Understanding Hazing: A Guide for Massachusetts Families and Students

For families across Massachusetts, the college journey is often filled with aspiration and hope. We envision our children thriving academically, building lifelong friendships, and discovering their passions. Yet, for some, this journey can take a dark and dangerous turn into the world of hazing. Imagine your child, a hopeful freshman from Boston, eager to fit in at the University of Massachusetts Amherst or a local institution, suddenly finding themselves pressured into a secret initiation ceremony in an off-campus house near Cambridge. Perhaps they’re told to consume excessive amounts of alcohol, endure degrading acts, or perform extreme physical tasks, all under the guise of “tradition” or “team-building.” Others are filming on their phones, chanting, and laughing, creating an atmosphere where calling for help feels impossible, even as someone gets hurt, passes out, or collapses. The student feels trapped between loyalty to the group and their own safety.

This is not a hypothetical scenario; it’s the reality for far too many students. This comprehensive guide to hazing and the law in Massachusetts is written for families like yours, who need to understand what hazing truly looks like in 2025, how Massachusetts and federal law addresses it, and what legal options victims and families may have. Even if your child attends school far from Massachusetts, this information provides critical insights into the pervasive issue of hazing and how justice can be sought. The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, can evaluate individual cases based on their specific facts, serving families throughout Massachusetts and across the nation.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  - Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
  - Photograph injuries from multiple angles
  - Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
- Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
- Do NOT:
  - Confront the fraternity/sorority
  - Sign anything from the university or insurance company
  - Post details on public social media
  - Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
- Universities move quickly to control the narrative
- We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Massachusetts families, understanding hazing today requires looking beyond the outdated stereotypes of simple pranks. Modern hazing, whether at a university in Boston or a smaller college in Worcester, is far more insidious, encompassing a spectrum of behaviors designed to assert control, induce conformity, and often, cause physical and psychological harm. Hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. Even if a student appears to “agree” to participate, the presence of peer pressure and significant power imbalances often negates true consent, making the activity hazing under the law.

Hazing is broadly categorized by its severity and intent:

Subtle Hazing: These are behaviors that establish power imbalances between new and existing members. Often dismissed as “harmless traditions,” they inflict psychological harm and lay the groundwork for more severe abuse. Examples include:

Deception and secrecy oaths: Requiring pledges to lie to parents or university officials about activities.
Demeaning tasks: Forcing new members to act as designated drivers at unusual hours, clean older members’ rooms, or run personal errands. The mentality is often that “pledges are on call 24/7.”
Social isolation: Restricting interactions with non-members, or requiring permission to socialize.
Deprivation of privileges: New members may be forbidden from speaking unless spoken to, or restricted from using certain entrances or seating areas.
Interference with academics: Mandatory late-night meetings or activities scheduled during critical study periods.
“Scavenger hunts” or “tasks” designed for humiliation: While seemingly benign, these often involve embarrassing public performances.
Modern subtle hazing may include constant monitoring through group chats, demanding instant responses, requiring live location sharing, or policing social media content.

Harassment Hazing: These activities cause emotional or physical discomfort, often creating a hostile or abusive environment, though they may not result in lasting physical injury.

Verbal abuse: Yelling, screaming, insulting, or using degrading language and threats.
Sleep deprivation: Late-night “meetings” or tasks that interfere with adequate rest, or multi-day events with minimal sleep.
Food or water restriction: Limiting meals, or forcing the consumption of unpleasant or excessive amounts of food or drink.
Forced physical activity: “Smokings” or extreme calisthenics like hundreds of push-ups or wall sits that go beyond safe limits, often disguised as “conditioning.”
Public humiliation: Forcing pledges to perform embarrassing acts in public, or endure “roasts” where they are verbally attacked.
Exposure to uncomfortable conditions: Forcing pledges into filthy environments, or covering them in degrading substances like food or spit.
Digitally, this can manifest as forcing students to post embarrassing content online, participate in degrading online challenges, or live-stream humiliating acts for others’ entertainment within private groups.

Violent Hazing: These are the most dangerous forms of hazing, carrying a high risk of physical injury, sexual assault, or even death.

Forced alcohol consumption: “Lineup” drinking games, “Big/Little” nights with hard liquor, or “Bible study” games where incorrect answers result in forced drinking. This also includes forced chugging, funneling, or keg stands.
Forced drug use: Coercion to consume illegal or unknown substances.
Physical beatings: Paddling, punches, kicks, slaps, or “branding” with heat or other instruments.
Dangerous physical “tests”: Blindfolded tackling, forced fights, jumping from heights, or dangerous driving while intoxicated.
Sexualized hazing: Forced nudity, simulated sexual acts, sexual assault, or coercion into sexually degrading acts.
Discriminatory hazing: Using slurs or forcing individuals to act out stereotypes based on race, gender, or sexual orientation.
Kidnapping or restraint: Blindfolded abduction, tying participants up, or physical restraint.
Environmental exposure: Confining individuals in freezing rooms or exposing them to extreme heat or cold for extended periods.
Modern violent hazing often uses off-campus “retreats” (Airbnbs, rural properties) to avoid detection, or disguises dangerous acts as “teambuilding” or “wellness challenges.” A particularly concerning trend seen nationally involves fire or chemical hazing, where pledges are intentionally burned or exposed to harmful substances.

Hazing is not limited to social fraternities and sororities. It manifests in various campus organizations:

Fraternities and sororities: Including Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations.
Athletic teams: Across all sports, including football, basketball, baseball, cheer, and even club sports.
Military-style groups: Such as ROTC programs or similar cadres.
Performing arts groups: Marching bands, dance teams, and theater groups.
Academic and service clubs: Even groups dedicated to community service or scholastic achievement can develop hazing cultures.

Ultimately, hazing is perpetuated by a combination of factors: the desire for belonging, the perceived importance of tradition, the secrecy demanded by perpetrators, and an underlying power dynamic that exploits new members. For Massachusetts families, it’s crucial to understand these nuances to recognize hazing in any form, wherever it may occur.

Law & Liability Framework (Massachusetts + Federal)

Understanding the legal framework surrounding hazing is crucial for Massachusetts families, regardless of whether their child attends a school like the University of Massachusetts Amherst or Boston University. Both state and federal laws define illegal hazing, impose penalties, and outline avenues for accountability.

Massachusetts Hazing Law Basics

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has specific and robust anti-hazing laws. The core legislation is found in Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 269, Section 17. This statute defines hazing broadly and imposes significant penalties:

Definition of Hazing: It defines hazing as “any conduct or method of initiation into any student organization, whether on public or private property, which willfully or recklessly endangers the physical or mental health of any student or other person.” This “conduct or method” can include physical brutality (whipping, beating, branding, forced consumption of food or liquids, etc.) or mental harm (sleep deprivation, extended isolation, forced conduct that could cause extreme embarrassment, etc.).
Criminal Penalties for Hazing: Any student who causes or participates in hazing is guilty of a crime, punishable by a fine of up to $3,000, or by imprisonment for up to one year, or both.
Criminal Penalties for Failing to Report Hazing: Any person who witnesses hazing and fails to report it to appropriate authorities (e.g., school officials, police) can be punished by a fine of up to $1,000, or by imprisonment for up to six months, or both. This “duty to report” is a critical aspect of Massachusetts law, encouraging bystanders to intervene.
Institutional Responsibility: Every post-secondary educational institution in Massachusetts must provide a copy of the hazing law to every student group and require that each group certify, in writing, that it has received a copy of the law and agrees to comply with it. Institutions also must adopt anti-hazing rules and have a process for reporting and investigating hazing. The law specifies transparency requirements, such as requiring institutions to publish these rules and any hazing violations in student handbooks.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s important to distinguish between criminal and civil actions in hazing:

Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state (prosecutors in Massachusetts) against individuals or organizations accused of violating criminal hazing laws. The goal is punishment—fines, jail time, or probation—for breaking the law. For example, if a student dies during an initiation, individuals involved may face charges such as involuntary manslaughter in addition to hazing charges.
Civil Cases: These are initiated by victims or their surviving family members. The primary goal is monetary compensation for damages suffered (medical bills, pain and suffering, lost income, wrongful death) and to hold responsible parties accountable. A civil case does not require a criminal conviction; the burden of proof is lower, and findings are based on a “preponderance of the evidence.”

Both criminal and civil actions can occur concurrently, as seen in many high-profile national cases.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state law, federal regulations also impact how hazing is addressed in Massachusetts:

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This crucial piece of legislation requires colleges and universities that receive federal funding to publicly report hazing incidents, enhance hazing prevention education, and maintain transparent hazing data. This will include specific details about organizations involved, the nature of violations, and resulting sanctions, all phased in by approximately 2026. This federal act aims to create a national standard for transparency and accountability.
Title IX: If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or discrimination based on gender (including gender identity and sexual orientation), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 is triggered. This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Universities have a legal obligation to investigate and respond promptly and effectively to such allegations, regardless of whether they occurred on or off campus.
Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. While hazing is not a separate Clery crime category, hazing incidents often involve other reportable crimes such as assault, liquor law violations, drug violations, or sexual offenses. These must be reported in the institution’s annual security report (ASR).

Who Can Be Held Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

When hazing causes harm, multiple parties may share legal responsibility:

Individual Students: Those directly involved in planning or carrying out the hazing acts. This includes members, new members, and even those who stood by and did nothing if they had a duty to intervene.
Local Chapter/Organization: The fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself. As a legal entity, the chapter can be sued for its actions, especially if its leadership authorized or condoned the hazing.
National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, particularly if they had knowledge of previous hazing incidents at the local chapter or a history of similar hazing across their organization nationwide, yet failed to take adequate preventative or corrective measures. Their role in setting policies, providing oversight, and collecting dues can establish liability.
University or Governing Board: The educational institution (like Worcester State University or UMass Amherst) or its governing board may face liability if there is evidence of negligence, gross negligence, or deliberate indifference. This includes failing to enforce known hazing policies, failing to investigate reports, or failing to adequately supervise organizations.
Third Parties: This can include landlords who rent properties for hazing events, bars or alcohol suppliers involved in providing alcohol to minors (under dram shop laws), or even event organizers who facilitate dangerous activities.

Every hazing case is fact-specific, and the determination of liability depends on a thorough investigation of all contributing factors and parties.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

When we look at hazing incidents across the nation, certain patterns emerge—repeated scenarios, similar tragic outcomes, and recurring failures of institutional oversight. These national cases are not isolated incidents; they cast a long shadow, informing legal strategies and reinforcing the critical need for accountability in Massachusetts and beyond. They demonstrate common threads in hazing behavior, how institutions respond, and why strong legal representation is vital.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The most pervasive and deadly form of hazing involves forced or coerced alcohol consumption.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza’s death remains one of the most stark examples of how extreme intoxication, coupled with a callous indifference to a student’s deteriorating condition, leads to tragedy. During a “bid acceptance” event involving heavy drinking, Piazza fell repeatedly, suffering traumatic brain injuries. Fraternity members waited nearly 12 hours before calling 911. The horrific events, captured on the fraternity’s own security cameras, led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the passing of Pennsylvania’s stringent anti-hazing legislation, the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. This case is a stark reminder to Massachusetts families that delayed medical care and a culture of silence can be legally devastating.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey’s death, also from alcohol poisoning, occurred during a “Big/Little” event where pledges were given handles of liquor. The incident led to multiple criminal hazing charges against fraternity members and a temporary suspension of all Greek life at Florida State University. Coffey’s case highlights how formulaic “tradition” drinking nights repeatedly serve as scripts for disaster, with chapters often ignoring national anti-hazing policies.
Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver died from alcohol poisoning after a “Bible study” drinking game where “incorrect” answers resulted in forced drinking. His death sparked public outrage and led to Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing law that carries serious penalties. Gruver’s case demonstrates how legislative change can be a direct response to hazing fatalities, underscoring the severity of these incidents.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz’s death, after being forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey during a pledge night, resulted in multiple criminal convictions for hazing. His family reached a $10 million settlement, including nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University and $7 million from the national Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity. This outcome serves as a critical precedent for Massachusetts institutions, proving that universities can face substantial financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities when hazing occurs. This outcome underscores the significant liability involved in inadequately addressing hazing.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Hazing isn’t just about alcohol. Physical and ritualized abuse also causes severe harm and death.

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng died after a horrifying incident during an off-campus fraternity retreat in Pennsylvania’s Pocono Mountains. Blindfolded and carrying a heavy backpack, he was repeatedly tackled in a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual. Members delayed calling 911 for over an hour, further contributing to his death from traumatic brain injury. Multiple members were convicted, and, significantly, the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years. This case demonstrates that “retreats” can be as dangerous as any on-campus event, and that national organizations are not immune to criminal charges.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing permeates beyond Greek life,
extending into various student groups, including elite athletic programs.

Northwestern University football (2023–2025): A national scandal erupted when former Northwestern football players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program over multiple years. This led to multiple players filing lawsuits against the university and coaching staff, resulting in the firing of the head coach, who later settled a wrongful-termination suit confidentially. This high-profile case highlights that hazing is not confined to fraternities and sororities, but can be deeply embedded within major athletic organizations, raising serious questions about institutional oversight at all levels.

What These Cases Mean for Massachusetts Families

These national tragedies reveal a disturbing pattern: forced drinking, humiliation, physical violence, delayed medical intervention, and systematic cover-ups are recurring themes. Justice, in the form of multi-million dollar settlements, criminal convictions, and policy reforms, often comes only after intense litigation and public outcry. For Massachusetts families, whether your child attends a local university like Boston College or Wellesley College, or an out-of-state institution, the legal landscape is shaped by these hard-won lessons. The precedents set in these cases mean that accountability is possible, and that grieving families and injured students have legal recourse when institutions and organizations fail to protect them.

Universities: Massachusetts and Beyond

Hazing is a complex issue touching institutions large and small, public and private. For families in Massachusetts, understanding the landscape at major in-state universities is crucial, as is recognizing the broader context of high-profile cases at other institutions your child might attend. This section delves into the specifics of Greek life, relevant policies, and documented hazing incidents at Massachusetts institutions.

University of Massachusetts Amherst

The flagship public university in the Commonwealth, UMass Amherst is a vibrant campus with a significant Greek life presence. Students from across Massachusetts, including many from Boston and Worcester, choose UMass for its academic programs and campus experience.

Greek Life at UMass Amherst: The university recognizes over 30 fraternities and sororities under the Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council (PHC), and National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC). These organizations collectively involve thousands of students, making Greek life a prominent part of the social scene.

Hazing Policies and Reporting: UMass Amherst maintains a strict zero-tolerance policy against hazing, in accordance with Massachusetts law. Their Code of Student Conduct clearly defines hazing and outlines disciplinary actions for individuals and organizations found responsible. The university encourages reporting through the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, or anonymously through their online reporting system. Transparency is key, and UMass aims to educate students and parents on the dangers of hazing through various outreach programs.

Documented Incidents: While UMass Amherst has actively worked to combat hazing, incidents do occur. Public records indicate various fraternities and sororities have faced sanctions ranging from social probation to suspension for violating anti-hazing policies. These incidents often involve alcohol misuse, forced servitude, or other behaviors that endanger student well-being. For example, in 2017, the university suspended the Kappa Sigma fraternity for three years following multiple hazing violations, including forced calisthenics and coercive activities. More recently, in 2022, a sorority was placed on probation for engaging in activities deemed psychologically harmful.

Impact on Massachusetts Families: Families in Massachusetts should proactively review UMass Amherst’s hazing report data, which is typically published transparently online, to understand any recurring issues or specific organizations that have faced sanctions. This information can help in making informed decisions about student involvement.

Boston University

Located in the heart of our state’s capital, Boston University is a large private research university that attracts students from Massachusetts, New England, and across the globe. BU’s urban campus environment offers a lively social scene, including a recognized Greek system.

Greek Life at Boston University: BU is home to approximately 20 fraternities and sororities, governed by the Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic Council, and the National Pan-Hellenic Council. Greek life here, while smaller in proportion to the student body than some other institutions, provides a close-knit community for many.

Hazing Policies and Reporting: Boston University rigorously enforces Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 269, Sections 17–19, explicitly prohibiting hazing. Its policy extends to activities both on and off campus and includes a duty to report. Students can report suspected hazing to the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct, or the BU Police Department. The university emphasizes education and prevention through its FSL (Fraternity & Sorority Life) office.

Documented Incidents: Boston University has had its share of hazing-related challenges. In a tragic 2013 case involving Sigma Alpha Mu, a student died from alcohol poisoning at a “meet and greet” party, though the university initially debated whether to classify it as hazing. This incident, documented nationally, highlighted what constitutes hazing outside of explicit physical abuse. More recently, in 2021, an unregistered fraternity chapter faced university sanctions for engaging in illicit, alcohol-fueled initiation activities, leading to injuries for some participants.

Impact on Massachusetts Families: For families in Boston and surrounding communities, these incidents highlight that even in a major urban environment, hazing risks exist. It’s crucial for students considering BU Greek life to thoroughly research specific chapters’ conduct records and understand the university’s enforcement history.

Northeastern University

Northeastern University, another major private institution in Boston, emphasizes co-operative education and a vibrant campus life. Its Greek community plays a role in student engagement.

Greek Life at Northeastern University: Northeastern hosts a diverse Greek community with several fraternities and sororities. The university explicitly recognizes these organizations and oversees their activities, ensuring compliance with university policies and state laws.

Hazing Policies and Reporting: Northeastern has clear anti-hazing policies consistent with Massachusetts law, explicitly defining prohibited behaviors and consequences. Students are encouraged to use multiple reporting channels, including the Office of Student Conduct and Conflict Resolution, the Northeastern University Police Department, or anonymous online reporting forms. The university promotes a culture of safety and respect through ongoing education and intervention strategies.

Documented Incidents: Northeastern University has also faced hazing incidents. For instance, in 2018, a fraternity was suspended for multiple years due to allegations of forced alcohol consumption and demeaning acts during an off-campus initiation week. In another case, in 2020, a sports club was placed on probation after members reported forced physical exercises and verbal abuse, extending the hazing conversation beyond traditional Greek life.

Impact on Massachusetts Families: Northeastern’s ongoing efforts to manage hazing, coupled with documented incidents, underscore the importance of families and students in Massachusetts being vigilant about organizational culture and new member activities.

Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI)

In Worcester, Massachusetts, WPI is a leading private technological university globally recognized for its project-based learning. While academics are central, WPI also has a Greek life that contributes to the student experience.

Greek Life at WPI: WPI’s Greek system includes various fraternities and sororities deeply integrated into the campus community. These organizations are overseen by WPI’s student affairs office, which sets expectations for conduct and compliance with hazing policies.

Hazing Policies and Reporting: WPI maintains a clear anti-hazing policy that is well-communicated to its students and student organizations. The policy aligns with Massachusetts law, defining hazing as any action that recklessly or intentionally endangers health. Reporting avenues include the Dean of Students, the WPI Police Department, and an anonymous reporting hotline. WPI emphasizes a proactive approach to risk management and student safety.

Documented Incidents: WPI has a historical connection to hazing, with a significant incident dating back to 1908 where a freshman, Emil S. Gran, died from a spinal injury during a class hazing event. More recently, in 2019, a fraternity chapter was placed on disciplinary probation for violating hazing and alcohol policies during an unsanctioned new member event that involved forced drinking.

Impact on Massachusetts Families: The history and recent incidents at WPI demonstrate that even at institutions focused on STEM, the issue of hazing persists. Families in Worcester and across Massachusetts should be aware of campus-specific hazing trends and the institutional responses to them.

Where Massachusetts Families Typically Send Their Children

While the above are prominent examples, Massachusetts families often send their children to a wide array of excellent institutions, both within the Commonwealth and across New England. For instance:

Many students from Massachusetts attend Harvard University or MIT in Cambridge, which have their own complex histories with student organizations and hazing, though often less formally structured than traditional Greek life.
Boston College in Chestnut Hill, a private Jesuit university, has Greek-like social clubs that have also faced scrutiny over unsanctioned initiation activities.
Tufts University in Medford also attracts many Massachusetts students and has a recognized Greek system that operates under strict anti-hazing guidelines.
Beyond Massachusetts, many families choose schools in neighboring states, such as the University of New Hampshire, University of Rhode Island, or University of Vermont, all of which have established Greek life and hazing challenges similar to those faced within Massachusetts.

Each of these institutions has its own unique campus culture, history, and policies related to hazing. Regardless of where your child attends, the underlying legal principles in Massachusetts and the federal laws still provide important protections and avenues for accountability.

Greek Organizations: Massachusetts and State

When a hazing incident causes harm, it’s not just the individual student perpetrators who may be held accountable. The local chapter and its national organization, with their histories and established practices, often share significant liability. For Massachusetts families, understanding these connections is vital, particularly when considering organizations present at our state’s colleges and universities.

Why National Histories Matter

Many fraternities and sororities present at Massachusetts institutions, from Amherst College to Worcester State University, are part of larger national organizations. These national headquarters often:

Possess comprehensive anti-hazing policies and risk management guidelines: These policies exist precisely because national organizations have been aware of and, in some cases, involved in hazing-related deaths and catastrophic injuries at various chapters nationwide over decades.
Understand common hazing patterns: They are privy to incident reports detailing forced drinking nights, degrading rituals, physical abuse, and other recurring hazing scenarios across their chapters.
Have a history of litigation and settlements: Many national fraternities and sororities have paid out multi-million dollar settlements or faced severe sanctions due to the actions of their chapters.

When a chapter in Massachusetts repeats the same dangerous “traditions” that have led to deaths or severe injuries in other states, it provides powerful evidence for foreseeability. This can strengthen arguments for negligence or punitive damages against the national organization, demonstrating that they knew or should have known about the risks associated with such behaviors but failed to adequately prevent them.

Greek Organizations with Massachusetts Addresses

Attorney911 tracks every IRS-registered Greek organization across the nation. Here are some organizations registered in Massachusetts, representing some of the many that operate within our state:

ZETA PI OF PHI KAPPA TAU FRATERNITY

This chapter, registered with the IRS (EIN: 81-5226789), is located in Allston, MA. Phi Kappa Tau’s national organization has a history of hazing incidents at other campuses. For example, in 2007, Gary DeVercelly Jr., a pledge at Rider University, died from alcohol poisoning after a hazing event involving forced drinking. This tragic incident highlights the severe risks associated with such activities and led to increased scrutiny of Phi Kappa Tau’s national policies and the consequences of their chapters’ actions. While we are not alleging that this specific Allston chapter has engaged in hazing, parents should research any organization their child considers joining, as national organizations often face repeated patterns of misconduct across their chapters.

ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC

Located in Amherst, MA, this chapter (EIN: 45-4402913) is part of a national fraternity that has seen its share of hazing-related controversies. Alpha Sigma Phi has been involved in incidents at other universities involving forced drinking and physical abuse. For example, in 2014, a pledge at Texas Tech University died from alcohol poisoning while pledging an Alpha Sigma Phi colony. These documented patterns indicate a known risk that national organizations are expected to address. We are NOT alleging that this specific Amherst chapter has engaged in hazing. However, the national body’s history underscores the importance of vigilance.

HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI

With a registration in Amherst, MA (EIN: 62-1784167), this is a widely recognized academic honor society. It is important to differentiate legitimate honor societies, which promote academic excellence, from social fraternities that engage in hazing. Honor societies like Phi Kappa Phi are generally known for their academic mission and do not engage in hazing. This distinction is crucial for families in Massachusetts, as not all student organizations fall under the typical hazing concerns associated with social Greek life.

ALPHA PHI OMEGA

This organization, registered with the IRS (EIN: 83-1832181) and located in Boston, MA, is a national co-ed service fraternity. Alpha Phi Omega’s national mission emphasizes leadership, friendship, and service, generally without the hazing traditions associated with purely social fraternities. While we are NOT alleging that this specific Boston chapter has engaged in hazing, it serves as an example of a type of Greek organization that can exist on campus, and parents should always verify the stated mission against actual practices.

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

This is a specific entry related to an educational institution rather than a standalone B83 organization. Northeastern University (EIN: 04-1679980) in Boston, MA, as a university, is responsible for overseeing all student organizations, including its Greek life. As discussed previously, Northeastern has had documented hazing incidents within its recognized fraternities, leading to suspensions and probation. The university’s policies and enforcement efforts are critical in preventing hazing among all student groups it oversees.

PI LAMBDA PHI FRATERNITY

Located in Boston, MA, this fraternity (EIN: 04-2092861) is part of a national organization with a history of hazing. Pi Lambda Phi has faced accusations of hazing that include forced drinking and physical confrontations at various campuses. We do not have specific documented incidents from this Boston chapter, but the national history is a point of consideration. The national fraternity has a responsibility to ensure its chapters adhere to anti-hazing policies, and parents should be aware of broader patterns of conduct within the national organization.

SIGMA CHI UPSILON

This organization (EIN: 84-2414945) is located in Boston, MA. While Sigma Chi has faced numerous hazing lawsuits and incidents nationally, including a significant $10 million settlement in 2024 at the College of Charleston for physical beatings and psychological torment, we are NOT alleging that this specific Boston chapter has engaged in hazing. However, the severe and recurring nature of hazing allegations against Sigma Chi nationally underlines the importance for families to understand the broader risks associated with the organization.

SIGMA PI THETA SORORITY

Registered with the IRS (EIN: 93-3112834) and located in Boston, MA, Sigma Pi Theta is a type of Greek organization focused on sisterhood and community. We are NOT alleging that this specific Boston chapter has engaged in hazing. For any sorority, families in Massachusetts should investigate its reputation and actual practices beyond its stated mission to ensure a safe environment for new members.

THE MASSACHUSETTS ETA CHAPTER OF SIGMA PHI EPSILON

This chapter of Sigma Phi Epsilon, registered in Boston, MA (EIN: 94-3178308), is part of a prominent national fraternity. Sigma Phi Epsilon has been involved in multiple hazing incidents nationally, including a 2001 death from an alcohol overdose at the University of Richmond. These incidents highlight how chapters, despite national policies, can engage in dangerous practices. We are NOT alleging that this specific Boston chapter has engaged in hazing. Families should consider the national organization’s history when evaluating a local chapter.

SIGMA CHI THETA ZETA

Located in Bridgewater, MA (EIN: 36-3308602), this chapter of Sigma Chi is subject to the national organization’s guidelines and its historical patterns. As noted earlier, Sigma Chi nationally has faced severe allegations of physical and psychological hazing. We make no specific allegations against this local Bridgewater chapter.

EPSILON THETA FRATERNITY

This local fraternity in Brookline, MA (EIN: 04-2112918), typically operates independently or with limited national oversight. While specific incidents are not broadly publicized for this local chapter, hazing risks are present in any student organization, especially those with less external oversight. Families in Massachusetts should exercise particular caution and diligence when assessing such local, independent groups.

SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY

This sorority, with a registration in Brookline, MA (EIN: 88-3858120), is part of a national organization. Sigma Delta Tau has been involved in some hazing allegations nationally, often related to alcohol or demeaning behavior. We are NOT alleging that this specific Brookline chapter has engaged in hazing. It’s important for Massachusetts families to consider the national organization’s overall safety record.

FOX CLUB GRADUATE ASSOCIATION INC

Registered in Cambridge, MA (EIN: 27-0126481), this type of organization often supports undergraduate chapters. While graduate associations themselves are usually not involved in active hazing, their funding or advocacy can impact the culture of undergraduate groups. The Fox Club, historically a specific social club, indicates affiliations that should be investigated if questions arise.

FOX CLUB UNDERGRADUATE ASSOCIATION INC

Also in Cambridge, MA (EIN: 76-0795560), the undergraduate Fox Club operates within the context of university social life. Like any student group, especially those with traditional “club” structures, questions about initiation or new member activities should be asked. We make no specific allegations against this local chapter.

KAPPA CHARGE OF THE THETA DELTA CHI FRATERNITY

This chapter, registered in Manchester, MA (EIN: 04-6167828), is part of Theta Delta Chi’s national presence. The national organization has had documented hazing incidents. For example, Kenneth J. Patterson died in 2017 after a Theta Delta Chi drop-off ritual at Rutgers University, highlighting the dangers of such activities. We are NOT alleging that this specific Manchester chapter has engaged in hazing.

ETA DELTA AT BABSON COLLEGE ALUMNI CORPORATION

Located in N Falmouth, MA (EIN: 61-2047557), this alumni group supports a chapter at Babson College. Alumni often play a role, positive or negative, in shaping chapter culture. Their influence, especially if they encourage or condone “traditions” that involve hazing, can be a factor in incidents.

ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC

Again, Alpha Sigma Phi (EIN: 45-5062737) is registered in Salem, MA. The national history, as noted with the Amherst chapter, includes hazing incidents. We are NOT alleging that this specific Salem chapter has engaged in hazing. Our concern is the historical pattern and the impact this has on the overall risk profile of the national organization.

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS

This organization (EIN: 20-2950011), with a registration in Saugus, MA, is a global service organization typically focused on community service. It’s important for Massachusetts families to distinguish between true service organizations, like the Lions Clubs, which do not engage in hazing, and social organizations that might.

ALPHA TAU OMEGA ASSOCIATES INC

Based in South Boston, MA (EIN: 04-6188591), this likely refers to an alumni or housing association for a chapter of Alpha Tau Omega. Alpha Tau Omega nationally has faced significant hazing issues, including a 2000 death from alcohol poisoning. We are NOT alleging hazing by this specific South Boston entity.

SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY

Another chapter of Sigma Delta Tau (EIN: 88-3911208) is registered in Waltham, MA. As noted with the Brookline chapter, some national hazing allegations have surfaced. We are NOT alleging hazing by this specific Waltham chapter.

GREAT OAK HOUSING INC

This housing entity in Winchester, MA (EIN: 86-1602427), indicates a potential residential facility associated with a Greek organization. The physical location of an event, even if off-campus or in a private residence, does not absolve organizations or individuals of liability for hazing.

ALPHA XI DELTA BUILDING CORPORATION OF WORCESTER MA INC

This organization (EIN: 26-0806130) in Worcester, MA, is a building corporation for Alpha Xi Delta, a national sorority. While sororities generally have fewer publicly reported fatalities than fraternities, they are not immune to hazing, which can include psychological abuse and forced servitude. We are NOT alleging hazing by this specific entity.

PI TAU ELDERS INC

Located in Worcester, MA (EIN: 22-2518277), this is likely an alumni support group. Alumni influence on chapter culture can be substantial, sometimes perpetuating old “traditions” that constitute hazing.

THETA MU HOUSE CORPORATION OF CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY

This housing corporation in Worcester, MA (EIN: 46-4549446), supports a Chi Omega chapter. Chi Omega is a national sorority that has faced hazing allegations at different campuses, often involving demeaning tasks or social isolation. We are NOT alleging hazing by this specific entity.

THETA NU XI MULTICULTURAL SORORITY INC

This sorority (EIN: 27-4423327) is also registered in Worcester, MA. Multicultural Greek organizations also contend with hazing, sometimes involving intense physical challenges or cultural specific rituals gone awry. We make no specific allegations against this local chapter.

Complete Massachusetts Greek Organization Directory

Attorney911 tracks every IRS-registered fraternity and sorority in Massachusetts. For complete reference:

ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 45-4402913 | AMHERST, MA
HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 62-1784167 | AMHERST, MA
ZETA PI OF PHI KAPPA TAU FRATERNITY | EIN: 81-5226789 | ALLSTON, MA
ALPHA PHI OMEGA | EIN: 83-1832181 | BOSTON, MA
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY | EIN: 04-1679980 | BOSTON, MA
PI LAMBDA PHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 04-2092861 | BOSTON, MA
SIGMA CHI UPSILON | EIN: 84-2414945 | BOSTON, MA
SIGMA PI THETA SORORITY | EIN: 93-3112834 | BOSTON, MA
THE MASSACHUSETTS ETA CHAPTER OF SIGMA PHI EPSILON | EIN: 94-3178308 | BOSTON, MA
SIGMA CHI THETA ZETA | EIN: 36-3308602 | BRIDGEWATER, MA
EPSILON THETA FRATERNITY | EIN: 04-2112918 | BROOKLINE, MA
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 88-3858120 | BROOKLINE, MA
FOX CLUB GRADUATE ASSOCIATION INC | EIN: 27-0126481 | CAMBRIDGE, MA
FOX CLUB UNDERGRADUATE ASSOCIATION INC | EIN: 76-0795560 | CAMBRIDGE, MA
KAPPA CHARGE OF THE THETA DELTA CHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 04-6167828 | MANCHESTER, MA
ETA DELTA AT BABSON COLLEGE ALUMNI CORPORATION | EIN: 61-2047557 | N FALMOUTH, MA
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 45-5062737 | SALEM, MA
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS | EIN: 20-2950011 | SAUGUS, MA
ALPHA TAU OMEGA ASSOCIATES INC | EIN: 04-6188591 | SOUTH BOSTON, MA
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 88-3911208 | WALTHAM, MA
GREAT OAK HOUSING INC | EIN: 86-1602427 | WINCHESTER, MA
ALPHA XI DELTA BUILDING CORPORATION OF WORCESTER MA INC | EIN: 26-0806130 | WORCESTER, MA
PI TAU ELDERS INC | EIN: 22-2518277 | WORCESTER, MA
THETA MU HOUSE CORPORATION OF CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY | EIN: 46-4549446 | WORCESTER, MA
THETA NU XI MULTICULTURAL SORORITY INC | EIN: 27-4423327 | WORCESTER, MA

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

When hazing causes injury or death, building a compelling legal case requires meticulous evidence collection, a deep understanding of potential damages, and a sophisticated legal strategy. For families in Massachusetts, this process can feel overwhelming, but an experienced hazing attorney knows how to navigate these complexities to achieve accountability.

Evidence Is Everything
In a hazing lawsuit, the quality and preservation of evidence are paramount. Fortunately, modern technology, particularly smartphones and digital communication, can be a double-edged sword for perpetrators; it facilitates hazing but also leaves extensive digital footprints:

Digital Communications: Groupme, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Snapchat, and other messaging apps have become the primary planning and communication tools for hazing. They are invaluable sources of evidence, revealing everything from explicit instructions to veiled threats and plans for hazing events. Screenshots of full message threads, and proper archiving of these communications (even those intended to disappear) are crucial. Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.
Photos & Videos: Incriminating photos or videos recorded by participants are frequently shared within private group chats or on social media. These may show injuries, humiliating acts, forced drinking, or dangerous activities. Security camera footage from houses or event venues, if available, can also provide crucial context.
Internal Organization Documents: Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” lists, rules for new members, and communications from chapter officers or national representatives often provide direct evidence of accepted practices that may constitute hazing.
University Records: Open records requests or discovery can yield a treasure trove of information from institutions. This includes past hazing violations, disciplinary actions against the same chapter or individuals, campus police incident reports, Clery Act reports, and internal emails among administrators discussing the organization. Such records can establish a pattern of misconduct or institutional negligence.
Medical and Psychological Records: These document the extent of the victim’s physical and mental harm. Emergency room reports, hospitalization records, toxicology reports (especially for alcohol or drug-related hazing), and psychological evaluations detailing PTSD, depression, anxiety, or traumatic brain injury are essential for proving damages.
Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts from other pledges, members who quit, roommates, RAs, or even bystanders can be crucial. Prompt interviews can secure these accounts before memories fade or individuals are pressured into silence.

Damages: Compensating for Harm
Hazing inflicts not only physical injury but also profound psychological, emotional, and financial harm. A civil lawsuit seeks to compensate victims and their families for these various losses:

Medical Expenses & Future Care: This covers all past and anticipated medical costs, including emergency treatment, hospitalization, surgeries, ongoing therapy (physical, occupational, psychological), medication, and, in severe cases like traumatic brain injury, long-term life care.
Lost Income & Educational Impact: Victims may suffer lost wages if they are unable to work, or a reduction in future earning capacity if injuries lead to permanent disability. Hazing can also lead to missed semesters, academic setbacks, lost scholarships, and delayed graduation, all of which have a financial impact.
Non-Economic Damages: These quantify intangible losses such as physical pain and suffering, emotional distress (including trauma, humiliation, and psychological conditions like PTSD), and the loss of enjoyment of life. These damages are often substantial in hazing cases, reflecting the deep and lasting impact on victims.
Wrongful Death Damages: In the tragic event of a hazing-related death, families can seek compensation for funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support from the deceased, and non-economic damages for the profound grief, loss of companionship, and emotional suffering of surviving family members. Attorney911 has extensive wrongful death experience (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic cases.
Punitive Damages: In cases of extreme recklessness, willful misconduct, or callous indifference, courts may award punitive damages. These are not meant to compensate the victim but to punish the defendants and deter similar future behavior, sending a strong message to institutions and organizations.

Navigating Insurance and Strategic Litigation
Hazing litigation is often complex, involving multiple defendants and intricate insurance coverage disputes. National fraternities, sororities, and universities typically carry substantial liability insurance policies. However, insurers may vigorously argue exclusions for “intentional acts” or hazing. This is where specialized legal expertise becomes critical. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is crucial for navigating fraternity and university insurance coverage disputes. She understands how these powerful entities and their insurers operate, allowing Attorney911 to effectively counter their tactics and pursue maximum compensation for our clients.

Practical Guides & FAQs

For Parents in Massachusetts

For Massachusetts parents, the thought of their child enduring hazing is terrifying. Knowing the warning signs and how to respond is your first line of defense.

Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to unexplained injuries (bruises, burns, or “accidents” with dubious explanations), extreme fatigue or sleep deprivation, drastic changes in mood (anxiety, depression, irritability), withdrawal from family or previous friends, and secretive behavior regarding student organization activities. Watch for sudden financial demands or changes in academic performance. A child who constantly checks their phone, especially at odd hours, for group chat messages may also be under constant, digitally enforced pressure.
How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy and without judgment. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things going with your group? Are you truly enjoying it?” Emphasize that your child’s safety and well-being are your top priorities, far above any organizational status. Reassure them you will support them regardless of their decisions.
If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize immediate medical care. Document everything: take clear photos of any injuries, save screenshots of texts or group chats, and write down everything your child tells you, including dates, times, and people involved.
Dealing with the University: Keep meticulous records of all communications with university officials. Specifically inquire about any past hazing incidents involving the organization in question and the institution’s response.
When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child sustains significant physical or psychological harm due to hazing, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or attempting to conceal the incident, promptly contacting an attorney experienced in hazing cases is essential.

For Students / Pledges in Massachusetts

Recognizing hazing and responding effectively can protect your mental and physical health.

Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself: Am I being forced or pressured to do something I don’t want to do? Would I do this if I had a real choice? Is this activity dangerous, degrading, or illegal? Would university officials or my parents approve? If older members are making new members do things they themselves don’t have to do, or if you’re told to keep secrets, it’s likely hazing.
Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: The law, particularly in Massachusetts, understands that “consent” is not truly voluntary when given under duress, intense peer pressure, or fear of exclusion. You are not obligated to endure harmful or degrading activities.
Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, remove yourself from the situation immediately. Report to a trusted adult, university official, or the police. You can report anonymously through campus channels or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE).
Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many schools and state laws, including Massachusetts, provide immunity or leniency for students who report hazing or call for help in an emergency, even if they were involved in underage drinking or the hazing itself. Prioritize safety.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were involved in or witnessed hazing, your testimony can be crucial in preventing future harm.

Your Role in Accountability: While you may fear personal consequences, your eyewitness account and any evidence you possess can save lives and hold responsible parties accountable.
Seeking Legal Advice: You may need your own legal counsel to understand your rights and potential liabilities, especially if criminal charges are involved. An attorney can help you determine the safest way to come forward or provide information.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For Massachusetts families, avoiding common errors in the aftermath of a hazing incident is paramount to preserving your legal options and seeking justice.

MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:

Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence
- What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble”
- Why it’s wrong: This can be seen as a cover-up, obstruct justice, and severely weaken your case.
- What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content.
Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly
- What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind”
- Why it’s wrong: They will immediately seek legal counsel, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare defenses.
- What to do instead: Document everything, then call a lawyer before any confrontation.
Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms
- What universities do: Pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements.
- Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to sue, and proposed settlements are often far below the actual value of the case.
- What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything without an attorney reviewing it first.
Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer
- What families think: “I want people to know what happened”
- Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys will use all social media posts, and inconsistencies can damage credibility.
- What to do instead: Document privately; let your lawyer control public messaging.
Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”
- What fraternities say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic”
- Why it’s wrong: They use these opportunities to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that could harm your case.
- What to do instead: Once you’re considering legal action, all communication should go through your lawyer.
Waiting “to see how the university handles it”
- What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally”
- Why it’s wrong: Critical evidence can disappear, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations can expire. The university’s internal process aims to protect the institution, not necessarily your child.
- What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW; consult a lawyer immediately; the university process does not equate to real accountability.
Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer
- What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim”
- Why it’s wrong: Recorded statements are primarily used against you to minimize payouts.
- What to do instead: Politely decline and state, “My attorney will contact you.”

Safe Alternatives to Greek Life in Massachusetts

For students in Massachusetts seeking meaningful campus connections without hazing risks:

Campus Organizations (Hazing-Free Alternatives)

Student Government: Leadership without pledging
Academic Honor Societies: Phi Beta Kappa, Golden Key, discipline-specific (legitimate honor societies do NOT haze)
Career-Focused Groups: Pre-Law Society, Business Club, Engineering organizations
Community Service: Circle K, Habitat for Humanity campus chapters
Religious/Spiritual Groups: Campus ministry, interfaith organizations
Cultural Organizations: Cultural centers, international student associations
Club Sports & Intramural Athletics: Team camaraderie without hazing culture

Social Alternatives

Residence hall communities and programming
Academic study groups and tutoring programs
Part-time campus employment
Research assistant positions
Volunteer opportunities (local food banks, tutoring programs)
Campus recreation programs

What to Look for in ANY Organization

Before joining any group, students should verify:

☑️ Clear written anti-hazing policy
☑️ Faculty or staff advisor actively involved
☑️ Transparent membership process with no “secret” phases
☑️ No “pledging” period with undisclosed activities
☑️ Open meetings you can observe before committing
☑️ Current members willing to discuss experiences honestly

Red Flags to Avoid

🚩 “What happens here stays here” culture
🚩 Excessive time demands that affect academics
🚩 Required alcohol consumption at events
🚩 “New member education” with vague descriptions
🚩 Sleep deprivation expectations
🚩 Financial demands beyond standard dues

Short FAQ

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Massachusetts?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Massachusetts law provides avenues for legal action against individuals and institutions proven to be negligent or complicit in hazing. While public universities (like UMass Amherst) may have some sovereign immunity, exceptions exist for gross negligence or deliberate indifference. Private universities (like Boston University or Northeastern) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its specific facts. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Massachusetts?”
Hazing itself is typically a misdemeanor in Massachusetts. However, if hazing contributes to serious injury or death, more severe criminal charges like assault and battery, reckless endangerment, or even involuntary manslaughter may be pursued, which can be felonies. Additionally, failing to report hazing is also a misdemeanor under Massachusetts law.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 269, Section 17, defining hazing, does not provide a “consent” defense. Courts and attorneys understand that “consent” under peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Massachusetts?”
Generally, Massachusetts has a 3-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including those arising from hazing. This period typically begins from the date of injury or when the injury reasonably should have been discovered. For wrongful death claims, the statute of limitations is also generally 3 years from the date of death. However, unique circumstances, such as cases involving minors or fraudulent concealment, can affect these deadlines. Time is critical, as evidence can disappear quickly. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately.
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of hazing, whether on or off campus, does not inherently eliminate liability. Universities and national organizations can still be held responsible based on their knowledge, supervision, and policies, especially if they sponsor the group. Many significant hazing cases, including fatalities, have occurred off-campus and still resulted in legal accountability.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Most hazing cases settle confidentially before going to trial. We prioritize your family’s privacy and can often work to keep records sealed and settlement terms confidential. While public awareness can be part of advocacy, your family’s wishes regarding privacy are respected.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing case in Massachusetts, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions—colleges, universities, and national fraternities—fight back, and how to win anyway. The stakes are too high to choose a firm that isn’t intimately familiar with the unique complexities of campus abuse litigation.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, brings unique qualifications to the fight against hazing:

Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, brings invaluable insight from her previous career as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She understands precisely how university and national fraternity insurance companies evaluate, delay, and attempt to deny hazing claims. “We know their playbook because we used to run it,” she often says. This expertise is critical in countering their tactics and ensuring our clients receive fair consideration.
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner, is a seasoned litigator with a proven track record against formidable defendants. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, taking on a billion-dollar corporation. This experience in federal courts, including the U.S. District Court, means we are not intimidated by the vast legal resources of national fraternities, universities, or their defense teams. We know how to fight powerful defendants and secure justice.
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Our firm has a strong history of securing significant results in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. We understand how to quantify long-term damages, including the lifetime care needs for victims of severe brain injuries or permanent disabilities.
Dual Criminal and Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph Manginello’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) underscores our understanding of how criminal hazing charges intersect with civil litigation. This dual perspective allows us to advise clients, witnesses, and even former members with insights into both potential criminal exposure and civil accountability.
Investigative Depth: We leverage a network of experts—including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, economists, and psychologists—to meticulously uncover hidden evidence. From deleted group chats to chapter records and university files obtained through discovery, we investigate each case with the thoroughness and dedication it deserves.

We understand that hazing at colleges and universities affects families across Massachusetts who seek answers and accountability. From our office, we serve families across Massachusetts.

We approach each hazing case with profound empathy. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face, whether your child attends UMass Amherst, Boston University, Northeastern, or WPI. Our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We focus on thorough investigation and real accountability, not quick settlements.

If you or your child experienced hazing at any college or university, we want to hear from you. Families in Massachusetts and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

What to expect in your free consultation:

We’ll listen to your story without judgment.
Review any evidence you have (photos, texts, medical records).
Explain your legal options: criminal report, civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
Discuss realistic timelines and what to expect.
Answer your questions about costs (contingency fee – we don’t get paid unless we win).
No pressure to hire us on the spot – take time to decide.
Everything you tell us is confidential.

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Massachusetts or anywhere across the nation, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com