If you’re reading this, your family may be facing one of the most terrifying moments of your life. Your child was supposed to make friends at college, make connections for their future, and embrace the vibrant community of King and Queen County. Instead, they were tortured. They were abused. They were hazed. We’re here to help families in King and Queen County fight back.

We are Attorney911, and our firm is actively engaged in a $10 million lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston for severe hazing that led to a student’s hospitalization with kidney failure. We don’t just talk about hazing; we’re in the trenches fighting it every single day. The same aggressive, data-driven, and relentless representation we bring to cases in Houston, we bring to families in King and Queen County and across the nation.

No family in King and Queen County should ever have to witness their child suffer through the nightmare of hazing. Your child deserved and expected safety and respect, not an ordeal that leaves lasting physical and psychological scars. We understand the profound emotional toll such an experience takes, and we are here to support you in every step toward justice and accountability.

The nightmare of hazing isn’t confined to a single university or a specific state; it’s a pervasive problem that impacts college campuses and student organizations across America, including those where students from King and Queen County attend. Many families in King and Queen County send their children to universities throughout Virginia and beyond, expecting them to be safe and thrive. We see vibrant local communities in King and Queen County valuing education and the safety of their youth, and the betrayal of trust that hazing represents strikes at the heart of those values.

The Hazing Crisis: A Reality for King and Queen County Families

Hazing is far more than innocent pranks; it’s a dangerous ritual that too often results in serious injury, lifelong trauma, and even death. Despite public awareness campaigns and stricter laws, hazing persists in fraternities, soror athletic teams, clubs, and other student groups. Students from King and Queen County who pursue higher education, whether at institutions nearby or across the country, may encounter these dangerous practices.

Consider these shocking statistics on hazing:

More than half (55%) of students involved in Greek life experience hazing. This shows that hazing isn’t an isolated incident; it’s deeply ingrained in many organizations.
40% of student athletes report being hazed. This extends beyond Greek life, impacting various student groups.
Since 2000, there has been at least one hazing-related death every year in the United States. This grim statistic underscores the deadly consequences of unchecked hazing.
95% of students who are hazed do not report it. Fear of retaliation, shame, and loyalty to the group often keep victims silent, allowing the cycle of abuse to continue.

These numbers are not just statistics; they represent individuals and families whose lives have been irrevocably altered by hazing. In King and Queen County, parents entrust educational institutions with the safety and well-being of their children. When that trust is shattered by hazing, it creates a crisis that demands immediate and comprehensive legal action.

We understand that speaking out against powerful institutions can be daunting, but we want families in King and Queen County to know that you are not alone. We have the expertise, resources, and unwavering commitment to stand by your side. Our goal is not only to secure justice and compensation for your child but also to prevent similar tragedies from befalling other students who hail from King and Queen County.

BREAKING: Our Attorneys Are Fighting This Battle RIGHT NOW — The Same Fight We’ll Bring to King and Queen County

King and Queen County Families: This Is What Hazing Looks Like. This Is What We Do About It.

The case of Bermudez v. Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity, Inc., et al. is not just another lawsuit; it’s a stark example of the insidious nature of modern hazing and our firm’s unwavering dedication to holding every responsible party accountable. This case happened in Houston, Texas, but the reality it exposes is universal. The same hazing practices occur at universities across the nation, including those where students from King and Queen County attend. The same national fraternities operate at colleges and universities that draw students from King and Queen County. The same institutional negligence that allowed Leonel Bermudez to be tortured is found at campuses throughout the country. And we will fight for King and Queen County families with the same aggression we’re bringing to this ongoing case.

This case, filed on November 21, 2025, in Harris County Civil District Court, seeks $10 million in damages against Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity, the University of Houston, the Pi Kappa Phi Housing Corporation, the UH Board of Regents, and 13 individual fraternity members. Our managing partners, attorneys Ralph Manginello and Lupe Pena, are spearheading this litigation, embodying the aggressive and thorough representation that Attorney911 stands for.

We have already gained significant media attention for this landmark case, with major outlets providing detailed coverage:

ABC13 Houston reported on November 21-22, 2025: “Abuse and hazing led to hospitalization of Pi Kappa Phi fraternity pledge, lawsuit alleges“
KHOU 11 published their report on November 21, 2025: “$10 million lawsuit filed against UH, fraternity over hazing allegations“
Houston Chronicle covered the story on November 22, 2025: “UH fraternity hazing lawsuit“
Houston Public Media provided an in-depth report on November 24, 2025: “University of Houston, Pi Kappa Phi fraternity sued for $10 million over alleged hazing“

Even Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters issued a statement acknowledging the chapter closure on November 14, 2025, posted on November 21, 2025: “Pi Kappa Phi Closes Beta Nu Chapter at the University of Houston“

THE PLAINTIFF: LEONEL BERMUDEZ

Leonel Bermudez was a “ghost rush”—a prospective member who had not even enrolled as a University of Houston student yet. He planned to transfer to UH for the spring 2026 semester. This means they subjected someone who wasn’t even their student to unimaginable abuse.

Leonel accepted a bid to join Pi Kappa Phi on September 16, 2025. What followed was approximately seven weeks of systematic abuse, torture, and hazing that led to him being hospitalized for three nights and four days with severe rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure.

Why this landmark case matters intensely to King and Queen County families:

Pi Kappa Phi has over 150 chapters nationally, many of which are located near universities where students from King and Queen County may attend.
The horrifying “traditions” that hospitalized our client are tragically common and can easily occur at fraternities and student organizations near King and Queen County.
Universities that draw students from King and Queen County are subject to the same oversight responsibilities and potential liability failures as the University of Houston.
If your child from King and Queen County is subjected to hazing, whether in Virginia or another state, we will fight for you with the same ferocity and dedication we are demonstrating in the Bermudez case.

Attorney Ralph Manginello told ABC13, “When he finally made it home, he crawled up the stairs and went to bed. The next day, he was really sore and couldn’t really move. The next day was worse, and the next day, his mom rushed him to the hospital, and he had some kidney failure.”

Attorney Lupe Pena’s words reflect our firm’s mission: “If this prevents harm to another person, that’s what we’re hoping to do. Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.”

WHAT HAPPENED: THE HAZING TIMELINE

The details of Leonel’s ordeal are chilling and highlight the calculated cruelty that often characterizes hazing. This is not isolated; these are tactics often replicated across chapters nationwide, including those that might recruit students from King and Queen County.

Sept 16, 2025: Leonel accepts bid to Pi Kappa Phi.
Sept 16 – Nov 3: Weeks of systematic hazing, abuse, and torture begin.
Oct 13, 2025: Another pledge is hog-tied face-down on a table with an object in his mouth for over an hour. This shows the widespread nature of the abuse within the chapter, not just focused on one individual.
Oct 15, 2025: A pledge loses consciousness and collapses during a forced workout. Other pledges are forced to elevate his legs until he recovers. This is a critical indicator that the fraternity leadership and members knew the extreme dangers of their actions and yet continued.
Nov 3, 2025: THE INCIDENT: Leonel Bermudez is severely punished for missing an event. He is forced into an extreme workout regimen including 100+ pushups, 500 squats, high-volume “suicides,” bear crawls, wheelbarrows, “save-you-brother” drills, two-mile warmups, and repeated 100-yard crawls while reciting the fraternity creed. He is threatened with immediate expulsion if he stops. He becomes so exhausted he cannot stand without help.
Nov 4-5, 2025: Leonel’s condition rapidly deteriorates. He cannot move, is “sore and couldn’t really move” (as per Ralph Manginello’s quote to ABC13), and the pain worsens dramatically the following day.
Nov 6, 2025: His concerned mother rushes him to the hospital. He is passing brown urine, a classic symptom of severe muscle breakdown.
Nov 6-10, 2025: Leonel is hospitalized for 3 nights and 4 days, diagnosed with severe rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure.
Nov 14, 2025: Pi Kappa Phi National officially closes the Beta Nu Chapter at UH (as stated on their website), just days before our lawsuit is filed, indicating prior knowledge and an attempt to mitigate repercussions.
Nov 21, 2025: Our $10 MILLION LAWSUIT is filed in Harris County Civil District Court, making national headlines.

THE HAZING ACTIVITIES EXPOSED IN OUR LAWSUIT

The acts committed against Leonel Bermudez are not mere horseplay; they are acts of physical and psychological torture. Parents in King and Queen County must understand the reality of what hazing looks like, often hidden from public view.

WATERBOARDING / SIMULATED DROWNING: Leonel was sprayed in the face with a garden hose while doing calisthenics, a practice described by KHOU as “simulated waterboarding.” He was forced to run repeatedly under the constant threat of being waterboarded. Houston Public Media explicitly stated, “Waterboarding, which simulates drowning, is a form of torture.” This is a profound level of abuse, akin to tactics used on prisoners of war.
FORCED EATING UNTIL VOMITING: He was forced to consume large amounts of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until he vomited. After vomiting, he was made to continue running sprints while in clear physical distress and lie in his own vomit-soaked grass.
EXTREME PHYSICAL PUNISHMENT: This included over 100 pushups, 500 squats, high-volume “suicides,” bear crawls, wheelbarrows, “save-you-brother” drills, two-mile warmups, and repeated 100-yard crawls. Critically, he was forced to recite the fraternity creed during these grueling sessions and was threatened with immediate expulsion if he failed to comply. He was even struck with wooden paddles.
PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE & HUMILIATION: Leonel was forced to strip to his underwear in cold weather and carry a fanny pack containing objects of a sexual nature at all times. The earlier hog-tying incident involving another pledge clearly illustrates the psychological degradation tactics employed.
SLEEP DEPRIVATION & EXHAUSTION: He was ordered to drive fraternity members during early morning hours, which intentionally led to extreme exhaustion affecting his daily functioning and resilience.

THE MEDICAL CONSEQUENCES: RHABDOMYOLYSIS

The physical demands placed on Leonel led to a life-threatening medical condition called rhabdomyolysis. This is a condition attorney Ralph Manginello has specialized expertise in litigating, especially in hazing cases.

What is Rhabdomyolysis? This dangerous condition involves the breakdown of muscle tissue, releasing harmful proteins (myoglobin) into the bloodstream. These proteins can severely damage the kidneys, leading to acute kidney failure and, if untreated, death.

Leonel’s Medical Evidence:

He reported passing brown urine, a classic and unmistakable sign of myoglobin in the urine, indicating severe muscle breakdown.
His lab tests showed very high creatine kinase levels, clinically confirming extensive muscle damage.
He developed acute kidney failure, a life-threatening complication that necessitated his hospitalization.
He was unable to stand or walk for days following the incident, requiring his mother to rush him to the hospital.
The hospitalization lasted 3 nights and 4 days, requiring intensive medical care.

The medical trauma resulting from this hazing ordeal is a critical component of our lawsuit. It underscores the severe, quantifiable harm caused by these so-called “traditions.”

INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSES — THEIR OWN WORDS USED AGAINST THEM

The responses from the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters following the incident reveal a calculated effort to manage public perception and minimize liability, rather than offering genuine remorse or accountability. This is common behavior from institutions trying to protect their bottom line, and our firm is expert at dissecting these statements for what they truly represent.

University of Houston Spokesperson (Houston Public Media, Nov 24, 2025):
“The events investigated are deeply disturbing and represent a clear violation of our community standards. The University is conducting its own investigation in coordination with law enforcement and with the cooperation of the fraternity and its national leadership. Pending the outcome of these investigations, any individual found responsible for hazing will face disciplinary action, up to and including expulsion and potential criminal charges.”

What this corporate-speak actually means: This is an admission that they know what happened was severe (“deeply disturbing”) and a “clear violation” of their own rules. The mention of “law enforcement” and “potential criminal charges” indicates the seriousness of the situation and the university’s awareness of criminal implications for the individual perpetrators. The phrase “in coordination with law enforcement and with the cooperation of the fraternity” suggests a united front to manage the crisis and likely steer the narrative away from broader institutional failure.

Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters — THEIR OWN STATEMENT (pikapp.org, Nov 21, 2025):
“Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity closed its Beta Nu Chapter effective November 14, 2025, following violations of the Fraternity’s risk management policy and membership conduct standards. Pi Kappa Phi takes all allegations of hazing seriously. This action reflects our commitment to upholding the Fraternity’s values and expectations while prioritizing the well-being of our members.”
“We thank the University of Houston for its collaboration and leadership. Pi Kappa Phi has a proud history of accomplished students and alumni from the Beta Nu Chapter, and we look forward to returning to campus at the appropriate time and continuing our partnership with the University of Houston in the years ahead.”

A critical analysis of their statement reveals:

Closure before filing: The chapter was officially closed on November 14, 2025, a full seven days before our lawsuit was filed. This strongly suggests the national organization knew severe legal action was imminent and sought to distance themselves from the local chapter. This is not proactive prevention; it’s reactive damage control.
“Violations of… risk management policy”: This is an admission that they had policies meant to prevent such incidents, but those policies were violated, indicating a failure of enforcement or oversight.
“Prioritizing the well-being of our members”: This rings hollow when a prospective member faces kidney failure due to their chapter’s actions.
“We look forward to returning to campus”: This shocking lack of remorse, while Leonel Bermudez is still recovering, implies they view this as a temporary setback rather than a catastrophic failure demanding fundamental change. It emphasizes their business-as-usual mentality.
“Thank the University of Houston for its collaboration”: This confirms a coordinated effort between the university and the fraternity to manage the fallout, further highlighting the institutional desire to control the narrative and minimize liability.
“150 campuses across America”: This statement, buried in their release, is a chilling reminder of the national scope of the problem. If this happened at UH, how many other chapters—including those near King and Queen County—are engaging in similar behavior?

WHY THIS CASE MATTERS TO KING AND QUEEN COUNTY FAMILIES

This case is a powerful lesson for every parent in King and Queen County who has a child in college or considering Greek life.

PROOF THAT “TRADITION” IS TORTURE: The barbaric acts against Leonel prove that hazing has transformed far beyond mere harmless pranks. It is systematic abuse, physical and psychological torture. This same deeply disturbing behavior exists at universities that students from King and Queen County attend, or are considering attending.
UNIVERSITIES ARE COMPLICIT: The University of Houston owned the specific fraternity house where much of the hazing took place. This is crucial because it establishes direct premises liability. Universities near King and Queen County, whether in Virginia or elsewhere, have the same power to supervise, regulate, and intervene in the activities of Greek organizations and other student groups. When they fail to do so, they incur significant liability.
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS KNOW: Pi Kappa Phi’s national headquarters moved swiftly to suspend and then dissolve the chapter the moment the extent of the hazing came to light. This action is a clear admission that they knew the conduct was unacceptable and illegal. The same national fraternity organizations operate chapters at colleges near King and Queen County; they are fully aware of the hazing problem within their systems nationwide.
VICTIMS ARE AFRAID: Our client, Leonel, expressed fear of retribution for speaking out. This fear is a powerful and very real component of the psychological trauma inflicted by hazing. Students from King and Queen County who are hazed may face similar fears of social ostracization or retaliation for breaking the “code of silence.” We are here to protect our clients through this difficult process.
ONE BRAVE VICTIM PROTECTS KING AND QUEEN COUNTY STUDENTS: Lupe Pena eloquently stated, “If this prevents harm to another person, that’s what we’re hoping to do.” By taking on this monumental case, Leonel is not only seeking justice for himself but is also sending a clear message to fraternities, universities, and student groups across the country, including those near King and Queen County, that such behavior will not be tolerated. Your King and Queen County hazing case could literally save lives.
$10 MILLION SENDS A MESSAGE: The damages sought in this lawsuit are not arbitrary. They represent the severe physical and psychological trauma inflicted, the medical costs, and the need to send an unmistakable message to institutions that this behavior has profound financial consequences. King and Queen County families can demand and achieve the same level of accountability.

What Hazing Really Looks Like: Beyond the Stereotypes

Many parents in King and Queen County may hold outdated perceptions of hazing, viewing it as harmless rites of passage or benign pranks. The reality, as demonstrated by Leonel Bermudez’s case and countless others across the country, is far more sinister. Hazing today is often systematic, brutal, and intentionally designed to degrade, humiliate, and instill fear through physical and psychological torment. It is not “boys being boys”; it is assault, battery, torture, reckless endangerment, and sometimes manslaughter or murder.

Types of Hazing Incidents Witnessed in Modern Greek Life

Our experience with cases like Leonel’s shows a consistent pattern of abuse. These are the shocking tactics that we see, and that can occur anywhere a student from King and Queen County might attend college:

Physical Abuse: This goes far beyond typical “roughhousing.” We see beatings, paddlings (such as those inflicted with wooden paddles on Leonel), branding, forced extreme calisthenics to the point of collapse (like Leonel’s 500 squats and 100 pushups), and forced prolonged physical exertion leading to severe injuries like rhabdomyolysis and kidney failure.
Forced Consumption: This category includes binge drinking or chugging alcohol past the point of intoxication, forced eating until vomiting (as Leonel experienced with milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns), or even coerced consumption of non-food substances. This is a direct pathway to alcohol poisoning, aspiration, and severe internal injuries.
Sleep Deprivation: Pledges are often intentionally deprived of sleep, forced to attend late-night events, perform menial tasks, or drive members during early morning hours, leading to dangerous exhaustion and impaired judgment.
Psychological Torture: This is often the most insidious and long-lasting form of hazing. It includes humiliation (like Leonel carrying sexual objects or lying in vomit-soaked grass), degradation, verbal abuse, isolation, and constant threats of physical punishment or expulsion from the group.
Simulated Waterboarding/Drowning: As seen in Leonel’s case, this involves spraying pledges directly in the face with water, often with a hose, creating the terrifying sensation of drowning. This is a form of torture that generates intense fear and psychological trauma.
Exposure: Pledges can be subjected to extreme environmental conditions, such as being forced to strip in cold weather or confined in small, uncomfortable, or unsanitary spaces for extended periods.
Servitude & Demeaning Tasks: Victims are often made to perform demeaning chores, errands, or personal services for older members, reinforcing a power imbalance and stripping away their dignity.

The True Medical Consequences

The injuries from hazing are rarely “minor.” They range from acute physical trauma to severe psychological wounds that can last a lifetime. Here’s what we commonly see:

Rhabdomyolysis and Acute Kidney Failure: This is exactly what Leonel Bermudez endured, a direct result of extreme physical overexertion causing muscle breakdown and kidney damage.
Alcohol Poisoning: A common cause of hazing deaths, linked to forced drinking.
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): From falls, beatings, or violent shaking.
Hypothermia/Hyperthermia: From forced exposure to extreme cold or heat.
Cardiac Arrest: From extreme physical exertion or pre-existing conditions exacerbated by hazing.
PTSD, Anxiety, Depression: The psychological scars can be as debilitating as physical ones, manifesting as severe mental health disorders, flashbacks, and an inability to cope with daily life.
DEATH: The ultimate, tragic consequence that far too many families, sometimes from communities like King and Queen County, have faced.

These acts are not about “brotherhood”; they are about power, control, and inflicting pain. They violate basic human dignity and often break state and federal laws. When institutions fail to prevent such atrocities, they lose their right to claim innocence. We stand ready to expose these cruel realities and seek justice for hazing victims from King and Queen County and beyond.

Who Is Responsible: Every Party That Participated Or Allowed It

When a student from King and Queen County is subjected to hazing, the individuals directly involved are certainly culpable. However, our extensive experience in hazing litigation, powerfully demonstrated by the Bermudez case, consistently shows that the responsibility extends far beyond just a few misguided students. Many layers of individuals and organizations contribute to an environment where hazing thrives, and we make sure every single one is held accountable.

In hazing cases, we often find ourselves pursuing:

1. Local Chapters of Greek Organizations:

Why they’re liable: The local chapter directly organizes, executes, and perpetuates the hazing activities. Their leadership creates the culture of abuse, and members actively participate.
Our approach: We sue the chapter as an organizational entity. In Leonel’s case, the Beta Nu Chapter of Pi Kappa Phi at UH was directly responsible for organizing and conducting the weeks of torture.

2. Chapter Officers and Individual Members:

Why they’re liable: Chapter leaders, such as the President, Pledgemaster, and Risk Manager, bear direct responsibility for planning and overseeing the pledge process. Individual members who participate, facilitate, or even stand by and fail to intervene, can be held personally liable.
Our approach: Our lawsuit names not only the fraternity chapter but also 13 individual fraternity members, including the President and Pledgemaster. Stone Foltz’s case, which involved Pi Kappa Alpha, saw the chapter president personally ordered to pay a $6.5 million judgment, illustrating the potential for individual accountability. These individuals have professional futures and sometimes personal assets that can be reached.

3. Former Members and Their Spouses:

Why they’re liable: Hazing often extends beyond official chapter properties, moving to off-campus residences or events hosted by alumni. When former members, or even their spouses, knowingly allow illegal hazing activities to take place on their property, they can be held liable under premises liability and aiding-and-abetting statutes.
Our approach: In the Bermudez case, we specifically named a former member and his spouse as defendants because significant hazing sessions occurred at their private residence. This expands the net of liability beyond just current student members.

4. National Fraternity or Sorority Organizations:

Why they’re liable: These national entities maintain significant power over their chapters, granting charters, collecting dues, and issuing policies. They have a duty to supervise, respond to known issues, and ensure their chapters adhere to anti-hazing regulations. When they fail to do so, especially after previous hazing incidents, they are grossly negligent.
Our approach: Pi Kappa Phi National Headquarters is a primary defendant in the Bermudez lawsuit. Their statement on November 21, 2025, confirming the chapter’s closure due to “violations of the Fraternity’s risk management policy” is a direct admission of wrongdoing. Furthermore, Pi Kappa Phi had prior knowledge of deadly hazing practices from Andrew Coffey’s death in 2017—eight years later, they had done nothing to address a systemic problem. This establishes a clear pattern of negligence and deliberate indifference. These national organizations also represent the “deep pockets,” possessing substantial assets, endowments, and comprehensive liability insurance, which are crucial for securing meaningful compensation.

5. Universities and Colleges:

Why they’re liable: Educational institutions have a fundamental duty to protect their students. This includes exercising oversight over student organizations, enforcing hazing policies, and intervening when dangerous activities are reported or should be known. Their liability is especially strong when hazing occurs on university-owned or controlled property.
Our approach: The University of Houston and the UH Board of Regents are codefendants in the Bermudez case. Crucially, the University of Houston owned the fraternity house where much of Leonel’s hazing occurred. Furthermore, UH had a prior hazing hospitalization in 2017 involving another fraternity, Pi Kappa Alpha, which resulted in a student suffering a lacerated spleen. This means UH had actual knowledge of hazing risks on its campus eight years prior and failed to implement adequate safeguards. Their failure to act, despite owning the property and having prior notice, demonstrates clear institutional negligence.

6. Insurance Carriers:

Why they’re liable: Ultimately, the funds for major settlements and verdicts often come from the various insurance policies held by the liable parties. This includes the national organization’s liability insurance, the university’s institutional insurance, homeowner’s or renter’s insurance (for off-campus hazing), and individual personal liability coverage.
Our approach: As former insurance defense attorneys, Ralph Manginello and Lupe Pena bring invaluable insider knowledge. They understand exactly how insurance companies evaluate claims, strategize defenses, and attempt to minimize payouts. This allows us to anticipate their moves, dismantle their arguments, and relentlessly pursue maximum recovery from all available insurance resources.

The Deep Pockets: Understanding who can pay is as important as understanding who is liable. While individual students might not have substantial assets, national fraternity/sorority organizations typically have millions in assets and comprehensive insurance policies. Universities, especially large public or private institutions, possess significant endowments and institutional insurance. Our strategy is always to identify and pursue every single entity with the financial means to compensate our clients for their devastating injuries.

For families in King and Queen County, it is vital to know that we do not stop at just the obvious perpetrators. We meticulously investigate every link in the chain of command and responsibility, ensuring that those who created, allowed, or ignored the hazing culture are held fully accountable.

What These Cases Win: Multi-Million Dollar Proof

For families in King and Queen County seeking justice for hazing, the question of what can be achieved through legal action is paramount. Our firm’s commitment is not just to awareness, but to securing substantial accountability and compensation. The landmark verdicts and settlements across the country, including those against national fraternities and major universities, demonstrate that hazing claims are winnable—and they can lead to multi-million dollar outcomes. These results are not unique to major cities; the same legal strategies and outcomes are possible for hazing victims hailing from King and Queen County who pursue justice.

LANDMARK VERDICTS & SETTLEMENTS — THEY WILL PAY

1. STONE FOLTZ — Bowling Green State University / Pi Kappa Alpha (2021)

Total Recovery: Over $10.1 Million
- $2.9 Million from Bowling Green State University.
- $7.2 Million from Pi Kappa Alpha National Fraternity and individual members.
- A separate $6.5 Million judgment was issued in December 2024 against Daylen Dunson, the former chapter president, making him personally liable for Stone’s death.
What happened: In March 2021, Stone Foltz, a pledge, was forced to drink an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” event. He died three days later from alcohol poisoning.
Why it matters to King and Queen County: This case shows that both universities and national fraternities—and even individual chapter officers—will pay millions. Our $10 million demand in the Bermudez case is directly aligned with the outcomes of previous hazing incidents.

2. MAXWELL GRUVER — Louisiana State University / Phi Delta Theta (2017)

Jury Verdict: $6.1 Million
What happened: In September 2017, Max Gruver, an 18-year-old freshman pledge, was forced to consume excessive alcohol during a “Bible Study” event, resulting in his death from acute alcohol poisoning (BAC 0.495).
Why it matters to King and Queen County: A jury unequivocally awarded millions, demonstrating that when hazing causes death, juries are prepared to deliver substantial verdicts. This case led to Louisiana enacting the Max Gruver Act, making hazing a felony—a powerful precedent for legislative change.

3. TIMOTHY PIAZZA — Penn State University / Beta Theta Pi (2017)

Estimated Total: Over $110 Million (multiple settlements)
What happened: In February 2017, Timothy Piazza was forced to consume 18 drinks in 82 minutes. He fell down a flight of stairs, sustained a traumatic brain injury, and fraternity members waited 12 hours before calling 911. He died two days later. Security cameras captured the entire horrific event.
Why it matters to King and Queen County: This case represents one of the largest hazing settlements in U.S. history. The combination of egregious conduct, institutional cover-up, and strong evidence (video footage) led to an outcome that sends a clear message. Our Bermudez case, while not involving a death, involves equally egregious conduct (waterboarding, extreme physical torture) and detailed evidence, positioning it for a significant award. This case also spurred the Timothy J. Piazza Antihazing Law in Pennsylvania.

4. ANDREW COFFEY — Florida State University / Pi Kappa Phi (2017)

Outcome: Criminal charges against 9 fraternity members, chapter permanently closed at FSU. Civil settlement (amount confidential).
What happened: In November 2017, Andrew Coffey, a pledge, was forced to drink an entire bottle of Wild Turkey bourbon and died from acute alcohol poisoning.
Why it matters to King and Queen County: This is the SAME national fraternity, Pi Kappa Phi, as our current lawsuit. Andrew Coffey’s death eight years prior proves that Pi Kappa Phi National had clear, actual knowledge of the deadly hazing risks within its chapters. Our client, Leonel Bermudez, faced kidney failure in 2025 due to Pi Kappa Phi’s continued systemic failure, strengthening our claims for punitive damages for their deliberate indifference.

5. ADAM OAKES — Virginia Commonwealth University / Delta Chi (2021)

Settlement: Over $4 Million (against the university and national fraternity). The lawsuit was originally for $28 Million.
What happened: In February 2021, Adam Oakes died from alcohol poisoning after a Delta Chi hazing event.
Why it matters to King and Queen County: This significant settlement underscores that death cases, even relatively recent ones, are achieving multi-million-dollar resolutions against both universities and fraternities. This case also led to Adam’s Law in Virginia, further showing the legislative impact of these tragedies.

6. UT AUSTIN / SIGMA CHI (November 2025)

Status: Lawsuit recently filed for wrongful death due to “horrific abuse” leading to death by suicide.
Why it matters to King and Queen County: This is another major hazing lawsuit filed in Texas the same week as the Bermudez case. It highlights the ongoing hazing crisis even within the state where our firm is based and underscores the urgent need for comprehensive legal action.

The Message to King and Queen County Fraternities, Universities, and National Organizations: Hazing Costs MILLIONS.

These precedent cases demonstrate a clear trend: when hazing leads to severe injury or death, the institutions and individuals responsible face monumental financial consequences. This is not about revenge; it’s about justice and compelling systematic change.

For King and Queen County families, this means:

Multi-million dollar compensation is a realistic and achievable goal for severe hazing injuries and wrongful death.
Universities and National Organizations are consistently held liable and ordered to pay.
Individual perpetrators can also face personal financial and criminal consequences.
Hazing lawsuits drive legislative change, making communities safer for current and future students, including those from King and Queen County.

Our $10 million lawsuit for Leonel Bermudez is not an outlier; it is a demand firmly rooted in legal precedent and the devastating impact of hazing. We are experienced in navigating these complex, high-stakes cases and are prepared to bring the same level of aggressive, expert representation to families in King and Queen County.

Texas Law Protects You: Understanding the Legal Framework for Hazing Victims

For families in King and Queen County grappling with the trauma of hazing, understanding the legal landscape is crucial. While our firm is based in Texas, which has some of the strongest anti-hazing laws in the nation, similar statutes and civil liability theories exist in most states. Furthermore, our firm’s federal court authority allows us to pursue cases regardless of state lines, bringing the same aggressive legal strategies to hazing incidents that occur anywhere in the country, including those affecting students from King and Queen County.

Texas Hazing Laws: A Model for Accountability

The Texas Education Code, specifically Sections 37.151 through 37.157, provides a robust framework that criminalizes hazing and holds individuals and organizations accountable. This law is fundamental to our litigation strategy, as it often mirrors the legal protections hazing victims have in other states.

1. Definition of Hazing (§ 37.151):
Texas law defines hazing broadly, encompassing “any intentional, knowing, or reckless act occurring on or off campus…directed against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation…if the act:”
* Involves physical brutality (e.g., whipping, beating, striking, branding, shocking).
* Involves sleep deprivation, exposure to the elements, confinement, or excessive calisthenics that subject the student to unreasonable risk of harm or adversely affect their mental or physical health.
* Involves forced consumption of food, liquid, alcohol, or other substances that pose an unreasonable risk of harm.
* Induces or requires activities that violate the Penal Code.
* Involves coercing consumption of drugs or excessive alcohol.

King and Queen County Application: The hazing Leonel Bermudez endured—waterboarding, forced eating, 500 squats, wooden paddles, sleep deprivation, cold exposure—clearly falls under multiple categories of this definition. This comprehensive definition is what allows us to pursue both criminal and civil liability. Many states have very similar definitions in their anti-hazing legislation, providing a strong legal foundation for victims from King and Queen County, no matter where the incident occurred.

2. Criminal Penalties (§ 37.152):
Texas law imposes severe criminal penalties:
* Class B Misdemeanor: For engaging in hazing, soliciting or aiding hazing, or failing to report hazing (up to 180 days jail, $2,000 fine).
* Class A Misdemeanor: For hazing causing serious bodily injury (up to 1 year jail, $4,000 fine).
* State Jail Felony: For hazing causing death (180 days to 2 years state jail, $10,000 fine).

Application to Bermudez Case: Leonel’s rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure undeniably constitute “serious bodily injury,” meaning the individual perpetrators in his case face Class A Misdemeanor charges. The University of Houston spokesperson even publicly acknowledged “potential criminal charges.” This parallel criminal liability strengthens our civil case significantly, demonstrating the severity of the illegal actions.

3. Organizational Liability (§ 37.153):
An organization commits an offense if it “condones or encourages hazing” or if its officers, members, pledges, or alumni commit or assist in hazing. Organizations can face fines up to $10,000, denial of operating permission, and property forfeiture.

Application: This statute directly targets the Pi Kappa Phi chapter and the national organization. When combined with our evidence of the national organization’s prior knowledge of “a hazing crisis” and the University of Houston’s prior hazing incident in 2017, it paints a clear picture of organizational culpability.

4. Consent is NOT a Defense (§ 37.154):
This is perhaps the most critical provision: “It is not a defense to prosecution for an offense under this subchapter that the person against whom the hazing was directed consented to or acquiesced in the hazing activity.”

Critical Significance for King and Queen County Victims: Hazing defendants, whether individuals or institutions, will invariably argue that the victim “consented,” “knew what they were signing up for,” or “could have left at any time.” This statute completely obliterates that defense. The Texas Legislature explicitly recognized that true consent cannot exist in the coercive environment of hazing. This powerful legal principle protects our clients and ensures defendants cannot evade responsibility by blaming the victim. Even if the incident occurred outside of Texas, this legal principle is gaining traction nationwide in civil litigation due to the inherent power dynamics and coercion present in hazing.

5. University Reporting Requirements (§ 37.155):
Chief administrative officers of Texas educational institutions must report hazing incidents to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board within 30 days. Failure to report is a Class B Misdemeanor. This imposes a strict duty on universities, and our discovery process investigates their compliance.

Civil Liability for Hazing: Beyond Criminal Charges

While criminal charges aim to punish offenders, civil lawsuits, like the one we’ve filed for Leonel Bermudez, aim to compensate victims and their families for devastating injuries and losses. These civil claims, applicable to King and Queen County victims no matter where the hazing occurred, provide the pathway to multi-million dollar recoveries.

Negligence Claims: This is a foundational claim in personal injury law. We argue that institutions (university, national fraternity) and individuals had a “duty of care” to protect the student, “breached” that duty by allowing or participating in hazing, and that this breach “caused” the student’s “damages” (injuries and losses). This applies universally wherever hazing incidents take place.
Premises Liability: When hazing occurs on property owned or controlled by an institution (like the university-owned fraternity house in Leonel’s case), the institution can be held liable for failing to maintain a safe environment or allowing dangerous conditions to exist.
Negligent Supervision: This claim holds national organizations accountable for failing to adequately oversee their local chapters and holds universities responsible for failing to monitor Greek life or other student organizations. When they know of hazing risks (as Pi Kappa Phi National did after Andrew Coffey’s death, and UH did after the 2017 incident) and do nothing, this claim is strengthened.
Assault and Battery: These are intentional torts that can be brought against individual hazing perpetrators who inflict physical harm (e.g., the individuals who used wooden paddles or waterboarded Leonel).
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED): This claim addresses the severe psychological trauma. It requires proving extreme and outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional distress. Waterboarding, extreme humiliation, and prolonged torment easily meet this threshold.
Wrongful Death: Unfortunately, many hazing incidents are fatal. In such tragic cases, families of deceased students from King and Queen County can pursue wrongful death claims for lost companionship, future earnings, and other profound losses.

King and Queen County families: It is essential to remember that even if local law enforcement or university authorities choose not to pursue criminal charges, your civil right to seek compensation and justice through a lawsuit remains strong. Our firm is adept at navigating the complexities of these overlapping legal systems to ensure your child’s rights are fiercely protected.

Why Attorney911: Your Trusted Legal Emergency Lawyers for Hazing Victims

When your child has been subjected to the horrors of hazing, you need more than just a lawyer; you need an advocate who understands the profound impact of this trauma, who knows how to dismantle the defenses of powerful institutions, and who will fight relentlessly for justice. For families in King and Queen County, Attorney911 offers unmatched expertise and a proven track record against the precise defendants you will face. We are Legal Emergency Lawyers™, ready to respond immediately to stop your crisis—whether it’s on a Texas campus or in any state across America.

Our Unfair Advantage for King and Queen County Families

We understand that choosing legal representation is a critical decision, especially during such a difficult time. Here’s why Attorney911 is the clear choice for King and Queen County hazing victims:

Litigating the Landmark $10M Bermudez Hazing Case RIGHT NOW: This isn’t just theory for us; we are actively battling Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston in court. This live, high-stakes litigation demonstrates our current expertise, aggressive strategy, and commitment to hazing victims. The strategies winning for Leonel Bermudez are the same strategies we will deploy for your King and Queen County case.
FORMER INSURANCE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS: Both Ralph Manginello and Lupe Pena previously worked defending insurance companies and large corporations. This is an unparalleled advantage. We know the insurance industry’s internal playbooks, their tactics to undervalue claims, and how to effectively dismantle their defenses. We literally know how the other side thinks because we used to be the other side. This insider knowledge gives King and Queen County families a crucial edge against well-funded defendants.
25+ Years of Battle-Tested Courtroom Experience: Ralph Manginello brings over two decades of aggressive litigation experience. He has faced down powerful defendants in complex cases, including the BP Texas City Explosion mass tort litigation—a multi-billion dollar case involving 15 deaths and 180+ injuries. This experience proves our capacity to take on major institutions—be they oil and gas giants or national fraternities and universities that threaten students from King and Queen County.
Federal Court Authority & Dual-State Bar Admission: Ralph is admitted to practice in Texas and New York State Bars and in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas. Lupe is also admitted to the Texas State Bar and U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas. This dual-state and federal court admission is a strategic advantage for hazing cases, as national fraternities often operate across state lines, and their national headquarters may be located in a different state. We have the legal authority to pursue these cases in federal courts, if necessary, regardless of where your child’s hazing occurred.
Hazing-Specific Expertise, Including Rhabdomyolysis Cases: Ralph Manginello has direct experience with fraternity litigation, rhabdomyolysis cases (the exact injury Leonel Bermudez suffered), and holding universities accountable. This specialized focus means we deeply understand the medical, cultural, and legal nuances of hazing claims.
“Outwork, Outsmart, Outfight” Philosophy for King and Queen County Victims: This is Lupe Pena’s litigation philosophy. His experience as an insurance defense attorney, coupled with his business background, gives him a unique ability to dissect complex corporate structures and financial damages in hazing cases. He knows how to “outwork” opposing counsel, “outsmart” their strategies, and “outfight” their attempts to deny justice to King and Queen County families.
Journalism Background for Compelling Storytelling: Ralph Manginello holds a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism from the University of Texas at Austin. This means he is trained to investigate, uncover crucial facts, and, most importantly, tell a compelling story—your child’s story—to a jury. This skill is critical in hazing cases where institutions attempt to hide the truth.
Commitment to the Community and Youth: Ralph is a known supporter of Crime Stoppers of Houston and a former youth coach, demonstrating a genuine commitment to community safety and the well-being of young people. As a father of three, he deeply understands what’s at stake when a child is harmed by negligent institutions. These values resonate deeply with families in King and Queen County who prioritize similar community and family ties.
Bilingual Staff – “Se Habla Español”: Lupe Pena is fluent in Spanish, and our team provides comprehensive legal services in English and Spanish. This is crucial for Spanish-speaking families in King and Queen County who need to navigate the legal process without language barriers.
Client-Centered Approach & Communication: We pride ourselves on clear, consistent communication. You will not be left in the dark. As validated by our 4.9-star Google rating with over 250 reviews, our clients consistently praise our responsiveness and care. “You are NOT a pest to them and you are NOT just some client… You are FAMILY to them and they protect and fight for you as such,” one client wrote. Another stated, “Consistent communication and not one time did I call and not get a clear answer regarding my case.” We bring this same level of client care to King and Queen County families.
We Travel to You: While headquartered in Houston, we represent hazing victims nationwide. Distance is not a barrier to justice. We offer video consultations for King and Queen County families and are prepared to travel for depositions, client meetings, and trials wherever your case demands.

Payment on Contingency – No Upfront Cost for King and Queen County Families:
We understand that taking on powerful institutions can seem daunting, especially financially. That’s why we take hazing cases on a contingency fee basis.

You pay us $0 upfront.
We only get paid if we win your case.
This ensures that every King and Queen County family, regardless of their financial situation, has access to top-tier legal representation against negligent fraternities and universities.

Choosing Attorney911 means choosing a firm that is actively fighting the hazing crisis, backed by decades of litigation experience and an intimate understanding of how the defense operates. We are not just lawyers; we are your dedicated advocates, ready to deliver aggressive, expert representation for your King and Queen County family.

What To Do Right Now: Actionable Guidance for King and Queen County Families After Hazing

When hazing occurs, the immediate aftermath can be chaotic and overwhelming. Yet, the actions taken in the critical hours and days following an incident can profoundly impact the success of a legal claim. For families in King and Queen County, we offer clear, actionable steps to protect your child’s rights and build a strong foundation for accountability. Remember, time is critical, and evidence can disappear quickly.

1. Prioritize Medical Attention – Immediately and Thoroughly

Your child’s health and safety are paramount. Even if injuries seem minor or hidden, seek medical evaluation immediately.

Go to the Emergency Room: If there are any signs of physical distress, unconsciousness, severe pain, or confusion, go to the nearest emergency room. For King and Queen County residents, this might mean Riverside Walter Reed Hospital or other local facilities. Explain exactly what happened and mention hazing as the cause.
Document Everything: Ensure all injuries, no matter how small, are examined and documented by medical professionals. This includes bruises, cuts, any changes in urine color (as with Leonel’s brown urine), muscle soreness, and any psychological symptoms like anxiety or disorientation.
Follow Medical Advice: Adhere strictly to doctor’s orders. Attend all follow-up appointments, physical therapy, and counseling sessions. Gaps in treatment can be used by the defense to argue injuries weren’t severe.
Keep All Records: Retain every medical bill, discharge summary, doctor’s note, and prescription. These documents are crucial evidence of the harm caused.

2. Preserve All Evidence – EVERYTHING is a Potential Key

Hazing cases often rely heavily on digital and physical evidence that can easily be deleted or disappear.

Digital Communications: SAVE EVERYTHING. This includes text messages, GroupMe chats, Snapchat conversations, Instagram DMs, emails, and any other social media posts related to the hazing. DO NOT delete anything, even if it seems irrelevant or embarrassing. These communications often contain direct evidence of coercion, threats, and specific hazing commands.
Photos and Videos: Take photos of any physical injuries your child sustains at every stage of healing. If possible and safe, take photos or videos of the locations where hazing occurred, any items used (e.g., paddles, alcohol containers), and any relevant documents (pledge manuals, schedules).
Witness Information: Collect names and contact details of anyone who witnessed the hazing, felt coerced themselves, or has knowledge of the fraternity/organization’s hazing practices. Other pledges or former members can be critical witnesses.
Documents: Preserve any official documents from the fraternity/organization, pledge manuals, schedules, rules, or any documents received from the university regarding Greek life or student conduct.
Financial Records: Keep track of any medical bills, lost wages, tuition or fees paid, and any other financial costs incurred due to the hazing.

Attorney911 has a YouTube video titled “Using Your Phone to Document Evidence” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) that provides valuable guidance on this front. We highly recommend watching it.

3. Avoid Critical Mistakes – Protect Your Case from the Start

In the emotionally charged aftermath of hazing, it’s easy to make missteps that can jeopardize your legal claim.

DO NOT Delete Anything: Accidental or intentional deletion of evidence—especially digital communications—can be considered spoliation of evidence and severely harm your case.
DO NOT Talk to the Fraternity/Sorority or University WITHOUT Legal Counsel: They are not on your side. Their goal will be to control the narrative, minimize fault, and gather information that can be used against you. Any statements given to them can be twisted or used to undermine your claim.
DO NOT Sign Anything: Never sign any documents from the fraternity, university, or their insurance companies without first consulting with an attorney. You could inadvertently waive your rights to future compensation.
DO NOT Post on Social Media: Refrain from posting any details about the incident, your feelings, or even general life updates on social media. The defense will meticulously scour your online presence for anything that can contradict your claims of injury or distress. Our “Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) and “Don’t Post on Social Media After an Accident” (YouTube Short) videos offer crucial warnings on this.
DO NOT Give Recorded Statements: Insurance adjusters or university representatives may try to get you to provide a recorded statement. Politely decline and state that all communications should go through your attorney. As Ralph Manginello warns in our “Never Talk to the Insurance Company After an Accident” (YouTube Short), they are trained to minimize your claim.

4. Understand Legal Deadlines – Time is of the Essence

Every state has a statute of limitations, a strict deadline by which lawsuits must be filed. In Texas, for most personal injury and wrongful death cases resulting from hazing, this deadline is two years from the date of injury or death. While extensions can sometimes apply for minor victims or delayed discovery of some injuries, DO NOT WAIT!

Evidence disappears: Digital trails can be wiped, physical items can be destroyed, and memories fade.
Witnesses become harder to find: Students graduate and move away.
Your rights expire: Missing the statute of limitations means losing your ability to sue forever.

Watch our video “Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case?” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c) for more information on the critical importance of timely action.

5. Contact Attorney911 Immediately – For a Free, Confidential Consultation

The most crucial step you can take is to reach out to an experienced hazing litigation attorney.

Immediate Consultation: Call us as soon as possible. Our consultation is free and confidential. We can offer video consultations for King and Queen County families, and we will travel for depositions and trials when your case demands it.
Expert Guidance: We will evaluate your case, explain your legal options, and guide you through every step of the process. We will insulate you and your child from the predatory tactics of the defense.
Contingency Fee: Remember, we work on contingency. You pay $0 upfront, and we only get paid if we win your case. This removes the financial burden and risk from your King and Queen County family.

For King and Queen County families facing the unimaginable pain of a hazing incident, this comprehensive guidance offers a pathway forward. We are your legal emergency responders, ready to act on your behalf.

CALL US NOW: The Consultation is Free. We Are Here For You, King and Queen County.

🚨 KING AND QUEEN COUNTY FAMILIES: HAS YOUR CHILD BEEN A VICTIM OF HAZING?

When your family in King and Queen County faces the devastating reality of hazing, you need immediate, aggressive, and expert legal help. This isn’t just a legal battle; it’s a fight for your child’s future, dignity, and safety. We are Attorney911, and our $10 million lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi and the University of Houston is proof that we don’t just talk about fighting hazing—we’re actively in the battle right now.

We know what you’re going through, and we know how to fight back. We bring the same unwavering commitment to justice for King and Queen County victims that we bring to every case.

KING AND QUEEN COUNTY FAMILIES – CALL NOW – FREE CONSULTATION

📞 1-888-ATTY-911

Email us directly: ralph@atty911.com

We are available 24/7 for King and Queen County hazing emergencies. You are not alone, and you don’t have to suffer in silence.

ELIMINATING FINANCIAL BARRIERS: OUR CONTINGENCY FEE PROMISE

We understand that pursuing a major lawsuit against powerful institutions can seem financially prohibitive. That’s why we remove that barrier for King and Queen County families:

YOU PAY $0 UPFRONT.
We work on a contingency fee basis. This means we don’t charge any hourly rates or retainers.
We only get paid if and when we win your case. If we don’t recover compensation for you, you owe us nothing for our legal fees.

This ensures that King and Queen County families can access top-tier legal representation without added financial stress.

WE SERVE KING AND QUEEN COUNTY HAZING VICTIMS – AND HAZING VICTIMS NATIONWIDE

While our headquarters are in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas, hazing is a national problem that impacts students from King and Queen County regardless of where their college or university is located. We are uniquely positioned to represent King and Queen County victims and their families wherever the hazing occurred, through:

Federal court authority: Our admission to U.S. District Courts allows us to pursue cases in federal jurisdictions across the country.
Dual-state bar licenses: Ralph Manginello is licensed in both Texas and New York, providing a strategic advantage when dealing with national fraternity organizations that may be headquartered or operate significantly outside of Texas.
Video consultations: Families in King and Queen County can easily connect with our attorneys remotely from the comfort and privacy of their homes.
Travel commitment: We are fully prepared to travel to King and Queen County for depositions, client meetings, and trials whenever the best interests of your case demand it. Distance will never be a barrier to justice.

HAZING IS NOT LIMITED TO GREEK LIFE

The same patterns of abuse and institutional negligence can be found in various student organizations. We represent victims of hazing in:

Fraternities and sororities that recruit students from King and Queen County.
Sports teams at colleges and universities where King and Queen County students play.
Marching bands and other performing arts groups.
ROTC programs and military organizations.
Academic clubs, social clubs, and any other student group that uses abuse as “initiation.”

No matter the organization, if your child from King and Queen County has been abused, we can help.

FOR OTHER VICTIMS OF THE UH PI KAPPA PHI HAZING:

We know Leonel Bermudez was not the only one. Our lawsuit details how another pledge collapsed and lost consciousness on October 15, and the systematic abuse affected many others. If you or your child were also subjected to this or similar hazing by the Pi Kappa Phi chapter at the University of Houston, or at any other chapter nationally, you have legal rights too.

As Lupe Pena said, “If this prevents harm to another person, that’s what we’re hoping to do. Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.” Your courage to come forward can be instrumental in bringing all perpetrators to justice and preventing future tragedies.

Call us. Let’s bring them ALL to justice.

📞 1-888-ATTY-911 | ralph@atty911.com | attorney911.com