Battling Hazing in Texas: A Comprehensive Guide for Randall County Families

The crisp Texas air crackles with excitement each fall as thousands of students embark on their college journeys, many hoping to find belonging in fraternities, sororities, athletic teams, or other campus organizations. Yet, beneath the surface of camaraderie and tradition, a darker shadow often lurks: hazing. It’s a risk that parents in Randall County, from the bustling heart of Amarillo to the quiet communities of Canyon, face as their children head off to universities across our great state.

Imagine this scenario: It’s “initiation night” at an off-campus fraternity house near a major Texas university. Your son, a bright-eyed freshman from Randall County, is being pressured to consume alcohol far beyond safe limits, or perhaps forced to endure physical abuse or execute degrading acts, all while older members film on their phones, chanting and laughing. As the night progresses, one student gets severely sick and collapses, but nobody wants to call 911 because they’re afraid of “getting the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble.” Your son feels trapped, caught between his desire for acceptance and his own safety.

This isn’t a scene from a movie; it’s a stark reality that unfolds far too often at Texas universities, affecting countless families, including those right here in Randall County. The pressure to conform, the secrecy, and the dangerous rituals can turn the college dream into a nightmare. Parents and students alike are left wondering: What exactly is hazing? What are our rights? And how can we hold those responsible accountable?

This comprehensive guide is designed to answer these critical questions for families in Randall County and across Texas. We’ll explore what modern hazing truly looks like, how Texas and federal laws address it, and what we can learn from major national cases. We’ll delve into incidents and patterns at key Texas institutions like the University of Houston, Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University. Most importantly, we’ll outline the legal options available to victims and their families. While this article provides general information, not specific legal advice, The Manginello Law Firm is here to evaluate individual cases based on their unique facts. We serve families throughout Texas, including Randall County, bringing our experience to bear wherever justice is needed.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Randall County families, understanding modern hazing is crucial, as it has evolved far beyond the stereotypical “dumb pranks” of the past. Today’s hazing is sophisticated, often hidden, and deeply psychological, exploiting social pressure and the desire for belonging. It’s any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. It’s vital to remember that a student verbally agreeing to participate, or saying “I agreed to it,” does not automatically make the activity safe or legal when significant peer pressure and power imbalances are at play.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

At its core, hazing is about control and manipulation, often disguised as “tradition” or “team-building.” It leverages a power differential between new members and existing members to normalize otherwise unacceptable behavior.

Main Categories of Hazing

Contemporary hazing tactics are diverse and insidious, often combining elements that create an inescapable web of physical and psychological torment.

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains one of the most dangerous and prevalent forms. It includes forced or coerced drinking, such as chugging challenges, “lineups” where members must rapidly consume alcohol, or games designed to promote extreme intoxication. Students may also be pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, putting their health and lives at grave risk.

• Physical Hazing: Beyond the outdated image of paddles, modern physical hazing encompasses extreme calisthenics or “workouts” far beyond normal conditioning, sleep deprivation that can span days, and restriction of food or water. Victims may be exposed to extreme cold or heat, or placed in dangerous environments without proper supervision.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This deeply degrading category includes forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (sometimes referred to as “roasted pig” positions), wearing humiliating costumes, or engaging in acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones. Such acts inflict profound psychological damage and violate personal dignity.

• Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but equally damaging, this involves verbal abuse, constant threats, social isolation, and manipulation. Public shaming, whether in person during “grilling” sessions or online through social media, can lead to severe emotional distress and long-lasting trauma.

• Digital/Online Hazing: With the ubiquity of smartphones and social media, hazing has moved into the digital realm. Group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Discord, and others are common. Pledges might be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos, or to track their location 24/7.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It’s crucial for Randall County families to understand that hazing is not confined to just one type of student organization. While often associated with Greek life, it pervades many corners of campus culture:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes those under Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and various multicultural Greek organizations.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: These groups, particularly at universities with strong military traditions like Texas A&M, can have deeply entrenched “traditions” that cross into hazing.
• Athletic Teams: Hazing incidents have been reported in football, basketball, baseball, cheerleading, and even club sports at all levels.
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Performance Groups: From marching bands to university spirit organizations, groups centered around campus traditions can often foster abusive practices.
• Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Even groups seemingly focused on positive endeavors can fall prey to hazing, especially during initiation or membership drives.

Social status, the allure of tradition, and an intense culture of secrecy combine to perpetuate these practices, even when organizations outwardly claim to be “hazing-free.” This makes recognizing and addressing hazing a complex challenge for parents and institutions alike.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For families in Randall County grappling with hazing, understanding the legal landscape in Texas is paramount. Both state and federal laws provide avenues for accountability, though they operate differently.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific, robust anti-hazing provisions outlined in the Texas Education Code. These laws broadly define hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

• Endangers the physical health or safety of a student (e.g., beating, forced exercise, forced consumption of alcohol/drugs).
• Or substantially affects the mental health or safety of a student (e.g., extreme humiliation, intimidation, psychological abuse).
• And occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

In plain English, if someone makes you do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a group, and they intended to do it or were reckless about the risk, that is hazing under Texas law. The law applies whether the act occurs on or off campus, so off-campus houses or retreats are not exempt. Crucially, as per Texas Education Code § 37.155, consent is not a defense to hazing; even if the victim “agreed,” it’s still hazing if it meets the definition.

Criminal Penalties for Hazing in Texas:

• Class B Misdemeanor: The default classification for hazing that doesn’t cause serious injury (up to 180 days in jail, fine up to $2,000).
• Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical treatment.
• State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This means that severe hazing can carry significant prison sentences for individuals involved.
  Additionally, Texas law makes it a misdemeanor to fail to report hazing if you are a member or officer who knew about it, and also a misdemeanor to retaliate against someone who reports hazing.

Organizational Liability:
Organizations themselves (fraternities, sororities, clubs, teams) can also face criminal prosecution if they authorized or encouraged the hazing, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about hazing and failed to report it. Penalties for organizations include fines of up to $10,000 per violation and can lead to the university revoking their recognition and banning them from campus. This is why legal action often targets organizations as well as individuals.

Reporter Protections:
Texas Education Code § 37.154 provides immunity from civil or criminal liability for individuals who in good faith report a hazing incident to university or law enforcement. Furthermore, in medical emergencies, Texas law often provides amnesty for students who call 911 for help, even if underage drinking or hazing was involved, encouraging timely medical intervention.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s important to distinguish between criminal and civil legal actions concerning hazing:

• Criminal Cases: These are brought by the State of Texas (a prosecutor) against individuals or organizations accused of violating hazing laws. The aim is punishment, which can include jail time, fines, or probation. Criminal charges related to hazing might also include furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in fatal instances.
• Civil Cases: These are initiated by victims or their surviving families against individuals and institutions responsible for the hazing. The primary goal is monetary compensation for damages and holding responsible parties accountable. Civil claims often involve negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

It’s crucial to understand that these two types of cases can run concurrently, and a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a successful civil lawsuit.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations also influence how universities must address hazing:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding must enhance their transparency regarding hazing incidents. By around 2026, institutions will be required to publicly report hazing incidents, strengthen prevention efforts, and maintain comprehensive public data on hazing occurrences. This aims to empower students and families, including those from Randall County, with more information.
• Title IX / Clery Act: When hazing involves sex discrimination, sexual harassment, or sexual assault, Title IX obligations—which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded education programs—are triggered. This means universities have a federal duty to investigate and address such misconduct. The Clery Act also requires colleges to report certain crimes and maintain crime statistics. Hazing incidents, particularly those involving assault, battery, or alcohol/drug offenses, often fall under Clery reporting requirements.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

In a civil hazing lawsuit, several parties can be held accountable, depending on the specific facts of the case:

• Individual Students: Those who planned, orchestrated, supplied alcohol, carried out the hazing acts, or participated in covering them up can all face personal liability.
• Local Chapter / Organization: The fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, if it operates as a legal entity, can be sued. This often extends to individuals acting in official capacities, such as chapter officers or “pledge educators.”
• National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which maintains policies, collects dues, and “supervises” local chapters, can be held liable. This liability often hinges on whether the national entity knew or should have known about hazing patterns, either at the specific chapter or as a recurring issue within the organization.
• University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself may be sued under various theories, including negligence, gross negligence, negligent supervision, or for violations of Title IX. Cases against universities often focus on whether the school had prior warnings, adequately enforced its policies, or displayed “deliberate indifference” to hazing.
• Third Parties: This can include landlords or property owners of off-campus houses or event spaces where hazing occurred, bars or alcohol providers (under dram shop laws if they served obviously intoxicated individuals), and even security companies or event organizers.

Every hazing case is unique, and the specific parties held liable will depend on the detailed facts and evidence uncovered during investigation. An experienced hazing attorney can help Randall County families navigate this complex web of potential defendants.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

While specific incidents may vary, national hazing cases reveal disturbing patterns that are critically important for families in Randall County to understand. These pivotal lawsuits and criminal prosecutions have not only brought justice to victims but have also shaped legal precedents and sparked legislative change across the country, profoundly influencing how hazing is approached in Texas courts.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The most tragic and common pattern involves forced or coerced alcohol consumption, leading to severe injury or death.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most widely publicized cases, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after a “bid acceptance” event where he was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol. Fraternity security cameras captured his multiple falls and the agonizing hours during which his “brothers” delayed calling for medical help. This horrific event led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the enactment of Pennsylvania’s stringent Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. The takeaway for Randall County parents is clear: extreme intoxication, delay in calling 911, and a culture of silence can be legally devastating for all involved.
• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): During a “Big Brother Night,” pledge Andrew Coffey was given a handle of liquor and forced to drink until he reached dangerous levels of intoxication, ultimately dying from alcohol poisoning. This incident resulted in criminal hazing charges against several members and prompted Florida State University to temporarily suspend all Greek life. This case, like many others, underscores how formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster.
• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver died from alcohol toxicity after participating in a coercive “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to drink heavily for incorrect answers. His death catalyzed the passage of the felony hazing law in Louisiana, known as the Max Gruver Act. This case highlights that legislative change often follows intense public outrage and clear proof of hazing’s devastating impact.
• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Another tragic pledge night saw Stone Foltz, also 20, forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey, leading to his death from alcohol poisoning. The aftermath included multiple criminal convictions for fraternity members. Critically, Bowling Green State University agreed to a nearly $3 million settlement with the family, in addition to further settlements with the national fraternity and individuals. This landmark case demonstrates that universities, alongside fraternities, can face significant financial and reputational consequences for hazing.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and ritualistic hazing can also lead to catastrophic outcomes.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng died from a traumatic brain injury suffered during a brutal blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual at a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. His “brothers” significantly delayed seeking medical care. Multiple members were convicted, and the national fraternity was ultimately banned from Pennsylvania for a decade. This case serves as a stark reminder that off-campus “retreats” can be just as dangerous, if not more so, than campus events, and national organizations can face severe sanctions for allowing such rituals.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing isn’t exclusive to Greek life; it also deeply affects athletic programs.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): This scandal unfolded as former football players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the prestigious football program over multiple years. The fallout included multiple lawsuits against Northwestern University and coaching staff, ultimately leading to the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald. While he later settled a wrongful-termination suit confidentially, this case profoundly illustrates that hazing extends far beyond Greek life, with big-money athletic programs often harboring systemic abuse and accountability challenges.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies share common, harrowing threads: forced drinking, humiliation, physical violence, deliberate delays in seeking medical care, and concerted efforts to cover up misconduct. Collectively, these stories demonstrate that meaningful reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements often come to fruition only after a tragedy has occurred and determined legal action is pursued.

For families in Randall County whose children attend or plan to attend UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, these national lessons are incredibly relevant. The landscape of hazing law and accountability in Texas is continually shaped by these precedents, emphasizing that you are not alone, and there is a path to justice.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For parents in Randall County, understanding the specific dynamics at Texas’s major universities is critical. While their children may attend schools across the state, the legal framework and common hazing patterns remain consistent. We’ll examine the situations at the University of Houston, Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University, providing insight into their cultures, policies, and notable incidents.

University of Houston (UH)

Students from Randall County often choose the University of Houston for its urban environment and diverse academic programs. For Houston-area families, UH is a pillar of the community, but like many large universities, it faces ongoing hazing challenges.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH is a large, dynamic urban campus with a significant mix of commuter and residential students. Its Greek life is notably active, encompassing various fraternities and sororities from collegiate Panhellenic, interfraternity, multicultural, and national Pan-Hellenic councils. Beyond Greek life, UH boasts a wide array of student organizations, including cultural, academic, and athletic groups. The bustling environment and diverse student body contribute to a vibrant campus life, but also present unique challenges for oversight and student safety.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, explicitly prohibiting hazing both on and off campus. Their policy covers a broad spectrum of behaviors, including forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and actions causing mental distress, especially when tied to initiation or membership. UH provides clear reporting channels through the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the UH Police Department (UHPD). The university also posts hazing statements and some disciplinary information on its website, aiming for transparency.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

One notable incident involved the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) fraternity in 2016. Pledges allegedly endured severe sleep, food, and water deprivation during a multi-day event. More alarmingly, one student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar hard surface. This incident led to misdemeanor hazing charges against individuals and a significant university suspension for the chapter. Other disciplinary actions at UH have involved various fraternities for behavior “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” often coupled with alcohol misuse and policy violations, resulting in suspensions or probation. These incidents highlight UH’s tendency to suspend chapters in response to serious violations, although public details on all such actions remain somewhat limited compared to other institutions.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Randall County families, a hazing case originating at UH would typically involve the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) if on campus, or the Houston Police Department (HPD) if off-campus. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in courts within Harris County, given UH’s location in Houston. Potential defendants could include the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the university itself, particularly if there’s evidence of negligence in oversight or policy enforcement. Property owners of off-campus venues where hazing occurred might also be included.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

• Report Immediately: If hazing is suspected, file a report with UH’s Dean of Students Office, UHPD, or use anonymous online reporting forms.
• Document Everything: Collect and preserve any evidence of prior complaints or past incidents involving the chapter or organization. This shows a pattern of behavior.
• Seek Legal Counsel: Given the urban environment and the complexities of litigating against a large university and national organization, talking to a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can be invaluable. Such an attorney can help uncover prior discipline, access internal files, and guide the family through the legal process.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M holds a special place in the hearts of many Texans, including those in Randall County, known for its deep traditions, strong alumni network, and the venerable Corps of Cadets. However, even within this culture of loyalty, hazing incidents have emerged, both within Greek life and the Corps.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M University in College Station is renowned for its unique traditions, especially strong within the Corps of Cadets, which fosters a military-style environment steeped in discipline and hierarchical structure. This culture, while promoting immense pride and loyalty, also inherently carries risks related to power dynamics and “tradition.” The university also boasts a large and active Greek system, alongside countless other student organizations that contribute to its distinctive campus identity.

5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M prohibits any hazing conduct that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of students for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. Their policies, like other Texas universities, extend to both on- and off-campus activities. Reporting is facilitated through the Division of Student Affairs, Student Conduct Office, and the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD). The university is also obligated to publish statistics through its annual Clery Act reports.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced significant hazing issues, often highlighting the interplay between Greek life and the Corps. In 2021, the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity was central to a high-profile lawsuit. Two pledges alleged they were subjected to a grueling hazing ritual where substances, including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, were poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The pledges sued the fraternity for $1 million, and the chapter was suspended by the university for two years.

In a separate, deeply troubling incident involving the Corps of Cadets (though specific legal details are often confidential), a cadet alleged degrading hazing, including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet reportedly sought over $1 million in damages, and A&M stated it had addressed the matter internally under its rules. These cases illuminate the challenges of enforcing anti-hazing policies within highly traditional and structured environments.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For families in Randall County, a hazing case originating at Texas A&M would involve the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) for on-campus incidents, or the College Station Police Department (CSPD) and, more broadly, Brazos County law enforcement for off-campus events. Civil claims would typically be filed in Brazos County courts. Cases involving the Corps of Cadets raise unique questions about the university’s direct oversight and liability compared to independent student organizations.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

• Understand the Culture: Be extremely vigilant about “traditions” within the Corps of Cadets and Greek life that might cross into hazing.
• Document Everything: If any “tradition” feels coercive or dangerous, document it with photos, videos, and detailed notes.
• Seek Outside Counsel: Due to the deeply ingrained traditions at Texas A&M and the potential for a strong institutional defense, consulting with a lawyer experienced in both Greek and Corps-related hazing is vital. These cases often require a nuanced understanding of internal hierarchies and unwritten rules that can hide persistent hazing practices.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

As the flagship university, UT Austin is a destination for many top students from Randall County and across Texas. Its large and diverse student body and robust Greek system mean that hazing remains a persistent concern despite the university’s efforts.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin is a vast, vibrant campus at the heart of the state capital, with a truly diverse student body and a highly influential Greek life system. Beyond its numerous fraternities and sororities, UT is home to a multitude of spirit organizations, academic clubs, and athletic teams, each contributing to its unique cultural tapestry. The university has a strong emphasis on tradition, which, while fostering community, also requires constant vigilance against hazing practices.

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UT Austin maintains a comprehensive anti-hazing policy that is explicitly communicated to all students and organizations. The university’s zero-tolerance stance prohibits any act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, on or off campus. UT is recognized for its high degree of transparency regarding hazing. It publishes a public Hazing Violations page on its website, detailing investigations, findings, sanctions, and educational mandates for organizations found in violation. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students Office, the Student Judicial Services, Title IX Office, and the UT Police Department (UTPD), along with anonymous online reporting options.

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT’s public Hazing Violations database provides valuable insights into the types of hazing occurring. For instance, in 2023, the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) fraternity was sanctioned after new members were reportedly directed to consume milk to excess and perform strenuous calisthenics, actions classified as hazing. The chapter was placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education. Other organizations, such as the Texas Wranglers and various spirit groups, have also faced discipline for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, sleep deprivation, blindfolding, and other punishment-based practices. This public record underscores UT’s commitment to documenting and sanctioning hazing, but also reflects the ongoing challenge of eradicating it entirely.

5.3.4 How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Randall County families, a hazing incident at UT might involve the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD) for campus-related matters, or the Austin Police Department (APD) and Travis County law enforcement for off-campus incidents. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in Travis County, the seat of UT Austin. The existence of UT’s public hazing log is particularly impactful for civil litigation, as it can be used to demonstrate patterns of misconduct and the university’s prior knowledge or awareness of an organization’s hazing history, thereby strengthening claims of institutional negligence.

5.3.5 What UT Students & Parents Should Do

• Consult the Hazing Violations Page: Families should regularly check UT’s public Hazing Violations webpage (hazing.utexas.edu) to understand the track record of organizations their students might join.
• Document and Report: If hazing is suspected, gather all possible evidence (photos, texts, witness accounts) and report it to the Dean of Students or UTPD.
• Leverage Prior Incidents: An experienced hazing attorney can utilize UT’s documented history of violations to build a stronger civil case, arguing foreseeability and a pattern of organizational failure, not just against the students but against the chapter and national organizations.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

SMU, located in Dallas, is a private university noted for its strong Greek presence and affluent student body. Students from Randall County who attend SMU will find a vibrant but sometimes challenging social landscape when it comes to hazing.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Southern Methodist University in Dallas is a prestigious private institution highly regarded for its academic programs and vibrant social scene. Greek life is a central component of student culture, with a significant percentage of students participating in fraternities and sororities from various councils. The university’s strong traditions, well-funded organizations, and close-knit community foster a unique campus environment that, like other institutions, must continuously guard against the misuse of peer influence and tradition.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU unequivocally prohibits hazing, articulating in its Student Code of Conduct that any act which causes or is likely to cause physical or mental harm or degradation for purposes of initiation or affiliation is strictly forbidden. This policy applies to all student organizations, on or off campus. SMU offers multiple avenues for reporting hazing, including the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and SMU Police. The university also utilizes anonymous reporting systems, such as Real Response, to encourage students to come forward without fear of retribution.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

One prominent incident involved the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity in 2017. Reports indicated that new members were subjected to paddling, forced excessive alcohol consumption, and severe sleep deprivation. The chapter faced suspension from the university, along with stringent restrictions on its recruiting activities for several years. This demonstrated SMU’s willingness to act decisively, although the details of such private university actions are often less publicly transparent than those at state institutions. Other internal investigations have led to various Greek organizations being placed on probation, receiving social restrictions, or undergoing mandatory educational sanctions.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Randall County families, a hazing case arising from SMU would involve the SMU Police Department for incidents on campus. For off-campus activities, the Dallas Police Department would have jurisdiction. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Dallas County. Suing a private university like SMU differs from a public one, as private institutions generally do not benefit from sovereign immunity protections. This can mean a more direct path to liability for negligence in oversight or failure to enforce hazing policies. Experienced attorneys can compel discovery of internal reports and disciplinary actions, even if they are not publicly posted.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

• Understand Private University Dynamics: Be aware that while SMU has strong policies, the transparency of disciplinary actions might be less public than at state universities.
• Utilize Anonymous Reporting: Encourage students to use anonymous reporting systems like Real Response if they fear retaliation.
• Engage Legal Counsel Early: Due to SMU’s private status, an attorney experienced in hazing litigation can more readily access internal university documents and past disciplinary records through the discovery process, which is crucial for building a strong case. This can help reveal patterns of conduct that the university may prefer to keep private.

Baylor University

Baylor, a private Christian university in Waco, draws students from Randall County and across the nation seeking a unique educational experience. While known for its values, Baylor has also grappled with serious issues of campus misconduct, including hazing.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University, located in Waco, is a private Christian institution with a strong emphasis on faith, service, and community. Its campus culture is distinct, blending academic rigor with a vibrant social scene where Greek life plays a significant role. The university prides itself on its values, but like any institution, it faces the complexities of student behavior, including hazing, which can challenge its foundational principles and oversight capabilities. Baylor’s history includes periods of intense scrutiny over its handling of various misconduct allegations, particularly related to athletics and Title IX.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor University maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that aligns with Texas law, prohibiting any act on or off campus that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for initiation, affiliation, or continuation of membership in any organization. The university enforces a clear “zero tolerance” stance against hazing. Reporting mechanisms are in place through the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct, Title IX Office, and Baylor University Police Department (BUPD).

5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor’s history with campus misconduct, particularly its large-scale Title IX and sexual assault scandal involving its football program, cast a long shadow over its institutional oversight capabilities. This backdrop often informs how hazing incidents are viewed and handled. In 2020, the Baylor baseball program faced a significant hazing investigation, resulting in the suspension of 14 players. These suspensions were staggered over the early season, indicating the seriousness of the findings. While specific details of the hazing were not widely publicized, such incidents underscore that even within Baylor’s values-driven environment, and particularly in athletic programs, hazing can occur. These events demonstrate the ongoing tension between an institution’s stated “zero tolerance” policies and the recurring reality of misconduct.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Randall County families, a hazing case at Baylor would involve the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) for on-campus incidents, or the Waco Police Department for off-campus events in McLennan County. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in McLennan County. As a private university, Baylor does not have sovereign immunity, which can simplify the legal path to holding the institution directly responsible for negligence in its oversight, supervision, or enforcement of anti-hazing policies. Past institutional challenges may influence how courts view the university’s response to misconduct.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

• Review Baylor’s History: Families should be aware of Baylor’s prior institutional challenges regarding student misconduct and how this might influence current oversight.
• Prioritize Safety and Reporting: Emphasize to students the non-negotiable importance of reporting any hazing behavior to the Dean of Students or BUPD, especially given Baylor’s “zero tolerance” policy.
• Engage Specialized Counsel: Given Baylor’s unique cultural context and its history of facing significant civil claims related to student safety, securing an attorney with expertise in holding private institutions accountable is paramount. Such counsel can effectively navigate the university’s internal processes and vigorously pursue external legal remedies.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For families in Randall County following the harrowing hazing headlines, it’s natural to wonder about the connections between a local fraternity or sorority chapter and its powerful national organization. The Manginello Law Firm understands that understanding these ties is vital. The hazing that occurs on campuses like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor is rarely isolated to a single, rogue chapter. Instead, it often reflects historical patterns within national organizations, which can significantly influence legal strategy.

Why National Histories Matter

The reality is that most fraternities and sororities active on Texas campuses, such as Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi, Kappa Sigma, and Beta Theta Pi, are chapters of vast national or international organizations. These national headquarters (HQs) are not merely advisory bodies; they typically:

• Maintain strict anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies, often developed precisely because of prior deaths, severe injuries, and multi-million-dollar lawsuits involving their chapters across the country.
• Are acutely aware of common hazing patterns within their own organizations, whether it’s specific “Big/Little” drinking rituals, forced calisthenics, or degrading historical practices.

When a Texas chapter repeats a dangerous “tradition” that has led to tragedy or legal action at another chapter in a different state, this establishes a powerful legal concept: foreseeability. It means the national organization knew, or should have known, that such hazing was likely to occur and posed a significant risk. This can strongly support claims of negligence or gross negligence against the national entity, potentially leading to substantial punitive damages. Such pattern evidence is critical for Randall County families seeking to hold the full chain of command accountable.

Organization Mapping: Connecting Local Chapters to National Patterns

While every chapter is distinct, certain national fraternities have unfortunately been implicated in multiple severe hazing incidents across the nation, establishing a concerning pattern. Here, we outline some of these organizations, many of which have chapters at the Texas universities discussed:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): Widely present at Texas universities, Pike has a tragic national history. The death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021 (due to forced alcohol consumption during a pledge night) and David Bogenberger’s death at Northern Illinois University in 2012 (also alcohol-related) highlight a pattern that can become foreseeable for the national organization. Pi Kappa Alpha chapters at UT and UH have also faced hazing allegations.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): SAE has faced immense scrutiny due to multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide over decades. This includes the tragic death of Carson Starkey at California Polytechnic State University in 2008. More recently, lawsuits include allegations of a traumatic brain injury at the University of Alabama (2023), and specific incidents at Texas A&M. In 2021, two pledges at Texas A&M sued the SAE chapter for $1 million after allegedly sustaining chemical burns from industrial-strength cleaner and other substances poured on them. In UT Austin in January 2024, an exchange student sued the SAE chapter for over $1 million following an alleged assault. These patterns demonstrate a national issue that frequently manifests in Texas chapters.
• Phi Delta Theta (Phi Delt): The death of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017 from extreme alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” hazing ritual is a chilling example of Phi Delta Theta’s national hazing challenges. Phi Delta Theta has chapters at many Texas universities, including UT, SMU, and Baylor.
• Pi Kappa Phi (PKP): The national organization faced immense pressure after the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017, who died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. PKP chapters exist across Texas, including at UH and Texas A&M.
• Beta Theta Pi (Beta): The catastrophic death of Timothy Piazza at Penn State University in 2017—where he suffered traumatic brain injuries during a hazing event with extreme alcohol consumption and delayed medical care—is a devastating part of Beta Theta Pi’s history. Beta chapters are present at UT, UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor.
• Kappa Sigma (KS): Kappa Sigma has also had multiple incidents, including the wrongful death verdict of $12.6 million awarded to the parents of Chad Meredith who drowned in Florida after being hazed by a chapter. More recently, allegations of hazing resulting in severe injuries (rhabdomyolysis) at Texas A&M University (2023) have led to ongoing litigation. Kappa Sigma has chapters at UT, UH, Texas A&M, and Baylor.
• Phi Gamma Delta (FIJI): The case of Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri in 2021, where excessive alcohol consumption during a hazing event left him with severe, permanent brain damage requiring 24/7 care, highlights the extreme risks associated with FIJI hazing.
• Alpha Phi Alpha (AΦΑ): This historically black fraternity, with chapters at UT, UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor, has faced allegations of physical hazing incidents leading to serious injuries in the past, including cases of paddling and even death, leading to national scrutiny.
• Omega Psi Phi (ΩΨΦ): Also a prominent NPHC fraternity with chapters at Texas universities, Omega Psi Phi has been implicated in hazing cases involving severe physical beatings, such as the federal lawsuit filed by Rafeal Joseph against the University of Southern Mississippi and the chapter in 2023.

These examples illustrate that specific hazing methods or a general culture of risky behavior can become deeply embedded within national organizations.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

For families in Randall County investigating hazing at a Texas university, these national patterns are crucial for legal strategy. They help demonstrate that:

• Foreseeability: Organizations had repeated warnings or knowledge of dangerous hazing methods.
• Institutional Negligence: National HQs may be found negligent if they failed to adequately monitor, train, or discipline chapters despite a known history of similar incidents.
• Insurance Coverage: Evidence of a national pattern of hazing can sometimes overcome insurance policy exclusions for “intentional acts,” arguing instead that the national organization’s negligent supervision led to the incident.
• Punitive Damages: In cases where there is clear evidence of reckless disregard for student safety, grounded in a history of similar incidents, the possibility of punitive damages (designed to punish and deter) may be strengthened.

By linking local incidents to a national history, The Manginello Law Firm works to ensure that all accountable parties, from the individual students to the powerful national organizations, face the consequences of their actions.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Pursuing a hazing lawsuit requires methodical investigation, deep legal expertise, and a comprehensive understanding of how to build a winning case. For Randall County families, this often means unraveling layers of secrecy and challenging powerful institutions. The Manginello Law Firm dedicates itself to meticulously collecting evidence, understanding the full scope of damages, and strategizing effectively to achieve justice.

Evidence

Modern hazing cases are often won or lost based on the quality and breadth of the evidence collected. This can largely be divided into several critical categories:

• Digital Communications: These are often the “smoking gun” in contemporary hazing cases. This includes messages from GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and any fraternity/sorority-specific apps. Even DMs on Instagram, Snapchat messages, or TikTok comments can provide crucial insights. Evidence spans active threads and, critically, recovered/deleted messages. Digital forensics experts can often retrieve messages that students attempted to erase, shedding light on planning, intent, and cover-up efforts.
• Photos & Videos: This invaluable category includes content filmed by members during hazing events, often for internal bragging or instruction. Footage shared in group chats, posted on social media (even if quickly deleted), or security camera/Ring doorbell footage from houses and venues can corroborate events.
• Internal Organization Documents: Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” lists, and emails or texts from officers giving instructions or making veiled threats about “what we’ll do to pledges” are all vital. National policies, risk management manuals, and training materials from the national organization can also be critical to show what they knew or should have known.
• University Records: These include prior conduct files, records of probation or suspension for the involved organization, letters of warning, and reports to campus police or student conduct offices. Public records requests (especially at state universities like UT, UH, and Texas A&M) can yield incident reports, and Clery Act disclosures can reveal patterns of campus crime.
• Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical records are essential. This includes emergency room and hospitalization records, surgery and rehabilitation notes, and especially toxicology reports if alcohol or drugs were involved. Beyond physical harm, psychological evaluations for conditions like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, or suicidality are crucial to document the mental trauma inflicted by hazing.
• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts are foundational. This includes testimony from other pledges, current members who break the code of silence, former members who quit or were expelled, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, and even bystanders. First responders and medical staff can also provide crucial observations from the immediate aftermath.

Damages

In plain English, “damages” refer to the various forms of compensation available to hazing victims and their families. These generally fall into economic and non-economic categories:

• Economic Damages: These are quantifiable financial losses.
  • Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers immediate care (ER visits, ICU stays, ambulance transport), ongoing treatments, surgeries, physical therapy, and medications. For victims with catastrophic injuries (like brain damage or organ failure), it can include the cost of long-term care and specialized rehabilitation.
  • Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: Compensation for missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed entry into the workforce, and, in severe cases, the reduced earning capacity if permanent injuries hinder a victim’s ability to work.
• Non-Economic Damages: These are subjective but legally recognized forms of suffering.
  • Physical Pain and Suffering: Compensation for the actual pain endured from injuries, as well as ongoing chronic pain or disabilities.
  • Emotional Distress, Trauma, and Humiliation: This addresses the severe psychological impact, such as PTSD, depression, anxiety, nightmares, intense feelings of shame, and the deep emotional scars left by hazing.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Compensates for the inability to engage in activities once enjoyed, damage to relationships, and the overall diminishment of life’s quality.
• Wrongful Death Damages: In the tragic event of a hazing death, families can seek compensation for:
  • Funeral and Burial Costs.
  • Loss of Companionship and Support: This grieves the loss of love, comfort, and potential financial contributions the deceased would have provided to their family.
  • Emotional Harm to Parents and Siblings: Acknowledges the immense grief and suffering endured by the family.

It’s important to understand that The Manginello Law Firm describes these types of damages based on legal precedent and our experience, but we never promise or predict specific dollar amounts. Every case calculation is unique and rigorously prepared.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

National fraternities, sororities, and universities often carry substantial insurance policies designed to protect them from liability. However, insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage for hazing incidents, arguing that such acts are “intentional” or “criminal” and thus fall under policy exclusions.

An experienced hazing attorney understands how to:

• Identify All Potential Coverage Sources: This includes not only the national organization’s general liability policies but also local chapter policies, individual homeowner’s policies of officers, and university umbrella policies.
• Navigate Exclusion Disputes: We challenge insurers who attempt to deny claims, arguing that even if the individual hazing acts were intentional, the liability of the national organization or university stems from their negligent supervision, failure to enforce policies, or prior knowledge — which may be covered.
• Force Accountability: Our firm, with Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney, knows the insurers’ strategies backward and forward. We are adept at pushing back against delay tactics and wrongful denials, ensuring that responsible parties and their insurers can’t evade accountability.

This complex interplay of defendants and insurance coverage requires specialized legal knowledge. The Manginello Law Firm’s background in complex litigation against well-funded corporations prepares us to effectively challenge these powerful institutions on behalf of Randall County families.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing impacts a family in Randall County, the immediate aftermath can be overwhelming. Knowing what to do, who to trust, and what mistakes to avoid can make all the difference. This section offers practical, actionable advice for parents, students, and witnesses.

For Parents

Parents are often the first line of defense against hazing, but they need to know what to look for and how to respond effectively.

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to both obvious and subtle changes in your child. Look for unexplained bruises, burns, or injuries (especially if explanations don’t add up). Notice extreme fatigue, sudden exhaustion, or constant sleep deprivation. Pay attention to drastic changes in mood, increased anxiety, social withdrawal, or irritability. A red flag is constant secret phone use for group chats and a palpable fear of missing “mandatory” events.
• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not judgment. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things going with your group? Is there anything that makes you uncomfortable?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are paramount, far above any organizational status, and assure them you will support them no matter what.
• If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize their physical and mental health. Get them medical attention immediately. Document everything meticulously: take photos of any injuries from multiple angles, save any texts or messages they show you, and write down details of what they tell you (who, what, when, where the incident occurred).
• Dealing with the University: Document every communication you have with university administrators. Specifically ask about prior incidents involving the same organization and what the school did (or didn’t do) in response. The university’s response or lack thereof can be critical for legal action.
• When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing what happened, it’s time to consult an attorney. Early legal counsel can help you navigate these complex situations.

For Students / Pledges

If you are a student in Randall County considering joining an organization, or if you are currently feeling pressured, these points are for you.

• Is This Hazing or Just “Tradition”? Ask yourself: Do I feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced? Am I being forced to drink or endure pain? Is this activity hidden from the public or administrators? If the answer is yes to any of these, it is likely hazing, regardless of what they call it.
• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Despite pressure to “volunteer,” your true consent is often invalid when there is a significant power imbalance, intense peer pressure, or fear of exclusion—all hallmarks of hazing. Texas law and courts recognize this coercion.
• Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the right to leave any situation that makes you uncomfortable or unsafe. If you are in immediate danger, call 911. For other situations, consider telling a trusted adult outside the organization first. You can report hazing privately or anonymously through campus channels (Dean of Students, Title IX Office, campus police) or anonymous tip lines like the National Anti-Hazing Hotline at 1-888-NOT-HAZE (1-888-668-4293).
• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and Texas law provide protections for students who call for help in an emergency, even if underage drinking or hazing was involved. Your safety is always the priority.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once part of a hazing incident, either as a participant or observer, and now carry regret or guilt, you have a crucial role to play in preventing future harm.

• Your decision to come forward can save lives and hold dangerous organizations accountable. While you might fear repercussions, your testimony and evidence are invaluable.
• An attorney can help you understand your legal options, advise you on potential personal liability, and guide you through the process of cooperating with investigations, ensuring your rights are protected.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Hazing Case

For Randall County families seeking justice, avoiding common missteps is just as important as taking the right actions. These mistakes can severely undermine your legal position:

1. Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence:

   • Mistake: Believing that deleting incriminating group chats or messages protects your child from trouble. It often looks like a cover-up, makes building a case nearly impossible, and can even constitute obstruction of justice.
   • Instead: Preserve everything immediately, even if it’s embarrassing. Use Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) for guidance on proper digital preservation.

2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly:

   • Mistake: Parents wanting to express their anger directly to the individuals or organization.
   • Instead: The organization will immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare defenses. Document everything, then contact an attorney before any confrontation.

3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms:

   • Mistake: Universities often pressure families to sign waivers or agree to internal “resolutions.”
   • Instead: You may waive your right to sue, and internal settlements are often far below the case’s true value. Never sign anything from the university or insurance company without legal review.

4. Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer:

   • Mistake: Wanting to raise awareness or vent frustration online.
   • Instead: Defense attorneys monitor social media, and inconsistencies can damage credibility. Moreover, public posts can unintentionally waive legal privileges. Document privately and let your lawyer guide public messaging.

5. Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting”:

   • Mistake: The organization may suggest a “talk” to understand the situation or ask them not to “do anything drastic.”
   • Instead: These meetings are often designed to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can later be used against you. Once considering legal action, all communication should go through your lawyer.

6. Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”:

   • Mistake: Trusting that the university’s internal investigation will bring full accountability.
   • Instead: Evidence disappears rapidly, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations continues to run. University processes are aimed at internal discipline, not necessarily compensating victims or preventing future incidents. Consult a lawyer immediately.

7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer:

   • Mistake: Adjusters may seem friendly and claim they just need a “statement to process the claim.”
   • Instead: Recorded statements or early conversations can be used against you, and initial settlement offers are often lowball. Politely decline to speak with them and refer them to your attorney. Watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY to understand more.

Short FAQ

Q: Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?
A: Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) have some sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on facts, so contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for case-specific analysis.

Q: Is hazing a felony in Texas?
A: It can be. Texas law classifies basic hazing as a Class B misdemeanor, but it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals, including officers of organizations, can also face charges for failing to report hazing.

Q: Can my child bring a case if they “agreed” to the initiation?
A: Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “consent” given under peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.

Q: How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?
A: In Texas, the general statute of limitations is 2 years from the date of injury or death. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute might be tolled (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and organizations destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately. Learn more about Texas statute of limitations in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

Q: What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?
A: The location of the hazing does not necessarily eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held liable based on sponsorship, control, knowledge, and foreseeability. Many major hazing cases that resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments in other states occurred off-campus.

Q: Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?
A: Most hazing cases settle confidentially before ever going to trial. We can request sealed court records and aim for confidential settlement terms to protect your family’s privacy while still pursuing accountability.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces the devastating impact of a hazing incident, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who intimately understand how powerful institutions—universities, national fraternities, and their insurance companies—fight back, and how to effectively navigate that complex battle. The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, is uniquely positioned to represent Randall County families through these challenges.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Randall County and surrounding areas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities can impact any family, even those whose children attend schools far from home. Our firm is built on a foundation of deep expertise in serious injury, wrongful death, and institutional accountability cases.

Why Attorney911 for Hazing Cases?

Our firm brings distinctive strengths that are crucial for effectively litigating hazing cases:

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable insight from her former career as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. This means we know precisely how fraternity and university insurance companies operate, how they value (and often undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, coverage exclusion arguments, and settlement strategies. We understand their playbook because we used to run it. Lupe Peña’s complete credentials and background are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, has extensive experience in complex federal court litigation, including being one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation. This background means we are not intimidated by taking on national fraternities, large universities, or their formidable defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won significant results; we know how to fight powerful defendants and hold them accountable. Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials are detailed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Our firm doesn’t settle cheap. We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases, working with economists to value loss of life and catastrophic injuries. We understand how to calculate damages for lifetime care needs and diminished earning capacity, building cases designed to force true accountability. Our wrongful death practice is detailed at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.
• Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) gives our firm a critical understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual perspective is invaluable, allowing us to advise not only victims but also witnesses or former members who may face criminal exposure. Our criminal defense experience is critical in these multifaceted cases, as outlined on our criminal defense lawyers page: https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.
• Investigative Depth: We pursue justice with unparalleled investigative rigor. Our firm utilizes a network of experts, including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, economists, and psychologists. We are adept at uncovering hidden evidence, from deleted group chats and social media content to subpoenaed national fraternity records and university files. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it often does.

We understand that hazing cases are not just about legal technicalities; they are deeply personal tragedies. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face, whether your child attends a huge state school or a smaller private campus. Our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We focus on thorough investigation and real accountability, not quick settlements.

You Don’t Have to Face This Alone: Contact Attorney911 Today

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s one of the major universities or a smaller institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Randall County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

The Manginello Law Firm offers a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward without any pressure.

What to expect in your free consultation:

• We will listen to your story with empathy and without judgment.
• We will review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
• We will explain your legal options, including reporting the incident criminally, pursuing a civil lawsuit, or both, or neither.
• We will discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
• We will answer your questions about legal fees, explaining our contingency fee basis – we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Watch our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
• There is no pressure to hire us on the spot; we encourage you to take the time you need to decide.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm today:

• Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email Ralph Manginello: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – Servicios legales en español disponibles. Contact Lupe Peña directly for a consultation in Spanish at lupe@atty911.com.

Reading this article does not create an attorney–client relationship. Every case is unique, and we cannot guarantee specific outcomes. However, an experienced attorney can review your specific facts, explain your rights under Texas law, and help you understand your options. Whether you’re in Randall County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com