The Complete Texas Hazing Guide for Windom Families: Rights, Risks & Legal Recourse

If Your Child Was Hazed at a Texas University, You’re Not Alone

For parents in Windom, Fannin County, and across Northeast Texas, the nightmare often begins with a phone call, a text message, or a child returning home changed. Your student, perhaps attending one of the many Texas universities where local families send their children, is suddenly injured, traumatized, or withdrawn. They mention “traditions,” “pledging,” or “team bonding” that doesn’t sound right. What you’re likely witnessing is hazing—a dangerous, illegal practice that continues to injure and kill students across Texas campuses, including right now in our state.

In late 2025, our firm filed one of the most serious hazing lawsuits in Texas history: the $10 million Leonel Bermudez case against the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi’s Beta Nu chapter. Bermudez, a UH transfer student, endured months of systematic abuse during his fall 2025 pledge period: forced to carry a degrading “pledge fanny pack” containing condoms and sex toys; subjected to extreme physical hazing including sprints, bear crawls, and being sprayed in the face with a hose “similar to waterboarding”; forced to consume milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting; and made to complete 100+ push-ups and 500 squats under threat of expulsion. The result? He developed rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown) and acute kidney failure, passed brown urine, and was hospitalized for four days with critically high creatine kinase levels—facing ongoing risk of permanent kidney damage.

This isn’t an isolated incident from a distant state. This is happening right now in Texas, to students who could be your neighbors’ children, your relatives, or your own. The Pi Kappa Phi chapter was suspended and then shut down, with members voting to surrender their charter—but the physical and psychological harm to Bermudez continues. At Attorney911, we’re leading this fight because Texas families deserve accountability.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

• Call 911 for medical emergencies
• Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

In the first 48 hours:

• Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
• Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
  • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
  • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
• Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
• Do NOT:
  • Confront the fraternity/sorority
  • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
  • Post details on public social media
  • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

• Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
• Universities move quickly to control the narrative
• We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
• Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

What Hazing Really Looks Like in 2025: Beyond the Stereotypes

For Windom families, understanding modern hazing is critical. What was once stereotyped as simple “pranks” or “initiation rituals” has evolved into sophisticated, dangerous, and often hidden abuse. Hazing in 2025 isn’t just about alcohol—it’s about power, control, and tradition that puts students at serious risk.

The Three-Tier Reality of Modern Hazing

Tier 1: Subtle Hazing (Often Dismissed as “Harmless”)

• Digital control: 24/7 group chat monitoring, required instant responses at all hours, location tracking via Find My Friends or Snapchat Maps
• Servitude requirements: Acting as personal drivers at all hours, cleaning members’ rooms, running errands, being “on call” for any demand
• Social isolation: Cutting off contact with non-members, requiring permission to socialize outside the group
• Psychological manipulation: Being assigned derogatory nicknames, forced deception about activities to parents and university

Tier 2: Harassment Hazing (Creates Hostile Environments)

• Sleep deprivation: Mandatory late-night “meetings,” 3 AM wake-up calls for tasks, multi-day events with minimal rest
• Forced consumption: Being made to eat spoiled food, excessive amounts of bland items (milk, bread, hot dogs), or unpleasant substances
• Extreme physical exertion: “Smokings” with hundreds of push-ups, wall sits until collapse, forced runs in extreme weather
• Public humiliation: Being forced to perform embarrassing acts in public, wear degrading costumes, endure “roasting” sessions

Tier 3: Violent Hazing (High Risk of Injury or Death)

• Forced alcohol consumption: “Lineup” drinking games, Big/Little nights with handles of liquor, “Bible study” games where wrong answers mean drinking
• Physical beatings: Paddling, punching, kicking, “branding” with burns or cuts
• Dangerous rituals: Blindfolded tackle games (“glass ceiling”), forced fights, swimming while intoxicated
• Sexualized abuse: Forced nudity, simulated sexual acts, sexual assault or coercion
• Chemical exposure: Industrial cleaners poured on skin (causing chemical burns), forced ingestion of unknown substances

Where Hazing Happens in Texas

While fraternities and sororities receive most attention, hazing permeates multiple campus organizations:

• Fraternities and Sororities (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural councils)
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC programs (military-style traditions can cross into abuse)
• Athletic Teams (football, basketball, baseball, cheerleading)
• Spirit and Tradition Groups (Texas Cowboys, cheer teams, mascot programs)
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups
• Academic and Service Organizations

The common thread? Power imbalance, tradition justification, and secrecy. Organizations often defend abusive practices as “what we’ve always done” or “character building,” while systematically hiding evidence from university officials and law enforcement.

Texas Hazing Law: What Windom Families Need to Know

Texas has specific anti-hazing statutes that protect students across our state, including those from Windom attending universities anywhere in Texas. Understanding this legal framework is essential for holding organizations accountable.

Texas Education Code Chapter 37: The Anti-Hazing Statute

Texas law defines hazing broadly and provides serious consequences. Under Section 37.151, hazing means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, directed against a student that:

1. Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
2. Occurs for purposes of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students

Critical Texas Law Provisions:

§ 37.152 Criminal Penalties:

• Class B Misdemeanor: Hazing that doesn’t cause serious injury (up to 180 days jail, $2,000 fine)
• Class A Misdemeanor: Hazing causing injury requiring medical treatment
• State Jail Felony: Hazing causing serious bodily injury or death

§ 37.153 Organizational Liability:

• Organizations can be prosecuted if they authorized or encouraged hazing
• Officers can face charges for failing to report known hazing
• Organizations face fines up to $10,000 per violation
• Universities can revoke recognition and ban organizations from campus

§ 37.154 Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting:

• Individuals who report hazing in good faith are immune from civil or criminal liability
• This includes amnesty for calling 911 in medical emergencies, even if underage drinking was involved

§ 37.155 Consent is NOT A Defense:

• Texas law explicitly states that victim consent does NOT excuse hazing
• This recognizes the power imbalance and coercion inherent in hazing situations

§ 37.156 University Reporting Requirements:

• Texas colleges must provide hazing prevention education
• They must publish annual reports of hazing violations and disciplinary actions
• This creates public records that can support civil cases

Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Understanding the Difference

Criminal Cases (Prosecuted by the State):

• Brought by prosecutors (District Attorney’s office)
• Aim: Punishment (jail time, fines, probation)
• Common hazing-related charges:
  • Hazing offenses (misdemeanor or felony)
  • Furnishing alcohol to minors
  • Assault, battery, sexual assault
  • Manslaughter or negligent homicide in fatal cases
• Burden of proof: Beyond a reasonable doubt

Civil Cases (Brought by Victims/Families):

• Filed by injured students or surviving families
• Aim: Compensation and accountability
• Legal theories include:
  • Negligence and gross negligence
  • Wrongful death
  • Negligent supervision/hiring
  • Premises liability
  • Intentional infliction of emotional distress
• Burden of proof: Preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not)

Both types of cases can proceed simultaneously, and a criminal conviction is NOT required to pursue civil justice. In fact, many families pursue civil cases even when prosecutors decline to file criminal charges.

Federal Law Overlay: Additional Protections

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024):

• Requires colleges receiving federal aid to transparently report hazing incidents
• Mandates strengthened hazing education and prevention programs
• Requires public hazing data reporting (phased in by 2026)
• Creates national database of hazing incidents

Title IX Protections:

• When hazing involves sexual harassment, assault, or gender-based hostility
• Universities must investigate and respond appropriately
• Can provide additional avenues for accountability

Clery Act Requirements:

• Universities must report certain crimes and maintain safety statistics
• Hazing incidents involving assault, alcohol crimes, or sexual offenses may trigger reporting

National Hazing Case Patterns: What History Tells Us

The tragic cases that have made national headlines aren’t distant anomalies—they’re patterns that repeat across campuses, including here in Texas. Understanding these patterns helps Windom families recognize risks and understand what accountability looks like.

Alcohol Poisoning Death Pattern: A Repeating Tragedy

Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University (Pi Kappa Alpha, 2021)

• 20-year-old pledge forced to consume entire bottle of alcohol during “Big/Little” night
• Died from alcohol poisoning
• $10 million settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national, ~$3M from BGSU)
• Multiple fraternity members convicted of hazing-related charges
• Takeaway for Texas families: The same “Big/Little” drinking traditions exist at Texas chapters

Max Gruver – Louisiana State University (Phi Delta Theta, 2017)

• Pledge forced to participate in “Bible study” drinking game
• Died from alcohol toxicity (BAC 0.495%)
• Louisiana enacted Max Gruver Act (felony hazing statute)
• Takeaway for Texas families: Drinking games disguised as “education” are deadly

Andrew Coffey – Florida State University (Pi Kappa Phi, 2017)

• Pledge died from acute alcohol poisoning during “Big Brother Night”
• Given handles of hard liquor
• FSU temporarily suspended all Greek life
• Takeaway for Texas families: National organizations like Pi Kappa Phi have fatal histories

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University (Beta Theta Pi, 2017)

• 19-year-old pledge died from traumatic brain injuries after bid acceptance night
• Extreme alcohol consumption, falls captured on security cameras
• Brothers delayed calling for help for hours
• 18 members charged with over 1,000 criminal counts
• Pennsylvania enacted Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law
• Takeaway for Texas families: Delayed medical care dramatically worsens outcomes and liability

Physical and Ritualized Hazing Patterns

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College (Pi Delta Psi, 2013)

• Pledge blindfolded, weighted with backpack, repeatedly tackled during “glass ceiling” ritual
• Died from traumatic brain injury
• Fraternity members delayed calling 911
• Pi Delta Psi banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years
• National fraternity convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter
• Takeaway for Texas families: “Retreat” hazing at off-campus locations is extremely dangerous

Danny Santulli – University of Missouri (Phi Gamma Delta, 2021)

• 18-year-old pledge forced to consume excessive alcohol during “pledge dad reveal”
• Suffered severe, permanent brain damage
• Cannot walk, talk, or see; requires 24/7 care
• Family settled with 22 defendants
• Takeaway for Texas families: Non-fatal injuries can be catastrophically life-altering

Athletic Program Hazing: Not Just Greek Life

Northwestern University Football Program (2023–2025)

• Former players alleged widespread sexualized and racist hazing over years
• Multiple lawsuits against university and coaching staff
• Head coach Pat Fitzgerald fired, then settled wrongful-termination suit confidentially
• Takeaway for Texas families: Major athletic programs can harbor systemic abuse

What These Cases Mean for Windom Families

These national cases establish critical legal precedents that apply in Texas courts:

1. Pattern evidence matters: When organizations repeat dangerous behaviors they’ve been warned about, liability increases
2. Delayed medical care = increased liability: Cover-ups worsen criminal and civil exposure
3. National organizations can be held accountable: Headquarters aren’t insulated from chapter conduct
4. Universities face significant liability: Schools that ignore warning signs pay substantial settlements
5. Transparency drives reform: Public cases lead to policy changes that prevent future harm

Texas University Focus: Where Windom Students Attend

Windom families send students to universities across Texas. Understanding the specific hazing landscape at each major campus helps parents recognize risks and know where to turn for help.

Texas A&M University: Corps Culture and Greek Life

For Windom Families: Located approximately 250 miles from Windom, Texas A&M attracts students from across Northeast Texas with its strong academic programs and tradition-rich campus culture.

Campus Culture Snapshot:

• Strong Corps of Cadets tradition with military-style discipline
• Active Greek life with approximately 60+ fraternity and sorority chapters
• Tradition-heavy environment that can sometimes cross into abuse

Documented Incidents and Responses:

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Chemical Burns Case (2021):

• Two pledges alleged being covered in substances including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit
• Suffered severe chemical burns requiring emergency skin graft surgeries
• Pledges sued fraternity for $1 million
• SAE chapter suspended for two years by university
• Pattern connection: SAE has national history of hazing deaths and injuries

Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023):

• Cadet alleged degrading hazing including simulated sexual acts
• Bound between beds in “roasted pig” position with apple in mouth
• Sought over $1 million in damages
• Texas A&M stated it handled matter under its rules
• Takeaway: Military-style traditions require careful oversight

Official Hazing Policy and Reporting:

• Student Conduct Office handles hazing investigations
• Corps of Cadets has separate disciplinary system
• Anonymous reporting available through Student Conduct website
• Public transparency varies; some sanctions published online

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed:

• Initial reports to Student Conduct or Corps leadership
• Potential criminal charges through College Station PD or Brazos County Sheriff
• Civil suits typically filed in Brazos County courts
• Multiple potential defendants: individuals, chapter, national HQ, university

University of Texas at Austin: Transparency and Tradition

For Windom Families: As Texas’s flagship university approximately 200 miles from Windom, UT Austin attracts high-achieving students from across the state with its academic reputation and vibrant campus life.

Campus Culture Snapshot:

• Large Greek community with approximately 60+ chapters
• Active spirit organizations (Texas Cowboys, Cheer, etc.)
• Relatively transparent hazing violation reporting compared to other schools

Public Hazing Violations (UT’s Transparency Advantage):
UT Austin maintains a public Hazing Violations page that lists organizations, dates, conduct, and sanctions:

Recent Examples from UT’s Public Log:

Pi Kappa Alpha (2023):

• New members directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics
• Found to be hazing
• Chapter placed on probation and required to implement new hazing-prevention education

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (2024):

• Australian exchange student alleged assault by fraternity members
• Injuries included dislocated leg, broken ligaments, fractured tibia, broken nose
• Student sued SAE chapter for over $1 million
• Chapter already under suspension for prior hazing/safety violations

Texas Wranglers (Multiple Years):

• Spirit organization repeatedly sanctioned for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing
• Pattern shows ongoing issues despite sanctions

Official Reporting and Response:

• Dean of Students Office investigates hazing reports
• UT Police Department handles criminal aspects
• Title IX Office involved when sexual harassment present
• Public violation list updated regularly

Leveraging UT’s Transparency for Justice:
The public violation records at UT Austin provide powerful evidence for families:

1. Pattern establishment: Showing prior incidents strengthens negligence claims
2. Notice proof: Demonstrates university knew about ongoing issues
3. Settlement leverage: Public records create pressure for accountability

University of Houston: Urban Campus, Systemic Issues

For Windom Families: As part of the Houston metroplex approximately 300 miles from Windom, UH serves as both a local commuter school and residential campus with active Greek life and concerning hazing patterns.

Campus Culture Snapshot:

• Urban campus with mix of commuter and residential students
• Active Greek life across multiple councils (IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, multicultural)
• Recent high-profile case demonstrates systemic issues

The Leonel Bermudez Case: Texas’s Current Hazing Crisis

What Happened (Fall 2025):
Leonel Bermudez, a UH transfer student, pledged Pi Kappa Phi’s Beta Nu chapter. His ordeal included:

Systematic Humiliation:

• Required to carry “pledge fanny pack” 24/7 containing condoms, sex toy, nicotine devices
• Enforced dress codes and hours-long “study/work” blocks
• Weekly interviews and overnight driving duties

Extreme Physical Hazing:

• Sprints, bear crawls, wheelbarrow races at Yellowstone Boulevard Park
• Cold-weather exposure in underwear
• Lying in vomit-soaked grass
• Sprayed in face with hose “similar to waterboarding”
• Forced consumption of milk, hot dogs, peppercorns until vomiting
• Nov 3 workout: 100+ push-ups, 500 squats under expulsion threats

Medical Catastrophe:

• Developed rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown)
• Acute kidney failure
• Passed brown urine, hospitalized four days
• Critically high creatine kinase levels
• Ongoing risk of permanent kidney damage

Institutional Response:

• Nov 6, 2025: Pi Kappa Phi national suspends Beta Nu chapter
• Nov 14, 2025: Chapter members vote to surrender charter
• UH labels conduct “deeply disturbing,” promises disciplinary measures
• Attorney911 represents Bermudez in $10 million lawsuit

Defendants in the Lawsuit:

1. University of Houston
2. UH System Board of Regents
3. Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters
4. Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu housing corporation
5. 13 individual fraternity leaders/members

Prior UH Hazing Incidents:
2016 Pi Kappa Alpha Case:

• Pledges deprived of food, water, sleep during multi-day event
• One student suffered lacerated spleen after being slammed onto table
• Chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and suspension

Reporting and Response at UH:

• Dean of Students Office investigates
• UH Police Department for criminal matters
• Limited public transparency compared to UT Austin
• Pattern of suspensions but ongoing issues

Southern Methodist University: Private Campus Challenges

For Windom Families: Located approximately 100 miles from Windom in Dallas, SMU’s private university status and affluent student body create unique hazing dynamics that Windom families should understand.

Campus Culture Snapshot:

• Private university with strong Greek presence
• Affluent student population
• Different disciplinary procedures than public universities

Documented Incidents:

Kappa Alpha Order Incident (2017):

• New members reportedly paddled, forced to drink alcohol, deprived of sleep
• Chapter suspended for multiple years
• Restrictions on recruiting until around 2021

Hazing Prevention Efforts:

• Anonymous reporting through Real Response system
• Greek Life office oversees investigations
• Private university status means less public transparency

Unique Challenges at Private Universities:

1. Less public oversight: Fewer public records requests possible
2. Different disciplinary procedures: Often more administrative than judicial
3. Reputation protection: Strong incentives to handle matters internally
4. Civil litigation strategy: Must often rely more on discovery than public records

Baylor University: Religious Identity and Accountability

For Windom Families: Located approximately 120 miles from Windom, Baylor’s religious identity and history of institutional challenges create specific considerations for hazing cases.

Campus Culture Snapshot:

• Religious affiliation influences campus culture
• History of scrutiny over football and Title IX issues
• Active Greek life despite religious context

Documented Incidents:

Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020):

• 14 players suspended following hazing investigation
• Suspensions staggered over early season
• University stated matter handled internally

Institutional Context:

• Baylor’s history with sexual assault scandal informs current approach
• Religious branding interacts with accountability mechanisms
• “Zero tolerance” statements vs. recurring misconduct patterns

Considerations for Baylor Cases:

1. Religious context: May influence internal handling and public perception
2. Prior institutional failures: Can support pattern arguments in litigation
3. Private university dynamics: Similar to SMU in procedural aspects

The Texas Greek Ecosystem: What Windom Families Are Up Against

Behind every fraternity or sorority on Texas campuses stands a complex network of organizations, insurance policies, and national hierarchies. Understanding this ecosystem is crucial for holding the right parties accountable.

Public Records Directory: The Greek Organizations Around Windom Families

Attorney911 maintains what we call the Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine—a comprehensive database tracking over 1,423 Greek-related organizations across 25 Texas metros. This isn’t theoretical; these are real organizations with IRS filings, EIN numbers, and legal addresses that can be held accountable.

Why This Matters for Windom Families:
When your child is hazed, you’re not just dealing with college students. You’re facing:

• National fraternity/sorority headquarters with deep-pocket insurance
• Alumni associations and housing corporations
• University systems with legal departments
• Complex insurance coverage networks

Sample Organizations from Our Texas Database:

IRS B83-Registered Texas Organizations (Tax-Exempt Greek Entities):

• Kappa Sigma – Mu Camma Chapter Inc (EIN: 133048786) | 3007 Earl Rudder Fwy S, College Station, TX 77845
• Gamma Phi Beta Sorority Inc (EIN: 161675890) | 115 Wild Wick Way, The Woodlands, TX 77382 | Zeta Rho HCB
• Beta Nu Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity Housing Corporation Inc (EIN: 462267515) | 10601 Big Horn Trl, Frisco, TX 75035
• Alpha Sigma Phi Fraternity Inc (EIN: 475370943) | 5019 Calhoun Rd, Houston, TX 77204 | Theta Delta Chapter
• Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity Texas Gamma Chapter (EIN: 911981478) | 2609 S University Dr, Fort Worth, TX 76109
• Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity (EIN: 746064445) | 1855 Highway 69 N, Nederland, TX 77627 | Epsilon Kappa Chapter
• Texas Kappa Sigma Educational Foundation Inc (EIN: 741380362) | PO Box 470061, Fort Worth, TX 76147

Cause IQ Metro Organizations (Dallas-Fort Worth Area):

• Beta Upsilon Chi Fraternity | Fort Worth, TX – 12650 N Beach St #30, Suite 114, Fort Worth, TX 76244
• Texas Kappa Sigma Educational Foundation | Fort Worth, TX – Kappa Sigma housing foundation
• Delta Tau Delta Fraternity – Gamma Iota Chapter | Austin, TX – Chapter house at University of Texas
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity – Texas Rho Corp. | Austin, TX – House corporation at University of Texas

Cross-Validated Brands (Appearing in Both IRS and Cause IQ Data):

• Beta Upsilon Chi appears in IRS records (EIN: 742911848) and Cause IQ Dallas-Fort Worth listings
• Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority appears in multiple Texas locations in both datasets
• Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity has Texas entities in both IRS and metro data

Metro-Level Greek Organization Counts:

• Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington Metro: 510 total Greek organizations
• Houston–The Woodlands–Sugar Land Metro: 188 total
• Austin–Round Rock Metro: 154 total
• San Antonio Metro: 86 total
• College Station–Bryan Metro: 42 total
• Statewide Total: 1,423 Greek organizations across 25 Texas metros

Why National Histories Matter: Patterns That Predict Texas Cases

When a Texas chapter repeats behaviors that caused deaths or injuries elsewhere, that’s not coincidence—it’s foreseeability. National organizations know their dangerous traditions because they’ve paid for them before.

National Organization Hazing Histories Relevant to Texas:

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike):

• Stone Foltz (Bowling Green, 2021): $10M settlement, multiple criminal convictions
• David Bogenberger (Northern Illinois, 2012): $14M settlement
• Pattern: “Big/Little” alcohol hazing events
• Texas Presence: Chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE):

• Multiple hazing deaths nationwide leading to 2014 elimination of pledge program
• Texas A&M chemical burns case (2021): $1M lawsuit, chapter suspension
• UT Austin assault case (2024): Over $1M lawsuit
• Pattern: Physical abuse, forced drinking, chemical exposure
• Texas Presence: Chapters at all major Texas universities

Pi Kappa Phi:

• Andrew Coffey (Florida State, 2017): Death from alcohol poisoning
• Leonel Bermudez (UH, 2025): $10M lawsuit, kidney failure
• Pattern: Extreme physical hazing, forced consumption
• Texas Presence: Chapter at UH (now closed), other Texas campuses

Phi Delta Theta:

• Max Gruver (LSU, 2017): Death led to Louisiana felony hazing law
• Pattern: “Bible study” drinking games
• Texas Presence: Chapters at Texas A&M, UT Austin, other campuses

Legal Significance of Pattern Evidence:

1. Foreseeability: Shows national knew or should have known risks
2. Negligence: Demonstrates failure to adequately prevent known dangers
3. Punitive damages: Supports arguments for punishment beyond compensation
4. Insurance coverage: Can defeat “unforeseeable accident” defenses

Building a Hazing Case: Evidence, Strategy, and Damages

When Windom families come to us after a hazing incident, we approach their case with a systematic strategy honed through years of complex institutional litigation. Here’s what goes into building a winning hazing case.

Critical Evidence: What Wins Hazing Cases in 2025

Digital Evidence (The Most Important Category):

• Group chats: GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, fraternity apps
• Social media: Instagram DMs, Snapchat messages, TikTok videos
• Deleted message recovery: Digital forensics can often retrieve “deleted” content
• Location data: GPS coordinates, timestamp data, social media check-ins

Photo and Video Evidence:

• Injury documentation: Multiple angles with scale references, progression photos
• Event footage: Videos from members’ phones, security cameras, doorbell cameras
• Social media posts: Even “joking” posts can establish timeline and participants

Internal Organization Documents:

• Pledge manuals: Initiation scripts, tradition lists, requirement documents
• Chapter communications: Emails, texts between officers about activities
• National policies: Risk management manuals, training materials

University Records:

• Prior conduct files: Previous hazing violations, probation letters
• Incident reports: Campus police reports, student conduct investigations
• Clery Act reports: Published crime statistics that may reference incidents

Medical and Psychological Records:

• Emergency treatment: ER records, hospitalization reports, toxicology results
• Specialist evaluations: Neurological, psychological, rehabilitation assessments
• Long-term prognosis: Expert opinions on permanent effects

Witness Testimony:

• Other pledges: Often afraid initially but may cooperate with protection
• Former members: Those who quit or were expelled often have crucial information
• Roommates and friends: Noticed changes, heard details, witnessed aftermath
• Medical providers: Documented injuries and patient statements

Damages: What Windom Families Can Recover

Economic Damages (Quantifiable Financial Losses):

• Medical expenses: Past and future treatment, therapy, medications
• Lost income: Wages lost during recovery, future earning capacity reduction
• Educational costs: Tuition for missed semesters, lost scholarships
• Life care expenses: For catastrophic injuries requiring lifelong care

Non-Economic Damages (Compensating Human Harm):

• Physical pain and suffering: From injuries and treatment
• Emotional distress: PTSD, depression, anxiety, humiliation
• Loss of enjoyment: Inability to participate in college life, activities
• Reputational harm: Social stigma, difficulty transferring schools

Wrongful Death Damages (For Families):

• Funeral and burial expenses
• Loss of financial support: Deceased’s expected lifetime contributions
• Loss of companionship and guidance
• Parents’ and siblings’ emotional suffering

Punitive Damages (When Appropriate):

• Purpose: Punish especially reckless or malicious conduct
• When awarded: Prior warnings ignored, particularly cruel conduct, cover-up attempts
• Texas caps: Generally limited but can be substantial in appropriate cases

Case Strategy: How We Approach Hazing Litigation

Immediate Action Phase (First 48 Hours):

1. Evidence preservation: Secure digital evidence before deletion
2. Medical advocacy: Ensure proper diagnosis and documentation
3. Witness identification: Identify and interview key witnesses quickly
4. University communication: Strategic engagement to preserve rights

Investigation Phase (Weeks 1-12):

1. Digital forensics: Recover deleted messages, analyze metadata
2. Public records requests: University disciplinary records, police reports
3. Organization research: National history, prior incidents, insurance coverage
4. Expert consultation: Medical, psychological, Greek life culture experts

Demand and Negotiation Phase:

1. Comprehensive demand package: Medical records, evidence summary, legal analysis
2. Multi-party negotiations: Often dealing with university and fraternity insurers separately
3. Mediation preparation: Most cases settle through mediation
4. Trial readiness: Willingness to go to trial improves settlement position

Why Attorney911’s Approach Differs:

Insurance Insider Advantage (Lupe Peña’s Background):

• Mr. Peña spent years as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm
• He knows exactly how fraternity and university insurers value claims
• Understands their delay tactics, coverage arguments, and settlement strategies
• “We know their playbook because we used to run it”

Complex Institutional Experience (Ralph Manginello’s Background):

• One of few Texas firms involved in BP Texas City explosion litigation
• Federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas)
• Not intimidated by national fraternities or university legal teams
• “We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won”

Dual Civil/Criminal Capability:

• Ralph’s membership in Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA)
• Understands how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation
• Can advise witnesses and former members with dual exposure

Practical Guides for Windom Families and Students

For Parents: Recognizing and Responding to Hazing

Warning Signs Your Child May Be Being Hazed:

• Physical signs: Unexplained bruises, burns, cuts; extreme fatigue; weight changes; sleep deprivation
• Behavioral changes: Sudden secrecy, withdrawal from family/friends, personality shifts, defensiveness
• Academic red flags: Grades dropping, missing classes, losing scholarships
• Financial issues: Unexpected large expenses, requests for money without explanation
• Digital behavior: Constant phone monitoring, anxiety about messages, deleted histories

Questions to Ask (Non-Confrontationally):

1. “How are things going with [organization]? Are you enjoying it?”
2. “Have they been respectful of your time for classes and sleep?”
3. “What do they ask you to do as a new member?”
4. “Is there anything that makes you uncomfortable?”
5. “Do you feel like you can leave if you want to?”

48-Hour Action Checklist for Parents:

HOUR 1–6 (IMMEDIATE CRISIS):

• Get medical attention if injured or intoxicated
• Remove child from dangerous situation
• Screenshot any messages shown to you
• Photograph visible injuries
• Write down everything they tell you (date, time, details)
• Call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911

HOUR 6–24 (EVIDENCE PRESERVATION):

• Help child preserve all digital evidence (don’t delete anything)
• Secure physical evidence (clothing, receipts, objects)
• Request medical records from any treatment
• Document witness names and contact information
• Note university communications (but don’t respond yet)

HOUR 24–48 (STRATEGIC DECISIONS):

• Speak with experienced hazing attorney (1-888-ATTY-911)
• Decide on reporting strategy (with attorney guidance)
• Refer university contacts to your attorney
• Do NOT talk to insurance adjusters without counsel
• Backup all evidence to cloud storage

For Students: Self-Protection and Safety Planning

Is This Hazing? Ask Yourself:

• Am I being forced or pressured to do something unsafe?
• Would I do this if I had a real choice (no social consequences)?
• Is this dangerous, degrading, or illegal?
• Would my parents/university approve if they knew?
• Am I being told to keep secrets?

How to Exit Safely:

• If in immediate danger: Call 911 or campus police
• To quit/de-pledge: Tell someone outside the organization first, then send written resignation
• Avoid “one last meeting”: Where pressure or retaliation might occur
• Document retaliation: Save threats, report harassment to university

Evidence Collection for Students:

1. Screenshots: Group chats with timestamps and participant names
2. Recordings: Texas is one-party consent (legal to record conversations you’re part of)
3. Photos: Injuries (multiple angles with scale), locations, objects used
4. Medical documentation: Tell providers you were hazed for accurate records
5. Witness information: Names and contacts of others who saw what happened

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

MISTAKE 1: Letting Evidence Be Destroyed

• What happens: Child deletes messages “to avoid more trouble”
• Why it’s fatal: Looks like cover-up, obstruction of justice, case becomes impossible
• Better approach: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content

MISTAKE 2: Confronting the Organization Directly

• What happens: Fraternity/Sorority lawyers up, destroys evidence, coaches witnesses
• Why it’s fatal: Gives them advance warning to build defenses
• Better approach: Document everything, consult attorney before any contact

MISTAKE 3: Signing University “Resolution” Forms

• What happens: University pressures quick settlement with waiver of rights
• Why it’s fatal: You may accept far less than case worth, waive future claims
• Better approach: Never sign anything without attorney review

MISTAKE 4: Posting on Social Media

• What happens: Defense attorneys screenshot everything, inconsistencies hurt credibility
• Why it’s fatal: Can waive privileges, create contradictions, damage case value
• Better approach: All communication through your attorney

MISTAKE 5: Waiting “To See How University Handles It”

• What happens: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, statute runs
• Why it’s fatal: University controls narrative, minimizes accountability
• Better approach: Preserve evidence immediately, consult lawyer promptly

Why Attorney911 for Texas Hazing Cases

When your family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. Here’s why Windom families choose Attorney911.

Our Unique Qualifications for Hazing Cases

Insurance Insider Knowledge (Mr. Lupe Peña’s Defense Background):

• Mr. Peña spent years as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm
• He knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies:
  • Value (and undervalue) hazing claims
  • Use delay tactics to pressure families
  • Fight coverage under “intentional act” exclusions
  • Set reserves and negotiate settlements
• “We know their playbook because we used to run it”

Complex Institutional Litigation Experience (Ralph Manginello):

• BP Texas City Explosion Litigation: One of few Texas firms involved against billion-dollar defendant
• Federal Court Experience: Admitted to U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
• Wrongful Death Expertise: Multi-million dollar recoveries in catastrophic cases
• “We’re not intimidated by national fraternities or university legal teams”

Dual Civil/Criminal Capability:

• Ralph’s membership in Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA)
• Understands how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation
• Can advise witnesses and former members with potential criminal exposure
• Navigates parallel proceedings strategically

Investigative Depth and Resources:

• Digital Forensics Experts: Recover deleted messages, analyze metadata
• Medical Specialists: Document rhabdomyolysis, TBI, PTSD, other hazing injuries
• Greek Life Culture Experts: Understand organizational dynamics and traditions
• Economists and Life Care Planners: Value catastrophic injuries and future needs

Proven Results in Similar Cases:

• Current Active Litigation: Leonel Bermudez v. UH & Pi Kappa Phi ($10M hazing lawsuit)
• Wrongful Death Experience: Multi-million dollar recoveries for families
• Institutional Defendant Success: Experience against universities, corporations, insurers

Our Approach: Thorough Investigation, Real Accountability

We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force institutional change. Here’s how we approach hazing litigation differently:

1. Immediate Evidence Preservation:

• Digital forensics within first 48 hours
• Witness interviews before memories fade
• Preservation letters to prevent evidence destruction

2. Comprehensive Defendant Identification:

• Not just individual members
• Chapter, housing corporation, national headquarters
• University, regents, third-party premises owners
• All potential insurance coverage sources

3. Pattern Evidence Development:

• National organization hazing histories
• Prior incidents at same chapter
• University knowledge and response patterns

4. Expert-Driven Damage Valuation:

• Medical experts on long-term effects
• Economists on lifetime earning loss
• Life care planners for catastrophic injuries
• Psychologists on emotional trauma

5. Strategic Negotiation and Trial Readiness:

• Comprehensive demand packages
• Mediation with experienced neutrals
• Willingness to go to trial when necessary
• Understanding that trial readiness drives better settlements

Serving Windom Families Across Texas

Our Texas Presence:

• Houston Office (Primary): Serving Harris County and Southeast Texas
• Austin Office: Serving Travis County and Central Texas
• Beaumont Office: Serving Jefferson County and East Texas
• Statewide Reach: We represent families across Texas, including Windom and Northeast Texas

Spanish Language Services:

• Hablamos Español: Mr. Lupe Peña speaks fluent Spanish
• Culturally sensitive representation for Hispanic families
• Understanding of unique dynamics in Latino student hazing cases

Contingency Fee Basis:

• No fee unless we win
• No upfront costs for families
• Percentage-based fee from recovery
• Allows access to justice regardless of financial means

Your Next Steps: Free Consultation with Attorney911

If hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. The window for action is limited, and evidence disappears quickly. Here’s how we can help.

What to Expect in Your Free Consultation

1. Confidential Listening:

• We’ll listen to your story without judgment
• Understand your family’s specific situation
• Answer your immediate questions

2. Case Evaluation:

• Review any evidence you’ve preserved
• Explain legal options clearly
• Discuss realistic timelines and expectations

3. Strategic Guidance:

• Evidence preservation steps
• University communication strategy
• Criminal vs. civil considerations
• Privacy and media considerations

4. No Pressure Decision:

• No obligation to hire us immediately
• Time to consider options as a family
• Clear explanation of next steps either way

Immediate Contact Information

Call Now for Free Consultation:

• 24/7 Emergency Line: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct Office: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781

Email Contacts:

• Ralph Manginello: ralph@atty911.com
• Lupe Peña: lupe@atty911.com (Spanish services available)

Website: https://attorney911.com

Why Time is Critical

Statute of Limitations:

• Generally 2 years from injury date in Texas
• Can be extended in some circumstances
• Don’t wait—evidence disappears daily

Evidence Preservation Window:

• Group chats deleted within days
• Witness memories fade quickly
• University investigations may compromise evidence
• Organizations begin cover-up immediately

Medical Documentation Needs:

• Immediate treatment creates crucial records
• Delay can undermine injury claims
• Psychological trauma requires prompt evaluation

For Windom Families Specifically

Whether your child attends school near Windom or hours away, Texas hazing law protects them. The universities where Windom students enroll—Texas A&M, UT Austin, UH, SMU, Baylor, and others—all fall under Texas jurisdiction. We’ve represented families from across Northeast Texas and understand the particular concerns of rural and small-town families navigating complex university systems.

Local Resources We Can Connect You With:

• Medical specialists familiar with hazing injuries
• Psychological support for trauma recovery
• Educational consultants for school transfers if needed
• Financial advisors for settlement management

Final Thoughts for Windom Families

Hazing isn’t “boys will be boys” or “tradition.” It’s abuse that destroys lives and families. The Leonel Bermudez case at UH shows these aren’t abstract risks—they’re happening now at Texas universities where your children study.

You have rights under Texas law. You have options for accountability. And you don’t have to navigate this alone against powerful institutions with unlimited legal resources.

The choice to come forward isn’t just about your family. It’s about preventing the next injury, the next hospitalization, the next death. Every case that holds organizations accountable makes campuses safer for all Texas students.

Call us today. Let’s start the conversation about how we can help your family find answers, achieve accountability, and begin healing.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com