies with Texas law. The university states a “zero tolerance” approach and encourages reporting through its Student Conduct Administration, the Baylor Police Department (BUPD), or anonymous reporting lines. Baylor, too, publishes an annual hazing report, providing some transparency into confirmed violations.
• Selected Documented Incidents & Responses:
  • Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): A significant incident involved the Baylor baseball team, where an investigation led to the suspension of 14 players for hazing violations. The suspensions were staggered to minimize the impact on the team’s season, which raised questions from some about the severity of the institutional response. This case highlights that hazing is not confined to Greek life and can permeate competitive athletic programs.
  • Baylor has also addressed incidents within its Greek system, with some chapters receiving disciplinary actions for alcohol-related hazing and other policy violations.
• How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed: Hazing investigations at Baylor would primarily involve BUPD and the Student Conduct Administration. Civil lawsuits against Baylor, its student organizations, or individuals would be litigated in McLennan County courts in Waco. The specific challenges of pursuing claims against Baylor often involve navigating its private institution status and examining whether its “zero tolerance” policies are consistently and aggressively enforced. Oldham County families should be aware of Baylor’s institutional history concerning oversight.
• What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do:
  • Oldham County families supporting students at Baylor should clearly understand the university’s anti-hazing policies and its reporting structure.
  • Given Baylor’s background, scrutinize any reports of misconduct, and question whether institutional responses are truly robust.
  • Document any incidents thoroughly, realizing that in a private university context, robust legal action may be required to uncover all relevant facts.
  • An attorney experienced with private university hazing cases and the McLennan County legal system can provide invaluable guidance.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

Understanding why hazing persists requires looking beyond individual chapters and examining the historical patterns of their national organizations. For families in Oldham County, whose children might interact with Greek life at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, this connection is crucial.

Why National Histories Matter

The vast majority of fraternities and sororities at Texas universities are part of larger, national (or even international) organizations. These national headquarters:

• Create Policies and Risk Management Plans: They have extensive anti-hazing manuals and risk prevention policies, often developed in response to past tragedies and multi-million-dollar lawsuits across the country. They know the dangers of hazing.
• Oversee Chapters: Nationals collect dues, provide guidance to local chapters, offer training, and are supposed to enforce standards.
• Understand Patterns: They are keenly aware of the common hazing scripts – forced alcohol consumption, sleep deprivation, physical endurance tests, and humiliating rituals – because these patterns have recurred across their various chapters for decades.

When a local chapter in Texas (at UH, A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor) repeats a hazing practice that has already led to injury, death, or legal action at another chapter of the same national organization in another state, it creates a powerful legal argument of foreseeability. It means the national organization had prior knowledge of the risk and failed to prevent it in Texas. This significantly strengthens negligence claims and can open the door to arguments for punitive damages, which are designed to punish egregious conduct and deter future harm.

Organization Mapping: Connecting Local Chapters to National Patterns

While we cannot list every single chapter at every university, here’s an overview of some prominent national organizations present at Texas universities and their documented hazing histories, which can be critical for Oldham County families to consider:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): This fraternity is present at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor. Nationally, Pike has a tragic history of hazing. The Stone Foltz case at Bowling Green State University, where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink a whole bottle of liquor, resulted in a $10 million settlement and multiple criminal convictions. The David Bogenberger case at Northern Illinois University (2012) also involved alcohol poisoning during a Pike event and resulted in a $14 million settlement. These cases demonstrate a recurring pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): SAE has chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and SMU. Nationally, SAE has been involved in multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries. Notably, the Carson Starkey case at California Polytechnic State University (2008), where a pledge died of alcohol poisoning, led SAE to drastically alter its national pledge process (though hazing incidents persist). In Texas, SAE chapters have faced direct accusations:
  • Texas A&M University (2021): Previously mentioned, pledges alleged severe chemical burns from industrial cleaner poured on them during hazing, leading to a $1 million lawsuit and a two-year university suspension.
  • University of Texas at Austin (January 2024): The local chapter faced a lawsuit after an Australian exchange student alleged he was assaulted and sustained severe injuries during a party, highlighting ongoing safety concerns and previous hazing violations.
• Phi Delta Theta: Present at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor. The Maxwell “Max” Gruver case at LSU (2017), where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game, led to the Max Gruver Act (felony hazing law in Louisiana) and a $6.1 million verdict for the family. This case is a prime example of fatal alcohol hazing within the organization.
• Pi Kappa Phi: Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. Nationally, this fraternity was implicated in the Andrew Coffey death at Florida State University (2017) due to alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night,” leading to numerous prosecutions and an FSU “Greek life” suspension.
• Beta Theta Pi: Present at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. The tragic Timothy Piazza death at Penn State University (2017) after extreme alcohol consumption during a ritual led to one of the largest hazing prosecutions in U.S. history and civil litigation including confidential settlements.
• Kappa Alpha Order: This fraternity has a presence at Texas A&M and SMU. Its SMU chapter was notably suspended in 2017 after reports of paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation.
• Sigma Chi: Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. A relatively recent case at the College of Charleston (2024) resulted in a jury awarding a victim’s family more than $10 million in damages for physical beatings, forced consumption, and psychological torment. This indicates continued issues within the organization and underscores the potential for large verdicts.
• Omega Psi Phi: Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor. Nationally, incidents such as the Joseph Snell case at Bowie State University (1997) highlight physical abuse (severe beatings) resulting in a $375,000 verdict that was collected by seizing fraternity assets across state lines. The Rafeal Joseph federal lawsuit against Nu Eta chapter at University of Southern Mississippi (2023) alleged severe beatings and emergency surgery.
• Kappa Sigma: Present at UH, Texas A&M, and Baylor. The Chad Meredith case at the University of Miami (2001) resulted in a $12.6 million verdict after a pledge drowned. Closer to home, a Texas A&M University (2023) investigation alleged hazing resulting in severe injuries, including rhabdomyolysis from extreme physical hazing, leading to ongoing litigation.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

For Oldham County families seeking legal recourse, these national patterns are invaluable. Our firm utilizes this information to demonstrate:

• Foreseeability: These national organizations consistently had knowledge of the dangers associated with their “traditions” or the behaviors of their chapters.
• Pattern Evidence: The repeated nature of specific types of hazing (e.g., forced alcohol, severe physical abuse) shows a systemic issue, not just “rogue members.”
• Negligent Supervision: It can be argued that national organizations failed to adequately supervise and control their chapters despite repeated warnings.

This evidence significantly impacts settlement negotiations and potential punitive damages. It helps overcome the common defense that “this was an isolated incident” or “we couldn’t have known.” The Manginello Law Firm leverages this deep understanding of national and local Greek life histories to build formidable cases for Texas victims.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

When a student from Oldham County or anywhere in Texas is harmed by hazing, pursuing legal action is a complex but crucial step toward accountability and preventing future tragedies. The Manginello Law Firm approaches hazing litigation with an unparalleled depth of investigation and strategic planning.

Evidence

In today’s digital age, evidence in hazing cases is rapidly evolving. We meticulously gather and analyze every piece of available information:

• Digital Communications: This is often the most critical evidence. We look for group chat messages and direct messages (DMs) from platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Snapchat, Instagram, and even fraternity-specific apps. These messages can show planning, intent, specific orders, reactions to incidents, and cover-up attempts. Even supposedly “deleted” messages can sometimes be recovered through digital forensics. We advise immediate preservation through screenshots and backups.
• Photos & Videos: Any content filmed by members during hazing events, shared in group chats, or posted on social media provides powerful visual proof. We also look for security camera footage from houses, venues, or even Ring/doorbell cameras that might capture arrivals, departures, or specific activities.
• Internal Organization Documents: These can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, lists of “traditions,” emails or texts from officers giving instructions, and even national organization policies and training materials. These documents can reveal the institutional backing or knowledge of hazing practices.
• University Records: Through discovery and public records requests, we seek prior disciplinary records of the same chapter, incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, official communications regarding hazing, and annual Clery Act reports. These records help establish patterns and institutional knowledge.
• Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical documentation is essential. This includes emergency room reports, hospitalization records (especially for ICU or surgery), lab results (e.g., blood alcohol content, toxicology, or muscle enzymes for conditions like rhabdomyolysis), and long-term treatment plans. Equally important are psychological evaluations for PTSD, depression, anxiety, humiliation, and other emotional traumas, which are critical for documenting non-economic damages.
• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts are invaluable. This includes testimony from other pledges, current members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, and even bystanders. We also seek out former members who may have left the organization due to hazing, as their experiences can corroborate patterns of behavior.

Damages

The law aims to compensate victims and their families for the full scope of harm caused by hazing. These “damages” fall into several categories:

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs associated with physical injuries, from immediate emergency care and ambulance rides to surgeries, ongoing physical therapy, medications, and specialized care. For catastrophic injuries like traumatic brain injury (TBI), this can include a life care plan to cover decades of necessary medical and rehabilitative support.
• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes wages lost if a student (or a parent caring for them) was unable to work. More significantly, it covers the impact on a student’s future, such as missed semesters, loss of scholarships, delayed graduation, and reductions in future earning capacity if injuries lead to permanent disabilities or psychological barriers to advanced education or employment.
• Non-Economic Damages: These address the more subjective but profoundly impactful harms, including intense physical pain and suffering, severe emotional distress, trauma, humiliation, profound grief, and the loss of enjoyment of life. This can also include compensation for the psychological scars, such as PTSD, anxiety, or depression that often accompany hazing.
• Wrongful Death Damages (for families): In the most tragic cases, where hazing results in death, surviving family members (parents, spouses, children) can recover damages for funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and compensation for their own grief, loss of companionship, and emotional suffering.

It’s critical for Oldham County families to understand that we are describing categories of damages, not promising specific dollar amounts. Every case’s value is unique, determined by the severity of the harm, the strength of the evidence, and applicable Texas laws.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Holding powerful institutions accountable in hazing cases often means navigating complex insurance and corporate structures:

• National fraternities, universities, and even individual members typically carry various insurance policies. These policies are designed to cover negligence.
• However, insurers often try to argue that hazing or “intentional acts” are excluded from coverage, attempting to deny their duty to defend or pay out claims.
• The Manginello Law Firm’s expertise, including that of Lupe Peña, a former insurance defense attorney, is crucial here. We know how to:
  • Identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, including general liability, umbrella policies, and homeowners’ insurance for individual members.
  • Navigate complex policy language and aggressively challenge wrongful denials of coverage.
  • Argue that while hazing may be intentional, the failure to supervise, train, or prevent foreseeable harm by the institution or national organization is often negligent, which should be covered.

Our strategic approach ensures that all financially responsible parties are identified and engaged, maximizing the potential for meaningful recovery for victims and their families. We understand that fighting institutional defendants and their insurers is a battle, and we are prepared for it.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing strikes, families in Oldham County and across Texas are often left confused, devastated, and unsure where to turn. This section offers practical, actionable advice for parents, students, and witnesses, empowering them to respond effectively and safely.

For Parents

No parent wants to imagine their child experiencing hazing, but knowing the warning signs and what to do can make all the difference.

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to changes in your child’s physical and emotional well-being, such as:
  • Unexplained injuries: Bruises, burns, cuts, or repeated “accidents” that don’t add up.
  • Extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation: Constant exhaustion beyond normal college stress.
  • Drastic changes in mood: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, or withdrawal from family and friends.
  • Sudden secrecy: Your child becomes uncharacteristically secretive about their organization’s activities, often saying, “I can’t talk about it.”
  • Constant phone use: Obsessive monitoring of group chats, and anxiety when their phone pings, indicating constant demands.
  • Fear of “getting in trouble”: Expressing concern about disappointing older members or facing consequences for non-compliance.
• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy and without judgment. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going in the organization? Is anything making you uncomfortable?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priorities, far above any organizational affiliation. Assure them you will support them no matter what.
• If Your Child is Hurt:
  • Prioritize medical care: Get them immediate medical attention, even if they insist they’re “fine.” Their health comes first.
  • Document everything: Take photos of any injuries, save screenshots of texts or group chats they show you, and meticulously write down what they tell you, including dates, times, and names.
  • Save names and locations: Gather any information about who was involved and where the hazing occurred.
• Dealing with the University: Document every conversation with university administrators. Ask specific questions about prior incidents involving the same organization and what the school’s response was. Be aware that the university’s primary goal may be to protect the institution.
• When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or the organization is minimizing or covering up what happened, contact an experienced attorney like The Manginello Law Firm immediately. Do not delay.

For Students / Pledges

If you are a student from Oldham County, or anywhere in Texas, and you are questioning whether what you’re experiencing is hazing, please know you are not alone, and there is help available.

• Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself: Am I being forced or pressured to do something I don’t want to do? Would I do this if I had a real choice, free from social consequences or fear of being “cut”? Is this activity dangerous, humiliating, or illegal? If you answer yes to any of these, it’s likely hazing. Tradition should never involve risking your health, dignity, or safety.
• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: In hazing situations, “consent” is often illusory. The immense peer pressure, the desire to belong, and the fear of social exclusion create a coercive environment. Texas law explicitly states that a victim’s consent is not a defense against hazing charges. You are not “at fault” for being hazed.
• Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time. If you are in immediate danger, call 911. If you wish to de-pledge, notify the organization in writing (email/text) and inform a trusted adult outside the group (parent, RA, advisor). You can report hazing anonymously through your university’s channels or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline at 1-888-NOT-HAZE.
• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and Texas law provide amnesty or protection for students who report hazing or call for medical help in an emergency, even if they were consuming alcohol underage or were involved in the hazing themselves. Your safety is paramount.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once involved in hazing, either as a participant or an unwilling witness, and now want to make things right, your voice can be crucial.

• Acknowledge Guilt and Fear: It’s common to feel conflicted, guilty, or fearful of repercussions. However, your testimony can be vital in preventing future harm and holding those responsible accountable.
• Your Testimony Can Prevent Future Harm: Your experience and willingness to speak out can expose dangerous patterns and lead to institutional changes that save lives.
• Seek Legal Advice: While cooperating with authorities can be an important step, you may also benefit from legal counsel to understand your own rights and potential exposure. An attorney can help you navigate the process of providing information.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For families from Oldham County and across Texas, knowing what not to do is as important as knowing what to do after a hazing incident. These common mistakes can severely jeopardize a potential legal claim:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence. Parents’ desire to protect their child from “more trouble” often leads to the destruction of crucial evidence. Digital evidence, such as group chats and DMs, is often the most powerful proof of hazing. Instead, preserve everything immediately, even if it’s embarrassing.
2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly. This rarely yields positive results. Instead, it alerts the organization, leading them to destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defense. Document everything first, then consult with a lawyer before any direct confrontation.
3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms. Universities may pressure families to accept internal resolutions or sign waivers. These documents can inadvertently waive your legal rights to pursue a lawsuit or may offer settlements far below the true value of the case. Never sign anything from the university or any organization without having an attorney review it first.
4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer. While the desire for public awareness is understandable, any information shared publicly can be used by defense attorneys, potentially comprising your child’s credibility or waiving legal privileges. Document privately, and let your legal team strategize on public messaging if necessary.
5. Letting your child go back for “one last meeting.” After a hazing incident, organizations may try to pressure or intimidate the student into silence or extracting statements that could harm a future case. Once you are considering legal action, all communication with the organization should go through your lawyer.
6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it.” Universities conduct internal investigations, but their primary goal may be institutional protection, not victim compensation or full accountability. Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations can run out. Preserve evidence immediately and consult with a lawyer; waiting for the university’s internal process can be a costly mistake.
7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer. Adjusters for the fraternity or university’s insurance company may sound friendly but are trained to minimize payouts. Recorded statements can be used against you, and early settlement offers are almost always lowball. Politely decline to speak with any adjuster and advise them to contact your attorney.

Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its specific facts; contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  Yes, it can be. While hazing is typically a Class B misdemeanor, it becomes a state jail felony under Texas law if it causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.
• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Absolutely. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to prosecution for hazing. The law recognizes the immense power imbalance and coercive environment inherent in hazing.
• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  Generally, the statute of limitations in Texas is two years from the date of injury or death. However, complexities like the “discovery rule” or fraudulent concealment can sometimes extend this period. Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations are motivated to destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately. More detailed information can be found in our video on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c
• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national organizations can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and the foreseeability of off-campus hazing. Many significant hazing cases, such as the Pi Delta Psi death at a remote retreat, occurred off-campus and still resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments.
• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  Many hazing cases are resolved through confidential settlements before going to trial. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy and can work to ensure secrecy while still pursuing full accountability.
• “How much is my hazing case worth?”
  The value of a hazing case depends entirely on the specific facts, the severity of the injuries (physical and psychological), the long-term impact on the student’s life, and the identified liable parties. There is no average. An experienced attorney can provide a more accurate evaluation after thoroughly reviewing your specific circumstances.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces the devastating impact of hazing, you need more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand the complex dynamics of campus life, the institutional defenses of powerful universities and national fraternities, and how to effectively navigate the Texas legal system to win.

At The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we bring unparalleled expertise to hazing litigation. From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including those in Oldham County and the surrounding regional areas of the Texas Panhandle, understanding that hazing at Texas universities impacts students from every corner of our state.

Our firm’s unique qualifications are particularly suited to hazing cases:

• Insurance Insider Advantage (Lupe Peña): Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable inside knowledge to every case. As a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm, she knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and, more often, undervalue) hazing claims. She understands their delay tactics, coverage exclusion arguments, and settlement strategies because, as she puts it, “We know their playbook because we used to run it.” This insight is critical for maximizing recovery. You can learn more about Lupe’s background at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions (Ralph Manginello): Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, possesses extensive experience in complex litigation against well-funded defendants. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, demonstrating his capability to take on billion-dollar corporations. His federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their formidable defense teams. “We’ve taken on tough defendants and won. We know how to fight powerful institutions and hold them accountable.” Learn more about Ralph Manginello’s credentials at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death & Catastrophic Injury Experience: We possess a proven track record in securing multi-million dollar settlements and verdicts in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. We understand how to collaborate with economists and life care planners to value long-term care needs for brain injuries or other permanent disabilities, ensuring that short-sighted settlements are avoided. Our firm’s wrongful death experience is detailed at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.
• Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) gives our firm a unique edge. We understand how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, allowing us to advise witnesses and former members who may face dual exposure while ensuring victim rights are protected.
• Investigative Depth: We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does. We utilize a network of experts from digital forensics to medical specialists, economists, and psychologists. Our team has the experience to uncover hidden evidence, including recovering deleted group chats and social media content, subpoenaing national fraternity records, and compelling universities to release internal files through discovery or public records requests.

We understand that hazing cases are not just about legal technicalities; they are about profound personal tragedy. The emotional toll on families in Oldham County and across Texas can be immense. Our job is to listen with empathy, provide clear answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We are committed to thorough investigation and real accountability, not just quick settlements. We believe that securing justice not only compensates victims but also forces institutions to implement meaningful changes.

Get Answers. Get Justice. Contact Attorney911 Today.

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Oldham County and throughout the surrounding Texas Panhandle region have the right to answers, accountability, and justice.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm today for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to what happened without judgment, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

What to expect in your free consultation:

• We will listen to your story with compassion.
• We’ll review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
• We will clearly explain your legal options: pursuing a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
• We will discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
• We will answer your questions about costs. We work on a contingency fee basis, which means we don’t get paid unless we win your case. You can learn more about how contingency fees work in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc
• There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot—take the time you need to decide.
• Everything you tell us is strictly confidential.

Don’t let valuable evidence disappear, or allow institutions to control the narrative. The sooner you act, the stronger your case can be.

Call Attorney911 now for immediate assistance.

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – For consultation in Spanish, please contact Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com. Spanish legal services are available.

Whether you’re in Oldham County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com