Nevada Hazing Lawyers: A Comprehensive Guide for Families

In the vast expanse of Nevada, where bustling cities meet serene landscapes, the college experience promises growth and discovery. Yet, beneath the surface of academic rigor and vibrant campus life, a hidden danger can lurk: hazing. Imagine your child, a bright student from Henderson, eager to join a fraternity at UNLV, suddenly finding themselves trapped in a ritual that demands far more than loyalty – one that risks their physical and mental well-being. Or perhaps a promising athlete from Reno, striving to make the University of Nevada team, endures degrading tasks disguised as team-building. These aren’t isolated incidents; they are stark realities that Nevada families must understand.

This comprehensive guide aims to shed light on hazing and the law in Nevada and beyond, offering crucial insights for families whose children attend any academic institution in the Silver State. We delve into what hazing truly looks like in 2025, how Nevada and federal laws address this dangerous practice, and the lessons learned from major national cases. Moreover, we examine hazing’s presence at Nevada’s own universities, including the University of Nevada, Reno, and UNLV, and explore the enduring national histories of Greek organizations that operate within our state.

This article provides general information, not specific legal advice. The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, is dedicated to evaluating individual cases based on their unique facts. We serve families throughout Nevada, from Las Vegas to Carson City, ensuring that no one has to navigate the complexities of hazing litigation alone.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  - Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
  - Photograph injuries from multiple angles
  - Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
- Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
- Do NOT:
  - Confront the fraternity/sorority
  - Sign anything from the university or insurance company
  - Post details on public social media
  - Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
- Universities move quickly to control the narrative
- We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

The popular image of hazing often conjures up scenes from old movies—harmless pranks or minor embarrassments. But for families in Nevada, particularly those with children heading to college, it’s critical to understand that modern hazing is far more insidious, dangerous, and technologically advanced than these outdated stereotypes. In 2025, hazing has evolved, but its core purpose remains a destructive assertion of power and control.

Hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. This broad definition captures far more than just physical abuse. It covers a spectrum of behaviors that undermine a student’s well-being and sense of self.

“I agreed to it” is rarely a valid defense in hazing cases. The law, and common sense, recognize that true consent cannot exist in an environment of immense peer pressure, fear of social exclusion, and a desperate desire for acceptance. The power imbalance inherent in hazing rituals strips away genuine choice, leaving victims feeling trapped and vulnerable.

Main Categories of Hazing in Action Today

Hazing manifests in various forms, often layered together to create a coercive and damaging experience. For Nevada students, this could impact their experience at institutions such as the University of Nevada, Reno, or the College of Southern Nevada.

Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is a tragically common and often fatal form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced consumption of alcohol, often to dangerous levels, during “lineups,” drinking games, or “bottle exchanges”—where new members are expected to rapidly consume hard liquor. Pledges might also be pressured to use illicit drugs or unknown substances, leading to severe health complications or even death. The goal isn’t social drinking; it’s about breaking down resistance and asserting control through intoxication.
Physical Hazing: Beyond the classic image of paddling, physical hazing includes extreme calisthenics or “workouts” that push individuals beyond their physical limits, leading to exhaustion, injury, or conditions like rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown). Sleep and food deprivation are also common, destabilizing new members and making them more susceptible to manipulation. Exposure to extreme weather conditions, dangerous environments, or forced physical pain are also part of this category.
Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This deeply degrading form of hazing involves forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (often with derogatory terms like “roasted pig”), or participation in sexually suggestive activities. It can also include public humiliation, often with racial, sexist, or homophobic undertones, designed to break down a person’s dignity and self-respect. These acts leave lasting psychological scars and, in some cases, can escalate to sexual assault.
Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but profoundly damaging, psychological hazing encompasses verbal abuse, threats, intimidation, and deliberate isolation from friends and family. New members might be subjected to constant criticism, impossible demands, or forced confessions orchestrated to manipulate their beliefs and behaviors. This form of hazing aims to erode self-esteem and create unquestioning obedience to the group.
Digital/Online Hazing: With the pervasive use of technology, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, challenges, and public humiliation via social media platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Discord. Pledges might be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos, or be subjected to constant, late-night digital demands that disrupt their sleep and studies. This “24/7” digital control ensures new members are always “on call” and can be punished instantly for perceived infractions.

Where Hazing Actually Happens in Nevada

While Greek life is often synonymous with hazing, it’s crucial for Nevada families to understand that this dangerous practice is not exclusive to fraternities and sororities. It plagues a wide array of student organizations:

Fraternities and Sororities: Both Interfraternity Council (IFC) and Panhellenic Council (NPC) organizations, as well as National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) and multicultural Greek organizations, have documented histories of hazing. Despite national anti-hazing policies, individual chapters often perpetuate traditions that lead to harm.
Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball, cheerleading, and club sports, hazing can occur as a twisted form of team bonding. New members may endure brutal physical conditioning, humiliating rituals, or forced alcohol consumption under the guise of building camaraderie. This has been seen in cases like the Northwestern University athletic hazing scandal, demonstrating that money and prestige do not inoculate against this risk.
Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous organizations are not immune. Traditions involving sleep deprivation, forced public embarrassment, or physical challenges can be found in marching bands, theater groups, and other student performance ensembles.
Spirit Squads and Campus Clubs: “Spirit” organizations or social clubs that pride themselves on upholding campus traditions can also engage in hazing. Any group with a hierarchical structure and a desire to “test” new members is a potential hazing environment.

The common thread uniting these diverse groups is the perverse dynamics of social status, tradition, and secrecy. New members, eager to belong and fearing the consequences of refusal, often endure extreme acts. This culture of silence protects perpetrators and perpetuates a harmful cycle, even when everyone “knows” hazing is against policy and illegal. For Nevada students, this means vigilance is required regardless of the type of organization they join.

Law & Liability Framework (Nevada + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is crucial for families in Nevada seeking accountability. In our state, specific laws and regulations govern hazing, and federal statutes also play a vital role.

Nevada Hazing Law Basics (NRS Chapter 398)

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 398 specifically addresses hazing, prohibiting activities that threaten student welfare. This statute outlines the definition of hazing, related penalties, and the responsibilities of educational institutions.

Definition of Hazing: Under NRS 398.020, hazing is defined broadly as “any method of initiation into a student organization or living group, or any pastime or amusement engaged in with respect to such an organization or living group, that causes, or is likely to cause, bodily danger or physical, mental or emotional harm to any student.” This comprehensive definition emphasizes that physical harm isn’t the only concern; it includes mental and emotional distress. It also applies to any student organization or “living group,” which can encompass fraternities, soror clubs, athletic teams, and even residence hall groups.
Criminal Penalties: Hazing in Nevada carries significant criminal penalties, underscoring the state’s zero-tolerance stance:
- If hazing results in bodily harm to a student, it is a gross misdemeanor (NRS 398.030). This can entail imprisonment in a county jail for up to 364 days, a fine of up to $2,000, or both.
- If hazing results in substantial bodily harm to a student, it is a category B felony (NRS 398.030). This is a severe charge, carrying a potential prison sentence of 1 to 6 years in the state prison, and a fine of up to $5,000.
- If hazing results in death, or involves sexual assault or any act that is a felony under any other Nevada statute including battery with substantial bodily harm, it escalates to an even higher felony category, potentially meaning longer prison sentences and higher fines.
Immunity for Reporting: Nevada law (NRS 398.040) grants immunity from civil or criminal liability to any person who, in good faith, reports a hazing incident to an appropriate authority. This crucial provision encourages whistleblowers and victims to come forward without fear of personal legal repercussions, promoting transparency and accountability.
Organizational Liability: Beyond individual perpetrators, student organizations themselves can face severe consequences. NRS 398.050 allows for the suspension or expulsion of an organization from the educational institution if hazing occurs. This can effectively dismantle a chapter or club, signaling a strong institutional message against hazing.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s essential to distinguish between the two primary avenues of legal recourse in hazing incidents:

Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (Nevada district attorney or prosecutor’s office) to punish individuals or organizations for violating hazing laws. Their primary goal is to enforce the law through penalties such as fines, imprisonment, or community service. Criminal charges related to hazing can range from misdemeanors to felonies, depending on the severity of harm.
Civil Cases: These are brought by victims or their families. The goal here is to seek monetary compensation for damages suffered due to hazing. Civil lawsuits often focus on claims of negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring/supervision, or premises liability. A civil case can proceed even if no criminal charges are filed or if criminal charges do not result in a conviction.

Both criminal and civil cases can run concurrently, allowing for simultaneous pursuit of justice and compensation.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, and Clery Act

Beyond state laws, federal statutes impose additional layers of accountability on educational institutions:

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation mandates greater transparency and prevention efforts from colleges and universities receiving federal funding. By around 2026, institutions will be required to:
- Publicly report all hazing incidents and disciplinary actions.
- Provide robust hazing education and prevention programs.
- Maintain and make accessible comprehensive hazing data.
  This act aims to create a national standard for hazing accountability, ensuring that institutions cannot hide incidents or downplay their significance.
Title IX: If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based discrimination, or a hostile environment based on sex, Title IX obligations are triggered. This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education and requires universities to respond promptly and effectively to such allegations, regardless of whether the incident occurred on or off campus.
Clery Act: This federal statute requires colleges and universities that receive federal funding to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents that involve assault, alcohol or drug violations, or other reportable crimes can fall under Clery Act reporting requirements, ensuring that institutions maintain and publicize accurate safety statistics.

Who Can Be Held Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

In Nevada, a civil hazing lawsuit can cast a wide net, holding multiple parties accountable:

Individual Students: Those who actively planned, encouraged, supplied substances for, or participated in the hazing acts can be held personally liable for their actions. This can include officers and “pledge educators” who directed the hazing.
Local Chapter/Organization: The student organization itself (e.g., a fraternity or sorority chapter) can be sued as a legal entity if its members engaged in hazing activities within its organizational context.
National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which sets policies, trains local chapters, and collects dues, can be held liable. This typically involves demonstrating that the national organization had knowledge of hazing practices (either at this chapter or others) and failed to adequately intervene, enforce policies, or prevent harm.
University or Governing Board: Educational institutions can be held liable for negligent supervision, failure to enforce policies, a deliberate indifference to known hazing, or creating an environment where hazing was allowed to flourish. Factors like prior warnings, a history of unchecked incidents, or a failure to properly investigate can strengthen a case against a university.
Third Parties: This can include landlords or property owners who allowed hazing to occur on their premises, or even alcohol providers who unlawfully served minors involved in hazing. Each case’s unique facts determine the scope of potential third-party liability.

Each legal claim is fact-specific, and not every party will be liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney can help determine the full scope of potential liability.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

The tragic stories of hazing victims nationwide serve as powerful reminders of the devastating consequences of this practice. These cases not only highlight common patterns of abuse but also underscore the legal precedents that inform hazing litigation today, including cases that could arise in Nevada.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced and excessive alcohol consumption remains the deadliest form of hazing, a ritualistic act often passed down through generations within organizations.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died from traumatic brain injuries and a ruptured spleen after “bid acceptance” night. Piazza was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol, fell multiple times, and was left unattended for hours despite clear signs of distress. Fraternity surveillance cameras captured members force-feeding him alcohol and then delaying medical help for nearly 12 hours. This case resulted in dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, significant civil litigation, and the passing of the “Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law” in Pennsylvania. The egregious delay in calling 911 despite obvious medical emergency emphasized the dangerous culture of silence.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old FSU pledge, tragically died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and instructed to drink them quickly. This incident led to criminal hazing charges against multiple members and prompted FSU to temporarily suspend all Greek life, launching a nationwide conversation about alcohol-fueled hazing. The takeaway for Nevada families is that these “traditional” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster.
Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, died following a forced drinking game known as “Bible study.” Pledges were made to drink if they answered questions incorrectly, leading to Gruver’s blood-alcohol level reaching 0.495% at the time of his death. His death led to the “Max Gruver Act” in Louisiana, a felony hazing law, demonstrating that legislative change often follows public outcry and clear evidence of hazing.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume an entire bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” pledge event. This case resulted in multiple criminal convictions, including for hazing and involuntary manslaughter. Bowling Green State University, a public institution, agreed to nearly a $3 million settlement with the Foltz family, while Pi Kappa Alpha national paid a $7 million settlement. This case, among others, shows that universities can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities. The case underscored that formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster, a risk also present on Nevada campuses.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, hazing often involves extreme physical exertion and degrading rituals designed to break down a new member.

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died from severe head injuries during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. He was blindfolded, forced to wear a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled in a ritual called “the glass ceiling.” His fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for over an hour, further contributing to his death. This case led to criminal convictions against multiple members, and notably, the national fraternity was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter – a landmark ruling for organizational liability. Pi Delta Psi was banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years and fined over $110,000. This case highlights that off-campus “retreats” can be as dangerous or worse than on-campus events, and national organizations can face severe sanctions.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse Pattern

Hazing is not confined to Greek letters; it permeates sports teams at all levels, from high school to university.

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): In a recent wide-ranging scandal, former Northwestern football players alleged a pattern of systemic sexualized and racist hazing within the program over many years. This included practices such as forced sexual acts, body shaming, and racist rituals. The allegations led to multiple lawsuits against the university and coaching staff, the firing of long-time head coach Pat Fitzgerald (who later settled a wrongful termination suit confidentially), and a profound re-evaluation of athletic culture. This case demonstrated that hazing extends far beyond Greek life, impacting even incredibly prominent and well-funded athletic programs.

What These Cases Mean for Nevada Families

These national tragedies carry critical lessons for families in Nevada:

Common Threads of Danger: These cases reveal consistent patterns: forced drinking, physical abuse, psychological torment, humiliating acts, and crucially, a dangerous delay or denial of medical care, often coupled with systematic cover-ups.
Legal Precedents and Accountability: Multi-million-dollar settlements and significant criminal convictions are increasingly common outcomes. These cases set legal precedents that enable victims in Nevada to seek justice and compensation for similar harms.
Foreseeability: The extensive national history of hazing means that organizations and institutions often have “prior notice” of the dangers associated with certain “traditions.” This “foreseeability” can be a key argument in civil lawsuits against those responsible.
Legislative Impact: Public outrage following these incidents has driven the passage of tougher anti-hazing laws in many states, such as New York, Ohio, and Louisiana. Nevada’s own laws reflect a growing commitment to addressing this issue.

Nevada families confronting hazing at universities like UNLV, the University of Nevada, Reno, or even out-of-state institutions, are operating within a national landscape forever shaped by these hard-won lessons in accountability.

Universities: Nevada and Beyond

For families in Nevada, understanding the specific context of hazing at our local institutions is paramount. The culture, policies, and historical responses of each university shape the landscape of risk and accountability.

University of Nevada, Reno (UNR)

The University of Nevada, Reno, located in the vibrant northern part of our state, is a hub for students from across Nevada and beyond. Families from Sparks and Carson City often see their children attend UNR, making its policies and campus culture of particular relevance.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UNR is a public research university with a strong focus on engineering, business, and arts. Its campus in Reno fosters a mix of academic ambition and outdoor recreation. Greek life is active and plays a significant role in student social life, with numerous fraternities and sororities contributing to a dynamic campus environment. The university also boasts a proud athletic tradition and a variety of student organizations, including club sports and academic societies, all of which contribute to the overall student experience.

5.1.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Nevada, Reno maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, clearly defining prohibited acts and emphasizing its zero-tolerance approach. Their policy, outlined in the Student Code of Conduct, prohibits:

Any activity that causes physical harm or mental suffering.
Forced consumption of food, liquid, alcohol, or other substances.
Deprivation of sleep or food.
Activities that degrade, shame, or humiliate.
Creation of a hostile or unwelcome environment.
UNR also mandates educational programs on hazing prevention for all student organizations. Students and families can report hazing confidentially or anonymously through the Dean of Students Office, the Student Conduct Office, the UNR Police Department, or an online reporting form. They also emphasize the federal Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE).

5.1.3 Documented Incidents & Responses

UNR has faced its own challenges with hazing:

Sigma Nu Incident (2016): A pledging accident involving an underaged pledge consuming alcohol, eventually led to the death of Ryan Abele, a member, due to poor judgment. Although the university initially claimed it wasn’t a hazing death, the family and subsequent investigations revealed elements of hazing and alcohol misuse. This case highlights the complexity of initial university responses versus family allegations and the importance of thorough investigation.
Pi Kappa Alpha Incident (2002): Although local law enforcement classified it as a “prank,” the drowning death of pledge Albert (A.J.) Santos in a campus lake was called hazing by his family. His death underscored concerns about alcohol-related activities during pledging.

These cases, among others, demonstrate UNR’s commitment to addressing hazing, though sometimes disputes arise over the classification of incidents.

5.1.4 How a UNR Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case originating at UNR might involve the UNR Police Department for criminal investigations, local Reno Police, or the Washoe County District Attorney’s Office. Civil suits could be filed in courts within Washoe County, requiring local legal expertise. Potential defendants would include individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, and potentially the University of Nevada, Reno, itself. The specific jurisdiction for a civil suit will typically be in Washoe County, Nevada, where the university is located.

5.1.5 What UNR Students & Parents Should Do

For students and parents involved with UNR, proactive steps are vital:

Familiarize yourself with UNR’s Student Code of Conduct and hazing policies, particularly those outlining prohibited activities.
If you suspect or witness hazing, utilize the reporting channels provided by the university immediately.
Document everything: keep records of communications, photos, medical reports, and any interactions with university officials.
If your child suffers physical or psychological harm, seek immediate medical and professional legal counsel. An attorney experienced in Nevada hazing law can navigate the specific legal landscape of Reno and Washoe County.

University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV)

In Southern Nevada, UNLV serves as a major educational and cultural institution. Many families from Henderson, Summerlin, and across Clark County send their children to UNLV, making it another focal point for discussions about campus safety and hazing prevention.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

UNLV is a diverse public research university known for its robust hospitality program, strong athletic teams, and vibrant Greek life. The campus in Las Vegas attracts a wide array of students, fostering a lively social scene. Recognized fraternities and sororities are integral to the social fabric, alongside numerous sports clubs, academic honor societies, and cultural organizations. This dynamic environment, while offering many opportunities, also presents potential challenges in ensuring a hazing-free environment.

5.2.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

UNLV maintains a comprehensive anti-hazing policy, explicitly prohibiting any activity that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, or subjects a student to humiliation or demeaning activity. The policy states that hazing is forbidden during any initiation, pledging, or recruitment process, on or off campus. UNLV’s reporting channels include the Office of Student Conduct, the UNLV Police Department, and an online incident reporting form, all designed to ensure that reports are investigated promptly and discreetly.

5.2.3 Documented Incidents & Responses

While specific high-profile hazing deaths like those seen in other states haven’t dominated national headlines directly linked to UNLV in recent years, the institution, like many others, has dealt with hazing allegations and disciplinary actions against student organizations. These incidents often involve alcohol misuse, physical challenges, or demeaning rituals, leading to suspensions, loss of recognition, and mandatory educational interventions for chapters. Such responses underscore UNLV’s commitment to upholding its anti-hazing policy, even as challenges persist.

5.2.4 How a UNLV Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case at UNLV would likely involve the UNLV Police Department and/or the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) for criminal investigations. Civil lawsuits would typically fall under the jurisdiction of courts in Clark County, Nevada. Potential defendants could include individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority organization, and potentially UNLV itself. Given its location in the heart of Las Vegas, cases might also involve third-party venues or event organizers.

5.2.5 What UNLV Students & Parents Should Do

For UNLV students and their families:

Actively review and understand UNLV’s anti-hazing policies and the Student Code of Conduct.
Utilize available resources such as the Office of Student Conduct or confidential mental health services if you suspect hazing.
Document any suspicious activities, communications, or injuries diligently. The rapidly changing social media landscape means digital evidence must be captured immediately.
If hazing results in significant harm, contact an attorney with expertise in Nevada hazing law. Our firm is equipped to navigate the complex dynamics of Las Vegas’s legal environment.

Other Nevada Universities & Colleges

While UNR and UNLV are the largest four-year institutions, other colleges and university campuses across Nevada are not exempt from hazing concerns. Families throughout Nevada send children to these valuable institutions, and the threat of hazing can touch any of them.

Nevada State University (Henderson): This growing institution serves a significant population of students from Clark County. As it expands its student activities and organizations, vigilance against hazing remains crucial.
Sierra Nevada University (Incline Village): Located in a more secluded environment, smaller campuses can sometimes present unique challenges and opportunities for hazing to go unnoticed.
Touro University Nevada (Henderson), Roseman University of Health Sciences (Henderson), and Wongu University of Oriental Medicine (Las Vegas): These specialized health and medical sciences universities, while not typically associated with traditional Greek life, may still host student organizations or formal/informal groups that could be susceptible to hazing, particularly in competitive academic environments or clinical settings.
Nevada System of Higher Education (NSHE): As the overarching system for all public colleges in Nevada, NSHE sets system-wide policies that all institutions must adhere to regarding student conduct and hazing.

For students and parents connected to any of these Nevada institutions, the advice remains consistent: know the policies, understand your rights under Nevada law, document everything, and seek expert legal counsel if hazing leads to harm.

Greek Organizations: Nevada and Beyond

Fraternities & Sororities with Nevada Addresses

These IRS-registered Greek organizations are officially recognized in Nevada and may have chapters at local universities. Their presence means they are part of the broader Greek ecosystem that Nevada families navigate.

ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY

EIN: 26-2777722 | HENDERSON, NV 89053-1672
Type: Greek Organization (IRS B83)
Description: Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc. is an international, historically Black Greek-letter sorority. Founded in 1920, the organization focuses on community service, scholarship, sisterly love, and finer womanhood. Nationally, organizations like Zeta Phi Beta are dedicated to philanthropic endeavors and academic achievement, and they vehemently disavow hazing in any form, implementing strict anti-hazing policies for all chapters. However, like many large national Greek organizations, incidents of alleged hazing, often against national policies, can occur within local chapters or among individual members.

ALPHA SIGMA FRATERNITY INC

EIN: 82-4673231 | LAS VEGAS, NV 89154-9900
Type: Greek Organization (IRS B83)
Description: Alpha Sigma is typically a local fraternity, not part of a larger national organization. Local fraternities often develop their own unique traditions and new member processes. Without the oversight and standardized anti-hazing policies of a national parent organization, the culture within local fraternities can vary significantly. While a local identity allows for greater autonomy, it also places a greater responsibility on the chapter’s leadership and the host university to ensure that all activities comply with state laws and university policies regarding hazing.

LINDSEY L ZELLER MEMORIAL FUND

EIN: 20-5910097 | LAS VEGAS, NV 89131-3142
Type: Greek Organization (IRS B83)
Description: While listed under the Greek Organization NTEE code, a “memorial fund” implies a philanthropic or commemorative purpose, likely established in honor of an individual. Such entities might be affiliated with a specific Greek chapter or council, but their primary activities rarely involve traditional “hazing.” However, any organization that recruits student members or affiliates could theoretically be involved in new member activities that veer into hazing, particularly if not properly supervised or if it adopts unsanctioned practices.

OMEGA PSI PHI FRATERNITY

EIN: 51-0208851 | N LAS VEGAS, NV 89032-8226
Type: Greek Organization (IRS B83)
Description: Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc. is an international, historically Black Greek-letter fraternity founded in 1911. Known for its strong emphasis on scholarship, leadership, and service to humanity, “Que” chapters are present on many campuses. Nationally, Omega Psi Phi has faced and addressed hazing allegations, leading to firm anti-hazing policies and educational initiatives. There have been documented national hazing incidents, such as the Rafeal Joseph case at University of Southern Mississippi (2023), where pledges alleged severe beatings (“Hell Night”) requiring emergency surgery. These incidents underscore the national organization’s ongoing struggle with unsanctioned practices within local chapters despite strong official prohibitions.

ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC

EIN: 47-5611644 | RENO, NV 89503-3704
Type: Greek Organization (IRS B83)
Description: Alpha Sigma Phi is a national fraternity with chapters across the United States. Founded in 1845, it is one of the oldest fraternities in the nation, known for its focus on character development and leadership. Like many established Greek organizations, it has comprehensive anti-hazing policies and educates its chapters on safe new member education. The national fraternity actively works to prevent hazing, yet individual chapters, often influenced by “tradition,” may engage in activities that violate these policies and state laws.

NEVADA ALPHA ALUMNI VOLUNTEER CORP OF SIGMA PHI EPSILON FRATERNITY IN

EIN: 88-0346447 | RENO, NV 89503-3609
Type: Greek Organization (IRS B83)
Description: This entity appears to be an alumni volunteer corporation associated with a Sigma Phi Epsilon chapter. Alumni organizations often provide support, mentorship, and housing for undergraduate chapters. While alumni groups typically don’t directly conduct new member education, their influence, fundraising, and tacit approval of certain “traditions” can indirectly contribute to hazing if those traditions involve prohibited activities. Sigma Phi Epsilon, nationally, is known for its “Balanced Man Program” which aims to eliminate pledging periods traditionally associated with hazing. Nationally, however, there are hazing incidents associated with Sigma Phi Epsilon; for example, the death of William Torrance (Vincennes University (Indiana)) at a pledge night which recalled previous “Tapping Night” deaths and instances.

PHI SIGMA RHO NATIONAL SORORITY

EIN: 83-2183202 | RENO, NV 89557-0001
Type: Greek Organization (IRS B83)
Description: Phi Sigma Rho is a national social sorority for women in engineering and engineering technology. Founded in 1984, it provides a support network for women in STEM fields. As a newer national organization focusing on academic and professional development, Phi Sigma Rho has strong anti-hazing stances intended to foster a supportive rather than punitive new member experience. Despite national policies, it is essential for all chapters, including any in Nevada, to rigorously adhere to these guidelines to prevent any form of hazing.

LAMBDA PHI XI MULTICULTURAL SORORITY INC

EIN: 32-0156092 | SPARKS, NV 89431-2105
Type: Greek Organization (IRS B83)
Description: Lambda Phi Xi Multicultural Sorority Inc. is a national multicultural sorority that promotes diversity, scholarship, and community service. Multicultural Greek organizations often emphasize cultural identity and academic success. While these organizations nationally maintain strict anti-hazing policies aligned with their values, families should always be aware that hazing can unfortunately occur in any type of student group, regardless of its stated mission or national affiliation.

Why National Histories Matter

The extensive national histories of Greek organizations are critical for a comprehensive understanding of hazing, even for families in Nevada. These histories reveal patterns that profoundly impact legal strategy:

Foreseeability: When a local Nevada chapter of, say, Kappa Sigma or Omega Psi Phi repeats a hazing script that previously led to injury or death at another chapter across the country, it demonstrates “foreseeability.” This means the national organization had prior knowledge of the danger and a responsibility to prevent it, strengthening arguments of negligence against them.
Policy and Enforcement Gaps: National organizations all have strict anti-hazing policies. However, litigation often uncovers a disconnect between written rules and actual enforcement. If a national consistently fails to discipline chapters engaging in hazing, or if its “training” is designed more to evade detection than to prevent harm, these become points of legal attack.
Institutional Knowledge: National organizations collect incident reports, internal investigations, and member complaints. This aggregate data forms a body of institutional knowledge about hazing methods and their risks. Lawyers can subpoena these records to show a pattern of willful blindness or deliberate indifference.

For example, the Stone Foltz case at Bowling Green State University involving Pi Kappa Alpha led to a $7 million settlement from the national fraternity. This was partly due to evidence revealing a national pattern of forced Big/Little drinking rituals. Similarly, the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana was a direct response to a hazing death in Phi Delta Theta, highlighting the severe consequences that can follow ritualized alcohol abuse.

Knowing that a fraternity like Sigma Alpha Epsilon has earned the moniker “America’s deadliest fraternity” by Bloomberg, due to multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide (including chemical burn lawsuits at Texas A&M and traumatic brain injury allegations at the University of Alabama), becomes critically important for any family whose child pledges an SAE chapter in Nevada or elsewhere. These national patterns of behavior illustrate ongoing risks that parents must be aware of and that legal teams use to demonstrate the national organization’s culpability.

In Nevadan hazing lawsuits, the burden of proving accountability often extends upstream to these national entities. It’s not enough for them to simply have a policy; they must actively enforce it and take meaningful steps to prevent known dangers from recurring.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Building a compelling hazing case requires meticulous attention to detail, a deep understanding of modern investigative techniques, and a strategic approach to proving liability and securing damages. For families in Nevada, understanding how a case is constructed is empowering.

Evidence: The Foundation of Any Strong Case

In today’s digital world, evidence for hazing cases often comes from unexpected, yet increasingly common, sources. Attorney911 leverages every available tool to uncover the truth. Our video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) provides essential guidance on this critical first step.

Digital Communications: Without a doubt, group chats and direct messages (DMs) are modern hazing’s smoking guns. Platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Signal, Telegram, Discord, and even fraternity-specific apps contain invaluable data. They show planning, coercion, threats, and even celebratory messages about events. We meticulously preserve and analyze these, often recovering deleted messages through digital forensics experts. Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, and TikTok videos are also crucial. They reveal who knew what, when, and can demonstrate patterns of behavior.
Photos & Videos: The culture of constant smartphone recording means that hazing events are often captured, sometimes inadvertently. This includes:
- Content filmed by members during hazing events, often for internal bragging or “proof.”
- Footage shared in group chats or posted (briefly) on social media.
- Security camera footage from chapter houses or Ring/doorbell camera footage from off-campus properties.
- Photos showing injuries, humiliating acts, or forced consumption.
Internal Organization Documents: Subpoenas can uncover pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” documents, and internal emails or texts from officers discussing new member activities. National fraternity policies and risk management training materials also provide context and can highlight where a national organization failed to follow its own rules.
University Records: Through discovery and open records requests (where applicable for public universities like UNR or UNLV), we can obtain:
- Prior conduct files detailing an organization’s history of violations, probation, or suspensions.
- Incident reports from university police or student conduct offices.
- Clery Act reports, which may reveal patterns of alcohol offenses, assaults, or other crimes on campus.
- Internal emails among administrators that may show knowledge of hazing.
Medical and Psychological Records: These are essential for proving the extent of harm. This includes:
- Emergency room reports, ambulance records, and hospitalization notes.
- Lab results (e.g., blood alcohol content, toxicology screenings, kidney function tests for rhabdomyolysis).
- Psychological evaluations and therapy notes documenting trauma, PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation.
Witness Testimony: The accounts of current and former pledges, new members, active members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, and even bystanders are invaluable. These individuals often become courageous witnesses, providing crucial insights into the inner workings of hazing.

Damages: Quantifying the Harm

When hazing inflicts harm, the law provides avenues to seek compensation for the full scope of that damage. This includes both tangible financial losses and intangible suffering.

Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs associated with physical injuries: emergency room visits, hospital stays, surgeries, rehabilitation, physical therapy, and prescription medications. For catastrophic injuries like brain damage or organ failure, it includes detailed “life care plans” to cover a lifetime of specialized medical needs.
Lost Income / Educational Impact: Hazing can derail a student’s academic and career path. Damages can include lost wages from time off work, lost scholarships, tuition for forced withdrawals, and a diminished lifetime earning capacity if permanent injuries hinder future employment.
Non-Economic Damages: These address the profound, non-financial suffering. This includes physical pain and suffering, intense emotional distress, trauma, humiliation, and the loss of enjoyment of life (e.g., inability to participate in sports or social activities due to injury or psychological trauma).
Wrongful Death Damages: In the most tragic hazing cases, families can seek compensation for:
- Funeral and burial expenses.
- Loss of financial support the deceased would have provided.
- Loss of companionship, comfort, and society.
- The profound grief and mental anguish of surviving family members.
Punitive Damages: In cases of extreme recklessness, malice, or deliberate indifference, courts may award punitive damages. These are not intended to compensate the victim but to punish the wrongdoers and deter similar conduct in the future. Punitive damages are a powerful tool for forcing accountability when institutions or individuals show a callous disregard for safety.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation often involves multiple defendants, each with their own legal counsel and insurance providers.

Multiple Defendants: Identifying all potentially liable parties is critical. This can include individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, the university, and potentially landlords or event organizers. Each party’s role in the hazing (e.g., direct participation, negligent supervision, failure to act) determines their liability.
Insurance Coverage: Most fraternities, universities, and sometimes individual members have insurance policies that may cover hazing-related claims. However, insurers often argue that hazing is an “intentional act” and thus excluded from coverage. Experienced hazing lawyers like those at Attorney911 understand how to challenge these exclusions, arguing that while the hazing act itself may have been intentional, the failure to supervise or prevent it was negligent, and therefore covered. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney is particularly invaluable here, as she intimately understands the strategies insurers use to deny coverage.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing impacts a family, immediate, actionable guidance is paramount. Here, we offer practical advice for parents, students, and witnesses in Nevada, along with answers to common questions.

For Parents in Nevada: Navigating Suspicions and Crisis

As a parent in Nevada, your intuition is often your strongest asset. Pay close attention to changes in your child’s behavior.

Warning Signs of Hazing:
- Unexplained physical injuries (bruises, burns, cuts) or frequent “accidents” with flimsy explanations.
- Extreme fatigue, chronic sleep deprivation, or constant exhaustion affecting their academic performance.
- Sudden, drastic changes in mood مثل irritability, withdrawal from social life, increased anxiety or depression.
- Obsessive use of their phone due to demanding group chats, coupled with a fear of missing “mandatory” events.
- Unusual financial requests or inexplicable expenses for the organization.
- Secretive behavior, especially about organizational activities, with phrases like “I can’t talk about it.”
How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not accusation. Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priority, far above any organizational status. Reassure them you will support them regardless of their choices. Listen without judgment, and avoid directly confronting the organization, which could put your child at further risk.
If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize immediate medical care. Insist that they tell medical staff any injuries are hazing-related, as this critical detail must be in their medical records. Document everything: take clear photos of injuries over several days, collect screenshots of all relevant messages, and write down a chronological account of what happened. Preserve any physical evidence, such as damaged clothing or initiation paraphernalia.
Dealing with the University: Document every interaction with university administrators. Request to see their hazing policies and any prior disciplinary actions against the organization involved. Understand that universities have a vested interest in managing their public image, so their initial response may be aimed at internal containment.
When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm due to hazing, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing the incident, it is time to contact an experienced hazing attorney.

For Students & Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning

If you’re a new member or pledge at a Nevada university, it’s crucial to understand what hazing is and how to protect yourself.

Is This Hazing or Just “Tradition”? If an activity makes you feel unsafe, humiliated, coerced, or forces you to consume alcohol or endure pain, it is hazing. If you’re told to keep secrets, lie to outsiders, or if older members are making new members do things they themselves don’t do, it’s hazing. If you wouldn’t do it if you had a true choice without fear of repercussions, it’s not a voluntary “tradition.”
Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: The intense peer pressure, desire for acceptance, and fear of social exclusion within new member processes negate true consent. Nevada law, like many state laws, explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing because it recognizes the coercive nature of these environments.
Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time. If you feel unsafe or wish to de-pledge, notify a trusted adult outside the organization (parent, RA, school counselor). Send a clear email or text to the chapter leadership stating your resignation. Do not attend “one last meeting” where you might face pressure or retaliation. If you fear retaliation, report your concerns to the Dean of Students or UNR/UNLV Police Department.
Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Nevada law, like federal law, includes provisions for good-faith reporting. This means if you (or someone else) call for help in an emergency, you may be granted immunity from charges related to minor offenses like underage drinking. Your life is more valuable than any perceived loyalty or fear of trouble.

For Former Members / Witnesses: A Path to Accountability

If you are a former member, or a witness to hazing at a Nevada college, your perspective and testimony can be invaluable in preventing future harm.

Your Role in Accountability: You may possess critical information or evidence (texts, photos, knowledge of past incidents) that could lead to justice for victims and prevent further tragedies. While acknowledging potential guilt or fear, your cooperation can be a crucial step towards creating a safer campus environment.
Seeking Legal Advice: If you have concerns about your own legal exposure or simply wish to share information discreetly, consult with an attorney to understand your rights and options. An attorney can help you navigate witness protection, potential self-incrimination, and the process of providing testimony.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Hazing Case

For parents and students in Nevada, avoiding these common missteps is crucial for protecting your rights and preserving the potential for a successful hazing claim. We emphasize these critical warnings in our video on client mistakes that can ruin your injury case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY).

Letting evidence disappear: Digital evidence is fleeting. Deleted group chats or social media posts are often the strongest evidence. Never allow your child to delete messages. Screenshot everything immediately.
Confronting the organization directly: This often prompts them to destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare defenses. Consult an attorney before any confrontation.
Signing university release forms or settlement offers without legal review: Universities or organizations may offer “internal resolutions” or ask you to sign documents that waive your right to pursue further legal action. Always have an attorney review such documents.
Posting case details on social media: This can provide ammunition for the defense, create inconsistencies, and potentially compromise the privacy of your child.
Waiting too long to act: Evidence disappears, memories fade, and the statute of limitations is a firm deadline. Contacting a lawyer immediately is critical.
Talking to insurance adjusters without legal representation: Adjusters are trained to minimize payouts. Any statement you give can be used against you. Direct all communication through your attorney.

Short FAQ for Nevada Families

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Nevada?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public institutions like UNLV or UNR, as state entities, do have some sovereign immunity protection under Nevada law. However, there are exceptions for gross negligence, willful misconduct, and certain federal violations. Private universities (like Sierra Nevada University) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case is unique, so contact Attorney911 for a confidential case analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Nevada?”
Yes, hazing is a serious crime in Nevada. If hazing results in substantial bodily harm, it is a Category B felony. If it causes death, it is also a felony and can be prosecuted with even more severe penalties.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Nevada law (NRS 398.025) explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that true consent often doesn’t exist under conditions of coercion, psychological pressure, and fear of ostracism inherent in hazing.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit in Nevada?”
Generally, the statute of limitations for personal injury and wrongful death claims in Nevada is 2 years from the date of injury or death. However, this period can sometimes be extended under specific circumstances, such as the “discovery rule” if the injury or its cause wasn’t immediately apparent. Given the strict timelines and the rapid disappearance of evidence, it is crucial to contact a hazing attorney immediately by calling 1-888-ATTY-911. Our video, “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c), explains these time limits in more detail.
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house in Nevada?”
The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held responsible if they sponsored the organization, knew about the off-campus activities, failed to enforce policies, or knew of prior similar incidents. Many significant hazing cases resulting in multi-million-dollar judgments occurred at off-campus houses or remote locations.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
We prioritize your family’s privacy. Most hazing cases settle confidentially before ever going to trial. We can often request sealed court records and negotiate confidential settlement terms. Our goal is to secure justice and accountability while protecting your child’s anonymity as much as the law allows.

Attorney911: Why We Fight Hazing for Nevada Families

When your family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. Attorney911 is dedicated to fighting for families in Nevada, bringing an unparalleled depth of experience in serious injury and wrongful death cases.

We know how fraternities, sororities, and universities operate. We understand the nuanced cultural dynamics and the sophisticated legal defenses employed to deflect blame. Our firm is uniquely positioned to handle these complex cases, ensuring that victims in Nevada receive the justice and compensation they deserve.

Our Unique Qualifications for Hazing Cases

Insurance Insider Advantage (Lupe Peña): Lupe Peña, one of our accomplished attorneys (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), previously worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. This experience gives us an invaluable advantage: we know precisely how fraternity and university insurance companies analyze, value, and attempt to minimize hazing claims. We understand their delay tactics, their arguments for coverage exclusions, and their settlement strategies because we used to run that playbook. This insider knowledge allows us to anticipate their moves and build stronger cases for our clients in Nevada.
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions (Ralph Manginello): Ralph Manginello, our managing partner (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), has a proven track record of taking on formidable opponents. We’ve fought—and won—against billion-dollar corporations in high-stakes litigation, such as our involvement in the BP Texas City explosion litigation. We are not intimidated by national fraternities, large universities, or their well-resourced defense teams. We possess the federal court experience necessary to challenge these powerful defendants effectively, ensuring that no institution is too big to be held accountable for hazing in Nevada.
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Attorney911 has a history of securing multi-million dollar results for families devastated by wrongful death and catastrophic injuries. We understand how to quantify not just immediate medical costs, but also the long-term implications of brain injuries, organ damage, and psychological trauma, including future medical care and lost earning capacity. Our commitment is to ensure that our clients receive full and fair compensation for their profound losses. For example, our wrongful death claim lawyer page (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/) details our dedication to these sensitive cases.
Criminal and Civil Hazing Expertise: The intersection of criminal charges and civil litigation in hazing cases is complex. Our firm possesses expertise in both criminal defense (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/) and civil personal injury law. This allows us to provide comprehensive guidance, advising clients on how criminal proceedings might impact their civil claim, and guiding witnesses or former members through their legal options.
Investigative Depth: We pride ourselves on thorough, data-driven investigations. This involves leveraging a network of experts, including digital forensics specialists to recover deleted messages, medical experts to assess injuries, and economists to project future losses. We meticulously obtain hidden evidence, from group chats and chapter records to university files, to build an undeniable case.

Call to Action for Nevada Families

If you or your child has experienced hazing at any Nevada campus, or at an out-of-state institution, we want to hear from you. Families in Henderson, Reno, Las Vegas, and throughout Nevada have the right to answers and accountability when their trust is betrayed.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm, Attorney911, for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to what happened, explain your legal options in clear terms, and help you decide the best path forward for your family.

What to expect in your free consultation:

We will listen to your story without judgment, providing a safe space to share.
We will review any evidence you have documented (photos, texts, medical records) to assess the strength of your case.
We will explain your legal options, discussing whether a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, or both, are appropriate for your situation.
We will outline realistic timelines and what you can expect during the legal process.
We will answer all your questions about our contingency fee structure—we don’t get paid unless we win your case. See our video explaining how contingency fees work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
There is no pressure to hire us on the spot; we want you to make an informed decision.

Contact Us Today:

Call Our Emergency Hotline: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Visit Our Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Spanish-Language Services:

Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña directly for consultation in Spanish at lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Las Vegas, Reno, or anywhere across Nevada, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Nevada attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com