DO NOT add any explanations or notes. ONLY return the translated text.

Wewetin Fonuen Mikronesia: Eú Pwóók Kichin Fóós nón Fóósún Chuuk – Kapatapat nón Ekiekéchchúk fán Iten Famili nón Fepuwerétet Seten Mikronesia

eánúngaat ewe Fonuén Fepuwerétet Seten Mikronesia, me néúnen pwááchecherán kapiinó me án ewe komuniti mi chék túkúfátá, ra pwan wesewesen sópwópatatá nón fénúwan. Iwe, chóón fépiwúruwétet ra uweiér néúr néwúnééngatá nón suukún lap nón Merika, fán iten ánnéúr néwúnnéchééchéngatá nón suukún lap me ánnéúr néwúnnéchénénén nóón óún pékúnnéét. Iwe, eú pwiinónóó nón fépiwúruwétet ra uweiér néúr néwúnnéchénénén nón óún pékúnnéét ra súkú néwúúnééchénénénééén néúr néwúnnéchénénénééén nón úkúmúnnééyénnééén néúr néwúnnéchénénééén nón óúnééén. Iwe, ewe chappek mi néúúééchénénénééén nón óúnééén.

Achechen, eú néúúééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééénéúén, néúr néwúnééén nón úkúmúnnééyénnééén néúr néwúnééén nón óúnééén. Iwe, ewe chappek mi néúúééchénénénééén nón óúnééén.

Ewe néúúééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééééén, family members in towns like Kolonia, Palikir, or Weno can be overwhelming.

Ewe Pwóók Kichin Fóós nón Fóósún Chuuk – Kapatapat nón Ekiekéchchúk fán Iten Famili nón Fepuwerétet Seten Mikronesia ewe ewe famini nón Fepuwerétet Seten Mikronesia ma chóór néúr néwúúéén nón úkúmúúngútáláá chón súkúún lap, suukún lap nón Merika, ewe kapechétáláá ewe chóón súkúún me chóón suukún nón Merika. Iwe, ewe chappek mi néúúéén nón óúnééén.

Ewe Chappek Mi Néchénénenéén nón Fóósún Chuuk – Kapatapat nón Ekiekéchchúk fán Iten Famili nón Fepuwerétet Seten Mikronesia ewe néúr néwúúéén nón óúnééén. Iwe, ewe chappek mi néúúéén nón óúnééén.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• Ika néúm pwiich mi nóóun nón rii téchúng:
  • Kóól 911 fán iten eú ekkékééén lóngééénún.
  • Mwirin, chóóyú Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • Kkótóóó **óúm óú óóóóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóú múúóó—ñáóú óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όۆό óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó όóó όόó όόó όόό όóό όόό όόό óóó óóó óóό όóó όóό óóó όóó όόó όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όóó όόó όόó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόó óóó óóó óóó όóó óóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όóό όóó όóό όóό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό óóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όόό όόό όóό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό óóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóό όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όóό όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όόó όόό όόό óóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό óóó óóó όóó óóó óóό όόó όόό όόó óóó όóó όóó óóó óóό óóó óóó óóó όóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó όóó όóó óóó óóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóό όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όόó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóό όόό όóó όόó όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόó όόό όόό όόό όóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόó όόό όόό όόό óóó όóó όóó όóó όόó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóό όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όόó όόό όόό όóó όόό όóό όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó óóó όόó όóó όόό όόó όóó όóό όóó óóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó óóó όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όόó όóó όóó όόό όóó όόó όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóό όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όóό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó óóó όóó όόό óóó όóó óóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό óóó όόó όόό όóó όóó όóό όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όóό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóό όόό όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóό όόό όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό όóó όóό όóó όóό όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όóό όóό όóό όόό όóó όόό όόό όóό όόό όóό όóό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóό όόό óóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó óóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό óóó όóó όόό όóó όόó óóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όóó óóó όóό όóó óóó όóó óóó óóó όóó όόό όόó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóό όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó óóó óóó óóó óóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóό όóó óóó όόó όóó óóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό óóó óóó όóó όóó όóó óóó όóó όóó όóό όóó όόό óóó óóó όóó όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όóó όóό όόό όóó όóó όόό όóó όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό óóó óóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóό óóó óóó óóó όóó όóó óóó όóó όóό óóó όóó όóó όóó óóó óóó óóó όόó όóó όóό όóó όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όόó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó óóό όóó όóó όóó óóó όóó όόό όóó όóó óóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όóó óóó óóó óóó óóśό óóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόó όόό όóό όόό óóó óóó όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó óóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó óóó όóó όóó óóó óóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó óóó όόό όόό όόό όóó óóó όόό όóό óóó όóó όόό όóó óóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό óóó όóó óóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό óóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όóó όόό όóó óóó óóó όόό όóό όóó όόό όóó όóó óóó όóó óóó óóó óóó όóó όółó óóó όόό óóó όóó óóó όόό óóó όόό όόό όóó óóó όόό όόό όόό óóó όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó óóó óóó όόό óóó όóό όόό óóó όóó όόό όóó óóó óóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóό όóó όόό όóό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όóό όóó όóó όόό όóó óóó όόó όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όóó όόό όóó óóó όόó όόό όóό όόό όόό óóó όόό όóó όóó όóó όóó óóó όóó όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όóό όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όóó όóó όόό όόό όόό όόό όόό όóó όόό όóó όόό όόό όóó όόό óóó όόό óóó όóó óóó όóó óóó όóó όόό όóó όóó όóό όóó όóó όόό όóó (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), ewe ewe Lupe Peña ewe atún éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én éwééér én إwééér én إwééér én إwééér én إwééér én إwééér én إwééér én إaw.

ENGLISH

Unmasking Hazing in Micronesia: A Comprehensive Guide for Families in the Federated States of Micronesia

The sun-drenched islands of the Federated States of Micronesia, with their vibrant cultures and close-knit communities, might seem a world away from the often-complex landscapes of college campuses abroad. Yet, many families in FSM send their children to universities across the United States, seeking opportunities for higher education and personal growth. Imagine the distress when stories emerge from these distant campuses – stories of students seeking belonging through challenges, only to find themselves ensnared in hazing rituals that jeopardize their physical and mental well-being.

Perhaps it’s a late-night call from a child studying in Texas, their voice strained, describing forced calisthenics or humiliating tasks demanded by a fraternity. Or a vague social media post hinting at excessive drinking during a team initiation, far from the supportive environment you envisioned. The cultural values of respect, community, and family inherent in FSM’s traditions stand in stark contrast to the coercive and often dangerous practices of hazing. When these incidents unfold thousands of miles away, the sense of helplessness for families in towns like Kolonia, Palikir, or Weno can be overwhelming.

This guide is designed for families in the Federated States of Micronesia who have children attending or planning to attend colleges, universities, or other organizations in the United States. We will demystify what hazing truly looks like in 2025, how U.S. and Texas law addresses it, and why understanding the national histories of certain organizations matters. We’ll specifically examine incidents and policies at major Texas universities—the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University—where many students from Micronesia might find themselves. Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge and resources to protect your children and understand your legal options should hazing ever touch your family.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
    • Post details on public social media
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

HAZING IN 2025: WHAT IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE

For families in the Federated States of Micronesia, understanding “what hazing looks like” is crucial, especially when your child is thousands of miles away in a different cultural context. Hazing has evolved far beyond the classic stereotypes of paddle beatings or late-night pranks. Today, it encompasses a wide spectrum of behaviors designed to initiate or affiliate new members through coercion, endangerment, or humiliation. The core of hazing is always about power and control, compelling individuals to participate in activities against their will to earn acceptance.

Many Micronesian traditions, particularly those involving rites of passage, focus on community, knowledge transfer, and earned respect within a supportive framework. Hazing, in stark contrast, is often rooted in degradation, secrecy, and a false sense of earned privilege through suffering.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

In plain language, hazing is any intentional, knowing, or reckless act conducted by a group member against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office, or maintaining membership in any organization. This act endangers the mental or physical health or safety of the student.

It’s critical to understand that:

• “I agreed to it” does not make it legal or safe. When there’s a power imbalance, peer pressure, and a strong desire to belong, “consent” is often coerced and invalid under the law.
• It doesn’t have to be violent to be hazing. Psychological manipulation and degradation are equally damaging.
• It doesn’t have to be a secret. Even if some activities are openly known, if they meet the criteria of endangerment or humiliation for affiliation, they are hazing.

Main Categories of Hazing

Alcohol and Substance Hazing

This is perhaps one of the most dangerous and prevalent forms of hazing today, frequently leading to severe injury or death.

• Forced or Coerced Drinking: Pledges are often pressured to consume large quantities of alcohol in short periods, through “line-ups,” “bottle exchanges” (where each pledge is given a full bottle of liquor to finish), or “drinking games” with severe consequences for losing.
• Chugging Challenges: Requiring pledges to rapidly consume beer, liquor, or other substances.
• Unknown Substances: Pressuring pledges to consume unknown liquids or mixed drinks that could be dangerous.
• Providing Alcohol to Minors: Many college pledges are underage, making it illegal to provide them with alcohol. When this leads to forced consumption, it’s both hazing and a crime.

Physical Hazing

While modern hazing often hides behind more subtle forms, physical abuse remains a grim reality.

• Paddling and Beatings: Though explicitly banned by most national organizations, physical beatings with paddles, belts, or hands still occur in underground hazing.
• Extreme Calisthenics or “Smokings”: Forced, excessive physical exertion, like hundreds of push-ups, sit-ups, or running while exhausted, leading to injury, heatstroke, or medical conditions like rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown).
• Sleep and Food Deprivation: New members are kept awake for days, denied proper meals and water, leading to exhaustion, disorientation, and health risks.
• Exposure to Extremes: Forcing pledges to endure extreme cold, heat, or uncomfortable physical conditions (e.g., spending hours in a cold shower or locked in a dark room).

Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing

This form of hazing strips individuals of their dignity and can inflict lasting psychological trauma.

• Forced Nudity or Partial Nudity: Demanding new members appear nude or partially nude, often in front of others.
• Simulated Sexual Acts: Forcing individuals to perform or simulate sexual acts, which can cross the line into sexual assault. Degrading positions like the “roasted pig” (where members are bound and paraded) or “elephant walk” (forced chain of individuals with hands on the person in front’s genitals) are examples.
• Degrading Costumes or Attire: Forcing new members to wear embarrassing, offensive, or sexually suggestive outfits.
• Racial, Sexist, or Homophobic Acts: Requiring individuals to engage in acts that mock their race, gender, or sexual orientation, or to use slurs.

Psychological Hazing

This manipulation targets a student’s mental well-being, eroding self-esteem and creating intense anxiety or fear.

• Verbal Abuse and Threats: Constant yelling, insults, name-calling, and threats of social exclusion or expulsion from the group.
• Intimidation and Isolation: Creating an environment where new members feel constantly watched, judged, and unable to trust others. Isolating them from friends, family, or other activities.
• Forced Confessions or Self-Incrimination: Demanding new members reveal sensitive personal information or admit to fabricated wrongdoings.
• Public Shaming: Humiliating individuals in front of others, sometimes publicly on social media.

Digital/Online Hazing

The rise of technology has unfortunately provided new avenues for hazing.

• Group Chat Dares and Challenges: Using platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, or Discord to issue dares, humiliate members, or organize dangerous activities.
• Social Media Humiliation: Forcing new members to post embarrassing content on Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, or other platforms.
• Constant Digital Monitoring: Requiring new members to be constantly available via phone or group chat, leading to sleep deprivation and anxiety.
• Location Sharing: Demanding pledges enable location tracking (e.g., “Find My Friends”) to monitor their movements.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It’s a common misconception that hazing is limited to “frat boys.” However, it is a problem that can permeate various organizations across U.S. campuses. Families in the Federated States of Micronesia should be aware that hazing can occur in:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes social fraternities (Interfraternity Council – IFC), sororities (Panhellenic Council), historically Black Greek letter organizations (National Pan-Hellenic Council – NPHC), and multicultural Greek letter organizations.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: Organizations with hierarchical structures and traditions, often found in universities with military programs, can be susceptible to hazing.
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to swimming, soccer, and cheerleading, hazing can be a deeply entrenched issue in college sports, often disguised as “team bonding” or “conditioning.”
• Spirit Squads and Traditional Clubs: Groups like university spirit organizations, cheerleading squads, and long-standing campus clubs can perpetuate hazing under the guise of tradition.
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous organizations like marching bands, a cappella groups, or theatre ensembles have faced hazing allegations.
• Some Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: While less common, even groups focused on community service, cultural identity, or academic achievement can sometimes fall victim to hazing practices.

The common threads are often social status, tradition, and secrecy, which create an environment where these practices can persist, even when the university or national organization has clear anti-hazing policies. For students from the Federated States of Micronesia, who may be navigating a new cultural landscape, recognizing these diverse environments where hazing can occur is paramount.

LAW & LIABILITY FRAMEWORK (TEXAS + FEDERAL)

Navigating the legal landscape of hazing in the United States, especially from afar, can be complex for families in the Federated States of Micronesia. However, understanding the basic legal frameworks—both at the state and federal levels—is essential for seeking justice and accountability. When a student from FSM attends a university in Texas, for example, Texas state laws, alongside federal regulations, will govern any hazing incidents.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific, robust anti-hazing provisions primarily codified under the Texas Education Code – Chapter 37, Subchapter F. This statute defines hazing broadly and applies to any student organization at a public or private postsecondary educational institution in Texas.

Key Definition: Under Texas law, hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by a student acting alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and
• Occurs for the purpose of initiating, admitting, affiliating, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members are students.

In plain English: If someone makes your child do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a student group, and they knew the risks or were reckless about causing harm, that is considered hazing under Texas law. This applies whether the act causes physical injury or deep psychological distress.

Criminal Penalties: Hazing is not just a violation of university policy; it’s a criminal offense in Texas:

• Class B Misdemeanor: Most hazing incidents fall into this category, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $2,000.
• Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes a student to suffer bodily injury requiring medical attention.
• State Jail Felony: If the hazing results in serious bodily injury to a student or, tragically, a student’s death. This carries a penalty of 180 days to 2 years in state jail.
• Failure to Report: Any student who has knowledge of a hazing incident and fails to report it to a university official may also be charged with a misdemeanor.
• Retaliation: Retaliating against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor offense.

Organizational Liability: Beyond individual students, organizations themselves can be charged with hazing. This occurs if the organization authorized, condoned, or recklessly allowed the hazing to occur, or if an officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about hazing and failed to report it. Penalties for organizations can include fines of up to $10,000 and institutional sanctions such as revocation of campus recognition.

Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting: Texas law also provides immunity from civil or criminal liability for individuals who report hazing incidents in good faith. Additionally, many universities and state laws have “amnesty” or “Good Samaritan” policies that protect students who call for help in a medical emergency, even if they were consuming alcohol underage.

Consent Not a Defense: One of the most critical aspects of Texas hazing law, as found in Texas Education Code § 37.155, is that it is not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the activity. This explicitly removes the common argument that “they agreed to it,” recognizing the coercive nature of hazing.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

Understanding the distinction between these two types of legal action is crucial for families seeking justice for hazing.

• Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state or federal government (through a prosecutor) against individuals or organizations. The goal is to punish illicit behavior and protect society. If convicted, penalties can include fines, jail time, probation, or community service. In hazing cases, criminal charges might range from misdemeanor hazing to felony assault or even manslaughter, depending on the severity of the harm caused.
• Civil Cases: These are brought by victims or their families directly against the individuals, organizations, and institutions responsible for the harm. The primary goal is to obtain monetary compensation (damages) for the injuries, losses, and suffering caused by the hazing. A civil lawsuit for hazing typically involves claims of negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, or other torts. A criminal conviction is not required to pursue a civil case; the standards of proof are different.

Both criminal and civil cases can proceed simultaneously, and each serves different, yet complementary, purposes in seeking accountability.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, several federal regulations can impact hazing cases, particularly for students attending institutions that receive federal funding.

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark piece of federal legislation mandates greater transparency and prevention efforts from colleges and universities across the U.S. Institutions receiving federal student aid will be required to:

  • Publicly report hazing incidents and related disciplinary actions in their annual security reports (Clery reports).
  • Provide comprehensive hazing education and prevention programming for students, faculty, and staff.
  • Maintain a public registry of organizations with hazing violations.
    This act will greatly increase transparency and accountability, making it easier for families in the Federated States of Micronesia to research hazing histories at U.S. universities by around 2026.

• Title IX: This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based bullying, or creates a hostile environment based on sex, Title IX obligations are triggered. This requires universities to investigate promptly, provide supportive measures, and address the discrimination.

• Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents that involve assault, liquor law violations, drug violations, or other related crimes must be reported in these statistics, providing another layer of transparency.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

In civil hazing lawsuits, our focus is on identifying all parties whose negligence or actions contributed to the harm, to ensure comprehensive accountability and compensation.

• Individual Student Members: Those who directly participated in, organized, or facilitated the hazing acts.
• Local Chapter: The student organization itself, if it is a legally recognized entity, including its officers and leadership.
• National Organization: The national or international fraternity, sorority, or organization to which the local chapter belongs. Their liability often hinges on whether they failed to properly supervise, train, or discipline their local chapters, especially if they had prior knowledge of similar hazing incidents across other campuses.
• University: The college or university can be held liable for negligent supervision, failure to enforce anti-hazing policies, ignoring warning signs, or creating an environment where hazing was permitted to flourish. Public universities in Texas, like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, often assert sovereign immunity, which can limit liability. However, exceptions exist for gross negligence, certain constitutional violations, or when suing individual administrators in their personal capacity. Private universities, such as SMU and Baylor, typically have less protection from such claims.
• Third Parties: This can include property owners who knowingly allowed hazing to occur on their premises, event organizers, or even alcohol vendors who improperly served minors (under “dram shop” laws).

Each case is unique, and the specific facts and applicable laws determine which parties may ultimately be held responsible. However, identifying all potential defendants is a key step in building a strong case.

NATIONAL HAZING CASE PATTERNS (ANCHOR STORIES)

While specific incidents may take place at individual campuses, hazing is a systemic issue with recurring patterns across the United States. These national anchor stories serve as crucial precedents, demonstrating the dangers of hazing, the evolving legal landscape, and the significant liability faced by individuals and institutions. For families in the Federated States of Micronesia, these cases highlight why vigilance is necessary, even for children attending seemingly reputable institutions in Texas.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing-related deaths. The tragic consistency of these incidents underscores a dangerous, repeating script across campuses.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after participating in a “bid acceptance” event where he was forced to consume excessive amounts of alcohol. After falling headfirst down a flight of stairs and suffering traumatic brain injuries, fraternity brothers delayed calling for medical help for nearly 12 hours. The agonizing events were captured on the fraternity’s own security camera footage, revealing a callous disregard for his life. In the aftermath, dozens of fraternity members faced criminal charges, and Piazza’s family pursued extensive civil litigation. This tragic case led to the enactment of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, one of the strongest hazing laws in the nation. This case is a stark reminder of how life is needlessly lost due to delayed medical care and a culture of silence.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): In another all-too-familiar scenario, Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given bottles of liquor and pressured to consume them rapidly. The incident sparked public outrage, leading to criminal charges against several fraternity members and a temporary suspension of all Greek life at Florida State University. The Coffey family later pursued a wrongful death lawsuit, reaching a confidential settlement. Coffey’s death, occurring just months after Piazza’s, highlighted the pervasive and deadly nature of alcohol hazing.

• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old pledge, died following a hazing ritual known as “Bible study,” where pledges were forced to consume vast quantities of alcohol if they answered questions incorrectly. Gruver’s blood-alcohol content was nearly six times the legal limit. This tragedy led to criminal convictions, including a negligent homicide conviction for one fraternity member. In response, Louisiana enacted the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing law. The family also reached settlements in their civil lawsuit. Gruver’s case vividly illustrates how hazing can exploit innocent-sounding “games” to inflict severe harm.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old pledge, died of alcohol poisoning after allegedly being forced to consume an entire bottle of liquor during a “Big/Little” event. Attorney911 notes that the Foltz family settled with Pi Kappa Alpha’s national organization for $7 million and Bowling Green State University for nearly $3 million, for a total of approximately $10 million in combined settlements. This makes the Foltz case one of the largest hazing settlements in U.S. history. Multiple fraternity members were also convicted of hazing-related criminal charges. Foltz’s death led to Collin’s Law: The Anti-Hazing Act in Ohio, making hazing a felony when it causes serious bodily harm. This shows that universities and national organizations can be held significantly accountable for hazing.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Hazing doesn’t always rely on alcohol. Brutal physical rituals, often under the guise of “tradition,” can also lead to catastrophic outcomes.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died after being subjected to a brutal hazing ritual called the “glass ceiling” during a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania. Blindfolded and carrying a heavy backpack, Deng was repeatedly tackled and assaulted by fraternity members. His injuries were severe, including a traumatic brain injury, and members delayed calling for help for over an hour, attempting a cover-up. In a landmark ruling, the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and was banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years. Several individual members also received jail sentences. This case proved that off-campus hazing retreats are not immune from severe criminal and civil penalties.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it is a pervasive issue in various student organizations, including high-profile athletic programs that often operate with immense institutional support and a unique culture of their own.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): In a scandal that shocked college sports, former Northwestern football players came forward with allegations of widespread sexualized, racist, and abusive hazing within the football program dating back years. The hazing reportedly included forced sexual acts, racial discrimination, and physical abuse. These revelations led to multiple lawsuits against Northwestern University and members of its coaching staff. Head coach Pat Fitzgerald was ultimately fired and later reached a confidential settlement in his wrongful-termination suit against the university. This case highlighted that hazing can flourish in highly visible athletic programs, often protected by a “win-at-all-costs” mentality, and can lead to significant institutional liability.

What These Cases Mean for Families in the Federated States of Micronesia

These national cases, though geographically distant from the Federated States of Micronesia, send clear signals about the shared risks students face in U.S. higher education and the legal tools available for accountability.

• Common Threads of Danger: These incidents reveal recurring themes of forced drinking, humiliating rituals, physical abuse, a pervasive culture of secrecy, and critically, delayed or denied medical care that turns preventable injuries into fatalities.
• Law & Accountability Can Evolve: Public outrage and sustained litigation in these cases often lead to stronger anti-hazing laws and unprecedented settlements, demonstrating that institutions can and will be held accountable.
• Precedent for Legal Strategy: The multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements in these cases establish valuable legal precedent, which families pursuing a hazing claim in Texas can leverage. They show that experienced legal counsel can successfully challenge powerful universities and national organizations.
• Vigilance is Universal: While your child may be thousands of miles away in a different cultural setting, the dangers of hazing and the need for vigilance are universal. These stories are a call to action for every parent sending a child to a U.S. college.

TEXAS FOCUS: UH, TEXAS A&M, UT, SMU, BAYLOR

For families in the Federated States of Micronesia, understanding the specific environments at Texas universities is crucial. Many students from FSM pursue higher education in the Lone Star State, where these institutions represent major hubs of academic and social life. We’ll delve into five prominent Texas universities—the University of Houston, Texas A&M, the University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University—examining their cultures, hazing policies, documented incidents, and potential legal pathways. This section will also consider the unique ties your family may have to Texas, preparing you for the realities of campus life.

The University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston is a significant institution, located in the dynamic heart of Houston, a city that offers opportunities in various industries, and is home to many families from the Federated States of Micronesia who have settled here. For families in FSM, a child attending UH represents not just an academic journey but often a connection to the thriving Micronesian communities in Houston. The university’s urban setting presents unique challenges and opportunities, and our firm’s strong presence in Houston means we are intimately familiar with the local context of UH and its Greek life.

UH: Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Houston is a large, diverse public research university with a vibrant campus life that blends a substantial residential student population with a significant commuter presence. With over 47,000 students, it’s a bustling academic hub. Its Greek life, encompassing Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural organizations, is active and deeply integrated into the campus social scene. Beyond Greek life, UH offers a wide array of student organizations, including cultural groups, sports clubs, and academic societies, each contributing to the university’s multifaceted culture. Many students from FSM might find themselves drawn to these diverse groups, seeking community and engagement.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at UH

The University of Houston maintains clear and comprehensive anti-hazing policies, which are regularly reviewed and updated, often in response to state law changes and national incidents. UH’s Hazing Policy explicitly prohibits any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation with any organization.

Key aspects of the policy include:

• Definition: Aligns with the Texas Education Code’s broad definition of hazing, covering physical, mental, and alcohol-related risks.
• Prohibited Conduct: Specifically bans forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs; forced sleep deprivation; physical mistreatment; mental distress; and any activity that could cause embarrassment, shame, or humiliation.
• Reporting Channels: UH provides multiple confidential and anonymous methods for reporting hazing incidents. These include:
  • Office of the Dean of Students
  • UH Student Conduct processes
  • University of Houston Police Department (UHPD)
  • Online reporting forms
  • Confidential reporting through campus counseling services
• Transparency: UH is committed to publishing its hazing policies and, increasingly, information about hazing violations and disciplinary actions taken against organizations, aligning with the Stop Campus Hazing Act.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at UH

The University of Houston has not been immune to hazing incidents. One significant case that has garnered considerable attention involves:

• Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston / Pi Kappa Phi (2025): Our firm, Attorney911, represents Leonel Bermudez in a $10 million lawsuit filed in late 2025. Bermudez, a transfer student and pledge to the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu chapter, suffered acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis following alleged severe hazing. The lawsuit names the University of Houston, its Board of Regents, the Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters, its housing corporation, and 13 individual fraternity leaders and members.

  Specific hazing conduct alleged in the Bermudez case includes:

  • Pledges forced to carry a “fanny pack” at all times containing condoms, a sex toy, nicotine devices, and humiliating items.
  • Enforced dress codes and hours-long “study/work” blocks.
  • Overnight and late-night driving duties as chauffeurs for active members.
  • Sprints, bear crawls, wheelbarrow races, and “save-your-brother” drills.
  • Cold-weather exposure in underwear.
  • Forced consumption of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting, followed by immediate sprints.
  • A brutal workout on November 3, 2025, involving over 100 push-ups and 500 squats, leaving Bermudez unable to stand.
  • Hose spraying “similar to waterboarding” and explicit threats of actual waterboarding.
  • Another pledge being “hog-tied” face-down on a table with an object in his mouth for over an hour.
  • Dawn/late-night workouts at Yellowstone Boulevard Park, leading to a pledge losing consciousness.

  Bermudez developed rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure, passing brown urine, a classic symptom of severe muscle breakdown. He was hospitalized for four days and faces ongoing risks of permanent kidney damage and long-term physical and psychological harm. The Pi Kappa Phi national HQ suspended the Beta Nu chapter on November 6, 2025, and the chapter voted to surrender its charter on November 14, 2025, effectively shutting down permanently. University officials called the conduct “deeply disturbing” and promised disciplinary measures, including expulsion.

  Attorney Ralph Manginello emphasized the severity, stating, “His urine was brown… We’re almost in 2026. This has to stop.” Lupe Peña added, “If this prevents harm to another person… Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.” This case demonstrates the severe risks of hazing, the potential for institutional and individual liability, and our firm’s commitment to fighting for justice. You can read more about the Bermudez case in articles from Click2Houston, ABC13, and Hoodline (https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/, https://abc13.com/post/waterboarding-forced-eating-physical-punishment-lawsuit-alleges-abuse-faced-injured-pledge-uhs-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity/18186418/, https://hoodline.com/2025/11/university-of-houston-and-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity-face-10m-lawsuit-over-alleged-hazing-and-abuse/).

How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a family in the Federated States of Micronesia, understanding the practical steps of a hazing case at UH is vital. Depending on the alleged conduct, law enforcement agencies like the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) and/or the Houston Police Department (HPD) may be involved, especially if criminal acts are suspected. Civil lawsuits, such as the Bermudez case, would be filed in county or federal courts with jurisdiction over Houston and Harris County, Texas. These courts have the authority to hear cases against individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and the university itself. Families from the Federated States of Micronesia would be represented by their attorney in these proceedings, without needing to be physically present in Texas for every step.

What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For students from the Federated States of Micronesia attending UH, and their families, proactive steps can make a significant difference:

• Familiarize Yourself with UH Policies: Read the university’s official anti-hazing policy available on the UH website.
• Utilize Reporting Channels: If you suspect or witness hazing, use UH’s anonymous reporting options or contact the Dean of Students or UHPD.
• Document Everything: As exemplified by the Bermudez case, detailed documentation (texts, photos, medical records) is paramount.
• Seek Off-Campus Counsel: Before engaging directly with UH administration or legal teams, consult with a Houston-based attorney experienced in hazing cases. They can advise you on your rights, protect your interests, and help navigate potential legal complexities unique to the local justice system.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, located in College Station, is a renowned institution with a rich history and deep-seated traditions, probably the closest of the major universities to the Federated States of Micronesia via its strong alumni network worldwide. Its unique culture, heavily influenced by its military roots and the Corps of Cadets, draws students from across Texas, the U.S., and internationally, including potentially from Federated States of Micronesia families seeking a distinctive university experience.

Texas A&M: Campus & Culture Snapshot

Texas A&M is one of the largest universities in the nation, known for its strong traditions, engineering programs, and fiercely loyal alumni. The Corps of Cadets is a defining feature, representing students participating in a military-style living-learning community, often with branches into ROTC programs. Beyond the Corps, A&M boasts a substantial Greek life presence and a multitude of student organizations. The campus culture emphasizes camaraderie, tradition, and a strong sense of community, often encapsulating the Aggie Spirit. These traditions, while fostering unity, can sometimes be twisted into problematic hazing rituals.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at Texas A&M

Texas A&M’s anti-hazing policy mirrors the Texas Education Code, prohibiting any act that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation.

• Emphasis: The policy is particularly strict regarding the Corps of Cadets, athletics, and student organizations, acknowledging the elevated risk in these environments.
• Reporting Channels: A&M provides various avenues for reporting, including:
  • Student Conduct Office
  • Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD)
  • Corps of Cadets leadership (for Corps-specific incidents)
  • Anonymous online reporting forms.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at Texas A&M

Texas A&M has faced its share of hazing challenges, both within its Greek system and its storied Corps of Cadets.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon – Chemical Burns Case (circa 2021): Attorney911 notes a lawsuit where two pledges of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon chapter at Texas A&M alleged brutal hazing. They claimed fraternity members poured substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, onto them, causing severe chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The pledges sought $1 million in damages, and the fraternity chapter was eventually suspended for two years by the university.
• Corps of Cadets Hazing (2023): In a high-profile civil case, a former cadet alleged he endured degrading hazing within the Corps of Cadets. Details included forced physical abuse, simulated sexual acts (being bound in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth), and other forms of humiliation. The cadet sought over $1 million in damages, and while Texas A&M asserted it handled the matter internally, such incidents underscore the challenges in highly traditional, hierarchical groups.
• Aggie Bonfire Collapse (1999): While not traditional hazing, the collapse of the student-organized Aggie Bonfire, which tragically killed 12 and injured 27, raised profound questions about institutional oversight of dangerous student-led traditions. Multiple lawsuits against university officials resulted in settlements exceeding $6 million, leading to the official cessation of the Bonfire tradition on campus. This incident, while different in nature, is often referenced when discussing A&M’s responsibility for student activities.

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

Legal actions involving hazing at Texas A&M would involve agencies like the University Police Department (UPD), and depending on the severity and location, local police. Civil suits would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Brazos County. Due to A&M’s status as a state-funded institution, claims against the university itself would need to navigate the complexities of sovereign immunity. However, claims against individuals, local chapters, and national organizations proceed under standard negligence laws in Texas.

What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For students from the Federated States of Micronesia and their families, navigating A&M’s unique culture requires careful attention:

• Understand the “Spirit”: Learn the difference between healthy traditions and traditions that cross into hazing.
• Corps-Specific Awareness: If your child joins the Corps, understand their specific regulations and watch for signs of hazing within the military-style hierarchy.
• Utilize A&M’s Public Resources: Review A&M’s hazing transparency webpage (if available) to identify any organizations with past violations.
• Seek Legal Counsel Promptly: Given the institution’s size and the potential for complex hazing issues (like those in the Corps of Cadets), engaging an attorney early is crucial.

The University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is the flagship institution of the University of Texas System, known for its strong academic programs, vibrant campus life, and passionate student body. For Federated States of Micronesia families, UT represents a top-tier U.S. education in a dynamic state capital.

UT Austin: Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin is a massive public university, home to over 52,000 students, establishing it as a major force in Texas higher education. Its Greek life is extensive and deeply embedded in the social fabric, featuring a large number of fraternities, sororities, co-ed professional organizations, and various student groups. The campus culture is diverse, academically competitive, and strongly oriented towards tradition, which, like at A&M, can sometimes enable hazing practices. The city of Austin itself, with its “Keep Austin Weird” ethos, provides a unique backdrop to campus life.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at UT Austin

The University of Texas at Austin has one of the most proactive approaches to hazing transparency in the state. Their anti-hazing policy strictly follows the Texas Education Code, prohibiting any and all forms of hazing.

• Definition: Aligns with state law, comprehensively covering physical, psychological, and alcohol-related hazing.
• Transparency: UT maintains a public Hazing Violations website (often referred to, e.g., hazzing.utexas.edu) that lists organizations found responsible for hazing, the nature of their violations, and the sanctions imposed. This public log is an invaluable resource for families.
• Reporting Channels: UT offers multiple confidential and anonymous options:
  • Hazing Report Form (online)
  • Dean of Students Office
  • University of Texas Police Department (UTPD)
  • Title IX Office (if sexual harassment/assault is involved).

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at UT Austin

UT Austin’s transparency website highlights a range of hazing incidents, demonstrating the continuous challenge:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): A recent entry on UT’s public log found Pi Kappa Alpha responsible for hazing, where new members were directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. The chapter was placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing prevention education.
• Texas Wranglers (2018): This long-standing spirit organization faced sanctions for hazing involving physically demanding activities and alcohol misuse, which resulted in a student’s death, though officials initially downplayed the hazing connection.
• Texas Cowboys (2018): Historically, this spirit group has been involved in multiple hazing incidents, some leading to severe injuries and deaths due to sleep deprivation and physical overexertion.
• Delta Kappa Epsilon (1928): In a historic case, pledge Nolte McElroy died from electrocution while crawling through electrified mattresses during a Delta Kappa Epsilon hazing ritual. This early tragedy underscores the long history of dangerous hazing practices even at prominent institutions.
• Sigma Chi (2024): Attorney911 notes a recent civil lawsuit concerning a suicide allegedly linked to hazing within the Sigma Chi chapter at UT Austin. The case, filed by the parents of Sawyer Updike (18), highlights the severe mental health impact of hazing and the continuous challenge for universities to prevent such tragedies.

These documented violations, including some from non-Greek groups, underscore that hazing is a recurring issue across various student organizations at UT, despite clear policies and public reporting.

How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

Cases at UT Austin typically involve the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD) or the Austin Police Department (APD) for criminal investigations. Civil lawsuits would be heard in courts with jurisdiction over Travis County, Texas. As a public institution, UT Austin may invoke sovereign immunity, similar to Texas A&M. However, exceptions and strategic legal arguments can still allow for claims against the institution, in addition to claims against individual perpetrators and national organizations. The availability of UT’s public hazing log provides invaluable evidence for establishing patterns and institutional knowledge.

What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

For families from the Federated States of Micronesia considering or attending UT Austin:

• Consult the UT Hazing Log: Before joining any organization, always check the university’s public hazing violations page.
• Understand Campus Resources: Familiarize yourself with UTPD and the Dean of Students office, key contacts for reporting hazing.
• Proactive Legal Advice: If you suspect hazing, consult with an attorney experienced in Texas university hazing cases. Your lawyer can guide you through reporting mechanisms and ensure necessary evidence is preserved, especially given the history of hazing at UT.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University is a prestigious private university located in Dallas, a major metropolitan area with deep ties to the Federated States of Micronesia through economic and educational exchanges. Students from FSM seeking a private university experience in Texas often consider SMU.

SMU: Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU is a highly-regarded private university known for its strong academic programs, beautiful campus, and a social scene largely shaped by its active Greek life. With a student body of around 12,000, SMU offers a blend of intimate learning environments and robust extracurricular opportunities. Its Greek organizations, fraternities, and sororities play a prominent role in student social life, often fostering strong bonds but sometimes contributing to hazing traditions, particularly within its exclusive culture.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at SMU

As a private institution, SMU’s anti-hazing policies are often more rigorously enforced and monitored internally than those of public universities, though this doesn’t prevent incidents. SMU’s policy unequivocally prohibits hazing, defining it in line with Texas state law.

• Risk Categories: SMU’s policy often emphasizes specific prohibited behaviors that mirror common hazing acts, including alcohol misuse, physical abuse, and any activity that creates a risk of mental or physical harm.
• Reporting Channels: SMU actively encourages reporting through various confidential and anonymous channels:
  • Dean of Students Office
  • SMU Police Department (SMPD)
  • Online reporting forms
  • SMU’s “It’s On Us” campaign and other sexual misconduct reporting avenues (if hazing has a sexual component).

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at SMU

SMU has a history of addressing hazing incidents within its Greek system.

• Kappa Alpha Order (2017): A notable incident involved the SMU chapter of Kappa Alpha Order, which was suspended after allegations pledges were subjected to paddling, forced alcohol consumption, and sleep deprivation. The chapter faced severe sanctions, including a multi-year suspension by both the university and its national organization, and restrictions on recruitment upon its eventual return.
• Other Greek Organizations: SMU’s records often show a pattern of organizations being placed on probation, receiving temporary suspensions, or being permanently removed for violating anti-hazing policies. While specific details may not be as publicly accessible as at state universities, these measures reflect the university’s response to reported incidents.

How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

For hazing incidents at SMU, criminal investigations would involve the SMU Police Department (SMPD) or the Dallas Police Department (DPD). Civil lawsuits against SMU would typically be filed in courts with jurisdiction over Dallas County, Texas. As a private institution, SMU does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it subject to direct litigation for negligence or other claims. This can sometimes streamline the path to discovery and accountability compared to public universities. Families can seek records through discovery related to SMU’s long history of alleged hazing incidents involving various Greek organizations, which can establish a pattern of institutional knowledge.

What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For families from the Federated States of Micronesia with children at SMU:

• Understand Private University Dynamics: Be aware that private universities manage their public image and internal investigations differently from state-run schools.
• Prompt Reporting: Utilize SMU’s reporting mechanisms quickly if any hazing is suspected, as this initiates internal investigations.
• Consult Legal Counsel: Due to the private nature of SMU and the typically higher stakes for such institutions, securing legal counsel is highly advisable in hazing cases. An experienced attorney can provide guidance on pursuing both criminal and civil remedies, leveraging SMU’s non-immunity status to your family’s advantage.

Baylor University

Baylor University, located in Waco, Texas, is the oldest continuously operating university in Texas. As a private Christian university, it offers a distinct environment that attracts students seeking a faith-based education, including those from the Federated States of Micronesia who prioritize these values.

Baylor University: Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor boasts a strong sense of community, a rich array of student organizations, and competitive athletic programs that are central to its identity. While Greek life exists, it operates within a framework that emphasizes Christian values and student development. The campus culture is heavily influenced by its Baptist affiliation, aiming to foster an environment of integrity and respect. However, like any institution, Baylor faces challenges in upholding its values across all student activities, occasionally confronting issues such as hazing that contradict its mission.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels at Baylor

Baylor University strictly prohibits hazing, framing its policy within its commitment to student safety and its Christian mission. The policy aligns with state law, but often includes additional provisions reflecting the university’s ethical standards.

• Definition: Consistent with the Texas Education Code, covering all forms of physical, mental, and alcohol/drug-related hazing.
• Emphasis on Values: Baylor’s policies often explicitly link anti-hazing measures to its core values, condemning practices that devalue individuals.
• Reporting Channels: Baylor promotes confidential reporting through:
  • Office of Student Conduct
  • Baylor Department of Public Safety (BUPD)
  • Online reporting forms
  • Title IX Office (for related complaints)
  • Campus ministries and other supportive offices.

Selected Documented Incidents & Responses at Baylor

Baylor University has a sensitive history regarding student conduct, particularly known for past controversies surrounding its football program and Title IX issues related to sexual assault. While hazing is a separate issue, these past challenges have led to increased scrutiny of all student group conduct and institutional accountability.

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): In 2020, Baylor’s baseball program faced a hazing scandal that resulted in the suspension of 14 players. While specific details of the hazing were kept confidential by the university, the staggered suspensions over the early season highlighted that hazing issues can occur even in high-profile athletic teams at faith-based institutions. The university emphasized its “zero-tolerance” policy in response to the incident.
• Sigma Delta Rho (local fraternity) (2016): This local chapter was suspended after allegations of hazing that included forced calisthenics, inappropriate consumption of substances, and other prohibited activities.
• General Greek Life Trends: While detailed public hazing reports may not be as extensive as at state universities, Baylor’s Greek organizations are regularly reminded of the university’s strict anti-hazing stance, and incidents are often investigated and disciplined internally.

How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

Criminal investigations concerning hazing at Baylor University would typically involve the Baylor Department of Public Safety (BUPD) or the Waco Police Department (WPD). Civil lawsuits against Baylor, as a private university, would be filed in courts with jurisdiction over McLennan County, Texas. Baylor’s private status means it does not claim sovereign immunity, similar to SMU, making it directly actionable in negligence and other tort claims. The university’s strong reliance on internal investigations and its historical challenges with student conduct mean that any hazing claim may involve intense scrutiny of its institutional responses and policies.

What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For families from the Federated States of Micronesia with children attending Baylor:

• Prioritize Open Communication: Encourage your child to speak openly if they experience uncomfortable pressure or activities in any group, emphasizing that their safety and well-being come first.
• Understand Baylor’s Ethos: Be aware that Baylor’s Christian mission often translates into strict codes of conduct, including zero tolerance for hazing.
• Seek Off-Campus Legal Advice: If hazing is suspected, consulting an independent attorney experienced in Texas university hazing cases is vital. They can navigate Baylor’s internal processes, which may prioritize the university’s reputation.

Other Texas Institutions and Their Relevance to Federated States of Micronesia Families

While Baylor, SMU, UT, Texas A&M, and UH are major university magnets in Texas, families from the Federated States of Micronesia also send their children to many other reputable institutions across the state. These include Texas Tech University in Lubbock, with its robust Greek system and large student body; Sam Houston State University in Huntsville, historically known for its strong community programs; Texas Christian University (TCU) in Fort Worth, another private university with a significant Greek presence; and Texas State University in San Marcos, a rapidly growing university with a vibrant student population. Even institutions near Federated States of Micronesia itself, perhaps smaller colleges or military academies, are subject to Texas anti-hazing laws.

Hazing is unfortunately a pervasive issue that can affect any campus, regardless of size, type, or location. Families in the Federated States of Micronesia should remember that the hazing laws discussed apply statewide, and the patterns of harm and liability are consistent across all Texas educational institutions.

FRATERNITIES & SORORITIES: CAMPUS-SPECIFIC + NATIONAL HISTORIES

For parents in the Federated States of Micronesia, it’s vital to recognize that your child’s student organization, whether local or national, is part of a broader, often global, network. This section connects the dots between local chapters in Texas and the hazing histories of their national organizations—a critical dimension in building a compelling legal case.

Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities and sororities in the U.S. are part of larger, national (or even international) organizations. These national headquarters typically:

• Develop intricate rules and policies: Including lengthy anti-hazing manuals and detailed risk management guidelines. These exist largely because the national organization has a history of hazing incidents, injuries, and deaths across its many chapters.
• Receive dues and maintain oversight: National organizations collect substantial fees from local chapters and members, providing services, training, and sometimes disciplinary oversight. This financial and supervisory relationship creates a basis for liability when hazing occurs.
• Track and document incidents: Many nationals internally track hazing allegations and violations, giving them a detailed history of problematic behaviors across their system.

When a local chapter at the University of Houston, for instance, engages in hazing that mirrors an incident that occurred at another chapter of the same national fraternity in Florida five years earlier, it strongly suggests foreseeability and prior notice. The national organization can no longer claim ignorance (“we didn’t know this could happen”) if similar events have already caused harm elsewhere. This pattern evidence is crucial in establishing negligence or even gross negligence against the national entity, directly impacting potential civil liability and damages awarded.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

Many well-known national fraternities and sororities have chapters at the major Texas universities discussed: UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor. Below, we highlight some national organizations with significant hazing histories that are prevalent on these campuses. This is not an exhaustive list but focuses on entities with documented national incidents that strengthen the argument for foreseeability.

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike):
  • Presence: Chapters often found at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and other national universities.
  • National Incidents: Infamous for the Stone Foltz (Bowling Green State University, 2021) hazing death, where a pledge died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume an entire bottle of liquor. This resulted in a $10 million settlement from the national fraternity and university. The organization also faced a $14 million settlement in the David Bogenberger (Northern Illinois University, 2012) alcohol poisoning death case.
  • Relevance to Texas: These cases set clear national precedent for alcohol hazing and national liability.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE):
  • Presence: Historically strong chapters at Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and nationally.
  • National Incidents: Often dubbed “America’s deadliest fraternity” by media due to numerous hazing-related deaths and severe injuries over the decades. Recent lawsuits include a traumatic brain injury case at the University of Alabama (2023) and a chemical burns case at Texas A&M (2021), where pledges sustained severe injuries from industrial cleaner. Attorney911 also notes an assault case at the UT Austin chapter (2024), involving an exchange student suffering multiple fractures and dislocations.
  • Relevance to Texas: The Texas A&M chemical burns case demonstrates direct, severe local incidents echoing national patterns, directly affecting families in the Federated States of Micronesia.
• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ):
  • Presence: Chapters commonly found at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor.
  • National Incidents: Responsible for the Max Gruver (Louisiana State University, 2017) hazing death, where a pledge died from forced alcohol consumption during a “Bible study” drinking game.
  • Relevance to Texas: The Gruver case established key precedents for alcohol hazing and individual liability, directly relevant to any chapter’s conduct in Texas.
• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ):
  • Presence: Chapters found at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, and across the nation.
  • National Incidents: Involved in the Andrew Coffey (Florida State University, 2017) hazing death due to alcohol poisoning. Our client’s case, Leonel Bermudez v. UH / Pi Kappa Phi (2025), is a current, high-profile example of severe hazing allegations against a Pi Kappa Phi chapter in Texas (https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/).
  • Relevance to Texas: The Bermudez case directly connects a national organization’s history to allegations in our home city of Houston, Texas, impacting families from the Federated States of Micronesia who patronize UH.
• Phi Gamma Delta (ΦΓΔ / FIJI):
  • Presence: Chapters at Texas A&M, UT Austin, and other universities.
  • National Incidents: Involved in the tragic Danny Santulli (University of Missouri, 2021) case, where a pledge suffered permanent brain damage from forced excessive drinking during a “pledge dad reveal” night. This case resulted in multi-million dollar confidential settlements from 22 defendants.
  • Relevance to Texas: The Santulli case illustrates the severe, permanent injuries hazing can cause and the significant financial stakes involved.
• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ):
  • Presence: Chapters at UH, UT Austin, and generally strong on many Texas campuses.
  • National Incidents: Recently faced over $10 million in damages for physical and psychological hazing at the College of Charleston (2024). A lawsuit also involved alcohol poisoning at the UT Arlington chapter (2020), which was settled.
  • Relevance to Texas: The UT Austin Sigma Chi chapter is currently facing a civil lawsuit concerning the January 2024 suicide of Sawyer Updike, allegedly linked to hazing causing or aggravating his depression. This case, represented by Ted B. Lyon & Associates, highlights the devastating mental health impact of hazing at a prominent Texas university.
• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ):
  • Presence: Chapters often found at Texas A&M, UT Austin, TCU, and other Texas universities.
  • National Incidents: Was involved in a $12.6 million jury verdict in the Chad Meredith (University of Miami, 2001) drowning death case, where a pledge drowned while intoxicated during a rush event. Attorney911 notes allegations of current hazing at Texas A&M (2023), resulting in severe injuries like rhabdomyolysis from extreme physical hazing. This ongoing litigation at Texas A&M involves claims of severe muscle breakdown requiring specialized medical recovery.
  • Relevance to Texas: The A&M incident involving rhabdomyolysis directly highlights severe physical hazing, and Chad Meredith’s case forms the basis for Florida’s anti-hazing law.
• Omega Psi Phi (ΩΨΦ):
  • Presence: Historically Black Greek letter fraternity with chapters at Texas Southern (Houston), Prairie View A&M, and others.
  • National Incidents: A former student alleged severe “Hell Night” hazing involving repeated beatings and extensive injuries requiring emergency surgery at the University of Southern Mississippi (2023). This resulted in a federal lawsuit against the university and the chapter.
  • Relevance to Texas: As one of the long-standing NPHC fraternities, its national history is relevant to its chapters at Texas Southern or Prairie View, often attended by students from FSM.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

For families in the Federated States of Micronesia facing hazing issues, these national histories are not mere anecdotes; they are powerful legal tools.

• Establishing Foreseeability: When a national organization’s history shows repeated, similar hazing incidents (e.g., alcohol poisoning, physical abuse) across different chapters over decades, it helps establish that the national entity knew or should have known such events were likely to occur again. This prior knowledge strengthens claims of negligent supervision against the national organization.
• Pattern of Behavior: The recurrence of specific hazing rituals (e.g., “Big/Little” drinking, forced calisthenics) across chapters belonging to the same national body allows a plaintiff’s attorney to argue a pattern of behavior that the national organization failed to meaningfully address.
• Overcoming Defenses: These national incidents help counter common defenses such as “this was a rogue chapter” or “we couldn’t have prevented this.” By demonstrating a long history of identical problems, attorneys can show that the national organization’s anti-hazing policies were merely “paper policies,” lacking genuine enforcement.

An experienced hazing attorney can strategically leverage this collective history to build a stronger case, enhancing the chances of justice and comprehensive recovery for victims.

BUILDING A CASE: EVIDENCE, DAMAGES, STRATEGY

For families from the Federated States of Micronesia seeking accountability for hazing in Texas, building a strong legal case involves meticulous evidence collection, a thorough understanding of potential damages, and a clear legal strategy. Attorney911 approaches these cases with the same rigor and investigative depth as multi-million dollar complex civil litigation, because we understand the stakes for your child’s future.

Evidence

In today’s hazing cases, evidence is paramount, and much of it is digital. Early and systematic collection is critical, as evidence can disappear rapidly.

• Digital Communications: This is often the most revealing category of evidence.

  • GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Slack: Screenshots of group chats, direct messages, or private channels are gold. They often contain explicit instructions, threats, derogatory comments, or discussions planning hazing activities. Crucially, they show who was involved, what was said, and when. Our firm advises clients to screenshot full conversations with timestamps and participants visible, ensuring authenticity.
  • Social Media: Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok often contain posts or stories (even if fleeting) that depict hazing events, injuries, or humiliating acts. Location tags, specific hashtags, and participant tagging can provide invaluable context.
  • Emails & Text Messages: Official communications from chapter leaders, or individual texts between members, can reveal directives, scheduling of hazing events, or attempts at cover-up.
  • Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document evidence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.

• Photos & Videos: Beyond screenshots, any direct photos or videos of hazing incidents, injuries, or aftermath are compelling. This includes:

  • Injury Photos: Taken at multiple angles, with good lighting, and ideally with a scale (like a coin) to show size. These should be taken immediately and then over several days to document progression.
  • Location & Event Photos: Visuals of the house, specific rooms, or off-campus venues where hazing occurred, particularly if they show signs of an event (e.g., excessive alcohol bottles).
  • Do not put yourself in danger to obtain this evidence.

• Internal Organization Documents: These can provide critical insights into the intent and knowledge of the organization.

  • Pledge Manuals/Handbooks: Sometimes contain coded language that, to an outsider, seems innocuous but to an insider, implies hazing.
  • Ritual Scripts: Documents outlining initiation ceremonies that may contain elements of hazing.
  • National Policies & Training Materials: These show what the national organization claims its rules are, which can be contrasted with the chapter’s actual behavior.
  • Meeting Minutes/Emails: Records of chapter meetings or executive discussions that might reference new member activities.

• University Records: Through public records requests (for public universities like UH, Texas A&M, and UT) and legal discovery (for all universities, public or private), we can often uncover a wealth of information.

  • Prior Conduct Files: History of the specific chapter’s hazing violations, probations, or suspensions.
  • Campus Police Reports: Records of any incidents involving the organization or its members.
  • Clery Act Reports: Institutions’ self-reported crime statistics, which may include a pattern of alcohol or assault violations linked to student organizations.
  • Internal Communications: Emails or memoranda among administrators discussing the organization’s problematic behavior.

• Medical and Psychological Records: These are essential for documenting the full extent of harm.

  • Emergency Room/Hospital Records: Detailed accounts of injuries, toxicology reports (for alcohol/drugs), lab results (e.g., for rhabdomyolysis), and physician notes.
  • Mental Health Evaluations: Documentation from psychologists or psychiatrists diagnosing PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other trauma-related conditions resulting from hazing.

• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts are often powerfully persuasive.

  • Other Pledges/New Members: Fellow victims who can corroborate events, often speaking up under legal protection.
  • Former Members: Individuals who have left the organization due to hazing concerns, often willing to provide testimony.
  • Bystanders: Any individual who witnessed elements of the hazing.

Damages

The goal of a civil hazing lawsuit is to recover comprehensive compensation (damages) for all the harm caused. For families from the Federated States of Micronesia, these damages aim to alleviate financial burdens and acknowledge deep emotional suffering.

• Economic Damages: These are quantifiable financial losses.

  • Medical Expenses: Past and future costs of medical treatment, hospitalization, therapy, medications, and rehabilitation. In catastrophic cases like traumatic brain injury or permanent organ damage (as alleged in the Bermudez case), this can include lifetime care plans.
  • Lost Income & Earning Capacity: Compensation for lost wages due to injury or recovery, and for any reduced ability to earn income in the future if hazing caused permanent disability or disrupted educational advancement.
  • Educational Losses: Tuition, fees, and other costs associated with delayed graduation, academic setbacks, or forced transfer to another institution.

• Non-Economic Damages: These are more subjective but legally recognized forms of harm.

  • Physical Pain & Suffering: Compensation for the actual physical pain endured from injuries and any ongoing discomfort.
  • Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm: This includes the profound impact of trauma, such as PTSD, severe anxiety, depression, humiliation, loss of dignity, and the psychological burden of the experience.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Damages for the inability to participate in activities, hobbies, or social engagements that the victim once enjoyed.

• Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the tragic event of a hazing death, specific damages are available to surviving family members.

  • Funeral & Burial Costs: Direct expenses related to the death.
  • Loss of Financial Support: Compensation for the financial contributions the deceased would have made to the family over their lifetime.
  • Loss of Companionship, Love, & Society: Damages for the intangible, yet immense, loss of relationship, guidance, and emotional support for parents, siblings, or spouses.

• Punitive Damages: In egregious cases involving gross negligence, willful misconduct, or extreme indifference, punitive damages may be awarded. These are not intended to compensate the victim but to punish the wrongdoer and deter others from similar conduct. Punitive damages can be substantial, particularly against national organizations or institutions with a history of ignoring hazing.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

The various liable parties (individuals, local chapters, national organizations, universities, and third parties) often have multiple layers of insurance coverage. Navigating these policies is a specialized area of law:

• Insurance Coverage Disputes: Insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage for hazing incidents, claiming “intentional acts” or “criminal acts” exclusions. Our firm, particularly with Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), understands these tactics. We argue that even if a hazing act was intentional, the organization’s negligent supervision or failure to prevent such acts often falls within coverage.
• Identifying All Policies: A thorough investigation identifies all potential insurance policies, from general liability and directors & officers (D&O) policies to individual homeowner’s or umbrella policies. This maximizes the potential for a full recovery.

Attorney911 has the experience and resources to identify these complex insurance pathways, challenge coverage denials, and vigorously pursue all available avenues for compensation.

PRACTICAL GUIDES & FAQS

Empowering families in the Federated States of Micronesia with actionable information is our priority. Knowing what to do if you suspect hazing, how to advise your child, and critical mistakes to avoid can make a monumental difference in protecting your family and building a strong legal case.

For Parents

For families geographically distant from their children studying in Texas, vigilance and clear communication are paramount.

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Be attuned to changes in your child’s behavior. These can include:

  • Unexplained injuries: Bruises, burns, cuts, or frequent “accidents” with vague explanations.
  • Physical exhaustion: Constant fatigue, sleep deprivation, or sudden weight loss due to forced activities or restricted nutrition.
  • Mood shifts: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, emotional withdrawal, or a sudden secretive nature about group activities.
  • Digital dependency: Constant attention to a phone for group chats, fear of missing “mandatory” communications, or sudden deletion of message histories.
  • Academic Decline: A sudden drop in grades, missed classes, or prioritizing group activities over academics.
  • New Money Needs: Unusual requests for money for “fines,” unexpected dues, or to pay for items for older members.

• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not judgment.

  • Ask open-ended questions like, “How are you really doing with your new group?” or “Is there anything about joining that makes you feel uncomfortable or unsafe?”
  • Reassure them that their safety and well-being are your top priority, even above their membership in any organization. Emphasize that you will support them no matter what.

• If Your Child Is Hurt: Prioritize medical care and evidence collection.

  • Seek immediate medical attention. Do not delay. Document all injuries with photos, preserving medical records.
  • Document everything. Note dates, times, names, and activities. Screenshot all relevant digital conversations.
  • Contact Attorney911. We can guide you from the very beginning.

• Dealing with the University:

  • Document every interaction with university officials, noting who you spoke with and what was discussed.
  • Ask direct questions about their anti-hazing policies, previous incidents involving the organization, and how they plan to ensure your child’s safety.
  • Consult with your attorney before making official statements or signing any documents from the university.

• When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm due to hazing, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing the incident, it is time to engage legal counsel. Early intervention is key.

For Students / Pledges

For students from the Federated States of Micronesia studying abroad, distinguishing between tradition and trauma is crucial.

• Is This Hazing or Just “Tradition”? Ask yourself: If this activity were to occur in front of university president, your parents, or local law enforcement, would it continue? If the answer is no, or if there’s any element of secrecy, coercion, humiliation, or danger to your mental or physical health, it is hazing. Your “consent” under pressure is likely not consent.
• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: In the context of hazing, “consent” is rarely truly voluntary. The desire to belong, the fear of exclusion, and the power dynamics at play mean that agreements to participate are often made under duress. Texas law explicitly recognizes this, stating that consent is not a defense to hazing allegations.
• Exiting and Reporting Safely:
  • Immediate Danger: If you are unsafe, contact 911 or campus police immediately. Prioritize your physical safety. Many places have Good Samaritan laws that protect you if you call for help related to alcohol/drug overdose.
  • Decision to Leave: You have every right to leave any organization at any time. You can notify the organization’s chapter president or new member educator via email or text, stating your resignation. You do not need to attend a final meeting or explain yourself.
  • Reporting: You can report hazing anonymously through campus hotlines, online forms, or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE). You can also speak confidentially with a trusted faculty member, an RA, or campus counseling services.

For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once part of a hazing organization and have information to share, your testimony can be invaluable in preventing future harm and achieving justice.

• Your Role in Accountability: You have a unique perspective on the organization’s practices. Your testimony and any evidence you possess can save other students from enduring similar abuse.
• Seeking Legal Advice: If you are a former member with knowledge of hazing, you may be concerned about your own legal exposure. Consulting with an attorney can help you understand your rights and options, and guide you on how to provide information effectively while protecting yourself. Our firm’s experience with criminal defense means we can advise on scenarios involving criminal charges interacting with civil investigations.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

Protecting your legal rights and preserving your claims requires careful action. Avoid these common missteps:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence: What parents often think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.” Why it’s wrong: This can be perceived as an attempted cover-up, makes reconstructing the events nearly impossible, and can even carry criminal penalties. What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content.
2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly: What parents often think: “I need to tell them what I think.” Why it’s wrong: They will immediately circle the wagons, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defense, potentially harming your case. What to do instead: Document everything, then call a lawyer before any confrontation.
3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms: What universities sometimes do: Pressure families to sign waivers or agree to internal “resolutions.” Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your legal right to sue or settle for far less than your damages are worth. What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything without an attorney reviewing it first.
4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer: What families often think: “I want to warn others and expose them.” Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys will monitor everything. Inconsistencies or emotional posts can be used against your child’s credibility, and you could inadvertently waive legal privileges. What to do instead: Document privately; let your lawyer control public messaging.
5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”: What organizations might say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic.” Why it’s wrong: They may pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can later be used against your child’s legal position. What to do instead: Once you’re considering legal action, all communication from your child should go through your lawyer.
6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”: What universities often promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.” Why it’s wrong: Evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, the statute of limitations runs out, and the university’s priority may be its own reputation, not your child’s full recovery. What to do instead: Preserve evidence now; consult a lawyer immediately. University processes are distinct from legal accountability.
7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer: What adjusters may say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.” Why it’s wrong: Recorded statements are often used against claimants, and early settlement offers are typically significant lowball proposals. What to do instead: Politely decline and state, “My attorney will contact you.”
   Watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY

Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, and UT Austin) have some sovereign immunity protections, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, and when suing individual administrators in their personal capacity. Private universities (such as SMU and Baylor) typically have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on specific facts—contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It certainly can be. While basic hazing is often a Class B misdemeanor, it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who fail to report hazing and organizations that condone it can also face criminal charges.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Absolutely. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and juries understand the immense pressure on pledges. The law protects individuals even if they seemingly “agreed” under coercion or the desperate desire for acceptance.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  Generally, families in Texas have two years from the date of injury or death to file a hazing lawsuit. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this if the harm or its cause wasn’t immediately known. In cases involving cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be “tolled” (paused). Time is always critical—evidence disappears, witnesses graduate, and organizations can destroy records. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 as soon as possible. Learn more about the statute of limitations in our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of hazing does not eliminate liability. Many major hazing deaths and severe injuries (like the Michael Deng case in Pennsylvania) occurred off-campus at private residences or retreats. Universities and national organizations can still be held liable based on their sponsorship, control, knowledge, and foreseeability of such events, regardless of where they take place.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  We understand privacy concerns. Most hazing cases resolve via confidential settlement agreements before going to trial. While lawsuits are public records, we work diligently to protect our clients’ privacy where possible, seeking confidential terms. Our priority is your family’s well-being and desires regarding public attention.

ABOUT THE MANGINELLO LAW FIRM + CALL TO ACTION

When your family in the Federated States of Micronesia faces a hazing incident involving a child studying in Texas, you need more than just any legal representation. You need attorneys who intimately understand the complex dynamics of campus abuse, how powerful institutions fight back, and how to fight for your child’s rights. At Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we bring a unique blend of experience and dedication to every hazing case.

Our firm, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, is based in Houston, and we serve families throughout Texas, including those in the Federated States of Micronesia who have children attending our state’s universities. We know that the trust and values instilled in your children from their home islands deserve protection, even when they choose to study far abroad.

Why Attorney911 for Hazing Cases

Hazing cases are distinctive in the legal landscape. They involve powerful defendants—large national organizations, well-funded universities, and individual students who are often protected by their families and institutions. This demands a specialized legal approach, and it’s where Attorney911 excels.

• Insurance Insider Advantage (Lupe Peña): Our Associate Attorney, Lupe Peña, leverages her invaluable experience as a former insurance defense attorney at a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/). She understands the intricate tactics used by fraternity and university insurance companies—their delay tactics, their arguments for coverage exclusions, and their settlement strategies. “We know their playbook because we used to run it,” and this insight allows us to anticipate their moves and build a stronger case for your family.
• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions (Ralph Manginello): Managing Partner Ralph Manginello brings over 25 years of experience fighting and winning against formidable opponents. His involvement in landmark cases, such as the BP Texas City explosion litigation, demonstrates our firm’s capability to take on billion-dollar corporations and their defense teams. We are not intimidated by the resources of national fraternities, universities, or their legal counsel. “We’ve taken on tough defendants and won. We know how to fight powerful institutions, and we’re not afraid to take your case to court if necessary.” Ralph Manginello’s full credentials are available at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: Our firm has a proven track record of achieving multi-million dollar results in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/). Hazing often leads to severe, life-altering injuries or tragic fatalities, requiring extensive legal expertise to value future medical needs (especially in cases of brain injury or permanent disability that demand lifetime care), lost earning capacity, and profound emotional suffering. We are committed to securing comprehensive compensation that truly reflects the extensive harm caused.
• Dual Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Hazing is often both a violation of civil duties and a crime. Our firm’s understanding of both criminal and civil law, informed by Ralph Manginello’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA), means we can navigate cases where criminal charges are present. This dual perspective is crucial for understanding the full legal landscape and advising clients on all potential outcomes.
• Investigative Depth: Building a strong hazing case requires a level of investigation that goes beyond surface-level facts. We work with a network of experts, including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, economists, and psychologists. We meticulously uncover hidden evidence, from deleted group chats and social media content to national fraternity disciplinary records and university internal files. We investigate like your child’s life and future depend on it—because they do.

We understand that hazing at Texas universities can profoundly affect families in the Federated States of Micronesia. Our firm is deeply committed to both justice and prevention, ensuring that every case we handle not only seeks maximum compensation for victims but also holds responsible parties accountable to prevent future tragedies.

Call to Action for Federated States of Micronesia Families

If your child, studying away from the Federated States of Micronesia, has experienced hazing at any Texas campus – be it the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or any other institution – you don’t have to face this challenge alone. We want to hear from you. Families in the Federated States of Micronesia and throughout the surrounding region deserve answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to your story, explain your legal options under Texas and federal law, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family.

What to expect in your free consultation:

• We will listen empathetically to what happened, without judgment.
• We will review any evidence you have, such as photos, videos, text messages, or medical records.
• We will clearly explain your legal options, including criminal reporting, civil lawsuits, or both.
• We will discuss realistic timelines and what to expect throughout the legal process.
• We will answer all your questions about our fee structure, which operates on a contingency basis—meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Watch our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
• There is no pressure to hire us on the spot; take the time you need to make an informed decision.
• Everything you share with us is strictly confidential.

Whether you’re in the Federated States of Micronesia or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you have rights, and you don’t have to face this alone. Protect your child’s future and seek the justice they deserve.

Call us today.

Contact Information:
Emergency Hotline: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: For consultation in Spanish, please contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

---