New Hampshire Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | $24M Pi Kappa Alpha Settlements Exposed | Attorney911 — The Attorneys Who Shut Down Pi Kappa Phi | Federal Court | Former Insurance Defense | 1-888-ATTY-911

It’s another brisk evening in New Hampshire, where families gather, students dream of their futures, and the promise of higher education shines brightly. Perhaps your child is preparing to leave the familiar granite peaks and historic towns for a Texas university, filled with anticipation for new academic and social experiences. Or perhaps they are thriving at one of New Hampshire’s own esteemed institutions. You’ve packed their bags, shared your advice, and now you trust them to their university community.

But what happens when that trust is broken? What if the “character-building traditions” they encounter cross a line into genuine harm? Imagine your child, far from their New Hampshire home, exhausted and humiliated, forced to endure physical abuse or drink dangerous amounts of alcohol to “earn” a place in a fraternity, sorority, or club. Their phone, usually a lifeline to you, is now a tool of their tormentors, constantly demanding their attention, capturing degrading moments, or pressuring them into silence. They feel trapped—between loyalty to their new group and their own safety and dignity.

This is not a hypothetical scenario from a distant land; it is the stark reality of modern hazing. It is a reality that has impacted countless families across the nation, including those sending their children from New Hampshire to universities in Texas and beyond.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
    • Post details on public social media
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

This guide is designed for New Hampshire families and those across Texas who need to understand the true nature of hazing in 2025: its forms, its legal repercussions, and its devastating impact. We will explore how Texas and federal laws address hazing, drawing lessons from major national cases, and examining specific incidents at prominent Texas universities like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor. For New Hampshire families, understanding these institutions and the legal landscape of a state like Texas is crucial when their child ventures away for college.

We recognize that reading this article is for general information, not specific legal advice. However, Attorney911 can evaluate individual cases based on their specific facts. We serve families throughout Texas, including those from New Hampshire, with the dedication and experience needed to navigate these complex legal challenges.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For many, the image of hazing remains stuck in old movie tropes: a few silly pranks, a bit of lighthearted initiation. The reality in 2025 is far darker and more insidious. Modern hazing can involve severe physical and psychological trauma, often hidden behind sophisticated smokescreens and digital walls. As New Hampshire families prepare their children for college, especially those considering institutions outside the state, understanding this grim reality is essential.

Clear, modern definition of hazing

Hazing, in its essence, is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, maintaining membership in, or gaining status within a group. This behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. It is crucial to understand that consent is rarely truly voluntary in these situations due to immense peer pressure, the desire for belonging, and a significant power imbalance between new and older members. This applies whether your child is in New Hampshire or thousands of miles away at a university in Texas. We often hear victims say, “I agreed to it,” but under the law, “agreement” made under duress does not make it safe or legal.

Main categories of hazing

Modern hazing manifests in various destructive forms:

• Alcohol and substance hazing: This is tragically the most common and deadly form. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often through chugging challenges, “lineups,” or games designed for rapid, excessive consumption. Pledges might be pressured to drink unknown substances or vast quantities of alcohol, leading to blackouts, alcohol poisoning, or even death.
• Physical hazing: Beyond the infamous paddling, this includes extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” far beyond typical athletic conditioning. It also encompasses sleep deprivation, forced food or water deprivation, and exposure to extreme temperatures or dangerous environments.
• Sexualized and humiliating hazing: This category is deeply damaging, involving forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (often referred to by degrading terms like “roasted pig”), the wearing of demeaning costumes, and acts with racist, sexist, or homophobic undertones.
• Psychological hazing: Often less visible but equally destructive, this includes verbal abuse, threats, forced isolation from friends and family, and manipulative tactics. Public shaming, whether offline or online, can also cause severe psychological trauma.
• Digital/online hazing: The rise of technology has introduced new avenues for abuse. This includes constant monitoring through group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp, Snapchat), forced participation in humiliating online dares or “challenges” on platforms like TikTok or Instagram, and pressure to create or share compromising images or videos.

Where hazing actually happens

It’s a misconception that hazing is confined to certain types of groups or schools. While fraternities and sororities (including Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council, and multicultural organizations) are frequently associated with hazing, it is pervasive across many student groups. Hazing is also reported in:

• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / military-style groups: These organizations, with their emphasis on hierarchy and discipline, can sometimes become environments for harmful initiations.
• Spirit squads, tradition clubs: Groups proudly upholding university traditions (like the Texas Cowboys at UT Austin) can unfortunately develop unhealthy hazing practices.
• Athletic teams: From football and basketball to baseball, cheerleading, and even club sports, hazing can be a dark undercurrent in teams at all levels.
• Marching bands and performance groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups are not immune, as evidenced by tragic national cases involving band hazing.
• Some service, cultural, and academic organizations: Any group with a membership hierarchy and a desire to foster “loyalty” can be susceptible.

The underlying drivers across all these environments are often social status, tradition, and secrecy. These elements create a powerful force that perpetuates harmful practices, even when anti-hazing policies are explicitly in place and everyone “knows” these acts are illegal.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is crucial for New Hampshire families whose children might attend universities in Texas. The state of Texas has specific laws designed to combat hazing, and these are often complemented by federal regulations. While our firm is based in Texas, we understand that families like yours, living in New Hampshire, have a vital interest in these laws if your child attends a Texas institution.

Texas hazing law basics (Education Code)

Texas has clear, specific anti-hazing provisions outlined in its Education Code. Simply put, hazing is broadly defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, whether on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any student organization. Critically, this act must endanger the mental or physical health or safety of a student.

This means that if someone makes your child do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a group, and they knew or should have known there was a risk, that’s hazing under Texas law. It’s important to remember that such an act can happen on or off campus—the location doesn’t remove the illegal nature of the act. Furthermore, the harm can be either mental or physical. The intent doesn’t have to be malicious; “reckless” behavior (meaning the individual knew of the risk and disregarded it) is enough. Crucially, “consent” is not a defense: even if the victim agreed to partake, it’s still hazing if it fits the legal definition because the law recognizes the coercive environment.

To summarize, hazing in Texas carries:

• Criminal penalties: Individuals found guilty of hazing can face fines and even jail time. The penalties become significantly more severe if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death.
• Reporter protections: Texas law can offer limited immunity or leniency for individuals who report the hazing or call for help in good faith, encouraging people to come forward without fear of self-incrimination.

This is a summary of the law; the actual statutes contain more technical and detailed language.

Criminal vs civil cases

It’s important for New Hampshire families to understand the two primary legal avenues when hazing occurs:

• Criminal cases: These are brought by the state (prosecutors) against individuals who are alleged to have committed a crime. The primary aim of a criminal case is punishment, which can include jail time, fines, or probation. In hazing incidents, prosecutors might pursue hazing offenses, charges related to furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or even manslaughter or negligent homicide in fatal cases.
• Civil cases: These cases are initiated by victims or their surviving family members. The goal in civil litigation is to obtain monetary compensation for the harm suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil claims often focus on theories of:
  • Negligence and gross negligence: Where an individual or organization failed to act reasonably, leading to harm.
  • Wrongful death: When hazing results in a fatality.
  • Negligent hiring/supervision: If an institution or national organization failed to properly oversee its employees or chapters.
  • Premises liability: If unsafe conditions on a property contributed to the hazing injury.
  • Intentional infliction of emotional distress: For the severe psychological trauma caused.

Both criminal and civil cases can proceed concurrently, and a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil lawsuit.

Federal overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond Texas state law, federal regulations also play a significant role in establishing accountability for hazing:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This crucial piece of legislation requires colleges and universities that receive federal funding to be more transparent about hazing incidents. It mandates public reporting of hazing violations, strengthening education and prevention efforts, and maintaining accessible hazing data. These provisions are being phased in, with full compliance expected around 2026.
• Title IX / Clery Act: When hazing involves elements of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based discrimination, Title IX obligations are triggered, requiring universities to investigate and respond. The Clery Act requires colleges to report campus crime statistics and maintain safety policies, and hazing incidents often overlap with reportable crimes, such as assaults, alcohol violations, or drug offenses.

Who can be liable in a civil hazing lawsuit

Determining who can be held responsible in a civil hazing lawsuit from a New Hampshire family’s perspective is complex but critical:

• Individual students: This includes those who actively planned the hazing, supplied dangerous substances like alcohol, carried out physical abuse, or participated in cover-ups.
• Local chapter / organization: If the fraternity, sorority, club, or team is a recognized legal entity, it can be named as a defendant. This often extends to individuals acting in leadership roles, such as chapter officers or “pledge educators.”
• National fraternity/sorority: The national headquarters of Greek-letter organizations, which set policies, collect dues, and oversee their local chapters, can be held liable. Their liability often hinges on what they knew, or should have known, about hazing practices based on prior incidents within their system.
• University or governing board: The educational institution itself, or its board of regents (for public schools), may be sued. Key factors here include whether the university had prior warnings about the hazing, how effectively it enforced its hazing policies, and whether it showed “deliberate indifference” to known risks. Public universities in Texas, like the University of Houston or Texas A&M, often invoke sovereign immunity protections, but specific exceptions exist, especially in cases of gross negligence or certain federal claims. Private universities like SMU and Baylor typically have fewer immunity protections.
• Third parties: Depending on the circumstances, others might also be held responsible, such as landlords or property owners of off-campus houses or event spaces, and even bars or alcohol providers if they served underage or obviously intoxicated individuals (under “dram shop” laws).

It’s important to remember that every case is fact-specific, and not every party will be liable in every situation. An experienced hazing attorney can help New Hampshire families identify all potential responsible parties.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

When a child from New Hampshire goes off to college, whether in-state or in Texas, parents rightfully expect a safe environment. Sadly, the history of hazing reveals devastating patterns, often repeating across different campuses and organizations. These anchor stories underscore the severe risks involved and the increasing legal accountability for those responsible.

Alcohol poisoning & death pattern

The most pervasive and lethal form of hazing involves forced alcohol consumption. These tragedies highlight how intoxicating substances, combined with pressure and a culture of silence, can turn “initiation” into a death sentence.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most widely publicized cases, 19-year-old Tim Piazza, a Beta Theta Pi pledge, died after a “bid acceptance” event. He was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol, leading to a series of falls that caused severe head injuries. Fraternity brothers, fearing consequences, delayed calling 911 for nearly 12 hours, a horrifying sequence captured by the chapter’s own security cameras. Dozens of criminal charges were filed against members, and civil litigation followed. His death directly led to Pennsylvania’s stringent Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. This case serves as a stark reminder of how extreme intoxication, egregious delays in seeking medical attention, and a pervasive culture of silence can lead to devastating legal and human consequences.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old Pi Kappa Phi pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given full handles of hard liquor and pressured to consume them quickly. Multiple members were prosecuted, with most pleading guilty to misdemeanor hazing charges. Florida State University responded by temporarily suspending all Greek life and implementing comprehensive policy reforms. Coffey’s death, like Piazza’s, reveals the deadly consequences of traditional drinking nights and bottle exchanges.

• Max Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old Phi Delta Theta pledge at Louisiana State University, died after a “Bible study” drinking game. Pledges were forced to consume severe amounts of alcohol (vodka and Everclear) from bottles whenever they answered questions incorrectly. Max’s blood alcohol content was a staggering 0.495% at the time of his death. One member was convicted of negligent homicide, and his death spurred Louisiana to enact the Max Gruver Act, significantly strengthening the state’s anti-hazing laws. This case powerfully demonstrates how legislative change often follows public outrage and incontrovertible proof of hazing’s lethal nature.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, also 20, died from alcohol poisoning after a Pi Kappa Alpha “Big/Little” hazing event. He was allegedly forced to consume an entire handle of bourbon. Multiple members faced criminal charges, with several convicted of hazing-related offenses. The Foltz family secured a $10 million settlement, with approximately $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This case highlighted that not only fraternities but also universities can face immense financial and reputational consequences for failing to prevent hazing, even if it happens off-campus.

Physical & ritualized hazing pattern

While alcohol hazing often dominates headlines, violent and ritualized physical abuse continues to be a dangerous pattern.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a 19-year-old Pi Delta Psi pledge, died during a fraternity retreat in Pennsylvania’s Pocono Mountains. Members blindfolded him, put a backpack full of sand on him, and repeatedly tackled him during a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual. Instead of calling for immediate medical help, members delayed for an hour, attempting to cover up the incident. Multiple individuals were convicted, and, in a landmark ruling, the national fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, subsequently being banned from Pennsylvania for a decade and fined over $110,000. This case showed that hazing at off-campus retreats is just as dangerous, if not more so, than on campus, and that national organizations are increasingly held liable for their chapters’ deadly actions.

Athletic program hazing & abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life. High-stakes athletic programs, often steeped in tradition and loyalty, can also be breeding grounds for abuse.

• Northwestern University football (2023–2025): A massive scandal erupted at Northwestern following allegations from former football players of widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program stretching back years. The university initially reacted by suspending its head coach, Pat Fitzgerald, who was later fired. This resulted in multiple lawsuits filed by players against Northwestern and members of the coaching staff, while Fitzgerald himself filed a wrongful-termination suit, which eventually settled confidentially. The Northwestern scandal powerfully demonstrated that hazing extends beyond a social club problem, reaching into major athletic programs, and raised critical questions about institutional oversight and responsibility.

What these cases mean for New Hampshire families in Texas

These national tragedies share common threads: forced intoxication, physical abuse, psychological torment, the desperate attempts to delay calling for help, and systematic cover-ups. The fact that the same patterns of behavior lead to similar devastating outcomes, despite repeated national headlines, underscores a profound failure of oversight and enforcement by universities and national organizations alike.

For New Hampshire families with children attending universities in Texas, these cases are not just distant news stories; they are crucial lessons. They show that:

• The consequences of hazing can be catastrophic, leading to permanent injury or death.
• Universities and national organizations can and are being held legally and financially accountable.
• Multi-million-dollar settlements often follow only after tragedy and determined litigation.
• The “everyone does it” or “it’s just tradition” excuses hold no weight in court when a life is lost or irrevocably changed.

New Hampshire families whose children might attend UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor and encounter hazing are operating within a legal landscape heavily shaped by these national lessons. These precedents are vital in building strong cases for answers and accountability.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For New Hampshire families whose children attend college in Texas, understanding the specific environments of these major universities is paramount. While The Manginello Law Firm serves clients across the Lone Star State, from our Houston offices to the far reaches of the Panhandle and every town in between, we understand that proximity and local culture influence the student experience. New Hampshire residents may send their children to any of these institutions, and being prepared means understanding their unique contexts.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, often called “Houston’s University,” is a massive-tier one research institution located directly in America’s fourth-largest city. For many New Hampshire families, UH offers a vibrant, diverse, and accessible urban university experience.

5.1.1 Campus & culture snapshot

UH is a large, dynamic urban campus, serving over 47,000 students. It boasts a thriving Greek life community, with a wide array of fraternities and sororities, including those governed by the Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and numerous multicultural organizations. In addition, UH is home to countless other student groups, from cultural associations to sports clubs, all contributing to a rich campus tapestry. The presence of such a wide range of groups creates a diverse student experience but also a complex landscape where hazing can unfortunately occur. New Hampshire families choosing UH are looking for world-class education in an active city, and this environment means being aware of all aspects of campus life.

5.1.2 Hazing policy & reporting

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, explicitly prohibiting hazing both on and off campus. Their policy is clear that any act that causes physical or mental distress, coercion, or abuse, whether subtle or overt, is considered hazing. This includes forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and any activity causing mental stress or humiliation. Students (and their New Hampshire parents) are encouraged to report hazing incidents through various channels, including the Dean of Students office, the Student Conduct office, or the UH Police Department (UHPD). Some information on hazing allegations and resolutions is typically posted on the university website; however, the level of detail can vary.

5.1.3 Example incident & response

In 2016, a Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) chapter at UH faced severe allegations. Pledges were reportedly deprived of adequate food, water, and sleep over several days. One student allegedly sustained a lacerated spleen, an extremely serious injury, after being slammed onto a table or similar surface during the event. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and was subsequently suspended by the university. This incident underscored UH’s commitment to addressing hazing, but also the enduring risks within Greek life. More recently, multiple fraternities faced disciplinary action for behaviors “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” involving alcohol misuse and policy violations leading to suspensions or probation. While UH has demonstrated a willingness to suspend chapters, the details of these actions are often less publicly available compared to some other Texas institutions.

5.1.4 How a UH hazing case might proceed

If a hazing incident were to occur at the University of Houston involving a New Hampshire student, several agencies might become involved. The UHPD would investigate campus-based incidents, while the Houston Police Department would handle events occurring off-campus within the city limits. Civil lawsuits related to hazing at UH would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County. Potential defendants in such a case could include the individual students involved, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, and potentially the university itself, as well as any property owners where the hazing took place. Navigating these various entities and legal complexities requires specialized expertise.

5.1.5 What UH students & parents should do

For UH students and their New Hampshire parents, proactive engagement and vigilance are key:

• Report hazing: Use UH’s official channels, including the Dean of Students office or UHPD, or their online reporting forms. The National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE) offers an anonymous reporting option.
• Document everything: Keep meticulous records of any suspicious activities, communications, or injuries. Screenshots of group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp), photos of injuries, and detailed notes are critical.
• Seek legal counsel immediately: If hazing results in significant physical or psychological harm, a lawyer experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can help preserve evidence, navigate university investigations, and pursue accountability. Our firm can leverage our understanding of local jurisdictions and prior incidents to build a strong case.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, located in College Station, is deeply interwoven with the identity of the state. It’s a popular choice for New Hampshire high school graduates seeking a strong engineering program, agricultural studies, or a unique blend of tradition and academics. Its rich history and traditions, particularly the Corps of Cadets, distinguish it from other universities.

5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Texas A&M is renowned for its deeply ingrained traditions, the most prominent being the Corps of Cadets. This military-style organization fosters strong bonds and a unique culture, often with its own “initiation” processes. Alongside the Corps, A&M boasts a massive and vibrant Greek life, an active athletic department, and countless student organizations. This environment, for all its strengths in fostering loyalty and community, also presents complex dynamics where hazing can become a deeply entrenched, albeit prohibited, practice. New Hampshire families attracted to A&M’s rich tradition and sense of belonging must also be aware of the potential for these traditions to be misused.

5.2.2 Hazing policy & reporting

Texas A&M unequivocally prohibits hazing, adhering strictly to Texas state law. Their policy extends to all student organizations, whether officially recognized or not, and applies to incidents both on and off campus. This prohibition covers any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that endangers a student’s mental or physical health for membership-related purposes. A&M provides accessible reporting mechanisms through the Dean of Students Office, the Aggie Honor System Office, and the Texas A&M University Police Department. The university’s official statements emphasize a “zero tolerance” approach, mirroring the state’s legal framework.

5.2.3 Example incident & response

Hazing at Texas A&M has unfortunately garnered national attention, particularly within both its Greek life and Corps traditions.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Incident (circa 2021): This case involved multiple pledges allegedly subjected to severe physical abuse and exposure to harmful chemicals. Pledges claimed they were forced into strenuous physical activity, and then substances including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit were poured on them, resulting in serious chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The university suspended the fraternity for a period and the pledges filed a $1 million lawsuit against the chapter. This incident highlighted the extreme and dangerous forms hazing can take, moving beyond traditional alcohol abuse to include chemical attacks.
• Corps of Cadets Allegations (2023): A former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading hazing practices within a Corps unit. The allegations included being forced to endure simulated sexual acts and being tightly bound between beds in a “roasted pig” position with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages. While Texas A&M stated it had handled the matter under its internal regulations, the lawsuit brought renewed scrutiny to the Corps’ traditions and oversight.
• Aggie Bonfire Collapse (1999): While not traditional hazing, the tragic collapse of the student-built Aggie Bonfire, which killed 12 and injured 27, raised profound questions about student-led high-risk activities and the university’s oversight of deeply entrenched traditions. Though the practice was officially ended on campus, it underscored the inherent dangers when student-run activities are allowed to proliferate without sufficient safety protocols. Multiple lawsuits followed, and settlements exceeded $6 million in total.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M hazing case might proceed

For New Hampshire families whose children attend Texas A&M, understanding the legal process is vital. Investigations might be conducted by the Texas A&M University Police Department (TAMUPD) for on-campus incidents, or by local law enforcement agencies if the hazing occurs off-campus in College Station or Bryan, like the Bryan Police Department. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Brazos County courts. Public universities like A&M can assert sovereign immunity, potentially limiting certain claims, but exceptions exist for gross negligence or when suing individuals. Such cases require attorneys familiar with sovereign immunity challenges and with the specific cultural nuances of A&M.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M students & parents should do

Students from New Hampshire and their parents connected to Texas A&M should:

• Be informed: Familiarize yourselves with Texas A&M’s Student Code of Conduct and hazing policies. Understand the reporting options available through the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct, or TAMUPD.
• Report safely: Utilize confidential reporting options or contact the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE). Even if hazing is described as “tradition,” if it causes distress, it’s a violation.
• Document thoroughly: Preserve all evidence, especially group chat messages that often detail hazing activities within the Corps or Greek chapters. Record dates, times, and participants.
• Consult legal experts: Families from New Hampshire facing hazing issues at Texas A&M need counsel who understand both Texas state law and the unique cultural environment of the university. Our firm has experience navigating complex institutional structures and legal defenses.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is a flagship institution for many New Hampshire graduates, known for its academic rigor and vibrant campus life. Located in the heart of the state capital, it attracts students from around the globe, and its Greek life and numerous student organizations are central to the student experience.

5.3.1 Campus & culture snapshot

UT Austin is one of the largest and most prestigious public universities in Texas, with an enrollment of over 52,000 students. Its campus culture is rich with traditions, including many long-standing student organizations and a very active Greek scene encompassing IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, and independent-affiliated fraternities and sororities. The university’s vast array of student groups, from academic and athletic to spirit and social clubs (such as the Texas Cowboys, responsible for the “Hook ’em Horns” sign), are integral to campus life. For a student from New Hampshire, UT represents a dynamic academic and social environment, making awareness of potential risks in various student organizations crucial.

5.3.2 Hazing policy & reporting

The University of Texas at Austin maintains a comprehensive anti-hazing policy that strictly prohibits hazing both on and off campus. Their policy aligns with Texas law, defining hazing as any act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or membership. UT is notably proactive in publishing information about hazing. They provide transparent reporting channels through the Dean of Students, the Office of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, and the UT Police Department (UTPD). Moreover, UT Austin famously maintains a public “Hazing Violations” page on its website, detailing sanctions, specific conduct, and the organizations involved. This transparency serves as both a warning and a potential source of evidence for families from New Hampshire and across Texas.

5.3.3 Example incident & response

UT Austin’s publicly available hazing violation records provide a window into the ongoing challenges of hazing within even the most regulated environments.

• Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) Incident (2023): Records show the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity was found responsible for hazing when new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. The specific “milk chug” ritual has been implicated in other national hazing incidents contributing to serious health issues. This resulted in the chapter being placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education. The repetition of similar incidents involving this national organization, seen in the fatal Stone Foltz case at Bowling Green State, highlights the pattern.
• Texas Cowboys (2018): This nationally recognized spirit organization, known for upholding UT traditions, was suspended for hazing and alcohol violations when a “new man” died in a car accident after a late-night work session. The university denied the death was directly caused by hazing, but acknowledged policies were violated. The parents, however, pursued a wrongful death claim arguing sleep deprivation as a form of hazing leading to the accident. Similar allegations of forced nudity, sleep deprivation, and calisthenics have been made against the Texas Cowboys in other publicly documented incidents.
• Texas Wranglers (2022): Public records indicate that another prominent spirit organization, the Texas Wranglers, faced disciplinary action for hazing that included forced workouts, public humiliation tactics, and alcohol-related hazing. Such repeated violations, even in the face of university sanctions, underscore the persistent challenges in eradicating hazing.

These publicly documented incidents, while showing a university attempting transparency, also demonstrate the recurring nature of hazing and the continuous need for vigilance and accountability.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin hazing case might proceed

New Hampshire families facing hazing situations at UT Austin would navigate a legal landscape involving investigations by UTPD for incidents on campus, or the Austin Police Department (APD) for off-campus events. Civil lawsuits would typically be heard in Travis County courts. As a public university, UT Austin may invoke sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist, particularly in cases of gross negligence or violations of federal statutes like Title IX. The unique aspect of UT’s public hazing records means that experienced attorneys can often find a history of warnings and disciplinary action, which strengthens arguments regarding foreseeability and the university’s knowledge of recurring issues.

5.1.5 What UT Austin students & parents should do

For students from New Hampshire attending UT Austin and their families:

• Access public records: Regularly check UT’s “Hazing Violations” page to be aware of organizations with a history of misconduct.
• Report promptly: Use UT’s online reporting forms, contact the Dean of Students, or UTPD. The National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE) is also available for anonymous reporting.
• Document everything digital: UT’s location in a tech-savvy city like Austin makes digital evidence (GroupMe chats, social media posts) particularly prevalent. Preserve these, as they are often key to building a case. Visit Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.
• Contact a Texas hazing lawyer: If you suspect or confirm hazing has occurred, especially if injury is involved, consulting with a lawyer who understands Texas hazing law and UT Austin’s specific policies is critical. The existence of UT’s public records can be a powerful tool for your legal team.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University (SMU), a distinguished private institution in Dallas, Texas, is often chosen by New Hampshire families looking for a strong academic experience in a vibrant urban setting. Its campus culture and lively Greek system are defining features.

5.4.1 Campus & culture snapshot

SMU is known for its beautiful campus, rigorous academics, and a generally affluent student body. Greek life plays a particularly prominent role, with a large percentage of students joining fraternities and sororities recognized by the IFC and Panhellenic Council. This strong Greek presence, combined with numerous club sports and student organizations, fosters a rich social environment. While SMU prides itself on community and leadership development, the high-profile nature of its Greek system often brings significant scrutiny regarding hazing. For a New Hampshire student, SMU offers a traditional college experience with a strong social scene, making due diligence on organizational safety paramount.

5.4.2 Hazing policy & reporting

SMU actively prohibits hazing, articulating clear policies consistent with Texas state law. As a private university, its internal disciplinary processes are often less publicly transparent than those of state-funded institutions like UT or Texas A&M. However, SMU does provide various avenues for reporting hazing through the Office of the Dean of Students, Student Conduct & Community Standards, and the SMU Police Department. They also often use third-party reporting systems like “Real Response” to encourage anonymous tips. While the detailed records of hazing violations may not be as readily available to the public as at UT, SMU’s policies explicitly condemn any activity that endangers mental or physical health for the purpose of initiation or affiliation.

5.4.3 Example incident & response

SMU has faced its share of hazing incidents, underscoring the challenges of maintaining a hazing-free environment even within well-resourced private institutions.

• Kappa Alpha Order Incident (2017): The Kappa Alpha Order fraternity chapter at SMU was placed on suspension and various restrictions were imposed after reports of severe hazing. Allegations, according to news reports, included new members being paddled, forced to consume excessive amounts of alcohol, and deprived of sleep. These sanctions lasted for several years, impacting the chapter’s ability to recruit new members until around 2021.
• Other Greek Life Suspensions: SMU’s Student Conduct records periodically show various Greek organizations suspended or placed on probation for hazing-related offenses, though specific details are often kept private. These incidents highlight the ongoing struggle of universities to curb hazing, despite clear policies.

These incidents demonstrate that even at private universities with strict policies, hazing can persist, and student organizations continue to face serious consequences for violations.

5.4.4 How an SMU hazing case might proceed

If a hazing incident were to involve a New Hampshire student at SMU, investigations would be handled by the SMU Police Department and the Dean of Students office. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Dallas County courts. As a private university, SMU does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more straightforward to pursue claims against the institution compared to public universities. However, private institutions often have considerable resources dedicated to their defense. Experienced hazing lawyers can pursue discovery to obtain internal reports and communications that might not be publicly available, shedding light on the university’s prior knowledge and response to hazing.

5.4.5 What SMU students & parents should do

For students from New Hampshire attending SMU and their parents:

• Understand the private nature: Be aware that internal investigations and disciplinary actions at private universities like SMU are typically less transparent for those outside the immediate case.
• Report discreetly and formally: Utilize SMU’s official reporting channels or anonymous systems like Real Response. Documenting every step of the reporting process is crucial.
• Prioritize evidence: Because of reduced public transparency about past incidents, every piece of personal evidence—screenshots, photos, witness accounts—becomes even more vital for building a case.
• Consult Texas legal counsel: Navigating a hazing claim against a well-resourced private university like SMU requires experienced legal representation. The Manginello Law Firm, accustomed to taking on powerful defendants, can guide New Hampshire families through this process, ensuring all avenues for accountability are explored in Dallas courts.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, located in Waco, Texas, is another top destination for New Hampshire students seeking a values-based education. As the largest Baptist university in the world, its distinct Christian identity and rich traditions significantly shape its campus culture and student experience.

5.5.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Baylor is a private Christian university with a strong emphasis on community, faith, and academic excellence, attracting over 20,000 students. While it maintains a robust Greek life with IFC, Panhellenic, and NPHC organizations, Baylor’s campus policies often reflect its religious values, including strict alcohol prohibitions. The university is deeply rooted in tradition, from its athletic programs to numerous student organizations. For a New Hampshire student, Baylor offers a unique blend of faith, tradition, and strong academics; however, like any institution, the potential for hazing in various student groups requires careful consideration. Baylor’s history includes significant scrutiny over its handling of abuse allegations, which has influenced its approach to student welfare and conduct.

5.5.2 Hazing policy & reporting

Baylor University has clear, comprehensive anti-hazing policies, rigorously adhering to Texas state law and its own institutional values. Their policy prohibits any act, on or off campus, that endangers a student’s mental or physical health for the purpose of initiation or membership. Baylor provides multiple confidential reporting options, including the Baylor Police Department, the Office of Student Conduct, and an anonymous “EthicsPoint” hotline. The university’s past experiences with scrutiny over its handling of sexual assault cases in its athletic department have led to a heightened awareness and emphasis on student safety and reporting protocols, influencing its approach to all forms of student misconduct, including hazing.

5.5.3 Example incident & response

Baylor’s commitment to addressing misconduct, including hazing, has been tested in recent years:

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): An internal investigation into the Baylor baseball team revealed hazing violations, leading to the suspension of 14 players. The suspensions were staggered to not decimate the team, but they underscored the university’s response to confirmed hazing within its athletic programs. This incident, while not resulting in physical injury, highlighted the ongoing presence of hazing even in sports teams, which often operate under intense pressure and internal hierarchies.
• Greek Life Suspensions: Historically, several Greek organizations at Baylor have faced suspensions for hazing and alcohol policy violations. While specific details of these private university investigations are not always publicly disseminated, they confirm that hazing is a perennial challenge, even within institutions with strong disciplinary frameworks and alcohol-free policies.

These incidents demonstrate Baylor’s proactive, if sometimes internally managed, approach to addressing hazing, often against the backdrop of its broader cultural and oversight challenges.

5.4.4 How a Baylor hazing case might proceed

For New Hampshire families with a child at Baylor, an incident of hazing would involve investigations by the Baylor Police Department and the Office of Student Conduct. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in McLennan County courts in Waco. As a private university, Baylor does not claim sovereign immunity, which can simplify the legal process for victims seeking accountability compared to public institutions. However, Baylor, like other well-established private universities, has significant legal resources. An experienced hazing attorney would conduct thorough discovery to obtain internal records, communications, and prior incident reports that might not be publicly disclosed, to understand the foreseeability of the hazing and the university’s institutional response.

5.4.5 What Baylor students & parents should do

For students from New Hampshire attending Baylor and their families:

• Leverage reporting channels: Utilize Baylor’s anonymous EthicsPoint hotline, the Baylor Police Department, or the Office of Student Conduct. Baylor’s emphasis on ethical conduct provides multiple avenues for students to voice concerns.
• Document everything: Despite Baylor’s strict policies, hazing can occur. Detailed records of communications (text messages, GroupMe, emails), witness accounts, and photographic evidence are indispensable.
• Understand the broader context: Baylor’s prior experiences with institutional scrutiny (e.g., in Title IX cases) mean there is often a heightened sensitivity to allegations of misconduct, which can sometimes work in favor of those reporting hazing.
• Seek skilled legal representation: Navigating a hazing claim at a private religious institution like Baylor requires legal expertise to counter sophisticated defense strategies. Our firm is prepared to challenge powerful institutions and ensure New Hampshire families receive the answers and justice they deserve.

6. Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

The Greek-letter system, whether at a large public institution like the University of New Hampshire or a Texas powerhouse like UT Austin, is a complex web of local chapters and national organizations. For New Hampshire families, understanding that hazing is not merely a local chapter “bad apple” issue but often a systemic problem with national roots is critical. When we look at hazing incidents at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, we frequently find organizations whose national headquarters have long histories of similar issues at other campuses.

6.1 Why national histories matter

When a student from New Hampshire is injured due to hazing, the legal inquiry often extends far beyond the local chapter or individual student perpetrators. Most fraternities and sororities, including those with chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor, are part of larger national organizations. These national headquarters often do the following:

• Develop anti-hazing policies: They create extensive manuals and risk management guidelines precisely because they have experienced previous hazing deaths and catastrophic injuries at their chapters nationwide.
• Identify patterns of abuse: They are aware of specific hazing methods that recur across their system, such as forced drinking nights, ritualized paddling, and humiliating acts.

When a Texas chapter repeats a hazing script that has caused injury or death at another chapter in a different state, it provides crucial evidence of foreseeability and pattern of conduct. This history can profoundly strengthen arguments for negligence or gross negligence against the national organization, potentially leading to significant punitive damages. It demonstrates that the national body had prior warnings and should have taken more effective measures to prevent harm.

6.2 Organization mapping (synthesized)

While we cannot list every chapter at every university, it’s illustrative to look at some national organizations present at these Texas universities and understand their broader history:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): Present at UH, UT Austin, Texas A&M. Nationally, Pike has faced severe scrutiny following several high-profile alcohol-related hazing deaths. The Stone Foltz case at Bowling Green State University in 2021, where a pledge died after consuming a handle of bourbon, resulted in a $10 million settlement from the national fraternity and university, along with criminal convictions. The 2012 David Bogenberger death at Northern Illinois University, also from alcohol poisoning during a Pike event, resulted in a $14 million settlement. These incidents demonstrate a national pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): With chapters at UT Austin, Texas A&M, and SMU, SAE has a particularly troubled national hazing history. Often referred to as “America’s deadliest fraternity” by some media outlets, SAE has declared the elimination of “pledging” in an attempt to curb repeat incidents, a move that has not entirely stopped the pattern of abuse. Lawsuits include a traumatic brain injury suit at the University of Alabama (2023) and severe chemical burns to pledges at Texas A&M (2021). The 2008 death of Carson Starkey at Cal Poly (California) from alcohol poisoning during a hazing ritual reinforced the pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing.
• Phi Delta Theta: Present at LSU and various Texas campuses like Texas A&M and SMU. This national organization was at the center of the 2017 Max Gruver hazing death at Louisiana State University. Gruver died from alcohol poisoning after an extreme drinking game involving answering questions incorrectly and chugging liquor. This tragic event led to the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana and underscored the lethal nature of “traditional” drinking games.
• Pi Kappa Phi: With chapters at UH. Pi Kappa Phi was involved in the 2017 Andrew Coffey hazing death at Florida State University, where Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. This national organization has faced other hazing-related lawsuits across the country, showing a pattern of similar incidents.
• Kappa Alpha Order: Present at Texas A&M and SMU. National Kappa Alpha Order has had chapters suspended at various universities nationwide for hazing violations, including cases involving physical abuse and alcohol misuse, highlighting recurring issues despite national policies.

This is not an exhaustive list, but it illustrates how many local chapters belong to larger systems with documented histories of hazing. For New Hampshire families whose children may choose to join these organizations, these national patterns inform the discussion around institutional accountability.

6.3 Tie back to legal strategy

The existence of a national hazing history for any fraternity or sorority with a presence at Texas universities profoundly impacts legal strategy:

• Foreseeability: If a national organization has experienced multiple hazing incidents involving alcohol, physical abuse, or psychological torment across its chapters, it becomes much harder for them to claim that a similar incident at a Texas chapter was “unforeseeable.” They had prior warnings, or “notice,” of the dangers.
• Insurance coverage: Demonstrating a national pattern of hazing can influence how insurance companies, often a primary source of compensation in these cases, interpret coverage for “intentional acts” versus “negligent supervision” by the national body.
• Punitive damages: In cases where the national organization has a long history of similar incidents but failed to take effective action, plaintiffs may be able to argue for punitive damages. These damages are designed not just to compensate victims but also to punish the defendants for reckless or malicious conduct and to deter others from similar actions.
• Policy enforcement gaps: A pattern of hazing within a national organization can expose failures in the enforcement of their own anti-hazing policies, signaling that their rules were merely for show rather than genuine prevention.

For families in New Hampshire, this means that a hazing incident affecting their child at any Texas university is not an isolated event. It is often part of a larger, systemic problem where the national organization bears significant responsibility due to its history and resources. Our legal team delves into these national histories to build the strongest possible case for accountability.

7. Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

When a hazing incident from a New Hampshire family’s perspective devastates a student at a Texas university, building a legal case requires meticulous evidence collection, a deep understanding of damages, and a clear legal strategy. This is not a simple personal injury claim; it’s complex litigation against powerful institutions, which necessitates specialized expertise.

7.1 Evidence

Evidence is the bedrock of any hazing case. In 2025, it’s not just about witness statements; digital data plays a paramount role. Understanding what evidence to look for, and how to preserve it, can make or break a case.

• Digital communications: In today’s wired world, group chats and direct messages (DMs) are often the smoking gun. Platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, and Slack are frequently used to plan, command, and document hazing activities. These messages can reveal pressure tactics, instructions for degrading acts, and attempts at cover-ups. We also look at DMs and chat logs from social media sites like Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok. Critical for proving a case, digital communications, especially screenshots with timestamps and participants clearly visible, are often the strongest evidence available.
• Photos & videos: Members often film hazing for their own amusement, to prove compliance, or as “receipts” for others. This includes photos and videos shared in group chats, posted to private social media accounts, or captured by surveillance cameras (such as Ring doorbells or campus security systems at houses and venues). These visual pieces of evidence can clearly show the nature of the hazing, who was involved, and the victim’s state.
• Internal organization documents: Access to a chapter’s internal documents can be invaluable. This can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, official or unofficial “tradition” lists, emails, or texts from officers giving instructions related to hazing. National organizations also have policies and training materials that can be leveraged to show expected standards versus actual conduct.
• University records: Universities maintain a trove of relevant information. We seek prior conduct files related to the same chapter (showing previous hazing violations, probations, or suspensions), incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, and any Clery Act reports or similar disclosures that might indicate a pattern of issues. These records can establish a university’s knowledge of recurring hazards.
• Medical and psychological records: These document the extent of the harm. Emergency room reports, hospitalization records, surgical notes, physical therapy reports, and toxicology reports (showing alcohol or drug levels) provide undeniable proof of physical injury. Critically, psychological evaluations and therapy notes can document the profound emotional distress, trauma, PTSD, depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation resulting from hazing. These records are essential for calculating non-economic damages.
• Witness testimony: The accounts of those who saw, participated in, or were aware of the hazing are vital. This includes other pledges, members who chose to speak out, roommates, RAs, coaches, trainers, and even bystanders. Gathering this testimony effectively requires sensitivity and legal expertise, as many witnesses may feel pressure to remain silent. Often, former members who quit or were expelled can provide invaluable insight.

Our firm’s video, “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs), provides practical advice on how to properly collect and preserve these critical pieces of digital evidence.

7.2 Damages

Hazing can inflict a wide range of devastating harms, both immediately and far into the future. A civil lawsuit seeks to recover compensation for these multi-faceted losses.

• Medical bills & future care: This covers all costs associated with treating hazing-related injuries. This includes emergency room visits, ambulance transport, hospital stays (including ICU or surgery), medications, and medical equipment. For long-term injuries like traumatic brain injury or organ damage (such as rhabdomyolysis or kidney failure), this also encompasses future medical interventions, ongoing therapy (physical, occupational, speech), and psychiatric care. In catastrophic cases, a detailed “life care plan” may be developed to project future medical and personal care needs for the remainder of the victim’s life.
• Lost earnings / educational impact: Hazing can disrupt a student’s academic and career trajectory. This includes tuition and fees for missed semesters, loss of academic or athletic scholarships, delayed graduation, and ultimately, a reduced earning capacity if permanent injuries hinder their ability to work.
• Non-economic damages: These compensate for the subjective yet profound impact of hazing and are often the largest component of damages. They include:
  • Physical pain and suffering: From the initial injuries through long-term recovery.
  • Emotional distress, trauma, and humiliation: Covering severe psychological harm, such as PTSD, depression, anxiety, panic attacks, and the deep sense of shame.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: The inability to participate in activities, hobbies, or fully engage in social life due to post-hazing trauma.
• Wrongful death damages (for families): When hazing results in a fatality, the surviving family members (parents, siblings, spouse) can seek compensation for:
  • Funeral and burial costs.
  • Loss of financial support that the deceased would have provided.
  • Loss of companionship, love, and society.
  • Grief and emotional suffering endured by the family.

Our firm has extensive expertise in wrongful death claims (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), having recovered millions for families in catastrophic cases, including those involving complex evaluations of future damages.

7.3 Role of different defendants and insurance coverage

Hazing cases often involve multiple defendants, each with their own legal counsel and insurance policies. This complexity is where specialized experience becomes paramount.

• Multiple defendants: A single hazing incident can lead to claims against individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, the university, and potentially other third parties like landlords. Each defendant will likely have their own legal strategy.
• Insurance coverage: Most fraternities, universities, and sometimes even individual students carry insurance policies. However, insurers frequently try to avoid paying claims by arguing that hazing or “intentional acts” are explicitly excluded from coverage. This is where the nuanced legal arguments come into play.
• Experienced hazing lawyers: An attorney experienced in hazing litigation knows how to:
  • Identify all potential insurance policies and responsible parties.
  • Challenge insurance companies’ denial of coverage by demonstrating that even if the hazing was intentional, the institution’s negligence (e.g., failure to supervise, lack of enforcement of policies) directly contributed to the harm, which may be covered.
  • Navigate complex “duty to defend” arguments to ensure defendants’ legal fees are paid by insurers, freeing up resources for settlement.

Our firm features Lupe Peña (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She understands how fraternity and university insurance companies think and fight, providing an invaluable “insurance insider advantage” in unraveling their strategies and securing equitable compensation for our clients.

8. Practical Guides & FAQs

For New Hampshire families grappling with the nightmare of hazing, practical, actionable advice is essential. Whether you are a parent, a student, or a witness, understanding your rights and how to protect them is your first line of defense.

8.1 For parents

The signs of hazing can be subtle at first, often masked by secrecy and fear. Vigilance and proactive communication are crucial.

• Warning signs of hazing: Look for a combination of these indicators in your child, especially if they are far from your New Hampshire home:
  • Unexplained injuries: Bruises, burns, or “accidents” with inconsistent stories.
  • Sudden exhaustion: Extreme fatigue, sleep deprivation, or constant late-night calls.
  • Drastic mood changes: Increased anxiety, irritability, withdrawal, or depression.
  • Secrecy: Evasiveness about group activities, especially if they were previously open.
  • Constant phone use: Anxiety about missing group chat messages or “mandatory” check-ins.
  • Declining academics: Falling grades, missed classes, or choosing group activities over schoolwork.
  • Financial strain: Unexplained money requests, or needing funds for unexpected “fines” or gifts for older members.
• How to talk to your child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not accusation. Emphasize their safety and well-being over loyalty to a group. Ask open-ended questions like, “What does new member education involve?” or “Is there anything about the organization that makes you uncomfortable?” Be clear you will support them regardless of their decision to leave.
• If your child is hurt: Your priority is immediate medical attention. After ensuring their physical safety, document everything: take photos of injuries, screenshot text messages, and keep a detailed log of events.
• Dealing with the university: Document all communication with university administrators. Ask specific questions about prior incidents involving the same student organization and what actions the school took. Transparency is key, and an experienced attorney can help you navigate these discussions.
• When to talk to a lawyer: If your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm due to hazing, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or covering up what happened, it is crucial to consult a hazing lawyer. An attorney can help you identify legal options and protect your child’s rights.

8.2 For students / pledges

If you’re a student or pledge, perhaps from New Hampshire attending college in Texas, you are directly in the line of fire. Your safety and well-being are paramount.

• Is this hazing or just tradition? Ask yourself: Am I being made to do anything that causes me mental or physical discomfort, fear, embarrassment, humiliation, or physical duress? Am I afraid to say no? Am I being told to keep secrets from my family or the university? If the answer is yes, it’s hazing. Tradition should not involve fear or abuse.
• Why “consent” isn’t the end of the story: You might feel like you’re “agreeing” to participation, but being forced by peer pressure, the desire to belong, or fear of exclusion usually invalidates true consent in the eyes of the law. You cannot consent to being assaulted or to an act that is a crime.
• Exiting and reporting safely: You have the legal right to leave any student organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, remove yourself immediately. Report the hazing to a trusted campus authority (Dean of Students), campus police, or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE). Save all digital evidence before you leave or make a formal report.
• Good-faith reporting and amnesty: Many schools and state laws, including in Texas, offer protections for students who report hazing or seek medical help in good faith, especially in emergencies, even if alcohol or policy violations were involved. Prioritize safety; the law generally supports those who come forward.

8.3 For former members / witnesses

If you witnessed hazing, or even participated in it in the past and now feel remorse, your actions can make a profound difference.

• Your role in accountability: Your testimony and any evidence you possess can be critical in preventing future harm and holding perpetrating individuals and organizations accountable.
• Seeking legal advice: If you feel compelled to come forward, but worry about your own past involvement, discuss your concerns with an attorney. They can advise you on your rights and potential liabilities, and help you navigate the process of cooperating with authorities while protecting your interests.
• Preventing future tragedies: Your willingness to speak up can be the key to breaking the cycle of hazing and potentially saving another student’s life.

8.4 Critical mistakes that can destroy your case

Knowing what not to do is as important as knowing what to do. These mistakes can severely jeopardize a hazing case:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:
   • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This can be seen as attempting a cover-up, makes proving the case nearly impossible, and could even lead to legal complications for your child.
   • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even if it seems embarrassing or innocuous.
2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:
   • What parents think: “I want to give them a piece of my mind.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This almost guarantees they will immediately lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defense, making your case much harder.
   • What to do instead: Document everything privately, then call a lawyer before any confrontation.
3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms:
   • What universities do: They may pressure families to sign waivers or internal resolution agreements to keep the matter quiet.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your legal rights to pursue a civil lawsuit, and any early settlements are typically far below the true value of your case.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from a university or any organization without an attorney reviewing it first.
4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:
   • What families think: “I want people to know what happened.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Public posts can compromise your case, create inconsistencies that defense attorneys will exploit, and can inadvertently waive legal privileges.
   • What to do instead: Document everything privately; let your lawyer control any public messaging.
5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting” with the organization:
   • What organizations say: “Come meet with us to discuss your concerns before you do anything drastic.”
   • Why it’s wrong: This is often a tactic to pressure your child, extract statements that can be used against them, or intimidate them into silence.
   • What to do instead: Once you’re considering legal action, all communication should go through your lawyer.
6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:
   • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; please let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: While universities conduct internal investigations, evidence disappears quickly, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations continues to run. University processes rarely result in the full compensation or accountability that legal action can secure.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence now; consult a lawyer immediately. University processes are distinct from legal accountability.
7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:
   • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim quickly.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Recorded statements are used against you, and early settlement offers are almost always lowball.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline and state, “My attorney will contact you.”

For more detailed advice on avoiding these pitfalls, watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes that can ruin an injury case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.

8.5 Short FAQ

Here are answers to common questions New Hampshire families have when navigating a hazing incident in Texas:

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?” Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like the University of Houston or Texas A&M) may have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individuals in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU or Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case is unique and depends on the specific facts; contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?” It can be. Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default, but it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individual officers of an organization can also face criminal charges for failing to report hazing.
• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?” Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts recognize that “agreement” given under peer pressure, power imbalance, and fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.
• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?” Generally, the statute of limitations in Texas is 2 years from the date of injury or death. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this period if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. In cases involving deliberate cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be “tolled” (paused). Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and organizations may destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to discuss your specific timeline. For more information, watch our video: “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c).
• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?” The location of the hazing does not necessarily eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held accountable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and the foreseeability of hazing activities, even if they occur off-campus. Many significant hazing cases, such as the Pi Delta Psi incident where a pledge died at a remote retreat, have successfully proven liability despite happening off-campus.
• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?” Most hazing cases pursue a settlement, which often includes confidential terms to protect the privacy of those involved. While complete anonymity cannot be guaranteed if criminal charges or public university transparency policies are in play, our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy while pursuing accountability.
• “How do contingency fees work?” We work on a contingency fee basis. This means we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Your family won’t owe us any legal fees upfront or out-of-pocket as the case progresses. Watch our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.

9. About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. New Hampshire families know the value of steadfast dedication, and that’s precisely what Attorney911 brings to the table.

9.1 Why Attorney911 for hazing cases

The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, is a Houston-based Texas personal injury firm with deep experience in serious injury, wrongful death, and institutional accountability cases. We serve families throughout Texas, including those from New Hampshire, as they navigate the complex aftermath of hazing. Our firm brings unique qualifications to these challenging cases:

• Insurance insider advantage: Lupe Peña, one of our skilled attorneys (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), previously worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. This experience means she knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (or undervalue) hazing claims. She understands their delay tactics, their arguments for coverage exclusions, and their settlement strategies because she used to run their playbook. This insight is an invaluable asset for our clients.
• Complex litigation against massive institutions: Ralph Manginello, our managing partner (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), has a proven track record in complex, high-stakes litigation, including being one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation. Our federal court experience in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-resourced defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won, demonstrating our capability to fight powerful defendants.
• Multi-million dollar wrongful death and catastrophic injury experience: We don’t settle cheap. Our firm has a proven track record in obtaining multi-million dollar results in complex wrongful death cases, coordinating with economists to value lifetime care needs for victims of brain injuries or permanent disabilities.
• Criminal + civil hazing expertise: Hazing often involves both criminal acts and civil liability. Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides us with a nuanced understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation, allowing us to advise clients on both tracks and support witnesses or former members who may face dual exposure.
• Investigative depth: We understand how to investigate modern hazing effectively. Our team is adept at obtaining deleted group chats and social media evidence (often crucial in these cases), subpoenaing national fraternity records to expose prior incidents, and uncovering university files through discovery and public records requests. We collaborate with experts in digital forensics, medicine, economics, and psychology to build comprehensive and compelling cases. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects families in New Hampshire and across the region, striking at the heart of their trust in higher education. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our job is to get you answers, hold the responsible parties accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family. For us, it’s not about bravado or quick settlements; it’s about thorough investigation and real accountability.

9.2 Call to action

If you or your child, whether from New Hampshire or any other community, experienced hazing at any Texas campus, we want to hear from you. Families in New Hampshire and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability when their trust is betrayed.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened without judgment, explain your legal options clearly, and help you decide on the best path forward.

Here’s what to expect in your free consultation:

• We will listen to your story with empathy and without judgment.
• We’ll review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
• We will explain your legal options, including the possibility of a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, or both—or even neither, if that’s what’s best for your family.
• We’ll discuss realistic timelines and what you can expect throughout the legal process.
• We’ll answer your questions transparently, including how costs are handled; remember, ours is a contingency fee structure, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win for you.
• There will be no pressure to hire us on the spot—we encourage you to take the time you need to decide.
• Everything you tell us is strictly confidential.

You don’t have to face the complexities of Texas hazing law alone. We are here to help.

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Please contact Lupe Peña directly for a consultation in Spanish at lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in New Hampshire or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com