New York Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | $24M+ Pi Kappa Alpha Settlements Exposed | Attorney911 — The Firm That Closed Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu | Federal Court | Former Insurance Defense | 1-888-ATTY-911 - Attorney911 | Personal Injury & Criminal Defense Lawyers

Our commitment at Attorney911 is to fiercely advocate for individuals and families in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) who have been impacted by hazing incidents on college campuses across Texas. We understand the profound emotional, physical, and financial toll such experiences can take. This comprehensive guide serves to illuminate the pervasive issue of hazing, clarify the legal landscape, and empower Texas families, including those in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York), with the knowledge and resources necessary to seek justice and accountability.

On a quiet evening in the heart of New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York), a parent receives a frantic call or an unnerving text. It’s their child, away at a Texas university – perhaps the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor. The child sounds exhausted, fearful, or strangely secretive. There are whispers of “initiation night,” “bonding rituals,” or “tradition.” Maybe they mention excessive drinking, forced physical challenges, or degrading acts that made them feel unsafe and humiliated. When pressed, the child simply says, “I can’t talk about it,” or “It’s just how things are done here.” This scenario, sadly, is not uncommon. It’s a silent ordeal many students and their families in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) confront, unaware of the serious implications and the legal recourse available.

This comprehensive guide is designed for families in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) and across Texas who are grappling with the harsh reality of hazing. We delve into:

What modern hazing truly entails, far beyond outdated stereotypes.
The intricate web of Texas and federal laws designed to combat hazing.
The critical lessons from major national hazing cases and their relevance to Texas universities.
Specific insights into hazing incidents and institutional responses at prominent Texas institutions like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor.
The power of understanding Greek organization national histories in litigation.
Your legal options, including how Attorney911 can help families in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) navigate these complex challenges.

While this article provides general information, it is not a substitute for legal advice tailored to your unique situation. Attorney911 is dedicated to evaluating individual cases and guiding you through every step toward justice and accountability. We serve families throughout Texas, including those in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York), ensuring that no one has to face this alone.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  - Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
  - Photograph injuries from multiple angles
  - Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
- Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
- Do NOT:
  - Confront the fraternity/sorority
  - Sign anything from the university or insurance company
  - Post details on public social media
  - Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
- Universities move quickly to control the narrative
- We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

Hazing in 2025 is far removed from the innocent pranks of old sitcoms. It is a dangerous, often brutal practice that extends across a wide spectrum of student organizations, leaving deep physical and psychological scars. For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families, understanding the true face of modern hazing is the first step toward protecting their children.

Modern hazing can be broadly defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, or is done for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. This definition underscores that “I agreed to it” does not automatically make the activity safe or legal, especially when peer pressure, fear of exclusion, and power imbalances are at play.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

Hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action tied to joining, keeping membership, or gaining status in a group, where the behavior endangers physical or mental health, humiliates, or exploits. This definition is crucial because it goes beyond mere physical acts, encompassing emotional and psychological manipulation that can be just as damaging. The element of coercion, whether explicit or implicit, invalidates any supposed “consent” given by the hazing victim, especially given the natural human desire for belonging and acceptance.

Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing manifests in various forms, each designed to assert dominance, test loyalty, or instill a perverse sense of belonging. The range and severity of hazing activities continue to evolve, often adapted to evade detection while retaining their harmful essence.

Alcohol and substance hazing is a pervasive and deadly form. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often through brutal chugging challenges, “lineups,” or drinking games designed to induce rapid and extreme intoxication. Pledges might be pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances, leading to blackouts, alcohol poisoning, or even death. The culture of “bottle exchanges” or “big/little reveal” nights, where copious amounts of hard liquor are expected to be consumed, has been a direct cause of numerous fatalities nationwide.

Physical hazing can range from relentless to brutal. This includes beatings, paddling, branding, and excessive calisthenics—often referred to euphemistically as “workouts” or “smokings”—that far exceed safe limits. Sleep deprivation, food and water deprivation, and exposure to extreme temperatures or dangerous environments (like being abandoned far from campus) are also common tactics used to degrade and break down new members. These acts often inflict severe bodily injury, from broken bones and internal organ damage to rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure, as seen in the recent Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston case.

Sexualized and humiliating hazing attacks a student’s dignity and self-worth. This can involve forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts, or degrading costumes and poses (e.g., “roasted pig” positions). Some hazing incidents carry explicit racial, sexist, or homophobic undertones, using slurs or forcing members to perform acts that perpetuate harmful stereotypes. These forms of hazing inflict profound psychological trauma, shame, and irreversible emotional damage.

Psychological hazing preys on a student’s mental and emotional vulnerability. This includes constant verbal abuse, threats of physical harm or social ostracization, and forced social isolation from friends and family. Manipulation, forced confessions, and public shaming—whether online or during group meetings—are tactics designed to break a student’s spirit and instill absolute obedience. The constant anxiety and fear instilled by psychological hazing can lead to severe mental health issues, including depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and PTSD.

Digital/online hazing leverages technology to extend the reach of hazing into every aspect of a student’s life. This involves constant monitoring through group chats on platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, or Discord, where pledges are expected to respond instantly, day or night. Dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation via Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok, or even forced participation in creating compromising images or videos, are increasingly common. These tactics can lead to sleep deprivation, intense anxiety, and feelings of constant surveillance, blurring the lines between online and offline harassment.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It’s a common misconception that hazing is limited to “frat boy” antics. In reality, hazing permeates a much broader array of student organizations:

Fraternities and sororities: This includes Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek-letter organizations. While many chapters strive for positive experiences, others unfortunately harbor cultures of hazing.
Corps of Cadets / ROTC / military-style groups: These organizations, often steeped in tradition and hierarchy, can be breeding grounds for hazing, especially during “rat” or basic training periods.
Spirit squads and tradition clubs: Groups like cheerleading teams, dance teams, and university spirit organizations (e.g., some Texas Cowboys-type groups) often have intense “initiation” periods that can cross into hazing.
Athletic teams: Hazing is a persistent problem across all levels of collegiate sports, from football and basketball to baseball, track and field, cheerleading, and swimming. Athletes may face forced excessive drinking, physical abuse, or humiliating acts as part of team “bonding.”
Marching bands and performance groups: Even seemingly innocuous organizations like marching bands, orchestras, or theater groups can have ritualized hazing practices, as tragically demonstrated in the Robert Champion case at Florida A&M.
Some service, cultural, and academic organizations: Any group with a hierarchical structure and a desire to “prove” membership can, unfortunately, develop hazing traditions.

The common threads across these diverse groups are social status, tradition, and secrecy. These elements create an environment where hazing can flourish, often with members rationalizing dangerous activities as “just how things are done” or fearing the consequences of speaking out. This culture persists despite clear anti-hazing policies and increasing awareness of the severe risks involved.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

For families in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) seeking justice for a hazing incident, understanding the legal framework in Texas and at the federal level is paramount. These laws define what constitutes hazing, outline the criminal consequences, and establish avenues for civil accountability.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Under Texas law—which governs cases in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York)—hazing is not merely a university policy violation; it’s a criminal offense. The Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F, explicitly defines and prohibits hazing.

Definition: Hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition is crucial because it highlights that:

Location doesn’t matter: Hazing is prohibited whether it occurs on university property or at an off-campus house, remote location, or private venue.
Mental or physical harm: Hazing doesn’t have to result in physical injury to be illegal; significant psychological distress or endangerment of mental health is sufficient.
Intent to harm isn’t always required: The act only needs to be “reckless,” meaning the perpetrators knew or should have known their actions posed a risk to health or safety.
“Consent” is not a defense: As explicitly stated in §37.155, a person cannot legally consent to being hazed. This protects individuals from being pressured into dangerous acts under duress.

Criminal Penalties for Hazing:

Class B Misdemeanor: The default charge for hazing, carrying potential penalties of up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical attention.
State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This carries potential jail time of six months to two years and significant fines.
Failing to Report: An officer or member of an organization who knows about hazing and fails to report it can face misdemeanor charges.
Retaliation: Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

These criminal provisions mean that individuals involved in hazing can face severe consequences beyond university sanctions.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It is important for New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families to understand the distinct paths of criminal and civil legal action in hazing cases. Although they can proceed simultaneously, their goals and processes differ significantly.

Criminal Cases:

Initiated by the state (prosecutors).
Aim: To punish the individuals for violating criminal law through penalties like jail time, fines, or probation.
Common hazing-related criminal charges in Texas can include hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or, in tragic fatal cases, even manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide. The burden of proof is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Civil Cases:

Initiated by the victim or their surviving family members.
Aim: To seek monetary compensation (damages) for the harm suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable.
These cases typically focus on legal theories such as negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, and occasionally premises liability. The burden of proof is “by a preponderance of the evidence,” which is lower than in criminal cases.

A critical point is that a successful civil case does not require a criminal conviction. Even if criminal charges are not filed or do not result in a conviction, a civil lawsuit can still proceed and be successful if negligence can be proven. This dual-track approach offers multiple avenues for justice.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, federal regulations also play a significant role in addressing hazing, particularly for institutions receiving federal funding.

The Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024), represents a crucial step forward. This federal law mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal financial assistance must:

Transparently report hazing incidents: A national database will collect and publish hazing violations and disciplinary actions taken by institutions, providing unprecedented public access to this data (phased in by 2026).
Strengthen hazing education and prevention: Institutions must implement robust prevention programs for all students and staff.
Maintain public hazing data: This requirement aims to increase accountability and allow prospective students and their families to make informed decisions about campus safety.

Additionally, Title IX and the Clery Act provide further federal protections:

Title IX: If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or creates a sexually hostile environment, it can trigger Title IX obligations. This requires institutions to investigate and respond promptly and effectively to ensure a safe educational environment free from gender-based discrimination.
Clery Act: This federal law mandates that colleges and universities disclose information about crime on and around their campuses, including certain hazing incidents that overlap with categories like assault, alcohol-related offenses, or other violations that compromise campus safety. The required annual security reports provide transparency and alert students and families to potential risks.

These federal laws, alongside Texas’s specific legislation, create a multifaceted legal framework designed to prevent hazing, hold perpetrators and institutions accountable, and protect student welfare.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Determining liability in a civil hazing lawsuit is complex, often involving multiple parties responsible for a student’s harm. Experienced hazing attorneys meticulously investigate to identify every potential defendant.

Individual Students: The students who actively planned, encouraged, participated in, or carried out the hazing acts are primary targets for liability. This includes those who supplied alcohol to minors or failed to call for help in an emergency.
Local Chapter/Organization: The fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself can be sued as a legal entity if its members, particularly officers, authorized, facilitated, or tacitly allowed the hazing to occur.
National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters can be held liable if they knew or should have known about the chapter’s hazing history, had inadequate policies or failed to enforce existing ones, or if there was a pattern of similar incidents across their chapters nationally indicating a systemic problem. They have a duty to supervise their local chapters.
University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself (including its board of regents for public universities) can be sued under theories of negligence, negligent supervision, or premises liability. This often hinges on whether the university had prior knowledge of hazing, failed to take appropriate preventative or disciplinary actions, or created an environment conducive to hazing. For public universities in Texas (like most of the Texas universities), sovereign immunity can be a defense, but exceptions, particularly for gross negligence or Title IX violations, exist.
Third Parties: Depending on the specifics of the incident, other entities can also be liable. This might include landlords or property owners who knowingly rented a venue for hazing activities, social hosts who provided alcohol to minors, or even manufacturers of defective products that contributed to an injury.

Every case is fact-specific, and the potential for liability depends heavily on the evidence uncovered during a thorough investigation. Our firm’s expertise lies in navigating these complexities to ensure all responsible parties are held accountable.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

When hazing tragedies occur in Texas, they happen not in a vacuum, but within a national pattern of abuse that has claimed lives and devastated families for generations. The cases below, each a stark reminder of hazing’s destructive power, illustrate recurring themes of alcohol poisoning, physical brutality, and institutional failure—patterns that directly inform and strengthen hazing cases in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) and across Texas.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing fatalities. These cases demonstrate a chilling uniformity: new members pressured to consume dangerous quantities of alcohol, often resulting in tragic and preventable deaths.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017)
The death of Timothy Piazza is a sobering example of how extreme intoxication, coupled with a callous disregard for human life, can lead to catastrophe. During a “bid acceptance” night at the Beta Theta Pi house, Piazza was forced to consume a dangerous amount of alcohol. He then fell down a flight of stairs, sustaining severe head injuries. Fraternity members’ delayed calling for help for nearly 12 hours, while their actions were captured on chapter security cameras—footage that became damning evidence. This pattern of extreme intoxication, delay in calling 911, and a culture of silence is legally devastating, exposing both individuals and organizations to severe liability. Dozens of criminal charges were filed against fraternity members, and civil litigation resulted in confidential settlements. Pennsylvania subsequently enacted the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law, one of the toughest in the nation. This case underscores that similar delays in seeking medical attention for students in Texas, whether at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, could lead to equally severe consequences.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State, Pi Kappa Phi (2017)
Andrew Coffey died during a “Big/Little reveal” event at a Pi Kappa Phi house. He was given a bottle of hard liquor and pressured to consume it rapidly. His death from acute alcohol poisoning highlighted how formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster in Greek life nationally. Following Coffey’s death, Florida State University temporarily suspended all Greek life and overhauled its hazing policies. Nine individuals faced hazing charges, with some receiving probation and community service. The civil suit resulted in a confidential settlement. This incident serves as a stark warning to Texas chapters—and the universities they operate within—that common pledging activities involving forced alcohol consumption can have fatal outcomes.
Max Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017)
During a “Bible study” drinking game at the Phi Delta Theta house, pledges were forced to drink copious amounts of alcohol as punishment for answering questions incorrectly. Max Gruver’s blood alcohol level was an astounding 0.495% when he died from acute alcohol intoxication. This tragedy galvanized the legislative process in Louisiana, leading to the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing law. One member was convicted of negligent homicide and hazing, receiving a 2.5-year prison sentence. His parents received a substantial civil settlement. The Gruver case shows that legislative change often follows public outcry and clear proof of hazing, serving as a powerful precedent for potential legal reforms in Texas if enough attention is drawn to hazing on our campuses.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)
Stone Foltz’s death is a recent and potent example of the alcohol hazing crisis. He died after being forced to consume an entire handle of liquor during a “Big/Little night” pledging event by Pi Kappa Alpha. This resulted in multiple criminal convictions for hazing-related charges against fraternity members. Bowling Green State University—a public institution—settled with the Foltz family for nearly $3 million, demonstrating that even schools can face significant financial and reputational consequences. The fraternity’s national organization, Pi Kappa Alpha, also settled confidentially for a reported $7 million. This case highlights not only the danger of forced drinking but also the increasing accountability of universities in hazing cases, signaling to institutions like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor that they cannot escape liability for student deaths.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, hazing often involves extreme physical abuse and degrading rituals, particularly when organizations seek to prove loyalty.

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013)
Michael Deng died during a brutal “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains. Pledges were blindfolded, forced to wear heavy backpacks, and repeatedly tackled by fraternity members. Deng suffered a severe head injury, and members delayed calling 911 for over two hours. This tragic incident led to the criminal conviction of the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity for aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter—a landmark case. The fraternity was banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years and fined over $110,000. This case illustrates that off-campus “retreats” can be especially dangerous, designed to evade university oversight, yet still lead to criminal and civil penalties against individuals and national organizations. This pattern of taking hazing off-campus is common in Texas to avoid detection.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is unfortunately not exclusive to Greek life; it is a pervasive problem that can deeply embed itself within athletic programs, even at prestigious universities.

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025)
The Northwestern University football hazing scandal brought to light widespread allegations of sexualized, racist, and otherwise abusive hazing within a major collegiate athletic program. Former players detailed a culture of forced sexual acts, nudity, and derogatory treatment that extended for years. Multiple players filed lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff, leading to the termination of the highly successful head coach, Pat Fitzgerald, who later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially. This case profoundly demonstrates that hazing is not limited to Greek life and can thrive in high-profile athletic departments, challenging the notion that university oversight always prevents such abuse. For Texas families, this highlights that athletic programs at schools like Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor must also be scrutinized for similar hidden dangers.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies reveal disturbing common threads: forced consumption of alcohol, physical and psychological abuse, intentional humiliation, and a pervasive culture of secrecy and delayed medical attention. They underscore that while hazing practices evolve, the underlying motivations to degrade and control new members persist.

More critically, these cases demonstrate that:

Hazing is foreseeable. National organizations and universities often have prior knowledge of these patterns within their systems. When a Texas chapter repeats a script seen in other states, it strengthens claims of foreseeability against the national organizations, chapters, and even university officials.
Accountability is possible. Multi-million-dollar settlements and verdicts are increasingly common, compelling institutions and individuals to face the severe financial and legal consequences of their actions.
Legislative change is driven by tragedy. Cases like Timothy Piazza and Max Gruver have directly led to tougher anti-hazing laws, creating stronger legal tools for victims and their families.

For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families grappling with hazing at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor, or any other Texas institution, these national precedents confirm that they are not alone. There’s a well-established legal path to seeking justice, backed by a history of successful litigation against powerful defendants. The lessons learned from these tragedies can be directly applied to protect students and hold perpetrators accountable in our Texas courts.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families whose children attend or plan to attend a Texas university, Understanding campus environments and institutional responses to hazing is critical. While not exhaustive, this section offers targeted insights into some of Texas’s prominent institutions, focusing on their policies, past incidents, and how hazing cases might proceed in our state.

University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston is a significant and diverse institution, serving over 47,000 students in the heart of our vibrant city. Its campus community includes a dynamic mix of residential and commuter students, an active Greek life scene, and a plethora of student organizations, ranging from cultural groups to sports clubs. While UH strives to provide a safe environment, understanding its approach to hazing is essential for New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels:
UH maintains a clear anti-hazing policy, explicitly prohibiting any form of hazing, whether on or off-campus. This prohibition extends to forced consumption of alcohol, drugs, or food, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and activities causing mental distress during initiation or membership. UH provides various reporting channels, including the Dean of Students office, the Student Conduct office, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). The university aims for transparency, posting anti-hazing statements and some disciplinary actions on its website.

Recent Documented Incident & Response:
A major incident that drew Attorney911’s attention to hazing at UH involved the Pi Kappa Phi fraternity in 2025. Leonel Bermudez, a pledge, suffered acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis after extreme hazing rituals. These included forced physical exertion, degrading tasks such as being made to carry a fanny pack with humiliating items, being sprayed with a hose “like waterboarding,” forced consumption until vomiting, and dawn workouts at Yellowstone Boulevard Park performing hundreds of push-ups and squats. Mr. Bermudez presented to the emergency room with brown urine, a classic symptom of severe muscle breakdown. He was hospitalized for four days. Attorney911, representing Mr. Bermudez, filed a lawsuit seeking over $10 million against the University of Houston, its Board of Regents, Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters, and 13 individual members. The national chapter suspended the local Beta Nu chapter on November 6, 2025, and the chapter voted to surrender its charter on November 14, 2025, effectively shutting it down. This case highlights the university’s response of suspending organizations and the potential for severe physical consequences from hazing.

How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed:
For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families, a hazing case originating at UH would typically fall under the jurisdiction of Harris County courts. Involved law enforcement agencies could include UHPD and/or the Houston Police Department, depending on whether the incident occurred on or off campus. Potential civil defendants range from individual students and the local chapter to the national fraternity/sorority, and potentially the University of Houston itself, along with any property owners involved. Navigating these judicial systems requires skilled legal representation, given the complexity of coordinating investigations and litigation across multiple entities.

What UH Students & Parents Should Do:

Report promptly: Utilize UH’s reporting mechanisms: the Dean of Students office, Student Conduct, or UHPD. If you fear retribution or inaction, contact an experienced hazing attorney first.
Document everything: For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families, collecting concrete evidence is crucial. This includes screenshots of group chats, texts, photos of injuries, and any physical items related to hazing. Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) provides essential guidance.
Seek medical care immediately: Document all injuries, even minor ones, with medical professionals, ensuring the cause (hazing) is explicitly noted in medical records.
Consult a hazing attorney: An attorney experienced in Houston-based hazing cases can help uncover prior disciplinary actions against organizations at UH and guide you through the complexities. They can also advise on the Texas statute of limitations (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c), ensuring your rights are protected.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, a cornerstone of Texas higher education, is renowned for its deep-seated traditions, particularly its venerated Corps of Cadets and expansive Greek life. With a strong sense of community and loyalty, often summarized by the “Aggie Spirit,” understanding the balance between tradition and safety is paramount for New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families considering this institution. Though a distance from New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York), many families throughout the state send their children to Texas A&M.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels:
Texas A&M unequivocally prohibits hazing within any university-recognized student group, including fraternities, sororities, and the Corps of Cadets. Their policy expressly bans activities that cause physical or mental harm, humiliation, or degradation as a condition for membership. Students and families are encouraged to report hazing through the university’s Student Conduct Office, the Corps of Cadets chain of command, or the Texas A&M University Police Department (TAMUPD). The university also provides an online reporting portal for anonymous submissions.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses:
Texas A&M has faced multiple hazing allegations, notably within both Greek life and the Corps.

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Lawsuit (around 2021): In a harrowing incident, two pledges alleged they were forced to endure strenuous physical activity while substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, were poured on them. This resulted in severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The chapter was suspended, and the pledges initiated a lawsuit. This case demonstrates the extreme physical harm that can arise from so-called “initiation rituals.”
Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): A former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading hazing practices, including simulated sexual acts and being bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages. While the university stated it handled the matter under its regulations, the allegations underscore that hazing can occur across various high-tradition groups.
The Aggie Bonfire Collapse in 1999, while not traditional hazing, raised critical questions about student-led high-risk traditions and institutional oversight. The tragic incident, which killed 12 and injured 27, led to significant lawsuits and settlements and fundamentally reshaped how the university approaches student organizations and traditions.

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed:
For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families whose children attend Texas A&M, hazing cases would typically be handled within Brazos County courts. Law enforcement involvement could include TAMUPD and Brazos County Sheriff’s Office, depending on the incident’s location. Civil cases might target individual students, the local chapter, the national organization (where applicable), and potentially the university itself, given its role in regulating campus activities and the Corps. Proving institutional negligence or gross negligence in the face of alleged recurring issues and strong traditions forms a key part of such litigation.

What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do:

Understand the culture: Be aware of the strong traditions, especially within the Corps, and distinguish healthy traditions from dangerous hazing.
Prioritize safety over secrecy: Report any hazing incidents to TAMUPD, even if the activity occurred off-campus. The university has an obligation to maintain a safe environment.
Document thoroughly: Keep detailed records of any suspicious activities, communications, or injuries. Given the traditional secrecy surrounding some A&M organizations, documentation is paramount to counter cover-up attempts.
Consult an attorney: An attorney with experience in hazing cases understands the nuances of A&M’s strong traditions and can help discern whether alleged “traditions” cross the line into illegal hazing.

University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is a flagship institution within the state, attracting students from New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) and beyond with its prestigious academic programs and vibrant campus culture. Its sprawling campus in the heart of the capital city features extensive Greek life, numerous student organizations, and a passionate fan base for its athletic teams. UT’s approach to hazing is notable for its public transparency, which, while commendable, also continuously highlights the challenges of eradicating these dangerous practices.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels:
UT Austin maintains a robust anti-hazing policy that is clearly articulated online and in student handbooks. The policy prohibits any act that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for initiation or membership purposes. UT is distinguished by its publicly accessible Hazing Violations Log (hazing.utexas.edu), which lists organizations, dates of incidents, a description of the conduct, and the sanctions imposed. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students, Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, and the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD), along with anonymous reporting options.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses:
The UT Hazing Violations Log details a pattern of recurring incidents:

Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): The log notes an incident where new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics, classified as hazing. The chapter was placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education.
Texas Cowboys (2018): This highly visible spirit organization was involved in a hazing incident that unfortunately resulted in a death. While not directly hazing-related, the death of a “new man” during a traditional off-campus event led to discussions amongst the family about sleep deprivation, a form of hazing. UT officials acknowledged serious hazing and animal abuse occurred within the organization, leading to expulsions.
Texas Wranglers (2017 & 2022): This men’s spirit organization has repeatedly faced sanctions for violations involving alcohol, forced calisthenics, and other forms of harassment classified as hazing.
The consistent appearance of well-known organizations on this log, even after sanctions, points to ongoing challenges in enforcing anti-hazing policies.

How a UT Hazing Case Might Proceed:
For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families seeking legal recourse for hazing at UT, cases would typically be heard in Travis County courts. Law enforcement might involve UTPD or the Austin Police Department. A key advantage for plaintiffs in UT cases is the publicly documented history of hazing violations. This transparency can be invaluable in establishing patterns of misconduct, institutional knowledge, and potential gross negligence by the university or national organizations.

What UT Students & Parents Should Do:

Review the Hazing Violations Log: New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families should proactively check hazing.utexas.edu for any organization their child considers joining, as this can reveal significant red flags.
Utilize transparency: Parents should be aware that UT’s transparency can be a double-edged sword: it documents misconduct but doesn’t always prevent it. Use this data proactively.
Document thoroughly with legal counsel: If hazing is suspected, immediately document circumstances. The past documented violations can be powerful evidence in a civil lawsuit, demonstrating prior knowledge and foreseeability for defendants.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a distinguished private institution in Dallas, is known for its selective admissions, strong academics, and vibrant social scene, which includes a prominent Greek life community. For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families seeking a private university experience, SMU often ranks high. However, hazing, unfortunately, is a concern even within its affluent campus environment.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels:
SMU explicitly prohibits hazing and outlines its policy in the student code of conduct. The university’s definition of hazing is comprehensive, covering mental and physical harm, and it applies to all student organizations, whether on or off campus. SMU encourages reporting through its Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards, the SMU Police Department, or via anonymous online forms and a dedicated hazing hotline (“Pony Up for Accountability”).

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses:
SMU has faced scrutiny over hazing incidents within its Greek system:

Kappa Alpha Order incident (2017): This chapter was suspended following credible allegations that new members were subjected to paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and significant sleep deprivation. The chapter faced a multi-year suspension from the university, with strict restrictions on recruiting and activities upon its potential return.
Other SMU Greek organizations have faced various sanctions, including social probation and temporary suspension, for violations ranging from alcohol consumption games to other forms of forced activities designed to degrade new members. These actions are typically documented in internal university reports, though private universities like SMU often have less public reporting requirements than state-mandated public universities.

How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed:
For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families pursuing a hazing claim against SMU or its student organizations, cases would be heard in Dallas County courts. Law enforcement involvement would primarily be the SMU Police Department for campus incidents, or Dallas Police Department for off-campus events. As a private university, SMU may have fewer legal protections (like sovereign immunity) compared to public institutions, potentially making direct litigation against the university more straightforward. However, private institutions often have strong legal teams and can be highly protective of internal records. Civil litigation against SMU could compel the disclosure of internal reports and past disciplinary actions, providing crucial evidence for a family’s claim.

What SMU Students & Parents Should Do:

Be vigilant: Despite its private status, hazing is a recurring issue within SMU’s Greek life. New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families should discuss hazing openly with their children.
Utilize internal reporting, carefully: SMU’s “Pony Up for Accountability” system is a resource, but an attorney can advise on when and how to report to best preserve legal options.
Understand private university dynamics: Private universities often have latitude in how they handle internal investigations. Legal counsel can help ensure due process and protect your rights during university reviews.
Document thoroughly: As with any hazing incident, detailed documentation of events, injuries, and communications is critical, especially given that private universities may not maintain public logs like UT Austin.

Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, holds a unique position in Texas higher education. Its Christian mission guides its policies and campus culture, which often includes a strong emphasis on community and ethical behavior. While not typically associated with the same level of Greek life presence as other major Texas universities, student organizations, athletic programs, and other campus groups at Baylor are still susceptible to hazing, a fact New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families should consider. Baylor’s history includes significant challenges related to institutional oversight, particularly concerning its football program and Title IX issues, which underscores the importance of scrutinizing all aspects of student safety.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels:
Baylor’s anti-hazing policy is stringent, reflecting its commitment to student well-being and its Christian values. The policy broadly defines hazing to include any activity that causes physical or mental distress, embarrassment, ridicule, or is abusive. It applies to all student groups and individuals involved in a group’s activities. Reporting channels include the Department of Student Activities, the Baylor Police Department, and various Title IX and institutional equity reporting options. Baylor emphasizes a “care line” and anonymous reporting portal to encourage students to come forward without fear.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses:
Hazing incidents at Baylor, while perhaps less publicized than at other Texas universities, have occurred:

Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): An investigation into hazing within the Baylor baseball program led to the suspension of 14 players. The suspensions were staggered to minimize the impact on the team’s season, but the incident highlighted that hazing can occur even in competitive athletic environments at institutions with strong ethical codes. The investigation revealed conduct inconsistent with university policies, though specific details of the hazing were not extensively publicized.
Baylor’s broader “cultural and oversight challenges,” as evidenced by its past Title IX scandals, illustrate how institutional failures in one area can make a campus more vulnerable in others. These past issues led to significant external scrutiny and reforms, setting a precedent for how the university responds to serious allegations of student misconduct and safety breaches.

How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed:
For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families pursuing a hazing claim against Baylor or its student organizations, cases would typically be filed in McLennan County courts. The Baylor Police Department would handle campus incidents, while the Waco Police Department might be involved in off-campus events. As a private university, Baylor does not enjoy sovereign immunity, which can simplify legal proceedings against the institution itself compared to public universities. However, like SMU, Baylor has considerable legal resources. Litigation would aim to uncover internal investigations, past disciplinary records, and communications regarding hazing and institutional oversight, especially in light of the university’s past struggles with accountability.

What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do:

Scrutinize all group activities: New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) parents should discuss hazing risks not just in Greek life, but also in athletic teams, religious organizations, and other clubs.
Be aware of Baylor’s reform efforts: Given its past Title IX challenges, Baylor has implemented numerous reforms. Parents should understand how these new reporting and accountability mechanisms function and whether they are effective in practice for hazing incidents.
Seek external legal advice: If hazing occurs, contacting an attorney can help navigate Baylor’s internal reporting processes and assess whether a civil claim is viable, free from the institution’s internal biases or public relations concerns.
Prioritize documentation: Maintain meticulous records of any hazing incidents, injuries, or communications. This is crucial for any potential legal action, particularly given the sensitive nature of allegations at a faith-based institution.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For families in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York), understanding the broad histories of national Greek organizations is as crucial as knowing local campus policies. The reality is that many alleged “local traditions” are often echoes of hazing patterns that have caused harm and death across chapters nationwide, setting a precedent that impacts the risk and liability profile of chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor.

Why National Histories Matter

The vast majority of fraternities and sororities at Texas universities, including those in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York), are chapters of national or international organizations. These national bodies typically develop comprehensive policies and risk management guidelines. However, these guidelines often exist precisely because the national organization has a history of member deaths, severe injuries, or high-profile lawsuits due to hazing elsewhere.

When a Texas chapter repeats the same hazing “script” that led to a death at a Big Ten school, a major injury on a California campus, or a multi-million-dollar lawsuit in Florida, it significantly impacts the legal landscape. Such a pattern can establish foreseeability against the national organization, indicating that they knew or should have known such dangers existed within their system. This knowledge can then be used to argue negligence or gross negligence, potentially increasing their liability in civil actions brought by affected families. National headquarters receive dues, provide guidance, and are responsible for overseeing their chapters; their failure to prevent foreseeable harm can make them deeply accountable.

Organization Mapping

While we cannot list every Greek organization on every Texas campus, some national organizations have a documented history of hazing incidents that parents in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) should be aware of:

Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has been linked to numerous severe hazing incidents and deaths nationally. The tragic death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021, where he was forced to consume a bottle of liquor, led to an almost $11 million settlement and multiple criminal convictions. Another case involved David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University in 2012, where alcohol poisoning during a hazing event resulted in a $14 million settlement for his family. These cases highlight a national pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing within Pi Kappa Alpha.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): Often dubbed “America’s deadliest fraternity” by some media outlets, SAE has a long history of hazing-related fatalities and severe injuries. At Texas A&M University (around 2021), two pledges alleged they suffered severe chemical burns after industrial cleaner and eggs were poured on them during hazing, leading to a lawsuit. A 2024 hazing incident at the University of Texas at Austin involved an Australian exchange student who suffered extensive injuries including broken bones and dislocated ligaments after an alleged assault during a party. Nationally, numerous alcohol-related deaths have prompted SAE to publicly announce changes to its pledging process. This demonstrates a recurring pattern of risk, not just at Texas chapters but across colleges with SAE chapters.
Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity gained national attention after the death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017 due to alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” hazing ritual. This led to his family receiving a $6.1 million verdict in a civil lawsuit and the passage of the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing law in Louisiana. The pattern of severe alcohol hazing highlights a systemic issue within the organization.
Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): This national fraternity has faced scrutiny following incidents such as the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017 from alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night.” Here in Texas, Attorney911 is currently litigating a $10 million lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi (among other defendants) following a severe hazing incident involving Leonel Bermudez at the University of Houston in 2025, where he suffered acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis from forced physical activity and degrading acts. These cases showcase a national pattern of physical and alcohol-related hazing.
Kappa Alpha Order: This fraternity has been involved in multiple hazing incidents, including suspensions at chapters at Southern Methodist University (SMU). The SMU chapter was temporarily suspended in 2017 for alleged paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation. Nationally, there have been other documented cases of hazing involving physical abuse and degrading behavior tied to “traditional” initiation practices.
Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI): FIJI faced nationwide scrutiny following the tragic permanent brain damage suffered by pledge Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri in 2021 due to forced alcohol consumption. The Santulli family settled with 22 defendants, including the national fraternity, for multi-million-dollar, though confidential, amounts. Closer to home, at Texas A&M University in 2018, Joseph Little died during hazing activities, an incident found by administrators to be hazing acts. The chapter at A&M also had a death in 1997 involving an asthma attack during pledging. This demonstrates a national and local pattern of severe hazing.
Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): This fraternity has faced significant hazing allegations, including a recent $10 million+ settlement with a victim at the College of Charleston in 2024 for alleged physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment. At the University of Texas at Austin, a 2024 incident involving a pledge who died by suicide is now the subject of civil litigation by his parents, who blame hazing for depression. This highlights a concerning pattern of physical, psychological, and alcohol-related hazing, with severe consequences.

Complete New York Greek Organization Directory

Attorney911 tracks every IRS-registered fraternity and sorority in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York):

SIGMA PSI ZETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 22-3665378 | ALBANY, NY
KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY | EIN: 51-0145104 | AMHERST, NY
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 82-2761053 | BINGHAMTON, NY
SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 81-1900063 | BINGHAMTON, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 92-0777721 | BINGHAMTON, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 92-0320220 | BRONX, NY
ZETA PHI ALPHA SORORITY INC | EIN: 99-4735384 | BRONX, NY
DELTA ALPHA ZETA CHAPTER ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 52-1345580 | BROOKLYN, NY
MALIKA KAMBE UMFAZI SORORITY INC | EIN: 16-1509776 | BROOKLYN, NY
NATIONAL OF NU OMEGA CHI INC | EIN: 93-1736055 | BROOKLYN, NY
OMEGA PSI PHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 27-4633925 | BROOKLYN, NY
PHI IOTA ALPHA FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 20-0319711 | BROOKLYN, NY
ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 73-1625485 | BROOKLYN, NY
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 83-1418281 | BUFFALO, NY
IOTA XI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF ALPHA TAU OMEGA INC | EIN: 92-1545730 | BUFFALO, NY
PHI OMEGA CHAPTER-OMEGA PSI PHI FRATERNITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 27-4473620 | BUFFALO, NY
PHI SIGMA RHO NATIONAL SORORITY | EIN: 82-2171896 | BUFFALO, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 92-3012612 | BUFFALO, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 93-1848489 | DEER PARK, NY
ALPHA EPSILON PHI SORORITY | EIN: 15-0533613 | EAST SYRACUSE, NY
ACACIA FRATERNITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 16-6049610 | FAYETTEVILLE, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 88-4022749 | FLUSHING, NY
NU ALPHA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 88-2996990 | FOREST HILLS, NY
NY IOTA CHAPTER OF SIGMA PHI EPSILON FRATERNITY | EIN: 52-1234996 | FREDONIA, NY
GAMMA CHI CHAPTER OF SIGMA DELTA TAU | EIN: 16-1398320 | GENESEO, NY
DELTA CHI FRATERNITY GENEVA ALUMNI CHAP | EIN: 16-0837748 | GENEVA, NY
PHI BETA PSI SORORITY | EIN: 16-6061214 | GENEVA, NY
BETA PSI FOUNDATION | EIN: 26-4133605 | GLENMONT, NY
ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 52-2262099 | GREAT NECK, NY
THETA CHI – GAMMA PI ALUMNI CORPORATION | EIN: 88-2848807 | HALFMOON, NY
MU BETA PSI NATIONAL HONORARY MUSICAL FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 80-0257024 | HARRISON, NY
THETA UPSILON SIGMA FOUNDATION | EIN: 86-3587108 | HENRIETTA, NY
AKWESASNE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ST REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE | EIN: 16-1607731 | HOGANSBURG, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0929275 | ICTHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0481874 | ITCHACA, NY
508 THURSTON CORP | EIN: 16-0916142 | ITHACA, NY
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 16-6053142 | ITHACA, NY
CAMPUS CLUB OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY | EIN: 16-6053649 | ITHACA, NY
CORNELL CORPORATION OF BETA THETA PI | EIN: 51-0225722 | ITHACA, NY
GAMMA THETA PROPERTY ASSOCIATION | EIN: 47-4940132 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0493289 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0491575 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0492036 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0498134 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0464264 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0495198 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0497658 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0482847 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 61-1606297 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0471958 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 61-1705869 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0490338 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0491455 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 61-1604245 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0484509 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 51-0602751 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-1122808 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-1062275 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-5763637 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-1789504 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-1661544 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-1559809 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-3743568 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-3586336 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-3506745 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-5509277 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-4619618 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-3847926 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-1893055 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-4755962 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-4627295 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-4570309 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-4998381 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-4990473 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-4910308 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-2835117 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-2817337 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-2343184 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-4282800 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-4125499 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 47-3761686 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0498154 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 87-4583780 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 86-1636333 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 86-1442178 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0520793 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0519292 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0511992 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 83-3815685 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 82-2764955 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 82-2752255 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 82-2592821 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 83-1852588 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 83-1235562 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 83-0833392 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 92-3498928 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0932437 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0879487 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 01-0933016 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 94-3487145 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 92-3935883 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0857317 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0523205 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0522428 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0522377 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0750025 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0604917 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 90-0526119 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0535193 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0504378 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0504361 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0846325 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0554517 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0552685 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0504088 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0499577 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0499419 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0498626 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0500557 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0500027 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 80-0499901 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 82-2349269 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 82-2243299 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 81-3696241 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 82-2541666 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 82-2465662 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 82-2375916 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 81-3661681 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 81-2809708 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 81-1087969 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 81-1050356 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 81-3546913 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 81-3358606 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 81-3280480 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-3504391 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1027052 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0993833 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0993630 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1056621 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1047163 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1031443 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0960137 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0924686 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0918865 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0977375 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0976775 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0970494 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1066544 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1151901 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1151576 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1141691 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1177592 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1177524 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1159433 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1094910 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1087089 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1076284 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1132625 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1113973 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1103847 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0917912 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0768141 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0748488 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0742254 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0803611 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0788178 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0786492 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 22-3530740 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 01-0935014 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 01-0934073 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0731301 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0713120 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0647651 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0810252 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0885382 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0858716 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0858261 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0909706 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0891768 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0885419 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0839950 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0834437 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0832574 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0849617 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0846075 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-0843015 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1197278 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 45-2407514 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 38-3805270 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 45-3028396 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 45-4708751 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 45-4288177 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 32-0332077 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 30-0606742 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 35-2372170 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 36-4740106 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 36-4660344 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-1920442 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-1845558 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-2403129 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-3475856 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-3095296 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-0597199 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 45-5271920 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-0707546 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-0848406 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 46-0717220 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 30-0591805 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-2870631 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-2013429 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-3093016 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-3350996 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-3260291 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1875241 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1294251 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1226659 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-2011186 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-1888063 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 30-0587114 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 27-4206330 | ITHACA, NY
LAMBDA THETA ALPHA | EIN: 30-0587776 | ITHACA, NY
PI KAPPA LAMBDA – ALPHA NU CHAPTER | EIN: 16-6090202 | ITHACA, NY
SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 20-8718395 | ITHACA, NY
SIGMA NU FRATERNITY | EIN: 15-0537031 | ITHACA, NY
ZETA PSI FRATERNITY OF NORTH AMERICA | EIN: 15-0532658 | ITHACA, NY
ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY | EIN: 56-2662501 | JAMAICA, NY
GAMMA THETA UPSILON | EIN: 37-6048251 | JAMESVILLE, NY
STUDENT PLATFORM FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT | EIN: 27-0892940 | KEW GARDENS, NY
PSI OF ZETA PSI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION | EIN: 54-2189053 | LANSING, NY
DELTA KAPPA KAPPA FRATERNITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION | EIN: 11-3835852 | NEW CITY, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 92-0337955 | NEW PALTZ, NY
ALPHA PHI ALPHA ALPHA GAMMA LAMBDA CHAPTER INC | EIN: 13-3414357 | NEW YORK, NY
ALPHA UPSILON ZETA HOUSING CORPORATION | EIN: 81-1390772 | NEW YORK, NY
BRONX NY ALUMNI KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY | EIN: 26-4307506 | NEW YORK, NY
CHI ALPHA EPSILON NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY INC | EIN: 45-3986410 | NEW YORK, NY
HELLENIC UNIVERSITY CLUB OF NEW YORK INC | EIN: 13-6138521 | NEW YORK, NY
KAPPA PHI LAMBDA SORORITY INC | EIN: 38-3641890 | NEW YORK, NY
LEXLEAD | EIN: 27-3682187 | NEW YORK, NY
MAARIFA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED | EIN: 93-1465810 | NEW YORK, NY
OMICRON FOUNDATION INC | EIN: 16-1279916 | NEW YORK, NY
PHI CHI CHAPTER ALUMNI CLUB OF NEW YORK INC | EIN: 61-1429691 | NEW YORK, NY
PI DELTA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 16-1483111 | NEW YORK, NY
SIGMA BETA RHO FRATERNITY | EIN: 11-3514174 | NEW YORK, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 92-0494435 | NEW YORK, NY
SIGMA LAMBDA UPSILON SENORITAS LATINAS UNIDAS SORORITY INC | EIN: 13-3813250 | NEW YORK, NY
SIGMA PHI RHO FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 71-0901399 | NEW YORK, NY
TAU CHAPTER SIGMA LAMBDA NU INC | EIN: 20-5811000 | NEWBURGH, NY
UPSILON SIGMA PHI NORTH AMERICA | EIN: 35-2098658 | NEWBURGH, NY
GRAND CHAPTER OMEGA GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 06-0982007 | OAK BEACH, NY
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 47-4074546 | ONEONTA, NY
KAPPA BETA GAMMA INTERNATIONAL INC | EIN: 83-3733599 | ONEONTA, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 83-1404549 | ONEONTA, NY
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 46-4625307 | ONEONTE, NY
GAMMA KAPPA CHAPTER OF SIGMA DELTA TAU | EIN: 16-1385997 | OSWEGO, NY
SIGMA TAU CHI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION | EIN: 11-3495062 | OSWEGO, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 92-3034697 | PLAINVIEW, NY
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 47-4049989 | PLATTSBURGH, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 88-4300860 | PLATTSBURGH, NY
SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY INC DBA KAPPA XI | EIN: 31-1321568 | PORT JEFF STA, NY
CLARKSON CHAPTER OF DELTA UPSILON INTERNATIONAL FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 46-3870175 | POTSDAM, NY
BETA PI OF SIGMA DELTA TAU | EIN: 99-1417891 | ROCHESTER, NY
THETA OMEGA SIGMA CHAPTER OF SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 91-2009219 | ROCHESTER, NY
THETA OMICRON CHAPTER OF OMEGA PSI PHI FATERNITY INC | EIN: 16-6073764 | ROCHESTER, NY
DELTA OF TAU EPSILON PHI ALUMNI INC | EIN: 16-1443859 | SAVANNAH, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 92-3714428 | SAYVILLE, NY
SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 92-1360169 | SCHENECTADY, NY
THETA NU XI MULTICULTURAL SORORITY INC | EIN: 30-0059380 | STATEN ISLAND, NY
PI KAPPA PHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 47-2201556 | STONY BROOK, NY
ALPHA OMEGA EPSILON | EIN: 16-1500089 | SYRACUSE, NY
CENTRAL AND EASTERN NEW YORK COOPERATIVE TRUST | EIN: 16-1556922 | SYRACUSE, NY
SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY | EIN: 16-1376892 | SYRACUSE, NY
ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY | EIN: 52-1345910 | SYRACUSE, NY
ALPHA OMEGA EPSILON INTEREST GROUP | EIN: 84-1678655 | TROY, NY
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 81-1619138 | TROY, NY
ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 81-1618516 | TROY, NY
TAU EPSILON PHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 23-2212199 | TROY, NY
TAU EPSILON PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 22-6108305 | TROY, NY
ALPHA OMEGA EPSILON PSI CHAPTER | EIN: 01-0961234 | VESTAL, NY
GAMMA OMEGA OF SIGMA DELTA TAU | EIN: 88-4340051 | W HEMPSTEAD, NY
HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 94-3305517 | WEST POINT, NY
PHI NU CHAPTER OF OMEGA PSI PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 86-1387519 | WHITE PLAINS, NY

Complete New York University Directory

Attorney911 tracks every higher education institution in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York). For reference:

Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences | Albany, Albany County | Private Non-Profit
Albany Law School | Albany, Albany County | Private Non-Profit
Albany Medical College | Albany, Albany County | Private Non-Profit
Bryant & Stratton College-Albany | Albany, Albany County | Private Non-Profit
Excelsior University | Albany, Albany County | Private Non-Profit
Maria College of Albany | Albany, Albany County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY at Albany | Albany, Albany County | Public University
SUNY-System Office | Albany, Albany County | Public University
The College of Saint Rose | Albany, Albany County | Private Non-Profit
Alfred University | Alfred, Allegany County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY College of Technology at Alfred | Alfred, Allegany County | Public University
Daemen University | Amherst, Erie County | Private Non-Profit
Bard College | Annandale-On-Hudson, Dutchess County | Private Non-Profit
Wells College | Aurora, Cayuga County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY Brockport | Brockport, Monroe County | Public University
Albert Einstein College of Medicine | Bronx, Bronx County | Private Non-Profit
College of Mount Saint Vincent | Bronx, Bronx County | Private Non-Profit
CUNY Lehman College | Bronx, Bronx County | Public University
Fordham University | Bronx, Bronx County | Private Non-Profit
Monroe College | Bronx, Bronx County | Private For-Profit
Sarah Lawrence College | Bronxville, Westchester County | Private Non-Profit
ASA College | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private For-Profit
Associated Beth Rivkah Schools | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Bet Medrash Gadol Ateret Torah | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Beth Hamedrash Shaarei Yosher Institute | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Brooklyn Law School | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Central Yeshiva Tomchei Tmimim Lubavitz | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Congregation Talmidei Mesivta Tiferes Shmiel Aleksander | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
CUNY Brooklyn College | Brooklyn, Kings County | Public University
CUNY Medgar Evers College | Brooklyn, Kings County | Public University
CUNY New York City College of Technology | Brooklyn, Kings County | Public University
Machzikei Hadath Rabbinical College | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Mesivta of Eastern Parkway-Yeshiva Zichron Meilech | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Mesivta Torah Vodaath Rabbinical Seminary | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Mirrer Yeshiva Cent Institute | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Pratt Institute-Main | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Rabbinical Academy Mesivta Rabbi Chaim Berlin | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Rabbinical College Bobover Yeshiva Bnei Zion | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Rabbinical College of Ohr Shimon Yisroel | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Rabbinical College Ohr Yisroel | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
St. Francis College | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
St. Joseph’s University-New York | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University | Brooklyn, Kings County | Public University
Talmudical Seminary of Bobov | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Talmudical Seminary Oholei Torah | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
United Talmudical Seminary | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Derech Chaim | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Gedolah Imrei Yosef D’spinka | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Karlin Stolin | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva of Machzikai Hadas | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Ohr Yisrael | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Sholom Shachna | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Yesoda Hatorah Vetz Chaim | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshivas Novominsk | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshivat Hechal Shemuel | Brooklyn, Kings County | Private Non-Profit
Long Island University | Brookville, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
Bryant & Stratton College-Buffalo | Buffalo, Erie County | Private Non-Profit
Canisius College | Buffalo, Erie County | Private Non-Profit
D’Youville University | Buffalo, Erie County | Private Non-Profit
Medaille University | Buffalo, Erie County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY Buffalo State University | Buffalo, Erie County | Public University
Trocaire College | Buffalo, Erie County | Private Non-Profit
University at Buffalo | Buffalo, Erie County | Public University
Villa Maria College | Buffalo, Erie County | Private Non-Profit
St Lawrence University | Canton, St. Lawrence County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY College of Technology at Canton | Canton, St. Lawrence County | Public University
Cazenovia College | Cazenovia, Madison County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva of Nitra Rabbinical College | Chester, Orange County | Private Non-Profit
Bais Binyomin Academy | Chestnut Ridge, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Hamilton College | Clinton, Oneida County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill | Cobleskill, Schoharie County | Public University
SUNY Cortland | Cortland, Cortland County | Public University
SUNY College of Technology at Delhi | Delhi, Delaware County | Public University
Five Towns College | Dix Hills, Suffolk County | Private For-Profit
Mercy College | Dobbs Ferry, Westchester County | Private Non-Profit
Elmira College | Elmira, Chemung County | Private Non-Profit
Beis Medrash Heichal Dovid | Far Rockaway, Queens County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva of Far Rockaway Derech Ayson Rabbinical Seminary | Far Rockaway, Queens County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Zichron Aryeh | Far Rockaway, Queens County | Private Non-Profit
Farmingdale State College | Farmingdale, Suffolk County | Public University
Rabbinical Seminary of America | Flushing, Queens County | Private Non-Profit
Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology | Flushing, Queens County | Private Non-Profit
Plaza College | Forest Hills, Queens County | Private For-Profit
SUNY at Fredonia | Fredonia, Chautauqua County | Public University
Adelphi University | Garden City, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY College at Geneseo | Geneseo, Livingston County | Public University
Hobart William Smith Colleges | Geneva, Ontario County | Private Non-Profit
Webb Institute | Glen Cove, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva of Ocean | Greenfield Park, Ulster County | Private Non-Profit
Hilbert College | Hamburg, Erie County | Private Non-Profit
Colgate University | Hamilton, Madison County | Private Non-Profit
Hofstra University | Hempstead, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
Houghton University | Houghton, Allegany County | Private Non-Profit
Culinary Institute of America | Hyde Park, Dutchess County | Private Non-Profit
Cornell University | Ithaca, Tompkins County | Private Non-Profit
Ithaca College | Ithaca, Tompkins County | Private Non-Profit
CUNY York College | Jamaica, Queens County | Public University
Jamestown Business College | Jamestown, Chautauqua County | Private For-Profit
Keuka College | Keuka Park, Yates County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah | Kew Gardens, Queens County | Private Non-Profit
United States Merchant Marine Academy | Kings Point, Nassau County | Public University
Sh’or Yoshuv Rabbinical College | Lawrence, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
Elim Bible Institute and College | Lima, Livingston County | Private Non-Profit
Bryant & Stratton College-Syracuse North | Liverpool, Onondaga County | Private Non-Profit
Rabbinical College of Long Island | Long Beach, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
CUNY School of Law | Long Island City, Queens County | Public University
Siena College | Loudonville, Albany County | Private Non-Profit
Elmezzi Graduate School of Molecular Medicine | Manhasset, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
New York College of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Mineola, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel | Monroe, Orange County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshivas Maharit D’Satmar | Monroe, Orange County | Private Non-Profit
Bais Binyomin Academy | Monsey, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Bais Medrash Elyon | Monsey, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Beth Medrash Meor Yitzchok | Monsey, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Mechon L’hoyroa | Monsey, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Rabbinical College Beth Shraga | Monsey, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva D’monsey Rabbinical College | Monsey, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Gedolah Kesser Torah | Monsey, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim | Monsey, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshivath Viznitz | Monsey, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY Morrisville | Morrisville, Madison County | Public University
State University of New York at New Paltz | New Paltz, Ulster County | Public University
Iona University | New Rochelle, Westchester County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva Ohr Naftoli | New Windsor, Orange County | Private Non-Profit
Alliance University | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
American Musical and Dramatic Academy | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Bank Street College of Education | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Barnard College | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Berkeley College-New York | New York, New York County | Private For-Profit
Boricua College | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Columbia University in the City of New York | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
CUNY Bernard M Baruch College | New York, New York County | Public University
CUNY City College | New York, New York County | Public University
CUNY Graduate School and University Center | New York, New York County | Public University
CUNY Hunter College | New York, New York County | Public University
CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice | New York, New York County | Public University
CUNY System Office | New York, New York County | Public University
DeVry College of New York | New York, New York County | Private For-Profit
Fashion Institute of Technology | New York, New York County | Public University
Glasgow Caledonian New York College | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Helene Fuld College of Nursing | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Jewish Theological Seminary of America | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
LIM College | New York, New York County | Private For-Profit
Manhattan School of Music | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Marymount Manhattan College | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Mesivtha Tifereth Jerusalem of America | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Metropolitan College of New York | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
New York Academy of Art | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
New York College of Podiatric Medicine | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
New York Law School | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
New York School of Interior Design | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
New York Theological Seminary | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
New York University | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Pace University | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Pacific College of Health and Science | New York, New York County | Private For-Profit
Phillips School of Nursing at Mount Sinai Beth Israel | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Relay Graduate School of Education | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
School of Visual Arts | New York, New York County | Private For-Profit
Sotheby’s Institute of Art-NY | New York, New York County | Private For-Profit
SUNY College of Optometry | New York, New York County | Public University
Teachers College at Columbia University | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
The General Theological Seminary | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
The Juilliard School | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
The King’s College | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
The New School | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
The Rockefeller University | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Touro University | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Unification Theological Seminary | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Weill Medical College of Cornell University | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva University | New York, New York County | Private Non-Profit
Mount Saint Mary College | Newburgh, Orange County | Private Non-Profit
Niagara University | Niagara University, Niagara County | Private Non-Profit
New York Institute of Technology | Old Westbury, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY College at Old Westbury | Old Westbury, Nassau County | Public University
Hartwick College | Oneonta, Otsego County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY Oneonta | Oneonta, Otsego County | Public University
Dominican University New York | Orangeburg, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Bryant & Stratton College-Online | Orchard Park, Erie County | Private Non-Profit
Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary | Ossining, Westchester County | Private Non-Profit
State University of New York at Oswego | Oswego, Oswego County | Public University
Paul Smiths College of Arts and Science | Paul Smiths, Franklin County | Private Non-Profit
Ohr Hameir Theological Seminary | Peekskill, Westchester County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY College at Plattsburgh | Plattsburgh, Clinton County | Public University
Clarkson University | Potsdam, St. Lawrence County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY College at Potsdam | Potsdam, St. Lawrence County | Public University
Davis College | Pottersville, Broome County | Private Non-Profit
Marist College | Poughkeepsie, Dutchess County | Private Non-Profit
Vassar College | Poughkeepsie, Dutchess County | Private Non-Profit
Manhattanville College | Purchase, Westchester County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY at Purchase College | Purchase, Westchester County | Public University
CUNY Queens College | Queens, Queens County | Public University
St. John’s University-New York | Queens, Queens County | Private Non-Profit
Manhattan College | Riverdale, Bronx County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshiva of the Telshe Alumni | Riverdale, Bronx County | Private Non-Profit
Bryant & Stratton College-Greece | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
Nazareth College | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
Northeastern Seminary | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
Roberts Wesleyan University | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
Rochester Institute of Technology | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
St Bernard’s School of Theology and Ministry | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
St. John Fisher University | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
Talmudical Institute of Upstate New York | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
University of Rochester | Rochester, Monroe County | Private Non-Profit
Molloy College | Rockville Centre, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
St Bonaventure University | Saint Bonaventure, Cattaraugus County | Private Non-Profit
Empire State University | Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County | Public University
Skidmore College | Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County | Private Non-Profit
Union College | Schenectady, Schenectady County | Private Non-Profit
Northeast College of Health Sciences | Seneca Falls, Seneca County | Private Non-Profit
Yeshivath Zichron Moshe | South Fallsburg, Sullivan County | Private Non-Profit
St. Thomas Aquinas College | Sparkill, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
Be’er Yaakov Talmudic Seminary | Spring Valley, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
College of Staten Island CUNY | Staten Island, Richmond County | Public University
Torah Temimah Talmudical Seminary | Staten Island, Richmond County | Private Non-Profit
Wagner College | Staten Island, Richmond County | Private Non-Profit
Stony Brook University | Stony Brook, Suffolk County | Public University
Yeshiva Shaarei Torah of Rockland | Suffern, Rockland County | Private Non-Profit
New York College of Health Professions | Syosset, Nassau County | Private Non-Profit
Le Moyne College | Syracuse, Onondaga County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry | Syracuse, Onondaga County | Public University
Syracuse University | Syracuse, Onondaga County | Private Non-Profit
Upstate Medical University | Syracuse, Onondaga County | Public University
SUNY Maritime College | Throggs Neck, Bronx County | Public University
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | Troy, Rensselaer County | Private Non-Profit
Russell Sage College | Troy, Rensselaer County | Private Non-Profit
SUNY Polytechnic Institute | Utica, Oneida County | Public University
Utica University | Utica, Oneida County | Private Non-Profit
New York Medical College | Valhalla, Westchester County | Private Non-Profit
Binghamton University | Vestal, Broome County | Public University
United States Military Academy | West Point, Orange County | Public University
The College of Westchester | White Plains, Westchester County | Private For-Profit
Academy for Jewish Religion | Yonkers, Westchester County | Private Non-Profit
Saint Vladimirs Orthodox Theological Seminary | Yonkers, Westchester County | Private Non-Profit

6.3 Tie Back to Legal Strategy

The documented national histories of these organizations are not just cautionary tales; they are crucial legal tools. When a chapter at a Texas university engages in hazing that mirrors past incidents elsewhere, it helps establish a pattern of misconduct that the national organization should have foreseen and prevented.

In civil litigation, this “pattern evidence” can be used to argue that the national organization:

Had knowledge of previous incidents but failed to implement effective preventative measures.
Negligently supervised its local chapters, despite being aware of recurring risks.
Exhibited gross negligence or deliberate indifference to the safety of new members.

This evidence can significantly strengthen a plaintiff’s case, increasing settlement leverage, impacting insurance coverage disputes, and supporting claims for punitive damages, which are designed to punish egregious conduct and deter future harm. It transforms a seemingly isolated local incident into part of a broader, actionable systemic failure.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Successfully pursuing a hazing case requires a thorough, strategic approach, grounded in the meticulous collection of evidence and a deep understanding of the full scope of damages. For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families seeking justice, Attorney911 employs a sophisticated investigative and legal strategy designed to hold all responsible parties accountable.

Evidence

Modern hazing cases are often won or lost based on the quality and volume of evidence, much of which is now digital. Preserving this evidence immediately is paramount.

Digital Communications: In today’s world, group chats and direct messages (DMs) are almost always the richest source of evidence. Platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Snapchat, and even fraternity-specific apps are where hazing is often planned, ordered, and documented. These communications can reveal planning, intent, coercion, participants, and even cover-up attempts. It is crucial to screenshot these messages immediately, including sender names, timestamps, and sufficient context, and back them up to multiple secure locations. Even deleted messages can sometimes be recovered through digital forensic experts.
Photos & Videos: Visual evidence is incredibly powerful. This includes:
- Content filmed by members during hazing events (especially if shared in group chats or on social media).
- Photos or videos of injuries, humiliating acts, or forced drinking.
- Security camera footage from houses, venues, or even Ring/doorbell cameras can capture crucial moments before or after an incident.
Internal Organization Documents: These can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “traditions” lists, and emails or texts from officers giving instructions related to new members. National organization policies and risk management training materials, often obtained through subpoenas, can demonstrate what the organizations knew—or should have known—about hazing risks.
University Records: Universities maintain records that can be vital. These include:
- Prior disciplinary actions against the same chapter for hazing or related violations.
- Incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices.
- Clery Act reports and similar disclosures that provide
- Internal emails among administrators about the organization.
Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical documentation is essential to prove physical and mental harm. This includes:
- Emergency room reports, ambulance records, and hospitalization notes.
- Lab results (e.g., blood alcohol levels, toxicology screenings, kidney function tests for rhabdomyolysis).
- Imaging (X-rays, CT scans, MRIs) for physical injuries.
- Follow-up care records, therapy notes, and psychological evaluations diagnosing conditions like PTSD, depression, or anxiety stemming from the hazing. Telling medical providers the truth about hazing ensures it is documented.
Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts provide critical firsthand information. This includes current and former pledges, active members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, trainers, and any bystanders who observed the hazing. Former members who quit or were expelled, or those feeling guilt for past involvement, can often provide invaluable testimony.

Damages

The goal of civil litigation is to compensate the victim for the full extent of their losses, often categorized into economic and non-economic damages.

Economic Damages: These are quantifiable financial losses:
- Medical Bills & Future Care: Covering past emergency care, hospitalizations, surgeries, ongoing treatments, physical therapy, medications, and crucially, long-term care plans for catastrophic injuries like brain damage or organ failure.
- Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: Compensating for missed semesters, delayed graduation, lost scholarships, and any reduction in future earning capacity due to permanent injuries or psychological trauma.
Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for subjective, non-financial harms:
- Physical Pain & Suffering: Covering the pain directly caused by injuries and any ongoing pain from permanent conditions.
- Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm: Addressing conditions like PTSD, depression, anxiety, humiliation, and the profound trauma and fear experienced by the victim.
- Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Compensating for the inability to participate in hobbies, social activities, or pursue a fulfilling life due to permanent injury or psychological scarring.
- Wrongful Death Damages (for families): In cases of fatality, families can recover for funeral costs, loss of financial support from the deceased, and the immense grief, loss of companionship, and emotional suffering they endure.
Punitive Damages: In cases of egregious negligence, reckless disregard for safety, or malicious intent, courts may award punitive damages. These are designed not to compensate the victim, but to punish the defendants and deter similar conduct in the future.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing cases often involve multiple defendants, each with their own unique legal and financial implications.

National fraternities/sororities and universities typically carry extensive insurance policies to cover liability claims. However, these insurers frequently dispute coverage, arguing that hazing, as an “intentional act” or “criminal act,” is excluded from their policies.
An experienced hazing attorney understands how to identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, including general liability, umbrella policies, and even homeowners’ policies of individual perpetrators. We strategically argue that while the hazing act itself might be intentional, the organization’s or university’s negligent supervision or failure to prevent the known risk of hazing is a covered event. This expertise in navigating complex insurance coverage disputes is critical to securing fair compensation.

Practical Guides & FAQs

When hazing impacts a family in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York), whether at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, immediate and informed action is crucial. This section provides practical guidance for parents, students, and witnesses, empowering them to respond effectively and protect their rights.

For Parents

For families in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York), recognizing the subtle signs of hazing can be the first, most critical step in protecting their child.

Warning Signs of Hazing:

Unexplained injuries: Look for bruises, burns, sprains, or sudden “accidents” that don’t quite add up. Your child might offer vague or inconsistent explanations.
Extreme fatigue and sleep deprivation: Constant late nights, early mornings, or an inability to sleep soundly, directly impacting their energy levels and academic performance.
Drastic changes in mood or behavior: Increased anxiety, irritability, depression, withdrawal from former friends, sudden secrecy about activities, or a defensive stance when asked about their organization.
Constant phone dependency: An unhealthy attachment to their phone, constantly checking group chats, or fear of missing “mandatory” communications from the group.
Financial strain: Unexpected demands for money, unexplained fines, or expenses to buy things for older members.

How to talk to your child:

Choose the right time and place: A quiet, private setting where your child feels safe to open up.
Lead with empathy, not judgment: Start by expressing concern, not accusation. Phrases like, “I’ve noticed you seem tired, is everything okay?” can be more effective than, “Are you being hazed?”
Emphasize safety over status: Reassure them that their well-being is your top priority, far above any group affiliation. Let them know you will support them regardless of their choices.
Listen actively: Avoid interrupting or offering immediate solutions. Their story is the most important thing.
Inform them of their rights: Let them know that hazing is illegal, and consent is not a defense.

If your child is hurt:

Seek medical attention immediately: Prioritize their physical and mental health. Ensure that medical professionals are informed that hazing caused the injuries to ensure proper documentation.
Document everything: Take clear photos of any injuries (with dates), screenshot relevant texts or group chats on their phone, and write down everything your child tells you, including dates, times, and names.
Save relevant items: Preserve any clothing, receipts, or objects associated with the hazing.

Dealing with the university:

Document every communication: Keep a detailed log of all interactions with university administrators, including who you spoke to, when, and what was discussed.
Ask direct questions: Inquire about the university’s knowledge of prior incidents involving the same organization and what specific actions were taken.
Do NOT sign anything without counsel: Do not sign any “release” or “resolution” forms from the university without first consulting an attorney. These forms can waive crucial rights.

When to talk to a lawyer:

If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm.
If you feel the university or organization is minimizing the incident or attempting a cover-up.
If you are unsure of your rights or need guidance on navigating complex university and legal systems.

For Students / Pledges

If you’re a student in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) considering joining a fraternity, sorority, club, or team, or if you’re a new member currently experiencing concerning activities, this section is for you.

Is this hazing or just tradition? Decision Guide:
Ask yourself these critical questions:

Am I being forced or pressured to do something I don’t want to do?
Would I do this if I had a real choice, free from social consequences or fear of being “cut”?
Is this activity dangerous, degrading, or illegal?
Would my university or parents approve if they knew exactly what was happening?
Are older members making me do things they don’t have to do themselves?
Is this “tradition” truly about initiation, or is it mostly for the entertainment of older members?
Am I being told to keep secrets, lie, or hide this from outsiders?
If you answered YES to any of these, it’s likely hazing. Your feelings of discomfort, fear, or humiliation are valid indicators.

Why “consent” isn’t the end of the story:
Despite what older members might say, your “consent” to hazing is often not legally valid. The law recognizes the immense power dynamics and peer pressure in these groups. The desire to belong, fear of exclusion, and implicit threats create a coercive environment where true voluntary consent is impossible. Hazing laws are designed to protect you from these exact situations, even if you “agree” to participate.

Exiting and reporting safely:

Immense danger: If you are in immediate physical danger (extreme intoxication, unconsciousness, severe injury, sexual assault), call 911 immediately. Get to a safe location (your dorm, a trusted friend’s home, a public area). You will not get in trouble for calling for help in a medical emergency under Texas’s Good Samaritan law.
Quitting: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time. You do not need “permission.” If you experience retaliation or threats for leaving, document everything and report it to campus authorities and, if appropriate, local law enforcement.
Reporting options: You can report hazing anonymously through campus hotlines, online forms, or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE). You can also speak confidentially with a trusted professor, counselor, or attorney about your concerns.

Good-faith reporting and amnesty:
Texas law and many university policies provide immunity or leniency for students who report hazing or call for help in an emergency, especially if alcohol or drug use was involved. This is designed to encourage students to prioritize safety without fear of personal repercussions.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you are a former member, actively involved, or a witness to hazing, your role in promoting accountability can be crucial.

Your testimony matters: Your experiences or observations can be invaluable in preventing future harm and holding individuals and institutions accountable. While it might be difficult to come forward, your perspective can provide crucial insights into how hazing operates.
Protection and legal advice: You may have your own legal concerns about past involvement or potential criminal exposure. It is highly advisable to seek independent legal counsel to understand your rights and obligations. An attorney can help you determine the best course of action while protecting your interests. Sometimes, cooperating with an investigation or providing testimony can be a path towards preventing future harm and even mitigating your own legal risks.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) families navigating a hazing incident, avoiding common missteps is as important as taking the right actions. These critical mistakes can severely undermine a potential legal claim. Attorney911’s video on client mistakes that can ruin your injury case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) provides further insight.

Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence:
- What Parents Think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
- Why It’s Wrong: Destroying evidence can look like a cover-up, potentially leading to criminal charges (like obstruction of justice) and making any civil case nearly impossible to prove.
- What to Do Instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing or compromising content. Screenshots of group chats, photos, or videos, and any physical evidence, are vital. Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains proper preservation techniques.
Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly:
- What Parents Think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
- Why It’s Wrong: This alerts the perpetrators and institution, giving them time to lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses.
- What to Do Instead: Document every detail privately, then consult with a lawyer before any confrontation. Your attorney can strategically manage all communications.
Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms:
- What Universities Do: They may pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements to quickly close an incident.
- Why It’s Wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue a civil lawsuit, and any internal “settlement” offered by the university is often far below the true value of your case.
- What to Do Instead: Absolutely do NOT sign anything from the university or an insurance company without having an attorney review it first.
Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer:
- What Families Think: “I want people to know what happened.”
- Why It’s Wrong: Anything posted online can be used against you by defense attorneys, creating inconsistencies that hurt credibility, or waiving legal privileges.
- What to Do Instead: Document all information privately. Let your lawyer control public statements to protect your family and your case.
Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting”:
- What Perpetrators Say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic; we just want to understand.”
- Why It’s Wrong: These meetings are often designed to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can be used against the victim in a legal proceeding.
- What to Do Instead: Once you’re considering legal action, all communications with the organization or its members should be managed or directly handled by your attorney.
Waiting “to See How the University Handles It”:
- What Universities Promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
- Why It’s Wrong: While an internal investigation can be helpful, it is primarily designed to protect the university. Crucial evidence can disappear, witnesses graduate or move away, the statute of limitations continues to run, and the university controls the narrative. This delay can irrevocably harm your legal options.
- What to Do Instead: Preserve evidence immediately and consult with a lawyer. The university’s process is separate from—and not a substitute for—real legal accountability.
Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer:
- What Adjusters Say: “We just need your statement to process the claim quickly.”
- Why It’s Wrong: Insurance adjusters are trained to minimize payouts. Your recorded statements can be used against you, and initial settlement offers are almost always lowball.
- What to Do Instead: Politely decline to speak with them and refer them to your attorney.

Short FAQ for New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) Families

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities in Texas, such as UH, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, benefit from sovereign immunity, meaning they generally cannot be sued unless specific exceptions apply. However, there are significant exceptions for gross negligence, willful misconduct, and violations of federal laws like Title IX. Private universities like SMU and Baylor have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its specific facts. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
It can be. While hazing is generally a Class B misdemeanor in Texas, it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals involved, including officers who fail to report hazing, can also face criminal charges.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and juries recognize that “agreement” given under peer pressure, within a power imbalance, or with fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
Generally, a hazing lawsuit in Texas must be filed within two years from the date of injury or death. However, this timeframe can be complex due to factors like the “discovery rule” (when the victim knew or should have known of the injury and its cause) or fraudulent concealment by perpetrators. Time is critical—evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and records are destroyed. Contact Attorney911 immediately to protect your rights. Our video, “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c), explains this crucial deadline.
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of the hazing does not eliminate liability for responsible parties. Universities and national fraternities/sororities can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and the foreseeability of hazing, even if it occurs at an off-campus private residence or venue. Many major hazing cases involving multi-million-dollar judgments have occurred entirely off-campus.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Many hazing cases resolve through settlement, which often includes confidentiality agreements to protect the victim’s privacy. While we prioritize protecting your family, seeking justice for severe hazing may require public action. Your family’s privacy concerns are always paramount, and we will discuss all options, including requests for sealed court records and confidential settlement terms.
“What types of damages can be recovered in a hazing lawsuit?”
Victims and families can pursue both economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages include past and future medical bills (including long-term care for severe injuries), lost income, educational expenses (e.g., tuition for missed semesters), and diminished earning capacity. Non-economic damages compensate for physical pain and suffering, emotional distress (PTSD, anxiety), humiliation, and loss of enjoyment of life. In wrongful death cases, families can also recover for funeral expenses and loss of companionship and support. Punitive damages may also be awarded in cases of gross negligence. Our video, “How Much Is My Personal Injury Case Worth?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onBzdkIWadY), provides a general overview of compensation types.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) faces the devastating consequences of hazing at a Texas university, you need more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to overcome them. At Attorney911, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, we are the Legal Emergency Lawyers™ with the unparalleled qualifications to tackle these complex, high-stakes cases.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including those in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) and surrounding areas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects families across the state, and we are committed to providing exceptional legal advocacy wherever it’s needed.

Why Attorney911 for Hazing Cases

Insurance Insider Advantage with Lupe Peña: Our Associate Attorney, Lupe Peña, brings a critical advantage to every hazing case. As a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm, she knows the intricate strategies employed by fraternity and university insurance companies. She understands their playbook—how they value (or undervalue) claims, their delay tactics, and their arguments for coverage exclusions like “intentional acts.” Lupe’s insight means we can anticipate their moves, dismantle their defenses, and maximize our clients’ recovery. This unique background ensures we are always several steps ahead when negotiating with the powerful insurance carriers that defend these institutions. You can learn more about Lupe Peña’s experience at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/.

Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions with Ralph Manginello: Our Managing Partner, Ralph P. Manginello, possesses over 25 years of experience taking on and defeating formidable defendants. He was one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, demonstrating our capacity for complex federal court litigation against billion-dollar corporations. Whether it’s a national fraternity with a vast legal team, a state university with sovereign immunity claims, or a private institution safeguarding its reputation, we are not intimidated. We have the resources, experience, and tenacity to fight powerful defendants and secure meaningful accountability. Discover more about Ralph Manginello’s distinguished career at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.

Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Our firm has a proven track record of achieving multi-million-dollar results in catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death cases. Hazing tragedies, particularly those involving permanent brain damage like the Danny Santulli case or acute organ failure like Leonel Bermudez, require attorneys who understand how to accurately value lifetime care needs, lost earning capacity, and immense pain and suffering. We work with a network of experts—including medical specialists, digital forensics analysts, economists, and psychologists—to build comprehensive cases that reflect the true cost of these devastating injuries. Our wrongful death claim legal services are detailed at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/.

Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Hazing often involves criminal acts. Ralph Manginello’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) underscores our deep understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual expertise allows us to advise clients on both tracks, ensuring informed decisions regardless of whether criminal proceedings are simultaneously pursued. Our criminal defense services are available at https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/.

Investigative Depth and Modern Evidence Collection: Modern hazing is conducted and documented digitally. We know how to uncover and preserve critical evidence that others miss. From obtaining deleted group chats and social media evidence to subpoenaing national fraternity records of prior incidents and forcing universities to disclose internal investigatory files, our team is adept at modern investigative techniques. We investigate every case as if your child’s life depends on it—because it often has. Our video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) exemplifies our commitment to leveraging every available tool.

Empathy and Victim Advocacy: We understand that hazing cases are deeply personal and traumatic. We approach each family with compassion, respect, and unwavering dedication. Our mission goes beyond financial compensation; it’s about getting you answers, holding the right people accountable, and helping to prevent such tragedies from happening to another family. We don’t settle cheap; we build cases that force accountability and drive institutional change.

Call to Action for New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) Families

If your child has experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or beyond—we want to hear from you. Families in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers, justice, and accountability. You don’t have to face wealthy institutions and their formidable legal teams alone.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to your story with empathy, explain your legal options clearly, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family.

What to expect in your free consultation:

We’ll listen to your story without judgment, understanding the profound impact of hazing.
We’ll review any evidence you have, whether it’s texts, photos, medical records, or your child’s account of events.
We’ll explain your legal options: pursuing a criminal report, filing a civil lawsuit, both, or neither, based on what’s best for your family.
We’ll discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
We’ll answer your questions about costs. We work on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Our video explaining contingency fees (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc) provides further detail.
There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot—we encourage you to take the time you need to make an informed decision.
Everything you discuss with us is protected by attorney-client privilege and is completely confidential.

Whether you’re in New York (Earth > North America > United States > New York) or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. We provide immediate legal guidance and begin the critical process of preserving evidence to build a strong case.

Contact Attorney911 Today:

Call our Emergency Hotline: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Visit our Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Spanish-Language Services:

Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña directly for consultation in Spanish via email: lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com