Tragedy on FM 116: How a Coryell County Trucking Accident Took a Young Life and What Texas Families Need to Know

The Texas backroads can be deceptively dangerous. On the evening of March 3, 2026, a routine drive along Farm to Market Road 116 in Coryell County turned into a catastrophic collision that claimed the life of 22-year-old Yasmin Lee Barrientos from Waco. According to the Texas Department of Public Safety, Barrientos struck the left rear quarter of a tractor-trailer that had pulled out from a loading yard onto the same stretch of roadway. The impact was immediate and fatal—Barrientos was pronounced dead at the scene from injuries sustained in the crash.

This wasn’t just another traffic accident. It was a preventable tragedy that raises serious questions about trucking safety, regulatory compliance, and corporate accountability on Texas highways. At Attorney911, we’ve seen this pattern before: a trucking company cuts corners, a driver makes a questionable decision, and a family loses a loved one. The details of this case—what happened, why it happened, and who is responsible—demand a closer look, especially for Texas families who share these roads with 18-wheelers every day.

The Incident: What Happened on FM 116?

The Fatal Collision Near Mile Marker 376

Just after 8 p.m. on March 3, 2026, Yasmin Lee Barrientos was traveling north on FM 116 near Mile Marker 376 in Coryell County. According to the Texas DPS report, a tractor-trailer had pulled out from a loading yard onto the same stretch of roadway. For reasons that remain officially “unknown,” Barrientos struck the left rear quarter of the trailer. The force of the impact was catastrophic. Barrientos was pronounced dead at the scene from injuries sustained in the crash. Next of kin were notified, bringing an abrupt and devastating end to what should have been a routine drive.

The Loading Yard Factor: A Critical Detail

The truck involved in the collision had just pulled out from a loading yard. This detail is crucial. Loading yards are high-risk zones for trucking accidents. Drivers are often under pressure to meet tight schedules, and visibility can be limited when maneuvering large vehicles in confined spaces. The fact that the truck was pulling out from a loading yard suggests several potential contributing factors:

• Limited visibility: Loading yards often have blind spots, especially for large trucks. The driver may not have seen Barrientos approaching.
• Improper maneuvering: Pulling out from a loading yard requires careful execution. If the driver misjudged the timing or angle, it could have placed the trailer directly in Barrientos’s path.
• Pressure to expedite: Loading yards are often the last stop before a long haul. Drivers may feel rushed to get on the road, leading to hasty or unsafe maneuvers.

The “Unknown Reason” Problem

The DPS report states that Barrientos hit the trailer “for an unknown reason.” This vague language is a red flag. In our experience, “unknown reasons” often become clear when the evidence is properly investigated. Possible explanations that should be explored include:

• Driver distraction: Was the truck driver distracted by a cell phone, dispatch communications, or something else?
• Fatigue: Had the driver been on the road too long without proper rest? Hours of service violations are a leading cause of trucking accidents.
• Mechanical failure: Did the truck have a brake failure, tire blowout, or other mechanical issue that prevented the driver from stopping or maneuvering safely?
• Improper loading: Was the cargo improperly secured, causing the trailer to behave unpredictably when pulling out?
• Road conditions: FM 116 is a rural road. Were there visibility issues, poor lighting, or inadequate signage that contributed to the collision?

The “unknown reason” should not be the final answer. It should be the starting point for a thorough investigation.

Why This Type of Accident Is So Common—and So Deadly

The Physics of Trucking Accidents

The size and weight disparity between an 18-wheeler and a passenger vehicle is staggering. A fully loaded tractor-trailer can weigh up to 80,000 pounds—20 to 25 times more than the average passenger car. When these two vehicles collide, the results are often catastrophic for the smaller vehicle.

In this case, Barrientos struck the left rear quarter of the trailer. This type of impact is particularly dangerous because:

• Underride risk: The height difference between a car and a trailer can cause the car to slide underneath the trailer, shearing off the roof and exposing occupants to catastrophic injuries.
• Trailer swing: When a truck turns or pulls out, the trailer can swing into adjacent lanes, creating a moving obstacle that is difficult to avoid.
• Limited reaction time: Rural roads like FM 116 often have higher speed limits. At highway speeds, a driver has only seconds to react to a truck pulling out.

The Loading Yard Danger Zone

Loading yards are among the most dangerous areas for trucking operations. Here’s why:

1. Blind Spots: Trucks have massive blind spots, especially when maneuvering in tight spaces. The driver may not have seen Barrientos approaching.
2. Time Pressure: Drivers are often on tight schedules. The pressure to load quickly and get on the road can lead to rushed, unsafe maneuvers.
3. Improper Loading: If cargo isn’t secured correctly, it can shift during maneuvering, affecting the truck’s stability and handling.
4. Fatigue: Loading and unloading can be physically demanding. If the driver was fatigued, their reaction time and judgment could have been impaired.

The Rural Road Factor

FM 116 is a Farm to Market road—a type of rural highway common in Texas. These roads present unique challenges:

• Higher speed limits: Rural roads often have higher speed limits than urban streets, reducing reaction time.
• Limited lighting: Poor lighting at night can make it difficult to see trucks pulling out from side roads or loading yards.
• Narrow lanes: Many FM roads have narrow lanes that don’t accommodate large trucks easily.
• Inadequate signage: Warning signs for loading zones or truck crossings may be missing or poorly placed.
• Mixed traffic: Rural roads often carry a mix of local traffic, agricultural vehicles, and commercial trucks.

Who Is Responsible? Identifying the Liable Parties

In trucking accident cases, liability often extends far beyond the driver. Multiple parties may share responsibility for the collision. Based on the details of this incident, here are the potentially liable parties that should be investigated:

1. The Truck Driver

The driver is the most immediate party involved, and their actions (or inactions) are often the direct cause of the accident. Potential issues to investigate:

• Distracted driving: Was the driver using a cell phone, GPS, or dispatch device at the time of the collision?
• Fatigue: Had the driver violated hours of service regulations? Fatigue slows reaction time and impairs judgment.
• Impairment: Was the driver under the influence of drugs or alcohol? Even prescription medications can impair driving ability.
• Training: Did the driver receive proper training for maneuvering in loading yards and rural roads?
• Pre-trip inspection: Did the driver conduct a proper pre-trip inspection? Failure to inspect can lead to mechanical failures.

Relevant FMCSA Regulations:
– 49 CFR § 392.3: Prohibits driving while fatigued or ill.
– 49 CFR § 392.82: Prohibits hand-held mobile phone use while driving.
– 49 CFR § 392.4/5: Prohibits driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
– 49 CFR § 396.13: Requires pre-trip inspections.

2. The Trucking Company (Motor Carrier)

Trucking companies can be held vicariously liable for their drivers’ actions under the legal doctrine of respondeat superior (“let the master answer”). They can also be directly liable for their own negligence. Areas to investigate:

• Negligent hiring: Did the company hire a driver with a poor safety record, suspended license, or history of violations?
• Negligent training: Did the company provide adequate training for loading yard operations and rural road driving?
• Negligent supervision: Did the company monitor the driver’s hours of service, fatigue levels, and compliance with regulations?
• Negligent maintenance: Did the company maintain the truck in safe operating condition? Were there known mechanical issues that weren’t addressed?
• Pressure to violate regulations: Did the company pressure the driver to meet unrealistic schedules, leading to hours of service violations or unsafe driving?

Relevant FMCSA Regulations:
– 49 CFR § 391.11: Driver qualification standards.
– 49 CFR § 391.51: Requires maintenance of Driver Qualification Files.
– 49 CFR § 396.3: Requires systematic inspection, repair, and maintenance of vehicles.

Case Precedent:
In Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Bates (2004), the Texas Supreme Court held that trucking companies can be held liable for negligent hiring, training, and supervision of drivers. This case established that companies have a duty to ensure their drivers are qualified and properly trained.

3. The Loading Yard Operator

The loading yard is where this accident began. The operator of the loading yard may share liability if:

• Unsafe loading practices: The yard may have contributed to the accident by loading the truck improperly or failing to secure the cargo.
• Poor visibility: The layout of the yard may have created blind spots that prevented the driver from seeing Barrientos.
• Pressure to expedite: The yard may have rushed the driver, leading to a hasty and unsafe departure.
• Failure to train: Did the yard provide proper training for drivers maneuvering in and out of the yard?

4. The Cargo Owner or Shipper

If the truck was carrying cargo for a third party, the cargo owner or shipper may be liable if:

• Improper loading instructions: The shipper may have provided instructions that led to an unbalanced or improperly secured load.
• Hazardous materials: If the cargo was hazardous, the shipper may have failed to disclose risks or provide proper handling instructions.
• Pressure to meet deadlines: The shipper may have pressured the trucking company to meet unrealistic delivery times, contributing to unsafe driving.

5. The Truck or Trailer Manufacturer

If a mechanical defect contributed to the accident, the manufacturer of the truck or trailer may be liable under product liability laws. Potential defects include:

• Brake failure: Defective brakes could have prevented the driver from stopping in time.
• Steering failure: A defective steering system could have caused the driver to lose control.
• Tire defects: A tire blowout could have caused the driver to swerve into Barrientos’s path.
• Underride guard failure: If Barrientos’s vehicle slid under the trailer, a defective underride guard could have contributed to the severity of the injuries.

Case Precedent:
In General Motors Corp. v. Sanchez (1999), the Texas Supreme Court held that manufacturers can be held liable for defective products that cause accidents, even if the product was misused. This case established that manufacturers have a duty to design products that are safe for their intended use.

6. Maintenance Companies

If the truck was serviced by a third-party maintenance company, they may be liable if:

• Negligent repairs: The company may have performed repairs improperly, leading to mechanical failures.
• Failure to identify defects: The company may have missed critical safety issues during inspections.
• Use of substandard parts: The company may have used cheap or defective parts that failed.

7. Government Entities

Government entities may share liability if road design or maintenance contributed to the accident:

• Poor road design: FM 116 may have had inadequate signage, poor visibility, or dangerous curves that contributed to the collision.
• Failure to maintain: Potholes, debris, or faded road markings may have made the road unsafe.
• Inadequate lighting: Poor lighting at the loading yard or along FM 116 may have contributed to the accident.

Special Considerations for Government Liability:
– Sovereign immunity: Government entities are generally immune from lawsuits unless specific exceptions apply.
– Notice requirements: In Texas, you must provide notice of a claim to the government entity within 6 months of the incident.
– Damage caps: Texas law caps damages against government entities at $250,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence.

The Evidence That Could Make or Break This Case

In trucking accident cases, evidence disappears quickly. Trucking companies have rapid-response teams that begin protecting their interests within hours of an accident. If you or a loved one is involved in a similar incident, here’s what needs to be preserved immediately:

1. Electronic Data: The Truck’s “Black Box”

Commercial trucks are equipped with electronic systems that record critical data:

Critical Timeline:
– 30 days: ECM data can be overwritten with new driving events.
– 6 months: FMCSA only requires ELD data to be retained for 6 months.
– 7-14 days: Dashcam footage is often deleted within a week or two.

What We Do:
At Attorney911, we send spoliation letters within 24-48 hours of being retained. These legal notices demand that the trucking company preserve all evidence related to the accident. Destroying evidence after receiving a spoliation letter can result in serious legal consequences, including:

• Adverse inference instructions: The jury is told to assume the destroyed evidence was unfavorable.
• Monetary sanctions: The court can impose fines on the trucking company.
• Default judgment: In extreme cases, the court can enter judgment against the trucking company.

2. Driver Records: The Key to Negligent Hiring Claims

The trucking company is required to maintain a Driver Qualification (DQ) File for every driver. This file must contain:

Why This Matters:
If the trucking company failed to conduct proper background checks, hired a driver with a poor safety record, or ignored red flags, they can be held liable for negligent hiring. We’ve seen cases where trucking companies hired drivers with suspended licenses, histories of DUIs, or multiple at-fault accidents—all of which could have been discovered with proper due diligence.

3. Maintenance Records: The Hidden Defects

Trucking companies are required to maintain systematic records of vehicle inspections and repairs. These records can reveal:

• Deferred maintenance: Did the company ignore known mechanical issues to save money?
• Brake failures: Were the brakes properly adjusted and maintained?
• Tire issues: Were the tires worn, underinflated, or recalled?
• Lighting problems: Were the trailer lights functioning properly?
• Inspection violations: Did the truck have a history of out-of-service violations?

Relevant FMCSA Regulations:
– 49 CFR § 396.3: Requires systematic inspection, repair, and maintenance of vehicles.
– 49 CFR § 396.11: Requires drivers to prepare written post-trip inspection reports.
– 49 CFR § 396.17: Requires annual inspections of all CMVs.

4. Hours of Service Records: The Fatigue Factor

Fatigue is a leading cause of trucking accidents. FMCSA regulations limit how long drivers can operate:

Why This Matters:
If the driver in this case was fatigued, it could explain why they pulled out in front of Barrientos. Fatigue slows reaction time, impairs judgment, and increases the risk of accidents. In fact, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that fatigue is a factor in 31% of fatal truck crashes.

5. Cargo Records: The Loading Yard Connection

Cargo records can reveal whether the load was properly secured or whether the loading process contributed to the accident. Key documents include:

• Bill of lading: Describes the cargo and its weight.
• Loading instructions: Shows how the cargo was supposed to be loaded and secured.
• Securement documentation: Records of the tiedowns, blocking, and bracing used.
• Weight tickets: Shows whether the truck was overloaded.

Relevant FMCSA Regulations:
– 49 CFR § 393.100-136: Cargo securement standards.
– 49 CFR § 392.9: Requires drivers to inspect cargo securement within the first 50 miles and periodically thereafter.

6. Witness Statements: The Human Perspective

Witnesses can provide critical details about what happened. In this case, witnesses may have seen:

• The truck pulling out from the loading yard.
• The speed and behavior of both vehicles before the collision.
• The truck driver’s actions (e.g., using a cell phone, appearing fatigued).
• The road conditions and visibility at the time of the accident.

Why This Matters:
Witness statements can corroborate or contradict the truck driver’s version of events. They can also provide details that electronic data doesn’t capture, such as the driver’s behavior or road conditions.

7. Accident Reconstruction: The Science of What Happened

Accident reconstruction experts use physics, engineering, and forensic analysis to determine how an accident occurred. In this case, reconstruction could reveal:

• The speed of both vehicles at the time of impact.
• The point of impact and the sequence of events.
• Whether the truck driver had time to stop or maneuver to avoid the collision.
• Whether mechanical failure or road conditions contributed to the accident.

Case Precedent:
In Cummins v. BIC USA, Inc. (2012), the Texas Supreme Court upheld the use of accident reconstruction experts in personal injury cases, stating that their testimony can be crucial in determining liability.

The Legal Process: What Comes Next for the Barrientos Family

If the Barrientos family chooses to pursue legal action, here’s what the process would likely look like:

1. Investigation and Evidence Preservation

The first step is to preserve all available evidence. This includes:

• Sending spoliation letters to the trucking company and all potentially liable parties.
• Obtaining the truck’s ECM, ELD, and telematics data.
• Subpoenaing the driver’s qualification file, maintenance records, and hours of service logs.
• Interviewing witnesses and documenting the accident scene.
• Hiring an accident reconstruction expert to analyze the collision.

2. Filing the Lawsuit

In Texas, the statute of limitations for wrongful death claims is 2 years from the date of the accident. This means the family has until March 3, 2028, to file a lawsuit. However, waiting is not advisable. Evidence disappears quickly, and witnesses’ memories fade.

The lawsuit would name all potentially liable parties, including:

• The truck driver.
• The trucking company.
• The loading yard operator.
• The cargo owner or shipper (if applicable).
• The truck or trailer manufacturer (if a defect is suspected).
• The maintenance company (if negligent repairs are suspected).
• Government entities (if road design or maintenance contributed to the accident).

3. Discovery: Building the Case

During discovery, both sides exchange information and evidence. This phase includes:

• Interrogatories: Written questions that must be answered under oath.
• Requests for production: Demands for documents, such as maintenance records, driver logs, and company policies.
• Depositions: Sworn testimony from the truck driver, company representatives, witnesses, and experts.
• Subpoenas: Legal demands for records from third parties, such as cell phone providers or government agencies.

4. Negotiation and Settlement

Most trucking accident cases settle before trial. Settlement negotiations may involve:

• Mediation: A neutral third party helps both sides reach an agreement.
• Direct negotiations: Attorneys for both sides discuss settlement terms.
• Demand letters: A formal letter outlining the damages and demanding compensation.

Why Cases Settle:
– Trials are expensive and time-consuming.
– Outcomes are uncertain.
– Both sides often prefer the certainty of a settlement.

Why Some Cases Go to Trial:
– The trucking company refuses to offer a fair settlement.
– Liability is disputed.
– The damages are so severe that a jury trial is necessary to secure full compensation.

5. Trial: Holding the Trucking Company Accountable

If the case goes to trial, both sides present their evidence to a jury. The jury decides:

• Whether the defendants are liable.
• The amount of compensation to award.

Types of Damages Available:
– Economic damages: Medical expenses, lost income, funeral costs, and other financial losses.
– Non-economic damages: Pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of companionship, and other intangible losses.
– Punitive damages: Awarded in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct to punish the wrongdoer.

Case Precedent:
In Werner Enterprises, Inc. v. Blake (2016), a Texas jury awarded $90 million to the family of a man killed in a trucking accident. The jury found that Werner Enterprises had a history of safety violations and had pressured the driver to violate hours of service regulations. This case demonstrates that juries are willing to hold trucking companies accountable for egregious negligence.

What This Case Means for Texas Families

The Dangers of Rural Roads and Loading Yards

FM 116 is just one of thousands of rural roads in Texas that carry a mix of local traffic and commercial trucks. These roads are often overlooked in discussions about trucking safety, but they present unique dangers:

• Higher speed limits: Rural roads often have higher speed limits than urban streets, reducing reaction time.
• Limited enforcement: Fewer police patrols mean less enforcement of speeding, distracted driving, and other violations.
• Poor lighting: Many rural roads lack adequate lighting, making it difficult to see trucks pulling out from side roads or loading yards.
• Narrow lanes: Rural roads often have narrow lanes that don’t accommodate large trucks easily.
• Inadequate signage: Warning signs for loading zones or truck crossings may be missing or poorly placed.

Loading yards are another overlooked danger zone. These areas are often bustling with activity, and drivers may feel pressured to get on the road quickly. The combination of tight spaces, blind spots, and time pressure creates a perfect storm for accidents.

The Trucking Industry’s Safety Record

The trucking industry has a troubling safety record. According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA):

• 5,100+ fatalities in large truck crashes annually.
• 125,000+ injuries in large truck crashes annually.
• 76% of fatalities are occupants of the smaller vehicle.
• Fatigue, distraction, and speeding are leading causes of trucking accidents.

Despite these statistics, many trucking companies continue to prioritize profit over safety. They may:

• Hire unqualified drivers to meet demand.
• Pressure drivers to violate hours of service regulations to meet tight schedules.
• Defer maintenance to save money.
• Ignore safety violations to avoid costly downtime.

The Legal Protections Available to Victims

Texas law provides strong protections for victims of trucking accidents. If you or a loved one is injured in a trucking accident, you may be entitled to compensation for:

• Medical expenses: Past, present, and future medical costs related to the accident.
• Lost income: Wages lost due to the accident and recovery.
• Lost earning capacity: If the injuries prevent you from returning to work or reduce your earning potential.
• Pain and suffering: Physical pain and emotional distress caused by the accident.
• Mental anguish: Psychological trauma, anxiety, depression, and other emotional injuries.
• Loss of consortium: The impact of the injuries on your relationship with your spouse.
• Funeral expenses: In wrongful death cases, the cost of funeral and burial services.
• Punitive damages: In cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct, punitive damages may be awarded to punish the wrongdoer.

Texas Law on Punitive Damages:
Texas law allows punitive damages in cases where the defendant acted with gross negligence or malice. Gross negligence is defined as an act or omission that involves an extreme degree of risk, considering the probability and magnitude of the potential harm to others, and of which the defendant had actual, subjective awareness of the risk but nevertheless proceeded with conscious indifference to the rights, safety, or welfare of others.

The Importance of Acting Quickly

In trucking accident cases, time is of the essence. Evidence disappears quickly, and the trucking company’s rapid-response team will be working to protect their interests. Here’s what you should do if you or a loved one is involved in a trucking accident:

1. Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you feel fine, some injuries may not be apparent right away.
2. Call the police and file a report. A police report is critical evidence in your case.
3. Document the scene. Take photos and videos of the vehicles, the road conditions, and any visible injuries.
4. Get contact information from witnesses. Witnesses can provide critical details about what happened.
5. Do not give a recorded statement to the trucking company’s insurance adjuster. Anything you say can be used against you.
6. Contact an experienced trucking accident attorney immediately. The sooner you involve an attorney, the better your chances of preserving evidence and securing full compensation.

How Attorney911 Can Help

At Attorney911, we’ve been fighting for trucking accident victims for over 25 years. Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, has built a reputation for holding trucking companies accountable and securing maximum compensation for our clients. Here’s what sets us apart:

1. Immediate Evidence Preservation

We understand that evidence disappears quickly in trucking accident cases. That’s why we take immediate action to preserve critical evidence, including:

• Sending spoliation letters within 24-48 hours.
• Obtaining ECM, ELD, and telematics data before it’s overwritten.
• Subpoenaing driver qualification files, maintenance records, and hours of service logs.
• Interviewing witnesses and documenting the accident scene.
• Hiring accident reconstruction experts to analyze the collision.

2. Deep Knowledge of FMCSA Regulations

Trucking companies are subject to strict federal regulations. Violations of these regulations can be powerful evidence of negligence. Our team has deep knowledge of FMCSA regulations, including:

• Hours of service rules (49 CFR Part 395).
• Driver qualification standards (49 CFR Part 391).
• Vehicle maintenance requirements (49 CFR Part 396).
• Cargo securement standards (49 CFR Part 393).

We know how to identify violations and use them to build a strong case for our clients.

3. Experience with Major Trucking Companies

We’ve taken on some of the largest trucking companies in the country, including:

• Walmart
• Amazon
• Werner Enterprises
• J.B. Hunt
• Swift Transportation
• FedEx
• UPS

These companies have teams of lawyers and adjusters working to minimize their liability. You need an attorney who knows how to fight back.

4. A Former Insurance Defense Attorney on Our Team

Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, spent years working for a national insurance defense firm. He knows exactly how insurance companies evaluate, minimize, and deny claims. Now, he uses that insider knowledge to fight for accident victims. This gives us a unique advantage in negotiations and litigation.

5. A Track Record of Multi-Million Dollar Results

We’ve secured multi-million dollar settlements and verdicts for our clients, including:

• $5+ million for a logging accident victim who suffered a traumatic brain injury.
• $3.8+ million for a car accident victim who required a partial leg amputation due to medical complications.
• $2.5+ million for a trucking accident victim.
• $2+ million for a maritime worker who suffered a back injury.

These results demonstrate our ability to hold trucking companies accountable and secure maximum compensation for our clients.

6. Compassionate, Personalized Representation

We understand that trucking accidents are life-changing events. Our clients are often dealing with catastrophic injuries, financial stress, and emotional trauma. We treat every client like family, providing compassionate, personalized representation every step of the way.

The Bottom Line: What Texas Families Need to Know

The tragic death of Yasmin Lee Barrientos is a stark reminder of the dangers posed by large trucks on Texas roads. This case raises serious questions about trucking safety, regulatory compliance, and corporate accountability. If you or a loved one is involved in a similar accident, here’s what you need to know:

1. Trucking accidents are different from car accidents. They involve multiple liable parties, complex regulations, and massive insurance policies.
2. Evidence disappears quickly. The trucking company’s rapid-response team will be working to protect their interests. You need an attorney who can act fast to preserve evidence.
3. Multiple parties may be liable. The truck driver, trucking company, loading yard operator, cargo owner, and others may share responsibility for the accident.
4. You may be entitled to significant compensation. Trucking companies carry high insurance limits, and juries are increasingly willing to hold them accountable for negligence.
5. You need an experienced trucking accident attorney. Trucking companies have teams of lawyers and adjusters working to minimize their liability. You need an attorney who knows how to fight back.

What to Do If You’re Involved in a Trucking Accident

If you or a loved one is involved in a trucking accident, follow these steps:

1. Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you feel fine, some injuries may not be apparent right away.
2. Call the police and file a report. A police report is critical evidence in your case.
3. Document the scene. Take photos and videos of the vehicles, the road conditions, and any visible injuries.
4. Get contact information from witnesses. Witnesses can provide critical details about what happened.
5. Do not give a recorded statement to the trucking company’s insurance adjuster. Anything you say can be used against you.
6. Contact an experienced trucking accident attorney immediately. The sooner you involve an attorney, the better your chances of preserving evidence and securing full compensation.

Contact Attorney911 Today

If you or a loved one has been injured in a trucking accident, don’t wait. Evidence is disappearing every day. Contact Attorney911 today for a free, no-obligation consultation. We’ll review your case, explain your legal options, and help you take the first steps toward justice.

Call us 24/7 at 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911) or (713) 528-9070.

Email us at ralph@atty911.com or lupe@atty911.com.

Visit us online at https://attorney911.com.

At Attorney911, we’re more than just lawyers. We’re your advocates, your fighters, and your partners in seeking justice. Let us help you hold the trucking company accountable and secure the compensation you deserve.

Don’t let the trucking company get away with it. If you’ve been injured in a trucking accident, you deserve an attorney who will fight for you. Contact Attorney911 today. We’re here to help.