When Tradition Turns to Trauma: A Wichita County Family’s Guide to Hazing in Texas Universities

It’s late at night, and your phone buzzes with a call from your child, a student at a Texas university. Their voice is strained, or perhaps they’re calling from a hospital bed. They tell you about an “initiation ritual”—forced drinking, extreme physical challenges, or degrading acts—all designed to “bond” them with their new fraternity, sorority, or club. They or a friend have been seriously hurt, but no one wants to call 911 because they’re all terrified of “getting the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble.” Your child, far from your home in Wichita County, Texas, feels trapped between loyalty to the group and their own safety, suffering under a tradition that has become outright trauma.

This is not an isolated incident; it’s a scenario playing out at campuses across the Lone Star State every semester. For families in Wichita County and beyond, the dream of a college education and vibrant campus life can quickly turn into a nightmare when hazing takes a dangerous turn. We understand the fear and confusion that comes with such a devastating realization.

This comprehensive guide is for you—families in Wichita County and across Texas who need to understand the complex world of hazing. We will explain what hazing truly looks like in 2025, how Texas and federal laws address it, and what lessons we can draw from major national cases. We will delve into specific issues at some of Texas’s largest universities, including the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University, and discuss your legal options if hazing has impacted your family.

This article provides general information and is not specific legal advice. However, if hazing has affected your family, The Manginello Law Firm is here to help. We serve families throughout Texas, including Wichita County and its surrounding communities. We understand that hazing at Texas universities can deeply impact families, sometimes hundreds of miles away in Wichita County. Many students from Wichita Falls and other areas throughout Wichita County attend these major universities, making the hazing crisis a very real and personal concern for our local community.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

Call 911 for medical emergencies.
Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911). We provide immediate help—that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

In the first 48 hours:

Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.” Their health and safety are the top priority over any fear of “getting in trouble.”
Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
- Screenshot group chats, texts, and direct messages (DMs) immediately.
- Photograph any injuries from multiple angles and over several days to show progression.
- Save any physical items like damaged clothing, receipts for forced purchases, or objects used in hazing rituals.
Write down everything while your memory is fresh: who was involved, what happened, when it occurred, and where it took place.
Do NOT:
- Confront the fraternity, sorority, or organization directly.
- Sign anything from the university or an insurance company without legal advice.
- Post details about the incident on public social media platforms.
- Allow your child to delete messages or “clean up” any evidence.

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

Evidence disappears fast as group chats are deleted, physical items removed, and witnesses coached.
Universities often move quickly to control the narrative and conduct internal investigations, which may not prioritize your child’s legal rights.
We can help preserve crucial evidence and protect your child’s rights from the outset.
Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation and guidance.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Wichita County families, misunderstanding what “hazing” means today can be a major barrier to recognizing a problem. Modern hazing extends far beyond the caricatures seen in movies. It is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, maintaining membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. It is crucial to understand that a student’s “agreement” or “consent” does not automatically make the activity safe or legal when there is inherent peer pressure and an undeniable power imbalance.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

Hazing encompasses a broad range of behaviors that can profoundly impact a student’s well-being. It is important to distinguish between legitimate team-building exercises and activities designed to degrade, control, or endanger students. If a student feels unsafe, humiliated, or pressured into an activity they wouldn’t otherwise choose, it is likely hazing. This includes scenarios where physical or mental health is at risk, or where students are forced into acts that are demeaning or exploit their vulnerability.

Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing tactics have evolved, becoming more insidious and harder to detect. We categorize them into several key areas:

Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is one of the most dangerous forms of hazing and often leads to severe injury or death. It involves forced or coerced drinking, such as chugging challenges, “lineups” where pledges consume large quantities of alcohol in a short period, or games designed to force rapid intoxication. New members may also be pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, including illicit drugs, putting their health and lives at extreme risk.
Physical Hazing: Beyond traditional paddling or beatings, physical hazing today includes extreme calisthenics, brutal “workouts,” or “smokings” that push students far beyond normal physical limits. It also involves sleep deprivation over extended periods, food or water deprivation, and exposure to extreme environmental conditions like intense cold or heat, or dangerous locations.
Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This particularly degrading form of hazing includes forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts, or poses meant to be humiliating, such as “roasted pig” positions. It can also involve degrading costumes, acts with racial or sexist overtones, slurs, or role-playing scenarios designed to strip dignity and foster shame.
Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but equally damaging, psychological hazing involves verbal abuse, threats, and deliberate social isolation. It can include manipulation, forced confessions, or public shaming on social media or during chapter meetings, systematically breaking down a student’s self-esteem and mental health.
Digital/Online Hazing: This modern form leverages technology. It often involves group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Discord. Students may be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos of themselves or others, leading to lasting reputational and emotional harm. This can also include round-the-clock text message demands, disrupting sleep and academics.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

Hazing is not confined to stereotypes. It happens across a wide spectrum of student organizations:

Fraternities and Sororities: This includes social Greek letter organizations (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, Multicultural Greek Councils).
Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: These groups, often emphasizing tradition and discipline, are unfortunately not immune to hazing allegations.
Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs: Organizations like spirit groups, cheerleading squads, student associations, or even some university “tradition groups” can fall prey to hazing practices.
Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball, soccer, and cheerleading, hazing can occur at all levels of collegiate sports.
Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous academic or performance-based groups have reported hazing incidents.
Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Any group with an “initiation” or “new member education” process can potentially engage in hazing.

The persistent existence of hazing is often fueled by a potent cocktail of social status, tradition, and fervent secrecy. Even when everyone “knows” hazing is illegal and dangerous, these practices can persist through generations of students, making it incredibly difficult for victims to come forward. For Wichita County students attending Texas universities, recognizing these patterns is the first step toward safety and accountability.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For Wichita County families navigating the aftermath of a hazing incident, understanding the legal landscape is crucial. Texas has specific laws designed to combat hazing, and federal regulations also play an increasingly important role.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas law, specifically the Texas Education Code, defines and prohibits hazing. It broadly covers any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, whether on or off campus, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the physical or mental health or safety of a student, including but not limited to physical beatings, forced exercise, or forced consumption of alcohol or drugs.
Or substantially affects the mental health or safety of a student, encompassing acts like extreme humiliation, intimidation, or prolonged psychological abuse.
All for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

Key aspects of Texas hazing law:

Criminal Penalties: Hazing can lead to fines and even jail time. The severity increases significantly if the hazing causes serious bodily injury (Class A Misdemeanor) or death (State Jail Felony). This includes not only those who directly participate but also individuals who, as members or officers, knew about hazing and failed to report it, or retaliated against someone who reported.
Reporter Protections: Texas law (and most university policies) provides limited immunity or leniency for individuals who report hazing or call for help in good faith during a medical emergency, even if they were involved in the hazing themselves. This encourages students to prioritize safety without fear of severe personal penalties.
“Consent” Is Not a Defense: Crucially, Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that it is not a defense to hazing that the person being hazed “consented” to the activity. This recognizes the inherent power imbalances and coercive nature of hazing and prevents organizations from escaping liability by claiming the victim willingly participated.

This summary provides a general overview, but the actual statute is more technical. Consult with an attorney for specific legal interpretations.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It is important for Wichita County families to understand the distinction between criminal and civil hazing cases:

Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations. The primary aim is punishment, which can include incarceration, fines, and probation. Hazing-related criminal charges often include direct hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault and battery (if physical harm occurred), or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in fatal incidents.
Civil Cases: These lawsuits are initiated by the victims or their surviving families. The primary aim is monetary compensation for damages suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil claims often focus on negligence (failure to exercise reasonable care), gross negligence (conscious indifference to others’ safety), wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision (against universities or national organizations), premises liability (against property owners where hazing occurred), and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

A key point for Wichita County families: a criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case. These two legal tracks can proceed independently, and the burden of proof is different for each.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations are increasingly shaping the response to hazing:

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation requires colleges and universities that receive federal funding to be more transparent about hazing incidents. By approximately 2026, institutions must publicly report detailed hazing statistics, strengthen hazing education and prevention measures, and maintain more robust data. This will provide unprecedented levels of data for families and legal teams.
Title IX: When hazing involves elements of sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based hostility, or discrimination, Title IX obligations are triggered. This can compel universities to investigate and take action, regardless of state hazing laws.
Clery Act: This federal law requires colleges to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents, particularly those involving assault, alcohol/drug violations, or other criminal acts, may fall under Clery reporting requirements.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Determining who is legally responsible in a hazing case is complex but crucial for seeking justice. Potential defendants can include:

Individual Students: The students who actively planned, encouraged, supplied alcohol, carried out the hazing acts, failed to intervene, or participated in cover-ups. This includes both current and former members.
Local Chapter/Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, particularly if it operates as a recognized legal entity. Key individuals in leadership roles, such as the president or “pledge educator,” may also be personally liable.
National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters overseeing the local chapter. Liability often hinges on whether the national organization knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing (either at that chapter or other chapters), and if they failed to adequately enforce anti-hazing policies, provide proper oversight, or respond to prior warnings.
University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, or its governing board (like the Board of Regents for public universities). Liability here often depends on factors such as prior knowledge of hazing, their failure to implement or enforce adequate policies, negligent supervision of student organizations, or even if their actions created a dangerous environment. For public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin), sovereign immunity may offer some protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence or willful misconduct. Private universities (like SMU and Baylor) typically have fewer immunity protections.
Third Parties: This can include the owners or landlords of off-campus houses or venues where hazing occurred, bars or liquor stores that furnished alcohol in violation of dram shop laws, or even security companies or event organizers who failed in their duties.

It is vital for Wichita County families to remember that every case is unique; not every party is liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney can help identify all potentially liable parties and build a comprehensive case.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

While your child might be attending a Texas university, the history of hazing and its legal consequences is a national story. Understanding some of the most prominent national cases is crucial for Wichita County families, as these precedents shape how hazing lawsuits are understood and fought right here in Texas. These cases reveal common patterns of abuse and underscore the devastating impact of hazing when it goes unchecked.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced alcohol consumption continues to be a leading cause of hazing-related death. These stories demonstrate how quickly fun can turn fatal and how the failure to act decisively by individuals and institutions leads to tragic loss.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most high-profile hazing cases in U.S. history, Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after falling repeatedly and suffering traumatic brain injuries during a bid-acceptance night at the Beta Theta Pi fraternity house. Security cameras inside the chapter house captured footage of brothers delaying calling for medical help for hours, even while Timothy was in obvious distress. The aftermath involved dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the creation of Pennsylvania’s Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. This case highlighted extreme intoxication, deliberate delay in calling 911, and a pervasive culture of silence as legally devastating factors.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old FSU pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to consume them rapidly. This tragedy led to criminal hazing charges against multiple fraternity members, some of whom pled guilty to misdemeanors. Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life, launching a statewide anti-hazing movement. This case is a stark reminder that formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster, with fatal consequences.
Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, 18, died after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to drink heavily if they answered questions incorrectly. His blood alcohol content (BAC) was 0.495%, more than six times the legal limit for driving. The outrage following Max’s death led to the enactment of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, a felony hazing statute with strict penalties. A former fraternity member was convicted of negligent homicide in his death. This case powerfully demonstrates how legislative change often follows public outrage and clear proof of hazing’s lethality.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume a nearly full bottle of whiskey during a fraternity “Big/Little” night. Multiple fraternity members faced criminal charges, with several convictions for hazing-related offenses. The Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with approximately $7 million from Pi Kappa Alpha national and nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This outcome underscores that universities can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities, and that national organizations are held accountable for their chapters’ actions.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and ritualized hazing can lead to severe injuries and death, illustrating a different but equally dangerous side of campus abuse.

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, an 18-year-old pledge for Pi Delta Psi, died after being subjected to a violent, blindfolded “glass ceiling” ritual during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania. During the ritual, pledges were tackled repeatedly while carrying heavy backpacks. Michael suffered fatal head injuries, and help was deliberately delayed. Multiple fraternity members were convicted, and the national fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and effectively banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years. This case highlights how off-campus “retreats” can be chosen precisely to hide dangerous hazing from university oversight, and that national organizations can face serious criminal and civil sanctions.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life. Major athletic programs, with their intense competitive pressures and team bonding traditions, can also be breeding grounds for severe hazing.

Northwestern University Football Hazing Scandal (2023–2025): In a scandal that rocked collegiate athletics, former football players from Northwestern University alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program over multiple years. This included forced sexual acts, racial slurs, and physical abuse. The fallout involved multiple lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff, leading to the firing of highly successful head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who later settled a wrongful-termination suit confidentially. This case profoundly demonstrated that hazing extends far beyond Greek life, permeating big-money athletic programs where systemic abuse can be normalized under the guise of “team culture.”

What These Cases Mean for Wichita County Families

These national anchor stories share critical common threads: forced drinking often to dangerous levels, deliberate humiliation, physical violence, dangerous rituals, and a disturbing pattern of delayed or denied medical care along with significant cover-up attempts by individuals and organizations. While these legal battles often result in multi-million-dollar settlements and significant reforms, they typically occur only after a tragedy has struck and families have pursued relentless litigation.

For Wichita County families whose children attend or plan to attend Texas universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these national lessons are directly relevant. The legal strategies, evidence requirements, and institutional defenses developed in these cases will inform how hazing matters are pursued in Texas courts. These stories demonstrate that Texas families are not alone in facing these challenges and are operating within a legal landscape shaped by these profound national tragedies.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Wichita County families, understanding the specific environments and hazing histories of Texas’s major universities is critical. Students from across Wichita County, including Wichita Falls, Iowa Park, and Burkburnett, often attend these institutions. While our firm handles cases for families across Texas, we recognize that the specific culture, policies, and past incidents at each university play a unique role in hazing dynamics. Here, we delve into the nuances of hazing at some of Texas’s largest campuses.

University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus, draws students from across the state and beyond, including many from Wichita County seeking higher education closer to a major metropolitan area.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH is a large, diverse university situated in the heart of Houston. It features a considerable mix of commuter and residential students and boasts an active Greek life with a wide array of fraternities and sororities, including those in the Panhellenic, Interfraternity Council (IFC), Multicultural Greek Council (MGC), and National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC). Beyond Greek life, numerous student organizations, cultural groups, and sports clubs foster a bustling campus environment.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UH maintains a clear anti-hazing policy, prohibiting it both on-campus and off-campus. This policy forbids forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and activities designed to cause mental distress as part of initiation or affiliation. UH provides multiple reporting channels through its Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the UH Police Department. Like other Texas universities, UH posts a public hazing statement and some details regarding disciplinary actions related to hazing on its website, though the level of detail can vary.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

One notable incident involved the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity in 2016. Pledges were allegedly deprived of sufficient food, water, and sleep during an off-campus multi-day event. A student suffered a lacerated spleen, reportedly after being slammed onto a table or similar surface during the hazing. The UH chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges, and the university initiated disciplinary action, including suspension.

Subsequent disciplinary actions involving various Greek organizations have referenced behavior “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” including consistent alcohol misuse and policy violations, resulting in suspensions or probationary periods. While UH has demonstrated a willingness to suspend chapters, some public records may not fully detail the intensity or frequency of specific activities involved in a hazing incident, creating gaps in transparency compared to some other institutions.

How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For families in Wichita County considering legal action related to hazing at UH, any investigation may involve both the UH Police Department and the broader Houston Police Department, depending on where the hazing occurred. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County. Potential defendants in such a case could include the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and potentially the University of Houston itself, along with any property owners where the hazing took place.

What UH Students & Parents Should Do

Know UH’s reporting channels: Report any suspected hazing directly to the Dean of Students’ office, the UH Police Department, or use their online reporting forms.
Document prior complaints: If you hear of or find any public record of prior hazing incidents involving the same organization, document this information. It can be crucial to establishing a pattern in a legal case.
Consult a Houston-based hazing lawyer: Attorneys experienced in Houston’s legal landscape can help uncover prior discipline and internal files that may not be readily public. Our firm, based in Houston, has deep local knowledge.
Educate yourself and your child: Understand the explicit prohibitions found in the UH Student Handbook and hazing policy.
Prioritize safety: Always prioritize mental and physical well-being over loyalty to a group.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, a storied institution known for its traditions, Corps of Cadets, and fiercely loyal Aggies, attracts thousands of students from across Texas, including many from Wichita County who are drawn to its unique academic and campus culture.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M in College Station is renowned for its traditions, strong alumni network, and a community deeply rooted in its values. The university has a significant Greek life presence alongside its prominent Corps of Cadets, a military-style environment that traditionally emphasizes discipline and camaraderie. These elements, while central to the Aggie identity, have unfortunately also been associated with historical and ongoing hazing risks.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M strongly prohibits hazing under university rules and state law. Its policies align with the Texas Education Code, explicitly banning any act that endangers mental or physical health for affiliation with an organization. Reporting channels are managed through the Division of Student Affairs, the Department of Student Activities, the Aggie Honor System Office, and the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD). The university is expected to comply with state requirements for publishing hazing violations.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Among the most unsettling incidents involved Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity around 2021. Pledges alleged they were forced to engage in strenuous activities and then had substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, poured on them. This resulted in severe chemical burns requiring emergency skin graft surgeries for some victims. While specific legal outcomes are often confidential, the fraternity faced suspension from the university for two years, and the pledges pursued a $1 million lawsuit.

More recently, a Corps of Cadets lawsuit in 2023 involved a cadet who alleged degrading hazing, including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The lawsuit sought over $1 million, while A&M affirmed it handled the matter under its established rules. These incidents underscore that hazing at A&M is not limited to Greek life but can tragically extend to its revered Corps traditions.

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Wichita County families of Texas A&M students, legal actions would likely involve investigations by the Texas A&M University Police Department and potentially the Bryan or College Station Police Departments, depending on whether hazing occurred on or off campus. Civil suits are typically brought in McLennan County or Brazos County courts. Potential defendants may include individual students, the local chapter and national organization (for Greek groups), or relevant Corps of Cadets leadership, and the university itself. Given the university’s large endowment and public status, cases against Texas A&M often involve complex legal arguments concerning sovereign immunity.

What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

Understand A&M’s specific policies: Familiarize yourself with the university’s Student Life rules and Corps regulations regarding hazing.
Document any incidents thoroughly: Gather evidence such as photos of injuries, screenshots of group chats, and names of witnesses. This is vital evidence for any legal action.
Consult a lawyer experienced in Texas hazing cases: An attorney can help navigate A&M’s internal processes and advise on potential civil claims focusing on both Greek life and Corps traditions.
Seek medical attention: If any physical or psychological harm occurs, prioritize immediate medical care and ensure documentation explicitly states it resulted from hazing.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution, is a magnet for students from across Texas, including many from Wichita County who aspire to its academic excellence and vibrant campus life. Situated in the state capital, UT Austin has a prominent Greek system and numerous influential student organizations.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Known for its academic rigor, spirited sports culture, and a dynamic student body, UT Austin is home to nearly 60 fraternity and sorority chapters, along with countless other student organizations, spirit groups, and traditions that define the Longhorn experience. Its large size and decentralized social scene can sometimes make oversight challenging.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UT Austin maintains a robust anti-hazing policy that strictly prohibits hazing both on and off campus. The university is notably transparent, publishing a public Hazing Violations webpage that lists organizations, dates of incidents, a description of the conduct, and the disciplinary sanctions imposed. Reporting can be made through the Office of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, the Dean of Students, the UT Austin Police Department (UTPD), or an anonymous online reporting system.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s public hazing log provides valuable insight into ongoing issues. Recent examples include:

Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): This fraternity was sanctioned after new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. The university found this constituted hazing, resulting in chapter probation and requirements for new hazing-prevention education.
Texas Wranglers (2022): This spirit organization faced discipline for hazing violations that included forced workouts, alcohol misuse, and other punishment-based practices.
Numerous other groups, both Greek and non-Greek, have received sanctions for alcohol-related hazing, physical endurance tests, and degrading activities.

These public records are invaluable, providing clear evidence of repeated patterns and how the university has responded (or not responded) over time.

How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Wichita County families pursuing a hazing case originating at UT Austin, both the UTPD and the Austin Police Department could be involved in criminal investigations. Civil lawsuits against individuals, chapters, national organizations, or the university would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Austin and Travis County. UT’s public hazing log is a powerful tool for civil litigation, as prior violations on this log can strongly support arguments about an organization’s pattern of misconduct and the university’s knowledge of such issues.

What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

Check the UT Hazing Violations page: Before joining an organization, familiarize yourself with its disciplinary history.
Document everything: If hazing occurs, gather all evidence, including screenshots of group chats and any university communications.
Report through official channels: Utilize UTPD, the Office of Student Conduct, or the Dean of Students.
Consult with an Austin-based hazing lawyer: An attorney familiar with UT’s policies and legal landscape is essential for navigating these cases, especially given the public university’s status and potential sovereign immunity defenses.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, known for its academic prestige and vibrant social scene, is a frequent destination for students seeking a private university experience, including some from Wichita County.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU, located in University Park, a suburb of Dallas, is a private university with a reputation for a strong Greek system and numerous social organizations. Its affluent student body and tight-knit campus community contribute to a distinct social culture that often places significant emphasis on Greek life.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that is consistent with Texas law. As a private institution, SMU has more latitude in its internal disciplinary processes than public universities and is typically not bound by state open records laws. Reporting channels include SMU’s Office of Student Conduct, the Dean of Students, and the SMU Police Department. SMU also utilizes systems like “Real Response” to encourage anonymous reporting of concerning student behavior, including hazing.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

A notable incident involved the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity in 2017. New members were reportedly subjected to physical hazing, including paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. This led to the temporary suspension of the chapter, with significant restrictions on its activities and recruiting capabilities until around 2021.

While SMU’s internal disciplinary records are not as publicly accessible as UT Austin’s, the university has a documented history of investigating and sanctioning organizations for hazing violations, underscoring that even private, well-resourced institutions grapple with this issue.

How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Wichita County families pursuing a hazing claim at SMU, investigative efforts might involve the SMU Police Department and the University Park Police Department. Civil lawsuits would generally be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Dallas County. As a private institution, SMU doesn’t benefit from sovereign immunity, making it a more direct defendant than public universities in some aspects. However, its private status can make obtaining internal records more challenging outside of formal legal discovery.

What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

Understand SMU’s private nature: Be aware that internal disciplinary records may not be publicly available; legal discovery is often necessary to uncover this information.
Utilize anonymous reporting systems: Encourage students to use systems like “Real Response” if they fear direct repercussions.
Document thoroughly: As with any hazing incident, immediate and comprehensive documentation of evidence is paramount.
Consult a Dallas-area hazing lawyer: An attorney with experience navigating private university policies and the Dallas legal system is crucial.

Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, holds a unique place among Texas institutions, attracting students from diverse backgrounds, including Wichita County, who seek an education within a faith-based environment.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor boasts a strong sense of community, a rich array of traditions, and numerous student organizations, including a significant Greek life presence and prominent athletic programs. The university’s strong religious identity influences its campus policies and student conduct expectations. Baylor has faced intense scrutiny in recent years regarding its handling of student welfare, particularly concerning sexual assault allegations within its athletic program, which informs its approach to misconduct like hazing.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor maintains a “zero tolerance” policy for hazing, emphasizing its commitment to student safety. Its hazing policy aligns with state law, strictly prohibiting any act that could endanger a student’s mental or physical well-being for organizational affiliation. Reporting channels include Baylor’s Office of Student Conduct and Conflict Resolution, the Dean of Students, and the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD). The university is also transparent about its “Safer Together” initiatives, which address campus safety broadly.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor’s history includes hazing incidents within its athletic program. In 2020, for instance, 14 members of the Baylor baseball team were suspended following a hazing investigation. These suspensions were staggered over the early season, impacting the team’s performance. This incident, while not directly involving Greek life, highlights that hazing can occur within any student group, even in the context of high-profile athletic programs at Baylor.

The university’s broader cultural and oversight challenges, particularly its past scrutiny over Title IX and misconduct allegations, provide crucial context for understanding how Baylor might address hazing claims. Its public statements emphasize a commitment to reform and student safety, yet recurring incidents underscore the difficulty of fully eradicating these behaviors.

How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Wichita County families pursuing a hazing case at Baylor, criminal investigations might involve the Baylor University Police Department and the Waco Police Department. Civil lawsuits against individuals, organizations, or the university would typically proceed in courts within McLennan County. As a private university, Baylor does not have the protection of sovereign immunity. However, its institutional policies and public relations strategies often play a significant role in how it responds to litigation.

What Baylor University Students & Parents Should Do

Understand Baylor’s policies: Familiarize yourself with Baylor’s specific “zero tolerance” hazing policy and its broader commitment to student well-being.
Document precisely: Collect all evidence meticulously, ensuring you record incidents, dates, names, and any communications.
Report through official channels: Utilize Baylor’s Office of Student Conduct or BUPD for official reports.
Consult a Central Texas hazing lawyer: An attorney experienced with private university systems and the legal landscape of Waco and McLennan County can offer invaluable guidance.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

When hazing occurs at a Texas university, Wichita County families are often left wondering how a seemingly isolated incident could happen. However, many fraternities and sororities involved in hazing are part of larger national organizations with their own extensive and often troubled histories. Understanding these national patterns is crucial because they directly impact legal accountability here in Texas.

Why National Histories Matter

The reality is that fraternities and sororities operating at campuses like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor—such as Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Phi Delta Theta, or Kappa Alpha Order—are not entirely autonomous. They are local chapters of national organizations. These national headquarters often possess extensive anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies precisely because they have faced deaths and catastrophic injuries at chapters across the country for decades. They are, or should be, acutely aware of common hazing patterns: forced drinking nights, paddling traditions, degrading rituals, and the pervasive culture of silence.

When a local chapter in Texas repeats the same dangerous script that has led to another chapter being shut down, sued, or even criminally prosecuted in another state, this creates a crucial legal argument of foreseeability. It suggests that the national organization knew or should have known these incidents were likely to recur and failed to take adequate preventative action. This directly supports negligence claims and can strengthen arguments for punitive damages against national entities.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

While it is impossible to list every single chapter at every university, certain organizations have established national patterns of hazing that are particularly relevant for our purposes:

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): A national fraternity with chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and Baylor. Pike has a deeply troubling national history of hazing, particularly involving extreme alcohol consumption. The Stone Foltz death at Bowling Green State University ($10 million settlement) involved Pike, as did the David Bogenberger death at Northern Illinois University ($14 million settlement). These incidents, often centered on “Big/Little” revelation nights involving rapid, forced alcohol intake, indicate a pervasive risk at their chapters nationwide, impacting students including those from Wichita County.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): With chapters at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and UT Austin, SAE has been involved in multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries across the country. Lawsuits include a traumatic brain injury case at the University of Alabama (filed 2023), allegations of chemical burns requiring skin grafts at Texas A&M in 2021, and a 2024 assault case at the University of Texas at Austin. The SAE national organization had previously eliminated its traditional pledge process in 2014 in response to a string of deaths, yet incidents continue to occur, showing persistent issues.
Phi Delta Theta (Phi Delt): Chapters are active at UH, Texas A&M, SMU, and Baylor. This fraternity was at the center of the Max Gruver hazing death at LSU, where forced drinking during a “Bible study” game led to felony hazing charges and the impactful Max Gruver Act in Louisiana. This national incident creates a clear precedent for foreseeing similar dangers at any Phi Delta Theta chapter, including those attended by Wichita County students.
Pi Kappa Phi (Pi Kapp): Present at UH and Texas A&M. Pi Kappa Phi was involved in the Andrew Coffey hazing death at Florida State University in 2017, where extreme alcohol consumption as part of “Big Brother Night” proved fatal. This tragic history underscores the severe risks associated with alcohol-centric hazing rituals within the organization’s chapters.
Kappa Alpha Order (KA): With chapters at Texas A&M and SMU, KA has faced hazing allegations. Most notably, an incident at SMU in 2017 involved paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation, leading to the chapter’s suspension. This shows that despite its traditional Southern gentleman branding, hazing problems persist. The death of Chad Meredith at the University of Miami in 2001, tied to Kappa Sigma but similar in nature, led to a $12.6 million jury verdict against fraternity members and a law named in his honor in Florida, illustrating significant liability for alcohol-related rituals.

This section is not an exhaustive list but highlights how particular organizations show recurring dangerous patterns across different campuses.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

For Wichita County families, these national patterns are not just historical footnotes; they are critical components of a successful legal strategy:

Foreseeability: The fact that certain hazing methods (e.g., extreme alcohol, physical abuse) have repeatedly led to injury or death across various chapters of the same national organization means the national entity was on notice. They cannot credibly claim an incident was “unforeseeable.”
Enforcement of Policies: Courts will scrutinize whether national organizations (and universities) genuinely enforced their anti-hazing policies, or if these were merely “paper policies.” A history of minimal sanctions for past violations can show a pattern of deliberate indifference.
Settlement Leverage and Punitive Damages: Evidence of repeated misconduct and national organizations’ failure to act can significantly increase settlement leverage. In some jurisdictions, this pattern can also support claims for punitive damages, which are designed not just to compensate the victim but to punish particularly reckless or malicious conduct and deter future harm.
Insurance Coverage: Understanding national patterns helps attorneys battle common insurance company defenses. Insurers often try to deny coverage by claiming hazing is an “intentional act” or falls under specific exclusions. However, when a pattern of negligence by the national organization can be proven, it strengthens arguments for coverage.

By understanding the interconnectedness of local chapter incidents and national hazing histories, Wichita County families and their legal counsel can build a more powerful case for accountability and justice.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

For Wichita County families seeking justice after a hazing incident, building a strong legal case requires meticulous evidence collection, a clear understanding of potential damages, and a strategic approach. The Manginello Law Firm excels in these areas, leveraging comprehensive investigative techniques and deep legal expertise to fight for our clients.

Evidence

Modern hazing cases are often won or lost based on the quality and breadth of evidence collected. This is why immediate action, as outlined in our 48-hour checklist, is so important.

Digital Communications: These are often the most critical pieces of evidence. Group chats and direct messages (DMs) from platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, and even fraternity-specific apps can reveal planning, peer pressure, instructions, and even admissions of hazing. Our firm can work with digital forensics experts to recover deleted messages, but original screenshots are invaluable. We recommend watching Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) for best practices in preserving digital evidence.
Photos & Videos: Any content filmed by members during hazing events, whether shared in group chats, posted on social media, or even footage from security cameras at houses or venues, is crucial. This can objectively show the events as they unfolded. Photos of injuries, from initial bruising to recovery, are also vital.
Internal Organization Documents: These can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” lists, emails from officers discussing new member activities, and the national organization’s anti-hazing policies and training materials. These documents can expose discrepancies between official policy and actual practice.
University Records: Through discovery in a lawsuit, we can obtain records of prior conduct, probation, suspensions, and warning letters related to the involved organization. Campus police incident reports, Clery Act reports, and other disclosures can illuminate a pattern of ignored warnings or inadequate responses from the university.
Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical documentation of injuries, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, toxicology reports (alcohol/drugs), and any ongoing treatments are foundational. Equally important are psychological evaluations that diagnose conditions like PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation resulting from the trauma of hazing. This helps establish the full scope of harm.
Witness Testimony: The accounts of other pledges, active members, roommates, Resident Assistants (RAs), coaches, and even bystanders who observed the hazing can be incredibly powerful. Former members who quit or were expelled often provide candid accounts that expose the true culture of an organization.

Damages

For Wichita County families, understanding the types of compensation (damages) available in a hazing lawsuit helps clarify what justice can look like. These are categories of harm for which the law provides monetary recovery:

Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs related to medical treatment, from immediate emergency room visits and ambulance transport to surgeries, ongoing physical therapy, medications, and mental health counseling. For catastrophic injuries like traumatic brain injuries, this can include a “life care plan” to cover lifelong care needs.
Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes wages lost if the student or a parent had to take time off work, as well as the long-term impact on the student’s earning capacity if injuries are permanent. It also accounts for missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed graduation, and the resulting setback in entering the workforce.
Non-Economic Damages: These quantify subjective harms, which are often the most profound in hazing cases. They include physical pain and suffering, intense emotional distress, psychological trauma (such as PTSD), humiliation, and the loss of enjoyment of life (e.g., ability to participate in sports, hobbies, or social activities).
Wrongful Death Damages (for families): In the tragic event of a hazing-related death, eligible family members (parents, spouses, children) can recover for funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and immense emotional suffering, loss of companionship, love, guidance, and society. Attorney911 has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic cases.
Punitive Damages: In cases where the defendants’ conduct was particularly reckless, malicious, or grossly negligent, punitive damages may be awarded. These are intended to punish the wrongdoer and deter others from similar conduct. While Texas law has caps on punitive damages in many instances, their availability can significantly influence a case if severe institutional failures are proven.

It’s important to remember that we are describing categories of damages, not promising or predicting specific dollar amounts for any individual case.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing cases often involve multiple defendants, each with their own legal counsel and, crucially, insurance policies.

National fraternities, universities, and even individual student leaders often carry various types of liability insurance. However, insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage by arguing that hazing constitutes “intentional conduct” or falls under specific policy exclusions.
Navigating these insurance coverage disputes requires specialized legal knowledge. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is crucial in this arena. We know their tactics, how they attempt to undervalue claims, and how to fight for the coverage our clients deserve.
Our strategy involves identifying all potential sources of insurance coverage, challenging unjustified denials, and using all available legal avenues to ensure that victims receive full and fair compensation. This requires not just general personal injury experience, but specific insights into how institutional defendants and their insurers operate in hazing contexts.

Practical Guides & FAQs

For Wichita County families, knowing what to do and when to do it can make all the difference after a hazing incident. Here are practical guides for parents, students, and witnesses, along with answers to common questions.

For Parents: Recognizing & Responding to Hazing

The signs of hazing can be subtle but often escalate. For parents in Wichita County whose children are attending Texas universities, vigilance and a clear course of action are paramount.

Warning Signs of Hazing: Look for unexplained bruises, burns, or “accidents” with dubious explanations. Observe sudden, extreme exhaustion or drastic changes in mood, anxiety, or withdrawal from family and friends. Notice constant, secretive phone use, especially for group chats, and a fear of missing “mandatory” late-night events. A rapid decline in academic performance or sudden financial strain can also be red flags.
How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not judgment. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with your group?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priority, and that you will support them regardless of the situation. Reassure them that they will not be “in trouble” for confiding in you.
If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize immediate medical care. Ensure that medical providers document the alleged cause of injury, explicitly stating “hazing” if applicable. Document everything meticulously: photograph injuries (from multiple angles and over several days), screenshot texts or social media messages your child shows you, and write down names, dates, and locations while the memory is fresh.
Dealing with the University: Document every conversation and communication with university administrators. Specifically ask about any prior incidents involving the same organization and what actions the school took in response. Understand that university internal investigations may not fully align with your child’s best interests or legal rights.
When to Talk to a Lawyer: Consult with an experienced hazing attorney immediately if your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing what happened. Early legal intervention can help preserve critical evidence and protect your child’s rights.

For Students / Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning

If you are a student from Wichita County pledging or joining an organization at a Texas university, your safety is paramount.

Is this Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself: Am I being pressured or forced to do something I don’t want to? Would I do this if my enrollment in the group wasn’t contingent on it? Is this dangerous, degrading, or illegal? Would my parents or the university approve? If the activity is hidden or involves secrecy, it is likely hazing, regardless of what it’s called.
Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Despite what older members might say, the law recognizes the immense power dynamics at play. The fear of social exclusion, the desire to belong, and severe peer pressure mean that “consent” in a hazing context is often not freely given. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing.
Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the right to leave any organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, remove yourself from the situation immediately and contact a trusted adult or campus authority. If you are in immediate danger, call 911. You can report hazing confidentially or anonymously through campus channels (Dean of Students, Title IX Coordinator), or national hotlines like 1-888-NOT-HAZE (1-888-668-4293).
Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and Texas law offer “medical amnesty” or “good Samaritan” protections for students who call for help in an emergency, even if underage drinking or other minor rule violations occurred. Your safety, and the safety of others, takes precedence.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were part of a hazing incident, or witnessed it, and now feel guilt, fear, or a desire to come forward, know that your courage can prevent future tragedies.

Acknowledge that coming forward is difficult. You may fear retaliation or legal repercussions. However, your testimony and evidence can be pivotal in holding perpetrators accountable and preventing future harm.
While you may want your own legal advice to understand your rights and potential exposure, cooperating with law enforcement or a civil inquiry can be an important step toward making amends and preventing further abuse. Lawyers can help you navigate this process.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For Wichita County families and students, avoiding common missteps after a hazing incident is as crucial as documenting the evidence itself. These mistakes can severely undermine a potential legal claim: Watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) for more information.

Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence. Parents may instinctively tell their child to erase embarrassing content or messages to avoid “more trouble.” However, this can be perceived as attempted obstruction of justice and can make it nearly impossible to prove the hazing occurred. Instead: Preserve everything immediately, even if it feels embarrassing or incriminating.
Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly. While the urge to confront those who harmed your child is understandable, it often backfires. Organizations will immediately get legal counsel, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare defenses. Instead: Document everything, then contact a lawyer before any direct confrontation.
Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms. Universities may pressure families into signing agreements or waivers for “internal resolution.” These forms can unknowingly waive your legal right to sue the university or specific individuals, and any early settlements are typically far below the true value of your case. Instead: Never sign anything from the university or an insurance company without an attorney reviewing it first.
Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer. Sharing details on public platforms, even to raise awareness, can unintentionally harm your case. Defense attorneys will meticulously screenshot everything, looking for inconsistencies or statements they can use against your child, and potentially claiming you’ve waived privacy protections. Instead: Document privately and let your legal team control public messaging.
Letting your child go back to “one last meeting.” Once you’re considering legal action, any further communication with the organization should go through your lawyer. Returning to “talk things over” can lead to pressure, intimidation, or statements being coerced that can hurt your case. Instead: All communication should be managed by your legal counsel.
Waiting “to see how the university handles it.” Universities perform internal investigations primarily to protect the institution. Evidence disappears rapidly, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations can run out while you wait for an internal process to conclude. Instead: Preserve evidence immediately and consult a lawyer; a university’s internal process does not equate to real legal accountability.
Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer. Insurance adjusters, representing the fraternity, university, or individuals, are trained to minimize payouts. They may ask for recorded statements or offer quick, lowball settlements. Instead: Politely decline to speak and inform them that your attorney will contact them.

Short FAQ

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing employees in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on specific facts. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. While Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default, it becomes a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Furthermore, individual officers of an organization can face misdemeanor charges for failing to report hazing.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that “consent” given under peer pressure, a power imbalance, duress, or the fear of exclusion is not truly voluntary.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally, there is a 2-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be tolled (paused). Time is always critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to protect your rights. You can also watch our video, “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities or sororities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and the foreseeability of hazing occurring off-campus. Many major hazing cases that resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments (like the Pi Delta Psi retreat case or the Sigma Pi unofficial house incident) occurred off-campus.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before ever going to trial. Our firm can work to request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms to protect your child’s privacy while still pursuing accountability and compensation. We prioritize your family’s privacy interests throughout the legal process.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces the profound challenge of a hazing incident, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand the intricate ways powerful institutions fight back—and possess the expertise to win anyway. For families in Wichita County and throughout Texas, The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, stands ready as your Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

From our Houston office, we serve families across Greater Houston, Harris County, and throughout Texas, including Wichita County and its surrounding areas. We recognize that hazing at Texas universities impacts families in Wichita County and across the entire region, and we are committed to providing exceptional legal support, no matter where in the state your child attends school.

We understand that hazing cases are not just legal battles; they are often deeply personal and traumatic experiences. Our firm brings unique qualifications to these complex lawsuits:

Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable insight with her background as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She knows precisely how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and often undervalue) hazing claims, anticipates their delay tactics, understands coverage exclusion arguments, and knows their settlement strategies. We know their playbook because we used to run it. For more details on Lupe Peña’s expertise, visit https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, has an extensive track record in complex litigation. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, and his federal court experience (including the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants and secure significant results. You can learn more about Ralph Manginello’s credentials at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We don’t settle cheap. We have a proven track record in obtaining multi-million dollar settlements and verdicts in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. This includes working with economists to accurately value loss of life and collaborating with medical experts to project lifetime care needs for victims with brain injuries or permanent disabilities. We build cases that force accountability.
Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a crucial understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual perspective is invaluable when advising witnesses and former members who may face both criminal exposure and civil liability. Our criminal defense expertise can be found at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.
Investigative Depth: We investigate hazing cases with the intensity and thoroughness your child’s future deserves. Our network of experts includes digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, economists, and psychologists. We meticulously work to obtain hidden evidence, such as deleted group chats, chapter records, and university files, through aggressive discovery and public records requests. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We understand this is one of the hardest things a family can face, whether you’re in Wichita County or elsewhere in Texas. Our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We approach every case with empathy and a commitment to victim advocacy, prioritizing thorough investigation and genuine accountability over quick settlements. We work on a contingency fee basis; we don’t get paid unless we win your case. For more information on how contingency fees work, watch our video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.

If your child attends a Texas university, perhaps from Wichita County, and has been impacted by hazing, we want to hear from you. Families in Wichita County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

In your free consultation, you can expect us to:

Listen to your story without judgment.
Review any evidence you’ve gathered (photos, texts, medical records).
Explain your legal options: criminal reporting, civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
Discuss realistic timelines and what to expect during the legal process.
Answer your questions about costs, explaining our contingency fee structure.
Offer guidance without pressure to hire us on the spot; take the time you need to decide.
Ensure everything you share with us is kept strictly confidential.

Whether you’re in Wichita County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com