Understanding Hazing in Texas: A Guide for Families in City of El Lago

The flickering screen cast a blue glow on the worried faces of parents in City of El Lago. Their son, a freshman at a prominent Texas university they wouldn’t name, had called just minutes ago, his voice strained. He’d gone to an off-campus “initiation event” for a club, not even a fraternity, and things had gotten out of hand. Forced chants, endless push-ups in the dark, and then the drinking. He’d watched a peer collapse, violently ill, but no one dared call for help, fearing “getting the club shut down.” He felt trapped, disillusioned, and profoundly scared. As the call ended, leaving them with a chilling silence, they found themselves asking: Is this hazing? What do we do now?

This scenario isn’t isolated. Across Texas, from the bustling campuses of Houston to the collegiate towns of College Station, Austin, Dallas, and Waco, families grapple with the shadow of hazing. For residents of City of El Lago, a serene community nestled in Harris County, sending a child off to university often comes with dreams of academic success and personal growth. The last thing any family expects is for that dream to turn into a nightmare of abuse and coercion.

This comprehensive guide is designed for families in City of El Lago, across Harris County, and throughout Texas, who need to understand the complex world of hazing. We will explore what hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated stereotypes to reveal its modern, often insidious forms. We’ll delve into how Texas and federal laws address hazing, examining crucial legal frameworks that protect victims. By analyzing major national cases, we’ll draw parallels to incidents that can and do occur at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), Baylor University, and other Texas institutions where students from City of El Lago pursue their education. Most importantly, we will outline the legal options available to victims and their families in City of El Lago and across our great state, providing a roadmap for seeking justice and accountability.

Please remember, this article offers general information and insights, not specific legal advice. Every hazing incident is unique, and its legal standing requires careful evaluation of individual facts. The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, is dedicated to evaluating individual cases and stands ready to serve families throughout Texas, including our neighbors in City of El Lago and the wider Houston metropolitan area.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies.
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911).
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Prioritize their health and safety.
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, and direct messages (DMs) immediately.
    • Photograph any visible injuries from multiple angles and over time to show progression.
    • Save any physical items related to the hazing (clothing, receipts for forced purchases, objects used in rituals).
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh: who was involved, what exactly happened, when and where it took place, and any witnesses.
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly, as this may lead to evidence destruction or manipulation.
    • Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal counsel.
    • Post details about the incident on public social media, which could compromise your case.
    • Allow your child to delete messages or “clean up” any evidence.

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast—deleted group chats, destroyed property, coached witnesses.
  • Universities often move quickly to control the narrative and internal investigations.
  • We can help preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s rights from the outset.
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate, confidential consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For many, the word “hazing” brings to mind Hollywood depictions of mischievous pranks or demanding physical challenges, easily dismissed as “boys being boys” or harmless college traditions. However, the reality of hazing in 2025—especially at Texas universities where students from City of El Lago may attend—is far darker and more complex. It’s often covert, deeply psychological, and carries severe risks of physical and mental harm. We’ve seen these patterns repeatedly, confirming that “I agreed to it” does not automatically make such conduct safe or legal when peer pressure and power imbalances are at play.

Hazing can be defined as any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action or activity connected to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status in a group. Critically, these actions endanger physical or mental health, humiliate, or exploit an individual.

Main Categories of Modern Hazing

Today’s hazing tactics fall into several dangerous categories, often escalating in severity:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains the most prevalent and deadly form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking of excessive amounts of alcohol, often in rapid succession. Examples include “chugging challenges,” “lineups” where pledges consume multiple drinks quickly, or games designed to ensure high levels of intoxication. Students are also pressured to consume unknown substances or illicit drugs. The goal is often to incapacitate pledges, making them more vulnerable to other forms of abuse.
• Physical Hazing: This category spans from traditional forms of abuse to extreme endurance tests. It includes explicit physical violence like paddling and beatings; forced calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” that push individuals far beyond safe limits; and forms of deprivation such as extreme sleep, food, or water restriction. Exposure to extreme cold or heat, or forcing individuals into dangerous environments, also falls under physical hazing.
• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts are designed to degrade and strip individuals of their dignity. They include forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (often grotesquely staged and demeaning), and the use of degrading costumes. Some forms of hazing also involve racist, homophobic, or sexist overtones, using slurs or forcing individuals into demeaning role-plays based on their identity.
• Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked, psychological hazing inflicts profound and lasting trauma. This can involve verbal abuse, relentless threats, and social isolation designed to break down an individual’s self-esteem. Manipulation, forced confessions, and public shaming—whether in person, on social media, or within group meetings—are common tactics that create a hostile and deeply distressing environment.
• Digital/Online Hazing: With the ubiquity of smartphones and social media, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation orchestrated via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Discord. Victims may be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos, respond instantly to midnight directives, or engage in digital surveillance (e.g., forced location-sharing). This constant digital pressure can lead to severe sleep deprivation and heightened anxiety.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It’s a common misconception that hazing is limited to Greek letter organizations. In truth, hazing is a pervasive issue across a wide spectrum of student groups at Texas universities. For City of El Lago families considering where their children might encounter such behavior, it’s vital to recognize its broad scope:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes social Greek letter organizations (Interfraternity Council – IFC, Panhellenic Council), historically Black Greek letter fraternities and sororities (National Pan-Hellenic Council – NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: At institutions like Texas A&M, these tradition-rich organizations can sometimes be environments where hazing, disguised as “discipline” or “bonding,” takes place.
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Student Groups: Organizations like the Texas Cowboys at UT Austin or other campus spirit groups have faced accusations or sanctions for hazing.
• Athletic Teams: From varsity football, basketball, and baseball to cheerleading squads, hazing in sports includes both physical challenges and psychological abuse, often under the guise of “team building.”
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups can foster environments of coercion and abuse.
• Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: While less common, some of these groups can also fall prey to power dynamics that lead to hazing behaviors.

The persistence of hazing, even with widespread awareness and strict anti-hazing policies, stems from a toxic brew of social status, tradition, and secrecy. The desire to belong, to uphold perceived historical rituals, and a pervasive code of silence—where members fear bringing shame to their group or facing retaliation—allows these dangerous practices to continue. This insidious culture makes it notoriously difficult for universities and law enforcement to intervene effectively without direct reports and strong evidence.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is crucial for families in City of El Lago and across Texas. Texas has specific laws designed to combat hazing, and federal regulations also play a significant role. These legal frameworks aim to deter harmful practices, punish offenders, and provide avenues for victims to seek justice and compensation.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas stands as one of many states with specific anti-hazing legislation embedded within its Education Code (Chapter 37, Subchapter F). Our firm often refers to these statutes when counseling clients. In plain language, Texas law defines hazing broadly as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed on or off campus, by one person or with others, directed against a student. This act must:

• Endanger the mental or physical health or safety of a student, whether through physical means (e.g., beating, forced exercise, forced consumption of alcohol or drugs) or by substantially affecting mental well-being (e.g., extreme humiliation, intimidation, psychological manipulation).
• Occur for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

Key points of Texas Hazing Law:

• Location is irrelevant: The law applies whether the hazing occurs on or off campus.
• Intent vs. Recklessness: The act doesn’t require malicious intent; “reckless” behavior—meaning the offender knew or should have known of a substantial risk of harm and disregarded it—is sufficient for prosecution.
• “Consent” is Explicitly Not a Defense: One of the most critical aspects of Texas law, specifically § 37.155, states that it is explicitly not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the activity. This recognizes the inherent power imbalance and coercive nature of hazing.

Criminal Penalties for Hazing in Texas:

Texas law outlines significant penalties for hazing violations:

• Class B Misdemeanor (Default): For hazing that does not result in serious injury (up to 180 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $2,000 for individuals).
• Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes physical injury requiring medical treatment.
• State Jail Felony: Critically, if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, the offense is elevated to a State Jail Felony. This carries more significant prison time and fines.

Texas law also imposes criminal liability for failing to report hazing (a misdemeanor for officers or members of an organization who know about hazing and fail to report it) and for retaliating against someone who reports hazing (also a misdemeanor).

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s essential to understand the distinction between criminal and civil legal actions, as both can arise from hazing incidents:

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations accused of violating criminal statutes. The primary aim is punishment—such as jail time, fines, or probation. In hazing contexts, criminal charges can include the hazing offenses outlined above, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, and even negligent homicide or manslaughter in fatal cases.
• Civil Cases: These are brought by victims or their surviving families against those responsible for the hazing. The goal is to seek monetary compensation for damages suffered and to hold individuals and institutions accountable. Civil claims often involve theories of negligence (failure to exercise reasonable care), gross negligence (conscious indifference to others’ safety), wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, premises liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

It’s important to note that a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil case. Both types of proceedings can occur concurrently, and the outcome of one does not automatically dictate the outcome of the other.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery Act

Beyond Texas state laws, federal regulations also impact how universities manage and respond to hazing:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funds must become more transparent and proactive in addressing hazing. Key requirements, to be phased in by approximately 2026, include:
  • Enhanced Reporting: Institutions must publicly report all hazing incidents, including details about the organizations involved and the sanctions imposed.
  • Prevention Measures: Schools must implement and strengthen hazing education and prevention programs.
  • Public Data: Universities will be required to maintain and disclose public data on hazing incidents, increasing accountability and providing valuable information to prospective students and families.
• Title IX & Clery Act: When hazing incidents involve sexual harassment, sexual assault, or create a hostile environment based on gender, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 is triggered. This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education and requires schools to investigate and respond appropriately. Additionally, the Clery Act mandates that colleges and universities disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents involving assaults, alcohol-related offenses, or other crimes must be reported under Clery, contributing to campus safety statistics and requiring transparent crime logs.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

In a civil hazing lawsuit in Texas, multiple parties may be held liable, reflecting the complex web of responsibility in campus life. For families in City of El Lago, understanding these potential defendants is key to pursuing comprehensive accountability:

• Individual Students: Those directly involved in planning, coercing, supplying illicit substances, carrying out the hazing acts, or engaging in cover-ups can be held personally liable. This includes officers and “pledge educators” who orchestrate the events.
• Local Chapter / Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or athletic team itself can be sued if it is a recognized legal entity. This extends to its officers and key members who act in an official capacity.
• National Fraternity / Sorority: The national headquarters, which sets policies, collects dues, and (theoretically) supervises its chapters, can be held liable. This often hinges on whether the national organization knew or should have known about prior hazing incidents, had a pattern of similar violations across chapters, or failed to adequately enforce its anti-hazing policies and risk management guidelines.
• University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, including its administration, trustees, or regents, can be sued under various legal theories, such as:
  • Negligence/Gross Negligence: For failing to properly supervise student organizations, ignoring warning signs, or inadequately responding to hazing reports.
  • Failure to Protect: If the university had a duty to protect students from foreseeable harm.
  • Title IX Violations: If the hazing involved sexual harassment or assault and the university’s response was “deliberately indifferent.”
  • Public universities, such as the University of Houston, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, may assert sovereign immunity (a protection from lawsuits for government entities), but exceptions exist under Texas law for cases involving gross negligence or when suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor generally have fewer immunity defenses.
• Third Parties: Other entities can also be implicated, including:
  • Property Owners: Landlords or owners of off-campus houses or event spaces where hazing occurred if they knew or should have known about dangerous activities.
  • Alcohol Providers: Bars, liquor stores, or individuals who knowingly furnished alcohol to minors involved in hazing (under “dram shop” laws).
  • Security Companies or Event Organizers: If their negligence contributed to the hazing.

It’s crucial to remember that not every party is liable in every situation. The full scope of liability in a hazing case is always fact-specific—requiring a meticulous investigation and experienced legal analysis to determine the responsible parties.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

When a hazing tragedy strikes a family in City of El Lago, it’s natural to feel isolated and overwhelmed. However, these devastating incidents reveal common threads across U.S. college campuses. Many major cases, while occurring outside Texas, set critical legal precedents and highlight dangerous patterns that directly inform how our firm approaches hazing litigation on behalf of Texas families. These stories underscore the profound impact of hazing and the determined fight for justice by victims and their loved ones.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The most common and lethal form of hazing involves forced alcohol consumption. These cases often involve similar scenarios: young pledges pressured to drink to dangerous levels, followed by delayed medical attention and tragic outcomes.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most high-profile hazing deaths, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after a “bid acceptance” event. Fraternity brothers forced him to consume extreme amounts of alcohol, leading to multiple falls captured on chapter security cameras. Despite his obvious distress and severe injuries, members delayed calling 911 for hours, terrified of consequences. The tragic outcome led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the powerful Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania. This case serves as a stark reminder of how extreme intoxication, a callous delay in seeking emergency medical help, and a pervasive culture of silence can lead to devastating legal and human costs.
• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, 20, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given bottles of liquor, forced to perform tasks, and encouraged to drink heavily. Coffey’s death sparked criminal hazing charges against some members. Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life operations, instigating a comprehensive overhaul of its policies. This tragic example highlights how formulaic “tradition” driven drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster within Greek life.
• Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, 18, died after a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to drink heavily whenever they answered a question incorrectly. His blood alcohol content (BAC) was found to be a staggering 0.495%. Gruver’s death led to the enactment of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, which upgraded hazing to a felony with serious penalties. This case powerfully demonstrates how public outrage and clear evidence of hazing can directly lead to legislative change and increased legal accountability.
• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): During a “Big/Little” night, 20-year-old Stone Foltz was allegedly forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey. He later died from alcohol poisoning. Multiple criminal convictions followed for fraternity members involved in the incident. Furthermore, Bowling Green State University (a public institution) agreed to a nearly $3 million settlement with the family, alongside other settlements with the national fraternity and individuals. The Foltz case underscores that universities, even public ones, can face significant financial and reputational consequences for hazing, alongside the offending organizations.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and psychologically brutal rituals are a recurring theme in hazing.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College / Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, 19, died after a brutal hazing ritual at a fraternity retreat in Pennsylvania. Blindfolded, weighted down with a backpack, and repeatedly tackled in a game called “glass ceiling,” Deng suffered a fatal traumatic brain injury. Fraternity members delayed calling 911 and tried to cover up the incident. Multiple members were convicted, and in a landmark decision, the national fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, ultimately being banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. This case critically confirmed that off-campus “retreats” can be as dangerous, if not more so, than on-campus events, and that national organizations face serious sanctions.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing isn’t exclusive to Greek organizations; it permeates various student groups, including high-profile athletic programs.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): In a scandal that rocked collegiate sports, former Northwestern football players came forward alleging widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program over multiple years. The incidents included forced sexual acts, racial discrimination, and physical abuse. This led to multiple lawsuits against the university and its coaching staff, the firing of long-time head coach Pat Fitzgerald (who later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially), and a complete re-evaluation of the university’s athletic oversight. The Northwestern case highlights that hazing is not confined to Greek life; even major athletic programs, often shielded by their success and prestige, can foster systemic abuse and accountability issues.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies, while heartbreaking, provide crucial lessons for families in City of El Lago and across Texas:

• Common Threads of Abuse: The cases reveal recurring patterns of forced drinking, humiliating rituals, severe physical violence, deliberate delays in medical care, and systematic cover-ups. Hazing rarely happens in isolation; it’s an institutional problem.
• Accountability Through Litigation: Significant reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements or verdicts—such as the $10 million settlement in the Stone Foltz case or the $12.6 million verdict in the Chad Meredith case against Kappa Sigma in Florida—often follow only after devastating tragedies and determined legal action.
• Precedent for Justice: The legal strategies and outcomes in these cases establish valuable precedents that our firm leverages for families pursuing hazing claims in Texas courts. These cases demonstrate that national organizations and universities can and will be held responsible.
• Texas is Not Immune: Students from City of El Lago attending major Texas universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor are vulnerable to the same dangerous patterns seen elsewhere. Our firm understands that the fight for justice in Texas operates within a legal and cultural landscape shaped by these national lessons.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For families in City of El Lago and throughout the Greater Houston area, these are the flagship universities, frequently attended by their children. While the exact geographical distance varies—with the University of Houston being the most local, and others like Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor being within a few hours’ drive—these institutions shape the collegiate experience for many Texas students. Understanding the specific hazing landscape at each is crucial. When hazing occurs at any of these schools, our firm, located in Houston, is adept at navigating the specific university policies, local jurisdictions, and unique cultural nuances of each campus.

University of Houston (UH)

As Houston’s largest university and a Tier One research institution, the University of Houston is a common destination for students from City of El Lago and across Harris County. Its vibrant campus environment fosters a wide array of student organizations, including a robust Greek life scene, as well as cultural and sports clubs that attract students from diverse backgrounds across the Houston metropolitan area.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH is a large, diverse urban campus that balances a significant commuter population with growing residential life. Its location within Houston, Texas, means it attracts students who often remain closely connected to their families in City of El Lago and other surrounding communities. The university boasts an active Greek life, comprising Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council (HPC), Multicultural Greek Council (MGC), and National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) chapters, alongside numerous other student organizations. This environment, while rich in opportunities, also presents potential for hazing, much like any large university.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Houston maintains a strict, comprehensive anti-hazing policy that is readily accessible to students and parents. This policy explicitly prohibits hazing, whether it occurs on-campus or off-campus. Prohibited acts include forced consumption of alcohol, food, or unauthorized substances; sleep deprivation; physical mistreatment; and any actions that cause mental distress, all when used for initiation or affiliation purposes. Students are encouraged to use UH’s reporting channels, which include the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD), and an online reporting form. The university also publishes a hazing statement and some limited disciplinary information on its website, aligning with transparency goals.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

While UH strives to maintain a safe campus, incidents have occurred:

• 2016 Pi Kappa Alpha Case: In a highly publicized incident, pledges of the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity (often known as Pike) at UH were allegedly deprived of sufficient food, water, and sleep during a multi-day event. One student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and a university suspension. This case highlighted the severe physical risks associated with hazing and UH’s willingness to pursue disciplinary action against chapters.
• Later university disciplinary references have described hazing by other fraternities, citing behaviors “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including alcohol misuse and policy violations, which have led to various suspensions or probations.

These examples underscore UH’s commitment to investigating hazing, but also reveal the ongoing challenge of enforcing anti-hazing policies, similar to other major universities. Public details about all violations, however, can sometimes be less comprehensive compared to institutions like UT Austin’s publicly available logs.

How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For City of El Lago families considering legal action following a hazing incident at UH, understanding the procedural path is key:

• Jurisdiction: Depending on where the hazing occurred, the incident could involve UHPD for on-campus activities, or the Houston Police Department and/or the Harris County Sheriff’s Office for off-campus events within the Houston metropolitan area.
• Legal Venue: Civil lawsuits stemming from UH hazing incidents would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County, such as the various District Courts or County Civil Courts at Law.
• Potential Defendants: Beyond individual students and the local chapter, potential defendants would often include the national fraternity/sorority. Importantly, the university itself could be named, particularly on grounds of negligence or gross negligence in its oversight. As a public university, UH may assert sovereign immunity, but our firm understands the exceptions under Texas law that can allow for cases to proceed, especially where ministerial duties were breached or where individuals acted with gross negligence. Other potential defendants might include property owners, if the hazing occurred off-campus.

What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For students from City of El Lago and their families connected to the University of Houston, proactive steps are vital:

• Report Hazing: Contact the UH Dean of Students, UHPD, or utilize the university’s online reporting forms. If it’s an emergency, call 911 first.
• Document Vigilantly: Preserve all evidence, including screenshots of group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp, Snapchat), photos of injuries, and witness contact information.
• Understand Prior Incidents: Researching prior hazing complaints or sanctions against a specific chapter or organization at UH can provide crucial context and support, particularly when building a civil case.
• Seek Experienced Legal Counsel for Houston-Based Hazing Cases: Due to UH’s status as a public university and the specific jurisdictional complexities of the Greater Houston area, consulting with a lawyer experienced in Houston court systems and hazing litigation is crucial. Attorney911 is intimately familiar with the legal landscape in Harris County and can help uncover prior disciplinary actions and internal university files through legal discovery processes.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, a storied institution in College Station, is deeply defined by its traditions, military heritage, and robust Greek life. Students from City of El Lago and across Texas often choose A&M for its unique blend of academic rigor and strong community, which includes the renowned Corps of Cadets and numerous Greek organizations.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M is distinct for its large campus, deeply rooted traditions, and the visible presence of its Corps of Cadets, a military training program. This environment, while fostering strong bonds and camaraderie, also sometimes faces scrutiny for practices that blur the line between tradition and hazing. Alongside the Corps, A&M hosts a large Greek system, including Collegiate Panhellenic Council (CPC) sororities, Interfraternity Council (IFC) fraternities, Multicultural Greek Council (MGC) organizations, and National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) chapters.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M prohibits hazing through clear policies disseminated in its Student Rules. The university explicitly forbids any act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or membership. Reporting channels include the Department of Student Life, the Office of the Dean of Student Affairs, and the University Police Department (UPD). The university also provides an online hazing report form and an anonymous reporting option.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced its share of hazing-related incidents, often highlighting the challenges in maintaining traditions while upholding safety:

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Lawsuit (around 2021): In a significant incident, two pledges of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity at Texas A&M alleged they were forced to endure strenuous physical activity and then had various substances, including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, poured on them. This resulted in severe chemical burns that required emergency skin graft surgeries. The pledges subsequently sued the fraternity for $1 million, leading to the fraternity’s suspension by the university for two years.
• Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): A former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading and forced hazing within the Corps. The allegations included being made to perform simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a humiliating “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The lawsuit, seeking over $1 million, brought to light the dark side of some Corps traditions. Texas A&M stated it had handled the matter in accordance with its internal rules and procedures.
• Aggie Bonfire Collapse (1999): While not traditional hazing, the tragic collapse of the student-constructed Aggie Bonfire, killing 12 and injuring 27, raised profound questions about student-led high-risk activities and institutional oversight. Multiple lawsuits against university officials amounted to settlements exceeding $6 million total, ultimately leading to the official ending of the on-campus tradition. This case underscored the university’s liability when student activities, even traditional ones, are inadequately supervised.

These incidents demonstrate that hazing at Texas A&M can occur in both Greek life and highly vaunted university traditions, requiring the university to continually re-evaluate its oversight.

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For families in City of El Lago—which is located roughly 100 miles from College Station—handling a hazing case in Bryan/College Station involves specific considerations:

• Jurisdiction: Incidents would typically involve the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) for on-campus events, or the Bryan Police Department / Brazos County Sheriff’s Office for off-campus locations in the Bryan-College Station metropolitan area.
• Legal Venue: Civil hazing lawsuits would primarily be filed in the District Courts of Brazos County.
• Potential Defendants: Individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, and Texas A&M University (where sovereign immunity might be argued but can be overcome through specific legal avenues) are all potential parties. Our Houston-based firm regularly assists clients with legal matters throughout the state, including Brazos County, managing the logistics of litigation effectively.

What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For students from City of El Lago attending Texas A&M:

• Report Concerns: Use Texas A&M’s official reporting channels, including the Dean of Student Life, UPD, and anonymous online forms.
• Document Thoroughly: Given Texas A&M’s strong tradition of secrecy in some groups, meticulously document all communications, events, and injuries.
• Distinguish Tradition from Hazing: Encourage students to critically evaluate whether a “tradition” genuinely fosters belonging or if it crosses into physically or psychologically harmful hazing.
• Seek Houston-Based Legal Expertise: Consulting with a firm like Attorney911, which has experience in both Greek life and traditional student organization hazing, is vital. Our firm can effectively navigate the unique cultural aspects of A&M, the local courts in Brazos County, and the legal challenges associated with a large public university.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is a premier institution, attracting bright students from City of El Lago and across the globe. Its vibrant campus life, iconic landmarks, and prominent Greek system make it a dynamic environment, yet one where hazing incidents regrettably occur.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin is a sprawling public university nestled in the heart of the state capital. It’s a significant draw for students from the Houston metro area, including City of El Lago, and is known for its academics, vibrant social scene, and large Greek system. Over 60 fraternity and sorority chapters operate on or near campus, shaping a significant part of campus culture. UT’s commitment to transparency, particularly regarding hazing, makes it an important case study for accountability.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UT Austin maintains a robust anti-hazing policy that is clearly defined in its institutional rules. The policy strictly prohibits any practice that would endanger the physical or mental health or safety of a student, particularly in the context of initiation, affiliation, or membership. UT’s Office of the Dean of Students oversees student affairs, and its website, hazing.utexas.edu, serves as a dedicated portal for reporting incidents, accessing resources, and viewing historical hazing violations. Students can report anonymously or through various university offices, including the Dean of Students, the Title IX Office, and the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD).

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin is notable for its commitment to publicly listing hazing violations, which provides invaluable data for prospective students, parents, and legal professionals:

• Public Hazing Violations Log: UT Austin is a leader in transparency, maintaining a publicly accessible Hazing at UT Austin page that details organizations, incident dates, specific violations, and imposed sanctions. This log frequently includes Greek letter organizations, as well as spirit groups and other student organizations.
• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): As an example from the public log, the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity was found liable for hazing where new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. The chapter was placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education.
• Texas Wranglers (Spirit Group): Other groups, such as the Texas Wranglers spirit organization, have faced sanctions for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, and other punishment-based practices designed to humiliate or physically challenge new members. These incidents illustrate that hazing extends beyond the traditional Greek system.

While UT’s transparency is commendable, the recurring nature of these violations underscores that hazing remains an ongoing challenge even at institutions with strong policies.

How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

For City of El Lago families dealing with hazing at UT, the process involves navigating both university and local legal systems:

• Jurisdiction: Incidents on or immediately adjacent to campus would involve the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD). Off-campus events within Austin would fall under the Austin Police Department’s jurisdiction.
• Legal Venue: Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in the various District Courts of Travis County, where Austin is located.
• Potential Defendants: Individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, and UT Austin itself could be named as defendants. As a public university, UT also may assert sovereign immunity, but exceptions often apply based on the specific facts of a case, particularly concerning gross negligence or statutory duties.
• Leveraging Public Records: UT’s public hazing log is a crucial resource. Evidence of prior violations by a specific organization on this log can strongly support civil lawsuits by demonstrating a pattern of misconduct and the university’s knowledge of, or previous failure to adequately address, the issues.

What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

For City of El Lago residents with ties to UT Austin:

• Consult the Public Log: Before joining any organization, review UT’s Hazing Violations page (hazing.utexas.edu) for any disciplinary history.
• Report Directly: Utilize UT’s online reporting system, the Dean of Students Office, or UTPD for formal reporting.
• Document Everything (Especially Digital): Given the sophisticated nature of modern hazing, preserving group chats, direct messages, and social media content is paramount.
• Connect with Experienced Legal Counsel: A lawyer well-versed in Texas hazing law and litigation in Travis County is essential. Attorney911 can help uncover prior disciplinary actions and hold accountable all responsible parties, from individual students to national organizations and the university itself.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University (SMU) in Dallas is a private institution renowned for its strong academics and vibrant, often prominent, Greek life. It attracts students from affluent communities, including City of El Lago, and families often expect a high standard of safety and conduct.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU is a private, selective university with a significant percentage of its undergraduate population participating in Greek life. This strong Greek presence, alongside numerous athletic and social clubs, creates a dynamic but sometimes challenging environment regarding hazing. Despite its private status, SMU is committed to preventing hazing and maintaining a safe campus environment.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU strictly prohibits hazing, outlining its policy in various student handbooks and on its website. The university defines hazing broadly to include any act that causes or is likely to cause physical or mental harm or serious embarrassment to a student, for the purpose of initiation, admission into, or affiliation with any organization. Reporting channels include the Office of the Dean of Students, the SMU Police Department, and an anonymous online reporting system (often called “SMU Aware” or similar platforms).

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

While SMU does not maintain a publicly accessible log of hazing violations as detailed as UT Austin’s, incidents and disciplinary actions are known:

• Kappa Alpha Order Incident (2017): New members of the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity at SMU were reportedly subjected to multiple acts of hazing, including being paddled, forced to drink excessive amounts of alcohol, and deprived of sleep. This led to a significant suspension for the chapter, restricting its ability to recruit new members until around 2021. This incident highlights the university’s response to clear hazing violations within its Greek system.
• SMU has also faced investigations into other fraternities and student organizations over the years, often resulting in chapter probation, suspensions, and mandatory educational programs.

These incidents underscore that even at private universities with strict policies, hazing remains a persistent challenge that necessitates continuous oversight and rapid intervention when identified.

How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For City of El Lago families considering legal action after an SMU hazing incident, several aspects are paramount:

• Jurisdiction: Incidents occurring on SMU campus would typically be handled by the SMU Police Department. Off-campus events in Dallas would involve the Dallas Police Department and/or the Dallas County Sheriff’s Office.
• Legal Venue: Civil lawsuits would most often be filed in the District Courts of Dallas County.
• Private Institution Status: As a private university, SMU generally does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more straightforward to pursue claims against the institution directly compared to public universities. However, private institutions often have considerable legal resources devoted to defending such claims.
• Discovery Challenges: While private universities may not publish detailed hazing logs, experienced legal counsel can use legal discovery processes (subpoenas, interrogatories) to compel the production of internal reports, past disciplinary actions, and communications related to hazing allegations.

What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For City of El Lago students attending SMU:

• Utilize SMU’s Reporting Systems: Report all suspected hazing through the Dean of Students Office, SMPD, or the anonymous online reporting platform.
• Document Thoroughly: Even if SMU’s public reporting is less transparent, meticulous documentation of incidents, injuries, and communications (including digital records) is critical for strengthening a potential legal claim.
• Seek Prompt Legal Counsel: Given the resources private universities and national Greek organizations can bring to bear, engaging an experienced hazing attorney early is crucial. Attorney911 understands the legal landscape in Dallas County and the specific challenges of litigation against powerful private institutions.

Baylor University

Baylor University, a prominent private Christian university in Waco, holds a unique place in Texas higher education. Students from City of El Lago and across the state are drawn to its academic programs, faith-based community, and strong traditions. However, Baylor has faced significant past scrutiny regarding institutional oversight, particularly concerning student safety.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor boasts a vibrant campus life with numerous student organizations, including a well-established Greek system and NCAA Division I athletic programs. Its private, religiously affiliated nature often shapes its policies and responses to student conduct issues. Baylor has, in recent years, undertaken efforts to reform its student safety and conduct protocols following prior high-profile scandals, making its approach to hazing critically important.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor University maintains a zero-tolerance policy for hazing, clearly outlined in its Student Code of Conduct. The policy prohibits any act that causes or is likely to cause mental or physical harm or degradation for the purpose of initiation, admission, or affiliation. Baylor provides various reporting mechanisms, including the Office of Student Conduct, the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD), and an online reporting form. The university also emphasizes confidential reporting channels and support resources for students affected by hazing.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor’s past challenges with institutional oversight have put its student conduct processes under intense public and legal scrutiny. Hazing incidents have surfaced within this context:

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): Following a university investigation into hazing within the baseball program, 14 players were suspended. The suspensions were staggered to allow the team to compete, highlighting the university’s balancing act between enforcing policies and managing athletic programs. This incident underscored that hazing can affect high-profile athletic teams, similar to patterns seen at Northwestern University.
• Baylor has also faced allegations of hazing within Greek organizations, which have resulted in chapter probations, suspensions, and mandatory educational interventions. These incidents, while often less publicly detailed than those at some public universities, are handled through the university’s internal conduct processes.

The recurring nature of these incidents, set against the backdrop of Baylor’s previous institutional challenges, emphasizes the need for continuous vigilance and robust enforcement of anti-hazing policies.

How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For City of El Lago families encountering hazing at Baylor, navigating the legal process requires an understanding of its private university status and local context:

• Jurisdiction: Incidents on Baylor’s campus would primarily involve the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD). Off-campus hazing in Waco would fall under the Waco Police Department and/or the McLennan County Sheriff’s Office.
• Legal Venue: Civil lawsuits would be filed in the District Courts of McLennan County, where Waco is located.
• Private Institution Advantages/Disadvantages: As a private university, Baylor does not have sovereign immunity, which can simplify legal avenues compared to public institutions. However, like SMU, Baylor has significant legal resources to defend against claims. Our firm, from our Houston offices including our Austin base, is well-equipped to handle cases across Central Texas.
• Oversight History: Baylor’s prior highly publicized issues around Title IX and student safety may be relevant in hazing cases, particularly concerning claims of negligent supervision or institutional indifference to known risks. Our firm understands how to investigate and emphasize such institutional failures.

What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For City of El Lago students attending Baylor:

• Report All Suspected Hazing: Utilize Baylor’s Office of Student Conduct, BUPD, or online reporting system. Given Baylor’s emphasis on a safe and ethical environment, they are often responsive to reports.
• Document Meticulously: Regardless of the university’s private nature, thorough documentation (digital records, photos, medical evidence) is paramount for any potential legal claim.
• Seek Legal Counsel Promptly: Engaging an experienced hazing attorney early is crucial. Attorney911 has a deep understanding of litigation against private institutions and how to uncover relevant internal documents and history through legal discovery. Our firm is prepared to guide families through the complexities of pursuing justice in McLennan County.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For City of El Lago families assessing the risk of hazing, it’s vital to recognize that many local chapter actions are not isolated but reflect patterns seen across the country within national organizations. Each of the universities attended by students from City of El Lago—UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor—hosts chapters of national fraternities and sororities. These national entities are often implicated in hazing because their central offices set policies, train leaders, collect dues, and crucially, are aware of their organization’s history across all chapters.

Why National Histories Matter

When a tragic hazing incident occurs at a local chapter at one of our Texas universities, such as a Pi Kappa Alpha chapter at UH or Texas A&M, or a Sigma Alpha Epsilon chapter at UT Austin, it’s rare that it’s an entirely new type of incident for the national organization.

• Pattern of Knowledge: Many fraternities and sororities with chapters at Texas universities—including prominent names like Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike), Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE), Phi Delta Theta, and Pi Kappa Phi—are part of national organizations that have faced repeated hazing allegations and lawsuits. They typically have extensive anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies precisely because they have experienced deaths, catastrophic injuries, and significant legal liabilities in the past. These national headquarters are intimately familiar with common hazing scripts: forced drinking nights, “Big/Little” rituals where pledges consume large amounts of alcohol, paddling traditions, and psychologically humiliating acts.
• Foreseeability: When a local Texas chapter repeats the same dangerous script that led to another chapter being shut down or sued for millions in another state, this demonstrates foreseeability. The national organization had prior notice that such conduct was dangerous and could lead to harm. This prior knowledge can significantly strengthen a negligence or gross negligence claim against the national entity, and directly impact potential punitive damages.

Our firm understands that a hazing incident at a local chapter is rarely an isolated rogue act. It is often part of a broader, systemic issue within the national organization that has been ignored, inadequately addressed, or even tacitly condoned.

Organization Mapping: National Patterns Affecting Texas Campuses

While we cannot list every single chapter or incident, here’s how some major national fraternities and sororities frequently present at Texas universities have recurring hazing issues:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, Pi Kappa Alpha has a national history deeply troubled by alcohol hazing. The tragic Stone Foltz death at Bowling Green State University (2021) involved Pike pledges being forced to consume excessive alcohol. In 2012, David Bogenberger died of alcohol poisoning at Northern Illinois University, also involving Pike. These incidents demonstrate a dangerous pattern of alcohol-fueled initiation rituals that the national organization has long been aware of, making similar incidents in Texas foreseeable.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and SMU, SAE has faced widespread allegations and sanctions due to hazing. Nationally, SAE has been linked to numerous hazing-related deaths and severe injuries. In Texas, we have seen this pattern manifest directly:
  • Texas A&M University (2021): Two pledges alleged being doused with industrial-strength cleaner, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. They sued the fraternity for over $1 million.
  • University of Texas at Austin (2024): An Australian exchange student alleged significant injuries following an assault by SAE members at a party. The chapter was already under suspension for prior hazing violations. These Texas incidents closely mirror the national pattern, such as the (then) pending traumatic brain injury lawsuit against an SAE chapter at the University of Alabama (2023).
• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): Present at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, Phi Delta Theta’s national reputation is stained by incidents like the fatal hazing of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University (2017), where pledges were forced into a dangerous drinking game. This case strongly underscores the deadly consequences of coerced alcohol consumption within their chapters, a pattern to which the national organization has clearly been alerted.
• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, Pi Kappa Phi chapters have been involved in severe hazing. The death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University (2017) due to acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” is a stark example of a dangerous ritual frequently associated with this organization.
• Kappa Alpha Order (KA): With chapters at Texas A&M and SMU, Kappa Alpha Order has its own national history of hazing. In 2017, the SMU chapter itself faced a significant suspension after new members were reportedly paddled, forced to drink, and deprived of sleep. This local incident directly reflects a national pattern of physical and alcohol-related abuse that the national organization is aware of.
• Lambda Phi Epsilon (ΛΦΕ): Present at UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, Lambda Phi Epsilon has a national history of severe physical hazing. The death of Kenny Luong at the University of California, Irvine (2005) after being tackled during a football game as part of a hazing ritual is one example that highlights recurrent physical endurance tests and dangerous activities.
• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): Active at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor, Sigma Chi has recently faced substantial liability for hazing. A family received more than $10 million in damages following the severe hazing of a pledge at the College of Charleston (2024), involving physical beatings, forced consumption of drugs and alcohol, and psychological torment. This significant verdict underscores the grave consequences when Sigma Chi chapters are involved in severe hazing.
• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor, Kappa Sigma also has a national history of severe incidents. The $12.6 million jury verdict awarded to the parents of Chad Meredith (University of Miami, 2001), who drowned after being coerced to swim across a lake, highlights the organization’s past involvement in reckless hazing. More recently, allegations of hazing resulting in rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown from extreme physical activity) have been reported at Texas A&M, showing a continuation of dangerous practices within Texas chapters.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

Understanding these national patterns is not simply historical curiosity; it is a critical component of our legal strategy at The Manginello Law Firm.

• Demonstrating Foreseeability: When similar hazing tactics lead to injury or death across different chapters of the same national organization, it becomes impossible for the national organization to credibly claim they “didn’t know” or “couldn’t foresee” the danger. This pattern evidence is powerful in court.
• Holding National Entities Accountable: Our firm pursues national fraternities and sororities, arguing that they have a duty to adequately supervise their chapters, enforce their anti-hazing policies, and respond decisively to prior incidents. Evidence that they failed to do so can directly impact:
  • Settlement Leverage: National organizations often have substantial insurance policies. A strong case built on pattern evidence increases the pressure for a favorable settlement.
  • Insurance Coverage Disputes: Our firm, with Lupe Peña’s background as an insurance defense attorney, is uniquely positioned to battle insurers who try to deny coverage by claiming hazing was an “intentional act” or “unforeseeable.” We argue that the national organization’s negligent supervision is covered.
  • Potential for Punitive Damages: In egregious cases, juries may award punitive damages to punish defendants for reckless or malicious conduct. A history of ignoring known hazing patterns strengthens the argument for punitive damages, which aim not only to compensate the victim but also to deter similar behavior in the future.

By meticulously researching the national histories and linking them to local chapter conduct at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, we build robust cases that aim to hold all responsible parties—from individual students to powerful national organizations and universities—accountable.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

For families in City of El Lago and across Texas contemplating legal action after a hazing incident, the process can seem daunting. However, building a strong hazing case involves a meticulous investigation, the strategic collection of evidence, and a deep understanding of the types of damages that can be recovered. At The Manginello Law Firm, we approach each case with the investigative rigor necessary to challenge powerful institutions.

Evidence

Modern hazing cases are often won or lost based on the quality and volume of evidence, much of which is digital. Our firm emphasizes aggressive, comprehensive evidence collection:

• Digital Communications: In 2025, group chats and direct messages (DMs) are the most critical source of hazing evidence. Platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and even fraternity-specific apps are often used to plan, coerce, and document hazing. We look for plans, instructions, threats, acknowledgments of hazing, and communications showing cover-up attempts. Pictures or screenshots (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) of these conversations, showing sender names and timestamps, are invaluable, even if messages are later deleted. Digital forensics can often recover “deleted” data.
• Photos & Videos: Hazing participants frequently record their actions. This includes videos and photos of hazing events themselves, humiliating acts, forced drinking (often shared in private group chats or on ephemeral social media stories). We seek to secure this content, along with any security camera footage from houses or venues where hazing occurred.
• Internal Organization Documents: These include pledge manuals, initiation scripts (often coded), “tradition” lists, emails or texts from officers giving instructions, and anti-hazing policies from both local chapters and national headquarters. Accessing these typically requires legal discovery tools like subpoenas.
• University Records: University files can reveal crucial patterns, such as prior conduct violations, probation or suspensions for the offending organization, incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, Clery Act reports, and emails among administrators about the organization. Public records requests can unearth some of this, but often deeper insight requires litigation discovery.
• Medical and Psychological Records: These document the full extent of the harm. They include emergency room reports, hospitalization records, surgery and rehabilitation notes, toxicology reports (for alcohol or drug exposure), and psychological evaluations that diagnose conditions like PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation resulting from the trauma.
• Witness Testimony: Accounts from current or former pledges, members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, trainers, or any bystander who observed relevant events are crucial. Former members who have subsequently quit or been expelled are often particularly valuable witnesses.

Damages

When hazing leads to injury or death, victims and their families in City of El Lago can recover various types of damages, which aim to compensate for their losses and hold those responsible accountable:

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This includes all costs associated with immediate emergency care, hospitalization, surgeries, ongoing medical treatment, physical therapy, medications, and any long-term care required for catastrophic injuries (e.g., brain injury, organ damage). For severe, permanent injuries, a “life care plan” is often developed by experts to project lifetime medical and support costs.
• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This covers income lost if the victim was employed, as well as the significant financial impact of educational setbacks. This can include tuition for missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed entry into the workforce, and reduced lifetime earning capacity if injuries lead to permanent disability.
• Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for subjective, non-financial losses, emphasizing the profound emotional and psychological toll of hazing. This includes physical pain and suffering, emotional distress, trauma, humiliation, and loss of enjoyment of life. Psychological conditions like PTSD, severe anxiety, and depression can have a devastating long-term impact on a victim’s mental health and quality of life.
• Wrongful Death Damages (for families): In cases where hazing tragically results in death, surviving family members can pursue claims for funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support (if the deceased would have contributed to family income), and the immense non-economic loss of companionship, love, and society. This also includes the grief and emotional suffering experienced by parents, siblings, and other close family members.

It is important to understand that our firm is describing types of damages that may be recoverable, not promising or predicting specific dollar amounts for any individual case. Each case’s value is unique and highly dependent on its specific facts.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation is uniquely complex due to the number of potential defendants and the intricate world of insurance coverage. Fraternities, sororities, national organizations, and universities typically carry extensive insurance policies. However, their insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage based on various exclusions.

• Insurers may argue that hazing or “intentional acts” are explicitly excluded from their policies, or that the policy does not cover certain individuals or events (e.g., off-campus incidents).
• Our firm, leveraging Lupe Peña’s invaluable experience as a former insurance defense attorney, is expertly positioned to challenge these arguments. We understand how insurers value (and undervalue) claims, their delay tactics, and their strategies for avoiding payouts. We often demonstrate that while the hazing itself may have been intentional, the national organization’s or university’s negligent supervision, failure to enforce policies, or knowledge of prior incidents is what ultimately led to the harm, and this negligence is typically covered by insurance.
• Identifying all potential sources of insurance coverage—from individual students’ homeowner policies to national organization’s multi-million dollar umbrella policies and university insurance plans—is a critical part of our investigative process. We are adept at navigating these complex insurance disputes to ensure that all avenues of compensation are explored for our clients in City of El Lago and across Texas.

Practical Guides & FAQs

For families in City of El Lago, navigating the aftermath of suspected hazing can be overwhelming. Knowing what to look for and what steps to take is crucial. Here, we offer practical guidance for parents, students, and witnesses, along with answers to common questions.

For Parents

No parent wants to imagine their child experiencing hazing, but being informed is your best defense.

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to changes in your child’s behavior or physical appearance. Look for:
  • Unexplained injuries (bruises, burns, cuts) or implausible excuses for them.
  • Extreme fatigue and sleep deprivation (constant late nights, calls at 3 AM for “mandatory” events).
  • Dramatic changes in mood, increased anxiety, irritability, withdrawal from family or old friends.
  • Sudden secrecy about their organization’s activities (“I can’t talk about it,” “I’m not allowed to say”).
  • Obsessive use of their phone for group chats, coupled with anxiety if they miss a message.
  • Sudden academic decline (missed classes, falling grades, disinterest in studies).
  • Financial strains or requests for unexplained money for “fines” or “costs” related to the organization.
  • Talking about “just having to get through this” or “everyone did it before me.”
• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation openly and without judgment. Emphasize their safety and well-being over status or loyalty to a group. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with [organization name]?” or “Is there anything happening that makes you uncomfortable?” Reassure them that you support them unconditionally, no matter what they want to do.
• If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize their health. Get them immediate medical attention, even if they insist they’re “fine” or “don’t want to get anyone in trouble.” Document everything: take clear photos of injuries, immediately screenshot any texts or social media messages your child shows you, and write down everything they tell you while the details are fresh.
• Dealing with the University: Document every single communication you have with university administrators (emails, notes from phone calls, meeting summaries). Ask direct questions about the university’s knowledge of previous incidents involving the organization and what actions were taken.
• When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or hiding what happened, it’s time to contact an attorney. An experienced hazing lawyer can help you navigate university bureaucracy, preserve critical evidence, and protect your child’s rights.

For Students / Pledges

If you’re a student from City of El Lago experiencing hazing, remember: you are not alone, you have rights, and help is available.

• “Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?” Ask yourself: Am I being coerced or pressured to do something I don’t want to do? Is this activity dangerous, degrading, or illegal? Would I do this if my parents or the university knew exactly what was happening? If the answer is yes to any of these, it’s likely hazing. Your gut instinct is often right.
• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: In Texas, the law is clear: consent is not a defense to hazing. You cannot legally consent to an illegal act. The pressures of group belonging, fear of exclusion, and power imbalances often mean that “agreement” is not truly voluntary.
• Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the right to leave any organization at any time. If you are in immediate danger, call 911. If you wish to de-pledge, it’s best to inform someone outside the organization first (e.g., a trusted professor, family member, or RA). You can then send an email or text (for documentation) to the organization’s leadership stating your resignation. Avoid “one last meeting” if you fear pressure or retaliation. You can report hazing via campus channels (Dean of Students, Title IX, campus police), or anonymously through services like the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE).
• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many Texas universities, and Texas law itself, offer limited immunity or leniency to individuals who report hazing or seek medical help in an emergency, even if they were involved in underage drinking or the hazing itself. This is designed to encourage reporting and prioritize safety.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once a part of hazing, either as a participant, a witness, or someone who “got through it,” and now regret what happened or fear for others, your actions can be incredibly important.

• Your Testimony Matters: Your insider knowledge and testimony can be crucial in preventing future harm and holding those responsible accountable. You can help save lives by shedding light on the truth.
• Seek Legal Advice: While cooperating with authorities can be a path towards accountability, you should also seek independent legal advice. A lawyer can help you understand your rights, potential legal exposures (both criminal and civil), and how to navigate your role as a witness without compromising yourself.
• Protecting Others: Even if you faced hazing yourself, speaking up can prevent another student from enduring the same or worse. Your courage can break the cycle of abuse.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For families in City of El Lago and across Texas, the aftermath of a hazing incident is fraught with emotional and legal complexities. Unfortunately, many make critical mistakes that can undermine their pursuit of justice. Attorney911 understands these pitfalls and offers this clear warning:

1. LET YOUR CHILD DELETE MESSAGES OR “CLEAN UP” EVIDENCE:
   • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble,” or “It’s too embarrassing.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This immediately removes crucial electronic evidence (group chats, texts, photos, videos) that is often the backbone of a hazing case. It can look like a cover-up, makes investigation nearly impossible, and in some instances, could even constitute obstruction of justice.
   • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even if it seems embarrassing or incriminating. Attorneys can recover deleted messages, but original, unedited screenshots are invaluable. Watch Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document a legal case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs
2. CONFRONTING THE FRATERNITY/SORORITY DIRECTLY:
   • What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind and demand answers.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Confrontation immediately puts the organization’s members on high alert. They will stop communicating, “clean up” their digital footprint, instruct members on what to say (or not say) to authorities, and accelerate their defense preparations.
   • What to do instead: Document all information privately and contact an experienced hazing lawyer before any confrontation.
3. SIGNING UNIVERSITY “RELEASE” OR “RESOLUTION” FORMS:
   • What universities do: Often pressure families to sign waivers, non-disclosure agreements, or internal “resolutions” that settle the matter administratively.
   • Why it’s wrong: These documents almost always require you to waive your right to pursue further legal action, including a civil lawsuit. The terms offered are often far below the true value of your case.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university or organization without having an attorney review it first.
4. POSTING DETAILS ON SOCIAL MEDIA BEFORE TALKING TO A LAWYER:
   • What families think: “I want people to know what happened and warn others.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Everything posted online becomes discoverable evidence for the defense. Inconsistencies between public statements and legal testimony can severely hurt credibility. It can also inadvertently waive legal privileges.
   • What to do instead: Document privately. Share information only with trusted counsel. Your lawyer will guide you on appropriate public messaging, if any.
5. LETTING YOUR CHILD GO BACK TO “ONE LAST MEETING”:
   • What fraternities/organizations say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic” or “Let’s clear the air.”
   • Why it’s wrong: These are often tactics to exert pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can be used against your child in a future legal proceeding.
   • What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication from or to the organization should be handled by your lawyer.
6. WAITING “TO SEE HOW THE UNIVERSITY HANDLES IT”:
   • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; please let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: University investigations are often slow, focused on reputation management, and primarily concerned with institutional policy violations, not criminal acts or civil liability. Crucial evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations can expire while you wait.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW and consult a lawyer immediately. The university’s internal process is separate from, and often insufficient for, real legal accountability.
7. TALKING TO INSURANCE ADJUSTERS WITHOUT A LAWYER:
   • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim and help your family.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Insurance adjusters represent the interests of the insurance company, not yours. Recorded statements can be used against you, and they will try to get you to settle for the lowest possible amount before you understand the full extent of your damages.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with any insurance adjuster and tell them, “My attorney will contact you.”

For a deeper dive into common pitfalls, we encourage you to watch Attorney911’s informative video on client mistakes that can ruin a personal injury case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY

Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin benefit from some sovereign immunity protections under Texas law, but exceptions exist for cases involving gross negligence, Title IX violations (if applicable), and when individuals are sued in their personal capacity. Private universities like SMU and Baylor generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case hinges on its specific facts, so contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. While hazing is typically a Class B misdemeanor, Texas law elevates it to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals (including officers of an organization) can also face misdemeanor charges for failing to report known hazing.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes, absolutely. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and juries recognize that “agreement” under immense peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of social exclusion is not genuine voluntary consent.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  Generally, you have 2 years from the date of injury or death to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas (this is the statute of limitations). However, the “discovery rule” may extend this period if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused) until the truth is uncovered. Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to discuss your specific timeline. For more information, you can watch our video on the statute of limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of hazing does not eliminate liability for universities or national organizations. Many major hazing cases that resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments (e.g., the Pi Delta Psi retreat case of Michael Deng) occurred entirely off-campus. Universities and national organizations can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and foreseeability of off-campus activities related to their groups.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  We understand the desire for privacy. While criminal cases are public record, most civil hazing cases settle confidentially before ever going to trial. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy and can request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms when appropriate. We always work to balance your need for accountability with your desire for discretion.

Remember, where the law is complex or depends on specific details, it is always best to consult with an attorney to review the unique facts of your situation.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

For families in City of El Lago and across Texas, facing the trauma of hazing requires more than just legal representation; it demands a legal team that truly understands the landscape of campus abuse, institutional resistance, and the profound emotional toll it takes. When your family is impacted by hazing, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. This is where The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, stands apart.

We are a Houston-based Texas personal injury firm with deep experience in serious injury, wrongful death, and institutional accountability cases. From our offices in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, we serve victims and their families throughout the state. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families in City of El Lago, across Harris County, the Greater Houston area, and throughout our broader communities.

Our firm brings unique qualifications to hazing cases:

• The Insurance Insider Advantage (Lupe Peña): Our Associate Attorney Lupe Peña previously worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national defense firm. This insider knowledge is invaluable: she knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims, understands their delay tactics, their coverage exclusion arguments, and their settlement strategies. We know their playbook because we used to run it.
• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions (Ralph Manginello): Managing Partner Ralph Manginello brings over 25 years of experience, including taking on some of the largest corporations. He was one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, a monumental case against a corporate giant. This federal court experience (he is licensed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas) means Attorney911 is not intimidated by national fraternities, multi-billion dollar universities, or their formidable defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Our firm has a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases, often collaborating with economists to meticulously value the loss of life. We are experienced in valuing lifetime care needs for catastrophic injuries such as brain damage or permanent disability. We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force accountability. Our experience extends across severe personal injury cases (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/), including wrongful death claims (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), where we have recovered millions for clients.
• Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise (Ralph Manginello): Ralph Manginello’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) demonstrates his deep understanding of criminal law. This expertise is crucial in hazing cases, where criminal charges often run parallel to civil lawsuits, allowing us to advise clients on the intricate interactions between both tracks. When hazing leads to criminal charges, Attorney911’s criminal defense experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) means we can advise on both criminal exposure and civil liability.
• Investigative Depth: We have built a robust network of experts—medical professionals, digital forensics specialists, economists, and psychologists. We meticulously pursue evidence, using legal tools to unearth deleted group chats, social media evidence, subpoena national fraternity records showing prior incidents, and uncover university files through discovery and public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments actually work behind closed doors. We know how to investigate modern hazing, balance victim privacy with public accountability, and understand the cultural nuances that make these cases different. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We believe in thorough investigation and real accountability.

Call to Action: Take the First Step

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it was the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in City of El Lago and throughout the surrounding region of Harris County and beyond have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened without judgment, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

In your free consultation, you can expect us to:

• Listen to your story and the full extent of what happened.
• Review any evidence you currently have (photos, texts, medical records).
• Explain your legal options, whether that involves a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
• Discuss realistic timelines and what to expect during the legal process.
• Answer your questions about legal fees. We work on a contingency fee basis—meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. You can learn more about how contingency fees work in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F1Nc.
• There is absolutely no pressure to hire us on the spot—take the time you need to decide what’s right for your family.
• Everything you tell us is completely confidential.

Take the first critical step toward justice and prevention. Contact Attorney911 today.

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: If you prefer assistance in Spanish, please contact Lupe Peña directly at lupe@atty911.com for a consultation. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in City of El Lago or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com