Hazing in Texas: A Definitive Guide for Morris County Families on Law, Cases, and Campus Accountability

The phone rings late, a parent’s worst fear. You hear your child’s voice, strained and scared, whispering about a “pledge event” gone wrong. Maybe they’re sick from forced drinking, bruised from a “tradition” that spiraled out of control, or overwhelmed by constant psychological torment. They beg you not to tell anyone, terrified of repercussions from their fraternity, sorority, or team. As a parent in Morris County, your heart races. This isn’t just about a bad phase; this is about your child’s safety, their future, and the disturbing reality of hazing on Texas campuses.

This isn’t a distant problem. It’s a risk faced by students from Morris County and across our great state as they pursue higher education. Whether your child attends Texas A&M in College Station, the University of Texas at Austin, Baylor in Waco, SMU in Dallas, or the University of Houston, the threat of hazing is real, pervasive, and often hidden. It’s no longer confined to the stereotypes of movies; it’s a sophisticated, often brutal, system of abuse designed to enforce conformity and silence.

At The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we understand what you’re going through. We know the fear, the confusion, and the anger when your child is harmed by the very institutions and groups that promised community and growth. This comprehensive guide serves as an essential resource for families in Morris County and throughout Texas who are grappling with the complexities of hazing. We will explain:

• What hazing truly looks like in 2025, moving beyond outdated perceptions.
• The legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas, including state laws and federal oversight.
• How major national hazing cases set precedents that affect accountability here in Texas.
• Specific insights into hazing incidents and policies at the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University.
• How the national histories of fraternities and sororities influence liability and risk for local chapters in Texas.
• The critical steps involved in building a legal case, including evidence collection, damage assessment, and strategic considerations.
• Practical guides for parents, students, and witnesses, empowering you with actionable steps.

While this article provides general information and is not a substitute for legal advice, our goal is to empower you with knowledge. If hazing has impacted your family, we encourage you to contact us for a confidential consultation.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies.
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911).
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority.
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
    • Post details on public social media.
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Morris County families, the image of hazing might be outdated, perhaps a scene from a movie depicting relatively harmless pranks. The reality in 2025 is far more insidious and dangerous. Hazing has evolved, often becoming more covert, psychologically damaging, and physically brutal, sometimes with fatal consequences.

At its core, hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, whether on or off campus, by an individual or a group, directed against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, or maintaining membership in an organization. This act must endanger the mental or physical health or safety of the student. It’s not just a rite of passage; it’s a pattern of abuse designed to break individuals down and rebuild them with unquestioning loyalty to the group.

A critical point to understand is that “I agreed to it” is not an automatic defense for those who inflict hazing. When there’s a power imbalance, intense peer pressure, and a deep desire to belong, true consent is often absent. Individuals being hazed are often trapped between maintaining their safety and the fear of social exclusion, academic repercussions, or physical retaliation.

Main Categories of Modern Hazing

Modern hazing manifests in various forms. While some are traditional, others exploit new technologies and psychological vulnerabilities:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains one of the deadliest forms. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often through “lineups” where pledges are forced to rapidly consume multiple drinks, chugging challenges, or games that require dangerous levels of alcohol consumption. We’ve seen cases where pledges are pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, putting their lives at extreme risk. The goal is to induce intoxication to control and humiliate.
• Physical Hazing: This category includes acts intended to cause physical pain, discomfort, or exhaustion. Examples include paddling and beatings, extreme calisthenics (often called “workouts” or “smokings”) far beyond normal conditioning, or prolonged sleep, food, and water deprivation. Students can be exposed to extreme cold or heat, or placed in dangerous environments, leading to injuries, illness, or even death.
• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This form of hazing aims to degrade and dehumanize. It can involve forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts, demeaning positions (like the “roasted pig”), or wearing degrading costumes. Often, these acts have racial, homophobic, or sexist undertones, using slurs and forcing students to role-play stereotypes designed to inflict maximum psychological damage.
• Psychological Hazing: This type of hazing causes significant emotional and mental distress. It includes verbal abuse, threats, forced isolation from friends and family, and manipulative tactics designed to confuse and instill fear. Public shaming, whether in person or on social media, forced public confessions, and sleep deprivation leading to psychological vulnerability are also common tactics.
• Digital/Online Hazing: With the rise of smartphones and social media, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, “challenges” posted on platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, or Discord, and public humiliation via online platforms. Pledges can be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos of themselves or others, leading to lasting damage to their reputation and mental health. This also includes constant monitoring through group chats, demanding immediate responses at all hours, and tracking pledges’ locations.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It’s a misconception that hazing is exclusive to fraternities and sororities. While Greek life remains a significant arena for hazing, the problem is far broader across college campuses in Texas. Hazing can occur in:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: Organizations with hierarchical structures and traditional “initiation” processes often have hazing risks.
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Student Groups: Groups like cheerleading squads, dance teams, and university spirit organizations (e.g., those similar to the former Texas Cowboys) can have practices leading to hazing.
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball and swim teams, hazing has been documented across various university sports programs.
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups can harbor hazing traditions.
• Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Any group where new members are expected to “earn” their place can become a hazing environment.

In all these settings, the common threads are social status, tradition, and intense pressure to belong. This secrecy and the perceived need to uphold generations-old “traditions” often allow hazing to persist, even when participants know it is illegal and harmful. For Morris County families, understanding the diverse environments in which hazing thrives is crucial for protecting their children.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal framework surrounding hazing is essential for any Morris County family seeking accountability. Texas has specific laws designed to combat hazing, and federal regulations add another layer of protection.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas takes a firm stance against hazing, primarily through its Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. This legislation defines and prohibits hazing, outlining both criminal penalties and institutional responsibilities.

Texas law broadly defines hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed on or off campus, by an individual or a group, directed against a student. This act must:

1. Endanger the mental or physical health or safety of a student; AND
2. Occur for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

For Morris County residents, this means that if someone forces or coerces your child into an act that is dangerous, harmful, or degrading, specifically to join or stay in a group, and they knew or should have known of the risk, it legally constitutes hazing under Texas law. Critically, the location – on or off campus – does not matter, and the harm can be either mental or physical.

Key aspects of Texas hazing law:

• Criminal Penalties: Hazing is a criminal offense in Texas. While it’s generally classified as a Class B Misdemeanor (punishable by fines and potential jail time) if it doesn’t cause serious injury, the charges escalate significantly. It becomes a Class A Misdemeanor if the hazing causes injury requiring medical treatment. Most seriously, hazing incidents involving serious bodily injury or death are classified as a State Jail Felony, carrying severe penalties including imprisonment. Furthermore, officers or members of an organization who know about hazing and fail to report it can also face misdemeanor charges.
• Organizational Liability: Texas law also holds organizations accountable. Institutions like fraternities, sororities, or sports teams can be criminally prosecuted if they authorized, encouraged, or if an officer acting in an official capacity knew about hazing and failed to report it. Penalties for organizations can include fines up to $10,000 per violation, and universities can revoke their recognition or ban them from campus.
• Reporter Protections: To encourage reporting, Texas law provides immunity for individuals who report hazing incidents in good faith to university authorities or law enforcement. This means you will not face civil or criminal liability for making such a report. Additionally, many university policies and Texas law itself offer amnesty to students who call 911 in a medical emergency, even if underage drinking or hazing was involved, prioritizing saving lives over minor infractions.
• Consent is NOT a Defense: This is a cornerstone of Texas hazing law. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that it is not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed “consented” to the activity. This recognizes that when there’s a significant power imbalance and social pressure, a student’s “agreement” to participate is often coerced and not truly voluntary.

It’s important to remember that this is a summary. The actual Texas Education Code contains more technical language. An attorney experienced in Texas hazing law can interpret these provisions in the context of your specific case.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

When hazing occurs, two distinct legal pathways can be pursued: criminal and civil cases. While often intertwined, they serve different purposes and have different thresholds for proof.

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (through a district attorney or prosecutor) with the primary goal of punishing individuals or organizations for violating Texas hazing statutes or other criminal laws. Depending on the severity of the hazing, charges could range from misdemeanors for simple hazing to felonies for serious bodily injury or death, such as assault, furnishing alcohol to minors, or even manslaughter. The state must prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
• Civil Cases: These are brought by the victims or their surviving family members. The primary goal of a civil lawsuit is to seek monetary compensation for the damages suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. This can include claims for negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, emotional distress, and premises liability. The standard of proof in civil cases is typically lower, requiring proof by a “preponderance of the evidence” (more likely than not).

It’s crucial to understand that a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for a civil lawsuit. Many times, criminal charges may not be filed, or a criminal case may result in a plea bargain for lesser offenses, yet a strong civil case can still proceed, focusing on accountability and compensation for the victims. Both types of cases can run simultaneously, allowing victims and their families to pursue justice on multiple fronts.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, federal regulations also impact how universities respond to and are held accountable for hazing. These federal provisions can offer additional avenues for holding institutions responsible.

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal funding must enhance their hazing prevention and reporting efforts. By 2026, these institutions will be required to:
  • Maintain and publicly disclose a comprehensive record of hazing incidents that have occurred on their campus or by their student organizations.
  • Strengthen their hazing education and prevention programs for students and staff.
  • Implement more transparent reporting mechanisms to provide clearer data on hazing, helping to foster accountability and inform prospective students and their families. This will allow Morris County families to more easily research hazing histories at schools their children may attend.
• Title IX / Clery Act: These federal statutes are primarily known for addressing sexual misconduct and campus safety reporting, respectively, but they can be highly relevant in hazing cases:
  • Title IX: If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender discrimination, or creates a hostile environment based on sex, Title IX obligations are triggered. This requires universities to investigate promptly and fairly, and failure to do so can lead to federal investigation and loss of funding. This is particularly important for cases involving sexualized hazing.
  • Clery Act: This law mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal student aid must disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents involving assault, hate crimes, or alcohol/drug violations often fall under Clery reporting requirements, providing a public record of campus safety issues.

These federal statutes work in concert with Texas state law to create a comprehensive framework for addressing hazing. They can be powerful tools for discovery and for establishing institutional negligence in civil lawsuits.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

One of the complexities of hazing litigation is identifying all potentially liable parties. When hazing occurs, multiple individuals and entities might share responsibility for the harm caused. In Texas, a civil lawsuit can cast a broad net to ensure all culpable parties are held accountable.

• Individual Students: Those who directly participated in, planned, encouraged, or failed to prevent the hazing can be held personally liable. This includes “pledge educators,” chapter officers, or any member who actively engaged in the harmful acts.
• Local Chapter / Student Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, or club itself, if it is a legally recognized entity, can be sued. The leadership of the chapter bears significant responsibility for the conduct of its members and new member activities. In cases where the organization can be shown to have permitted, encouraged, or knowingly allowed hazing, it can face substantial liability.
• National Fraternity/Sorority: Many local chapters are part of larger national organizations. These national bodies often have anti-hazing policies, risk management guidelines, and oversight responsibilities. Liability can be established if the national organization knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing within its chapters but failed to take adequate preventative or corrective action. This “pattern evidence” is crucial, showing that the national organization had prior notice of dangerous conduct but ignored it.
• University or Governing Board: Colleges and universities have a duty to protect their students. Depending on the circumstances, a university can be held liable for hazing if it was negligent in its supervision, failed to enforce its own anti-hazing policies, or showed deliberate indifference to known dangers. While public universities in Texas (like UT, Texas A&M, UH) might invoke sovereign immunity, exceptions exist for gross negligence or failure to address issues covered by federal laws like Title IX. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections.
• Third Parties: Other entities can also be found liable, such as:
  • Property Owners/Landlords: If hazing occurs at an off-campus house, the property owner, if aware of dangerous activities, could be included.
  • Alcohol Providers: Bars, stores, or individuals who illegally furnish alcohol to minors or already intoxicated individuals can face “dram shop” liability.
  • Event Organizers/Security Companies: If hired for an event where hazing occurs and they failed their duty of care.

Every hazing case is unique, and the specific facts and chain of events will dictate which parties can be held accountable. The Manginello Law Firm conducts thorough investigations to identify all potential defendants, ensuring comprehensive claims are pursued for victims and their families.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

The tragic reality of hazing is that it follows deeply disturbing patterns, often resulting in similar injuries or deaths across different states and universities. By examining major national hazing cases, Morris County families can understand the nature of these incidents, the legal battles that follow, and the types of accountability that have been achieved. These cases serve as powerful anchors, demonstrating foreseeability and the systemic failures that experienced hazing attorneys leverage in Texas courts.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced or coerced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing-related fatalities. The following cases illustrate this horrifying pattern:

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (February 2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died from traumatic brain injuries after a “bid acceptance” night involving extreme, forced alcohol consumption. Security cameras within the fraternity house captured Piazza falling repeatedly and suffering significant injuries, yet fraternity members delayed calling for help for nearly 12 hours. The aftermath led to the filing of over 1,000 criminal counts against 18 fraternity members, including involuntary manslaughter. Piazza’s family pursued civil litigation, resulting in confidential settlements, and his death spurred the creation of Pennsylvania’s Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. This case underscored the devastating consequences of extreme intoxication coupled with a culture of silence and delayed medical intervention.
• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (November 2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old FSU pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and forced to consume them rapidly. Criminal prosecution followed for multiple fraternity members, most of whom pled guilty to misdemeanor hazing charges. Coffey’s family filed a wrongful death lawsuit, which was settled confidentially. In response, FSU temporarily suspended all Greek life and implemented a strict overhaul of its anti-hazing policies. Coffey’s death highlighted the dangers of highly ritualized drinking events that are normalized as “traditions.”
• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (September 2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old LSU pledge, died with an extremely high blood alcohol level (0.495%) after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game. During this game, pledges were forced to drink large quantities of alcohol if they answered questions incorrectly. Several fraternity members were criminally charged, with one convicted of negligent homicide. While the family’s civil lawsuit resulted in confidential settlements with multiple parties, the case led to the enactment of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, which made hazing a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. This case became a powerful example of how public outrage over a clear-cut hazing death can drive significant legislative change.
• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (March 2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old BGSU pledge, died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” night. This tragic event resulted in multiple criminal convictions for hazing-related charges against fraternity members. In a landmark civil case, Foltz’s family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and approximately $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This case demonstrated that universities, even public ones, can be held financially accountable for their roles in negligence surrounding hazing.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and ritualized hazing continue to cause severe injuries and fatalities, often emphasizing brutality and psychological degradation.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (December 2013): Michael Deng, an 18-year-old pledge, died from a traumatic brain injury he sustained during a “glass ceiling” ritual at a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania. Blindfolded and weighted down with a backpack, Deng was repeatedly tackled by fraternity brothers. The brothers delayed calling 911 for hours, attempting to cover up the incident. Multiple members were convicted, and in a groundbreaking move, the national fraternity was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter. Pi Delta Psi was banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years and fined over $110,000. This case was a landmark for organizational criminal liability and highlighted the dangers of brutal, off-campus “retreat” hazing designed to avoid detection.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it is a pervasive issue within athletic programs, often protected by team loyalty and institutional indifference.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): In 2023, former football players came forward with allegations of widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the Northwestern football program, spanning multiple years. The incidents allegedly included forced sexual acts, racial discrimination, and other forms of abuse. These allegations led to multiple lawsuits against Northwestern University and its coaching staff. The head coach, Pat Fitzgerald, was fired and subsequently filed a wrongful-termination lawsuit, which was reportedly settled confidentially in August 2025. This scandal demonstrated that hazing can permeate major athletic programs, raising critical questions about institutional oversight and the responsibility of universities to protect student-athletes from abuse.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national anchor stories share common, terrifying threads: forced alcohol consumption, physical violence, extreme humiliation, a pervasive culture of silence, deliberate cover-ups, and critically, delayed or denied medical care. These patterns are not unique to any single university or state; they are systemic within organizations that allow hazing to flourish.

For families in Morris County and across Texas sending their children to universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these cases carry profound weight. They illustrate that:

• Foreseeability is key: When a national organization has a history of these incidents, they are on notice of the potential for harm, strengthening arguments of negligence.
• Accountability is possible: Multi-million-dollar settlements and significant legal reforms often only follow after tragedy is met with determined litigation.
• No institution is immune: Universities and powerful national organizations, regardless of their reputation or financial resources, can be held accountable when they fail to protect students.

These lessons are directly applicable to any hazing incident in Texas. An experienced hazing attorney understands these precedents and how to apply them to secure justice for your family in Morris County.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Morris County families, understanding the unique context of hazing at major Texas universities is crucial. While hazing is a statewide issue, each campus has its own culture, policies, and history of incidents that can impact how a case proceeds. Morris County is located in East Texas, and many families from our community send their children to colleges across the state, including the large universities discussed below. These institutions are major pillars of higher education in Texas, attracting students from all corners of the state, including our own.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus in our state’s largest city, blends a commuter population with a growing residential community. Its diverse student body includes many from Greater Houston and surrounding regions, including students from Morris County seeking opportunities in a major metropolitan area. UH boasts an active Greek life with a broad range of fraternities and sororities, alongside numerous multicultural and service organizations.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UH has a dynamic campus environment, reflecting Houston’s diversity. It offers a wide array of student organizations, including a robust Greek system with multiple Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council (HPC), National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), Multicultural Greek Council (MGC), and United Greek Council (UGC) chapters. This active Greek scene, coupled with numerous other student groups, creates many opportunities for social engagement, but also potential environments where hazing might occur.

5.1.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at UH

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, clearly stating that hazing is prohibited whether it occurs on or off campus, involves university-recognized groups or not, and is directed at any student. The policy explicitly forbids:

• Forced consumption of alcohol, food, drugs, or any other substance.
• Sleep deprivation or forced physical activity.
• Harassment, ridicule, or humiliation.
• Any act that causes physical abuse, mental distress, or endangers health or safety.

UH encourages reporting through several official channels, including: the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, UH Police Department (UHPD), and various online reporting forms. The university is legally required to publish its hazing policies and respond to incidents, but the transparency of public incident reports can vary.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at UH

While UH strives for a hazing-free environment, incidents have unfortunately occurred. One notable case involved the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) fraternity in 2016. Pledges were allegedly subjected to physical and psychological hazing during a multi-day event off-campus, including sleep and food deprivation. In a severe incident, one student suffered a lacerated spleen after being slammed onto a table-like surface. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges, and the university responded with a suspension.

Subsequent years have seen other disciplinary actions against fraternities for violating university policies related to hazing, including alcohol misuse and conduct “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort.” While specific details often remain confidential due to student privacy laws, these cases highlight UH’s ongoing efforts to enforce its policies and the persistent nature of hazing despite those efforts.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Morris County family whose child attends UH, a hazing case in Houston would involve specific local jurisdictions. Depending on the nature and location of the incident:

• Involved Agencies: The University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) would likely handle on-campus incidents, while the Houston Police Department (HPD) and the Harris County Sheriff’s Office would have jurisdiction for off-campus events.
• Civil Suits: Lawsuits would typically be filed in civil courts within Harris County, Texas.
• Potential Defendants: These could include the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, potentially the University of Houston itself if negligence can be proven, and even property owners if the hazing occurred on private residences.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

Families from Morris County with students at UH should be vigilant. If you suspect hazing:

• Report through official UH channels: Use the Dean of Students Office, UHPD, or online reporting forms.
• Document Everything Thoroughly: Preserve all digital communications (like GroupMe or Snapchat), photos of injuries, and accounts of what happened.
• Investigate Prior Incidents: While direct access to comprehensive internal UH records is limited, public reporting should be reviewed. An experienced attorney can help uncover patterns of prior complaints and discipline.
• Contact a Houston-Based Hazing Attorney: An attorney with experience in Houston—the home of UH—will understand the local legal landscape, the university’s specific policies, and how to navigate the Harris County court system. This local knowledge can be invaluable when building a case against powerful institutions and their insurers.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University in College Station is renowned for its deep-seated traditions, particularly its Corps of Cadets and its fiercely loyal Aggie Network, which spans the globe, including alumni and families in Morris County. The university cultivates a strong sense of community and pride, but like many tradition-heavy institutions, it faces unique challenges with hazing.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M epitomizes a mix of highly disciplined military tradition through its Corps of Cadets and a vibrant, large-scale Greek life presence. Both environments, while fostering camaraderie, have historically been sites of hazing. The culture of intense loyalty and the emphasis on “earning” one’s place can create conditions ripe for exploitation under the guise of tradition. Many students from Morris County are drawn to the strong academic programs and rich traditions of Texas A&M.

5.2.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at Texas A&M

Texas A&M unequivocally prohibits hazing, outlining its policy in its student rules and providing dedicated resources for reporting. The university defines hazing in line with Texas law, covering physical, mental, and humiliating acts. Its policy applies to all student organizations, including Greek life and the Corps of Cadets, regardless of whether the activity takes place on or off campus.

Reporting channels include: the Dean of Student Life, the Office of Fraternity & Sorority Life (for Greek organizations), the Commandant’s Office (for Corps-related incidents), and the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD). The university is transparent about its commitment to anti-hazing initiatives on its official student activities website.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at Texas A&M

Texas A&M has faced several significant hazing-related incidents, particularly involving both Greek life and the Corps of Cadets:

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Lawsuit (around 2021): Two pledges alleged severe physical hazing, including forced strenuous activity, followed by being covered in various substances, including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit. This resulted in severe chemical burns requiring emergency skin graft surgeries. The pledges filed a $1 million lawsuit against the fraternity, which had already been suspended by the university for two years. This case highlights extreme physical and chemical hazing.
• Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): A former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading hazing within the Corps, including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The lawsuit sought over $1 million in damages. While Texas A&M stated it handled the matter under its internal rules, the public nature of the lawsuit brought attention to the persistent challenges within the Corps’ traditional environment.
• Kappa Sigma (2023, Ongoing): There have been ongoing allegations of hazing within the Kappa Sigma fraternity at Texas A&M, resulting in severe injuries such as rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown from extreme physical exertion and dehydration). This incident led to ongoing litigation with specialized legal representation focused on the long-term recovery from such injuries.

These incidents demonstrate the diverse forms of hazing at A&M and the university’s and organizations’ responses, which often include suspensions, but sometimes require legal intervention for full accountability.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Morris County families, a hazing case originating from Texas A&M would likely involve Brazos County jurisdiction.

• Involved Agencies: The Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) would be the primary law enforcement agency for campus-related incidents. For off-campus hazing, the Bryan or College Station Police Departments, or the Brazos County Sheriff’s Office, would have jurisdiction.
• Civil Suits: Lawsuits would typically be filed in civil courts within Brazos County, which includes College Station.
• Potential Defendants: Claims could target the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national organization (for Greek life), the Corps of Cadets’ leadership, potentially the university, and other third parties like property owners.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

Families from Morris County are an integral part of the Aggie community. If your child at Texas A&M is affected by hazing:

• Understand A&M-Specific Resources: Utilize the Dean of Student Life, Office of Fraternity & Sorority Life, or Commandant’s Office.
• Document Thoroughly: Given the strong sense of loyalty, collecting evidence like group chats, photos, and detailed personal accounts is even more critical. Our video on using your cellphone to document a legal case, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs, can provide vital guidance.
• Beware of “Tradition” as an Excuse: A&M’s rich traditions can unfortunately be used to normalize hazing. Remember, if it’s degrading, harmful, or coercive, it’s hazing, not tradition, regardless of how long it’s been done.
• Consult a Texas Hazing Attorney: An attorney specializing in Texas hazing cases can navigate the specifics of Texas A&M’s institutional structure, including the Corps of Cadets, and the legal landscape of Brazos County.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution, is a magnet for students from across Texas, including many from Morris County seeking a top-tier education and vibrant campus life. Austin’s unique culture and UT’s large, diverse student body contribute to a dynamic social scene, including a very active Greek system and numerous other student organizations.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin is one of the largest universities in Texas, with a bustling urban campus and a rich history of student life. Its Greek community is extensive, encompassing a wide range of social fraternities and sororities, along with professional, service, and cultural Greek organizations. Beyond Greek life, UT is home to countless student clubs, spirit groups, and athletic teams, all of which fall under the university’s anti-hazing policies.

5.3.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at UT Austin

The University of Texas at Austin has one of the most proactive and transparent anti-hazing policies and reporting systems among Texas universities. UT’s policies strictly prohibit hazing, defining it broadly to include any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that endangers mental or physical health for the purpose of initiation or affiliation.

A key feature of UT’s compliance is its publicly accessible Hazing Violations page (https://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/sfl/hazingfacts.php, though direct link may change). This page lists organizations that have been found in violation of hazing policies, detailing the conduct, the dates of the violation, and the sanctions imposed. This level of transparency is rare and invaluable for families.

UT provides multiple reporting avenues, including: the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, Title IX Office (for sex-based hazing), and University of Texas Police Department (UTPD). Confidential reporting options are also available.

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at UT Austin

UT’s public Hazing Violations page paints a clear picture of ongoing hazing incidents, demonstrating that even with strong policies and transparency, the problem persists:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) (2023): This fraternity was found in violation when new members were allegedly directed to consume significant quantities of milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, actions that were deemed to endanger their physical health and safety. The chapter was placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education.
• Texas Wranglers (Spirit Organization): This well-known spirit organization has faced multiple sanctions over the years for hazing violations, including alcohol-related misconduct, forced excessive physical activity, and punishment-based practices designed to degrade new members.
• Various other fraternities and student groups have been sanctioned for violations ranging from forced alcohol consumption to sleep deprivation and humiliating acts, often leading to suspensions, loss of recognition, and stringent conditions for reinstatement.

The recurring theme from UT’s public records is that alcohol and physical endurance tests are common, and these incidents often violate basic safety standards.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Morris County family pursuing a hazing case against a UT Austin organization, the legal process would be centered in the state capital.

• Involved Agencies: The University of Texas Police Department (UTPD) would handle on-campus incidents, and the Austin Police Department (APD) and Travis County Sheriff’s Office would be involved in off-campus cases.
• Civil Suits: Lawsuits would typically be filed in district courts within Travis County, Texas.
• Potential Defendants: These could include individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, potentially the University of Texas (with considerations for sovereign immunity), and property owners. UT’s transparent public records can be a powerful tool for plaintiffs, providing immediate evidence of an organization’s prior hazing history and the university’s foreknowledge of such patterns.

5.3.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

Morris County families with students at UT Austin have unique advantages due to the university’s transparency but must also be vigilant:

• Review UT’s Hazing Violations Page: Before joining an organization, check https://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/sfl/hazingfacts.php (or current URL) for past violations.
• Report Directly: Utilize UT’s robust reporting channels including the Dean of Students and UTPD.
• Document Everything (especially digital): The culture at UT, like many large campuses, often relies on digital communication. Saving screenshots of GroupMe, Snapchat, and other messaging apps is critical.
• Consult a Hazing Attorney in Texas: An attorney deeply familiar with Texas hazing law and UT Austin’s specific policies will be well-equipped to use the university’s own public records and internal documents to build a strong case. Given UT’s status as a public institution, understanding the nuances of sovereign immunity and how to navigate it is also key.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, nestled in Dallas, enjoys a reputation as a private university with a strong academic profile and a vibrant, often prominent, Greek life. Students from Morris County who aim for a private university experience often consider SMU, which offers a distinctly different environment from public state schools.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU’s campus culture is characterized by its strong Greek presence and a dynamic social scene. Its fraternities and sororities play a central role in student life, attracting a significant portion of the student body. The university also has numerous other student organizations and athletic teams. As a private institution, SMU maintains its own distinct policies and internal disciplinary processes separate from state-mandated public university requirements.

5.4.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at SMU

SMU prohibits hazing in all its forms, defining it consistent with Texas law, covering physical, mental, and humiliating acts connected to group affiliation. SMU’s policies emphasize student safety and well-being, applying to all recognized student organizations both on and off campus.

SMU provides reporting mechanisms through the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct & Community Standards, and campus police. It also utilizes systems like the “Real Response” tool for anonymous reporting, aiming to encourage students to come forward without fear of retribution. Information on SMU’s hazing prevention efforts can typically be found through its student affairs or fraternity/sorority life websites (e.g., smu.edu/studentaffairs/fraternity-sorority-life).

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at SMU

While private universities often have less public reporting about specific disciplinary actions compared to public institutions, incidents of hazing at SMU have led to chapter suspensions and sanctions:

• Kappa Alpha Order (2017): This fraternity faced severe disciplinary action and suspension following allegations of hazing that included physically assaulting new members, forced excessive alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. The chapter was suspended for several years and faced significant restrictions upon its eventual return, highlighting the university’s response to serious violations.
• SMU has also addressed other incidents involving fraternities for violations related to alcohol misuse, physical misconduct, and failure to adhere to university and national anti-hazing policies, often resulting in periods of probation or temporary suspension.

These cases indicate a pattern of hazing behavior consistent with national trends, showing that even at private institutions, the problem persists.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Morris County families, a hazing case involving SMU in Dallas would be handled primarily through courts specific to Dallas County.

• Involved Agencies: The SMU Police Department (SMU PD) would address incidents on campus. The Dallas Police Department (DPD) and the Dallas County Sheriff’s Department would have jurisdiction for off-campus hazing reports.
• Civil Suits: Lawsuits would typically be filed in civil courts within Dallas County, Texas.
• Potential Defendants: These could include individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, and crucially, SMU itself. As a private university, SMU does not enjoy the protection of sovereign immunity, potentially simplifying the process of holding the institution accountable in a civil lawsuit.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

Morris County families with students at SMU should be aware of the university’s policies and legal context:

• Utilize SMU’s Reporting Tools: Familiarize yourself with SMU’s Dean of Students Office and its anonymous reporting options like “Real Response.”
• Understand Private University Dynamics: While SMU may protect internal disciplinary details more rigorously than public universities, this does not mean a lack of accountability. An experienced attorney can compel disclosure of relevant documents through civil discovery.
• Document Thoroughly: As with any hazing incident, preserving all forms of evidence—digital, photographic, and testimonial—is paramount.
• Contact a Texas Hazing Attorney: An attorney specializing in Texas hazing law and familiar with the legal environment of private institutions and Dallas County courts can provide expert guidance on how to navigate a civil claim, free from the complexities of sovereign immunity.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University in Waco, a private Baptist university, holds a distinct position in the landscape of Texas higher education. Its strong religious affiliation and focus on community values draw many students, including those from Morris County, who are seeking an institution that aligns with specific moral and ethical principles. However, even with this unique identity, Baylor has faced its share of challenges related to campus misconduct, including hazing.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor’s campus culture emphasizes Christian ideals, academic excellence, and a close-knit community. It has a significant Greek life presence, alongside numerous faith-based, academic, and athletic organizations. The university’s strong traditions and emphasis on community can sometimes, paradoxically, create environments where hazing might be perceived as a means of bonding or upholding group identity. Baylor has also garnered national attention for past scandals related to sexual assault, which has led to increased scrutiny of its institutional oversight and student safety protocols.

5.4.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at Baylor

Baylor University prohibits hazing, articulating its policy in the university’s student code of conduct. The policy aligns with Texas hazing law, outlawing any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of affiliation. Baylor’s policies apply to all registered student organizations and athletic teams, regardless of the activity’s location.

Reporting channels include: the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct Administration, the Title IX Office (especially if sex-based misconduct is involved), and the Baylor Police Department (BUPD). Baylor’s official student activities website (baylor.edu/studentactivities) provides access to information on its hazing prevention strategies.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at Baylor

Baylor, despite its religious foundation, has confronted several hazing incidents, underscoring that the problem can appear in any institutional setting:

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): An internal investigation into hazing within the Baylor baseball program led to the suspension of 14 players. The suspensions were staggered over the early part of the season to avoid crippling the team but sent a clear message regarding the university’s intolerance for such behavior.
• The university’s past struggles with sexual assault allegations and its response to them have also placed hazing incidents under greater public and legal scrutiny, leading to questions about the effectiveness of its various oversight mechanisms.

These documented cases indicate that hazing, including physical and alcohol-related activities, occurs across different types of student organizations at Baylor.

5.4.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

For Morris County families pursuing a hazing case against an organization at Baylor University, the legal proceedings would primarily take place in McLennan County.

• Involved Agencies: The Baylor Police Department (BUPD) would investigate incidents on campus. For off-campus hazing, the Waco Police Department (WPD) and the McLennan County Sheriff’s Office would have jurisdiction.
• Civil Suits: Lawsuits would typically be filed in civil courts within McLennan County, Texas.
• Potential Defendants: These could include individual students, the local chapter, the national organization (for Greek life), and Baylor University itself. As a private institution, Baylor does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it more straightforward to pursue direct claims against the university for negligence or other failures.

5.4.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

Morris County families with students at Baylor University should remain informed and prepared:

• Familiarize with Baylor’s Policies: Understand Baylor’s specific code of conduct, especially regarding hazing and student safety.
• Utilize Reporting Channels: Use the Dean of Students Office, BUPD, or the Title IX Office as appropriate for reporting incidents.
• Consider Baylor’s Unique Context: Baylor’s history of past campus safety issues means that any new allegations often draw heightened scrutiny. An attorney will consider this context when building a case.
• Document Everything Diligently: As hazing often involves secrecy and coercion, meticulously collecting evidence—screenshots, photos, detailed journals of events—is paramount.
• Consult a Texas Hazing Attorney: An attorney specializing in Texas hazing law and with experience in cases against private institutions in McLennan County can offer expert guidance. This expertise is crucial for navigating Baylor’s unique institutional structure and how it impacts liability.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

When hazing occurs at a Texas university, it is rarely an isolated incident unique to a single chapter. In most significant hazing cases, the local chapter is part of a larger national or international organization. The national history of a fraternity or sorority is not merely background information; it is crucial evidence that reveals patterns of behavior, prior warnings, and systemic failures that can profoundly impact a civil lawsuit.

Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities and sororities active at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor—such as Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Phi Delta Theta, Pi Kappa Phi, Kappa Alpha Order, Beta Theta Pi, and Alpha Tau Omega—are governed by national headquarters. These national bodies often develop extensive anti-hazing policies, risk management manuals, and training programs. While this might seem positive on the surface, these policies often exist precisely because these organizations have a documented history of hazing deaths, severe injuries, and costly litigation across their chapters nationwide.

This recurring pattern demonstrates foreseeability. When a local Texas chapter of a national organization repeats a hazing ritual that has already led to injury or death in another state, the national organization can be argued to have had prior knowledge—or at least, constructive knowledge—that such conduct was dangerous. This strengthens claims of negligence or gross negligence against the national body, particularly if they failed to adequately monitor, intervene, or enforce their own policies. For Morris County families, this means the history of a national fraternity can be a powerful tool in seeking accountability for a local incident.

Organization Mapping: Connecting Local Chapters to National Patterns

While we cannot list every single chapter and its history, we can illustrate the connection between prominent national organizations and their repeated involvement in hazing incidents, which directly impacts their liability for local chapters at Texas universities.

Let’s examine some organizations and their national hazing histories:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has been linked to numerous severe hazing incidents, most notably the tragic death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021. Foltz died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume an entire handle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” night. This incident resulted in a $10 million settlement, with a substantial portion coming from the national Pi Kappa Alpha organization. Another case, involving David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University in 2012, also resulted in a $14 million settlement after a pledge died from alcohol overconsumption. These cases demonstrate a clear, dangerous pattern of forced alcohol consumption tied to their pledging process within Pike, which directly informs any hazing claim against a Pike chapter at a Texas university like UH, Texas A&M, or UT.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE has a particularly grim national hazing history, with multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries across the country. In 2014, in response to a pattern of fatalities, SAE national even announced the elimination of its traditional pledge process, though hazing incidents have unfortunately continued. Lawsuits against SAE chapters include allegations of traumatic brain injury during hazing at the University of Alabama (2023), and specific Texas incidents. For example, at Texas A&M University (2021), pledges alleged they suffered severe chemical burns after industrial-strength cleaner and other substances were poured on them. At the University of Texas at Austin (2024), a student sued an SAE chapter for over $1 million after allegedly suffering serious injuries in an assault occurring during a party at a chapter house already suspended for prior hazing. This pattern indicates a systemic issue within SAE that can be used to establish foreseeability in any claim against a local chapter in Texas.
• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity is linked to the high-profile death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017. Max died from alcohol poisoning after a forced drinking game. The tragedy spurred the creation of Louisiana’s felony hazing statute, the Max Gruver Act. This case is crucial for establishing a pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing and the national organization’s prior knowledge of such risks, relevant for any Phi Delta Theta chapter at Baylor, SMU, or other Texas schools.
• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Pi Kappa Phi chapters have also been involved in fatal hazing. The death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017 from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” led to criminal charges and a temporary suspension of all Greek life at FSU. This contributes to the pattern evidence of dangerous, forced alcohol consumption within Pi Kappa Phi chapters nationally.
• Beta Theta Pi (ΒΘΠ): While the national organization has a history of hazing incidents, the most infamous is the death of Timothy Piazza at Penn State University (2017). Piazza died after repeated falls during a forced drinking event, with delayed medical attention. This case led to over a thousand criminal charges and strict new anti-hazing laws. This incident is used to demonstrate patterns of delayed care and cover-ups within chapters, relevant to Beta Theta Pi chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, or SMU.
• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): Kappa Sigma has a long history of severe hazing incidents, notably the Chad Meredith case at the University of Miami (2001), where a pledge drowned after being coerced into swimming while intoxicated, leading to a $12.6 million verdict for the family. More recently, allegations at Texas A&M University (2023) involved hazing leading to rhabdomyolysis, a severe muscle breakdown. This pattern shows a disregard for safety measures and a history of physical hazing within Kappa Sigma nationally and locally.
• Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): The catastrophic injury of Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri (2021) serves as a stark reminder of hazing’s potential for permanent damage. Santulli sustained severe, permanent brain damage after being forced to consume excessive alcohol. Multi-million-dollar settlements with 22 defendants, including the fraternity, were reached. This case highlights the organization’s pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing that can lead to lifelong consequences.
• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): In a recent landmark case, a pledge at the College of Charleston (2024) alleged physical beatings, forced consumption of drugs and alcohol, and psychological torment. The family received more than $10 million in damages, one of the largest known hazing settlements. This demonstrates the potential for substantial damages when severe hazing causes lasting harm and is brought to light by determined legal action.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

Understanding these national histories is critically important for Morris County families pursuing a hazing claim in Texas. Here’s why:

• Pattern Evidence: These recurring incidents across states and campuses demonstrate that certain organizations had repeated warnings that their “traditions” or “pledge education” were dangerous. This helps establish foreseeability—that the organization knew or should have known its actions posed a severe risk.
• Institutional Knowledge: It’s difficult for national organizations to claim they were unaware of hazing when very similar incidents have occurred in numerous chapters, leading to public outcry, investigations, and lawsuits.
• Insurance Coverage: Evidence of a national pattern of hazing can be pivotal in challenging insurance companies that try to deny coverage by claiming individual acts were “unforeseeable” or “intentional” and thus excluded from policies. An experienced hazing attorney knows how to use this pattern to argue that the national organization’s negligent supervision (a covered peril) allowed the hazing to occur.
• Punitive Damages: In some cases, a history of ignoring warnings and repeated dangerous behavior can support a claim for punitive damages, which are designed to punish the defendant for egregious conduct and deter future similar acts.

At The Manginello Law Firm, we meticulously research the national history of every organization involved in a hazing incident. This deep institutional knowledge allows us to build powerful cases that hold not just individuals, but also the powerful national organizations and universities, truly accountable for the harm they cause.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

For Morris County families facing the aftermath of hazing, the thought of pursuing legal action can be daunting. However, building a successful hazing case is not just about proving what happened; it’s about meticulously collecting evidence, understanding the full scope of damages, and deploying a strategic legal approach. At Attorney911, we leverage our experience in complex litigation to navigate these challenges effectively.

Evidence

Modern hazing cases are often won or lost based on the quality and quantity of evidence. Unlike older cases that might have relied solely on witness testimony, today’s investigations demand a comprehensive approach to digital and traditional evidence gathering. Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs, explains these best practices.

• Digital Communications: This is often the most critical category. Group chats and direct messages from platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook Messenger, and even fraternity-specific apps are goldmines of information. They can reveal planning, peer pressure, instructions, specific demands, the mood of the group, and even admissions of hazing. Our team knows how to identify, preserve, and, if necessary, recover deleted messages which can expose the truth.
• Photos & Videos: Visual evidence captured by participants or bystanders—showing the hazing in progress, injuries, or incriminating aftermath—is exceptionally powerful. This includes content shared in group chats, posted on social media (even if quickly deleted), or security camera footage from houses or event venues.
• Internal Organization Documents: These can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “traditions” lists, emails or texts from officers about new member activities, and the national organization’s anti-hazing policies and training materials. These documents can show intent, knowledge of hazing, or a failure to enforce policies.
• University Records: We investigate the university’s compliance records, including prior conduct files, probation or suspension histories for the involved organization, incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, and any Clery Act disclosures. This evidence can establish a pattern of misconduct and the university’s knowledge of the risks.
• Medical and Psychological Records: These document the full extent of the harm. Emergency room reports, hospitalization records, surgical notes, toxicology reports (for alcohol/drug-related hazing), and psychological evaluations (diagnosing PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health impacts) are crucial for substantiating damages. Our lawyers work with medical experts to fully understand and present the long-term impact of injuries, such as in cases involving rhabdomyolysis from extreme physical exertion, or traumatic brain injuries.
• Witness Testimony: Accounts from current and former pledges, active members, roommates, RAs, coaches, trainers, or any bystanders are vital. Even former members who quit or were expelled can provide invaluable insights into the organization’s culture and specific hazing practices.

At Attorney911, we employ skilled investigators and a network of experts, including digital forensic specialists, to uncover and preserve every piece of available evidence.

Damages

Hazing inflicts a wide range of harm, and the legal system aims to provide comprehensive compensation for these damages. For Morris County families, understanding what can be recovered is a critical part of the legal process.

• Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs associated with the physical injuries sustained: emergency room visits, ambulance transport, hospital stays (including ICU), surgeries, medications, and ongoing physical therapy. For catastrophic injuries, it can also include the cost of long-term care plans, occupational therapy, and specialized medical equipment for the remainder of the victim’s life.
• Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes wages lost if the victim or a parent had to take time off work. It also covers the significant educational impact, such as missed semesters, tuition and fees for courses that couldn’t be completed, lost academic or athletic scholarships, and potential delays in career entry. If the injuries are permanent, an economist might calculate the victim’s diminished future earning capacity.
• Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for the subjective, intangible harms. This includes physical pain and suffering, the severe emotional distress, humiliation, and trauma inflicted (often leading to diagnosed conditions like PTSD, depression, or anxiety). It also covers the loss of enjoyment of life, meaning the inability to participate in activities and hobbies due to the injuries, or the withdrawal from the normal college experience.
• Wrongful Death Damages (for families): In the most tragic cases, when hazing results in death, surviving family members can pursue a wrongful death claim. This compensates for funeral and burial costs, the loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and the profound non-economic losses such as grief, loss of companionship, love, society, and the loss of guidance and counsel, especially for parents and siblings.
• Punitive Damages: In cases of particularly egregious, reckless, or malicious conduct, punitive damages may be sought. These are designed to punish defendants and deter future similar behavior. They are often awarded when an organization had prior warnings of dangerous hazing but deliberately ignored them or engaged in a cover-up. While Texas has caps on punitive damages in many instances, their availability in hazing cases can be a powerful tool for accountability.

These damages aim to restore victims and their families as much as possible to their pre-injury state, recognizing that some harms, like the loss of a loved one, are immeasurable.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

A critical aspect of hazing litigation is navigating the complex world of insurance coverage. National fraternities, sororities, and universities often have extensive insurance policies that may apply, but their insurers often fight claims vigorously.

• Identifying Coverage: Our role at Attorney911 is to identify every potential layer of insurance: national fraternity policies, local chapter policies, individual member homeowner’s policies, and the university’s general liability and umbrella policies.
• Navigating Exclusions: Insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage by arguing that hazing, especially if it involved intentional acts or criminal behavior, falls under policy exclusions. For example, policies often exclude “intentional acts” or “criminal acts.” However, an experienced hazing attorney knows how to frame claims using theories of negligent supervision, failure to warn, or premises liability, which are typically covered.
• Insider Knowledge: Lupe Peña, one of our associate attorneys at Attorney911, brings invaluable insider knowledge. As a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm, she understands exactly how large insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, bad faith arguments, and settlement strategies. This “inside baseball” perspective provides a significant advantage in fiercely contested insurance coverage disputes.

By meticulously understanding the evidence, the full scope of damages, and the intricacies of insurance law, The Manginello Law Firm builds powerful strategies aimed at achieving maximum accountability and compensation for families in Morris County and throughout Texas.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing impacts a family, immediate, practical advice is essential. This section offers guidance for parents, students, and even former members or witnesses, along with answers to common questions for Morris County families.

8.1 For Parents

As a parent in Morris County, detecting and responding to hazing can be incredibly difficult, often due to secrecy and the fear your child may express.

Warning Signs of Hazing:

• Unexplained Injuries: Bruises, cuts, burns, or “accidents” that don’t add up.
• Sudden Exhaustion & Sleep Deprivation: Extreme fatigue, falling asleep in class, or constant late-night “events.”
• Drastic Mood Changes: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, hostility, or social withdrawal from friends and family.
• Secrecy: Your child becomes uncommunicative about group activities, saying “I can’t talk about it,” or becomes defensive.
• Constant Phone Use & Fear: Obsessive checking of group chats; anxiety if they miss a “mandatory” message or call.
• Academic Decline: Grades dropping suddenly, missing classes, or falling behind.
• Reluctance to Leave: Expressing a desperate need to “get through it” to belong, even if miserable.

How to Talk to Your Child:
Approach them with empathy, not accusation. Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your priority. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going with the group? Are you feeling pressured to do anything that makes you uncomfortable? Have you seen anyone get hurt, or have you been hurt?” Remind them they can tell you anything without judgment.

If Your Child is Hurt:
Prioritize medical care immediately. Do not delay. Document everything:

• Take photos of injuries from multiple angles and throughout the healing process.
• Screenshot any messages, photos, or videos your child has on their phone.
• Write down a detailed account of what happened, when, where, and who was involved, while the memory is fresh.
• Gather any physical evidence, such as damaged clothing or objects used.

Dealing with the University:
Document every communication. Email is best. Ask specific questions about:

• The university’s specific hazing policy.
• Prior hazing incidents involving the same organization.
• What steps the university took in response.

When to Talk to a Lawyer:
If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or covering up what happened, contact Attorney911 immediately. Evidence disappears fast, and universities and organizations mobilize quickly to control the narrative.

8.2 For Students / Pledges

If you are a student from Morris County experiencing hazing, it’s crucial to understand your rights and how to protect yourself.

Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?
Ask yourself:

• Am I being forced or pressured to do something I don’t want to do?
• Would I do this if I had a real choice, without fear of social exclusion or punishment?
• Is this dangerous, degrading, or illegal?
• Would my parents or the university approve if they knew exactly what was happening?
• Are older members making new members do things they don’t have to do themselves?
• Am I being told to keep secrets or lie about this?

If you answer “yes” to any of these, it is likely hazing, regardless of what they call it.

Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story:
In Texas, consent is NOT a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that in situations of extreme peer pressure, desire to belong, and power imbalance, true voluntary consent is impossible. You are not “agreeing” to be harmed.

Exiting and Reporting Safely:

• Immediate Danger: Call 911 immediately if you or someone else is in physical danger. Texas law often grants amnesty or immunity for good-faith reporting in medical emergencies.
• Exiting: You have the legal right to leave any group at any time. If you fear confrontation, tell a trusted advisor, RA, or directly email the organization’s president stating you are withdrawing. Do not go to a “final meeting” if you suspect you will be pressured or humiliated.
• Reporting: You can report privately and often anonymously.
  • On-Campus: Dean of Students, Office of Student Conduct, UTPD/UHPD/UPD, Title IX coordinator.
  • Off-Campus & Anonymous: National Anti-Hazing Hotline: 1-888-NOT-HAZE (1-888-668-4293).
• Evidence is Gold: Screenshot all group messages, photos, and videos. Record conversations where hazing is discussed (Texas is a one-party consent state, meaning you can record if you are part of the conversation). This evidence can protect you and helps build a case. See Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were part of a group where hazing occurred, or you witnessed it, you might feel a complex mix of guilt, fear, and a desire to do what’s right.

• Your Role in Accountability: Your testimony and evidence can be pivotal in preventing future harm and saving lives. You may hold crucial pieces of information that can lead to accountability.
• Seeking Counsel: If you have concerns about your own legal exposure, it’s wise to consult an attorney. An experienced hazing lawyer can advise you on your rights, potential liabilities, and how your cooperation might be handled. In many cases, cooperating with authorities can be a mitigating factor and a path toward personal healing and accountability.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

Hazing cases are complex, and subtle errors can undermine even the strongest claims. Morris County families should be aware of these common pitfalls:

1. Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence: Parents or students might panic and try to erase digital evidence to avoid “getting in trouble.” This is a grave mistake. Deleting critical messages or photos not only hinders your case but can also be construed as obstruction of justice or spoliation of evidence, which is the intentional destruction of evidence that is relevant to a legal proceeding. Once this evidence is gone, it’s often impossible to retrieve, making it nearly impossible to prove claims. Always preserve everything, no matter how embarrassing.
2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly: While tempting to demand answers, direct confrontation almost always backfires. The organization will immediately “lawyer up,” instruct members to delete evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defense, often by shifting blame. Document everything, then call a lawyer before any direct confrontation.
3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms Without Legal Review: Universities, especially private ones, sometimes pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements that might waive your right to pursue further legal action or settle for far less than your damages are worth. Never sign any document from the university or an insurance company without an attorney reviewing it first.
4. Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer: Sharing graphic details or accusations on public social media platforms can severely compromise your case. Defense attorneys screenshot everything and will use any inconsistencies or emotionally charged posts to attack your credibility. It can also inadvertently waive certain legal privileges. Document privately; let your lawyer strategize public messaging, if any.
5. Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting” with the Organization: If the organization asks your child to come “talk things over” or attend “one last meeting” after you’ve expressed concerns, it’s a trap. They will often try to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that compromise your case. Once you consider legal action, all communication should go through your lawyer.
6. Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”: Universities often promise internal investigations and disciplinary action. While their process runs, critical evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations continues to run on your civil claim. The university’s internal process is aimed at protecting the institution, not necessarily maximizing your compensation. Preserve evidence NOW; consult a lawyer immediately. The university process is separate from pursuing real legal accountability.
7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer: Insurance adjusters, whether for the school or the organization, are not on your side. Their job is to minimize payouts. They may claim they just need a “statement to process the claim.” Recorded statements will be used against you, and early settlement offers are typically lowball. Politely decline and state that your attorney will contact them.

8.5 Short FAQ

Here are short, clear answers to common questions for Morris County families concerning hazing:

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) benefit from sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, certain federal violations like Title IX, or when suing specific individuals. Private universities (such as SMU, Baylor) have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its specific facts; contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. Under Texas law, hazing is generally a Class B misdemeanor. However, if the hazing causes injury that requires medical treatment, it becomes a Class A misdemeanor. Critically, if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it is classified as a State Jail Felony, carrying severe penalties. Officers of an organization who fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.
• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes, absolutely. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that “agreement” made under extreme peer pressure, the desire for belonging, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.
• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Texas?”
  Generally, in Texas, you have 2 years from the date of injury or death to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. However, the “discovery rule” can sometimes extend this period if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be “tolled” (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations destroy records. It’s crucial to call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to protect your rights.
• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and foreseeability of off-campus activities. Many major hazing cases that resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments occurred at off-campus houses or private retreats (e.g., the Pi Delta Psi case in the Poconos).
• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  Most hazing cases, particularly civil lawsuits, are resolved through confidential settlements before going to trial. We work diligently to protect your family’s privacy, and it is usually possible to request sealed court records and confidential settlement terms. Our priority is balancing the need for accountability with your desire for discretion.

These are complex legal issues. For specific advice tailored to your family’s situation, we urge you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family is faced with the devastating reality of hazing, you need legal representation that goes beyond general personal injury practice. You need attorneys who intimately understand the intricate dynamics of campus culture, the aggressive legal tactics of powerful institutions, and the complex interplay of state and federal hazing laws. At The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we provide exactly that specialized expertise.

We know that a hazing incident isn’t just an “accident”—it’s a betrayal of trust, often by organizations and institutions that promised safety and community. From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including those in Morris County and surrounding regions, offering a unique blend of empathy, investigative depth, and formidable legal prowess. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families like yours across the state.

Why Choose Attorney911 for Hazing Cases?

Our firm brings a distinct advantage to hazing litigation:

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, leverages her invaluable experience as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She understands precisely how fraternity and university insurance companies operate, from their claim valuation processes to their tactics for denying coverage and delaying settlements. We know their playbook because we used to run it, giving you a critical edge when fighting for fair compensation. You can learn more about Lupe’s background at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.
• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, has a proven track record of taking on formidable opponents. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the complex BP Texas City explosion litigation, where he successfully challenged a multi-billion dollar corporation. With extensive federal court experience, we are not intimidated by national fraternities, large universities, or their well-resourced defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won—we know how to fight powerful defendants. Discover more about Ralph’s credentials at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We don’t settle cases cheap. Our firm has a proven record of securing multi-million dollar settlements and verdicts in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. We meticulously collaborate with economists and life care planners to fully value the long-term impact of hazing-related injuries, from permanent brain damage to lifelong medical needs. You can visit our wrongful death practice area page at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.
• Dual Criminal and Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s distinguished membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides us with a unique perspective on the intersection of criminal charges and civil litigation in hazing cases. We understand how criminal charges against individuals involved in hazing can impact civil claims and can adeptly advise witnesses or former members who may face dual exposure. Our criminal defense experience is detailed at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.
• Investigative Depth: We investigate hazing incidents with the rigor and precision of a major accident reconstruction. Our network of experts includes digital forensic specialists capable of recovering deleted group chats and social media evidence, medical and psychological professionals to document harm, and experienced investigators who uncover hidden university files and national fraternity records. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We understand that hazing hits at the core of what families value most: the safety and future of their children. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face, which is why our approach is built on empathy, transparency, and relentless advocacy. Our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. We focus on thorough investigation and real accountability, not just quick settlements.

You don’t have to face this alone.

If your child from Morris County has experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s UT, Texas A&M, UH, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Morris County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers, justice, and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to your story without judgment, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

What to expect in your free consultation:

• We will listen to your story and the details of what happened with compassion and discretion.
• We will review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
• We’ll clearly explain your potential legal options: reporting to authorities, pursuing a civil lawsuit, both, or neither.
• We will discuss realistic timelines and what you can expect during the legal process.
• We’ll answer your questions about legal fees. We work on a contingency fee basis, generally meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. You can learn more about how contingency fees work in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
• There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot—we want you to make an informed decision for your family.
• Everything you tell us during the consultation is strictly confidential.

Whether you’re in Morris County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911

• Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email for Ralph Manginello: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Contact Lupe Peña directly for consultation in Spanish at lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com